GRAND JURY PRESENTATION
GRAND JURY PRESENTATION
OPERATION LEAP YEAR
I. INTRODUCTION
A. New Indictment
1. Summarize Changes
2. Summarize Current Charges
3. Review Law/Instructions
4. Go through legal allegations in introduction
B. Summarize How the Evidence Will Be Presented
1. Chart
2. Break Overt Acts into Two Categories:
a. Meetings/Sexual Activity — Grouped by victim — Testimony
re Interviews with the Girls
b. Flights — Manifests
C. Take Questions
D. Call Special Agent Kuyrkendall
H. RETURN DOCUMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS
ISSUED SINCE THE LAST DOCUMENT RETURN.
A. Have additional subpoenas been issued on behalf of this grand jury
regarding Operation Leap Year? And have documents been received in
response to those subpoenas? What subpoenas were issued and what items
were received? Did you bring those records with you today?
KUYRICENDALL SUBSTANTIVE TESTIMONY
A. Hand out summary chart
1. Review renumbering of Jane Does
a. S/A Kuyrkendall: Can you explain to the grand jury how the
Jane Does have been renumbered? (They were numbered to
try to appear in a more chronological order depending on their
Page 1 of 11
EFTA00192670
first known contact with Mr. Epstein)
b. S/A Kuyrkendall: Which of these girls has the grand jury
already heard testimony about?
2. • Go over how chart is organized
a. S/A Kuyrkendall: What does each column refer to?
3. Generally review references to transcript pages
a. S/A Kuyrkendall: What does the list of transcript pages refer
to? How was that list created?
B. Go through the allegations in the Introductory Section of the Indictment.
Summarize evidence that hasn't already been presented (I think just the
high school allegations)
C. Hand out flight chart
1. What does this chart refer to? What does each column mean?
2. Flip to a few overt acts and read the text aloud. What is the evidence
in support of these allegations? (Flight manifests)
3. Remind the grand jury how the flight manifests were obtained.
4. So, for each flight referenced in the overt acts, what evidence was
relied upon? And did you bring those flight manifests with you?
Let's mark those manifests as Composite Grand Jury Exhibit
Number JE-1.
5. There are several dozen manifests contained within Exhibit IE-1.
Have you marked in any way the manifests related to the flights
referenced in the indictment? And in reviewing those manifests,
what information will the grand jurors find? [Airplane used. Date.
Departure airport. Arrival airport. Arrival time. Passenger names.]
D. Discuss telephone records
1. Flip to a few overt acts and read the text aloud. What is the evidence
in support of these allegations? (Telephone records)
Page 2 of 11
EFTA00192671
2. Remind the grand jury how the telephone records were obtained and
whose telephone records were obtained. Were there any records that
you tried to obtain that you couldn't?
3. Have you pulled the telephone records that contain the telephone
calls referred to in the indictment? And did you bring them with
you? Have you marked in any way the telephone bills that reference
the calls listed in the indictment? And in reviewing those billing
records, what information will the grand juror's find? (Telephone
number called. Time and date of call. Call length.)
TAKE A BREAK
BEGIN TESTIMONY REGARDING THE GIRLS
IV. JANE DOES 1 and 2
•
A. Who is Jane Doe #1?
1. Has she been interviewed? In addition to her statements, who else
provided information regarding Jane Doe #1?
2. During what period of time did Jane Doe #1 have contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
4. How did she meet JE?
5. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
6. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
B. Who is Jane Doe #2?
I. Has she been interviewed? In addition to her statements, who else
provided information regarding Jane Doe #2?
2. During what period of time did Jane Doe #2 have contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
Page 3 of 11
EFTA00192672
4. How did she meet JE?
5. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
6. How much was she paid for performing sexual massages for JE?
7. Did she recruit any of the other Jane Does to go to JE's home?
8. Please take us through the evidence supporting the overt acts related
to Jane Doe #2.
9. What did Jane Doe #2 say about whether JE knew her age?
10. Who would contact Jane Doe #2 to make appointments? How would
she be contacted?
11. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in
overt acts 1 through 18?
12. Let's refer to Count 2. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis
for the allegation that JE and SK procured Jane Doe #2 to engage in
commercial sex acts knowing that she was under 18?
JANE DOE #3 ( W.)
A. Who is Jane Doe #3? Have you testified about her previously?
B. Has she been interviewed?
C. During what period of time did Jane Doe #3 have contact with JET
D. How old was she during that time frame?
E. How did she meet JE?
F. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JET
G. How much was she paid?
H. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home? What did she tell you about
Page 4 of 11
EFTA00192673
JE's recruiting requests? Were there girls whom Jane Doe #3 brought to
Epstein's home whom he didn't like? Did he allow them to massage him?
I. Did he ever become frustrated when JD#3 wasn't able to find a young girl
for him?
J. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt
acts 19 through 31?
