J.P. Morgan
J.P. Morgan
Facebook
Expecting Strong Advertising Traction to Build Toward
Year-End & Into '14; Reiterate Overweight, PT to $53
We are incrementally positive on Facebook shares as we believe advertising traction
across both Mobile and Desktop continues to build into year-end and 2014. 2Q13
marked an inflection point in advertiser demand and ad quality for Facebook, which
enabled the company to increase inventory while simultaneously realizing higher
pricing. We believe that momentum in the ad platform continues as marketer feedback
around Mobile, News Feed, and FBX continues to improve along with ROI. We are
raising our Mobile and Desktop News Feed estimates going forward, and we
project Mobile will surpass 50% of Facebook's ad revenue in 4Q13 and represent
60% of ad revenue in 2014. We reiterate our Overweight rating and are raising
our price target from $44 to $53.
• Seeing a broader advertiser base in 3Q. During 3Q we believe Facebook has
expanded its advertiser base, with a notable pick-up in Entertainment industry
ads across TV shows, movies, and console game launches. These ads often
feature click-to-play video—which bodes well for Facebook's likely more formal
launch of News Feed video ads in coming months—and they likely command
premium pricing based on guaranteed timing and the more advanced format.
• FBX ramping up. The Facebook Exchange (FBX) was a small contributor in
2Q, but we believe it will become an increasingly important part of Facebook's
ad platform as re-targeted ads move further into the Desktop and Mobile News
Feeds. Our anecdotal checks suggest that FBX ads have increased notably in the
Desktop Right Rail—often representing the majority of ads shown—and marketer
feedback after a few months of FBX in the Desktop News Feed is positive. Triggit
data across 90 campaigns and 4.9B impressions suggests increased FBX ads in the
Desktop News Feed and increased adoption of dynamic ads are driving a 27x
increase in CTRs and a 50% decrease in eCPC (implying a 13-14x increase in
CPMs) since the end of 2012.
• Estimate and PT increases. Mobile estimates in our bottom-up model increase to
$2.968 in 2013 and $5.95B in 2014, up from $2.838 and $5.098 previously,
increases of 3% and 12%. We now project 2013 and 2014 non-GAAP EPS of $0.76
and $1.09. We reiterate our Overweight rating and are raising our price target
from $44 to $53 based on the average of our DCF analysis ($56), 17x 2015E
EBITDA ($56), and 33x 2015 non-CAAP EPS ($47).
Facebook Inc. (FB;FB US)
FYE Dec 2012A 2013E 2013E (Prey) (Corr)
EPS - Repotted (S)
01 (Mar) 0.12 0.12A 0.12A
02 (Jun) 0.12 0.19A 0.19A
03 (Sep) 0.12 0.19 0.20
04 (Dec) 0.17 0.23 0.24
FY 0.54 0.74 0.76 0.98 1.09 1.25
CONSENSUS_EPS
Bloomberg EPS FY (5) 0.51 - 0.71 0.95 1.26
Source: Company data. Bloomberg. J.P. Morgan estimates. 2014E 2014E (Prev) (Curr) 2015E 2015E (Prey) (Cur')
1.43 North America Equity Research
12 September 2013
Overweight
FB, FB US
Pike: $45.04
A Price Target: $53.00
Previous: $44.00
Internet
Doug Anmuth AC
Bloomberg JPMA ANMUTH cGO>
Kalzad Gotta, CFA
Bo Nam
Diana R Kluger
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Price Performance
4
Is
Sepl2 Ost.12 IbM3 AMI MO3
Fe stare price 0)
S1P500 (tamed)
YTD 1m 3m 12m
Abe 609% 17.0% 87.4% 131.8
%
Rel 45.4% 17.1% 815% 114.0
%
Company Data
Price (5) 45.04
Date Of Price 11 Sep 13
52-week Range (5) 45.09-18.80
Market Cap ($ mn) 110,393.00
Fiscal Year End Dee
Shares 0/S (mn) 2,451
Price Target ($) 53.00
Price Target End Date 31-Dec-14
See page 17 for analyst certification and important disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Asa result, investors should be aware that
the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single
factor in making their investment decision.
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
EFTA01104689
Dou Animal North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P. Morgan
Expecting Strong Advertising Traction to
Build Toward Year-End and Into 2014;
Reiterate Overweight, Price Target to $53
We are incrementally positive on Facebook shares as we believe advertising traction
across both Mobile and Desktop continues to build into year-end and 2014. 2Q13
marked an inflection point in advertiser demand and ad quality for Facebook, which
enabled the company to increase inventory while simultaneously realizing higher
pricing. We believe that momentum in the ad platform continues as marketer
feedback around Mobile, News Feed, and FBX continues to improve along with
ROI. We do not believe ongoing strength is attributable to one single driver, but
rather the combined impact of stronger sales efforts, improved advertiser education,
better tracking and measurement, and simplified ad formats.
During 3Q we believe Facebook has expanded its advertiser base, with a notable
pick-up in Entertainment industry ads across TV shows, movies, and console
game launches. These ads often feature click-to-play video—which bodes well for
Facebook's likely more formal launch of News Feed video ads in coming months—
and they likely command premium pricing based on guaranteed timing and the more
advanced format.
The Facebook Exchange (FBX) was a small contributor in 2Q, but we believe it
will become an increasingly important part of Facebook's ad platform as re-
targeted ads move further into the Desktop and Mobile News Feeds. Our
anecdotal checks suggest that FBX ads have increased notably in the Desktop Right
Rail—often representing the majority of ads shown—and marketer feedback after a
few months of FBX in the Desktop News Feed is positive. Triggit data across 90
campaigns and 4.9B impressions suggests increased FBX ads in the Desktop News
Feed and increased adoption of dynamic ads are driving a 27x increase in click-
through rates (CTR) and a 50% decrease in eCPC (implying a 13-14x increase in
CPMs) since the end of 2012. Desktop News Feed FBX ads began in May of this
year and they are becoming more prevalent, but we would also expect them to extend
into the Mobile News Feed in coming months, thereby increasing the relevance and
quality of mobile ads. Advertiser targeting should also improve going forward as
Custom Audiences becomes easier to use.
We are raising our Mobile and Desktop News Feed estimates going fonvard,
and we project Mobile will surpass 50% of Facebook's ad revenue in 4Q13 and
represent 60% of ad revenue in 2014. Mobile estimates in our bottom-up model
increase to $2.96B in 2013 and $5.95B in 2014, up from $2.83B and $5.09B
previously, increases of 3% and 12%. We remain positive on Facebook shares as
user engagement remains strong with mobile more than offsetting desktop declines,
and Facebook still early in its overall advertising trajectory. We reiterate our
Overweight rating and are raising our price target from $44 to $53 based on the
average of our DCF analysis ($56), 17x 2015E EBITDA ($56), and 33x 2015 non-
GAAP EPS ($47).
2
EFTA01104690
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Adjusting Estimates
Overall: We am raising our overall Facebook revenue, EBITDA, and EPS estimates
as we are increasingly optimistic on Facebook's ability to monetize the News Feed,
particularly in Mobile. Overall, our 2013 and 2014 estimates for revenue increase
by 2-3% and EBITDA increases by 12%. See Figure I below for more details.
Figure 1: J.P. Mor an's Revised Facebook Estimates
FK•boolc
itereseee 3013 NYE
Old Now 4013491E
On NIINI 2913 JPIE
Old New 20144940E
Old Mow 2015 AIME
Old Now
Odereslag Revenue 14293 1.762 1.852 1097 e469 6493 0430 ABM 11.161 12426
WV &oath at% 01.3% 469% 574% 616% 664% J61% 479% 26.4% 290%
% ce7v5 de 5.5% 74% 3.1% 124% 14.9%
MOS Revenue 601 842 996 1.091 2829 2961 5482 5,963 7.587 9.9)3
Y/Y09:591 4294% 453.6% 225,7% 2516% 502.5% 531714 WO% 1070% 490% 49.6%
%Nevi 440 46% 9.5% 4.7% 199% 17.4%
0461.16.TolAIR.24 868 910 951 1.0% 3360 3432 3.738 3.945 3.575 3.923
WYGe401 49% -26% 45% 4.7% -3.5% 10% 21% 54% 44% .06%
%569 vs 00 2.5% 52% 2.0% 55% 9.7%
Deddte RI 0M Rail Rev NO 620 646 646 2001 2006 2269 2209 1.972 1.972
WI Growth -260% -268% -24.7% -243% -24.6% -24.6% -40 2% -142% 419% 439%
%1900301 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00% 00%
044.4.7016444 Ned Rye 261 261 311 361 994 1.066 1 ASO 1.667 IA00 1:162
1710.totiM 241.4% 2701% 027% MO% 200.9% 2869% 159% .56.5% wetc 47.0%
%this oif 94% 160% 7,2% 14.3% 21.7%
Payeenia Renews 2CCI 201 201 201 831 831 798 738 762 762
AY Ciente 154% 193% -21.4% 41.4% 2.6% 29,4 42% -92% 42% 42%
% /419 vs de 00% 0,0% 0,0% 0.0% 00%
TolaIRK4ain IASI 1.956 2.153 2.298 7.320 7524 9.610 101806 11.924 13.9$1.
