IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
FANCELLI PANELING, INC.,
Defendant,
-vs-
J.P. MOLYNEUX STUDIO, LTD.,
Nominal Defendant. CASE NO. ST-10-CV-443
ACTION FOR DAMAGES
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PLAINTIFFS' EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL THE ATTENDANCE OF MR.
JEAN-PIERRE FANCELLI AT MEDIATION
The Plaintiffs Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their
undersigned counsel, Hodge & Francois (Denise Francois, of counsel) move this Court, pursuant
to Super. Ct. Rule 40(e) and this Court's inherent authority, for entry of an order directing Mr.
Jean Pierre Fancelli, the President of Fancelli Paneling, Inc. to appear at the mediation presently
scheduled in this matter for July 13, 2012. As grounds for this Motion the Plaintiffs rely upon
the following:
1. Mr. Jean-Pierre Fancelli is the president of Fancelli Paneling, Inc ("Fancelli").
The Library Cabinetry which is the subject of the above-captioned action was fabricated by
and/or the supervision of Mr. Fancelli. In fact, its Rule 26(a) Disclosures, Fancelli Paneling, Inc.
it states:
Mr. Jean Pierre, the principal of Fancelli Paneling, Inc., 24 East 6e Street, New
York, New York, 10021, has knowledge of all aspects of the transactions and work
he provided forming the bases for some of the claims and defenses herein, including
EFTA01112521
Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion to Compel Attendance of Jean Pierre Fancelli
Epstein et at vs. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. et al.
Super. Ct. Case No. ST-Ill-CJ444
the purchase order issued by "Molyneux" requesting a limited scope of Fancelli
work on, or about June 15, 2006.
No other witness identified by Fancelli is attributed with same extensive knowledge of the
Library Cabinetry or of the relevant claims and defenses.
2. The parties have agreed to mediate the above-captioned action on July 13, 2012.
The parties have also agreed upon Attorney Britain H. Bryant as the mediator.
3. While the parties and the American Mediation Institute were trying to obtain a
date on which all parties and the mediator were available, Defendant Fancelli Paneling, Inc.'s
counsel sent the following email:
>
To:
Cc: Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:15 PM
It was my understanding that Jeff's Client has not confirmed. My Client requires
confirmation that Mr. Epstein will personally attend. My Client further needs to clarify
whether the mediator and parties will be able to view the work in place at the time of
mediation and whether we will have the use of all settlement agreements between
Messrs. Epstein and Molyneux in advance of mediation. these materials are needed for
the ex parte submission to the mediator and for a meaningful mediation. I have and
continue to request dates from client and counsel in France and NY, but a resolution of
these questions would facilitate it. Thank you. (emphasis supplied)
4. By email dated May 30, 2012, the undersigned counsel replied:
My clients, or their representative with full settlement authority and I are all
available on the 15th of June.
5. Due to scheduling issues, the parties could not proceed with mediation on June
15, 2012. During the course of rescheduling the mediation, legal counsel for the Defendant
Fancelli Paneling sent the following email to the American Mediation Institute and other parties:
2
EFTA01112522
Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion to Compel Attendance of Jean Pierre Fancelli
Epstein et at vs. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. et al.
Super. Ct. Case No. ST-IO-CV-44
On Jun 1, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Michele Baker < wrote:
Nancy,
The representative who will be appearing for Fancelli Panelling is also a trial lawyer
and will be in trial that week. I am attempting to secure additional dates. So far,
July 12 or 13 would be his availability.
Would this be feasible for all parties and the mediator??
MichEle Baker, Esq.
Moore Dodson & Russell P.C.
5035 Norre Gade, Suite One
St Thomas, VI 00802
Tel:
Fax
6. July 12 and July 13 were dated that the undersigned counsel was scheduled to be
off island for vacation, and had so notified the Court at the May 30, 2012 status conference.
However, in light of the June 1, 2012 email from Fancelli's counsel, the undersigned counsel
cancelled her travel plans and notified all parties in a June 5 email that she and her clients were
available on several dates in June and July including July 12 and 13t°.
5. There is no indication that the "trial lawyer" has any familiarity with the work
performed by Mr. Jean Pierre Fancelli and his employees or craftsmen. Sending a trial lawyer to
mediate a dispute over the quality of the fabrication of the interior of a library calls into question
whether the Defendant Fancelli Paneling, Inc. intends to mediate in good faith.
6. By the foregoing June 1, 2012 email from Attorney Michele Baker, the Plaintiffs
learned that although Fancelli Paneling, Inc., required that the Plaintiff personally attend the
mediation, the principals of Fancelli Paneling were exempt.
3
EFTA01112523
Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion to Compel Attendance of Jean Pierre Fancelli
Epstein et al. vs. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. et al.
Super. Ct. Case Na ST-IO-CV-44
7. The fact that Fancelli Paneling, Inc. elected to send a "trial lawyer" to the
mediation shows the imposition of a double standard: the Defendant can take the position that
the its participation in Court ordered mediation is dependent it is requirement that the Plaintiff
Jeffrey Epstein must "attend personally" but Mr. Jean Pierre Fancelli is not required to do so.
8. The participation of Mr. Jean Pierre Fancelli in the mediation process is critical to
resolving this matter.
Based upon this Court's inherent authority and the requirements of Super. Ct. 40(e)(2),
the Plaintiffs move this court for entry of an order directing that the Mr. Jean Pierre Fancelli
personally attend the mediation in this matter scheduled for July 13, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated:
Denise Francois
HODGE & FRANCOIS
1340 Taarneberg
St. Thomas, VI 00802
Telephon~
Telefax:
4
EFTA01112524
Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion to Compel Attendance of Jean Pierre Fancelli
Epstein et at vs. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. et al.
Super. Ct. Case No. ST-IO-CV-44
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I cause and true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiffs'
Emergency Motion to Compel Attendant of Jean Pierre Fancell at Mediation to be served
via first class U. S. Mail, postage pre-paid upon Treston E. Moore, Es uire, MOORE DODSON
& RUSSELL, P.O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 and by email to and
upon A. Jeffrey Weiss, Esq., A. J. Weiss & Associates, 6934 Vessup Lane, St. Thomas, VI
00802-1001 and by email to: on this day
of , 201
5
EFTA01112525
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document is titled "RE: WESTERN UNION COMPANY, et al. v. HSBC BANK USA, et al." and is dated "June 11, 2010." The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, which seems to be a watermark or a censorship mark. The visible text includes a list of numbered points, which are likely part of the document's content. T
[Image 2] The image is a document scan, specifically a court document. It appears to be a complaint or a legal filing, as indicated by the heading "Complaint" at the top. The document is dated and includes the names of the parties involved, which are redacted for privacy. The text within the document is too small to read in detail, but it is structured in a typical legal format with sections for the title,
[Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a memo. It contains text and a header with the sender's name and address. The text includes a salutation, a body with numbered points, and a closing. The document is dated and addressed to someone named "Nancy." The visible text includes a reference to a "remand" and a "trial," suggesting that the content of the document relates to legal pr
[Image 4] The image shows a document that appears to be a legal or official letter. The document is titled "Petition for Writ of Certiorari" and is addressed to the "Supreme Court of the United States." It is a formal letter with a header, body, and footer. The body of the letter discusses legal matters and references a case number. The footer includes a date and a signature, which is redacted for privacy.
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a page from a report or a formal document. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a formal statement or a section of a larger document. The document is structured with headings and paragraphs, typical of official reports or legal documents. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from thi