1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
1
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2
REAL-TIME AND INTERACTIVE REAL-TIME TRANSCRIPT
3 ROUGH DRAFT DISCLAIMER
4 IMPORTANT NOTICE:
AGREEMENT OF PARTIES
5
6 We, the party working with real-time and rough
draft transcripts, understand that if we choose to
7 use the real-time rough draft screen or the
printout that we are doing so with the
8 understanding that the rough draft is a
noncertified copy.
9
We further agree not to share, give, copy, scan,
10 fax or in any way distribute this real-time rough
draft in any form (written or computerized) to any
11 party. However, our own experts, cocounsel and
staff may have limited internal use of same with
12 the understanding that we agree to destroy our
real-time rough draft and/or any computerized
13 form, if any, and replace it with the final
transcript upon its completion.
14
Case: Fortress v. Jeepers
15 Witness: David Lee
Date: June 1, 2011
16
REPORTER'S NOTE:
17 Since this deposition has been real-timed and is
in rough draft form, please be aware that there
18 may be discrepancies regarding page and line
number when comparing the real-time screen, the
19 rough draft, and the final transcript.
20 Also please be aware that the real-time screen and
the noncertified rough draft transcript may
21 contain untranslated steno, reporter's notes,
misspelled proper names, incorrect or missing Q/A
22 symbols or punctuation, and/or nonsensical English
word combinations. All such entries will be
23 correct on the final, certified transcript.
24 Court Reporter: Laurie A. Collins, RPR
Reporting Firm: Veritext Reporting Company
25
EFTA01165407
2
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. We're
on the record. My name is Chris Martin. I'm
3 the videographer for Veritext Court Reporting.
Today's date is June 1st, 2011, and the time
4 is 9:06 a.m.
This deposition is being held at the
5 office of Susman Godfrey, 560 Lexington 09:06:52
Avenue, New York, New York. The caption on
6 this case is Fortress VRF I LLC and Fortress
Value Recovery Fund LLC versus JEEPERS, Inc.,
7 respondent, and Financial Trust Company, Inc.,
and JEEPERS, Inc., counterclaimants and third -
8 party claimants. This is filed with the
Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service,
9 Reference Number 1425006537. The name of the
witness is David Lee.
10 And at this time will counsel please 09:07:27
introduce themselves for the record.
11 MR. SUSMAN: Harry Susman for JEEPERS
and FTC, along with Darren Indyke.
12 MR. ARFFA: I'm Allan Arffa from Paul,
Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. We
13 represent the claimants in this proceeding.
Also with me is Hannah Sholl from Paul, Weiss.
14 MS. JOHNSON: Megan Johnson from
Fortress.
15 MR. SIFFERT: John Siffert, Lankler 09:07:53
Siffert & Wohl LLP, on behalf of Dan Zwirn
16 personally.
MR. O'BRIEN: William O'Brien from
17 Cooley LLP for the Zwirn entity parties in the
case. There are several of them. I don't
18 know all the names.
MR. SIFFERT: And you're representing
19 the witness.
MR. O'BRIEN: And the witnesses.
20 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: At this time the 09:08:16
court reporter, Laurie Collins, will swear in
21 the witness.'
EXAMINATION BY
22 MR. SUSMAN:
Q. Mr. Lee, can you give us your address
23 for the record?
A. Sure. 5 Stokes Farm Road, Old Tappan,
24 New Jersey 07675.
Q. Have you given testimony before?
25 A. Yes. 09:08:48
Q. In connection with this Zwirn fund?
EFTA01165408
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
A. Yes.
Q. How many times?
A. I can't recall specifically, but more
likely than five.
Q. Did you give testimony to the SEC?
A. No.
Q. In what connection have you given
testimony? What proceedings?
A. Fund-related litigation with specific
counterparties involving transactions.
Q. Where do you currently work?
A. I have my own firm.
Q. What is the name of it?
A. Colford Capital, C-O-L-F-O-R-D.
Q. What does Colford Capital do?
A. It is a merchant banking operation
trying to find acquisitions and advising on
corporate transactions.
Q. How long has Colford been in existence?
A. Today is its first anniversary.
Q. Prior to working at Colford, where did
you work?
A. Dan Zwirn & Co.
Q. How long of a gap was there between
when you left D.B. Zwirn and Colford starting?
MR. O'BRIEN: It's Colford.
Q. I'm sorry, could you spell it? 09:10:21
A. C-O-L-F-O-R-D.
Q. Okay. Got you.
How long of a gap was there between
work -- when you quit at Zwirn or stopped working
and your starting up at Colford?
A. None.
Q. Does Dan Zwirn have any connection to
Colford?
A. No.
Q. Anyone who worked with you at the Zwirn 09:10:45
enterprise connected to Colford in any way?
A. On an affiliate basis, I do utilize the
services of an assistant that previously worked
with me at Dan Zwirn.
Q. Is it a he or she?
A. She.
Q. What's her name?
A. Alicia Ferraro.
Q. And when you say "an affiliate basis,"
does she work somewhere else most of the time? 09:11:18
A. Yes. She actually works for Dan Zwirn 09:09:12
09:09:51
EFTA01165409
4
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 as well.
Q. So you and Dan share the same
3 assistant?
A. Yes.
4 Q. And "assistant," is she your secretary?
A. Secretary.
5 Q. Do you and Dan share offices? 09:11:32
A. Yes.
6 Q. Where are those offices?
A. 595 Madison Avenue.
7 Q. Who else offices at 595 Madison?
A. A person named Todd Meister,
8 M-E-I-S-T-E-R.
Q. Did he have any connection to the Zwirn
9 operation?
A. No.
10 Q. And what business is it that Mr. Zwirn 09:12:01
runs out of 595 Madison Avenue?
11 A. As I understand it, he has an
investment firm called Alda Capital that has made
12 investments in various financial businesses.
(Mr. Schwartz joins proceedings.)
13 Q. Does Colford and Alda make investments
together?
14 A. No, we have not made any investments
together.
