Platform: iMessage Timezone: UTC+0000

EFTA01617389 Dataset 10 5 pages Download original PDF Download as text
Platform: iMessage Timezone: UTC+0000 • • 2016/10/24 Maybe better to think of the future of disease 02:17:31 pm Food? 02:24:12 pm There are no good parts of Xander 02:24:42 pin Cancer 02:24:44 pin [email protected] Harnessing the food parts of cancer 02:18:22 pm Good 02:24:35 pm Survival 02:24:51 pm • • • EFTA01617389 That makes no sense 02:25:15 pm And cancer probably isn't even a real thing 02:25:28 pm Like if a different species from mars looked at all the things we call cancer they wouldn't call it cancer 02:25:50 pm What causes unchecked growth of different biological cells 02:26:23 pin the biggest advance would be to deecrypt the bio language. giving us the chance to write bio code and fix problems 02:28:15 pm I disagree 02:50:53 pm The bio code is like learning an alphabet it's not a language or a culture 02:51:25 pin Temperature pathogens food etc have a way greater effect than any code stuff 02:55:39 pin Communication is modulated protein structure is a limited grammar 02:59:07 pm • • EFTA01617390 • Naah 03:07:18 pm Ok 03:07:42 pm Would you prefer the term signals 03:08:1 S pm Not accurate but more feminine 03:08:32 pm Disagree 03:08:33 pin I think about it very differently 03:08:43 pm If it was just protein structure and "code" we would have cracked one thing 03:08:56 pm It isn't 03:08:58 pm It's more like soup than steak 03:09:04 pm Great you have a carrot. But we are in soup. 03:09:18 pm Neural transmission is all electricity and zero code 03:09:51 pm EFTA01617391 Thresholds 03:09:54 pm Temperature acidity pressure etc 03:10:10 pm The code and language is really far downstream and not so interesting 03:10:38 pm Soups under certain conditions behave predictably- electricity is a signal frequency a code 03:10:41 pm We know everything about the mouse genome and we haven't fixed a single mouse 03:11:02 pm You no nothing except letters - no meaning it's silly 03:11:54 pm Permutations and combination s remain opaque 03:12:37 pm Language is one of the least useful and interesting parts of human existence 03:12:56 pm Signals I agree but not as cracking a code 03:13:17 pm Physics yes 03:13:26 pm EFTA01617392 Mostly all physics 03:13:38 pm This neural lace stuff is making me think a lot 03:13:51 pm We aren't making progress be we are wrong 03:13:59 pm Focused on not RIGHT stuff 03:14:09 pin Spoken language ? Yes / we need to talk you are not thinking 03:14:25 pm You are looking at the ink on the page . Says nothin about the story 03:15:24 pm ✓ Sent Right that's what I'm saying 03:17:54 pm V Read EFTA01617393

📷 Images in this document (5 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a screenshot of a text conversation on a messaging platform. The conversation includes several messages from different users, with the content discussing topics such as language, biology, and the potential for a virus to mutate. The messages are timestamped and indicate that the conversation took place over a period of time. The text is in English, and the conversation appears to b [Image 2] The image shows a screenshot of a text conversation on a messaging platform. The conversation includes several messages with different participants. The messages are in English and appear to be discussing topics related to science, specifically about the concept of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. There are also mentions of language and the difficulty of explaining certain scientific [Image 3] The image shows a screenshot of a text conversation on a messaging app. The conversation includes several messages with different text content, but the specific details of the conversation are not clear due to the resolution and angle of the screenshot. The messages appear to be casual in nature, with no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image. [Image 4] The image shows a screenshot of a text conversation in a messaging application. The conversation includes several messages with timestamps and user icons, indicating the participants of the conversation. The messages contain text, and the conversation seems to be about a topic that is not fully clear from the image. The user icons suggest that there are at least three participants in the conversat [Image 5] The image shows a screenshot of a text conversation in a messaging app. There are two participants, one of whom is asking a question, and the other is responding with a statement. The conversation includes emojis and timestamps indicating when the messages were sent. The content of the conversation is not described, as per the guidelines.