Document text
,'-. *1; I
92._..é*
a
-92'.' "-' >.#.._92 -.-'
-, 5 .i: 92 _ .'' 4.1- ..dt. i -113 .
Chicago File 58_l9-4 tDIVD . -.1-J-u .HLIR I I AIIU . I--I-1 ~ .-~ -'-'-
daughter of Ellington Field, Texas. D'ANDRF.A stated this girl was raised =
by him but she is not his legally adopted daughter. D'Ah'IJRE-A advised that
ANNA LIACEY used to take care of his son and her parents suddenly disappeared -_ o_i__
and thereafter he has continued to look out for her. He stated she ispresently a sergeant in the WAGS and has told him she intends to mks! a'_~,=:
career of the A-mvo i --L ~"i1 7%,The ooit visitor listed was one Corporal msnliir listed as a. Q
v I1' J - -. 4' ' ," -'- 1" if-."=;1l*'-" "'1'.-
Thc balance of the visitors to D'AlJDREA while at Leavenworth were -- ii?
92 relatives of his with the exception of E. I.{.=6TERlI, attorney of Fargo, North _.f-"'.I Dakota. Mr. SlHN's contact with D'AT-IDIZEA will be discussed subsequently. i
i<'AL DREA states that after serving approximately seventeen months ,'-. 4.
at Leavenw rth he was transferred to the Hedi cal Center for Federal :Pris_onér:e5.'f '2at Spri9292¬glye1d, Missouri. Outside of D'AN.D1<EA's relatives and 'attorn'eys,:"§Vi',s;::§ __;,'%.4
one L-BIA _J92_NQlY.l0, a friend of Chicago, visited himo D'iNl3RISA states that ~ "'*'
LENA. PAIIOZZO was his secretary while he was president of the -Italo-.Americ_'an__;'_~-¢_i_~}-if T,-_o
National Union. He stated she was a close friend of the family, and ontwo""'-7'f_""§"'- ,-13'
different occasions brought his young son, PHILIP, to visit him at Spring-- _--., :7
field, Liszsouri.
with Tspli to D'AIJ1JI@lLA's parole, he stated that during the early ---1"
part of 194,6 he suggested to his wife, since deceased, that shed call together,_'--all of his relatives and see what could be done towards his parole. He - ~*._,»; '3 Y.-_
stated she contacted his brothers and sisters and other relatives and thejr '-f_{ {1j
agreed to let SAJ*»l'U'I:lL H. SHAPIRO handle the matter. DA?lDREA stated that -A-_,¢ 7__.'L_">.o|;.
;'oH£iPIRO, being a civil lawyer, did not know anything about criminal pro-"o P '_ ~ _;§__
cedure, and therefore hired E. M. STERI of Fargo, North Dakota to represent "
him in his parole matter. He stated SFAPIRO agreed to pay STERN $7,000 fox-_ _, j'
his services in this case. He stated that STERN then visited him in prison t #92?'' T
and asked him a few questions concerning his background. DULNDREA states -
that when STE}-U1 visited him in prison was the first time he knew who SH.APIRO' 7:-'*,4_l."'
had hired to represent him. D'.»iNIRI;A states he didn't understand why its ;
was necessary to hire an attorney in connection with his parole but that "r.
this matter was left in the hands of SILAPIRO who apparently felt it was z _ '0
necessary. D'AN'D1lI3A stated that after a man has served one-third of his ' -1,-"q_;_..7~__"__ 'sentence and has behaved himself while in prison he should be eligible for, .@" Y'a;P. '1
parole..!g_'
_l~1'.1
i ~
?!'A}.DI<i1A was asked if he was acquainted with PAUL"TE LLON, St. _~,.i.' .';'Louis attorney, and he advised he had never heard of DILLON until the It ..- o__recent congressicinal hearing. do was asked if any of his frien'cl_s:"_ t. _',| n , _ l IA J. I aw- I . L' ti;;_
- 22 - I -W §.Ji»J_ -92__
4. , r
I :1 ,<..
"."j-- _ ~__, e ., .. f - e '#_ 1' -: oi-I't'"-I V - 92 - I ,.- .11 ' 1 _ - - ." , : - _ _ - "' , "= ~ E!-~ - " s if-é""".I-"fr"- -_ ~ -- ---~ ~ v" .- -*~ . .. - ow;-_.. ~ -51," -._ .'-.= K. ~s_f*n._,-,,/_ -_-,5. ~.,,§>,3 ,_.__ -'-iY'- *' e. . -'.- -. --- - -_ r -- ' _ '._ " _ u -- * *.. ' ,3-- . " -. .J' - - f,-. *7 - . , . "9292 E ,_ J. - .. » l. 1-...,,M__#5: 1;_ ;_. -,.~%;frf~ 1'-1 §. -_. _::.l_.,§£.,__
t , ._:_iv u-r
7 ii
L
3
J1...
.1av1
a
; -3.11
F
32
..,,,
./
:1.1an
I .-
_-4
J?2:5'.
u
92_' --Y-.1-%
sec
Q- 92
inL-.92 .
.11-1 mlv
kq k_,.
1;. O. .5
s
. , ,._ ._1._.
92-;-.."';}',. .-
. ._ , .1 ,5}!r'-as...»
92JlLJ~92dCFE3
HER srmb
' . r 1
.0-3»-F4 -1 .U do - 1* '-.'Yv"... .._
.
»
;/.- ' A have contacted DILLON and he said I do not believe in Santa. Claus . ' a 1
D'AN}!PT';A. then stated he was referring to the testimony of CAMPAGNI when ' i;-'_ CN.iPA~3III testified he did not know the source of some eighty or ninety , .4'- thousand dollars which had been delivered to BBRNSTEIN, Chicago a.ttorney', ii__
J" to settle his income tax suit. D'ANDHEA states he thought BERNSTB.'_£N's
_ and CAL'PAG1II*s testin~""n5.' in this regard was fantastic, He was s.....=92rd if.
1' "- he knew the source of this money and he stated he did not. D'ANtREA' I
states he today does not thin}: PAUL DILLON had anything to do with his -.
parole. He stated that Had I known that Iir. TJTLLOI-I was going; to act.on A
my behalf I would h!1.V8 soved 111;, 55?, coo. co."4 _ , .. : '1 ,1; .'*~.-Y».-: "
Er.
f592§.92,i
i » . _.g.
E .
his own knowledge there were absolutely, _'i _ *his parole with the exception of--thef",}i¬"f%ft;§§STERN of Fargo, North Dakota. . 'n'ii'1:;1jsA_.;;f;»;-;§;_.'=;:;family were ever contested for'§eor.ey"in""*,'.%f.;§§3any other purpose. DAliI}lEli..statod-thet; fg,during his incarceration he never discussed his parole with any of tho if -.-?.;.',*-,' '1
other perolees, and since his release he has not been in commu.nica.tion" -I * _-1* I,
with any of them, and ho definitely does not went to have any connection 11" .
with them because he fears this is e. violation of his parole, and Jmowing ,
that if he violates his parole he will have to serve the duration of his
sentence, he feels he is going to do everything to keep is record clean -='-- is =.
from this date forward. He stated there is nothing in this world that _ 1 L -1-1 1_ J n 1. ' " 1" '-J}'A"'L: _--_ - i_:_-.___-i - -2-... -Q --4--es.-I ":. UU QJLLJBJ HDUU L1 U1-ll ll-LU fL'F.I~TLREA stated that to
no monies paid in connection with
$7,000 attorney foe paid to E. M.
states none of the members of his
conre ction with his parole or for>Q
would cause him to violate his pm-ole
. Son stein. " - ~ "1-*
- :-1
_. .- r.., ',_ D'£_T$DREA states he believes hewas entitled to parole because he"'- ._had served the required portion of his sentence and had acted at all times
in {pod faith and behaved himself while in prison, end he certainly isn't '_ _
going to do anything or get in any trouble with seven years facing him?-3 ' 1 1&3;. r F,_ .. -.
D'A?'JI}l"lA stated when he was released from pri son on August 13, i
1947, he was met at Epringfiel cl, Missouri by SUAPIRG and they both flew ',
vie. commercial air line to Chicago. D'AIU.il?*'Ji does not know how the other - ..,j_paroloes were transported from Leavenworth to Chicago. _ _' : ' F ' n-. .. - .
41r »
D'_A_.]_!BE?A stator] that all the people who wrote letters in his . ~_behalf to effect his ]"e.r0le worth contacted either by ANTHOIYY T. D'ANIREAW;;,;
92_ f~!.>-
|¬' I
:_.,_,
.7:_*<'
Q.
It
§-'
_:.ff
I.
- .1.
11
';
.*-we
»
7 .
. r
I . 4 'u _. -{she
-v"*?~E1}:
i :Il lI
~-w
/
~
!
-.r;JL _.
§ 1 { .
92;.' ' ,
" _-
-<- ', 71'-ta fr
- . EChicago File 58-1,94 {-3}Rm srmb ' ' " "
1 - 1 ,1-t -A,;.his brother, or attorney Slb°.PI1'10, and in the case of references needed " ' Y .for business world contacts, <I%R't' *'_D"Al"1'¬lL, cousin and manager for PHILIP _ 5
D'Al¬LRM, made the contacts "with the persons sulmitting letters from the ;f,_s: "3".
International Harvester Company, and the Mac}: International Truck Company, '9'"-
- Chicago. -"J
r ' -- 3., '."t ..'-~-ii-. - v .
-. - ' h -"=-f1.L.";;_Concerning the payments made to E, H, STERN, D'ANDR.EA adviseri -it "4
1" as follows. He stated the total fee was to be -E1000, $5500 of wn1¢nwas=f="':->'r.i¢paid prior to his release, D'Al92-UREA states this payment was handled by Y H
SIAPIFiO out of monies which SHAPIRO had been keeping for 1!'ANDREIA. These ';
monies came to Si{APlF.C in connection with the sale of some oi DAh'DRRjs J
property in Glercoe, Illinois. The balance of the $7000 fee was paid after . "
DAN1>hf.A':.< release. D'A?-IPHLA explained that prior to his incaroerationfyeti Q,
left approrciznatljf $10, O00 cash with ATITHONY C. D'ANDhEA_, his cousin, 'tO__'-ii f't;.92§ i
take care of his family while he was gone. Upon his release, ANTHONY §._T-¢_r_.-;';*';.i.¥
D'AlIL'i;E1A settled up with him and gave him two checks totalling approxinate-',
ly $3700. IVANDREA states he endorsed these two checks which his cousin:-11*. »;=1ssrns om had given him and handed them to SHAPIRO who in tuI~'?§?va them to ',.; -.
STr'.l<I¬, D'AI$DI~tT.A receiving approximately E200 in cash. INANDREA stated th:'|.s__' -'
particular transaction was handled in his home in Lincolnshire Estates. ' { _
B'AJ~ED;LZA advised that his cousin, .E<,.I'I'I'T~¬C=IJY C, D'AT.'IDRILA resides at 9955 !~
South Seeley Avenue, Chicago. I"AI.i."RI?A stated that outside of SHAPIRO ~
and his cousin A?I'l"rTOI'EY C. D'AIII§}1F.A no 0116 handled any monies for him during T_. '
his incarceration. ". 9292. V» '
Concerning his present financial condition, D'ANDR'E.A. stated he" .+"-'+=h *1.
is practically broke. He stated that since his release it has been necessary * _i__
for him to pawn six or seven thousand dollars worth of his r-i.fe's jewelry *'9=.-.3}
for vhicii he received e. loan oi *j2OGC=. He states this transaction was A1_ ii
}1m1'11eC by SELQFIRO, 1.'A?iD1{}'192. states he has no indebtedness other than "1_=;- '-fa
current monthly bills with the exception of a1=;ro:»1irr.ate1y 9. $6000 loan on - J P.-__
his home in Lincolnshire I-states, Crete, Illinois. D'A1~IDHBA states he has ' IQ
no bank accounts at the present time and has no monies, hence the reason ' '-N '1
for him tn?-iiirlg his wife's jewelry,
The folloz-aim; description of WAITDREA was obtained through interroga-;">;{":,""
tion and observation: J; *.;-f""'.]-
;,r- = .' _,;_-., , . . +-1
* '92_ '3'".. R _/;s'f',,$,-_ .
-ate Z He.-,,'92:I
I . =;¬$ E
T?""' in»
_ .'92 1-4
. -'..'>'.
n W _,, ,_,li, ijlij, , QII t H
, J1.-lg s. V - -- I . - . s ' "-. ~ - '. ~ i ..-,-t'- -- ' 23 hm,aw, ' ".>- -'1-.4 i 92' .-.-. 1'1"." '"--"' 1 '~' "'L' n J. I. Wei . . .its--.-»-a~~. --* - -- - ,_. .¢.»-». ». -F-<~.--.-.--a-H-=-~5%--c - ..' . -' - '- _- - " * - . . . ' - 1- ,1-1» »_ 1. --12.-. -' ' ' -I. __IniJII___ '1 '1 -t 1- . - ' w"I-"4""-92. 92_. L-Y". N4
0-
0
92-_';:
1'
~ u
I
: -ihu
W " - "
hi;-.i2&'
F
'=
.-,_ '
-t. .."' .'- .;L:92~.$s'. ,.
1.,
.. _ ,92
1" - -.
c
9292>;»I'*
' "H. q0
~ -kltl* -1
Chicago File SB-194 ',J r;
i ' *-"F,---* '"'-r-L -.1?-Ii? , RER:rmb 7
IIBIILEI 2
Date of birth:
Place of birth:
Residence:
Height;
I height;
Q Sex:
Color;
Rationality;Hair:
Peculiarities:
Attire:92 n,
'1 92
Education:
FBI No.2
Ifaritul stat us;
Children;
Relatives:
Oucupati on ;
~ L:
i
H 33 _
1
L-I K __ 74-'-_,_7,- 4.;-=---, -=.-¢_;v-_ ~n
-nub-F1 » . "Pt-.__ F ._ ..-- '4 " - _ ', '*"1
lo
-1. _
. ' '1 I'1 _"v _.
'."§_'i
. , _¢, 1 , _w__. _:_!v__?{_:.- ' "1-' " _e.-.PHILIP LOUIS D'ANDP.l-2A was
r <. '
Phil p92An "ea; Philip D, re; o @;§_»£?Sopteliler 7* 1s91 , 7 ; _.,Buffalo, Ne592York ,* }*&e?¢:%.{§%;§_ ff :4 r b ;Phllip Ldgrne; Philip L rtin ¢f;,?1 1
Lincolnsh re Estates , ;_,. @ ~?@_iYCrete» Illinois ...»I%"??,3hl!f
5' 6"
16:3 1-
Male " it ii
White ;..;§i$ .§1gelamm l_ . . -- ., g'*"_1?=;*>#;f-_-; 13;
ac" w '** 1 w
hears mustache; wears glasses 1 j l _1
Very well dressed, businessman '
appearance. t5l ' §F§
High school graduate, 2% years l
law, Hamilton Law School, Chicag0}"
603720
Widower °1
PHLLIP JR., age 14 . o .
Corporal ANNA MACEY, girl raised by,e ~,,j5 L-Qnuuwem but not legally adopted. "'-fu_,-A?-IT}{0NY T. D'A?»ll-EPA brother! ;;;_, ~-2+;-¢If_ ,-
5l1 Beckwith Lane A "?~3;;t7?U
Lincolnshire Estates -:J|Qj{;Crete, Illinois 5 9* ?
Flikllli-,3 PEHRI and AIIN13 D'AI92DP.EA, " -i "~_92'»J,"
both sisters, residing with Subject: "* 7
in Lincolnshire Estates *92Qe>f3%~§
rm! ens:-n:AN sister! '- ~_ I"T_*%', _-
205 East 83rd Street :H§q515 eecieqtn Lane "L -' Q
M -
. - ,
Chicago, Illinois {*-ti
Former insurance, newspaper and wQf-Jcartege business background. 'jg{§LQ£
VI *7 . 4. . ,_; F n" I _ L ._, ,_ F || I-r _J._"$'_ ~a J, .. _ .La-V 5- _-ul' 7:2-'-JIU: >*' ' " ~ ->92
1 II;
s-51»
'_|- -nu
J' Q ' . " _ - _ _ _ v . "' " -Q!-' .."' ._ , - , 1-!92,92_,'!'-"a. - . - .-~ . _»-,._ 7' ' -1-. ""-1" ~»-= 4".--=--" 7 "%r-'-. - me *"NJ'V92¢J"92||-1 J-'5! 92aIu" II92.Ipn.-v*Pq' ,e -~ 1 - -»-" * ' . - o - - - »92.-,_ K __ 92 _ -- _~V,-_L _ _--I: ~ -r.- -
Fa " H44 -r
ii ..
la:
'?l..
92'._=.-
E-I
i ' .
;
Y;
».
1
J
*1
I2
it
<
lmdi
p A
s=1;._"-as
'"#
1
/
1.-
§#P
m"' '. ,,'.-;f" A -
lil
L ' '.'1
10!.1: r!
kn 3 -"F -
" Chicago File-58-194
_ _ AJR:EDD -
Is!
EUGENE BERNSTEIN, attorney, with of
furnished thei 1 I1
BERNSTEIN was engaged to represent subjects DE LUCIA and CA-QPAGNL ae_-their-;-5 ,
attorney in connection with individual claims against them by the U. 8
.9 - Government for deficiencies in income taxes covering a period of several _-1"l,.f».'.'g.;:=,~-~..;;=.1 ..»
.-.- .
- -
..
I
I.92 :3u-' ._,_
4:-_ 1.
,- I-f,.'¢".
~ **r7"-vi:
_ _<_,g t:_', ,.
fices at 77 West Washington Street Y H
27, 1947, by Special Agents .,1_';
mber 29, 19 , y-_' -,,., _. ".1.ssnnsrsxu -;_.
n, .. -.
A-
years prior to their incarceration under the sentence for violation of the» ,'-_?i'>'1~
Anti--racketeering Statute. In connection with this matter, BERNSTEIN visitedt.- _;'§ " .92 DE LUCIA on at least two or three occasions during the period of time DE LUCIA .
was incarcerated in the Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia. After DE LUCIA , -, .
was transferred to the U. S. Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, BERNSTK_LN_
'. visited DE LUCIA on some six or eig
ANTI'DNI ACCARDO, alias JOE BATTERS
syndicate!. BERNSTEIN denied that.< .. - _-,_
ht occasions at Leavenworth. On most, '*-, , _:_,- -1..if not all, of these occasions, BERNSTEIII was accompanied to Leavemlorth-by'_=-L .i.".-5?. A-f'if reported head of the Chicago ur1dervrorld','<A?j_"_I- '_- _
he see ever accompanied on any of his._@.,t;,i_@,,-J.
visits to Leavenworth by anyone other than ACCARDO. iii 1;- -_~_
.!_l_.
B!3R.N5T'5IN explained that he experienced considerable difficulties in his _.; °"_-,
tax cases
Treasurypreparation of the income
complained that the U. S.
informationas to the bas
'- was, therefore, necessary for BERHSTEIN to
in this regard. In talking with DE
difficulty because BEPJISTEIN did no
and inasmuch as DE. LUCIA spoke veryof Lb mom and CAMPAGNA. BERNSTEIN L - _ '1; c.
Department furnished him with very scant ' Pg.-
is of the Government's claims for taxes and thatfit - 3'--iv
engage in considerable research _";",_92>7'_-_.._.-i;_i_;.=BERNSTEIN experienced considerabIe_-P-§"§?"° *"
DE LUCIA's native language , »ItaIL,iaf;',*. #5.:-,§¢-1-.3-,English. Also, me LUCIA i.r1di_cated}_"1-_"l-:_LUCIA,
t speak
brokensome reluctance to confide in BERNBTEIN, and BERNSTELIN felt that DE LUCIA ' ,{:
lacked confidence in him. It was for these reasons, according to BERNSTEIN,- -';r_'~.-=- §_~'-"-
that he contacted JOSEPH BULGER a Chicago attorney who was acquainted with .1
DE LUCIA, and asked BULGER to refer
DE LUCIA who might be of assistance
Thereafter, according to BERNSTEIN,
had been referred to him by BULGER.
personally acquainted v-ith DE LUCIA
nature of DE LUCIA's income and the
Prior to each occasion when DE$E?.£¬.Sl'E
Leavenworth, BERNSTEIN "trots to the%_!|
him to someone personally acquainted with i_
to BER}-ISTEIN in talking to DE LUCIE. -- n _*"*' s;
he was contacted by ANTHONY ACCARDO, who p ,2
ACCARDO, according to BERNSTEIN, wass .-,2"and had considerable knowledge of the
sources thereof. -' - '54.. 92. I
. n "Y -1' A I
" Y-_1..
IN and ACCARDO visited DE LUCIA at _ ';;' -.'~'§.",;warden of the Penitentiary, requesting:> T.I
. _ 1 ..1 ,_| I , ' ,
-" ' .1.1..~1~"?'9?li--*-- ' ~'.~'L"
a " .=-L'f_.._-_f
Q " 25 ' if-»"".': "".a"'
s' _
hail- .._ __ *_.
; - __'~_"._ ._.
a - - ,., _ r _ _ _ _ , , __~-- . . - " -.1--rt -J -:27-.- ~ x-,_ -2 Fr",ru.-J:;_..4-'$,,a_- -.= ....»-.-,r...,,;} ---:1~ i " '1' I _~4 "' _' . p T ' ', ' .~ "' . an-,- '.-11-~ .. , _- EI. F '1 11. - I" ':_..~-r J-Hrs;- -, ~.,- .. .4 !-.-ugdl _;".|_1.."".92,. ,_/PIP1-. .1
ff}: '
55
.4
J
u
!
v
.-
.' -Q54»-1:-
fF_ W11-r~
in .1,
.-
|»*1
~' .
A ca
_<
.-1"-_'
!..
1
A
4-:
1."
1-.
-J
-.r-.' 1<
ho?
92
Chicago File se-194 _
AJR:EOD
permission for sac visit According to BERNSTEIN's recollection, he referred a - e
to ACCARDO in these letters as the "individual who has accompanied me on
previous occasions" and did not at any time identify ACCARDO by name. _-,
On the first visit by BERNSTEIN and ACCARDO to DE LUCIA at Leavenworth, BERNSTEIN*
took with him the letter received from the warden granting permission for?v!
."' at-',:~_ a ..-1,
.r~Q5¢
he s; - I '-' 1 in I "-L ?xww!f. _._»'. ..,-.;~- !- 92~1._x-1;. e=- 4'1!
'_-1.
.7-
W31. -Eh,. _,.
-' _~.:-in.,1 4BERNSTEIN and his companion to visit DE LUCIA. BERNSTEIN presentedthis 12§,l§Y[%§*§>
letter for identification and as proof of his permission to visit E IUCTA. x§fT§~f§
On this first occasion, BERNSTEIN was infonmed upon arrival at the Penitentiary§m2 n§
that the warden wished to see him. BERNSTEIN, therefore, visited the warden _,7& ~>{
in the 1atter's office while ACGARDO waited outside. '
BERNSTEIN was uncertain as to whether he took with him on the occasion of
his second visit to Leaventorth the letter received by him from the warden"_~§i_; lI .
constituting permission for him and his companion to visit DE LUCIA. l ;Q jf*§f§§ R1 ; M Q "BERNSTEIN stated positively, however, that after the second visit he did'*not take with him or present the letter from the warden but was apparently " Q§§.§?
recognized by officials at the Penitentiary and was admitted without questions; 5}-3,
_ ,;__iLrof his identity or of his authority to visit DE LUCIA. BEHNSTEIN presumed.1 - A.
that at the times of these visits, reference was made by Penitentiaryofficials'5, i
to their files, which would have confirmed BERNSTEIN's penmission to visit, ,§1-i
together with his companion, ACCAHDO. " . ..
On the occasions of their visits, BERNSTEIN and ALCARDO were requiredto *. , @-
. . 9'." '- ' ';. ....
sign a prison register at the time of entering and again at the time of leaving ;g;,;.
the Fenitentiary. BERNSTEIN signed his own name in each instance and stat
he paid no attention and had no knowledge as to what name ACCARDO used in
signing the prison register. , l
. .4
At the time of the interview with BERNSTEIN on September 29, 1947, he was_
confronted with photostatic copies of the list of visitors to DE LUCIA at
Leavenworth which photostatic copies weze previously obtained and furnished e
by the Kansas City Office!. BERNSTEIN stated that his name as it appears
on this visitors list is not his signature. He reiterated his statement
that he and ACCARDO did actually sign a register at the Penitentiary on ea
occasion, but he stated that it was undoubtedly another register inasmuch
as his name on instant visitors list was not his signature. BERNSTEIN _
denied any knowledge that ACCARDO used BU1GER's name in registering or in
ing admission at the Penitentiary. He stated he did not observe what name
ACCARDO used on those occasions."'t*BERNSTEIN also denied that he introduced
ACCARDO by name to any Penitentiary official. __ _;f
4 .
Z
e
i__s , -. __BC! '; '
W, 1: ..,,¬_
| -1 u. .-,.>,e,.2 if-j
.;w-- 1-.; I
.-; _92' _ no.1 Ii1*. ._ "5: :1T." t: -,. 92 -,Q1... -. 'bu
'13: ...'" -,
ga1n;?§$
F
3-
.;_"-.-'. .'-. if: 1_ 27 _ ..ih}Q
, H...".. '.
.11.-*_" .4,0-
r
I» r; ,J?
Yer
'r..
-4-_' '
7.
J
1|.
a.
. 92-.711:
IF: _,92.1.1>¢<
3;-Q-:-3.5
.1.
r
I
t
V??? Fii ..-*1
Q55
-3- . .
-.'.'7._
r|,Chicago File S8-194 " ",_ ¢, .- 3;-_ l 2,; .+ _.» i ~ yP AJILEOD .1. .._._,_.%§ 3,.I
_.:,
J. I
; .., - _1 »~H. ., .__,_ : -
U. S. Penitentiary at Leavenworth, in which letters JOSEPH BULGER___1Ias named.-as p
person who was granted permission to accompany BE nIiS'1EIIi. BEEJSTEIN denied__that_ p
he had previously noticed BULGER's name in these letters. He stated he l_]W7{}j
could not be certain that he had even given any personal attention to these * g
A letters inasmuch as he did not use the warden's letters in gaining'adittance
to the Penitentiary after his second visit there. BERNSTEIN at first £lat1y
denied that he had ever seen BU1£3ER's name in any of these letters, but f-
-.~ subsequently during the interview stated that he might possibly have * T ~¢
noticed BULGER's" name in one or two of the letters but, if so, he undoubtedly
,_ passed it off as being merely another alias of ACGARBO, who, to BERNSTEIN's]i[
¥ knowledge, has used numerous aliases in the past. BERNSTEIN stated, howeter,
that in any event he has no present recollection of seeing BUlGER's name 3
in the letters from the Penitentiary and that he had no knowledge prior to
fl ~' own in connection with certain matters, and BERNSTEIN further suggested that
~ However, BERNSTEIN was unable to suggest the reason or the logic by which'p"92ACCARLO may in some way have considered himself a representative of BULGEB¢,.§';i§-- BERNSTEIN was alsoiconfronted with photostatic copies of letters from the 7,a¥%é$ If
. r :3
'.1~92-A, ,
¢;?~?:*?*_._;:7 'Pm; c at; P .
.5#'.l?'1'-"
t
I
,-51 __
at I". '1:
this interview that ACCARDO may have used BULGER'e name. BERNSTEIN suggested*;5§:that many tines an employee of an attorney may use the attorney's name as3his'n¬§E i . ' .~ ,,}g-!_- V .1 j_
. ._, _. i I.r 1
ACCAREO might have considered himself BUD3ER's representative, and he denied'"-Q1-
that he had any specific infonnetion in that regard. BERNSTEI did advise
that on one occasion he consulted JOSEPH BUDGER, who is a Chicago attorney,, ,
concerning an income tax return which BULGER had once assisted DE LUCIA in ;'
. preparing. Concerning BULGER, BERNSTEIN stated that he is acquainted with
< BULGER and that he was under the impression that BULGER's name was originally_.92 IMBUHDIO and that he is a brother of one IMBURGIO a Chicago underworld .
= .fig11re ' H"
= In denying that he had observed the name of JOSEPH BULGER in an of the ' _
letters received by him from the Penitentiary at Ieavenworth, BERESTEIN -
emphasized the fact that his secretary, Miss GENEVA*COX, handled the -*
correspondence with the Penitentiary as a routine matter. EERNSTLIN stated -1
1 .-» .3 -{T-"tr
that it was, therefore, entirely probably that he himself did not actually H ;;§#?"
see these letters from the Penitentiary after the first two letters, " P
Miss cs:-rsva cox, BERNSTEIN's secretary, who resides at 1204 Park Avenue f"L ¢,_Chicago Heights, lllinois, and who has been BERNSTEIN's secretary conti;1uous_1,J'.,*§;,.*.".,since 1925, was present during most of the interview with BERNSTEIN on ,*-§ ratio I
September 29, 1947. Miss COX confinmed BERNSTEIN*s statement to the effect g* "
that she handled as a routine matter the correspondence between BERNSTEIN,l<-;
;'_.herself had ever observed the name of JOSEPH BULGER in this correspondence. a 92 -_
...o-and the Penitentiary at Leavenworth. Miss COX, however, denied that_she}fgLQ_3 _" .: s - zlil
- 2 D P ' 1*:. !"9292,_¢W- r 1'.
1*" $5.a. --1hs
v .'
|-
1.".-:1:I '_ . '
..r§'
... .- r
1_ r,, .4
:'__ t
4 I : ' .92 -
In
Ii-
|§5 _.|;_§, _H, 1
1 .a.- -.,. _ ..__ , ,
, 1_.-__p L
92 ' 1
v
- -v
- 1
All
.'_.. .6
F.
.92 i '.
:4 _;~.-.1-u"'- - .--=,::a},.J-
_ -.__ _ ' __ -1-
1 t f
.~' I
07!,-
92".I
- r
,¢I
__
_.5,~= ix'..
.1.
0,8 __,~:" F-_ _ rs, Q -_
~~ - P 1 i>#. a-'
" 2 ".h'§X Q '- 1 .she.u .r.",;i'..E,? }J
2 , J
I. ',_,~ Q
-._ .1-1>1 ~.
I A.0
. I511!-', |-I -$1.4
..;n Peaif 1.. 92" A
- <'
sv. .
.
-HI ' _
e.192K
u .
