9 East 71st Street:
9 East 71st Street:
Comprehensive Energy Assessment
9 E 71St St.
New York, NY 10021
Report submitted by:
SourceOnc
SourceOne, Inc. 1 7 Penn Plaza I New York, NY 10001 1 P
BOSTON
EFTA00287165
SourceOne January 24, 2011
Richard J. Barnett
Property Manager
9 E 71st St.
New York, NY 10021
Re: 9 East 71' Street Comprehensive Energy Assessment Executive Summary
SourceOne Project Number 11-005
Dear Mr. Barnett:
On December 23nd, 2010 SourceOne performed a walkthrough audit of the private residence
located at 9 E 7151 St. in Manhattan, NY.
Representatives of SourceOne have:
• Conducted a facility walkthrough.
• Conducted interviews and met with representatives of the facility.
• Identified Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) that will conserve energy.
• Identified potential ECMs that cannot be financial justified.
Executive Summary:
SourceOne recommends the implementation of the following ECMs:
1. SI-ECM-1: Motor Upgrades
Annual Energy Savings: 24,399 kWh ($4,626)
Simple Payback: 1.18 years
2. SI-ECM-2: Backroom Lighting Upgrades
Annual Energy Savings: 13,419 kWh ($2,544)
Simple Payback: 3.34 years
3. SI-ECM-3: Installation of VFDs on Air Handler Unit Fan Motors
Annual Energy Savings: 21,276 kWh ($4,034)
Simple Payback: 9.74 years
4. SI-ECM-4: Installation of a Condensate/Hot Water Heat Exchanger
Annual Energy Savings: 17 Mlbs of steam ($602)
Simple Payback: 6.39 years
5. SI-ECM-5: Installation of a Free-Cooling Heat Exchanger
Annual Energy Savings: 52,252 kWh ($9,906)
Simple Payback: 3.09 years
6. SI-ECM-6: Installation of an Additional Multistack Chiller
Annual Energy Savings: 38,650 kWh ($7,328)
Simple Payback: 11.98 years
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287166
HBRK Associates Inc. January 24, 2011
9 East 71' Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment Page 2
Relative to the annual electric consumption of 853,740 kWh for 9 E 7V' St., these ECMs
represent a 21% energy savings and have a collective payback of 6.06 years.
In addition to these six (6) ECMs, SourceOne has identified a potential energy conservation
initiative whose enactment may benefit 9 E 71g St. but which cannot be easily justified
financially. It is as follows:
I. SI-ECM-7: Elevator Motor SCR Conversion
Annual Energy Savings: 21,724 kWh of electricity ($4,119)
Simple Payback: 30.36 years
As will be described in detail in this report, each one of these initiatives could bring about
substantial energy savings individually and as a collective whole.
Facility Overview:
The facility in question, 9 E 71g St., is a private residence located between 5'h Ave. and Madison
Ave. on 71g St. in the upper east side of Manhattan. It has six (6) floors with approximately
30,000 ft2 of space.
Although the building is a private residence, there is a year round staff charged with cooking,
cleaning and providing security. Members of the staff also maintain the heating and cooling
systems in the building.
Energy Usage:
The facility's current annual energy usage and costs include:
• Electric
o Usage - 814,110kWh
o Cost - $154,307
o Rate - $0.190/kWh
• Steam
o Usage - 2,875 Mlbs
o Cost - $99,069
o Rate - $34.24/Mlbs
• Natural Gas
o Usage - 51 MMBTU
o Cost - $1,067
o Rate - $20.99/MMBTU
• Energy Utilization Index (EUI): 204 kBTU/ft2
Electricity, gas and steam are all purchased from Consolidated Edison.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287167
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71" Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment
HVAC System: January 24, 2011
Page 3
The heating, cooling and ventilation of the building at 9 E 71' St. is carried out by three main air
handler units (AHUs). Two of them are located in the basement and the third is in the penthouse.
Each AHU has a single speed supply fan that is powered by a 7.5 HP electric motor and contains
heating and cooling coils.
Heating:
The facility accepts high pressure steam from Consolidated Edison and steps it down to low
pressure steam before circulating it through steam/hot water heat exchangers. The water that is
heated by these heat exchangers is pumped through the heating coils of the AHUs by two (2) hot
water pumps located in the basement. In the AHUs, ambient air is blown across the heating coil
which transfers heat from the heated water to the ambient air. The air is circulated through the
conditioned space to provide heating.
Cooling:
A 30-ton, water cooled Multistack scroll type chiller and a much older 40-ton Carrier chiller,
both located in the basement, are used to accomplish cooling. These are shown in the photos
below.
Photo 1: Multistack Chiller
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287168
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71" Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment
Photo 2: Corner Chiller January 24, 2011
Page 4
Figure 1 below depicts the common components comprising a water cooled chiller system.
COPOGIO.00
TRACE RERAN
ORE
GERARD
WATER
RM
NR WO VNIT CI. Lill, VASTRR EIRERRGRIMEMaii
6,•1a WIRICOGUMG Tong
EVAPORATOR COMMNOA C
GOl
Eq•'.m
V** GUM! Olt OAT
NEIR,
OTRIR
Figure 1: Water Cooled Chiller System w,fl
WATER
PUMP
1INAIPCOAIME COOLING TOMB,
As can be seen from the illustration, there are three main components to the water cooled chiller
system. These are the AHU, the chiller and the cooling tower. The chiller itself contains the
compressor, the condenser, the expansion valve, and the evaporator. In the first stage of the
refrigeration cycle, refrigerant enters the compressor as a low pressure gas and is pressurized by
the compressor into a hot, high pressure gas. The high pressure gas leaves the compressor and is
circulated to the condenser. In the condenser, the high pressure gas is cooled via a heat
exchanger with the condenser water, which causes it to condense into a hot liquid. The hot liquid
refrigerant then proceeds through an expansion valve, which decreases the pressure of the
refrigerant, causing it to cool. The cool refrigerant is then circulated to an evaporator. In the
evaporator, the refrigerant accepts heat from the chilled water, causing it to vaporize into a low
pressure gaseous state. The AHU contains coils through which chilled water is circulated. These
coils absorb heat from ambient air (chilling it) which is circulated through the conditioned space
to accomplish cooling. The cooling tower (located on the roof) cools the condenser water
through evaporative cooling. The condenser and chilled water pumps are all located in the
basement. The HVAC system runs 24 hours a day 365 days a year to keep the building owner
and staff at a comfortable temperature.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287169
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71°' Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment
Electric Utility: January 24, 2011
Page 5
Consolidated Edison supplies electricity via a three phase, 208 volt bolted pressure switch that
has 1000A fuses. There is no submetering as the entire building's electric usage is billed through
one account. The sole Consolidated Edison meter is located in the basement.
