Four Futures for the New Economy Geoeconomics and Technology in 2030 2025
Page 10 of 23 · WEF_Four_Futures_for_the_New_Economy_Geoeconomics_and_Technology_in_2030_2025.pdf
access to critical raw materials – such as
lithium, rare earths and others – risks slowing
the pace of decarbonization.
–Domestic policies: Domestic politics
continue to be highly polarized around the
future of globalization and technology, the
latter’s impact on privacy, labour markets and
ethics, the need to address technology-driven
and trade-driven inequalities, and cultural
divergences. Radical movements continue
to be on the rise, and technology-enabled
misinformation and disinformation continue
to erode trust in institutions and governance
more broadly. Economies that have anticipated
and proactively managed these risks have
preserved societal trust and local opportunities. Business environment: The dual trend of
geopolitical stabilization and widening technology
adoption has partially curbed business uncertainty.
This has allowed businesses to shift from crisis
response strategies towards longer investment
and growth horizons. Technology has become
deeply embedded across corporate strategies
and increased the number of new entrants
across the industries. Business competitiveness
is increasingly defined by digital infrastructure,
pace of technology adoption, data fluency
and talent attractiveness. The intense focus
on understanding geopolitical disruption in the
mid-2020s has become a more integrated part
of contextual awareness among managers
and boards.
Geopolitical stability, slow and concentrated
technological adoptionGeopolitical normalization has lowered risk premiums and reduced
price shocks, but growth remains stagnant as technology fails to deliver
expected economic impacts. Adoption of frontier technologies has been
limited to a few sectors and industry leaders across the world and has
not had a significant impact on wages and jobs.
Geopolitical risk index
Baseline: 149.1
(Iacoviello, M. et al., 2025 average)
Share of business tasks
performed by technology, %
Baseline: 22%
(World Economic Forum, 2025)
GDP growth, % annual
Baseline: 3.2%
(International Monetary Fund, 2025)
Supply chain pressure index
Baseline: -0.01
(Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
2025 average)
US effective average tariff
rate, %
Baseline: 17%
(Yale University The Budget
Lab, 2025)
Wage polarization, D9/D1
earners ratio
Baseline: 16.8
(International Labour
Organization, 2025)
Energy price index, absolute
monthly % change
Baseline: 3.7%
(based on World Bank, 2025)
Trust in media,
% of population
Baseline: 52%
(Edelman, 2025)Scenario 2: Cautious Stability
Notes: The arrows denote a directional change in a given scenario characteristic. All values are at the global level, unless specified otherwise. The analysis is based
on scenario narratives and extrapolations from similar existing research. The directionality is illustrative and for scenario-building purposes only.
In this scenario, geopolitical stability and slow
technology adoption have delivered a more
predictable, albeit less dynamic, global order. The
stabilization of US–China tensions and easing of
major conflicts have lowered risk premiums and
prevented further escalation of trade barriers,
but have failed to revitalize the global economy.
Slower technological adoption has eased strategic
competition around technology and innovation
between major blocs.
The adoption of frontier technologies such as
generative AI, quantum computing and robotics has
been limited to a few sectors and industry leaders
globally, as most businesses have faced skills gaps,
weak infrastructure and low business readiness. A
limited payoff from broader AI commercialization
has triggered an AI bubble burst that deflated AI
stock valuations and dampened investor appetite
by the end of the decade. Innovation has remained fragmented, with global R&D spending stagnating
below $3 trillion annually.5
–Macroeconomic conditions: Global GDP
growth is stagnant by historical terms, ranging
around 2–3% and falling short of early-decade
projections.6 The promise of productivity gains
and digital leapfrogging has failed to materialize
at scale. Inflation has stabilized, but markets
have been volatile as tech valuations have
plummeted and capital expenditure (CapEx)
investments have not yielded expected returns,
weighing on corporate balance sheets.
–Trade and investment: Global trade and
investment flows have returned to a positive
growth trajectory following the disruptions of the
mid-2020s, as supply chains are reorganizing
around emerging geoeconomic faultlines. Flows
of data and digital services, as well as exports
Four Futures for the New Economy: Geoeconomics and Technology in 2030
10
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: