Document text
Naval Medical Research Institute
8901 Wisconsin Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20889-5607
NMRI 94-84
November 1994
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE
OF
SURVIVAL, EVASION, RESISTANCE, AND ESCAPE
INSTRUCTOR PERSONNEL
J. M. Govia, Ph.D. D 1 * r*
ELECT E
FEB 2 3 1995
0 G
D
Naval Medical Research
and Development Command
Bethesda, Maryland 20889-5606
19950217 036
Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Department of the Navy
Washington, DC 20372-5120
Approved for public release;
distribution is unlimited
NOTICES
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private ones of the writer and are not to be
construed as official or reflecting the views of the naval service at large.
When U. S. Government drawings, specifications, or other data are used for any purpose other than
a definitely related Government procurement operation, the Government thereby incurs no
responsibility nor any obligation whatsoever, and the fact that the Government may have
formulated, furnished or in any way supplied the said drawings, specifications, or other data is not
to be regarded by implication or otherwise, as in any manner licensing the holder or any other
person or corporation, or conveying any rights or permission to manufacture, use, or sell any
patented invention that may in any way be related thereto.
Please do not request copies of this report from the Naval Medical Research Institute. Additional
copies may be purchased from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Virginia 22161
Federal Government agencies and their contractors registered with the Defense Technical
Information Center should direct requests for copies of this report to:
Defense Technical Information Center
Cameron Station
Alexandria, Virginia 22304-6145
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL
NMRI 94-84
The experiments reported herein were conducted according to the principles set forth in the current
edition of the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals," Institute of Laboratory Animal
Resources, National Research Council.
This technical report has been reviewed by the NMRI scientific and public affairs staff and is
approved for publication. It is releasable to the National Technical Information Service where it
will be available to the general public, including foreign nations.
ROBERT G. WALTER
CAPT, DC, USN
Commanding Officer
Naval Medical Research Institute
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
Form Approved
OMB No. 0704-0 168
tfDonme bu'een for ih»* coMhrtion of information n «iimai*c tc avenge t hour per retporse. mcluOmg in* lime lor reviewing instruction!, teerchmg exiting e*ii sourcev
Catherine *ne maintaining the data needed, and completing anc reviewing :ne ‘collection of information Sene comment* regarding this buroen estimate or any other aspen of this
fclienon of information, including suggestions for reducing tms oureen to Washington Heacowanen Services. Directorate for ,n^*V°«9c*rM.Lor,i ,n* S0S?A.WW Jet1rnon
: *-!S Highway. Suite t2C4. Arlington, va 22202*<3C2. and to tne Office of Management and Budget. P a perwprx Reduction Project (Q7t*»tn 66). Washington. DC 20SC3.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
novemb:
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SURVIVAL, EVASION,
RESISTANCE AND ESCAPE INSTRUCTOR PERSONNEL
6. AUTHOR(S)
JOSEPH MICHAEL GOVIA, PhD* (LCDR, MSC, USNR)
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
Naval Medical Research Institute
Commanding Officer
8901 Wisconsin Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20889-5607
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER
NMRI 94-84
9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
Naval Medical Research and Development Command
National Naval Medical Center
Building 1, Tower 12
8901 Wisconsin Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20889-5606
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
FASOTRAGULANT DET BRUNSWICK
Naval Air Station, Box 16
Brunswick, ME 04011-5000
12a. DISTRIBUTION /AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
10. SPONSORING /MONITORING
AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)
The Psychological Profile of Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and
Escape (SERE) Instructor Personnel is critical to the success of this
type of training. Sixty- four SERE instructors were administered a
clinical interview; the Shipley, MMPI-2, NEO PI-R, Rosenzweig P-F
Study, Locke-Wallace Marital Inventory, and the Holmes -Rahe Life Change
Index. The findings revealed that the SERE instructor personnel were
a mature, bright, and psychologically healthy group of individuals.
The extant Navy criteria for SERE instructor duty is appropriate and
should be continued.
REF: NMRI 83-15 Report No. 1
TOTO QTTM/CfT m SES0S3B 4
14. SUBJECT TERMS
[ 15. NUMBER OF PAGES
PROFILE; ESCAPE; EVASION; RESISTANCE
16. PRICE CODE
17 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION j 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Unlimited
NSN 7540-01 -280-S500
Standard form 298 (Rev. 2-89)
t>> ANSi Sic 235**8
298-U2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Method . 5
Results . 8
Table 1 . 9
Table 2 . 10
Table 3 . 11
Table 4 . 13
Table 5 . 14
Table 6 . 16
Figure 1 . 12
Figure 2 . 15
Discussion . 17
Acknowledgement . 23
References . 24
l
SERE Instructor Personnel
SERE Instructor Personnel
The Psychological Profile
of
SERE Instructor Personnel
Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) training
is critical to the men and women of the armed forces who may
someday be at risk for capture by a government hostile to the
United States . SERE training involves rudimentary instruction
in emergency first aid, evasion and land navigation,
resistance to interrogation, and ideas on how to escape from
captivity. SERE training also enables an individual to
become familiar with some of the psychological effects of
detention; it aids the individual in preparing him/herself
for the many ways in which a captor will attempt
exploitation; and, it also enables individuals the opportunity
to acquire the skills necessary to survive such an experience
with honor and integrity.
The importance of SERE training is widely recognized and
accepted by each of the uniformed services. Individuals most
at risk for capture - pilots, navigators, intelligence
officers, and air crew personnel, are encouraged, if not
required, to receive this specialized training. After action
analysis of Prisoner of War (POW) experiences from World War
II, Korea, Viet Nam, and, more recently, Desert Storm, forced
military planners into dealing with this possibility of
1
SERE Instructor Personnel
capture or detention. Indeed, military planners now
recognize that without SERE training, personnel are likely to
be manipulated and coerced into divulging information that
would put themselves or other Americans at risk for capture
or compromise. Without such training, there is concern that
under extreme duress individuals may lose respect for
themselves, experience a loss of honor, or even question
their own integrity.
Amidst the recognized need for SERE training, the next
concern becomes "who are most eligible to train the men and
women who may likely fall into harms way?" Within the Navy,
active duty enlisted personnel must clear two hurdles to
become eligible for SERE instructor duty. First, the
Enlisted Transfer Manual (NAVPERS 15909E) provides guidelines
for anyone seeking to become a SERE instructor. Individuals
must volunteer for such duty. They must pass both a physical
and psychological evaluation to insure their suitability for
the training. They must also be qualified second-class
swimmers, career designated, and possess a secret security
clearance .
The second hurdle involves a commanding officer's
responsibility for determining an individual's suitability
for SERE instructor duty. Commanding officers are required
to evaluate prospective instructors for appearance,
2
SERE Instructor Personnel
deportment, physical fitness, freedom from financial burden,
the absence of alcohol -related incidents, oral and written
communication skills, good character, and amiability.
Performance requirements on a 4.0 point scale for service-
members in the rank of Chief Petty Officer through Master
Chief Petty Officer should have an overall average of 3.6 or
greater, with evidence of continued improvement. Individuals
in the rank of Petty Officer Second Class and Petty Officer
First Class must obtain 3.6 scores for at least 24 months.
Deficits in any of these requirements are sufficient to
preclude them from participating in SERE instructor duty.
Irrespective of pay grade, all prospective instructors must
possess a secret security clearance.
The Navy SERE School in Brunswick, ME, is approximately
thirty years old. Conceived from the lessons learned about
American POW behavior during World War II and Korea, the
program was active in preparing Naval and Marine Corps
personnel for duty in Southeast Asia during the Viet Nam
Conflict. More recently, participants in Operation Desert
Storm also had the opportunity to apply the skills acquired
in SERE training.
Curley and deCspikes (1983) conducted a study which
sought to identify the personality and demographic
characteristics of a sample of twenty-eight SERE instructors.
3
SERE Instructor Personnel
This study focused on the delineation of superior performing,
high performing, and [average] performing instructors and
their salient personality characteristics. Curley and
deCspikes observed their sample was free of psychopathology
and was significantly achievement -oriented. The current
investigation is an attempt to replicate their efforts;
however, unlike their study, no attempt was made to have
level of performance evaluated as superior, high, or
performing.
As in the earlier study, recent staff at the Brunswick
school are a varied admixture of job occupations and
seniority. They represent a cross-section of the many highly
qualified individuals who make up the Navy and Marine Corps .
The results of their psychological assessments are reviewed
below. In doing so, attention is given to their
demographics, performance on standardized testing, and self
reports of level of stress and typical pattern of coping.
Such information should prove helpful in discerning whether
the extant criteria for selection to SERE duty is effective
in screening out psychopathology.
4
SERE Instructor Personnel
Method
Subjects
Subjects1 for this study were 64 men and women enlisted
active duty, U.S. Navy personnel who had been assigned to the
Navy SERE School in Brunswick, ME. As assignment to this
school was not available to everyone, the sample was not a
random one; rather, it reflected the reality of individual
choice, initiative, and careful screening. Psychological
assessment was required of all individuals who were assigned
to SERE training; they received this assessment after
completion of the SERE course but before they were formally
enrolled in the SERE instructor curriculum. Additional
psychological assessment was also required of all instructor
personnel at yearly intervals to detect any changes in their
psychological status .
Instruments
Shiplev Institute of Living Scale. The Shipley
Institute of Living Scale (Shipley; Zachary, 1991) is a brief
screening measure of intellectual functioning. It
specifically attempts to assess word knowledge and abstract
analytical reasoning skills. On the basis of the ratio of
As a result of the limited number of women participating in SERE instructor duty
(N=5) , no effort was made to separate their data from their male counterparts.
Additionally, only male pronouns were used in referring to the subjects.
5
SERE Instructor Personnel
vocabulary to abstract reasoning scores, an estimated
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised IQ score is
obtained (WAIS-R; Wechsler, 1981) . Previous research with
the Shipley revealed that it is an acceptable screening
measure of intellectual ability (Heinemann, Harper, Friedman,
& Whitney, 1985; Zachary, Crumpton, & Spiegel, 1985) .
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory - Revised.
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory - Revised
(MMPI-2 ; Hathaway & McKinley 1989) is a revision of the
original Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI;
Hathaway & McKinley, 1940) . It is a 567-item, true-false,
multi -dimensional measure of personality functioning. The
MMPI-2 was developed to measure personality functioning, in
general, and detect the presence of psychopathology, in
particular. Considerable research supports the use of the
MMPI-2 for these purposes (e.g., Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham,
Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989; Graham, 1990; Greene, 1991).
Revised NEO Personality Inventory. The Revised NEO
Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) is
also a multi -dimensional measure of personality; however,
unlike the MMPI-2, the NEO PI-R is not concerned with
psychopathology. Instead, it is primarily focused on the
assessment of "normal" personality functioning. The NEO PI-R
is based on a five- factor model of personality functioning.
6
SERE Instructor Personnel
This model advocates that personality can be most
parsimoniously described across five factors: Neuroticism,
Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and
Conscientiousness. Considerable research has been generated
on the five-factor model of personality functioning, and the
reader is directed to McCrae and Costa (1990) for a thorough
review of this research.
Rosenzweig Picture -Frustration (P-F) Study. The
Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study (P-F Study; Rosenzweig,
1978) is a semi -projective measure of aggression. The
uniqueness of the measure is noted in its neutral view of
aggression, where such behavior is labelled positive or
negative depending on the outcome. Rosenzweig postulated
that individuals respond to frustration by becoming
preoccupied with a given source of frustration (Obstacle-
Dominance) , taking it personally (Ego-Defense) , or else
seeking a constructive solution to a perceived source of
frustration (Need-Persistence) . In addition, reactions to
frustration are directed toward others (Extraggression) ,
inward ( Intraggression) , or else by disregarding the
experience (Imaggression) . Considerable research has been
generated on this instrument and a review is offered by Govia
(1983) .
7
SERE Instructor Personnel
Procedure
Upon reporting to the Navy SERE School, most subjects
were given a clinical interview, the MMPI-2, and the P-F
Study. Approximately one year later they were given another
clinical interview, administered the NEO PI-R and the
Shipley. Although 69 instructors received a psychological
assessment, incomplete data existed for some instructors, and
the sample sizes for the specific analyses varied.
Results
A review of the demographics of the instructor personnel
revealed the average instructor was 32 years old and had been
on active duty for approximately 12 years and 9 months . He
possessed 13 years of education and had an estimated WAIS-R
IQ in the average range of ability. Fifty- seven instructors
were married, seven were single and unmarried, two were
separated, and three were divorced.
8
SERE Instructor Personnel
Table 1
Demographics of SERE Instructor Personnel (N=69)
Current
Former
(N=28)
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Age
32
5
35.3
7.4
Active Duty
(Months)
152
56
181.7
63.9
Education
13
1
12.8
1.5
IQ
103
15
Not Available
Married
57
II II
Single
7
H II
Separated
2
II II
Divorced
3
II II
The data from the earlier study by Curley and deCspikes (1983)
was gleaned from their article and was presented
here for purposes of comparison.
Summary statistics for the MMPI-2 clinical scales
are presented in Table 2 and summary statistics for the
MMPI-2 content scales are presented in Table 3. On the
MMPI-2, T-Scores less than 65 are considered normal while
scores above 65 connote less health. A review of the
validity scale indices revealed the presence of the "V"
configuration for L, F, and K. All of the clinical and
selected content scales fell within normal limits. The
9
SERE Instructor Personnel
validity and clinical scales profile is presented in
Figure 1.
Table 2
Raw Score Summary Statistics for the MMPI-2 Clinical
Scales (N=64 )
Mean
T-Score
SD
L
6
61
3
F
3
45
2
K
19
66
4
1
12
48
2
2
17
47
3
3
20
47
3
4
22
48
3
5
22
42
5
6
9
46
3
7
24
44
3
8
24
45
4
9
20
49
3
0
21
47
7
A T-scores is a standardized score with a mean of 50
and a standard deviation of 10. The MMPI-2 denotes
any score greater than 65 as significant and indicative
of pathology.
10
SERE Instructor Personnel
Table 3
Raw Score Summary Statistics for selected MMPI-2
Content Scales (N=64)
Mean T- Score SD
ANX
2
42
2
FRS
2
45
2
OBS
2
41
2
DEP
2
45
2
HEA
3
44
2
BIZ
1
46
2
ANG
4
46
2
CYN
8
47
4
ASP
6
46
3
TPA
5
43
3
LSE
1
41
2
SOD
6
47
4
FAM
3
44
2
A T-score is a standardized score with a mean of 50
and a standard deviation of 10. The MMPI-2 denotes
any score greater than 65 as significant and indicative
of pathology.
Summary statistics for the Revised NEO Personality
Inventory are presented in Table 4. The five factors of
Neuroticism, Extroversion, Openness to Experience,
Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness were all within
normal limits. Individual traits of the five factors are
presented in Table 5 . All traits fell within normal
limits. Figure 2 displays the profile of scores on the
NEO PI-R .
11
SERE Instructor Personnel
Table 4
Raw Score Summary Statistics for the NEO PI-R
Dimensions (N=64)
Mean
SD
Neuroticism
65
17
Extraversion
112
15
Openness
109
17
Agreeableness
117
15
Conscientiousness
126
16
13
SERE Instructor Personnel
Table 5
Mean
SD
Anxiety-
12
3
Angry Hostility
11
4
Depression
10
4
Self-Consciousness
12
3
Impulsiveness
13
4
Vulnerability
7
3
Warmth
21
3
Gregariousness
16
5
Assertiveness
18
4
Activity
18
3
Excitement -Seeking
18
4
Positive Emotions
21
4
Fantasy
17
4
Aesthetics
16
5
Feelings
19
3
Actions
17
3
Ideas
19
5
Values
21
3
Trust
21
4
Straightforwardness
20
4
Altruism
23
3
Compliance
17
3
Modesty
17
4
Tender-Mindedness
19
4
Competence
23
3
Order
18
4
Dutifulness
23
3
Achievement - Striving
20
4
Self-Discipline
23
4
Deliberation
19
3
14
Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R)
P*uJ T. Co«», Jr„ Ph-D. *nd Rober. R. McCr»«, Ph.D. Due ___ ___ Aft
ICMCWr **tpto**n p«/»XNino^ * uo*j*a **440 Auy iMDd uo *4 «Ofq 14 p«|i4Jd * umOj «M1 flk (Crf9/M
'MJ/OWg |UMuM#Ny ^iJ|QO|l)l p<U^ (O UOftlfUUM] U < | U |fKM4|(M >1 HflU
AuoAqjouJJOjAijou|MOdu|Jo«tcM4m«4p«:tnpoi0ai*qtouAo*rp*M*t«j MnOtirV X ‘wawtj tuwmttwy uaAi^ An M61 9 m0v**O
JS3MCC-009-I / 9SSCC «WOu ‘ocsepQ / 966 *og O d ItMtOMu (uwMtMty jD9f6ofoqdA*d
Very High
"w^
,v°> j°i
'^‘•VtoyjT
frWW«/^?r
■'^r-
fRW *“/>*,
i,'rP-
l,'Sr
**•**;> ~Zr
W^*,„ ^
^Ov, *•
, *r
rr
>r
UA,^r
*)£*) S! ers S3 5S,K *gs 5SC *3* 3S?L
is£Ii5ii2III=§II2IIs2i=a22^*
"*f7T cs 3 ;* * * vs » 53 aef4^*
553^3555*5
FIGURE 2: Profile of NEO PI-R Factor and Trait Scores
SERE Instructor Personnel
Summary statistics for the Rosenzweig P-F Study are
presented in Table 6. The three types of aggression and
the three directions of aggression were all within normal
limits .