Photo 3: Consolidated Edison Meter
In NYC electricity is supplied by third party Energy Service Companies. These companies
charge for the electric supply, and Consolidated Edison charges fees for the delivery of that
electricity.
Consolidated Edison charges 9 E 71' St. for electrical delivery according to their EL9 rate. This
rate is assigned to customers who are expected to have a monthly demand greater than 10 kW.
The demand at 9 E 71' St. is well over 10 kW. Rate EL1 is the only other electric rate for which
9 E 7O St. could qualify. ELI is described as being used for customers who use electricity for
general uses in an apartment or home. The EL9 rate has a higher monthly delivery charge than
EL1 and charges per kW (which ELI does not) but has a much lower kWh charge than ELI
does. Because of these differences in charges and the high demand and energy usage of 9 E 71°
St., the delivery charges using ELI would be higher than that of EL9. A comparison of the
delivery charges between the two rates (not including taxes and other surcharges) using average
monthly energy usage and demand is included on the following page.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287170
HBRK Associates Inc. January 24, 2011
9 East 71m Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment Page 6
Lighting: Monthly Average
kW
kWh 132.7304
67,607
Comparison of ELI and EL9 Delivery Rates
EL1 EL9
Monthly $15.76 Monthly $81.71
kWh under 250 $0.07 kW over 5 under 100 $19.97
kWh over 250 $0.08 kW over 100 $19.15
meter charges $21.42 kWh $0.02
meter charges $8.16
monthly total $5,678.84 monthly total $4,006.51
Table 1: Comparison of ELI and EL9 Delivery Rates
The living spaces of the building are lit with a wide variety of lamps, chandeliers, candelabras
and wall/ceiling mounted fixtures. Most of them bear decorative or aesthetic appeal and will not
be changed for the sake of efficiency. The basement and backroom areas, however, are lit
mostly by fluorescent light fixtures as well as some floodlights and incandescent fixtures. The
fluorescent light fixtures are a combination of 4 ft, 2-lamp, linear T12 light fixtures and 2 ft, 2-
lamp, U-tube T12 light fixtures.
Vertical Transportation:
There is one passenger elevator in the building that is used by the building owner as well as
guests and staff. It is a cable-driven elevator operated by a DC motor that is powered by a motor
generator set. There is also one hydraulic freight elevator.
SourceOne Recommended Energy Efficiency Measures:
SourceOne has identified six (6) major energy efficiency measures that can be enacted at 9 East
71' St. They are as follows:
1. S 1-ECM-1: Motor Upgrades
2. S 1-ECM-2: Backroom Lighting Upgrades
3. SI-ECM-3: Installation of VFDs on Air Handler Unit Fan Motors
4. SI-ECM-4: Installation of a Condensate/Hot Water Heat Exchanger
5. SI-ECM-5: Installation of a Free-Cooling Heat Exchanger
6. SI-ECM-6: Installation of an Additional Multistack Chiller
The appendix of this report contains the spreadsheet analysis evaluating each of these ECMs.
The annual savings, material cost, labor cost, and simple payback is calculated for each ECM
individually as well as for the collective whole.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287171
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71" Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment
S I -ECM-1: Motor Upgrades January 24, 2011
Page 7
Electric motors manufactured after the Energy Policy Act of 1995 are required to have high
efficiency performance. During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne identified six (6) motors
produced before 1995 that can be replaced with high efficiency equivalent units. These motors
were each 7.5 horsepower and include the three AHU fan motors and the three condenser water
pump motors in the building. The existing motors have an efficiency rating of 85.2%, where the
new equivalent motors have an efficiency rating of 91.7%. This difference can be seen in Figure
2 below.
Efficiency (TEFC 4-pole Motors) (percent) 95
90 -'
65
so
75 • •
•
• •
• •
• • • Replacement Results in Big Savings
• • • • • nip
• • • la
• • * • 1
• s • •
• : : • I I • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •
-7-4—•-- • • • * •
• •
• 1 • •
•
• • •
• • Average Old Motor
• • Prior NEMA EE Standard
• NEMA EE/EPACT
• NEMA Premium
I 10 20 50 NO a a
Horsepowor
Figure 2: Motor Efficiency
The motor upgrade analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the appendix. As can be seen, the
energy savings has been calculated to be 24,398 kWh annually. The corresponding cost savings
is $4,625 annually. With a total material and labor cost of $5,459 the simple payback would be
1.18 years.
S I-ECM-2: Backroom Lighting Upgrades
During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne identified several backroom areas with lighting
fixtures that could be retrofitted or replaced with more energy efficient options. For retrofits, the
fluorescent tubes and ballasts would be removed and replaced leaving the existing light fixture.
Replacements require the removal of the existing light fixture and installation of an entire new
one. These changes can be broken up into these four specific categories.
