NAME SEARCHED: Erika Kellerhals
NAME SEARCHED: Erika Kellerhals
PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business. We completed thorough searches
on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below.
Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business. Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated.
Search: Result: Click here for results: Reviewer Comments (as necessary):
RDC 0.:4 No I in imui• Not Rred I. RDC Results No RDC alert (Please sec attached) Mt
PCR No Hit Not Required
El Hit IL PCR Results No PCR alert (Please sec attached)
BIS El Yes gi No III. Negative Media There was no information found
IV. Non-Negative Media There was no information found • Not Required
V. Other Language Media Not Required
D&B Results? M Yes • No
CI Not Required VI. D&B Not Required
Smartlinx Results? lEl Yes 0 No
• Not Required VII. Smanlins Result Found(please see attached)
Court Cases 0 Review b' Legal Mai.
be Required • No Results
M Search not required VIII. Court Cases Result Found(please see attached)
Prepared by: Prachi Pawa Da c: 10/12/2016
Research Analyst
Instructions:
I. Review and confirm that all results arc returned for your client.
2. Please note that you are still required to perform any Martindale -Hubbell search (if applicable) on each search subject. We have attached the web link
below for your convenience:Martindale-flubbellhttp://sww.martindak.comhip/Martindak/home.sml
3. As needed, provide comment for any negative results.
4. If applicable, please obtain clearance from Compliance for all alerts.
S. Save any changes you make to this document and attach file to your KYC.
Please note: Submission of a signed KYC is your confirmation that you have fully reviewed the research documents.
For internal use only
S0NV_GM_00057180
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. Ft CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020004
EFTA_00167748
EFTA01295845
OFAC RESULTS
RDC:
Date of I
11593661 NQEllitth GCIS Country :United States Birth: Found 00000483290 Erika Kellerhals 10/13/1974 i•
PCR:
C20161034949193 Erika Kellerhals 12013248 NCA customised Auto-Closed No-Hit 12/10/2016
BIS RESULTS
Negative Media:
There was no information found
Non-Negative Media:
There was no information found
Other Language Media:
Not Required
Public Records:
1 OF 1 RECORD(S)
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
Copyright 2016 LexisNexis
a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Date:10/12/2016
Report processed by:
DEUTSCHE BANK AGII
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057181
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED_ „QC) .NEIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020005
EF1'A_00167749
EFTA01295846
Page 2
Full Name Address County Phone
KELLERHALS, ERIKA A 242 BRYANT AVE RICHMOND (718) 667-1921
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3142
RICHMOND COUNTY
ADDITIONAL PERSONAL INFORMATION
SSN DOB
074-72-XXXX 10/1974
(Age:41)
Subject Summary
Name Variations
1: KELLERHALES, ER ICKA A
2: KELLERHALLS, ERIKA A
3: KELLERHALS. E A
4: KELLERHALS. ERIKA
5: KELLERHALS. ERIKA A
SSNs Summary
No. SSN
1: 074-72-XXXX Gender
State Iss. Date Iss. Warnings
Most frequent SSN attributed to subject:
New York 1987-1988
Possible E-Mail Addresses LexID(sm)
001368644215
ERIKA©MARJORIEROBERTSPC COM
EKELLAR©VT. EDU
Others Using SSN - 2 records found
# Full Name SSN DOB
1: KELLERHALS. ENER 074-72-XXXX 10/1974
11 YOUNG, MICHAEL S 074-72-XXXX
Address Summary - 12 records found
No. Address
1: 242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3142
RICHMOND COUNTY
2: 9053 ESTATE THOMAS 101
ST THOMAS, VI 00802
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
3: 9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
4: 9053 ESTATE THOMAS STE 10
ST THOMAS, VI 00802
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057182
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020006
EFTA_00I 67750
EFTA01295847
Page 3
No. Address
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
5: PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS. VI 00804-0608
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
6: PO BOX 6347
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-6347
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
7: 9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 2
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-3602
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
8: 184 JORALEMON ST APT 1
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
KINGS COUNTY
9: 184 JORALEMON ST APT 12R
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
KINGS COUNTY
10: 187 JORALEMON ST APT 12R
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4306
KINGS COUNTY
11: 242 BRYSON AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10314-1923
RICHMOND COUNTY
12: 242 BYRNE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-4409
RICHMOND COUNTY
Address Details
1: 242 BRYANT AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3142
Address Dates Phone
242 BRYANT AVE 2/1994 - 10/2016 (718)667-1921
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3142
RICHMOND COUNTY
Census Data for Geographical Region
Median Head of Household Age. 47
Median Income: $82,353
Median Home Value: $584.337
Median Education: 14 years
Household Members
DAHLING. MELISSA A
KELLERHALS. EDWARD
KELLERHALS. EDWARD A
KELLERHALS. ENER
KELLERHALS. KATHLEEN M
Other Associates
HANRATTY, THOMAS E
2: 9053 ESTATE THOMAS 101 ST THOMAS, VI 00802
Address Dates Phone
9053 ESTATE THOMAS 101 6/2016 - 8/2016
ST THOMAS, VI 00802
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057183
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020007
EFTA_00 I 67751
EFTA01295848
Page 4
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
None Listed
3: 9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 15 ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
Address Dates Phone
9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 15 12/2003 - 6/2016
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
BETZ, SHAUNA L
4: 9053 ESTATE THOMAS STE 10 ST THOMAS, VI 00802
Address Dates
9053 ESTATE THOMAS STE 10 5/2016 - 5/2016
ST THOMAS, VI 00802
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