7.70•916. 40.2% 64,9% 359% 410% 438% 479% 31.4% 420% 24.0% 27.2%
%569 vs. 031 3.1% 6,7% 2.9% 11.1% 140%
40110.4 LOIS 1011 1.182 1.247 4.056 4.145 5.102 5.727 6.392 7433
Y4'00;41'. 494% 527% 234% 299% 394% 425% 25496 362% 251% 290%
Mem rep SSA% 542% 549% 54.3% 564% SSIK 510% 53.8% 516% 540%
% dun. al 24% 6.5% 2.2% 112% 147%
PF EPS 5019 5020 5023 5024 50.74 50.76 5098 51.09 51.25 51.43
44.50torAh 58.5% 636% 339% 42.7% 380% 41.9% 322% 431% 27.6% 315%
% <VW, al 3.1% 13,6% le% 11.9% 144%
Source: J.P. Morgan estmates, Company data.
Simplified Ad Formats and Broader Advertiser Base
We think Facebook's efforts to simplify its ad formats have removed friction for
marketers and helped create more News Feed-eligible ads, thereby spurring the
advertising auction process. Beyond moving from 27 to 13 ad formats, the
company recently announced it was standardizing image sizes for ads, making
them consistent across all types of formats, across Desktop and Mobile.
Faccbook has also increased the image sizes for its Page Post link ads on desktop
which we think should drive higher click-through rates and engagement.
We believe Facebook's advertiser base continues to widen and think advertisers in
the Entertainment category have increased their Facebook ad spend in 3Q, likely due
to the heavy summer movie season as well as advertisements around the fall TV
lineup. Examples of entertainment advertisers in 3Q include ads for the movies
Getanay and Lone Ranger, TV shows The Million Second Quiz and Masters ofSer,
as well as Take Two's upcoming release of the console game Grand Theft Auto V.
3
EFTA01104691
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
We also expect Facebook's 4Q revenue growth to be bolstered by the retail vertical
as we believe large retailers likely made significant strides in terms of measuring the
ROI of their Facebook ad spend over the last year.
Expect FBX To Drive Continued Yield Improvements On
Desktop... Mobile Next?
While Facebook has indicated that FBX represents a relatively small percentage of
its ad revenue, we expect FBX to drive meaningful yield improvements — particularly
on Desktop Right Rail — over time. We believe FBX remains relatively
underpenetrated even among direct response advertisers and we expect additional
advertiser adoption to drive yield increases as FBX ads offer higher ROI than many
other direct response channels. According to Triggit, a Facebook Preferred
Marketing Developer (PMD), FBX ads are currently adopted by just 9% of the
Internet Retailer Top 500 sites and less than 7% of the top 10k Alexa sites. We
note that Facebook currently requires PMDs (Preferred Marketing Developers) to
individually approve clients for FBX ads and we expect further streamlining of its
ad-buying process.
Triggit data across 90 campaigns and 4.9B impressions suggests increased FBX ads
in the Desktop News Feed and increased adoption of dynamic ads are driving a 27x
increase in CTRs and a 50% decrease in eCPC (implying a 13-14x increase in
CPMs) since the end of 2012. Note that FBX ads in the Desktop News Feed went
live in early May 2013, after an initial test phase. We believe Facebook's Desktop
Right Rail ads have CPMs of -$0.40 in the U.S though our checks suggest that
industry CPMs for re-targeting are closer to -42.00, a significant gap that we believe
FBX can help tighten over time as more advertisers shift to FBX and FBX ads
increasingly appear in the News Feed going forward.
Based on ow anecdotal checks, we believe FBX ads now represent the majority of
Desktop Right Rail ads, up significantly over the last few quarters. We also believe
FBX ads are becoming more prevalent in the Desktop News Feed with sites like
Booking.com and other OTAs increasing their ad exposure in the Desktop News
Feed. We believe Facebook is also working on adding Mobile News Feed ads into its
exchange.
Video Ads A Potential Upside Driver in 2014
We believe video ads can be a significant driver of growth for Facebook over time.
According to eMarketer, digital video ad spend will reach $4.1B in 2013, up 41%
Y/Y, and it will continue be one of the fastest growing segments of online
advertising. While video ads already exist in both the desktop and mobile News
Feeds, they are primarily click-to-play Page Post ads. Industry publications such as
AdAge have suggested that Facebook is working with advertisers to launch auto-play
video ads in the Desktop and Mobile News Feed for up to $1M-S2.4M per day.
Advertiser demand for Facebook video ads appears to be strong, though the launch of
auto-play video ads has seemingly been repeatedly delayed as Facebook ensures it
has the necessary technology backbone in place to support higher-bandwidth video
ads while maintaining the user experience on the site. We think it is critical that
Facebook maintains the user experience, and recent delays do not change our
view that video ads will drive increased demand and higher pricing.
4
EFTA01104692
Dou Amish North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Revisiting Our Bottom-Up Advertising Build
In this section, we walk through revised estimates in our bottom-up advertising
build which is based on three segments: I) Mobile News Feed; 2) Desktop News
Feed; and 3) Desktop Right Rail. While overall ad revenue remains key, we
believe the bottom-up build is useful for capturing the ongoing mix-shift from web to
mobile that generally results in fewer impressions, but higher overall eCPMs.
5
EFTA01104693
DOU Plineith NO7111 ArneriCa EquIty Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 2: Facebook Bottom-Up Advertising Build
$ In millions except per user ligures
nMllnnt p14740rAm1 2011A 10124 20124 30124 24 2012A 10134 20134 138 38 20136 2011E 2015E
Mobile Mt» Fe»
339
0.7 480
070
000
0
.
MA
MA
10»
MA
MA
103
NM
NM
-
190 51$
000
017
72
1222
MA
MA
$648
MA
M4
1402
3050
NM
NM
3049
$11.8 574
096
055
200
27145
MA
1507%
55.52
MA
.20%
$027
3300
NM
500%
3156
31520 642
100
100
642
$9/7744
MA
Im%
55.18
MA
.6%
$048
3366
MA
22%
3332
33017 566 006
083
241
04354
1531
2024
3366
81.26
8.11Q1 rle
1.07
166
801
72.077
NM
22%
55.18
MA
0%
2432
3168
NM
28%
»15
33715 716
1.12
1.18
»37
94448
5397%
37%
$4193
1%
34%
$024
3971
1843%
109%
3718
14512 617
120
125
1271
1182»
324%
23%
$720
37%
.1%
$099
$8.56
186%
42%
39.15
36413 P32
128
130
1501
138.017
134%
18%
8710
53%
10%
$121
$15.13
319%
76%
111.85
31.0091 nm
1.17
120
1.155
421.710
377%
$7.02
32%
5368
$125e
245%
38 11
3211011 1.033
1.40
1.35
1953
712.884
69%
24.35
19%
5579
32003
59%
31631
»NU 1231
1.56
1.42
2710
010.264
39%
»SO
1»
17.23
$26.75
44%
32439
38.103.4 Anyer WW' VOIsUeartey
IneeeproMeNtice
7410 Mnnmorse»
7440 Impreieions In Polo0
171, G.0,e,
GO Grme
4121114
Y/Y Cm,»
00 Dux»
Renm36.346
Item; enengmem6441.47 (mtion4)
2/2020,a,
00•34,40
AniPerre11ktertree ,6221m1b215)
Mo6114114»1444 Rciwo
Ire Greeä3
oes Ase*
% of Total MReer»
giliialleffialg
emene kWh
VeleNtertey
koprossions ,Vh41.13a
Total limecoMorciOst
Total lopetalees In Pmtod
Y/Y Gran»
GO Gabe.