• Retrofit 4ft, 2-lamp, linear fluorescent T12 fixtures with corresponding 4ft, linear
fluorescent T8 lamps and electronic ballasts.
o These retrofits will save about 31W per fixture
• Replace 2ft, 2-lamp, T12 U-tube fluorescent fixtures with 2ft, 2-lamp, linear fluorescent
T8 fixtures with electronic ballasts.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287172
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71' Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment January 24, 2011
Page 8
o These replacements will save about 56W per fixture
• Replace flood light bulbs with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) of equivalent
luminosity
o These replacements will save about 45W per bulb
• Replace incandescent bulbs with CFLs of equivalent luminosity
o These replacements will save about 40W per bulb
The lighting upgrade analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the appendix. As can be seen, the
energy savings has been calculated to be 13,419 kWh annually. The corresponding cost savings
is $2,544 annually. With a total material and labor cost of $8,507 the simple payback would be
3.34 years.
S 1-ECM-3: Installation of VFDs on air handler units fan motors
During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne identified several electric motors that could be made
to run more efficiently through the installation and use of variable frequency drives (VFDs).
These motors include the three (3) 7.5 horsepower units powering the fans in the main AHUs.
For AHU fans, the HP requirement varies as the cube of the speed, so the slower the fan speed -
the less energy required. A fan running at 80% speed will consume only 50% of the power of a
fan running at full speed. At 50% fan speed, power consumption is only 16%. This is
illustrated in Figure 3.
100
90
1 80
*9 70
V so
50
t 40
30
20
ry 10
0 A 100 HP fan running at half speed only
requires the energy of a 16 HP motor?
ggggog O OO O
CI CO V U1 CO r-- CO CO O
Percent Fen Speed
Figure 3: Relationship between Fan Speed and Motor HP Requirement
Given the relationship shown in Figure 3, the installation of a VFD will help reduce the electric
usage of the AHU fans. The AHU fan motors can be run at 80% speed when the building owner
is present to maintain the low temperature he prefers. When the building owner is not present,
the AHU fan motors can be run at 50% speed to reduce the power consumption and save energy.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287173
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71" Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment January 24, 2011
Page 9
The installation of VFDs on AHU fan motors analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the
appendix. As can be seen, the energy savings has been calculated to be 21,276 kWh annually.
The corresponding cost savings is $4,034 annually. With a total material and labor cost of
$39,285 the simple payback would be 9.74 years.
S I-ECM-4: Installation of a Condensate/Hot Water Heat Exchanger
During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne noticed that the hot condensate, produced from using
the Consolidated Edison supplied steam for heating, is being cooled to acceptable disposal
temperatures by quenching it with cold tap water before allowing it to drain into the sewer
system. It is necessary to cool the condensate because the city requires that water temperature be
below 120°F before allowing it to drain into the sewers. The condensate however is at a
temperature of about 180°F after it exits the heat exchangers. The 60°F difference represents a
significant amount of energy being wasted when the condensate is quenched and disposed. A
method to use the energy in the still hot condensate rather than dispose of it would be to install a
plate and frame heat exchanger between the condensate and unheated water to pre-heat it before
sending it to the two domestic water heaters. This would conserve energy in the form of steam
used in the domestic the water heaters, as well as save water that would be used to quench the
condensate to an acceptable temperature.
The condensate/hot water heat exchanger analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the appendix.
As can be seen, the energy savings has been calculated to be 17.59 Mlbs of steam as well as
67,000 ft3 of water annually. The corresponding cost savings is $800.85 annually. With a total
material and labor cost of $5,514 the simple payback would be 6.89 years.
S 1-ECM-5: Installation of a free-cooling heat exchanger
During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne was informed that the chiller is used all year round.
When temperatures are below 48°F however, the chiller could be effectively bypassed by
installing a heat exchanger between the condenser water from the cooling tower and the chilled
water that is circulated through the AHUs. This is effective because the chiller normally outputs
chilled water at 47-48°F and if the outdoor air temperature is below the chilled water temperature
a chiller is not needed to cool the chilled water. Heat will naturally flow from the warmer
returning chilled water to the condenser water through the heat exchanger and then from the
condenser water to the outside air in the cooling tower. Under these circumstances, the heat
exchanger would harness free-cooling and a large amount of energy would be saved by shutting
down the chiller unit when the temperature drops below 48°F. In addition to the heat exchanger
itself, valves would need to be installed to switch between the chiller and heat exchanger and
these would need to be tied into the existing central control system.
The free-cooling heat exchanger analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the appendix. As can
be seen, the energy savings has been calculated to be 52,252 kWh annually. The corresponding
cost savings is $9,906 annually. With a total material and labor cost of $30,644 the simple
payback would be 3.09 years.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287174
HBRK Associates Inc. January 24, 2011
9 East 71m Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment Page 10
S I-ECM-6: Installation of an additional Multistack chiller
During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne noticed that two chillers are being used in the facility.
One of them is a 30-ton scroll type Multistack chiller. This was installed in the last few years to
replace one of two older Carrier chillers. The other Carrier chiller is still in operation along with
the new Multistack. Multistack chillers are modular units that are designed to easily be
combined to create a chiller sized to match any demand. Therefore it is relatively inexpensive to
add on to the Multistack modules already installed in the facility. SourceOne recommends
installing another two (2) 15-ton modules to cover the load currently being handled by the older
and less efficient Carrier chiller which can then be shut down permanently. With the more
efficient chiller installed, we can expect an energy savings of about 0.22 kW/ton of cooling.
The additional Multistack chiller analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the appendix. As can
be seen, the energy savings has been calculated to be 38,649 kWh annually. The corresponding
cost savings is $7,327 annually. With a total material and labor cost of $87,750 the simple
payback would be 11.98 years.
Examined Energy Efficiency Measure That Cannot Be Financially Justified:
SourceOne identified a potential energy conservation measure but, due to its large initial cost and
long payback period, its feasibility will need to be further examined. The ECM is as follows:
S I-ECM-7: Elevator Motor SCR Conversion
During the walkthrough audit, SourceOne notice that the building's elevator motor currently runs
on an outdated Motor Generator set. This could be replaced with a more modern and efficient
SCR static drive.