K. Let's refer to Count 12. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for
the allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to
persuade, induce, and entice Jane Doe #3 to engage in prostitution and in
sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense?
[Florida violations — Jane Doe #3 was under the age of 16 when she *as
involved with Epstein, so he could be charged with lewd and lascivious
molestation, lewd and lascivious conduct, and lewd and lascivious
exhibition based upon his touching of Jane Doe #3's breasts and genitals,
his solicitation of Jane Doe #3 to commit a lewd and lascivious act, and his
masturbation and exposure of his genitals in her presence.]
VI. JANE DOES #4, 5, and 6 MI Ha C., and NM P.)
A. Who are Jane Does #4, 5, and 67 Have you testified about them
previously?
B. Have they been interviewed? In addition to their statements, who else
provided information regarding Jane Does #4, 5, and 6?
C. During what period of time did Jane Does #4, 5, and 6 have contact with
JE?
D. How old were they during that time frame?
E. What sexual activity did Jane Does #4 and #5 engage in with JE?
F. Did either of them take anyone else to JE's home?
G. What sexual activity was Jane Doe #6 involved in with JE?
H. Did she take anyone else to JE's home?
Page 5 of 11
EFTA00192674
I. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt
acts 32-45?
J. Let's refer to Count 3. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for
the allegation that JE and SK procured Jane Doe #4 to engage in
commercial sex acts knowing that she was under 18?
K. Let's refer to Count 13. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for
the allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to
persuade, induce, and entice Jane Doe #4 to engage in prostitution?
VII. TESTIMONY REGARDING GIRLS ALREADY COVERED IN GRAND
JURY - JANE DOES 9, 10, 14, 15, 16 (Alex,liala,..1, and
)
A. JANE DOE #9 (Alex H.)
1. Who is Jane Doe #9? Have you testified about her previously?
a. Is there anything that you want to clarify or add regarding
your earlier testimony?
2. Please remind the grand jury, during what period of tune did Jane
Doe #9 have contact with JE?
3 How old was she during that time frame?
4. And please summarize the sexual activity that Jane Doe #9 was
involved in with JE?
a. Was she involved in sexual activity with any of the other
defendants?
5. Does your prior testimony and your testimony today cover the
evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts 66-73, 75-77, 80-83,
and 90?
6. Let's refer to Count 4. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis
for the allegation that JE and SK procured Jane Doe #9 to engage in
Page 6 of 11
EFTA00192675
commercial sex acts knowing that she was under 18?
7. Let's refer to Count 15. Is the evidence you just summarized the
basis for the allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate
commerce to persuade, induce, and entice Jane Doe #9 to engage in
prostitution and in sexual activity for which a person can be charged
with an offense? How many telephone calls have you been able to
document between Jane Doe #9 and Kellen?
8. What was the activity for which a person could be charged with an
offense [Vaginal intercourse between an adult over 24 and a 16 or 17
year old minor — violates Fl. Stat. 794.05]
B. JANE DOE #10 (B.)
1. Who is Jane Doe #10? Have you testified about her previously?
a. Is there anything that you want to clarify or add regarding
your earlier testimony?
2. Please remind the grand jury, during what period of time did Jane
Doe #10 have contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
4. Please summarize the sexual activity that Jane Doe #10 was involved
in with JE?
5. Does your prior testimony and your testimony today cover the
evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts 67, 74, 78-79, 81,
84-89, 147?
6. Let's refer to Count 5. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis
for the allegation that JE and SK procured Jane Doe #10 to engage in
commercial sex acts knowing that she was under 18?
7. Let's refer to Count 16. Is the evidence you just summarized the
basis for the allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate
commerce to persuade, induce, and entice Jane Doe #10 to engage in
prostitution? How many telephone calls have you been able to
Page 7 of 11
EFTA00192676
document between Jane Doe #10 and Kellen?
VIII. OTHER BACKGROUND INFO
A. Background re defendants and intro section — February 6, 2007 NK
Transcript and May 8, 2007 NK Transcript pp. 17-end.
B. ASK ABOUT ITEMS TO BE BROUGHT FOR FINAL
PRESENTATION - MASSAGE BEDS!!!
JANE DOE #14 la E.)
1. Who is Jane Doe #14? Have you testified about her previously?
a. Is there anything that you want to clarify or add regarding
your earlier testimony?
2. Please remind the grand jury, during what period of time did Jane
Doe #14 have contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
4. Please summarize the sexual activity that Jane Doe #14 was involved
in with JE?
5. Does your prior testimony and your testimony today cover the
evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts 112-131?
6. Let's refer to Count 8, Is the evidence you just summarized the basis
for the allegation that JE and SK procured Jane Doe #14 to engage in
commercial sex acts knowing that she was under 18?