CIA
Y/Y Ono»
00 Ortga.
ihmembieu
Pes» »eng nnore090 Mim')
YeGrowle
GO Gram
An Pone1Reeroodley (»Ions) 1 803
1.07
005
44
3981
NM
NM
11.50
NM
NM
3001
NM
M4
- 1%
838
1.03
017
145
13.168
NM
NM
$1.75
NM
NM
$003
3050
NM
M4
3025 1133%
14%
867
132
016
310
29166
NM
114%
»71
NM
55%
1009
3103
NM
100%
WM 107%
23%
890 100
060
534
48.594
MA
73%
$1.50
MA
29%
10.19
12.74
NM
171%
3157 11%
643
1.03
030
257
93309
1293
1033
32 74
30 75 NM
22%
30%
910
096 070
612
55.037
NM
IN
1136
NM
.411
1020
31 34
NM
40%
3205
$184.4 NM
76%
41%
929
090
080
UI
81502
363%
17%
1390
123%
16%
tose
3386
671%
184%
3261
$2372 454%
28%
48%
915
085
026
682
62.790
123%
3%
$4.50
66%
15%
$030
3229
129%
-47%
3307
12821 257%
30%
en
962
ere 0.90
676
62.158
28%
.7%
1510
66%
29%
3037
$525
103%
143%
eses 4140.5 531%
44%
905
oer 085
660
240947
157%
$4.42
51%
31 14
3310
13%
$292
$1/414 101%
00%
90)
eeo 0.95
756
276.101
15%
58030
39%
31 86
$598
93%
$454
11,8548 50%
CO%
1939
ere
1.03
764
278.803
1%
$7.08
/7%
St»
$4.72
24%
33»
11251.4 04•10.» Ne» 14441 Ulme» $4.0 3208 176.2 1670.1 12243
Y/Y Gen»
GO Gretel
% of To» 44 »nonoe
2444141049 Fad Roveouo [Mobile • Cosklose 14.0 286%
2%
$34.9 237%
7%
$228.3 123%
13%
$475.7 6%
8744.9 NM
8%
15%
8557.9 932%
29%
15%
1883.5 271%
HM
18%
811243 112%
28%
17%.
81= 287%
18%
540248 65%
II%
1722412 18%
15%
110956.0
Y/7 Cm.» NM NM 292% 441% 89% 43%
00 Grtue. 484% 551% 106% 17% t'6% 26% 29%
04410op Re Rd
Ase> 1.34.Us 690 203 836 867 »0 243 910 929 945 962 935 905 1.039
VOIsUrs.Day 1.04 1.07 103 1.02 1.00 1.03 096 090 026 0.78 087 080 070
IncreoproMCoce 64.) 36.9 ee2 61.9 77.8 64.5 79.7 83.0 830 850 832 75.0 750
Total »smeen:30e 43 119 50 506 SO 864 54.728 69269 56034 69.632 69.359 68250 63.810 64222 59.719 64.5»
To4111»nneilons In Ptdod 15.738.369 4.596919 4428304 4980291 6.303.482 20.508.186 6.266286 6.484512 $278.1111 5.870.521 24300.805 21.797.414 1%914.303
171, Goa* 34% 13% 26% 44% 30% 36% 40% 26% 27% 42% -9%
GO Mose 5% 7% 0% 27% 4% 3% .3%
4CPM $029 $0.19 $021 38.17 $0.14 $0.17 $0.11 $0.11 $0.10 $0.11 $0.11 WM $4,19
171, Cm.» 2% 5% -74% 41% -74% AM 47% 42% 49% -39% es otrerese. 42% 70% -77% -V% -79% -8% 10%
ReernoMAU 357 2166 81.16 1039 1436 3.19 30.78 14.77) 14813 10.67 $283 9230 61.90
An Pono3174nonatOst tentkail 1804 3952 51032 $9,43 $938 9966 $763 57.73 $682 37.02 $730 5627 56.40
Desimp Reell 14741 Rommee 13,154.0 »KO $957.1 5857.7 54153.3 41534.1 8687.1 3705.5 $627.9 45.8, $29663 12288.7 11971.5
llY Cm.*
00 Geem 0 30%
404 234e
71% 7%
-10% .744
.1% 12% -er%
40% -264h
3% .11% 3% -ze,4 44% 44%
%of Tolie4.4 Rian,r,Q 96% 79% 64% 83% 56% 44% 16% 31% 40% 23% IS%
74141 Desktop Rovonuo PCs Food 13.1540 »720 1960.2 1836.0 11.023.3 13.8009 $871.5 $843.4 3•10.5 11.005.3 31731.6 33.9493 139211
Y/Y »von 69% 37% 26% II% 9% 21% 0% .4% -3% -2% 0% 4%
GGGnreh 6% 12% 6% I» .75% 8% .3% 17%
%of741444 Roten., 100% 100% 99% 84% 77% 89% 70% 39% 62% 48% 93% 40% 31%
Mex.-K*4MM $4.$0 11.00 im? 11.71. $1.15 2452 NM $122 1436 21.05 $393 3396 3378
Wr Germ 7% 3% 4% 4% •113 -72% -13% 47% -8% -12% -1% .5%
TOTAL ADVIERTSING
727 873 8211 961 1.032 ep 1.(63 1.133 1.177 1.216 1.147 1222 1.482 meng, $Q47711.40sUme,02y 1.31 1.15 1.37 1.46 1.49 142 1.51 1.51 1.55 136 1.53 1.70 1.78
IncrospoWv»Ver 45 43 40 39 46 42 43 42 99 35 40 26 22
rees lereent+0,PD32 43.119 50.549 51.027 Mim 70.452 56.232 71.044 72.769 70203 66.585 70.037 82.428 58.034
Wes meremmet In P44470 19738208 4900500 4943944 5.039024 6411.140 20.030.449 9394.000 11440.182 4.454.444 1079737 2591111.183 22714.299 21.113.372
WYCeem 34% 18% 27% 46% 31% »% 43% 28% 4% 24% 41% .7%
0126.6697 5% r% 8% 27% 0% 4% .3% 4%
CM »29 »18 $021 $022 $021 *21 $0.19 $024 $027 $0.35 $028 14343 $4301
viffam..* 2% 9% 7% .4% 3% 3% 13% 26% 67% 27% 66% 39%
670 Ortete 42% 13% 1% -4% -0% 24% 13% 27%
70741.ADVIOITM110 REVENUE 331841 $072.0 1102.0 11006.0 113212 842799 11246.0 315010 11.7622 12.000 $41033 WM 9 »WM Y/Y Gros» 69% 41% 39% 43% 61% 61% 58% 56% 49% 30%
04.FX Y/Y Gros* 0% 39% 33% 43% 43% 0% 43% 63% 61% 58% 56% 4914 30%
00 Gabe. -9% 74% 9% 22% -6% 28% 10% 20%
%44 Tee Ad Avenue 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ICO% 100% 100% 103%
Nonn Fades 4 % 44 %ei inecom 009% 032% 1.11% 1.66% 1% 13)0% 234% 2.78% 330% 2.50% 4.34% sm Noe4 4405 /Os % olcoloi »inlna> 07% 15% 210% 358% 17.4%. 448% 559% 612% 692% 002% 76.9% 246%
Source: Stelpany regle and J.P. Magen estimtet
6
EFTA01104694
Dom Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
As shown in Figure 3 below, we expect Facebook to continue to benefit from overall
user (MAUs) and engagement (visits/user/day) growth as mobile drives users and
frequency of visits. Impressions per visit and overall impression volume is likely to
come down, but we expect higher eCPMs on mobile and improving yield on
desktop to more than offset the negative impacts of declining overall
impressions in 2014 and 2015. We think further upside to our estimates could come
from: 1) increases in mobile and ad load in overseas markets; 2) if the Facebook
Exchange and other new targeting tools drive a rebound in Desktop Right Rail CPMs
and stabilize Desktop revenue; and 3) video ads.