None Listed Phone
5: PO BOX 608 ST THOMAS, VI 00804-0608
Address Dates Phone
PO BOX 608 3/2004 - 11/2015
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-0608
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
Household Members
KELLERHALS. EDWARD A
Other Associates
FERGUSON. GREG J
6: PO BOX 6347 ST THOMAS, VI 00804-6347
Address Dates
PO BOX 6347 3/2004 - 4/2009
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-6347
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
Household Members
KELLERHALS, EDWARD A
Other Associates
FERGUSON, GREG J
7: 9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 2 ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
Address Dates
9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 2 7/2003 - 6/2004
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
ST. THOMAS COUNTY
Household Members
KELLERHALS. EDWARD A
Other Associates
None Listed
8: 184 JORALEMON ST APT 1 BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
Address
For internal use only Phone
Phone
Dates Phone
SDNY_GM_00057184
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020008
EFTA_00I 67752
EFTA01295849
Page 5
184 JORALEMON ST APT 1
BROOKLYN, NY 11201.4329
KINGS COUNTY
Census Data for Geographical Region
Median Head of Household Age: 34
Median Income: $127,273
Median Home Value: $741,587
Median Education: 18 years
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
None Listed 11/1997 - 11/1997
9: 184 JORALEMON ST APT 12R BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
Address Dates Phone
184 JORALEMON ST APT 12R 10/1997 - 11/1997
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
KINGS COUNTY
Census Data for Geographical Region
Median Head of Household Age 34
Median Income: $127,273
Median Home Value: $741,587
Median Education: 18 years
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
None Listed
10: 187 JORALEMON ST APT 12R BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4306
Address Dates Phone
187 JORALEMON ST APT 12R 2/1994 - 10/1997
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4306
KINGS COUNTY
Census Data for Geographical Region
Median Head of Household Age: 34
Median Income: $127,273
Median Home Value: $741.587
Median Education: 18 years
Household Members
KELLERHALS. KATHLEEN M
Other Associates
None Listed
11: 242 BRYSON AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-1923
Address Dates
242 BRYSON AVE 2/1994 - 2/1994
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10314-1923
RICHMOND COUNTY
Census Data for Geographical Region
Median Head of Household Age 47
Median Income: $74,028
Median Home Value: $483,978
Median Education: 13 years
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
None Listed
12: 242 BYRNE AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-4409
Address
For internal use only Phone
Dates Phone
SDNY_GM_00057185
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020009
EFTA_00 II 67753
EFTA01295850
Page 6
242 BYRNE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-4409
RICHMOND COUNTY
Census Data for Geographical Region
Median Head of Household Age 42
Median Income: $95.399
Median Home Value: $462,729
Median Education' 13 years
Household Members
None Listed
Other Associates
None Listed
Voter Registrations -1 records found
1: New York Voter Registration
Registrant Information
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKA A
Residential Address: 242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3142
RICHMOND COUNTY
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Date of Birth: 10/1974
Gender: Female
Voter Information
Last Vote Date: 2002
Party Affiliation: DEMOCRAT
Active Status: ACTIVE
Driver Licenses - 0 records found
Professional Licenses -1 records found
1: Professional License
Licensee Information
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKA ANN 2/1994 - 2/1994
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Address: 9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 15 ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
County: ST. THOMAS
Phone: (340) 779-2564
Gender: FEMALE
License Information
License Type: 105284
Issue Date: 02/10/2015
Status: OTHERS
Health Care Providers - 0 records found
Health Care Sanctions - 0 records found
Pilot Licenses - 0 records found
Sport Licenses - 0 records found
Real Property - 0 records found
Motor Vehicle Registrations - 2 records found
1: NY MVR
Registrant Information
Registrant: KELLERHALS, ERIKA A
DOB: 10/1974
Address: 242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3142
RICHMOND COUNTY
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057186
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020010
EFTA_00 I 67754
EFTA01295851
Page 7
Original Registration Date:
Registration Date:
Registration Expiration Date:
2: NY MVR VIN:
Class:
Model Year:
Make:
Model:
Series:
Body Style:
Weight:
License Plate Type:
License Plate Number:
Plate State:
Data Source:
VIN:
Class:
Model Year:
Make:
Model:
Series:
Body Style:
Weight:
Name: Registration Information
1/30/2002
1/30/2002
1/29/2004
Vehicle Information
WVWPD63842P 171962
PASSENGER CAR/LIGHT TRUCK
2002
Volkswagen
Passat
GLS
Sedan 4 Door
3196
Plate Information
Private
AHG1059
NY
Source Information
GOVERNMENTAL
Vehicle Information
VVVWPD63B42P171962
PASSENGER CAR/LIGHT TRUCK
2002
Volkswagen
Passat
GLS
Sedan 4 Door
3196
Owner Information
KELLERHALS, ERIKA A
DOB: 10/1974
Address: 242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3142
RICHMOND COUNTY
Lienholder Information
Name: CHASE MANHATTAN BANKUSA NA
Address: PO BOX 5210
NEW HYDE PARK. NY 11042-5210
NASSAU COUNTY
Title Information
Title Transfer Date: 3/6/2002
Title Issue Date: 3/6/2002
Source Information
Data Source: GOVERNMENTAL
Boats - 0 records found
Aircraft - 0 records found
Bankruptcy Information - 0 records found
Judgments/Liens - 0 records found
UCC Liens - 0 records found
Fictitious Businesses - 0 records found
Notice Of Defaults - 0 records found
Potential Relatives - 10 records found
1st Degree: 6. 2nd Degree 4
No. Full Name Address/Phone
KELLERHALS, ENER 184 JORALEMON ST
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057i87
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020011
EFTA_00I 67755
EFTA01295852
Page 8
No. Full Name
2.
3.
4.
5. SSN:074-72-XXXX
DOB:10/1974
(Age: 41)
KELLERHALS, EDWARD A
• AKA RELLERMALS, EDWARD A
• AKA KELLERNALS. EDW
SSN:063-36-XXXX
DOB:7/1944
(Age: 72)
KELLERHALS. KATHLEEN M
• AKA KELLERHAL, KATHLEEN M
• AKA KELLERHALS, KATHLEEN
• AKA KELLERHALS, K M
• AKA KELLERHALS. KATHEEN
• AKA KELLERBALS, KATHLEEN M
• AKA KELLERHALS, KATHLEEN M
SSN:063-3640(XX
DOB:6/1949
(Age: 67)
KELLERHALS, EDWARD
DAHLING, ROBERT J
SSN:133-60-XXXX
DOB:4/1971
(Age: 45) Address/Phone
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306.3142
(718) 667-1921
242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3142
(718) 667-1921
102 LINCOLN AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-2459
PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS. VI 00804-0608
PO BOX 6347
ST THOMAS. VI 00804-6347
9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 2
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-3602
242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3142
(718) 667-1921
256 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3142
(718) 351-1242
184 JORALEMON ST STE 12R
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4329
187 JORALEMON ST APT 12R
BROOKLYN, NY 11201-4306
242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3142
(718) 667-1921
(718) 979-7823
196 RICE AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10314-3032
(718) 273-7338
413 HEBERTON AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10302-2125
PO BOX 61494
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-7494
46 BACHE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3010
(718) 351-1586
76 PRINCETON AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306.2816
(718) 987-7331
(718) 987-7685
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057188
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020012
EFTA_00 I 67756
EFTA01295853
Page 9
No. Full Name
5.A. DAHLING, ROBERT J
SSN:080-34-XXXX
DOB:11/1940
(Age: 75)
5.B. DAHLING, PATRICIA M
• AKA DAHLING. P
SSN:106-34-XXXX
DOB:3/1943
(Age: 73)
5.C. DAHLING, MICHAEL A
• AKA DAHLIG. MICHAEL
SSN:133-60-XXXX
DOB:6/1974
(Age: 42)
5.D MAYFIELD, JESSICA E
6. • AKA DAHLING. JESSICA A
• AKA MAYFIELD, JESSIE
• AKA MAYFIELD, JESSI
• AKA MORRIS. JESSICA
• AKA BUCCOLA, JESSIE
SSN:605-09-XXXX
DOB:11/1977
(Age: 38)
DAHLING, MELISSA A Address/Phone
196 RICE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-3032
(718) 273-7338
(718) 979-0174
46 BACHE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3010
(718) 351-1586
(718) 979-0174
76 PRINCETON AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-2816
(718) 987-7331
(718) 987-7685
196 RICE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-3032
(718) 273-7338
359 DEMOREST AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10314-2161
(347) 861-0330
5 BOWEN ST APT
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10304-3513
4926 E AMELIA AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85018-5523
15822 W PAPAGO ST
GOODYEAR, AZ 85338-3340
1207 E SECRETARIAT DR
TEMPE. AZ 85284-1611
5050 W IVANHOE ST
CHANDLER, AZ 85226-1964
196 RICE AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10314-3032
(718) 273-7338
3516 E PICCADILLY RD
PHOENIX, AZ 85018.5116
4926 E AMELIA AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85018.5523
300 W BEECH ST UNIT 1504
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-8450
6945 E 2ND ST APT 4
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-5339
(480) 994-7352
(760) 685-6573
2395 CARRIAGE CIR
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-3605
46 BACHE AVE
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057189
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020013
EFTA_00 I 67757
EFTA01295854
Page 10
No. Full Name Address/Phone
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3010
• AKA KELLERHALS, MELISSA A (718) 351-1586
SSN:087-70-XXXX
DOB:12/1971
(Age: 44)
Business Associates - 2 records found
1: KELLERHALS FERGUSON FLETCHER KROBLIN PLLC
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKA A 46 BEACH AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-1915
242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3142
(718)667-1921
76 PRINCETON AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-2816
(718) 987-7331
(718) 987-7685
Address: 501 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 802
TAMPA. FL 33602-5201
Status: ACTIVE
State: FL
Corporation Number: M13000002984
Descriptive Status: ACTIVE
Title: MEMBER MANAGER
Record Type: CURRENT
Record Date: 10/28/2013
2: KELLERHALS FERGUSON FLETCHER KROBLIN PLLC
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKA A
Address: 501 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 802
TAMPA, FL 33602-5201
Status: INACTIVE
State: FL
Corporation Number: M13000002984
Descriptive Status: INACTIVE
Title: MEMBER MANAGER
Record Type: CURRENT
Record Date: 8/4/2016
Filing Date: 1/6/2014
Person Associates - 7 records found
No. Full Name Address SSN Phone DOB
1: BETZ, SHAUNA L 9100 PORT OF SALE 522-69-XXXX 12/1981
MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
3602
6501 RED HOOK PLZ STE
201
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
1373
5600 ROYAL DANE MALL
STE 51
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
6410
148 W MAPLE AVE
DENVER, CO 80223-1841
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057190
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.ctON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020014
EFTA_D0 I 67758
EFTA01295855
Page 11
No. Full Name Address SSN Phone DOB
1576 S JERSEY ST
DENVER. CO 80224-1935
2: FERGUSON, GREG J 9100 PORT OF SALE
FERGUSON. GREGORY J MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
3602
PO BOX 12259
ST THOMAS. VI 00801-
5259
PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-
0608
PO BOX 6347
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-
6347
2422 W PECOS AVE
MESA, AZ 85202-7821 601-42-XXXX (480) 8314166 4/1976
3: HANRATTY, THOMAS E 256 BRYANT AVE H 123-204000( (718) 667-1921 1/1928
STATEN ISLAND. NY (718) 987-5316
10306-3142 (718) 987-5316
242 BRYANT AVE
STATEN ISLAND. NY
10306-3142
102 LINCOLN AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY
10306.2459
4: ROBINSON. KELLY M 9100 PORT OF SALE 134-564000K 7/1973
TRAYNOR, KELLY MALL STE 22
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
3602
9100 PORT OF SALE
MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
3602
4600 ESTATE
CHARLOTTE AMALIE
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
2305
2369 KRONPRINDSENS
GODE STE 8
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
6252
3219 CONTANT STE 211
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
6111
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057191
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.QPN(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020015
EFTA_OOI 67759
EFTA01295856
Page 12
No. Full Name Address SSN Phone DOB
5: TRAYNOR, CARA 9100 PORT OF SALE 052-604000K 7/1976
ROBINSON. CARA MALL STE 22
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
3602
9100 PORT OF SALE
MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-
3602
4600 ESTATE
CHARLOTTE AMALIE
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
2305
2369 KRONPRINDSENS
GADE STE N08
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
6252
3219 CONTANT STE 211
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
6111
6: GEARY, BRETT A A 17724 MINE RD 580-23-XXXX (703) 221-2506
DUMFRIES. VA 22025- (703) 445-9194
2003
9100 PORT OF SALE
MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
3602
9100 PORT OF SALE
MALL STE 22
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
3602
PO BOX 305259
ST THOMAS. VI 00803-
5259
15211 STREAMSIDE CT
DUMFRIES. VA 22025-
3022
7: THOMAS. WILLIAM AVERY 10204 MAPLERIDGE DR 451-83-XXXX 10/1984
DALLAS, TX 75238-2257
2900 CHAUTAUQUA AVE
APT 255
NORMAN. OK 73072-7715
2900 CHAUTAUQUA AVE
APT 2
NORMAN, OK 73072-7723
1020W 4TH AVE APT 13
STILLWATER. OK 74074-
3337
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057192
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020016
EFTA_OOI 67760
EFTA01295857
Page 13
No. Full Name Address SSN Phone DOB
9100 PORT OF SALE
MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-
3602
Neighbors - 10 records found
242 BRYANT AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3142
Name Address Phone
CAHILL, JAMES BRIAN 235 BRYANT AVE (718) 987-5658
CARDO. ERICA
BURKE, MATTHEW J STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3103
235 BRYANT AVE APT 2
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3103
ASSENZA, CHRISTOPHER M 241 BRYANT AVE (718) 979-2166
ASSENZA, MICHAEL P
CIRIGLIANO. MICHAEL EDWARD
CIRIGLIANO, SUZANNE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3143
MIRO, FRANK AGUSTIN 243 BRYANT AVE (718) 979-6876
PACCIONE, PAMELA J STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-3143
GLAZAROV, MICHELLE J 245 BRYANT AVE (718) 667-1705
LEOKUMOVICH, BORIS STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3143
KRUSE. ADAM M 250 BRYANT AVE (718) 351-8871
KRUSE, BRANDON G
KRUSE, DONNA V
KRUSE. JOHN J
KRUSE. VICTORIA M STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3142
CUSACK, C J 251 BRYANT AVE (718)351.3510
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3143
CUSACK, MARIE E 251 BRYANT AVE APT H (718) 351-3510
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3143
GILLIUM, MAUREEN A 256 BRYANT AVE (718) 351-1242
MCMILLAN, ROBERT M STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306.3142
RAMIN, DENISE A 257 BRYANT AVE APT (347) 286-0615
STATEN ISLAND. NY 10306-3136
Employment Locator - 14 records found
1:
Company Name: THERAPY ASSOCIATION AND DISABILITIES ADVOCATES INC
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKA A
Address: PO BOX 6016
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-6016
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Confidence: High
2:
Company Name: KELLERHALS FERGUSON FLETCHER KROBLIN PLLC
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKA A
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057193
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020017
EFTA_00I67761
EFTA01295858
Page 14
Title: MEMBER MANAGER
SSN: 074-7240(XX
Confidence: Medium
3:
Company Name: THE MAHOGANY RUN HOME OWNER'S ASSOCIATION
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Title: VICE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR
Address: 6501 RED HOOK PLZ STE 201
ST THOMAS, VI 00802-1373
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 626-5890
Confidence: Medium
4:
Company Name: PATIENT ASSIST VI
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Address: 9100 PORT OF SALE MALL STE 15
ST THOMAS. VI 00802-3602
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Confidence: High
5:
Company Name: VISF
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKA A
Title: VICE PRESIDENT
Address: PO BOX 1605
KINGSHILL, VI 00851-1605
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (304) 692-3310
Confidence: Medium
6:
Company Name: KELLERHALS P.0
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Title: PARTNER
Address: PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-0608
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 779-2564
Confidence: Medium
7:
Company Name: THERAPY ASSOCIATION AND DISABILITIES ADVOCATES INC
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKAA
Address: PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-0608
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Confidence: High
8:
Company Name: ERIKA A. KELLERHALS P.0
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKA A
Address: PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-0608
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 779-2564
Confidence: Medium
9:
Company Name: ERIKA A. KELLERHALS P.0
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKA
For internal use only
CONFIDENTIAL —PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00057194
DB-SDNY-0020018
EFTA_00 167762
EFTA01295859
Page IS
Title: PRESIDENT
Address: PO BOX 608
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-0608
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 779.2564
Confidence: Medium
10:
Company Name: MARJORIE RAWLS ROBERTS P.0
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Title: ATTORNEY
Address: PO BOX 6347
ST THOMAS, VI 00804.6347
SSN: 074-7240=
Phone: (340) 776.7235
Confidence: Medium
11:
Company Name: ROBERTS, MARJORIE RAWLS
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Title: ASSOCIATE
Address: PO BOX 6347
ST THOMAS, VI 00804-6347
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 776-7235
Confidence: High
12:
Company Name: THE LALTJ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKA MS
Title: CONTACT
Address: 17 STATE ST
NEW YORK. NY 10004-1501
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Confidence: High
13:
Company Name: ERIKA A. KELLERHALS, P.C.
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Title: MEMBER
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 779-2564
Confidence: High
14:
Company Name: MARJORIE RAWLS ROBERTS P.0
Name: KELLERHALS. ERIKAA
Address: PO BOX 6347
ST THOMAS. VI 00804-6347
SSN: 074-72-XXXX
Phone: (340) 776-7235
Confidence: Medium
Criminal Filings - 0 records found
Cellular & Alternate Phones -1 records found
1:
Personal Information
Name: KELLERHALS, ERIKA
Address: 102 LINCOLN AVE
STATEN ISLAND, NY 10306-2459
Phone Number: (340) 690-0891
Phone Type: Mobile
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057195
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020019
EFTA_00 I 67763
EFTA01295860
Page 16
Carrier:
Carrier City:
Carrier State:
Sources - 44 records found
All Sources
Corporate Affiliations
Email addresses
Historical Person Locator
Motor Vehicle Registrations
Person Locator 1
Person Locator 2
Phone
PhonesPlus Records
Professional Licenses
Utility Locator
Voter Registrations
D&B:
Not Required
LEGAL RESULTS:
Court Cases: Carrier Information
NEW CINGULAR WRLS GA
CHARLOTTE AMALIE (SAINT T
VI
44 Source Document(s)
2 Source Document(s)
7 Source Document(s)
7 Source Document(s)
3 Source Document(s)
11 Source Document(s)
4 Source Document(s)
4 Source Document(s)
1 Source Document(s)
1 Source Documents)
3 Source Document(s)
1 Source Document(s)
IN RE: JEFFREY J. PROSSER, Debtor. NORTH SHORE REAL
ESTATE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JAMES P. CARROLL,
CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Appellee.
Chapter 7, Case No. 06-30009 (JFK), Civil No. 2010-70
United States District Court for the District of the Virgin
Islands, St. Thomas & St. John Division
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633
July 6, 2012, Filed
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057196
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.QQN(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020020
EFTA 00167764
EFTA01295861
Page 2
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
PRIOR HISTORY: Carroll v. N. Shore Real Estate Corp. (In re Prosser), 2010 Bankr.
LEXIS 1566 (Bankr. D.V.I., May 26, 2010)
CASE SUMMARY:
OVERVIEW: Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the bankruptcy court.
Appellee trustee moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Bankr.
P. 8001(a). Of the six Poulis factors. five weighed in favor of dismissal and one weighed
against dismissal. The court took into account the possibility that appellants counsel had
some of the responsibility for its failure to follow the court's scheduling order. Nonetheless.
on balance, the Poulis factors demonstrated that dismissal of the appeal was an
appropriate sanction for appellant's failure to file its brief.
OUTCOME: Motion to dismiss granted.
CORE TERMS: summary judgment, scheduling, reconsideration, deadline, weigh, failure
to prosecute, designation, discovery, failure to comply, affirming, bankruptcy proceedings,
extension of time, general denials, citations omitted, genuine issue, effectiveness,
reconsider, notice of appeal, failure to follow, bad faith, financial resources, deemed
admitted, dilatoriness, non-moving, willful, incur, Bankruptcy Rules, matter of law, personal
responsibility, clear error
LexisNexis(R) Headnotes
Bankruptcy Law > Practice 8. Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[FIN11 Under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a), the district court is empowered to dismiss an
appeal for failure to prosecute or otherwise follow the procedures set out in the Bankruptcy
Rules. Before such a dismissal occurs, a district court must consider six factors outlined in
Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. In Poulis, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit stated that a district court must balance the following factors: (1) the extent of the
party's personal responsibility; (2) the prejudice to the adversary caused by the failure to
meet scheduling orders and respond to discovery; (3) a history of dilatoriness; (4) whether
the conduct of the party or the attorney was willful or in bad faith; (5) the effectiveness of
sanctions other than dismissal, which entails an analysis of alternative sanctions; and (6)
the meritoriousness of the claim or defense.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice 8, Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN2j An appeal from a judgment, order, or decree of a bankruptcy judge to a district court
or bankruptcy appellate panel shall be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk
within the time allowed by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002. An appellant's failure to take any step
other than timely filing a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal, but is
ground only for such action as the district court or bankruptcy appellate panel deems
appropriate. which may include dismissal of the appeal. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a) (2011).
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057197
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020021
EFTA_00I 67765
EFTA01295862
Page 3
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
[HN3] Not all of the Poulis factors need be met for a district court to find dismissal is
warranted. However, courts must consider and balance all six Poulis factors before
dismissing a case with prejudice, and all doubts must be resolved in favor of an
adjudication on the merits.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN4] Dismissal typically occurs in cases showing consistently dilatory conduct or the
complete failure to take any steps other than the mere filing of a notice of appeal.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN5] A client's lack of responsibility for its counsel's dilatory conduct is not dispositive on
a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, because a client cannot always avoid the
consequences of the acts or omissions of its counsel.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN6] Prejudice for the purpose of the Poulis factors does not mean irremediable harm.
Rather, the burden imposed by impeding the opposing party's ability to prepare a
meaningful litigation strategy has been held to be sufficiently prejudicial.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN7] The third Poulis factor considers the appellant's history of dilatoriness.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN8] Either of these violations-failing to comply with the Bankruptcy Rules for filing a
brief within 15 days of the docketing of his appeal or providing for the transcript of the
bankruptcy court proceedings —is grounds for a dismissal under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN9]The fourth Poulis factor considers whether the conduct of the appellant or of the
appellant's attorney was willful or in bad faith.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN10] The fifth Poulis factor assesses the effectiveness of sanctions other than dismissal.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN11] The sixth Poulis factor considers the meritoriousness of the appellant's claim.
Ordinarily, a claim, or defense, will be deemed meritorious when the allegations of the
motion, if established, would support recovery by plaintiff or would constitute a complete
defense.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Adversary Proceedings > Judgments &
Remedies
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Standards of Review >
General Overview
Civil Procedure > Summary Judgment > Standards > General Overview
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057198
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020022
EFTA_00 I 67766
EFTA01295863
Page 4
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
[HN12] In reviewing a determination of a bankruptcy court's grant of summary judgment, a
reviewing court subjects the bankruptcy court's legal determinations to plenary review,
reviewing its factual findings for clear error, and considering its exercise of discretion for
abuse thereof. A bankruptcy court may grant summary judgment if the pleadings, the
discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine
issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
Civil Procedure > Summary Judgment > Burdens of Production & Proof > General
Overview
[HN13] The movant has the initial burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of
material fact. Once the initial burden is met it shifts to the non-moving party to establish
specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial. The non-moving party may not rest
upon mere allegations, general denials, or vague statements. There is no issue for trial
unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the non-moving party for a jury to return a
verdict for that party.
