Document text
i
, ..., .
21;-
.' T"-5'
__ <
3;=="il-ts.
. -1:-_
.Q=;'i"
_J"92".. . '
=---IQ
u-Qa
hp.-
l
_i ee
1 ;".'.'.'.::?:n~ 4/1/'11,
_, 3':'L.921=vter ;_i_§,' " llmlmp§?I.Tl':§'§.;C'°'_ F . 1'Iv1v92.',9292t.EEt3 it 1- . 01*' nnpeI'i.__ ;,__92. am ,-_t- |-.1 1; "1' H .i;:?.;:""" ° 'I"Ar-"5R1*-'197f°'f ---. H, 1 1 V A1" r i! 71
é,.2_- 1'/5}!
W4!
Tlvectar, 1-"I7!
'12"-F-.'=...'92'1" Tu rt.-<.".';.' UI U. :3,
.. ., 1-. xu. .2 c ;:»-1: r.-1' 1i:uir.1:x::<;.
1?. 1"E3;LIl£G x"-"111.-:1: or
1. ! 5
F; 'Ti- 'i'."'§L1..l- '92'PI21: I ttorney GeneralIi/-in
L.!
- Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Rosen
Mr1;2.-Ll I, I
Mr. C. D. Brennan é pf
b7</
This is to aivlzxe that Aseeeiete Justice Jo!-.=.1 1?. 1.-.1 :-ha
of the U. E1. Eu"+_1rc::10 cert has ree-::r.'c<I :1 lziter v.1" £211 cm 1:2?-.-.3
a t3zre.:=t to l:1<>.:' up the faqrreme Court b1:i1;?1ng- at 1:38 p. m. en an
ur.=.;e-exiled date damn; the week ei I12:-Ll 5, 15'!I. The I-ctter,
I-'o:;t:-rarfzc-:1 March 2.-*8, IDTI, at r"£¬tn.::1r:;!1, I"e:1:::;;-*i'.=:1ni;a, .':L£*.ue.'3
that the bombing will be dune by the 11 kite ?.':1r.tI:er .-'5-arty of
L": I 1
Inve:;ti;;e.t'i:m has been inzteted to eetabltelz the identity
ei the writer ui theletter, in view oi thepesstble vlolatlen of
1-faction G-211!, Title 13, U. S. Code.
1 - The Deputy Attorney General
1 - Aestvarat 11. tterncy General -
Internal Security I2-ivlzteu1 - .s;:i.';1:~.nt Mm-my General
y ii 92I-PH I g ~ 'Gale i G. ,' ' IIhm:-rl e1_.___r._.... u
Tuvr-I __i
92'u1|l|-rn 4}-5--92nrn ___i
Tvlo. Hnnm ..,,._.i
||I'I|Il'Ill _ _______,,_._C rinatml Eivislzrn[J 92
Q I
~--N» _A Prlsnoorg 1~s1.m-rwz: um'rI:| '-Q , ,kRosen to Sullivan, captioned as above, dated
ea 92 M3
Y
""-__
KS
_92_
_,
I
LP;
".¢.,
-92'..
"-.ro_-92""'
2;;
2."...-,
~iT»_'-'
5*_.__- , _7;_,.-I _, V *i ' "_ * _ I ' w" '__-""7 747:1:
5Anb!c/ e V V V
..
itQ 3 .. .-¢_92JI _ q' ' H V ' - - _ J V
J V r ml,.,_"».§.- . k..._- '- -3* -up Q
<
. 2..| .
1 ' -, '
xv _ , _ .1 .»..r A92 - . : ' ' ~.92_¢:1 - .1 . 1-1 ""'.I! .'f-. 7 ' '5' i'- ~i ' i i r i - . f _ ~ 92|,_ -. , n-. ,1 ,.:~ __ _ V Ir . _ V I _ ._-H '§__._ . _~_';_ _ _ _» .92- -_,. _:. -- . 4-,. _ . V - - ' - 1, _ 1. _ 92i TI Q, . > _ _ _ _ _ , . L . 1- t ." '_-. ,_ ! - - » * -=' ' § v 'N___, , 92 ,._, - , _,-,-». .,"_-_e -_ _ 4 . 1 , ,- 4 4-_4_ _. ~ _.
.... .. 92 - ~ _ - I .e ~- -*1 ' ~ e
- . ' ~ , . .. .. r - {_ -- FM. »;,. E i - ' _ V . ' . ' b,92,--492- __ . . , .;Z,_< -. n-'92
Chief Justice oi the United States '
Washington, D C 20543
Dear Warren.W APrii 1, 1971 M W I H mggzi -
.9 - 1-, Honorable Warren E. Burger ~
. V ' 0 , 1 thought you would like to know that F V VPoHce, has contacted Assistan ec or
oseph . per of this Bureau and relayed your request that the _ »V
FBI review the security of the Supreme Court Building in view of ' _
the anonymous letter addressed to Associate Justice John Marshall I - Harlan. Mr. Casper contaeted_on March 31, 1971. V '-
.. p ",92. -- ._V i I . V e 1 V We have the original oi the anonymous letter and an
rr" 70 appropriate investigation h initiated. In addition, Mr. _ -Q4 - 0 Casper reviewed with &the increased security steps .
- - he has put into eifeet since my representatives were last in touch
be e
L5
@"?"e' 1
1- Jj5"'*
TolnonBIllivll,____ V
ileici...._
' §§Z'3'I..¢.»._.... ' Mrv Sun-iva-n_'!' Isl Clallli. _ Mr. {Q l _ Mr Conradzzar, -i
to Mohr, i, re: "Threat to Blow Up U. -.
1-»i
r.14'.
5}.
-x.1.¢».-4 a
.-1-.-f».I1
.5.5".1.599/
» lo05 .-
I""' Q! O '
b!
/, ' 1
U
I Honorable Warren E. Burger
bl!
Other minor suggestions were given to
however, it was quite apparent he has made
ment to increase the security oi the Supreme Court Building since
the lest time my representatives visited him. We shall keep you
apprised of the results of our investigation concerning the anonymous
letter. In the meantime, if I can be of assistance to you, please do
not hesitate to communicate with me. -I Sineere1%.:§E?a_ '
é -2-
_ 0 -
J- '2
_'*1'/_.'
1,.» or
..§_;_, _ 1
5:; 1'.-'
.-.:.§;; _.
F55:
__-_' : Y
-.1.
4
iii
y i;;;
1
1
?
Q
;_;_s_f.
L?
. '1»;-.i|92 92-.,.,.. .4-. _ I;:L -w 1 ._,-,
~:m92~._ -
- '?avl'E|~£Q nf tlp '§Init:h Sinks
anlnglnn. B. . 2:15»;
March 30, 1971
Joseph J. Casper
Assistant Director, F.B.I.
Department of Justice
10th & Pa., Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr, Casper;
would you please have this letter checked,
perhaps you have heard from him too. I would
avoreciate any information that you might be
able to give me. ~i~
RFIL 1|:.[
"*uila . W 1Qrvwr Sincerely yours, 45 /" j , '
. is ,
7*/I_ APR 619111
ju-I--I--I-ii
fr, ¢»4*yF_/r~'/..{/? /L,
54m. 9 19 92*7 /?
Iv ./5 1,!», 1./If 7 I /J, / E
i
I K 92
1 _ r -Q, 1::-71' -f it
5:-I,-I-.I_':rr-' . - _¢.; 5
¢' T; -.-'- _~ '2
,, - __-.__' . _ rr .- ~ -
,..-1"! -' z' ' -_'-.- .- ' s
.-ts 1. --
-- ----.~--.--".1 7;-: I ..;.._-. t ii-' .'.4. .. __~__ _ 1 ~ _.¢_. ....=~-.-+=~- ' "' u
1'5 ."' J. I '-';_'§ _',_"F_J
__._ .- _ l
V |
5'5; i - . 5,__..
cf-7;_::.__ 2 . T
r
3 i
iv _ .2 ;.,. -12"" - . _-....-.~.-=0". _-w. I,-__ - ;..-.. _, V. -.<.-- _ _ -__ » 1..~-:* .---~
"L-set-,.-+:.__- "77:-7 i s. ' -
:3; =..i-.-=2--~.» _ ':';'.!:__... , Mr. . n' _ - ,_ . um .
C 192Ir.B"":pr1__ .._92Mr. Sgrmm Quart of y: nttrh Stain '
'§asl1i:ngt:m. Q. Kl}. 211511.51
April 5, 1971Mr
,3 ; 3'11-/_ -! H can-warns or KIM!MrTHE CHIEF .:us1'1c|-: . F _, ; . !92 51, <1.
Mr.
Mr
Tele. Room._m.
M iss H1-92hnes____
Miss Gandy___-'92.| _._..
Ca, "ad V
Pr -._,'
F-=-It ..
63.1.1|:R"' ='II ......_.-.
Ta-"r I m...
Walters.__.
S.-92'" rs
Dear Edgar:
Many thanks for your letter of April 1 and your
assistance. I have reviewed security procedures withCaptain Coble and we are tightening up all along the
line. This week we will not permit persons to actually
enter the Courtroom and all delivery trucks will be
checked.
The equipment you mention may be necessary. We
have no budget provision for it and that always presents
problems.
Again our thanks.
Regards,
F
K Warren E. urger!
"U 3.1;-:11! p 9'
Honorable J. Edgar Hoover l _._ ,.Director REL"--:sc,@;L .- 2 r/ '7
Federal Bureau of Investigation 'DD
United States Department of Jugtgé ____, 92 92H'§ 1<."~
I
I-L
I!
_.:
rix X
, Q92
v
92
~./tr2' /1?.92_
r
a
U
F-
.
..
>.
.-
C
is
*5?
J
11
é
i
-2
!
¬
f
!
%A 92.
U!r!./
0
=5 Wqvs54/
o Y
776110
Portland, Fa ins
Aprxi 22, 1911!
lion. var:-on , Ch, Justice
United State up:-ems bourt
Washirmton, "'RE I SCIIOOL-BUSINE
I11:-CISIGFI
nos: 52-! -
Duo to its radical, left-wing, ultra-liberal decisions during
the past ton years, the Supreme Court 01 hm United Statue
has becune tin laughing-stock of the conservative world albeit,
hailed in Moscow and Hanoi!, and certainly s symbol for opprob-
rim by the vast majority of patriotic Amricans.
Your aegis of the court, and the addition of so-ca1lcd"consti.t-
utioml constructionisn" to the infamous-nine was heralded bymost citizens as a breath of clean air in the ant?-filld halls
of U.S. Jurisprudence. F-'0 were emoumged by I t. imblcful of
conservative adjudications-
Iou can imagine, then, our disappointment in the decision of the
court early this week which insisted/Uggn eradication of school-
imbolance, HUI upon E-lIFCI. »EI92 IQXCII-.L HIKING, by fcrcinr working
whites primarily!, to pay for busing welfare Negroes into white
schools.
That decision demonstrated that the court is still lrgislating
laws, instead of interrretinp the vill oi majority-America.
I for one view that vote as a disgrace to the country, and I feel
enormous s;mpathy»in particular, for the people of Alabama, and
what for so rim yours 23$! been a system of goverment that made
ourgra vonderrul oountrg, in which to live and raise children.
Upon the curt in ynrtiouls r, and iii oral, left-wing Cort
ressmon in go:-.eral--the Kennedys, Fondalss, Javits', Gaylord Nelsons
atrields, Churches, Stevcnsone, Lindaaggs, Moi-ovorns, Eurtene Ho-
C-arthys, and other sociologists oi this cotmtry, I place the blamefor hundreds cl acts that love gone to mks ours a rotten countrl Qto live in--Jest deteriorating, R 92 "r- lI-mom, those acts were the Firarga annfczobedo decisions of QHMZPR 2 I9
"92*lrren" Court; ahrogatsd obscenity laws; open-door irr~.mie"'I'~-11'-£01!__¢|.l_l__ !_ LL_ 1I___ _J ______._1___.___.L ____92 .a._AI-92_.|..a _._- .a.92__ _.-.__,..&PDLICLUI 111 TIE IICB D1 'l.lI'El"lPLOyITIEHT| II!!! 1JllJ.EC1Ol'lj 1'-Ill" II..-92'1III--1
arrest oi the publishers of SGIEK--, in New York and their alleged
molestation and wnal photography of seven-gear-old children; cred
tion of illdeath penalty nforcemcntg the denirration of J. Edgar" w and law enforcement specifically; the toleration of F-esurrection
Ci and I handful of Vietnam best-niks on povernnent P!0P¢=1*-3'! 91";
the 1.8-year-old vote» I .G: 92-i. __ '|jJ . ' __,92 __[@§&3 q c 1 coo:
é~;¢~-
. E, .
T/,r5-qr-_f':
FT
'.' xii
»-n-Q
92.'
!..--i .>u-10'
1
51.22 aav QQ
I I 11 toua man I think I would find that a 1' were a re g ,
mvjcrity of the court are substantially "evil" men, bent
5 at I find them upun destroying the 1.1.8. moo I In n , I
still dedicated to that destruction and.-nielpicable.
The Court might bo azrprised to 11nd"|'.h'at most-Americans
agree with no.
bb
b7¢
cc: The Prea_ident of the United $tatea
Federal *1ureau of Investigation
5enator Lloyd Bentsen, Texan
v
._. _3';92&=92
llB92 -L"? 9° 6 F2 P4!
'- -"Q:-'_i
- J. _,
Dlréutgr
92' Fuéeral ;ureuu of Inves-4 var n~uvw'
Jiafz-.1.'r.;1,___. 2;], D.'J .
-'F_ -..o.¢'
-.,1.f=.".?:'_- Q-5: '
92 . ., C:L4§L:1u 3OuI
:_92_»
-_.' -1 T
Laliug 3a. ', .. 92 .-,...4~.
.4. U -92---
1 -14. u
r_ I.-L . :l'-1 92..
1.1.4. ..l.».l.,.. .-._
.-1'.;.,Li'_J;.._E'
_ .
J
OIiJ
A.
W
W0
92
3_JuLO:
._,-_l_ ;;_é_!S ll
pg a coirt
I___.
_J_...J;_3.
.4 U-" .-»-
,¢~.--l'- ll J§}."*_1l .
Jl-J
.1
r;
l.-
'_l
92-O
"'1:
"y ".1
"'J
. -"'92. c4 .__.. L_l
_
-_ _92..
,_»,-.1,q .l_/.l
V
l 92i'......;....-
... " -Um -».'.C.
ii" L.1'_'?Q
i".:-li:'L.l..L '.4.-
;=E.U1-40
...-.....
| L 7.'-_. 1422.. J...
3 .~ I_-1:, -.
.'l}'§.'IL.
1" _ k
l" ;;'l1:."_'."
Z1911
.-, _ 4-
_ * E
.'ilL. 7 V _
.' 1* I .-
. .: '-.;.4 J ;.. 1..;- , 11;..1.' .2. 9 U'_.,, :. .,'4./.1..a -.---
5 E! 1. .."..l ; -..
.44»: O__! _,{ .92 .- ;..L
.; ..JL'=L;-.1, J:.;:.'. u'JI.l3'
1- .. . .. '.:.~..i;r: E11--V-.';h.e4...
l.
Cd fr»; 0
.1. LJ. _- ..-.. 12.1.!-.~'.'a
I _,-,J,_».'.»~l'.. 1"-L! .LL.1-. _| -
"1' "...~l-1:3
1 "
A--.;
_-.. - ' '-.;..LJ.-C I-.1. C._»'_;" --- 1.. ..
. - -_- .
E ..." ./ML. -- -. , 1,M .F_ / L . ,__ ,92-l ._,-_,.92....... ..-...v.r .._ 4;;
;.1_92'_;
:92_. 1at you
_..92.. .5 1..'.;C, __ . _1.
-1-
'.l;;_-1|-_; _'_.J:/_.E f_-LD'Ja-'--
._J4 '..I s.1,..... v-92J
-..... ' J.. I
____,_ ln __,-v 0
7"L3
L.<. v
92.J'_.;:._ c _ ...~
._ 4ftrll ,_ .'. _. . .. -5. L --.. ._ _»_4-..-._J, ~.
_ ., .e.92 _..1 ,'__ ...,':l Cl ..».~92. 1» -192-L.
_-_.._'1.-: A.
.1-_-
_'~J*J.. '.'
ll.-.4 .4-92/ I alr-
5
- P
M . Brennan, C.D. .
Mr. Callahan il
Mr. Casper __i
Mr. Conrad -i
Mr. Dulbey __i
Mr. Felt ________
Mr. Gale ___i
Mr. Rosen
Mr. Tavel _.._...._
Mr. Walters _._..i1
Mr. Soyars
3 Tele. Room i._
1Misa Holmes ___1
Miss Gandy lH1 un il
311, Tc?- ,.,,.L;';1.
_#
92J>| .
C'_:.l1'1 0
.1"
..-..-ti
.-
O
i
Jnrrei.3urger
Chief Justice
Suuveme Caurt of United States
Tn|1...-
Bear L
wha
bill
sch
C I111
Q99?
V311t I
ce
ocl
1e
ed
'.
+tJt
50;,
I '1." 31;;
freena
QC? L J.-11'
1'1 -T1
1,.1|O-1
-0
1|-
u
e '.92./LI;
|,r'-g
.i ¢- the
'_" C-1
_ 11'.-1
'1l~= <1? 21;;. .iu
Jul
> -' -
Hln L
lull ingest of tn
N'-, .4
J mun Q
, .r. surger:
In ne wake of the recent
;rame Court, I feel compel
believe to be the warat m
he histary-malin5 Dred Eu
chllévwd to achieve a so-t
j Berle to create
of the United Lt:
:'J':101tly l392;:f;'_!I'@ T311
now yuur court
necessary is
n5 children an
homes over al
s yure lunacy.
0 buFly needed
cumes scuandur
use chi1&?¢n 1
of a radica can
ally
luci
':u:l. 1"
ya 1
C CH, H
c
5 on
lmv
¢:.LV'3
i1.Ll§!-L!"-
9 12311 O 1;.;!;.:=J
as becnme game
uvised a more
Unlud LtntetTo s
we|v-.'t uUP?. -.11-IJUVQ
V9 .1
.1 L1-3=:._»{L1'.J'.-I11 .'.n the I".3s;--.=;-
. 1 .-|*:.s.U.:1.L.
z-H-bet not
¬ Deglnn
ld Cecre
beJond t
bus:es,
I-
y in ant rehatr
cud
-v-r ._l1<;-1'
1.1; a
' U1'1'L|.CC§3cjc..y uv
.AQ to"'ngt0n, D. ¬. F
".2 Cl
¬
71::
I.
1.
ZIP
C.J.i:"C.
:92 _4- .1 .[92i;'I.1..:S
c..__,
"ayy
.92'; -'.,-A-J
lot ii} '31.!
use? when a m
the Puc$lGQHtdeclblon :
led to sgeax out arainst
lsuarrlag
utt Case.
-;ed P1
uud tunslon
unlike that
lug of the Civil ar.
-..u...J.11=_;=_:
scopeHoust
May l,
_|.'.3L.'.-:'.id. J .:--.':; If
e of justlue
The uu;in5 Of
ciul balance
among the
I - 1 ~
J
' 1
. I1
c
L
1':
O
Ll
JV
U
_V
4.
1»
I
._U-.nun " t@
11:»0..
;r inc
ticus
L} 11.11
l"'J"¬1'63.
1131
4- ¢U
U
'-.aL!-..__;J,":;
hd all Fed
otur witho
-1"esiaency t5-
k
V9 U£;'L'-
25
V
u 1|-In
i
.5
U
,»-- r:.;."° 1.3.¢¬92.;.._.....|.'.| -1.1
...' '. - r I.J1J .if.hL v»'ln; pu
nqout thu 1 ;utl0n
.11-_-1 F1.- T =.1'a'x L C OLl1't
1510: to mnhu when
uHOOJus unwiaely an
L?
UL
sea to
in;
e U
pe1
nor
0
f_i
ra
t
U1
ha
£1»ople 01' txi: 'J.1_. '12: - 1.oLl¢l
vi the mun on thm ..pruMe
s. Our elcutu rrutide t hat
the nucd arisen, If ouv Pruutue
Conéress ratifies thu a,t»1nu
are sadG1ed witn L bad choice
-tth no meant of getting
etsiuncxl im;-~.=:.'.92;Em1<.-11.2.
now stuck with nine
PyP9L the luts US the unu ¢;¢
latlng t m. Xou G tht otntr
tutors every tncu of the v
tian, alttrlr~"'buns
of £119 ..t_; .'.1...~..'..u.t-921' du-
11L
G
aple
E;cl11Q;
L1-923].L,. - f -N6
i1C
CI'u.
uECO
cu with
1
_u~_ 0
K .~ -..U .4 La ....E £1
r. I . - , 1;-. u-.42.; ._, v..=-.1; - .L uziiu.'.'92~.»Q."[..';'.1 U4.
"c;es.
£;..£lL..-.131.
11111.1 §If.'L;j':1Jutlué
_~ I. 1 _
-3.1- J9.
'." Ill. Q:-1
.'92 2.; 1'-..-.L!-. 1, .u_-1 ....-V, ...all -1.'». Q
£3.11! 111'.- . .. .; -,-.-,92|:_J .;L-- -92-uh: ILL
C t
J0-Q .|u-.92..'<..-
$1.;-31
' ' -..'Jr."
5* .3;?si":'..~'
- 1. .5
;.....
T; 92:' _
l.
n-re
_ .
II-rllvi
92qlln92nQ
i"
.-
',:
._;
$I~ sf
,=,,,.--_»_- -1.--.
.. 92.-.¢- E7it 792 F l
.._.l' I
1
May 12, 1911
92=_x-103§;,»é@?- Jr 7s Ss"-52 7&7L/ I
6/r
W
Dw-
Your letter of may lat, with enclosure,
has been received and I thank you tor your thoughtlulneas.
I am indeed grateful for your support and hope my future
endeavors continue to merit your condence.
' Sincerely yours,
MAILED 10
U: N1 1 fl 1971
NOTE: C01-respondent's enclosure criticizes the Supreme Court for
its affirmation of the legality of school children.
-3
_ * I/I Imi £1 _ "{T._l >-_ Q I§.§.F;32ni -r._.; 11 ..1 ;-'1 L'_f =5} e l
Brennan. CI!Callahan ___ -
aspcr
unrad ______Dalbey it 'Fell. ii _ 1 ' f
Gale ___. ~' ' '~ 1,
Rusen __i__ 92 " , 'Tavu] . M
Waiters __._______ .'Soy-are * ' ' »=_' 7-3 1% lutnzws mm _ *
candy ___w mun nooM[__J TELETYPE uurrijj 92-
! -__r__i_-_ 0 " ' I '.
UWWNAL VOIII I40. IO IQ-III ,
ll IIOI IIOIIOII ,|~OB Gill. ll. NO. ll
!
n
1
'|
F
.#*
;-3-. .
"K' - -7?r ;
-.5--I
._.,_.,,,._
. 1
'§-.'-'~'~é-
lge;
ff !_- -raou %?'5_ Rp$9nj_.» _
,_ ..ni__ 7UNITED s"m'n:s OL-/ERNMENT .- U .
d?92{em.0randum
ConhdMr. Sullivan? - _DAT£: May 25, 1971 5» ,
1 -' Mr: B
_ iv
nlhr
., .. Q llilnco
' Och
JLMES HERMAN BOSTIC, ET AL- -
CQHHERCE UNION BANK ' ¥_' _ -
BORDEAUX BRANCH, a = ~ -
NASHVILLE TENNESSEE 3- U 'APRIL 24, '1967_ . U b /BANK ROBBERY . " ' 6:? '~
' ' on 5/24/71 the U. S. Supreme Court in a
decision per curiam copy attached! dismissed a writ ofcertigri inasmuch as the court hadB¬¬ EHder'the'1staken
representation that the petitioner Bostic! had been convicted
of the offense oi conspiracy to commit murder. The record,nIshows Bostic was neither charged with_n9r convicted of the
,offense of cOnSpiracy#tQ_commit murder, The conspiracy
count on which he was convicted did not include any charge
fof conspiracy to commit murder, but did list the murder as92one of several overt-acts to further the Bank Robbery con-
spiracy The qpinion_contains no criticism or reference_to_the' TQIMI _....,,_..._..7p
Sullivan ..._._._-..
92
&
92
Captioned bank was robbed by two armed men on
4/24/67 who obtained over $29,000. Bostic and William Beard.
were later identified as the subjects. Bureau Agents arrested
Bostic on 6/5/67 and he was subsequently convicted in U. S.~
District Court, Nashville, Tennessee, for violation Federal
Bank Robbery Statute which included a Bank Robbery - Con-
spiracy count tor which he received a 25-year sentence.
The conspiracy count contained several ov rt ac o e
I 4* twhich was the murder of one of Bostic s é%ociianother gang member. His conviction we Hél U. S.
Court of Appeals,Shd.Circuit. --»'-" _ g[1HXW5:? _ _The U. S. Supreme Court grant tlw ofcertiorari to consider whether the Court of Appealgéjpr the
_Sixth Circuit had erred in ho1ding'mI Boeeic 5H roperly
;been convicted of conspiracy to commit_murder in order to"i
avoid apprehension-for bank robbery. The Su reme Court ed-- .-; I ' . - I J ii ..2»e~e==.,»,m. J .l*' ~-Q E lj_ ~ H T 59 2 W1/ CONT HEB _
. a .e
_-'---- - ..,......_.- ._ --~-- ~- -_-_--s. . .- e ._ e_,.,.r-._ e - e , e .4 .. .--.¢-_..,_-;»---- r'4 ~ e _ '. ' _ 111* 1 is in '~1£vW7' W
92
¢
Y
.4
I
4-_
-3»
-_- '1
$5
-.
F
1;? -
u--_
3'1
ac-.-.§_ _ k _ _ _ _ ~ H _.__.__.._.., .._ . _ A---im
-A '0 ' --
' IA , - Ii I . J .
' n
Hosea to Sullivan
RF; 312:5 hsnnihMemorandum
BUSTIC
gm that the Court of Appeals purported to uphold the conviction
in for this offense even though there was no evidence that Bostic ,
,» knew of the plan to commit murder and he had been confined -
A in prison for severai months prior to the date of the murder.
The court noted the memorandum for the U. S. Government in
1 opposition to the granting of the writ urged that Bostic
<, was "responsible for the actions of his co-conspirators in
Q killing one member of the group." The Supreme Court indicated
§,the statements in the opinion oi the Court of Appeals and
;'in the memorandum oi the U. S. Government were erroneous and
, that the facts were not as the Court believed them to be at
tqthe time the writ of eertiorari was granted.
ACTION: For information. 7 '
m We. V;/i 92v@>§!{" V g./@W/
92
JU
u
I_ Q
I
-2--
IE!!!.- .- '-'-'
K! _ .
. 1-u 4H. .92
.__ _-77;
..~.
5-
_----I
em
F.__¢_..
-.i v
I
92 _ '
srrylclc; rm; opinion ll subject to fnrlnnl revision before publicationii: inc nrciisntiters print of um Unite-1 sum-n Rcimrru. .|il9mltl'1 mil If?-qm-_-tcti to notify the Rcnortcr of Dec!-"l0n>I. Sl-1l'l'""° -'0"?! 9 "'992'nH<-ll Stntcg, 9292 uslillagmn, D.C. 20-'-iii, of any tnwr-|.:|':92|v1|lc|1i or othert-wmiil ;92rrnl'u, in nnicr int corrections mu; be made before the pre-
liminary print mien to press.
SUPREME COURTOF THE UNITED STATES
No. 5250.~Oo'rosi-in TERM, 1970
__?..i-.1.-_
James Herman Bostic_.iO W. f _,. , _ iPemionen n tit 0 Lertioiari to tie
' "United States Court of Ap-
_ _ v' peels for the Sixth Circuit.
'L*n1ted States.
. [May 24. 1971]
Pen Contest.
We granted the writ of certiorari in this case to con-
sider whether the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
had erred in holding that the petitioner had properly been
convicted of conspiracy to commit murder in order to
avoid apprehension for the robbery of a. federally insured
bank. The Court of Appeals purported to uphold a.
conviction for this offense, though there was no evidence
that the petitioner knew of the plan to commit murder.
and he had been conned in prison for several months
prior to the date the murder was committed.- The
inemorandum for the United States in opposition to the
g1':1.nting Of the writ urged that the }3 iiZitiOIiGI was re-
sponsible for the actions of his coconspirators in killing
one member of the group," and as to this issue, relied
on the opinion of the Court of Appeals. _
1 400 U. S. 991.
=42-4 F. -Ed. 951. The opinion recites that the CQ!iSpi1:Lc_92 count
on which the petitioner was convicted aliegcd 2. conspiracy to rob
federally insured banks with dangerous 9292'cn.pons and to commit
murder to avoid apprehension for seine. -124 F. 2d, at 953. The
court went on to say, As to Bostic, although he had been returned
to the pr-ni'icnti:ir3= sometime hciorc Fr-rgu.-'on'-s murder, there no
t:92"'ulc|n-c that he had renounced or 9292'iIInIrn9292'n :';'c;-'. the con.-pir.-103'."
42-I 1". 2:1, at 96-L
.-'1 -/-/-é2_l7< X
F?- hC92S92J2U
i_§ :_ -"J;___:_'.':'_'.' _i P
_g
I?
Jli;
H.../
.';¢
"qr"
lis-
,.,|__ _ _o- -0-1 a
5250--1'1-llt CUIILUI
-I BOSTIC v. UNITED ST.-92'1ES
It now appears that those statements in the opinion oft
tho Court of Appcn'|s and in the memorandum of the
United States were erroneous, and that the facts are not
as we believed them to be at the time we granted the
writ. The record shows that the petitioner was neither
charged with nor convicted of the offense of conspiracy
to commit murder. The conspiracy count on wlfieh the
petitioner was convicted did not include any charge of
conspiracy to murder. Indeed, in his closing argument
to the jury the -prosecutor stated that the 3;.-zitioner had
left the conspiracy prior to the murder, when he was
returned to the penitentiary.
Inasmuch as our grant of the writ of certiorari in this
case was predicated on the mistaken representation that
the petitioner had been convicted of the offense of con-
spiracy to commit murder, we now dismiss the Writ as
improvidently granted. "
It is so ordered-
I
1
Q
~
_ _i____.___i _ _ i __ _i.__..._.ii~_._.._.__._i__ . - .-. 3-20 Rcv.2-2-TI! { A ' ° _ _ S Z6 ' ,/' Qua - . 92 {'!|1l'.'.._.':__;..::..._...-JRi<>.hr.;. , _____,- . ~ ' rm--'.= 1. ..b. .___.Callahhn ____....._
Casper -
Conrad '
Dalbey
92 -' ale 1 'voaen ____..___;Tavel .._..._._..._..
Walters ___i__
Soyara ___i__.__
Tele. Room ._..._..
