From: ' (NY) (FBI)"
From: ' (NY) (FBI)"
To: ' (NY) (FBI)" c
Subject: Fw: Epstein Materials: Questions
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 17:22:23 +0000
Importance: Normal
From: . (NY) (FBI) < >
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 1:19:47 PM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI) (IMD) (FBI) <->;
(NY) (FBI)
Cc: (IMD) (FBI) < ).; (OGC) (FBI) <->; (DO)
(FBI) <II >; (CCRSB) (FBI) <= >
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
All- kee in this FBI internal.
Is that correct?
Sorry for the confusion
Assistant Director in Charge I FBI New York
Desk Mobile
From: (ODAG) < >
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:57:20 AM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI) (IMD) (FBI)
Cc: (IMD) (FBI) ; (OGC) (FBI) , ;
; . (NY) (FBI) , (CCRSB)
(FBI)
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
I'm told that whatever was on the original thumb drive is not what's contemplated for release. So we
don't need it reproduced in a drive or by Share Point. I'm told there is another category of material, it's
just not what was originally on the drive.
From:
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:52 AM
To: (0DAG) < >; (CCRSB) (FBI)
EFTA00164881
Cc: (IMD) (FBI) <->; (OGC) (FBI) <->;
(DO) (FBI) < >; (NY) (FBI) <->; (CCRSB)
(FBI) ‹ >
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Thank you
I Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0. ' C
From: (ODAG) ca*
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:27:51 AM
To: (CCM) (FBI) (IMD) (FBI) < >
Cc: (IMD) (FBI) <->; (OGC) (FBI)
(FBI) <.>;-. (NY) (FBI) < >; (CCM) (FBI)
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Just got confirmation that we are not using anything on that thumb drive. Nobody needs to recreate it
because we are not reproducing it.
From: (ODAG)": >
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:23:27 AM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI) <
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <->; •
(FBI) < >; . (NY) (FBI) <
>
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Hi,
Just to clarify, we are not publishing anything that is under seal.
Thank you, >;
>; (IMD) (FBI) <
(OGC) (FBI) <
From: c >
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:16:01 AM
To: (ODAG) < >;
Cc: (IMD) (FBI) <->;
(FBI) <->; . (NY) (FBI) <
>
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions >; >;
(CCRSB) (FBI) (DO)
(DO)
(CCRSB) (FBI) ‹ >
(OGC) (FBI)
(CCRSB) (FBI) (DO)
EFTA00164882
Hi
This is the thumbdrive that contains the photos being referenced.
Can you please confirm that this cannot be located within ODAG?
Our NY colleagues are traveling into the city from Long Island to recreate the folder and I'm hoping to
save everyone time. Estimated time to travel, recreate folder, download onto a new thumbdrive and
coordinate delivery is about 6-7 hours.
From: (ODAG)
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:30:25 AM
Co: I (CCRSB) (FBI) <I
Cc: MES(IMD) (FBI) c
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Great. Thanks.
Get Outlook for iOS
From:
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:26:53 AM
To: (ODAG)
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions (IMD) (FBI) < =-
> (CCRSB) (FBI)
Our Deputy's Chief of Staff provided the thumb drive directly to the DAG yesterday, as I understand he
was in our building for a briefing.
I Interim Director of ',Ali,
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0. C.
From: (ODAG) <
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:23:47 AM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI) < >., (IMD) (FBI) <
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Sounds good. Thanks.
EFTA00164883
From: `• >
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 9:10:21 AM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI)
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Thanks (ODAG)
- unless you see otherwise, we can deliver tomorrow morning.
interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
I C.
From: (CCRSB) (FBI) <I M>
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 9:06:24 AM
To: (IMO) (FBI) (ODAG) (JMD)
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: RE: Epstein Materials: Questions
If DOJ needs these today, we need to determine how best to get them over. If it can wait until
tomorrow, I will take it to the threat brief
From: (IMD) (FBI) < >
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 7:36 AM
To: (ODAG) (JMD) < >
Cc: (CCRSB) (FBI) (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Good morning
Our Deputy asked we compile unsealed photos from both the trafficking and suicide cases to provide
on a thumb drive. These photos are all contained within materials the FBI previously submitted. My
colleague Yarbrough will be bringing a thumb drive when he heads over for the AGs morning
operational brief.
