DTIC ADA490346: Field Manual (FM) 3-0 -- A Blueprint for Full-Spectrum Conflict and Army Modernization

Survival, Water, Medical Field Manuals

Military Manuals

Defense Technical Information Center

Document text

Ben  Ennis 


Army  Modernization 


ARMYAL&T 


Field  Manual  (FM)  3-0  — 

A  Blueprint  for  Full-Spectrum  Conflict  and 


FM  3-0  Operations,  dated  February  2008,  gives  the  U.S.  Army's  view  of  how  to 
conduct  prompt  and  sustained  land  operations.  The  manual  draws  on  learned 
lessons  from  the  last  6  years  of  combat  in  Iraq  and  Afghanistan.  "FM  3-0  is  the 
blueprint  for  an  uncertain  future,"  says  GEN  William  S.  Wallace,  Commanding 
General  (CG),  U.S.  Army  Training  and  Doctrine  Command.  "The  Army  must  pre¬ 
pare  for  a  full-spectrum  conflict  —  not  just  major  combat  operations.  Preparation 
for  full-spectrum  conflict  and  organizational  change  begins  with  doctrine.  FM  3-0 
presents  doctrine  that  will  become  a  driver  for  change  in  the  Army." 


LTG  William  B.  Caldwell  IV,  CG,  U.S.  Army 
Combined  Arms  Center,  Fort  Leavenworth,  KS, 
adds  that  to  understand  the  size  and  scope  of 
changes  in  the  doctrine,  look  back  to  the  Army 
of  pre-Sept.  11,  2001: 

•  The  organizational  structure  was  based  on  the 
division  as  the  key  warfighting  element. 


•  Stability  operations  were  considered,  but  were 
treated  as  a  symptom  of  mission  creep. 

•  Talk  about  the  peace  dividend  due  to  a  strate¬ 
gic  pause  was  driving  our  acquisition  process 
to  potentially  skip  a  generation  of  equipment. 

•  There  was  still  a  strong  tendency  toward 
risk  aversion  because  of  Operation  Southern 
Watch,  Bosnia,  Beirut,  and  even,  to  some 
extent,  Vietnam. 


38 


JULY  -  SEPTEMBER  2008 


Report  Documentation  Page 

Form  Approved 

0MB  No.  0704-0188 

Public  reporting  burden  for  the  collection  of  information  is  estimated  to  average  1  hour  per  response,  including  the  time  for  reviewing  instructions,  searching  existing  data  sources,  gathering  and 
maintaining  the  data  needed,  and  completing  and  reviewing  the  collection  of  information.  Send  comments  regarding  this  burden  estimate  or  any  other  aspect  of  this  collection  of  information, 
including  suggestions  for  reducing  this  burden,  to  Washington  Headquarters  Services,  Directorate  for  Information  Operations  and  Reports,  1215  Jefferson  Davis  Highway,  Suite  1204,  Arlington 

VA  22202-4302.  Respondents  should  be  aware  that  notwithstanding  any  other  provision  of  law,  no  person  shall  be  subject  to  a  penalty  for  failing  to  comply  with  a  collection  of  information  if  it 
does  not  display  a  currently  valid  0MB  control  number. 

1.  REPORT  DATE 

SEP  2008  2.  REPORT  TYPE 

3.  DATES  COVERED 

00-00-2008  to  00-00-2008 

4.  TITLE  AND  SUBTITLE 

Field  Manual  (FM)  3-0  -  A  Blueprint  for  Full-Spectrum  Conflict  and 

Army  Modernization 

5a.  CONTRACT  NUMBER 

5b.  GRANT  NUMBER 

5c.  PROGRAM  ELEMENT  NUMBER 

6.  AUTHOR(S) 

5d.  PROJECT  NUMBER 

5e.  TASK  NUMBER 

5f.  WORK  UNIT  NUMBER 

7.  PERFORMING  ORGANIZATION  NAME(S)  AND  ADDRESS(ES) 

Army  Acquisition,  Logistics  &  Technology  (AT&L),9900  Belvoir  Road 
Suite  101, Fort  Belvoir, VA, 22060-5567 