I Holmes _.__,_____. Gandy ----i---
?-;~ _ _'
'2? "I;
SEUPI-32
ROBBERY APPEAL!MN , WASHINGTON--THE SUPREME COURT EXPRESSED EXTREME, AND SQEETEAT1T1 UNUSUAL, IRRITATION TQDAY AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND A FEDERALIAPPIIALS COURT FOR PIISREPRESENTING TI-IE FACTS IN A ROBBERY CASE-
'.u-. II. coDEEcT1oE WITH TEE EDEEEAT or THE; |UNIOH EASE IN NASHVILLE IT 1957THE COURT SAID, IN EFFECT, THAT IT SHOULD 92EVER FAVE TAKEN THEIS or " HL h1STAhEN REPRESENTATION"IR A UNAP~!IIIOUS, UNSIGNED OPINION, THE HIGH COURT DISI-'sISSED,_APAUPETPS APPEAL BY JAPEES HERI"=-AI-I BOSTIC 1'1!-IO DREW 25 YEARS IN JAIL INBORDEAUX BRA'.¬CI~I OF THE COE~1I'iERCE
4. T H L; yl
EP.:-ID THAT IT DID SO ON THE BASEPIADE BY BOTH THE 6TH CIRCUIT COURTIBOSTICK CORRECT! HAD BEEN CONVICTF ICOI-iI=1IT l-lLIRDE.R- _ ' --TEASE Ev
I;D OF THE OFFENSE OF CONSPIRACY TO
92_AGREED To HEAR THEM, HEARD ORAL ARGUMENT, AND THEN NET INL ICOUFEREHCE To DEcIDE THE IssuE. BUT BLAME IS NOT NORHALLYST [ATTACHED FOR nIsAEPnEsENTAT1oA. - .§%g , THE COURT SAID IT GRANTED THE APPEAL IN ORDER To CONSIDER WHETHER~E - _ ;TAE APPEALS COURT HAD EAAED IN HOLDING THAT DosTIcA HAD PROPERLYA»? ;BEEH coTvIcTED OF CONSPIRACY To COMMIT ASADEA IN ORDER To Avo1DT* iAPPREHESlON FOR THE ROBBERY or THE FEDERALLY INSURED DADA..; BOSTIC EAD ARGUED TAAT LOWER COURTS WERE MISTAKEN IN FINDING 52;coET1Eu:D TO PARTICIPATE IN THE coEsPIAAcY AFTER HIS ARREST ATD THUS=EAs RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS or HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS IN KILLING ONEIHEHBER CF THE anon? UHO HAD BEEN TALKIKG TO THE EDI.THE ALGA COURT TDDAD STATEEEATS IN TAE APPEALLATE COURTS OPINION,AND IR THE MEMORANDUM or THE UNITED sTATEs HERE ERRONEOUS, AND THATTHE TAcTs ARE NOT AS_NE BEhIEVED THEM To DE.AT THE TIEE WE GRANTED
THE ERIT."1 - 5-EA-=cE/Aw12oAPED ,__5 . "&-17f7é___
5 WASHINGTON CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE
S - @E@§$5§ '§ " ' ~ . - .I _._. _E _ ,__ - __ _7_ ____ _ 1. ___ __ _': _ __ _ _ i i ________:_ _. ,1-__
I . I1 _ .__.,_._ .1.
F APPEALS AND THE GOVERI-RIENT THAT I
' 1"! IT IS NOT UNUSUAL FOR TI-IE COURT TO DISNISS CASES OI-ICE IT HAS E
I
To} son 'O-19 Rev. S-9-7|! ,_/- , is_ /J -{u lw '_,;}¢__._.__Mo QBi op "l '1 [:4
Brennan. C.D.
Callahan
Casper _
Conrad ._- .____
Dalbey __,_____
- __I Felt _
Rosen
Tavel ___.___._
é 31- Walters__i-i_
ft- ~* Soyars ______..._Beaver
Gandy
1.
-|v-J .. I ' .-
, .. ,_ - l at ~.f.|Hiqh Cou¬t ippoints jl T? ITale. Room __.__
Holmes _,,_._..___
Chief Depu Clerk , The Washington P04 fi WA U. L _Cqm_t has ap/ Times Herald '~_ '*
The Evening Star Washington! _'_
Rodak -dgrhas been on the Q Q-PPFPGX i '.- The Sunday Star Washington!
court's staff for nearly 15 years.
As chief deputy clerk, he
.air22s;<1a_§dmud,B-cwlinanI IWIIO recently retiree. PDaily News New York!
Sunday News New York!
New York Post5"!_ < 4 ptteu i _ The Washington Daily News ____!__ 1 ¢h1°ldePl_Y cl r?.- »:¢".o- -1': '-92. r , , - , . . - :1
2?____i..._i-
The New York Times -
The Daily World___.___.._-
, The New Leader
r_ The Wall Street Joumal_'l The National Observer
'.!"1"'Q is»People's World __.____.___--
Q JLIN2 91971 T T
2: RM ,1 .4
I };:o'r 1-"zrfrfnanm? ,. I0 1. i_ Iii? "3my 1 W _1 A
xi/
?
|
!
K
M
5
I
I
i<5
92.92-w"K "92-
4 '92,
1
L»ve
qumlm _ , s 601
June 30, 1971 '
The 9 Supreme Court Justices
Their home addresses
K Honorable Justices:Vi aOur Su reme Court tcoay contributed, agair, to our r tion's
crime rate. S? its permissiveness, again, towards CPiwe.-
Namely, by your acquital today of the New York Times, for i
breaking of our national-security laws, you have encouraged, aga
every individual in our nation to break our laws, provied they,
indiviual judgement, prejudge that they are in the right and th
people our government! are in the wrong.Mr. Tn!s0n___.
Mr. Sullivan._
M ~M;:b!..-..-
Q-_I}rqnnanCI
Mr, CrrHahan..
Mr. C3-P"~---
ML 'I!'|L'.92.d ..
Mn! .~r ~
M1. Folt
r. Gale ----- --$.Rmm-_
ML Tavl ....
Mr. Walters..-
Mr. 5'2-'=1"5 -
Mr. Bc:wer.....
Teie. Room_.._
Miss Holmes...
Miss Gand&'---
-n-A.
ts
in,
in their
at the
I wish you would cease increasing our crime rate by encouraging
people to break laws
/B/Sincerelta.
oi/V
CDPY: I ,' -. '1
/attorney General John Eitcheil.FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. @%~
House Comtittee on Grime. '
Senate Judiciary Committee.
National Commission on Crime and Deliquency.World Association of Judges. j '
National Association of Citizens Cruse Commissions.
smerican Association of Criminology.Unites Nations Committee of Experts on the Prevention of Cri1e.!1* _J
American Society for the Prevention of Crime. Ifr. Patrick Buchanan, the '-fhite House. :9
"'3
/6,9 ; 7545° 1
-
{kl-PEA - .._1-ii.- .I n.v-Q ' u-Ii
51.105 as JUL;-6"1971
*92'~ _ VI "1|~--»--.-l;|r|T-cf;-|92_Q fly?»-pr-15!;-nv _ F I-V Q -"""' on ff A C C .; JUL 9 L." q.§ 7 Q"
13 2JUL .1 3 1971F ., ' ,, 3' 92a$E* ,-:J ...L.é° -
1.Etl_la-{-2-8[.3_| _-$11.39?-3717/Fr&.L:_. F1 .1.
H, 1. .--_ .-=:=-..-.-..
-.
-J' x=-. 4 .__,,_,_,':., ,_:_-_'__._i:,__m:~,-,_1'_:.. U j 3é * xvi» "
' _;-4; '.-
___ __q_,. _.-__
. .._- 4,. _ '
" -- . - -. * - . é.-<1;~vr- -F.-u
w -.
=.~:?* '* ';..L'1r=
M-P
Fgm&A£@z ~?Zfi£nu@:%@%w@%§ M%f#%
4 ? ru-<.»d
;;*'**~ ¢--f g%, / ;;@MJ1M .,./4%_££J!x£2 ?'}-hpdfgl '? "a..[..,_,,37H,.,AH-4» !r~J
w%f@ww%%"tmMW / 7*f,,,¢ ,@m,.; 75d" ZL"*%"' "amM* --F: 1 / , I L -
J. ' ¢;,_!;/1&4-q.¢'r|.» ATV ' ' ' ' _ @,_",,;ag,,_,_;,g, W
I. ~f'2 * r"" "¢%JZ$i, Jw-~'Z' T. / I J dkuijfhuq_ . _i . . 1 ____ _ _
REC- . .4 ~'
1%v
.9292
92..||-r #MM~" ;-1L,,.,1,,._~.:.»»=»v~<-'»'~"
+ww ?,,@%~?14¢: .- ="@*- '1; :::' JUL/$397?/¢-w-4/92 WA; £""""" ad
/J-L» _
A_5;,,:,--Jn..¢-»--4-41-¢/"Z.
" §Z .¢u.~MJM-fifwyw ,,Z...'.7a.7;u»==:-»~1
Ii
/92--w
,92_1~'1."L 4! q,2,.<;::.J 2-;K~L~' , *4awZ,. .7 7"",,,..,,.¢=>/~1::,.~» !'92/q,§,:=92.»§_1=' lg 1 . . . 0-../J72
1a-_-.¢-
.92 ___ _qggt '. -=.:
._ .,.¢;,-
-
. - I '1 4:" "1'? __'-
. __
ad- *%3ar2 - E z,J_;_JZ;6_v-' ffzé ii; I/~,¬?§%$-@W;z~§
¬a;-p j1 ~{ :1]-4 J-£14!-**;1=CZJJ /B-¢¢»r-~17 -1"/32*-v-J~¢-J--¢...Z;;~.../i WM &-av» i .mi :»s_/.:¢_w/;<¢:: §>/ZZ2;;Zi? * ¢~,.. .¢. */%~ " **¢***1 "* ¢;§,* ; " '; z'N.@ £"M4.m Jail 1+» -~11
-4@1?_2~=»f ,A,,~z.,=/».,.¢,.,.z=-J»v»-Ja"/»;»-»n~Y;»3»--i~¢/"?~»~":§-§m.£;,z:..*J;$.14~d¢Mu¢~Tm'r,&J/=~7~u,a-J ii-»#3»-4» nm~W- ¢u¢; .1¢@ufM>@,.,,u.:¢: a1m;,,.;.,>§ 1:M_f1~L~; ' ,2122..-,=-. ::.z..,4-3 mi A .»._¢.,~.#:r»»--~.¢1..~..,~ -H J~ ¢7?rj/¢~:_.. 71%» '
!w_,{, ____ _____ £r~+~<-»¢»~J_____,n§_=/*&-;_-es.»Z3, #fw é- i¢»~./4: mw% 4~@ ._, ..-""/d.Z.?~1jwljL.Z;..L>,/3..F, . W . _ 5. *7 _/134-44-/,1
1»~..;.;,f:..~..¢.,, »~/zM¢.,.;.., J /11;w~ i~@-//" ?*"m'~
L,,.§,U 159 A ,,. " ~ ,,,..1 *-{M*/¢~<dv~U/¬~Y*i? < ~»:~'Z77¢< J?/7 **a47%.Hz.1z~§"z71f.?¢..7¢m*
/W--*~»/-y-Z!,,,,,z:,f,/4,4 /»....,.M.7¬¢-.»<.>I¢»<Jr-»*¢-~ Z*hm "M4Z',1",,i,.,7i"L,¢.~.n1z/.LQ$4.4. -if t wi_ziJ;5 ~¢ -Wk/=~?7W~?@%~wA@?@%%»3|
|
1
"5-0
ezs.-;q
er
fl
I
!
"6" '1
_.-92-'
1-92
-nu---sqQ! U91 -
8246; ;q1¢~1kb clghéz
¢7f¢?-I
July 1, 1971
Terre Haute, Ind.
Dear Mr. Hoover: l
I have been an admirer of you for many
years, as head of the F. B. I. in Washington
D, C. I think all law-abiding citizens of
mature age feel the same wayl I'm glad
President Nixon sees fit to keep you as head
of this department as many Presidents have
done before him. I read once a report on
the department when you took it over, which
was not goodl I believe, as we get older,
we realize too, that wisdom ecmes by ex-
perience & it is our best teachers! I
think the people "hollering" about you are
either immature, or revolutionaries & not
responsible citizens e some may not even
be American citizens! These people are
out to do anything to run America down, or
destroy America in any way possible & of
course they do not like anybody enforcing
our laws or investigating people. I think
it is due to your departments efforts that
America is still free & to warn people of the
forces behind these riots, bombings, killings
& etc. I commend you & your department for
a job well done, no doubt men under you
have lost their lives or been injured while
trying to guard our country & our people,
& I, as a private citizen, do appreciate it
& our police forces & our boys of the
national guard, who look out for us, too.
If the Supreme Court & lower courts
done as good a job while trying the people
Ir Icopy:rw 92A92wg$1192 k9 ? £/ ayéy./ J ,11/
Mr.F Mr. Sullg n ____._
1'. rennan, C.D._
Callahg ___
Mr. Casper __.__._
Mr. Conrad ..__.___
Mr. Dalboy ___.__.
Mr. Felt ..__.______
Mr. Gaie .________
Mr. Roaeu ___..._.
Mr. Tavel _____
Mr. Walters ___.__
Ma§kymsaaaa_a
Mr. Beaver _.___.
Tole. Room _____
Miss Holmes .___._
Miss Gandy _.___._
_.,_._.._-.__.._i;i.1-....
. I,".
h 92
1
J
1 1'.-._1
- 4
"is?-: "
--_p|_r
:3
ad
!
@__-'| =g
H4,
'.'+,.l ,
4.--9___ - __-__L -._-.1. .I.l- --4 'I4I K @ 1-on-L maul-I-nun L Q-can Ila-smelti--IIWIYOU SBQICII 0111;, 1.1; WUULQ Di: Cl muuu urn.-I-=5 us usual uuuuaui;
I have criticized the Supreme Court but I never received
a answer to my letter! I do not think the Supreme Cour
acts always in the best interest of majority of thet
people. lve come to believe, it would perhaps be bette
if they were elected by popular vote, every I0 years or
so. As some do not seem to be highly experienced men
at times & these men should be best judges in our land,
T think, T think they should be very highly educated in
their field & they should be of the highest moral chara
ter-of most anyone in our governent. Ive been told
that Justice Warren was a political pay-off appointee.
This appointment is one thing l do criticize ?resident
Eisenhower for doing. He did not seem to have a very
good educational & experienced back ground as a judge
when he was appointed. And, his views seemed entirely
to liberal to suit me. Also, I believe Judge Douglas
has been criticized for a book he wrote, which was
very liberal. I can not remember the name of the book,
but the paragraph I heard discussed seemed rather shock
ing coming from a Supreme Court Justice. I do not
believe in banning prayer from public schools either!
How could 1 atheist woman, who I understand was driven
out of America, have been listened to? How can a
simple prayer, as the Lords prayer or other non-
denomational prayer hurt anybody? The pilgrims came
to America to have freedom of worship, this is the
lst step to e country's downfall, iorgetting God!
Every country who forgot God has been destroyed down
through History! This is what is the main trouble
with the youth of to-day, who riot, steal, down grade
America, our service men o everything good principles
& God fearing people believe in, they are out to des-
troy! This really alarms mel But, I feel as Billy
Graham says, we may have hit the low in morals &
behavior & I hope, as he does, that there will be a
great spiritual awakening, not only in our Country,
but all over the world & people turn back to God!
This is the only thing, I believe, which will change
people. They have lost their purpose in life a in
being here! If we all obeyed God's Ten Commandments,
we would have Heaven on Earth! We may never have it
2C
A
E?
92-
1< 2
-i?
...---u
D
92
I-1
--,,,but we can do our part by striving for right & justice
in the world? I believe you & your men have tried &
it s against great oaas: But, cnanxs aga1n ror a JOD
well done!
Sincerely,
- -- J= -;
.
,_ ,
'
1
;'.',§:_,;<'.'_';5
' :.._.._.
1" 51;
1.2, 1'1;
uw.2-1. P
92 :25,
-nu-ii
,"'~l*~?.§.i-'
_. "ii-6 3-
.1_t+._%
_,, _ ,:..._
Q9? -' ._.'..._ __ --I
of
3-, .7,
g,
DeJuly 9, 1971
bi/1'
_4';so2 b
vi
I received your letter on July 7th and appre-
_ / ciate your interest in furnishing me your views. Your
i "' comments about my work are most encouraging and mean
a great deal to me.
i Sincerely yours,
A.MAlLED 10 L Edam H00 .
JUL -1971
FBI
NOTE: Correspondent is not identiable in Bules. In her 1etter she
Tolson A__.__.
Sullivan ______
92'|oh1 i___
Biahp ______._
Brennan. C.D. __ -.
Callahan __%___
Casper I7v
onrad _4_____
Oaibey ___.____,_.
Felt ._..__._'_'
9292alu.'n=. _____+__.
lmars _____._
IS-nu-r ______
'j'r92'|{-, Room __._. .
Hnlmee _,_..r_._-.
1-mxdn l@.._--- MAILthe Director, is critical of the Supreme Court, and hopes for
a spiritual reawakening.
W Qt 5%
we
Gale ,_______ ,.Hu=u;'n i__i__* '-,.'__' ' 1' Tm-01 _ wgb U
ROOMl:| TELETYPE UNIT 5:]
92
I _ Mr. Felt .___.__' I Mt. Tr||!l0I'l_.__
Mr. Rosenui.
A __ L ;.§__
F II1 -" -14-..-'1-__ .- y 7
gyv
nousion , i exas - §,,'_ "-
October 1, 1911 iM£.;~l';1;"""_
Mr. Walter;
Q- ""3!l..._....
l Mr. wyars._____
Tale. R0om____
The Honorable Richard M. Nixon Ml G' d'""-
I600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D_ C. f
Dear Mr. President:
As a citizen of the United States, I as manyothers
ieariully await your decision of the choices for the supreme£3531, Once again I took upon myself to ask the one person--
rethe, whom I knew couid receive an answer for you from -the Infinite Source oi wisdom, and I arn forwarding that message
to you. -
' I hope you will find comfort, love and brotherhood on
the written pages I have enclosed.
6 §r Sincerelygyours, I 5/ .5!
,0/QW
"Clnce again in manis history an innocent man stands at the
crossroads of a mighty civilization with the burden to undo the
erroneous deeds of men who preceded him, to once again try to
abide by the laws of God and to not give in to the pressures of
.1 0 I -1 I wrv I .1 0 | | I - |I
erroneous men; mus is me signmcance ortne appointment tor me
highest Court of the United States which is now lacing the President
of the United States.
"if two men who love God and who have respect for law and
order do not occupy these positions - s court, * "
will have removed herself completely from her true foundation and
can become nothing but a jungle, and in a very short time she shall
reduce hersell to ashes with all her great achievements consummed
H Page 2
own interest and, therefore, no two men are supposed to be
equal. This is God's plan and no man whoever he may be,
whatever position he may hold, will be capable of changing this
Truth.
"One other Truth these men did not comprehend was that,
although they may go clown in history books as saviors and great
heroes it is not so written in Godls Universe. There they face
God's Law of Compensation which will punish them without ceasing
until all of their erroneous behavior is removed from their souls.
There is no way in earthy words to describe that suffering.
"No man has the right to play God; he has the right to love
God, to love his country, and to want his country to prosper just
as does the man who is now President oi the United states. in
Truth the present President wants nothing '5for himself and his love
for his country is without measure, so it is for this reason that he
must choose the two men himself and he must demand that his
appointments be confirmed because the ones who will oppose him
in his choices cannot afford to be exposed in their true nature to
the American people; this is the pressure point in the President's
iavor. These men will lgive in and await a next time which in
truth will never come ii the President does choose his own men
because from then on the United States oi America will regain her
true foundation and no one, nothing, can stop her from becoming
the greatest civilization since creation time.
Page 3
"This last paragraph is spoken directly to the man who is
now President oi the United States. "Thy burden is great but
thy strength and courage is greater. Thy have no reason to
fear the other side. Make thy own choices and stand by them and
an abundance of help, love, and brotherhood will envelope thee,
not alone from Above but from the citizens of the United $tates
who in Truth truly deserve that this country reaches the plateau '
of the highest civilization since creation time."
e
~ .22§i:' '
-"' .'.»-'
EH
z. . 4-3» "~". -.2»:-
Q..-
' l1
-_ _
$12!"-Q
5!.f; -'-
X
4-
92
-92-='-_. I
- F
-55-: '_.i I/rid v-.TO
FROM
summer;
1!;, 4,-> 1=;~.-~.===-;=.&=.~.~- " r ""*"' - " /. of, 0:04. l|o._no.':r I ._ I/J P igson _i____- /1 UNITED STA FES GOVERNMENT /' Sum, J M <1 T '";"~e§*$ emman um L ._
Casper l
Mr. Cleveland oars 9-24-71 §§E£;j:E:f'0- / 2221: ~
Lg Hg fMal l2i,92.":"' :'::fr|re__.,i._aylgunorn ___
llolmea ':-
PROSPE IVE CANDIDATES FOR
U. S
ea/I
W/J
ACTION:
.46.
Enclosures
1K1
_ J1
.2-'5; r/Asubmitted on
- Mr. Sul4-K Q///ii - Mr. Rosen k;7éQ,~;l -
dL£_:J_¢For
~13"¬i '31:-ya; i.<g5PREME counw vacancv
POWEBL, JR.
~ii:1
{Eel _AEn.pr
F»
information onl' I
with the retirements of Justices Hugo L. Blackand John Marshall Harlan of the Supreme Court of theUnited States, the wire services and the local presshave speculated on a successor to these Justices. Thenames of those most prominently mentioned have beenthrough the indices of the Bureau. Hereinafter is setforth biographical data concerning them, as well as infor-mation from Bureau files on ail available references. Acheck was made with the Identification Division'of theBureau and no arrest records were located for any of theseindividuals. The names of these individuals are as followsFundy
Z
t'c>?g/ ¢-'.' --.
4 L56 10-¢;1
Memos wer e reviousl
E§3;In$
l -.Adminisfrative Review Unit
1 - i
. .-1;;-. /' '
92 Crime Records Division
eveland01/F3/"
/I / 1 I
has; ,~"
-'1
=4:-re
. 1
4
0
1;
E1-4-
-F
.l*aii--Q
J
. pf.
I , -.|_.' 92_._>
is" T .J._'
' 1:Rh
../
I,Y.?."i1II'-if: it at=1I:F"".ZF-¥"- 92 if Q! g92l
H
i r~lnrul._.... ._._.
I1! _
§u92 Mh ,.__' _ __ auxin!-Iln
.| .--.I
in-', ___ A ___I. f
The Attorney General October 29 1971
Director, FBI
1.nv.1s FRANKLIN POWELL, an.
wxnmam noses REIINQUIST
/92,JUS'?ICIZSV some 1~.-rs count or THE unrrsn STATES
The "Washington Post" on October 29, 1971, on page A1
carried an article captioned "FBI Queries Possible Opponents of TwoSupreme Court Nominees." This article indicates that certainindividuals interviewed during the course of the investigation of thecaptioned individuals were asked "whether they plan to ght the
confirmations. " .
This is to advise that the Agents who conducted theinterviews oi these individuals have been contacted and deny that atany time did they ask whether the person being interviewed plannedto tight the confirmations or planned to testify against the nominees.
é1- 975%?1 - The Deputy Attorney General 1
bi/~ >
? even some-as
Note. See memo Cleveland t Rosen, 10-29 '71, same caption, JAR bsh
Mandi -
ff-*" WBI
§0NOV3 1971H /no NOV 1 1971
-n-I""III""""_-H-_'I
-..
5
7 . ¢
0:152 - .2-7s/75» Q:Za/
CHANGEU Tn as: ~ //7/¢"7~"!<
APR201977 I63
:1/K/Q/t///%
. . i_4--523
-_.n=.l'v*
.- ~.-- ,-.' --1 " 1:, 5':_...
_ 1-.
i
5
1'3: as
.,:.
'..-'..-s
92>-IP?'_""1
q-:1-I-IQ
4
I
J
-~.;_;"i;
. g
-_.._1f E5, "92 I .115 1
, .1/E"~.'::.'-an m- Slqrrrmrlunri nftl1t'1nhbBtatn Z, .1- _.,d ___
FMl1ina!m'¢.P- II. 285%? 92 if §I°f .'I"
Mt. Ienirinl .___.
II" M':'=Ho!! _m_
Mr T-Ek'.!"r YT3. __
September 20, 1972 C an Fer" ..__._
. Mr '7 "11 .
l Mr . rs
T'Z_ -
1 -92
Mr. L. Patrick Gray F "Z "7 F
Director, Federal Bureau of l ' __
Investigation -Pennsylvania Ave. at 9th St. , N. W. _Washington, D. C. /j| JR ,_»92~- '
Dear Mr. Gray:
As you may know, the law clerks to the Justices of the
l United States Supreme Court regularly invite distinguished92 guests to have lunch with them in the Supreme Court Building.The lunches are quite informal. They are designed to give the
law clerks an opportunity to chat with the guests about their
experiences and ideas.
We realize that your schedule is a demanding one, but
we would be pleased if you could find time to be our guest some _.time during the weeks of October 9, 16, or 23. We are free to '/
have guests any day except Friday, the Court's Conference day.
I shall be happy to arrange a date at your convenience.
' If you can accept this invitation, perhaps your secretary
could call me at 393-1640 to arrange for a definite time and date.
If these dates are not convenient, perhaps we can work out an
alternative. [I have attached a. list of possible alternative dates
92 . . .for your conven1ence.] We are all lpking forward to meeting 5° ea; .2.?$- =15 |
/3 , I la 1a SEP29 1912 J
F ,1,/Q',_Q -'14 Q!/"dry _92c >"
- L, I , {I ,. _ 1 I. . _ |' i " ,- M I '/.1 -0
'1 92o ?/
p I /l Encl. _'_;'f.l>' QQ,%NOV ~ - Q? _ .... ..- -- 92 7 92 nu-do tar Tole. Rm. Ai 'ma°1~~=a;rs?é";' | l Mr. Fah
i Mr. B her
Mix. are:
- W E ""1
/_92
......._-_-- A/1
1:. --_ »_,_."
-__ ~.1.'.
sfh
""' I
-5 . -'.
1- :4
£21
2-2
i
7 "-"'!""'¥
NIIIU
E
-D-5.. iii
I
-,§;; .; ' '-',___
2:,., . _ .__F
Y Iw
*-g SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
' Day§_which are not Days gf,Q9nference on Arggmeng
OCTOBER: 25, Z6, 27, 30, 31
1NOVEMBER: 1,,2f,/16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 21-so
DECEMBER: 14, 19, 20, 21, 23, 29
2 3| 4| 18' 23"26| 29' 30'
FEBRUARY: 1, 2, 5-9, 12-15, -
MARCH: 6-9, 12-15, Z9.
3'6 9-12' 24-27' 30. 310
MAY: 1, Z, 3, 8-10, 15-17, Z2-Z4, 30, 31.
JUNE: 5-7, 12-14, 19-21.
October Term, 1972!
/ 1; . ,F¥',- <;2 £?.E5-'. . r'- "
gwgLQ$gB§_
/
-v
LI
|-an--Q
I
kT§
I
n
§
- . _.
z
-41>;
:'~..
-1
r-1:3. ;. J
=.» _.._
1?"q vf
Q
P04 -an-1I'rCE'0F ACTING nmzcron
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
9/25/72
Mr. Gray:
If you wish to do this luncheon,
the week of October 30th really
looks better for you.
mln
/_.
I,
.1..' I I
to
C;/1.-IMR.
MR.
E
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.ad
FELT ._.-...i_-
;;.;zECALLAHAN _._.._........._
CLEVELAND ii
CONRAD _i._..-.i
DALBEY :
JENKINS Q
MARSHALL ii
MILLER. E.5- __..i
PONDEH
SOYAFI5
WALTERS
TEL E. ROOM
MR.
NIH.KINLEY iii
ARMSTRONG _,,.....i
M5. HERWIG ii
MR5. NEENAN i.-M
I
I
I
185
?.
A _..?'__ =rf"
l
.-
-e~1
TM
1 L
ll.
-1:1-92_:,,_ . W
§§?3
-'192Conrad -'
Dal 92T0 = Mr. Felt DATE October 31, 1972 vet£§E§?/§"|° ll '°Cl H°- |§ 101D-IQI
nu ma IUIIION°92o92 UIII. Ila. NO. IF
UNITED STATES G W ERNMENT Baker __._.-lDMemorandum 92%;§;;;__;.
_¢ ~ Ponder ____..FROM =11}! Jenkins 5°"" ~--- ' Walters _._.._.
Tale. Room ._.
S mE°T= NATIONAL ACADEMY, VISIT or 92{!
2'
'1v
b7 :§1?;.929292 - ~~to hear oral arguments before the Court on police-related
., iiMr. Kinley ___
Mr. Armstrong -
LAW SEMINAR STUDENTS TO
SUPREME COURT
Twenty-three National Academy students are
artici t Law Seminar conducted at Quantico
rsity of Virginia Law
s part o t e course, as arranged for the students
to visit the United Sta es preme Court Washingtgp,_Q@_£QJb_on November 6, 1972. The objectives 0? ge visit are to
acquaint the students with how the Court operates, allow themcurrently
by
School.
ssues, and meet with Justice Lewis Powell at the end of the
v sit. These purposes are closely related to the aims of the
.,»;_J}aw Seminar.
6/
J-»
5w
¬
92! The students will arrive at the Court at approximately
9:30 a.m., hear oral arguments from 10:00 a.m. until 2:30 p.m.,
and visit with Justice Powell thereafter. , .1
Students will be required to miss regular National /sdt
Aoade las N mb 6 l my c ses on ove er , 972. u Agent from the '
Office of Legal Counsel, as well as , will accompany
the group on the trip. Bus transportation to and from theSupreme Court will be provided by the Bureau. 9
RECOMMENDATION
. Approval of proposed visit, travel to be arranged byTraining Division, Quantico. Z
0 I92't"*u .~%, /3-'*""T"'/> .-
¢, . _ 3 511" ? 1"Dalb
- _' v JL'92 UVA!.N ' § B5'
. 3 "
7 orvov 1 5 S#1
. _ ' 92 ;;f gmi
C
.-._¢:5-*-v
,_,
Q 1.
2
-|-..
_-92
A
. ;Fé,_';
lqunlh-IQ
C.
I_,:1
41 4-V
T-'_-_-.5"
_
FT,- /
'1"?-
D"|5.NA92 IQ. ND, IQ IOUO-QC
NIT |II IDIHONll Gin. "0. F.°- if F Iuwrreo STATES cow ennmsm silt. ____
Bishop ___..
v an
Conrad
Dalbey
T0 : Mr. Felt we 11/1/12 §;:,{;;f
Mllihlll _____.
Miller. E-S- --
Purvin _._._.
