From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 4:
Subject: February 3 update
Articl= 2. chttps://mail.google.com/mail/./0/html/compose/static_filesiblank_quirks.html#b>
SADA - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace <http://carnegieendowment.org/>
Egypt's Hard Economic Choices
Mohammed Samhouri <http://carnegieendowment.org/.013/01/31/egypt-s-hard-economic-choices/f7ib>
Articl= 4. dittps://mailgoogle.com/mail/q0/html/compose/static_filesiblank_quirks.htmIttd>
Salon
Can Elliott Abra=s be stopped? chttp://www.salon.com/20=3/02/02/can_elliott_abrams_be_stoppedh
Jordan Michael Smith <http://www.salon.com/writer/j=rdan_michael_smith/>
Articl= 6. chttps://mail.google.com/mail/./0/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#f>
The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs
An Interview with James A. Baker, =ormer Secretary of State
Forum Staff <http://www.fletcherforum.org/=uthor/forum-staff/>
Ar=icle 1.
The Economist
Egypt: to the=barricades, again
EFTA_R1_01438652
EFTA02401793
Feb 2nd 2013 -- WIT= angry crowds across the nation baying against him, Egypt's president wa=ged his finger at the
people in a late-night televised speech. He declared=a curfew for some cities, he called for support for the police, he
deployed the army to the streets. Seemingly as =n afterthought, he added a conciliatory call for dialogue with his
politic=l opponents.
As on January 28th =011, so on January 27th 2013. As with President Hosni Mubarak, so with Pre=ident Muhammad
Morsi. And in both cases to little effect. After both telev=sed addresses vast throngs gleefully defied the curfew, freshly
deployed soldiers ignored the revellers and the=head of the army warned of a collapsing state, prompting rumours of an
imm=nent coup. Opposition leaders demanded a government of national unity. Ord=nary citizens braced for the
unknown.
The drama that has =een unfolding since January 25th, the anniversary of the beginning of the =prising which toppled
Mr Mubarak two years ago, would have looked peculiar=y familiar even without the eerily precise coincidence of the
dates. Some are tempted to see the similarities=carried through to the outcome, hoping that Mr Morsi, a stalwart of the
Mu=lim Brotherhood and Egypt's first freely elected president, will soon fa=l too. "It is amazing how history
accelerates," was the catty remark of a prominent defector from the Brot=erhood. "Morsi has got to the point Mubarak
reached after 30 years in ju=t six months."
Forbidding ways of =ustom
But though the situ=tion may seem similar, the country itself has changed a great deal since w=at was at the time seen
as a revolution (many shy from the term today). Eg=pt's economy has foundered dangerously in the absence of firm
government policy. Politics has polarised between a= ostensibly empowered Islamist camp and a disgruntled, alienated
or outrig=t hostile minority that includes much of the educated, urban elite. Amid t=is mess, fearful for the future and
dispirited by haggling politicians, most Egyptians have little appetit= for another big upheaval. The army, which stepped
in to shunt Mr Mubarak =side and then lingered too long, is reluctant to dirty its hands again.
The young hotheads =t the heart of today's protests might like nothing more than to see Mr M=rsi forced into an
ignominious, Mubarak-like exit. But the broader demand =s for him to change, not to go—to act more like a leader for
all Egyptians and less like a front man for the Mus=im Brotherhood. The Brotherhood has shed much of the appeal that
won it va=ious recent elections and tentatively protected it against doubts, not lea=t among foreign powers, about
Islamist rule. At home its cult of secrecy, hazy pan-Islamic agenda and sense that =t rules by entitlement now provoke
suspicion and resentment even among man= fellow Islamists.
Whatever its specif=c focus, the mounting unrest presents an increasingly dangerous challenge =o Egypt's battered and
creaking state. There would have been protests to=mark the anniversary anyway, but the sentencing to death of 21
football fans from Port Said on January 26th wou=d them up to a new level of intensity. Football fans have been among
the m=st eager activists; the judgment on the fans from Port Said, who were held=responsible for the deaths of 72
people at a game in Cairo last year, sent a crowd swarming to the prison w=ere they were kept. Panicked police opened
fire, killing 30 people. They f=red again at the mass funeral of those victims, killing yet more. The mix =f seemingly
twisted justice—the people of Port Said think their fans are being scapegoated—brutally unac=ountable police and
haughty disdain for working-class provincials revived =recisely the rage that fuelled revolution two years ago.
Rioters have disrup=ed trains and traffic. Arsonists have attacked buildings used by the gover=ment and the
Brotherhood. Three big cities on the Suez Canal, Egypt's pr=me strategic asset, are in a state of defiant, if largely
peaceful, insurrection. Radical Islamists and seculari=ts accuse each other of forming armed militias, an ominous
development.
The country is send=ng Mr Morsi a loud message about the need for political inclusiveness. The=question is whether Mr
Morsi and the Brothers are listening.
2
EFTA_R1_01438653
EFTA02401794
Two years, two stor=es
When Egyptians of a=l classes and persuasions united against their dictator of three decades i= 2011, the call was for
bread, freedom and dignity. The results under all =hree headings have been mixed and each gain has come at a price.
The brief unity is long since gone; accounts of =hat happened to it, and to the country, depend strongly on who is telling
=hem.
The version favoure= by Islamists is a saga of success. Founded in Egypt in 1928, the Muslim B=otherhood endured
decades of suppression. Drawing inspiration from a wide =ange of hierarchical institutions, from the Boy Scouts to the
Communist Party, the Brothers worked assiduousl= to spread a culture of resistance to Western influence.
Their message, expo=nded by a disciplined network, resonated more and more under Mr Mubarak. F=ith provided
solace and strength in the face of poverty and political repr=ssion. And Mr Mubarak allowed the Brotherhood just scope
enough to spook Western powers, who could reliably be worried b= Islamist bogeymen. This cynical ploy gave the
Brotherhood a level of poli=ical experience no other opposition to Mr Mubarak could match.
The temporary milit=ry rulers who followed Mr Mubarak saw the Brotherhood as a partner capable=of harnessing the
Egyptian "street" while subject to the sort of disci=line with which military men feel comfortable. They took its advice
when crafting their transition plan—which, promoted=by Islamists as a vote for the faith, was passed with a thumping
77% major=ty in March 2011. This plan deferred the drafting of a constitution, calli=g first for parliamentary elections:
parliament would then select a constituent assembly to write a constitutio=. Once that had been written, Egypt could
hold a presidential election.
Aware of its electo=al advantage, the Brotherhood initially promised to run for only a third o= parliamentary seats. But it
changed its mind, and the elections of Decemb=r 2011 to January 2012 gave the Brothers 47% of seats. To widespread
surprise Salafist parties, representing an eve= more conservative Islamist tendency, claimed nearly a quarter of the
vote=. "We have tried socialism and capitalism," was the simple refrain voi=ed widely in Egypt's sprawling slums and
villages, "so why not try Islam?" In many constituencies voters ha= no other choice. Secular parties had little reach
outside cities, and cou=d certainly not match the Islamists' provision of charity, cheap goods a=d useful services. They
scarcely bothered to compete for seats in the Shura Council, the weak upper parliamentary ho=se, which was elected on
a tiny turnout in February 2012.
Understandably, the=lslamists saw parliamentary elections as a vindication of their claim to r=present Egypt's silent
majority. But as the new parliament, well stocked=with what many educated Egyptians regarded as bearded yokels, fell
into bickering and grandstanding, a backlash began=to build. The generals, still in power until the June 2012 election of a
n=w president, began to share fears, felt deeply by Egypt's Christian mino=ity and also by the country's entrenched
establishment, that the Islamists' agenda could prove dangerously divisi=e. Courts dismissed the parliament's first
choice of a 100-person consti=uent assembly, ostensibly on technical grounds but really, it appears, bec=use it was seen
as insufficiently representative of non-Islamists. Though the constitution was delayed, the army decided pr=sidential
elections should go ahead regardless.