_1 4 __ _ _ ___ __ __ _ . _ _ ___ Al _____ 1 '-7 -W ~ _. _ " . t . . -,h- "".;Qaq4*m»par
H$aa~
.l=.,
' T **~i V 'e ' W . . A _ __ ___ _ _. i iii if -_-_ __ : _A,_7 :i I-. I W-. -} E,-.~~ ._ F.-::"E<d.%n_
Re 3 "/3
' _ q 1.
. "'-.r~'l__T ite gr: 1",?_ P __ -it =¢:..e .
. I V1 - er-tr,-awe-:?". 1' -*-, . - . .I' » i £1-1= - _.-in " if -.- Chicago F119 SB-19? , W
92 __ V 92 H I-1.! . ' _ AJR:EDD ~ _
" She stated she did not give the letters received from the Penitentiary close _
attention as to their content and, furthermore, if she had noticed the name c r.
JOSEPH BULCER in the letters, she would not have regarded it as significant _j."_.»~;'1-f-i", . =-
_, but would have presumed that BULGLR was, in fact, going to accompany _;_ to Leaverrworth. ;, . _ , _ 5 -3% :*§1<;'i§_3;..;.' -*-'*.£- i:'*{:'f"' ; C
Bl5RrJSTEIN, according to his statement to the interviewing Agents on 3eptember,£{,,, 2* ' -1947, arranged for the transportation of subjects DE LUCIA and CLMPAGNA "~J.
i,_ .- Leavenworth to Chicago at the time of their release from the Penitentiary; 3 ,';';j,;,, ' ,_
At that time BERNSTEKN was in Kansas City, Missouri, on other business. Hist 1' 1
' arranging for the transportation of DE LUCIA and CAI/LPAGNA was done by'virt_ue . Y ' ;~--
of his position as their attorney. I--hen asked by the interviewing Agents V 3
" as to what form or means of transportation was used in bringing DELUCIA and c ,- J; " . CA1-EPAGNA from Leavenworth to Chicago, BERNSTEIN states that he did not"_ q5azf'e,~?,j¢;§,*;,"_f, ,f to answer or to discuss that question. The question of the means of t_ra_x_1s_-_1;§co_-;}_"g'c#.;=-*2?
portetion was again presented by the interviewing Agents to BERNSTEIW. on :3 if
in - September 29, 194.7. BEHNSTEIN again refused flatly to discuss the mear1,8-' :*§;,e-.v5*_3¢'_~
' of transportation furnished by him and also declined to discuss his reesonsejifor this I"9f'LlSa1e '
-_ . , 92
BER!-ISTEIII denied that he himself had participated in erg manner in effecting ,
the parole of DE LUCIA or CAWPAGNA or any of the other subjects. He also .__ -92 H"-
' denied that he had arqr knowledge of bribery or pI'8SS92l18 in any form having""i"".T '~'F'
been used in obtaining the paroles. He denied that he was at any time ,oonf;-;t§i;§<;é%1,-£3 i
sulted in connection with obtaining the paroles of the subjects. ' 92_ ' '. '- .- 11- ;> I-r_;,",:':§, 3 r£._Concerning the tax claims in which eeeuswezn represented subjects DE LUcn;'1_Y--;.;-}f-';. ;;;"%.,_:r:;-,
., and C!1:'fPliGI'JA, BJBRNSTIN furnished interviewing Agents with a schedule showing1"cr"7i;_'= '§§§
the amounts of the claims and also the amounts for which they were finallyl .- J __f~{? ""'"'settled. This schedule, which is being retained in the Chicago file, is Pas" ii f .-/follows: _ '-;-i .__. ¢~ -=-' L L F ' I-, .3 __:.,.. ,_. _ i - -.. .--1 7/.- ~- :__..--,7
->£~
r
,' '*',7;:. -f . -U-*1. ; '~
.|-__-,-. '; -- ;>-4. . Q 1 1 -I», r L
'92t-I n_ 41: . ., _ i.
._- ., ,; ._
u .~ , .92 . ,_. 3.5-_, .- ' _- F1» F-. . ' 4' -" Y" - 551:5.§ . r-I 1 pk-_ -, _ ., __ e. _O ._ .-._..~_--gxwii- ~9 - n ; 1» ., -1-'3-'-*-'2--3'.* 1 e2 1 1* "-".1 -1-=,--"_*1'**',¬;'r+ * vi "1 ' in ' ___ . HF V72: it 92-' - 'l~ r"_"';_925 ' "92-. -_ .--. .3 2 -~ , e ~- t. -- @311 ,4, sea:1.! ' _ -_-. -1-»
t =""T- -1" " t. .11
' "' - . _ . , . . - - -' ' "1:r'----l'~i- - '.. r--- - . - _,-I .- -- - - ~ c- - i. - - .- -' '= -' -- i-~ .-<'..'=." P" -1 . 2'4 ., ~-'1!-J"92~"-bx-'.. '~. . " 4h __; u.-, " -.' - - J,» ' ' -~: .?:""' ;92. .'£r %;+rf §J?92* _ s _ iI|.r__,:92,nnn-Ej'I92',u~q_92_'|aIIy92-I-I"'* ,!-q "92rl92"-Fiénu " w .' ,'- ' --" '-' :"' - """"92l- _ _""- _ - ll 1 1;, -I e -C."* . - -, M -_ - - .1 . ... _ -_'"u.. we-"'1'. -..,'_.-.:Il£2E*:.r¢."" " » -. V _ V . .. __ _ _ _. _ __
92-J
T
u_-9,;0-
Chicago File -
AJR:EODtfj
TAX CLAIM AGAINST PAUL DE LUCIA
Docket No. 8805, U. S. Tax Court
YEAR-it-
An.-1900l936
1957
1958
l940
1941
TO
TAX CLAIM
Docket No.
I995
1955
1959
, 1* - - _ _ at 2
- ./ =1-r.»_ .- . ,_ . .2» -1- >.-. _ ._. 1 -- . "4 'f_r~ ' R- 92,.-F5: 92 , iv
- Chicago File 58-194 7 as I0 AJR:EOD Y. ' '.4 2: Ml '1"- - "'.~.-,--it ; L ! t H " ' "'"'. . ' . "wz. it
each, with instructions to apply this money on payments of the tax chins
against DE LUCIA and CALEPAGNA. On three of the above occasions, BERNSTEIN use 1:? _
absent from his office and the money was received by his secretary, lies _ '";'?§f-
, csnsva cox. , ' _, V y =__,_-,_;__w-,,_.~"+,',;,',- _
teWMWd by Special Assn ,1].n this regard. She stated that in October, 1946, an unidenti.f1ed_'e.- -_.-;-_- --- man, whom she has never seen on any other occasion, before or since; Oéi.fn6Ti'.O,."_"¥f§f";rf;-*r!§" .-
BEP.NS'lEINs office and asked for BERNSTEIN. Miss COX informed the man that '-_ "*1-- _,,.y BERNSTEIN was not in. The man than counted out and handed over to Miss COX * I Y *
about $25,000 in cash, consisting of large bills, including some of $1000 _- _ ~
denomination. The only explanation the man made to Miss cox was that the - .
money was "for LOUIE CA3iPAG1~{A's tax." Miss COX offered to furnish hima I" ,.
' receipt, to which he replied, "Never mind." According to Liiss COJC,-thi-_'!*'Ti1n'_-,- 3='.,.j.:_;, -
, known man did not in any nay identify himself nor did she press him for an f ',',,;Y{,_;I.I§ --iv
identification. Miss COX did not regard the incident as necessarily unusual? '
-y inasmuch as on numerous previous occasions in connection with matters not _Ij.
I. related to the case, unidentified persons have similarly come to BERiISTEIN*_s _ Y: . t .office and left money or documents for BERNSFEIN. p . ' ,-
Miss COX related that two or three days after the above incident, a second . j
unidentified man came to B13RNSTEIN's office and in BERN5TEIN's absence, left i
o with Miss COX a large package of currency, amount unknown, which was merely . '
tied together with a strip of paper. Also, a day or two later, a third __ _,=';e__~7;:_ "
unidentified man similarly came to BERNSTEIN's office and left with Miss -; "_-,"| .-
COX a large package of bills. In both instances, according to Miss COX, : -"-_-i,"592Tf~_Zf7'92'*'4 2- -é_'j_,'N.the men did not identify themselves and indicated they wanted no receipts. 1 ' ';§~"=.~According to Miss COX recollection, one of these latter two men meralytold "7- ii 35-as-
her that the money was "for PAUL's tax," and on the other occasion the man- ' 4*;-._-.'i=.; -
indicated merely that the money was "for mUIEJ's tax." '_ -",_,_--§'=£':tfi IA -"
-.»92,y-_f, ., _§Miss cox stated that she did not regard the visits by these latter two men l92
unusual any more than she regarded the visit by the first man as unusual. __ -,7 Q
She stated that she turned the money in each instance over to BERNSTFIUW upon ',
his arrival at the office. _ , 3_~ "_-
Miss COX denied she had any information whatever which would servo to identify _<the three men referred to above. _ She stated she believes she would be able .4 §;ue._-.'-_'to identify these three men if she should ever see them again. Miss COX 7 _ -"W indicated that she had a better recollection of the first man thanlof the ej.
O other two. She described the first man as being an Italian, about_¢_l5 years,R§,,_;,,'5_",_ , .1: .92 3 ,. , lg? , - - c --- .. 1 .1 92 .. "J _ ., . _,.,, ¢_ ,,', .1_,.._,~;_§ _ I ,3. ,- - - -,m.-- ,_-,_-asD ; ,; . ___,.,.;_.. __ _
_ ,1-,_ ._ !_ g ..__,1_:-be "SJ; 92. F _
-- -I J ,- _r _, V; I -;o_,__'- 1-1'-1. _ ._. . _.,_,92 -1 2.,-._ ,_ 92: n: 2 1 "R = 1&3?
' :4. ' %i'-*;4-, .92 __; , .I .,_ , -_ 3, ,- ._- " . !_3-' ... _ _ _- o |", _. ',,.-L: =;1t92 .-,- .grijtii ii _ _ _,__ _, __;__ _ _ _i,_:__ , ,A _i__i, __..__ A_ -_ -__,=,,.--.. _,_ .-- _ .. . -... - . E =" v '*-'-4' It-.;r--»--.-~~»--~ - _.... - - 92 _.. .-j'L92;:V,~ - - *-- "~ .-*'-_~»F- -I, --: - ~ '-___ . = ' r--.,_ - '.-r 1;-1.* "7-'"--2-*'°' > -1-3-92I~"-if-¢_.=_w- . -__ J - --.- . - . "5-._ 1.-.. ,
-, .-t I -;_ 4 92
a :-* _ 3. Q -
9292
l 1- U :*'.-if' "1-.'.'- I 1.:-.1 1:. as
Chicago File 58--194 _ , J" , .8.JR:E-OD - "'.*.>-'::-
. 4-_s,c
Pf _
of age, medium build, and of dark c0lOIing. Miss COX got the impression that
this first man might be a relative of OAHEPAGNA but stated she had no definite-
basis for that impression.
- Miss COX was unable to furnish a detailed description of the second and
men and stated she did not have occasion to observe them as closely as the" " 'first man. ' '- 551- P"'*--2--'*. I , t - 1~ 1 .~.._ - , _q- - ..
BEHNSTEIN stated that he himself was present on about six or1 when unidentified men brought other sums of money to his office. He stated - -=-1.? 5*
that he had never seen any 01 these men before or since, but he believes he { "
could identify some or all of these men if he should ever see them again. On
= each occasion, the man left with BERNSTEIN a sum of cash with the mere -" -_< ',
-. explanation that he had been "told to leave this package with you _ior_,P1_92UL ;'_.,r_;';f,"}.Q,_* ;_;;._,'
or I.OUIE!." BERNSTBIN stated that he did not regard this procedure as too. *;f#~;,§-';- =5-
unusual in view of the apparent type oi men with whom he was dealing and _for
whom the money was intended. He stated that when he began to receive thes_e_, '.'_'-£52, v
1* c.' payments, he telephoned Mrs CAMPAGNA, subject CA.!PAGNA's Wife, thinking___that
she might have arranged for the payments. However, Hrs. CA921PAGNA denied to J ;,;;»-'1 '¥
BERNSTEIN that she had arranged for the payments but told BERNSTEIN that she 5-'.{_§3.» .17
had "heard the money was coming in." . , F
___,.t .. ¢
. BERNSTEIN stated that no receipts were given by him for any oi the money he_ *i",j
.5-P'° .. . ho4 "..""'' received and that he kept no record showing the amounts or the dates of recs ,.., ;- _
5 He stated that as he received the money he placed it all in a safe deposit xf.
at the First National Bank in Chicago. On October ll, 1946, he removed all; 'f',_t
of the money from the safe deposit box and placed it in his personal aocoimt"'
- at the First National Bank. On the same date, October ll, 1946, BERNSTEIN 5"
drew a check on his account in favor of the Bureau of Internal Revenue to '
pay the specified tax claims against DE LUCIA and CAMPAGNA. 'r_ .
. T.* M _I; r _.I
r .P-I T .~ -1-.- According to BERIISTEIN, the money which he had received anonymously was his |
only source 01 obtaining the amount used in paying the tax claims. He stated. 1-; O ~ . .
that the amounts which he received exceeded by $1700 the amount necessary"- Y -~,;.* 1;»to pay the tax claims, and sssnsras retained this ti".-oo to apply on his fee ~ '" '
as attorney. BEHNSTEIN stated that in Hay, l945, he had been paid $2500 by" 1"-»{=,;.»;l.~,
Mrs. LOUIS CAMPAGNA as a retainer fee. "f-=":_}:'1,¬c___'7 ""; *_., i .l~ ¬'r-.2»-A 1. . - ,'1 V .. -.
. '9292 .7- re.-¢__,s , ,; 1,." -$3" = ;-Q3- - --|| ..4-. vI -_ .".'_=-.i.92nl§-: .'-I__ __ .1. ... , .
4 xi _¢ V
I r - -an ':-1' ' -i u ~ § h _92 15 , -.": !' _ 4f-__~ . ' - =..13 92r - ' ..: ' - ""';= -.3 _ F1- -.- ' .9?-i-'¢
- >. 1-r--"' _,:. ' ' -1 -*"i";.f.
l. _-1... M ,
' + ~.L7 . -_- . .-.-H g/,5 I. I, -Z. _, .1 - *1!- - .. .. , . Q, 1, ,' ' - . - r -ii: if . - . .
,1in 77 7 :__ _ 7 __ -- 0-_. __r
D
I
r
r
_ 7' ~ ' , _;' : _ ,i___ ice, - -- -1 - - ~- -- Tii J; - _- - ";l;f**_ - "1 H ' ALe
15.
4.
1I
.1
l
.4
ci
>¬_.
'.,-c.,-'
8: -V.
'4<' '92
92
/-
=.'
Q
s
fa
.
F!9 n
W3.7.:-u »_~na.i4-9,},
. _. - ~ r --- -_ " '- _ ,, _ ~w-. __-Q.B3-+._92 .. '. __ A _ _- .- _'-_'92-,.-92-- -. -"4--_'_ 1, _, l*-- e-__.>..__¢-,,1-r92..,~'.,,"92'¢,=1n..;,,,-fl. 1,- .. J _»_ ___ _, ...- » .-- .- i-A , -r - -. __ - ,_._ .I21 v*_ .- p A J; -1 1 4' "1 ' -v ' P A "5' i tn *1} '* -' . . 5J/I. I ._ , H
nnmssn l -£1 '7' -
Chicago file 58-194 _' xIv -,1-Y 1
1' ' .* -1. ' I ' 1-. '5". ".~."--" .-5-.1 "-~<-4;"V, _ _ _ .- _. _ .. 13- ,
T J . _ . _ ' W?--- -5-.453. The investigation was conducted by Special _-' - '-.:_="»92'-
m September 29, 1947, Sal-IUEL H. SELAPIRO, attorney with oiiic_:es at 313- South 5*-1:
Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, was interviewed and advised he had ktnown
D'AI.'DPEA for approximately twenty years. He stated that his wife's father an<i_._,§r'.-D'AIIDEtBA'S father were brothers. ~
we}
1?. - 5 ,
According to SHAPIHO he handles no criminal cases but for many years has ha'm_1_1.¢".:_,
D'M{DHEA'S civil matters. He stated he does this work because of the.connections between D'AhDREA and himself. ' ' ' -","';'. '11- .-.
i_?.i.-__ . . . _ . - -. u Ir92 1-nnrxn _SHXPIHU stated he has VlSl'B8C1 u'A.-sultan a
purpose of these visits being the discus
real estate owned by D'A1.'DPtE.A. at added he might have discussed parole matters __at any one oi these visits; however, the main purpose of the visits-rasftthe
real estate transactions. H_ i_ __-:__ .|.al-_ .L-.._'S_..92 &:_...- J-L- _.n-'-Q 'pE!IU!KL'TB. UQLLIY U92'iU.LV|I.' L'.L1l1UU, DHG lI.lQJ..|-.l
sion of the sale and management of '_
.1. ~.. -_ . .1!. . _- '-I" _- - >.~.--- '1 1._,,._'E, ,___;:.- _,_~92,_':3?
SHAPIRO advised that he had handled a fund of money in the amount-o£,$4,2'72_--r fin; ,3!, ,for DWIDREA which was a fund derived from the sale of real est§§g"located.*-1."'5f1*.-iifv-tagin Glencoe, Illinois. He added he had paid expenses of JOHN R.-_,,B_I}.*S_ON_'in .' ' '
the amount of -$100 when ROBINSON made a. special trip to '".'.ashinéton in connec-l~
tion with D'.ItIH3IiE.!i'S parole. He had paid various sums to D'ANDREA'S 1'lif6 "
when she so requested. lie had paid. his o".-.n expenses on his trips to visit .
DANDF.EA in the penitentiary and he had paid various real estate taxes and
income taxes from this fund. He stated that at the time Di..I92'DH.F..=t was re-B
leased, the balance of the fdnd tea returned to D'A!.'D1tE.-1. and it is hisopinl-i
ion that this balance was used to partially pay the attorney fee of El£A.I92IUEL'._
STERN, attorney who represented D'AI.'D??.EA in his recent parole. _4 .es
I
_. 1:.. _|. 1-4. '.-- 2_ _..,,
1
I", .
. I. _
. .' wa".¢.-..
.. I-_1 . _-~., ,
A ".,': iiiqt-j~
us. . -- -at-.a-' .' -92b1-vwlvln
,,_,,,.---f--.- ».$ _J A .' '. i 92;-§'»_.--1.SEEAPIPIO stated he did not know the other four subjects in this case and that W A
he knew that STEJT-IE represented only D'AI-TDREA during the parole proceedings.5r
i av
192' .45_92_ '3SMJIRO stated that he knovrs of no irregularities in connection with the _
securing of the parole for D'AITDR.E1F92; he is sure no money was paid by IPANDREL
for his parole, and that he has no knowledge oi money being paid by the othersubjects for the securing of their parole. SI-LAPIRO stated that his reason 7
for saying that DHWDREA had not paid for his parole was the fact he does not .|,,_1;_-.1 _.
believe D'AI-JTDPEA has a sufficient sum of money to pay. He backed up__ this .staae§,3§f.;ment by stating that while D'AI ID1lEA was incarcerated it was necessary to_alio1r_f-;.fE;_-_a mortgage company to foreclose an a piece of property'owned by D'A1JlDREA on_i;§ ,9 -1?:Ashland Avenue in Chicago. i z . I r .__ b ; ._ ...."ti.' .- _- J; .
i
SHAPIRO stated he did not retain STERN but that he had suggested the.of arses and he believed that TONY out-pant contacted sn-zen. He said that . -' '- 4?- ,-" '-
I¢.. -_,_.'.__ .- _ = z»n sl --.1 71- 1--1'." --~..:' '=-i W. '
- 1.-Z T #L,Fj:'!'.
,-_ 5 :2"-;
-~- -v---at-1,;:r'"!»Li@»-..eL-
.. _ '- 1
- . - . i »_ - -,_. . - . ' r '_ -V ' ' . .' .--- . . - .,_ __ Q. r _ ._. _- » '_ - . w.. _ . . cl . . _ '4 _ ~ _92"I',_.~,_.$92.1 ' - ' 'STERN had been paid $7,000 in all made up of two p=:.yments of $35500 'r v
5»
=§
J.
4
u
n-
K .
1.
_
J.
>-
~.!
.*
i.
,..-..-T
L
Cl11.C'3.,"D 1 lle 2;-194
Ofialnl $3, pa ent was made approxlhately a week after D'ANDREA wasparoled and was ma e at D'A'DHhA'S home. Two checxs sllehtly LR excess oi$3,590 were glven by D'A1DREh to SHA°I@ who lmmedlately turned them over
to STEwN and o.APrhO dld not know who the rmkers of these checks were.
The second 3,370 payrent wag mode up of &p0rOXimately -l,3;O representmngthe oalance 1h a trust "end account molnoalned by SHAPIRO and of a sum of
money approx1mat;nv $2,000 derlved from the pawnlng of JBN6lIY owned byD'AJDWEA S=APITO stated that D'&DWEA dld not wish the fact to be known
that he had to pawr hlS Jewelry to may a portlon of STEHN'o attorney fee.
S %PIBO furtqer Stxt d that he recalled he nad recelved 32,000 from a llfe
1neuran"e poricy on .rs. D'A.D*LA at the t1ne of her death WlGh had been
an ed to the trueo f nl of A 2 2,LJ{?A£$._
f,,_.-_ _ .
*.~ ', A-3I4' 1|; 92 %_ G »
'13- *.
92
. H.
i-gr;
~ **.*:- ' if'1 H if-:92I§Jvi1- '5.. . .-," " fa
!.'#-F}*T.i"i-?i-"
K; '.~-13' ..
. _-;»:K gt <
w re, I
. P,
. 3-.! L.| --
=.: HI/ili A-'*'F1*- ii
e-tiff ii;
L M
&3o1';$-- I .".-- :J.
' -
92 ,~ a
_-a92 {'1 , Ir-",..,,_', .~ If».me] . ». -_ _.,-I1?" =13h __ ,, .. Q .
|
9'
-»
11'. 5-'1,-u
H l I: I
1",-
H? 5, !rd, __, _- ..
..
'¢ .»'?"-' :1
A '.r , s.
-.921,. _
. :92__. ...
_":f1..,»,, :.-91 "__; '-qzv .
if-'.-_ ;v,_»;r _. »|. H. _92 * '/ -u .!'
¢ T..a.'*?_, ,-r ..1* ' ' -?¬- _i! a-- .-ii! 1"
, ' :15?-7
~ *?.2-=.~=;='»_"'1; I=r"=-~.. -- .* 9 9. ii92'v"-.92"£,&fI
' M? 92i
I
5" _-'.-'H..,92
* x.r
.';g"
Z-
i .
F
1
A
1
a
lid. .' 15¢:
i -:'J¬lq_1§
Hkar1 .
4-
..
1;
it
:-
iL 92{
'<1
92 *- |
-. ,-, _ ..-. !_n',-. *::§t',. "- 1- .
Chicago 'File no. .,S8-1914RER:LML _ ,{t*ft
Y¢II..LIAM SCOTT STE.2:IART, Attorney, T7 West Washingto Str ?'
was interviewed on September 29, 19117, by Special Agent _ - - 4' "" I/ll ' 8
I »- Y; ,4
Hr. STEWART advised Agents that he represented all of the subjects in the"' L
appeal of their convictions, and, in this connection, visited the subjects HI I
while in prison. Mr. STEWART stated that he played no part in securing the]
paroles of these men. He stated that he was asked to represent CHAR.IES,¢ "Vi '7' f
GIOE at the recent Congressional hearing, which he did. .- '-
Hr. o T stated that he moss oi nothing irregular in the paroles of these " '
men. Mr. STEHART stated that the publicity in this matter is due to the
rivalry of Chicago ne'.':spap¬1"S. Ho also voiced the opinion that the paroles ,-
were not secured by payments of money, but, at best, possibly as a politics].--f'_f~.;'.
favor. Mr. STE7»kPtT would not elaborate on this statement other than to@say '._'§1f_ ,.;,
that although the prison officials did not desire that these men be trans- "*,-'_7_
ferred from Atlanta to Leavenworth, the transfer was effected. Mr. SIEYART
stated that he thinks the idea of a "pay-off" in instant case was umva.'rranted,' Q k
as he stated the Parole Board oificials were honorable men and, in his opinion,
could not he approached with money. 5 ;., -- -of _
92'v
Mr. STE.-JART stated that it was his opinion that a man, after serving a portion _' __j
of his sentence, was considered for parole ! if his record had been good --
while in prison, and ! if he were considered a good risk. Mr» STE.1TART_ stated.,;i=@;,
that undoubtedly these men's records during their incarceration were good, m j =.¢.
otand he stated that these men certainly were good parole risks. Mr. SIEYARTH '
stated that these individuals are very intelligent men and certainly will n ' '* J
by remote control, he stated that if such were possible, they could do. that inc-1?.-
prison as well as on the outside. i Y_get into any trouble. As fer as any worries that they would handle matters ' ?f'":"- J?
.1
92-
., _.,
Mr. ST';3'u'ART stated that the city of Chicago is the only city where there is such'__ h.
jealousy among leading newspapers. He stated that it is his opinion that JAMES q$ §
DOI1'E'.RTY oi the Chicago Tribune" went to Washington and wanted to see the p8J.O1B_-T
files in this case, and, being refused, decided to publicgly air the paroles.
It is also Mr. STE".JART's opinion that DUI-l-ERTY then contacted Representative.;s:-;,"7-. 1 . ' "l. '.'1 ii -.BEISBEE end started e Gmgression-e_l investigation to secure the parole £92..les= .-'-Mr. s';E;-MRT stated that, in his opinion, the whole matter is a political issnegri-P 2; ;-5but would not further e1aborate"Z>n this statement. -Q
. " - in - J
. 92 av.
. " 35 "" ' I il.~" h+"fe'£'-'.'§3- -
. : . __ .-.1; {I '21?-,,92 i. :,-$2
. - 1 .-31$ . -'2 "'' ?:3;";£?=;i?"-.1 ¢
_-:
e'
'5
5
.1.
1 "-
,
1
It
av ,
ti ru Pp 4.=-Fflv ;
5,-4.1. .F?
'1
4.51'5
4
§~.
it
S.
2--
§_-. -
gs; -, .I:-._._- .-
-é
1..
a14-
Bernese
Chicago rile so-lee - **~=. ii, .
I
_.__.._...-» . . .. 1.. -- . In_ _ _""'T' nunsnan, residence address senneca hotel,On September 2?, 194?, olbhdfEast Chestnut Street, Chicago, business address 154 North LaSa1le Street, w F
Chicago, stated that he was CHARLES GIOE'e civil attorney and had known GIG '
for approximately 10 years. He stated that he first became acquaintedA 4-HGIOE at the time GIGE donated $100 to KORSHAK's camoaien for alderman in the»:dai*~** a '4' "' -'--'- - --:- .,_-.-. 5-the " 48th Ward. KORSHAK stated he was also the attorney for GIOE when Don
GIOE when GIOE was divorced from his first wife
l- _ _ _ ____I KORSHAK stated he lived in the same building with GIOE
and saw him socially quite often. He stated that both
KORSHAK and his wife went out together.
According to KORSHAK, he did not represent GIOE during the BIOFF trial
case when BIOFF '7 York City, but that his name had been brought into theconducted by Special Agent e c
I H . _e +1
,.. .1. _ ,_ -u,.
.-.1;-. rZ.LU "a.
. F .'-=i
i» Beachcomber Restaurant was organized in May of 1939, and that he represented ;¢j$¥ #*
after GIOE was remarried -
GIOE and his wife and .
-ih&'é%i3;$mV 92 , ; ar
in New .1 £ "
informed'
. the government that KOHSHAK had brought $15,000 from Chicago to New_York, and.,;.;, e
had given this money to BIOFF. KORSHAK, at the grand jury hearing, flatlyf »'i2 -
denied having at any thnc acted as a courier between GIOE and BIOFF and having'i
brought any money whatsoever from Chicago to New York. He still, as of this
tine, denies this allegation. He states that after the grand jury hearing __' e
he requested that he be confronted with BICFF and that BIOFF make this statement,~*
to his face. Arrangements were tentatively made for such a meetins but although _
r Irv 1: _.._.__,.___.} :92__. L... .....,.J-J...-. "'LC A-1.-2 -|- Ln... .-ELQRDFJQA c1_ppUc1.:<:au J.U£' Luv mun: u.|..ui_;, Bin/1'11" ulu RG1.» Show up:
- During the time GIOE was incarcerated, KORSHAK and his wife were very friendly§sl;;_§
with GIOE's wife and daughter, and according to KOFSHAK, tried to help them in M Qf
any way possible. He stated that about two or three years ago GIOEs wife had-*-. 1- -- . ea - .1.
. -re .._
.,;,
requested hhn to sell some reel estate owned by GICE and his wife, which real ,'
estate was located at Antioch, Illinois. In connection with the propoe ed sale
of this real estate, KOHSHAK visited GIOE at the Leavenworth Penitentiary, . '
Leavenworth, Kansas, on several occasions. KOHSHAK, at first, was opposed toII
the sale of this property, however, after talking with GIGE and his wife and " =
discussing the matter, it was decided that GIOE would in all probability be
incarcerated in federal prison for many years, and they arrived at the conclusion "
that by the time GIOE was released the value of property would probably have f IL
fallen off and tho money that could be realized from the sale of this reel"
estate could be used to purchase another piece of property if this was felth
desirable. KORSHAK stated that the sale of this property did not materialize. I1.-
3.-.;4"
" ..|
He also advised that all of his visits to GIOE while GIOE was incarcerated;§ J
' were in connection with the sale of the aboveenentioned property. KORSHAK --l
said that the sale pf the property did not materialize because of the faot_i~ ;.s|.
v
n
.a _ _.' Jed -
v§._~-anvil "Crehenna
.-
1
-
~
1
g.
1I 92Q J
DH!':EI92K _ A
Chicago file 58-ISQ
that agreement couJh.not be reached as to what the sale price of $25,0O0t9** #@{il~3*
should include in the way of furniture as well as the house and realty.I
On the occasion of KOR5HAK's last visit to G195, which visit was in May of
194? GIOE mentioned to him that he would be up for parole in July andGICE,asked Konszur at this tone if xoeseax would obtain individual; to write
letters to the Penitentiary stating trot they believed GIOE could be V '»T
rehabilitated in society. At this time, KORSHAK mentioned to GIG that he 5
would suggest that HARRY ASH be GIOE's parole supervisor because of the fact
that ASH was the Suberintendent of Crime Prevention in the
and was an individual who should be above reproach because
KOHSHAK contacted ASH for the purpose of having ASH act as
and ASH agreed to do so.State of Illinois
of his position.
n...._.-.1 .. Q...-..........-I.-..-....
