Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-
MARRVJOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-
MARRVJOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-
MARRVJOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
EFTA00201180
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 2 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
VS.
EFTA00201181
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 3 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
EFTA00201182
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 4 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102's MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL
THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT
Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together,
the "Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby file this Motion For
Leave to File Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Response in
Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain
Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum of
Law Under Seal, and, as grounds, state as follows:
I. Undersigned counsel seek to file this Response in Opposition to Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal in order to abide by this Court's August 21,
2008 Order to Compel Production and Protective Order entered in Case No. 08-80736-
CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON (the "Protective Order"). The Protective Order prohibits
Plaintiffs from disclosing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the "NPA") or its terms to
any third party. The sealed document should be maintained under seal for the duration
of this Court's August 21, 2008 Protective Order.
EFTA00201183
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 5 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
2. Undersigned counsel recognize that this Court has previously unsealed
documents referring to the NPA. We seek to comply with the Protective Order for this
new and independent filing in an abundance of caution, until directed otherwise by the
Court.
3. If this Court denies Plaintiffs' instant motion, Plaintiffs seek appropriate
disclosure of the NPA pursuant to this Court's recent order in Case No. 08-80736-CIV-
MARRA/JOHNSON (DE #36) denying Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's
motion to unseal the NPA. As stated in that Order, the NPA has not been filed with the
Court. Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 would then have "a specific
tangible need to be relieved of the restrictions" of the Protective Order because
consideration of the terms of the NPA is necessary for this Court to resolve Defendant's
Motion to Stay.
WHEREFORE,
I. Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter an Order granting
Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 the right to file under seal their
Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time
Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated
Memorandum of Law.
2. In the alternative, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to unseal the
Non-Prosecution Agreement in order to allow Plaintiffs to concretely respond to
Defendant's Motion to Stay.
3. Finally, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to grant such other and
further relief to which this Court finds the Plaintiff otherwise entitled.
EFTA00201184
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 6 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
Date: May 29, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No.
101 and Jane Doe No. 102
By: s/Katherine W. Ezell
Robert C. Josefsberg
tcatnenne w. rzett
Fla. Bar No. 114771
City National Bank Building
Miami. FL 33130
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
On May 29, 2009, undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant in a
good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion, and Defendant's counsel
advised that Defendant opposes this motion.
Date: May 29, 2009
EFTA00201185
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 7 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 29th day of May, 2009, we electronically
filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify
that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on
the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated
by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not
authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
Respectfully submitted,
PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No.
101 and Jane Doe No. 102
By: s/Katherine W. Ezell
Robert C. Josefsberg
Fla. Bar No. 040856
Katherine W. Ezell
Fla. Bar No. 114771
City National Bank Building
25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
EFTA00201186
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 8 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
SERVICE LIST
JANE DOE NO. 2 I. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Robert Critton, Esq.
Michael J. Pike, Esq.
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
Jack Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
est Palm Beach, FL 33401
Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.
Bruce E. Reinhart P A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Counsel for Co-Defendant, Sarah Kellen
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Jack P. Hill, Esq.
ailsisrola r Shipley, P.A.
ida 33409
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
EFTA00201187
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 9 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
Adam Horowitz, Esq.
Stuart Mermelstein, Esq.
Mermelstein c Horowitz P.A.
iami. FL 33160
80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 ounse en ea ase 'os. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08-
Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.
Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.
Leopold Kuvin. P.A.
Palm Beach Gardens. FL 33410
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
Richard Willits, Esq.
Richard H. Willits. P.A.
Lake Worth, FL 33461
counsel for Plaintiff in Ra a ed Case No. 08-80811
Brad Edwards, Esq.
Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC
Hollywood, FL 33020
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
Isidro Manuel Garcia, Esq.
Garcia Elkins & Boehringer
EFTA00201188
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 10 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
EFTA00201189
📷 Images in this document (10 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a court order or a legal document. The text is written in English and includes numbered points, which are typical in legal documents to outline the details of a case or a ruling. The document is titled "ORDER" and is dated "5/15/2015." It mentions a case number and a reference to a specific case. The text includes statements about the court
[Image 2] The image shows a document, which appears to be a court filing or legal document. The document is titled "NOTICE OF FILING OF PLEADINGS" and is addressed to "Jane Doe." It mentions a case number and a filing date. The document includes a paragraph that seems to be a statement of facts or allegations related to the case. The text is too small to read in detail, but it appears to be a formal legal n
[Image 3] The image shows a document with a heading that reads "SERVICE LIST" followed by a case number and a date. Below the heading, there is a list of names, which appear to be individuals involved in a legal case, possibly as defendants or parties of interest. The names are redacted, with asterisks replacing the actual names. The document is a formal legal document, likely related to a court case or leg
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a certificate of achievement or recognition. The document is titled "CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT" and includes a date, which is redacted. The text mentions a specific individual and a company, but the names are redacted. The document is signed by multiple individuals, including a "President" and a "Secretary," but their names are also redact
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a court filing or legal document. The text includes a case number, a title that reads "Case 2:15-cv-00299-JRG-MJR," and a list of parties involved in the case. The parties are identified by their names and contact information, which are redacted to maintain privacy. The document also includes a date and a reference to a specific page number
[Image 6] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The document is titled "Certificate of Compliance with Local Rule 10.02." It includes a date, which is redacted, and a reference number. There is a signature line at the bottom, but no signature is visible. The text mentions a "Defendant," "Plaintiff," and "Court," indicating that this is likely a legal documen