An MG set is used to convert the AC current from the utility line to DC current which is used by
the main elevator motor. A DC motor was chosen for almost all elevators (until very recently)
because it provides a much smoother operating elevator. Because utility supplied power is AC
the MG set, which is an AC motor running a DC generator, was developed. This has been an
effective solution in the past, however it poses several problems. To provide immediate power
for the elevator motor, the MG set spends much of it's time in idle. When idling, the MG set can
use up to 40% of its full load current. In addition, it is inefficient when in operation by today's
standards and requires regular maintenance because it has high speed moving parts. The more
recently developed SCR static drive is a solid state device that converts the AC current to DC. It
does this more efficiently and immediately without running in any idle state. The elevator
conversion is quite expensive, however, and will take an extended period to pay for itself.
The elevator motor SCR conversion analysis is shown in the ECM analysis in the appendix. As
can be seen, the energy savings has been calculated to be 21,723 kWh annually. The
corresponding cost savings is $4,118 annually. With a total material and labor cost of $125,053
the simple payback would be 30.36 years.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287175
HBRK Associates Inc.
9 East 71" Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment
SourceOne Recommended ECM Summary:
SourceOne recommends the implementation of the following ECMs:
1. S 1-ECM-1: Motor Upgrades
Annual Energy Savings: 24,399 kWh ($4,626)
Simple Payback: 1.18 years
2. S 1-ECM-2: Backroom Lighting Upgrades
Annual Energy Savings: 13,419 kWh ($2,544)
Simple Payback: 3.34 years
3. S 1-ECM-3: Installation of VFDs on Air Handler Unit Fan Motors
Annual Energy Savings: 21,276 kWh ($4,034)
Simple Payback: 9.74 years
4. S I-ECM-4: Installation of a Condensate/Hot Water Heat Exchanger
Annual Energy Savings: 17 Mlbs of steam ($602)
Simple Payback: 6.39 years
5. S 1-ECM-5: Installation of a Free-Cooling Heat Exchanger
Annual Energy Savings: 52,252 kWh ($9,906)
Simple Payback: 3.09 years
6. S 1-ECM-6: Installation of an Additional Multistack Chiller
Annual Energy Savings: 38,650 kWh ($7,328)
Simple Payback: 11.98 years January 24, 2011
Page 11
Relative to the annual electric consumption of 853,740 kWh for 9 E 71" St., these ECMs
represent a 21% energy savings and have a collective payback of 6.06 years.
In addition to these six (6) ECMs, SourceOne has identified a potential energy conservation
initiative whose enactment may benefit 9 E 71" St. but which cannot be easily justified
financially. It is as follows:
1. S 1-ECM-7: Elevator Motor SCR Conversion
Annual Energy Savings: 21,724 kWh of electricity ($4,119)
Simple Payback: 30.36 years
Each one of these initiatives could bring about substantial energy savings individually and as a
collective whole. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you for
this opportunity to be of service.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287176
HBRK Associates Inc. January 24, 2011
9 East 71" Street - Comprehensive Energy Assessment Page 12
Sincerely,
Timothy Sande
Associate Project Engineer
SourceOne Inc.
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287177
SourceOne
Appendix:
Section 1: Utility Billing Data
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287178
readsh4,41lostruelione:
SourceOne All baka in lighi yen« are input folet. This dala med: le 6o gathored troen DCAS
Or Ihe Facilly Sta.
All halds in lighl green are aule« klet This flormaton Mn be used to analyzo gro
tonal:dry olvanous Energy Ccansorvabon Moasuros (CCM]
~es in t•loni yebra are assumed tien* Ul% 443 nol govi:OKI Cr nl8veleNe
9 East 71si Skoti
9 Eau 7181 Sinte,
Ne. Vak, NY 10021
Faciny Sauane Foolafte lor stoarn. Hour ot C)C13.10.1 247 Total ~Na:y Cp., ra•rg teluer I&I, 30.110
Fatale Sauero F00148110, «alt 30.400
} aciny Uso 6 uncion: Pnvate Inesitlence
1..%tataier ~annan:
Electric Utility Consumation Information:
ENTRE 81.043 CE BILL Vis une me Fe Nie Ar MIN Jun ar Aug 3•11 Oet Nov oie kSMI Tout
2009 KWH 62,880 69580 65.040 62.760 62.760 61.200 63.120 63,120 63.120 63,120 70,560 67.920 774.480
2010 KWH 74.160 62.400 63.720 63.720 65.760 80,280 80.2193 73.440 72.000 72.360 72.360 73.260 8$1.740
a iciainzataino iro~rano~irsi eastaste~ez ein7 2010 KW 127 1 C 149 149 120 161 161 130 134 151 151 139 161
2009 US 3 10.944.81 3 12.636.47 S 10,738.05 3 11.385.46 S 11.385.46 3 12.565.79 S 12.036.50 3 12.03650 1 12.036.50 5 12.036.50 3 11.341.73 1 11.793.59 3140.934
2010 1$$ $ 13,584.0 3 11,364.09 $ 13,98435 $ 13,984.35 6 13,354.50 $ 157652.24 $ 16,652-24 $ 13.255_74 j 13,140.22 3 13,965.58 1 13.92858 1 13,775.10 5167579
Unt COSI As. e Monn W.179 10.163 10.192 30.201 50.192 10.207 50260 30-185 $0.186 10.192 30-177 10.181 10190
Veer Avers«
BocTric4 Ccm:ti-nou:n 8147 10 kWh
Ele«ncal Deraand 149 kW
Elaln Lend Fxter 62%
Eletliic CO14 5 154.307
EFTA00287179
medal**, Inenutgena:
SourceOne All bat in Iglu yelkne we input fees. This data need: ID be gathered from OCAS
Or Mors:111y Sore
All bads in Ighl green are oulpiA apps. This irionnanan wilt be used to analyze the
toasettley of various Energy Conservabon Measures (ECM
Values in telohl yelkra are imumed liege Ulilly eels 001 Of %kW Co ACIa.5914010
Steam Uti
Account Nainelnlo Oat
2003
2010
2009
2010
Um Cod Average JAGS
vies
lit
Stew n Cc
Stearn Cog I 0 2.675
99.069to
Account Narnelnlo IVsar I OM
2001 1.1BTU
2010 ESSE 2009 5$$ 2010 5113Tu
UntCoel Average 61.487U
Gas ConsyniA cr I SI IUBTU
Gas Cos: 1.067 Annual UM
312 264 290 258 246 263 232 217 217 271 259 323 3.153
274 263 214 221 204 198 172 172 183 205 2391 25' 2597
12.112
I 9997 9.938 9,294 b4214$ 7 710 765 1 6 025 $ 6 362 $ 7 305
I t:173 1 1:121 102 768
10.365 9(962 8./30 S asos $ 6510 355 8.402S sq:Sia t 7'2139
-I 9670
38.36 S 37.92 $ 3/.01 4 37.17 s slas s use' s 32.49 $ 31.96 $ ass* 30.08 4 4
Jan Apr Ilay Jun Jul Aug [Sepil l.iller [Dec Annual Total
4.2 35 3 4 3 3 33 4 0 3 4 3 7 38 24 4 8 35 43
3.4 4 4 4 7 5.0 6.01 85
93 63 50
$ 97 87 $ 78 SS $ 68 so $ 70 76 S 56 B0 93!,
93 70 72 105 91 3 94 91 103 119 5 77 $ 153 $ 123 11f).)