15 Q. Do you and Mr. Zwirn look at 09:12:31
investments together?
16 A. To date we have not looked at any
investments together.
17 Q. Are there plans to do so in the future?
A. Nothing definitive or concrete.
18 Q. I had asked you, I think, whether
Mr. Zwirn had any connection to Colford. I also
19 mean does he provide any financing or investor in
any way.
20 A. No 09:12:55
Q. How about does Fortress provide any
21 financing to Colford?
A. No.
22 Q. Can you give me your educational
background?
23 A. Wharton School, University of
Pennsylvania, 1986 bachelor's.
24 Q. And then after graduating from Wharton,
where did you go to work?
25 A. Dillon, Read. 09:13:35
Q. How long were you at Dillon, Read?
EFTA01165410
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
A.
4.
A.
4.
A. A little under two years.
What were you doing at Dillon, Read?
I was an investment banking analyst.
From Dillon, Read where did you go?
Lazard.
Q. How long were you at Lazard?
A. I left Lazard in January 1999, so
approximately 11 years.
Q. And what were you doing at Lazard?
A. I was an investment banker.
Q. Where did you go from Lazard?
A. Sandler Capital.
How long were you at Sandler?
Two years.
What were you doing at Sandler?
Making private equity investments.
Sandler is a hedge fund?
More of a private equity fund.
Private equity fund? Okay.
And where is Sandler located?
New York City.
So that takes us up to roughly 2001?
Correct.
In 2001 where did you go to work?
I started a firm called Saturn Venture 4.
A.
4.
A.
4.
A.
4.
A.
4.
A.
4.
A.
Partners.
4.
Ventures?
A. For about two years.
Q. What did Saturn Ventures do?
A. It was a venture capital firm.
Q. So now 2003, roughly, where did you go
to work?
A. I started a firm called LLJ Capital. 09:13:53
09:14:32
How long did you keep operating Saturn 09:15:06
MR. O'BRIEN: Could you spell that?
THE WITNESS: LLJ.
Q. LLJ Capital. What does
A. It was my last name, my
partner's last name, and our wives'
started with J.
Q.
A. I got you.
What did LLJ do?
It was funded by Dan Zwirn to make
special situation debt investments.
Q. Was LLJ owned by Dan Zwirn or just
simply the financing was provided?
A. It was financing was provided.
Q. How did you come to meet Dan Zwirn? LLJ stand for? 09:15:40
junior
names both
09:16:14
EFTA01165411
6
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 A. I hired Dan Zwirn out of Wharton in
1993, and he worked mostly under my supervision
3 for the first year and a half as an investment
banking analyst.
4 Q. So that would have been at Lazard?
A. Yes.
5 Q. So you basically gave Dan his first job 09:16:47
in finance?
6 A. Well, he had a summer internship
before, but I guess his first full-time job.
7 Q. And do you remain friends with Dan?
MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
8 Q. I'm sorry, so from 1993 to 1996,
roughly, he worked for you?
9 A. No, for about a year and a half.
Q. Oh, for just a year and a half?
10 A. Yes. 09:17:14
And did he leave Lazard in 1994/'95?
11 Q.
A. I actually left Lazard in mid '94 and
then returned back to Lazard a year and a half
12 later. Dan left Lazard in '95.
Q. Where did you go during this interim
13 period from Lazard between '94 and '95?
A. Toronto Dominion Bank.
14 Q. So as I understand it, you hired Dan,
he was at Lazard, you left; by the time you came
15 back, then he was leaving? 09:17:57
A. He had left when I came back.
16 Q. He had left.
A. Yes.
17 Q. You remained friends with Dan from '95
through 2003?
18 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
A. We maintained an acquaintance.
19 Q. So in 2003 when he or D.B. Zwirn
provided the funding for LLJ Capital, how did that
20 come to be? 09:18:28
A. I reconnected with Dan in 2003 over
21 lunch, having not seen him for two or three years.
And he discussed with me the possibility of
22 starting a new business with his funding.
Q. So the funding that you mentioned that
23 D.B. Zwirn provided to LLJ Capital, what entity
exactly provided the funding to LLJ? What Zwirn
24 entity? I'm not so much concerned with the name
as was it one of the hedge funds or was it some
25 company he ran. 09:19:13
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
EFTA01165412
7
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 A. All the funding we received came from
the D.B. Zwirn Specialty Opportunities Fund L.P..
3 Q. So that would have been the onshore
fund; right?
4 A. Correct.
Q. And how much funding did they initially
5 provide to LLJ? 09:19:32
A. It was on a deal-by-deal basis.
6 Q. How long did this -- did LLJ Capital
remain in existence?
7 A. I remained with LLJ until April 2005.
Q. What happened in April 2005?
8 A. I joined D.B. Zwirn & Co.
Q. At that point how much -- did LLJ
9 Capital as of April 2005 get money from anyone
else other than D.B. Zwirn?
10 A. No. 09:20:12
Q. How much money, roughly, by April 2005
11 did LLJ Capital have invested on behalf of
D.B. Zwirn?
12 A. I think approximately a hundred
million.
13 Q. So in 2005 you decided to go in-house,
in effect, with the Zwirn management company?
14 A. Yes.
MR. O'BRIEN: Objection.
15 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form. 09:20:40
Q. And what was your position that you
16 started in April 2005 with D.B. Zwirn?
A. I was a managing director.
17 Q. What entity was it that actually
employed you?
18 A. D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P.
Q. Were you a partner in D.B. Zwirn & Co.,
19 L.P.?
A. No.
20 Q. I meant when you first joined. Did you 09:21:20
ever become a partner in D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P.?
21 A. No.
Q. In the D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P., what --
22 it provided investment advisory services?
A. It was the management company on behalf
23 of the funds and managed accounts.
Q. By that you mean it would provide
24 management services for the onshore fund, the
offshore fund, and the various managed accounts;
25 is that right? 09:22:00
A. Yes.
EFTA01165413
8
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
Q. As the managing director, what were
3 your job responsibilities? What were you doing?
