Document text
Baron Coleman DESTROYS The Charlie Kirk Tyler Robinson FEDSLOP Narrative
YouTube video by Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52ENDzA2yrQ). OPINION COMMENTARY by Baron Coleman (Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips)) — one commentator's contested analysis of the Charlie Kirk assassination and the State v. Tyler Robinson prosecution. These are his own assertions and theories, NOT the court record, NOT established fact, and NOT endorsed by profoundd; some make unverified allegations about named individuals. Archived here, attributed and lane-separated as commentary, so the claims can be weighed against the primary record — the tyler-robinson-trial hearings and filings in this same collection. Inclusion in this archive is not evidence of truth.
This is, I think, one of the more consequential, or at least more explanatory, opening statements I've given relative to the Charlie Kirk case. So, with your permission, oh, okay, I have your permission. So, this is your opening statement. >> [music] >> It's becoming increasingly obvious to nearly everyone who looks carefully at the Charlie Kirk investigation, something is incredibly off. Even if you don't buy the official narrative, there are a number of things that just don't sit well with normal thinking people. Who literally digs up a crime scene 3 days after a shooting? And, without a contractor in place yet to pave over it once it's dug up? And for that matter, who paves over a crime scene at all? Especially just 4 days after a high-profile political assassination, on a Sunday, in Utah, where and and we're told that order came from the FBI and the governor of Utah. Since when do governors and the Federal Bureau of Investigation make beautification decisions on college campuses? And since when do they demand them so urgently after making them? This is, of course, not the only anomaly in the Charlie Kirk investigation. There are others. For example, .30-06s are not stopped by 3 in of soft neck tissue. They're just not. I don't care who tells you they are, they are not. You don't have to be a firearms expert to know that. Even some of the most strident supporters of the theory that Tyler Robinson acted alone, those people once plainly accepted this fact at face value. The wound certainly doesn't look, and it did not act like any .30-06 wound in the history of marksmanship. That much is blatantly obvious. But, it's not just the covering up of the crime scene and the impossibility of the wound having come from a .30-06. While most platforms now censor any display of the moment Charlie Kirk was struck, there are still a number of videos floating around out there. They're on X, they're on Rumble, they're on other platforms. And what they show is striking. At the moment of impact, supposedly by a single round to Charlie's neck, nearly everything on Charlie's body seems to react instantly to something that very clearly is not a single rifle round to the neck. The microphone under Charlie's shirt instantly starts to move from his right collarbone towards the center of his neck. Something under his shirt originating from the middle of his thorax rapidly and powerfully rises towards the left side of his neck. It's not loose T-shirt fabric that's rising. It's a structured mass. It's a solid object of some sort. At the exact same time, footage from Charlie's side shows his shirt blow back off his neck several inches as if air is gushing out of it. As does his right shirt sleeve expands as if air is gushing out of it. And while both of those things are happening, the hair on the back of his head down where his head meets his neck is blown up and out as if air is gushing past it. I can't positively tell you what caused all of that to happen, air gushing this way and that way, but what I can say is that does not happen with a single rifle round to the neck. It just does not do that. Rifle rounds don't cause those types of movements. There's also the absence of an ambulance in an event on a college campus that hosted more than 3,000 people. There was the refusal of help from two medical professionals who were on the scene with medical bags offering their expertise as Charlie Kirk was being loaded into a car.There's the fact that Charlie was loaded into a car at all considering a giant gaping neck wound. And then there are the pictures of Charlie being carried to that car with his head and neck literally dangling and flopping as they carried him. Oh, and that SUV they carried him to? The one that transported a dead body from a crime scene? It was cleaned. It was refurbished. It was sold. The hospital they took him to? No camera footage available. It was confiscated by the FBI. There was that old man, George Zenn, the political activist and allegedly interested in illegal images of minors? He jumped up nearly immediately after Charlie went down. You remember him. His pants fell down. He was waving his hands and his hat saying he did it. The very few officers present that day? They responded to him. They secured him. They escorted him out of the way. Of course, that left the rest of the place unattended by officers at a time when anyone involved in the crime in the crime could have been exfiltrating. There was that guy who was detained going hospital to hospital, allegedly armed and allegedly looking for Charlie. He was described on police scanner traffic. His name was given. A description of his car was given. Turns out he's the son of a Navy 06 Intel officer who runs a defense contractor and who had previously worked for DynCorp in the Middle East and North Africa. His brother's a Green Beret in the National Guard. Speaking of police scanner traffic, there were policemen on the scanner reporting that people were hanging out of the SUV as it sped to the hospital. One officer said it looked like a struggle was taking place. We don't have any dashcam footage and haven't heard from those officers since that police scanner transmission. There was the jet that took off from a local airport shortly after Charlie went down. It turned off its transponder, remember? It flew without tracking for a few hours and then returned to Provo. Probably nothing. There was Bryan Harpole telling how he was directing hospital staff in cutting off Charlie's shirt while perched across Charlie on a hospital stretcher. There was Frank Turrek telling one