I ru L'U.LU uupv L V LU UK
Ho stated that ASH wrote a letter of a character
reference nature to the Penitentiary, and later executed forms to qualify rq?wL¢H
the position of Parole Supervisor for GIOE. KORSHAK stated that ASH was'e;
definitely GIOE's Parole Supervisor but had become frightened because of the 1_Q
publicity and had gotten hhnself in trouble by denying it. KORSHAK said that 71HASH had discussed a telephone call between ASH and a Probation Agent by the;e¢923j§§1' ,,.~0. :92-I-w
J ?-
if-
92-.--1
M
3."?
' . -1'5' ' I., _.-L1 :,__¥»_ .. g.rm ,-
2'5.
lflj
15.
t
no
I
.--=
- -su J15?
name of COLGSIMO, and that he remembers that ASQ did not tell POLOSIMO thati '*he would not act as Parole Supervisor for GIOE. According to KORSHAK, Ase-" _ ll
became frightened because of the influence exerted upon him by JAtE§fB@HERTY, . "
a reporter for the Chicago Tribune.
KCRSHAK stated that he also contacted LLOYD BUTLER in regard to writing a" '-,
letter on behalf of GIOE, and stated also that DAVID ZISOOK had telephonically=1Y; '
contacted him about writing a letter for GIOE. KOHSHAK said that he advised {
both individuals that it would be perfectly alright to trite such a letter" ' Yi*='
inasmuch as it was common practice for prominent individuals to do so. KORSHAK 1.
stated that ASH came to him at the time the publicity concerning this case ,"
became known, and was very angry about the fact that KORSHAK had asked ASH
to be GIOE's Parole Supervisor. KORSIAK stated that he had told ASH at this
time that because of his position in the Crime Irevention Department and the e.
fact that his office had the necessary machinery set up to watch over parolees,| I-
it was his opinion that ASH's action in this matter had been quite proper and -' '
was no matter for hhn to be concerned about. _ _ Q
KORSHAK was specifically asked if he had been the individual that had mentioned é"
4-»... 4-,-..,+ +1-...+ D'§r192-|.<.v92 c:n"r1."1' -F HI-.1 .1 ha.-J Hz: 1» A F.TF92Ti A ha n nl-m+.-in I11: 4 "*3.-uuu .|_q92_,u uuau £_!.|_:|u.u|_.J un.1_x-1.: 04. o..iC35O uqu. ou¬n892.. u;uu gnu Jau ..-ill:-..=.....~...."......_, '1 _.
denied ever mentioning the Bishop[s name. He stated that he does not know ' _a3{&,;
Bishop SHIEL, has never met htu, and has never contacted anyone in the Bishop8ajt;.i-
Office. KORSHAK said that to his knowledge the name of Bishop_SHlEL originated§* ~¬
th!*0L1g h PI]-L5 .; I 3 , I -.'
, I _ _ _- _l _- Eu W; ._j '1.
*?¬F*s 2 __
F r y
~ ~_ ..'.,
2'.-3 r_=i"-~--'.. '92_ __ ,._ -die_ i l;->1 L I: -is-r,' , >r*:-i-2'3: I "-r LB,
£1-_' -
I z
- - ' i|$" "~' I_ 1| ,, . _ ._ . . at T"i". U It _ " h ' ' 92. " r ' 1 '~ --.¢"., " - "' ¢ '1: ii.- 1L: ."9" r *" -L. - .,;,. ,- . 92- . . - .. .__ . _.,, .7 .. ~_ Y - _ »-. 'l.*'_. -._,-* . - . 92 . if ' -'-1} 2 "~a -ieram-agevn. I.-1,,__,_'*1. -_-.5-7. J_, 1%_=£
A
J
i I _
92- -3-he. xi-¢.;_,.;»,_
n :aaag
M,
-1
_F--.
=1-
-5,
-u .
'3-1.
. 1.:.1 -
x ".1~
k-._, .
r -
U..,_,,,
DEW:EAK
Chicago file 58-194
~ ¢.- _ . V 1
KORSHAK said he believes he heard the Bishop*s name mentioned at another -
time but could not recall who mentioned his name, and he went on to state
that it did not strike him as peculiar inasmuch as Bishop SHIEL maintained
a service wherein he provides parole supervisors, parole sponsors and jobs
for parolees. KOHSHAK stated that Bishop SHIEL was very active in this
field.
at the present time working for trn Consolidated According to KORSHAK, GIOE is
in Chicago, but it is KORSHAKs belief that in * Wire and Associated Companies
}STEVE HEALY who is a prominent subway contractor in the city of Chicago.
KORSHAK stated that he believed the present investigation by the Congressional
Committee is the "kick-off" for the next election, and that it is also a
contest between the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun. He said that the
Tribune is blaming the whole thing on the Democratic Party, whereas the Chicago;t'
Sun is blaming the Republicans. 1 ~w. -~""v-1,.-.4'
.' -'
_, ,, . -4 Ji_,_ _ _,*-~ he .. .émqpah pa H
$#»>9» 1 -. 9 92 --. .1. - _ I-.-"-1-' . -.
5. 'f.. __,1 35
@§ '-e.. ,. .. t7 ., i t
ti! u
the near future GIOE will terminate this employment and accept a POSitiOD'I1§hiéé",£3,:
|
I_ 92 r
' a
0
.15u- .I: .'.'-.!ll ¢. ' -_ e~ ti "-' -. #1;
At the time the Subjects were transferred from the Atlanta Penitentiary.to the
leavenworth, Kansas Penitentiary, KORSHAK stated that he was in the Armed'" r
Services and that he did not know of these transfers until after they had been
completed. '
According to KORSHAK, GIOE is a person who could probably be paroled, and
' KORSHAK stated that he believed Gl0E should not have been convicted in the.=
BIOFF trial in New York City, but that it was a question of a man keeping
bad company. Ho stated that he knows casually CH1PhGNA and DE LUCIA, but 'r
has only a speaking acquaintance with these two individuals. He stated that o,
he knows of no irregularities or money payments on the part of the Subjects
to secure their paroles.
KORSPMK was asked if he had received any money from any of the Subjects, and
he stated he had not been reimbursed for his visits to GIOE while GIOE was
incarcerated, however, he expected someday that he would be reimbursed for
his expenses.
.3--5 §$ 1 ?I 1- .~' . . -Q:
5 _ 38 _ tip;
E in. - - 1"- _| J F ' Z
r . , -
-seeif. .,.
:'1||||*l --.-.; r.: :7 _
ll
.'= 4',-.1
., 0- _ i ,TY r~,.|- ',_. - _
. Is?--ex -- .,»-ax.-gs.¬.- 3ti:-~1* a =4
/
I
92-
? F- 'n,92 ,.- -._ _.. _.-,-.' -A
J,-.1 L J.
4.. .-~ -
run .45r.¢ - -
-Ii" 92' -
. .¢-- --s3 * 1i»-resisitu ' '; ~i¬.-- ~
~ * ~v.. s1s1 - ~~. ,r-..~ A' '1-'.. "
' 9. ' - "
.;~. .~.- = -1, .-1-. '.-it .. ..-'1-1 ___ r W ...--._,..-. i . J ,_- 7 _,~_ __I;_-»_':2f;=::§;-":i -i -- _l
*3':.w *1 Y ~ 3 .- = » . .~*eet>' 5' " ,1".-' v-1*...-K _w. _. . .""'q1¢f',,I'_ H. ; ,_. I ' I - I _ i .__.. -r .-.1l_4,>.- . 1.
. 5'"/-.- *1f
_.._,.
Chicago Filene. 58-191» ,92,-;_;';_"-Q, "Rem» 1, ~ e i
. vI+J_i._~ 0.1 V __.-j. 7...
HI-
r
-0-¢92
subjects until August ll, 1916?. Mr. FISHER stated that on August ll, he receiveidi. their respective parole plans in letter form, the letters dated
19 ? - - " *:-. 'e it-§~
1 -re J...g .1. u
0with respect to the parole plan of C!{ARl.E.S GIOE, I.-Ir. FISHER stated that he, 5, L
received a. letter dated August 6, 19147, from MI" 17- LJIEAGLEY, 3l1PE1V15°1 °£ ' - _
Classifications arid Paroles, Leavenworth, eu August 1.1, 1914?. This letter eet 2':
forth the sponsor of Mr. GIOE as HARRY A. ASH. This letter stated that the _ " . --parole of C'nP.l" LIES GIOE was to be effective August 13, 1914?. It was poixlted ' o " 7"-4.- . ' 'out by 151-, P155138. that his office felt that HARRY A. ASH would be ahgood '
. sponsor; however, after the publicity in instant case, Mr. ASH advised Mr._'~
COLOSIMO of Mr. FISHER's office that he did not care to serve as sponsor
CHARLES GIOE. _ -. » --'- " " ii
v -, ;_'¥>'§ $55
- 'i_."'<,:.7',.
_ _.. '5 _ . ... ,_ _ .._.,.,- _ .¢_.. ,5 . J|_',L__k¬ ,--92___,IThe parol as also received by Mr. FISHER'S office'on'f V, 5-
August ll at Leavenworth. - i -
with respect to the parole plan of cezsmczrh, FISHEEI stated that his o££ioe"'_'_"§i',~ H
was advised of CAIAIPAG1-JA's pending parole by receipt of a copy of a letter 1Ihich'_"""'Q
Mr. TEAGLEI had directed to n0R0Thtr-emtPhc1aA, daughter of LOUIS cAmPAcNa._;..'-H '*_;;;.',,;,
With respect to the p¬I1CLiI1g parole of DAh'DPE.A, mo. FISHER stated that his -err1ee'.2r.eu -
was advised of this parole by a copy of a letter dated August 8, l9h7, addressed *"-'_.1l_
to H. SiLAPIRO. '
: ..= ~
Mr. FISZ?£.P» stated that the letters he received direct, as well as the copies or ,
the letters, were all dated August 5, 19147, and were all received by his officeAugust ll, l9h7. He stated that this was the first indication that his of_fice""
had with respect to the pending paroles of the subjects. Each of the four letters --
stated that the parole was to be effective August 13, 19147» _ -'.-.1 '.L . 4 c
{_.£_.
Mr. FISHER stated that oh the morning of August 12, 1914?, he received a telephocé .-1_'t_f;,';
call from Mr. D. L. mom at Leavenworth, at which time Mr. YEAGLEY advised -;-'_...,-~.f..=_1~"'
FISHER to ezqvedite the investigation of the parole plans, wire him that date
concerning the results of the investigation, and to follow the wire by a vrrittehreport on August 13. 19h'I. ur. FISHER stated that this call from mom,. ~ "=. *"=i'~-"-'-"'-*.*:<':l$'1'..-l'CHARLES W.JTF'ISEE, Chief United States Probation Officer, Northern Di trict fLewig iiepternber 29, l9h?, by Special agent ; ,3,-.
F15;-{E31 stated that his office was not aware of the pending paroles of the h'~l*] f
-|_ '-.
_g 7 4
I.
Jc4
F
:-
>
-1_5¢¢ -
g. ,92,-Liv!.- .4
Q -tn9;.-sea-'
..,, .
1» *
5.
-.
E
q .
_ ,.,-all:1. J 1'92 K
Chicago File No. 5=§l9L92
HER:LI.-51..
Officer, Parole Board, Washington, D. 0., and that D'ANDREAs parole plan '5"
:.-.--.-.._-I--: »-.-I-4,-.,-92 -m-.19 +»92 hm av»-92nrH|.r>H- KY1-_u|_yu;|_,_,_E¢u4_v,i "eh; vv My ~. ..:.- vvvvv -1 up- -i..-.r.. .....-e.. -.-_- 1_n ._ew o_ .__ie
the investigation of the parole plan Of UR D'1u'92iDREA was mailed direct to IO,1»-
. ,, ~_ ,'§_?f:
. ..""
. , ,
armw . i1-1"'.<-221:: .-=+.=.+. rl +.hh+. ' vi i th , 4'- "J
H *~I.-,1,
§ . ->e:;a§;;si3}etug :3 1?
.-=,,_. ;'-FM. .
1, ,.'1.
u
1
in washinstsn rather than to the Warden at Sprinsfield, Missouri. Mr. -1--vs.t»;
FISHER stated that his office conducted their investigation and wired. A:-1, ,7
I_gav9nwQr92j,11 August l2, 19h? of their approval of the parole plan, and---' _ >5-
followed the wire by their written report the following dw, Augllst 1.3» '
Mr. FISHER stated that, in his opinion, there was nothing unusual about 92
instant paroles other than the great amount of publicity received and the --
.<~..»..92- 4-A-v+ 1.-: .-. f921F92ll"92A 1575.: e-sins:-1 +.n Q-u-marl-I+.n em-n~nvn'I nf than narnla n'1:n1.q- "Lckuu uzluu 113.0 kl.LJ-J-92492.. Iru.-.| Isl-92-JL92921H92 --v U...-,1-av-.---.' -r'1¢----u.-- --- ----- ;-------- 7-- --v
J-Mr. F1515}? stated that he had no information concerning any irregularities ,
in connection with the paroles of the subjects of this case. Mr. FISHER."<<1. .,-3
pointed out that it was not too unusual to be requested to expedite i.nves_ti- 1""--""
been out conducting investigations of parole plans and have found that the .
men have already been released 0m the institutions. Mr. FISHER did state,
however, that normally speaking, his office had on an average of four to -
five weeks to investigate parole plans. . j
L11. FISHER stated that because of the backgrounds of these men, he felt his -
office should have had more time, and stated that he had learned one thing, ,
that he was never again going to expedite an investigation of a parole plan, .-
regardless of where the request came from. He stated that he did not know.-
how much time 1.5;-, YE,AG]_,EY at Leavenworth was given; that is, he did not knot!
when the prisoners submitted their parole plans. Mr. FISHER stated that it
is the custom that as soon as a parole plan is submitted to the penitentiary,
same is forwarded to the Parole Office covering the district in which the man
intends to reside after his releasee Because of this, 1Jr= FlSF..-.- stated that
his office has received many parole plans a short period after the incarcera-
tion of the prisoner.-_. !=-,-,. v 921., -.3 i _§f_~_.
_¢ _0 ,_492 ipI
; 3'
r
.92.,.-,.1
. ..
gation of parole plans, and pointed out that in some instances, his men have*'-_I-'-£5 .-
3.,..,,.
.-92..~¢
../.
- 1
_ 4,_.Ll ;
_ '-ii.1-?l '4. 5%!
I
"i §
, }H1'92I4
,-
92. '_;|I11
F .
xvi
-it
4
.-.,P
:-
'4
A
I
>!- -l x ". ', J, ._..7- ,;.. 9215- -*1-,
.-.m *-.: . 4- 0..
1 u
. ,a
.'92r
V
l Mr. FISEEIR stated that his office had received medical certificates to the -
effect that DAIID?EA was in need of medical attention, and his office had
granted permission for D'A.?.YDP_EA to enter the Mayo Brothers Clinic at -
Rochester, Minnesota, and that recently D'ANIJRE.A has requested the permissionto enter another clinic. . . --;'~T:;,'. _ ,_ __
Mr. FISHER stated that each of"thEe parolees would personally appear monthly",I 4
92 K., I
"r
1
{Y_-ye,at his office. He pointed out that in some instances, parolees are given "'1'permission to mail in their monthly forms. However, in this particular O&ee,""'_'-'"'jfi"-H,Mr. FISHER has already instructed that these men appear personally between tw.
*.
the first and fig? of a month to report on their activities t»hB.pT6CBdiJ1E,,;1-Q-;a-;f;;,bj;!S%:t1,month. Mr» F131 stated that the usual custom is that these men will ff "";_,_';I'-.'I;-_'.'@ ".-". ~ - -._ | k ;" -.-
_ 40 _ _ -I _ ...+_.."
_ _ _ . _i .___.__._¢._. _ ,__ _, _ __ __ __ 92_ r . .- - - ' - ' ' ¢92 2» ,. ..-v _ . " _ Q1 - v'¢n--e __ . - - . - - -.1. -'-_ -~. - - a ".- -.,_>;~._.',n.-..v 4-' .1-92.*¢""-."".-ml-1*""=Ih-fI~lhfL*$ 92
u
1
1
-1.M!
Q
*4,' I_?.~n:I
it
@-
11
FF
e$w»A.
qr-_
£1
£2,
?5--~= 5.-in
,.|.n
4
$14-,=.
. v'?iI~-as-"~
so
J Residence 515 Becloxith Lane, Crete, Illinois 'CI;._z~ i - 4., -:--F c ~ F. & _. .Qt:-J 1 i-
92.
t '-E:3 H
.---1_/..7'.» . '92 .45.-- -. -.=. -1.: 1: -1-.~;. 2:1.A,
Chicago File No. gs-19L, '-;
RF3R=L71' ;. st-Lg? -
contact one of his men and arrange for an appointment some day between the H
first and fifth of each month, at which time they would come in, furnish L11
FISHER with their ntonthly reports, and be interviewed by the Parole Ofi'icer_t-_;;,;1handling their case. " it,
I 1' 11 - mi
1-, , _ Fm 'P"' t;_Concerning the eddresses and employments of the four parolees under lira, t-P-~*,,__-LFI51m{|S jurisdiction, he advised as follows: - t _ , e :5,
V i i__PHILIP D'AN1JRE.A Q i
mloyment I{rispy392Zlean Vegetable COmp&I'1J, _'-t '
139 Ll0'0.th -Tater Street, Chicago, ' 'Illinois _. -~.- :.c.~;;;,;
Because of in-. D'AEJD; ~_EAs health, Mr. Flszen stated that he has been given ,_- i
permission to enter various medical ClLI1iC5 and has not yet reported to work; _ 1;; '_._ _1
U A. ;..;-r . ||-,-- t ll_ it - - t--'51-*' =PAUL Deb.-CIA .- 92 w.Residence 812 Lathrop Avenue, River Forst, Illinois ' - -' '-Z3» ,
Employment - Faim:Lng 100 acre farm Kendall County, Illinois!
LOUIS C!92j.l.!.P¢}IYA _
P;esid<.~nce 2927 South Liaple, Ben.-yn, Illinois -.- -
EmplCyT-Rent - Farming two farms - one at Fowler, Indiana, and""- Q
Qnn gt. Barri _.:_1__r*. F~9211~'Irgrrs:_ Minhivnnl _.. _..-.. .. ._.,,.....c,.., .._..._ _.°.._-,ul -9292
v
' _5 .;:'i f.' . H '
_.. I;-
CIUXPLES GIOE V 1 ' ' " ,92
Chicago, Illinois t
Employment - P. L. 1-£!J92I~I, Consolidated Wire and Associated
Companies, 1635 South Clinton Street, Chicago, "t" , _
Illinois, as a salesman at a salary of $714.00 Y -71- _ e
per week. Mr. FISHER stated that the Consolidated ,1
92.92_'-I-r~.c= nn Ilqv-:nr~'*v+. A F. 92| . ' Ind r3Q_ '1 - D |"92Y'Y1Z"Y'92I IS-|,.,¢v.., um I92.z§;nv92-r.¢_g9292092-.92_,., 92,V 92 .|.,,.H~b;,-; '1¢
wire. - 1 " "
1 92'
. *1 -' ,-
"ill-L
»
IV cl
av
3
:-
-.. 1,/-. . . ' _ "- ' .- zne
at ~ t"Residence - Seneca Hotel, 200 East Chestnut Street I. __- aria»
1 weJ-
.»
- -.r
L I
n
-o19:.
92'! t.rt -P
.,.,* _.L".-'3 *'
he - -
*1 .1
lV-|lu _ 92' u.>2 "." B4
Chicago File 58-194 " CRER:lab - D ¢ , -- . : -*."t-at s I-M." ' Ur->. . - e »FRANCIS J$:CURRI, 16 western Avenue, Joliet, Illinois, was interviewed in 1-1,
the Joliet Res i o ° 947 by Special Agents ,
,~ - '. . '>;",:. -, ,;}.,- up ;It will be noted that this office has been attempting to locate and interttiew ff :1-Hr. CURRY since September 24, 1947 nd that on September 29, Mr. CURRY "ét_'_~ ,-,;"§,'?__"".,f?telephonically contacted Agent at the Joliet Resident Agency Office-if _%=-;'1"'-,'T.1"_92-'*»_,.:.'*and stated he would be available or interview on September 30, at which ;;'[{§Q'§.§ Ifhe was interviewed. ' ' .l»_V;.-"5..;.,
- .,-, - . . _. > .A-7..-.1Mr. CURRY readily admitted that he had been hiding because he thought that I ' --
}1;he FBI had a "ticket" for him, in connection with the Congressional hearing ._ M
in the parole matter. I-Ir. CURRY stated that after checking around, he found . ,_ V
that the FBI was not serving subpoenaes in connection with the Congressional,-- '». j 1;,hearing, therefore he contacted Itéentt 9'"
v
Mr. CURRY, when asked his occupation, stated "farming". He advised that he
was personally acquainted with all oi the parolees in this case. Hr. CURRY: " ,-,._.;
stated that he had never had any business transactions with aw of the parole '__,"?
with the exception of PAUL DE LUCIA. e T I. . 1.:
Mr. CURRY advised that just before DE LUCIA's incarceration, he rented U
DE LUCIA 's 1.100 acre farm in Kendall County, Illinois. Mr. CURRY related 1;
that each year's rent was applied against a mortgage on the farm, which was Eheld by the Prudential Insurance Company at Springfield, I11inois.-- He advised-2,3, I,
that it was his unclerstanding that the original mortgage was $100,000 and *" '--9."-I1"v
that the balance at the present time is in the neighborhood of $75,000. - I ~» "'92?._"1-,.'~_,_-
Mr. cuss! stated that the DE LUCIA farm was a very profitable one and that .', ;Q;
he took 1,550,000 off of the farm last year. He stated that at the present , . ~,
time, 900 of the ll00 acres are under cultivation, consisting of grain crops J
of wheat, corn and soy beans. In the remaining 200 acres, there is maintained -~.~[_i_*
a herd of 200 head of cattle. ,- , ee;]
Mr. CURRY stated that in his opinion the paroles of the subjects were secured '
in a normal manner, and that these men were eligible for parole or theywould
have remained in custody. tir. CURE! was asked if he had any information as
to whether any monies had been paid in connection with the parole of the fivesubjects, and he stated as follows: "Now really, if I knew of monies being ,._,_**__1f¥92;,T_Tf'*-';v55'-',
paid you wouldn't expect me to tell you, but honestly I think the idealof .
monies being paid in connection lth these paroles is foolish. In my opini'on,_;,* V
the whole thing is a fairy tale." CURRY stated that it is his opinion that*,;;..~_' 1,,"Representatives BUSBY and HOFFMAN are seeking free publicity and that the "kn?-1__=_ .,';§-'3?"Chicago Tribune" s aiding them in that manner. Mr. CURRY stated that ne@-e;;§§%§:§
has never discusse the parole with any of the subjects, has seen none of"the1',;;"l.i-9;=,; W
we ,%~$.i-t- -parolees with the xception of DE LUCIA, and has only talked to'him in connac _ '_
. ~ ,:'e£¢;1e#'-92
.'- ' 1 .5? i,-'1-" 15$;tion with the farm
_ 43 ...
7 ~' 1" W 7 I _ ',_, A:; ._-Q... ,,
.- ,~..:- eon»--*.»-. .~ -~.e. .-.,..t_ .=~r~...._;~_.-e.":+', - = __ - v . . 11' "'' __*"' f _ -,8 _'_ _ ' " _92 - . -_,__- -_ _ _' r ' - 92 ' -- ,-fwe _ -1-I ."'k *7» _v3.._ ;, 92_
,_ i .
ff 3+:
ii
vi. .*1 anw.
?..
.
J
1.
us
4.
é.¢.f Y- r. M 92{
P w _14r-.
?'iI~.uea N, A
3
_, ,
2
§.:'~_'. -'s~:='_..'
5- -j*'_'. '
tat:
:1 1..." >.92. .E ¬~
%*'_j I.- 1'2.
Chicago File 522-194 .
REH:1ab 1 5
¥Mr CUPPY stated that he wrote a letter to the warden at Ieavemvorth, Kansason-beheif of DE LUCIA on the request of Mrs. DE LUCIA. He ST-£1-ed that 0'6!!!
than this letter he took no part in the securing of these paroles, that is,- .1-.» 92 J I v
92 | I
Fe-_'>._.
:'|':92 .qr-.
5 1 ._.;;F}Lg@
. 4- .|
he never contacted anyone to write letters and no one contacted him,
exception of Mrs. DE LUCIA. _ . . _
-.
ii"..-
_. *_ _ -. '1>._- 1: '~= -J92- . - - , ._ .._-,....- ex, M "_---__.»-* ,_*_,.-Hr? - "1. V J -I In.,-» 1 ;, --°{-we }_| _ ,,
1, ..' ;i I.
_".~4_r£ .
.;:,vO
t
.1 .7__ -r -.
- - -_ ?"_ _ . _
-"f*r?.i_92_ -,.'-.2 5
-TL -.l_ xi-_. -4.-' ".15 "__'»,-'. n*=~'- "':'-'.- 1*"-
",- --_z'-1". . .-~ *..---~¥:- *-av_'-Z ,|,: - - .-:4 ":2
. ."*'!'*" -
.. 1 I, '_
_ gr. _s .
.~J
L-A
¢' » ... - .1 . .._' I ' .---h_ -3'1' e
r-'_. . ,, 14.'- = "'- -" -4-.»-=;-@:._'.
- ' -'-faPi .
- ",_ r. l"'L,-. ... If
0-
-q >r
19211q ~r
,» .
*-M _.
.1 5 -J _V| 'v ' I I _ .
E1 92-3,.p ..';::_!; .1?
.. 3- '- . .f92_ _ . ' _ Q, = ».. --.5; ' ~ ' . '- '5-7 J! 2' I. ..-- *<';.+;f;¢ - .
.~ - --:;r1-.=..' '1 2. ,, 9. {._-5'-.1; -, r - . ' '.»- Q -{,1 1+ g
.
" 45 ' T1. 5;-*:."§=--7
:9I m I. -. _- _
§ I. L
bl. '5" ' ;'.'}"*
"" QIPZ 4 " a - ._ ," . -I
. ~+.. . or *- - *'92," *=£,>"""'92'92-*5"'#In-{'1 4TH: .
5'
L»
!
1
-8
a _
-:6-.-s
Q, 92~=_1-e
F;-223';
.4.
__A 5 -~ F_ _§;'._;_v|; . L.-
92-
.. u '.1E ;.'.~--._.1<..4. ..-.0" '. ..'-*
J11L -k
w
W
- -3:.-.4Chicago File se-194 I . DE"'i:l b = | $ r _-, - -. l R §; _ _ _- g.¥_£-|§_:*:l?;.. I
The followii anveeii ucted by Special Agents _'
On October 2, 1947, roams creams tsmstsra, Room 1424, 10 South LaS-alle Street, F;
Chicago, Illinois, was interviewed and advised that he and T. E. REIN of his * .
office had represented as LUCIA in regard to DE LUCIA being Out on bond bet'vree,n'j,;"_j.,. -Qthe time of his sentence in 1943 and the time that the appeal would be decided- Eel.-;.i§_ _
by the Circuit Court of Appeals. He stated that this bond had been refused by _§$
~- the Circuit Court, and the services of HEIN and CHESLER had not been any longerrf-;@§-eeisglneeded by DE LUCIA. -.
[}.L1l'3SL};;R stated that they came into the picture ciginally through ED¥7ARI1_ {i-
who resides at 704 Jackson Boulevard, Oak Park, Illinois. CHESLER understood _"
that MONACO knew DE LUCIA and also knew that REIN was an excellent trial", ._ - .
lawyer, and therefore suggested to DE LUCIA that/he retain REIN. _ ' I'"'.-_~,e-Q1 .-at_ 1 4,. ,
. -< . 3;" In regard to the letter written by 111-. 'no1mI%v, which letter was suggested
by CEESLER, CHESLER said that ED r.;om.00 or DELUClA's wife had asked him_to ., _ _rask Dr. LEV to write this letter. ; _, "..¥'_¢£"
During the recent Congressional hearings in Chicago, T. E. HEIN. again repre-l: -Q '
canted on LUCIA and cnassse said that :.;ore.c0 and oz were arranged this repre- . _ -
sentation. ' - '
CHESLER has no 1cno"r:le:1,_'-;e of any irregularities in connection with the securing --
of paroles. -. ' ~_;_* "-'
.g,T;?1$:=<5-1'' .. ,,, 7-5..
,-_ _,,..»'.,-!_ ,1
I
i .
H. -_-_
v--->5.- we /H
hm,.92 ,,*__..',,r. re _"1 2;__ ,-4».
1 -t__.'i 3.» . 7' ' .-"'5'.c.5_~; .2
-.>-:-it*;<' 1- ,?_'I,'!""",_~aI!"r 1 . ~-d
- ' T ..f.Q -._ ._ _ v -44 - -
-. L :;':..1.-;;eg§g:ef.~
. - l- J-F-1-_ ., .-ad-_. _1- _ I .=-- - -" '-'92 .,.......__.. _ .. -- 4-- -- --~- ---_ q~_ i|___ . _ -- WP-f~_ 1- _.., _ _ _ _ _ __ __ , . _ _ , __ _ 92 > _. luv--. -0" .- r . .1 ,. . .._ . _ - _- t ,- ,92 , , ,._ U , I ,- _ _ _'- 4'1: - - 1, "_ " i .1"I-4 . - . ' - - L ' i K" -' ' I 7' ; "5 1 . "L4 - ' 92 1" ' "J ' p%-:_ i 1. r _ n P "1-_.___ _ r - _,__ u -.t 9292_ _ _ X ..,;_r _. ,1; - _. ~__ <?__92J-Awail
2--..e ._-
-':"- "
t '~<.=
E92.R
1
s
4
i
1
i:
S
e
av
" ..' Iic
P 5.4.11,-.
I-KI- ..'i§"
W, ,
4
T"
P
'::
.
