Etwavos 09J. Fier"! 5‘0/-2012
• •
Etwavos 09J. Fier"! 5‘0/-2012
EFTA01099665
From: Bata._Moab
To: WIllatakla
Subject FW: Epstein
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2039 2:16:00 PM
This is your Palm beach post lady. Do you want to call her? We did not talk about the sealing of that
document. Only talked about her experience with Epstein. If you want me to call. I will, but I know you
have the relationship with them and were going to call them about tomorrow.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CM-Palm Beach) (mailto:
Sent Thursday, may 28, 2009 2:06 PM
To: Bradley 1 Edwards
Subject: RE: Epstein
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Would you have a moment to give me a call?
Was the young woman you represent interviewed by Channel 5? And did she/you touch on the sealing issues with
5? Please advise .. as we at the Post do not want to be beat to the punch.
Many thanks.
Susan Spencer-Wendel
Courts Reporter
Palm Beach Post
Original Message
From: Bradley J. Edwards l
Sent: Fri 5/22/2009 12:13 PM
To: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach)
Subject: Epstein
The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the
victims and victim's attorneys is Jane Doe v, United States or America.
08.80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I
cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement.
Bradley J. Edwards
02241
EFTA01099666
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
02242
EFTA01099667
Front: etaka.ratoo2s
To: als1311$02011(
Subioct FW: Epstan respooSt
Data Tuesday, key 14, 2009 4:37:00 FM
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City
From: Michele Dargan [mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:26 PM
To: Bradley ). Edwards
Subject: Epstein response
Brad,
Please don't forget about e-mailing me your response to the Fourth District. I need your document
to update my story, which ran on the web today, and would really appreciate it.
Thanks so much,
Michele
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Pam Beach Dail New
02204
EFTA01099668
From: Mini-Um=
To: atillat-114111SCal
Subject: FW: jeffrey costal
Date: Monday, AuguSt 17, 2009 10:42:00 AM
I have told this guy that we are really busy and getting the information to him is just not our number
one priority right now. He is really oushv and I want to send this stuff to him whenever we have some
free lime. REDA t T ED WCAtc, PRODIAC.',T
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adierl Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto.
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:31 AM
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Brad- tx. Either scanning or faxing -- and put to my attention- will work. -f you cam email
the name of your assistant, I can follow up with her directly.
Also, let me know if you tracd down the name of that incestiga(or who heard about the fbi resignation.
Tx again for your help.
Mike Isikoff
From: Bradley J. Edwards <la
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Sat Aug 15 18:00:44 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot
promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this
information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend.
Sincerely.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adierl Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
02442
EFTA01099669
From: Isikoff, Michael lmailto
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call
asa ?
From: Bradley J. Edwards
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however, Epstein Ned an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is
still a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- I sec you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
confirmed, that his pica agreement with federal prosmutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you
know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
02443
EFTA01099670
From: 120121 J.
To: IS. Fas
&Mott: FW: here, Wein
Dote: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:52:00 PM
REDA‘Ta D — tkrects.. Pli•aDucT
Bradley I Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailtofflil
Sent Friday, October 02, 200 :
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Brad—
Hi there. Been off on other matters, but understand there have been some interesting developments on
this of late. In particular, was told about an affidavit that mentions some interesting names of people
who you are now about to subpoena. Would like to talk.
Mike Isikoff
From: Bradley 3. Edwards [mailtcl i
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:01 PM
To: Isikoff, Michael
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot
promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this
information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend.
Sincerely.
Bradley J Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael pnailt
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2001111
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
02440
EFTA01099671
Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call
asa
From: Bradley J. Edwards arn>
To: lsikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I can verify that a State Court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now. it is
still a seated document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
From: Isikoff, Michael [mailto.
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-• I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told. but have not yet
confirmed. that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you
know if that is in fact the ease and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
02441
EFTA01099672
hem:
To: elintratledi
SuIdeet: Re. Reside • Address for Nan Alessi
Diet ThindaY, SeMenber 24, 2009 6:53:21 AM
Agree not good idea unless were going to get something ie alleged records...
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
From: "Bradley J. Edwards"
Date:Thu 24 Se 2009 6:31:01
To:
Subject: RE: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi
Renee wanted it to go to his house. Like I said though, he's already given a deposition where he
testified favorably for Epstein.
From
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:40 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject Re: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi
Thanks. What do I do with this?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
From: "Bradley J. Edwards"
Date: Wed, 23 Se 2009 20:05:14 -0400
To:
Subject: FW: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi
From: Jacquie Johnson
Sent Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject Epstein - REPAr.T2 1AUF
ge.bac-r
worm PP.O0 tsc.T
Jacquie Johnson
Legal Assistant to
Brad Edwards. Esq.
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
04318
EFTA01099673
04319
EFTA01099674
Prom:
To: atyrlley I Fr*INA%
Subject Re: Epstein • Address for Juan Mess:
Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:42:38 PM
Thanks. What do I do with this?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
From: "Bradley J. Edwards"
Date: Wed, 23 Se 2009 20:05:14 -0400
To:'
Subject: : pstein - ress or Juan A essl
From: Jacquie Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi
Jacquie Johnson
Legal Assistant to
Brad Edwards, Esq.
Partner
Rothstein Rosenteldt Adler
04320
EFTA01099675
From:
To:
Subject
Data: RE: Epstem - Address fa Juan Alessi
Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:31:00 AM
Renee wanted it to go to his house. Like I said though. he's already given a deposition where he
testified favorably for Epstein.
From:
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:40 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi
Thanks. What do I do with this?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
From: "Bradley J. Edwards"
Date: Wed, 23 Se 200. 9 2Cf :15:14 400
To:
Subject: FW: Epstein - Address for Juan Alessi
From: Jacquie Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Bradley 1 Edwards
Subject: Epstein Address for Juan Alessi
Jacquie Johnson
Legal Assistant to
Brad Edwards, Esq.
Partner
04321
EFTA01099676
From: atadiaiithEna
To, tlichelelltimas
Sooject: RE: Epstein
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:53:00 PM
Will the US attys office talk to you? Because they obviously know. FBI on the Tannin and Cioffi (Bear
Steams) case knows. I doubt they will talk though. The people that are in the know are holding the
info very close to the vest, as I am sure they are being told to do so. Can you contact Radar? Maybe
they will reveal the source. The information about Epstein being "Major Investor Number 1" has been
out for awhile. I want to say that was first leaked in November 2008. Following the timelines of the
Bear Steams case as stated in the indictment and the evolution of the sex charges that ultimately lead
to the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein is where I started, but it is a long, somewhat confusing
and complicated. trail.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Michele Dargan (mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:39 PM
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a higher standard
than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally, have to confirm that the Info
is in fact true. However, we may be able to cite Radar as a source....8elleve me, I've been making
umpteen calls trying to verify the info.
On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" < wrote:
I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media
channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info...
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law
From: Michele Dargan
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 : 7 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Thanks'
05212
EFTA01099677
On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, 'Bradley 3. Edwards" < wrote:
I sent the request to my secretary and she will senycm..M.P eocs y.
Bradley J Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law
From: Michele Dargan (mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Brad,
Thanks for the link. I appreciate It!
Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the
Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on
Friday.
Thanks so much!
Michele
On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" < > wrote:
htlo:/Nome radaronline com/exclusiyes/2009/0R/exclusiye rjeffroy-epsteln-be-releaeed-orison-early
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
Michele Dorgan, staff writer
Palm Beach Dail News
05213
EFTA01099678
From: Brae*" 1 Fr:wards
To: antkitallatO
Subject RE: epstein
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:12:00 IM
The victims were not notified before the deal was reached (the NPA), not even conferred with about
the possible deal; in fact the girls were intentionally left in the dark; they were not notified before he
was out on work release, and No they will most likely not be notified before he is released. The whole
thing has been very secretive from the very beginning, for reasons that are just now coming out.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Michele Dargan (mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Don't the victims have to be notified before he can get out? Have you received anything from
PBSO or US Atty's saying that he's getting out in the next week or so? Wouldn't they have to
notify you and the other atty's?