FROM D. J. Dalbe 50!!" ---Walters ._.____.
Tole. Room __
Mr i 'nIeMemorandum 5?l1IEV
. I 5' .1
SUBJECT: SHINGTO FIE OFFICE Mr. .*92rn'|at_|-orig-!S,492§iBl92a1SS10N Om FOR i¬;. .$;;'.I§r_'
, ITS OF CERTIORARI FILED ~O
IN THE U. S. SUPREME COURT. ....
The Washington Field Office WFO! practice of submitting copies of
petitions for writs of certiorari filed in the U. S_,'jSupreme Court_§hould
be discontinued. At present, WFO submits"Eopie's of petitions filed by
defendants, however, experience has shown the statement of issues and
the arguments presented by defendants and their counsel are not sufficiently
reliable to be particularly useful for legal research. The WFO program
duplicates in substance the service afforded us by the Office of the Solicitor
General from which we receive, on a weekly basis, copies of the Governme nt
responses to the petitions filed. The Government's statement of the issues
and arguments provide a more useful means of detecting any significant
development in the law.
Copies of the Solicitor General's brief in opposition to petitions
are routed to interested divisions at FBI Headquarters in addition to being
studied by the Office of Legal Counsel. In view of the duplication of the
work and of the savings that may be realized, it is recommended that WFObe instructed to discontinue the obtaining and submitting of petitions for 2
certiorari filed in the U. S. Supreme Court.
RECOLQMEUDATIOH: g
That the attached airtel be approved and sent to WFO.
Enc .
- Mr. Bates I : ,- Mr. Miller ' ' xx,- Mr. Cleveland '_§92'X65 ll 1 3%!5155'? at 9 75¢! -*2 -+1t.:/7 F!-*2' _ __....-. --- ---'- Mr. Dalbey
- Mr. Mintz.
JAM:mfd ! 92./
23 NOV 9 ma
ii.--~ ..'-.-.-:/I flit/I
I
.
, mm
/1/2 REQZQ - .//W .; Q§
To: SAC, Washington Field Ottlce
U_ _ .
.. .=._,. g,2 '11/8/'72
- Mr. Bates
_?___M___, From: Acting Dlrecbor, FBI .. Mr, Miller'-'~I~=~ - Mr. Cleveland
WASHINGTON FIELD OFFICE - Mr. Dalbey
suemssron or PETITIONS FOR - Mr. Mintz
r/' wnrrs or cmnonm men
IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
Washington Field Office discontinue collecting and submitting
petitions for writs of certlorarl led in the U.S. Supreme Court.
NOTE: Based on memo Dalbey to Felt, 11/'7/72, captioned as above,
' JAM:mfd.
{H1
l ya U .. ]'£M:mfcE3/ J 17 oi --
Ed I ,..'1-:-.»"t"
" -' ' Fell. __Baker___._ __TMAll..E 2'5-
,_ Bishop _..__
:->.s"" --.1: C 11 n ___
- " 5 '_ -.; Conrad _._._
Dalbey ,iGebhardt i ' ""'_ FBI
Jenkma _.__Vtarshall __ /,*.92|iller, E.5.___ / I -
Purvis e___Soyars-54NULr M IWalters ____- J 'T;-59, Room ___
sir. Kinley ___
92!1-, ,'92rmatrong_
92'Es- H ' __ T5. §I:,l§,92§ mm. ROOM TELETYPE uurr [:11
1-lruuuql inn; ml pg I IBIII-IOUnu lnn lnmlm
nu mu no, no lrUNI'l'l'Il! ST/92'l'HS Ii /Q-IRNMEN1
A/Iernorandum
1 } ; M1-_ F911; |m'n-;= 11/ 13/'72
- W
K1;-Q:
-r-=>
.~!,.f>.
1-<. .'1
.._-
ll
- 1.
'5
It
~=s=a--Q
G
1
$-
I.
92I-ROM = D. J. D:1lbcyT/>3 >
SUBJF-CT= NATIONAL ACADEMY, VISIT OF
LAW SEMINAR STUDENTS T0
[SUPREME COURT
On November 6, 1972, 21 National Academ students e Vin we advanced seminar in law being conducted b 92
, University oi Virginia Law School, visited the _ni-e.. -_.a esbi,/-" ame Court, Washington, D. C. After hearing oral argument '
the court, the students met briefly with Justice Lewis Powell.h with the cooperation of the Training Division, arranged for both the visit
to the court and the meeting with Justice Powelle The Qioe oi LerralCounsel participates in the seminar. D
On November 10, mag advised that he had sent =1 e
letter to Justice Powell thantcing ..1m .or ..1.. appearance before the
students. He stated further that he did not think it necessary that a
letter of appreciation be sent from the Acting Director of the FBI to
Justice Powell. Rather he suggested the members of the seminar might
4-14-920~u:unI92 -l mama noun-u r92 nlv-nun '1']-|r92 n1f92ncI I-u-92l'92I92n"92QII|.l!L,l :b,l1, U LU Dllhl Dubll CL LISBI-Cl. . 1 ll; hl-DD IILCIIIIJ U1. D lll.92A.L92-vi-l-92|92-92nl 92-ll-all. Ill!-924ll92-J-92-Ill
of doing so.
RECOMMENDATION: 6 4 " ' , .W ,, . , T -- ,.. .- c
_,
None; for information. QT ¥>:}=:: 92';I!j,]J 1
191:» 1-7 Mr. Jenkins - M l.|-<l|I||| __, ,
|:|lI:|im|I| _ _ ,._' Ir--.-I-lmnl /I r-urnll r|!|u|l|4 '1 1r.¢ |.1|».J;'/-In nlurm-1 | I1 I921m~|u||| ___1|!!!-I. |"..H,___
1'mw|n _...
Y-u92>nrI| __ .,_
Wnlll-In ___,._.___.
'I'|-ll. "mill! ___
Jr. !.5::!:-"
Hr. f92rmulrrm|_
Mu. Ila-rwil ..._
92fl"|. ?92'r-vnl ..-
,_.
92
NJ
J
¢
__ -I-. Y--11-E» 92 _ I :_.,_ %b ~- W 7 9292<.P it /.t"i92/7 92 T2 A. :22 Nmf in-~-19__ ""
_ if,
.. _,___,_.,,92
W3
:_ »-n_-,._ ;- . - 4- -.~_ __ 92-sf
* i'.-'."'1?"lT
. -' W14-.
' .1,
-, i
,
;' I, .
r~f"i 1
-45¢! -
. .1_..:r'§~-1+ -mq~',-"-:-9," '_
?
. _ 71
.1 2 -- R
_ 4
2%".
. ---,'... ~.-r» --we-1» Mr.
M1.FD an in-v_.5-2244!' I 92 Ml.
I -. I MI
' m
' MI. Cont
F B l MI. n "|~|g92-
Date: 11/13/72
Ml
- IA .. . .. . ._ M:Ttunsmit the IOllOW11'1q in Hi pc in plairlitejrt or '5a4¢! f ii i i
Vin ,_ AIRTEL 2 d is YT . .. _ 2; 4i f y P riorily!
1 /"sac, wro 6 3031!
1 H /Fwssumcros FIELD om-"105:
, SUBMISSION or Pmlnons FORwnrrs or C§lIORARI FILED
IN nu-: u".s' umms count
q Reurairtel 11/8/72.
L §ULES%GOVE3_bLI_HG cA1>1'_1om:n 1~:4_fr'1
Rules for handlin EQQ§l§-§Qd petitions for writs92 of certiorari_filed in thee SSC hereafter referred to as
b"Fi e'fs!i dais set forth in the Manual of Rules and Regulations,A i Part II, Section BK, Miscellaneous Regulations, page 22, andManual of"Instructions-,~--Volume 1,-Section 9A,- page 25;-~'-rm:-"=5 "
Pertinent rules governing;jurisdiction and venue of
USSC are set forthh Title 26, United States Code, Sections
1252, 1253, 1254 and 1257.
CURRENT PRACTICE
USSC docket is reviewed to identify new cases invol
ving Bureau interests. Field offices covering circuit courtsof appeals and offices of origin office of prosecution! alsorequest UFO to obtain briefs filed in the USSC, All such
briefs are read, One xeroxed copy of a brief containing no. Bureau M/,»;¢~ 8-113 'mzo73~" 9" 9 7-ii-5-39 51*
' 102:, i 22 NOV 211912
_ L/ / -7, _ '___-_-L:/, 5. $_v- ac;-*.'; wt: =1-L -r &¬.:.r~1"3s in!
44.Baker ___i__.,
Hula ____.......
Bu!-mp ______
. Callahan ____
- Cleveland __,._
M1. lent; _
Mr. r7192h}~J::
. Mi1l,| '_§_ __
. Pcn':r _
. 3c_'urs _
Mt. Waller: ___
Talc. lozm _
MI. Kinky .__________,
M1. Armstrong ___
-It ll " _- * * - - - - " *-"wmvwmmmw ---------------- " M $321;i_ -311 ~ ll ATTE.N'1I92I: OFFICE OI- LHSAL COUNSEL! ' *ii H92. 5 I I ~------inn-:-
- -I 92 / _ _
3*
L
v
>
92
1
; -i-
Approved: _ _ 2 _c d_ Sent ______._________M Per _____-1-1-
Specicl Agent In Charge;192 -'92
K
_,_.,.,- s-+.,, ';92.-- In . -.'. :§ti.'t -
._,54. __.-'1- p
7_n
mwqg
' l 4
J
M
1
_.-
"VIII?" "Bi' T
er. _?
f%?".u?s?~so B
'1
- 1
i se§§
2:-1
1', 3....-. "*-i
.1
iI
I
UFO 66-3081
serious allegations against the FBI is submitted to the
Bureau, and a xeroxed copy of the questions presented is
distributed to the_office of origin. Two xeroxed copies
are made of USSC briefs containing_serious allegations -
against the FBI: One copy is distributed to the Bureau and
one to the office of origin. Experience shows greater num-
ber of briefs do not contain sertnisallegations against the
FBI. The decision of the USSC, whether by order or written
opinion, is furnished to the Bureau and the office of origin.
Written opinions of the USSC setting forth decisions
of interest ere furnished to the Bureau whether or not such
matters involve FBI cases.
PROCEDURES IN USSC
' Briefs filed in the USSC nay set forth legal ques-
tions never presented to the circuit court of appeals. For
example, an appeal to the circuit court may only raise the
n-nest--Inn GI: on 1115051 can-I-rI|'| Purl fl-92n qnm nnfifinnar I92-HI I-rd-92-Ill l G-ll LLb|6 L I-|92-92|ln|92uIn| ww-nu 0-new iaypu_ :1--no--vans-an an
his brief filed in the USSC may raise the additional question
of an illegal lineup. The USSC hasithe power to hear certain
matters not raised in the lower appellate court. Accordingly,
allegations against the FBI could be made in connection with
the mentioned lineup and such allegations would not be set
forth in the brief filed in the circuit court.
Rules regarding filing briefs in the HSSC stipulate
that the opinion of the circuit court will be attached to the
brief for the USSC, The brief filed in the circuit court,
however, is not attached. Review of available materials at
the USSC would not, therefore, be determinative as to whether
or not new matter involving the FBI has been incorporated into
the USSC brief,
2
I
5
g J
ans;
mneav-r
;_.i -f_.A,..,_ __ -Pl:
. . .r'1_
i-§5"t»
AI_'_e_f92?:!.
-".2! -
Eskii
ésws
'9."'- "Ex
P - ..
ll
_i_w.._ g,
. I
**r¥"{
i
Ji
.- -=-- -.
r-'="-_ ".:;£,. I =_-.1." '
.1. -.-
-tl: -§5i>=§'.e.~*~ -
res:
_ -j.- -- ----_.
D
UFO 66-3081
Under certain circumstances an appeal may be made
directly from the U.S. District Court to the USSC. In these
cases no brief would be filed in the circuit court and only
by reading the USSC brief could the contents of the appeal
be determined.
RECGMMENDAIION
In light of instructions set forth in referenced
communication and information set forth above the following
changes are recommended in connection with handling matters
at the USSC:
! WFO will continue to follow all USSC cases
. involving Bureau interests, but only USSC
briefs which set forth serious allegations
against the FBI will be submitted hereafter.
! In the event special circumstances exist and
appropriate request is made by the Bueau
and/or field offices,'WFO will obtain and
distribute a brief.
! All field offices should be advised by the
Bureau of the changes set forth.above.
! UFO will cotinue to use form letters WFO-61
and WFO-62 to distribute data from USSC.
However, in accordance with the change setforth in ! appropriate changes will be made,
in the wording of these letters,
Unless advised to the contrary, F0 will immediately
institute these reconended changes,
-1-
*2
.4'92
W 92-1.,-
an-_--.0-Q-92-III
aspen.-£1t
i
P . '2 1
~_'_..
-:~. I
s-»
,u
1,
.1111|_-P_..-u" I
,5? SAC, A1%; Us
' 'REC- .. - 1ActlngDirector7,3!H u»>- 9"'>°5>"2%1
. /
U./9 wssnmcmn new omen
sunmssxon or rsrmous ron
wsrrs or can-nonnm mso
IN THE 13.3. SUPREME CTITTFTNovember 16, 1922
Cleveland
Gebhardt
- Mr. M11161 -_
- Mr. Jenkins Attn:
- Mr. Dalbe-an
- H .- , I 7 ;_ '" Mr:
- Mr.
P I.r' '
-if _
The Washington Field Office Ins been instructed to discontinue
collecting and submitting petitions for writs of certiorari in lthq, S.
Supreme Court. Each oice will continue to observe the provisions oi
Part II, Section 8, Subsection K, Page 22, out the Manual oi Rules and
Regulations.. __,
I Qk.A ;_ .. ' ¢
In the event special circumstances exist and appropriaterequest ls made, the Washington Field Office will obtain"-and distribute
a copy oi the petition led in a particular case.
E1 z - A11OiE1ces
'92 ' .
92"/2! ,_,;.__A
92
. 9292
e" NOTE: Based on Bureau airtel to WFO 1'1/8/'72, captioned as above; . U: 1 _ and WFO airtel to Bureau, 11/13/'72. No manual changes _ "
ur
-J41
1*.-
WFO.
J AM_:mfd .!/
25! //'
Felt _i_e-_
Baker i.._..
Bisho ___..-_
Cailshan _._a.
Clevelnnd ___
Conrad __,__
Dalbey ___.__
Gebhardt _._Ir.-.92>.-ensew ... ____ ._
Marsha192__.._
921il|er.E-5-_...wm i'/iaw La»: '9? J5 V
921 . H ' -~1:§.§:;:n_ MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT {:13 . . n @,.-"-"___-.1 . . 1 -92 I
0' L "U J} A _92 bit! Q-HIS92 £"""";fI,- _:."; .... ~| ¥, /Q inecessary. » We now receive copies of the Solicitor Genera1sbriefs and that is the reason we do not need this service from Q
3:
-.Jn
.¢ -_
J.-.
-i
_.. -
,,.~ W _
_ '3., 5
Q
QT;
I
8
-92;»=!.¥,'_
3%?
;>=._1{,_-I-_92;' __ -_ 92i_,.-1u-a--ui-- hp"-..-lb." 7 . I I -- Qt; -no.0:
I/
the Attorney General
Acting Director, FBI a9
, / /"
_A_. .TTl.IC.".E"T I§?V:;S';TIC".TIOITS FUR
Tne FBI has been conoucting applicant-type investigations
the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. These
inclted investigations for the positions of United States P
nzoirtrates, Federal Qefeners, Probetion Officers. and Referees
in Lcnkruptcy. Requests for these investigations have been channeled
to us through the office of the Deputy Attorney General and receipt
iron thet office has constituted the FEI's authority to ',-i. C1
iZ '.92-"'11_ _
4.-, ,-_-.92,li_...92 of
conduct the investigations.Mr. Kinley
Mr. Callahan
Mr. Dalbey
Mr.
Mr.Cleveland
Martin
A . n ,_,.Q-~-n;
]"";"-_-1 'p92]"*I-E f'| 'r.'l.Lu~-',.' - .,- -It92.|.1-3.92.
/" 92 01.7 'I'LIL;'l Ul~ZIllID STATLIS COULLTS I.1~§D TILE CHIEF JUSTICEJanuary 16, lye
-@<z,/- "=.'1-|§___,,/' 92
RATXVB OFFICE
92..___
9292
9292
92-kt
9292~
Mr. John T. Duffner, Executive Assistant to the Deputy ~
Attorney General, has advised that the channeling of these cases 92¢througn tee Deputy Attorney Generel's office serves no useful 9292
purpose and ceases unnecessary work. Se considers it preferable H
for the requests to be sent oiroetly to this Bureau by the Adninistra-
tive Office with the results being returned directly to it. You may '
. desire, therefore, to grant blanket authority for the FBI to conuct
such investigations. If this is done, we will make the necessary
procedural arrangements for the handling of the cases.
Hr. Mark Cannon, Administrative Assistant to Chief Justice 1
T'TC.IfIC:I1 E .
up at theBurger, has novisod Q
direction of the Chief
The White House Fellows Program.
would investigate the applicants
there will be four to eight eppl
year. It is suggested, therefor
~ -.--.-,,.___. _ .,,_ ---~'~
-. I
92_//,r
J
1v'|92 _i__
H1-M-I _____
l':92l|:92l92nI92 i
Iv-.1-liuul i
_r|;92nn1 ii
f]:1Ti-92-92- +___
ll,-l,h.mh _ iv
,',,r-J..||| __l_ _inn} no F
.',|Ih~r. |l.3-__. -'
l_ur92'|.- _____*--_92.|92.|'I1h ii.-Judicial Fell cu; Progrem_is being set-3l -r-.-.-_ l-:,_.,. -1.-is-2 ' -41 '_ 'u92.~:.>'L.:..92.r.: v.-.a.1.Cf1 3.-4.4.1 bG 511311;-3.! C0
Re has inqu 'ired whether the FBI
under this program. He anticioetes
icents who wi ll be considered eech
e, that, if you agree, the above
authority be breed enough to include investigations such as these.
/.1-,> /J75 -
/»;/ -as R':a6as'a,/st_ -FBI | if , J 3 -£41," 24'73 ._- ..
,1. 1- .
O-...___ /73
Deputy Attorney General J . _~__
. j§§=°1° NOTE: See memorzulclurn I.-,7H. Martin tow,7; JAN? gig Mr. Cleveland 1-15- 3. LHM.dc.c
..- . W
E
F
- f.._. -14 ;'' 4._
§C
»
'
e
--§
_- ' _92__i
._. _ .{' s
I
'*,
¥
_£
jg-
- av
.._~.+~%f.T?.'=
es.U'"ONM Kill! YQ. IO "I.-.5 ! '
:3 ::|a'.l¬:|. 11 N-'*92
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT v A ,,_/M
emorar. um, M Mr. Gebhudt ____TO = Hr. Clevelan DATE 2-6-73 ::$:L:::
I. HHIR, E.3. _..
Ii Plli- I ___i_
FROM = L . H . Martinum .1; §,°_1;,'"".-"
'1' la. Room ,______.III. Kinsley ._.__._
Hr. Armstrong __
MI. BO SUBJECT = JUDICIAL FELLOWS PROGRAM
U. S5?SUPREME COURT
REQUEST FOR FBI INVESTIGATION OF APPLICANTSWETI .11.-
. Httingtgn ._.._
MS. Herwig ___.. Mr. Mini: ___.._
Mrl- Neenan __,_.if On memorandum from Mr. Callahan to Mr. Felt 1-
captioned as above, Mr. Gray approved our handling of investiga ion
of applicants for the Judicial Fellows Program and the setting up
of procedures for processing the requests with Mr. Mark Cannon, 3
Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice. x
on 2-5-73 arrangements were completed with Hr. William E. 1;
Foley, Deputy Director, Administrative Office of the U. S. Courts,
for the procedure for the handling of all cases for the U. S. Courts
memorandum L. H. Martin to Mr. Cleveland 2-6-73 captioned "Applicant
Investigations for the Administrative Office of the U. S. Courts and
the Chief Justice"!. Mr. Foley agreed to handle any requests for
investigations under the Judicial Fellows Program under the same
procedure. On 2-6-73 Hr. Cannon was advised of this and he was
informed that the requisite application forms, fingerprint cards, and
transmittal forms could he obtained from Mr. Foley and could be
handled through the 1atter's office. Mr. Cannon indicated this would
be most satisfactory. 1
The question was raised with Mr. Cannon regarding the
undesirability of disseminating FBI reports of investigation outside
of his office. It was suggested that he personally retain all copies
of our reports and that he brief any other officials in charge of
this program regarding the results of the investigation,being most
careful .not to disclose any of the sources of information.
Hr._Cannon stated he was aware of the problems involved and that
he planned to follow this procedure.
ACTION For information
.1 -1'//~ K - "' E Q73 2- $1
I I-n-.i__ _______
N/W ?"..-,-. *"'-r... ="?T'I - . c llahan 15 I I1. Cgeveland 8.MAR- . Martin - !P_ .9292_ o .3 -» c-$359.1
Ldhzdc.. _ '**1."/ -» l 92<égf bu? I ' U}
92'l.!l-5!-.t'.'l'. _. -._._a-.-Q.-q-92..._.--.-_...--u
r/'
l.7l'921N|f.||7li92.~:l" 92 : l..92 ;..-.: ::..92"l l/ ,it Ir. 92 A .4
92 u rt. 92 . '- V
uh-l 1-10-1§92_ :
Mn. cnnnanan " ' I"" MR. FELT
l'i{l!92l i
|l -. E.-t.--.-| .__,
y lunl.-92 __,_
ART
9292. -_1'-q-.5» I,
/ FL" 4'f:L" !.;.:_vf';ii1 ii; P x O-' -.-4- -yr IJ _ Q.-.'5x 9 I 1*!-swrutéi 1/Y w / V ~92 ' /.1 [1 / ~92~ W
| i 92'1I " t_ -__...._-i _._-._. ._._ _rv 7
. /" '
I92 . I
-- 4.
I
Memorandum Callahan to Felt
RE: Judicial Fellows Program
For your information, the FBI does not handle inv-. stigations Of 3PIJli-cants for the White House Fellows Program. These invest.' 150118 are handled
by the Civil Service Commission, _ __ _ _ -
RECOMMENDATIONS:4
1. That we agree to handle investigations of applicants for the JudicialFellows Program and that no charge be made for the investigations cor.-ducted
for the first year.
2. That I be authorized to contact M-r. Cannon to setup procedures forprocessing requests through the Deputy Attorney General's Office.
" 3/A /,£?f
/... 1/
/2..-2.90______.r_ . . - .
, ||
I s. ."*- ¢Ii I ',." . ,1r-9' i f." ll-, I .my -u ,' i.
4 .. W" 1" . * "U I -Iv! '[_;I' Alf ' #4! Iv-|d ;92! V v""/ "5. .0 . Z5" A" -/I - -. "'L|§ ~ -1 3/ .'f/ T,-F"Iv- " -W
-
Q .
_ ;"'_. . s-.1-~
Q--ti
'1-
_; - ~-y'2'», '
1
AM
Q
mu
e
1:-
~.*G:-
;1
!
. 1
;v4
._.......-.,
';
,..pu_n....
Aal
vZ
§
- I
'1
'§%e
earbiz:
by1 Assoc. Dir. _,___,____
maAou@_
" Dcp. AD lnv. ___
92 Ant. Dimbmomn folqn N0. I8 N10-I06
'51 $1.. §'.L'.°-Q. :1
UNITED STATES GT ZRNMENT
Memorandum ._| a-" f"ulriMr Franck_ _ F , To 1 _ V DATE: 1 31 '7 G In 8. Com ___< In. |l'W.____
» At." ' /p /' y idem. ________FROM ; G. E. Malmfe1dtC92&p/ Q6/9" y :::.v|~l='I---
11~ Pggn . Lnboraiory _.._._
92; Plan. 8| Evul. __
Spec. lmr.
SUMEUD aaoussr FOR res ornscron TO APPEAR ;}5AT INFORMAL LUNCH WITH LAW CLERKS 92
T0 THE JUSTICES OF THE_p. s.¬suPREuE 5counw ' ' }/
WEEKS or FEBRUARY 4 on 11; on MARCH'4 on 11, 1974 T
gt!5%/I .m 1dated 1-Z8-7
clerks to the Justices
of the U. S. Supreme Court for lunch the Supreme Court
Building during the weeks of February 4 or ll, or March 4 or
ll, 1974. He indicated the lunches are quite informal and
encouraged discussions which give the law_g1g;k§_§_hroaderperspective of the Governmental process. asked that
a member of the Director's staff contact ing a definite
date and time. He can be reached at the Supreme Court, telephone
EX3-1640.
' tor has asked to be advised regarding this.- matter. is not identifiable in Bufiles. In 1957 'former D . Edgar Hoover was invited to appear before {F}
the law clerks to the Justices, but he declined to do so. The
law clerks are "cream of the crop lawyers selected to serve e
in the Supreme Court, namely becauseiof the outstanding records./F
they made in law school. These young attorneys clerk in the
Supreme Court for several years and then go on to practice law
or other positions in Government. Many of the most famous lawyers
once clerked for a Justice of the Supreme Court. Some of these
young attorneys have gone on to become U. S. Attorneys or to hold key Government positions. It is the position of the External Affairs Division that the Director should give-favorable consider-lation to having lunch with these bright young attgfgeyp.~ 2 1 ,;f_ g /;" s l Lb 0%» »The Director's schééu e for the first two §egR% t&1974
February and the first two weeks of March is crowded. on 3-4-74
he has a speaking engagement in Denver and will possibly test??? on 3-6-74 regarding FBI ippropriations. During the week ofMarch llth he may be abl lRq1aork in a lunch with thes cg rneys." - at COQR . .** cs _ ..|92 1 Telephone Roo1&_.92:% RECOMM§~!DA'I{£N _,n fice of Legal q oven I J7 -i<-=t=h_ ;..<{q92.-.92_I L f Mr Malmfeldii /5 W 2; - a *3/-. ,~~ -:*n"~> . A ° 1";92 .
-1.-.-.
,..-y
_
-
--n
¢
cw"
|-an-nlg
'-T:
It
P
L '15. .av
'13-S:1
§'i*'.#>
e
h92
92
QQQ/r
5' ~--
G. E. Malmfeldt to Franck meme
RE: REQUEST FOR DIRECTOR T0 APPEAR
RECOMMENDATION:
7:/' ,. 5 /
QThat Mr. Kelley accept the iDVlt&tl0n to have lunch
with the law clerks to the Justices of the U S Supreme Court
during the week of March llth and that thls memorandum be
the Correspondence and Tours Sectlon so that
y be advised of the time and date the Dlrector
avallable
5° 1,,/M
é/7
I
£- .' 9... .
-L53?
'3
I
4
1
92-i
.1
-II-:1-F"
-1--1|' i1
..__, .
4
X
-1... -;:.
?t.. W. = '
est"-___
..92:SD '- if. _,.,_._. _
Andi. Din:
' Admin.
C 1:1; yrt. ,._ ,Suqwrrmr Qlmnrt of tlp',_Eni£2h Stain _ !uiru ., F e Com. .._-§- 0; 2H5 ? My Gen. luv. ._.,..__-
|del|L ..___.-.._.-.K Itlspcction __..___X hakill. .-_....._._.-.
' ' Z8, 19174 !.:.'%,-::'ei.:.-';' ,_.__,,
Plan. G EVIL .....
Spec. luv. .___-...
'I'r:.in'ing .__._......
Lu;-*1! haul.
? .1-l'Ia|'%_IlIThe Honorable Clarence M. KelleyS - .Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation " an
9th and Pennsylvania Avenues N. W. ~
r gai-_ Washington D.C. 20535 /
Dear Mr. Kelley: U mt
J As you know, the law clerks to the Justices of the ,Un.ited.,
States Supreme_'CourtA regularly invite distinguished guests to have
lunch with them in the Supreme Court Building. The lunches are
quite informal. We hope these discussions will give the law clerks
a broader perspective of the governmental process.
This year's law clerks have requested that I invite you tol join them at a. convenient date during this Term. We realize your
schedule is a demanding one, but we would be both pleased and
honored if you could find some time to be our guest during the
weeks of February 4, ll, March 4 or 11. I shall be happy to
arrange a date at your convenience.
1'4 -s v-v-..-.v-v-ti-H;-r .- F r 54- -F-F 1:-I 1'1; l-A A 1-20+ rn rnnnnvnLL G. JLLGLJILJU UL D5-I?-L3. %F.OU.a92.¢ L11-92e 5-H cvnwuu» b4l§e 92-92-fl-I-'92-92-'-10-
ing a definite date and time, I can be reached at the Court, EX 3-U 1640. If this period is not convenient, perhaps we can work out an
Sincerely
57¢»alternative. We are all looking forward to meeting you. { '
r g
,2
92
its-so , ~1-J S 4.2 .17->-'5/~'.;
I L " 92 -""//. 92 , Q -__ _ Q... 1B._r_.~.1i-§.i'H9I4
_j<_-1.; '_'_._~13 fgr/'iClB. l V _-_- --I -u-no
I
iu..C>
X
-Mu
A
£6
.w.- aw ..:» M$0 C9 s
~$1_
-1-
=7:
""'-"1""?
q2
!
._ -n .-_. .,~ 1
I
1:. 1
3'5
err _- "
.3!-_-'
=*- -
-1:8 . tM3 ,- g "7 -
J;;92s
.-_-- at A- "' -
r
Qiimmr Emu-t cf th: atten StainFil
G0'1
Z.mMlrmf¢11.§- 91- 28511-3 » Idt--1*.Irys In.
Lof-H :~ 1P1A March 15, 1974 lj '~_j
5 L01:--.1
92 DirAd: " .-_._-
{jn-~ '- j-;/!_,_..[_ Ext PM111 _92 [ .' lm .1 I!< V I-
1 .
' Fl ,,_.-".-
. .v
"val. __.
Inv. .__-___,.._---.
P,., V _._-._
un. .-_._
Rm. __I.- v-V .-_.-
an
t /
I Honorable Clarence M. Kelley f ' " '' 1
Director, Federal Bureau ofInvestigation '
9th Street and Penna. Ave. , N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20535
Dear Mr. Kelley:
On behalf of the entire staff I want to92 thank you for joining us earlier this week.
Everyone enjoyed the occasion immensely. It
was good of you to give us so much of your
time. -
Sinc erel
C/
_>' , _
_ _ _ _ . __ l .-92 r V' V_ ___._ __. --.i-.-~ .----' ' " _ _ '? :5 ;7/ REC-63 '-=e~-=*-;"-"-;'*I'Q 3?' I/' 9292!° K E-x_H.m 1lb::3?-t
xi
5-L MAR-401974I
'---.
-ri
.
%K :
§
|r
Q.