Q, _
§.922'
;. .,. -_5 l-3" ._ .,...-. _ 1< -fa _
/ H1. f, _.1 I 1', 1 1 _.t 3» 1 E
._
'lI.
,1. .
Chicago File 58-19% I if-ii.J. I n__ -I ' '~_/ 1' '' DB.-':A.-.J I ' .. -i.=~""""r;; ?'_=:. - ;.~-'. {'1 ",' 0. . . ""%E+ §*The fol 1 F was conducted by Special A;;ents ;- E, 1
., ,-_ 1- s I .
92 £,_,J L;
axazs L.s>1Ii<,=_;.i', 2101 Clarence Avenue, sewn.-n, Illinois, was interviewed and goadvised that he had visited CAYPAGTA while he was incarcerated in the company-*f '
of 13LIZ.~ ».F,E.J'H ,'A."PAGI£A, his sistcr and dPAGI§A's wife. He stated that the. _ '
reason for the visit was that he had been discharged from the P-zrrny in the
latter part of 1945 and had not seen CATPAGHA for several years. He stated tatti
during the visit no E.B1'1tiOn was made of paroles or transfers, that it was pur_e_J_.!n
a social visit and that he did not see CA'.'PAC-ETA subsequent to that time While?-"7*" "_
he was incarcerated. S}-II;~I£Ji' stated that he had no knowledge of irregularities -Fr payraents of money in connection with the securing of CA-*FAGNA's parole. - ' I a '. . "R
ifnen qicsti:-no-.1 s;v:ci:"i_ca11;,' as to the source of the iun=_1s used in payment , i L
of Cf92_'. A.i.-I..'~-.'s incszf.-3 ta:-zc-s, L3iZIn}L.I could supply no information on this .
matter. SIfI1.AI."i at-fined L he Em"-lO;»'¬d at a Balaban and Katz"'I'heate_r f_1.n_-,1 rd ;=-5
Evanston, Illinois at the present time. - I
:I.j_§|:.'_¬ In!
..- ,,
<92
v.
-
1|
¢.
' ¢%,r'T¥?
I
: _ "_ .- '?'-r.1"~'i .-- ,-.1 .-7 - e ; :6-m'
.. F ~11?
' 3:"-_'92¥§H
, ' "5'
> ;
92-or Q . <1-" . " 92, .' Jr-¥ I-i__n. .i ' _-- 2»1. - - _ :-I 3 . . I .
3-__'_i.§|5»'; _,2 - v-"-~e":3.f"»i.v"-= ' .- rr . Y .. at
w '
._~ yi . iv .V
PI <., - 1 *_ -4- ._ .., 1' -- *' :1-'1'. 7' .* ".~1:' a" 1 ~. ¢ . 92 ,_ r 4; H..1, 1~.,_ is |_ A ."' _ -92=.r 5.
, -.-.1 vi V~ 1"=l'"f~¢1--
Z 1 _ 1' _ ,. _. =. -4. 7 __ .- -i .7: _ I - "- .-' cl ,,, _-¢...1._-P-..F-dis ---_- ace. --- __ _ _ e e st - ' 4*?
. . -If
.»__ 4- -7-£na--_ ii? __ ,, um-_ -* awn "- -" - ~- ._ } . _-. -_ ' "'-'2, .'.-r 1' . . "-' * T" --F ,- '5 - 92 " *. , _ , 2 . -..,..- '' ..', F ' 1. _ - |_ , - h*1. .-¢92_--sq, -..- ash -an _, _
kn. ' V J .
, __'; ._ _.Q;,,_.. J .
nemsax : _ PChicago file se-194 ' K "f _j;'-",.._ ';
7%. ¬The followin invee-ti ation was conducted by Special Age:-1t A" 3"-id'-:--w.~r-.~-J J1.
On September 2?, 1941, Dr. MORRIS WILLIAM Liv, Room 51e, 104 South Michigan -.="Q-;
Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, was interviewed and advised that he had written' xv
a letter to the Parole Authorities on behalf of Subject DE LUCIA. V V
Q 1of MORTON crmszzs, 10 South ns'.n.3;
this letter and that csssim had .,j.;§';_~3#"~*"_:,¢;¢
and requested his help in securing " ' "Dr. LEV stated that an attorney by the name
Street, Chicago, had requested him to write
stated that Mrs. DE LUCIA had contacted him.», _
" this time or letter. . *> '
gczcording to Dr. LEV, he had known DE LUCLA since March ll, 1941 as a patient
I d had no other contacts with JE LUCIA except as a patient. He stated that
since DE} LUClA's parole, DE LUCIA had been to see him on two occasions as a
patient. _ - ; -'
. ., ': -- -.1-Q
Dr. LEV stated that at the time CHESLER had requested him to write e letter;,on;-<1:-rt
behalf of DE LUCIA, CHBSLER had submitted to Dr. LEV a rough draft letter .1. 1;
which LEV was to use as a guide, but LEV stated that he refused to use this _ Lg
letter as a guide and wrote one of his own composition. -. .1,
Dr. LEV stated that he did not know any of the other four paroleee or any of
the attorneys in the case, and that he had no knowledge of any irregularities
or payments of money in connection with the parole secured by the Subjects. _ - !-
I_. =, _. .. " e ~ -92., - '' . J
¬
. .| =.,_'__,_'_
..=-. -"
s .1 +.. 2 _,
r
-.
I>
1/"'
92..
~1*=<-.'-.3f- 43¢..._ ';.:;r!.
.: -=1 '12».- . .- _ ,
§-:1 I
1 .92-1,-_,. ~ 7..., '
ft. _-n».--1
I ___ i -- . -4' '..-_~.' .1. .. _ _ ,_ A . 92__ .- ., _ -_-r, ' *'_;,'.-. I, . 92,,,-_ I ~ ~_-a~.¢- -1» ,.._ _ J C. - In -u ____-Y*-.>¢_»-¢""_>-.-_~_~ """..~ =-4"! _ 1 . sh-M-_____'~ , _ _ -'__' .--'. ..""- J
__ .3.. .--- - - .2 - V4 :
. ?" ~"1.".l--Ila 8 'and
M
J
1
J
<1
R
I A .
Q _. -33.7.-Q
i, *+*'}-r1
}'=92."I~-ht"
..,,, .
92-
.
e
.
.
e
e-Ir.
.1.
w
L, K,
r
Chicago File ho- 53-1
REE :LP.[L 3 1
2~ ' z_ The follgiii iiiiniiiation was conducted by Special Agents
WALTER J."§LJL1=33-IGS, Cha;LIma.."1 of the Board of Directors of the Continental
Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, 239 South LaSalle
Street, Chicago, Illinois, was interviewed on September 29, l9hT¢ Mr. .
no-an--=4-r-g_I'P92_!'! _1__-ii.:| J.2_,.J- -1-1...... 92:nI'92~'!l'I1l-92 .-.4 4-ha !I11 A+ -In +h-T4: r~-nan P-171:1: ntnna "I-.nL_,U{,]_|-,11_,iL.1Q aClVlSBD. Lvlldb UHU JG--LU-J-U U4. 92-Inc auudwuvg 4,4; vu-4.9 vaow 4-.|.-snv 92I§Illl92d vv
L his attention through a nehspaper article quoting some of the testimony of
" Attorney PAUL DILLON of St. Louis, Missouri. The newspaper stated that PAUL ~
DILLON had testified that he had gone to'Weshington at the request of an _
ofiicial of the Continental Bank, Chicago, Illinois, to arrange for theE92
ta
a .. ____ _,_-,.-
-c. 41?.-
*-.'92|
.|,
.».,.ei, - 92..,_ _-a _»' "'4 -. ! J,,4 l -' ", V-In.
.. _:
transfer of some of the prisoners from Atlanta, Georgia, to Leavenworth. _Mr. -
CULQEEGS stated that after noticing this article in the newspaper, he imediately.
had a meeting called of all of the officers of the Continental Bank, and'a sked""§@
them at this conference if any of them had had any business or financial transi-W
-V-.+-inns 'u1'92'+j1 +.Hc: r-m1-'n'1 nos: and whcthnr Q1 _I1Qt thav '.-.,'¢=92'rn :u;c::_1_a-En'l;.mj_ with 'P'HTT. I - IGUVJ-Vlzq II_$.92IAi -.- V 1."..- - V 92 J U Q - n ' - - - v. _.. wv .--v - -I -_ - --.-. --_-
DILLON, a St. Louis attorney. Mr. CUMMINGS stated that none of the officers QL; p
was acquainted with PAUL DILLON or with any of the parolees, and that none
the officers had ever been contacted by anyone relative to assistance in
securing paroles or the transferring of the prisoners. »o£f1_@
yr, QUERJNGS stated that the "Chicago Tribune" contacted him after the testimony"
of DIL:ON, and he made the statement to them that none of the officers of his .bank had had'any dealings with PAUL DILLON or the parolees» --M_...' :4*1
Mr. ARCHIEZREVIE, Auditor of the Continental Illinois National Bank_and Trust~;¢LsrCompany of Chicago, was interviewed, and he was requested to search the files 1,;;
of his bank to ascertain whether or not any of the perolees had ever maintained '
' an account or had any transactions with his bank. Hr. REVIE was given the
! savings accounts; ! commercial accounts, or ! safe-deposit boxes.
Mr. REVIE was also requested to check the bank's Real Estate Dpartment, but _;-*"
he advised that he could not check the Real Estate Department by name inasmuch53_:;as it was necessary to have a specific transaction in mind before the files of i;¤=
the Real Estate Department of his bank could be checked
- 1: .~' ,' , .
I 1 YT."-i.i*-1 ~ - I I
1.. _~_» -_; - : i . ..47 -. . I-.*n=E',. :~
i - "£33?
r - I
t La-.».,._,.,i___ ..:~ 4.1__ :-V:-..-,. ..-....._,.":.-..-..., -MA 1..-, '1-1+, -. "A"-: .-..-..-1 +1.-92+ 1...-. 1.-.,..-I at-........-1 .. ....,.-Q.-,1.. 41LcLI_l1&::; U1. M18 .LJ..Vt: £_JQ_|,92}-i-GED, cluu up, LGUGL au.v.J.:|92;92.I- uuuu MU tn:-9292.92 uauauu cl DEG-Lu _
y E. .- , L-Ti 4to be made, and that his bank had no record of any of the parolees ever havingn *_t.-
g-
? 7
I _ . iii:-Egg. __,_
.13 |_o.i_._.-- -be-B--0--f 42;-
-I-oi ~n
Q
Eh.
92_ |--;-, _
1. .
al
-ll '
v1
,
.|J.
v1 '' F
.1,
S
.1
14
4;
W
4
1. '3',<
' 4
.,4
'vl
I_. ._.4i. r._q,1.; 1
an?
v
1 :1n
,-1:
. ~ . , .. _ -, -' ' _'_.- - 3' 'It-92;.,hk _ .. -_-. _ 92-_ _ __ -.,-_ ._ . H-'___f__ :--5;.-... 5 K
uav
4
P
I" '3'-'¢"G
at ""~"
524$
-we
1
Z
a74 ..'~ §.l92"ate--. 92, ___!__ 1e .' -
, t
. . ' Our1-!-' .
"i
920 .
w- "i .-..'_r_é
Chicago File8-194 ' '- "_'~,_
mmlab ' a ..ef-,1r§."'f'"".?
W _l .
sir B Chili!-IY, Salesman, International Harvester compan 5 Sou ";5;';§?¬}fL'
Mr MC CAHTHY IeS1.d8S at 854 reen ,j,»
Street, Chicago, Illinois. His telephone number at his residence is Rlcliffe ,1
r I I: -,__-I.
Mr. LIC GARTH! advised that in 1929, he began working for the Interr1ati0nal__-,1.-:'_*1:,Tf5 Q:-F
Harvester Company, and continued this employment until 1942, at which time, L _.
he left to work for the Chicago Bridge and Iron Company as superintendent-_oLf
material at Seneca, Illinois. Mr. MC CA.RI":l'1' was employed by the Chicago ifBridge and Iron Company until the latter part oi 1945, at which time he - ' 1;
came back and resumed his duties as a salesman with the International Harvester,
Company. "K 1 _
~l - H. .: .
Mr. MC CARTHI stated that after his return to the International Harvesterf<- fl'13:?-F "WCompany, he went around town locating some of his former contacts, among _-
whom was ERRY DHKPRIIE, who presently is engaged in the operation of an '- "ht - . ' .';= .
auto accessory store under the trade name, Loyal Oil Company, '7258,Vince_nnes,.=,Avenue, Chicago. Mr. MC GARTH! stated that he had been acquainted with ; "
DAPRII.E during the time that DHAPRIIE was manager oi the United Cartage *L
Company, Chicago, and had in 1959 sold him four or five International trucks.
. _ - 'H
Mr. MC GARTH! stated that during the early part of this year, Mr. DEAPRILE - S-*telephoned him and wanted to see him. MC GARTH! contacted D'APBILE and was P "
advised by DULPRIII. that PHIL D'ANDREA was up for parole and he wondersd._. - 5,-._.=.-"if;-__-;§,_;,
if the International Harvester Company would Write a letter concerning their], _' '
business associations with DURNDREA, who owned the United Cartage Company. »'.T1a'-5}{-5-p
In-. no GARTH; advised that he took this matter up with mr. F. E. sv0soDA,h1e;
superior at International, and they decided that it would be proper to write "-.;" -'
a letter to the Parole Board telling them of their past experience and business.
connections jith PHIL D'Al92iDB_EA and the United Car-tags Company. Hr. MC CARIHI 33 '
stated thet'svos0m then wrote a letter to the Parole Board telling of his .~ _
company's ezcperience with PHIL D'Al*1DRE.A in their business dealings arising "Q . ,7
out of the sale of trucks to United Cartage Company. Kr. MC CARTHI statedh; Q '
that his company's business transactions with United Cartage Company were _*j .3:-=proper and he could see no reason why such a letter should not have been - _'
written, therefore, he and Mr. SVUBODA decided to write this letter.
._ _ , in
mt. no cums stated that n'A1°3_II.E: asked him to write the letter in a veryfriendly manner and that thawriting of the letter was left entirely in the Q; l'~,.'_.§1;_~
hands of himself and Mr. SVOBODA. He denied that there was any offer of mona3§$5'?~§§,
or pressure of any kind used to induce him to write the letter. ;.-. ,_£-4E;;_,' ~,
lir. EC CARTHX adgrised that he has no criminal record. __. 1- 1,-; '_-2'5 4 ' -' 491?P T. T51-%_,_*",1:,;
- as - » . '.~,.Y_-HI - Pu";. --;;,-.-i:Fé?' - ' .-on-1 J- .n,.,.t-.3 -..,_~..w- K-. -92_ ___ -. . 7' a. _ , f I
,,..../....-92-Q92..y- -. .. .' r _ ' . _ -_ ._ {' _ .f _ _ "M - _ V _ t .4 _,,_ .' x I. ..;!.ray} 7,, .-4'- .._ _ ,.n.. __ _; V -_ V F _ I _ y - r ! . . 1 _.-.- M .. 3._,J_§-F-'~¢.¢?£ Fr .-1- .,_ J. _ . --.-- .r_- - , . .. W r § .. - A. "_..,_ _ ___ * _u_-_'_,.;__,*-_.Tr,__J
'1e
r
. 5,5--rm. ~.,,,,,F1. .. _He-=a<-§
,-
.92:
-..
if
s } ? ," -_ 1": ' Q 92.
-=-5 -.1 e<.if
K"
92.-
-.t.
-11- ..-
-.
x alt!
1 vr
C Chi cago File 58-194
HER : lab
' 92 ' ' -.1 -15--
Mr. JEROME JERRY9 . APRILE was interviewed on October 2, 194?, at his C jg,-~.fa
place of business, the Loyal Oil Company, 7258 Sout ' ' ue Chicego,"l,._j- 1
Illinois tele ho erdeen 0609, b Special A ent .. -
.- .-,-
-|,. »
¥ i
_ Y
t. . r . '= H_ tn id_ q __ -Wu _ -rz
5 . -_
i _ . _.,,t . , ., -H P
1| NI
Y s . --D'APRIlE resides at 7605 Cotta rov . ~ . ° ge e
is resi ence telephone number is Radcliffe 8596. MI. DA1"RILE advised __ _ l
that he is the sole owner of the loyal Oil Company at the above mentioned " .,
, address.'__,s
=-' ..-L11-". 1}
' " _. , :1. .."""fn- - -. ;-_ rap 92t .__!. W V,.4 I ._. J11 ~.~92 ,-.,- 1. =1 Q ,92 p-_ 1 ,. _-if
t .1. 1. -.9,-,*592"-._,._._, .Mr. D'APRIlE stated that for many years he was associated with PHIL D'M1DREl'-- . C92
>2.,.
>4
v
v
a.J in the United Cartage Company, Chicago, Illinois. For a period of at least.
imother is a cousin of PHIL D'ANDREA
Hr. DHRPRILE stated that after leaving the United Cartage Company, he and om N
_ ANTHONY' RE1*IELLA, who was formerly a driver for United Cartage Company, began " _1Tsix years, he served as manager of this concern. Mr. DHKPRILE stated that his - C
. 9
operation of the Loyal Oil Company. He stated that REINELIA was with him a ._
few years, then left the business as it was not large enough for the two of ,
~ them. RENEILIA is presently an insurance
Insurance Company, Chicago , Illinois.
Mr. D'APHILE stated that SAMUEL SFAPEO,salesman for the Metropolitanilife T fr a v.- - ." ., . X ~.- , ._¢ , .-- .. L: - .. _ I .' ..q 92
who is also related to DUKNDREL by '~
marriage, contacted hizn and requested him to contact some former business
-I _associates for letters of reference in connection with D'A.NDREA's parole. -_
Hr. D'AP1'i.ILE stated that he contacted Mr. LEG GARTH! of the International ' .
Harvester Company, and Lir. HEGh.H'I'I of the L.-Lack Truck Company, and requested ifj-V,
these men to write a letter concerning their business associations with -_ -r
F. 1t -.D I. K1'
¥
DMKIIDREA and the United Cartagge Company. Mr. DULPRILEI stated that he also * t .contacted the Standard 011 Company but found that the people he knew there - . , . Q3---?.1-.~+,
: letter of recommendation from the Standard Oil Company. Mr. DULPRIIE could " 5'" W , Cwere no longer connected with the company and therefore he did not ask for a. ' l 31?~'-iii
not recall who he had contacted at the Standard 011 Company. . . l_ "_ gr} _ ,
5 , K. --.
E-Lr. D'aPRILE stated that no one other than Mr. SHAPIRO contacted him in connec- 5»
tion with the parole of D'ANDREA and he contacted no one other than those
mentioned above. He stated that he was offered no money for his services andf,
offered none to the International Harvester Company salesman or Mr. ; p
of Hack Truck Company. He also denied that he indicated or suggested to the '-= "$1 "£4.
persons he contacted that D'ANDREJL might
trucks from them. J
Mr. D'A.PH.ILE stated that he did not know
-. DANDRl£.A until he read about same in the
has Seen ouumasa 'nce since his release
C Ltinne s ota I~'- .1-cin the fL1t:J.I8 be -in the market for
' ' 1' . -J".*.f"-#..'.1>~' " f".;~..é>fW=.":"
of any of the past activities ,0!-Pli1]'4~f'§,-fig:-;,.§:_
newspapers lately. Ha stated thet_}|e;1_=l.l.-#;,..v{.from prison, and numnasa told himl
o - ' - A. '-!'P".»- - .that time that he Fae on his way to the Liayo Brothers Clinic in Rocrhester, f in 1.,' 14?, ' Q;~ , tr. --7?; Mr. DHKPRIIE stated that he had no criminal record i
1;-1 ,fi,92_" -, , ifuni", .r
. ' Z. --:- t '-_
1-" "' * :3: ¥
92_ . , . . J -_; l'"""' _ _ _ _ _ .. __, ,_o.'1.;'_ ' " ' "
,2! . _7__,'___ __ ._ -_' ,'_- . . . -. a " - t . _- '- _- _ - _- .._. ~ 5; ,_ - V _.|v _. . .:.' - I 92- P -:' ii k ""92J- '2' 3 "'1" 1;. ::n-7 1-,4-'-.6 -' A 92- 5 r - =r»' -,fF"o" L.3; -.-5* F 'P".' 92 ' -_"92"- i" Q? " . . . ._ __ A_ _ : . - .. _ . _ .. "*"_" . "7 -" ' ' . ~ . . = . . - _ -.., "Y * a ».- -» .' -. =L~"'--_-- §.s"-*.-*-ri'-v_~*.-a-.-.- ' . '- .-_.- ~...._» -r . - - ' ' .-. - - ' - ~ - .., 1*; --L
-'
2-.
to
Z?
:*'
...¢,|
4
1
vi
IE __.' Q _ .5,.-gilt-......' ..92 . . __ - . ..-- v.. ._ Qt..- . -I| u ,
t .~ .
I
'- 92.r;_,1i1--
.3,
_ .. .. a .,.m.,'..
1
Chicago File 58-
- F of i T} ti-
l - "+5-.§"
I ' |'..-- -:-I.
3,»... 4.._F92!..On September 30, 19-4'? LO*JIS ZF?AT?IT..RK, Managing editor of the "Chicago_"---§»...;._.___mHerald American , was interviewed regarding statements made to a Hearst * A "
representative named FIi92.STOI-I to the effect that C _JST1'f_1l.L.Q_h8dip&id__ f__
. money to HA;-FNEGAI-I in connection with the paroles, andalso that one
-3-PELIT, Carruthersville, Iiissouri f3OlitiCi¬lI'1, had handled money in connection ..xv-:ii.th the paroles. -:J92__=_ _
.;- Q2
T .1 $3} S].:_fLIdl"},_T§_K Stateg tp.-,{, gg $363113 L112 f¢1Ct til.-L GE dld H88-I SUCH I'1UT1OI'S, -but .1
that lie U-"cs not 1:-'.i~-." he source of th-oer: rumors. Ife stated that he 1-rouldo,
endeavor to recall the source and if he aid recall he would notify bhlS°92. 1-'-f=-1T,"-1*-""'w H
office. . __-Jr. Ti
.;-. - -.;-;'.--. ,4. .,_"aa-~ J
~ e r.-»
I;
. '5_;|
_ c92... xk. §
$tn'92
--;-1-_'!'n-.=
'= - i 5'.»
1? ,-> 4'-' LL .ur1"| ' £9
3;-'5"-".'92;--7._P." .r. ' , ,'-;i1"'-.l-1". " "ii *:"*".'!?;"DE'.'=':A..'J = ' 1»~¥=3e*?i7;§%
- -]";:',1 ,' -- 92 ,. -_.|F
§j
|92-lo9*; '
'¢I§.I'-.="»Z_f§' M" ' 1-.._,.§.» 1.9!;-
.J'.
-t~_ -. -I!.0 '-' 7..-
;--
L
U ..
ft
...92-e _ ¢ .
7:11¢.
i '-
5*
'1-'9292
, 1-~ 7 - --Q-¢:~
-_ t .171.1 ' --
4 ¢»
| '.: _ ' ,Y. ,':1
-1' *5 ' e ,1-_5.,._.hi 4- ' <
. y -;- n.-~92 ..1'. ., n
x . _- . '.|JI _
a» _.
*|- "1
A o 15"..- L,r -
-.'1.~' 5;,
1 ..~ ,.,.,.92 1';I-av
1.5.-.
. J; '
.5. -1.?_.. ?'I. '~. ' -* , @.-..1F:-;-.-
:- Y_ __ '.v- §'-:1-In
.t¢;¢,~¢.
.te§e. .'+:__- A . ,,'_i'=:92-V.' _ -_gO.I *1,1 . .
Etch. 92- ji_.._ lg,-'yr -_f.~a. 1* u -,3-.1.-'' 9*
r» v 1,? LL! .92 .- 7 1. ,é
1
'r
F.
,0=5
i
F
T
.-J,
c
>
F
92
..1- '*'IrYn:
Iw
;;
* .-_.
§
?''?iI~".-=';~§~
W
.._ 1,-"1
.92, 92*.
RNH/l-{I»IW1 I .,
- _' I-l,!:|._J._ if
' 53-194 1 _ e ' -:1 _=_,-g.l - a _>¥ .'-I* ' ,1 -_ 1:-': -i
_Roman Catholic Bishop seamen J-15%/Shl:ZIL was interviewed on October 2, 1947, ' *-'=*' ",YI.
-
$.31 I_
."..', 3;
4»-
-..
. 1 _ » -n,
at his office, Room 218, CYO Center, 31 East Congress Street, by Special __, .,,n -n_'. 4'Agenaand Assistant Special Agent in Charge RICHARD N. nosmnr. s .,
it th smart was informed the investigation in the instant _r i .
matter was being conducted at the specific instructions of the Attorney _1 ,_e;Z i?
h, General and that in view of the fact
supporter for the release of subject
being interviewed.
J,
Bishop SHEIL requested the source of
c urteously advised the interviewingtgis source as it was confidential.his name had been mentioned as a ' T':*?i7?* aftCHARLFS GIOE on parole, he was there§ore7:y¢§¬¬3§¬
. , ..-'2 r.this Bureau's information and was ' il;
agents were not at liberty to disclose 1; 1
He stated that previously after hearing '{ P
of efforts to connect his name to this case, he telephonically contacted J e-_
Attorney General TOM C. CIAEK and has talked to him on three occasions. ; "*- > - t
He advised that he informed Mr. CLARK he positively had no connections'with-* H p
this case and fully explained his position to the Attorney General. Bishopf,_ ti it 7» . - _ _ - -____ur ~»-t -SHEIL further stated he had the Attorney General check his files so as to f _ jfrqf t '' ' ..> 92 '-.' I
P assure the Attorney General the Bishop's name was not mentioned at all. I» r_§ ; ,
He further advised that he is blazing about this whole matter, and specifically ;," 7 *
for the audacity of certain people to even mention his name with such a gang _
of hoodlums.
Bishop SHEIL described this matter as mainly a vicious newspaper activity
to connect his name with this case and said that this newspaper, whose
identity he did not care to disclose, had even gone so far as to call over .1 _ -*1 "
1nr92 _...,_..e_1.. ..._,: 4.-.-:.-,..+ 1-.-ze. .-.-. -3 +,-. -He a++ T31-is-n -n P1 th 1- i F r-m'I t
L-.4
- 92
.;'. .
_l _n.1 I *5 '.J.UU purple GIUJ .1_u_;92.92.u u.|.u r-'3m¬ lvv one R"s.»~vEI'e ..»l.,..Oy ...~...-.u.. ....J1"--9- ....I"...0-...'3l.'l
that he had personally told subject CALIPACI- A's attorney, SIDNEI t_Congressman FHLD E,$BUSBEY and all the local newspapers that he would " 1 __ l_
imediately institute suit for slander or libel if they dare cause his name ; =§f¢;;,,
to be mentioned in this matter. He remarked that this caselnuibeen of ';*" ".*_ e;§_-H-;~_§§-_ .._|, .-
extreme annoyance and embarrassment to him, particularly in view of the fact'i '
that at the recent Eucharistic COUQIGSS held at Buffalo, New York, and
among the Cardinals there present, certain unidentified persons caused his
name to be linked with the press statement as one of the two prominent .
Chicagoans active in this matters He further related that he is incensed
that the subjects of this case would dare try to use his name in zrtherance -,+_
of their efforts to run the City of Chicago, and he remarked he wondered if -e
there was any moral decency left.
.~';. P Li» "
- _-B-+' -
- - , 4!-32' .
_,v-LA --._.-,
1 - <<;s.#
. _:.i---- , ;:.r.I -Ii-o92}£§'*'?;;§-,_5_'' 0- ,,._f5,j _-*8,-,Z*.*._1' - 1; :-- :--1"" ,,. ,T*- it 1.4 , ll - __; .1 <1-p:'I92 xv ->, fl ,1,»~ Le en 4 m___ _: I _ 1: . . .__-51- " ' = -~"~'.*.'.';.* "-:~t%<?»;lE'*':"*'
. __,.. .
: . . -I ' | <~- |- ,- _-'..,|-"-s'-a * 1" . :-. . 7., - - - r~":0'e' 1 _ . ' ~r II: I-"2: .;a._,___. .._.-,_, ...,eY._,, _. ..li+_.-.*" 7 . -0-I"*.'a' a Z-'3-4!.! -1 ,_,__. _,___,. "1. _.a 92-_»_ -<,--.- .-.';- T -In. '3?'92n{".. , _ . ~ IL- :-! ' '-__; ¢f§,_4""r1v_ - _-1* .1. _-_-_. __ _ -.-_ . . 831 s>.,.:: at , * . _ - 4v_- t - I 1,;-q are ]92¢*;g_4'*1B-q - ""-»-@',T'_qgF -I ' l§JIli"lJ__'--~' e . - ' -I-Q; -*4 ». -. ' 1.2--.-F""'_'.Y.In» v?. ; _-.'.£.*-'7 -'§_. - __._;;$=~ ,,,-we ;,_,?:. ,
'7 , 0~
Q 1 I. 492 l_ L ~A-_ ,, _1| .e
rC
K
t '
7'
t
us
a
92
'11
J1
-_.M ~. 92-ti
.-ninesL _
,-
SP-4
9-}--?92.:_~»'
<_-:11 t
§- "
?. sq
92' .1
I 1-n 92 -
in I r
-ea
,i
4 .'_-; . , , !92A
. L , _
ENE/i§1'|'|' - __ ._ _ B F
55-194 H "Z" n . -.
3'. Q;-_-_-_~7'-?l"" I .|Bishop SHEIL was couiteous during the interview but declared that he did not - Z ~.3' l * I
understand the reason for the interview in view of his PT9vi° 5 t91BPh°n° @3115 .- - '
3 - - ' P thing whatsoever . w, 'to Attorney ueneral TOM CLARL whereio he exp1a1n,d he knew n0 _e .x _ iabout these paroles, and stated he flrmly deslred that hls attitude be made
}q1Q'wn personally to the Attorney General. f_;.;o: ._..__ F ,1-V F. an=:_, §,:¥.'q"592=:_-ll i-f - 0'4 F '
_ _,,..n _, .'._..92'.-. -. Q1"-_; y_... ._V E ... - -
. - 3'¢ . ;
K K 5" .
