Document text
0 of 3 Premium Clicks used this month SUBSCRIBE Print + Online Subscriber Activation | Register x Forgot Password | Need an Account? e-edition | subscribe | newsletter | deals Classifieds Jobs Autos Real Estate FEATURED » NEWS NOW Our View: Sizzling heat, blazing fireworks coincide this year ... Jackson County to help analyze impacts of proposed Medford casino ... MPD uses forfeited funds to help expand evidence building ... Our View: Sizzling heat, blazing fireworks coincide this year ... Jackson County to help analyze impacts of proposed Medford casino ... MPD uses forfeited funds to help expand evidence building ... ELECTION 2014 Resent ballots, late results likely to trigger GMO recount 1,100 votes separate 'yes' and 'no' tallies Comment By Jonathan J. Cooper The Associated Press MailTribune.com By Jonathan J. Cooper The Associated Press Posted Nov. 22, 2014 at 2:00 AM By Jonathan J. Cooper The Associated Press Posted Nov. 22, 2014 at 2:00 AM » Social News PORTLAND — The campaign pushing to require labels on genetically engineered foods built an extensive voter-turnout operation leading up to the November election, but their work didn't stop on Election Day. Using a new state law that makes public the names of voters whose ballots weren't counted, usually because of problems with the signature, labeling proponents aggressively reached out to those they thought might be supporters. As a result, they may have helped push the measure toward an automatic recount. It had been headed for defeat, but late election returns showed it trailing by a razor-thin margin. "We were successful in getting several thousand challenged ballots counted and included as part of this election, and it's making a difference," said Sandeep Kaushik, a spokesman for the pro-labeling campaign. On Friday afternoon, Measure 92 was trailing by just 1,100 votes out of more than 1.5 million — a spread of less than 0.1 percent. Oregon law requires a recount if the margin is within 0.2 percent. Counties have until 5 p.m. Monday to report their final vote tallies to the Secretary of State's Office, which faces a Dec. 4 deadline to certify the statewide results. A recount would begin after certification, said Tony Green, a spokesman for the office. At nearly $30 million, the battle over Measure 92 was by far the costliest campaign in Oregon history. Every election, thousands of Oregon ballots end up not being counted, usually because of problems with the signature. Some voters forget to sign, or their signature evolves over time so it doesn't match the one on file with their voter registration. In the past, county elections officials have sent letters to affected voters informing them that their ballot wasn't counted but they could visit the elections office in person to correct the deficiency. Starting this year, the list of "challenged ballots" was released publicly, allowing the campaigns to nudge voters to take action if they believe they might be supporters. Before the election, the pro-labeling campaign invested heavily in a voter-registration effort, focusing particularly on the Portland and Eugene areas, Kaushik said. So the campaign had staff and an army of volunteers to contact the voters whose ballots had been rejected. Labeling proponents also used social media, encouraging their supporters to check whether their friends were on the list of challenged ballots, Kaushik said. Advocacy groups supporting the labeling campaign checked their membership lists against the challenged-ballot database and helped make contact, he said. "It's a fair amount of work and inconvenient to get those ballots corrected, so it usually takes multiple contacts," Kaushik said. The labeling critics also used the list to reach out to supporters, said Dana Bieber, a spokeswoman for the No on 92 Coalition. Still, the ballots counted late heavily favored the measure's proponents. "We are confident that Measure 92 has been defeated, and that will be the case even if there happens to be a recount," Bieber said. Oregon's last statewide recount followed the May 2008 election, for a ballot measure on civil forfeiture. It passed by 681 votes. Around the country, there were 22 statewide recounts between 2000 and 2012, according to FairVote, a Maryland-based advocacy group. The recounts shifted the final margin by an average of less than 0.03 percent. Three recounts flipped the outcome of the election. By Jonathan J. Cooper The Associated Press MailTribune.com By Jonathan J. Cooper The Associated Press Posted Nov. 22, 2014 at 2:00 AM » Comment or view comments Reader Reaction » STAY INFORMED Email NewsLetter Sign Up Today Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Southern Oregon Directory Featured Businesses Loading... Business Name address Location, ST | website.com Find Southern Oregon Attractions Bars Restaurants Beauty Salons Entertainment Doctors Medical Specialists Contractors Education Lawn Services Lawyers Shopping Travel Tanning Used Cars Wedding Services ▼ Add your business here + Events Calendar Connect with MailTribune.com Facebook Twitter RSS Back to top Reader Services Reader Services Home Subscriptions Subscriber controls Contact us Submissions Photos Events Letters to the editor Corrections Announcements Obituaries Story ideas Since you asked Alerts Email Alerts RSS Feeds Text Alerts Advertise Media Kit Home Products and services Ad rates Advertising contacts Propel Marketing Mail Tribune Daily Tidings The Nickel Shop Our Valley Blogs Mobile Site Stay Informed Email newsletter Sign Up Today Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Your privacy is important, read our privacy policy. © Copyright 2015 Local Media Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Local Media Group Publications Original content available for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted. MailTribune.com | P.O. Box 1108, Medford, OR 97501