From: Richard Kahn

EFTA00950516 Dataset 9 6 pages Download original PDF Download as text
From: Richard Kahn To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: WAPA visit Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:18:36 +0000 i spoke with frank from frank's electric and he told me that danny verbally approved their estimate of 5,000. i asked frank for a discount but he all of the work was subcontracted and he was unable to discount at all i then called danny who told me that he spoke to anna about this which anna said was not true.. i told danny to please never approve thousand dollar quotes again without jee or my approval frank will submit the document certifying that cable tested ok to wapa to go back in service immediately and we are hoping for wapa power early next week... Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York NY 10022 tel fax cell On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:59 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: negotation but not too hard On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Richard Kahn > wrote: agree and what is frustrating is that jimmy and danny arranged yet jimmy wants no responsibility.. shall i attempt to negotiate or just pay please advise Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexingtsti Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 tel fax= cell EFTA00950516 On Nov 21, 2017, at 10:50 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: we might need frank for other things. . we should always get prices in advance. difficutl after the fact On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Richard Kahn < wrote: attached is invoice from Frank's Electric (jimmy's electrician) in the amount of 5,000 for when they came out to test WAPA cable i thought invoice was to high so i asked daphne to have jimmy review - his disappointing response was danny dealt with them so i cannot verify invoice.. danny then asked vendor for explanation of invoice which is below 4 hours x 3 men = 12 hours x $100 (estimate) = $1200 a reasonable rental fee of $1300 would make cost $2,500 not $5,000 please advise thank you Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 tel fax cell Begin forwarded message: From: Danny Vicars < Subject: Fw: hi pot testing Date: November 21. 2017 at 6:37:16 AM EST To: Daphne Wallace < >, Richard Kahn Ann Rodriquez < Reply-To: Danny Vicars < On Monday, November 20, 2017 3:40 PM, frank > wrote: Good day Danny I understand there was a question on the invoice in regards to a rental fee. The invoice should have been worded differently but what it means really is not a rental fee , but a specialty tool use charge. To own and operate a Dc Hi Pot machine as per Wapa requirements we have to have it calibrated and recertified every couple of years. Considering the low demand for this type of testing makes own and calibrating this machine very expensive for a tool we use only 3-4 time a year. We do own the machine and it costs us $16,000.00 plus fed ex insured shipping both ways every couple of years to and from Texas for calibration for a $38,000.00 machine. EFTA00950517 We do have the option of renting it from a stateside company rather than buying it but the rental fee and shipping 3-4 times a year is equal to owning it and charging these rates for usage. I hope this clarifies it for you. Franks Electric 6475 Est Mandahl St Thomas USVI 00802 Begin forwarded message: From: Daphne Wallace < Subject: Re: WAPA visit Date: November 20, 2017 at 9:44:47 AM EST To: Rich Kahn < >, ann rodriquez <a> Greetings Rich, Mr. Fraguela put Frank's Electric in touch with Danny Vicars for the cable testing project, he was not a participant so cannot verify the invoice. Per Danny Vicars: 1. The testing took place on a Sunday, he was present. 2. The project took 4 hours. 3. There were 3 men involved, including the WAPA engineer. 4. They used a piece of equipment called a Hi-pod tester, which tested the cable under the water. He is getting in touch with Frank's Electric to obtain what equipment was rented. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Daphne Wallace < > wrote: Forwarded messa e From: Ann Rodriquez Date: Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:40 AM Subject: WAPA visit To: Daphne Wallace Ann R. Begin forwarded message: From: Danny Vicars Date: November 17, 2017 at 8:45:21 AM AST To: Ann Rodriquez Subject: Fw: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: EFTA00950518 Reply-To: Danny Vicars On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 2:13 PM, frank < > wrote: please find atached Original Message From: "frank To: Jimmy Fraguela < Date: November 15, 2017 at 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Please find attached invoice for cable testing. Once we receive a check we can get all necessary documents to wapa to get the island energized. Frank On November 15, 2017 at 10:06 AM Jimmy Fraguela wrote: Email bill to them. When you can panel for a/c at peterborg. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Daphne Wallace < Date: November 15, 2017 at 10:57:27 AM AST To: Jimmy Fraguela Subject: Re: > Greetings Mr. Fraguela, He should bill to: LSJE, LLC 6100 Red Hook Quarter B3 St. Thomas, VI 00802-1348 He can email it to me or give it to you to drop off to us. Kind regards, Daphne On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Jimmy Fraguela wrote: EFTA00950519 Hi Daphne Franks electric ask who do you want bill made to. Check main lines from STT to LSJ. Thanks Sent from my iPhone Franks Electric 6475 Est Mandahl St Thomas USVI 00802 Franks Electric 6475 Est Mandahl St Thomas USVI 00802 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA00950520 JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00950521

📷 Images in this document (6 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a screenshot of an email conversation. The email is from a sender named "Danny" to a recipient named "Dr. Wallace." The email contains a discussion about a bill and a request for payment. The sender mentions a previous conversation and refers to a machine that was purchased. The email also includes a note about the machine being very expensive and the need for insurance. The conver [Image 2] The image shows a scanned document, which appears to be a letter or an email. The text is partially obscured, but it includes a salutation, a date, and a closing. The visible portion of the text mentions a project, a meeting, and a request for a status update. The document is addressed to an individual named "Danny," and there is a reference to a "Danny Vita" in the text. The document is dated Dec [Image 3] The image shows a scanned document, which appears to be an email. The email is from a sender named "Richard Kahn" to a recipient named "Frank Richardson." The email contains text that discusses a financial matter, specifically a credit card transaction. The text mentions a charge of $98.00 and refers to a "credit card statement." The email also includes a reference to a "credit card number" and a [Image 4] The image shows a screenshot of a text message conversation. The conversation includes several messages with timestamps and names of the senders and recipients. The messages appear to be related to a business matter, possibly discussing a contract or agreement. The text is overlaid with a red rectangle, which seems to be a digital watermark or a form of censorship to obscure sensitive information. [Image 5] The image shows a screenshot of a text message conversation. The conversation appears to be between two individuals, with one person sending a message to another. The text in the message is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a standard text message conversation with a mix of text and emojis. The conversation is taking place on a messaging app, as indicated by the interface elements such [Image 6] The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document. The document is a letter with a header that includes a logo and a name, which is partially obscured. The visible text includes a salutation, a body of text that seems to be a formal communication, and a closing. The document is printed on standard letterhead paper, and the text is in English. The style of the document suggests it could be