Subject: FW: Following up

EFTA00150862 Dataset 9 6 pages Download original PDF Download as text
From: ' To:I Subject: FW: Following up Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 20:47:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Pm around if you need someone to sit in/ tag team on notes. Let me know. On Sep 6, 2019 4:44 PM. ' Great. Thanks for the update. wrote: On Sep 5, 2019 9:11 PM, ' wrote: Team, after much following up we just got confirmation from the attorney for that she can in fact do this coming Monday at 1:00 p.m. So I'll forward the calendar invite to the full team, for whatever combination of folks are able to attend. thanks, From: Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2019 20:54 To: Sigrid McCawley <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Great, thanks very much — we'll plan to see you then! From: Sigrid McCawley <smccawleyBbsfIlp.com> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2019 20:52 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Yes -I am able to come up that morning and we should be able to be there by 1:00. My apologies for the delayed response. Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 EFTA00150862 Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33301 (t)1 954 377 4223 (m)1 954 770 5377 smccawley_®bsflIp_on www.bsfllp.com Sent by Boxer On September 5, 2019 at 8:28:41 PM EDT, wrote: Sigrid, Following up on the below, can we confirm for Monday? We're very sensitive to scheduling challenges but now just a few days away. If we're not able to confirm today, please let us know another date (or dates) later this month or next that we can put on the calendar more firmly. thanks, From: Sigrid McCawley <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2019 13:49 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Sony for the delay -I just need to confirm I can get a flight that morning. I should know by later today. My apologies. Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33301 (t)1 954 377 4223 (m)1 954 770 5377 [email protected] www.bsflIp.com Sent by Boxer On September 4, 2019 at 12:52:02 PM EDT, Hi Sigrid, > wrote: Hope you're doing well. We're juggling some scheduling issues on our end, so it would be great to get this meeting scheduled if possible. Can you please let us know if September 9th at I p.m. works? Thanks, EFTA00150863 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 12:28 PM To: Sigrid McCawley <smccawle bsfll .com> Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Hi Sigrid, Hope you had a lovely long weekend. Following ni the below, would it be possible to get dates on the calendar for videoconferences with and M, please? And can we confirm will plan to meet with us on September 9th? Early afternoon would be best on our end—say 1pm? Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York. NY 10007 From: Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:10 PM To: Si a 'd McCawle <smccawle a .sfl m> Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Hi Sigrid, A video conference with date scheduled. will work, thanks very much. Please just let us know when we can get a Monday the 9th should work for Could we plan to start sometime in the early afternoon that day? And thank you for checking with =—we appreciate it. Best, EFTA00150864 Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Sigrid McCawley <smccawley_®bsflIp.com> Sent: Thursda , Au ust 29 2019 5:39 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Hello I am so sorry for the scheduling difficulties but I spoke to David and he said what we can offer is to do a video conference interview with when she returns to Spain and then if you feel you need more time with her in person the firm could fly her back to meet with you further. Will that work? With respect to — we can't do Friday the 6th but could do Thursday the 5th or Monday Sept. 9th in the afternoon or Tuesday Sept. 10th or Wed. Sept 11th after the Preska hearing which is set for 11:00 and may take a few hours. Will any of those work? Let me check on dates for and get back to you. Thanks Sigrid From: ) [mailto: Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 12:40 PM To: Sigrid McCawley <smccawle bsfll .com> Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Hi Sigrid, We're sorry to hear that is no longer able to meet today or tomorrow. As we've mentioned previously, we are able to make ourselves available any time today or tomorrow while she is in town if you can make an attorney available to accompany her. We will be travelling for work-related mattersatext week, so we are not available on the dates you proposed. Would it be possible to meet with MIM on the morning of 9/6? Thanks, EFTA00150865 Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Sigrid McCawley <smccawley_®bsflIp.com> Sent: Thursda , Au ust 29 2019 8:32 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Following up Hello My apologies but I am not able to arrange something for today or tomorrow due to a bunch of scheduling conflicts. I believe is set to fly out on Monday. I am assuming you guys are going to be closed Monday for labor correct? I know it is not ideal but I can also try to set up something via video conferencing when is back in Barcelona? Alternatively I could see if she could stay until Tuesday and I can fly up and try to do something Tuesday? As for — do you have availability on Wednesday? I have a hearing with Judge Preska in the morning at 9:00 about the v. Maxwell document release issues and I am not clear how long that will last but I could do something afterward with Or if that does not work we can pick a different date/time? Sony the scheduling of this is a bit crazy. I am also dealing with a hurricane threat in Florida so this all depends on me being able to get out by flight on Tuesday morning. Best, Sigrid From: ) [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 6:52 PM To: Sigrid McCawley <smccawle bsfll .com> Cc: Subject: Following up Hi Sigrid, Thanks so much for so much time meeting with us today. Following up, is there a time tomorrow when would be available to meet with us again? We would also appreciate getting dates on the calendar for and if possible. Thanks again, EFTA00150866 Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10007 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1 08201831BS9 EFTA00150867

📷 Images in this document (6 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a user named "Stacey McKeown" to a recipient whose name is redacted. The email contains a message that is too long to read in its entirety, but it appears to be a professional or business-related communication. The email is dated August 20, 2019, and the subject line is not visible in the screenshot. The body of the email con [Image 2] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "Stacey" to a recipient whose name is redacted. The email contains a series of messages, with the most recent one being a response to a previous message. The content of the email is not visible due to the redaction of the text. The email interface suggests it is a web-based email service, and the sender's email [Image 3] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "Susan" to a recipient whose name is not visible. The email contains a message that is partially obscured, but it appears to be a request for assistance or information. The sender mentions a specific date and a location, but the details are not fully visible. The email also includes a phone number and an addres [Image 4] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "RE: Follow-up on the calendar video conference with the team on September 2nd." The recipient is not visible in the screenshot. The email contains a message that is redacted, with the text "THANK YOU VERY MUCH" visible at the bottom. The email is dated September 2nd, 2010, and it appears to be from a user with [Image 5] The image shows a printed email with a subject line that is redacted. The email is addressed to a recipient whose name is redacted. The body of the email contains a message that is redacted. The email appears to be a formal communication, possibly a business or professional correspondence, given the formal language and structure. The date and time of the email are visible at the top, but they are [Image 6] The image shows a text message on a computer screen. The message is from the United States Social Security Administration and contains a warning about the confidentiality of electronic messages. It mentions that the recipient should not forward the message to anyone else and that it is intended for the recipient only. The message also includes a disclaimer about the use of electronic communication