3 22.89 S 23.82 $ 2214 $ 19.52 4 2052 $ 20.07 4 2035 $ 2048 $_ 19.64 5 2261 $ 1899 $ 2.68 $ 2.`7
At nue, Elecon Coreunplon 27.14 Kahn'
92.6 Mule
Annual Steam Consumseco 0.096 Mbyte
111.2 Mule
Total Annual Energy
COnsumplIan 204 kIlluit2
2.04 theme&
EFTA00287180
10/13/2010 12/14/2010 144,720 Elec
151.2 $27,931.16
11/10/2010 12/14/2010 -- -- --
10/13/2010 11/10/2010 -• -- --
9/13/2010 10/13/2010 72,000 134.4 $13,140.22
8/12/2010 9/13/2010 73,440 129.6 $13,255.74
5/13/2010 8/12/2010 -- -- --
6/14/2010 8/12/2010 160,560 160.8 $33,304.47
5/13/2010 6/14/2010 65.760 120 $11354.50
3/17/2010 5/13/2010 127,440 148.8 $27,968.69
4/15/2010 5/13/2010 -- -- --
3/17/2010 4/15/2010 •• -- --
2/16/2010 3/17/2010 62,400 122.4 $11,364.09
1/14/2010 2/1672010 74,160 127.2 $13,584.62
12/15/2009 1/14/2010 67,920 136.8 $11,793.59
11/12/2009 12/15/2009 70,560 127.2 $11,341.73
7/15/2009 11/12/2009 252,480 124.8 $48,146.01
10/14/2009 11/12/2009 -• -- --
9/14/2009 10/14/2009 -• -- --
8/13/2009 9/14/2009 -• -- --
7/15/2009 8/13/2009 -• -- --
6/15/2009 7/15/2009 -• -- --
6/15/2009 7/15/2009 61,200 120 $12,565.79
4/15/2009 6/15/2009 125,520 120 $22,770.91
3/17/2009 4/15/2009 65,040 120 $10,736.05
2/13/2009 3/17/2009 68,880 122.4 $12,635.47
1/14/2009 271372009 62,880 132 $10,944.94
12/12/2008 1/14/2009 78,960 132 $14,874.61
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
.c 50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0 L._ Elecrtrical Consumption 62.880 132 $10,944.94 _2009
2009 !Ian
feb 68,880 122.4 $12,635.47
2009 mar 65.040 120 $10.736.05
2009 apr 62760 120 $11,385.46
2009 may 62760 120 $11,385.46
2009 jun 61200 120 $12,565.79
2009 jul 63120 124.8 $12,036.50
2009 aug 63120 124.8 $12.036.50
2009 sep 63120 124.8 $12,036.50
2009 oct 63120 124.8 $12,036.50
2009 nov 70.560 127.2 $11,341.73
2009 dec 67,920 136.8 $11,793.59
2010 jan 74.160 127.2 $13,584.62
2010 feb 62,400 122.4 $11,364.09
2010 mar 63720 148.8 $13,984.35
2010 apr 63720 148.8 $13,984.35
2010 may 65,760 120 $13,354.50
2010 jun 80280 160.8 $16,652.24
2010 jul 80280 160.8 $16,652.24
2010 aug 73,440 129.6 $13,255.74
2010 sep 72.000 134.4 $13,140.22
2010 oct 72360 151.2 $13,965.58
2010 nov 72360 151.2 $13,965.58
2010 dec
jan teb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec
Month ❑ 2009
❑2010
EFTA00287181
year month Mlbs bill amount Payments
2008 oct 269.50 $8,682.83 7323.1 $32.22
2008 nov 302.56 $10,277.13 $8,682.83 $33.97
2008 dec 319.33 $11,477.13 $10,277.13 $35.94
2009 jan 311.81 $12,112.07 $11,477.13 $38.84
2009 feb 263.56 $9,997.06 $12,112.07 $37.93
2009 mar 290.40 $9,938.08 $9,997.06 $34.22
2009 apr 258.30 $9,293.57 $9,938.08 $35.98
2009 may 247.64 $8,428.57 $9,293.57 $34.04
2009 jun 262.77 $7,709.52 $8,428.57 $29.34
2009 jul 231.60 $6,765.16 $7,709.52 $29.21
2009 aug 216.80 $6,025.48 $6,765.16 $27.79
2009 sep 216.96 $6,351.95 $6,025.48 $29.28
2009 oct 270.88 $7,304.81 $6,351.95 $26.97
2009 nov 258.53 $8,370.31 $10,084.29 $32.38
2009 dec 323.42 $10,471.23 $0.00 $32.38
2010 jan 273.78 $10,345.10 $0.00 $37.79
2010 feb 262.79 $9,962.25 $8,757.86 $37.91
2010 mar 214.19 $8,736.05 $9,962.25 $40.79
2010 apr 220.65 $8,508.15 $8,736.05 $38.56
2010 may 204.06 $6,633.56 $8,508.15 $32.51
2010 jun 197.96 $6,709.73 $6,633.56 $33.89
2010 jul 172.17 $6,354.52 $6,709.73 $36.91
2010 aug 172.00 $6,401.62 $6,354.52 $37.22
2010 sep 183.43 $6,712.59 $6,401.62 $36.59
2010 oct 205.05 $7,009.44 $6,712.59 $34.18