_ ." -'w"92*I'f'1Q - '5'4 -- r - .- ,~_ "LY. air _h - . -* ' ~"";' I. 1 "
. ff: _ __
1 _ T5, "_;:l ~ is , , ._, .--3 *. '
92 ' '
D
92
1
I
J -. . '._', - S
.5-_A'-My-4f, 5 -1 F r _. " _
, I-~_ _. Q,-_j.?*". _- ' Iv _ ''»- 9; _ , - Fi-.~~a<-5
. : .,,..I -1_ bi I7.
1 . ,-
v
I 92 .. u. -I- 4-,?- I"_ -i . .,
_ ._ H4: n é.| - -4.» _, -.-. r , _ '.-"n ."
-1 ' -F" -'- ,-'9":.-_-'1 A-.J ' ' 4.1
2. '
.-52_~ ?T=-'-1~.?-£1;
$11,, F 14"-'I4 : -r -:1-G-~ ' "
. ="a;v ' __'_ ,, 4_ -J ,
___ ,, _ .. - ' " "'__" M"" ..» T .'. ."--- _ '____..___
' - "-1.4 *1 ' " '
I .- » --mrr . .~ 1 - .- - . 9- - g . ' 092 '-_L P -- 92 it -.-92 _ . __- _-4' - M. -.._,-- _-nu ' -_ -1- -P 5 F-* I . ,1 Ti 9"_A:_,.e, fiI92 ,~ 92 , Y 92 V 1&4-J;- F_ l - Y > H I ' ,. 1 . . -92 gr , 2 _<-¢__ '92- ?Hl92- 92-3Q-P1-._ I F___ Rf;-._ _w,-1; ._ _, -, _ .,_ v_ - . -1-. a - , - . _.- _ .4,__,a_»..-. "V '92- ._-1;-k -. ~ ' _ __ _ _ _ _
. ./ 7 92Q ' 92 4
92,.- t1.. _-~ F, -vimph, ,2
Chicago File ss-194 '.._ R.ER..l8b I_ __ , _- ._V_r_ .13-i£_$9,?_- I -=1 _,.,- -1;,-
t - e»,Reference is made to teletype of September 24, 1947, to Chicago from Washington 5,: qr:Field, requesting that the pertinent files of the "Chicago Tribune be 921_Instant teletype pointed out that JALES DOHERTY,"Chicago Tribune" reporter,-then;interviewed at Washington, stated these files would be made available upon ,' v ~';_ request. _"' Qt . ""ff*~?I£On September 27, 194?, JAMES DOHERTY, "Chicago Tribune" reporter ' ';,;;
"Chica o Tribune" by Special Agen; " llliiliiiiii -**tW»e=*.":- Mr. DOHEH'I'1' stated that at the tims=hewas interviewed by Agents in Washington, the pertinent files to which he 18- ,'7"-"- -'' ferred consisted of the "Chicago Tribune" morgue files, which contain all " 'f information published by the "Chicago Tribune" with reference to individual h _hoodlums and their activities in and around Chicago, Illinois. _ ' _ to
' Mr. DOHERTY stated that he had received one or two anonymous letters in c"onnec-':"_} _ 'tion with the parole matter, however, he stated that he has now turned_the_se ?"fj_*=""_letters over to Representatives BUSBY and HOFF}.'.A.N. No copies of these anony-i'f;i?*; -'emous letters were made or retained by lir. DOIDLHTY. Mr. DOHERTY stated that at ,,; =11; '
this time he does not have in his possession any information in connection_.with_ f Hthe parole matter which has not been printed. i . -_.§._r
- , .
-I 92 =- ' -.
r; ii'..- .
1. .-i'_."??I!
-_ _-t ..._|-
I I1 i . I. 1 iv.
.1
.. _'.-L1 I _
p. hrs.-1..~:..2--.J _' _-_.'~:"rr§.i
--,.¢.'.' .Jd:t»92|,L- ;92|__|_.,K .
-rt.
~*-' _ I-it-is-*
»<;-;.i.-*=.»_~_'£p* e
. -' fr-r 't 92 * ~»_ . _ _V : :-. ,,>--r 3|fe ''4. ' *11 ._ _ L _ .1 ,,3 we-_; - ._ _, -55- ii l J.. _ ,¢_. __.. f1 L 1:1-
1 .
92_ :.,-J;92!~';' .-
~._ _ i ,_ _ 92 .. . ... __....- ,_,,.. r1- _ _ r H, __/,_ r - 92 ~_ 45, __- ..-___, H. _,- ' -. .' I - -|-_ 4 '- It .. - ' ". '." "~- ' },"'; '--- -92» 92... '__ _ .l ,- --,____'_ .,__ ,_ .,__ ; 4 _ _ -.,_ ,,_ 92 .. ._ .,. . - .¢_ . J--.» - --_ 1
1'»:
:1 _' .
1;. o.
7
a
J
f
'!
-G
»
1<.i.
frii-seer-i 92";-"*1F, .~""1@"
1
1
JI-
-¢
-Q.
.,.
'.. 1.. .
E.1<l.i*
_" 10
- .» .M..." 5 -
kg ..f L .,.
~5g:! ,' _.*,:' "'
:1 ".-.r
, --,1. _*_- - 1- ~.--114.1-d-l£bi|¥i1_.g§[,-;» »all _ I
Chicago File 53"]-.9* I- ~Y-~* ~"'»'*!'§lw.'92-.*.>-'{ 79*wsumnb 5
The records of the» Chicago Po1i¬:e DBparhne1_1t ":~'e1_-e ohecke$d§°I'-é1 it_n__Ses interviewed 92_.,5_1;h the @1¢@pt1on of the 1nd:.v1dua1s ho ng _ __ _ _Mb; £2106 1."j_th negative results. However, it '9-S f°921I1d mat _§§l_1 F.9...__;_ -ISRQFELCQ. was ailrest-ed on J1-1119 14, 1955 for larceny and discharged 1? ..92 _
kn
The Police records have II-05 B5 fiat 179° °he°k°d with ¢r°9P°°t7.t6:g- ' JERELE D'A.PRIL and B. J. McCA.R'1"-PI. However, tneywere specifillv 951-¢°=1 A -17" wheni interviewed if they had Gfimim-1 "°°°rd5 and they stated they did
| , . .,i92qr _ .not- ' 9'
1
_,"< .
;.- ~ ,'~-*-Y
..-_2-'; 92.5r_.3. 3;
._". ,,"1_--A 1 -.. - -1;'w.""~ '
92
.0. ".1. __
- L,-'n_-m{-, '
' ,.-">3n
, - _'_ I ,-_ ,5-. _" "4-_ iv-,1q, I* rJ ""1!--' ,~e -92 n
'.-.~- »»--*-:>->a=l=- .--:5.
Q-'-"- --.
- ?§;-as?3 ;'=',- "IN"
Y
». = .-up. ..
_-1" 92I
.92.-.I -"| V. ,_a-:- ,_.,.'- . _92 A , _ v. r , if '
- _._':¢-" F»-.92,|
J, - ' J
/ _ . "§'U- !1 _ _ _- .11.-1 _- - .-
~ .,. 54 ... , ~_.- _-,_'_ 1 __.-- d ., . ._
'_ I 5.; , w_ '
, _,..:.,", :___-_;.,-1 r- E; ..u
- ' .' -- E 92_'. __
, -",- wk". <-f -~.',., H I ;i"-'. -92
I "'._" .': '1' '
.|' I _ ~ ' P-_n
. -1, Aw, 11 44-' - ....- __; 1 __;__ ' -t ,11_;5'l.,Q:* :: ** " 77 W ' ' '"' '92. -' 1. '_ , __ , . _ _ _ ,--. -_ -_y. " '. '- - . ~ ..-......_... - ,-"~ w-'-I-:--P-92 - _---|-1"-"'*--_-lki-*---*N ~-~ -v "- L: I! ¢--*- ', "* J " " r - " - '
V - 1_ ___ _ __ _ _ ___ . - ~,-92.%¢,T¢'~ -'.__5 , ,1 - _-- . , _ _ - . ___f ., _-__. ,_. . _¢-92-.4-,__---.1, 4' -';__;~'_.___:92,.v-->;.~ I -
7I » -1, .
n _ .. , U34 .5..-.§ -E
T 1'E 92
- 1-1--1*92
*_v -_ 1"! 'i..¢-.~'Ch F11 58-194 f I"108-$0 8 i - ; . .._wsn grmb ""l H ._ e;
UL1;I.7Ji_~ILOPl:-I! Ll-ADS
The following loads were covered on October 2, 1947, teletypen
summaries forwarded and the details will be reported in the next_report1?
in instant case: - -_ , '
-. "1 -1' 'THE c HICAGO DI vi s_1Zcrg .r
gt Chi§e§o{_lllinoia
~.-ili interview IIFIA PAPIUZZO, 6Inp1O_,'86 of the Italo-American
Ifational Union, 30 '.'.'c:;t ushington, concerning the occasion
of her visits to Subject D'ANDREA while he was inoarcer&ted:- ;
at the Llenlical Center for Federal Prisoners at Springfield, _ ._r.,.-,issouri, l
. g, -. 3 -.»T~.,92 W ;_'
will interview PHDD 1.1, MORELLI, Democratic Com.mitteeme.n from
the first ward, regarding his knowledge of the paroles in
instant case, as well as details concerning a banquet given
?.iOR1".1'.LI 1:; o. priest of t-10 Cx=.=i-101i: church at which time the
paro1~s were allo;_;udlj,' discussed. » 1
1 1
92- Tho following leads have not been covered:
T"'EI CY-IIC.P92GO DIFI$Y'J1I 4--_.-.----
t it clh_i§_9~::,q.c _Ic1,1}_l1°Ei
' 4-131.11 i1tervi-av: PHILIP J. LBJLATTTIA, President, and TONY A.
L¢92.T-'AN'IlA, lreasurer, of the iirlspy-Kleen Ve_r_:ete.ble Com-
pany, Inc., l-'59 Ilurket itroet, with reference to any in-
formation they might have 1-egarrliné; the employment of
PHILIP D'AIJTREA who is alleged to have been employed
through. the authority of JOSEPH 1PIiREO, Secretary of
the above organization.
X.-ill interview T, E._|§%EIN, Room 1424, 10 South LaSa1le
Street, in record tolhis visit to DellFCIA on April 25, c1944 and his representing DeLUCIA. at the Congressional, _: .;;.;._'1-o_;
,3:-¢._;,?_-*4"-.-iI*" :4" --£35 Phearings. , e
q L L' I
- t.r I
_ -55-
Wrrr _ ' ~ __ r ;'_ 77' Li4'
-92|- '. 1_,q.-r'u "J.1. . ,. |.r_ H ' ' . z A X
.' 5' ";1-Kn. :1 ;. 92
5%"; .'§***
L1 kn I
we
. .- iv;
-1_ 9.1 92 . 1"._ g A: I7'.»-_ __- - ,
.,;_r_1 . -
11- F 3;
'.|? -T?o__,,92~ ,1? ,-.; _~. , .-
? I *5 < I
S we-, . .' "ml.r-.1 .1,-$3.; '1»;-'1;_ . - t'92J. .-4 .
.._=_¢'aw
:- _i;:"._, .
' .17}?-" 1 H
x
92.
_- 92.¢__
-92_"_'. E -
_.- _. L-l ; "4.z- _.r
. » r| '4 -
I u-v .I ,.-.|: i
1 1 - "Y
4-|
1-
| 92 1
J »" 1 .r . I1 " .._» ' x92
|_ '. "_ J.- » . . ,. e, §-.,~.-
*:@":?:1;f
--are e
.i_ ,: __ _-!_-,.92 _;,.-3,,
. 7, . §"§92_
_ 1 '. .-'.--L = .
___ W 7 - '_ l " . I; .n~: . , ~.§..»'- Q'* . -~ _ _ .- _- " .' .--- - - ~ ' - - - w , ' ~ - ' - r '_=» .-}>-_- e-3*!-:--='-" 7""'*;5-rcas
Z
w,_
J
1 L
1
Ii
92
I
i
5
' kI
I , K ! hr N;
- _
N . < . -. ,._. 5 4Q 92* *, is _ "
"9292"¥'?|-_ i-__° V v u -'92._._-. _ h _-1 __ _.__,_ .__' _.=___ _, '1 t_>_ru_b _ _ _' .. __, R '__ " ' __ r i -I. _' .4 ,n;
1
'§r§'4'd '
aw ~"-"
-"*0
.1
'5'
_
.
;- .§_-T
or:IJ?--
F».-~14
¥> "
.|.-V ..
_Ii'-.-~ ~-
n-§'-
. ' _ ll A"_-
-. '~| 1"_t .¥ :7§ ci___* 1 - .
n '92l-K _ :
,. .6
'.-,;;~:--
1!?
1.. aw with
Chicago File so-194WS1'~!:Imb " '_ ,. - -92... -.
__ _ . _ _ - .. . --_» -J5Unrleveiopecl _Lee.ds _ _ 71__t_'1.! i -I;
1 - Ta ,1will interview GRLGG DILLON, Chicago Here1dAmerio&n, in _ I . *"
regard to his call to 1.511 at which time he questioned ASH - _
about the rumor that HANHEGAN received money for the secur-F 535;a
ing of the paroles. . ,.'»
92"
If authorized, will, at the U. S. 1'1G0rney's 0.1£ioe, obtl-11 . __ _
e subpoena duces tecun for the personal checxing account of
1_'1'r*. ~_rq92 r_n-it-92rr~192x~Tr._'! .-.J- J-1.-H-i 92~,.m92--1 .111 7.Yn-Pi nu-92u'1 'Rr.92n'ir 9116 'T"r92__1_.q'i_§ '1, |lJ]_J_| J'_ J._;;_"|L H ?l.U bill £92..§.l J--willl *'¬KV+92""-4'--5 J "'"- " "" " -- "', .
i
33 .01-th Leallo StfU5't0 -- iI
I
'.Y0:.".§:e:~iI1!f,
Isms-.;;-". -'
- .-We
,..;: --r'92F If oots.
Bank and
make a. cl
EUUf.L'I11§ Hmed, will serve subpoena on the American National _f F
Trust Company, 33 North Lasalle Street, and will j
etai led '3I>f8J.".i1'19tiOI1 oi" the checking; 8CO092JI1t Of
EPEFSTIZIII for the month of October 1946- = ' ~- "
will reintervie".-1 E.TJf;I-f2T#, B]'RIJL;1T]£.I17, 7'2 "-{fest 1'-rasliinetoni _' 1
after exemi".-ition of his chec!.-Lirie; account at the American National _
Tank and Trust Company for further details concerning the " ' - ~.
receipt of ins from wiknomi persons and applied on the _ Hr F.
't;g_;-3 pa_:[m9nt.3 Of CK!:PIfiGEJI and D6LUCI.Au i, -¢92-._'4
r _
Will also determine -iifferonce in BL'RIIS"i1';i s previous i
statements as to amounts deposited and the amounts actually i-§~
, ghqvm. in the ban}; account. - '- '-1
I-K. --0" - . .
I A4 - ~'n - - ".
= A ';~__ ;;.3- __§_,;.p
' *0'3?_ .
:. ' , F
92"nr .1 192I .' l_ .- - I ~ -qvrh v _ .92Ir92T92T"A I J..;..._.-1 A,-92_»-92J- Fawn; no-n lL, f'L|'$!l'1l'.|, 1'1 u-Lubiiu, u van 14-O1 Q QJ 1:111 l1'1tO1"-J1-TBW r~..vi'*1 L |._ _ _Council, 814 Jest Harrison, hone address 9955 South Seeley, _ _;_hf_F",
in rogard to his handling funds for his cousin, PHILIP ~ * ""3 -
Q T
. ...'.-'.>_.' A;1-.92?.f!REfi, in connection with the parole matters. _ '..i_->-.'5..;;$_' ;I Y
LI:-
$'.. .
=1 ,-
L
Q .
il
,.
1
1 .
92
1I
wp
i.
~
n _,- M-1:
gs. ~ 5""
}'§i-"-see
W _
'2'
.' -92-1. " M. N . ..:392 1;, .._» VI ¢ -Q -is 92*.'n P ' T i ' , 92.-:11 -. =1: r 92 4 I ___:R 1
_ £1
_ a H;-5_'| .. ,_ jg: .-_ 1.' r;-i3 ..
._ V ,92, . '.',._'. 9 +1? '7" -I R-.~ '
. - l ' '1 L: ; -. , i , é _. a;'|;.*.92'"~¬AI':- _ . -1 Chicago File sa-194 -- - ~ - =i... < - '1-" RY »< WSM.lImb .-__ : - _ .-."_ *5
.92. .1-V__:; 7 ._ -_Unde:m1 Qped_ ]_gaLa_cii_ {011tni._! _ 1_ .11 in--V-j_|3*q ;F${GE R BIBBER, 160 North LaSal1e Street, '_ - " i. W1 ' ' ' T Hi rnowled of any " "'°E-larities with rasp°°t"' " 92 "'"".'' e OOHGBTQ E ' S . ' {ft l. to Obta11ng paroles for SubJ°°t3' " - _
' . - "U.. -.-i -1%*.-Y
.. W -J _
~|w I _. I .;»_< .!._, _. . ..
~ . _ -. linois ' .-"-+-1 M. .1_1__ . fur.j -" '11 1tervi=w p.1~m1o1w i92.JCARDO, 14:51 Worth Ashlund Avenu, ,~. A.-_ H1 *. ER when. - .-_. .,, ".-"t hl 1 Q the nam Of JOSEPH I. BULB ¢':H >in ?I§§d ;eL£I_xSe;.:1 CALIPAGNI wni1B they W°1° 1n°"°°"t°d***" A" '* ' G YT, _ ., _§92 . .. 3' _- -.' ' ' - - :7-li-...'7 -"f§!;f" '1
Hillalso interview ACCARIJO for any 1<n@"»"1iise he n{i§h:f.*? "Y Q:. . - , ' 0 6 ~ _' '1.-_of ,3; irregzzlarltlss 1n the secu-lng of 6 pal _ 1 _
theiubjectsn ' é "9" >
At 0&1: I5}_.__Ill"~-"W5-.5. 7 "-'E
1-1 interview }~U"L=1.PJJ Honaco, 704 J&¢1=S°n B° 1@" *"1- ° d - " -. H --'¢l ' J. ' ' t to ; _;_; ' 1-, errung the reason for h1s v1s1 _. - L. .. I .3 . ,] §Ll?g:;:ninU.:ti:§11za peniterltiafy on A1311 25' 1944' and his"- 3:? .. _km-'1-adge of the securing O? T.]_E1:;@::-152 :5 the -aH'°rn°Y .4. . ,l'?-.1'i'..::5 -
H. D6LU ;1,n_ in the C0r15Ii3SS101'92& 5 '- ra , .' .,-' J4 ,
... P E N D I N G -'M; "_' 1:-cl I
I"92i Y. 4 5" 3,1 .-. 54* ~..h..~,_ ' _r P.-14 1'_v '
V ~47?. ;%¢ 'I . I I
-£4;
__.» _ .",n " 2 . || 1' I
'- »." ~.Q
-. ~-'--.;:* *3-" -
1' .~ .1771, '8 '--92 -w .§¢;;aL_ v _=' |.{= ,-_,- _"- _ ' }'..._.- 1 . .,»- - -_{_ ;. , -,._--__- n 1 5
' $5 an _ '» - ». .-6'1"» ,-' 57 -' -' ' *i<f.a*'-.;f*_"~-.*:.*rf:..-'§§'<1.@;~*i§*é_;@
' V .'~".-#4.
1 , Q
*-.-'=.;~;=s -. _ _ , »' - ~ = .» I 1 !_-1;-..-..,. -1 .=~_~: "I ' ~--'31 =
i __ 4...._-» -f '-*"" =.'!"§i*WL!WW$I ,*n**** "T 7 * fiinifé "'~~w_ ._i ' £5" I- - - o- * -rs '_ _ , _ . - n _ - -~ ». _.'* ' . _ ,'. 1,, _- _ ._ . 7- . .. -. - _ _>,._ -..-..-» »--AP.-..~.~-¢-;::..<.=-.=.::15-f5rm = -__ ___ : T -______ ___ ,-_ _ i d _ g. V. ,._ _ _¢,92_ - -. , _'a- .. - _. sd-..~wv.p; _A',._ . *0. pg _. _ -. . - - __ . 4'15 __ 591". - -H! _ _ ___ _ _. -my - ~92; I¢ g _ _ .1
. _ 1! L.-~11;£
.4v
-411_ FA -am:-~
¢?' {mg
11
-12'
.92.._
_;_ IQ
{Q11
-92
4.1- qr '
3?
:'0 :1
the tionmthehersl
gala ma or names"!-11 manna..- F
#_.-Q.-,_._.-.---.~.--1,;
é-Y-P
-e
*1
-1'-1.1..
;_, 'H l¢ 1* A-7 -92 '
n ,
as 1* -.1 1'
,_.
1
.. Y._..92~¢p/zsg
59 -" =1 2*mm. 1 '
;i'*'-~.l;5?," -" rhw I._._.. 5... .:_I92-"-4- ' nil-1-92' in_ 1 II! II-I 1,=IlI,II-u -_ III" W"
__ ' .i£'-the - _
A_ ";1!nd rented In
_ nitA A --Lon girdle
"w-=¥!<-1'.
~ ~ M -~~*~ a-15= ~-n
M
Ihbed 1939 T
3'73-"5 »:
*2; ~
1%,.
'|__ _ __
¬ JELQ _ _<92u____h_ _ _ *7 W N __ k _ _ 2 n ___ 1:"; MY _ I_ __' _ __ ___ }___V I 4 T~N ___ _B _ n w __v_ bi
_ A_Wm_ _ m____=_g I _ MI __4 '_ muL_é é H Ev _u
__ _a!___ _ 3 _
_ _ 2 _r W I C _ h _'_ F; __ AI '1 _ ____ _ _ _ 1'ls __f_ k §'tL._"§!uL ' __
. - - -=.»- _ .-,1§,-.- » - ¢ -;:e;;;:,. ,- - -P. __?_ .. _. H. .. _ ._-_. . __.....-, ____ ___. . ' ~ - ..._._ . _iV Al; _ _> _ __________ >__A _:7__ 1%
" 1131., _ - 1 "'- P * " " - 1 * - ~"" 5"» = - " "* ~ F4
~ . - -- ,~_:4"-*f%?~:.- .. - .._ -- ._ .. -- ,--, ._ _ -. W,. ' % ' **~~" " " "Mi -' w - " **"' 1 .»--~f1=»>~.»--*-'- .1. --W - s = "' = .-. -_:.¢. . ".1 "_ -. -"- . ._ "; -' ' ' -- -=F-4-1:-_. - J; .- ' _ :-- - » .~A - .-I, ,-§_- .;~~_f;:-q. ._ .5},-':?§~5:_,._ __ I - ,-.:1q,>.§?é92_~,_:_ ¬:1j,_;;-.1. ___: '»..<_;__ -U ,._»§, . _! 1 . _ :.-__?-T-_~_ -.92:.&:f, A la 7 :1 {WI ._-I It I'1'-*'-" ->-~,» ~|'¢. ' - - £3 -. '1»? *3. ;" T =." -. ' :-1:-5 -1-1 " . - . . " 1 - "' ' '- - . _: --w . , >. * -'= n ,.-.»--- -. »92 4;? ~.. ,- ~-;~:-. 1;;--1 -- - 92_ - ~ -»~ ,: . H_ J ,--H? .-~-J - .. _. ~--g|m92~.- ..¢ _ , .~;,'. :3 - =__ _92 .- _,n.. _' 1 t?»-= or 4* _:f * *3, ,,,__ 1--=--- .- ' =.-- 92 .. '- '- A -"3; .- _ .-_."._- 3; _ --.-. __-,._-_- "1; . ., _-$4? - ' »-,_. _ ;-._w_=~ ;..: Z?§ ' . <-;=:P 31$: _"- al _ -'4", ,4. *5 .. :..-.- - -.,.-1 3 - 5 ' r"_<=- "' '- +=-I7 4-. -'-1*,';i_ . ,;.,._'-T, ~§;"..--;'=;":"}*§,l".I -T"_:. .. -- - __. j.=f.3 _' 3" I, -1 ... -_ _~; -' .-»-»,73"%1~., . .-_--; ~" -1 -'. f-. - ..-' .:~.~l.~~'. ,,, _* ':92_-._ :. Y 92,*_,;_ ,k7,_-~'?r-1; ~.,-,_- Lny. - .Kw_'r '_?-7-;a._,-.92_,-_- _d Q», _J r%<, . ..jgIi_'= mi ;V._-= . ; ; _,_ .r I v T~ ¢ ,.. e- .;-"x,§4_-' I --92. ,-|- 25- Q-. .. - - , -q- . . =1 .=- .
"1-» -.='-Q1;-N" = =;:.=¥-=-;;- *1.-;-~ £5" .4 -. --_ _-. ,_,,_ ,1-.,. , -._,-~..-,_.-. ._ .= .,, , -5-¥592;.§§;.4,_.. g,-. ~ - 92,_» .. |._ 4 ..~,4_ _ . .1-._ . 1,. A, .~'~,. 6.»; . w _ . - -.5 5 - 2:-,= _+ - . _¢;&" -- -a =_.~.-.~__s.:.-"-.,_.. -1»:---31.. - ~ -- -_. -. Jig ~./ ff-§§r92 -1» -1:-1 J - . >' --4* -vi.»- E >~+~.~.@-. 41- -M. , -=*.-. - » -- »:,w-1.-.-My-r - .,- ",..-W"! ,-, -_-.- " 1-;..~,.-.-., -1, e» .- ~ 2-:9; -...g»..- -J. 1... .. -_-~. ...-.3-4' .1-92. ,. ; -»-.=-'- __ . ».92 - ft ' _ ~ - -3, - - . .-;--.__-,- 4.. -3. ,,- -- .;;¢&u- .. W1, " '1"?-'--*¢~'"-7; .=.<a;...~@*é§5.-;.~.§%.-1 .~ Fr.- - . ,. . .1 - » ~ ~'_ .- .- -- ;----- -. ..-¢.-,» ... 5'--. - ..~ . .. ~. 1 . . _ - ._ -; -- .- .- ~ .-» - -,, - 9292|.'§ 'r-.- P5. » ..- 92- 1- 1923- ~- ».1.'~¢_.~ 91". =-P aw - - P . ¬"q1- k '- ~,.-. qf;-.»- _ -..-->.-,-I! -- _~-. ..92 " ";.$§g:- . -:--Q - |.» '-" ~ '- . - " ,' _-.- -.-..; »- .-.._, -391?-- Y rm} _ . ;.,-'-i--' - ~.¬ --,".-' . 33,,- - --!' -5. '.'»;-"H 5 I - .,. '!'»-=»-:""3""- "3"?-"-- """_"§.Y3;<"1'--. -r-I--P 5 -'~ H--15'1" Q" "31 -1' *3 '.I id -.1 <1 -- -V -_ -..t§,_.- _v-<-- .- -v -§*."~ -_-x _: -,1.-' . .~ q -"s V_...- _. .:v_ .-,_5a;' -- -_;., __ _.. ,_r--ire ;.<_R.
@.' _ ~__ . I __ If I . r ._, L ._ I _"_.- -_--Ir. .,, -.-- _ ,-. - paw. :- _. ' t .. _ . .' - I ' '. l -, *' » 33--_ ;aa~, *5? J 1.1-.--;.= . -1+1 , --23*; .* ¢~ F - |.; 1 :1. ,.$ -., -, »I». 92'--.- _."92-.. . -F - - _ - A . . I<.' .; . . - . N - ~ -- - - *3» - ».=.-1» . - l .- -» ~"- . '.=~ -- '1'-{i*" -'"-' ~"*" -1.---.64 -kt - -* " é-é -aw 1':-~ ; 5* -. ._ u _ i I. ,_ - . 92 _, _ . _ kg K , r 1 . _; 6 7 .. -:_; ____: _..92_3.J,.. rm: _?_ I Ar _ Us __ I M _ A? H H I. ._~ I . LP I -__ -._r_.£ F 5 A h . 1 » ,__ . !_:_,,,_- ,_. 2:. ~ -.,- : .2;. iE.:I:'I§'.'-_.--J ' " __l -Li -' - -- " F ~' ' ' I -
1!-.1--Pf w _ =5 "- - - - " 1! - " *=- '~.-"--==-= .- --.--.-.--<~-~.:- -.
~ . . - "
-. ,~-.._- -I. l___k5.. -u__.V__.,.__-8 . . __,.,! ___'- __ H<__ ,&-_< L-. _ , _ .- In ti . _:_, U _ - - _ I ____I_~:f-T.*~_<»4_;' _- .- "§ - -. . .- .- '.:- *1 -".1 -- in ~ - 4- - --w. -. --gi at. .."' 5"." ..;.. ".. - " 2 -Earl -- _..__.f--ah. .._;:_,.1>_.~192.. ".3 :-_.'___ ' " -' _ --L "2, kii 4 = - ~ -i -ii ---"~' ' " ' '1 1-'1 -J---- - - -1- ». Q-fiiii.- :V':><.H1161: 50¢-5 , , -"
.2 .1.--_8*92
1.» 27-. . 5'.
-1 1*»-' ~'~ E; -. -. ..._, -.~. i.'-92";i'l?F_§R*-~"-.'.'-"-' -1 .=--1..-..<.-
anyhow 80.111
tohwyhotmyuqi tn
-*'-iu-iipiiimeA * 1 Em» *" L.,$;g:__, - IA _ . F ___. . _ V. ._._' , ,2... -_ y ._;* - A ._..,-1-,._;s V_ I __,,{§,-_92;%?~L_'1J_;;|-if-If-t._*__,.__.;~:_. - ._ -. " ' _*_ v U M > éilhbj '**§;f'=_{;--..- .
'-L.-l__.-.
.- . .-, . . 5 . . . -.19-'=1.H.-win . %...§ . ' - -- . . _ - 7' . ' .. :-" ' ' '3?-;:. ";;; §;:5l..¥é*".?" m3 *"'.:'.'_:; -'_"-"3' "__.'-7'--7'#'.*'=1T"
- -r ; 3fm.;n= tho Egan: referred nnmn to t--alk -up Boa _ -
" . EBIIHHI HLLOH aid haiku! It aith B1>B*HA!mm!-N inEwing iodna'§U- . RAH! 18:6 nzhtur tam; $301-e nanny, " '-"-;- **'mi W _" _M TV *1. _
~ %@:=-'-
_"'i.'l1It .