7. Let's refer to Count 19. Is the evidence you just summarized the
basis for the allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate
commerce to persuade, induce, and entice Jane Doe #14 to engage in
prostitution and in sexual activity for which a person can be charged
with an offense? How many telephone calls have you been able to
document between Jane Doe Nand Kellen?
Page 8 of 11
EFTA00192677
a. How old was Jane Doe #14 during this period? And what is
the sexual activity that she and JE engaged in that also
violated Fl. Stat. 794.05? [Sexual intercourse btwn adult over
24 and a minor.]
D. JANE DOE #15 (=NZ.)
1. Who is Jane Doe #15? Have you testified about her previously?
a. Is there anything that you want to clarify or add regarding
your earlier testimony?
2. Please remind the grand jury, during what period of time did Jane
Doe #15 have contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
4. Please summarize the sexual activity that she was involved in with
JE?
5. Does your prior testimony and testimony here today cover the
evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts 132-148, 175?
6. Let's refer to Count 9. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis
for the allegation that JE, SK, and Adriana Ross procured Jane Doe
#15 to engage in commercial sex acts knowing that she was under
18?
7. Let's refer to Count 20. Is the evidence you just summarized the
basis for the allegation that JE, SK, and Adriana Ross used a
facility of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, and entice Jane
Doe #15 to engage in prostitution? How many telephone calls have
you been able to document between Jane Doe #15 and Kellen? And
how many telephone calls between Jane Doe #15 and Ross?
E. JANE DOE #16 al D.)
1. Who is Jane Doe #16? Have you testified about her previously?
Page 9 of 11
EFTA00192678
a. Is there anything that you want to clarify or add regarding
your earlier testimony?
2. Please remind the grand jury, during what period of time did Jane
Doe #16 have contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
4. Please summarize the sexual activity that Jane Doe #16 was involved
in with JE?
5. Does your prior testimony and your testimony today cover the
evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts 90, 149-151, and
156-181?
6. Let's refer to Count 10. Is the evidence you just summarized the
basis for the allegation that JE, SK, Adriana Ross, and Nadia
Marcinkova procured Jane Doe #16 to engage in commercial sex
acts knowing that she was under 18?
7. Let's refer to Count 21. Is the evidence you just summarized the
basis for the allegation that JE, SK, Adrian Ross, and Nadia
Marcinkova used a facility of interstate commerce to persuade,
induce, and entice Jane Doe #16 to engage in prostitution and in
sexual activity for which a person can be charged with an offense?
a. How many telephone calls have you been able to document
between Jane Doe #16 and Kellen? Between Jane Doe #16
and Ross? And between Jane Doe #16 and Marcinkova?
8. What was the sexual activity that Jane Doe #16 and JE engaged in
that also violated Fl. Stat. 794.05? [Sexual intercourse between an
adult over 24 and a minor]
IX. PRIOR DRUG USE/MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES
A. Today we have discussed 11 victims — Jane Does 1 through 6, 9, 10, and 14
through 16. Are you aware of whether any of them have used illicit drugs
or have had mental health issues? Please summarize.
Page 10 of 11
EFTA00192679
B. Now, with respect to each of those girls, can you summarize for the grand
jury your efforts to independently corroborate their statements? What
physical evidence corroborates their statements to law enforcement?
Page 11 of 11
EFTA00192680
E. JANE DOE # 16 a D.) and JANE DOE # 17 MIS D.)
1. Who is Jane Doe # 16? Have you testified about her previously?
a. Is there anything that you want to clarify or add regarding your earlier
testimony?
2. Please remind the grand jury, during what period of time did Jane Doe # 16 have
contact with JE?
3. How old was she during that time frame?
4. Please summarize the sexual activity that Jane Doe # 16 was involved in with JE?
5. Did Jane Doe # 16 recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
JANE DOE # 17 a D.)
6. Who is Jane Doe # 17? Have you testified about her previously?
7. Has she been interviewed?
8. During what period of time did Jane Doe # 17 have contact with JE?
9. How old was she during that time frame?
10. How did she meet JE?
11. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
12. How much was she paid?
13. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
JANE DOE # 16 HE D.) and JANE DOE # 17 al. D.)
14. Does your prior testimony and your testimony today cover the evidence
supporting the allegations and overt acts 90, 149-151 and 156-181?
15. Let's refer to Count 10. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that JE, SK, AR and NM procured Jane Doe # 16 to engage in
commercial sex acts knowing that she was under 18?
16. Let's refer to Count 21. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that JE, SK, AR and NM used a facility of interstate commerce to
EFTA00192681
persuade, induce and entice Jane Doe # 16 to engage in prostitution and in sexual
activity for which a person can be charged with an offense?
a. How many telephone calls have you been able to document between Jane
Doe # 16 and Kellen? Between Jane Doe # 16 and Ross? And between
Jane Doe # 16 and Marcinkova?