Additionally, our OTD team is ensuring all videos from the same camera - both raw and refined - have
the exact same run time to the second. They are confirming this and will provide a new link if there is a
change.
BL,
From: (IMD) (FBI)
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 3:00:24 PM
EFTA00164884
To: (0DAG) (MAD) <
Subject: RE: Epstein Materials: Questions
Good afternoon
To close out the last of the pending questions, the estimated total size of materials provided to DOJ is approximately
377GB, to include documents, images, video and audio files.
Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0. I C.
From: (IMD) (FBI) < >
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 10:26 AM
To: (0DAG) (ND) <
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Good morning,
Update and final for #2 below. >
Term: Refined Video
Description: increased the contrast, balanced the color and slightly improved the sharpness of the
edges. These types of refinements are typical for video of any quality or resolution. These refinements
allow the human eye and brain to interpret the video as clearer, richer, and more detailed. None of
these steps can re-create detail that was never captured. This is standard for video refinement.
Will have #1 confirmed on Monday.
I Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
a
From: (IMD) (FBI) < >
Sent: Thursda May 29, 2025 8:58:52 PM
To: (ODAG) (JMD)
Subject: Epstein Materials: Questions
Hi
I wanted to provide an update on the three questions we discussed yesterday:
1. Total Data Size (estimated) of the totality of what was delivered to DOJ from February 2025 — May 2025.
1. Paper Documents
2. Photo Scans / Images
EFTA00164885
3. Audio / Video
Status: will have by Monday.
2. Terminology to use to differentiate between MCC videos and 1-2 lines description of work done
1.
Status: The tech team is deciding between two terms to use (
Description of work done: increased the contrast, balanced the color and slightly improved the
sharpness of edges. These types of enhancements are typical for video of any quality of any
resolution. These types of enhancements allow the human eye and brain interpret it as clearer, richer,
and more detailed. None of these steps can re-create detail that was never captured. This is standard
for video enhancement.
3. Date FBI closed the suicide investigation
90A-NY-3 151227 encompassed a deferred prosecution agreement for two guards executed on 05/21/2021, and was closed
on 12/5/2022.
EFTA00164886
📷 Images in this document (6 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a screenshot of a text message conversation. The conversation includes a message from a contact named "Dr. Shankar" with a timestamp indicating it was sent at 9:30 AM. The message contains a link to a video and a note about a balance transfer. The recipient of the message has not yet responded. The conversation is set against a background that appears to be a computer desktop with
[Image 2] The image appears to be a screenshot of a text conversation, possibly from a messaging app or email. The conversation includes several messages with visible sender and recipient names, dates, and content. The content includes a request for information, a response with a link, and a follow-up message. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, indicating that some parts of the conversation
[Image 3] The image shows a document with text that appears to be a message or a letter. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, indicating that some information is being withheld. The visible text includes a subject line, a sender's name, a recipient's name, and a date. The body of the text contains a message that seems to be an apology or an explanation, but the specific content is not fully vi
[Image 4] The image appears to be a photograph of a document with text. The document is a letter or a report, and it contains text that is too small to read clearly. The visible text includes a heading and a subheading, but the specific content of the text is not legible due to the resolution of the image. The document is printed on standard letter-sized paper, and there are no visible logos, names, dates,
[Image 5] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender to a recipient, and it contains several lines of text, which appear to be part of a discussion or exchange. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a professional or work-related communication. The email interface suggests it is from a web-based email service. The sender's name is visible at the t
[Image 6] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender to a recipient, and the content of the conversation is not visible due to the blurring of the text. The email appears to be a standard business or personal correspondence, but the specific details are obscured. The email interface includes the sender's name, the recipient's name, the date and time of the email, and t