Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 26487

EFTA00792635 Dataset 9 4 pages Download original PDF Download as text
Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 26487 The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.0 106(g), 40113. 44701. §39.13 [Amended] ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA- 2016-6139: Directorate Identifier 2015- NM-061-AD. (a) Comments Due Date Wo must receive comments by June 17. 2016. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to Tho Booing Company Model 737-600. -700. -700C. -800. -900. and -900ER series airplanes. certificated in any category. excluding airplanes equipped with a flammability reduction means (FRM) approved by the FAA as compliant with the Fuel Tank Flammability Reduction (FTFR) rule (73 FR 42444, July 21. 2008) requirements of section 25.981(b) or section 26.33(c)(1) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 25.981(b) or 14 CFR 26.33(c)(1)). (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28. Fuel. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent ignition sources inside the center fuel tank. which. in combination with flammable fuel vapors. could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. (I) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified. unless already done. (g) Modification Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD. modify the fuel quantity indicating system (PQIS) to prevent development of an ignition source inside the center fuel tank due to electrical fault conditions, using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD. (h) Alternative Actions for Cargo Airplanes For airplanes used exclusively for cargo operations: As an alternative to the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD. using methods approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD. To exercise this alternative, operators must perform the first inspection required under paragraph (h)(1) of this AD within 6 months after the effective date of this AD. To exercise this alternative for airplanes returned to service after conversion of the airplane from a passenger configuration to an all-cargo configuration mom than 6 months after the effective date of this AD. operators must perform the first inspection required under paragraph (h)(1) of this AD prior to further flight after the conversion. (1) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD. record the existing fault codes stored in the FQIS processor and then do a BITE check (check of built-in test equipment) of the PQIS. If any nondispatchable fault code is recorded prior to the BITE check or as a result of the BITE check. before further flight. do all applicable repairs and repeat the BITE check until a successful test is performed with no nondispatchable faults found. using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD. Repeat these actions thereafter at intervals not to exceed 650 flight hours. Modification as specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD does not terminate the repetitive BITE check requirement of this paragraph. (2) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD. modify the airplane by separating FQIS wiring that runs between the FQIS processor and the center tank wing spar penetrations. including any circuits that might pass through a main fuel tank. from other airplane wiring that is not intrinsically safe. using methods approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD. (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager. Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO). FAA. has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD. if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CPR 39.19. send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office. as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO. send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-AM41-Seattle-ACO-AMOC- Requests€faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC. notify your appropriate principal inspector. or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair. modification. or alteration required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager. Seattle ACO. to make those findings. To be approved. the repair method. modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane. and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (j) Related Information For more information about this AD. contact Jon Regimbal. Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch. ANM-140S. FAA. Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO). 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6506: fax: 425-917-6590: email: fon.Regimbalefaa.gov. Issued in Renton. Washington. on April 15. 2016. Victor Wicklund, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2016-09799 Flied 5-2-16:8:45 aml BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2016-6144; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-088-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A318, A319, and A320 series airplanes; Model A330-200, —200 Freighter, and —300 series airplanes; and Model A340-200, —300, —500, and —600 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This proposed AD would require modifying the fuel quantity indicating system (FQIS) to prevent development of an ignition source inside the center fuel tank due to electrical fault conditions. This proposed AD would also provide alternative actions for cargo airplanes. We are proposing this AD to prevent ignition sources inside the center fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 17, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax:202-493-2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M— EFTA00792635 26488 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 6144; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647—5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2125; fax 425-227-1149. SUPPLEMENTARY MFORMA710N: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA- 2016-6144; Directorate Identifier 2015- NM-088-AD" at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to hap:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a regulation titled "Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements" (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 ("SFAR 88"), Amendment 21-78. Subsequently, SPAR 88 was amended by: Amendment 21-82 (67 FR 57490, September 10, 2002; corrected at 67 FR 70809, November 26, 2002) and Amendment 21-83 (67 FR 72830, December 9, 2002; corrected at 68 FR 37735, June 25,2003, to change "21-82" to "21-83"). Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e., type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews. In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, combination of failures, and unacceptable (failure) experience. For all three failure criteria, the evaluations included consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for further action. We have determined that the actions identified in this proposed AD are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. Model A320/330/340 FQIS Design The design of the in-tank FQIS components and wiring has the potential for a latent FQIS electrical fault condition inside the fuel tank combined with an electrical hot short condition connecting a high power source to the FQIS wiring to cause an ignition source in a fuel tank. Under the policy contained in FAA Policy Memo PS-ANM100-2003-112- 15, SFAR 88—Mandatory Action Decision Criteria, dated February 25, 2003 (http://refee.gov/Regulatozy and Guidence_Library/reolicy.nsf/0/ dc94c3a46396950386256d5e006aed11/ $F1LE/Feb2503.pdf), the FAA determined that this ignition source risk combined with the fleet average flammability for the center wing tank on airplanes affected by this NPRM created an unsafe condition for the center fuel tank. Applying that same policy, the FAA determined that due to a lower fleet average flammability, that same unsafe condition does not exist in the main wing tanks (inner and outer) and tail trim tank of these airplanes. Related Rulemaking On March 21,2016, we issued AD 2016-07-07, Amendment 39-18452 (81 FR 19472, April 5,2016), for certain Boeing Model 757-200, —200PF, —200CB, and -300 series airplanes. AD 2016-07-07 requires similar actions to those proposed in this NPRM. AD 2016- 07-07 addressed the numerous public comments that were submitted on the proposal. FAA's Determination This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. In accordance with FAA policy memo SFAR 88—Mandatory Action Decision Criteria, dated February 25,2003, we have determined that the unsafe condition warrants issuance of an AD to mandate the actions proposed in this NPRM. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require modifying the FQIS to prevent development of an ignition source inside the center fuel tank due to electrical fault conditions. As an alternative for cargo airplanes, this proposed AD would provide the alternative to modify the airplane by separating FQIS wiring routed between the fuel quantity indicating (FQI) computer and the center fuel tank, provided repetitive BITE (built-in test equipment) checks of the FQI computer are also performed. EFTA00792636 Federal Register/ Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 26489 Costs of Compliance Wo estimate that this proposed AD affects I airplane of U.S. registry. Wo also estimate that it would take about 1,200 work•hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work•hour. We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the parts needed to do the actions specified in this proposed AD. Based on these figures, we estimate the labor cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $102,000. We have not received definitive information on the costs for the alternative wire separation modification specified in this NPRM. The cost for this action in similar rulemaking on other airplanes, however, suggests that this modification could take about 74 work- hours with parts costing about $10,000, for a total estimated cost to U.S. operators of $16,290 per product. We estimate that the repetitive FQIS tank circuit checks associated with the alternative wire separation modification would take about I work-hour per check. We estimate the cost of this check on U.S. operators to be $85 per product, per check. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: "General requirements." Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft. Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113. 44701. §39.13 (Amended) ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-6144: Directorate Identifier 2015—NM-088—AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by June 17. 2016. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes. certificated in any category. identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(6) of this AD. except airplanes equipped with a flammability reduction means (FRM) approved by the FAA as compliant with the Fuel Tank Flammability Reduction (FTFR) rule (73 FR 42444, July 21. 2008) requirements of 14 CFR 25.981(b) or 14 CFR 26.33(c)(1). (1) Airbus Model A318-111,-112. —121. and —122 airplanes. (2) Airbus Model A319-111, —112. —113. —114. —115.-131, —132. and —133 airplanes. (3) Airbus Model A320-211, -212. -214. -231. -232. and -233 airplanes. (4) Model A330-201. -202.-203, -223. -223F. -243. and -243F airplanes. (5) Model A330-301. —302.-303, —321. —322. —323.-341, —342. and —343 airplanes fitted with a center fuel tank. (6) Model A340-211. —212.-213, —311. —312. —313.