Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10

EFTA00201180 Dataset 9 10 pages Download original PDF Download as text
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00201180 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 2 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. EFTA00201181 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 3 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00201182 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 4 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102's MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together, the "Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby file this Motion For Leave to File Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum of Law Under Seal, and, as grounds, state as follows: I. Undersigned counsel seek to file this Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal in order to abide by this Court's August 21, 2008 Order to Compel Production and Protective Order entered in Case No. 08-80736- CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON (the "Protective Order"). The Protective Order prohibits Plaintiffs from disclosing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the "NPA") or its terms to any third party. The sealed document should be maintained under seal for the duration of this Court's August 21, 2008 Protective Order. EFTA00201183 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 5 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM 2. Undersigned counsel recognize that this Court has previously unsealed documents referring to the NPA. We seek to comply with the Protective Order for this new and independent filing in an abundance of caution, until directed otherwise by the Court. 3. If this Court denies Plaintiffs' instant motion, Plaintiffs seek appropriate disclosure of the NPA pursuant to this Court's recent order in Case No. 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON (DE #36) denying Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's motion to unseal the NPA. As stated in that Order, the NPA has not been filed with the Court. Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 would then have "a specific tangible need to be relieved of the restrictions" of the Protective Order because consideration of the terms of the NPA is necessary for this Court to resolve Defendant's Motion to Stay. WHEREFORE, I. Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter an Order granting Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 the right to file under seal their Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum of Law. 2. In the alternative, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement in order to allow Plaintiffs to concretely respond to Defendant's Motion to Stay. 3. Finally, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to grant such other and further relief to which this Court finds the Plaintiff otherwise entitled. EFTA00201184 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 6 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM Date: May 29, 2009 Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg tcatnenne w. rzett Fla. Bar No. 114771 City National Bank Building Miami. FL 33130 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3 On May 29, 2009, undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion, and Defendant's counsel advised that Defendant opposes this motion. Date: May 29, 2009 EFTA00201185 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 7 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 29th day of May, 2009, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 EFTA00201186 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 8 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM SERVICE LIST JANE DOE NO. 2 I. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. est Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart P A West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Counsel for Co-Defendant, Sarah Kellen Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. ailsisrola r Shipley, P.A. ida 33409 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. EFTA00201187 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 9 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM Adam Horowitz, Esq. Stuart Mermelstein, Esq. Mermelstein c Horowitz P.A. iami. FL 33160 80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 ounse en ea ase 'os. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08- Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq. Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq. Leopold Kuvin. P.A. Palm Beach Gardens. FL 33410 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804 Richard Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits. P.A. Lake Worth, FL 33461 counsel for Plaintiff in Ra a ed Case No. 08-80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Hollywood, FL 33020 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Isidro Manuel Garcia, Esq. Garcia Elkins & Boehringer EFTA00201188 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 10 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469 EFTA00201189

📷 Images in this document (10 detected; 6 largest described)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a court order or a legal document. The text is written in English and includes numbered points, which are typical in legal documents to outline the details of a case or a ruling. The document is titled "ORDER" and is dated "5/15/2015." It mentions a case number and a reference to a specific case. The text includes statements about the court [Image 2] The image shows a document, which appears to be a court filing or legal document. The document is titled "NOTICE OF FILING OF PLEADINGS" and is addressed to "Jane Doe." It mentions a case number and a filing date. The document includes a paragraph that seems to be a statement of facts or allegations related to the case. The text is too small to read in detail, but it appears to be a formal legal n [Image 3] The image shows a document with a heading that reads "SERVICE LIST" followed by a case number and a date. Below the heading, there is a list of names, which appear to be individuals involved in a legal case, possibly as defendants or parties of interest. The names are redacted, with asterisks replacing the actual names. The document is a formal legal document, likely related to a court case or leg [Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a certificate of achievement or recognition. The document is titled "CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT" and includes a date, which is redacted. The text mentions a specific individual and a company, but the names are redacted. The document is signed by multiple individuals, including a "President" and a "Secretary," but their names are also redact [Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a court filing or legal document. The text includes a case number, a title that reads "Case 2:15-cv-00299-JRG-MJR," and a list of parties involved in the case. The parties are identified by their names and contact information, which are redacted to maintain privacy. The document also includes a date and a reference to a specific page number [Image 6] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The document is titled "Certificate of Compliance with Local Rule 10.02." It includes a date, which is redacted, and a reference number. There is a signature line at the bottom, but no signature is visible. The text mentions a "Defendant," "Plaintiff," and "Court," indicating that this is likely a legal documen