To:' (NY) (FBI)"
From: '
To:' (NY) (FBI)"
(NY) (FBI)"
Subject: Fw: Epstein Materials: Questions
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 15:36:01 +0000
Importance: Normal
See below
From: . (NY) (FBI) a>
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:22:13 AM
To: . (NY) (FBI) •c >
Subject: Fw: Epstein Materials: Questions
Assistant Director in Charge I FBI New York
Desk I Mobile
From: (IMD) (FBI) <a>
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2025 11:16:01 AM
To: (ODAG) (JMD) ca, (CCRSB) (FBI)
Cc: • UMW (FBI) 'an (OGC) (FBI)
(FBI) <a; . (NY) (FBI) <a.>; (CCRSB) (FBI)
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Hi
This is the thumbdrive that contains the photos being referenced.
Can you please confirm that this cannot be located within ODAG? (DO)
Our NY colleagues are traveling into the city from Long Island to recreate the folder and I'm hoping to
save everyone time. Estimated time to travel, recreate folder, download onto a new thumbdrive and
coordinate delivery is about 6-7 hours.
From: (ODAG)
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:30:25 AM
Cc: (IMD) (FBI)ci Co: (CCRSB) (FBI)
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - Re: Epstein Materials: Questions (imD)(931) .,
EFTA00164857
Great. Thanks.
Get Outlook for iOS
From: `• >
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:26:53 AM
To: (ODAG) <
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions (CCRSB) (FBI)
Our Deputy's Chief of Staff provided the thumb drive directly to the DAG yesterday, as I understand he
was in our building for a briefing.
Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0.-I C.
From: (ODAG)
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 7:23:47 AM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI) < >; (IMD) (FBI) < >
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Sounds good. Thanks.
From: c >
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 9:10:21 AM
To: (CCRSB) (FBI) < (ODAG)
Cc: (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Thanks
- unless you see otherwise, we can deliver tomorrow morning.
I Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0
From: (CCRSB) (FBI) •
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 9:06:24 AM
To: (IMD) (FBI) (ODAG) (JMD).
Cc: . (IMD) (FBI) <
Subject: RE: Epstein Materials: Questions
EFTA00164858
If DOJ needs these today, we need to determine how best to get them over. If it can wait until
tomorrow, I will take it to the threat brief
From: (IMD) (FBI) < >
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 7:36 AM
To: (ODAG) (JMD)
Cc: (CCRSB) (FBI) (IMD) (FBI) <->
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Good morning
Our Deputy asked we compile unsealed photos from both the trafficking and suicide cases to provide
on a thumb drive. These photos are all contained within materials the FBI previously submitted. My
colleague will be bringing a thumb drive when he heads over for the AGs morning
operational brief.
Additionally, our OTD team is ensuring all videos from the same camera - both raw and refined - have
the exact same run time to the second. They are confirming this and will provide a new link if there is a
change.
I Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0.-I C.
From: (IMD) (FBI)
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 3:00:24 PM
To: (ODAG) (AID)
Subject: RE: Epstein Materials: Questions
Good afternoon
To close out the last of the pending questions, the estimated total size of materials provided to DOJ is approximately
377GB, to include documents, images, video and audio files.
I Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
0. C.
From: (IMD) (FBI) < >
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 10:26 AM
To: (ODAG) (JMD)
Subject: Re: Epstein Materials: Questions
Good morning,
EFTA00164859
Update and final for #2 below.
Term: Refined Video
Description: increased the contrast, balanced the color and slightly improved the sharpness of the
edges. These types of refinements are typical for video of any quality or resolution. These refinements
allow the human eye and brain to interpret the video as clearer, richer, and more detailed. None of
these steps can re-create detail that was never captured. This is standard for video refinement.
Will have #1 confirmed on Monday.
I Interim Director of Infrastructure
Federal Bureau of Investigation
a
From: (IMD) (FBI) <ME>
Sent: Thursda May 29, 2025 8:58:52 PM
To: (ODAG) (JMD)
Subject: Epstein Materials: Questions
I wanted to provide an update on the three questions we discussed yesterday:
1. Total Data Size (estimated) of the totality of what was delivered to DOJ from February 2025 — May 2025.
1. Paper Documents
2. Photo Scans / Images
3. Audio / Video
Status: will have by Monday.
2. Terminology to use to differentiate between MCC videos and 1-2 lines description of work done
1.
Status: The tech team is deciding between two terms to use
Description of work done: increased the contrast, balanced the color and slightly improved the
sharpness of edges. These types of enhancements are typical for video of any quality of any
resolution. These types of enhancements allow the human eye and brain interpret it as clearer, richer,
and more detailed. None of these steps can re-create detail that was never captured. This is standard
for video enhancement.
3. Date FBI closed the suicide investigation
90A-NY-3 151227 encompassed a deferred prosecution agreement for two guards executed on 05/21/2021, and was closed
on 12/5/2022.
EFTA00164860
EFTA00164861
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a scanned document, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document contains text and a table with columns and rows. The visible text includes a heading, a date, and a list of bullet points with numbered items. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be discussing technical or operational matters, possibly related to a project or a technical issue. The docum
[Image 2] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender to a recipient, and it appears to be a professional or business-related correspondence. The sender's name is visible at the top of the email, but the recipient's name is redacted. The email contains text that is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be discussing some technical or operational matter. The email
[Image 3] The image appears to be a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from an address that has been redacted, and it is addressed to a recipient whose name is also redacted. The email contains a subject line that is redacted, and the body of the email is redacted as well. The email seems to be a professional communication, possibly related to work or business matters. The sender's name is vi
[Image 4] The image shows a screenshot of a text message conversation. The conversation includes messages from different individuals, with the names and contact information redacted. The messages appear to be related to work or project discussions, with references to materials, questions, and responses. The conversation includes both text and images, but the images are not described due to the redacted natu
[Image 5] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or scan of a document. The document has a vertical orientation and contains text, but the content of the text is not clearly visible due to the resolution and the angle at which the document is being photographed. The visible text includes what seems to be a date at the top, but the specific details are not discernible. The document has a header and a