From: IIMIa>

EFTA00369033 Dataset 9 5 pages Download original PDF Download as text
From: IIMIa> To: "John Heyrich" Cc: >, "Lesley Groff" <1 Subject: RE: Pergola>link Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 19:19:34 +0000 lane-Images: image00 Ljpg; image002.jpg John, Unfortunately this still falls under the definition of accessory structure. See definitions below. As we indicated these structures cannot be located within a front yard unless they are a minimum of 150' back from the street. I have no problem with the Building Dpt. issuing a Temporary CO until this matter is resolved which allows the owner to move in. In speaking with Bob on the phone he indicated that my office stated that it was ok to locate the pergola in the front yard. What you must understand is that without looking at a plan in front of us, the answer given is based on the question asked. While I do not recall fielding that phone call, I imagine that the question asked was whether a pergola could be located on a patio. Our standard response would have been and is, "yes, provided it meets the yard setbacks". Unfortunately something probably got lost in the translation. BUILDING -- Any structure having a roof and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of persons, animals, goods, or personal possessions. BUILDING, ACCESSORY -- A building, the use of which is subordinate and customarily incidental to that of the principal building on the same lot. A building shall be considered an accessory building unless it shares a common wall or a common roof with the principal building (a breezeway roof shall not be considered a common roof). BUILDING, PRINCIPAL -- A building in which is conducted the main or principal use of the lot on which said building is situated. BREEZEWAY -- A roofed passageway, which is open-sided or screened, connecting a building or structure to another building or structure. EFTA00369033 From: John Heyrich [mailto: Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 2:50 PM To: Subject: Fwd: Pergola>link Here's my last email reply, including our sketch and recent picture of the front corner of this home. Sony for this confusion... John Begin forwarded message: From: John Heyrich < Subject: Fwd: Pergola>link Date: May 16, 2014 1:33:38 PM EDT To: Cc: Robert < >, Lesley Groff < Hello Pursuant to our telephone conversation on 7May2014, I had forwarded to you via an email below a proposed rendering and accompanying front corner photo for the new home under construction on Oenoke Ridge Road. At EFTA00369034 your main concern was the pergola built above the front attached terrace, and our sketched idea of adding a similar bridging trellis material, within a link connection about 8 feet in width, providing physical attachment to the main house. Have you have a opportunity to review this concept and offer any comments or critique? The builder is ready to complete his final close out phases, and the owners are anxious to move in to their new home. Any expedition in the resolution of this issue would be appreciated. Thank you, John Heyrich Begin forwarded message: From: John Heyrich Subject: Pergola>link Date: May 8. 2014 12:46:41 PM EDT To: Heres>a>rough>sketch>for>your>review>of>this>connection>proposed>to>the>house>as>we>spoke>yesterda 31- Also>included>is>a>recent>shot>from>the>front. John EFTA00369035 R R EFTA00369036 EFTA00369037

📷 Images in this document (5 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or an email. The document is titled "Building Act Notice" and includes a date and time stamp at the top. The body of the text discusses a notice regarding a building act, mentioning specific sections and requirements. There are also bullet points outlining the details of the notice. The document is addressed to a recipient, but the [Image 2] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from John Hayden to a recipient whose name is not visible in the image. The email contains a subject line and a body with text. The text in the body of the email is too small to read clearly. The email appears to be a professional communication, possibly related to a job opportunity or a review of a concept. The sender's name is v [Image 3] The image shows a digital document, which appears to be an email. The email is from John Lewis to Robert, with the subject line "Re: Request for a copy of the letter." The email is dated May 11, 2011, and it mentions a letter dated May 10, 2011. The body of the email discusses a request for a copy of a letter and includes a reference to a previous email. The email also contains a disclaimer statin [Image 4] The image appears to be a screenshot of a computer interface, specifically a document viewer or a file explorer. The document is blank, with no visible text or images. The interface shows a central area where the document would be displayed, and there are two panels on the left side, which might be used for navigation or editing. The overall appearance suggests a digital workspace or a software ap [Image 5] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or scan of a document with a vertical orientation. The document has a header and a footer, suggesting it might be a letter or a report. The text is too small to read clearly, and there are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this description. The document is centered and occupies the entire height of the image. The bac