1
*5 3
Ego; _-Q; 3
I
1
an _.{.-H
0"--3',g mom =Lega.l Counsel _. 1.151/¬,__v
92/
- SUBJPFFEEYERSE PE.R$0NNF-L A¢"r1<>Nst=-
4 DUE rnocsss nnQu1RE192/is1;1_rs___omomu rem no. In , - mo-m -_ ,"1' 92 I -~ ' .::A'a.l::. |:a:°:n. at '
UNITED STATES F VERNMENT
emorandum
Mr. T, J. Jenkins one 6/18/'74
,,_/in
56:04:10: ha? .-Attached hereto is a copy of an article which in Ob
the 6/12/'14, issue of the "Washington Post," entitled "High Court
Eyes Own Labor 111s. "
Q The article indicates that effective 6/1.0/74, employees of
the Supreme Court were afforded new protections with regard to dis-
m es the appointment of an Ad terse Action Review
Committee, the composition thereof, and its function which includes
the power to overrule or coriirm an ern..ployees dismissal,
It is significant to note that according to the article, court
employees are zloipart of the Civil Service System. Until now, we
have been iuliy justied m heiievhdg that in the case of an excepted
agency, due process did not require the institution of any review
board to reconsider dismissals and other serious disciplinary ac-
tions. However, the advent of such a review bcard for employees
of the Supreme Court bears an obvious inference for other excepted
agencies. The Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of what con-
stitutes due process. If it now believes due process requires itsemployees to be provided with such protection, we may expect to be
held to the same standard in the future. In that event, we would be
better advised to institute our own review sysi em structured to the
needs of the FBI. This would avoid the possibility that a court
might order the reinstatement of a discharged employee based uponAnne. Div. __
Dnp. AD Adm. ._
_ _jon,_4926 |nv. 4/ u. i|.. 1git .,/_',./-Camp. $yo92- -_...-
Eiltitfuiru _._
F ilnn 5 Com. _.
Gen. Inn, .._.--
Ham. _.._.._._.._
lnlpulion .__.
lntlll. __.-_-
Lionllory _.Z
Plan. I Ev|- _
Spot. lnv. ._.._
Yrllnlnp j__
Legal Conn. ___
Tulaphom Rm. _
92
.1.--. .,>.-.__.._.-... T .,,1
e »" st /e4 - J -d-.--.; -
-~»~- . .-.- _ .~ .--- -NOT RE; " ""- '- C ii SPA]-1.1531 - Mr Walsh ORDEDlack oi due process, and also order institution oi suchpa revg ' ./'board, with 1~eE1tent adverse pub1icity.__ _ ,P ~ .- -. -I I 1 :3..-Q K If " * "
'4' ,I;i_ t,» e .. 92. ./"':.l_'2 _ -92. . 5 idllr .U * ""-._i . - * " ' 1{,,,__ ....._..
V *1 V;-, ~.92 /__._.§-4 . .-- _.r
ti CCIIT.lNUED - oven
r'5.'!;"1 F_:»3;.:':'92"'
names ~">* nfJ A Jx
W
92. 9292a "1
;;.,._,.. I 4
-nu-1-_.."
3-
'&
-=.=u>..§
Z
*__§' 5.35,,
92'_
»:
1
_ . 0
.92 1;- ,5."
f .-.
Pn J
t
Memorandum to Mr. T. J. Jenkins
Re: Adverse Personnel Actio.'1s--
Due Process Requirements
In order to assess the exact 1mp1iC311 .IlS of this development,
we are requesting WFO separately to obtain full information as to the
contents oi the plan and the considerations behind it for further study.
You will be advised as to the results of such study and any recom
mendations deemed appropriate.
RECOMMENDATION:
None; for information.
-3-- ?9°L
M g <1
@-
u
r
92
C
U ,I
By J olm I. I92l:1cKcnzie
" _ W:-v.hl11:1on Post am: Write: o
_," The Supreme Courl. whirl:
F "_Z:::1 discusses mtionul l:1l!or, .
'="1.=:ucs but rarely n1e11l.io11s its
092'-n internal Ialior prolilcms,
__;. J1.-.1-= come up with :1 :1ew__11o11-
1.111i0n--w:92.y of dealing with ll5
if 2t-0-111cn1i>er worlc force.
,5" new I;!l¬92aI1CO procedures
i_. -and :1 lIv92'Ql s;-'sl.on1 for rc92'i92! "
.1, 91:1 disciplinary actions were,
1.-'-discloacd to court. employees
0'11?» '5- 1 9
Vl/5"5"¬' l¢Pn._..
6//2//7fH!92l011cla5', following by l.9292'n
921'Cclcs the coui-Us latest re-
Itlsal to 11.-cogizizc :1 union lu
,w|1lcl1 most of its 50 pulll:Cml2l1
belong. .
Court spol-ccsm:111 said the
lwo notions were not related.
But 51.-92'c~1'aI |10lic0nw|1 -'-lil
ilioy s.-1w 1110 move as :1 submi-
uilc-zm inadequate one-~i'or
:1 union Io rcprcseiit lhcm in
tr-lks about pay and worklm:
conditions.
__¢-.-;¢~
J
_ Q hi-Io ,
92¢..
1 ' . ,'|~. . TI- Y§"/ n ' '192 i 1';r*2i*/ "@153 1 x-11:7 ,
OIk
Court cmpolyccs arr: not '1'i1cr:ourt Z.l;-t1C5i3l1li._-llC l :1
,-co System, w'|1it'l1 permits
3 '.111io11s.
Unzlcr the new p1-ocerlilrc-s.,
flli1I{!S and Gilli!! serious rlisci-I
u1l11:11'jl' uciiusis 111113! he up-
p 'illLll to n11i111!-:1ic:11i!Q1 :22-1
.11i1li-e u.|' fellow c111plo3*ccsJ
..-lmsr-n by Chic! .l1i:~!im: 9292':u'-,1-011 ll111*1{r-1'. lie ll l.lllfd Ju-i
ii:u1S. iarza1, :1 I'k'?9292I "CliJll l0'i'-l-1
}ul_v clerl:, as U10 r'of111|1i1lvc:92l,
{rst cl1.'|i1'n1.111. aml ll-.5l_'-iTl1'llL' l|
-1i-_;l1L utlmr 0mplr1_y1u.s 1'1-umilrorl of the icrlc'r:1lCi92il Scrv-1 -,pl:111 9292'ltLl{'l3!' an cmpln5'cr:, af-
iler lll1ll{lIlL_l his cu111|1lr1i11t to
;l1is ziuporvisor. can consult the
court's Pl?1:iOl} l officer.
l _-'92L ]1l'l.!-'1flll. thvrc is no con-
F!i'cssio:1:ill_92' :1ull1nri'rud '|1r':'-
51-i",r|<>l u!l'l<-01'. 'i'h1'* 1,-o'.1rl,.<.
l:111i.I1'-t i111-luclcci :1 $26.00-TJ 1'0-
QHPSL for the pnsl.
i The iii-iim: in-1-.=u1111cl
is I-1. Llurrlon :01-, .19. :1
;nlun1l1l:1 1:111: sclioul £1-zulualc
M111 11111!-zeal on the 1;1ic92'um'12
marl li:=1'i11ll|1i11y p1'ori-cliirr-s.officer
1'lr1'icai, library, 11:1;-roll nl Il :Cu it-1 scr1'i11g' mi :1 .!o1u1cln-
oilu.-1 slaffs 10 1'1'u='l: undcrll
l-lm 1lil-11-spo11~.m1-cl ju'.licia1l fel-
lo921'-l1i11" umi-.-1* :1 |1r0_:!1":1111 92lQ-
simiorl 10 1cr~r11i::lpc-clnilsts in
.i11c-d for the 11c9292' 192cl92'1-1.*:c Av-
Lmu Jicvicw Co:11111i:t<:u. :1
733110! of liars? 1:1vn1lJf'1':~l
picked by the cl1:1i1-111.111 mill;
have final and i1in li11;["'' - Ace-orilimx to the rules out-ll
ljmlirinl n1lmE11i:.lr;11in|1.
fir-0 rci'1:sr:<l to illscue-s ilie
rclmn-.505 r.ii1'ec1l_92.- with :1 1'0-
pm1c1', and :111.»9292'cred q11<.-s-
Lions ntllb lhroulfll murt ;i12I11r-'1 !.lc¥ilr11 said |:~..rl r.:'iici:'
I.l'llI1litll:J1 l been 1.23-.c.". :oKl"
-jlialltr-S for their ll~.92.'l i--:1,9011':-rlo overrule or co11Ii1111lnial.io|1 oificcr I-nrl'1':tt Ale-l;11icd,"'ll1c'rc is nr1.;:in; Ir:
:m cmp1oyees dismissal. l,Gu1-11. In one answer, he saidigivc 3'-DU on U1.-it." _.92
.-.,.,,--.,|
1 r *1. >
- -.1...--... .___
1
tho vuu;'1'.92' :11-ii-'..i -92;=.+ 11:-LY
shidinl "11-11;; lice-no |.o1.:'1
fl 'lflli ii-.-cclriit. J-1'..;'L l :11-
,il..~»1-u.~=i1i1| u'~nccr:.i::"_ llze pm-
i_sii1i!il_92' of a gt-slito 11:1-'11:."
ilmci1'1-:1l.";i-11:1-rl111'-.l:11:.f' , ' ~,'I0 lj-K ihezr 11:.-lie"?,:1'_':1i11~t r-'1.-u_r;:1if.i-1.: :1. l!"92= ll-'.-{
ion. .1 lm-:11 of 111*. .'1:'.-'-15-:'.111,
l"ccl1-:':;li-1:1 of K.-J'.1.:'r.r.'.|:=.l.|
:vce11t , 1'-I11 ill '.92'°92$- '
..92s1-:-:1i '.-.l1ctl11"r ll:-;' _ii;',iir:~-zl
had c ialiliahc-l ll-P ro1."ti<.~.1|
,l»uli"§'. T-lr- Film '1-5-. l'-:-i-"~$Zi"§Hn;1]r»r, ll;c 111:.1.~ ,.»l 4*-"7"
I-icaii-11. n~i1L-:1 -1111-lia. ii;
I .. - - __ V777 7_ 7 7: 7 7 77 :7_ _ 92
u92
""~.
,-' 1 .
I 92
x - ' .
9292
9292f92
-.>
92 .14
I1-111111. rnzri C;1;1l. Y1 _ .l:_-E1
-lilo, hm!!! of illir $1;-l--... ;'nn'-.}'-'1
hnrl 11E<cn 1h.-1: =.1.'11= E -$1216,"tl1r.*!' h:192'e not be-:2 u9211'P._92l?Pg.l§1'§
by 1111- com i." ii92
0|O0In1 win not $0our ill! lbmonGOA GIN, I15. HO. I1
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT __K
/UI|92. ID luv. .,,_7Ann. Dim 'ISOIO-W0
Memorandum
TO = Mr. Jenkins one; 3/6/#5
M. . C
!,
l
r
_ 92' -:-»-
- -_ 1 to assi t the.i
2
l
f I
21/ l 92 % . .mom ooney j.- Us 92 1 1: ,. _l .. -
suB_1l=.cT= U.S / SUPREME counr SELECTION BOARD
3 REéUEST FOR FBI ASSISTANCE
AUGUST, 1915
e ' -it .. Q.
r
,'- I
On B/5/'75,
re placement.
1 51 a r than ve 0 an I10 m0 8_..: ,!@,92According
individuals will
S Capitol Poadvised
me Court Police,
of health reasons. He
has been formed to conduct the final screening
be will
given on 8
On 8/6/75iProtective Service,
' a t e as th
that
to act as a membewill c
'5lFor information.P .' 4lection Coat least107
an E31
three .Aim.
Admin. ____.__
Comp. Syn. ..._.
Isl, Allalrg ,.___
Filo: G Com. _...
@011. luv. .__,_
ml. _______
lullllcllcn _.__
Inll. .__.__._.
Loiounpq ___
Talc In. _,,_
Dh-actor $a:'y _
mmittee
instructions and atithorization
will sit on this Selection Board.
dViS¬d that the FBI Will ad
-_'-"In-gig
5 AUG1X,. 1 1
Committee. v
oi the Quantico Staff,__~
Ur
r .
He stated that this will entail no more than one or two days at the most.
a ' 1. . Court in this matter and that M3_;=tt-g 92 will be available to assist as a member of this Selection Committee.
so 92 -' ' . - ar- a RE9°_192£1V£#Z¥*[I1A_TlQ1£= .si-110 . éi 9 .53 70
975
fl
In, r¢*°/
b*! / pl-ERS. REC. norm
.-_,.,_,,
2:; ~*ii 1- _. I --§
OFIIONM lllq I40. IQ MIG-WInu uni lolluon 'on om. IIO. I004 :1 1 I
UNITED STATES GCMERNMENT -»' W '-inane. Dir
Memorandum .§';?i.§§=7-7'
Admin. _,____
Comp. $100.
EM. llllrlTO =Mr. Jenkins DATEI 8/18/75
Gan.
Id I it 20
Llinrnln EV/M. Mooney A _ I _ _ __ ,/yL .: ~ - _' i' .* b
_u a SUJB CT: U. S£UPREME COURT SELECTION BOARD
REQUEST FOR FBI ASSISTANCE /q ,
-gj AUGUST, 1975 -I-Ignl nun.
Tnlqphono knDinner Sn:
- - Remymemo 8/6/75.
' ' - The Selection Board in captioned memorandum met at the
Room 4, at 9:00 a. on 3/13/75. In addition -
to SA the following individuals
~ U. S. Capitol Police;-+___,1-v~_.Supreme m.
s Service.
-----a the who interviewed were
__ 2 Interviews and preliminary discussion were completed and1 secret ballots cast 2:30 p. m. on the same date. Recommendations of the
are unknown at this time! will be acted upon by
Chief Justice. To date, noV
been designated.
.:--- an .
RECOMMENDATIOIQ: --------
92'-Y- .".For informatiol 108 /
/ . ' 5; ? 3" J 5 ' K7 '5!-r '
F " H7». ---- .¢- --1-"-1-|~ uni
.""1 ~'~.1"1a
I u-din-.»-e ~n=»--»-H-I-1 "'--.nu|n_ ! l.. 92
J / L "--' I .Fihl Ir Con.
In
ll 0
lnspucrlon ,._.__._
||llI||. __.___,,,i
I /~/
- .,-__
.11 3* .. -.,-JX _ '.
.;
9292-:h-u-m-.i.-
-: .- .12 |"P ._ _ .
_ . . P.
-,1. i92:_1~I. .. -.
i-I :1
' E
.,*.
7'1
"B-.,_
I n
.4:
1;"
-J.
F *:'
uv.aew-_-
.-..-.41 --Q. . Q*.rr..!I=¥Tm"!
Surrmu fllmtrt nf y: nitrh Stain ,
'll.l.s!ri11nts-H-'B.¢. sass: .* c- ;-"v "Hr -1 I-' ='
October 15, 1975
Mr. John A. Mintz,
Assistant Director, Legal Counsel Division,
Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters,
Ninth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. ,
Washington, D. C. 20535.
1
. » 1 - Q ~ IDear Mr. Mmtz: ' p- ' '
This letter is to confirm and clarify the request for infor-
mation I have made to Mr. Joe Davis of your office.
We are interested in the formal F. B. I. procedures regard-
ing custodial interrogation of a suspect being questioned as to his guilt.
Specifically, we are looking for anything which indicates that once such
a suspect has indicated he wishes to assert his Miranda rights, it is
F. B. I policy not to attempt to obtain a waiver of the Miranda rights
especially the right to remain silent! either by:
! specifically asking the suspect if he wishes to
waive his rights, or
! attempting to further question the suspect,
'.
! reading the suspect his Miranda rights a
second time, subsequent to the initial in-
terrogation, and attempting to further
question him at that time. .
We would appreciate it if those sections of the F. B.I.
Handbook or Manual of Instruction which deal with the procedure to
be followed in these circumstances, along with the title page of suchhandbook or manual, could be photocopied/and copies sent t_o us via ' 2our messenger whR'/illelivers this letter. _'_/A /.1: 92-1 I - __7.... .-
asc-4 ~.
Your he , and that of Mr. Davis, is appreciated. .15 om-_2§1g15
-|-II- iyl I
_ Q92Y927'§a¬Research Librarian. --_.-mm
!
I
._L,-n-A
'-,,,~}:;: ;.
'v§~3;k
=-=;.-§ -se.-PIP _ .__,-ea...-
. al...wt- 7I- a
»-_. . .'1.-' -».-y,-_1'¢~._..-
~...- sh"
2 1:: --1 ~ _Y" »
.h_-' 7.3%
.;.§"11:~~ -=-1i--1
-ie.
;-é
.-:1. '...~ _ ....
r*_-'_'.
_ 7
.. " --..
__ _92-._
'.:"§T_"- J
d §* _ f.;'§~.. ?'~?&=-..._. ,-Jet:-u.-
E- '_»_'.'-.~e.._
;;-.F=.I!§??*5
;:.f_" *;._';§=-'.- "2 ..:i.-.-.1" 1'-_, 3; _.
A"
'.>-=--.iT'§.-
,,¢.+ R1 _ _
,~_-2 ».
L" - ',.
2&4." <- ' I17 the titlepege oi _"_rnt Handbook tor ..: :3-:-Bob-a 92 llltloq _ M 71"-'.'.'r7.vV.lHF"-LB '1 - . A n » K
1 A?-'_-iv:-; EN 12! Page 12 jug s portion 0! page l2s iron -.
A I I V : .12 :'?1'.. - ; a' I -Viid H A: ' V '1 LA -92 I 6
I
Pl o | '1 '
4 9 H9* 1 Uh l I! ' ._l'j'._.
I
92 -1
E v October 11, nos ~i 92.1_}92'92_s-i.-Jo
p_,. -- - -~-- '1 - Mr. Mooney»-
- Mr. Mintztb 1 - Mr Davis
r e l.a.a=~= "ooo
- Usenet 1- .= _ nulls. e-
L5; 3.925; heel
i to Assistant Dire . Hints has been broughtto my attention. In your lettertgzu requested theFBI furnish certain rtions of é__:I'BI forapeciu 1929!=M=_I_? ¢ 7 '- t
' I understand you are interested in the
sections of our written instructions which set forth
our procedures regarding custodial interrogation oi
e eeepeot hegig queetioned as to his guilt. Also,
epecifically, you are desirous of locating any
intructions which would indicate that it is the
FBI's policy not to attempt to secure e waiver of
s suspect's I-liremda rights etter he has once
indicated iimi to assert any of t.»-e--"
rights, particularly the right to remain silent.
. 92. . - 92 A ¢
s In response to your question concerning our
general. procedures regarding custodial interrogation
oi e suspect and your specific request for certain
secti s of the I81 Handbook tor Special Agents and
" 1 oi Instructions, 1 an enclosing one copy each
of he following: A
I ~
5
_ _ '_:iq_-Iii _.a.;¢§.*- '_"_-I-'-ln-yoil "V
.'-If , I ._ . ! F.
- ' ?'L""L ;
_;= ,92._,_=.».:.J, ._u:-._:_ ;£_ "1214:.-. 1a-..,. Q
.3 " 3;;-
+"3 '' 'ns_
.- .':-.._-
_ ;-5-liq?!"*:.,., . = - ..-- r.*- .as-I-.
e-92$-' '*._ _,= -
i
» -
¥._.'~'-" 43'!
4...," »_
'§'-1'_rl"._:.§"' "":7.":r'-_-_.r_,.: -.¢..P .-*2-"_-mp ....-
Y»-_._ g
.... 44311;-- , __ . n__r
__¢
..
_.~
--
- 1|
92
R
I
J
_ a. lu-
'492
.."'
-n-..- ' I I _1
.1" _
r
v
J",..
. J
.'1_ __iv..4 ,. _. .» '0-4-_s'~ 4.-:..l-... U --4-..-...V_ -1» V ; _- . >441"
. 9'
s
! its tltls pugs 0! tho I'D! "'Hll92tllI_.
-';-_:-__.r- -_~_;_~-_»-;__».-.~_m;-o_:; fro! nstruot1om,," Volasss !¢:_~;-;."-:*~a*.-;wiv-12¢ ,;;i§."~';.'T'.;'. ,1 -- .~._-"1 T" J?--- :a" _' ,_l-,1 . H - -_ »--'-_92J"-_.;q.- :,_ ____ I .' I <3.-" -I .-_=,' H 6' w"-92-"7 '<"f:92-.'*1- JFLT _ "'71"'__'4""?._ _:',_*;;"._-
5-'_', ,;- 4! tags 13 of tbs rs: _._;=e92;_2-_,?;_;. ., , -H -' r P 7 92_ »- |. ti '"1"__{'--Eff ¢:92§3_&-;,'"92¢'<' -= . 4- -':"Hk' Q ' 11' I. inii .' . 1- - ': -'2-"' " " ',-j__"..:~_ "' " "'A'i.7" "'_',""' ""'
. i J ,1 T s ' ' ts r@ 12s hss Boon dslstsl
so it mists: to tbs cs o£_:-soonllng s units}: r
of rights and pm-spsrstlos oi slq-nsd_ststsnsnts,¢_ qt
" Isohipsctsllgontislurslshsdsoopy-».,§~_-';,_
0! tho FBI Bsmlboo so:!_l.s_¢hu.'gsd ugith knonlggsg ' " f
ot its oontsnts. tbs l'3:|:'s Mums! 0!
is lnnintslnod in ssoh PB! £1011! olos Ind ll ._ 1 -
snilsbls to 8pso1s_1_m;sats £0: thstr ssslstosos. -__ _-
_ I , , 5. , ..- ,.. ..F ,. .- . - - J .
~v-;- _Iorssponsstothonorsspso1£1oqo.sst1ooo;-<;Zoonosraing our policy so to s subsequent sttsnpt ts
lntn.-view s psrson oonosrnlnq his quilt sits: bs Isl 4
ouos ssssztld his Ilirsnds ztqhts; our vrlttss * 7
instructions do s this sltustllm. 11' ' " ~-
yoo viii acts iron s rsviur of tho sncioss coconuts 3
our instructions do stats that oaos as laaivtdosl. ~
indicates hs wishes to remain sllsnt or wants In
sttornsry, :11 tntsrroqstloa for svidanos of guilt most
mun. FBI Handbook, Put II, Psqs 12s: sad.
Manual of Instructions, Volums I, Bastion 8, _ -k
rsqo 15!. the purpose sad thrust pt this portion 021 . _
oo: instructions ls to insurs that spsoisl Agents us _- "
swan that onus so individual sskss known his intsntioa
to siaroiii iii i-iiraaéii iiqihti hi ii aot to be -w-u-..-aa1nmy92nqtoraIE'iHih than rights. = A" ' ' _
. -mus instructions srs buloslly sddrossod '
to tho initial lntsrvlss and srs not Lntsadowl to
Ztrvgibiia s subssqusaitstt to-lntsfgpw sa an-aatss,toqsrd to I 11:10 vunnnt I s ssparlottsgs not tbs Uubgt oi tbs previous intszvisw, or I_;+~in connscti-on with ollonls Ohioh Us-I tbs subjO¢f,_;-f. ' 5 ..
oi tho are-:1-or: Latorvi-2:; £2 %.f.,t!.o:-..-.1 92{* l_-
A osmtslightshlohvouhlsskos t tsttswt~ tto Lats:-v1os_tho mum : mam sag 6sa1tsb1s'¢"lj"§-.- -' ' ~=-". -H-1 ~- 'L' .-".'v- *4-3: 7" _ , 4-,----*1. :-' -.._-.-...|. ,.-4---.'.._ _.,,___92...,_. -..-_A¢1_;> ;.-__- 4;, "'..,'-4-->11-:.§..l92_,.=4.;92._ - i 92.|..- .i'-3.1, -1-- _'I a
-9;. _..;c- ' _ , '. :__ L ;- -. ___ . . . _; ' Ml 1* , . ,
v
i I should also point out that than' instructions are ravine! periodically no the mood
j for ouch rovisiqn becomes apparent and, thorotoro.. -my-,..-__ at new the Lnthn put than instructions _ ___%___ ____, _. __.--~=--' '" Jain dillorod uuuuuhnt {rel air present ...::.7fj-,;§-rt--;'§;;;. ~
V7 _ . ; ~;:,__,~v_ ~ -. I '1l_l"*-*.~,} .,.. v___.;¬_¢ _H.__l__ Tr .1 ._--- __; .1. -3. .; f-._. .¢.. 3;-, .~,...»,;_92 -"-__--;:_:._. ._;.. 1. ._ _-_;, _ 1 .-'.. in H _.- . _. 2 the above will be at uliatuoo -"'-'1--- r'*= "2--"= - Y- . _. '__ V? __ M K _ 2. I. é 1-,,.._._. ._ _ - _ --.. _ Me. _ . . - - . 92v - ,- "r -"' - -
~,g 1--_-r .~ --. - . ... rwr llv-|I1=.r+-.~ -;=:~=..-Q. . _ -- . ' . , -- 1» . 1'. .';__~ L;-j "'~_ - -- - -- ' k. _ _- .1. . . K... _-.92._:_ ' '.92§5._.._..-,_r_ _._,f_r,,_ _:._.fi_' .._ _. H _-_.;____ _._'.; _ . W17" U ; _ _{'. ._ |_4 92 '-r - '- 1.. .- _ '92..
- . - . - - 5_ .-7"-I-: - .- -1_ 1- _...- .- -921'~ - ., -.-", --, -- ." " f ... ~ »_ ' e ' _'._ " 1;, - M, ._ ':-=»'"-_ - " -. -. -- . . r _~»": 2» . - r» ~ - -. _-~ 1 I _ . .. _-.._ -er _'- . 92 .,
*;a§ . _ .1 - * , Clarence I. Kalli; ; --2 ' ' nlrnalmr '
:?";92<:-'.._ .. . ' S _ _ Itlllttw-w@Y 1 1 . - . '
3.1"" - _ '- "4 - _ .. -' I _ .* . 1' 92;......-,- _ _,. ..._ _ .. _. - 4 - - A._ . _ ~. -, V . __ - _ 1 ,_ Fur 'i¢:_',: _ _,-1 -. V. ,_H.Jrf___;- . , J
92. .. . . . , ._ M . . . . ..-,1 . _v .@.."»= "-1;» r§*- _--~ 1% e - ~ .?A- _ - r . ...~ ._ _ . _ 3. .7 - .t,»__ - ,_._ _ =- if - :__ 4" ~ '5 .,u ". -. 8 M -., _~ _- - »_ _ . _ ..-. i -. _, ,4 .. V ,_, ,--.- , _ 92 1 . _?%?? H NOTE: -Legal Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams memorandum é7cf .
" dated 10/14/75, captioned "Request fo '. _ Handbook or Manual of Instructions ' _
aw C1erk,,United States Supreme Court," set rortn the .-
h': background of this request and recommended this request'_*fr be discussed with a representative of the Solicitor=s*f'- . .Genera1's Office of the Department to obtain their-'-§;*;; concurrence_in our response, and that Legal Counsel;;;; - Division prepare the response furnishing the requested materia1s.. This matter was discussed with Deputy z. ~
Solicitor _Genera1 Andrew IJ. Frey on 10/15 and 10/16/75,1 j Q- ,n ~ and he concurs in this response. A copy of this letter _ i*_ Q is being furnished to the Ofiice of the Solicitor General55$? by separate memorandum. '
-2... . _ I p A __ _ I .J .4";_;1 . . . ' -_-1' ' -_ r ; .- - I V __ . _ * ' .. , -" ~ >-:.. ;.-.1-' 92 _ .- - ' V , ¢ " '.¢;_-_. - . .. V a 1 - - - _ -
' _.. ""f: r:'- "15- 7 _-._.-.i_-., 5 _ >- _
.."" 4 . ¢
3 '- -- ~- o - -~ I '.. c V1" r - . e. . .,, _.:. _ 5 . ___ _ H 1 _ .._ _ U U ? . F ._ ;- ,_ r... W. .-,.,__-_._92_.:;__. _-_ .- __ Q .r 2|; _,._ -..r. J. _. , - ,r___ *1; L, _3_._.;_-.._.-___~.. -'_ _-3.-if ',~_. _ we .1. r_.- ,5» 71;; '.*~¢ Q.--1. .-_~.s._. >1 -1-' -_-,[.;.,_¢ -.,._ ..~_._.'-_,,f-_w_'-..-._ "!~"'._: '_:-L _ 1 -, ' ii -'-.- T . 1 2: 3 ' .- ,.-- "i . .~- '3 -in--". '- J-v:'.'. ~;'- - 92' .. 1 - --J-'3-, I - . .-"V .. ._ , __ _ _,92 -. . -:--=1. _ -. . _- -_..Q . , - '92 '1'"?-"> -"l - '-1? L"-1". ' ~ 5;:-.4» " ~ "1 " 1 L. 5' ' I r " £2 "'."-. '. . 7- I '. . =, _ ,, -__ -_ ,4 -, __.;»,_ ~ -r_ e -..;4_ =2}; _,. .~-7.-._. ._ J--... -,. - -A t ' .0 " '4' " p-"ll?" ox "-5. '"- QT , 7%,. _ ' I-1-- , 492 . 1- __»_. =_ _; 1. _--. _. U '- ;;r_:- .- _ ..; ' .1 . --._e - _- .._t._ ., _--W L_ '1, 4 i -_ -.. _' I - . - I , ..- _-. _-- .. TI- - 4» , _ __ ._ _. ',_t___. ,_ _-=~-. ; .~a. . e - _¢~..~ ,.~. . gs» :,»: --.. .o.#-*.. ..;-_.£ . ~¢2+@._ ..=-_ . ....~~. ~ - ,.. ~ . . e»,_'-."T7 "7 " ' ;" '5"' S ' -,7 '9' '. ¢- r.--;;"-|I","~- " ..-' .¢ "-'. "<,'. '- ' X-P , " "1--1-,'-- L _' '1, ' " _' = _ ' 7 -, - - _ ; Q ' j. _ _ _ ..§ 92"_ - . _ - ' ,- " .3 H ' .1 .. _. -Q? F-. ."-r ' " "" - - ~- .w: VL "' '=- ..'- - - - '- 4. ..- "v I . .. -.> . - - ... _, .= ._- _ -- - ..». ... .. ,92._ -.,-.-...- ., -- _ , .9,-4 Q.. ' --r- ' - ._".»-'".' - .' .'¢ '- 4- .. -1 um ' ~ _. . - " , r . . '. - - 4 -Y3 ".- .. -'_ . - .',;_. .- .' 1- ' »' ' . T - .- V * ~ » -. -. ' -. i- 51 1 , an-. ..-.... -. .i~-M J- ....-q. 92=-7.1..» -v.=;;_,-._,£ _> ._ _______-,;._.'.-_-¢|..,_.- ___-,,_ ____g___ -4&5 ,. " ."
L t_ _' ~lnan
z
2
>.
.w
- @
-1 _
1'.
r%i
T?
?
