To: Sigrid McCawley
From: " <
To: Sigrid McCawley
Cc: )11 <
Subject: RE: follow-up request
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 17:58:47 +0000
Sigrid,
Thanks for getting back to us so quickly. Goes without saying that we of course would be happy for you to be on the call
as well—I should have mentioned that in my initial email. On timing, let us just check with the agents on the case to see if
that works for them, and we hope to be able to confirm with you in the next couple hours.
thanks,
Mi•
From: Sigrid McCawley
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 13:27
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: c e
follow-up request
Hello ME — said she has time tomorrow if that would work for you team. She is in Texas so an hour behind us. I
would like to be on the call as well. Would it work to do something tomorrow at 11:00 EST? Let me know. If that does not
work I can try to get other times.
Sigrid McCawley
Partner
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
www.bsfllp.com
From:
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 11:02 AM
To: Sigrid McCawley
Cc:
Subject: RE: follow-up request ) [mailto
CAUTION: External email. Please do not respond to or click on links/attachments unless you recognize
the sender.
I unfortunately was on trial during the previous interview, but I think somewhat less time than how long it went last time.
Ordinarily we try not to go longer than about 90 minutes in any event, so I think if she is able to block out that amount of
EFTA00025501
time, that would be great — and we'll try to be as efficient as possible and hopefully take less than that. If that sounds
alright?
thanks,
From: Sigrid McCawley <
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2020 18:57
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE:
Hello M, follow-up request
I am sure will be happy to help in any way she can. Let me find out what her patient schedule is like for next week
and find a time that works. How much time do you think she should allot for the interview — just so she can plan?
Best,
Sigrid
Sigrid McCawley
Partner
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
www.bsfllp.com
From: ) [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 6:41 PM
To: Sigrid McCawley
Cc:
Subject: RE: follow-up request >
CAUTION: External email. Please do not respond to or click on links/attachments unless you recognize the sender.
Hi Sigrid,
We wanted to follow up in connection with — our supervisors have asked us to do an additional interview with her,
both to follow up on some specific aspects of her recollection but also do basically go through her experiences again. As
I'm sure you know, we have no doubts whatsoever, at all, about her candor and truthfulness in our previous interview,
which also was broadly consistent with what she has said in other interviews, but we are nevertheless hoping she might
be willing to speak with us sometime in the next week or two? Obviously due to the current situation we would plan to
do it via phone, and we would be happy to chat about logistics with you if that would be helpful, or to answer any
questions at all. And if is willing to speak with us again, we're happy to work around her schedule, including talking
during an evening or weekend if that's easier for her than during the day—whatever you and she would prefer.
Please let us know if any questions, or if it would be useful to chat, and thanks very much.
EFTA00025502
From:
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 14:35
To: Sigrid McCawley
Cc: <
Subject: RE: follow-up request
Got it, thanks.
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
From: Sigrid McCawley
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 2:29 PM
To: I c >
Cc:
Subject: RE: <
follow-up request > I <->
I checked back with and she said that the last entry in her journal is in late February and she
went to New Mexico in April.
Thanks
Sigrid
Sigrid McCawley
Partner
BOLES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
www.bsfllp.com
Sent by Boxer
On January 16, 2020 at 1:05:54 PM EST,
Thank you very much, Sigrid. > wrote:
EFTA00025503
Just to confirm, does have any journal entries regarding the time when she traveled to New Mexico? I
believe she told us during our interview that she does not have any entries from that time, but I just wanted to
make sure.
Thanks again,
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
From: Sigrid McCawley
Sent: Thursda Janua 16 2020 12:31 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: follow-up request
Hello — attached are the pages sent me to provide to you. Here is a bit of an explanation and I also
asked her to take a copy of the front and back of the journal book which she did. Hope this helps. Please let
me know if you need anything else:
"The shortest page and the one that is the hardest to read is the first entry from 12/95. It is written in colored
pencil and is fading. There are then two pages from 01/07/1996 where I talk about the highlights of my NY
trip and going to Epstein's house and then the next entry from 01/25/1996 is where I talk about going to the
movies with him."
Best,
Sigrid
Sigrid McCawley
Partner
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
www.bsfllp.com
From: [mailto
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 4:01 PM
To: Sigrid
Cc:
EFTA00025504
Subject: RE: follow-up request
Thanks very much, Sigrid. Yes, we received the photographs from =, which we very much appreciate.
Anything else she is willing to share, including her journal entries, would be very helpful.
..est
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
I St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
From: Sigrid McCawley
Sent: Frida January 10, 2020 3:59 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: follow-up request
Hello
Let me follow up with about her journal. I know she shared some pictures with you from around the
time period when she was with Epstein/Maxwell. I will ask her about the journal ASAP and will get back to
you and will check with her to see if she has anything else that might be helpful to the investigation.
All my best,
Sigrid
Sigrid McCawley
Partner
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LAP
W IMM
www.bsfllp.com
From• [mailto:
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 3:30 PM
To: Si rid McCawle
Cc:
Subject: follow-up request
EFTA00025505
Hi Sigrid,
Hope you had a wonderful holida season and very happy New Year. We wanted to follow up on a request we
made after interviewing a few months ago. During her interview, referred to several
entries in her journal that had helped refresh her recollection of the events involving Epstein and Maxwell. As
we mentioned at the end of the interview, it would be very helpful to our investigation if we could review
those journal entries, as well as any other records or documents may have that relate to her experiences
with Epstein and Maxwell.
Would be willing to share with us any relevant journal entries (or any other relevant documents she may
have) to assist in our investigation?
Happy to have a call to discuss if that would be helpful.
Thank you,
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information
that. among other protections, is the subject of attomey-client privilege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of
this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient. you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. II you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. (v.1
08201831BSF)
EFTA00025506
📷 Images in this document (6 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "Steve McNamara" to a recipient whose name is redacted. The email contains a discussion about scheduling a meeting and includes a request for a specific date and time. There is also a note at the bottom of the email stating that the sender will be out of the office for a week and will not be available for meeti
[Image 2] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "Amy" to a recipient named "Scott." The email contains a discussion about a project or task, with Amy mentioning a deadline and Scott responding with a question about the project's status. The email is dated January 20, 2023, and the time of the email is not visible. The content of the email is not fully visibl
[Image 3] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender with a name redacted, and it appears to be a response to a request for information or assistance. The email includes a subject line, a date, and a recipient's email address. The body of the email contains a message that is too small to read in detail. The email interface suggests it is from a web-based email service,
[Image 4] The image appears to be a screenshot of an email conversation. The email contains several lines of text, including a subject line, sender and recipient names, and the body of the email. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, indicating that some information has been redacted. The visible parts of the text suggest a professional or formal tone, typical of business correspondence. The em
[Image 5] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a memo. The text is written in English, and it includes a salutation, a body with several paragraphs, and a closing. The visible text includes the sender's name at the top, followed by the recipient's name, and the date of the document. The content of the document is not described, as per the instructions. The document is printed on standar
[Image 6] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "Sigrid McMahon" to a recipient whose name is redacted. The email is dated January 20, 2021, and it appears to be a professional correspondence. The content of the email is not visible due to the redacted text. The email includes a subject line, which is also redacted. The recipient's email address is visible,