On 6/23/09 2:53 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" a wrote:
Will the US attys office talk to you? Because they obviously know. FBI on the Tannin and Cioffi (Bear
Steams) case knows. I doubt they will talk though. The people that are in the know are holding the
info very close to the vest. as I am sure they are being told to do so. Can you contact Radar? Maybe
they will reveal the source. The information about Epstein being 'Major Investor Number 1" has been
out for awhee. I want to say that was first leaked in November 2008. Following the timelines of the
Bear Steams case as stated in the indictment and the evolution of the sex charges that ultimately lead
to the Non•Prosecution Agreement with Epstein is where I started, but it is a long, somewhat confusing
and complicated, trail.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
From: Michele Dargan (mattro
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 :
To: Bradley 1 Edwards
Subject: Re: epstem
05215
EFTA01099679
I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a higher standard
than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally, have to confirm that the Info
is in fact true. However, we may be able to cite Radar as a source....8elleve me, I've been making
umpteen calls trying to verify the info.
On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, 'Bradley I. Edwards' <bedwardsCorra-law.com> wrote:
I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does that media
channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info...
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law
Cents
From: Michele Dargan a
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:27 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Thanks!
On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards' wrote:
I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those does today.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
From: Michele Dargan
• n u ay, une ,
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Brad,
Thanks for the link. I appreciate it!
Also, would you e•mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to unseal - and the
Posts' atty if she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney document that was filed on
Friday.
Thanks so much!
05216
EFTA01099680
Michele
On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, "Bradley I. Edwards" wrote:
N1Lth5MYlagallfigSDMth=lialYgla iLlable4afifflY:22Slititl -121tiftlea dX
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Palm Beach Dail News
05217
EFTA01099681
Prom: tik:bele.DaWall
To: Bradley Edwant
Subject: Re: epstein
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:08:53 PM
Don't the victims have to be notified before he can get out? Have you received anything from
PESO or US Atty's saying that he's getting out in the next week or so? Wouldn't they have to
notify you and the other atty's?
On 6/23/09 2:53 PM, "Bradley 3. Edwards' wrote:
Will the US attys office talk to you? Because they obviously know. FBI on the Tannin
and Cioffi (Bear Steams) case knows. I doubt they will talk though. The people that are
in the know are holding the info very dose to the vest, as I am sure they are being told to
do so. Can you contact Radar? Maybe they will reveal the source. The information
about Epstein being "Major Investor Number 10 has been out for awhile. I want to say
that was first leaked in November 2008. Following the timelines of the Bear Steams case
as stated in the indictment and the evolution of the sex charges that ultimately lead to the
Non.Prosecution Agreement with Epstein is where I started, but it is a long, somewhat
confusing and complicated, trail.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
m
From: Michele Dargan
Sent: Tuesday, lune 23, 2009 2:39 PM
To: Bradley ). Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
I also noticed that Radar is the only one to report that info. Newspapers have a
higher standard than online publications and bloggers etc. and newspapers, generally,
have to confirm that the info is in fact true. However, we may be able to Cite Radar
as a source.... Believe me, I've been making umpteen calls trying to verify the info.
On 6/23/09 2:31 PM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote:
I have not seen anyone else report anything similar to the Radar report anywhere. Does
that media channel not share with others? I am pretty curious how Radar got the info...
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
05344
EFTA01099682
• M n
n : ues ay, une ,
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Thanks!
On 6/23/09 1:16 PM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" wrote:
I sent the request to my secretary and she will send you those does today.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Michele Dar an -
<
Sent: Tuesday, lune 23, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: epstein
Brad,
Thanks for the link. I appreciate it!
Also, would you e-mail those documents that we talked about - your motion to
unseal - and the Posts' atty If she has a separate one and also the Epstein attorney
document that was filed on Friday.
Thanks so much!