Table 6
Raw Score Summary Statistics for the Rosenzweig P-F
Study (N=47 )
Mean
SD
Type of
Aggression
Obstacle -Dominance
Ego -Defense
Need- Persistence
Direction of
Aggression
4 16.7(19.6)*
11 45.8(53.2)
8 33.3(27.2)
1 (7.2)
2 (10.7)
2 (8.5)
Ext r aggr e s s i on
Intraggression
Imaggression
9 37.5(43.3)
7 29.2(28.1)
7 29.2(28.6)
3 (12.1)
2 (7.6)
7 (9.3)
* The values presented in the parentheses are the means and
standard deviations obtained by the normative sample. Thus,
the data reported herein does not differ from the normative
sample .
The mean score on the Holmes and Rahe Social
Readjustment Scale was 180 and the standard deviation was
71. This score indicated the instructors reported
16
SERE Instructor Personnel
"Mild Life Crisis Level with a 35 percent chance of
illness . "
The mean score on the Locke-Wallace Marital
Adjustment Test was 121 and the standard deviation was
17 . This score corresponds with the original research of
Locke and Wallace (1959) wherein 96 percent of their
well-adjusted couples scored 100 or higher.
Discussion
The findings of the present investigation revealed
that the psychological profile of SERE instructor
personnel differed very little from the previous research
of Curley and deCspikes (1983) . The typical SERE
instructor is a mature and more senior member of the U.S.
Navy. According to the Shipley, he possessed average
intellectual acumen. The MMPI-2 indicated he approached
the psychological assessment with a propensity to present
himself in the most favorable light. He did so by
minimizing the significance of any potential
psychological concerns, which suggested good ego- strength
and good coping skills. Such an observation reflected
two considerations: First, the instructors were a fairly
psychologically healthy group of individuals. Thus, the
data presented herein actually mirrored their current
state of psychological health.
17
SERE Instructor Personnel
Second, but no less significant, like most
vocational assessment findings, the SERE instructors were
uninclined to reveal anything about themselves that might
be construed as negative, or potentially disqualifying.
Amidst the increased competition for promotion, the
revelation of any potentially damaging, or job-
threatening, psychological issues would jeopardize their
career potential, especially when the relatively high
status of instructor duty is considered.
That the Revised NEO Personality Inventory should
correspond so closely with the MMPI-2 should come as no
surprise. The findings revealed that the current group
of SERE instructors was a generally relaxed group of
individuals. They were free of anxiety or feelings of
remorse or guilt, and they reported being comfortable in
a variety of social situations. They further reported
the capacity to delay gratification for desired objects
and to handle stress without needing to rely upon others.
The average SERE instructor is friendly and enjoys
the company of others . He is comfortable in taking
charge or assuming leadership positions and also likes to
be on the go. He likes to engage in stimulating
activity, and he has little difficulty in showing his
enthusiasm during such times.
18
SERE Instructor Personnel
The SERE instructors further indicated they
preferred a balance between novelty and routine. He has
an appreciation for such things as art, beauty, drama, or
poetry without a compulsive urge to indulge himself. He
is open to exploring his feelings and valuing this part
of his life. He sometimes likes to go to new places, try
new foods, and he is intellectually curious about the
world around him. He is also comfortable with his
political, religious, and social beliefs.
Interpersonally, the average SERE instructor accepts
others at face value, seldom doubting their sincerity or
motivation. He is candid with others, cares about the
general welfare of others, and is able to convert such
caring into acts of kindness and sympathy. He is
cooperative on projects and often displays humility and
deference in dealing with others.
The typical SERE instructor is conscientious . He
has a good sense of his abilities, is generally
organized, and can be expected to follow through on his
commitments. He is achievement -oriented, has good self-
discipline to obtain his goals, and he often refrains
from thinking or acting hastily, preferring to weigh his
options.