17. What was the sexual activity that Jane Doe # 16 and JE engaged in that also
violated Fl. Stat. 794.05? (Sexual intercourse between an adult over 24 and a
minor)
18. Does your prior testimony and your testimony today cover the evidence
supporting the allegations and overt acts 150-155?
19. Let's refer to Count 22. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to persuade,
induce and entice Jane Doe # 17 to engage in prostitution and in sexual activity
for which a person can be charged with an offense?
EFTA00192682
F. JANE DOE # 7 EMI L.)
1. Who is Jane Doe # 7? Have you testified about her previously?
2. Has she been interviewed?
3. During what period of time did Jane Doe #1 have contact with JE?
4. How old was she during that time frame?
5. How did she meet JE?
6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
7. How much was she paid?
8. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
9. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts
46, 47, 54, 57, 59-64?
I3 10. Let's refer to Countili%Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that JE and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to persuade,
induce and entice Jane Doe # 7 to engage in prostitution and in sexual activity
for which a person can be charged with an offense? How many telephone calls
have you been able to document between Jane Doe # 7 and Kellen?
lit; 01 Tcd-wr Mil tor Yr_cietu: a nrAt_ ejjjt
EFTA00192683
G. JANE DOE # 8 lalit E.)
1. Who is Jane Doe # 8? Have you testified about her previously?
2. Has she been interviewed?
3. During what period of time did Jane Doe # 8 have contact with JE?
4. How old was she during that lime frame?
5. How did she meet JE?
6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
7. How much was she paid?
8. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
9. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts
49-53, 55, 65?
EFTA00192684
JANE DOE # 12 Ell= S.)
1. Who is Jane Doe # 12? Have you testified about her previously?
2. Has she been interviewed?
3. During what period of time did Jane Doe # 12 have contact with JE?
4. How old was she during that time frame?
5. How did she meet JE?
6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with YE?
7. How much was she paid?
8. Did she recruit anyone to go to JB's home?
9. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts
96, 98-104?
10. Let's refer to Count 06. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that YE, and SK procured Jane Doe # 12 to engage in commercial sex
acts knowing that she was under 18?
11. Let's refer to Count 17. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that 3E, and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to persuade,
induce and entice Jane Doe # 12 to engage in prostitution and in sexual activity •
for which a person can be charged with an offense?
a. How many telephone calls have you been able to document between Jane
Doe # 12 and Kellen?
EFTA00192685
I. JANE DOE # 13 (al.)
1. Who is Jane Doe 11 13? Have you testified about her previously?
2. Has she been interviewed?
3. During what period of time did Jane Doe 11 13 have contact with JE?
4. How old was she during that time frame?
5. How did she meet JE?
6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
7. How much was she paid?
8. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
9. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts
96, 97, 104-111?
10. Let's refer to Count 07. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that JE, and SK procured Jane Doe # 13 to engage in commercial sex
acts knowing that she was under 18?
11. Let's refer to Count 18. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that JE, and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to persuade,
induce and entice Jane Doe # 13 to engage in prostitution and in sexual activity
for which a person can be charged with an offense?
a. How many telephone calls have you been able to document between Jane
Doe # 13 and Kellen?
EFTA00192686
J. JANE DOE # 18 MEI A.)
1. Who is Jane Doe # 18? Have you testified about her previously?
2. Has she been interviewed?
3. During what period of time did Jane Doe # 18 have contact with JE?
4. How old was she during that time frame?
5. How did she meet JE?
6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with M?
7. How much was she paid?
8. Did she recruit anyone to go to JEs home?
9. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts
182-188, 190?
10. Let's refer to Count 23. Is the evidence you just summarized the basis for the
allegation that M, and SK used a facility of interstate commerce to persuade,
induce and entice Jane Doe # 18 to engage in prostitution and in sexual activity
for which a person can be charged with an offense?
a. How many telephone calls have you been able to document between Jane
Doe # 18 and Kellen?
EFTA00192687
K. JANE DOE # 19 Mt H.)
1. Who is Jane Doe # 19? Have you testified about her previously?
2. Has she been interviewed?
3. During what period of time did Jane Doe # 19 have contact with JE?
4. How old was the during that time frame?
5. How did she meet JE?
6. And what sexual activity was she involved in with JE?
7. How much was she paid?
8. Did she recruit anyone to go to JE's home?
9. Does your testimony cover the evidence supporting the allegations in overt acts
189-190?