A. Well, I was a managing director, and my
4 responsibilities were to originate and manage a
portfolio of investments and to also manage a
5 portfolio of investments that had been originated 09:22:46
by others prior to my arrival.
6 Q. And how long were you a managing
director of D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P.?
7 A. Until October '06.
Q. How big was the portfolio of
8 investments that you were managing between April
'05 and October '06?
9 A. North of 300 million.
Q. You mentioned a portfolio of
10 investments that had been made by someone else 09:23:32
that you were managing; is that correct?
11 A. By others.
Q. By others.
12 Who were the others who had made those
investments?
13 A. There was a person named Ivan Zinn and
a person named Cameron Fleming.
14 Q. Was there some special area of
investments that you were charged -- or type of
15 investment you were charged with making? 09:24:06
A. I generally focused on an industry,
16 which was media, telecommunications, and the
services that provided those two industries.
17 Q. Now, as a managing director, did you
have any role in the administrative functions of
18 the management company?
A. None.
19 Q. Did you have any role in meeting with
the investors in the actual funds or clients who
20 had managed accounts? 09:24:58
A. I occasionally was asked to come in for
21 portions of meetings.
Q. What portions of the meetings would
22 those be?
A. Most of the time -- frankly, all the
23 times that I can remember, I was asked to discuss
the types of investments that I focused on and the
24 portfolio.
Q. During that time period from April 2005
25 to October 2006, did you ever have any discussions 09:25:35
with investors about what the terms of any
EFTA01165414
9
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 investment would be in the funds or in the managed
accounts?
3 A. No.
Q. Did you, when you were making
4 investments either at LLJ Capital or when you were
a managing director, make any investments with
5 Fortress, side by side or in some sort of 09:26:07
partnership?
6 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
7 A. I don't recall closing on any deals
that I originated with Fortress. There were a
8 number of portfolio investments that had Fortress
as a coinvestor that I inherited from Ivan and
9 Cameron.
Q. Can you give me a rough estimate of the
10 size of those investments? 09:26:47
A. Of each investment or cumulative?
11 Q. Cumulatively.
A. Including Fortress's piece or D.B.
12 Zwirn piece?
Q. Just the D.B. Zwirn piece.
13 A. I'd have to guess, but I would estimate
200 million.
14 MR. O'BRIEN: Let me just say that you
shouldn't guess. You can -- if you can
15 estimate in some range, but just a fat guess 09:27:25
you should not do.
16 THE WITNESS: Okay.
No, I cannot.
17 Q. What's that?
A. No, I cannot.
18 Q. Was it fair of the $300 million
portfolio that you were in charge of looking after
19 that more than half of those investments had
Fortress as a coparticipant?
20 A. No, that would be inaccurate because 09:27:58
investments mature and are repaid. So the numbers
21 that I threw out would be based -- at least on the
300 north number I threw out earlier was an
22 approximate running tally, and the guess I threw
out was cumulative.
23 Q. So that I understand what you're
saying, you're saying the 300 was a sort of
24 average amount of the portfolio over time, at any
point in time, and the 200 million was some amount
25 of investment that may have run -- churned through 09:28:40
the portfolio over the year; is that fair?
EFTA01165415
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 A.
Q.
fund?
A.
Q.
interest
than the
offshore
A.
not sure
Q.
interest NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. Roughly.
Q. Did you yourself have any
the onshore or offshore Zwirn funds prior to
October 2006?
Yes.
What were you invested in?
The onshore fund.
When did you make that investment?
The spring of 2006.
How large of an investment did you A.
Q.
A.
Q.
A.
Q.
make?
A.
Q.
was that
A.
Q.
into the
investment?
No.
Did investment in
09:29:08
400,000.
Do you recall what the liquidity option
applied to your investment?
The one year plus liquidity.
Did you make any subsequent investments 09:29:52
onshore funds after this initial
you ever invest in the offshore
No.
Did you have at any point any ownership
or in any of the Zwirn entities other
investment you've mentioned in
-- onshore fund?
You'd have to be more specific. I'm
I understand your question.
Yeah. Did you have any ownership
in any of the -- strike that.
When we started, Mr. O'Brien said he is
here representing a bunch of Zwirn entities.
There are entities called Zwirn Holdings,
D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P., D.B. Zwirn & Co. LC.
Did you have any ownership interest in
any size in any entity that had the name Zwirn in 09:31:06
it, other than your investment in the onshore
fund?
A. So in your -- I just want to make sure
I understand the question. When you're referring
to the Zwirn entities, are you referring to
entities that are affiliated with the management
company?
Q. Yes.
A. No, I did not.
Q. I'm also referring to just any company 09:31:43
that had the name Zwirn in it, or entity. 09:30:33
EFTA01165416
11
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
Q. It could have been part of the
3 management company, it could have been a hedge
fund, any type of entity.
4 A. No.
Q. What happened, by the way, to LLJ
5 Capital? 09:32:21
A. It was acquired by the onshore fund in
6 the second half of 2005.
Q. When it was acquired, did you receive a
7 payment for your ownership interest in LLJ
Capital?
8 A. Yes.
Q. How much of a payment did you receive?
9 A. Approximately 800,000.
Q. Do you remain a limited partner in the
10 onshore fund? 09:33:04
A. Yes.
11 Q. Did you ever withdraw any of your
initial $400,000 investment?
12 A. No.
Q. Prior to October of 2006, did you
13 had you ever heard of Jeffrey Epstein?
A. Yes.
14 Q. In what connection had you heard of
Mr. Epstein prior to October 2006? And I'm using
15 that October date because that's when I understand 09:33:37
you became the acting CFO.
16 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. I heard of Jeffrey Epstein through
17 colleagues at Lazard.
Q. By the way, what had you heard from
18 your colleagues at Lazard about Jeffrey Epstein?
A. Not flattering things.
19 Q. Such as?
A. That he was extremely difficult.
20 Q. Difficult in what way? 09:34:19
A. Generally difficult to do business with
21 and difficult to negotiate with and belligerent.