2010 nov
2010 dec
Steam Consumption
350.00
300.00
250.00
u, 200.00 .o
• 150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
jan feb mar apr ma jun ul aug sep oct nov dec
Month ❑ 2008
O2009
U2010
EFTA00287182
. From Data To Data Gas Use
(Therm/ Gas Bill
Amt
10/13/2010 12/14/2010 -- --
11/10/2010 12/14/2010 85 $153.13
10/13/2010 11/10/2010 35 $77.11
9/13/2010 10/13/2010 60 $118.76
8/12/2010 9/13/2010 50 $102.66
5/13/2010 8/12/2010 140 $282.26
6/14/2010 8/12/2010 -- --
5/13/2010 6/14/2010 -- --
3/17/2010 5/13/2010 -- --
4/15/2010 5/13/2010 57 $106.34
3/17/2010 4/15/2010 34 $72.40
2/16/2010 3/17/2010 31 $70.45
1/14/2010 2/16/2010 41 $93.12
12/15/2009 1/14/2010 35 $79.50
11/12/2009 12/15/2009 48 $99.42
7/15/2009 11/12/2009 -- --
10/14/2009 11/12/2009 24 $56.28
9/14/2009 10/14/2009 38 $75.68
8/13/2009 9/14/2009 37 $75.50
7/15/2009 8/13/2009 34 $70.13
6/15/2009 7/15/2009 40 $79.84
6/15/2009 7/15/2009 -- --
4/15/2009 6/15/2009 65 $136.66
3/17/2009 4/15/2009 34 $78.16
2/13/2009 3/17/2009 35 $86.78
1/14/2009 2/13/2009 42 $96.84
12/12/2008 1/14/2009 39 $98.34 MAIAl. qas (therm) _ MBTUI aas 4
2009 jan 42 4.2 $96.84
2009 feb 35 3.5 $86.78
2009 mar 34 3.4 $78.16
2009 apr 32.5 3.25 $68.33
2009 may 32.5 3.25 $68.33
2009 jun 40 4 $79.84
2009 jul 34 3.4 $70.13
2009 aug 37 3.7 $75.50
2009 sep 38 3.8 $75.68
2009 oct 24 2.4 $56.28
2009 nov 48 4.8 $99.42
2009 dec 35 3.5 $79.50
2010 jan 41 4.1 $93.12
2010 feb 31 3.1 $70.45
2010 mar 34 3.4 $72.40
2010 apr 57 5.7 $106.34
2010 may 46.66666667 4.666666667 $94.09
2010 jun 46.66666667 4.666666667 $94.09
2010 jul 46.66666667 4.666666667 $94.09
2010 aug 50 5 $102.66
2010 sep 60 6 $118.76
2010 oct 35 3.5 $77.11
2010 nov 85 8.5 $153.13
2010 dec
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 Gas Usage
L
jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec
Month 02009
la2010
EFTA00287183
SourceOne
Appendix:
Section 2: Energy Conservation Measures
Summary Sheets
Seven Penn Plaza • New York, NY 10001 •
EFTA00287184
SI.ECM.1 Moto. UpgradOS
Suatatd61ficlassTat1
lip OLD EPP NEW PPP
5011 S1,74 49.54
7511 85251 91.7%
1003 8514 91.7%
15110 4484 93.04
SNP 97.714 9.1.04
2590 09 MS 91615
3000 89.7% 94.1%
4000 90.154 9.1.54.
50 00 946% 91.015
60110 91.7% 9544
7503 9194 95.4%
10040 9244 95.1.
125.00 92214 95"
MOO 9244 95.44
leek Curl
S New 73 HP lush Elfusens Nam 32.766.00
F4544/44 S.k osatio0141.44 $1278.00 title Aexoeyniym Fltsek
6pin..eptacazn bass, f on molars 'SNP
Aim mAW el Kinney Da ed on NE TA Ssvigards
.CorroYee motor assessment rept/Jo retifyoisYng meter eXtency
ES1440441444441 COSI S2.2136 00
1,5.454.1 1144 Con $12711 00
Prolocial EleclOcal Savings 24.399.90 KWh
PROPONED CAPITAL COST4 MATERIAL AND LABORN S 4,044 00
TOTAL ENERGY SAVINC4.4 kWh 24.396 00 1tWa
TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS 495 S 4.625.91
SIMPLE PAYBACK 4EIXCL FEES & CONTINGENCY. 0.67 Years F4190544 CSPOI COSI 5 4p4(0
Contingency
Erg neenng mem
TOTAL 1 Iv WO
(Socha span. ledulmli I IS
EFTA00287185
61.10.2 Larag %ran
ti.le Tee • of (Wife .untall4tert(tul4n0) sail .Ja P,On.R<Ph« ," .elt.tio
C 2 bah eaulrl2 fames 4! 06 4' .1 ledb uneht1), vdelneutit Mao 51
Z :balk TI: Mee nm 2 2 bullninneafl et data. labs 6.)
Mal leis I: M 110 (It Mods :0
lowaNketalt A en mn GU
104 >SLUM cesiAlusat • Min LautlIluue 06(..1(.110Luste kul OM
2165 III le $.1100 414 On SIM»
lice 5.2M 3,6900 14407) S431532
WI 160/ $1500 $1520:.