8.  PERFORMING  ORGANIZATION 

REPORT  NUMBER 

9.  SPONSORING/MONITORING  AGENCY  NAME(S)  AND  ADDRESS(ES) 

10.  SPONSOR/MONITOR’S  ACRONYM(S) 

11.  SPONSOR/MONITOR’S  REPORT 
NUMBER(S) 

12.  DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY  STATEMENT 

Approved  for  public  release;  distribution  unlimited 

13.  SUPPLEMENTARY  NOTES 

14.  ABSTRACT 

15.  SUBJECT  TERMS 

16.  SECURITY  CLASSIFICATION  OF:  17.  LIMITATION  OF 

_ _ _  ABSTRACT 

18.  NUMBER  19a.  NAME  OF 

OF  PAGES  RESPONSIBLE  PERSON 

a.  REPORT  b.  ABSTRACT  c.  THIS  PAGE  Same  aS 

unclassifled  unclassifled  unclassified  Report  (SAR) 

4 

Standard  Form  298  (Rev.  8-98} 

Prescribed  by  ANSI  Std  Z39-18 


ARMYAL&T 


Caldwell  points  out  that  today  our 

reality  is: 

•  The  organization  structure  is  based  on 
the  Brigade  Combat  Team  (BCT)  as 
the  key  warfighting  element. 

•  Stability  operations  are  considered 
a  core  mission  of  the  military;  full- 
spectrum  operations  means  stability 
operations  are  just  as  important  (and 
sometimes  more  important)  than  of¬ 
fensive  and  defensive  operations. 

•  We  are  in  a  state  of  persistent  conflict 
in  a  long-term  global  war. 


•  There  is  an  emphasis  on  initiative  and 
accepting  risk  to  achieve  decisive  results. 

According  to  Caldwell,  FM  3-0  provides 
the  blueprint  for  a  new  training  strategy, 
changes  in  organizational  structure  to  re¬ 
spond  to  full-spectrum  operations,  and 
changes  in  leader  development  and  pro¬ 
fessional  military  education  to  focus  on 
adaptive  and  innovative  leadership. 

“This  blueprint  for  the  future  looks  be¬ 
yond  the  current  fight  in  Iraq  and 
Afghanistan,”  Caldwell  continues.  The 
implication  of  full-spectrum  operations 


still  includes  the  requirement  to  remain 
fully  capable  to  fight  major  combat  op¬ 
erations  in  the  future;  the  implication  of 
information  engagement  requires  a 
change  in  the  cultural  mindset;  and 
the  whole-of-government  approach  — 
inherent  in  all  of  our  operations  — 
requires  not  only  a  change  in  the  mili¬ 
tary  but  also  in  the  interagency  process. 
“These  changes,  I  believe,  will  be  revo¬ 
lutionary  —  and  FM  3-0  provides  the 
blueprint  to  move  out,”  he  says. 

FM  3-0  major  doctrinal  changes 
include  the  following: 


U.S.  ARMY  PHOTO  BY  SGT  |AMES  HUNTER. 


▼  The  FM  emphasizes  the  critical  nature  and  influence  of 
information  in  operations.  Information  engagement  re¬ 
quires  the  integrated  employment  of  related  disciplines 
such  as  public  affairs,  psychological  operations  (PSYOPS), 
and  combat  camera.  Information  superiority  is  central  to 
mission  accomplishment  and  requires  consistency  between 
actions  on  the  ground  and  the  messages  being  presented  to 
the  audiences  at  all  levels.  Here,  Soldiers  from  the  U.S. 
Army’s  350th  Tactical  PSYOPS,  10th  Mountain  Div.,  drop 
leaflets  over  a  village  near  Hawijah  in  Kirkuk  province, 
Iraq.  The  leaflets  are  intended  to  promote  the  idea  of  self- 
government  to  area  residents. 