Q. Other than what you heard from Lazard
22 folks about Jeffrey Epstein, had you heard
anything else about him between -- prior to
23 October of 2006?
A. Other than magazine or newspaper
24 articles, I do not recall anything else.
Q. Did you know that he was an investor in
25 the Zwirn fund? 09:34:58
A. Prior to October 2006?
EFTA01165417
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
Q. Yes.
A. No.
Q. Prior to October 2006, had you ever
heard of an entity called Financial Trust Company?
A. No.
Q. Now, you mentioned -- oh, I want to ask
you one last question about some of the background 09:35:26
we talked about earlier.
How did you and Dan end up sharing
office space currently?
A. When I left, D.B. Zwirn was housed at
Fortress's offices. Dan had a -- and Todd, who
shares that floor, had an empty corner office.
And Dan had also hired Alicia. And so he made an
offer for me to sublet that space, which I found
attractive and decided to put my office there.
Q. So you left Fortress or D.B. Zwirn, I'm 09:36:18
sorry, in roughly June of 2010?
A. May 31, 2010.
Q. So you continued to work at
D.B. Zwirn & Co. even after Fortress acquired the
management company?
MR. O'BRIEN: Objection.
MR. ARFFA: Objection.
Q. I'm sorry, I guess it didn't acquire.
After Fortress took over management
responsibilities of the funds, the onshore and 09:36:46
offshore funds --
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
Q. -- did you become an employee of
Fortress?
A. No.
Q. You remained an employee of
D.B. Zwirn & Co.?
A. Yes.
Q. And it moved its offices, then, into
Fortress's offices for some period of time? 09:3-:03
A. Yes.
Q. And you made the move at that point?
A. Yes.
Q. Fortress took over management of the
funds in roughly the summer of 2009?
A. June 1, 2009.
Q. So for roughly a year you were working
for D.B. Zwirn & Co. but actually physically
housed at Fortress's facilities?
A. Yes.
Q. In October of 2006 you became the 09:37:36
EFTA01165418
13
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 acting CFO of D.B. Zwirn & Co.?
A. Yes.
3 Q. Do you remember what day it was that
you were made the acting CFO in October?
4 A. October 5th.
Q. Who suggested to you that you become
5 the acting CFO? 09:38:17
A. It was a discussion amongst myself, Dan
6 Zwirn, and David Proshan.
Q. What was the discussion that occurred?
7 MR. O'BRIEN: I'm just going to caution
the witness, since Mr. Proshan you said might
8 have been involved in these conversations, to
not in your answer reveal any communications
9 that are in the nature of legal advice or
seeking legal advice.
10 A. I don't recall the specifics of the 09:39:05
conversation. It's been a long time ago.
11 Q. At that point you obviously knew that
Perry Gruss was no longer the CFO?
12 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
Q. Right?
13 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
MR. ARFFA: Objection. Can I just have
14 a rule that if any of us object to form that
it counts for everyone and that way you don't
15 have to hear two or three people saying it? 09:39:30
MR. SUSMAN: Yeah, that's fine. I
16 don't know how you're going to do that in
practice, but fair enough.
17 MR. ARFFA: The first one to say it;
the others don't have to.
18 A. Can you repeat the question, please?
Q. Yeah. Before you went to this meeting
19 with Mr. Zwirn and Mr. Proshan, did you know that
Perry Gruss was no longer the CFO?
20 A. Yes. 09:39:52
Q. How did you learn that Perry Gruss was
21 no longer going to be the CFO?
A. I learned in a discussion with Lawrence
22 Cutler over lunch.
Q. The discussion with Mr. Cutler over
23 lunch, how -- how many days before or was it the
day before the October 5th, 2006, meeting that you
24 had?
A. It was on October 5th.
25 Q. So what did Mr. Cutler tell you at the 09:40:31
lunch that you had?
EFTA01165419
14
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 A. He told me that Perry Gruss had
resigned the night before. He told me that there
3 had been an internal investigation and that
investigation had resulted in a number of issues
4 regarding management company expenses and the use
of money from the funds for the purchase of an
5 airplane but that it had been remediated but the 09:41:30
decision had been made that Perry had to go and
6 that we were going to restructure senior
management and implement a number of new
7 compliance procedures.
Q. Did he at the lunch suggest to you that
8 you might become CFO as part of this
restructuring?
9 A. No.
Q. Prior to Mr. Cutler telling you at
10 lunch that there had been this internal 09:42:14
investigation, did you have any hint that there
11 was an investigation underway?
MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
12 A. No.
Q. So was it the news that Mr. Cutler told
13 you that there had been an internal investigation
that came as a surprise to you; first time you
14 heard of it was October 5th?
A. Yes.
15 Q. Had you heard that there were any 09:42:44
issues with Perry Gruss's job performance at all
16 prior to October 5th?
A. Yes.
17 Q. What issues had you heard existed about
his job performance?
18 A. Dan had informed me around September
15th that he wanted to make management changes and
19 that he wanted me to consider possibly stepping
into a role of managing the firm in the near
20 future. 09:43:25
Q. When Mr. Zwirn informed you that he
21 wanted to make management changes, did he
specifically mention Mr. Gruss as one of those
22 changes he wanted to make?
A. No, he did not.
23 Q. I think I asked you what issues you
were aware of about Mr. Gruss's job performance,
24 and you told me in response that you had this
discussion with Mr. Zwirn on September 15th.
25 MR. SIFFERT: Objection. 09:44:02
Q. My only question is did Mr. Zwirn
EFTA01165420
15
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 mention Perry Gruss during this September 15th
conversation.
3 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
A. He mentioned that I should spend time
4 with Perry to learn more about the firm's business
and finances.
5 Q. Did you infer from that that there was 09:44:20
some issue that he had with Perry Gruss?
6 A. I recall making an inference that there
could have been an issue.
7 Q. Did you ask Mr. Zwirn specifically
whether there was some problem with Perry Gruss's
8 performance?
A. I don't recall asking him that
9 specifically.