—541, and —642 airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28. Fuel. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent ignition sources inside the center fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified. unless already done. (g) Modification Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD. modify the fuel quantity indicating system (FQIS) to prevent development of an ignition source inside the center fuel tank due to electrical fault conditions. using a method approved by the Manager. International Branch. ANM-116. Transport Airplane Directorate. FAA. (h) Alternative Actions for Cargo Airplanes For airplanes used exclusively for cargo operations: As an alternative to the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD. To exercise this alternative. operators must perform the first inspection required under paragraph (h)(1) of this AD within 6 months after the effective date of this AD. To exercise this alternative for airplanes returned to service after conversion of the airplane from a passenger configuration to an all-cargo configuration more than 6 months after the effective date of this AD. operators must perform the first inspection required under paragraph (h)(1) of this AD prior to further flight after the conversion. (1) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD. record the existing fault codes stored in the fuel quantity indicating (FQI) computer. and then do a BITE check (check of built-in test equipment) of the FQI computer. using a method approved by the Manager. International Branch. ANM-116. Transport Airplane Directorate. FAA. If any fault code is recorded prior to the BITE check or as a result of the BITE chock. before further flight. do all applicable repairs and repeat the BITE check until a successful test is performed with no fault found. using a method approved by the Manager. International Branch. ANM-116. Transport Airplane Directorate. FAA. Repeat these actions thereafter at intervals not to exceed 650 flight hours. Modification as specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD does not terminate the repetitive BITE check requirement of this paragraph. (2) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD. modify the airplane by separating FQIS wiring that runs between the FQI computer and the center fuel tank wall penetrations. including any circuits that might pass through a main fuel tank. from other airplane wiring that is not intrinsically safe. using methods approved by the Manager. International Branch. ANM-116. Transport Airplane Directorate. FAA. EFTA00792637 26490 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2016/Proposed Rules (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager. International Branch. ANM-116. FAA. has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD. if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19. send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office. as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO. send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. (2) Before using any approved AMOC. notify your appropriate principal inspector. or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (9 Related Information For more information about this AD. contact Dan Rodina. Aerospace Engineer, International Branch. ANM-116. Transport Airplane Directorate. FAA. 1601 Lind Avenue SW.. Renton. WA 98057-3356: telephone 425-227-2125: fax 425-227-1149. Issued in Renton, Washington. on April 15. 2016. Victor Wicldund, Acting Manager. Transport Airplane Directorate. Aircraft Certification Service. IFR Doc. 2016-09789 Filed 5-2-16: t45 arol OILLING CODE 4910-18-11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2016-6145; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-056-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400D, and 747-400F series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This proposed AD would require modifying the fuel quantity indicating system (FQIS) to prevent development of an ignition source inside the center fuel tank due to electrical fault conditions. This proposed AD would also provide alternative actions for cargo airplanes. We are proposing this AD to prevent ignition sources inside the center fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 17, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202-493-2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M- 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 21-I-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206—544-5000, extension 1; fax 206- 766-5680; Internet https:// www.mybeeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the intemet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 6145. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 6145; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6506; fax: 425-917-6590; email: lon.Regimbalefaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA- 2016-6145; Directorate Identifier 2015- NM-056-AD" at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a regulation titled "Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements" (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 ("SPAR 88"), Amendment 21-78. Subsequently, SF/AR 88 was amended by: Amendment 21-82 (67 FR 57490, September 10, 2002; corrected at 67 FR 70809, November 26, 2002) and Amendment 21-83 (67 FR 72830, December 9, 2002; corrected at 68 FR 37735, June 25, 2003, to change "21-82" to "21-83"). Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires holders of certain type designs (i.e., type certificates (TCs) and supplemental type certificate (STCs)) to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design holders for large turbine- powered transport airplanes and for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to EFTA00792638