"51I -H-.4.:
-4!- ,~- . - w _'_Y_ _ ...;5,.;,;L':i;¥_L~::.¢ ..-'__ <-;§»'_ '-V; 92__;V.¢. J ' ,..: L--' I I ' 1 "' '. ..~ * _;&~ -'§-J ;r.%;_;_3; - {F -§92., " Qre ~ - >~ " 1- Ix.
1
92
m
n _Hf1 _ii
_ _w_" 5 _w_ JV , _ ~__ __ _____ _ >___ A , ____ bl 92___ __*_ _ * __ ______ __ __ _ r_¥_w¬~W___ H_ ' k_ _r cw _ I_ _ _ rm ___W_ _ 1ww_____"mwwHWm__m_ H _ _:__ I _ 2 I _ 3 _ _ ix:J_ , __ ,_4 2 ___ T H h_°_ __ ad __'_ _ _ _7
_ '_L_r__ $ wt _,_ A _
J _ I _ n _W__j"_'_HU _ Y __ __"_ V; 13 __ _ _ _:__ it_MW °1 _"N. ,_ __ l___:_ _
_W___ W
_F_ ___ M_____
__wh_mH_n _J___ , f
__"__1 Z __ _
M _»_ :7 ._ _ 92_ kw 1: , w w _M H __ __V__ F I QM __ _ é H _ __
> *"_ "W
3 H v_ I _ . _ ¢_,_ wri__92_? '2 P_ K _ L H _'_ _ If 3 _ _ __ _ _u_ 2:1 !¥ F I _hLkg"é ___$ 7__ a_F_ n__ _L E__ |__* _
_ H: T1_ _ __ _ _ _ J _ _ Iv $_'0 __ _
T__
_ i~_ fr
H __ _ _ __ _ A _! _ _ M? _ A __
_ _ _ f _ _ '___ _*N_ 2 _ _ dR _u_i _ _ __h__ ___ _ 3 7 I 4 1 _ __ _ _____md_ __ a _92_.¥__"_;___V _
_I M if J; W __ _|_Mm_ _1_=_N _é __&¬_r_d_
_' V H Q *3 3, , av _'v _,__{ _ i_ _ _t ___ M _____ __ __I _ ___ J ____
_ i M_ _ _" ___~
__ML PW
9é_ V
ui_'__ _N F __ I _ % _H_h"'_ _ __ L_ _ _ W*
_~1 __*_ F ;ww__V _W _
W jMm 1% W A 3K
zv
TF1?!x
wryQ-inn-1|-Ii! 7 7
4-.
' »Ii ,. 6- -
Q5-'
4
.= ...~
v-
_ -1;->
a _
. . _~:.
._~ _§92?_¢_-win-. _- 5'-5 .
.-r 5,
. 1»
I A
,.- ._-._'. q-
4;-
-w-F
_. I», .m_
=..
.¥.__r.. _' -..:§._. "p_*92."
.-_~
w~.92 " __ Tr
92.._.
._~, 3'-.-
_} _ J.-.
_._ . .
P: -F-"'=-12?-;.;.
.,' .1 ,J . _...,¢x5 _" -ii.
v-.--.'4
I _ _, - __ ngi. . _;_7_,Y...I "£'*..qr1: . -: .1121. J - V-Ff» -- -' - - ',- -11::-L,;;_.
é. ."_;.'
.-.
-.92=. -'92. "
15'>2. V».-; .- .
' "
'11; -TQQI
|-'.f5|gf|5;§$g
.5.»-._-__'
_ __;.92,..-_ _ ~:- ,1 .
.:,_?;: '
192 xvi¢, ww .- .3;.
1 -_ _' _ _V .
. __,.L Y f ~~, ,1
7»: la . '
*1.
. 1. _ 1:-,, §;£h_ '. f. _ ;_V,.;; A'._ _-5?
_,, ...,:"v§;;~_~#'l._ ' -J: .¢ " " -=1"-"?
,,=._ . C~. J __ .,342 '
__f.
.,.. _
-;.»;: -' 33, .|_ --- '.-. -_-.- .
' ,~$=--' 92 J.
, -E;7r ._ . 1 . 92_-= ._ -_-.-~.. ,
.. ~- , ' '
-an- ;»~. _-.__ I ,,,|'-= '>92-- - tr.-em "$2-*"""?;":» ._,,.
_ .4 H 1..,. 3 .-. ' =1---.
>. -' ¢
.§.x_ .
'1-- rt: -M?-;*'Z>.,'.~
__d?"
7 . ia-.- =3;-.~»w.!'I-=1 I1.» .
.£:+->"<,.
_ ._ _; -.
£1'l'92:_|pr'~||n-¢~ *~ _- Y .""';';_' ..'1- MK.
"__ 2; _ k
H y .. K .inn.. IK ' . "K- "'1/_* . K " -Sit '51.. -»-K.-~.KK. -- ." -- ~ - " K ."g~§{.,..; "_ _. W .K .
4,.~ *-
. . -1. =»::_.- " K» " - -rr 5- -K K_ K'.._,,. . _ 'K K-"K- =~.~ *5.K-' . KK,_ _. _' -0 ./_ -£5-P.-'_'_ _;_K.K""-KK - _K ___,;. , h wk. ._
V f ..:K
pa. . m. " K"K;.__ .__.;- .'-" .- K '. lK~.
.~.-' "'~K"
=a-'K. 1:1 x-. .K*-K ,~.-.,. . -- -- -_K . " K- -- K Y" 'K§**" K ' K K K-Z ..' " -K" ' I I I ' ~' :,..I..:'. " KT lbw??? 'Z"§"*=iK'KK'.K *1?" "'4"- F-' K .. ' ".;Ki~ ;' ' " '-.. -= -K K1! " "' -v 'Ke ¢ " " K-~" "- --"'K~ 1' KKK-K~Iw--K-"Kj"':""--" " -I'-. * K..' i-=i " .,:_K..*_.§{92§§"j ~ "- = =4-2* §, _-;~..~:K_- _ K 1-.» - R,-. . $ P .,, -_ K. I K. _. - -_K.$-;?K$,92~ _.KKK,_ ;, - _ ._;:_>.*;b _ A -
;".*.j-T-.K .K KK..-K33 -6: -3"~ K
.=-- . 5- '
1 Q~11 '._-4; 5;'1 K..,,. ="-" K {Q14 _**"_§:d K !.K'_<=i?{
-K:-§'¢>;.1 -3 K__K -
' e
1- ..-..1
_v ' Q1, . ' _ -1-25. _ _L-'}r"_- -'- - 7 --- "~.K K _K »;92 _¢. 9 _ K
.,nu '_ I."';fgf";--'-1'~ ,,"K,92§.. 1- _ "* 11 _"K ' '~K~.:>'¢ = - .' i" ' W4K .-K-K-~K -. K =~K.,-.KK F... K. l':.§r" " Ki.
-"K":-. '
,,"..'p K.-"" I4 ff
..l-g_-3- K-_'.,'.,.-'.§"'_"-" .;.t~j . K...'K .K K K, a=K -"t"
K-,_.,,.§.'- "--
92 u, ~_-.---.-,r ;- - K.
"=1.--:I7 . ":J?i;7;4 -i .7-K K. - K. - .'K . '_ .;" K K' ' . .:: K - . -.-.. 92--" 1.»_. '.=.' _. _Z ' .- "fa," $4 * ."»1_f %;;.92~"d0-9219233 92 Q . "i92§:iq£-59$ ., 1:; _ "w 5' : '.-92§":.* _- ". . " vi .__ ' ~»- ,1'K" .. K _ K " - I WK; /- K " ,"¢'~..r-3,-".'|_I§.»1K.L H1"-,.;J;Kq;..;= K. _
I .K K K-" "K" -" 'i~"»3 """ " ""*-" '4-. .-:1 "K*~' " ' .:.K = =*-K '5&1."<"-iK.~;=K':;i~;=KK@<92'f" K - K2"" .1»-K-. K--1 dz. ,;K. ~**" .. 1 'a- K; Q;~ ' = .--'=1»;k:K K-K1.-;~ K "+*- K-1? -.K~ , K "'K- -* .-~-" ' K - K-.1 ¢ 1. *5-j ".. "" ;, ;. ,1 "KK - K - .. _ .. K ,K:. a , K. KK ~ -A1: - K; K». _ .5 , . K KaKK="'*-"--Z'~§r
.~"'92:I _ __' ...;. T.¥ " 71?.. 5:; _. __
" 7-; '1.
, ,1, =_..K._ ",,__,_ K .
.., K. K .K...,,"~K" K-K3 K».~-""K .K . ARK . K . K . K. ...;3"-K. ?!"K. l .;~»KK. ;q.=;-.@;; K.,._g:.K.K,;_KT"~KK!';; _ .. _ if F .KKH * I ', , . K». __92g»._ ' K- g§**-_:.:,-__§~§_ _:7K=,;,Q,5=g,'-.K...K; .3 ~¢§%_~s~.K.'~K.K-§ --n?§ in '- --* . K - - K K K -'--;-.- . ,;r"'; ' :.."_*_ -""K <_ _..' _-. _ . K "-"*1; = "."K"K."'=*'»"T". K K=,' .- K-K1 1-?" ,,==@- K=-,. e-K-Ki"'.- K ~';. ~.u . ,: "-K*§K'~.. *5;~", "1-.=K-.. _,_ _K=-4 -. . fq-El.92 2;, g.[-- - K ~ "' - _: if . " " K;_92- "- ,K-K " K " K K = -"-KKK"*~92'*.K"'~ K. *KK~-=-K __ K K¢~~»~-*92--K"-" - "- ';K- .'-A-.4-T;-KK. K-:.K».K .K K K.. " " M. " ""*¬ " 5'-$2» 1 7 a '-A P . I W ' K 7 7 ~13; U D _ ,, _| -1-1 __ 43,2; _; r Q i'K""7L."-K";.-..v=_|;l.;_ ' -$5 K K- -K.K .111" K- -..*-K-1-'* '=_"- "-f|'K:?"?. ~ T, ém "-L . .K **K' K-1 i_-;§I1 3-1*~~.K=-".-. -K 1" " --~ H . "" K ' . " K ,_ K. ;'i-1" -;K ." . ,."K_|;;_2'. ,., K1? -*'K.I{';_'__-*¢"1_:'F1K- K; ~ -0 $J§L92'=*;.:§;i.-"".~ =1 =.~KK K 1,, _..92- v92"'~-1"-'5 . -H: _;_ 's..,T ' ff -I¢§ - ' » * '4 - II. 7 ~ '1:
"£'§E- K ;-1 K 92=~"+=KK~
.. .".
""v- ."
4 .rl92I'~. I V-'1 -~-. ;- " " " " " K.""' ~' * .K' ' --_"K . W .- >1-'~"K -K ""-- -. ' " A ' - - -K --
'-sw; H . 1-I H
'b_ HQ 31-4
r.K -
; ,,_..=K "~~-.K.
-.-:1;I,K._- .":Ké. ._ ~,.-; '"_ 1.; ~.s-v._._' .;,r
av . -" »"KTi'92,1; :_ 1-4 '.
ST
*2
: Ff ""'-.K.K'- ' :. T ' ' Q *. r».1; =.¢"~='*- K.g;-..4j { ~K"';:j::92.";:_?»1 ~;,- "?'~ .- _:-5+;-z-i',."K?".!.i$2. *L'."~"- we. , . ""1 . Q?! _K__K_..-; ,~ .__- - _ _,. .V ;__ 1-#5:" "~ ' -1 . -K:-- -" ..._K"9 K, " H4.» 1-. .- '. _ .."- ". K" : K Ki" "- ;q|:a;.~_K - _" .¢..__,-' ,"*K-"mi.-'. F * -K ._ " ._ g,'-ii! ~"+I _ _ .
. 35 92"'K_ __-- .._ . K ..- . 492..'."-; __ . .. _. ' . ,a-:.____£¢ ___3;;_i_ K. _ ;?3;-,7-.. K f{.._,.7 ..-K ._ K .
-K.'K*e¥.- .92 =2, 1,1 : V ..
#:-
-»:.. .17"!-.K .. -'_l- 4. .
" K 1%;. .~ . J 11. K, I
-013- , ,3. 5,. '_=.}:;K .:,K :-.-";1§",,, ft". . _.
.1-""'; . .D-1,;-La;-K V I Q . l m fa-,.. 1K K ..KK.KK1¢-,-, .K Km -.+ K " §.. _ - " =' .N E. .H . .,'""§$.'K ~_'. K..'". l- K: "Q . K =K?;- K.."K K"T-*KY "" "-..92 ._. .::» * K" _é~::.,,- K - . ,;'w_'-K- , "K-. -KM» J K . .< K ! - K»-K,¢-'-¢§*;;T '-"5.-:.=¢ *; 1. K """" =:K-.'.-Jr'_II~'4 §*K.-""-,~g -- K 1; -.¢ KK -_ "- "- - ~ ; -' .,__K *1; ~. " K._,_-,K_. "" K K;K-K ; KK-K .-mi. -_'-. ix -' 5§'T:: L K. "ggu |§ ' ' g. ' '1' d. ' " rt: ' ' ' '.K*.-':§i*» '92L~'92r923-.K-- ..K4_".?;;" * 5.;-_ .;»e=~~ KK 92 K K»' V. :" '" B __ , _ _ Ki.» A §p"- K '* '""*"KK!,-";;=: . - A-92 _. . KK K K . > . K _ .,Q._ .. - " 1 -K ,---1 1-. ,"--" -K '-.. ..- "m""'~ f'rzK"K"K.KK'I-2*!" *." .1. "1-K J'1. b 92_. ' NE -
r-~ .
§ - K ~- 1V K * " ' - ~':92_-.KK~~v ., K- _--- 1§K§*--a.;~.~' K K.~.+.K§ K ¢.LK_~_K._,,92_ -_92,' ;~H-K __. _ .-_V_ K . .K' -_rK'=_92¢'K ,92'.-K .- _" as 4 _ "" -.+ ~" K-¢* 1 - - --
*5 1.,»-~.r_;'7?'5f"@ ¢ , '." " -- J
SK is gm,,: _. .7! w . ".. *»"
"
§.a%~' '
~ ».,|~r' -KK
-. - = . ,.92_'Fr- _ .17 -K _ . . . K .. ?~':'*.*@wK~ W l.K 1%~:~K*K'K;f."i'.K"".=*."i.'K"-=..;.-_r_;..: ,. _92= .. ._. _ ._.-K.»,.__ '92;K,92- ,__ _ .._|. ,__ y H.» 't§_:._, .1_ K,-._. _K- P! .,~.< '-wr" K;-KK.._. "" K - K ¥ -.,' - - KJK ,-,'-' ".K-<,;~._- _-K ~-92wg=- - --' -3,,» __'",:¢K;j' l _ hf K-fl.-K-;_!"" " """*-*~'K"K*-"~"".KK>"=.= :* I"'-'- .K - K-.. "" we - vi -"= _."§;.K:..&.__~_- ..é._,.=."__':1 ;._ "2 3 _;f.,,._R;;§" - .-_-K -- KK 15- K . .',92-f~:;§_ . _ ._. aé-.,.
____ <- '..:~v|-1 _=,{" " '
.. ._K1- M-_-_K -".92 - ;:v_~» -- - , . _ . -.- _. K K, .h ._-K = Kgk ., K . K ":Z'~'*"._.'? :.KK"'KK '1 111;? K=.» K="-;-,1,K._ am-~'%,92:<'35 "K ' E -, ".FT'1'K .,,K" .~K "" F1-Z -" K.» """K-~"~ . K" K K- K.Ké?.* KKK
n. ' , .KK-K¢'.K .
' ' '" K K= ""= :5.
. '~Kw-.-* .- -+-:§#hV~7 :' -t?éI' '"
L W -'.'_" """."'»:f' K'=.K§' _ - K. _~I_$;$,.-45;, 5'' K '° ' ' K-£12 2 ._- "nan._.. 9292'- .7 -_" _- ». * ;- .. _"f. _ , _ _ _- ,,__ g?.K-K,_,._ _..4.K*~eK.,.¢».....--1:-1" K";3";,_,--. §l- - "K-j. 5wK@'§~Y~"~<K- " 4;"- "'*" "-"'""K " -" ;."'K". .»~»K K- ~**K
K"/.§¢~K.I.*--K "-1.1 .1 .-g,L -. K...» . - I -3_- r_ 33" __*E K- 1: __. . _ __:._w._;.~: ~ Fa 3_§.,_ fK,..~ , K. _:_jL;. _ 92'.§P{~}.:__- -5' _ -2
g -- - - 1. '~ 1 -._._, . i K K, ,K W-K.-5*"--1 KK-.. - -;;K.-3 *3-fk_y_i;}4.:?:!.%' . . -K» ~. Y" &
__,-5 .. - H _ .w,2 L! s ~ UK ; __
5"?-r? K:K~K".K K: -K K ;:~K:K'~ -1; " 1;.=- . . K -3' W: - F.-K-11.", _-E
KIK . ' ' 1.
" v_.»K;"_ I&K=_ I J
*- ' -i-:__
- K~ " - -.--1
." ." _~w~K-"" .- V . . K- l.| ' _'l'..
" ~. .-- K»'"-
>-
92~~.
*4?
//' J! .
,., L ,.!92, ~n __
92
QLr§:i.- kajiflii QI."92]- 1lil92U"} ""
onv 0 overheard HORLAN's GOHVPTSLLIOH Ln
uclleyi; TavQrn, Si. Touia.
92
-15,
92
3av
QC 41
L , 'l~m
%2a#~Y '
-l
I ..v
2 ,
. _'1-"*-
4*
,_ ..
J»,
.1,
an-.
T315
*§§
..w
--¢._
,_,.
ft.
ii;
mst1
0 I '1 I
t
FEDERAL BU.1 REAUOF |Nl92/ESTIGA
1 1111.:CA5: onrormnrn A1 MLSIIIIJSTON FIELD - A nu: H0. 53-611
nlrowr mm: 7 olviwnnu mu: L-{.§§-,§-L. ..§j. 7 7?? l
IHIC ML ST. IDUIS, HISSDUHI -
[:77 710,11/1.
LOUIS 'CA1:1m:-:'.*., was|'|llTcr|':I-k0; Cl
., et al - am;11:~:r-.1:
PAP. O LE L!.=.'l' 'I' ii-PS
GYNOPSSS OF
bw
0 2 c
F'1:'.I?.L.}F. 1: Report of SA-
T +FACTS: MICHAEL J. 0'NEILI, Supervisor in office .
Collector, Internal Revenue, St. Iouis, states he
never applied for position with U- S. Board of
Parole and to his knowledge no one intereoded in
his behalf for such position; that he nov
with PAUIFDILUUN or EDARDBFADX, deceased, anythir
concerning such position nor with respect to the
T8183-5%? 01 convicts from federal ponit':ntle:*i'2S-
He admits being in DIL1LN's office with ! ~1i»92I"1' but
says that they did not discuss parole m.1tte1"..'= and
denies seeing BRADY fo ' r period 01 at least six
months prior to L'1t+o.r's d¢=::f.n. JOEHZ In J'"';'I'T,
922att/Jr-1;-'?;." at 1->1", llb. M571, it-in '.|'1.~_'_-"l_" -'-"it. to!"-
i&;r".o1 ,'.' 2 ]92_=.1 1.11" 01- l.".1,7- I1|.]92.[u.?l, £»L-Ft "T ' .a
,...ti:"..f- mo unj.-'t-hiimi to no " ' ': f' ;' *1"<!~-.: 1*"
§,,;uh ecT.s and nas [no 1~::'~'»"1'* I J ...-..:= '_ O1 C1I"~'r I"-pt .'~h{1I.- .he so-"r: in newsp'§p'3rs. tater; J=JXi'E ii'iC- b=;c;:1
involved in parole mat ors with ~'e:;-est tr: St. 10-oi 1
convicts but -has no knowledgqe;/th-at ei.t,i~r= JO1'I..l orDILIOIJ were involved in instant case. ~-<--
sently out oi city but will be i:1r.<~'1'92'i/2-..,.»,, ~_92;'~-._1n nix
ret1:*."n. JMLFJS PATHIC}LlTE5'l'A un1lJ.l~' to ].;':?#
-.vi:.Ch allegedly '3 ' 'ofU.S
- .--<.. l"*.!?'-
__ n-1* - of [_~+ SODG lo ' '~ ;-:*:'o}o.l-
i. 1; n '.'Lo'l{1 an-1 -»~1r"/*0
.1 ed 10-10--1'7.
_Arriov:o"A '
1'4*"tdr1_']O-_Q?'.' at 3!. Iv ="
elcsype to Bureau, H'J*1hin to 1' " #
H t__w;va@= $ P "' M~~~ - --piul _Lq.. 4 -e
_____ ___ ARGE I66 no-r WRlYElI¢ r I
V I 7i 77?"'i__i'_-1-_i'* 'H qt sPAC£s _ _.______-e_ s__ E. , __'_ __,_, _,i,.;.1
-r P 1 l '___- , ,_ _ -__'_*____;____ a H __ _ ff ~Y. ., o -
coHl:sor'rn|sm:Pon'r ' 4 l '- ~ - - - .11..-»,¢.,J..4_._.__ .._ __, [___ LE. ___ if92:; I .?f'w 92 Bureau A1-.SI»! Att-ention Hr. ltosen! - <
Chicago 2-;--1'9/J ' '1 2': _ -- -
'ashi.12ton 1--:¢1d'*:-2»;1.! s1m1. R:-:0: - --
St. 1.011215- so _.-, --.. [_-&-lA-'- ___-s_e} TW "*
?n s es __ is
rruu:|- -92I
W e_ i __
I! 07- l0GMn.'a-I nDi OIYMADIIV W
10-11 1» 10? we
or o'isc-usrrcd
i1 1
alt. Ob1"'u1
.'Z ,l1.~t_. 92
we in oossessmn of =3 '-*'1*o"" '
c'm*.'.:Enin' " "'
_M1
ll:
my "1:F:L'
v ;_'-Q
."'*. z
SL -
This is a oint re ort of ASAC H. K. H055, Epcciwl
' g agent. Agen .nd the reportin____------r. 92 H.__ ii
Investigation through city and telephone directories
and in the building at 418 Olive Street, St. Iouis, Missouri, where the
office of PAUL Dlil is located, disclosed that the individual referred
to by JAMES PATRICK TESIA as HIKE O'NEIL was probably identical with
MICHAEL J1 O'NEILL, presently employed as a supervisor in the Clayton,
Missouri branch of the Office of the U- S. Collector of Internal Revenue,
St. Iouis, Missouri. O'NEILL was telephonically contacted and stated
that he would call at the St. Iouis Office of the FBI for an iUtGF¥iuF-
Upon being interviewed by ASAC H. h. hOSS and the
reporting agent ONEII1|executed the following signed statement, the
original of which is being transmitted here~ith to the Washington Field
Division:DETAILS:
"St. Innis, Missouri
October 10, 1947
p
"1, ?[3PA¬T.. o . 7 .-.. .4.»
Bureau oi lHV?%tl;~ _- .
II
I hate never applied directly or indirectly for a positior
with the United States Board of Tar 1e and to my knowledge no one
has ever interceded in my behalf to obtain a position with the
U. S. Board of Parole. Specifically, I have never discussed with
Nr. PAUL L1 LLON or in-. ED.-mil! smut, deceased, anything at .111
that misht be construed as an application for a position with the
U. S. Bcald of Parole. I have never discussed with Kr. kAUL
UILICN anything relating to the ]E19&S¬ of fedora] prisoner;
iron a United States penitentiary.
I L-
[D 1I. F "I V I Viiditnesson.
, 53¢,.r-¢-
.. __.
s
:,.-4- .
,_é_¬.-[ ,-fa-J
st 58-64 _
advancing funds to DILIDN on his92beha1f92for any type of job- He further
stated that he had not seen BRADY for a period of at least six nwnths
prior to the 1atter's death but did admit that on one occasion he had
been in DI11Cn's office with BRADY. However, he did not remember just
when this occasion was and would not state why he was in DIL1OH's office
on that particular occasion but said that it was not in connection with
parole matters of any type.
JOHN u. JOINT, a lawyer with offices at 1221 Locust Street,
St. Iouis, Missouri, who was fornezy a circuit judge for the city of '
St. louis, was interviewed at which time he executed the following state-
ment, the original o1'whid1 is being transmitted herewith to the Washington
Field Uivision:
"October llth, 194?
"I, JOB» no "1 1 . r or at -- "Po following voluntary
5Bat¬m8ht= T -f the kederal Bureau
of Investigat on:
I have been asked as to whether I had made any contacts in order
to obtain the paroles of certain individual; in connection witt
v.-hem C0n['_rc¬sior.al h=za.rin_".*s are being conducted, p.11-ticulzagwith L
respect to lble CAbFAGNA, et al. For the iniornntion of toe
authorities conducting this investigation I will state that at no
time, past or present have I had angthing to do with any such p T~
sons or their paroles. In addition, I have not boon in any dis-
cussion concerning such persons or their paroles ind have no know-
ledge oi the Subject excepting what I have read in the r:ii 1} press.
/s/ JOHN o. Jcwru .. inpis _ Ti if ii _-M fl?
Q'92 i<.'1- -"""|:L -1 :1-je e-|.-.. . ,
m,_ , 1!! A-_";1;! r. :.i.
At. Louis Mo."
Mr. JUYNT admitted that in about 193% LO 1*3§ hi-UL; 0"S0'J- -92 --. . ~ - i--". - 1'.work in connevtion with Obtlnlp a parol. f r cni JLQJI ~1 Hf :'3 1stated inst in "st. Innis rest-uispntch" D@"5P3?@Y hi 111@ § . , ,was active i!!LU[mCCtiO witn tho case of one i;nt¢ 1MV@_ U_¬Fd:Y92:h. . . _ -,_ - - - 1 ;- .1<=:p~that t-his newzxlpor nad tried to smear his nsnae in I-<1I1I'°-ti? H in ».,.].' - - =- .-92 - ~. - '592- tcases but enqhutically derned any connection whiL,o,92_1 "1 1 _ 92i]_ _, _ . '_ - " - .. - ,-v1 Q -_ , ' 1 _case. IQHUE and Iinh were notorious Crlmldlb nho hid b--n Llli
the vicinity of St. Inu."..<s. .
-3-
F
1
SL 59-64
as invo .ed in these cases a a sometime during the li3O's
JOINT and DlIlDN were law partners and "worked together" on matters of
that type. "However, he said he had heard nothing definite to the effect
that DILLON was interested in the instant case ano that as a matter nf
fact, he knew nothing about the case involving IOUIS UALPAGNA, Qt al.
He said that DILLON and JOYNT had been closely associateo for a number
of years and tnat it was prior to the time JOXNT was a circuit judge in
St. louis that they were associated as law partners.
ill he interviewed
immediate en 115 re urn or any in orraiion he may no able to furnish
concerning thi: matter.
JAEE5 PATRICK TASTA was again interviewed and stated ihut he
had made a thorough search of his home but was unable to locate the menu
and other paper which he had seen in the possession of EDHARD BRAMY which
he believed coniained a list of convicts BLADI wanted paroled from federal
penitentiaries.
Enclsure to ashington Field: Signed statement oi hlGHALI.J.
O'NEILL dated 10-1U-$7;
Signed statement of JLTW J.
JOIN? datei 10-11-47 ~
REGISTERED LAIL
P E F D I N G
.../_
. ,
f*_
H.
r '
_¥- _
V
_.-1 "-"u
a4
IQya
BL 58-64
ST. IDUIF DIVICION
at C51,. Louis, féirssouri will in1.ervi§>1UNDSVE1DPEb L¬kDS
.-5..1570
¢4 --" 4r :: . I--rd ' 1 __ _,O:
. 1 ,.n _
ii. £1-.§3 * 3 4'-;_-7
' FFDFRAI __ _ __ ___ BURFAU OF IN e _.- .-_ -- ---92./E5TlG1A.TlQN
.'I'|mnHo.l ' l
_nT:-ue us: omamn-urn AT W1-@IHGTQ'H, -D, Cu -
. .- ,_ ,-
- : QATI HHQI 111,9] FIIIOD POI
,1_ nu: no. 58-47 . __;- .
. K Vi. y 7 V ,* fl ,
HEORT "HQ. QYI§°RTMl@lIv V V 77 V77 W777 7
RIC M DI '.R -- rxrwseunes, PA. 10/14/47 1077747 b
"E.-T ' W
. r»
I.!_'-_¢_%__ '*
_ c
r .-=_.
_ i1
92
1
4. _<:
92
.
*1
. _svuor-em or FACTS: _'
. . '- 1,
.-1
r
__ . .
|_.
7 :9-I:-=£-&au;ni.92'r~
M memos:
929""- " 1A;~TIr1.§v'm-
W , _ ,1 -- A e _ ~ _ ."_'3L;'7flf_~::;;:::;:.: ~<g <11 " %$f°-?t2i éL- e _ ~=»~=» - ==1
_Low_1s cm1m,' es. et_e.l e BRIBERY-92
I .. '1. 10apte.inALBERT COHNER, Federal. Prisonelnduetriee, I "
_ . e " , Inc" recalls seeing letter 1 tom JAMES R. Ronmson D
l when reviewing files on subject, but does not '
remember any converaeti on with ROBINSON, When CORNER
was Acting Director of Bureau of Prieo
' 1945 hns in summer
, _e talked to FRANK LOVELAIID of the Bureau of
1 ' - * Pr-ieone about the transfer from USP, Atlanta, Gr». .
of 3 prisoners, one of when was DMIIDREA. These 3
' men had been rec onmended for transfer by e claeei-E
_ fication board at USP, Atlanta " , -I30 W9-rtlen Jo we -use, Atlanta, wrote letter about rumors em
favors and transfers were being obtained through X
expenditure of large emne of money. 00141-IBR beli
transfer: of 3. Oven i
= prisoners held up because of these
rumors but later transfers went th
-I1rough when space
a1v'|?92|4-4.n'§bl$ on bus going to USP, Leavenworth, Kansas, 92
Lttornw no-med DILLON new CORNER in summer 1945 about
transfer of one or more subjects but exerted
pe.rtic'ula.rI10 92
pressure, according to CORNER, COHITHR V
- reports that neither ROB1NSON'S letter or DILLOIUS
personal cell had anything to do with transfers.
CONNER knows of no bribery or irregularities.|| .
_ .- .
,--,
92
-0 -r I92uu_-__
Telephone call from Washington Field to Pittebux-§1,1O/7/47.