K; u
G =¢_._
_,¢., ~--1..-1..-~4-4--an-mug-4:---;._-.-1..--u-b -- i----- -
._ .. t K . I g
_ 01¢
FOR
SPECIAL AGENTS
OF
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
October 16, 1944
This Handboek is a summary of and contains citations to:
Manual Of Rvles uni Regulations
Manual of Inatructiena
1
F.B.I. HANDBOOK NO.
Contents of this manual must be held in strici
confidence and may not be disseminated outside
this Bugeau. Manual must %¢ maintaine in a
safe and secure place so it will not be available
to unauthorized indiviquals.
A copy of this Handbook shall be issued to each
Special Agent of the FBI ani each Agent ahall
be held respcnsible for a full and complete
knowledge of its contents.
r:r~'<".r.0sun1zé*;§ " 2 75' /5-» 0'-I L r -
'0-A _4
x.t Jar,-~
my-0-'-""-
fs r ~..' - no_4J
PART II
2. INTERVIEWS WITH WITNESSES, SUSPECTS, AND S H
CONFESSIONS AND-SIGNED STATEMENTS '
A. Policy and instructions
l. Interviews of subjects, suspects, and
witnesses must be handled in a businesslike
manner, carefully prepared, and thought-
fully planned. It is imperative that all
pertinent information be obtained in a
minimum of time. Every offort should be
made to avoid rccontaets unless good
judgment, common sense, and sound investi-
gation make them necessary.
2. Interviews with persons under arrest must
be in a manner that will not unnecessarily
delay their apearance before a U. S.
[ [Hagistrnte,]
5' 3. Constitutional safeguards must be borne in
:92-l"-
£Q'
4!-
BI-1.
K
eis
-mind at all times. At the beginning of an
interview with any known sukjoct of a
Bureau ease, or any person under arrest or
for whom arrest is contemplated on completion
of the interview or later, or any other
person so strongly suspect that he is now
to he interviewed for a confession or
admission of his own guilt in the ease
rather than merely as a possible source of
information, such person must be advised of
the name: and official identities of the
interviewing Agents, the nature of the
inquiry, and must be warned of his rights
as Iullonsi
Before we ask you any questions, 30?
_f must understand your rights. You have
_;f23 during questioning. If you cannot
ii-
F!U f I wish.
5*F@_ questions now without a lawyer present.the right to remain silent. Anythinj
iii you say can be used against you in co urt, You have the right to talk to
a lawyer for advice before we ask you
any questibns and to have him with you
Fip afford z lawyer, one will be appoiried
_ "1 for you before any questioning if jcu
If you decide to answer
you will still have the right to stag
answering at any time. You also have
'92f " .=-.5-T '.. '¢'.'f"t1_ P -'rj-.1"; ».:.-U}.
t$_.__f:.3>-.
££5:"
.4..-1;-._§ _- -
...:_.V__,A
.
no---IQ.
* ii
»qq
1 .9292
i:§
~
v
r---.; |_
"wm.
1.-3%:Car
ex:
a 0
for
E. C
in:
who
r~
:'L
f_ v _|_
L-.2
nilCZ
1-
OI have readF.|'92!-LT II
rights and I
»9_ I[L
and
D
Pansm
a lawyer at
and kncn wh
ts r ihrca
r-0 r 1:11-c
muat
ci
nf
CO;
Chf
mi
v
4', .L-.L:hl
ka:
P1,.
of
1 i1. 1-.sod
CSS
th
1p L;-1
<~:
w.
*1
{_'.".
. 92.-. 2'1.
Ll-. F, 1bf:
; 1icn
Pna
inn
H1 P
.| J
._r.._
1-?
r-I
%;,
"PC
-1.5.bven u:¢
1.
:.l
t
i
c
r
-i
.92.3
.;
21.
O
S
O
1
1
L
:"1 1-'5 ' ,
r-
.4at I
have
O1 C Cl 1
LE.--1'.J.T1
=IQTl
no
:~ arlmi
, 0 n
r aiml
I4 CCU?"
1 r-~-1.
OT
11f5 ;atnwcntJ A..1-:!S|.
3|.t
15
bac
TS 1 "J11
.. 4-_.
THC
$300
P111911
rcnises.
ifn 7J5
+
HT7 I'-
{;C92_:l.'1
.1 U
1.
.'- -.1
.,- 11"C~{,
:.<
-.1.;
1' Qhi..-.92~C
oi
or Q
ll
-13
92-FE.0-
axad
0 make a
. I
C-oing
ma
0
1f
15
u
11?
Y,
'21
.1 ¬/ .137
@5211 ea ,~o!
L?
1
i'. V
do n
I under
. U0 p
dc to memy
LT..1-: rf'|92..,__.
ntcwu
Nani
stand
vnnis
any E123
guilw
Duran
PlUHt¢
I ..: f J;
1? he
Lg qu
ni 0
ZC HIE .
I lax T:3»mnno du
made 1,
S
92
T.
" fP¢ cu
Tnl53lI
Q
by
.L
cf*and
C
1'.
L.
[92F15
:5 1,Cf
I10
oatnlu
ukc
and
C1
!-1'1"
. Ll1. A .
1..-.
CW1;
,-,4
.-I S
,92n
|
:>
L
-
.1-, -7__.,
efw
>
"1
1
IF-E-Ff
-inn-ll-and
W4-
~_ _..
3+ -4-:' T I .
Ii.M-TU.-92L or III smucr Ions
VOLUME I
}"EDEF~.AL mmmu cm 1::vssT1t:m"1o1-:
uu11'£:n S';A'1F.S m3P;~.s;-I:-&::.'1 CF JUSTICE
Coats
strict11HAJJLLF f
. I
ts cf his
ougf -ch:
siminlteé outii~
maxi b
piqé
U 1'§.E'.LI.T k
CCpJL$
A Spa .
t O ix My
is PC
divis
92v.
iG nujnfaib.~J0 41 wlil
0rizcu indnanual mutt be hold in
e uni n;Y not be dir~
Braau, Hausa}
a safe and SCQUTQ
301 kw avai1aL1@ 10
jvidualw,
are ibSUd to all field diviaiuns.
LN C'u in] Acnf 1 A zpe ma? ;_uq a en»
! Pid&hf Aiwhi, Qa C]u?l3L1 c:;L¢
miitud in
Sn office,Y¬T"vu Lila manual irom O
I-'..92'C!4 J.92l RF. .
4
52.5-. '
"Iii.'21=
.1-':%
..=.' ' -'
a=.11an-_-q
- .»r'::
wv-. 4
.-! .-. Burs
El-
b.
c.11.1|
In
bu
I¬
nu
In
'1.'?'1
bv
ms
su
Ta
C0
%c
G1"!
of
Iv
E.1
cfI
-.
- 1
C
t
1.r~4
11
.1
1
i
Li'I
C
5
i
¬
ll
C
;!
C
T
i
I1
LJ
7.
1
V
III:
1-1
ll .
1-
r
!.I
E1
I92W
IF.
I1
C-
1
P
'1'?
-r-.
J .
I.
O
-1i
i
i
I".'I
0a
i
0
.1.
11
|.
1.
-1
Ti
.1
U
T
Q
-92-
u
1".
1.:
II
'11
'1
UY
1-:
s1i
m[1 I.
fa
1
W
.1
i.L:-
1]
U
4.4 .-.
1':
LiK
w
TIT}
-1, 1,I. 1- r. 1-
F
I92L
92 I I[J-I154 1| 1. .
of $111!;
f.I'!I'l
- I?
E
r
1.m
i
4.
.1
C
i
2
'92
1 .-.--
"-2In
_. '~ "t"
-¢_92 .1.5.;;.»; -1" int ,, ".1 "'* r-1-_
_ .+a'.;.._ :3-
. ...,=|_.
,_ . , .4.....J__A
I1--7-T
_ ,... *4
' -'21?'52!"-' -- '5 .-' -9-ve._1-»."-P;-Iv ->.:_§,.=?,-,:_,
n» y __
I »
, . Ii
~ '
--51'-:'_~1'.'V.-'925.ifL" 1'.". --
?_" J E
'-1 " » 0 . I
I -V /1: '
' 92 1- " e
17.?. . a a a k' _ _ 1-Mr.1I
92
Till Ilitllt GIIIII October 11, lI'lI
Director, II - a _ Attn.:_- .~ -. ' Y 2-Mr
muun. or nzswaucnoru
mace mcememt,
coon .:6 1 - " °? @£*g" *Wk" ass » " .a '
>
A This will conrm the discussions between Deputy .Solicitor General Andrew L. Frey and Special Agent Joseph R. Davieof our Legal Counsel Dhleion eoueernlog the above request on . -
October Hand 18, 1075. bb . bf! L : _ -" e H V Enclosed 1.1 .'¢.,,eQ;1e¢=e¢e this Bureau dated omen 15, ms, and = copy V 1- gumOctober 11, 1915, with enclosures, responding to melt. » -
" A '_ my:-eapoaseuupreparedwiththeeooeurronoed
Hr. Frey. _ ,
1_- loau-el! ' - -;
j » V , Ei'u5=
vi,-,-.->_ - . - _ ' ' J r
NOTE: See memorandum Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams dated 10-14-'75/_! .
c tioned as ove.--143 " "W L [Rm 42 a 75?:T-:.':;l¢ ' -I {_-.;"-.4} -.3-. 5'1 :3: _?:T°.: '7 L 3'. .~ _r . - Er; I . Elf ll - I D2".2'.'.'»,..._ A , -.-A £_8":"" 5'? 15*-uov-171915-;1§a" *"
I-~'*"-'~ » '» vz, _ -92 Qrri 2f31'-R-"£as£A|En ~ .a - . Zllullu Con: L g =92 _ _. . -1I -Iii it '. V _ ' W 92 Km-s"2S "8 an .s2 - 0 5 '~'* " B 1L i'r. _I_-,-r~. . '. 1-.P|...e -1. Zmb ' ~ ii I- u92" 1/ ! H e M 92aur.; l <"
Tole I- _'1 1 *-'-'_'-_- 92
ae-
-Q!
r. -
27]}
. .
r-"-
i.
it-if
Q7
_-,
, .
-1.---92
.;,,,_' '
=-_r
92-¢
92_ _ _ . ____ __ _:;__.:_.: ._._ kv , _____._. _..,_,__.. ___....._.l,.._._,.__.-.-__.__._' . -_._.. . . -
F Iv , "
.. ' U -SJ '." Ibrarg
- ,¬51t.prnn: Qlmtrt of fl]: Qilnitrh féfaten _
aalyingtmt. R <1}. 21151;;
J5 . - 0- A--
uctooer 1:, 1; ID
Mr. John A. Mintz,
Assistant Director, Legal Counsel Division,
Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters,
Ninth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. ,
Washington, D. C. 2i
3§. t .
Dear Mr. Mintz:
This letter is to confirm and clarify the-request for infor-
mation I have made to Mr. Joe Davis of your office.
We are interested in the formal F. B.I. procedures regard-
ing custodial interrogation of a suspect being questioned as to his guilt.
Specifically, we are looking for anything which indicates that once such
a. suspect has indicated he wishes to assert his Miranda rights, it is
F. B. I policy not to attempt to obtain a waiver of the Miranda rights
especially the right to remain silent! either by:
! specifically asking the suspect if he wishes to
waive his rights, or -
Z! attempting to further question the suspect,
! reading the suspect his Miranda rights a
second time, subsequent to the initial in-
terrogatidn, and attempting to further
question him at that time.
-- We would appreciate it if those sections of the F. B.I.
Handbook or Manual of Instruction which deal with the procedurelto
be followed in those circumstances, along with the title page oi such
handbook or manual, could be photocopied and copies sent to us via
our messenger who delivers this letter.
Your help, andlthat of Mr. Davis, is appreciated.
1r
ENCLGSURE an - 17$;/_<.'
W-._. _,___,__,_...__,,___,._..__.._..._..__......,___ .__.__ -- - -- - "--b7¢/
1
92_--
.7,
"--3?"-- -,._
1-Ev >. .
"_1_:92 __,
- ;-5§..¢>, ,
In-. -L _
-? _;*'
, ~.i.... 1, ..g_§' A -
.'-3;
'--_uQ-Y
'1--r
-4»
. |l
-'»1,."*-__
.*;~ "... 5.. ....,_ a
11':
.~ ' $1 "'.- K _ _,'92;-.. - -
-~
.--5"
Tr, ..
an
§§¢
I .., ..'.-.1_- 1-_ ;.- .-'f"".
1..I
. _, 92 Mm. _. ._I___$- 5 __._V;-"{r_;_:.1._. i V_.V:;-_ R. .1 _ Q ." - _ Li} ;_!
- @- - V E Octobar 11, 1975
.. I. '5 I -. -_ -_ »: 1
- >-- --_r-._ '. i _.__ .- . - .' -. -., ~" -'- *- ' 3., := »T.- .-_'-:. '"..1'-*,;.L.'-"t. -4 _ - . . , -1_ . - .---92~ _ - - ~ ~¢_" " 92 ' ' ' 1 # Hr. Hoonuy
2 - Mr. Hint!
1 -' K!»
iupzana Eouxt of the nitoé Etatcq ' W:
°°"'" 1 t 92
ton: iettar at October 15. 191$, aédraaaaé
to Aaaiatant Director John A. Hint: baa baan brought
to uy attantion. In your latte: you roquaatea the
PB! furnish cartain portions at tha.'ra1 Handbook for
I unéazatan run arc iataraatad ia tho
auctions 0! cur written instructions which sat torth
our procadurea regarding custodial intarroqatiom of
a auapact bcinq questionee aa to hia quilt. Also.
apccifiaaily, you ara daairoua 0! locating any
iaatructioaa which would indicate that it is the
tBIa policy not to attempt to aacuru a waivar of
a ;u;pQQt'! nizaggg gighta aiteg ha baa gas
indicated th§¬"ha uiahaa to aaaert any 0! those
' rights; particuiarly tho riqht tn_rcaain aiiaati 5
' In raapanso to your quaation concerning our
. qanrai prnuaduraa regarding custodial intarroqatian
, of a auapact and your apacific requaat {bx certain
auction! of the II! Handbook for Special agents and
Manual of Instructions, I an ancieainq one copy each
oi tha tailoring: g _ -
j ! Eh titia paga at tha frat Handbook tor
F -78:. - ' V'. h. - ' I "1! " pf I-'. '-1' r .. _ h~ ' ', - ! raga 12 ané a férticn of pad 12a tron' Part n 0! tho tn: mama for Spat: .1 aqua..~ , . , = 1.--_ . . . i . . - -" ." ' -= _ -. - - .. -. . : - , = . - - * .*-k .>'. >"'1 ' --* " I ' . . 0* '92 . '. " E " ' ' I -'- . - '* '7 .- ' -' *' p '1 5" ' I - '1-"9 ~-'- :;:- " .-1:: . . ' '
5% : 1:1:
!
Sac NOTE, Page 3.!
- 6.2.275/J"<="3
ENCLOSURE -
l
!-
» e tr.
rTi: _
L ---..-. -,
. -"*6-?"'.-3- "-4! '-5 -.
11' - L
.. t--_:.*'t-.v "!~'~* =."-"'-I -334---'-.": _.-~-> ' . "--1; 7:5. _§~,._-5." -_.:;-- p it ,g? 1: '
..
-.11.-44 .-.._ |
._ '1._' g
if I1.
.-,:.._ 7'"7" .1: 1.;5i;
$755
4_._I-3';i?
?TL
f
D.
*_-1.-
:1
.
.. T
.ir
tp.1?; '-ft.e,e
hr?-
_:_L."}L" _ L! ll ~
wIa
1
4- o. E __ ! The title page or the IBI Manual
oi Instructions, Volume I.
. . v 'aual--Iaeagbiam-s . IQ92I14 ' QQQ-IIQ|Ie 9 . ' ' -' -
§ll§lpl921l92.slpL92JIi_]' wv.|.92slaII if as-us-ueraavqa _ __
I ;' ' The remainder or page L1; has been awn-.¢a'
as it relates to the mechanics of recording a waiver -
oi rights and preparation oi signed statements. 7 "
_ Each Special Agent is furnished a copy -
of the FBI Handbook and is charged with knowledge
or its contents. The PBI's Manual oi 1nstructins'
is maintained in each tn! Qield eiice and is
availahle'to Special Agents for their assistance.
_';"~ In response to the more speoiiie question 7
concerning our policy as to a subsequent attept to
interview a person concerning his guilt aiter he has
once asserted his Miranda rights, our written
instructions do not .aa§... this situation. is
you will note iron a review of the enclosed documents,
our instructions do state that once an individual
indicates he wishes to remain silent or wants an
attorney. all interrogation for evidence oi guilt must
cease. FBI Handbook, Part II, Page l2a| and
Manual of Instructions, Volue I, Section'2,
Page 15!. The purpose and thrust of this portion of
our instructions is to insure that Special Agents are
aware that once an individual makes known his intention
to exercise his Miranda rights he is not to he coerced
in any way to reiiiuiih these rights. "
These instructions are basically addressed
to the initial interview and are not intended to
prohibit a subsequent attept to interview an arrestea,
either in regard to his involvment with a separate
oitense not the subject of the previous interview, or
in connection with the offense which was the subject
oi the previous interview. it additional information -
came to light which would make a subsequent attemt ';
to interview the individual logical and dssirahla.T; *_
,r e -_ 1 _- H - . _;_ .:_ _' _ 92 . V.. ' .- '. - - " y - V - . 7 ".92 -1 . 92.. -.1 »- ,r p I _ -"333 _ _ _ 4' .'~ . 92 . .* __
.111 -9-"L-I.."I¢' ,_-2 Is ... e o .._..--....»' ..'.'- ': '1.'-' .... -v -.._' ' ....
_ 2 _1-
:: -l- . !' Page 15 of th FBI "Manual of ~= r, ~
-I"
-- =1.L - we,.-.
;L..."_ ' 1
4 i '
'*-av - -._ .ate "
< "_=~.-_."-_,,_-t-_,
e.
11:;
4: . ,T;,_
F v . -
I
,¢i_ii__ P
f 92'L "7:F.
#:£%- .1-.
;_;;-_-,,;.$;r ~'_ i .5? _ _
g
H -L
v.
---,..,-q;_-92E_ 3? '
__i;_ .._____ .
I
l
I
1FU
I
t ~ "U 3
I should also point out that these
instructions are revised periodically as the need _
tor such revision becomes apparent and. thsretore,,"_ "
at see time in_the past these instructions ley;_*n =,
have diflered soneshat_£roa their present §orn.~ Q ~
" @- 7' I hope the above will he o! assistance ~
in your inquiry. ' .- - _. . -_ 1
' Sincerely yours, '
Clarence H. Kelley
92 ~92 .. <-7. " -. l ' ~ 1
.- .' - .' - z .. . 'Enclosures ! ' A '
1.
'*- '.' r - . . . 1 .. . -.. . I .. ° . Ii .
NOTE:_ Legal Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams memorandum
dated 10/14/75, captioned Request £0Handbook or Manual of Instructions l
Clerk, United states Supreme Court. set forth e '
background of this request and recomended this request
be discussed with a representative of the Solicitor
Generel's Office of the Department to obtain their Y .
concurrence in our response. and that Legal Counsel
Division prepare the response furnishing the requested
materials. This matter was discussed with Deputy
Solicitor Genera1,Andrev L. Frey on l0/15 and 10/16/7§,and
he concurs in this response. A copy of this letter is
being furnished to the Office of the Solicitor General
by separate memorandum.
r V . r -~- - ,.. _ 2 __ . _ . _sf - . P - 92_ .4 , f , . A h é I
1'.. -I . 4 4 I _, _ f _' *7 ,- - _ .i A I , -92 -|i~ - -4 V . =- .. ~ _ .r- -. .» -. . , _92 7 . -0.' .: Q _--_ 9-923_-. 92 1 3 . 92 -._ ; -___Q - _ .| __- J ' Ha. _. -
1' n .,
- >-
I3192' ' Q
vl
£3? n__" 0 x Q. .
MANUAL OF INSTRUCTIONS
VOLUME I
R FEDJRAL BUREAU qr INJ'F'.STIG»92i"IO!! wnrn s'::u1"Es D]'LP;J{T!1E1a"Z' 0;" JUSTICE
8:8
1_ Hi... _ .
..
1-
,,.__
_. -w- .-|~
4.;.-s-.-4». -FIf.1-+_- -1-,
:-J:.,_,,,;,- ..-,.
4 92_;;v'g$92
'%-
'§
1
E
a w-
=- !--.-
; .
i
Contents of t
strict confid
seminatcd out
must he maint
.. Place so it u
unauthorized
II Copies are is
5'" A Special Age
~§;' to any reside
= " is permitted
*P= division ofri" ¬'U
his mauhal musk be held in
once and may not be dis-
aide this Bureau. Manual
aineé in a safe an: secure
ill not be available to
individuals,
sned to all flnld iviaicns
At in Charge may issue a co_
Rt Agent. Na clerical EmplO¢eE
no remove this manual from a
cc.
L _ j emasunz 5"*~W7-'7->752"
-- 5-.
...--a;~-_4- K- .. ~
gsi.
~;c¢
.37:
k¬*1h__ o.
5
Ts,_£%;i
,1"wl
4.
r-.. --;;; . .-'92_
LQTY I have road this
'2'ii '
iv; -- '
.2 I
... _1-,-Pi .
n é -
-%&;
iii?
. f
--.
-__;i:§'_.._¢.
.;'_a 4 """*-Y" '-' sum;-rxsé mm §=.¢1.&ame"' ' V
2. Bureau policy and instructions
_8.-
businesslikeInterviews of subjects, suspects, and witnesses must
manner, carefully prepared, and thoughtfully3»
be handled in a
planned.
It is imperative'that all pertinent information be obtained in_a
minimum Of time. Every effort should be made to avoid recontacts un-
less good judgment, common sense, and sound investigation
necessary.1-. T-n'I'n-nun-|e~-|-n92.-Q ,s,nv92-5 15;";
will not un
before a U.an arrested person must he conducted
ssarily delay the appearance of such
Magistrate,]U. S, district judge, ormake them
-92 n n |--92v.1»v92.-. .»J, u l492.l|l.Ll~-l
arrested perso
other committinr
magistrate for a hearing. The procedure for handling interviews with
suspects or
recommended by
beginning of
any personpersons under arrest must conform with the procedure
the U. S. district court in each judicial district.
Constitutional safeguards must be borne in mind at all times. At the
an interview with any known subject of
under arrest or for whom arrest is contemplated on enmnlctlena Bureau case, or
of the interview or later, or any other person so strongly suspect that
he is now to
In-1I+ '.92v92 -A-k.-_.6m.A.LL .LlJ 'Jl1,d
uch personbe interviewed for a confession or admission of his own
caau ..| 1' " '5 ' .-.1 -.-..-.4-$._.-.. + --.- H-.--..1_ ._ , _.........L"r. .......... ..:- .92.i_:.-..._.___.a:_.._A'.!.'I u.-;u;:.|.. >---uc1r.,1._! Q: u. 1J92.-2."-L,l.U'J.C 21'- -lint! U1. J.1liLI:|..-_-,92..,1,'.J1,,
mUSt be advised of the names
the nterviewing Agents, the nature of ti
of s rights as
Before wefollows:
ask you anv
rights. You have the t
can be use
a lawyer fd against you in ewe
or advice before we. L _ .him with y
one will
-1-.0 -...__ _.:-....__L.L . l.",_|_ TEL:
"' till have you will s
You also have the right
talk to a
The warning of
rights'boTore i
or admission of
from the silenc
eventually was
what my ri
answer que
understand
have been
has been u
Care mustbe appoints for youcu during qusstionin
d
.--_ ..L£ lLiL'Sb,L
right
to sto...'|,92 4... -__...__.Au-5 bf-J 3.11 $111.71
the
lawyer.
rights must he Iollo
nterzofaticn can pro
guilt. A valid wtl
e of the suspect or
obtained. The textquestions,
righ to "
ask yo
g. If
blfDTE
6115110
to stocmai
rt. Yand official identities of
e inquiry, and must be warned
von must understand your
n silent. Anything you "
ou have the right to talk
u any questions and to have
you cannot afford a lasyer,
any questioning if you wish.. .!1_L_...L '92_ ._._ . . _ . |N 92'-'1l-L1L"1l- H. .LI1||';.'E2I' p"EI'-..Z.EI ,
p answering at any time.
p answering at any time until you
wed by
ceed t
var wi
simply
of theat express waiver of th?3e
o an admissible confession
ll not be eresumed £113-?
from the fart a ccnfewzién
waiver should read as fellows:
cnt of my rights and I understand
ghts are. I am willing to make a statement and
-L -t . 1 Ssticns. I do not wa
and knot what I . dn +1 awyer at tai time. I
v , am _1 i. No promises or threat:
made to me and no pressure or coercion
sad against me.
P
be taken to see that no duress is exercised-
1= ma e Obt in f P"
or prom
inadmiszible in
Whether he
wishes to
gation '
trick,
right:or eajolo the
will invalidat the wailer.court., a *r,t
_gi K '. . d to a a con ession or admission of gui1* by force, th e&'"
' ises. Duress makes a confession or admission involuntary an _.:_
of any kind
that no so J
will cooperate is left entirely to the suspect or accused.
11 he indicates at any time prior to or during questioning that he
remain silent or that he wants an attorney, all interve-
ior evidence of guilt must cease. Any effort to persuade,
snect out of exercising his constitutional
via
If? .'Y "
F T
.,..
i_3ll_?°b
.,_{;T_~%
-b *=;=~
H
'- P01-
__.924»
I ", _g
. 1..._»'~
l ,;_;ra
93?:QQ Q
. 1..
3 _ 1-. .--I 4
§:."15¥%§
. .
¢1117' _..........__._. __.._--____.__ ..,.,,.___..,,,,_...Y, A.-..._.._.-_~.. .. . % _ _
- 4v0
0 0- -
1
- F.B-I. HANDBOOK
FOR
SPECIAL AGENTS
OF
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
October 16, 1944
This Handbook i3 a summary cf and contains citations to:
Manual of Rules ani Regulations ~
Kanual of Instructions
. 4' 4'f__' ,' F.B.I. E{.%LIL*EC3lf wo. -- ~~' __1
Contents of 1hiS manual must be held in strict
confidence and may not be oiuseminuted cutside
this Bureau. Manual must be maintained in a
safe and secure place so it will not be availal1_
to unauthorized individuals.
A ooyy of this Handbook shall be issued to each
Special Agent of the FBI and each Agent shall
be Leli rcsponrible for a full and Camplctg
know}edge of its cunt¢nLs.
smusuns 4'7'~"7~" F*' "'°?Z*'":
F5;
=1?- L~';»~"
in!-.: -
#;
#1
EL? "
F -5
.. H
n- 4
_ ,<
._..<,2. INTERVIEWSPART II
CONFESSIONS AND-SIGNED STATEMENTS
A. Policy
1. Inand instructicns
terviews of subjects, suspe
witnesses must be handled in
manner, carefully prepared, a
fully planned. It is imperat
pertinent infcrmatiOn he obta
minimum of time. Every effer
maa to avoid recontact
judgment, ccmmon sense,
tion make them necess ga
2. Interviews with persons
be in a manner that wil
delay their appearance
[ fNagistrate,]
3. Constitutinnal safeguar
mind at all times.
iuterview with any
any
isBurea
for who
of th
perso
to beUC
e i
n s
111
admis S10
rather t
infcrmat
the name
inter
ineuivie
rv,
as-folia
4'3 ,
__;
The v:
an exinter
ccnfe
waive
silcn
fiuctBef
mus
the
92TI'92l92
,92J92-1
con
a 1
any
Qur
aff
for
wis
-' '-.
ix
3
-=.::*-,1-,
qg.= V'¢"wwu
"1:
L,.-an
?"51
_ : .
5 ?
I
__...
5»:-Q» '
I
.1
--mu,
-t- ll
P»
3:.»
._-,..
"_,._,,,-,_..__.._..92..-_....-.__._ ._..~ -.I.~~~~ » -,-; - ,- 1 _..»
-u ' O
.
K - .
| 4'._,_ ,
¢____»-i I _. ; -::;_ .- .--..~. _-. t. in-1. _-_ ,..._.--»..__-. . _
Y 0
' n
PART II
read this statement of my
ans! T H'nR:.92r92cI+Ia'r|n1 0-9210;? mu! 1--'1 ff-92'|'n 92-IlA92-I .1. -92 u.92.- -1 92-can u 1|. .J 1 Pour».-
a I am willing to make a statumant
and answer qucstiOns. I do not want
a lawyer at this time. I understand
and know what I am doing. No promises
or threats have been made to me and no
pressure or coercion of any kind has
been used against me.
Care must be taken to see that no duress
exercised; that no attempt is made to obtain
3 snfcssisn 0? aimission of guilt by
f°P¢@- threats, or promises. Duress makes
a confession or aimissicn involuntary and
inadmissible in court. '
Nhether he will cooperate ft cntircl?
to the suspect Or accused. he inicgng
at any time Brion to or duri
that he wishbn to remain sil that he
wants an attorney, all inter ion for
8Yidencu of fuilt must Cen=~, Any cffcrtstiuuing
tv persuade, tTlCK, or CaJ01u the susocct
Ot Of Qncrcising his ccn;tituticna1 right:
will invalidate the waiver.
v
»
P
v
lPa
l.i. '!
92_ 4_:-'
- ---us-----» . -._..-q-. t .> 'A - ,5
i
'. . 92v4__ .._,-.
- »
._
.;'l.f
. -..-
.=.r».~'92
' i
;-=3_:_-.'..
. We-''_'~'-WI'-§.*:~.=i1T. ,
sis
i::r"-'-.5;-<'.'._' '_ ,._ -27
?._§.'-
. .
:-__. _llesit
;='=_;r
. __,'._'.
.. V};
3.4}-
"'t D?
$1--;
.".- 2
¢~.
-4 1'I
TO
FROM
BIB
"NI/U
b
lo4. -_ .,_ ....,.,..,...._-.-._. .i..__.__l._...._ -._ _.......> _____ -.. -
' omonu noun an. noIA
.1U UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
1 Mr. J. B. Adams °*1'E=1o/14/75
1 Legal Couns%92/
3§4B-EQUEST FOR POR'1ION_Sg OF FBI.....
HANr InsmaucrlonsrBY -CLERKrrUH1$ED_.LETATEF sUfg_3.g:'i1g1s c'oum'g g Dc _ 'v
T! if On 10/14/75 , telephonenumber 393-1640, extens one , c n aiiii SA Joseph R.
Davis of the Legal Counsel Division. identifiehimself as a law clerk in the libraryws.