Civil Procedure > Summary Judgment > Evidence
[HN14] At the summary judgment stage, the judge's function is not himself to weigh the
evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine
issue for trial. In making this determination, the court draws all reasonable inferences in
favor of the non-moving party.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Adversary Proceedings > Discovery
Civil Procedure > Discovery > Methods > Admissions > General Overview
[HN15] Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7036 provides that Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 applies in adversary
bankruptcy proceedings.
Civil Procedure > Discovery > Methods > Admissions > Responses
[HN16] See Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(3), (a)(4).
Civil Procedure > Discovery > Methods > Admissions > Responses
[HN17] Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 36, specific denials which fairly respond to the substance of
the matter are required.
Civil Procedure > Discovery> Methods > Admissions > General Overview
Civil Procedure > Summary Judgment > Supporting Materials > Discovery Materials
[HN18] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has long recognized that deemed
admissions are sufficient to support orders of summary judgment.
Bankruptcy Law > Case Administration > Examiners, Officers & Trustees >
Preferential Transfers > Elements > General Overview
[HN19] To establish a claim for avoidance of a preferential transfer pursuant to 11
U.S.C.S. § 547, a party must establish that the transfer was: 1. to or for the benefit of a
creditor; 2. for or on account of an antecedent debt owed by the debtor before such
transfer was made; 3. made while the debtor was insolvent; 4. made — on or within 90
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057199
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020023
EFTA_00 I 67767
EFTA01295864
Page 5
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
days before the date of the filing of the petition; 5. that enables such creditor to receive
more than such creditor would receive if — a. the case were a case under Chapter 7 of this
title; b. the transfer had not been made; and c. such creditor received payment of such
debt to the extent provided by the provisions of this title. 11 U.S.C.S. § 547(b).
Bankruptcy Law > Case Administration > Examiners, Officers & Trustees >
Fraudulent Transfers > Elements
[HN20] To establish a claim for avoidance of a fraudulent transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S.
§ 548(a)(1)(B), a party must show that within two (2) years of the petition date, the debtor
received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or
obligation, and: 1. was insolvent on the date that such transfer was made or such
obligation was incurred, or became insolvent as result of such transfer or obligation; 2. was
engaged in business or a transaction, or was about to engage in business or a transaction,
for which any property remaining with the debtor was an unreasonably small capital; 3.
intended to incur, or believed that the debtor would incur, debts that would be beyond the
debtors ability to pay as such debts matured; or 4. made such transfer to or for the benefit
of an insider, or incurred such obligation to or for the benefit of an insider, under an
employment contract and not in the ordinary course of business.
Bankruptcy Law > Case Administration > Examiners, Officers & Trustees >
Fraudulent Transfers > General Overview
[HN21] To establish a claim for the avoidance of a fraudulent transfer pursuant to 11
U.S.C.S. § 548(a)(1)(A), a party mush show that within two years of the petition date, the
debtor made such transfer or incurred such obligation with intent to hinder, delay, or
defraud any entity to which the debtor was or became, on or after the date that such
transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, indebted.
Bankruptcy Law > Case Administration > Examiners, Officers & Trustees >
Postpetition Transactions
[HN22] To establish a claim for the recovery of a post-petition transfer pursuant to 11
U.S.C.S. § 549, the appropriate inquiry is: (1) whether a transfer of property occurred; (2)
whether the property transferred was property of the estate; (3) whether the transfer
occurred after commencement of the bankruptcy case; and (4) whether the transfer was
authorized by the Bankruptcy Code.
Civil Procedure > Summary Judgment > Burdens of Production & Proof >
Nonmovants
[HN23] See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Standards of Review >
General Overview
Civil Procedure > Judgments > Relief From Judgment > Motions to Alter & Amend
[HN24] A bankruptcy court's denial of an appellant's motion for reconsideration is generally
reviewed for abuse of discretion. However, to the extent that the denial of reconsideration
is predicated on an issue of law, such an award is reviewed de novo; to the extent that the
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057200
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.QQN(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020024
EFTA_001 67768
EFTA01295865
Page 6
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
trial court's disposition of the reconsideration motion is based upon a factual finding, it is
reviewed for clear error.
Civil Procedure > Judgments > Relief From Judgment > Motions to Alter & Amend
[HN25] See D.V.I., R. 7.3.
Civil Procedure > Judgments > Relief From Judgment > Motions to Alter & Amend
[HN26] The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or
fact or to present newly discovered evidence. Such motions are not substitutes for
appeals, and are not to be used as a vehicle for registering disagreement with the courts
initial decision, for rearguing matters already addressed by the court, or for raising
arguments that could have been raised before but were not.
Civil Procedure > Judgments > Relief From Judgment > Motions to Alter & Amend
[HN27] A motion for reconsideration cannot be used to relitigate old matters, raise
argument or present evidence that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment.
Bankruptcy Law > Practice & Proceedings > Appeals > Procedures
[HN28] A claim will be deemed meritorious when the allegations, if established, would
support recovery by the claimant.
COUNSEL: rii Jeffrey B. C. Moorhead, Esq., Jeffrey B. C. Moorhead, P.C., St. Croix,
USVI, For North Shore Real Estate Corp.
Christopher A. Kroblin, Esq., Erika Kellerhals, P.C., St. Thomas, USVI, For North Shore
Real Estate Corp.
Bernard C. Pattie, Esq., Law Offices of Barnard Pattie, P.C., St. Croix, USVI, For James P.
Carroll.
Fred Stevens, Esq., Fox Rothschild LP, New York, NY, For James P. Carroll.
JUDGES: GOMEZ, Chief Justice.
OPINION BY: Curtis V. Gomez
OPINION
MEMORANDUM OPPUGN
IJUly IL 2012)
Before the Court is the motion by James P. Carroll to dismiss this appeal for lack of
prosecution.
I FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057201
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.QQN(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020025
EFTA_00I 67769
EFTA01295866
Page 7
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
On June 30, 2010, North Shore Real Estate Corporation ("North Shore") filed a notice of
appeal from the May 26, 2010, judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of the Virgin Islands (the "Bankruptcy Division"), and the June 9, 2010, order of the
Bankruptcy Division denying North Shore's motion for reconsideration. On July 9, 2010,
the Court entered an Order stating that:
Appellant shall, not later than 10 days after the date of this Order, file and serve on the other parties the designation of
record and statement of the issues to be presented, fli fading with the Appeal may be dismissed for failure to
prosecute
Appellant's brief shall be filed and served within 30 days of the date of this Order, or if the designated record includes a
transcript, within 15 days after the transcript is Ned. whichever canes later ....
(Order 1-2, July 9, 2010, ECF No. 2).
North Shore did not file a designation of record nor a statement of the issues within the
time provided in the July 9, 2010, order. North Shore did not file its brief within the time
provided in the order.
On March 9, 2011, North Shore filed a motion for leave to file an untimely designation of
record, statement of issues, and brief. North Shore attached to its motion a designation of
record and statement of issues. North Shore did not attach a brief.
Subsequently, James P. Carroll, Chapter 7 Trustee ("Carroll"), filed a motion to dismiss
this matter for lack of prosecution. North Shore did not file an opposition.
On March 28, 2012, this Court entered an order stating that:
. North Shore shall, not later than April 2. 2012. file and serve on James P. Carroll the designation of record and a
statement of issues to be presented, failing which this appeal may be dismissed nj for failure to prosecute...
North Shore's brief shaft not later than April 10. 2012. be filed and served on James P. Carroll, failing which this
appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute...
(March 28, 2012, Order 3-4, ECF No. 8).
The Court found as moot the motions filed by North Shore and Carroll.
North Shore did not file a designation of record nor a statement of the issues within the
time provided in the March 28, 2012, order. North Shore did not file its brief within the time
provided in the order.
Carroll now moves again for dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution. North Shore
has not filed an opposition.
II. DISCUSSION
II-IN1] "Under Rule 8001(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the District
Court is empowered to dismiss an appeal for failure to prosecute or otherwise follow the
procedures set out in the Bankruptcy Rules." In re Richardson Industrial Contractors, Inc.,
189 Fed. Appx. 93, at *96 (3d Cir. 2006). Before such a dismissal occurs, however, a
district court must consider six factors outlined in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.,
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057202
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020026
EFTA_00I 67770
EFTA01295867
Page 8
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
747 F.2d 863, 868 (3d Cir. 1984) [hereinafter Poulis]. In Poulis, the Third Circuit stated that
a district court [*4] must balance the following factors:
1) the extent of the partys personal responsibility (2) the prejudice to the adversary caused by the failure to meet
scheduling orders and respond to discovery. (3)a history of dilatoriness: (4) whether the conduct of the party or the
attorney was willful or in bad faith; (5) the effectiveness of sanctions other than dismissal, which ertails an analysis of
alternative sanctions: and (6) the meritoriousness of the claim or defense.
Id. (explaining that "dismissal is a drastic sanction and should be reserved for those cases
where there is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff')(alteration
in original); see also In re E Toys Inc., 263 Fed. Appx. 235, 237 (3d Cir. 2008) (affirming
the district court's dismissal of a bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute upon
consideration of the Poulis factors).
1 IFIN2j 'fin appeal from a judgment, order, or decree of a barkruptcy judge to a district court or bankruptcy appellate panel ...
shall be taken by Ming a notice of appeal with the clerk within the time allowed by Rule 8002. An appellant's failure to take any
step other than timely filing a nonce of appeal [•6j does not affect the validity of the appeal. but is grand only for such action
as the district court a bankruptcy appellate panel deems appropriate. which may include dismissal of the appeal...." FED. R.
BANKR. P. 8001(a) (2011).
[HN3] "Not all of the[] Poulis factors need be met for a district court to find dismissal is
warranted." Hicks v. Feeney, 850 F.2d 152, 156 (3d Cir. 1988). However, courts must
consider and balance all six Poulis factors before dismissing a case with prejudice, and all
doubts must be resolved in favor of an adjudication on the merits. See $8,221,877.16 in
U.S. Currency, 330 F.3d 141, 161 (3d Cir. 2003) ("[W]e have always required
consideration and balancing of all six of the factors, and have recommended the resolution
of any doubts in favor of adjudication on the merits."); see also Bjorgung, 197 Fed. Appx.
at 125-26 ("Although '[n]ot all of the Poulis factors need be satisfied in order to dismiss a
complaint' they must all be considered") (quoting Mindek v. Rigatti, 964 F.2d 1369, 1373
(3d Cir. 1992)).
III. ANALYSIS
In In re Richardson Industrial Contractors, Inc., 189 Fed. Appx. 93 (3d Cir. 2006), the
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed [*6] the relevant factors
that a district court must consider before dismissing a bankruptcy appeal for failure to
prosecute. In that case, the district court dismissed a creditors appeal with prejudice for
failure to comply with the mandates of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. In so
doing, the district court considered only two of the six Pocks factors: the creditor's bad faith
in requesting a second extension of time in which to file his brief and the ineffectiveness of
alternative sanctions. The creditor appealed the district court's decision.
On appeal, the Third Circuit found that, in addition to not considering all six Pouts factors,
the district court's discussion of two factors was limited and did not set out the basis for its
conclusions in such a way to permit meaningful review of its decision.
In reviewing similar cases in other circuits, the Richardson court noted that [HN4] "
'[d]ismissal typically occurs in cases showing consistently dilatory conduct or the complete
failure to take any steps other than the mere filing of a notice of appeal.' " Richardson, 189
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057203
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.QQN(FIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020027
EFTA_00I6777 I
EFTA01295868
Page 9
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
Fed. Appx. 93, at *97 (quoting In re Beverly Mfg. Corp., 778 F.2d 666, 667 (11th Cir.