Q. And prior to the September 15th
10 discussion with Mr. Zwirn, had you heard of any 09:44:49
specific issues with Mr. Gruss's job performance?
11 A. No.
Q. Did you ask Dan why he wanted to make
12 management changes?
A. Yes.
13 Q. And what did he say?
(Discussion off the record.)
14 A. My recollection was that he wanted
somebody who had deal experience in a role of
15 leadership as opposed to someone that had more of 09:45:24
an operational background.
16 Q. So at least during the September 15th
conversation, Mr. Zwirn did not mention to you
17 that there was any sort of investigation underway
about any sort of improprieties involving
18 Mr. Gruss?
A. No, he did not.
19 Q. The only explanation he gave you for
why he might want to make management changes was
20 to bring somebody with more deal experience into a 09:46:05
leadership role?
21 A. Yes.
Q. How is it, by the way, that you
22 remember that this discussion with Mr. Zwirn
happened on September 15th, 2006?
23 MR. SIFFERT: Objection.
A. I just happen to remember. There
24 were -- there were a number of events that
occurred in that short window of time that I seem
25 to have specific recollection of, but obviously 09:46:41
there are other things I don't.
EFTA01165421
16
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 Q. So between September 5th and October
5th, did you hear any other news about Mr. Gruss's
3 job performance or any investigation about him or
any issue with the management company?
4 MR. O'BRIEN: I take it you mean
September 15.
5 MR. SUSMAN: Did I -- I did mean
September 15. Sorry.
6 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. Repeat the question.
7 Q. I'll ask the question again. Between
September 15th, 2006, and October 5th, 2006, did
8 you hear any additional information about
Mr. Gruss's job performance or any issues at the
9 management company in terms of how it was being
run?
10 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
Q. Any problems?
11 A. I was not aware of any problems
associated with Mr. Gruss's performance.
12 Q. Essentially you had a discussion with
Mr. Zwirn on September 15th where he mentioned he
13 might want to make some changes, and October 5th
you go to lunch with Mr. Cutler and he tells you
14 Perry Gruss is going to have to leave, you come
back from lunch, and you're offered his job on
15 October 5th?
MR. SIFFERT: Objection as to form.
16 Q. Is that --
A. I'm not sure whether that was a
17 question or a statement.
Q. Is that the chronology? Do I have it
18 right?
19 MR. SIFFERT: Objection as to form.
A. Those two events occurred on those two
dates, yes.
20 Q. I just want to make sure I'm not
missing any events that occurred between September
21 15th and October 5th relative to your becoming
CFO.
22 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. Well, once again, define "events."
23 Q. Any conversations you had with anyone
else, any information you learned in the interim
24 that gave you some indication you might become the
CFO or have some leadership role.
25 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. Part of the September 15th and 09:47:02
09:47:32
09:48:00
09:48:17
09:48:45
EFTA01165422
17
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 subsequent September 18th conversation with Dan,
as I previously mentioned, Dan suggested I speak
3 with Perry and some others with regard to learning
about the firm's operations and its finances and
4 in particular to spend time with Lawrence Cutler
to learn about a number of the operational changes
5 that were planned. 09:49:21
Q. You mentioned there was a September
6 18th discussion with Dan? What was that
discussion about?
7 A. On the 15th he mentioned the idea that
he wanted me to think about that he wanted to
8 discuss with his partners. On the 18th we had a
confirmation discussion that I was interested in
9 taking on the additional role, and he conferred to
me that his partners were in agreement with him.
10 Q. By the 18th when you said you were 09:50:04
interested in taking on the additional role, did
11 you understand that role was going to be the CFO?
A. At that point in time, no. I thought
12 the role would be more of a president- or CEO-type
role sometime in the future.
13 Q. Did you actually talk to Mr. Gruss
between September 15th, say, and October 5th,
14 2006?
A. Yes.
15 Q. And what did you talk to him about? 09:50:30
A. I recall a couple of conversations and
16 a breakfast meeting where I was trying to gather
as much information as I could from him about the
17 firm and the funds and its finances and inner
workings.
18 Q. Did he ask you why you were asking for
this information?
19 A. No, he did not.
Q. Had you ever asked for that kind of
20 information from him before? 09:51:09
A. No.
21 Q. Did you also meet with Mr. Cutler?
A. Yes.
22 Q. How many times do you think you met
with him during -- between September 15th and
23 October 5th in an effort to learn more about the
firm's management?
24 A. I can't recall how many times.
Q. And Mr. Gruss during this time period
25 never, in any of your discussions, let on that he 09:51:38
was under some kind of investigation, perhaps, or
EFTA01165423
18
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 that his job might be in jeopardy?
A. No.
3 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
Q. You say you talked to Mr. Gruss about
4 the firm's finances. By that do you mean the
management company's finances or do you also
5 include the funds' finances?
A. I would say all of the above.
6 Q. During those conversations did
Mr. Gruss tell you anything about the liquidity
7 needs of the funds, the onshore and offshore
funds?
8 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
A. No.
9 Q. Did he express any concern to you that
the funds did not have a lot of liquidity?
10 A. Not that I can recall.
Q. So on October 5th you were offered the
11 job of acting CFO; is that right?
A. Yes.
12 Q. Did you get a pay raise?
A. At that point in time, no.
13 Q. Mr. Cutler had explained to you that
there was this issue with the airplane and the
14 fund expenses that had been the subject of an
internal investigation. He explained that to you
15 at lunch; right?
A. It was management fees, not fund
16 expenses.
Q. And you understood it was prepayment --
17 early payment of management fees --
A. Yeah.
18 Q. -- that had occurred, was an issue?
A. Yes.
19 Q. And was that the first you'd ever heard
of investor money being used to finance an
20 airplane purchase?
A. Yes.
21 Q. And was it also the first you ever
heard of the early payment of management fees?