Teletype from Pittsburgh to Bureau and Washington Field,- 10/'2/4?. "' "
J! I ,
,..3
if-:
n ,3-IINT EIFACEI__ _ if ' _. M1- -n _fQ-~_ '. ' " -:1~;uu.un*-11» _,:,_.__ Q ~] ,.1__-,,,.- r _ _ ~_._.__& _ lIll rrnnl nr ~i'i-_'_II_- |_,B!l1'0&11c° .;.I'l;D54'-,'~° /Q.-2-1 ¬o92° _. F B I tshicago ._F ,5 92.__ v15 D92F¢20'9eehin t'1.» .-. ., 47 . _g on ield AMSD! ' ' - _,_" . 5?! 6,. Lp ' iPittaburi _ j A 92W, ,9- Q51
none I, I,,.,__,..'..._--. ;92 ' 92$$'Q$ . I i ii TiI
. -'17
p "qr
334$
92 or
. ¢i"*% 1
s .
DETAILS: On October 7, 1947, at 3:00 PM, Assistant Special Agent in
Charge CXBL E. HEHNRICH, Washington Field Office, talephoni
cslly furnished Assistant Special Agent in Charge A. K. BOWLES of the Pitts-
burgh Division pertinent information in this case and requested the interview
of Captain ALBEBD He COHHEB, an orfioial or the Bureau of Prisons, at the
Federal Rotormetory for Women, Alderson, West_Virginia.
' 1_; AT LLDEHSQH, HEST_VIRCINlA "__ _
Captain ALBERT H. CORNER, Associate Commissioner, Federal
Prisons Industries, Inc., United States Department of Justice, Washington,
D,C,, advised that he has in the past acted as Director of the Bureau of
Prisons in the Bbsence of Mr. JAMS V, BENNETT, Director of that Bureau.
Captain COHNER advised.that he previously reviewed the files
on the five subjects involvedin this investigation on October 2 and 3, 1947,
before he left Wsshington,_D.L. and Captain CORNER was aware of the nature
of the investigation being conducted, He advised that in one of the five
files at Washington maintained by the Bureau of Prisons, he recalled seeing
a letter from JOHN R. ROBIHSUN, Chicago, Illinois, but Captain CONNER was
of the belief that the letter was addressed to Hr. BENNETT, Captain CONNEB
reported that he did not recdl having seen the letter previously and speci-
fically does not recall having had any conversation with ROBINSON about
transfer of any of the five subjects.
Captain CONNEB talked to FRANK LOVELAHD of the Bureau of
Prisons about the transfer of three prisoners from the United States
Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgie. This discussion took place in the summer
of 1945 when Captain CORNER was the Acting Director of the Bureau of Prisons
and during which time Mr. BENNETT was in Europe. CORNER seemed to recall
that one of the men mentioned for transfer was D'AHDREA, and that he was one
of the ones who went to the United States Penitentiary, Leesenworth. COHHER
mentioned that LOVELAHD has immediate charge of transfers and signs the
orders for the transfer after discussing the matter with the Director or
Acting Director of the Bureau of Prisons. Captain COHNR specifically
pointed out that in the instance of these three men who were transferred
to Leavenworth, he was willing to accept full responsibility, and that if the
facts were the same, they would still be transferred if the matter were left
up to him, Captain CONNER pointed out that it was a common practice to
transfer prisoners to an institution which affords the same amount of security
if that institution is located closer to the prisoner's home; that_this pro-
cednre makes it nore convenient for the relatives to interview the prisoner
in question and has e direct relationship on the behavior of the prisoner,
- 3 -1h
qt
til;,,' .
- ' "
é
g n
It was pointed out by CONNB that the recommendation for the
transfer of these three men had been made by the Classification Board at the
U,S, Penitentiary, Atlanta, because these men were forming e clique with other
prisoners at Atlanta and this use something the penal authorities tried to
avoid. CONNEB stated that this recommendation would be found in the "Progress
Report" on each of the three men in question in their files maintained by the
Bureau of Prisons. CONNER stated that he had seen this recommendation in the
files and that the recommendation had been made while BENNETT was still in P
this country and was in fact, the Director, Bureau of Prisons. '
CORNER brought out that he also recalls seeing in the file
a letter written probably in May 1945 by Warden J. W. SANDFORD, United States
Penitentiary, Atlanta, in which Harden SANDFCRD stated that there was a
prevalent rumor at the Penitentiary that large sums of money were being spent
to secure favors and transfers. This letter was written about the time, or
shortly after, the recommendations had been made to transfer three of the
subjects, of whom D'ANDREA was one. Captain CONNER informed that this letter
was received at the Bureau of Prisons before Mr. BENNETT went to Europe and
uhile he was in fact the Director of the Bureau of Prisons. Captain CONNEE
was of the belief that Mr. BETNETT we away during the summer of 1945. Return-
ing to the discussion about the letter from Warden SANDFORD, Captain CONNER
advised that the letter mentioned that certain attorneys, names not recalled,
had contacted some of the prisoners at Atlanta and that apparently the rumor
was circulated based upon these interviews. Captain CONNER stated that the
letter in question contains the names of the attorneys who interviewed the
prisoners.
After Mr. BENNETT went to Europe, an Attorney named DILLON
came to the Bureau of Prisons and was interviewed by Captain CORNER, DILLO
was sndeeworing to secure a transfer for one or more of the subjects involved
herein. CONNER stated that the transfers were not made because of DILLC or_
because of the letter from ROBINSON but were made in spite of these efforts
to secure transfers. Captain CONNER recalled the name DILLON when he recently
saw a newppper clipping from the Chicago Tribune which stated that DILLON
had been called to testify before a Sub-Comittee of the Imus-Committee on
Expenditures in the Executive Departments which was interviewing witnesses
in connection with this case. Captain CCNNEB stated that four of the paroled
men testified before the Committee; that one subject's wife and at least
one attorney also had been celled to testify and that this brought DILLOH'S
name back to COHNER'S mind, Captain GOHNER reported that he had made no
record of DILLONS cell and that it was his impression that EILLON did not
exert any undue pressure to secure the transfers but did talk about his
illeged friendship with President TRUMAN and said something about having
managed THUhANS campaign when he campaigned for election as Senator,
-3-re
{-1 . mu."'-rP
ares
~e
1.
- . u q-2-J»,-".¢ X - 1 '4 , >
As tar as CORNER was concerned, these transfers were routine,
in this particular instance, were made at the convenience of the federal
government. Captain CORNER explained that the transfers had been held op
because of the rumor prevalent at the U.$, Penitentiary at ktlanta: that
several months later, a penitentiary bus was at Atlanta and had several
seats available and was going to the U.S. Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas,
to deliver prisoners. Captain CONNER sent a teletype while acting Directors
to UILLILM HUHTER, Warden, U.5. Penitentiary at Leavenworth, to find out if
he could and would accept the three.additional prisoners. A teletype was
received in response stating that no special problems would be created by
having these prisoners at Leavenworth and that they could be transferred so
far as the authorities at Leavenworth were concerned.
Captain CORNER stated that D'ANDREA was not transferred based
on the ROBINSON letter and that as indicated previously, the transfer was
routine. Captain CONNER did not remember that the allegation had been made
in this letter that D'nNDEA was ill.
As previously indicated, Captain CCNNER played a part in the
trnns£er<£ two additional prisoners who went to the U.S. Penitentiary at
Leavenworth. However, he did not recall the details involved but did remember
the name PAUL DeLUClA but did not seem to be too familiar with the names of
the other subjects.
He had no additional information to furnish with reference
to the transfer of the three men to Leavenworth. Cptain CORNER did volunteer
the information that these men were reported to be members of the old CAPONE
I-...__ .-.....-I J.l.».-.l- 1-1.-.. 1.-.! 1.....__. -....1-.4_.'| 1.. I__.l-.lA._-L.I___ -,l..1_1. __.__.'|: ...o492v___;u _UH-Ll GLUU. UL]- Ill ULLUJ uu-u. UUEI-l _}_JJ.¢l92-vUU. LIA Jtlrll-|Ll»92rJ.UUH W-Ll.l-U11 W01-L-L11 51 [U111 I-
maximum amount of security. Captain CONQHPR stated that he did not remember
any transfers from this group being made to the Medical Center at Springfield,
M0,, and he nontiohad that transfers to the facilities at Springfield are
based on the recommendations made by a medical officer at the institution
where the prisoner is incarcerated. Host of the tuberculosis, mental and
cancer cases are sent to the Medical Center at Springfield.
Captain CORNER did not remember anything about transfers to
the Correctional Institution at Terra Heute, Indiana,
He furnished no information with reference to the irregularities L
involved in connection with transfers and specifically pointed out that paroles
are not within the Jurisdiction of the Bureau of Prisons since they are handled
by the Board of Pardon and Parole.
-4-
_ - ;"'_____ .é__ F :__ __~ ---q-7:_ wt 7 "' I _-V».-I
p ._ 92-
-1;
*5
. " :- _ §a ;§!§I..-I
, _,|.-._-1' ,_, -
r
F
Captain CONHER was specifically asked if he knew of any
pressure that was brought to hear on anyone including himself on behalf
of these men. He stated that the only possible instance he knew of was
the personal cell of DILLON but he explained that DILLON was merely pre-
tending to have lots of political weight and wanted to throw it around.
Captain CONER stated that DILLON did not impress him one way or another
and the fact that he had made a call on behalf of e federal prisoner was
not something unusual. _ - 4 .
Captain CORNER stated that no money had been offered to him
or anyone he knew shout in connection with the transfer or in connection
with a parole involving these mun. He again emphasized that the ROBINSON
letter and DILLON call had nothing to do with the transfers.
Captain CORNER said that the files in the Bureau of Prisons
would disclose the exact dates mentioned herein and that the majority of the
information he furnished is based for the greater pert on his briefly
refreshed recollection. Captain CORNER stated that he would he perfectly
willing to give s signed statement with reference to this matter-after
reviewing the files to further refresh his memory. He was cooperative
throughout the interview. Captain CONNER was interviewed in the private
study of Warden HELEN HIRONIMUS of the Federal Reformatory for Women.
The referenced teletype furnished the substance of the
information giwm1by Captain ALBERT H. CORNER,
- REFERRED UPON COMPEETIOH TO THE OFFICE OF ORIGIE _
J
r
...5..0
'|-r
P.the
Y!
Q.Form Ho. 1 Q ':- THII CASE ORIGINFFTED AT
l I I'3.
A - - Q * ti
1
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
if w FILE NO. V
- anon? MAUI rr in Z, DATI WHEN MAD! PERIOD ron IIIFORY MAD! Ir
h _ wtucr-| MA?!. NEWARK, new JERSEY | 9/27/4'? 5 9/ 2536/47 1 '
1"-|-|-|-|_; f 7 CHARACTER or cans:
:/f _' ' LOUIS CAMPAGNA, Was. Bt R1 BRIBERI; PAROLE MATTERS
.. . E- . _ E J ..__..__ ___________ -...ra.-_______
._ g@;n§192rrIoN= ASSISTANT_p_IBECTOR Rosau ' 921 5YNoP5|5 or FACTS: "y 7 "WW
AIEXANIER,-IEINBERG, only attorney in Camden by that name,
does not know JOHN RQSELLI and did not telephone Board of
Parole on July 14,1947. No L01 Main Street in Camden.
MELLIAM J. HANIEY, Hoboken, N. J., attorney, met unidentified
man at Astor Bar in NYC . He was asked to take interest in
- _._ Rf_$EJI.l.I's parole application HANIEY ref . used because no
_ regains: offered. later mumzr wrote to ROSELLI, asked 1: ;
hell-bould take interest in case and identity of ROSELLI'srrgnd in New York. HANIEI discouraged by ROSELLIW reply
an dropped matter. ROSELLI unable to identi; friend in 92
1&5 HANIEY denies any Emowledge of C3-55¢ .
on4 w
ew-
.--
lb --RUC -
REFERENCES; Bureau Ietter to Washington Field dated Q 2.-" 2'4-70
Teletype from Washington Field dated 9-24-1.7.92-
~r-m
EITAILS: AT CAMDEN N. J-
. F ALEXANDER FEINBERG, 210 North Sixth Street,
that he has had no dealings whateoever with anyone by
of JOHN ROSE-LLI. He stated that he has never repress
-individual by this name nor did he make any contact wi
Lirdted States Board of Paroles on July 11., 191,7./T/"advrlteg
the ham f
nted an
th the
1:1. W
n /4 _¥._._- _._.__._. 1.. _.r. F . ..'. _ _r__n_-_i-_..i____. . .. . W _ W . . r_n -- - __ 7%-_, Allrnovsb AND -' / BP_£c|ALM;ENT roawAwn:u;£[ % , IN C-I-4-l92R<§_E.__l __r __ _ V , _°°"°T1 *_'TE_{ _T"E5E___5P _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' s . - | . - V. I- ¢ /9 1 I __ ' K | R] J 92~'»'__ __ J"--- 4, s A
- as ' g on e Q. l ,__... -=--1-" """"""' ' o~P+~'- Chicago Information! ' 92 F 13 I
-- New York Informati !"
. _
on 1-I DEU !q'1? 1'- Newark - ' 13 5!__.-____._ .___f.: 4!2*iA-1Q-
_r'F92_1¬ A L ._ ,
FEINEERG stated that he is the only attorney by that name
in the Camden area. He said that tiers is an EDWARD FEINBERG, who is an
attorney in Atlantic City with whom he is acquainted.NK 58-152
ALEXANER FEINBERG, in the writer's presence, telephoned
EDWARD FEINERG and without divulging the Bureau's interest in the case,
ascertained from EUWLRD FEINBERG that he had no dealings with JOHN ROSELLI.
A check of the Camden telephone directory and the city directory
confirmed the fact that ALEXANDER FEINBERG is the only attorney by that name
in Camden.
Inquiry on Rain Street, revealed that there is no such address
as A01 Lain Street, which was mentioned in referenced letter as the address
of FEINBERG. This street is a short street of approximately two blocks
running parallel to the railroad tracks in a poor section of town.
AT HOBOKEN,TN§§;dE§§hI
. "0 . -WiLLIsM J. HANIEY is a practicing attorney with his c
84 Washington Street, Hoboken, New Jersey. He is known to be active in
Democratic political circles and HANIEY is counsel for the Board of Education
in Hoboken. He is admitted to the New Jersey State Bar and also to the Federal
Bar for the 5outhern District of New York. During political campaigns he
frequently goes about the State making speeches in support of candidates
endorsed by the former Layer FRANK HAGUE, Jersey City, and the Democratic Party.
HANIEY was interviewed at his office on Setember 25, 1947
L.-n Q .-. Ii""
LE5 HANIEY advised that he has been a lawyer for about thirty
years, that he practices both in New Jersey and in Federal Gourt in New York
City. At one time he worked in New York City, has many contacts there and
spends a great deal of his time in New York. He stated that about a year
ago, he was at the bar of the Astor Hotel in New York city which he frequents
often. He met an individual at the bar whom he had never seen before. He
heard the man's name but is unable to recall it.
3-
-7 , -Q~4-_
H; -§
1-
. ».'92, _
i
ms ss-152 '_ _
court Judge in New Jersey and is addressed as "Judge" by many people who
know him. He believes that the individual who he met at the bar was
impressed by the fact that he was called "Judge" and because of this, advised
him a'oout J0hl92I ROSELLI. he pointed out that ROSELLI was involved in the
WII.LIE§ BYL,0FF movie racketeering case but that ROSELLI had really not done
anything serious. J He described the individual as white; male, short, about
orty, Italian descent, black he1r;_ lived at the
. as in the clothing business in New York and had
academy at West Point at that time. -Astor Hotel at that time ,
s son at the military
HANLEY was asked by this individual if he would take an
interest in ROSELLI's efforts to obtain s parole. HANLEY inquired about a
retainer and was advised that it was not possible at that t:Lsre to give hit
money but that there would be money in the case later. he individual
stated that it would be necessary first to find out what HANLEY could do
on ROSELLI's behalf.
ROSELLI's. He also
at Atlanta, Georgia.The individual said that he was merely a friend of
told him that RGSELLI was in the Federal Penitentiary
A
Within s short time after themeeting at the bar, this individual
telephoned I-IANIEY ontwo occasions. HAINIIEY still took no interest in the
case because there tss no money in it. He has not heard from or seen the
individual since and HANIEY has visited the Astor Bar frequently since that
time.
HMUEY pointed out that s few months later, when he was in
need of money, he reviewed some of his records to see if he could get a case.
He came across a notation about JOHN ROSELLI and
to locate the individual he had met at the Astor
stated that he then wrote to JOHN ROSELLI at the
an attempt to get ROSELLI's permission to act on
if ROSELLI could identify his friend in New York
that in a case of this type he might get as highthereafter took steps
without success. HANIEY
Atlanta Penitentiary in
his behalf and to ascertain
City. HANIE-Y pointed out
as $500 or $750 to make
one trip to the penitentiary to interview ROSELLI for the facts of his
confinement. He than believed it would be possible to get another retainer
after his interview with ROSELLI.
HANIEY turned over to the agents of this office all corres-
pondence in his records with ROSELLI and the penitentiary. He stated that
he nss discouraged oy Rf6ELI.I =s reply and oy ther-._4. 1-1....-.1. nnc.I1:92I-IT .....-..LGUU UHGU I1-UQDJJ-l.:J-. W65
further steps on half of ROSELLI and took no interest whatsoever in theunable to identiizethe man in New York City. Cionsequently he took no
0869- - 3 . -
...3..5
-u
-1--1
no_ <4,
N -.{ I ... _§< 1- J
1.-
".
§
NK 58-152
92'92
" He stated that it is his belief that the individual in
New York city made no other efforts on HOSELLI's behalf or else he would
hme@mminmmhmHMEL msmwdwwumanumtmmme
absolutely no contacts with anyone or no efforts whatsoever on ROSELLI's be-
half. He stated that he has absolutely no knowledge of any activities on
the pert of anyone on behalf of any of the subjects.
The following is the correspondence between HARLEY and HOSELLI
"Department of Justice
United States Penitentiary
Atlanta, Georgia"
June 5 , 191,7
"The Warden
United States Penitentiary
Terre Haute, Indiana"
RE: John Roselli, Reg. No. 63'7'75-A.
Discharged!
|r~n.__._ rs: __ UBHT DJ.I' 2
"I am in receipt of a letter from Hr. William J. Henley, 8!.
Washington Street, Hoboken, New Jersey regarding a communication
he addressed to the above named subject, apparently while Roselli
was incarcerated in this institution.
"Since Roselli was transferred to Terre Haute September 29,
191.6 I enclose herewith the communication from Hr. Henley for
your information.
"Very truly,
Signed!
JOSEPH W. SANFORD
_ ' - Warden "
c "cs - Hr. HanJ.ey"
-4--
Q
:1; "
P
_e.*'1-5, - .A. . .. ,-,.; -. _3, , 4 §'~_ 4 -../J '
-
3
5:
. 3 _,
NK 58-152 ?
"Jum om, 191.7. H
'Wmrden, United States Penitentiary
Terre_Haute, indiana. _ _
Re: John Tloselli. t '
Dear Sire-
"If it is not a violation of the regulations of your
institution, would you be kind enough to see that the enclosed
communication is delivered to John Roselli, an inmate of
Tour institution. .
Why I suggest that you refer to letter received by
you from Joseph W. Sanford, Warden of the United States
Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, under date of June 5th, 1947."
"Respectfully,
WILLIAM J. HANLEY" _
"WJH:SRN T5 ;
anon. " e _
-R» -I -if '51-
- 5 -
1 J_-" "-1 1*.92 . _ 51 -ea 1 =;1--- 1 " 921 - _.392'-
;r
mcss-152 "
- "June 9th, 1947-"
"John Roselliz
Dear Sir =-
"Some months ago one oi your friends, whosename i
I do not remember, called me and asked me if I would interest
_ myself in your case aszregards presenting certain facts to
the Parole Board when your case came up. Unfortungately I
. have lost the name and address of your friend and I am
writing you to find out two things, one, will you give nie
permission to so interest myself in your case, and two, if
you are so inclined, would you be kind enough to let me know
immediately whether I can locate your friend, who is someplace
in New York.
' "It is important that I hear from you one way or the
other immediately.
"I am enclosing a self-addressed, stamped envelope"
for your return letter."
"Sincerely,
'92iILLILM!I J. HANl'.EY"
Tl'~i :31-ZN
ENCL. "
-5-"9
92
1-
-u..,1,
P ' "
Q
>- " a '5 ti I
U
-
u
NK 58-152 é92
"United States Department of Jhstice"
United States Penitentiary
Terre Haute, Indiana
June 17, 1947
"Mr. William J. Henley
Attorney at Lew
84 Washington Street
Hoboken, New Jersey
' RE: ROSELLI, John
r Reg. No. 4305-TH
. 92
"Dear Mr. Henley;
"Upon receipt of your letter dated Jbne 9, 1947 we interh
viewed Roselli and found he had no objection to our advising you
about his sentenee .
"Subject is serving a ten year sentence, and will become
eligible for parole on July 7, 1947. His case will be reviewed by
the U. S. Board of Parole some time next month to determine the ad-
visability of his early release. If parole is granted he may be
' released at any time between the date of parole eligibility and
November 23, 1950, which is the date of Conditional Release,
r'I 4':-has F 'u no LUQD was might have some
this information and is therefore unable to supply the name and
address of the person you had in mind. It is suggested that before
initiating an action in his behalf that he be advised specifically
what sort of action is contemplated."Roselli stated that h
"We trust this is the information you desire and thank you
for your interest in Roselli."
j "Sincerely yours,
J.E.OWmUwE
Warden
- 7 _1-
I-S
an ' '
._,-we4
.* - L§;_Q~* * P
1
58-152 ' -
From the letter dated June 5, 1947 from the Warden of the
-_; United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, to the Warden of the United States
;f'Penitent1ary, Terra Haute, Indiana, it appears that there was at least one other
_ letter from Mr. HANIEY in this regand. Mr. HANLEY stated that he could recall
;, no other latter and his files do not contain a copy of it.
I 92.-5.>5
D! "
W.
REFERRED UPON COMFIETION TO THE OFFICE OF ORIGIN
_ 5 _- n-92
Ii- _ '/e. ,_- J. {f 1 .' 11%
"_ -.-. ctJ . _ 5 .-
_ I
J ' l
.¬
W.
o _, .
- A _m< 5e-152
or.
|I
n 1 I.
- -_ _ .: . . ,r "1 _"':T I '
MINIS TRATIVE DA1'
¢
AD
-_~ ' A copy of this report has been
_ information of the New York Office in view of
individual who contacted WILLIAM J. HANIEY in
through other interviews and investigation inJ- 1
ITA
designated for the
the possibility that the
New York can be identified
connection with this ease.
l
',_
.-, _
I '. ._,9 _92
i_./"d__'.-
"P1
:-
mi-
ii? - i i , i _ i W 7 7 ~ es; j 7_:7 7, ,
u II nonnrlarvrn .| T ';'II'H
Ir - -1 *1 13- e -~ --~ "_~fVe__'Y,<_ lei 7,___ 3- . - . , ._-._4~. _ VA V _»_. .._ _ -I-_ --1,.-_---_ _ _.»- 1;/A t I I. I .- ~1,,,:
_ 1
92
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
I-orrn No. 1rs-us case omsma-rec AT £533 C I TY |=|,_;.; No_ 58 6O
REPORT MAD! AT _ DAT! wnin MAUI PERIOD FOR R I MAUI If
T T _ wmcn MAO:CIIICi_ If Alli /4?
TIT-E U cm-umnc-rzn or- CASE
LOUIS @Ai.FPAGI~TA, w.as., tr AL BRIBERY; PAROLE I-FATTER
svuopsns or FACTS: I rectional ffic er, U.S .Pen .,
n-I r , .ans s, positively identified photo-I graphs of ATTTHONY OSEIPTII7 cmwno as identicalI v0°t'.1 JOIIIHBUIF-I'Rtates numw. and nEm1s1"F.n1évays together a every visi sec! by him and np_third person was P/resent. ble to identifypmtograph of I~.FJRRAJ£*fY-ITJ1'IPHRE'f . etermined from
Pu}?-ISTEIN that BULGEP. not an attorney but a business
C? reeresentative. TIP I~ ' O fiwt visit at Leaven-
If -su'0- ~ J '-
I A , T 1'I REF»tREI'ICE: Kansas City letter dated 10%/47
92f . - 92l:0'_,J/F} '_-_ ,, Ias interviewed by the _re_§'>5?t'i:i'"cf:i;<;'entz on October 3, 194 a Chi 1 co , where he vI'as attending a conference
I of Prison ocals of Public "orkers of America, C.I.O. He advised that he
92 was assigned as Correctional Officer, for a period ofaoprorimately two
I years, 'in the visting room of the 11.5. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, I§an,<3a5beginni . metime in August 1945. After being assigned to the Vistor'sRoom, mrecalled that T:IU[»}-INF, FHHSTFIIN, Attorney-at-law, :=_ppe'+rod .attne enl ntiary and visited with lOU]'S CI! 'PAG A and PAULU3I:.IUCIA. '
During this visit, BFRNSTEIIJ was a ccompanied by JOSEPH BULGEB, who was
I listed as an atto on the visitor's form. Atthe end of the firstI visit in 1945$eeeerted m;m:sT1=;rN and BUUDF-R from the visitor's
I: I , 92-., £5-i.% DETAILS: AT CHILL-ICO'I'HF.,OHIO -$53-we
-¢--II wth offered refused. .1 1-D III
Room to the from office and just before 1eavi11§I BERPISTFLIN thanked 3 "H
q COPIES DF7T92';lS;VR;,PQTW r 0% $77777 7" - _. I Zm 7 7
' 3-51n'eau AL!SD! 92" 92_0" -"*'I_1I'I>92' 11»
I 3-Kansas City3-75! ' I --
2- iincirmati ,, I 7 -"3I =I " :2".I " +1-~§1-_;¢y;92;;g~1@-mi I*ii*"*Y**** " Y "oi" r._f
if i 1: i__ i_ _ __.i__,._____i____i; _._.__ ;i_ _ i _ .__ _;_ i APPROVED AND s A *' F95lgni9.£E Li i V F: um §,f,{;' f if if no Nor WRITE IH rues! sraczs -. e * * * * I -_ *** if T * '. 1 - ,4 I .,1i',I!],_]»;,,|_ _ __L i_ i eg _ i I 6; izi i 5 _ ;_ _
.___-_-._,,._-rI
A
Ir
II-2
- =9» we .1
_ .. F--J-J J92
Uineinreti bile #5h6Q M3' 5/J-n
Q 4__rer his couitssies and extended his hand for a handshake. 92TherI s withdrew his hand 'e__foun:1 a rolled up bill of money, denomination unlo-o-.-m
; I which he r e
' gratuity
incidentto RERNSTBDJ, advising him that he could not accept any ,
advised that he immediately thereafter reported this
Weft. HUIIT%~. br does not lmow whether any record was. maintained of this incident. vised that no other offerwas ever made
by BPIRNSTEIN and none was ever made by BLILGER.
JCEEPH ACCARDO, which e positively identified as bei tical with BUIF'.*Re
' 4 He was also shown a photograph of MLHRAY HUMPHREYS- dvised that he
_ - never before had seen the person picturedas MLIHRAY H , 1 .YS. .
u.rtherddthtl pwas then shown the three photographs of AN'I"rlONY
supervised, BULGFJR was in his oompan_ F a vise ' a a 1 of the visits b-' P-l":'-STEIN at the U.5.Pen entiary, %ave as, in which he
...-....1...92..1.. ._: ..- H... .-.,.-.,.._. .. 1-. .-: -:+ L..-pruuauiy ib u1 acvcu $uGu ¥i5iv$ uf Bu1
other person was ever in their company.
elleved that t1
I'924-I r>1wTn1.?n He. e~+-.ILIILI *5 DLILLan '92
Duri one of the later meetings by Ei~.I?NSI'EIN andBULGER at IeaVenvI0rt11 of '?u}1NS'fi5IN Whether BULGER was anattorney and em:NsrsI e11et emnee e.~.-ee net an qttornoy but
was a business representative, 11 o lng the business interests of CA1PAGTEA
and DE LUCIA
92.
the name of JOSEPH AI"l'HJ?" 92Cf ARDO.
_ returned to ansas City office under separate cover.A --r~--1-1-1 'l_,92 92.92._,. ..-.,~4.-. et C~.4»9292.e-.-3 /92192| Le-.-.-.-Vi I-92PU ILKTEVUL U92C'LUJ.E.'.' LIliJ'L1,i92L»- Ll4'-SIVLRLZII l1'3d.lU RJJ
advised that he Y-tsa returning to Leavenworth U '1
on Oc tot-er 6, 1947. e; -~
"'F
fhe photographs oi HL1TTPIIRI*;YS and ACCAP.DO are beine
-TtE*jF}:lhY<1ID UPON COIPI"TT.T'1.' T-F F-"L }' 7"". - OF O?f'7}TI7'-
.""'92._ _-'1 -.
Fbrm Nu. 1FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Tu-us case OFHGINATED AT IHASH IIFGTOII F IELD I FILE no. '75 -T29
pg-gg-r ngp yr on: WHEN MADI rtmon rdn Iji I I iiw I I £4?
I IFDIANAPOLIS, 1nn1'* "lrcrolrf nan: Iv b 7wmcu lunlt
10-'.'-47 DHT 92 - .11 I 10-s-4.I E**A * * ** -.-.-| ' ' r-|.14nn|-'-r|:- n|.- 4--en I|-| _. -....-"-.-....-. urr ...-..-.
LOUIS cnnrncna, w.aa.i BRIBERY
ETAL PAROLE? IEKTTFES -
. I
~-
H
.
13?;
T» .. .3"
0DETAILS:I REFERENCE:SYNOPSIS OF FACTS:
'-.