19
SERE Instructor Personnel
That SERE instructors should be a psychologically
healthy and versatile group of individuals is obvious.
No less significant in any evaluation of instructor
personnel is the nature in which they handle frustration.
While both the MMPI-2 and the NEO PI-R reveal a solid
foundation of healthy psychological functioning, the
Rosenzweig P-F Study provides a unique window through
which we can examine individual reactions to common,
everyday stressors, for it is only in the more subtle,
prosaic situations that individuals reveal their mettle.
The Rosenzweig P-F Study is instrumental in
discerning whether individuals get hung-up on myriad
sources of frustration, whether they react to such
frustration defensively, or whether they can maintain
equanimity and aplomb at such times. No less important,
the P-F Study can also tell us whether individuals
aggress against others or internalize their frustrations,
thereby placing prospective students in harms way, or a
less than healthy training environment.
The findings revealed the SERE instructors were
flexible in their responses to frustration. They were
neither inclined to consistently become preoccupied with
a given source of frustration, take it personally, nor to
seek out constructive solutions to sources of
20
SERE Instructor Personnel
frustration. Similarly, they were neither inclined to
consistently aggress against others, themselves, nor to
simply disregard sources of frustration. Rather, their
responses to the Rosenzweig P-F Study suggested greater
ego- resiliency and flexibility of response to a broad
array of potentially frustrating situations.
Finally, the SERE instructors arrived at this
assignment with minimal sources of stress in their lives.
Their marriages were well-grounded, characterized by
mutual give and take, and a keen capacity to resolve any
differences as they arise. These findings are in accord
with the data presented by Curley and deCspikes. Thus,
the data further suggest that the steps necessary for
consideration and selection for SERE instructor duty are
reasonable, useful, and worthy of continued adherence.
21
SERE Instructor Personnel
BLANK
22
SERE Instructor Personnel
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the
private ones of the writers and are not to be construed
as official or reflecting the views of the Navy-
Department or the Naval Service at large.
In writing this paper, I want to express my
appreciation for the warmth and encouragement afforded me
by CDR Michael D. Curley, Ph.D., MSC, USNR, who provided
many insightful and incisive comments. Dr. Curley, thank
you very much.
23
SERE Instructor Personnel
References
Butcher, J.N., Dahlstrom, W.G., Graham, J.R., Tellegen,
A. & Kaemmer, B. (1989) . MMPI-2: Manual for
administration and scoring. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992) . NEO PI-R:
Professional manual. Odessa, Florida:
Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Curley, M.D . & deCspikes, R. (1983) . Personality and
demographic characteristics of U.S. Navy Survival
Instructors bv performance level . Bethesda,
Maryland: Naval Medical Research Institute.
Govia, J.M. .(1983) . A comparison of multi -dimensional
measures of aggression. Unpublished masters thesis.
University of Rhode Island.
Graham, J.R. (1990) . MMPI-2: Assessing personality and
psychopathology . New York: Oxford University
Press .
Greene, R.L. (1991) . The MMPI-2 /MMPI : An interpretive
manual . New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Hathaway, S.R. & McKinley, J.C. (1940) . A multiphasic
personality schedule (Minnesota) : I . Construction
of the schedule. Journal of Psychology, 10., 249-
254 .
Heinemann, A.W., Harper, R.G., Friedman, L.C. & Whitney,
J. (1985) . The relative utility of the Shipley -
Hartford Scale: Prediction of WAIS-R IQ. Journal of
Clinical Psychology. July 1985, 41(4), 547-551.
24
SERE Instructor Personnel
Locke, H.J. & Wallace, K.M. (1959) . Short-term marital
adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability
and validity. Journal of Marriage and Family
Living. 21, 251-255.
McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1990) . Personality in
adulthood . New York: Guilford Press.
Rosenzweig, S. (1978). The Rosenzweia Picture -
Frustration (P-F) Study Basic Manual. St. Louis:
Rana House.
Wechsler, D. (1981) . WAIS-R Manual. New York: The
Psychological Corporation.
Zachary, R.A., Crumpton, E. , & Spiegel, D.E. (1985).
Estimating WAIS-R IQ from the Shipley Institute of
Living Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology. July
1985, 41 (4) , 532-540.
25