EFTA00192688
4-(z_flos
OPERATION LEAP YEAR
REVISED INDICTMENT SUMMARY CHART (by victiml
New Jane
Doe # Old
Jane
Doe # DOB Range of activity
dates Overt Acts Substantive
Counts GJ Transcript Pages
1 n/a August 1983 1998 - 2003 1 n/a
2 n/a January 1987 2001 to 2003 1-18 2 5/8/07 NK Transcript
pp. 6-7
3 n/a October 1987 2003 19-31 12
4 n/a August 1986 2004 32-38, 41 3
5 n/a October 1986 2004 32, 34, 39 n/a
6 n/a June 1987 2004 40-45 n/a
7 12 April 1988 7/04 46, 47, 54, 57,
59-64 13, 26
8 n/a November 1986 7/04 - 11/04 49-53, 55, 65 14, 26
9 6 December 1986 7/04 - 12/04 66-73, 75-77, 80-
83, 90 4, 15, 26 5/22/07 NK Transcript
pp. 16-27
10 7 February 1987 7/04 - 11/05 67, 74, 78-79, 81,
84-89, 147 5, 16, 26 5/22/07 NK Transcript
pp. 25-37
11 n/a October 1986 2004-2005 91-95 n/a
12 14 April 1987 8/04 - 2/05 96, 98-104 6, 17
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED 1 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
EFTA00192689
New Jane
Doe # Old
Jane
Doe # DOB Range of activity
dates Overt Acts Substantive
Counts GJ Transcript Pages
13 13 May 1987 8/04 -5/05 96, 97, 104-111 7, 18
14 5 June 1987 11/04 - 3/05 112-131 N'34-1, 27 5/22/07 NK Transcript
pp. 4-13
15 3 June 1987 12/04 - 6/5/05 132-148, 175 \lil, 27 3/20/07 NK Transcript
pp. 4-22
5/15/07 NK Transcript
3-17
Transcript
pp. 23-25, 27-28
16 8 October 1987 2/05 - 10/05 '0, 149-151, 156- .\1),*2.1,
181 27, 28,
29 5/22/07 NK Transcript
pp. 39-47
17 9 April 1988 2/05 - 3/05 150-155 \.22
18 n/a February 1986 8/03 - 3/04 182-188, 190 23
19 n/a May 1986 3/04 189-190 n/a
T.M. n/a July 1988 2003-2005 48, 52, 56, 58,59 n/a 5/8/07 MC. Transcript
pp. 3-12
A.F. n/a n/a n/a 182 n/a Transcript
pp. 5-13, 27
5/8/07 NK Transcript
pp. 24-25
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED 2 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
EFTA00192690
A-/2_q/c)?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No:
18 U.S.C. § 371
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1)
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2)
18 U.S.C. § 2422(6)
18 U.S.C. § 2423(e)
18 U.S.C. § 2423(d)
18 U.S.C. § 2423(b)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
SARAH KELLEN,
ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska,"
and NADIA MARCINKOVA,
Defendants.
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury charges that:
BACKGROUND
At all times relevant to this Indictment:
1. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed defendants SARAH KELLEN,
ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and NADIA MARCINKOVA to perform,
among other things, services as personal assistants.
EFTA00192691
2. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other
things, services as a personal assistant.
3! '3 Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and
A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services.
4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,
Palm Beach, Florida, in the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "358 El
Brillo Way").
5. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 9 East 71st Street,
New York, New York (hereinafter referred to as "the New York residence").
6. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner of JEGE, INC., a
Delaware corporation. JEGE, INC.'s sole business activities related to the operation and
ownership of a Boeing 727-31 aircrifttearing tail number N908JE. A; L_
7. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN served as president, sole director, and sole
shareholder of JEGE, INC., and had the power to direct all of its operations.
8. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner of Hyperion Air, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation. Hyperion Air, Inc.'s solebusiness activities related to the operation
h
and ownership of a Gulfstream G-1159B aiit..afttearing tail number N909JE.
9. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN served as president, sole director, and sole
shareholder of Hyperion Air, Inc., and had the power to direct all of its operations.
EFTA00192692
10. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 794.05, a "person 24 years of age or older
who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the
second deg*." For purposes of "this section, `sexual activity' means oral, anal, or vaginal
penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not
include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose." Florida Statutes Section 794.021 states
that "ignorance of the age [of the victim] is no defense," and that neither "misrepresentation
of age by [the victim]-iqr a bona fide belief that such person is over the specified age [shall]
be a defense." 1- ,
11. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(5Xa) and 800.04(5)(c)(2), an adult
"who intentionally touches in a lewd or lascivious manner the breasts, genitals, genital area,
or buttocks, or the clothing covering them, of a person less than 16 years of age, or forces or
entices a person under 16 years of agglio so touch the perpetrator, commits lewd or lascivious
molestation," which is a felony of the second degree if the victim is 12 years of age or older
but less than 16 years of age.
12. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(6)(a) and 800.04(6)(b), an adult
"who [i]ntentionally touches a person under 16 yearA of age in a lewd or lascivious manner
or [s]olicits a person under 16 years of age to commit a lewd or lascivious act commits lewd
or lascivious conduct," which is a felony of the second degree.