Figure 3: Facebook Total Ad Revenue Growth Drivers
In millions except per user Fig res
on iniOnS eit:CI print Ism) 2061*
TOTAL AtivER119003
727
131
46
43,119
19718.389
$0.20
03.114.0 673
135
49
50.549
4400.030
34%
9%
10.19
2%
.72%
01721 928
137
40
51.027
4.643.484
15%
7%
10.21
73%
33.0 961
145
39
55.341
5036.036
27%
$022
ne
/14
11416.0 1.002
1.49
46
70.452
9411.140
46%
2714
3921
.
11329,0 951
1.42
42
56432
20490949
If%
3021
3%
34,2794. 1.083
1.51
43
71.044
6.394.000
3916
0.19
3%
-6%
$4245.0 1.1$)
151
42
72.769
6.640.162
43%
30.24
13%
24%
31.0091 tor
1.55
39
70.203
6.451.664
28%
10.27
26%
13%
$1.7612.2 1,216
1 56
35
55.92,6
6.070.717
.5%
US$
67%
27%
$2406.1 1.147
153
40
70.037
25.563.581
2"
30.21
27%
10.103.1 1.322
1,70
26
82.426
22784399
-II%
10.43
66%
0.017.9 1.462
1.78
22
56034
21.182.387
50.11
30%
112.924% %Yew/4109%
11919t190.04/
orninevo-nMs/11.1x4
TOW lenreseatn141Y/
Taal Impressions In Pitied
WY Groom
00 Crony,
CPU
Y/Y &Clan
OO otos*
TOTAL ADVIRT004011393 11113
Y/YG/0“Th 60% 37% 28% 36% 47% 36% 43% 67% 67% 58% 55% 46% 36%
er4X WY 670.1111 0% 18% 33% 43% 43% 0% 4% 61% 61% 58% 56% 46% 30%
00 0A.411 -47% 14% 9% 22% -1/6 20% KS 20%
% of Taal la0 Revalue 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1131% 100% 1120% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1060%
New Feed 44 0% 011:0311moreamons 000% 0.32% 1.11% 1,58% 1% 1.99% 231% t78% 33)% 2.59% 4.34% 510%
New Fee 48 a % elms1124..eflue 0.1% 3.5% 210% 36.0%. 17.4% 441% 559% 64.2% 692%, 60.7%. 76.9% 44.0%
Source: Company reports and JP. Morgan ashrams. 1012A 2012A 30121 40124 2012.4 1013.1 2013/1 3013E 4013E 2013E 2014E 2016E
Facebook posted strongly accelerating ad revenue growth in 2Q 13, driven primarily
by mobile ads. While increasing Facebook's overall share of ad budgets across both
desktop and mobile is critical, we expect mobile to remain the primary focus.
Facebook also sometimes has discretion around directing certain campaigns
across formats, and we believe the highest quality ads and especially those that
point to strong mobile sites will be pushed toward the Mobile News Feed.
Mobile benefiting from several growth drivers
As shown in Figure 4 below, we expect Mobile to surpass Desktop ad revenue in
4Q13. We remain optimistic on Mobile ad formats including Sponsored Stories,
Promoted Posts, App-Install Ads, and others as Mobile ads have higher CFRs and
significantly higher eCPMs relative to Desktop.
7
EFTA01104695
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 4: Facebook Ad Revenue by Format
S in millions
18.000
16.000
14.000
12.000
10.000
8,0:0
6,000
4,000
2,000
2011A 2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E
• Mobile News Feed • Desktop News Feed •Desktop Right Ral
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan emmates
As shown in Figure 5 below, we expect mobile to continue witnessing very strong
growth driven by increases in users, visit frequency, and ad load (impressions per
user visit). We believe newer ad formats have been adopted more quickly by
U.S. advertisers but international mobile ad load should increase over time. The
mix-shift toward international markets such as Asia and Rest Of World could drive
lower overall mobile eCPMs, but also greater impression volume.
Figure 5: Facebook Mobile Ad Revenue Build
$ In millions except per user figures
n %tons ewes. peruser Igures) 20114 1012A 24312A 3011A 44312A 2012A 1013A 9313/1 30131 40131 2013E 20149 20151
1/41910 118.49 End
330 490 616 574 642 566 716 716 847 032 804 1.033 1231 mouse. raw
Wstalso0Day 0.7 020 080 O.% 1.00 026 1.07 1.12 1.20 128 1.17 1.40 136
InreevonsMs41)444 040 0.17 0.56 1.00 0.61 1.05 1.18 1.2$ IS 1.20 1.95 142
Tc441000u6aprevosi 0 72 330 142 241 801 1037 1271 1501 1.156 1963 2710
mut Imeamslem Weeded • 1,722 27.568 Woe' 88.364 72.077 94.668 110908 138187 421.710 712284 949254
WY Groom MI MA NM MA MA 6397% 324% 131% 311% 69% 39%
00 Won* NM MA 1501% 114% 226 31% 23% 18%
4061 $0.011 14.08 08.52 $110 95.31 Sill %AO 57.20 V% 37.02 *35 %.00
MG/94M MA MA NM MA MA 1% 31% 53% 32% IP% 8%
OO Gros* MI MA .6% 0% 34% 4% 10%
RikenualAAU 14.03 50.02 3022 50.48 3054 50.52 5014 5099 $121 1.3.64 55.76 5723
Pe001400094/499410w1m1104/11 $060 040 3305 4360 44.06 59.71 %41.1 815.13. $12.58 42003 928.75
WY &clan Me MA NM MA NIA 1643% 196% 315% 245% 59% 44%
004406" MA MA 590% 22% 26% 109% 42% 76%
1515.585113ener5053(.41ons) - 50.49 41.65 sao2 Si 28 $4.15 47.18 5815 411% *II 41691 $24.30
1.01416 114/619903 Review* 50.6 $11.8 $152.0 $305.7 5469.6 6373.5 5665.4 5841.7 51110.6 52661.5 16.952.6 58.983A
WY Groom flu MI 45" 2.57% 631% 101% 60%
OO Grower 1193% 101% 22% 76% 28% 30%
% 91 704 40 Reveroe 1% 14% 2 11% 30% 41% 48% 6216 44% 60% 60%
Source: Company reports and JP. Morgan estimates.
Desktop yields should improve over time
We expect Facebook's desktop ad revenue to continue facing headwinds as users
shift their usage towards mobile. While desktop users are likely to continue growing,
we think a greater proportion of each user's Facebook usage is likely to shift toward
mobile, resulting in declining desktop engagement metrics such as visits/user or
minutes/user.
We expect Facebook's desktop impressions to decline beginning in 2014 as
increasing adoption of Desktop News Feed ads is more than offset by declining
usage of Facebook on the desktop. However, we are more optimistic on
improvements in desktop yield or eCPM as: 1) Facebook improves targeting
capability; 2) third-party data through FBX and Custom Audiences pushes Facebook
further down the purchase funnel, driving higher ROI and ad spend; and 3) social
8
EFTA01104696
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
still represents a small fraction of most advertiser budgets. Our checks suggest that
advertisers such as Zappos are having success with Desktop Right Rail ads at low
CPMs. We note that improvements in desktop yield in more mature markets may be
somewhat offset by impression growth in lower eCPM developing markets and as a
result our overall Desktop Right Rail eCPMs are essentially down for the next few
years. Higher yield through FBX and Custom Audiences could make our numbers
conservative.