Michele
On 6/23/09 12:52 PM, *Bradley J. Edwards" ote:
rus.'<nn-early
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
05345
EFTA01099683
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Palm Beach Daily News
05346
EFTA01099684
From:
To:
Suowct:
Date: eatIletlattottla
tIcbeleaatuaa
RE: Epstein
Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:36:00 PM
Thank you. We have our answer then. All the pieces are public record — Complaint filed by
Josephsberg regarding Epstein being at the dub with Ghislaine Maxwell and taking a 15 year old home
with him, a newspaper article that indicated he was banned for similar conduct (don't remember who
published it but I read it a few months back), and a no comment from Trump. He's banned. Don't
worry, we will get the official word. We are setting many depositions soon and certain people that will
be set will know that information. I will keep you informed. Good work. I'll be in touch.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler l Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Michele Dargan (mailto
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:48 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Epstein
Brad,
We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists.
However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth/
Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a
member. He would not comment at all (which Is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got
booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar•A•Lago.
Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does
comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual.
If you get any info, please pass it on....like if any Info comes out during depos of anything related
to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will
run with it!
Michele
On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley J. Edwards' c wrote:
Hi Michele,
I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago. and even more importanUy if
you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned
for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club. and we already know of certain
minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there it we need to
do that to get the true information on this. but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and
we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the
info another way.
05535
EFTA01099685
Thanks
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
Michele ()arcane staff writer
05536
EFTA01099686
From: Bradley 3 &Manic
To: SICIICILQUIRO
Subject: RE: Enda
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009 6.06:00 PM
Michele, I forgot to tell you that I have a hearing acourtroom (11B I think) at 8:30 on our
motion to add punitive damages. Should be some interesting things said for you. Things that have not
been said before.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
IMMNIMactra
From: Michele Dorgan [mailtoollipp i
Sent Wednesday, Arty 29, 2
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject Re: Epstein
Brad,
We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists.
However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth!
Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a
member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got
booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago.
Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does
comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual.
If you get any info, please pass it on....ilke if any info comes out during depos of anything related
to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will
run with it!
Michele
On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" wrote:
Hi Michele.
I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more importantly if
you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor has it that he was banned
for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at the club, and we already know of certain
minors that he took from the dub to his house. I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to
do that to get the true information on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and
we are setting them right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the
info another way.
Thanks
05538
EFTA01099687
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Palm
/
05539
EFTA01099688
From: kaditaEatan
To: Wore, wennei So<an «w-Palm Rosati
Subject RE: Epstein
Date: Friday, SepWnber t8, 2009 1:01:00 PM
Hi Susan,
I know you spoke to Bill this morning, as I just got off the phone with him. If ou want any further
dissection of this somewhat encrypted document, you can get me on my cell: I have
lived with the document for a year and can shed light on its true meaning. Than s
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) Attorneys at Law
Las Olas Centre
From: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach) (rnailto )
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:06 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: RE: Epstein
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Would ou have a moment to give me a call?
Was the young woman you represent interviewed by Channel 3? And did she/you touch on the scaling issues with
5? Please advise .. as we at the Post do not want to be beat to the punch.
Many thanks,
Susan Spencer-Wendel
Courts Reporter
Palm Beach Post
Original Message
From: Bradley J. Edwards (al
Sent: Fri 5/222009 12:13 PM
To: Spencer Wendel, Susan (CNI-Palm Beach)
Subject: Epstein
The case in which the Non-prosecution agreement was released to the
victims and victim's attorneys is Jane Doe v. United States of America,
08.80736. It was released pursuant to protective order which is why I
cannot discuss the contents of the Non-Prosecution agreement.
05619
EFTA01099689
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
0
pin
05620
EFTA01099690
From: Michele Qua
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Staged: Re: Epstein
Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:3S:46 AM
Brad,
I actually got ahold of Duane yesterday. He referred me to his supervisor, saying he could not talk
to the media. Then I got his supervisor, Ken Johnson, who also told me that he couldn't talk to
the media and that I had to call the Dept. of Corrections in Tallahassee. There I got a very helpful
woman, Jo Ann Ratcliffe, who told me that the Dept. of Corrections doesn't have any records from
his stint in jail. They begin their monitoring of him today. But she did send me court records,
including a document that says he WILL NOT wear an ankle monitor. I wrote about that
today.... Apparently, the original court record was wrong and not wearing the monitor was part of
his plea deal.