3
EFTA00192693
13.. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(7)(a) and 800.04(7)(c), an adult
"who: (1) [i]ntentionally masturbates; (2) [i]ntentionally exposes the genitals in a lewd or
lascivioUs Manner; or (3) [i]ntentionally commits any other sexual act that does not involve
•
actual physical or sexual contact with the victim, including, but not limited to . . . the
simulation of any act involving sexual activity in the presence of a victim who is less than
16 years of age, commits lewd or lascivious exhibition," which is a felony of the second
degree.
14. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.04(2), "[n]either the victim's lack of
chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crimes proscribed by [Section 800.04]."
15. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.04(3), "[t]he perpetrator's ignorance
of the victim's age, the victim's misrepresentation of his or her age, or the perpetrator's bona
fide belief of the victim's age canno4e raised as a defense in a prosecution under [Section
800.04]."
16. Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.02, a "person who commits any
unnatural and lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second
degree."
17. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was over the age of 24 and did not have any
medical license.
4
EFTA00192694
18. During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #4
attended Wellington High School and Palm Beach Central High School in Palm Beach
County:: •
19. During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #5
attended Wellington High School in Palm Beach County.
20. During the period of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 6, 8
and 12 attended Palm Beach Central High School in Palm Beach County.
71. During- the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #7
attended William T. Dwyer High School in Palm Beach County.
22. During the periods of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 9,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 attended Royal Palm Beach High School in Palm Beach County.
23. During the period of er involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #10
attended Lake Worth High School in Palm Beach County.
24. During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #11
attended the Professional Performing Arts School, a public high school, located in New
York, New York.
25. During the period of her involventent with the Defendants, Jane Doe #13
attended John I. Leonard High School in Palm Beach County.
5
EFTA00192695
COUNT 1.
(Conspiracy: 18 U.S.C. § 371)
26.,, Paragraphs 1 through 25 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
27. From at least as early as 2001, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury,
through in or around October 2005, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of
Florida, and elsewhere, the Defendants,
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
SARAH ICELLBN,
ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska,"
and
NADIA MARCINKOVA,
did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other and
with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, that is, to
-
use a facility or means of interstate dr foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, and
entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution, in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(6).
Purpose and Object of the Conspiracy
28. It was the purpose and object of the rc6nspiracy to procure females under the
age of 18 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way and the New York residence so that JEFFREY
EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females
in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests.
6
EFTA00192696
Manner and Means
29. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought
to accomplish the purpose and object of the conspiracy included the following:
(a) It was part of the conspiracy that Defendants SARAH KELLEN,
ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," NADIA MARCINKOVA, and other
participants would contact minor females via the use of cellular and other telephones to
arrange appointments for minor females to travel to 358 El Brillo Way and the New York
residence to allow Ddin-dant JEFFREY EPSTEIN to engage in lewd conduct with them.
(b) It was fitrther a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," NADIA
MARCINKOVA, and other participants would make payments to, or cause payments to be
made to, minor females in exchangtihr engaging in lewd conduct.
(c) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and other
participants would ask females to recruit other minor females to engage in lewd conduct with
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
(d) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY
EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and other
participants would make payments to, or cause payments to be made to, the recruiters for
7
EFTA00192697
bringing additional minor females to 358 El Brillo Way and the New York residence to
engage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
(e) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN would pay minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant NADIA
MARCINKOVA to satisfy Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests.
Overt Acts
30. In furtherance of this conspiracy and to effect the objects thereof, there was
committed by at leastane'of the co-conspirators herein, at least one of the following overt
acts, among others, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere:
Jane Does #1 and #2
(1) In or around the beginning of 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
engaged in sexual activity wit bane Doe #1, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl,
in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl.
(2) In or around 2001, Defendant SARAH KELLEN led Jane Doe #2 from the
kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at 358
El Brillo Way. . ,
(3) In or around 2001, DefendaniJEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the
presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl.
(4) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #2,
who was then fourteen years' old, to.pinch his nipples while he masturbated.
8
EFTA00192698
(5) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of
$300 to Jane Doe #2.
(6) In or around 2001, Defendant SARAH ICELLEN placed a telephone call
to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel
to 358 El Brillo Way.
(7) In or around 2001, JEFFREY EPSTEIN engaged in sexual intercourse
with an unidentified female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-
.
year-old girl.
(8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane
Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female
to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence.
(9) On or about Iv eh 11, 2003, an employee of Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's
review regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #2.
(10) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #2
if she had any younger friends who would, be interested in engaging in similar
activities with him.
(11) In or around 2003, Defendant SARAH KELLEN took nude photographs
of Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl.
EFTA00192699
(12) In or around 2003, Defendant SARAH KELLEN made a payment of
$500 to Jane Doe #2 in exchange for posing for nude photographs.
