From: Caleb Harper

EFTA01020029 Dataset 9 5 pages Download original PDF Download as text
From: Caleb Harper To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:45:32 +0000 lane-Images: IMG_3794.JPG; IMG_3796.JPG; IMG_3795.JPG Sony to miss you Monday - you'll enjoy John ... interested to hear your thoughts after On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:57 PM Caleb Harper I sorry for late response -just got back from eastern europe. > wrote: I. Follow up On John De La Pam - Got John on board as a temp to perm hire (he is perfect for the team - brilliant) and we are working on a white paper to send out shortly. He is willing/able to leave his positions at North Eastern and Tufts and go full time with us starting in Nov. So until then I have him committed to 50% time. 2. Next steps - Setting up mtgs with Ed B and Martin to discuss the draft white paper and our approach. In general I think developing a quantified "raring test^ for plants would be a great first step to proving sentience. lye also started working with Lazlo Barabasi on the next round of the flavor experiments, and from a network science perspective, I think he would be a great collaborator on this work. With advisory from Ed, Martin and Lazlo and building up my team here - I think we are in great shape. We might need a reputable thinker on consciousness, maybe a philosopher? Know anyone that could collaborate from that perspective? 3. Funding - I cant hire John MI time and start spending money on other staff/prototype development/experiment costs until Joi signals to me that the budget we talked about has landed at ML. Is it possible to move forward with that? 4. Things to read - attached - OpenPhann : a white paper John started in the last week or so geared towards using our tools for drug discovery --- Cyber+Agriculture _Paper_Harper - a flavor paper we just sent to PLOS , its pretty basic but has some good underpinnings that we will expand on with further experiments. In Boston anytime soon? Id really like for you to see the lab out in Middleton, MA (40 mins north boston) next time the real question....what are these plants thinking in my lab today and what language are they speaking... EFTA01020029 R EFTA01020030 R EFTA01020031 Best, Caleb Previous email breaking down funding: To do this id need to add depth to my bio team, that's b far my weakest team in the lab currently. I recently let contracts lapse on Arielle and my molecular biologist as it wasn't working out.. want to add the following team and would need to do a search to get the best. MIT won't let me hire PhD Research Scientists, and likely quality people wouldn't accept, without secure multiyear funding.. propose 500k a yr for 3 yrs with the expectation we evaluate progress after year one as to year 2 and 3. The transparent cost break down is: EFTA01020032 PhD plant physiologist - 80k base salary +56% mit research OH (none goes to my lab or ML) + 20% benefits = 149, 760 k total cost PhD plant biochemist - 100k base salary + 56% mit research OH + 20% benefits = 187k total cost Plant science tech (JR) - 40k • 20% administrative OH - 48k total cost 100k prototyping budget + 20% material & services OH = 120k total cost = 500k a year / 3yrs On my side I'll dedicate 2 out of our 4 shipping containers for 3 years (target paid for install / dev etc but with stock price decline is stopping support for non essential research) and my salary is covered in other sponsored accounts plus my team of engineers on staff (backend /front end software, data science , electrical, embedded systems and mechanical engineers) I know it's a big ask, and would understand if it's out of ball park, but I think that's what it would take to make meaningful and rigorous progress on figuring out if plants can think and communicate Thoughts? On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:03 PM, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: nexzt step? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved Principal Investigator / Director Open Agriculture Initiative MIT Media Lab *Please contact Mr.David Zack for scheduling [email protected] ctHarper TED Talk QpenAG Community Forum EFTA01020033

📷 Images in this document (5 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image appears to be a screenshot of a text document, possibly an email or a letter. The document contains text, which seems to be a formal communication, possibly related to a legal or official matter. There are visible sections with headings such as "RE: [Case Number]", "To Whom It May Concern", and "From [Name]". The text includes references to "Defendant", "Plaintiff", and "Case Number". Th [Image 2] The image shows a digital document, which appears to be an email. The document is a photograph of a computer screen displaying the email. The email is from a sender named "Frank Cardwell" and is addressed to a recipient whose name is redacted. The email is dated "Mon, 10 Sep 2018" and was sent at "5:05 PM." The subject line of the email is "Re: Your request for a meeting." The body of the email co [Image 3] The image appears to be a photograph of a document or a printed page with text. The text is too small to read clearly, and the content of the document is not visible. The document is placed on a surface with a pattern that could be a table or a desk. The background is nondescript and does not provide any additional context or information. [Image 4] The image appears to be a screenshot of a computer interface, possibly from a web page or a software application. There is a blank area where text or content would typically be displayed, suggesting that the content is not visible or has been removed. The interface has a simple design with a white background and a grey border. There are no visible texts, logos, or other distinguishing features tha [Image 5] The image appears to be a screenshot of a computer interface, possibly from a word processing or document editing program. The central part of the image shows a blank document with a white background and a gray border. There are no visible texts, logos, or other distinguishing features that would indicate the type of document or its content. The interface elements suggest that this is a digital do