I will try to find out about the Virgin Islands thing.
My real problem is with the PBSO, which are holding all of his jail records, his work release stuff,
etc. They are really stymying me getting the records that I want....My next step Is to go directly to
office, since his underlings are NOT giving me the records - that are public records.
Please let me know if you have any additional info - or particularly any scoops.
On 7/22/09 11:22 AM, "Bradley J. Edwards" wrote:
Hi Michele.
I am sure you heard that Epstein was released this morning (assuming he wasn't
released last week). We are hearing that his probation is being transferred so that he can
actually spend his house arrest on h' i Ian in the Vi in Islands. Anyway, this is the
name of Epstein's probation officer. . Just passing it on in
case you wanted to interrogate him and see if he will tell you something. I will have more
news for you soon as there are a lot of things starting to happen now.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Oias City Centre
Michele Dargan, staff writer
05803
EFTA01099691
From:
To: Bradley J. &Mauls
Subject Re: F0Stein
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 21:09 10100:32 AM
Hi Brad,
I'm not sure if we can or can't get the info because it's not a governmental body and I don't think
it has to provide those records to us....But I am going into a news meeting and will ask if there's a
way we can persue this. There are other reporters here who know some key staff members there,
I think, and maybe they can help get that info.
What time period are we looking at? What specific years, do you know?
On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley I. Edwards" < > wrote:
Hi Michele,
I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago. and even more
importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor
has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at
the dub, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house.
I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information
on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them
right now around the country) that 1 would like to avoid this one if we could get the info
another way.
Thanks
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Palm Beach Daily News
05848
EFTA01099692
From: Lineitaltal
To: endley Edwards
Subject: Re: ECaeln
Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:49:54 PM
Brad,
We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists.
However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's mouth!
Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever was a
member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether or not Epstein got
booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago.
Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He usually does
comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual.
If you get any Info, please pass it on....like if any Info comes out during depos of anything related
to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls from there. You know I will
run with It!
Michele
On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, 'Bradley 3. Edwards" c wrote:
Hi Michele,
I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago. and even more
importantly if you were able to get a fist of banned members from the Maralago? Rumor
has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at
the club. and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house.
I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true information
on this, but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them
right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info
another way.
Thanks
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfoldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
n r
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Palm Beach Daily News
05852
EFTA01099693
05853
EFTA01099694
From: =Eta
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Epstein
Date: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:20:06 MI
Brad,
I didn't get your e-mail until I got in this morning (Friday) so it was too late....you did mean it
took place this morning, right? Anything interesting?
On 7/30/09 6:06 PM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" > wrote:
Michele, I forgot to tell you that I have a hearing in (11B I think) at
8:30 on our motion to add punitive damages. Should be some interesting things said for
you. Things that have not been said before.
Bradley .1. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Michele Dargan
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:48 PM
To: Bradley 3. Edwards
Subject: Re: Epstein
Brad,
We have no way of getting the members or the banned members lists.
However, I spoke to Donald Trump today - nothing like getting it from the horse's
mouth!
Anyway, he said Epstein is not a member and would not confirm or deny that he ever
was a member. He would not comment at all (which is very rare for him) on whether
or not Epstein got booted from the club or if he had recruited girls from Mar-A-Lago.
Sorry I couldn't be more help. I really thought that he would say something. He
usually does comment for all of our stories. That's why this was quite unusual.
If you get any info, please pass it on...dike if any info comes out during depos of
anything related to Epstein getting booted from the club or about him recruiting girls
from there. You know I will run with it!
Michele
On 7/28/09 9:28 AM, "Bradley 3. Edwards" wrote:
Hi Michele,
I was wondering if you were able to get a members list at the Maralago, and even more
importantly if you were able to get a list of banned members from the Maralago' Rumor
05857
EFTA01099695
has it that he was banned for having sex with and attempting to have sex with minors at
the dub, and we already know of certain minors that he took from the dub to his house.