; (13) In or around 2003, Defendant SARAH KELLEN told Jane Doe #2 that
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN had asked KELLEN to take nude photographs ofJane
Doe #2.
(14) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the
presence of Janc,Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl.
(15) In oraround 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of
$200 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl.
(16) In or around 2003, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a telephone call
to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel
to 358 El Brillo Way.
(17) On or about April 23, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2.
(18) On or about May 2, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2.
Jane Doe #3
(19) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the
presence of Jane Doe #3, who was then a fifteen-year-old girl.
10
EFTA00192700
(20) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of
$200 to Jane Doe #3.
9 (21) On or about October 26, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
,
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #3.
(22) On or about October 30, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #3.
(23) In.pr around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed Jane Doe
#3, who was then a sixteen- or seventeen -year-old girl, to straddle an adult female and
to touch the adult female's breasts.
(24) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN placed a massaging
device on the vagina of an adult female in the presence of Jane Doe #3, who was then
a sixteen- or seventeen-year-0cl girl.
(25) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of
$200 to Jane Doe #3.
(26) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed Jane Doe
#3 to rub his nipples.
(27) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN placed a massaging
device on the vagina of Jane Doe #3, who was then a sixteen- or seventeen -year-old
girl.
11
EFTA00192701
(28) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #3
to recruit additional females to come to 358 El Brillo Way.
(29) On or about November 8, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN's employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant
JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #3
that read: "I have a female for him."
(30) On or about January 14, 2005, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #3.
(31) On or about January 29, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's
employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #3 that read:
"I have a female for him."
Jane Does #4, #5. and #6
(32) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN led
Jane Doe #4 and Jane Doe #5 to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN% bedroom at 358 El
Brillo Way. •
(33) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
asked Jane Doe #4 about her age, and Jane Doe #4 responded with her true age.
12
EFTA00192702
(34) In or around the fast half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #4, who was then a seventeen -year-old-girl,
and Jane Doe #5, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(35) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
instructed Jane Doe #4, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl, to play with his
nipples.
(36) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
instructed Jaa"Doe #4, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl, to remove her
clothing.
(37) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
stroked the vagina of Jane Doe #4, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(38) In or around thsrst half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid
$200 to Jane Doe #4.
(39) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid
$200 to Jane Doe #5.
(40) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
asked Jane Doe #6 what high school she alttnded.
(41) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
instructed Jane Doe #4 to leave so that Jane Doe #6 could massage him alone.
13
EFTA00192703
(42) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #6, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl.
(43) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
digitally penetrated Jane Doe #6, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl.
(44) In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
placed a large vibrating massager on the vagina of Jane Doe #6, who was then a
sixteen-year-old,girl.
(45) Iii or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
caused a payment of $200 to be paid to Jane Doe #6.
Jane Does #7 and #8
(46) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who
was then a fifteen-year-old gik„and Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old
girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN's bedroom at 358 El Brillo Way.
(47) On or about July 4, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN made one or
more telephone calls to a telephone used by-Jpe Doe #7.
(48) On or about July 5, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by T.M.
EFTA00192704
(49) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in
the presence of Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(50) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN stroked the
vagina of Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(51) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid
approximately $200 to Jane Doe #8.
(52) 14..or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $200 to
T.M. for recruiting Jane Doe #8 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way.
(53) In or around July 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN told Jane Doe #8
that Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN would pay Jane Doe #8 if she returned with a
friend.
(54) On or about Jule 5, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed one or
more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7.
(55) On or about July 15, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8.
(56) On or about July 15, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by T.M.
(57) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed one or
more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7.
15
EFTA00192705
(58) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by T.M.
1 (59) On or about July 17, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's
employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. that read: "Me &
[Jane Doe #7] can come tomorrow any time or [T.M.] alone".
(60) 1,9.9r around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in
the presence of-Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl.
(61) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed Jane
Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, to rub his nipples.
(62) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN stroked the
vagina of Jane Doe #7, who 4 then a sixteen-year-old girl.
(63) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a
payment of $200 to Jane Doe #7.
(64) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN told Jane Doe
#7 that if she reported to anyone what. had occurred at Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN's home, bad things could happen to her.
(65) On or about July 24, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8.
; j
16
EFTA00192706
Jane Does #9 and #10
(66) On or about July 15, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed one or
niorei telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9.
(67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN caused Jane
Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10.
(68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call-to,.a telephone used by Jane Doe #9.
(69) On or about July 18, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9.
(70) On or about July 22, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9.
(71) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN fondled the
breasts of Jane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(72) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in
the presence of Jane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(73) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a
payment of $200 to Jane Doe #9.
(74) On or about July 22, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10.
17
EFTA00192707
(75) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
NADIA MARCINKOVA engaged in oral sex and sexual intercourse in the presence
o Jane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(76) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
forcibly inserted his penis into the vagina of Jane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen-
year-old girl.
