Document text
Principal Investigator: James M Dubois
Organization: WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Fiscal Year: 2022
Award: $561,127
Funding agency: National Human Genome Research Institute
Project Summary
Religion is a primary driver of concerns with genomics and genomic healthcare (GGH). It is vital for research
on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genomics to understand the role of religion in shaping
public attitudes toward GGH. Ninety percent of the US public believes in some kind of higher power and 55%
pray daily. The US public attends religious services at a rate 3 times higher than scientists in the US, who are
at risk of misunderstanding the role religion plays in attitudes toward GGH. Further, Black, Hispanic, and rural
populations attend religious services more frequently than the general US public. Concerns with GGH
activities may lead to lower levels of engagement of GGH, which may in turn contribute to health disparities.
This project aims to understand why higher levels of religious practice are associated with greater concerns
with GGH activities.
Additionally, this project will interview faith leaders to identify how public health genomics might engage
faith communities in ways that are respectful and constructive. While some concerns with healthcare
technologies may disappear with new information, others stem from worldviews, deep moral commitments,
or mistrust of the healthcare system. Engaging religious communities is essential to identify which concerns
can be addressed with information, which call for alternative responses, and what alternative responses might
look like. Very few models exist for genomic public health engagement with religion, particularly models that
directly address value-laden concerns.13,14 This project will achieve two specific aims:
1. Quantitatively examine which aspects of religion explain its influence on support for GGH activities.
We will survey 4800 adults in the US to examine the association of religious variables with support for GGH
activities such as prenatal genetic testing, gene editing, and mRNA vaccines. We will generate rich descriptive
data and explore how and when diverse religious variables predict support for, or opposition to, GGH activities.
2. Explore how genomic public health can engage with religious communities in a way that is
respectful and constructive. We will conduct in-depth interviews via Zoom with 180 faith leaders—30 from
each of six groups: Evangelical, Mainline Protestant, Historically Black, and Catholic Christianity, Judaism,
and Islam. These groups represent the largest religious groups in the US, comprising 90% of those with a
religious affiliation. Interviews will explore several different issues: What are their views on GGH activities? Is
diversity of opinion on these matters tolerated within their community? To what extent are concerns with GGH
activities principled and to what extent might further information be helpful? How might genomic public health
engage religious communities in a way that is both respectful and constructive?
Terms: <2019-nCoV vaccine><21+ years old><Address><Adoption><Adult><Adult Human><Attitude><Belief><Bible><Black><Black Populations><Black group><Black individual><Black people><Black race><Blacks><COVID-19 vaccine><COVID19 vaccine><Cessation of life><Characteristics><Christianity><Communities><Data><Death><ELSI><Education Level><Educational Background><Ensure><Frequencies><Genes><Genetic><Genomics><Health Care Activity><Health Care Systems><Health Care Technology><Health Technology><Healthcare><Healthcare Activity><Healthcare Systems><Healthcare Technology><Hispanic Populations><Hispanic group><Hispanic individual><Hispanic people><Hispanics><Human><Interview><Investigators><Islam><Jewish><Knowledge><Lead><Learning><Life><Measurement><Messenger RNA><Modeling><Modern Man><Mohammedanism><Morals><Muslim><Muslim population group><Muslim religion><NHGRI><National Center for Human Genome Research><National Human Genome Research Institute><Participant><Pb element><Persons><Play><Population><Prayers><Protestant><Public Health><Qualitative Research><RNA vaccine><RNA-based vaccine><Regression Analyses><Regression Analysis><Regression Diagnostics><Religion><Religion and Spirituality><Research><Research Methodology><Research Methods><Research Personnel><Researchers><Risk><Role><Rural Population><SARS-CoV-2 vaccine><SARS-CoV2 vaccine><SARS-coronavirus-2 vaccine><Sample Size><Sampling><Scientist><Services><Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoV 2 vaccine><Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine><Shapes><Statistical Regression><Subgroup><Survey Instrument><Surveys><Technology><Time><adulthood><corona virus disease 2019 vaccine><coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine><coronavirus disease-19 vaccine><disparity in health><ethical legal and social><ethical legal social implication><experience><follower of religion Jewish><gene testing><gene-based testing><genetic testing><health care><health disparity><heavy metal Pb><heavy metal lead><innovate><innovation><innovative><instrument><interest><mRNA><mRNA vaccine><mRNA-based vaccine><new technology><novel technologies><prenatal><religious><religious group><response><social role><stakeholder insights><stakeholder perspectives><stem><stem cell based therapy><stem cell mediated therapy><stem cell therapeutics><stem cell therapy><stem cell treatment><stem cell-based treatment><unborn><vaccine against 2019-nCov><vaccine against SARS-CoV-2><vaccine against SARS-CoV2><vaccine against SARS-coronavirus-2><vaccine against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoV 2><vaccine against Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2><vaccine for novel coronavirus>