22 A. Yes.
Q. Did anybody explain to you why the
23 management fees had been paid earlier or what the
explanation that had been given for that practice
24 was?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
25 MR. O'BRIEN: Since the question
doesn't have a time frame, I'm going to direct 09:52:00
09:52:38
09:53:19
09:53:39
09:54:04
EFTA01165424
19
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 you to not, in your answer, communicate
something that was communicated to you by
3 counsel.
A. I recall Lawrence saying that on a
4 number of occasions management fees were taken
after they were accrued but prior to when they
5 were payable. 09:54:37
Q. Did Lawrence explain to you or tell you
6 what the explanation was for why that had
occurred?
7 A. I can't really recall at that point in
time.
8 Q. After you became the acting CFO on
October 5th, was that news then conveyed to all
9 the other employees that day or the next day?
A. It was conveyed on October 9th.
10 Q. What was the reason for delaying from 09:55:14
October 5th to October 9th to tell the employees
11 that you were the acting CFO?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
12 A. There was a strategy to make a
comprehensive announcement to the employees about
13 Perry's departure and other organizational
changes.
14 Q. After the announcement was made that
you would be acting CFO, did you then make any
15 effort to contact investors in the funds or 09:55:59
managed accounts to let them know about your new
16 job responsibilities?
A. There was no effort on my part.
17 Q. I understand there were a series of
investor calls to inform investors, roughly about
18 October 10th or October 11th. Do you recall that
happening?
19 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
A. My understanding is that Dan and
20 possibly others from the IR department made a 09:56:35
number of investor calls I believe starting on
21 October 9th.
Q. Did you participate in any of those
22 investor calls in any way?
A. I don't recall participating in any of
23 those round of calls.
Q. When did you first hear that there had
24 been advances made from the offshore fund to the
onshore fund and from some of the managed accounts
25 to the onshore fund? 09:57:09
A. On October 9th.
EFTA01165425
20
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 Q. Was it before or after the announcement
of your new job and that Perry was gone?
3 A. After.
Q. Was the announcement in a conference
4 room?
A. It was in Dan's office with a number of
5 employees dialed in globally. 09:57:36
Q. On a conference call?
6 A. Yes.
Q. After that meeting how did you then
7 come to learn about the advances from the offshore
fund to the onshore fund?
8 A. Lawrence came to my office, said that
he had had a conversation with Alisa Butchkowski
9 and that Alisa had told him that when her prior
boss, LeeAnn Law, left in the summer of 2006 that
10 LeeAnn had told her that the offshore fund was 09:58:42
owed money from the onshore fund and that two of
11 the accounting employees, Jason Pecora [phonetic]
and Phil Ryu, also knew about it.
12 Q. How much was the amount of these -- the
money that was owed at that point?
13 A. As of that moment, I didn't know.
Q. Did Larry give you any indication of
14 how large a sum it was?
A. I can't recall.
15 MR. SIFFERT: Lawrence? 09:59:34
MR. SUSMAN: Lawrence? Is that what it
16 is? Fair enough.
Q. What was your reaction to Mr. Cutler
17 telling you about what Alisa had told him?
A. Surprise.
18 Q. And then did Mr. Cutler explain to you
when he'd had this conversation with Alisa?
19 A. It was shortly after the firm
announcement.
20 Q. So after you had this conversation with 10:00:17
Mr. Cutler, what did y'all do about this
21 information you'd learn from Alisa?
A. We asked Alisa to come up to my office,
22 and also Bob Sumberac, and we asked Alisa to
repeat what she had told Lawrence just earlier.
23 Q. Did she repeat to you the same thing
that Mr. Cutler had conveyed?
24 A. Yes.
Q. After you had this discussion with
25 Alisa, what did y'all then do? 10:00:54
A. We asked Jason Pecora to come up to my
EFTA01165426
21
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 office, and we asked Alisa to yet again explained
what she had just explained. And then we asked
Jason what he knew about this issue that Alisa had
brought to our attention.
Q. Did Jason confirm what Alisa had said?
A. Jason said he had no idea what we were
talking about. 10:01:24
Q. So what happened after you had this
conversation with Jason and Alisa?
A. I asked Dan Zwirn and the other two
partners, Chris Swan and Vasan, into the office,
and we explained what had just happened in the
conversation with Alisa.
Q. And what was their reaction?
A. Dan had a look of utter surprise and
shock, screamed out some expletives. And then I
recall conversation about trying to figure out if 10:02:06
this was true and how do we figure this out.
Q. Did y'all come up with a plan to try to
figure out if it was true?
MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
A. My recollection is that the first step
we would take would be for Bob Sumberac, who was
the controller, to dig into the firm's accounting
systems and ledgers to see if he could figure out
whether this was true or not.
Q. So you tasked Bob with going and trying 10:02:40
to dig through the fund's ledgers to see if there
were in fact these monies owed?
A. Yes.
17 Q. And did Bob do that?
A. Over the course of the next two days,
18 yes.
Q. Did he report back in some form?
19 A. Well, we had multiple conversations
over the course of those two days.
20 Q. Was it all oral? Was there anything 10:03:14
written that was prepared by Mr. Sumberac and
21 given to you or Mr. Zwirn?
A. I recall a spreadsheet that he put
22 together at some point during those two days.
Q. So that takes us to roughly like
23 October 11th, thereabouts?
A. Yes
24 Q. Did the spreadsheet show the
outstanding balance of the advance from the
25 offshore fund to the onshore fund? 10:03:57
A. The first analysis showed an estimated
EFTA01165427
22
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 balance of 108 million.
Q. Did that balance materially change over
3 the subsequent weeks?
MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form.
4 A. With regard to what we believed the
onshore fund owed the offshore fund, no.
5 Q. Was there at this point any indication 10:04:40
that there had also been advances from the managed
6 accounts or the TE fund?
A. As of October 11th, no.
7 Q. When did you discover that there had
also been advances from the Highbridge managed
8 account and the TE fund?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
9 A. The weekend of the 14th and 15th, we
discovered that there was possibly a balance of
10 approximately 50 million owed from the onshore 10:05:14
fund to the Highbridge account. And we also
11 thought that there might be balances owed from the
onshore to the TE account as well.