Figure 6: Facebook's Desktop Advertising Revenue (News Feed and Right Rail) n insointa2= 60440 2011A 1012A 2012A 30121 4012A 20121 1013.3 20138 1013E 30138 2013E 20149 20159
50096 /450
8,601.80.170
Inc700-0M0Veer
181010-00040$014
10.01000046sInPwlad
WY Gn:80,
00 Coont
•CP18
19Y Grown
00000
Re 00.179)
Period 448000001ley Imlionll
Y/Y &clan
00074041
Inv 054:0 Renen950,0 94418,0
00008 Nan Feed Revenue 1.04 803
107
0.05
44
3901
Mg
'IA
3110
MA
MI
$0.01
MI
AM
-
KO 836
1.03
0.17
145
13,100
MA
MA
31.75
MA
MA
$003
$050
MA
MA
$0.25
Me 867
102
035
310
2010
NM
04%
32.71
NO
55%
$0.09
$1.00
NM
100%
WM
$702 860
1.00
0.80
634
40504
MA
73%
$3.50
MA
29%
$019
074
MA
174%
$1.07
$170.1 843
1.0)
0.30
257
93.900
$2.93
$033
$2.74
$0.75
32751 910
0.96
0.70
612
56,037
NM
73%
0335
NM
4%
$020
$1.36
NM
.60%
32.05
51$4.4 929
0.90
0.60
569
$1102
363%
11%
$3.10
12.3%
0%
1026
$371)
671%
184%
$2.61
$2771 915
085
0.85
02
10,700
123%
3%
$4.50
66%
0)6
$030
$229
129%
41%
Sser
MAI 962
0.76
0.90
676
0,151
28%
.7%
St*
46%
29%
$037
$355
103%
143%
$310
$3603 935
eer
0.05
OW
2•007
157%
Ma
51%
$1.14
0.10
13%
$2.92
$1.016.4 SOS
0.80
0.95
756
27%101
0%
WOO
36%
$1.86
$6.96
93%
$4.54
35,650,6 1.030
0.70
106
794
270100
1%
$7.00
17%
$1 a
$472
-21%
$535
0,951.6
19Y Grolom NM 932% 271% 112% 257% 55% 75%
00 0.080 310% 237% 723% 6% 29% 19% 28%
% 018400 4 1R454 4 uo 2% 7% 13% 6% 15% 15% 16% 1714, 16% 17% 15%
Taal Nom prod Revemar (14,0•10 4 0.583pl HO 334.0 3220.3 $47.7 $744.9 057.9 $8033 35,124.3 $14312 $4.026.8 37.00.2 3101510
WY Grown MIA NM 392% 205% 441% 69% 43%
00 00/.03 48/31 554% 100% 77% 60% 20 29%
0•1811op R19018211
A3*00901.1A1.71 $93 803 836 867 880 613 910 929 5135 962 935 595 1.039
154.55 4 4 0.0 1.04 107 1.03 1.02 1.00 1.03 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.78 087 080 070
100/4001030$1112ve 64.5 589 592 61.9 771 64.5 797 83,0 85.0 85,0 832 75.0 700
Tag Imweisio,003, 41119 50.506 50.861 51.728 69269 58034 69.632 69.359 68250 61810 68.222 59.719 54.560
Teo Impres8040 In 3,001 15.73330 406319 4.00.594 4.080.201 0303.482 20.508.386 6.20886 6.484.512 8.270.9116 5370.521 2410885 21397.414 19314.303
wY Groom 34% 17% 26% 44% 30% 36% 40% 26% 21% .12%
00 0.680 5% I% 8% 27% .3% -7%
0914 $.20 $0.111 feat $0.17 014 0.17 80.11 $0.11 0.19 30.11 UM 011 *so
WY Grown 2% 5% .14% 47% 44% NM 47% 42% .19% .8%
000,0.» -72% 10% -17% -27% 1916 .7% 4% 101
17603t7$01.1.12 $4.57 $148 $1.15 3039 9196 $4.19 50,76 076 9166 $087 $2.85 $2.30 $190
/00 170000 176030091)0y (011003) MU $9.52 51052 1943 5938 $966 $7.63 $7/3 96.82 1702 3/30 *27 3540
0010 Right RaN Revenue 33,154.0 11681 $057.1 8107.7 $10.3 58536.1 5647.1 MIA $07.9 $8450 $2.603 $2,286.7 $1,1713
YtY Grown 698 36% 23% 7% 40% 12% .21% .26% .27% .21% .29% .104 44%
000700 4% 0% 40% -7% .79% 3% -11% 3%
% cd Tam .010.6460 SO% 79% 641% 53% 55% 44% 36% 31% 40% 23% 15%
Source: company reParts.JP lAorgan estimates.
Investment Thesis, Valuation and Risks
Face book (Overweight: Price Target: $53.00)
Investment Thesis
We believe Facebook's virtual ownership of the social graph, strong competitive
moat, and focus on the user experience position the company to significantly
improve monetization over time and to become an enduring, blue-chip company built
for the long term. Facebook's massive reach and engagement continue to drive
network effects and its targeting abilities provide significant value to advertisers,
though it is still early. We believe Facebook's ad platform is just beginning to shift
EFTA01104697
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
toward more social ads with higher-quality formats, and it will become increasingly
valuable to advertisers.
Valuation
$53 Price Target. Our 2014 December year-end price target of $53 employs an
average of a DCF and multiples (EV/EBITDA and PIE) based valuation. We're using
this valuation approach as we believe it appropriately balances Facebook's valuation
relative to its growth and industry peers, while a DCF gives the company some credit
for the opportunity to improve monetization over the long term.
Our DCF results in a $56 price per share and employs an 11% WACC and 3% long
term growth rate. We expect Facebook to generate $32.16B in revenue in 2020 with
a 54.2% EBITDA margin.
Our EV/EBITDA valuation results in a $56 price per share and employs a 17x target
EV/EBITDA multiple on our 2015 EBITDA of $7.33B. We note that our I 7x 2015E
EBITDA target multiple is at a discount to its high-growth industry peers such as
Netflix (25.5x) and TripAdvisor (18x) but at a premium to other online advertising
peers such as Google (7x).
Our PIE valuation results in a $47 price per share and employs a 33x P/E multiple on
our 2015 PF EPS estimate of $1.43, which is below Facebook's 39%2012-15E PF
EPS CAGR.
Risks to Rating and Price Target
Downside risks include: I) user-first mentality could create short-term revenue risk
and volatility; 2) competition from purpose-driven social services; 3) advertiser ROI
on Facebook may remain difficult to measure; 4) privacy, security, and regulatory
risks; 5) competition for online and mobile ad dollars from Google, Yahoo!, and
other online advertising companies; and 6) dual-class share structure and Mark
Zuckerberg's control.
10
EFTA01104698
Doll Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 7: Facebook Income Statement
20114 10124 20124 3O12A 40124 2012A 10134 20134 3013E 4013E 2013E 2014E
Revenue
Cost of Revenue 3,711
851 1,058
273 1,184
295 1,262
317 1,585
387 5,089
1.272 1,458
404 1,813
454 1,955
489 2,298
563 7,524
1.910 10,686
2.682
Gross ProM 2,860 785 889 945 1,198 3,817 1,054 1,359 1,466 1,735 5,614 8.004
Operating Expenses
Marketing and Sales
Research and Developmen:
General and Administrative
Stock-based Compensation
Payroll Tax Related to SSC 383
273
225
217
6 136
93
72
103 135
112
127
1.106
152 149
142
129
179
(31) 162
157
143
184
29 582
504
471
1,572
150 175
165
151
170
20 235
186
144
224
8 260
225
156
235 306
257
177
276 976
833
628
900 1.389
1.261
876
962
Total Operating Expenses 1.104 404 1.632 568 675 3279 681 797 876 1.016 3.342 4.488
Operating Income 1.756 381 (743) 377 523 538 373 562 590 719 2,273 3,516
PF Operating Income 1,979 484 515 525 736 2,260 563 794 825 995 3,177 4,477
Other name (expense). ne' (61) 1 (22) (5) (18) (44) (20) (17) 0 21 (16) 103
Pre-tax Income 1.695 382 (765) 372 505 494 353 545 590 741 2,257 3,618
Income Taxes 695 177 (608) 431 441 441 134 212 260 326 932 1.520
