Department of Justice
Department of Justice
EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
CONTROL SHEET
DATE OF DOCUMENT:
DATE RECEIVED:
FROM:
TO:
MAIL TYPE:
SUBJECT:
DATE ASSIGNED
09/05/2019
INFO COMPONENT:
COMMENTS:
FILE CODE:
EXECSEC POC: 8/29/2019 WORKFLOW ID: 4325153
9/4/2019 DUE DATE: 9/19/2019
The Honorable Debbie Wasserman Schultz*
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515-0001
AG (cc indicated for OIG)
Congressional Priority
(Rec'd from OLA via email) Urging DOJ to allow the Inspector General to
conduct an independent and comprehensive investigation into the non-
prosecution agreement that DOJ provided Mr. Epstein, as well as the
circumstances surrounding his death. Advises the investigation should not only
cover Mr. Epstein's death, but also investigate the conduct of any officials who
approved, reviewed and defended his egregious and unprecedented plea deal. Ltr
also signed by 5 other MCs.
ACTION COMPONENT & ACTION REOUESTED
OLA
For appropriate handling. Advise ES of any action taken.
OAG, ODAG, CRM, EOUSA, FBI, O1G, OPR
09/05/2019: Per OLA, assign to OLA (M.
EFTA00175131
Congress of the Iliniteb aides
Wastlington, 33C 20515
August 29, 2019
The Honorable William Barr
U.S. Attomey General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W.
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Attorney General Barr:
It has been announced that the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of Inspector General
(OIG) will investigate the questionable circumstances surrounding the recent death ofJeffrey
Epstein.' While that certainly merits OIG attention, limiting the scope of an independent
inquiry solely into his death is grossly inadequate, and would ignore the various DOJ
officials who have allowed this serial pedophile to elude true justice for more than a decade.2
We respectfully request that the Department permit the OIG to conduct a broad, independent
investigation of this entire case. It should be one that not only covers his death, but also
investigates the conduct of any officials who approved, reviewed, and defended Mr.
Epstein's egregious and unprecedented plea deal. That agreement was not only intolerably
lenient, but it was recently deemed illegal by a federal judge.3
Members of Congress made a similar request for an independent investigation of this
potentially illegal plea deal last year (see attached item 1, dated Nov. 30, 2018). Regrettably,
we were denied. The subsequent response from Inspector General Michael Horowitz (see
attached item 2, dated Jan. 29, 2019) stated that his Office lacked the authority to conduct
such an investigation, and that Congress in Sec 8E(b)(3) of the Inspector General Act had
delegated exclusive jurisdiction into such matters to the DOD's Office of Professional
Responsibility (OPR). The Inspector General has requested authority from the Department
on several other occasions to investigate issues related to attorney misconduct and every
time that authority has been denied.
While we understand his concerns regarding the limitations on the statutory independence
of the OIG, there are no legitimate legal barriers to an independent investigation of the
circumstances surrounding this plea deal. More importantly, these concerns should not be
used to starve Mr. Epstein's victims of the justice they so desperately still seek
Department of Justice, "Statement from Attorney General William P. Ban on the Death of Jeffrey Epstein,"
August 10, 2019, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pastatement-attorney-gencral-william-p-barr-deathieffrey-epstein.
2 The Washington Post, "'He was inappropriate with me': Epstein face to face with accusers at bail hearing," Renae
Merle and Man Zapotosky, July 15, 2019, htrns://www.washingtonpost.comrnational-security/he-was-inappropriate-
with-me-epstein-comes-face-to-face-with-accusers-at-bail-hearing/2019/07/15/0e067664-a706-11e9-a3a6-
ab670962db05_story.html.
3 Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 v. United States 359 F.Supp.3d 1201 (S.D. Fla. 2019).
PAINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
EFTA00175132
•
As has been well puhlicizal, pcnitAriotably in the Miami iterald's."PervetOon otIustice"
newsPaper tepoiting, the plea SgreeMentthat-.the DOJ gave Mr. Epstein is now shrouded ,in
corrosive allegations .6f official misconduct, corruption and illegality. Therefore, the Justice
Department owes these victims arid the public its-absolute highest level of transparency and
self-examination.. A limited OPR inquiry into this•matter, which we understand was opened
in February ofthis year, will not satisfy that demand. An OIG investigation which can fully
examine all issues surrounding the Epstein case is:needed.