12 Q. How did you discover the $50 million
advance from the Highbridge account to the onshore
13 fund?
A. We had engaged Deloitte & Touche that
14 week to assist us; and as part of some analyses
and work that we saw, a wire transfer.
15 Q. When did Deloitte & Touche get hired, 10:06:31
roughly, relative to October 9th, when you first
16 heard about the issue from Alisa?
A. It was either that Thursday or that
17 Friday, so either the 12th or the 13th.
They were engaged by Fried Frank, so I
18 don't know if --
Q. So Fried Frank was also hired roughly
19 after -- shortly after October 9th?
A. Yes.
20 Q. Did you participate in any of the 10:07:20
meetings to discuss what would be disclosed to
21 investors during the October 9th, 10th, and 11th
series of calls?
22 A. No.
Q. By the way, when you found out about
23 these advances to the onshore fund, did it cause
you concern that this had occurred?
24 A. Yes.
Q. And why?
25 A. Why -- I don't understand your 10:07:54
question.
EFTA01165428
23
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 Q. What about it was of concern to you?
A. It caused a lot of concerns. One of
3 the concerns that was prominent was did we have an
accurate NAV calculation.
4 Q. Any other concerns?
A. Yes, of course.
5 Q. Such as? 10:08:38
A. The quality of the books and records.
6 Q. Anything else?
A. I'm not sure -- do you want me to list
7 out all the emotions I went through that week?
Q. Not really the emotions as much as the
8 issues that were potentially raised by having
these loans or advances.
9 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. Well, as I said, the primary concern
10 was did we have an accurate NAV. If we did not 10:09:17
have an accurate NAV, then there were a lot of,
11 you know, consequences.
Q. Was there any -- were you concerned
12 that -- about how investors would react to hearing
about it?
13 A. That would be one of the consequences.
Q. But whether or not there was an
14 accurate NAV calculation, might investors be
upset? Did you believe investors might be upset
15 about this having occurred? 10:09:50
A. Yes.
16 Q. Were there any tax issues that were
raised by having these loans or advances occur?
17 MR. O'BRIEN: Does your question have
any time frame?
18 MR. SUSMAN: Sure this October of 2006
time period.
19 MR. O'BRIEN: The whole month?
MR. SUSMAN: Yeah.
20 MR. SIFFERT: Well, the concern I 10:10:09
have --
21 MR. SUSMAN: Look, guys, I'm letting
you all do this, but you've got to stop it.
22 Okay? Object to form. Don't -- you can
quibble with the question all you want.
23 MR. SIFFERT: To the extent these
involve privileged conversations -- we're
24 trying to avoid privilege, Harry. That's the
issue.
25 MR. SUSMAN: So just instruct him. 10:10:30
MR. SIFFERT: It's not disruptive.
EFTA01165429
24
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 MR. O'BRIEN: Just instruct him, he
said.
3 MR. SIFFERT: I'm not obstructing.
MR. SUSMAN: Just instruct him.
4 MR. SIFFERT: Okay. Don't report
anything about conversations with counsel on
5 these topics.
A. Tax issues would be privileged.
6 Q. After October 14th when you also
discovered that there might be money from
7 Highbridge's managed account that had been
advanced plus you thought there was an issue with
8 the TE fund, were you involved in attempting to
document these loans or advances so that there was
9 some piece of paper that actually memorialized,
such as a note?
10 A. Yes.
Q. Were in fact notes prepared that
11 obligated the onshore fund to repay the money at
some point in time?
12 A. Yes.
Q. Why didn't you just have the onshore
13 fund repay the money as opposed to entering
into a -- a loan agreement that would allow
14 repayment over some period of time?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
15 You may answer.
A. The onshore fund did not necessarily
16 have the liquidity at that point in time to repay
it quickly.
17 Q. There was a second series of investor
phone calls like at the end of October; is that
18 correct?
A. Yes.
19 Q. Did you participate in those, any of
those calls?
20 A. Yes.
Q. How many of them did you participate
21 in?
A. I can't recall specific number.
22 Q. Was your role to speak during the call
or were you just there listening?
23 A. The vast majority of the calls I
listened.
24 Q. Who else listened with you?
A. It was split amongst Elise Hubsher and
25 I believe Lawrence Cutler.
Q. Did you listen to a call that involved 10:10:46
10:11:29
10:12:14
10:12:43
10:13:21
EFTA01165430
25
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 Financial Trust Corporation or Jeffrey Epstein?
A. No, I did not, did not.
3 Q. What was the reaction of the investors
on the call that you did listen in on?
4 A. Vast majority were supportive.
Q. Were any agitated or upset?
5 A. I do not recall any of the calls in 10:14:15
which I listened in on an investor openly
6 expressing agitation.
Q. Did you hear from Ms. Hubsher,
7 Mr. Cutler, or Mr. Zwirn that there had been other
investors who were agitated during these calls,
8 during calls that you didn't listen to?
A. The only one I can recall was the call
9 that he had with Financial Trust.
Q. What were you told about the call that
10 he had with Financial Trust? 10:15:02
A. I recall Dan mentioning that Jeffrey
11 was upset.
Q. Did Mr. Zwirn tell you anything more
12 than Jeffrey Epstein was upset?
A. I can't recall specifically with regard
13 to that particular call what else was said.
Q. We're talking about the second set of
14 investor calls Mr. Zwirn told you after he had had
one with Financial Trust that Mr. Epstein was
15 upset? 10:15:59
A. Yes.
16 Q. At that point you knew who Financial
Trust was and who Mr. Epstein was relative -- that
17 they were a big investor in the fund; is that
right?
18 A. Yes.
Q. Did Mr. Zwirn tell you what he planned
19 to do about Mr. Epstein's being upset?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
20 A. That he was going to call Glenn. 10:16:17
Q. Glenn?
21 A. Glenn Dubin.
Q. Did you know who Glenn Dubin was at
22 that point?
A. Yes.
23 Q. Had you ever spoken yourself to Glenn
Dubin?