131
my 1301 $15030 MOO
56.0115
My fleeted tune Cmetmom ‚W.
New Faints Genera., II )57 kWh
Amid Faun S..nen ILm9
Comm.Bean Cussapta• 21176 kWh.
tsionak•I anal Eleane Crests 4.)7t2
Piro‚attd Fianna CantlIWIMI I I.757
Pitretinl Iltatitace(4. 2:"..e I I
PltratetIF.Tec.nikl Snap IKm 9 kWh
Pe.ratt.1 Amid Payinck 2.144119
6 Ed II
1.:1111$
PRCPOSED CAPITAL COST. 16.101 76 ISW. wSM
TOTAL ENERGY SAVINGS kWh 519 LAT TOTAL CAPITAL C067 $ !MAE
TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS 44) 2.5•109
SIMPLE PAYBACK (EXCL FEES. CONTINCENCVi 2.4.0 inn Matto rnlied. slillud.d•
• indak• slime lieculfee
EFTA00287186
91.60.1.3 imunsinn or 336.334 Rocponcy Oa% GA A/ NTT%
EITOtallITLISIXSOlcvlatHT
impono4014 Dee
44 el memo Ho 040
Woe URN. Ow% WOO" • WWII,
Mrs —4 has PO4.44
0881068 Pommel 78p/488
..1.0888w8 Teo win
97.5 9510 100 19 13 6 110% 0% 183 122 IS 137
424 %le% 77 51 M 33% 099 744 4% 61 568 87.5 66N90 196 131 68 70% 011. 1893 ITO 154 NIT
82.5 SOT 89 356 252 126 80% 0% 3660 2433 297 2730
774 Tie% 608 405 5671 3814 478 44£
72.5 7010 75 812 941 271 ION PA 7841 5227 638 5865
67.5 860370 809 939 270 ON 0% 7812 5204 636 5844
824 6010 64 754 506 250 12% 7320 4886 586 5482
57.5 551060 7% 470 235 19% 0% 6808 4938 564 5092
52.5 501055 689 459 230 27% 0% 6693 4435 541 4977
474 46 le 20 07 sse 228 35% 0534 4422 240 496£
424 40 ie 45 266 511 256 42% 0% 7387 4931 602 5533
37.5 351040 838 559 279 SON 0% 8092 5395 669 6063
324 331835 635 419 200 ST, 0% 0344 4043 493 4.52(
375 351e30 365 243 122 65% 0% 3524 2350 287 2636
22.5 200325 222 148 74 73% 0% 2144 1429 174 1604
174 151420 Ill 78 38 017, 1130 753 82 845
124 10 io 15 51 34 17 88% 492 328 40 368
7.5 5 to 10 17 II 6 96% 0% 164 109 13 123
23 OloS 2 1 1 104% 0% 19 13 2 II
87% 49900 2919.0 0 84143 562% 6872 83167
UM T4TUpFT
H Roll Fan HP ETIMG VFD
AC.1 75 NO
AC.2 7.6 NO
40.3 7.5 NO
Tcal 228 0
Jan
CwlnbfknW9I 7461
vi0ola AC.I Tour AC'S (76IIT C.33
4.90000
2440040
$ 2%10040 64100- Awarchont
0cc Space TOM FF) 70 F
kopulotock IFI 60 F
Coalp 441040..(F) 85F
Peak kW Octinind 160.8 kW
Actual KWH SW70 21.276 WA
6564 unl (ail 0 0.19 8/14%
Toler DMA
«Mon% Fan HP 22 PIP
CoNenionCOrdiart 0246
IsIllifIsM abastio void
FlaintonateNtle speed 80%
Ea Wei 1.3% 807.
Ea TNT EN 89%
HITT TOT Oa4 used loarwyte oock Malt, neeCti Oynsm
GI INN TeTa.
%Loaf .10ANTITHISOTTSTHAT
FW.TP ' 718)6811
OW • Wm 47.0088.8•Wil
Zorem Ekes Concueppso 64.443 VT
Toocied ElocaleGiConuarcli'm 67367 Prow...40 Caola 0)51 $ 2310)
Pcsoclo3EITTATIST9,21 21.276 VT 80'8,1801Y 20 $ 5.8Z)
W2r..e.nr, 15 5 4.3I.