Effective Tax Rate 41% 46% N/A 116% 87% 89% 38% 39% 44% 44% 41% 42%
GAM Net Income 1.000 205 (157) (59) 64 53 219 331 331 415 1,325 2.099
GAAP EPS 50.43 50.09 (50.08) ($0.02) $0.03 $0.02 $0.09 543.13 50.13 $0.16 $0.53 $0.82
Diluted Shares Out 2332 2.361 2.451 2.579 2.506 2.474 2.499 2.502 2.511 2.515 2.507 1557
Non-GAAP Pre-tax Income 1,918 485 493 520 718 2.216 543 777 825 1,016 3,161 4,580
Income Taxes 732 192 198 209 292 891 231 289 330 407 1.257 1.786
Effective Tax Rale 38% 00% 40% 40% 41% 00% 43% 37% 40% 40% 40% 39%
Nona3AAP Net Income 1,186 203 296 311 426 1.325 312 488 495 610 1,905 2,794
Non414AP EPS $0.51 50.12 50.12 50.12 50.17 50.54 50.12 50.19 50.20 50.24 50.76 51.09
EBITDA Calculation
Operating Income 1.756 381 (743) 377 523 538 373 562 590 719 2.273 3.516
Stock-based compensation 217 103 1.106 179 180 1.572 170 224 235 276 900 962
Payroll Tax Related to SBC 6 152 (31) 29 150 20 8
Depreciation and Amortization 323 110 139 176 224 649 241 230 246 252 968 1.250
EBITDA 2,302 594 654 701 960 2,909 804 1,024 1,071 1,247 4,115_ 5,727
20114 10124 20124 30124 40124 20124 10134 20134 3013E 4013E 2013E 2014E
TA, Growth
Revenue 88% 45% 32% 32% 40% 37% 38% 53% 55% 45% 48% 42%
Cosi olRevenue 73% 63% 43% 34% 59% 49% 48% 54% 54% 45% 50% 40%
Gross Profit 93% 39% 29% 31% 35% 33% 34% S3% 55% 45% 47% 43%
Marketing and Sales 110% 100% 48% 38% 40% 52% 29% 74% 75% 89% 68% 42%
Research and Oevelopmen: 102% 75% 78% 89% 97% 85% 77% 66% 58% 64% 65% 51%
General and AcVninislrative 101% 50% 123% 139% 120% 109% 110% 13% 21% 24% 33% 39%
Stock-based Compensation 985% 1371% 1628% 156% 142% 624% 65% -80% 31% 50% -42% 6%
Total Operatng Expenses 146% 130% 481% 85% 99% 197% 69% -51% 54% 50% 2% 34%
Total Operating Expenses (Ex4BC) 88% 71% 60% 57% 67% 63% 56% 52% 53% 53% 54% 43%
Operating Income 70% -2% -283% -9% -5% -69% -2% NM 57% 38% 322% 55%
PF Operating Income 88% 23% 8% 8% 18% 14% 16% 54% 57% 35% 41% 41%
GAAP Net Income 65% -12% -165% -139% -79% -95% 7% NM NM 548% NM 58%
GAAP EPS -13% -179% -125% -80% -95% 1% NM NM 546% NM 55%
Non-GAAP EPS 20% -1% 4% 2% 5% 1% 62% 63% 43% 42% 44%
EBITDA 93% 33% 19% 21% 32% 26% 35% 57% 53% 30% 43% 38%
Cla2 Growth
Revenue -6% 12% 7% 26% -8% 24% 8% 18%
Operating Income -30% -295% -151% 39% -29% 51% 5% 22%
PF Operating Income -22% 6% 2% 40% -24% 41% 4% 21%
EBITDA -18% 10% 7% 37% -16% 27% 5% 16%
% of Revenue
Cost of Revenue 22.9% 25.8% 24.9% 25.1% 24.4% 25.0% 27.7% 25.0% 25.0% 24.5% 25.4% 25.1%
Gross Profit 77.1% 74.2% 75.1% 74.9% 75.6% 75.0% 72.3% 75.0% 75.0% 75.5% 74.6% 74.9%
Marketing and Sales 10.3% 119% 11.4% 11.8% 10.2% 11.4% 12.0% 13.0% 13.3% 13.3% 13.0% 13.0%
Research and Development 7.4% 8.8% 9.5% 11.3% 9.9% 9.9% 11.3% 10.3% 11.5% 11.2% 11.1% 11.8%
General end Adenintstrative 6.1% 6.8% 10.7% 10.2% 9.0% 9.3% 10.4% 7.9% 8.0% 7.7% 8.4% 8.2%
Stock-based Compensation 5.8% 9.7% 93.4% 14.2% 11.6% 30.9% 11.7% 12.4% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 9.0%
Operating Income 47.3% 36.0% 42.8% 29.9% 33.0% 10.6% 25.6% 31.0% 30.2% 31.3% 30.2% 32.9%
PF Operating Income 53.3% 45.7% 43.5% 41.6% 46.4% 44.4% 38.6% 43.8% 42.2% 43.3% 42.2% 41.9%
EBITDA 62.0% 56.1% 55.2% 55.5% 60.6% 57.2% 55.1% 56.5% 54.8% 54.3% 55.1% 53.6%
Source: J.P. Morgan esamsles. Company data.
11
EFTA01104699
Doug Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 8: Facebook Revenue Segment Summary
2011A 1Q12A 2Q12A 3O12A 4012A 2012A 1Q13A 2O13A 3013E 4013E 2013E 2014E 2015E
• ummary
Advertising 3.154 672 992 1.08E 1.329 4,279 1.245 1.599 1.752 2.097 6.693 9.898 12.826
Y/Y Growth 69% 37% 28% 35% 41% 36% 43% 61% 68% 58% 56% 46% 30-!:,
Ex-FX Revenue (YM 38% 33% 43% 43% 43% 63%
0/0 Growth -8% 14% 9% 22% -6% 28% 10% 20%
% of Total Revenues 85% 82% 81% 86% 84% 81% 85% 88% 90% 91% 89% 93% 94%
Payments and Other Fees 557 186 192 176 256 810 213 214 203 201 831 788 762
WY Growth 425% 98% 61% 13% 36% 45% 15% 11% 15% -21% 3% -5% -3%
0/0 Growth -1% 3% -8% 45% -17% 0% -5% -1%
% of Total Revenues 15% 18% 16% 14% 16% 16% 15% 12% 10% 9% 11% 7% 6%
Total Revenue 3.711 1,058 1.184 1.262 1.585 5,089 1.458 1,813 1,955 2.298 7,524 10.686 13.589
WY Growth 88% 45% 32% 32% 40% 37% 38% 53% 55% 45% 48% 42% 27%
FX Impact (11) (36) (57) (23)
Ex-FX Revenue 09Y) 3.681 1.069 1.220 1.319 1.608 5216
WY Growth (Ex-FX) 86% 46% 36% 38% 42% 41%
O/0 Growth -6% 12% 7% 26% -8% 24% 8% 18%
Seasonality 21% 23% 25% 31% 19% 24% 26% 31%
US & Canada $11.50 $2.90 $3.20 $340 $4.08 $13.61 $3.50 $4.32 $4.24 $4.83 $16.95 $19.59 $22.64
Europe $5.61 $1.40 $1.43 $1.37 $1.71 $5.94 $1.60 $1.87 $1.82 $1.99 $7.33 $8.84 $10.43
Asia $2.08 $0.53 $0.55 $058 $0.69 $2.37 $0.64 $0.75 $0.78 $0.76 $2.96 $3.39 $3.86
Rest of World SI 56 $0.37 $0.44 $0.47 $0.56 $1.88 $0.50 $0.63 $0.96 $1.34 $3.54 $6.68 $8.03
Total 55.11 $1.21 $1.28 $1.29 $1.54 $5.35 $1.35 $1.60 $1.68 $1.89 $6.56 $8.09 $9.17
WY Growth
US & Canada 33% 17% 13% 22% 28% 18% 21% 35% 25% 18% 25% 16% 16%
Europe 46% 18% 7% 2% 7% 6% 14% 31% 33% 16% 23% 21% 18%
Asia 40% 25% 11% 3% 22% 14% 21% 36% 36% 11% 25% 14% 14%
Rest of Woad 468% 18% 13% 18% 38% 21% 36% 44% 106% 138% 89% 88% 20%
Total 25% 7% 1% 4% 12% 5% 11% 25% 29% 23% 23% 23% 13%
CVO Growth
US & Canada -9% 10% 6% 20% -14% 23% -2% 14%
Europe -13% 2% -4% 25% -7% 17% -2% 9%
Asia -6% 4% 5% 19% -7% 18% 4% -3%
Rest of World -9% 19% 6% 21% -11% 26% 52% 40%
Total -12% 5% 1X 19% -12% 19% 4% 14%
Geographic Revenue Breakdown
Based on User Location
US & Canada 1.914 525 590 637 780 2.532 679 848 840 963 3.330 3.957 4.649
Europe 1.155 328 346 341 440 1.455 423 505 499 552 1.979 2.518 3.090
Asia 363 118 135 154 198 605 197 247 271 280 998 1.397 1.863
Rest of World 278 87 113 130 167 497 159 213 342 503 1217 2.813 3.987
Total 3.711 1,058 1.184 1.262 1,585 5.089 1.458 1,813 1,955 2,298 7,524 10.686 13.589
% of Total
US & Canada 52% 50% 50% 50% 49% 50% 47% 47% 43% 42% 44% 37% 34%
Europe 31% 31% 29% 27% 28% 29% 29% 28% 26% 24% 26% 24% 23%
Asia 10% 11% 11% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 14% 12% 13% 13% 14%
Rest of World 8% 8% 10% 10% 11% 10% 11% 12% 17% 22% 16% 26% 29%
Total 100% 100% 103% 100% 100% 100% 103% 100% 100% 100% 103% 100% 100%
WY Growth
US & Canada 67% 33% 25% 32% 38% 32% 29% 44% 32% 23% 32% 19% 17%
Europe 100% 43% 26% 18% 22% 26% 29% 46% 46% 25% 36% 27% 23%
Asia 145% 90% 65% 48% 72% 67% 67% 83% 78% 41% 65% 40% 33%
Rest of World 907% 89% 69% 68% 90% 79% 83% 88% 163% 201% 145% 131% 42%
Total 95% 45% 32% 32% 40% 37% 38% 53% 55% 45% 48% 42% 27%
Source: J.P. Morgan eserreles. Company data.
