Document text
Principal Investigator: Siobhan Sutcliffe
Organization: WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Fiscal Year: 2024
Award: $351,511
Funding agency: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
ABSTRACT
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), including storage, voiding, urinary incontinence symptoms and pain,
and their associated diagnoses are common, costly, and negatively impact women's quality of life throughout
the life course. Despite their common occurrence and high cost, little research to date has focused on
identification of risk and protective factors for LUTS and prevention, and even less has focused on promotion
and maintenance of bladder health. To address this gap, the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
(PLUS) Research Consortium (of which our site is a founding Clinical Research Center) was established to
develop the scientific foundation for future evidence-based bladder health promotion and LUTS prevention
interventions in adolescent and adult women. In this application, we propose to build upon foundational work
conducted in PLUS 1 to further this scientific foundation. Specifically, we propose to establish a large,
longitudinal, national, population-based, observational cohort study (currently under development and co-led
by the Washington University School of Medicine site PI) designed to: a) determine the distribution of and
changes in bladder health over time in the general female population; and b) identify new risk and protective
factors for LUTS and bladder health amenable to intervention. Per the FOA, we have selected one important
risk/protective factor research question for incorporation into the population-based cohort study: does chronic
delayed voiding, a common behavior among women across the life course that can be addressed by
preventive interventions at multiple levels of social ecology, contribute to bladder health deterioration
and the development of LUTS? Guided by an intervention mapping approach and community partner insight,
we will build the evidence base for this research question by conducting a series of innovative, multi-method,
transdiciplinary studies nested within the population-based cohort study, as well as complementary to this
study. Together, this comprehensive set of quantitative and qualitative studies will provide: 1) critical new data
to address the causal nature of associations between chronic delayed voiding and bladder health/LUTS (i.e.,
high-quality, prospective epidemiologic data devoid of temporal biases and supportive biologic, mechanistic
data); 2) new findings to inform the optimal focus and mode of delivery of future prevention interventions (i.e.,
multi-method data on the strongest individual-behavioral, interpersonal, institutional, and community/societal
determinants of chronic delayed voiding, the most effective mode of delivery of educational interventions
[assuming that future interventions will include an educational component], and initial promising educational
messages); and 3) new tools to evaluate future interventions. As such, this complementary set of studies
holds the promise to greatly expand the foundation of knowledge for future bladder health promotion
and LUTS prevention interventions.
Terms: <Active Follow-up><Address><Adult females><Adult women><Affect><Behavior><Behavioral><Biological><Bionomics><Bladder><Bladder Urinary System><Causality><Chronic><Clinical Research><Clinical Study><Cohort Analyses><Cohort Analysis><Cohort Studies><Communities><Complement><Complement Proteins><Concurrent Studies><Cross Sectional Analysis><Cross-Sectional Analyses><Cross-Sectional Studies><Cross-Sectional Survey><Data><Deterioration><Development><Diagnosis><Disease Frequency Surveys><Ecology><Education><Education for Intervention><Educational Intervention><Educational Models><Educational aspects><Epidemiological data><Epidemiology><Epidemiology data><Etiology><Evaluation><Female><Females in adulthood><Focus Groups><Foundations><Future><Goals><Health><Health Promotion><High Prevalence><Individual><Institution><Instruction Intervention><Instructional Models><Intervention><Intervention Strategies><Intervention Studies><Investigation><Knowledge><Life Cycle><Life Cycle Stages><Maintenance><Measures><Meta-Analysis><Methods><Nature><Pain><Painful><Patient Self-Report><Persons><Phase><Population><Preventative intervention><Prevention><Public Health><Publishing><QOL><Quality of life><Research><Risk><Risk Factors><Salutogenesis><Self-Report><Series><Site><Time><Training Intervention><Universities><Urinary Incontinence><Washington><Woman><Women in adulthood><Work><active followup><adolescent woman><adolescent women><biologic><causation><community partners><community-based partners><complementation><cost><design><designing><developmental><disease causation><educational methods><educational practices><educational principles><epidemiologic><epidemiologic data><epidemiological><evidence base><experiment><experimental research><experimental study><experiments><follow up><follow-up><followed up><followup><implementation study><incontinence symptom><innovate><innovation><innovative><insight><instructional intervention><intervention delivery><intervention for prevention><intervention mapping><intervention research><interventional research><interventional strategy><interventional study><interventions research><life course><lower urinary tract symptoms><medical college><medical schools><member><observational cohort study><population based><preference><prevention intervention><preventional intervention strategy><preventive intervention><promoting health><prospective><protective factors><school of medicine><social><systematic review><tool><urinary bladder>