1985)); see also Nielsen v. Price, 17 F.3d 1276, 1277 (10th Cir. 1994) ['7] (upholding
dismissal of bankruptcy appeal for failure to follow Bankruptcy Rules or timely file appeal
brief where plaintiffs provided no explanation or excuse for noncompliance); In re
Champion, 895 F.2d 490, 492 (8th Cir. 1990) (finding no abuse of discretion in dismissing
appeal where appellant had not filed designation of record or statement of issues required
by Bankruptcy Rule 8006); In m Tampa Chain Co., 835 F.2d 54, 56 (2d Cir. 1987)
(affirming dismissal of bankruptcy appeal for failure to file a brief for seven months after the
due date or provide any explanation for the failure, even after the court's inquiry into
delinquency).
Given that backdrop, the Court will now assess whether the Poulis factors favor or disfavor
dismissal.
1. Extent of North Shore's Personal ROsponsidIrly
The first Poulis factor assesses the extent of the appellant's personal responsibility. 747
F.2d at 868. North Shore has suggested that its counsel is responsible for its failure to
follow the Court's scheduling order. North Shore averred that,
Defendant. Chapter 7 Debtor Jeffrey J. Prosser (Case No. 06-30009), and his farndy. including Dawn Prosser. the
owner of North Store. are overwrought and under NI assault with numerous and often duplicate suits replete with
continuous motions and actions...
(Appellant's Mem. Supp. Mot. Leave to File Untimely Resp. 2, ECF No. 4). North Shore
also contended that it is "without the financial resources to employ an adequate number of
counsel that have the time availability to meet the relentless and continuous assault and
actions..." Id. North Shore went on to aver that it has "mounted a defense with far too small
group [sic] of counsel and others which have committed what time they can and what effort
they can, when possible, for little, or in most cases, for no compensation." Id.
Indeed, North Shore referred generally to the commotion of the bankruptcy proceedings in
explaining its failure to comply with the original scheduling order in this matter. North Shore
also pointed to the limited size of its legal team and financial resources. Because it seems
that North Shore's counsel was at least somewhat responsible for North Shore's failure to
comply with the Court's original scheduling order, the first Poulis factor does not
necessarily weigh in favor of dismissal.
However, [HN5] North Shore's "lack of responsibility for [its] counsel's dilatory conduct
[a 9] is not dispositive, because a client cannot always avoid the consequences of the acts
or omissions of its counsel." See Poulis, 747 F.2d at 868; see also Ware v. Rodale Press,
Inc., 322 F.3d 218, 222 (3d Cir. 2003)("[E]ven assuming that WCI does not bear
responsibility for its counsel's conduct, consideration of the remaining factors still compels
affirming the District Court's decision to sanction WCI and dismiss the breach of contract
claim."); cf. Lee v. Sunrise Senior Living, 455 Fed. Appx. 199, 201-202 (3d Cir. 2011)
(finding that the pro se plaintiff was "fully responsible for her conduct.") The Court also
notes that North Shore has not offered any explanation for its failure to comply with the
March 28, 2012, scheduling order.
For internal use only
SDNY_GM_00057204
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R.cON(FIDENTIAL DB-SONY-0020028
EFTA_00 I 67772
EFTA01295869
Page 10
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, *
2 PrehjUdICO 10 Carroll
The second Poulis factor considers prejudice to the appellee caused by the appellant's
failure to meet scheduling orders and respond to discovery. 747 F.2d at 868. [HN6]
Prejudice for the purpose of the Poulis factors "does not mean 'irremediable harm."' See
Ware, 322 F.3d at 222; see also Curtis T. Bedwell and Sons, Inc. v. Intl Fidelity Ins. Co.,
843 F.2d 683, 693-94 (3d Cir. 1988) (rejecting the argument that "the district rioi court
should not have dismissed its claim ... unless the harm to the other parties amounted to
'irremediable prejudice"'). Rather, the burden imposed by impeding the opposing party's
ability to prepare a meaningful litigation strategy has been held to be sufficiently
prejudicial. See Ware, 322 F.3d at 222.
Carroll argues that he has "incurred costs and fees of bringing the underlying adversary
proceeding and opposing North Shore's late filings." (Carroll's Opp'n Mot. Leave to File
Untimely Resp. 5, ECF No. 5). Carroll also argues that he "should not be made to incur the
additional costs to oppose an appeal that North Shore failed to address for several
months, particularly when North Shore's current default merely continues its dilatory
performance in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding." Id.
Additional costs and fees do not necessarily amount to prejudice. However, it is clear that
North Shore's conduct has prejudiced Carroll by hampering his ability to resolve the
underlying bankruptcy matter. See Lee, 455 Fed. Appx. at 201-202 (finding that the
plaintiffs conduct prejudiced the defendants by "impeding their efforts to resolve [the]
case, causing
📷 Images in this document (52 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a page from a legal document, specifically a case law citation from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The document is titled "2014 LexisNexis 'Family Law' Case Law Update" and is page 16 of a larger document. The text is dense and includes case law citations, which are typically used by legal professionals to reference specific court decisions. The text is t
[Image 2] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or court-related document. The text is in English and includes various paragraphs with headings such as "Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" and "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment." There are also references to case numbers, parties, and specific sections of the law. The document is structured with
[Image 3] The image shows a page from a legal document, specifically a case summary or a brief. The text is in English and appears to be a summary of a legal case, detailing the facts, issues, and outcome. The document includes a header with the case number and a page number, indicating it is part of a larger document. The text is structured with headings and bullet points, which is typical for legal briefs
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a formal letter or document with a header, body, and footer. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image. The document is not a photograph, but rather a scan or a photograph of a physical document.
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The text is in English and includes paragraphs with headings and subheadings. The document is titled "2014 WILLIAMS LEISS & CUMMINGS LLP" and is labeled as "Page 8 of 85." The text is dense and seems to be discussing legal matters, possibly related to a divorce settlement or a similar legal proceeding. There ar
[Image 6] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The text is in English and includes sections with headings such as "Plaintiff's Exhibit 1," "Defendant's Exhibit 1," and "Defendant's Exhibit 2." There are also references to "Plaintiff's Exhibit 3" and "Defendant's Exhibit 3." The document contains paragraphs of text, which seem to be related to legal proceedi