Supreme Court and explained that he was not assigned to
a particular Supreme Court Justice but does research
for the Court under the direction of the Chief
Librarian of the Supreme Court for the use of various
Justices. _ _
M inquired as to whether the FBI could
furnish yuiuluua of our written instructions or manuals
available to Agents which set forth the procedures which
an Agent should follow when conducting an interview of
an individual under arrest. He stated that the specific
in any such instructions when the individual being
_ interviewed indicates that he does not wish to answer
any questions or that he wishes to exercise any of his
Miranda rights such as his right to counsel!?
advised that he did not k h
gustice
any, it
SA Davis suggested that to insure there was
< -inc-misunderstanding concerning the scope of the question
it would be helpful if a letter could be directed to
the FBI setting forth the above-mentioned factual
situation and requesting the appropriate written' '_ i - , en: m crlfm nu L _ N
question involved was: "What course of conduct is prescriInns. Dir. i...
Ulp. uBop. A0
Ant. Dim
Admin. __.__.
Coup. Syn. __
[IL llhlrl __
:' Fliol i ¬lI. .-
501. luv. _._...
IIQQI. 1....-
lnpnun _-
IIIIQIL __i_
§:Z&1£:§
sign canary
Pill-IHYIL --
hue. lav. _,._._...
Tlohlhj _-.-_
Tnlqplnnc Ill. __
Dinner Soc! _._
Aus
now w athad requested this information or what case, if ¬?f/Iis related to. ;Z7_5"X92$- - _ F
92
-I||||||||-n1nl|iIlIll'l$$
Mr. Mintz
Mr. Davrp15 NOV171W5
iii
g?
i~¢" " Q
ii-1'._.'.~_ 1
1*
1-,-7 .7--.'¬"'92-1
3-4 "-
n1 .._-.-.~¢
H 4
u
1 - ----~~----1--t_. _.--» ll -1_ - ___'_' -_e ____ __ '=-_-::;___e__- -..--.. I . A,--... ,.. _._-.._.-......___¢.,-........ ... _ r_0-
, C» D
Legal Counsel Memo to
Mr. J. B. Adams
Re: Request For Portions of FBI
Ha of Instructions
Sta upreme ourt
instructions to Agents be furnisheqadvised
that he would have such a letter prepared an and
- elivered on 10/15/75¢ setting forth the above
<factua1 situation and requesting the pertinent portion
of our manuals or other appropriate instructions be
expedite this research and hoped the material oou[HQ 'F11v'n§ eshn run 1l"l/1:/ I: nv "|/1C/ IE CH '|"92g92"r':Q 19-: anI? F 4l¬92l Elli. -l-92I/-L-J/ [J 92-IL J|92II&92Jl f|JQ LJJ1 Lll-U'J,§ Q.92,lU'¢L§§
, that this matter would be discussed with the
ap ropriate FBI officials and his request would be
considered on an expedite basisLtgg k;¢ vfurnished. He indicated that he had been requested toif ; " 16'___ q /J 5.-10 / F
_ Findicated his desire to have Xerox
copies of e appropriate instructions along with a
eccpy of the title page of the publication from which
they were taken to insure, if necessary, that they
are cited correctly. In view of this re"uest it
appears we should consider the
furnished may appear either in
of a Supreme Court opinion.
RECOMMENDATION:
l. A representative
Division contact the Solicitor
i-hp T'lon:'r"+-mnn+- -I-n ac: -r-'l-:a-in {F F10van-a Q-wt-um- --u-u.¢-n.92- 92-ml 1-nu-1-92.¢92-1-92-nun-an asa-nl 1 ,
fact that any material
the text or a footnote
~
of the Legal Counsel
General's Office of
that office has a case
pending before the Supreme Court which might involve
such an inquiry, and to obtain
any response.
_ 2 _
--.__-- .. -_ -their concurrence in
CONTINUED - OVER!R
u
M?
-'5
..- ivE. -;;- 14 '5e -X c-92-.
-~-_.~1!".-.
4. .__ I4-¢:_y-xv _92.- 1-4-.,.,.-_:I-H5 =v-
.._t ..F-*--1r=
.7;..!s,
.,.
.__-H51,
.; .}_,'
..92 -
I-T: . _IIIn._'v_'
£5;-92"'.3-Y '
:,_ <
"$3-if3.,
:',?';'
.>[1 b~
I ~ '
Legel Counsel Memo to
J B Adams I Mri I Ilag! Re: Request For Portions of FBI
Han of Instructions
By lerk, United
Sta' t
2. If the Solicitor Genera1's Office interposes
no objection; Legal Counsel Bivi" -"-"' 'alpu PLBPGIB H YESPODSGfrom the Director furnish ' 'ing the pertinent_port1ons ofthe Manual of Instructions and/or FBI Handbook.
Al
v
r
1
ww
M.
._'1-~er ~
' ~'-92 .-
,-._;'_,'-'.
.i' ._ '
"Y
' .3.-r
.__,,
ref
F;
S
F ' '
-a.
..J--
J_
B
.a_-
._l_.,;_v.71 '
§_5,4?92
'2
. u
_il
I
3
T!
.
E
i
r
IY' . .. .-~_:s»-_-..-.~.._.,_- _ M... -..A:-~ :_ ~.=':7.= "r -- ~ _--s.-_ - -M...-~ - ...-...._ _- ., _ _ ,_ _H _ *_ _ _ _
T___* _
! lilac. D1:___"' ____, .. . _ U Dzp. 1""! Hal.-:1___0- --0 .. . nu D; "- --
OFFICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE
ADMINISTRATION OF IUSTICEii
- WASHINGTON, 0.0. 20530
January 10, 1978 p
<iQ¥"F£-1."""MEMORANDUM TQYWERID I "i
T0: Heads of Offices, Boards and Divisions *
FROM: Daniel J. 5/Ieador
Assistant Attorney General1 _ _ . . M" elsutnh Statcs Elspartnzrrxt sf E-Zltacz *";_'£-,g__;g -1--p I J ...v,__-,___
t--...>
3 .H _M
92 Pa
. J.i-_-
i S; 17:.
i TQC'.h. scr-'S..?__.
Trzmnl-,3-____92I *! Public Lila O.L_' _
Tephona F.m.____,,
3'xu:c1': S1,;-'
19SUBJECT: Obligatory Appellate Jurisdiction I
of the Supreme Court
Attached for your consideration and comments
proposed bill which this Office is developing for
to the Attorney General, OMB, and Congress. Also
is a memorandum giving some of the background for
proposal.
The effect
atory appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Courtis a
submission
attached
the
of this legislation is to limit the oblig-
generallyto those cases involving the granting or denial of an
injunction by a three-judge district court. All other cases
would come to the Court on writ of certiorari to one of the
courts of appeals, the Court of Claims, the Court of Customsd:;pd Patent Appeals, the highest court of a state,
uprems_Court of Puerto Rico.
¢
Obligatory appellate jurisdiction is retained in
cases decided by three-judge courts because, after the
revision of the jurisdiction of such oouran relatively
cases are still heard by threejudge courts, and since
revision is so recent we are reluctant to ask Congress
open the question of three-judge courts at this time.
if mandatory jurisdiction were removed from these
would be no appeal of right available unless one was cor the
those
1976
fill J-P
to re-
Moreover,
s there
reatedC358
in the courts of appeals. Courts of appeals review of these
cases would be peculiar in that one group of three judges would
be reviewing the decision of another group of three judges,
and the latter would include one judge from the reviewing court.I ;<-105 ;g.<»" Lé 27.;?...Z.2_"-?=?-T-:%_'/W3
-n_ a . .__; '
-":"f:5*5;f: Q. . ..-__ .. '1;..=_- 5
i$?
.-1-v~
92"
-|,,.._ -
_{,Z-" -
_ 7 -»_
....92.":-
' =-
.4» .Qgz E
:_'.'..,_
92 -1-, 1
s
~
1?
P.
P
i
I
*3._ .0 2- _
We would appreciate your views on the proposal and
the issues raised in Part 4 of the attached memorandum.
feel free to contact me or Denis Hauptly ext. 5107! of
Office for any further information on this subject. We
appreciate receiving your coments by January 25.on
Please
this
would
Attachments
I
~
V
f
1 ,1.
;s+
Edi
-1,.
. .'..-*1 _
-.--
,1.
-1-;
*"." -_
...;92-.-.-
I- .._==_--
we
J J
_."zf- .~-Lrc.H! 3
3
S. 14 . 1
» _-
-Q1
..._~ l» -.m_r_ gl :-3 ' -
.é§
dd?
1|
1
5
1
%
11.4m-Ir.--..-4-Ȣ.. --..-_- ..-4 ___ __ _ : -- _>_-- =_----J --.l -t _~.._-.A-- -.-- - -.--- - H _s -~- ~---I - 0-
. . C!! A BILL {!
To improve the administration of justice by reducing the
obligatory appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, permit
ting the Court greater discretion in selecting the case to be
heard by it and for other purposes. V
Se it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatiyes
of the United States in Congress assembled, That this Act may
be cited as the "Supreme Court Jurisdiction Act of 1978".
.SEC. 2. Section 1252 of title 28, United States Code, is
repealed. -
Q - pt r-13/1 '3 1-.-..-.J_: _.D-C|92.¢u -J; DUULLUI
1
amended by deleting subsection
United States Cede, is
!, by redesignating subsection
! as subsection ! and by deleting "appeal;" from the title.
SEC. 4. Section 1257 of title 28, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows: '
In
F§l257. State courts; certiorari.
Final judgments or decrees rendered by thethighest court
of a State in which a decision could be had, may be reviewed by
?9292Pl92Iw1r92 f9292, -1.--|- 92 - - - .-:1. .-.5 -1.-..._1..-2.-..._...' .--..-....-.:11-CLLLC 92.-UU-LL. U] W1-.l..L. U4. Ll;'LI..LUI.d.L.l.. WIICJBA ---a
3S!? "w 1
sq» -
.,,-....,,,. I
w_. -..l
r. ' =
ea;
¢;¥
e: ' 1
.»,_ -_ 1
.' i
° if-1.
liq
g:
'@-
;
I
IU -2- J '
the United States, or where any title, right, privilege or
immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution,
treaties or statutes of, or commission held or authority
exercised under, the United States.
"For the purposes of this section, the term highest court
4! I ' 1 A .-. : 4-... 4- ._4= n...'I.....1..-:.. ....__ -1: _.._.-.-1.. OL a I-92 can 1 nu A n- ck I1 _ C6--uh In _ 92 _ 1. Iaunt: LHbLuQBb a ii UL bULUEULG uuurn or Appeals.
SEC. 5. Section 1258 of title 28, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows: H
"§1258. Supreme Court of Puerto Rico; certiorari.
Final judgments or decrees rendered by the Supreme Court
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico may be reviewed by the
Supreme Court by writ of certiorari where the validity of a
treaty of statute of the United States is drawn in question or
.1-92 -. .. .-. .. -... r92,92-.....-.......-.'| h ..-1': em... A'92927u¬r¬: " " " c: 92.unuuvuwt:a.4.tu U1. rutzzitu
Rico is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant
to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or
_where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set
.. 7 4. .___..-.- =-_.-._.. _.._ r_. ,_A_____ ____ -__ _ _d __ _ W H _ ____ _ _ _
0
i
"Chapter 81 - SUPREME couar
, Sec. '
ze um;
-eweerr -1252. Repealed.
.'§¢: ,; "1251. Original jurisdiction. 1
I;;§;_ 'l253. Direct appeals from decisions of turee-judge courts.311: r - -1254. Courts of appeals; certiorari; certified questions.
?%§? "1255. c_§5?» ourt of Claims, certiorari; certified questions.I", I:1?»-
_92-;. "
.s"._-__, ..
' H.
___;._ _.
. l
' "liq.
J? ..
we
-__-i.-rpl : .* I
1 '5' 2-.r
ii
|
v.
,.~
92L.
,...
!
Qn
¢
<
3
1'.
'-.
1ff "1256. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals; certiorari.
1257. State courts; certiorari. -
"1258. Supreme Court of Puerto Rico; certiorari.".
-
92-r
1
3
. ' 1-
f' L§,i':'§ 92- ;_..1
1.-94., ' r»-1*- is."-+-
~'92".L .
1.-=55
III| 'x . Vi.
L341.»1 , E
1:?D.
'1!l... .51-1..-.-.92.
st:' r-:-
"< :52.
w-
..-fI
|
I
§
i
3
.
3
2
i
,
1
3_. ,..._...'.. .-...->~* e- --'=- ~ _t Wt '__-- - ~' t 71%-----._--M---'~-_---. -- _- _---._..-.:_ _;... - _ -_ _»_--. ...¢.._c
. r
January 10, 1978
BACKGROUND MEMORANDUM ON THE SUPREME COURT'S
OBLIGATORY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1. The
Prior to 1925 the majority of the Supreme Court's docket
was comprised of cases brought under the Court's obligatory
appellate jurisdiction. In that year Congress passed the Judge's
Bill which provided for certio rari, or discretionary, review of
most lower court decisions. However, review of decisions of 7
threejudge district courts and certain other decisions remained
mandatory and as the caseloads
so did the mandatory docket of
A study conducted for the
that in the 1972-73 Term 424 c
Of these cases 293 came to the
Legislative changes sinceof these courts gradually increased
the Supreme Court.
Court by student interns reveals
ases were decided on the merits.
Court via the obligatory route.
1973 have certainly altered this
picture somewhat. See P.L. 93-258 amending the Expediting Act 1/
and P.L. 94-381 altering the jurisdiction of three-judge courts.
We expect new data from the Court in the near future documenting
the effect of these changes. Preliminary data indicates there
were 307 cases on the mandatory docket in the 1976-77 Term. It
seems certain that obligatory appellate jurisdiction cases form
a large percentage of the Cour
It is our view, and the vt's docket.
iew of many others see section 2,
infra!, that there is little justification for the obligatory
jurisdiction. Certainly there
annually produce questions ofare categories of cases which
such magnitude that it is very
important that the Supreme Court review them. But such questions
regularly appear in its certiorari docket as well. Because some
-rs:
4
Q .v..- Inn
1.
3;;--=n-_ _
.._.._,
ir
--51
_..,_ -,_
.11
iiI
.
I
,.
L
,
..-
u.
r
-
i;
11*-'
,1
v~>i
8!
"?
6
L
_n.-
-.
v.
1
92'
~
1
s
5.
42i_-_e - - _ _ ~;~;~- *3 __-=_ _- __ _ 1. _. .c...-...- - A__A_4__~ . _ ....__.__..._._.-.l..,._.. __.-......_____,.___,,. ....
' ' . r
0
. . .
In short, there is little gained by continuing the present
Obligatory burden and much to be gained and little, if anything,
to be lost! by eliminating it. g
2. Proponents of the Elimination A
Among those who have advocated the elimination of the
Court's obligatory appellate jurisdiction are Chief Justice
Burger, Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun and Justice Powell.
See Commission on Revision of the Federal Appellate Court System,
§tructure and_;nternal_Proceduresg "Recommendations for Change,172-188 975!. Z 8 W * Z 2 h Z z H
In addition the Department of Justice has previously taken
a position favoring the elimination of obligatory appellate
jurisdiction. See Department of Justice Committee on Revision
of the Federal Judicial System, The Needs of the Federal Courts},
ll-l3 977!. Finally, the Freund Report strongly advocated the
same change. See, Federal Judicial Center, Report of the Qtudx
Gropp_Qn the Qa§e_Load_0§ the Supreme Court, 25-38 972!.
We are unaware of any opposition.
3. The Proposal
The proposal is fairly simple in form. Set forth below is
a section~by-section analysis of the draft.
Section l. This section gives the name of the Act.
Section 2. This section repeals 92
currently provides for appellate
Supreme Court for cases from the
one judge has invalidated an Act of Congress in a case in which
the United States or its agencies or employees is a party. The
purpose of the section obviously is to expedite cases in which an
Act of Congress has been invalidated by a single judge. However,
it is our view that in such cases application for a stay would
almost always be granted and wheie it is not application can be
made for certiorari prior to judgment in the court of appeals
under 28 U.S.C. 1254!.28 Q.S.C. 1252. That section
mandatory! jurisdiction in the
various district courts where.r
The effect of the repeal is to place jurisdiction for such i
cases in the courts of appeals under 28 U.S.C. 1291 and 1292.
If the judgment were upheld and the case of sufficient importance
then a writ of certiorari could be sought under 28 U.S.C. 1254!. ?
;;-7f -"I-Q-1.-.1?-' 1Il.0. - .~ -*~- 61'/I. -
1 l»'.='
-, .1. Jar.1: '
-.=a=_a">-- '31.-T6.t.f..';. -T 92, _
l.._
, .
E
i
r.
3'4
i
5
i
,-
i
t
.1I
'2
3;! _ ~ 3 - l 4! .
Section 3. This section modifies 28 U.S.C. 1254 which governs
the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over cases arising from the
courts of appeals. Subsection ! of that section is deleted.
That subsection provides for obligatory appellate jurisdiction
where the court of appeals has found a state statute to be
invalid as repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of
the United States. Review is limited to Federal questions.
There is nothing which makes these cases, as a class, different
from other cases in the courts of appeals. While there is some
aura of federalism about the provision the same "state's rights"
arguments could be made about habeas corpus cases, invalidation
of state regulations, and many prisoners rights cases.0 n ,
Cases presently appealed under subsection ! would now be
brought by writ of certiorari under subsection !.
Section 4. This section modifies 28 U.S.C. 1257. Currently that
section provides for obligatory jurisdiction for cases from the
highest available state court when the state decision invalidated
a statute or treaty of the United States or when a state statute
was found to be repugnant to the Constitution or a treaty or law
of the United States. The section also provides for certiorari
jurisdiction when any state statute or federal treaty or law is
questioned on federal grounds. .
The changes made in the section simply eliminate appellate
jurisdiction and substitute certiorari jurisdiction. The theory
is similar to those previously expressed: there is no particular
reason to believe that these cases, as a class, are more signi-
ficant than other Cases arising in state courts or, for that
matter, in the federal courts..-
Section 5. This section modifies 281U.S.C.'l258. That section
is virtually identical to 28 U.S.C. 1257 except that it applies
only to cases from the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico. The changes
made are the same as those made to 28 U.S.C. 1258 and the result
is the same. '
Section 6. This section makes conforming changes to the caption
at the beginning of chapter 81. In addition it is likely that
some other technical changes will have to be made to delete
references to 23 U.S.C. l252 which would he repealed by section
2 of this proposal.
E
:_; r- _.V '14| v I._ J-I-_- °'.+1=-1
£5-TIT-Fa' ... 92__- B
L:In
Eu ~. §
<oI? .,
~.
§""."§
._
e%
.=_-'*r. .2" '.*"
L./I .1
s@~3
".;.; -- -
.:,
2?-1
-':I.- '
.,,_
. _,,,.
i
P
3
5. ' . ' gm _ 4 - :~! . .
4. Areas Not Modified
There are at least four sections outside of title 28 which
provide for obligatory appellate jurisdiction. These are 25
U.S.C. 652 Indian claims against the United States for land!;
43 U.S.C. 1652 d! actions related to the Alaska pipeline!;
and 45 U-S-C- 719 8! and 743 d! dealing with appeals from the
special court reviewing railroad reorganization matters!. The
last three sections appear to be measures of temporary necessity,
while the first appears to be more long range. Because of the
technical nature of these sections we would especially appreciate
the views of the relevant divisions as to their continued utility
In addition there are some sections e.g., l5 U.S.C. 29 b! and
49 U.S.C. 45 b!! which appear to provide for obligatory appellate
jurisdiction but in fact lodge discretion in the Court. These
_ have not been dealt with. If relevant sections have been over-
looked we would certainly appreciate being informed.
Q
V
92"*~=-~-----r. __~_, _,_,_, I _,_ ___ _ _, _____ _____ ______ 7__ ___;::___ *_:__ ____;V__ ____ __V__ _ _ ___,_._ ____ __ __ _~-,1; W...
V...-. .-t._E
I
"-'-1-.; -T-_ '
'1. - 1.-n"J.'.-___ _,,_.
:_*'_~;92;_,.- _- ..- "'. - -»92_$24
Jib.1 _ Y _ _1. LX--?'.,._
_'d._.'_._...1 "E ;_:~;§5.! _-V.
-1~' -_
r-..-
"92:~
I
cl
Q
b
<'-.-I-.-"A-
.111- -._".92. _
Is; I
_ '
21
_ _|:
I-""3#=
1
'* one-1..;-..:"-*=
l _ie~_
in
uJs
-Mr
QQIEQ , .:-- H 3Alllltlt GGDBIQI - l rut
/65 Oice for the Improvements in Administration I LN 7 K "/ afo::'1c§1mm- Legal Counsel . I997 Jd;ederai Bureau oi Investigation -
osuoaroar AIZBELLATE mgtsoicrxou or
lrassorajans couar p___ _ *
92 , Reference is made to your "memorandum to the Heads oi
if! ome BardsandDivisi dated 0 c s, o ons January I , 1978, with enclosures,
I captioned as above. o the telephonic conversation520 between Special Age: Legal Counsel Division,* Federal Bureau oi loves on, as rlcia Bailey at your office
on January 23, 1978-
Aa discussed mm; the referenced telephone conversation,
it appears that the propos I ppreme Court Ju1;iu_|_dietion_§ct qt plQ;l_8__wil.lhave no effect on the investfga-ative and other operations oi the FBI. We,
therefore, will have no comments or observations to make regarding the
proposed legislation. /
' TE: By referenced memorandum Mr. Meador solicited comments from thq Heads of all Offices, Boards, and Divisions regarding the proposed
- - n reme Court Jurisdiction-Act oi 1928 which would restrict the mandatoryS ellate jurisdiction of thgbgpreme Court so that an" instance of a Federal
st tute being overturned 'by 5'D'i'sTt?iFt'C'o'tTFt can be appealed to a Circuit
C rt and need not be directly appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court.
T proposed legislation provides for certiorari appeal in cases of
su icient importance. Other changes-areset iorth in the backgroundemoradum attached to refer edjél 78 commumcatwn. 1 A ii ..2:1¬ ¢;.;-aria <?-e..,T'......_. W105 """ '7 _ as FF.B1<> 1%Dip. Alnv.---3 - - __________APPROVED! : o :di'n. Semi
rim. inv.i._
irselnfii Fin. I Peri-Mi .;.'lull. Dim
-ln. sin. ___
Cum. luv. _..,_ 92 92-i---
Fin. I Pu ._ @5555, I]||-,__,_,i____ litiili-_i__.---_ .. iiI.._._......._.__._.
H""'- --i De la ll! -i "11"",-
. Ill Yeah. tern-____
lisp. in luv mi "11" |nia1l. ___.____ ' l.sl|erainry__.. ,_i__._._
- - PLIHE: kf!s- Eli-__._....
Io
P|n|92. I |r||p, __ 92
Ros. lgnl. __
Spec. luv. _,_i
Tech. 5orv;,___
TrainingLohvunmy
L at C
Public Mia. OIL-
Jclaphontl R"? _..a La 4 JIJ?£.? TELETYPE UNIT III~/£4
- ' QU 1.!" .
92
Ah _ -.._, ,_. . , May 22, 191a.
~;' ' -' iv
i -_.¢. _ I-92'
.4 I-3.1-_~
Hz-92
;I':' '
.;-_'_~_"'
ii
.,-',.','-tr
-I-,»':5 -_
-:- -- -
. 15'I-a~,._ _92
-
I!"-
1»
-.., 1~-20:.
e
- w
*-
J--1?S /I] J rnnn1w.covmn|:zu1' r, < ,ah. " . ~i". - ~ ' 5 . i" *- ' '
13¢ .
!u!!eme
Washington, D. C.Dev S r.//2_/it --'=m -P C0 '4 P7
Pursuant to your telephonic conversation with
1 my stair, Treasurer oi the United
a es _ 316,878, dated May 15, 1978, is being .
returned for correction Y i " . ou w 11 note that there is a
discrepancy between the written amount and the numeric
amount. SF-1080 number 78-83 is also being returned.
l T1, W111 11¢ Q!-92n!lan'I on-nu 4-lass.-I-v inQ Ir I'I--51 92I92-I §P92|IJ- LLUII Qucun la u,
promptly. i_
Sincerely yours, "!i9' ' 92-../H Richard E. Long 92929292______,-"d/I
Assistant Dirqptor -
TIQ QQIIO namecans-92.LAA-tam!-Ii;-I-RI:-I-VU LJUJ-I-I-I-oC§
Enclosures ! '
_.-n-- - '
0-1-u_
Q _
NOTE: The discrepancy on the check is the diiference in_
the written amount and the numeric numbers. Per,_ _._,,,___ i _I..£leDhonic conversation with '
DmADMm__ e ues hr Q ted °*?° - 5,, aw <4 we-1% ~ --51>, £-:»29/
_._.,',,
92-I I." I _--a---ai. -... i_*_ii_____ .i-_lt_l__. _ _ _-~__A_~ ;~~ ~~ ~* *; 1 L ""'?L* *Tf" """" I0 Revised May I970 lTIea:a%-FRM 2500 ' I_ } scueouie T46. 7 *-
I . i f-' ; _ BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS mo/on FUNDSDeparImrnc.u-labiiiliment.bun:au.oIu?fi<ebiIli0} E K i 7 K V fig _ Viiiri i A
U. S.De1nrtmeiit of Justice - Federal Bureau of Iiiveatigatioii
Washington, D C 20535 Accounting Station 15 02 001 92 . . "0_L,;,, I _._ if ____0 ___* , _ ;P : __- _" _ , ,__, 0H Depuirneni. eaubliihmeni. bureau. or aim biiled '
1 _ ' Administrative Office 0: the ',
U0 3. C0011!
- Supreme Court Building 0 -_ wiisnmgmii, D.C. 20544 if
92 _ _' -. |_ i92 - .
92;
V ..]_,_ -. ;ri 592i . v .é v I
%¬:!§-;*
<.;:.Z":-H . 3.' ' ""'r:§'---1
"- .
_ *f;;:, - '__t _ <7__:_ _ _ _, _- L 7 17177 ?_7__ iJ_t; -7 ' 771* _7 ' A---q§ * _ 7:4-:
1i.".T' .. omen NO. 9"? °":92- _' , "i I iimi riuce 92 i ;A;~92CU;lfan lE seavces ,°"*"'-i ~ ~ - 0-_ 0 ____ ~~- - DEiiVERY i f j 'c* 5° _' i i _*i ~, mv em _ 1 3935 MEE5
Re
conbu:-same t Ior investigative work under author! Mined in ction 686 of Title 31 of U. S. Code -0
A tated!. eceived during March, 1978: 6 name
e che ks @ $1. 9 ____ f4 and 24 full field investigations @ -
$2, 65.00. seA0 attached. 0 0 A0 A 1050, 'm. 04
,_ 0 00 0, ___ 0- __l1§iA1. nance in iiaymerii hereof ahuulil be uni io- ,z u W 1
. 0 Richard E. Long, room 0012 ma , 1
4 Washinqton D C 20535
92Z," T11
*1 .
_____j__ Z_ __:_: ___:_j_.____;__ ___,_ == 1'0 ' __._e__,____, ___ ,.Q _ I * 0 0 _ Q KCCQQQEFNB §l1é1j575f'§1Y;l'g"1j1 0§1Il;f?ef1!7'-:,e_Q'gE?si*jf_ 0 , _ __[ W10] fl _ 0;
500200 Salaries 0 Expenses, FBI, 1970 l 0 ' ;~
- 1-
00004412/J10 ? ,0 0 0 V 0 i " 0
i-I_t ~" ' CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED
I certify ihai ihe above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as ained and should be cl-ia ed lo theap i0|>lilli0l'l[$] and/or fundp! as indi d bel - ' ' care ow, or that the advance payment requested is approved and ahouldre paid asinsicated. _ _ .
-------------------- 1;; ;;;-i?;i-';£-t;--c-e-I-!- -o--------n -----~ - -i.................. -..b.z.;3--.--------u.-...-----.-.. I U Ni--------------------------------------------------------------- --
{Tirlej 7-4-_#i_';Y _ ~j_*j_'; 7;7_7 ;' ' - 1 :__; :._'__,_ _i_i»: * ' ' _ -_- _, ~_:_7 ff? f; _ 74~ '___ _ _ 0 __ _ ____492CCQUNTl_N_G C1-A55lF_lCATl0N0j?_r¢ liiilrif e_ _ _ _ _ ___/,5 _ _ ,_ ,, ,,,__ ,,,,_ __,,_,__ . __ . ___ .
- 7 92
I. 92-.,__-
a- --i.000"§1>;y=§»i_;e;*_;_*0T i" T77; 1* ?11?i J >< " 0 ;I2f':;-5 F _ / KW K -W K Kjz _ K H _ K ?5,¬,q|-e "all-}l~l1Dl-I-I we-"ll!
0 fviosvnz ~ .
, ,.._ 0, _W .__- -
" " ;-T " "' "'-1""-"--"- --n -"J":-¢-1. ...»-1..-n._. _.,;,,, _,,_ - 1 , . |_ 9@ I .1-¢ -1 -1»-92 > 9 - - wulw 1 -um-an-sq-q-1-.---1.1-1..-i92,_92_-a1..,.,.,.,,.,q.4¢4.|w0umaiwmqu¢'1i.-- ;'*-*__?*%J*______ II
-I ---- --_. -._ _:_.....-....-.
0
|.,
'1
1- .1- 92~-Q- ~<'
win' 1O
Q
;_ .1,-Lia 3
1
1 Q v.1
1
i
!
1
1
1
1
I_ ' II" .| ;b92--M *1 ' .
..In_I. 1
-s.--
- r
|:-u
0 ¢-I.1
.1 ,T153.-.1*1_i5I"~;' " !D.92Il!92'IS'l'IL92'l'l92'E OFFICE I - 1' 010-calm " -92-_ 1
'-~" ' I I rs»-. >4.-mu.» -~- .- . '. . - - I . _- I . --I I I I .I. .1. III I92 I' ' ' '1 -1-wAsm1~m1oN.n.c. -_: A No. "-316 878 ' II - ?92
OF THE U.8. COURTS - _ .
PI Zfrrnlznrrruf tlyriflrrilrhI . 1.
% may 15, 1971.1 _
I. - I. .
' .-1.
1 ~.~r-1-< ~ 1. ' PAY $56,771Do11ar's 65Cents '_ '11 1 56,771,514 - I -~ '1: .-1:1
F '. __'/w 1 1 ' I
-L-**-_-%--/-'-" 1 to rm: __ I . _ . . -> .