I will take a deposition of someone there if we need to do that to get the true Information
on this. but there are so many depositions to take in this case (and we are setting them
right now around the country) that I would like to avoid this one if we could get the info
another way.
Thanks
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
Michele Dargan, staff writer
Palm Beach Daily News
05858
EFTA01099696
From:
To:
Subject: Re: Epstein
Data: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:03:54 AM
Brad,
Thank you very much for your help, it was a pleasure to meet you and I look
forward to collaborating with you on this case.
Today I received the best possible news; confirmation that is, from both the Mexican
Attorney General Eduardo Medina Mora and the Mexican Ambassador to the U.S.,
Arturo Sarukhan, that child trafficking Is operated by the Mexican Cartels!
This is the first time that 2 key Mexican government officials confirm this. In the
meantime and if we can prove that JE is involved in trafficking children for his sexual
needs even if she is just ONE victim, he will be linked to a federal crime that is
becoming the number #1 issue in criminal investigation by ICE, FBI, Interpol and all
other law enforcement agencies involved in these investigations.
JEs new case (confirmed by unnamed source that FBI just opened new case against
JE), might become the biggest federal case of a US non-cartel related trafficking
crime!!! NOW THAT'S A WINNING CASE all round!
Let me know how you want to pursue this.
We'll be in touch.
Aug 24, 2009 07:38:41 PM, wrote:
Sorry it took me a couple days. I actually forgot about it. If the link still does not allow
ou to open it, then I am also giving you all the information so that you can get it from
Pacer. It is Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, case number 09-80656. Let me know if you need
nything else from me and also if you hear of anything that would be helpful. I am still
orking on some things for you.
ttips'llecf fisd uscourts gov/doc1/05116541941
Sincerely.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlerl Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
05952
EFTA01099697
05953
EFTA01099698
From:
To:
Subject:
Date: ad0le2LLEISS
Re: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman potanSid and 3E
Monday, September 28, 2009 10:10:45 AM
You're right Brad, it would have to be focused (any media initiative), strictly on the Issue that is the
power of power in sexual abuse.
older, powerful men using their influence and money to abuse system.
Original Message
From: Brad Edwards
To:
Sent: 28 Sep 2009 10:06
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanskl and JE
The dynamics of the two cases are so different, not factually but procedurally (meaning Epstein was
already sentenced and Polanslci was not). I am unsure as to how we could use one to help in the
other. Maybe Anita could help get people together on this front. I think the idea of Palm Beachers
speaking out, picketing, or voicing public opinion is great irrespective of any Polanski connection, so if
that can be done, then it should be done.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler! Attorneys at Law
L Ola tre
Original Message
From: csamofflOyerizon net (Maia
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:07 AM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Cc: Renee/Carlos Morrison
Subject: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanski and JE
Ni Brad,
The media buzz surrounding polanski's arrest in Zurich based on a 70s warrant for his arrest on charges
that he had sex with 13 year old shld be leveraged in epstein's case now!!!!
Maybe mother's in palm beach can create a stir and a vigil against men in power who abuse children?
What are your thoughts?
Warmly,
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
06788
EFTA01099699
From:
To:
Subject
Date: 8ecarorfletaals
RE: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanst aria JE
Monday, September 28, 2009 l0:06:00 AM
The dynamics of the two cases are so different, not factually but procedurally (meaning Epstein was
already sentenced and Polanski was not). I am unsure as to how we could use one to help in the
other. Maybe Anita could help get people together on this front. I think the idea of Palm Beaches
speaking out, picketing, or voicing public opinion is great irrespective of any Polanski connection, so if
that can be done, then it should be done.
Bradley 3. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adleri Attorneys at Law
Las Olas GN Centre
From:
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:07 AM
To: Bradley Edwards
Cc: Renee/Carlos Morrison
Subject: IMPORTANT POTENTIAL MEDIA TACTIC Roman polanski and )E
Hi Brad,
The media buzz surrounding polanski's arrest in Zurich based on a 70s warrant for his arrest on charges
that he had sex with 13 year old shld be leveraged in epstein's case now!!!!