(77) /w around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made
, .
a payment of $300-to Jane Doe #9.
(78) In or around the last half of 2004 Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
rubbed the vagina of Jane Doe #10, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(79) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made
a payment of $200 to Jane Dile #10.
(80) On or about November 28, 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
arranged for one of his employees to provide an envelope filled with cash to Jane Doe
#9.
(81) On or about December 4,2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN provided
a written message to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN regarding Jane Does # 9 and 10,
stating: "[Jane Doe #10] would like to work @ 4:00 pm if possible. [[Jane Doe #9]
is scheduled for 5:00 today.] the movie is @ 7:30".
(82) On or about December 29, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed
a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9.
18
EFTA00192708
(83) On or about December 30, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
SARAH KELLEN caused the purchase of Broadway tickets as an eighteenth birthday
gfft for Jane Doe #9.
(84) In or around the last half of 2004 or January 2005, Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #10, who was then a seventeen-
year-old girl.
(85) lu.gr around the last half of 2004 or January 2005, Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN fondled-the breasts of Jane Doe #10, who was then a seventeen -year-old
(86) On or about January 14, 2005, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed one
or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10.
(87) On or about JaiiiiEuy 27, 2005, Defendant ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a
"Adriana Mucinska," placed one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane
Doe #10.
(88) On or about January 28, 2005, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed one
or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10.
(89) On or about February 1, 2005, Defendant NADIA MARCINKOVA
placed one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10.
(90) In or around February 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN caused a
payment of $200 to be made to Jane Doe #9 for recruiting Jane Doe #16 to travel to
358 El Brillo Way.
19
EFTA00192709
Jane Doe #11
(91) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN told Jane Doe #11
that te would pay her to find and bring him more girls.
(92) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $200 to Jane
Doe #11 for recruiting a minor female to travel to his New York home.
(93) In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #11
when she would be getting more girls.
(94) On or about April 5, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's
employees prepared a written message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review
regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #11 that read: "Re does she have
any new friends you can meet — I was away over the weekend so I have not spoken
to anyone new. But, [unidenAtfled Jane Doe] will be around later today and I know
she really wants to work. The others should be back around Thursday. Let me know
about [unidentified Jane Doe]."
(95) On or about June 22, 2005, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane,pcke #11.
Jane Does #12 ilitd #13
(96) On or about August 2, 2004, an employee of Defendant JEFFREY
EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's
review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated:
"They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe ilt] too".
20
EFTA00192710
(97) On or about August 21, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13.
•
Y (98) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant J -14(12EY EPSTEIN
masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #12, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(99) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
digitally penetrated Jane Doe #12, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
(100) Ins around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
I :4
attempted to place a massaging device on the vagina of Jane Doe #12, who was then •
a seventeen -year-old girl.
(101) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTFJN made
a payment of $200 to Jane Doe #12.
(102) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked
Jane Doe #12, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl, about her age.
(103) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN told
Jane Doe #12 that he would take her to Los Angeles when she turned eighteen.
(104) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
SARAH KELLEN caused Jane Doe #12 to recruit Jane Doe #13 to travel to 358 El
Brillo Way.
(105) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen -year-old girl.
21
EFTA00192711
(106) In or around the end of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN placed
a massaging device on the vagina of Jane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen -year-
old girl.
(107) In or around the last half of 2004, DefendantJEFFREY EPSTEIN made
a payment of $200 to Jane Doe #13.
(108) In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN
📷 Images in this document (77 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document is partially obscured by a red rectangle, which seems to be a watermark or a censorship mark. The visible text includes a date and a name, but the specific content of the text is not clear due to the red rectangle. The document is printed on standard letter-sized paper, and there are no visible logos or ot
[Image 2] The image shows a document with text that appears to be upside down. The text is not legible due to the orientation. The document appears to be a page from a book or a manual, as indicated by the page number and the layout. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image.
[Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a report. The document is scanned and contains text, which is upside down, making it difficult to read the content. There is a visible signature at the bottom right corner, but the name of the signer is not legible due to the orientation of the document. The document has a header and a footer, but the details in these sections are not clear
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a page from a legal or official report. The text is numbered and includes questions and answers related to a case or investigation. The document is titled "Report of Investigation" and includes sections with headings such as "Background," "Findings," and "Recommendations." There are also references to "Jane Doe," "John Doe," and "Dr. Smith,
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a list of questions or prompts. The text is organized into numbered sections, suggesting a structured format, possibly for an interview or a questionnaire. The document is titled "Commercial Sex Worker Questionnaire" and includes questions related to the respondent's personal experiences, demographics, and opinions on various topics. The qu
[Image 6] The image shows a document with text that appears to be upside down. The text is not legible due to the orientation. The document appears to be a formal or official type, possibly a letter or a report, but the specific content is not clear due to the orientation. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this angle.