QRDER op-U. S. Department Of JUSt'iCE '
- _ - -Federa1 Bureau of Investigation 1 Ivo no 12767 ' ' 'R'ichard E Long V V -
Acct 11° Room 6012 JEH °""" ' ° '°"'?....1....'.......l., ,-_..F-"a$h*"@'=<?n-.0-¢.-Q .?°.53-5.... - 11 3 - '
- I 1 F
' -T "~ 1" L 1¢;1Ir;l,92'g=.'r ;~'I,1i'-1r;7»I~;1=r-43;-I I sq"a-- 000-moan-: -01:13 Lsja van»-1
1 92 . - 1. - , ' ' - - ' _ . ' I. H'*_92""' " V _.:. - ' .2 :_ ~L;.I--'9:'IwV I. I5 ;' .-It-I ' -p T. A . ._ . I _ -II ._ I _ f I . _I ,5 ___ _=-1:. --W swé +1%"1*%*.W= '§:+'- "- -ri» ..--T? 125- 1'" -1'1? 1*?-&1¢ i'"**1'-"?"'** ~;*".;1%="--"=~'=1"1111'-' ~ " :**.'i-'
1
. 1
1
pl-4;;
1 I
4 92I_4..921'0--11-
..-"_I=,'.;5:T>£"'.'i11~! '¬-'-.>"é""' - 92-.1 . - - _ . 1 _Q1 _ ._ ».. -@@',1¢-='**3V*#-1<-- ~"§1'"92~'¢1 -=+*-#11-he=': ' ""-we->
.III_ ?II I-II__ II .I_.I . I, I14 1;-._;-If-TI.__I -I I H I_ II I ,_-.__.I'II I:I.I_I I _I I I __ _ I 2 -I___ _ _I I I' 5 1. Q 931*-1&1-1 - 54: . ' '1
_ l IQ "-'- - '-- :.::' 1'-ii!-'3-I.--;' -Li. " ' ' .. -'~1- ' .' V - '--1. .- . " .- -- '- .-".1 -' .|_~. I-£_f_}_.: -};_~ f-$55 ,-*;-.p_-:.,9§g-,,. .-L I-_l -_ ,,Q,I~ I51;-_,. ;.1I. .-sq . I-_.';_¢ .-,I_I-_,§,q1-_I* _.592. II 101.; L12. 11' I.t_+_I,---,.q _ . _' 92 -92 _II_ _.1*-*1.»1=-11 -.--11¢-1 -I I 1» 13:: -- 1-*1-'1-'-1-:*-'1 ?-= s - .~- " - ' - - 1- "- 1" - " ;;-1. ~ -" "-{-<- - .3 -1'-'-=1" -
1 1II _ WC] A _ ." W """* ' " ' " *1? -""- "Ti -~ -- "*."f""92"- H. --1'1-11P-1-.; F-*TI:'q'F lf"'"1'Il-qw1I§w~1'- . I '1'-~|-1 -". _ - I .
92 . 1 ' I
- _ 1 1
92-
. i-'-_- - -I '.I 1 - _ -.-' - - _. .-_ 1 I_ I ., ..<_. .' '-- -- - M - -- .- - 1 . "1 1 1i!'= 1----- '. '5"? 1-'-FE;-.--..'11=-"I - ~- 1 - . ».
1 1 ' X _*
. o._;
- . -- .- .I - I - "I --.. . q -I
' I1 . 1 ' . ' . |
- .¢-.'__-..'f 1-"
1_1LI¢I'1.i-§I _I;-+'f1;,~ I 'j 1
I
11 - .- 9 _E - svmacn. 5697 , ~ *-*~.
' I
I- .I:v "-.' .I- -I
§ 1
- 1
. 1 r
|
I1;. .II I I fI I 1 ,4-u-' _~ I 1I 1 _- I.I-I%IP=_-'1¢_.I{'P-'-l/ 1.- -_ -1! ' 1I I 1
11.:
1 9292
n /
»- TO I
= .
FROM I
" E°
$3 k37C;»
we
5... ' .
11 --,-1 ,.
r-'4-.'.;_,
29/? L
- ' '. ' 1¢
*92 -L
T! I/-92r"92
H».
. 5
» _ ,.¢._92-92 -7.-__..;g92-? .1 92_{
92
. 3 _92-Q
,
1/>"3~»
I
+
R1 1 '
. 1 . °
$2 >q!vJ asJ V. . Savings Bonds Re_ __ 1; __.,-.._ ...-._-4._....,__.-.»-.-.......-.-_-.-.._ __ .__H.
r 1
C! J A
92
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUBTICE "
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONMem.g .-.--.__.-q'-w"' §l|l||._._.____
La»mq_J__Assistant Director nxra: 10/25/73 C
Criminal Investigative D ision' A /ILqal Counsehcpr §é§7 -
IAnn. Dk. _.__.
DI. ID All. __._
Dip. All ll]. _.,_____
Anal. Din:
cg on. __._.
Plan. I lnp. __._
In. Hpl. ____f-_L ¢-....II-I -"'1 Qii
Trailing .___..._
Hill: Alb. OH. __._
92'ohp92on u. _i
Directs: Sn'y __ mouxmr BY Q
__U.rS §.IJ1?r HAL,-~
CONCERNING2§%9_1*1¥I.4Q1!?L'¥§lJ=?P?£9.1i.'."§CAL]; TO WFO Y comm EM§L6YE_E "74/
PURPOSE:
To advise of anonymous tele to WFO al-leging irregularity by Supreme Court employee.
DETAILS;
23, 1973," telephoned SAQng or particu ars i ' d
V1501
tion concerning it 18'?!-Ce
on October 20, 1978, at 7:45 p.m. '
_/_,.?_.,?_1
consists of
1' 00; rm -.978_SA *re1ayed We informationJoseph Corless, w 0 advised a WFO Agents will contac _./f
RECOMMEND ATION: P
. . d . S . L IC . YWFor 1nf<>rmH»n- Pain r::;';eP1. /fr 9 Director id t Rec Mam-__I ' A .Di , ''"' en .________ Tech. Servs._Q Va 4,1,, 956 DS¢:;cAD»;dFr1%'_' """°"- TrainmsDep.ADInv. _""' '- "°'a°'Y_.._ Publicfiioif-_____
- Mr. Coulson __92_,_/ /
1 V I f5 7g L, J ?1 - Mr Boynton '
Mr. Moore
Mr Mlntz *' 2
_ IJ-Ail. 3%»-1. I I
Cril. |lv- __
n
;
I
I
+'_;*"_
T 4
.:t-' _ . ..
.._-=_3;w_
er"
¥~~
"_I&::r'
~=. r
"_'.:"
F-a_-I-"L_"."":- TA ---- ' --» - /er» ""7-* 1 ""* ' 7-; w-.:w-:1» -e---v. --
1 ' ;- --- ' ' 1 '
0-
Aauawn__ I
Dep. AD Adm.9 Dep. AD tnv.! f m I 92 , . Asst. r.:§u_p1-g1-Q; Q1311;-1 gf gngb fgjg, _ Adm. Serv.' 9 t 3".*'<*!!11'31ste21»_P_-J.l1&1&.?é<. -
92,<
25; The Honorable.3 William H. Webster
v .-Crim. inv.
went. .
lntell. r
Laboratory
Legal Coun.
Pian. 8. lnsi
Rec. Mani. _
Tech. Serve.
Training _ __ _____
Public Alta. Off.
Telephone Hm.
mmmw%&nV"_ August 9, 1979
-
&, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigationse! % Department of Justice
? 5 §- Dear Mr. Webster:
;§§ _ Please help us to find strong candidates by cal1- fr
0 L f 3f]-' 4 K / ,1 92.>.
|~.'92 -
~.5-.-..
u",4!
L '1 3';
32
u,.
» Ijig {J} P Constitution Avenue and 10th Street, N.W.FW? '§~ % Washington, D.C. 20530
@K. we have an opening for a Legal Officer at the§hp5eme_cogr; I have enclosed a brief description H'6f the position.
Thank you.ing our vacancy to their attention _f__
REG-Zfl. 1. I-_-- >1." 9 -9 s ¥ _92Q'§, §'§.§S1" °1Y' In AUG 201979s R»Q:Q?..:- --- -- ---1 -92___,_..-l.___-____k_ _ _ . _ I A_
59Enclosure
/'%
/ £m:L0sun5'+' I
- 1979. James A ObbLD§_
-~g§Acting ser nnel Officer .-q ' aE0u:e;::.*-:1.
Z ,¢tZ§é;;A _o - W -/v myj, -:<2: J1 M5j',f;..' kg ,rw»g.C.
¢~~e¢i2P é;¥?£ET-vA/w.§~/'/6;/M d
_ _ _ __ _u__ _ ,A_ _____ ____ ___:_-__ _ - _ ,.._.....___ ' r_. -- i-- ,__T
1'
c ~ ' i O
Suprnru gm-1 s;:1,.ms.».z» 3;}-$§asI1uqrlnn.?- <11. as»:
August 7, 1979
.._92_
T;g
~!
:~ 1-41,,
;92¢-
an-'. :3... v_,.....
"'5"
'-JG
, 7|
.-i»;l,;.
i_I:'
__
.17._ ,_92E___."'.":$"1
is
Iraq
- 4'b1
*31, ,_-_..
-.
LS1
.; ..:_
.1-7%
IIPOSITION:
DESCRIPTION:
9
QUALIFICATIONS:
SALARY:
cnosine ones:
CONTACT;vJOB VACANCY
Legal Officer _ '
Legal work for the Justices, including
memoranda on certain motions appearing on the
Conference Lists, on applications for
emergency or extraordinary relief, and on
original cases. Other responsibilities
.include research and analysis on
jurisdictional issues, and the occasional
drafting of orders and opinions. Also,
assistance.with the circuit work of some
Justices, special projects as assigned by the
Justices, and rendering legal advice to key
Court personnel on internal administration of
Court.
Employment of a legal officer is intended to
provide an additional degree of continuity
and experience to the Court's legal staff.
Attorney with excellent research and writing
skills. Demonstrated ability to perform high
quality legal work with minimum supervision
and within specified time limits.
A minimum of four years practice preferably
including criminal and constitutional law,
especially on appellate level. Supreme Court
practice particularly helpful._ "'
Commensurate with the GS~14 range.
August 27, 1979
send resume, writing samples, and sF 171,
including telephone numbers of references
and supervisors to:
James A. Robbins
Acting Personnel Officer
202-252-3404 '
éiikl. k ZF;7 fx5r-1*-£;sE5jQ 5;;retéietll ' 1
I
921 n/ ,,,,,,,, 14 i 0 ,3 ~
Mnitzh States Eepartmmt of Justin:
92
X
9
ii
92
O6*Subject: I/Increase inxrkdmisgion }E_j§_<-2__t*o_:Qe__S;_up_;eme_G_o5ax_t_*Ba,n_. " __
??'
l.- | "u
__.rn
LUG
May 14, 1980
. 3$mMLG°°a!
MEMORANDUM
__ vv -» H -.1-... _
From: Wade H. MoCree JrSolicitor General 'z?HM$tfirz at 11;: nliritnr mzral o. A
wasbmumn. 3.1:. 20530_....i___.I El-Is. Allh_______
92 inc. §i>Mq,___
hit. IB-lui. Ila: &92 Mun. ltrln. hr. I
THlll._........i
lIllI.__..__._
Lalmmq
Llgll
Han I Int
In. Iiqnl. ___
Tush. Sllvl. ......_
TnlulIl| .__.._.
92 Pulls MI; !l!!= 1
Tllnlwnc In. .._
linear: lee; _.__I
I 92~§
= neaas or urrices, Boards, Divisions, and Bureaus
; .1 /92"~~'
H Under amended Rule 52 d! of theggmprgme Court effective
5June 30, the fee for admission to the Bar of the Court will increase from $25 to $100. You may wish to advise eligible{attorneys admitted three or more years! in the event they wish to 'be admitted before the effective date of the increase.
V
QR: liaj
92.*
..-I
1iLi=La»":*.1'-:i_~.__ L ;|._.__, Z¢;.,.~m.~.z-t»-- ---I»-
u
:>,..27§§5..}OOhis
5 ocr 81980
. S
iii
IQ!
~ » A _f Liiikgagkkii.
4
i_ 6. I Kt . - .92__
.: ~
L .
>/
E
.»
1
I.
' .'..>-_ ~r
nllv--'_._
" |.:
F r
+ D v_'1 , v ,§,.92
0" !r____ _ _. _..;!=.-.G__; ;- L, ._'_. ,.r_;_.i.l_¬~_ _;=,;:' -__-.;_, _;=;-7 .,.:_:_ _.;.- W I-;" ' 921r...-._92._.. .,;.r_.__ ; ;, ~.»r:v*~a.'<~-*1,-"1=#>-24*.»* :==:*--~~" *$'-- =-'i*¢?*1~ --.-, -r'-£1!..»'.~~T».=.'-..$»¢~'<'~.{ n"Y._.='""n'=1-' :4» 5'" " " ' - -"- ' Q-"1'=!','-33'--'1'"-"--1;- _92H'2,'-,-" .4" ".'- '-:-w-"- ' Elli ., ¢." .,. _,§,f;;.';-"-~~: .t~'. .:.-'.1,.__-Jr .--. , 'v.._'! 4 ,.-' J- -- -.- --_~ "92-92- i ~ - -,-_' -r ' - . v _l'¥
" 50 ri ' -92 * .1 " *
. . =-6.». vi. ..- - ¢:-'"';-"'<_- - ~ 1* - '
K
_ ,. i __ ,......-,_,_,, .. . --_..--___ - 1- ' _ _ . ' 92 _ -'* ,__ "-Z. _ _ 'I er . w J; , .»'.'92' :,_ F _, ._' ln'_,_ ky _ ., _ _1.'- -. _ __ .;,. "-_ _ .. -_ .'.'.;r..» e -.~1..'-.-- ~92 92_ i '- ' '4 U ' ' __
' D- I-,,
LII
WI. -i"-- _ 7 2 - Mi. "Mintz 92
1 - r. McKenzie
'.C". i92fT9f' Q} _.-!f92'§'I¬'_'-_93h|"+y-|_~r l'P92¥~i'.|@-,.92 _..=92...";'--:76,-Ya!»; "5; -.1. '_,'.,.,i..,..'.'.,,,., . 1", W,_ .-
. . ---" - -92' " iw ' ""7" I ' '_ ' -' " -1 ' ~ '-i 1'-I - 1-," Z - I.. - 4,4 - ' 7" I -I ~ 1*. J-" II ' '1'-uyé-*5t':|£""92'U - g?"r'¢'-J 3' ' 1; 1' " I ' "" " '._ ehi 31
. . "' '1 _- . "" - ' --¬92_i__._92'-J§¢.' 3'"-1*"-' - -'1, -' 3 " ~- I 1
Harrow. ! u
2_ e en, 2,5}, zg543- . e ei - v -> .. 92 .i . ' _ i I - -1i Dear Mr. Cliief Justice: .,92 /! i/-J ""I -< _;- - Qu¥YEJU&.- L.- JULY La
A e < On behalf f th F d ' '-I would like to exprgss sincgre gppgggggig §§§°§§§g§§§¥:é§} '2 '
é'::u:§:;?§2v;;b:="'@'¬ *?<ifi?e,? ' §5'?c????} *°~*_**=>' f-?'? °'='.-P 1 e Ql . _ _n _ .- 1-. ~ _92 92x
I ' e -» It was most gracious of aim. take time £ "J"other responsibilities particular! on 3 1; da r you? _ ___-~ 92.pwglshiglgese ogfcergi i Yssure you {hey gar: §;~.¢1~.y§.r=§§1§.k 7Tessa Y *1 B "I1 Que experience. Your generous
marks regarding the FBI Academy and the N ti 1 Aijprogram were relayed to me. . . . _ . ' _ _j -. n K ,' '92~ _ '
I 1d be '» wou remiss I did not acknowledge the92»¬:t3§ai'g1:§1_ g;b1 k§Et ¥-igeaver of Your Oifice contim._1es'"" ' pob students frgmnhe FBI Z ng e visits :9 the cmrt ' ' 1 ' -' -~ . ,. cad . <"' - * A 13? 55" --'
I Again, thénk you f5"r"_§rour hg§pfI:/alif? I , V "1
E - ' i ' .;Sincere1y yourh," ' ' -
EL U? 8:1! /,. o J , _p William u. Webstelo 0flI__1;_J339 -_ '.- -A I in lg _ J. .2 "vi h Hz, _ _. I .- , ._r- __ .- .
.f.
_ T-2ch.S" " Exec.AD-Adm. A ' Ids-nl. _____*_____ Tmqwfna -"""'""_ j "- - 92L92 '- -4;-'p-----' '- 8? E1,Qe,AU-lnv. lnietl. FE Tm . _ Dita C-gnu!; _ ,_~; I _~ _ 1
I Exec.AD-LES uno==:¢q>;__ &Publi . . e '-, ,- - 1P -* I "'1' 92 ' l
clp NOTE See memorandum $1/18/80 Leeal Counsel to Dire:-tnr l : ' '.-'92-- 3. i-' "*" ' :""""' 2-:_____ ! caponed "Letter of Appreciatiotfto Chief Justice Warren E. Burger".
;;Lm..% °w"
T; II iii * '*"§ +5 .5 .,»_> |-_ -i - 2 i" '. 2;-"'1' .' A-" Le;,¢ _ " ' "- - ..-' 1 _ 5'51? ;;" 9"??; .- - n ;<'- Pug» am. I ii? -"'* ' P- 5:. _ ._ ' _ -3. VI ,g_ 6.: J-_ _yHec_ Man. _92 _. I I -. _.
?
L
I
?
i- L! _ Z '7 *1!
Qr I .. ' 'Q, .
.-
I I _ _ , 4 ___' .1 : I... _ ___ t__!"__-__L.,__:_ ¢___:._ ___:i_,,v _._','_:;.f;,,; -9.1:-.'.; _, --Q.-__ ,1 - .. ,_-w-_-v-»-_ . In _ _' 2",! +" Q" ' :"£q 4'." ; y G1'92 ~ , e .' -I - , . -F I §";,.*. ,-.:, ,_ 1-. 92 :7 ~ ~ _ N _ ,r:_:_. :._;N__ }-";,A.92.."92h- e K'| M-"I1, .-'_.:,_ .1. _,92g ,¢_..:.$_, -6 __-_ am .0-.-1:: ti, __- _._ . _ ;_ > ,i.» <- ',*1*p,;~.;r=»v_.-w-~ a w»:¢»ea~~' ~-»~a ~ - ~ 7' in _ . . ,~-..-.--_ 3 - 1 . ha" J -- -' , I - - -r - -=<-"r. - 1"» '"--..'.'- *>, _ __ - - ' _1 . 92m--'~'- -- Ha-4; - "< ;H'=-- g1 ';u |, Z - ,1-"'l 'Z'.tl ¥'-| ,;=.'l- 4 4 -- -- 1 - 1 ,_ _. -- ';, :_- k '4' J" RF, /1 §,?'-_~'_r-i~' ; --¢ v--."924.;"l" _,£ -- -I;L'._ er '; .-2.-'_;".1--;"'151-2;/A -Z". 21., ' ' .. , . _*:.> __ 92- ~:..- --~_-->-,~92-,.-,q,¢;,-_,r._ H-_.;.-1- 92_.;.,_ ..*'_1_ -> -. . -_.._~_'--- "=1:-__ _._. '» I 5- -1-2. -.,a 1; __-,-- 1- 92_r-r..,'d_, -__-w.- Iv ,_ .-' ii- M H_.1._,,_._J_'_ ~ ~-.-_--_..¬ If" _ '.,'_ _.tg.;=*yI92'.oi /1' -if 1,»'- _ 1- '!'_-IJ=1"__?-:._.;,__ _' §_1"" . ?._'.f.,' I.-" ':.. 5;: L ". rf .- _ . __ _ .. _ _._ d 4 _>V - , I - 3.. _. . ... v -_- _ , ,_ .4-.-,.= .- 4 92 92 -is. .,- _. ..-.,»: » J ~,~1=;r . _ ~II. 'i'.. ' '. -3-L . -;."." I I ' I I - -I 5}" ': IA .; ~n92 < _ i A; f_ . { ;M _ ';-_ A 3QMmALsowmmmm!,_w__;~ " a c,_"_ Iv-_' 3 4, __ _ . . ' __.- - ~ -,_ '- ._ ,'- t-' .
of the Uni 1 State! '
in/fit A
9 /**~// V *1 5" - 1°=i<=* Yo Omce pro- *
ided a tour of the Supreme court to_e group of etudente fromF /%/ l .,. A unw: seen inrormed that Miss McCullough.
acted in e mo tthe FBI Nationel header" ' h-"* --" '
s professional and exemplary manner while conducting
the tour. The students who participated in the tour are law '
enforcement officer_ j a from various police departmente throughout ,
_ the United Staten and many of then cemented that the tour was ' _
excellent and thorough. The etudente who participated in the .Ptour were moat impressed with their day at the Suprem Court. ¢§§§t;
x You personaiiy for your efforts on behalf of the9253"
,, Federai Bureau 0! Investigation g55_ 6! _ __ ;_Z {
} o1=i '3 E -;.N,' '-4'4" ' __T-_MA|LED _ U l - 12 :' M 3 M
.1 t» fwmL¬ '*¢. -»_
_ ___ _£% 1@'m-r? w ~_ V 15EI¢LY youre;»,q@q_. F r.~*'f - - 1- <_- "--._, . . ,-,.- -.>.._ _;- _-. V.-,~ _V »_ ~ P - _ _ ~-; 11} . :::::::-.:.- - V "w "' "22'98Z FA I ' ;92 I - " _. . " 92< __ _ . _ _ _ W __ _ _;_'.?"'. 1|] - . o-_ _ Ire: LU L-l§._... V i *7 I H 2" ' ' . " ' I I Inf. Din: V A 'FBI 92' Jh-I1 Hint: My I
H/w!?
Lega
'92f___ I@?rn/
i law/..ldelf. _.>_.__
fell, _i___
eberehly _*
ugel Cell.
un. G leap. _._
c. Hgnl. ..__
|:||. Sun. _....
hi?! "K?-
: Qfh. OH. ..0I0
u. 5.-4;e ,
t . - _ 5, k June 21, 1982 * vs -, - 1," 11.,-'9§"!*~1-aw:-"r--,i."""""'-. "- in ~-~ |;' ' " " ' . :__ - _-, ~ .. . = V _ _.,_ , _~,__,_..- . _... . ,...- -_ ._._ '. _ __ __,, ,__.__ _ .,_ - J , .3. I " '. . -'L_"- .A_- +9 - '~'- ;" '"- -.-..-r~_-'--: '=' , °* : P-W ' --' ~- Q , ,. 1 H: ..,_. ,0 |:.~__!;f1;Aiv_,-.. 1,,...,._-1 ._,,_:"' .--_- L -t ,,_. J 92__s!_ ~ _*,_ 0.; ,1 ., -'5. J R _=_- _ 4 r. - _-., 3, -_T:*<~.-=u-._, .7.-.~_.-1,; my 92__..t_- -,_ _ -5., ¢ _:-if - - _ __ ,_~ -- -' " '-_»¢- 2.-,.r;-~+ -1 1?: vii--='92_»?'.';¥*.j'}.'X-=é7.'¢92"_.Tp¢__3--» ,';"w£"." -oz, v»,,.;~-'-<-3-12-¢..'..» »t.-"-.r--»-' ' ~ ' "~- L'92'.'.'11.,,.'*_..--"",""T -,_1-*>.._-. r ' _< 'i~r'.-.».=.-.:w u P -I- _' | rj~ _,-_ -., :- ~III w '92 ..,' ____ . -
4-. ' »- _ -.92~.
: u reme Court of the United States . >#1? P..=t_.-_s§@"1a;3¢?;a_ a as " ~ ~ rM Viamofon, n.c. 2054: ' " ' ~_ _ " -*"-"""" *f-frf-if
u* Dear ' 92_ . ¢ -' 1, _ '- , . _ .I . v l T I '7 J
= On June 1l;1982, e oroup of students from the @Bfkg H National Academy made e visit to tne Supreme Court After the. y, '» 17 completion of the Supreme C 'ourt s public business for the day, 6/ bu5 inyok office made a presentation to the
______- oup concerning the history 0! the Court._'i "1 w s delivered Nk
in a professional manner and was no st inrormative.Q ish to extend to you my personal thanks for your efforts onU- rVi be If er the Federal Bureau of Investigation. '
Sincer 1 yours,_ _*_
.
, __. .xii Q. ~ ... .."I§§ "=..'*" I ,
.. H I. - e : -'._,|*t'9 '_'_ . . ' I J: . '_. ' 4 iv._ . u - . _~, 92 - - -. - ,4 > . - ' - Q _ J . 1 ', __- _ *_ .;. --52+. -. we-~ =. *,.."."~~.;.§~.1-. -. - Jolm A _ _ I-.. ._ _ _. __1__.: _r_- -_ I-w,._,._ I, _ 1... I} _ _. __' v I ' - -.1, ; f ~. § 1' ' 1 W ~. -w '- ' " H "" " lie: -RD lllv. H v. - ..;;£~, 2, : i_w__._¢>,._; _a._ Assistant Director - Legal 2.... an A4-._: ' Y '1 i In u N r R
.-=an|.zs__1 _, 4 2"lu1.DIu.: _ ,4 -@?_'Z§.£2.'=
I---. '?' =*' "I-7 JUN 28 isaz'C.I;1'.'.I: A:.~-'::--- = ~ < ~la:-.'H|s:..: ' ' 6%
'ecI. Sena.
raising ___. _ ,
||ic All-. 0". ..V .
spins Il._. ~ '. "Q1
lain: Se:'y .__ MAIL R00"_ , - , :_l- _ -- , U . ',. rg -Ii W -~ '--1 ;.' - __ -I
r 1"_ ;'., , . -'3, 3.5.5.,--' _'-.' Fa-_ __;5,-=- _ ,_. ._~,.gU:.,<'. 6; ti ,| - »é1'I.092_--r;-_.t:~'92~Z'_':;-¢v_-'-- _ . -.--..,'_,'..-K .._.r;-- >~ -'- " ' _ _ _ .-.-t . "- | V. F.-.1-__ .__:- - L _ 'r~ _ , ,,,-- ' , "- , __' 92 1' / ._ t _ I _.-',"_92"_ .__.- I Q _a_g J9 __-- I :1 ._ a __- -11- -~ -.; ./Llll .h@ - ~ . - IHERLLGUWHmMEII-- '2 -
. r I 1', _. -. - ~ I ff, j .4 A..T . . .., , '
. T I - *~' , ~ e' F .-.., 1 . '1» . t J , -»---~--»Memorandum 53333;
1!! .0 .-_-
Auh Dim
; 1 §_§.~' -Ill. Inn. _____
" Crlll. llw. ..___
~ '- HoM..._._...___
' ' P 7777 * ' llvllli-i_..__
l-nbIro1wy__...__
L lun.To , The Dire to um 1/3/as ,?....|..;_
From
Subject 1In. Ip¢._____,_
Tull. ions. ._..
Tnlnlng ,_..___,._R. S. Young 0u_.|¢,,.,_
Q Plills WI-._.
' Tolouno In ...Z DlnI9lr'l ha; _. A§g!;T RELATING TO $HE¢%OLICING OF THE BUILDING A cnouuns or -rnysu coumli- /. u
PURPOSE: To advise of the passage of referenced bill.
DETAILS 3,.-i4r:.,1_z_¢zg_4_, which pr r~»the appointmentand authority of t e Supreme Court Police and 1'
other purposes has been enacted by Congress and has been
signed into law by the President.
Currently, the authority for policing the
Supreme Court building and grounds and the responsibilities
of the special policemen" designated by the Marshal of
the Supreme Court of the United States are primarily set
forth in 40 U.S.C. 13. These special police have the power
streets to enforce and make arrests for the following: within the Supreme Court building, grounds and adjacent {:?7;2,/.,' ,' '/Xviolations of certain provisions of Section 13; violations {i/
of a regulation prescribed by the Marshal of the Supreme
Court: violations of any law of the United States, any
law of the District of Columbia, or of any State; or
violations of any regulation promulgated pursuant thereto.
Section l3n!
s
The enrolled bill amends Section l3 redesignating
these special police as members of the Supreme Court Police
and redefines, in part, and clarifies their authority. _
Therefore, as amended, the Supreme Court Police have the
authority to police the Supreme Court building, grounds and
adjacent streets for the purpose of protecting persons and
property." In performance of those duties they are permitt
to make arrests for any violation of a law of the Uniteded
'14 'o92z-'20?» ?I> 5 5 l _./S
Mr. Revell - Enc.
Mr. Mintz Enc.
- Mr. Young Enc.
- Mr. Haynes Enc.l * Mr. Otto * Enc.
3
1
CONTINUED - OVER!
__.., ...___-._--._.~_r-...1-r----- _12 JAN 7 1983
..-
O92 ;_- : ' <:$Q..:'2.92!.T:_§/
,
53 JUN 121984 Q0/W/6 _//
1 --Mr. Colwell ~_ng,__,_...--my
Q 0 - '"
92§ 0
Q
Memorandum to the Director from R. S. Young
RE: AN ACT RELATING TO THE POLICING OF THE BUILDING
AND GROUNDS OF THE SUPREME COURT
States or any state. Further, the enrolled bill permits
the Supreme Court Police to carry firearms as may be
required to perform their duties. In addition, these
police are authorized to protect the person of the Chief
Justice and any Associate Justice of the Supreme Court or
any officer or employee of the Court while engaged in the
performance of official duties. In the performance of these
duties, the Supreme Court Police can make arrests for any
violation of the laws of the United States and any regula-
tion under such law. However, this additional protective
authority is only effective for three years and annual
reports are required to be made to Congress regarding
the costs of carrying out such additional duty.
RECOMMENDATIONS: PJ¬NJL3!1! That the Criminal Investigative Division _! lhb
review and prepare manual changes and/or instructions to
the field as deemed necessary.
APPROVED: Adm. Serve. _ 7 Let:oraton»'___________Grim. lnv 1e99 .c.°"n -/-, _ V O. oi Cong.
lI>IrB¢!°'.____--_ a Public Aifa.Exsc.AD-Mm. ldent._____________,___ Hes. Mgnt. i
E:-ac. AD-lm. !n=u@<=92i0n__.__. Tech $8"!-_...._..__ Tlalnln ____,____,_. Q:EmcNMES____hl °
2! That OCPA obtain copies of Public Laws when
printed and provide to CID and Legal Counsel Division..
' mm: Am& §$T*
cum W O. of Cong.
DlmC10f___.____. 8 Punlic Atfs.
Ex9C.AD-Adm. ldant._______.__, Flsc. Mgnl.