A  The  importance  of  stability  operations  is  elevated  to 
co-equal  with  offensive  and  defensive  operations. 
Stability  operations  embrace  a  whole-of-government 
approach,  which  uses  all  elements  of  national  power 
to  include  diplomatic,  information,  military,  and  eco¬ 
nomic  to  achieve  success.  Stability  operations  are  co¬ 
ordinated  to  maintain  or  reestablish  a  safe  and  secure 
environment  and  facilitate  reconciliation  among  local 
or  regional  adversaries.  Stability  operations  strive  to 
establish  political,  legal,  social,  and  economic  institu¬ 
tions  and  support  the  transition  to  legitimate  local 
governance.  Here,  SGT  Brandon  Griffis,  1st  Platoon, 
Go.  A,  1st  Battalion  (Bn),  502nd  Infantry  Regiment, 
2nd  BGT,  101st  Airborne  Division  (Div.)  (Air  As¬ 
sault),  talks  with  an  elderly  Iraqi  man  during  a  dis¬ 
mounted  patrol  in  Hurriyah,  Iraq. 


DOD  PHOTO  BY  SSGT  SAMUEL  BENDET,  U.S.  AIR  EORCE. 


JULY  -  SEPTEMBER  2008 


ARMYAL&T 


r 


U.S.  ARMY  PHOTO  BY  SPC  SHAWN  M.  CASSATT. 


^  FM  3-0  doctrine  continues  to  advocate  Soldiers  as 
the  Army’s  centerpiece.  Army  leaders  and  Soldiers 
should  be  given  maximum  latitude  to  exercise  indi¬ 
vidual  and  small-unit  initiative.  Here,  a  Soldier 
from  Alpha  Co.,  2nd  Bn,  23rd  Infantry  Regiment, 
4th  BCT,  2nd  Infantry  Division  (2ID)  views  a 
monitor  in  his  Stryker  vehicle  to  check  if  all  is  clear 
before  deploying  his  team  in  Muqdadiyah,  Iraq. 


U.S.  ARMY  PHOTO  BY  CPT  RICHARD  YBARRA. 


U.S.  ARMY  PHOTO  BY  SPC  LARAYNE  HURD. 


A.FM3-0  operational  concept  drives 
initiative,  embraces  risk,  and  focuses  on 
creating  opportunities  to  achieve  decisive 
results.  The  FM’s  operational  concept 
emphasizes  leaders  and  Soldiers  seizing, 
retaining,  and  exploiting  the  initiative  to 
achieve  decisive  results.  Here,  SGT 
Amaury  Lantigua  and  SFC  John  Guy  of 
Heavy  Co.,  3rd  Squadron,  3rd  Armored 
Cavalry  Regiment,  inspect  a  vehicle  that 
was  destined  for  use  as  a  car  bomb  as  a 
Kiowa  helicopter  provides  cover  in  the 
AI-Rissala  market  of  Mosul,  Iraq. 


A  The  commander  leverages  experience,  knowledge, 
and  intuition  to  play  the  central  role  in  full- 
spectrum  operations,  bridging  battle  command 
and  operational  art.  The  commander  has  the 
central  role  in  full-spectrum  operations  and  must 
creatively  apply  battle  command  and  operational 
art.  Here,  U.S.  Army  CPT  Edmond  Hardy,  1st 
Armored  Div.  Commander,  2nd  Stryker  Cavalry 
Regiment,  4th  Squadron,  holds  an  Iraqi  child 
while  giving  orders  during  an  aid  mission  in 
Baghdad,  Iraq. 


40 


JULY  -  SEPTEMBER  2008 


ARMYAL&T 


LTG  N.  Ross  Thompson  III,  MILDEP  to  the  Acting  ASAALT,  emphasizes  that 
we  are  doing  everything  possible  to  meet  Soldiers’  needs  by  accelerating  the  deliv¬ 
ery  of  vital  equipment  and  new  technologies.  Here,  U.S.  Army  ILT  James  Cleary 
(right),  1st  Bn,  38th  Infantry  Regiment,  4th  Stryker  Brigade,  2ID,  uses  a  field 
radio  in  Baghdad  during  a  combined  cordon  and  search  mission. 