podcast his phone was on FaceTime with his family from the time Charlie Kirk went down, during the entire duration of his stay at the hospital, and until he got back to his hotel room later that evening. That's some battery and that's some telephone connection. Of course, he told a different podcaster that he actually had made at least one phone call from the hospital. And we're still unclear how he was able to make a phone call while his phone was on FaceTime with his family. Unfortunately, Frank Turek has not bothered to clear that up. Nor has he cleared up why he didn't notice his phone was on FaceTime when he was changing into scrubs from his clothes. His clothes presumably where his phone was in his pocket. Nor are we clear why the hospital was handing out scrubs to members of Charlie's security team. Speaking of phone calls, um Pastor Jack Hibbs told Fox News that his brother Butch Hibbs called him from the crime scene in the immediate aftermath of Charlie going down. Pastor Jack is quoted in the article describing the chaos in the background as his brother updated him. Pastor Jack must have forgotten about that call because fat Pastor Jack later told Frank Turek on a podcast that he couldn't remember if it was Frank Turek or Mikey McCoy who first called him. He never mentioned his brother.He couldn't remember whether it was Frank or Mikey. Thankfully, Frank Turek was there to remind Pastor Jack that it was in fact Mikey McCoy who first called Pastor Jack. Frank didn't call him later until he called him from the hospital with his phone maybe or maybe still not on FaceTime with his family. It's all very confusing. There were also those mysterious text messages from the night before Charlie died about clearing the roof above Charlie which just so happened to make sure there were no audience members who would be positioned where someone on the Loosi Center could be seen. There was the officer who was cited in the probable cause affidavit saying he ran straight to the Loosi Center roof because he said it looked like a good perch for a sniper. Not sure why of all the roofs that would have made good purchases for snipers, he chose the Loosi Center roof, but that's where he went. Not sure why he picked the farthest roof with visibility to Charlie and just happened to be correct. UVU officers are very sharp officers, I suppose. There are the pictures the FBI released of the alleged shooter walking to the scene of the crime looking quite unlike Tyler Robinson, but I suppose that's subjective. What's not subjective is that he was seen a few minutes earlier limping down the road, supposedly because he had a gun down his jeans and that prevented his leg from bending. But, when he's seen on camera just a few minutes later, both knees are bending just fine as he ascends and descends stairs on campus. No gun appears to be stuffed down his skinny jeans. And these are jeans so tight you can see the clear outline of his telephone in his pocket as he bends his knees to walk the stairs. Within minutes of allegedly pulling off the greatest political assassination in decades, there's footage of what appears to be Tyler Robinson's car hanging out in a shopping center parking lot. According to the arrest affidavit, it was in that parking lot that he punched in the address of a local car wash on Google Maps. Because who doesn't want a clean getaway car? It must have slipped his mind before the big day. He's seen on camera at a Dairy Queen five or six hours later holding what looks like a blizzard and a box of chicken tenders. That's, of course, before he takes off for a steakhouse three hours away. He drives three hours south where he's seen eating a ribeye and a potato in Panguitch. He's identified by servers who recognized him and confirmed it was him using his credit card receipt. At this point, he's an hour or so from home. It's after 9:00 p.m. Charlie's been dead around seven or eight hours, but Tyler doesn't go home, at least not according to the search warrants. The search warrants place him back in Orem, Utah near the place where the gun is found. They say he arrived around 20 12:30 a.m. and left around 1:15 a.m. He made sure to park his car in front of a Ring doorbell camera for good measure. Uh did I call his Dodge Challenger a car? I apologize, ladies and gentlemen. That won't happen again. I meant vehicle. And we know he prefers to call it a vehicle because over the course of several hours he allegedly texted a conversation that would that amounted to a confession to nearly every single detail of the crime. He started by texting saying he intended to take the secret to his grave. But, first he made sure to leave a handwritten note confession under his keyboard back at the house. That note, by the way, doesn't exist.Tyler told his roommate to get rid of it, and his roommate did in fact get rid of it. He burned it. But before burning it, he made sure to take a picture of it. It's noteworthy that a picture can't be tested for pesky things like DNA and fingerprints. They also can't be tested for ink types, pressure points when writing, or anything else that might have indicated who actually wrote the note. Not content with confessing in the letter that was preserved by picture before it was destroyed, Tyler Robinson also texted a series of confessions. He admitted to planning the crime for about a week, using his grandfather's rifle, stashing his grandfather's rifle, the type of scope on his stashed rifle, the rifle being stashed with a towel around it, returning to find his grandfather's rifle, being motivated by Charlie's hate, being late returning home to their shared shared townhome, engraving men memes on the rifle shells, his dad being super mega simp Trump one, and more. Oh, and he also texted his intent to go out on his own terms after calling police to a location so he wouldn't get dragged through the courts on television. But he wasn't content with that. No, that wasn't enough confessing for one day. He wasn't content to confess in a handwritten note. He wasn't content to confess in a series of text to the person he confessed to in the handwritten note. He then took to Discord to record his confession for all of eternity to anyone with a link to the Discord chat. There, Tyler Robinson confessed to being responsible and told his friends goodbye and thanks for the good times. After that, he arranged