UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EFTA00724049 Dataset 9 14 pages Download original PDF Download as text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE Plaintiff, JANE DOE 5, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 34, hereby submits her Sixth Supplemental Response to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, First Set of Request for Production to Plaintiffs as follows: General Obiections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents to the extent that the Requests call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Request, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved. EFTA00724049 Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein Page 2 2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad. 3. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents to the extent that the requests seek to impose obligations beyond those imposed by applicable law and the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. The foregoing general objections are incorporated into each of the specific objections and responses that follow. The stating of a specific objection or response shall not be construed as a waiver of Plaintiffs general objections. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement these responses and to make further objections. Plaintiffs responses shall neither waive nor prejudice any objections that Plaintiff may later assert. 5. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement or amend its Responses and Objections to Defendant's Discovery as and if additional information becomes available. Subject to and without waiving any of the foregoing objections, which Plaintiff hereby incorporates into each Interrogatory set forth below, Plaintiff responds to Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents as follows: 2 EFTA00724050 Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein Page 3 PLAINTIFF'S SIXTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE 5. All medical reports and/or records from doctors, physicians, (including psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors), hospitals, drug or alcohol facilities or any other person or entity who has rendered treatment to or examined you for any reason after the incident(s) which is the subject matter of this lawsuit. Response: Supplemental documents that are responsive to Defendant's Request for Production are attached. April IV, 2010 Respectfully submitted: MERMELSTEIN & FIOROWITZ P.A. Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Mon a Bar No. 376980 Jessica D. Arbour Florida Bar No. 67885 Certificate of Service WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copyjrpf the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail to the following addressees this i"--day of April, 2010. Robert D. Critton, Jr, Esq. Burman Critton. Luttier & Coleman 3 EFTA00724051 Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein Page 4 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Fax: o- ounsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 4 EFTA00724052 ERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA ATTORNEYS AT W www.hermanlaw.com November 19, 2008 Dear Sir/Madam: 410 The above named firm represent in a civil legal action. Enclosed please find a HIP u onza on or re ease of information. Please provide our office with r tire file siding billing records. Of course, we will be happy to pay for any ph tocopying charges associated with this production. In addition, I would appreciate any efforts you can take to expedite this request. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, firn Ron Jacobs, Paralegal /rj Encls. EFTA00724053 HIPAA COMPLIANT AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION ereby authorize you to furnish full and complete file records, k . • it inn records containing private health information, policy information, employment information, plan documents, and any and all other information, or a copy, to Jeffrey M. Herman and Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., to whom I authorize the release of all records, at the following address: For the purposes of this authorization, "information" means all records or knowledge concerning my health or employment, any benefit plans, any benefit claims, any injuries, medical history, mental and physical conditions, before and after the date of this authorization, regardless of the time of occurrence. For purposes of this authorization, the term "records" includes, but is not limited to, written or graphic documentation, including notes, billing records or statements, sound recordings, computer records and diagnostic documentation such as X-rays, lab test results, or other test results. This authorization also extends to the release of any records received by you from other providers. This authorization includes your entire file, without exception, for all dates of treatment. You are requested to cooperate and communicate directly with Jeffrey M. Herman and Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., and furnish such information as may be requested and to assist in the collection of any and all information requested. You should not disclose information to any other person without my written authorization unless required by law to do so. This authorization shall expire one (1) year from the date 1 sign this form. The information requested in this Authorization is for use in a legal proceeding. I agree that: (1) This authorization overrides any existing agreement to restrict information pursuant to 45 CFR 164.502(b)(2Xii); (2) I understand that I have a right to revoke this authorization in writing by mailing the revocation to Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.; (3) A copy of this authorization is as valid as an original; and (3) I h ‘.3)alt)/CS Date EFTA00724054 EFTA00724055 EFTA00724056 EFTA00724057 EFTA00724058 EFTA00724059 EFTA00724060 EFTA00724061 EFTA00724062

📷 Images in this document (14 detected; 6 largest described)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a form or agreement. The document is titled "HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION." It includes sections for the patient's name, date of birth, and other personal information. There is a section for the health care provider's name and address. The document also contains a statement about the release of informati [Image 2] The image shows a document, which appears to be a court order or a legal document from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The document is titled "PLANNED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. JURY VERDICTS, INC." and includes a case number and a date. There are sections for the plaintiff, defendant, and a signature line for the judge. The document mentions a "Jury Verdict" a [Image 3] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The text is in English and includes numbered points, which are likely part of a set of instructions or guidelines. The document is titled "JOHN DOE" and includes a date and a reference number. The text mentions "Defendant's First Request for Production of Documents" and refers to "Defendant's First Request for [Image 4] The image shows a document that appears to be a legal or medical document, possibly a letter or a report. The document is titled "SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE" and is addressed to "Jane Doe." It mentions a "SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE" to a "MEDICAL REPORT" and includes a date of April 15, 2010. The document is signed by a person whose name is redacted, and there is a reference to a "Certificate of Service" at [Image 5] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a memo. The document is partially obscured with a black rectangle, indicating that some information is redacted or withheld. The visible text includes the names "Herman & Melnick," "Ronald Reagan," and "Ronald Reagan Presidential Library." There are also handwritten notes and corrections on the document, suggesting it is a draft or a copy. [Image 6] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a memo. It is a scanned document with visible text and a signature at the bottom. The text includes a header with the sender's name and address, followed by the recipient's name and address. The body of the document contains a message, which seems to be a formal communication, possibly related to legal or business matters. The signature at