Oregon AG: Wolf delisting bill likely makes conservation case irrelevant - News - MailTribune.com - Medford, OR

Mail Tribune (Medford, OR — Wayback)

Document text

0 of 3 Premium Clicks used this month SUBSCRIBE Print + Online Subscriber Activation  |  Register x Forgot Password | Need an Account? e-edition | subscribe | newsletter | deals Classifieds Jobs Autos Real Estate FEATURED   » NEWS NOW   Purse snatcher injures 80-year-old woman at Medford Lowe's       ...       California man dies in I-5 rollover       ...       Medford man wins Megabucks jackpot       ...       Purse snatcher injures 80-year-old woman at Medford Lowe's       ...       California man dies in I-5 rollover       ...       Medford man wins Megabucks jackpot       ...           WILDLIFE Oregon AG: Wolf delisting bill likely makes conservation case irrelevant Comment By Kistena Hansen The Associated Press MailTribune.com By Kistena Hansen The Associated Press Posted Mar. 29, 2016 at 6:02 PM By Kistena Hansen The Associated Press Posted Mar. 29, 2016 at 6:02 PM »  Social News PORTLAND — Two weeks after the signing of new legislation that upholds in state law the delisting of the gray wolf as endangered, Oregon's top attorney has now launched an effort to end wolf advocates' lawsuit once and for all. Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum filed a notice with the state appellate court on Monday, using an attached copy of the new law, House Bill 4040, as justification for why wolf advocates' complaint against the state is likely no longer relevant. This is what conservative lawmakers hoped to accomplish with HB 4040 — among the most contentious bills of the year — and what environmentalists had feared. In December, environmentalists sued state wildlife officials over their decision to remove the gray wolf from the state's Endangered Species Act list, saying the decision was premature. Nothing is settled yet and the judge will have the final say. But parties on both sides agree the situation is gloomy for the wolf advocates' case. "We don't have a next step yet," said Arran Robertson, a spokesman for Oregon Wild, adding they'll be discussing a game-plan this week with the other environmentalists that are part of the suit. The issue dates back to November, when the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission determined the gray wolf's population was robust enough to remove the species from the state's endangered list. Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands and the Center for Biological Diversity followed with their lawsuit, arguing the commission used flawed scientific evidence and the delisting decision should therefore be independently re-examined. That's where HB 4040 — backed by the Oregon Cattleman's Association and others concerned with wolves' attacks on livestock — comes into play. HB 4040 essentially says the commission did everything it was supposed to do by law in reaching its final decision to delist. That's the very thing wolf advocates want re-examined, but with the Legislature's seal of approval now established in state law, their "challenge is likely moot," Rosenblum wrote in Monday's court filing. Rosenblum's filing — submitted about a week after the wildlife commission began revising its wolf management plan — stands in contrast to the way HB 4040 was initially portrayed at the Legislature in early February. In hearings, GOP lawmakers in the Oregon House repeatedly denied claims that the intent was to end the lawsuit. "Does this basically prevent litigation? ... and the answer that I have come up with, or the answer that I could find was, no it doesn't," Rep. Greg Baretto, a Republican who helped sponsor HB 4040, said during a Feb. 12 House floor session when the bill was up for vote. "They can still have their day in court. But what this does is it'll allow the Legislature to affirm or agree with this commission, this Fish and Wildlife Commission, that has basically approved delisting, and that is what this bill does." Rep. Chris Gorsek, a Democrat, was among the first vocal critics, who followed Baretto's comments during that February floor session by saying, "I'm concerned that the Legislature is being asked to step in a process that could involve any endangered species ... it's not about the wolf, it's about due process." By Kistena Hansen The Associated Press MailTribune.com By Kistena Hansen The Associated Press Posted Mar. 29, 2016 at 6:02 PM » Comment or view comments   Reader Reaction »  STAY INFORMED   Email NewsLetter   Sign Up Today   Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Southern Oregon Directory Featured Businesses Loading... Business Name address Location, ST | website.com Find Southern Oregon Attractions Bars Restaurants Beauty Salons Entertainment Doctors Medical Specialists Contractors Education Lawn Services Lawyers Shopping Travel Tanning Used Cars Wedding Services ▼ Add your business here + Events Calendar Connect with MailTribune.com Facebook Twitter RSS Back to top Reader Services Reader Services Home Subscriptions Subscriber controls Contact us Submissions Photos Events Letters to the editor Corrections Announcements Obituaries Story ideas Since you asked Alerts Email Alerts RSS Feeds Text Alerts Advertise Media Kit Home Products and services Ad rates Advertising contacts Propel Marketing Mail Tribune Daily Tidings The Nickel Shop Our Valley Blogs Mobile Site Stay Informed   Email newsletter   Sign Up Today   Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Your privacy is important, read our privacy policy. © Copyright 2016 Local Media Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.    Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service  |  Local Media Group Publications Original content available for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted. MailTribune.com | P.O. Box 1108, Medford, OR 97501