Maybe mother's in palm beach can aeate a stir and a vigil against men in power who abuse children?
What are your thoughts?
via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
06789
EFTA01099700
From: leant, hbrhari
To: Pt Mtn, I FrMaids
Subject: Re: rereY epstrn
Date: Friday, August 14, 2C09 4:41:41 OM
Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call
asap/
From: Bradley J. Edwards
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael, 0nt >
can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement:
however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is
still a seated document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailtollat•COrn)
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you
know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matte of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
06953
EFTA01099701
FROM: LtdLithad
To: BUSIbLikbraf0S
Cc: Jamleintiospa
Subject RE: Jeffrey epstsn
Data: Friday, Octcber 02, 2009 6:14:09 PM
Tx. Good talking to you -- and I look forward to the letter, and further developments.
--Original Message
From: Bradley 1. Edwards
Sent: Fri 10/2/2009 4:53 PM
To: Isikoff, Michael
Cc: lac:rule Johnson
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I will have someone pull the Reiter letter and send it to you soon. And, I will keep you apprised of
anything else that is verified and useful.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Ofas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2 .
To: Bradley Edwards
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Brad-
Hi there. Been off on other matters, but understand there have been some interesting developments on
this of late. In particular, was told about an affidavit that mentions some interesting names of people
who you are now about to subpoena. Would like to talk.
Mike Isikoff
06955
EFTA01099702
202-626.2018
From: Bradley .). Edwards [MailinEll.a
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 6:01 PM
To: Isikoff, Michael
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I have gathered the documents to be faxed to you to make it an easier task for my assistant. I cannot
promise when my assistant will send them, but I will remind and encourage her to get you this
information this week. Hope you are having a great weekend.
Sincerely,
Bradley .3. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (ma
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:40 PM
To: Bradley ). Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Hey- never heard from your assist but just heard something pretty astonishing. Can you please call
as.ap m
Bradley ). Edwards -am>
10: Isikoff, Michael
06956
EFTA01099703
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is still
a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley 3. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Dias City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 :
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have
not yet confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the
civil cases. Do you know if that Is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
O6957
EFTA01099704
From:
Tor
Subject
Date: Isiattaiicaael
ticadlecifteash
Re: Sere/ epstein
Tuesday, — II, 2009 12:39:30 PM
Brad- great talking to you, you certainly gave me plenty to think about. Can you please forward me a
copy of one of those letters to the victims and a couple of your complaints-- against the us attorney's
office and epstein? Also, please let me know if I can talk to one of the victims. -f one or more is willing
to go on the record about how they felt deceived by the fbi and prosecutors over the handling of this, I
can probably arrange to come down as early as next week.
Mike
From: Bradley I. Edwards am>
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Tue Aug 11 10:10:01 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
httpIN.ww.businessinsidercom/2008/6/more-woes-for-teen-sex-afficionado-jeff-epstein-also-lost-57-
million-in-bear-steams-hedge-fund
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailtoopiii
Sent Tuesday, August 11, 2
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Just left a voice message. Is there a good cell phone number?
Mike Isikoff
From: Bradley J. Edwards Orri>
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Tue Aug 11 08:43:42 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
anytime
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
06959
EFTA01099705
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 .
To: Bradley ). Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow.
From: Bradley 3. Edwards
To. Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is
still a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 .
To: Bradley 1 Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you
know if that is in fact the cast and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
06960
EFTA01099706
To: 10b0500...Bad
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epster
Data: Muratlav, October Oa. 2009 9.11:57 PM
Attachmenb: 2na Amerered Ccmolaint revised W
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Johnson, Richard [mark
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 21PRI MMII
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Thanks. Please copy me one of the lawsuits
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient (or
responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are
hereby notified that you have received this transmission in error; any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmission is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in er
notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at
nd immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any
content of this message and its attachments that does not relate to the
official business of NYP Holdings, Inc. must be taken not to have been
sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or
attachment(s) are free from computer viruses or other defects.