through family to turn himself in, only to at that time assert his Fifth Amendment rights to silence and assistance of counsel. And we've not heard from him since. There are, these are rather, believe it or not, the only weird facts surrounding the day Charlie Kirk was taken out. These are just a sampling of them. And there are people, I kid you not, who look at all those weird things and say, "Yep, Tyler Robinson did it beyond a reasonable doubt. Fry him." And that's weird to me. I don't see how anyone can look at any of that and think it's an open-and-shut case. I don't see how anyone close to Charlie Kirk can look at all of that and ignore it and demand people accept the Tyler alone narrative. But I want you to consider Tyler Robinson. A lot has been made about Tyler Robinson turning himself in. I want to propose a hypothetical situation and ask what you would do in that situation. Ignore Tyler Robinson, ignore Charlie Kirk, ignore the politics surrounding this case, ignore the 9 months of investigation. Just imagine yourself in the following scenario. You live with Lance Twiggs. You guys play video games, Magic the Gathering. And there are people in and out of the household all the time, and they play video games and they play Magic the Gathering. You're in your early early 20s. You're young, you're impressionable, and a group of people start coming around the house. Your roommate seems fine with them hanging around. It is, after all, his townhome, so how much can you do about it? One day they're meeting up in Orem and ask you to go with them. It's a college town a few hours away. You're young, you take the day off the work of work and head up there. You get up there in the morning and look for them to meet up, and you head to where they said to meet. Just assume, for the sake of argument, you're at least aware a crime has been planned.Just insert that fact. While you're there, Charlie Kirk is shot. You're told to meet here, so you head over there. Oh, no, no, not here, meet over there, so you head over there. And while the day ticks away, you check your messages and notice, at a certain point, that there are text messages being sent from your account, and you didn't send them. Maybe someone has access to your computer. Maybe they have access to your watch or anything that has your account logged in. Anyone with an iPhone knows how that works. You can text from my computer, you can text from my phone. The person on the other end doesn't see where it came from. You just get the message, and the message is copied to all the devices. They're all synced together by a common account. You realize this is happening and you start reading through the messages, and now you really understand what's going on. You're being framed. You start to panic. But who can you call? Your phone has messages confessing to the crime, and you yourself were at or near the scene of the crime. You're hours from home. You don't even know the real names of the guys you were supposed to meet up there. It's not like you checked their IDs when they came by the house to play Magic the Gathering. Then you realize something in the text messages, something dark. You realize the text messages are setting you up to die. You read a text message that says you're going to lead the police to a location and go out on your own terms. So you call the only people on Earth who might possibly believe you. They're the people who have been with you your entire life. Your mom and dad. You go meet mom and dad, but you don't quite know what to say. You don't know if they'll believe you, but you know they don't want you to die. And you know they'll do anything to help you stay alive. Dad has a plan. Dad calls a family friend. He's a former pastor at the local parish who is a retired sheriff's deputy. He's reputable, he wore the cloth, he wore the badge. If anyone can keep you alive, this guy may be our only hope. The former pastor and retired deputy sheriff shows up and personally escorts you to the jail. It's the one place he knows you aren't going to die in a shootout with police. He used to work there, so he vouches for you, they know him. There are no guarantees in life, but you're safer there than anywhere else right in this moment. You're no longer on the run, you're not going to be shot by cops, and you're not going to be shot what by anybody else while you're in there. Your family is given strict instructions to shut their mouths, talk to nobody. It's unclear at this time, in that moment, how high up this goes. They don't know who's involved. It's impossible to know. But anyone who can orchestrate what your son just described is not working alone, and they certainly have resources in high places. They can and will kill you to protect themselves. Is this what happened? I don't know, but it's more likely to me than believing that all that weird stuff is just random weird stuff. The verbose texts, the changing stories, the weird injury at the the moment Charlie dies, the shirt and body movement, the stuffing Charlie in an SUV, the getting rid of the SUV, the covering up the crime scene, the paving over the crime scene, the involvement at the highest levels of government.All of that stuff is harder for me to believe than a guy getting framed, then being scared for his life, and then turning himself in, and then everyone remaining silent until the courts can get a chance to review everything. Is Tyler innocent? I don't know, but that's not the standard. That's not Tyler's burden. The question at this time, based on the charges he's facing today, is whether he alone planned and executed Charlie Kirk with a .30-06 from the Loews e-Center roof, and whether that can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. That's called being found not guilty. That's not innocent. That's not guilty. Can they prove that? As to that part, at least for now, there's just too much weirdness in this case for me to conclude anything other than Tyler Robinson, at this point in time, is not guilty of that charge. And ladies and gentlemen, that is your opening statement. I hope you enjoyed it as much as I did. I had to get that off my chest. I had to get that off my chest. This case is so dark, so involved. Charlie himself suggested that the Butler case might have involved dozens of people, including law enforcement officers. I think this case does as well. >> [music]