FM  3-0  doctrine  execution  requires 
well-trained  Soldiers  and  the  finest 
weapons  and  equipment  available. 
“This  doctrine  is  the  engine  driving 
change  in  our  concepts  and  designs  for 
organizations,  training,  leader  develop¬ 
ment,  and  the  materiel  solutions  we 
need  to  support  our  modernization 
strategy,”  explains  LTG  N.  Ross 
Thompson  III,  Military  Deputy 
(MILDEP)  to  the  Acting  Assistant 
Secretary  of  the  Army  for  Acquisition, 
Logistics,  and  Technology  (ASAALT). 
“Army  modernization  is  necessary, 
successful,  and  long  overdue.” 


According  to  Thompson,  just  as  the 
commercial  market  has  been  trans¬ 
formed  to  meet  market  demands,  the 
Army  is  transforming  to  meet  the  needs 
of  our  Soldiers  in  an  era  of  persistent 
conflict.  “Our  Soldiers  are  depending 
on  us  to  get  them  what  they  need  to  ac¬ 
complish  their  mission  and  return  home 
safely,”  Thompson  states.  “We  are  doing 
everything  possible  to  meet  their  needs 
by  accelerating  the  delivery  of  vital 
equipment  and  new  technologies. 

“We  are  pushing  the  limits  of  technology 
to  provide  our  Soldiers  with  the  very 


best  weapons  systems  and  equipment 
America  can  produce  as  quickly  as  possi¬ 
ble,”  Thompson  emphasizes.  “Much  of 
our  effort  centers  on  providing  new, 
more  robust  communications  capabili¬ 
ties  to  connect  our  Soldiers,  our  leaders, 
and  the  systems  that  support  and  protect 
them  in  unprecedented  ways.  We  are 
succeeding  in  this  critical  aspect  of  our 
modernization.  We  are  already  delivering 
some  measure  of  our  desired  capabilities 
to  our  Soldiers  in  Iraq  and  Afghanistan 
—  providing  a  glimpse  of  what  we  will 
achieve  in  the  future  through  the  power 
of  a  modern,  redundant  network. 

“Our  modernization  strategy  is  flexible, 
adaptive,  and  well  suited  to  the  uncer¬ 
tainties  inherent  to  the  environment  in 
which  we  operate,”  Thompson  adds. 
“We  continuously  refine  and  adapt  our 
efforts  to  address  new  requirements  in 
an  effort  to  keep  ahead  of  the  ruthless- 
thinking,  adaptive  enemies  we  face.  De¬ 
velopment  risk  exists  in  any  venture 
that  seeks  to  move  beyond  the  status 
quo;  it  must  be  actively  managed  and 
mitigated  to  the  maximum  extent  pos¬ 
sible.  Without  assuming  some  risk, 
however,  progress  will  never  occur.  The 
real  risk  —  to  our  Soldiers,  our  Army, 
and  the  cause  we  serve  —  lies  not  with 
a  modernization  effort  that  is  both 
comprehensive  and  ambitious.  Rather, 
the  real  risk  lies  with  a  failure  to  realize 
that  the  world  has  changed  and  that 
our  Army  must  change  accordingly.” 

BENENNIS  is  the  Strategic  Communica¬ 
tions  Chief  at  the  U.S.  Army  Acquisition 
Support  Center.  He  has  a  B.S.  in  business 
from  the  University  ofCobrado  and  an 
M.B.A.  in  marketing  from  Atlanta  Uni¬ 
versity.  Ennis  is  a  former  Army  Reserve  Ad¬ 
vertising  Chief  and  has  attended  numerous 
military  schools,  including  the  U.S.  Army 
Command  and  General  Stajf  College  and 
Defense  Information  School. 


JULY  -  SEPTEMBER  2008 


41