Evec.AD4nv. " |nspscon______ Tech.Servs.-+----
Exec.AD-LES . . we T'° °-
-2-
_ 92_ A _ e ~ ' C " ' ""
_ _ . _ 1,4 ~' -
' QLa-u-III
H.R.6204
Jtnttysmmth oiungrtss of tht inittd States of mtts
nuAT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Wahlngton on Mortday, the twentyfth day oflonluny,
one thousand nine hundred and eighty-two
n Qtt
To provide for appointment and authority cfthe Supreme Court Police, and for at&'
Pm?-
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of theUnited States tXAmericu in Corfmsa assembled, That a! the rstsection of the ct entitled An ct relating to the 5>o1icin%of thebuilding and grounds of the Sugreme Court of the nited tatea ,
approved August 18, 1949 0_U. .C. 139, is amended-! by striking out special policemen" and inserting in lieuthereo "members of the Supreme Court Police"; and
_! by striking'0ut ", for duty" and all that follows through
"achacent streets. __ b! Subsection b! of section 7 of such Act 0 U.S.C. 13l b!! isamended by striking out promulgated under" and all that followsthrough the end o the subsection and inserting in lieu thereof
prescribed under this section shall be posted in a public place atthe Supreme Court Building and shall he made reasonably availableto the public in writing". 92 ' - _-5-.. _92 c!! Section 9 of such Act 0 U.S.C. 13n! is amended byout Sac. 9. The special" and all that follows through ": Prue"
' That the Metropolitan Police force of the District of Columbia and
inset-tin in lieu thereof the follo ' 8' W138? Sec. 9. a! The Marshal of the Supreme Court and the SupremeCourt Police shall have authority, in accordance with regulationsp;-estcggbgd by the Marshal and approved by the Chief Justice of the
ni tatee
! to police the Supreme Court Building and grounds, andaawnt streets for the purpose of protecting persons and prop-
eJé! in any part of the United States, to protect- I -1
A! the person of the Chief Justice of the United States,
any Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and any om-cial est of the Supreme Court; and" glltlilelperson o any officer or employee of the SugemeCourt w ' e such oicer or employee is engaged thegwerformance of oicial duties;" ! in the performance of duties necessary for carrying out
paragraph ! of this subsection, to make arrests for any viola-
tion of a law of the United States or any State and any
regulation under such law;
! in the performance of duties necessary for c6;i'ryi.ng out
paragraph ! of this subsection, to make arrests for any viole-gon £5 law of the United States and any regulation under such
'2
! to carry rearms as may be required for the performance
of duties under this Act.
K/2- I/V/C rt;/Y ./-94>?"cs; The Metropolitan police force of the District of Columbia". !
1t.-.-..- F--~ r J J "" .
92..l
H.R. 6204-2 S
! SOOUOII 9 Of such Act 0 U.S.C. 1311!, as amended by paragratgz
! of this subsection, is further amended by adding at the endfollowiainew subsections: cl e authority created under subsection aX2! shall expire
three years after the date of enactment of this subsection. During
the tnres-"" year effective period of subsecti-""on a!!, the Pviarshai oi
the Supreme Court shall report annually to the Congress on March
1 regarding the administrative cost of carrying out his duties under
such subsection. Duties under subsection I-l!! Al of this section with
respect to an official guest of the Supreme Court in any part oftha
United Stem {ether than the Dbtrict of Columbia, Me:'ylend, and
Virginia! shall be authorised in writing by the Chief Justice of the
United States or an Associate Justice of the Su reme Court, if suchduties require the carrying of rearms under suheection a!! of this
section.
dl As used in this Act, the term-
! 'oicial guest of the Supreme Court means an individual
who is a guest of the Supreme Court, as determined by the Chief
Justice of the United States or any Associate Justice of the
Supreme Court;
_g _! fState' means a State of the_United States, _the of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory
or possession of the United States; and
! United States, when used in a geographical sense, means
the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
gf Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United
iota11% 1 U
d! Section 11 of such Act 0 U.S.C. 1311! is amended by adding at
the end the following new sentence: In addition to the property
referred to in the preceding sentence, for the purposes of this Act,
the Supreme Court grounds are comprised of any property under
the custody and control of the Supreme Court as part of the S-.:=
reme Court grounds, including property acquired as provided byPaw on behalf of the United States in lots 2, 8, 800, 801, and 802 in
square 758 in the District of Columbia as an addition to the grounds
of the United States Supreme Court Bui.lding.".
SEC. 2. Section 672 cl of title 28, United States Code, is amended-
! by striking out the period at the end of paragraph ! and
iIl?;;':Z,iI1g men thtgreof 3 Emiicon; and ya 'gat een e o owingnewparegraph:
8! Oversee the Supreme Court Pol.ioe. .
Soc. 3. Section 8 of the Act entitled "An Act to provide for the
acquisition of property in square 753 in the District of
Golumbiaes an addition to -the grounds of the United States a-
preme Court Building", approved December 15, 1980 0 U.S.C. 18p
note!, is amended by striking out Act of May 7, 1934 0 U.S.C. 18athrough 131:!, as amended and inserting in lieu thereof Act en-
titled An not to provide for the custody and maini-enan of theQ ' J.1 0s O I ' ' I
. . . "1.- .~ Q - - - .
H.R.6204--8
United States Supreme Court Building and the equipment and
grounds thereof, approved May 7, 1934 0 U.S.C. 13a13c!, andsection 6 of the jvint resolution entitled Joint resolution to provide
for the use and disposition of the bequest of the late Justice OliverWendell Holmes to the United States, and for other purposes.
approved October 22. 1940 0 U.S.C. 13a! .
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United sum and
President of the Senate.
92_ .
V-92
5
J
..__,,. _. .H._.-.._e__.._ -_._-._ ._. ._....._.--..._-_
. _ I _J ;,.F Inn :0 timi-Memorandum J v! ' 222.25?"
Au} Dtm ._ . ~__ _ "-. _'_:f T-" Ill. $o?l- .-is
Ctln. lav. _....' IJQIII.' ' I * 7'"*' ' r ;*7'*7' 7' H Insp-
lnI¢|I. l
L h -1» The Director nu. 9/22/as dimer
' O". CnIQ- I-
Puilll -Uh. __92 From : L693-1 COuhSe Tosh. um. _...
Tnlnlng i...__.
/ Tcloyloono Ila. ._..._.
Ulmgtc-'1 Sac; -III. IQOI. _-_....
5"b.i¢¢f= . SE5 BEFORE THE-U.S ' UPREM.E-
lie uamlinvorvzus FBI if ESTiGATIONS-- __, _.
l_Reference is made to recent MAOP changes Part II, £~Section 4-5! wherein the Legal Instruction U it assumes respo élbility for monitoring the U;S,CEupreme Courtis docket and for i
reporting on the status of lower court ecisions in FBI cases ~
wherein certiorari has been granted.
During the Supreme Court's 1982-83 term, certiorari
was granted in three FBI cases. None has been decided. The
cases have been deferred until the 1983-84 term of court. The
are: - -__ / I |92£E_1g' as-1526§92" 9751 Sl! Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled Margh 19, l98_¥680 F.2d 327 §d Cir. I§§§!,*Eert. granted sub nomf}4United
States v. Doe, Sl U.S.L.W. 37§§?Tay2, I§BFTI*docEet #32-786.
This is a HoBbs Act investigation from the Newark Division.
A sole proprietor of a business successfully invoked the Fifth
Amendment privilege against selfincrimination to resist
disclosure of business-related records pursuant to a federal
grand jury's subpoena duces tecum. The government appealedwhile the case was still in the investigative stage. Questions
presented: ! May the Fifth Amendment privilege against com-
pelled se1fincrimination be invoked by a sole proprietor in
response to a subpoena for preexisting business records, many
of which were not prepared by him and are of the type kept by
virtually all businesses? ! May a person properly resistcompliance with subpoena duces tecum on the ground that act of 'production would be self-incriminating, despite the,g%%g;nmQn£!soffer of the functional equivalent of use immuni%:'Wi respectto act of production? 031 to W°°
2! Unitedpstates v. Martino, 681 F.2d,952 th Cirlq1932! en bane!, certi* ranted sis nom., Russeiio-v¢ui¬¬aStates, 51 u;s;L.w. §§bg*Y3an. ID; Isszw, docket4¥§2-I71. *
This appeal stems from a conviction in a RICO case from the
Tampa Division. The court of appeals held that profits and
income from an arsonfor-insuranceprofit scheme, and not
just the interest in the enterprise, are subject to forfeiture
929L'92 1|||||||l||||||"' Q
W
" ""- i .¢r..:' _:===== " '*1-Mr. Col
1-mp.I
Fl ll DOJ
I
ho. 92 v-
1Q.
' I
Memorandum Legal Counsel to the Director
Re: CASES BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME
COURT INVOLVING FBI INVESTIGATIONS
under 18 U.S.C. 51963 a!!, a provision in the RICO statute.
Question presented: Does the term "interest" as used in
18 U.S.C. §1963 a!! include income and profits derived from
a pattern of racketeering activity?
3! Dixson v. United States, Hinton vL_United States,683 F.2d 195 thCC1r.!,*ceft. ranted, 3I U.S.L{WT*3Z73 Dec. 13,1982!, docket #825279 and_F§:3g3I. These appeals stem from the
bribery conviction of the executive director and housing
rehabilitation coordinator of a private, community based, non-profit corporation that contracted with a municipality toadminister federal funds granted under a Block Grant program.
The convictions resulted from an investigation instituted by
the Chicago Division. Question presented in Hinton: Is the
employee of a private, nonprofit organization Eat was sub-
grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds a "public
official" within the meaning Of 18 U.S.C. 20l a!? Question
presented in Dixson: Is the employee of a communitybased,
nonprofit corporation, under contract with a city to administer
Community Development Block Grant received from Department of
Housing and Urban Development, a public official within the
meaning of 18 U.S.C. 201?
Legal Instruction Unit will monitor the status ofthese cases and advise the office of origin upon final disposition
.-
1
..'~_-¢-.n:V"!"' ""'' _rem-We-r»' ., - %'--* **5B - Gnmvwuie- 0 '-. dam.
.>'+" ===~*= M»--~ $.L;;';-;;;...;;;:.... * /1 _ m1 - -15' AD. - W I---d _._-_'__._» 59-.
Ash! Y**?Hr EX . . . __..-n' M--__
_ 2 _
_, _,, _ ____ __-_----...___.___._... L -.-. ._._
as LU Mn. __
:I. Blnl "21- .' ' ,5-¢"":" "i-.vo- _
1';-_ 1:1"-~ WHW:mfd 3 -_ #1,-./1nu» .___ ' ' i "_Iflz xv! ;! _ 1,!
. _4l vII? .
w °
Hovebor 17, 1983
Egonorabla Sandra Dn§£bI!?gnor.Assoc a e nticalof t§§_ upramn
.cqgrx of the United St&til *-wa m1 6/I .i :*i* _ _:-:-'-' l_
Dear Sondra:
1 am delighted to learn that you will be available
to speak t0 our Supervisory Hanagémsnt! group on January 4thas a part ot our Distinguished Lecturer Series. I know you
will find this to be a.reoaptivo.and supportive audience and
we are vary grateful that you can find tima to ba with us.
I think you will find the question and answer peri
stimulatin nd g a enjoyable. These young men and women have an ,_active intorost in how the process works, and they ask g ' ¢
questions. _ , , 1
I hops you will stay and_hnvo lunch with me toll ing
your talk. Perhaps John and Drue_wi1l be able to join us.
Warmost regards and many_thanks,
r Sincerely, ,9;--1027526 ja _ 3lg William B. iIebstor_ '. V
Director
. I71 - Hr Youn 1 pr AD lnv. __.i ' g.=ao|.:s___ . " '""" :'"'"""" M
-_-_.___,
80". --_.i_,
P
'03": ANI.
meh. Sun. -_..
min!!! --_-__,
phnu In. -.__.
~:lw'o 50:? __. mg. % "
::.UQnl._.__,mrr NOV 28 1983
_____ -__-, -mini
HAILIOQIID
7-l__?__,_____ _ _ _,_ _ 7,:_7_7__7 92
__._-'-- .__ Inn: DlII.._..Q I L lln __,_ Memorandum J '
-4-5111'.-T- -
- ll'~ '._____ T- Ala. I-own. __-
Clln, l|w._i_' 7 lJu|._...i__
7 7 '7 lnhll. ____.___
|»llnrI1Iy..__92._ - --
To Mr. calm-J11! D.» 1/2/a4 tI."..'..':,:
ll-II-Tub, Son:
TIIIIII ...___,,._Fmm : K. T. BO§[d @ u||,,;¢':..,,
I Fulll: AlF||-
Tcbshuu In-_...
Subject: TECHNICAL sscunxwy assessment FOR was °"""""""
CHIEF JUSTICE , u._s g
PURPOSE: To apprise you of_the Chief Justices concern for
assuring the protection of sensitive supreme Court decisions prior
to their official announcement and how we contemplate lending
assistance.
DETAILS: During his luncheon with the Director on 12/29 3, thCh'fJ ' 'e
ie ustice expressed concern for the physical secu ty o the
supreme Court Building and the protection of inform etoh77_¢
indicating the Court's decision prior to the time f public
announcement. He indicated an awareness of certa n sop sticatattacks made possible through modern technology; e.g.Q£¥:mpestexploitation!. /
With.respect to the latter concern, th' D'rector
requested today that I extend the Chief Justice s stance
will apprise him of the vulnerable points from the Justice's
decision through the steps prior to its publication!, what
technological attacks are feasible, and what measures may be
taken to prevent exploitation or reduce its likelihood.HS
I wi11.contact the Chief Justice s Administrative
Assistant, Mark W. Cannon, to obtain, if available, a description
of the process leading to publication of Court decisions as well
as the identity of pertinent technical equipment. Thereafter,one or two specialists from this Division will make an on-spengevaluation en ~~~~~ "~ - L-** ~~~-so - - - * " * --t *" * - '1 't 1 auu prepare a Luruac dbb¬bbmEHC report IO! tne L IJustice's perusal. _ ,_- '" ~ ,", ,929292_j5 -
I will keep you and the Director inforFgq6§thesE
events. ' , ,£7 U 92..,|u'f
ACTION: For information i
_ mum . lea-1"*""-""T'uT1'q -*"
Mr. Boyd
- Mrs. Morris Attn
~ Mr. Witzel Attn:
b<~ m n1 ~?*1WEeikmr
mivr .... -- _ £4 Mm lib.m. an-nm.e;§¬'.'. !f::!. Rae. mm. ..Em. AD-lnr. ...... -. !rs_~.:'.-Kan ________ __ Tlzh. Sam.
E1 . - - - - - -_. _ _ _ . - . _ . - - --. - - - 92 - n nI In
doMr. Colwell j ea; |a_'-IIIIIII1r»;=.i tm.'I§IIIII _
I ' ' " 3
" 1 ' .. Memorandum 92_ , ' J .
,_,__ *;en1
1° = nrnscron, rs: D-'= 5,14,/24
_ Attention: Civil Rights a"}~ Applicant Section!-§ FM = sac, wro
V w 92/Unnecessar§%Bar Checks at the q.§EE§uprgQ§ Court _
and U.S. District Court in applicant Type Investigations
a record check
Court in applicant
an applicant indicatesWashington Field currently conducts
at the U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. District
type investigations in every instance where
they are an attorney. The purpose of those checks is to deter-
mine whether the applicant is admitted to practice before those
courts. A record check is also conducted at the District or
Columbia Bar D.C. Unified Bar! to determine membership
and at the office of Bar Counsel to determine standing and
¢ grievances.E .0"District o Co umb a Bar has advise ~that the District ofL~}Cw/ Columbia Bar is the only oiice in ashington, D=C.; that hasL/ licensing authority over attorneys. He further advised that the
Office of Bar Counsel, which is associated with the District
of Columbia Bar, is the office responsible for maintaining
ma standing and grievances pertaining to local attorneys.
noted that admission to practice before individual!ur!s, Lncluding the U.S. Supreme Court, within the District
of Columbia is simply a matter of the attorney requesting
to be placed on the court's register and furnishing a letter
certifying good standing.
After reviewing this procedure it is Washington
Field's conclusion that the record checks at the U.S. Supreme
Court and U.S. District Court are unnecessary and an unwarranted
drain of this field office's limited resources. It is unclear
why or when these checks were instituted at Washington Field or
the rationale behind them. The checks reveal only whether the
applicant has met the pro forms requirements for admission to
practice before those courts. Neither court has licensing
authority and a check of their membership records does not
produce information as to any record of complaints or investi-All.,92._
I
92I1
ti in 11 t. Q 2-"Z "" ,_92_"__ _....... ---P 7.11% one concer92r92.92 g an app can 1§,N0T REBOBDED
Q, Lgffggea '=§,{3 g;n 2 e92§9292 92-11 mu 231984{r} 5 " 92,P {F 61"00l ________ _____i_,-u -new II"-in5°C 5116?? . M
II:-'1-§5§ 2,§1 3/%U5-11 {:64 iv
VII/DO-J!-
!
1*
I
van.
K]
UACB Isshington Field is discontinuing routine agency
checks at the U.S. Supreme Court and 6.5. District Court Lawyer's
Register. when warranted, e.g., in a judqeship investigation,
checks will be conducted at thosa oourts. Hasnington Iisld
will continue to check the records of the District of Columbia
Bar D.C. Unified Bar! and the Office of Bsr Counsel for evidence
of membership, standing and grievances. .
..2e...
/x
43
§
"T
_~ "
U-.
,.-
jnc AD Ali. i
ice AD lam _-_
'h: AU ti! __
mu. Dim
Ada. §Irvl- __
Cull. lav. _,,._._
lltnf. .___i__
leap. -...i_--
lllhll. _...._._._
Lab. _..,_.i__,_
L.,.1c-92. ._._
III. I'M.
Tosh. lens. _.-..
Trolling '
"elulO¢IO ll. -.-.-.
iimnclvlfl §Oc'y .__°§Lf.I"I&:. -_ /Ff, 6
3/ ;P .1 -
11
H11 57¢
SAC, UFO 5/15/B4
Director, FBI
urmscrssnmr BAR cuncxs Ar ran-.IJrj%llP3£&1Z1;0Un1'
A!-ID u. s. o1s'rR1c'r coon-r znnmrnxcnnr ms INVESTIGATIONS
Reurlet 5/4/B4.
Your proposal to limit bar checks in background
investigations to those entities responsible tor admission
to practice and for maintaining records on standing and
grievances has considerable merit and should be placed
into effect. Your interest in eliminating unnecessary
investigative steps is appreciated and you are encouraged
to continue to seek out ways to etreamline operations by
increasing the efticiency and effectiveness of our procedur GS-
APPROVED: Adv Sew! 1 ofBi0"Y
Ch. 3... L 1.-gal Count _______¬__1%? =1 " "en .D "c:'--~*--- 3 2'15. ____
I-T :.:,A3-.=._.1 _ 1 c ___ H___ _ i _;___; _____
Exec AEH;-w. |;.:.;=-;;: '2'e:. - Scrvs. ____,
ExecnAD-LE5 ',' In-ml. , Tf31"1"9i-_--
bWV Q 2L2 7.§5s*_.
-92 - .. - - ,4-
"_"'lIIIaq-callus-su|il"
no-r nsnonbnn"
11 MAY 231984
;e::r:=-v'*-~
__,----IF-"--i.
nil.
bf? L/
@;<~92 ' .Inc AD lll.__...
In MI Inv-1-"'.1','- Memorandum J " *1! ' -§-......__
-._ _- Ann. Du-.1
T° = Mr. Bayde92}58@ 9'" 6-6-94
. FIQI 1 r We
1
Subject: ' C 3/ 9
"SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
@
£fv_L*_ I gov 929/IL/1
SYNOPSIS: Personnel from the Engineering Section ES! met with
personnel from the Supreme Court of the United States to discussMn. Sqvl. .__
Cull.
Hunt. -__...___.-..
llllp. _.i.....-
lnmll. _i__.._
I-oh. __._..__
l-cpl Con. _.._
OI-I. Chg. I
Publh Mb. _-.-
Ioc. lpn.flab. §v
Tvilllllg __.--
uhplnno In. _._._
hunt: lu¢'1 _.-
PURPOSE: To re ort on the meetings held with Messrs : , Supreme Court SC! of the Unite States.
their concern on their newly acquired computer system. This computeris used in the SC Building for word processing and typesetting.
with few exceptions, the security precautions taken to prevent
unauthorized access to the files in the system are adequate.
Several observations were made where minor changes could improv
the security of the system.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the attached letter tc Chief Justi ewarren E. Burger be sent. /I;,_.
. * """ *»dww. [mummy -I--P '
Crim mv. Ltgnf Coun.
Dimclor4s.hnqL_ or .~===»»=-%/_ Exec. AD-Adm. Idem. 8' mans AH"---_----_ Pee M tExec. AD-lw. Inspection 19¢ htell. _11a|n1ng ' ..==
DETAILS: During early February 1984 Qthe Engineering Sectionwas asked to meet with Supreme Coufdxpersonnel to discuss their
concerns on their computer system. DE-Z1 .-1 - _;;'/5'2 ~
On F ruary 10, 1984, SSA
t with Messrs/-92
-__es,
L '7-3 JUN 12EIIC. "3-in-I / qr. , _-::::::;:: M, e r
0"/-~Supreme Court of the United Sta
ngton, D.C.
.-
,-.
-
CONTINUED - oven!
. =92-'
r 1:'t~ '92 JV9292
T4! 7ma}
=1nI§
7984 '
--$7
4414
1 92
9,isW»
D
2,-inU! Y
Q
5'3-r_... ' ~ i i...-.... _. ._. . _.. _..__. 1551-41-.-'-. - -------- - **A .._.. ...,___l __ _ W __._ - _:, -___ at . v-H--~ '~ 'i--1* V ...._,__
J Q~._
Memorandum from R. W. Witzel to Mr. Bayse L
RE: COMPUTER RISK ANALY5IS/
SUPREME CQURT OF THE UNITED STRTES {
Due to time constraints, was unable toprovide all pertinent information to _ullv evaluate *he e"stem's _ I J " '~ Ysecurity ' irst meeting. Also, in view of conflictswith both and Engineering Section personnel, thenext two meetings were scheduled for mid April and early May 1984.
Based on these meetings, the following comments reflectviews as to the strength and weaknesses of security measures
currently in force at the SC building:
TEMPEST Exploitation:
/_,
5/20Memor
RE:
III -
,¢-"'92_ év 0 ~ ,
andum from R. W. Witzel to Mr. Bayse
conpursn nxsx ANALYSIS/
SUPREME counw OF was UNITED STATES
Attacks Against Computer System:
- 3 CONTINUED - OVER!
-- -k._._.__%:_%#_--_.___-...?.,__.._..____ _.. _ ._..¢._....-., . ._._..__._ ,.
Dun
,7!-h.»
Db
.1
Memorandum from R. W. Witzel to Mr. Bayse
RE: COMPUTER RISK ANALYSIS/
supnzms coua-r or -rm: uunsn smvrzs l
bl
we
E On Ma 1, 19a and SSA met<><~w1 ll of the Court,":{,, telephone number 252-32 to disc_ , uss the technical security of their telephone system.
//E
' I
.1
Memorandum from R. W. Witzel to Mr. Bayse
RE: compuwnn RISK ANALYSIS/
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No technical evaluation to the security of their
telephone system was performed as it is being replaced in
the near future, possibly by August.
bk commented that they may request FBI
f _, assistance LR the security aspect of their proposed newiQy[j}e1ephone system.
The continued services and assistance of theBngineerin Section were offered to both Messr-andll lluliiI
0
h
9292 It should be noted that the attachment to Chief Justice
Burgers letter is basically the same as the details of this
memorandum.
.-
u
;-5-
_,_. _,_.__-.-we .....__._e__I
~E
l
-Q;.C:T~._': F, _ 1" it ' 1 '.__-7. I . 5.;;¬¬§§!§EGAI ésol §;@ F{ 92 92. ; _ of; ' yll ,,,.7_ _;_;A ' H ;
I- - -._._ .;_-....-.,_-J-~ _..»- -1--r-s--¢-q-,.__....»....,--..,..92. v92_._,.b:?__ ,._. _ ___ .....~..H...,,
Q 192_ - I I-7 " I . A 1-.-0 I. '1, II! . 2 - 1 Iu Q I If.I 92.£.- ' J 1" l H 92- ' "1 ,.._"' -" .. ""*f::*- 92Y ' ' _. ' " *:-- - E-F§.!Y'5.".. --VZCZCLONB4é 2411211 j E'§¢;i.¢4T
.: , ,3 J , _..,3»2sas1ez Au_"§_5__. _. ' -_ 55?"
1:
1 _ 1.._ :»CLASE?-TO A,»-~_' 1" "H]: _ ! , m HfATTN: LIAISON unit; zwrn »/ '. 6;. 92 f _ 1 - -' 4 .l . '1
/ LIAISON MATTER ' '
'7 -rim nueusr 22, 1985; an mun ICE ms HAM; onzvsnsn to ms T-3"-
"._ .._; . --
».
. _ , . !--- ----_--__. ____ __________
- 5_ 92-1 J-- '- 92 / ,10 l I
92' , 33¢ =z ~
'9 J ""-.' 92.'
n
I .v_7 _ F
1- 92' Q O
_92_ J _. fl
. 1 - .
kmzlcnn Em5AssY, wuoou, mom no cmrsrs éxmrz-:0, as soum '- A__. AUZJLIEY} sraszr, mvmma, LONDON wl. 1'rgyo'r_.c£"{-1~ai.¢.=rzp.n{j=.'r FAY-" V zen nECEIUED BY u.s. MEET IN THE AMOUNT UF $2|546.4£ HAD 5 '
._ - 63> "TALASURY CHECK FROM , MARSHAL! u_.s. suraama scum" Q;.{u-"gsajxueron, D.c_. A NOTE ACCOMPANYING THE INVOICE ADVI§LD THAT é .'1' Q I ' ' L"§ uR CARPETS HAVE BEEN DESPA1'CHED_FROH rm: SHOP."». '
Two cnrwzrs FROM Pan CARPETS ivskz SELECTEID BY, nub sat ASIDE; -- _
FDR: CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN BURGER WHEN HE RECENTLY VISITED LOH$0*"
" IN ccghuucrxou um: ms AMERICAN an ASSOCIATION mzarma HEREa ~.,.vf- p :33-wll-'-"*' IN.
92$
.,1 .' < -1
IhESE ORIENTAL CARPETS wane roa uss AT THE SUPREME count, AND ;$,r4 I I_Lf_:I §_AT wwos was ASKED In sxPAz:_p_;r_s pgnxvzgv-. _ svlszb VT0 stun e ?varmurA r1-4 " -' ~ 2fr§}§as" V _?n Q E j E 7 PU uunsa 0nDE nun LHECK IO P& - H _;A _P!_$TfEJ;;°EDIIIOU5 wmr or esrrxm cnm=:~:gs I0 u.s. ._ 7 ~ . 1~.0'1 RECORDED 1 f, ~ f_"_ .;...__.» K 1 V _ 7% V _ _ I-A P&0 CARPETS anvxszn RECENTLY THAT CARPETS ARE USUALLY AIR - 7 -
» m -..;______wp I: -,___ _ 1 _ w f ,_ -4» ' 1, . L . F . W1 ' AI -- .
" | . . 1 ' ". l 0 I .. 1 _ Pm: i P-ti - P 1 L i I-I §2UUi23'i985
!'-92,2
k!/!Lj,_:92
' - - -----A-I-'--.¢_...,.______ _________~_
-#1,-_-_-W ,_....__,,___ _ _ ..-»--..._
3 » -- 4 M V , _ T ___ L' - 1 - -';£q¢2»¢3' r ; ~1; ' - ' _ '
~_ ,92 ~ _ E _i 5
"_:_ , _ . x1 ,; 1
'...i a '1 §_{E _ 92 I y
.____Fms£ no Lou .»
' i4.Af'T.§IGH#Ep -H.-?.H§ ."8 Houns up-_ uEsPAI¢"- ,-/92 4 ;%L i ._ reFbo~rAcr-jar 11.5. surname ' _ '- T0 an s '7 7 - '7 ' ,L W . K E HIM Tl'f_AT cnnlfs mfr mow BE AT u.s. cusrons IF. nor ALREADY vuxvznsp io Hm. _ _
zw - ' .A~ ozcs wm. s1~:_sz-:uI nm:cr__ 10-3? MIL FROM LEG V .92J92
i0H§UN,
er , g
F
' f
1; In I192
92
" """"" --M---.---.-..... ,_,,__,._,..--
- x
NNNH
I
Q. , . , fr -
'.-M-.; ,-.. =_,~ .-~; I-F"..{:1 X, gr ;_::, -"". -
P .
< v" '-- ...9.- .- . . 0' - 4
4 . '3 _I . E1* -4* 1
» E. ~. .
x/k ~*
92.J Lli-Ir,_»~
I
I
_/-._/'92
_ I
-~-- ..---._._____ ___ _ _ ' -
I ~ ' 92
MemorandumE-4" an A;-, __
' Eu: A Iv. ___
Eur: I, LES W-lull. Us-=
J Adm. Sn-vi. _._..>-
I
Crlln. |nv. _.,,i
lulu
'I92_
lo _ _92 Datenr. _.?._.,7 "fii f *"7" W W 2* ijiwi lllup. _._.___
lnrlll
upmz
92 U". c0- a
Public AWL __ / ' / - 0:. L Fl'0l'l'l Counsel <J 92_ i .. . :I¢92|n::"92r|.__
. 92. ,h-.r - 9- . _ - __ '
V '_ 92-P-' - -11. 51-~,___.¬ 1, Trllnln __i_
Subject : 8 4 _ 1 9 8 5 _.. B_§'_I:1__E____P 9_U____
PURPOSE: To provide you a
4}! that were
198b85 term.
DETAILS:
During the last S
interest to the FBI involvi
construction, evidence and
number four cases directly
sustained the conviction o
Selective Service over his
Ui. Qegartment gf_Justice
of Information Act request
the District Court without
enacted legislation mootin
the sufficiency of proof n
conviction; and itchell vf
8
eRT TERM
' ;?é;§is of_intergetiiaii
dec HMw_y_§hg _ugreAy uring' n-" H Tclcplvonolnui
blroclou-'0 Su'y ..._
It
upreme Court term, 43 cases of
ng criminal procedure, statutory
civil liability were decided. Gf
involved the FBI: Wayte v. U.S.
a man who failed to register with the
claim of selective prosecution; -~' _
Provenzano, involving the Freed0 9292
of Anthony Provenzano, was remanded t '_ Idecision in light of subsequently' Y? ~;
the issue; U.S. v. Miller concerned ; 92_
cessary to sustain a mail fraud r /,
Eorsyth, arising from an Attorney i
Genera1*ordered FBI electt
court's refusal to grant q
appealableO
Unic surveillance, held that a district
alified immunity is immediately
uI
In addition, we have listed, by topic, the cases of
' 0
1985-85 Supreme Court Term
Cases Decided
I. Criminal Procedure
A. Investigative Detention
10 Hose vs HEIISIBZ, S.C£.
A unanimous Court held that the investigative detention
doctrine first recognized in Terrz v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 968! -
is applicable to completed offenses as well as prospective and
on-going offenses, and that a "wanted flyer" issued by a police
department may form the basis for the atop. The officers making
such a stop need not have knowledge of all of the underlying
facts so long as the issuing agency is in possession of specific,
articulable facts amounting to reasonable suspicion.
Z. U.S. V. Sharpe, 105 S.Ct
…[truncated]