12
EFTA01104700
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 9: Facebook Revenue Driver - Advertising
2011A 1012A 2012A 3012A 4012A 2012A 1013A 2013A 3013E 4013E 2013E 2014E 2015E
10031 Summa
Global Advertising
Advertising Impressions (in billions) 18500 0.600 4,643 5.038 6,411 20,691 6.394 6.640 6.459 6.071 25.564 22.786 21.182
V7Y &Nona 41% 35% 18% 27% 46% 33% 39% 43% 28% -5% 24% -11% -7%
WO Growth 5% 1% 8% 27% 0% 4% -3% -6%
Average Cost Per Thousand (CPM) $020 $0.19 $021 $0.22 $0.21 $0.2t $0.19 $024 $0.27 $0.35 $0.26 30.43 $0.61
WY Growth 20% 1% 9% 7% -4% 4% 3% 13% 28% 67% 27% 66% 39%
WO Growth -12% 13% 1% -4% -6% 24% 13% 27%
Global Advertising Revenue 3.154 872 992 1.086 1,329 4279 1.245 1,599 1,752 2,097 6,693 9,698 12,826
V/Y &one 69% 37% 28% 36% 41% 36% 43% 61% 61% 58% 56% 48% 30%
WO Growth -8% 14% 9% 22% -6% 28% 10% 20%
MO 1 US & Canada
Advertising impressions On billions) 4.455 1.200 1.103 1212 1.337 4.852 1.265 1,169 1,175 1,283 4.893 4.697 4.509
Y/Y Growth 8% -2% 14% 16% 9% 5% 6% -3% -4% 1% -4% -4%
0/C? Growth 4% -8% 10% 10% -S% -8% 1% 9%
Average Cost Per Thousand (CPM) $0.36 $0.35 $0.43 $0.44 $0.47 SO 30.44 $0.62 $0.63 $0.67 $0.59 $0.77 $0.96
Y/Y Gone 16% 24% 20% 15% 20% 25% 42% 42% 43% 38% 30% 25%
01Q Growth -13% 24% 2% 6% -8% 41% 2% 7%
US & Canada Advertising Revenue 1.583 419 479 538 631 2,067 552 721 741 866 2,880 3,595 4,314
WY Growth 48% 26% 22% 36% 37% 31% 32% 51% 38% 37% 39% 25% 20%
% of Torsi Adverasuv Revenue 50% 48% 48% 50% 47% 48% 44% 45% 42% 41% 43% 36% 34%
Europe
Advertising Impressions (in billions) 5.549 1.800 1.715 1.638 2.045 7.1 2.341 2.326 2.162 2,250 9,080 9.535 9.535
Y/Y Growth 40% 26% 27% 27% 30% 30% 36% 32% 10% 26% 5% 0%
0/Q Growth 12% -5% -S56 25% 14% -1% -7% 4%
Average Cost Per Thousand (CPM) 30 '8 $0.15 $0.17 30.18 30.18 $0.17 $0.16 30.19 $0.20 $022 $0.19 $0.24 30.30
WY Growth -5% ,5% -S% -4% -5% 3% 13% 13% 20% 12% 25% 25%
O/C/Growth -20% 13% 5% 2% -14% 24% 5% 8%
Europe Advertising Revenue 1.002 274 294 295 374 1,237 367 451 440 494 1,752 2,299 2,874
Y/Y Growth 81% 33% 20% 20% 22% 23% 34% 53% 49% 32% 42% 31% 25%
% of TOW Advertising Revenue 32% 31% 30% 27% 28% 29% 29% 28% 25% 24% 26% 23% 22%
Asia
Advertising Impressions (in billions) 2.646 650 841 953 1.315 3.7 939 1.219 1.287 1,361 4,826 5.309 5,734
WY Growth 28% 25% 30% 80% 42% 45% 45% 35% 5% 28% 10% 8%
0/O Growth -11% 29% 13% 38% -29% 30% 6% 7%
Average Cost Per Thousand (GPM) $0.12 $0.15 $0.14 30.14 $0.13 $0.14 $0.19 30.16 $0.20 30.19 $0.19 $0.24 30.30
Y/Y Growth 38% 24% 16% -2% 17% 23% 35% 40% 45% 37% 28% 25%
Ci/O Growth 17% -10% 2% -6% 47% -1% 6% -5%
Aida Advertising Revenue 313 99 115 133 168 51 176 225 251 256 908 1,279 1,726
Y/Y Growth 119% 77% 55% 5f% 77% 65% 78% 96% 89% 52% 76% 41% 35%
% of Total Advertising Revenue 10% 11% 12% 12% 13% 12% 14% 14% 14% 12% 14% 13% 13%
Rest of World
Advertising Impressions (in billions) 3.089 950 984 1233 1.714 4.681 1.849 1.924 1.835 1.156 6.764 3.246 1.405
Y/Y Growth 77% 25% If% 93% 58% 95% 95% 49% -33% 39% -52% -57%
0/0 Growth 7% 4% 25% 39% 8% 4% -5% -37%
Average Cost Per Thousand (CPM) $0.08 $0.08 $0.11 30.10 $0.09 SO $0.08 $0.10 $0.17 $0.42 $0.17 $0.84 $2.79
IVY &theft? 5% 32% 22% 1% 14% -4% -1% 79% 357% 81% 393% 232%
0/0 Growth -6% 25% -6% -6% -11% 29% 66% 139%
ROW Advertising Revenue 256 80 104 120 156 460 150 202 320 481 1,153 2,726 3,913
WY Growth 934% 86% 65% 77% 95% 80% 88% 94% 166% 208% 151% 136% 44%
% of TOM! Advert/sus: Revenue 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 11% 12% 13% 18% 23% 17% 28% 31%
Source: J.P. Morgan a:Armies. Company data.
13
EFTA01104701
Dou Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 10: Facebook Revenue Drivers - Payments and Other Fees
2011A 1012A 2 1 2A 3012* 4012* 2012A 1013A 2013* 3013E 4013E 2013E 2014
9 UMM
040061 Payments an0 Other Nee
Total Payments and Other Fees 557 186 192 176 256 810 213 214 203 201 631 786 762
WY Growth 425% 98% 61% 73% 36% 45% 15% 11% 15% .21% 3% .5% -3%
CPO &oath .1% 3% 4% 45% -17% 0% .5% -1%
0.96
Revenue per Avg. DAV 51.38 50.37 $0.34 3031 5043 51.47 5033 30.31 $0.21 3027 $1.20 51.00 50.88
WYGroosa 232% 37% 16% .13% 6% 7% -10% -12% -9% -37% -19% -77% .12%
0/0 Growl, -8% -3% -13% 37% -22% -5% -10% -5%
Revenue Per Avg. MAU IAPJP1); 50.77 3021 5021 30.15 $025 30.85 5020 30.19 50.17 30.17 50.72 50.60 30.51
VP / GroorA 250% 46% 23% -12% 9% 11% .8% .9% .4% 33% .15% 48% .14%
010 G,Owth .7% .314 .13% 1R' -21% -4% .914 -414
201121 101721 2012A 3012A 4012A 7012A 101321 20134 3011E 4013E 2013E 2014E 2015E
FteMbook Payments Revenue From Zynge (30% lake: 436 120 103 SS 151 462 75 57 57 62 251 225 210
VP/Grove-1i 35% .6% -24% 23% .9% -3314 45% -35% -59% 46% •70% -6%
GOO Growth -2% -14% -15% 72% -50% -25% 1% 9%
% 01813 PA)ThOIX4 RO•totrO NA 64% 54% 50% 59% 57% 35% 26% 28% 31% 30% 29% 28%
% of FB Total Revenue NA I I% 9% 7% 10% 9% 6% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2%
Other Peyrnen% Ftevinue (excl. Zynge: 121 69 59SI 105 348 136 157 14$ 139 580 563 552
WYGrossa N.4 NA 720% 105% 189% 709% 78% 65% 32% 87% -3% -2%
OA) GrOWM 0% 34% 0% IP% 31% Id% -7% -5%
% 01 FB Pay0W44 116,10o0 NA 36% 46% 50% 41% 43% 65% 74% 72% 69% 70% 71% 72%
Total IMeebook Payments Revenue (Bottom-up 587 166 192 176 266 210 213 214 203 201 631 761 762
WY Grote", 425% 98% 61% 13% 36% 45% 15% 11% 15% -21% 3% -5% -3%
Grown -1% 3% -8% 45% -17% 0% .5% -1%
Source: J.P. Worgan estimates. Company data.