24 A. I don't recall speaking to Glenn prior
to that second call to investors directly.
25 Q. I don't mean in any capacity. Had he 10:16:44
ever made an investment where you spoke to him at
EFTA01165431
26
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 any point in time?
A. I don't recall speaking to him before
3 that.
Q. Did Mr. Zwirn explain to you why he was
4 going to talk to Mr. Dubin about Mr. Epstein being
upset?
5 A. I recall that Glenn had a close 10:17:05
relationship with Jeffrey and that Dan almost
6 always conferred with Glenn on matters related to
Jeffrey.
7 Q. In between the time of the second --
the first set of calls and the second set of
8 calls, before you made the second set of calls,
you reached out to lenders to the fund; correct?
9 A. Yes.
Q. Who was -- I think it's KBC? Do I have
10 the initials right? 10:17:52
A. Yes. That was one of the lenders.
11 Q. It was a lender to both the onshore and
offshore fund?
12 A. Yes.
Q. Were they the biggest lender?
13 A. No.
Q. What kind of liquidity did they provide
14 to the funds?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
15 A. As of that particular day, they were 10:18:15
actually not a lender. We had a credit agreement
16 that was in the process of being closed.
Q. Did you reach out to them because you
17 were concerned that the issues with Gruss had
potentially -- strike that.
18 Did you have any problems with any of
the lenders when you told them about the Perry
19 Gruss issues or these interfund notes?
A. No.
20 MR. O'BRIEN: Objection to form. 10:18:50
Q. You've told me you heard Mr. Epstein
21 was upset after the second investor call. When
was the first time that you heard that Mr. Epstein
22 wanted or was asking for some of his money back
from the fund?
23 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. I believe there was a letter faxed to
24 us around November 13th.
Q. I'm going so to show you what was
25 previously marked as Exhibit 5. Is that the 10:19:59
letter?
EFTA01165432
27
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 (Discussion off the record.)
MR. SUSMAN: I'm not going to ask him
3 about the document other than is that the
letter you're referring to.
4 MR. ARFFA: What's the exhibit number?
MR. SUSMAN: It's Exhibit 5.
5 A. Yes. 10:20:20
Q. Prior to seeing Exhibit 5, had you
6 heard from any source that Mr. Epstein might want
some of his money back from the fund?
7 A. I don't recall that I had heard he
wanted his money back prior to this letter.
8 Q. Now, you had told me during the second
set of calls that I think none of the investors
9 who you listened to were upset or agitated, were
supportive.
10 Did you hear from Mr. Zwirn or 10:21:04
Mr. Cutler or Ms. Hubsher that any of the
11 investors on the calls they had listened to had
asked for any of their money back?
12 A. No, I don't recall anyone asking for
their money back around those calls.
13 Q. And certainly in the calls you listened
to, did any of the investors ask for their money
14 back?
A. Not that I recall.
15 Q. Prior to receiving Exhibit 5, had you 10:21:40
dealt with any investors attempting to redeem from
16 the fund?
A. I don't believe so.
17 MR. SUSMAN: I think we've been going
for about an hour and 20 minutes. Do you want
18 to take a break? Or keep going? Whatever you
want to do.
19 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: There's eight
minutes left on the video.
20 MR. SUSMAN: Let's go eight more 10:22:14
minutes.
21 Q. Exhibit 5, how did you come to see it
first? Did it arrive on the fax machine and
22 someone deliver it to you or did somebody
specifically bring it to your attention?
23 MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
A. I don't remember.
24 Q. After you saw Exhibit 5, did you
participate in the discussions about Mr. Epstein's
25 $80 million request, on or about November 13th? 10:22:44
A. Can you be more specific? Participate
EFTA01165433
28
1 NONCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT - CONFIDENTIAL
2 with whom?
Q. Were there any discussions either on
3 November 13th or, say, the next day that you
remember about Mr. Epstein's $80 million request?
4 A. I recall us having discussions about
this letter shortly after receiving it.
5 Q. And who were those discussions with 10:23:11
that you recall?
6 A. I believe it included counsel.
Q. All of the discussions had included
7 counsel that you remember?
MR. ARFFA: Objection to form.
8 A. I can't remember conversations that
didn't include counsel.
9 Q. Did you have any discussions on
November 13th, that day or the next day, with
10 anyone from Mr. Epstein's office about -- 10:24:02
specifically about the $80 million request?
11 A. I recall a telephone call with Harry
📷 Images in this document (95 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document that appears to be a transcript or a record of a conversation or correspondence. It contains a series of numbered points or paragraphs, each with a date and time stamp at the top. The text is written in English and includes various statements, questions, and responses. There are no visible names, logos, or other identifiable features that would allow for a more detailed
[Image 2] The image shows a document that appears to be a transcript of a conversation or meeting. It is a text-based document with numbered lines, indicating a structured format for the content. The document includes names, dates, and possibly a location, but the specific details are not clear due to the resolution of the image. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a formal or profes
[Image 3] The image shows a page from a document, which appears to be a transcript of a conversation or a meeting. The text is organized in numbered paragraphs, each with a date and time stamp at the beginning. The content of the text is not described, as per the instructions. The document is a standard letter or report format, with no visible logos or images. The text is black on a white background, and th
[Image 4] The image shows a document that appears to be a transcript of a conversation or a series of notes. The text is organized in a numbered list format, indicating a sequence of points or topics discussed. The document is not a photograph but rather a text-based document, possibly a letter, report, or meeting notes. The text includes names, dates, and a reference to a location. The content of the docum
[Image 5] The image shows a document that appears to be a transcript of a conversation or meeting. The document is numbered and contains a list of questions and answers, with each question followed by a response. The text is in English, and the document is structured with headings and bullet points. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be confidently described. The content of the doc
[Image 6] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a transcript of a conversation or a series of notes. The text is organized in numbered paragraphs, suggesting a structured discussion or a list of points. The document includes names, dates, and possibly locations or logos, but without specific details, it's not possible to provide a more detailed description. The text is too small to read