.-
un-
1-
'. 7'.I _._ BEREIICE AHEFRLIIK, fiancre; and DATEIEL H.I"¬'II,I}fLI".R .11 FP_AI"I'TSubject OSELLI yransferred from USP, Atléhta, to Terra _
Haute ___.?-46. cleaned on parole B-@3447. C'0rre!p-.>1|c.EntsI. A.' UMAR& riend; Hrs. HELEN WOODS'§CHOFS' sietrrg
zr
vaun.gg friends. Subject visited by PAUL DILLON 11-20-45,
_by f§;nc0e 12-14,15-46, ry I. A. RUHAN 4~2-4?, and by JACK
KEAFJIJ-, promoter 5-21-4'7. Attoz-nq; WILI-IAIZ J. ?L92IiL.ET,
Hobo§gn, n. J., advised qubjgct that a frierd of nag whose
nameihe had forgotten had anke that EANLEY intercede with
Parogg Board for him. In letter to Hon. THOMAS J.¢o'BnI2n,
House- Raf Representatives, Washington, D. 0., J. "'. .BE-1-*1-TI'3I"I
rafusg petmisnion for KEARNS t0 B00 =ubJ0c¬. Latter wnnt
Era. §Y'FFAFK Of Hnllywood, Cs1., to be mod? authorized
corrcE§0udent. Chief 0f Pvlicc thrrc sni "F2 P*d roved t7
unknovn eddrwrs in Tau Y0;E. ,Yuwq; AV1?UFH, Ewrri2i*Fvr' "
rhws subject and WINEFREDIVIASFP rnrrie in Tumn di-¢U.
Subject has clear record while in pT'19OI'92.
- RUC -
FQPM of klndiannpi-11:. Imim.
10-F-5'3.
hi IEEBE EAEEE. lEPlAN&
I
$ubject EOSELLIn filn was reviow mt thn Unitwd Stat¢:
Tenit"n.!nr}r. The file 911:1-:3 allr------. f .. .92II] F, SR]-"-I,-'LR"{
JOWN STEWART. and gives his trur nr"r rv J97? RCSSILET.
I Arvllovlnnrm 1*927 A-1 I ' *i-E=*T»~£C92a=r=r*" __' EE' E W EI I'0!92!J*I=Ev=_¢.-" "L./_Q_.' ""-_' "__ 1"°"-=== -. _ _,. _ -.°° "°T "7 ':'"T"§?'?3'l fs. .__E__.._.__...... 92 _/_ ,___,__ If _ __ _ _
L'* _I, ._ . I ,. _. I-7--- -E-_.. J;.I ' Mg, ;§;5 -;L'I717 :l - . - 4_ Q.-- _.. I "vi, ,_ ______ Icomm or THIS an-on1' 3 I , F I . .- "./' 92¢ ';- '%a_ '~I'-I ' I2--Bureau Attn. A.¢t. Director HOSE J »nsnf,;, q } 3, - I2-hnshington Field ° I F , ' '___* _*
2-Indianapolig ;. ,,7
1L.;I. .
XE. 92 IL. E- -_._-,-_.I. ____._.__" ' . I I
r a. qwnnnnnu In ¢q 1 7 ' .f92"r|
I
..,,,,,.
#5
4- x
-. sq;...@
- ,5.O
-p '- as.
iiz
_ R. J
Indpla.
76-729
He wee transferred from Atlanta to Terre Hnute on Cctober 7. 1946, and
ynn released on parole August 13, 1947.
ROSELlI'e euthoriged correspondents while in prison were as followei
I. A. HUMAN, friend, 215 Welt 5th Street, Los Angelea. This man was
also given as one to be notified in case of serious illness or death of subject.
Mrs. meter ueons JOHONS, eieter, 436% west sen Street. Dayton. Ohio.
BERNICE AFR FHAHK, fiancee, Box 941, Beverly Hills, California.
DAFIYL H. HIHKLER, friend, Bank of America Building, Peverly Hills.
Ceiifornia.
FRANK Rfwj, friend, Bank of America Buildinr, Beverly H111", California.
$ubJeCt received ten letters from HUMAN to whom he wrote nineteen.
He received nine letters from hiB'sister, and wrote her none in return. Hie
fiancee wrote him about 250 times, and he sent her about 164 letters. WIFKLER
wrote him 12 tines, and HOSELLI sent him 13 letters. / " ' _é
ROSTTLI'e visitors and dates of vieits were ne followe: jijj:ji3l*"_
PAUL DILLON, November 20, 1946
Fiancee, December 14 and 15, 1946
I. A. FUMAH, April F, 194?
JAG? YCAEHS, Chicogv fight promoter, For 21, 1 4? 92
In connection with DILLOH'a visit, he was intervieeed by W. H. RARQART
parole officer nt the Penitentiary. A notation was made on DILLON'e letter to
the warden renuesting interview with subject. to the effect that another lawyer
hired FiLL@ nné that-letter was to be paid by subject throurh the iavror making
the arrangement. Upon being questioned about this ntation, Hr. EARHART rtetnd
inat he did not recall the incident, but that he believed it wrs brought about
by the feelinr rf parties concerned thet DILLUH c"u1d hoio rw ject more than hie
own lawyer.
In letter dated April 30, 1947, from the Diraetur of Prieene to Yonernh
TBCMAS J. 0£HIEH, House of Representatives, Weehinet0n,_D. 0., ho stated tL"t he
could not grant permireion for KEARFS to vieit BCQYLII vitheut fUTLFn* inftrwetio
re to ihP'pQIPO" of the visit. -
In ]c*trr drtod June 9, 194?, WILLIAX J. FA i? , attorney, 91 Vntniurto
Street. Hobokcn, New Jersey, advieed subject that one of 1ettcr'r friends had
seen HAHLEY sore month: ago and asked him to present certein {note to the pnrole
board. HANLFY rewreeted permission from ROSELLI to do so end eléo renuerted the
subject to send frieni'e name which had been forgotien by BAILEY. Latter enid it
was important that he be advised immediately.
..:3_,_,,1:
P
H
' , . 4_. _ 13 ; :55.4 _ A. .--
Indpls. :_
we-129 . . . t .~
In-0 11 n owrivwsuv-92 1.. .__._lJ__A. -3 s___.n_ I92____92_1__ A___._.___ 1..-H Lo Yll, VIUI PTGIIQOHU UI IIOQQB bulll uompany, 1nc.,
Iashington, D. C., wrote Warden at Atlanta on December 12, 1944. that his wife n
had known ROSELLI all her life and wanted to be remembered to him. He enclosed
a picture, Christmas card, and a letter which he asked the warden to give sub-
ject. . _
. 1
~" ' A letter from the warden dated dugout 9, 1944, to Chief of Police,'
Hollywood, California, requested information concerning Hrs. MAY FRANK. It had
been requested by subject that she be made an authorized correspondent. 'The _
-n1- A-0-3 s.~ -a DA 1041 qahena ehee ah- h_A c»_ma 1» 14"; ac oh- uA11_ nAA'2 Us U U U rc L i|lEvlIU'92l- I'D DI! I 4I7'I"I Dll|92rD92|l. 92Ill§92l HI-4 I-E L ll"Ul-l- -Ll-U11. Evil Ull-U Ll J-In i 92J92I| I I
Knickerbocker Hotel, Hollywood, but that she had moved to New York with no known
address.
Information was obtained from the Yuma, Arizona, Marriage Bureau by
the prison officials to the effect that subject and WINEFRED VLASEP had been
married in Yuma April 1, 1940. _ t
The penitentiary records show that while incarcerated, subject had a
clear record and that no disciplinary action was ever taken againet him while in
prison. t
REFERRED UPON COMPLETION T0 THE GFFICE OF ORIGIN
mason-
,92&
s
F
a . -
__ ___:__f__ _ _ l _,_, _,_A ,,,,~|j1::.~.J.;.' .4ni|.q{.w;_'A..; -.,*..=w-Q 1 : _.n..1-.':.92 4 _ _ , _. -,...i92. 1......-... _.... 92 .. -.___.j_--,..'.,, __ ., - _ ... - 1. -92_ _ __
- .
. g
FED
I-vrm ?92~92._ _ -_.92 -.~ .- I t .
ERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGAT
_ ___, H _ , N _ ~ _ _'___ - ' _*, 1" W . _ . . QT?
Fl£PORT MAD! AT
' ms :-mssm:s-
TITLE
192
SYNOPSIS OF FACTQI
REFERENCE:
92 DETAILS:
Bureau mass!
Chicago e_m.sn!_
New York AMSD!Tr-H5 L;ASEORlGINATED AT Yl:A.SHINGTON FIELD ""'"- O 58-125 1
92 1 Q
|1°'5'i"_ "25" ? i Ve to-o"'* " Tl
LOUIS CALTAGHK, with aliases, at al
Anv - I -
,,A' 4 _;7__- ; _ W *' ,, _ ,; e '__ ; _ i __,,-_, ,_, -92 Al! F[v92.t;_:LAlr~r!' sr| |.:;.92 :»;.-H,.|:,-kc On No. w,U.[.|_ .1 .n _.,_E sh, E; :-
covlssor nits nsvonr ,. I V.- I ' _ ! _ ____ gpI I 1 . ,5-. }
Washington Field AMoD! ' ..D11! WHIN MAD92 ' .
Pcrurm u-on Iu:1-our mm! 2': F, "F_
- I" "" .---in >'
AC. A 1; 92P_'.l.
BFIBERY
PAROLE MATTERS
§;E§§?;O§; AS§g§$§NT DIRECTQP Q3 §Q§EN
ROSELLI denies any know1e&ge of any irre5- |
u1ar3§ies in connection with his parole or
knowthdge of any pressure brought in connection I
withEhis parole or the parole of the others.
ASH Emies sending letter to ores requesting
GIOEUhame him parole adviser. ASH also deniesreoering word appointing him as pru-olo adviser.
Has n knowledge of nny oonneotion of HIEERR
withsalleged payoffs. Admits giving letter of
chnrigter reference concerning GTOE to RIDNEY
KORSEEK upon recommendation of personage whoso
identity ASH refused to divulge. o
H - __' 'RUG. I "*'QRr-="=*1'¢r-:- .~
Teletype from Chicago to Loe Angolcs, 10-1-H7.Teletype from Bureau, 10-1-I47. § 92
¬
South Catalina Struot, Apt. 5
wu Los Angeles ~-1 _ .
Eagle-Lion Studio '_' i .
752k Santa Monica Bouievard i . k
Los ales _ _This is a joint
the "f.*r'i f $1 .
L2JOHK RGSELLI
Residence: 527
Business:
0-0:, I'M,-__ __F Mr '¥»
V? PF? 20:1;-.1 ' 5 .:1.
1 _an .
¥
2»-1
rr
A;
3%.
§
2;
{Z
~
92
-u
-
_.$1
$5»J
t
1
,. " . =. .- _ . . . ., , r r . ..- -i ,1 -. . .___~,_ ,_;_-.;_- -_ ,; ,.A _ _-;.-,,,-;>.|_.,S92Q-':m92g>..- 1. Ln. ~ . _ _. .q'JL|'4q>_;Z'Ann92_.;92-T-A4._l . A - * -,.. .. 4Ql__4l - .,
LA 5B~l25
ROSELLI advised that he had absolutely no knowledge of any irregu
laritiee regarding hie parole or the parole of the other individunl: ~%o
were convicted with him on the conspiracy charge. In order to indicate
his activities since just prior to conviction, ROSELLI furnished the follow
ing datee.. '
He etated he entered the U. S. Army on December M, lQH¬, vnd_that
he wag indietod on the conspiracy charge on hhroh 13, lQb§. The trirl wo-
oommenced on Pctober h, 19h}, and he was sentenced on Deccrher E1, Th.
Ho elected to nerve his sentence on Merch B, 19hh,'end was received at
Atlanta Penitentiary on April h, l9hh. He was transferred to Terro Haute
Penitentiary, Indiana, October T, IQQ6, had his parole hearing on July h,
19b7, nnd was released from Terro Haute Penitentiary on parole Angwvt 1§,
1957-
ROFLLI advired that while he was innnrccrntod in {ho Atlantn _
Penitentiary, one of his duties permitted him to see the trnnnfer lint and
that he observed that the other individuals who were incarcerated in Atlent
with him on the same charge were transferred to Leavenworth Penitentiary.-
He stated that he knew nothing about this transfer until ho obrervod their
name; on the transfer list. He further advised that since the tine that
those indiviwnle loft Atlentn he hen not heard from or SP"? rny ef horP
Persrrn.
WhiT= ho was still incarcerated nt Atlanta Penif~r%i"ry, P"FiT
STEWART, an attorney who was Working on the appeal for ?H6ULTT and the
others, vieiicd him at Atlanta. He requested STEWAPI to crud somocno tc
see him so thwt he could discuss the mail fraud irdictnent that he under-
stood was still pending against him. While he was iHcrC@rnted at Atlanta
he heard nothing more concerning this matter. However, some eighteen
months later in Deconher, 19b6, after he had been transferred to Terre
Haute, he received a letter at the Penitentiary requesting fernisni~n for
one PAUL,DflLON,'an attorney, to see him. He gave permisricn for T?T0Us
visit and DIPPQN did visit him at the Penitentiary in Decanter. '
ROSLLLI stated that during the interview
all times standing within three feet of both DIILON and hirqelf end that
the only matter discussed was the indictwrnt ngairet RHQVPLI for the il
mention was redo by
either DILLON or himself of the possibility of RORFTLT's rorole or the
fnrnlr of any of tho other individuals. Thrrv ftcr, he 5tnteF, he ro-
ncivad no conmunioniions, nor did he hcr from PAUL DTELON rrrr rd~*~,F, [:11-92,r T ','.'92'¬ I-;-51;-r-1-v1_; 5-t
fraud violation. ROSBLLI positively states that no
1-
-0
21
He izherneft-r Wrote a letter +.¢ oTIoc1ms1"m-rslzrl, M-torixr-_v-at-U1"
in Loo Angcler, requesting him to advise him of his status GOtcGTn rt the
indictnent on the mail fraud violation, and CHRISTENSEN replied that tho
-3-3
i
~
,§.
2-Tiof 92-ak .-;
.-
.1-
1'3
.»
1
.92I
r
A43.
2!
-
r
K
2
»-I.¥192
1.
..92
J
,4.
2
2
w.
-,;_1
92- I
t z
,,
Q-
P
'1
.»
,- , .--,..-..< "2-> *1.-c-,.-.= -" - .:--,_,.-92"-- - ,- -.-d-<-2 '- hI92»1L_F4..¢92.__§§ .'!-~,1.iLZ-ulf'l'.ia.{'i| .-.1Lil92:h_>-a4.92. u. -.. >- ~ _. _. A - a -....~: -.- -.-. ~. 1.- '. *-". =,' -."'
. -.-,- U
_.~
TA ES-125
indictment had been nolle prosequied. ROSELLI stated that prior to the
receipt of the letter from DILLON requesting permission to coe him +kat -
he did not know DILLON. It will be noted that ROSELLI did nnt nontion
DILLON's nave until he was specifically questioned concerning it.
ROSELLI stated that ho appeared atta parole hearing at Torre
Haute Penitentiary on July h, 19b7, and that this board consisted of a
Bk. NELSON, who was the institution Parole Adviser or official, a Parole
Judge who he afterwards ascertained was named ROGERS, and a stenographer
who took down the notes of the hearing. Ho stated that he was thereafter
advised on July B that he was to be paroled on August 1} or r: sOOn thore¢
after on possible.
H? stated that he had been visited by his fiance , PEATRIFF M
FRANK, also known as ANN CORCORAN, on approximately three ocoarions and
had corresponded with hor frequently. ROSELLI stated that if he Wore for-
tunate enough to got a parole on the expiration of his minimum sentence,
that he felt it would to best that he have a job promised to him and that
a parole adviser bo secured prior to the actual parole. He svggostod to
ANN CORCORAK in a letter that a friend of his, Dr. JAMFS STEENPFTG of Lon
Argeles, might serve in that capacity as parole adviser.
After this name was suggested, ROSFLLI stated that ho had hoard
that Father JOSEPH THON SON was parole adviser to numorov: rolconed Fodorwl
prisoners iv tho Lo: Angeles area, and ANN CORCORAU also wrvk~ and thought
that it would be better if Father THOETSOU woro snbstiintod in place of
Dr. JAFTS STZIIEERG in view of the fact that both RWSELLI and horsolF Wore
Catholics.
RFSELLI denied that he had asked anyone ether th~u in thoco oow
munications referred to between himself and ANN CORCORAN For wry nnristanco
or favors of any kind. He stated as far as he was concerned, the parole
was a mntter_of form and that he knows of no pressure by any ocqnaintanoe
or frionde wh*ch facilitated his parole or the parole of othorr, Ho further
stated that lo had ahrolutoly no contact or visitcrn totveon the tF~~ of
his parole h»wrin5 on July R, l9hT, and his roleooe on Avn"sE 17, lh?.
loznava, Ho stated upon his relere on Augvrt 1? h "R" W"* by Jnnr
who took hin to Chicago whore they romainod over ninht, nod thw following
day, the lhth, FOSELLI left via TWA plane for Loo Awgelon, His tronsportotidp
was paid for by KEARWS. During this visit with K?RN no rnntion was weds *
of hie parole or the parole of the othors, nor were tholr ounce wont "Hod.
No mention rrs made of ROSELLI having to pay any money nr grant any other
favors for his-parole. In feet, ROSELLT stated that he was not in the
position of raying anyone anything and that he was absolutely flat hroto
other than the $60 a week that his present job provides him. .
..3..I
5
,.
ti
vIL
Fa. _.k
£1.
if
5.
g.
3
2
a
k
1
Y
y
£
ii
§-..%v..
.92_
i
E».v
,.-_ , u
J
' ca_, 1, _, _....92...,--..." -.--:92..-.1" _~ a ~ ~ '----~-------- --J ~
1 __
. l ,___
He stated that he stayed at tho Alexandria Hotel in Loa ";o1u:
for a couple of days after his arrival on tho 15th of August and that ho
contacted tho Probation Office in Los"Ange1es, Federal Building, roquosting
permission to go to Santa Barbara to the Sansom Medical Clinic for a com-
plete physical checkup. He stated he thereafter returned to Lea Anqelee,
discussed his physical condition with Dr. JAMES-STFINBERG, and through the -
efforts of another friend, I. Aa_RUlMlQ secured an apartment at his present
address. Hc further advised that he had been offered a job with Englc-Lion
Studio by BRYANJFOY and that he comenoed work there as soon an he returned
from Santa Barbara.
vr n__ :1 __ 92__ L 1 |92 | 1 Q . | 92 1 |-. . .ne Iurtner stated that no nae not noerc irom, e1Ther directly
or indirectly, any of the individuals that he WEB originally convicted with '
and that no one had placed any pressure upon him in connection with his
parole or the parole of any of the othore. Ho further stated that as for
as he was concerned, he did not want to sec any of the individuals that ho
was convicted with under any circumstance because he did not want nnvthipq
to happen that would "jam up" his parole. w M
E2EPcr_i_l7h:sldlng Hollywood_Plazn Hotel, Loo Anfeles
ASH Wrc intorriowed immediately upon his arrival in Les Angolan
and questioned specifically concerning any letter which he had written to
GIOE at Leavenworth in which he requested GIOE to Tvquoat that ho be
designated as GIOE'e parole adviser. He emphatically d ri¬d crndinf cry
such letter. "
Honrror; he stated that one STDTEY {@P¬HLF? or otornr§ of ?hiqrqoj
contacted him in February, 19h7, and said that GIOE had ho~1 vouched for 7
a personage who was one of the "highest church dignitaries in tho Fnitod
Staten" and th"t KORSHAK requested that ASH write a letter of chorno+cr
reference to "ICE for the use of GIOE in his subsequent parole application.
ASH etated that he had known GIGE for approiiwntoly $5-yowrr rd had not
known him to h" in any previous difficulty with tho low. Ho stated that he
had known him quite well years ago and thoupht highly of him at that time,
but had loot contact wiih him in rooent y'1rr.
He rteted that he wrote this letter at K§SHAK's roquoot rt did
not mail it, ~nd, in fact, inadvertently misspelled ¢TOE's none and oisdirocted
the letter. Upon showing it to KORSHAK, KORSHAK advised him of the correct
spelling of GIOE'a name and of the correct address at Leavenworth Penitentiary,
whnv-mu-mm hq v-nu-v-.~+- Fhn "l=.++=.- 1"-|_A 1r92c9211_Ac92A %4- +1-. xgnncnrntr L!-. .-_.:-.. |-.,'.: 1". A-i_-1Huunuuruu H. awwnuww vuv _c..c. hi handed AV uq hquugnq L" ,,¢ugu U ole
not knew that this letter was going to be mailed but thought it would sorelyK
E,
5.
r.
;.;_
_c .-.1"-..
*2
3
c
¬
.1:
I
'>.
'1
5
J
95""
-,.
KF*1
__ .¢
- , ._, 92- . I i: :> ' '92- - :'= ~ - ' i . ~ .» - 'r 1~;..' ~92.- '1: . by , _ - ..'. Q. -_ - ._, W- " 1" I i -'-. 2 1 ""> ~" '-we- -5- i " "* I ' "' ii . ,o -. _ __._ .,92UW-...__i-92_.~~ , in ,,_,_;__,-_ A__,__,___-j__,_._u;,,._92_,,L,_.,,;_,-_-¢nia~:=¢..14_,5¢_,>__ >._- .. .1 -92.mu.92:=i...,o ___ -. .. _..
LA 53-125
be used by KORSHAK in the parole heaning for GIOE. The first inkling he
had that this letter had been mailed was in Mhy of 1956 when ho'roc:iv»i
- letter from Washington, 9. 0., possibly from tho Parole Board, eigwod
URICH, which letter stated GIOE had requested him on his parole advisor-
With respect to the personage thnt had vouched for GIOE, ho eto+od
he wnuld not divulge hie name, but that his identity woe knwn to the
Chicago Office or to e Mr. WENDELL, who apparently had something to do
with the hearing recently held in Chicago. ASH further stated that the
reason he would not divulge this personage's name was that when the news-
paper articles appeared concerning this matter, two emissnrles from this
personage cone to ASHs office and requested him not to divwlgo this per-
sonago'e namp and also stated that if ASH did divulge it +h1t this foreoncd"
woulq deny any connection with the above matter. Ho reiterated that hn T
would not und~r any circumstances divulge the nine of this rorsonnjc.
Ho further advised that after the newspaper article: oprqpred
that he was noted parole advisor for GIOE, that ho Wrote 1 loticr to YFAGLBY
at Leovenworth Ponitontinry on August 19 and asked HEFGLFT to dofinn his,
AEH's, status as to whether he was tho parole adviser ' for PIPE r" not ow
hc hon never r ceived cny communication naming him We r"ro cdnircri
H Further statcd that on tho Slvt of upucb, l?tT,
ASH in rggnnv~9 to his letter of the 19th and swid th1* "T7*'e re
p1TOl0 plan Pol boon submitted to tho Pnrole Pc~rd nwinq if" s ffrolo
adviser.-'1" Ir
"arc
ASH s tated that the testimony of FISCHFR to the »Ff¢ct Pit on
August lb while ASH was in Springfield, Illinois, tkwt ho, !"H, hi with-
fla-¢:'.'_.'Y92 no .1 »-|- -..~ _ I new-r|n nrlt-inr-'r' '.92ln.= qr. n11l'.|"i'l'||, lin- Fin 2-.?'1l@"l tho! I»-~ hn--" nvrr tsn - --..-..---. -'-92.' |--. -_»~92-¢»:_-92-~ - '7 --- -~ - -- - 7 -- a --- --
nny "nnmunicwtion from FISCHER ' rcceiv~d in nny r"nrcr, chop" 1r fore.
However, in August, COLLOSINO of the Parole Office in Chic'fo
called ASH and amid that GIOE would be released and requestod ASH to not
in touch with GIOE's Wife._ ASH stated that he did Jnoote GTCT'J Fife ct
the Seneca Apartments whore she was residing and furnirhed hur oidrcnr to
COLLOSINO, Po nddod that KOPQHAK nppirently did not know when GI ? was to
be released on parole because HORFHAK's Wife and GIPF's wife nor" ylwnnirf
e trip to Celifcrnic and that this trip woe cn"c@l1"d t="r~¢" of @T!'o
release-
Whon questioned specifically about his Pu rledéo or r<1ati n1hi9
with on attorney by the nome of BIEBER, ASH stated that he Know there was
an attorney by that name but to his knowledge he had never seen him. HmH
ever, he advised that he knows BIEBdR's partner, "IHE'BROPFIN. However,
he stated he did not receive any oonmunicatione from BRODVIN concerning
the parole of QIOE.
_5_
<I
// uI1w
»<--,__-
.1
F:
2;.
c
3;?
?<
1"
i
,
1Q
3
|
-v92-
J
1
.'_
5
7;-".xv"-_i-~.' Q. 1.
te-.'-,.
-v
13-:H, - ..e . _ _. .;=-a,¢::..,;.;-_»'..'.__,_: ~e,.;'.'-=..:.,--....._...1_~,..._-._...¢....e_;_....._._....-._. e _ k
g O
i LA 56-125 d _ _
:_ 1. - -. _' ,.' .92
6.? -- 6-?
. _
#. ,_._ _ _1 . tIn thin connection, ASH denied any oonneetion with any in-egu1e.rit1,g_| 'in the parole of GIOE or any of the other: and denied any knowledge of any _.p ppreaeure being brought upon one in connection with the entire matter. ' ' .He further stated that from lat} he did not see GIOE until he methim on V
" the street in Chicago approximately ten daye after hie release on August
15! I~ - ;
. - _ 9 ' '
A
. -' =1" ' ' .1
- REFERRED UPON COMPLETION TO THE OFFICE OF ORIGIN -
o
I
1
I
-6..- .
£51
QQ
§";'
fl
,.
=
r~.in
Y-
-:
1
-=s
uI
3.
i;
"u
F;
E;_»St
i.bi
an-
'1 .
If ":-- v-0
EJ!
-,'92r92A.n_..¢. ._
+".,
F
.
_, E
' v
1
92'
Z
5 $.
u
I
1
l.
Q
IQ;
u.
-92/r " 5" -1 9 . .1 . .92 - , ;I ' ,__. .- ~-. __& 1-- J .- .' _ _ ' . -v._'_ - _. '_ .. ~ ';_ ..,_.,-';~_',iItrmlfml - ~ - - = 1 A V. . - -. . ' .92- --A T - - ' . Q _»'- .92-"_' '_92 _ H ' . _V ~ . 4. _ ._92_ , _" W1"'H_v'i_" - ~=--=~*~ ~ " V ~ -
.1 - 4 ~ _ L 1» - .»w- -._;,_* .92 ~_
92 - - : ' . ' $+"t".=92.-1 : -'- 1 _ r_ E V. -' , ._ +- ».;r-_-_-.k.._~<»_-~= --' ~ ' .-.___92=;.-;'-'~ :1 --' ',-'4 " -1 -- 3'! - -. 11; ' "i*:.92 ' "* -_:~- - - ~;. - .1.-: .' 1- -'_~' 3 -, ., --.:' 41" -__-"1'. . . .? . .¢~ ,. ' , F?
,._ =.:-E-5 -__ i_7_:_,_l1 I . _-f-,;._._a_' _ .v-_ i,;1.:.;.~§,.;_ _....._ __ __ ,_§ __l_ ,.. _92;?é ',_,,. " ~- - . :1-=5? -- ;---1» - 4.»! HF:=-" 4 -._-. é--- -- ....'I.¢".,' ' . -*.' *__ _'. - __" _-I -_92 _ -,- ;;#i..1::_'¢- "u >'_"92. --,- ""*'. " -1 ;_.& .14 F, * j-. ' : u w " 4-_ _*-1'15: -- _ _ k-._ . 1 - _ 1 _;~.- . 92 | -_;_- m.;:";f: _92- V _ ir _b;v%£?:Jr_.._»r~:f_-;4£_%" ac,-_ .__-E i F1 >1-7 7 wk 1; ",_'f1 ': - ." .'£;6:!_ ,.J,'* :i'.92._ '?:'?;,92. -1-5. ';___ J; ._=-* '5FEEERAL FUREAU OF ir§iVE§Tit§Aj*io|i;;
1 * -, . .1 * 1 7+ -~. .',,'§f-9_. l'llI'II1~wil||A$ llllllunrnn _ _ 1IqI|'||.Q$Ir ,.,,'~;-,_~ M, |- It-IIG-IIIAQ ., _ ~ ,_ I _" 2413* tlvflg-1' Q/1944-10/*1
_ uuu1.:|vAI.r'5&l.|.,I11inI.'u.i-iii,i'ill. .-:.92:~~-.;92'w-1-3-_-[3131-f,§1]fgn ,3-= ~ T . . __, .92 ' . I _ I . . ""'92-I A -' -' ' .~ F ' a-unn.1'Qw '-. -' '="P I , . '_ _ __.l 3 . |_... . .,'. _ _;.: _P. __, - .. »_ _ w 92:____§:. 7* ' .1", "5' » '-,"--1-1
. . A _: _. -.. 1.-_* I-._,'." ;_-._-_V_',]_ ,'§;_1-_- -A - - --.~f-~51--;.¢? :v»--1-m_:*,»-.¢»;=
92 -,_ ~ 1 -, -.< ¢ =@._._~r~4-»'»_,.-1'Y~=="'=°"'~="'=
$9? xi;
. - - .'. --. V _i.'
r'.=
-* --0'.
Dru-on
Phhlcv
_~_ _ '1 - infect~ '7 92 V 7 _ __ __;__~ _
-' . » ~- -: - - ."_1".E~.~-*.~$'11"*'*.?h-:-¢ " 1i' 1
-nmxcu usumn perm.
aunpuqh ruordl rolltivo ballarmm; zmmny ask an um an-ma nu to +3.,-E-I rag:-:12! eowuz, 9-_<.1a=1;-.1-_~.=, 2-..? L2"mm;-1==»a='u 1-a=u»1.r an mm rw lubjootn mu ' *-
AIEEAI Bllldf §OIPI oxprulod 1 Indra bl lo tolouul
their 1-up»-1bu4g;. I110! cal mmmmm usunn ;nu2.uI::: -
courm, 1_-:11-aelpld-u 'r01'u1 14 an hula, mama ma in
imiudn, in tin-gamut: of i55,iI§ Main, In iumi, for
I55:-opts uollntorcl at $46,545.82 in obj ad. [LEM 13 pf
I:-ouu:7I_n:' I-ondq no put up by approzllhly Iillllrllnla, ibnjau-it-,1 at inn 1-nlhd in thn ling: Int:-opolltcl uni} IIIII
sungmcrnnuu-;¢n¢:¢=nmrAcmmsusun.1!xm1nl:;courm. Aourtin; 1» tooth or new, ma rtvulol paumuii-*=$cop!-0| qr @111 ;-n up»-nu If cu LIIIIGAI mmun
Ending, Pu, QGGQIU, plus Qk ll I
…[truncated]