14
EFTA01104702
OOw Anmuth North America Equity Research
12 September 2013 J.P.Morgan
Figure 11: Facebook User Metrics B Region
Monthly Active U8.10 (MAU)
uS 6 Canaria
Europe
Asra
neseerwcoa
Total
YetAkcadb
us & Canada
Europe
Asia
Rest or Woad
Told
Cauca:at s
US.S Canada
Europe
Area
Rea Or Wed
row
Motidle MAU
WY Grimm
OO Grimm
% Mum MAUS
Mottle.Only MAU
WY Matte
00 Stettin
% dkla MAU*
W4b end Mall MAU
19Y Grime
Gramm
%dM19i MA1.4
Web MAU
YrY Geeate
OO Grow*
% «Mai MALS
Web Orly MAU 413 413 412 403 376 374 359 334 324 309 267 234
14% 5% 0% -5% -9% -9% -13% -18% -20% -18% -18% -14% -12% Geowfrr
00 Omni* 0% 0% -2% .7% -5% -8% .4% -4%
% Mum MAUS 499E 46% 43% 40% 38% 16% 32% 29% 27% 26 25% 19% 16%
OHM Active Vats (PAW
US 8 Comae 126 129 130 132 135 135 139 142 143 144 144 151 155
Europe 141 152 154 160 169 169 179 182 190 196 195 211 222
Ave 105 119 129 141 153 153 167 181 194 207 207 260 310
Rost of Wad i09 128 139 151 161 161 180 194 208 222 222 293 352
Total 483 526 662 584 618 618 665 699 736 768 768 912 1.039
Motile IMM 293 339 374 374 425 449
WY Gera 80%
12% 14% 14% 10% OO Gratin
% citrobae MAW 54% 54% 55% 55% 57% 57%
EMU as %of MAI
US 8. Canoes 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 71% 72% 72% 7 72% 74% 75%
EurOM 62% 64% 63% 63% 65% 65% 67% 67% 69% 7 70% 72% 74%
Aaa 50% 51% 51% 51% 51% 61% 62% 63% St% 55 55% 58% 80%
Rest of Wad 48% 51% 52% 52% 53% 53% 55% 56% 57% 5 58% 63% 66%
Total 57% 58% 58% 58% 59% 59% 60% 61% 61% 62% 65% 67%
YN Growth
LISS Canada 27% 23% 11% 6% 7% 7% 8% 9% 8% 7% 7% 5% 3%
Europe 34% 27% 27% 19% le% 18% 19% 16% 16% 8% 5%
AS 64% 65% 5214 44% 46% 46% 40% 40% 37% 35% 35% 26% 19%
Read World 91% 88% 59% 51% 48% 48% 43% 40% 38% 36% 38% 20% 22%
Tour 48% 41% 72% 28% 28% 28% 26% 27% 26% 24% 24% 19% /4%
Comity Mit
US 8 Canada 26% 25% 24% 23% 22% 22% 21% 20% 19% 19% 19% 17% 15%
Europe 30% 29% 28% 27% 27% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 25% 23% 21%
Area 22% 23% 23% 24% 25% 25% 25% 26% 28% 27% 27% 29% 20%
Regal Ward 23% 24% 25% 26% 28% 24% 27% 28% 28% 29% 29% 22% 34%
Teal 100% 100% /00% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 20 11A 1012A 20124 3012A 4012A 2012A 1013A 2013A 3413E 40113E 2013E 2014E 2015E
179
229
212
225
1345
re%
25%
54%
69%
39%
21%
27%
25%
27%
100%
432
76%
51%
56
287%
7%
374
63%
44%
747
33%
93% 183 188 189 193
239 246 253 261
234 256 277 298
245 268 288 301
901 955 1.007 1.056
12% 10% 7% 8%
19% 16% 14% 14%
50% 47% 41% 41%
53% 46% 39% 35%
33% 29% 26% 25%
20% 19% 19% 18%
27% 26% 25% 25%
26% 27% 28% 28%
27% 28% 29% 29%
100% 100% 100% 100%
488 643 604 660
69% 67% 61% 57%
12% 11% 11% 13%
54% 67% 80% 64%
83 102 126 157
277% 240% 215% ill%
43% 23% 24% 25%
9% 11% 13% 15%
405 441 476 523
52% 49% 42% 40%
8% 9% 8% 9%
45% 46% 47% 50%
818 853 881 899
24% 20% 16% 74%
4% 4% 3% 2%
91% 89% 67% 85% 193
261
299
304
1.091
8%
14%
41%
35%
25%
18%
25%
28%
29%
100%
680
57%
64%
157
71%
15%
5Z)
40%
50%
899
/4%
85% 195 198 199 200
269 272 276 27 279
319 339 359 37 375
327 346 366 38 383
1.110 1,155 1,199 1.2 1.238
7% 6% 5%
13% If% 9%
36% 33% 30%
33% 29% 27%
23% 21% 19% 4%
7%
26%
26%
17% 4%
7%
26%
26%
17%
18% 17% 17% 16% 78%
24% 24% 23% 23% 23%
29% 29% 30% 30% 30%
29% 30% 31% 31% 31%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
711 819 876 92 928
54% 51% 45% 37% 37%
10% 9% 7% 6%
88% 71% 73% 75 75%
189 219 248 266
128% 115% 96% 69% 69%
20% 16% 12% 8%
17% 19% 21% 2 . 22%
542 600 630 642 662
39% 36% 22% 27% 27%
7% 7% 5% 5%
51% 52% 53% 54 54%
921 93. 953 972 972
13% 0% 8% 8%
📷 Images in this document (20 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a page from a financial report or document, likely from JPMorgan Chase & Co., a multinational investment bank and financial services company. The page contains text and a graph. The text discusses Facebook's advertising revenue and growth, mentioning a "strong advertising trajectory" and the company's "relentless focus on building toward a $100 billion revenue run rate." The graph
[Image 2] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a page from a report or a presentation. The document is titled "JPMorgan Chase & Co." and includes a subtitle "Investment Banking." The text is dense and seems to discuss various topics related to investment banking, including market conditions, financial performance, and strategic considerations. There are no visible names, dates, places,
[Image 3] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a financial report or a summary of financial data. The document is titled "JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2015 Annual Report." It includes sections such as "Summary of Financial Condition," "Summary of Operations," and "Summary of Financial Performance." There are tables and figures with numerical data, including income statements and balance sheets.
[Image 4] The image shows a page from a document, which appears to be a report or a newsletter. The document is titled "JP Morgan" and includes a subtitle "The FX View." The text is organized into sections with headings such as "FX View," "FX View," and "FX View." The content of the document discusses topics related to financial markets and investment strategies. There are no visible names, dates, places, o
[Image 5] The image shows a page from a document, which appears to be a report or article from J.P. Morgan. The text discusses the advertising industry and the trends expected in the coming years. It mentions the growth of digital advertising and the impact of social media platforms. The document includes a table with data on advertising spending and growth rates. The text is written in English, and the doc
[Image 6] The image shows a page from a financial report or document. The page is titled "JPMorgan Chase & Co. Annual Report 2015." It contains a table with various financial data, including figures for income, expenses, and net income. The table is organized into columns with headers such as "Income," "Expenses," and "Net Income." The numbers are presented in a column format, and there are footnotes indica