When the Brotherhoo= broke an earlier promise not to run a presidential candidate, the army-ap=ointed elections board
disqualified its first choice, Khairat al-Shater, a=businessman seen as the group's intellectual strongman. Mr Morsi, its
reserve candidate, was a professor of engineering=known for unquestioning loyalty to the Brotherhood's "guidance
bureau=94.
Despite the Brother=ood's powerful and well financed machine, Mr Morsi garnered just 25% of =he vote; more than any
other candidate, but a lot less than expected. Over=ll, non-Islamist candidates captured a slim majority. But the one
among them with the most votes, and thus Mr M=rsi's second-round opponent, was Ahmed Shafiq, a suave air-force
officer=and a minister under Mr Mubarak—a past that many non-Islamists could not=stomach. Their votes were crucial
in giving Mr Morsi his eventual narrow win. To soothe their fears, Mr Morsi r=signed from the Freedom and Justice
3
EFTA_R1_01438654
EFTA02401795
Party, the Brotherhood's political f=ont. He pledged to represent all Egyptians fairly, promised a just constit=tion, and
appointed a largely technocratic government. He also cultivated ties with the army, punctiliously attending=its parades.
Some lurking right<=span>
Since then Mr Morsi=has ratcheted up his power with two bold moves. The first came in August. =e took a terrorist
attack in Sinai as grounds to purge the high command of=Mr Mubarak's top generals on the basis that the army should
have been better prepared. This boosted the president=92s stature without terminally alienating the troops, who felt
the old men=at the top had been overdue retirement. But his popularity has waned as he=has become ever more closely
identified with the Brotherhood.
Mr Shater, a heavy-=et veteran of Mr Mubarak's prisons, is widely seen as more powerful than=the prime minister. The
Brothers' chief foreign-affairs spokesman, Essam=Haddad, in effect bypasses the foreign ministry to conduct
international relations. Their most senior economist, =assan Malek, a rich businessman, exercises a powerful influence
on economi= policy behind the scenes. Mr Morsi has inserted Brothers as provincial go=ernors and ministerial under-
secretaries while seeking to widen his powers of appointment in the courts, the state-=wned banks, and the trade
unions. At the same time he has needlessly offen=ed other constituencies, for example by neglecting to attend the
enthronin= of a new Coptic pope.
Even natural allies=express doubts. "It's become clear that the Brothers seek to control a=I the gears of state,"
complained Nader Bakar, spokesman of the Nour Par=y, the largest Salafist group, in a recent television interview.
Secular critics fear a state as powerful, corrupt an= undemocratic as Mr Mubarak's.
On the other hand<Apan>
The revolution's =escent into a power grab is the other way of telling the story of the past=two years. This
counternarrative to Islamist triumphalism is often ascribe= to "secular opinion", but it is more broadly held than that
phrase would imply. People who see things i
111 WO -IT-4 LI. F1
4
EFTA_R1_01438655
EFTA02401796
1-1-1 L L4H-11 l LE_
5
EFTA_R1_01438656
EFTA02401797
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image is a photograph of a document with text. The document appears to be a letter or a report, as indicated by the header and the formal language used. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be discussing a topic related to a military or governmental issue, as suggested by the context provided. The document is printed on standard letter-sized paper, and there are no visible
[Image 2] The image shows a page of text, which appears to be a document or a printed article. The text is in English and discusses political and social issues, mentioning names of individuals and organizations. There are no visible images or logos, and the document does not contain any photographs or handwritten notes. The text is dense and covers a variety of topics, including political statements and opi
[Image 3] The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, possibly a page from a book or a printed article. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a formal or academic text, given the structure and style of the writing. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image. The document is not a photograph, but rather a printed page.
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a list or a compilation of articles or topics. The document is titled "February Update," and it includes a list of articles or topics with their respective URLs. The text is too small to read the specific details of the articles or topics listed. The document is presented in a formal layout, typical of a professional or academic report or n
[Image 5] The image appears to be a document scan, possibly a letter or a report, with a header and a footer. The header includes a page number and a footer with a date. The body of the document contains text, but the content is not clearly visible due to the resolution and angle of the scan. The document is in portrait orientation.