PROPOSED CAPUT COST' 28.10) TOTAL CAPITAL COST $ 53265
TOTAL ENERGY SAMOS AM awn TOTAL ANNUAL ENERGY SAWS III Eilectlw Payback (14% Wheat° 9.74
SfatE PAYBACK (EXT. FEESaCONTINGENCY) 721 Yrs
EFTA00287187
Stand-. Iwollaow et Hui Eu6vµn onewadpewk
Cunonl welor badet Pss» Mcal Exthirg« Gort sovod ITOM Odd min
cOM wder km, SO F Cdd walto lemo 50F elume used 13 cool concleende 3e4 6755 100 im Il
leviaber kelP 140F co-clename Wem 169F toelaiwan $2 95 per 100cv R
Tarn, <Memme e F wate' alle P.0t 109F IOS OMI 0 *Ih, used $1.052 19
Vtatorrealod ilitnale 420000 to Toto cliTecorno 50F teurnownedby k. 6730769 100 co II
MW. 31 66 Mbs tax 17.59 Ubs opld wate sawn> $196.55
Con olheatng 5 1.06412 Coeland S te 29
berds mg
Leb« con
folg teil
Atelual Cal sakod
time Penne 5.1 Proposed Gerte Cool 1 4..0011
S2:1 Orenppopy 330k I 11170
St. En? nee"; iscs. 1 41: )1
TOTAL a Kran
elben Peteet Osa 1«1•64 CM
EFTA00287188
SI.E(.11.3 trialsHalton or Mee-cooling Heal Exchanger
TOrnnarrilute BIN Data
lakl.pts Hangs Annual Hrs
97.5 95 to 100 19
92.5 90 to 95 77
87.5 85 to 90 196
82.5 80 to 85 378
77.5 75 to 80 608
72.5 70 to 75 812
67.5 65 to 70 809
62.5 60 to 65 759
57.5 55 to 60 705
52.5 50 to SS 689
47.5 45 to SO 687
42.5 40 to 45 766
37.5 35 to 40 838
32.5 30 to 35 628
27.5 25 to 30 365
22.5 20 to 25 222
17.5 15 to 20 117
12.5 10 to 15 51
7.5 5 to 10 17
2.5 Olo 5 2
8745
Annual hours below 48 3349.5
Materials cost
Labor cost
Total cost
Annual Cost saved
Simple Payback Chiller size
Load factor
Chiller demand
Winter hours
Chiller energy usage
Energy cost 40 ions
0.5
0.78 KWiton
3349.5 hours
52252.2 KWh
$9.906.58
hourly chiller flow 9590.41 galhr
159.8402 galornin
$6.379.67 Proposed Capital Cost 22.699.67
$16.320.00 Contingency 20.0% 4.539.93
$22.699.67 Engineering 15 Cr. S3.4C4
$8.906.58 TOTAL 3 30.644.56
2.29
Effective Payback noes included') 3.09
EFTA00287189
S I-ECM-6 Installation of Addidional Mulusty& Chillers
Chilling Load Savings 0.22 KWitonihr
hourseyear 4392 energy savings 38649.6 KWh
tons 40 cost savings $7,327.64
KW/ton 0.78
KWh 137030.4
Cost per year 625.979.83
Materials cost
Labor cost
Total cost
Annual Cost saved $7.327.64
Simple Payback 58.87 645.000.00
$20.000.00
$65.000.00 Proposed Capital Cost $ 65.000 00
Contingency sem, $ 13.000 00
En ineering S 9 7E/3 00
TOTAL $ 87.750.00
ElfeclIve Payback (lees included) 11.98
EFTA00287190
SI.ECNI-7 Elevator SCR Ccoversion
Annual Hours
LIG Sol Motor HP
MG Set Motor Efficiency
MG Set System Electric Consunction
MG Set Motor Electric Costs
SCR System Electric Consumption
SCR Motor Electric Costs
Yearly Savings
Yearly Savings 4368
38
85.50%
144823.47 KWh
$27.457.33
123099.95 KWh
523.338.73
21.723.52 KWh
54.118.60
Materials cost $37.053.04 Proposed Capital Cost 52.632.10
Labor cost $55.579.06 Contingency 200% S 16526 42
Total cost $92.632.10 Engines/Mg 150% S ilfsco $2
Annual Cost saved $4.118.60 TOTAL S InA53.34 i
Simple Payback 22.49
efeclive Payback (lee. in< tudecli 30.35
EFTA00287191
SourceOne 9 E 71st Street - Energy Efficiency Analysis Summary
9 E 71st Energy Assessment Results
ECM
ID Energy Conservation Measure
(ECM) Yearly Savings
(kWh) Yearly Savings
(Mlbs ) Yearly Savings
(BTU) Yearly GHG
Emissions
Decrease
(M7CO2e ) Capital Cost
(S) Yearly Savings
(Si Effective
Payback
(Years)
51 .ECM-1 Motor Upgrades 24.399 83.248.691 II S 5.459 $4.626 1.18
S1-ECM-2 Lighting Upgrades 13.419 45.784.951 6 $ 8.507 $2.544 3.34
S1-ECM-3 VFD on Air Handlers 21.276 72.592.188 10 $ 39.285 $4.034 9.74
S1-ECM-4 Heat Exchangner on Condensate 0 17.59 18 1 $ 5.515 $801 6.89
S1-ECM-5 Heat Exchanger Parallel with Chiller 52,252 178.284.506 23 $ 30.645 $9.907 3.09
S1-ECM-6 Increase Multistacks 38.650 131.872.435 17 $ 87.750 $7.328 11.98
S1-ECA$1.7 Elevator SCR Conversion 21.724 74.120.650 10 $ 125.053 $4.119 30.36
Total 171,718 18 585,903,440 78 $ 302,214 $33,357 9.06
Total without Elevator SCR 149.995 511.782,789 6820% $177.161 $29.239 6.06
EFTA00287192
📷 Images in this document (28 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document with text and a photograph. The document appears to be a report or a presentation slide with a title that reads "9 East 71st Street: Comprehensive Energy Assessment." Below the title, there is a subtitle that says "New York, NY 10021." The document includes a logo at the bottom right corner that reads "Sustainable Energy."
The photograph on the document depicts a buildi
[Image 2] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a scientific or technical report. The document is titled "The Analysis of Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium in the Condensation of Water Vapor." It includes sections with headings such as "Introduction," "Methods," "Results," and "Discussion." The text discusses the analysis of vapor-liquid equilibrium in the condensation of water vapor, with refere
[Image 3] The image shows a document with text and a photograph. The document appears to be a technical report or article, possibly from an organization or company, as indicated by the header at the top. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be related to a technical or scientific subject, possibly involving water cooling systems.
The photograph is a close-up of a mechanical system, whic
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a page from a report or a presentation. The document is titled "IBM ASSOCIATES, INC." and includes a date at the top right corner, which is January 31, 2011. The text discusses energy efficiency and mentions a "Motor Control Center" and "Motor Control Center (MCC)". There are also references to "Motor Control Center (MCC)". The document inc
[Image 5] The image appears to be a document, specifically a letter or report, with a photograph attached to it. The document is from "Hydro One Inc." and is dated January 2011. The photograph shows an electrical meter, which is a device used to measure electricity consumption. The meter is mounted on a wall and is accompanied by a handwritten note that reads "100% of the meter is dead." This suggests that
[Image 6] The image shows a document with text and a graph. The document appears to be a report or presentation slide, possibly from a business or academic setting. The text includes a title, a date, and a list of bullet points. The graph is a line chart with a title and a legend, showing a trend over time. The visible text includes the name "IBM," which suggests that the document is related to IBM, and the