06961
EFTA01099707
From:
To: Bradice1-Eceatsh
Subject: Re: Jere/ epsteln
Date: Tuesday, August II, 2009 9:29:05 AM
Just left a voice message. Is there a good cell phone number?
Mike Isikoff
From: Bradley J. Edwards
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Tue Aug 11 08:43:42 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
anytime
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler] Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael [mailt
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:22 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow.
From: Bradley J. Edwards a>
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is
still a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt /WW1 Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
06963
EFTA01099708
From: Isikoff, Michael [mail
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:02 PM
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil eases. Do you
know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
06964
EFTA01099709
From: fkradlev n Fdward%
In: Isadr M
Suoject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Date: Monday, August 10, 2009 6'59.00 PM
Michael,
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is
still a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosonfeldt Adler( Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael imailt&:1111.1
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards— I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil taus. Do you
know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
06965
EFTA01099710
Front: Isan77 My-haal
;Varney J Fdwardc
SRoject: Re: Jeffrey egsten
Date: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:23:12 PM
Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow.
From: Bradley J. Edwards 'ohl>
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epstein
Michael,
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement;
however, Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So, for now, it is
still a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- !see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
confirmed, that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil eases. Do you
know if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record?
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
06967
EFTA01099711
From: gralev 3. Edward(
Subject: RE: Jeffrey town
Date: Tbesday, August It 2009 8:43:00 AM
anytime
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler' Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael (mailto:
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2 .
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: Re: Jeffrey epstein
Tx much. I had a few questions about this and will give you a call tomorrow.
From: Bradley J. Edwards ont>
To: Isikoff, Michael
Sent: Mon Aug 10 18:59:51 2009
Subject: RE: Jeffrey epsteln
Michael.
I can verify that a State court Judge granted our Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement:
however. Epstein filed an appeal and the appellate court has not issued an Order. So. for now, it is
still a sealed document and not a matter of public record.
Bradley J. Edwards
Partner
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adlori Attorneys at Law
Las Olas City Centre
From: Isikoff, Michael
Sent Monday, August 10, 2 .
To: Bradley J. Edwards
Subject: jeffrey epstein
Bradley Edwards-- I see you are on one of the lawyers suing Jeffrey Epstein. I have been told, but have not yet
• irmcd. that his plea agreement with federal prosecutors was recently unsealed in one of the civil cases. Do you
if that is in fact the case and if it is now a matter of public record?
06968
EFTA01099712
Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
06969
EFTA01099713
From: ararilra/..Etoxib
To:
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein
Woo Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:1
📷 Images in this document (164 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a printed document with text. The document appears to be a letter or a report, as indicated by the formal layout and the presence of paragraphs. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be discussing a topic related to "Women Against Violence Against Women" (WAVAW). There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image. The docume
[Image 2] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document is printed on a piece of paper and contains text in English. The visible text includes phrases such as "as a result of the above," "the following," and "the following." There are also references to "the agreement," "the agreement level," and "the agreement." The document mentions a "letter of agreement" an
[Image 3] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official letter. The text is in English and includes various paragraphs with headings such as "This letter is to inform you of the following," "This letter is to inform you of the following," and "This letter is to inform you of the following." There are also references to "the agreement," "the contract," and "the terms and condi
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a page from a book or a manual. The text is written in English and discusses topics related to the Women's Army Corps (WAC) and the Women's Air Force (WAF). The document mentions the WAC's involvement in World War II and the WAF's establishment in 1948. It also discusses the roles and responsibilities of women in the military, including the
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The text is dense and includes paragraphs with headings such as "POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984" and "OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON". There are also references to "SECTION 47" and "SECTION 48". The document includes sections titled "OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON" and "OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER". The text
[Image 6] The image shows a scanned document with text. The document appears to be a letter or a report, as indicated by the header and the formal language used. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be discussing a topic related to the Veterans Administration (VA) and possibly the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discer