•
As Members of Congress intent on ensuring the equal application of justice, especially as it
relates to the.plague of sex trafficking and sexual abuse, we urge you to allow the Inspector
General to conduct an independent and comprehensive investigation into the• • non-
prosecution agreemem that the Department of Justice provided Mr. Epstein, as well as the
circumstances surrounding his death. Mr. Epstein is alleged to have manipulated every level
of out legal system, throughlis .Wealtii.and polities! connections. If justice was indeed for
.sale, or the procesS.that led to. the non-prosecution agreement violated ethical and legal
standards•within the Department of Justice, the Inspector General must conduct a thorough ". . • investigation that extends far beyond the jail cell where he died. Mr. Epstein's victims have
been denied justice at every turn so • far. They must be granted this dignity, white some
measure of true accountability is still within reach.
Sincerely,
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Member of Congress •
Ted Deutch
Member of Congress Lois Fratikel
Member of Congress
Debbie Weasel-Powell
Member of Congress ,•
Jamie Raskin'
Member of Congress
CC: Mr. Michael I4orowitz, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice
EFTA00175133
Page 1 of 2
From: DOJ Correspondence (SMO) [
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 8:55:10 AM
To: DOJExecSec JMD
CC: '
Subject: FW: Letter from Members of Congress to Attorney General Barr
Good morning,
Please log & assign to OLA M).
Thank you,
From:
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 5:25 PM
To: DOJ Correspondence (SMO) <E
Subject: RE: Letter from Members of Congress to Attorney General Barr
Please assign to Thanks!
From: Dal Correspondence (SMO) <
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 1:15 PM
To:
DOJ Correspondence (SMO)
Subject: FW: Letter from Members of Congress to Attorney General Barr
Importance: High
Good afternoon,
Please provide assignment guidance.
Thanks,
From: Kugler, Sara
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 10:10 AM
To: DO1 Corresponde
Cc Wolman, Lauren
Subject: Letter from Members of Congress to Attorney General Barr
Good afternoon,
l am emailing to send a letter from Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz and the co-signed Members of Congress
to Attorney General Barr concerning an Office of Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz is CC'd on the letter. Thank you for your attention to this correspondence.
Regards,
• https://igapp.justapps.doj.gov/iq/StreamDownloader.aspx?path=&filename=962019_31845... 9/6/2019
EFTA00175134
Page 2 of 2
Sara Kugler
Legislative Assistant/D.C. Press Secretary
Office of U.S. Re . Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-23)
Sign up for weekly legislative updates here
https://igappjustapps.doj.govfig/StrearnDownloader.aspx?path=&filename=962019_31845... 9/6/2019
EFTA00175135
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document titled "Executive Control Sheet" from the Department of Justice. It appears to be a form or template used for tracking and reporting on various aspects of a case or investigation. The document includes fields for the date, case number, and other details such as the name of the person or entity involved, the type of action taken, and the date of the action. There are also
[Image 2] The image is a photograph of a document, specifically a letter from the United States Department of Justice. The letter is addressed to William Barr, the Attorney General of the United States, and it is dated August 29, 2019. The letter is signed by William Barr himself, indicating that he is the sender. The text of the letter discusses the handling of a case involving a former government official
[Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a formal communication. It is a scanned document, and the text is not fully legible due to the resolution and angle of the scan. The visible text includes the names of individuals, possibly signatories or recipients, and there are lines of text that seem to be part of the document's body. The document is addressed to "Mr. Michael Horowitz,"
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or an email. The document is partially obscured by a red rectangle, which seems to be a watermark or a censorship mark. The visible text includes a salutation, a date, and a closing. The sender's name is visible, but the recipient's name is redacted. The document mentions a subject line, but it is not fully visible. The visible tex
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a form. The document is titled "Page 2 of 2" and includes a header with the sender's name and address, followed by a date and a recipient's name and address. The body of the text is not fully visible, but it seems to be a formal communication, possibly related to a request or an application. There are fields for the sender's nam