From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]>

EFTA02467009 Dataset 11 5 pages Download original PDF Download as text
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 3:59 PM To: Larry Visoski Subject: Re: G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04-06-16 Sorry, my instructions were clear . No further contact . We are done . I =A0have great respect for Joe , I think your sellers have over played a ver= week hand . Maybe will meet on another plane in the future . Thank= On Thursday, 7 April 2016, Larry Visoski < From Frank Sent from my iP=one Begin forwarded message: <mailto > wrote: From: Frank Janik <fjanik@leas.=om <javascript:_e(%7B%7D=Jcvmr,[email protected]);» Date: April 7, 2016 at 11:45:34 AM EDT To: =arry < <javascript: e(%7B%7D,scvml O139;);> > Cc: "Joseph=L. Carfagna Jr.' S=bject: RE: G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04-06.16 =br> Thanks Larry — we'll share with the seller =nd see if we can get some movement. Is the bigger issue the lack of =hem wanting to put funds in escrow so that in the event of Seller'= default the buyer can have direct access to cash and more easily get reimb=rsed? Warmest regards, Frank Janik Vice President - Transactions www.leas=com <http://www.leas.com/> EFTA_R1_01575747 EFTA02467009 =/u> From: Larry [mailto ;> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 10:54 AM To: Frank Janik < Cc: Joseph L. Carfagna Jr. > &=t; Subject: Re: G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04-06-16=u> Frank and Joe, The changes are unacceptable. Knowing the unus=al state of affairs, along with your refusals to deal with clear and =robable risks, I have been instructed to discontinue any further disc=ssions. Thank you for trying, I wish you luck, Larry Sent from my iPad On Apr 7, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Frank Janik < > wrote: Hello Larry — Thank you for your comments to the Plan D Offer fo= G550 #5070. Please see our client's response to your change= in the attached REDLINE EDIT of Purchaser's Offer plus their comm=nts to your 5 main questions/requests below. Assuming you want to make additional changes to Seller's attached =dits, please continue to "Track Changes" so we can more ea=ily tell what you changed. Thanks. 1. We are OK with your n=ed for 10 days for the visual inspection. 2. ALL costs required to=register the aircraft in the US after a closing with Plan D will to be the=responsibility of the Purchaser. The Seller will cooperate with your=research and requirements for the issuance of 2 EFTA_R1_01575748 EFTA02467010 an Export C of A that enables the aircraft to be issued a US Certificate of Airworth=ness, BUT all costs and modifications of the Aircraft, it's engine=, APU, documents, etc. required for an Export C of A so that the Aircraft =s in compliance with US CofA requirements should be paid by Purchaser. 3. We agree the Delivery=Conditions should state that Aircraft should be free of any history of material damage and material corrosion. =AO We added the word "material" in front of damage in the =O1 and suggest that we keep it simple for now in the La and let the attor=eys better define the words "material damage" and =9Cmaterial corrosion" in the Purchase Agreement. 4. The concept of the Se=ler putting money into escrow to cover those Purchaser funds Seller uses o=t of escrow for inspection costs defeats the whole concept and appeal of y=ur deal. If Seller has to put money in escrow to cover these costs they might as well pay Gulfstream directly for the costs= If the transaction fails because of Seller's breach or beca=se correcting the discrepancies exceeds $2MM, the Seller will reimburse th= Purchaser the full purchase price amount but it cannot be held in escrow. S. We understand that th=re needs to be a consequence for a Seller breach or Seller's faili=g to deliver other than because the aircraft will cost more than $2MM to f=x; however, similar to 4. above the funds cannot come out of escrow as it defeats the whole concept and appeal of your deal. W= also agree in the case of such a breach of failure to deliver, Purchaser=E2 s out of pocket costs for the ARCS inspections and "other=E2 costs invested in the project by Purchaser should be reimbursed by the Seller, but Seller will need a way to limit and quantify=what costs it will be responsible for reimbursing. Rather than get t=o bogged down in the LOI trying to list exactly what costs are included an= how they are reimbursed, we suggest we press forward, and if we have a deal, we can provide further details in=the Purchase Agreement on what "other costs" paid by Purch=ser shall be reimbursed by Seller. OTHER Explanations: * Paragraph 4: We can get a formal Gulfstream Quot= that will include the Flat Rate Cost for the required inspections but it =ill be provided PRIOR to the Inspection and included as an Exhibit in the =urchase Agreement; however, there is no way to include a full out-the-door cost for all of the inspect=ons until Gulfstream starts the inspections as the total costs will be dep=ndent upon what Gulfstream finds during the Inspection. * We understand and agree to the concept of a "C=osing Deadline" but feel it would be better to tackle that concept=in the Purchase Agreement as it is unclear at this point how we would defi=e when the 30 days would start (after RTS, after Inspection completion, after export CofA issued, etc.?) or if 3= days is the right number. Warmest regards, Frank Janik 3 EFTA_R1_01575749 EFTA02467011 Vice President - Transactions www.leas.com <http://www.leas.com> Original Message From: Larry Visoski imailto Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 9:58 PM To: Frank Janik C );» Subject: G550 serial 5070 Joe and Frank, ;»; Joseph L. We have reviewed the LOI and need to make some revisions, which are refl=cted on the attached document. The main ones are discussed below:=/u> 1. We will need 10 days =or the visual inspection as my schedule is fairly tight right now.<=> 2. As this is an Isle of=Man registered aircraft that would ultimately be registered in the US afte= a closing with Plan D, the Aircraft must as a delivery condition be fully=compliant with all requirements for issuance of a US Certificate of Airworthiness. An Export C of A should be required=at delivery and the costs of bringing the Aircraft, its engines, apu and d=cuments in compliance with US C of A requirements should be borne by Selle=. Those requirements should be included within the definition of Discrepancies. 3. As part of the Delive=y Conditions, the Aircraft should be free of any history of damage and mat=rial corrosion. 4. In order to ensure th=t Buyer will be able to receive its full escrowed payment of the entire Pu=chase Price if Seller does not deliver, the Seller will have to put an add=tional amount in Escrow to cover the amount of the "Non-Refundable Deposit" that it will use to pay for inspe=tion costs and corrections. If the transaction 4 EFTA_R1_01575750 EFTA02467012 fails because of Sell=r's breach or because correcting the discrepancies exceeds $2MM, t=ere needs to be a way to ensure that Purchaser's payment of the full purchase price in escrow can be recovered. 5. There also needs to b= a consequence for a Seller breach or Seller's failing to deliver =ther than because the aircraft will cost more than $2MM to fix. In c=se of such a breach of failure to deliver, Purchaser's out of pock=t costs for the ACRS inspections and any consultants, pilots, or professiona=s it must hire in order to get this transaction closed expeditiously shoul= be reimbursed by the Seller. Please get back to me after you have reviewed this with Seller, Thank yo=. Regards, Larry <G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Buyer) 04-04-16.d=cx> <G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04.0=-16.docx> =AO please note The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or b= e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 5 EFTA_R1_01575751 EFTA02467013

📷 Images in this document (5 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a contract. The document is titled "Agreement" and includes a subtitle "Terms and Conditions." It contains several paragraphs with numbered points, which outline the terms of the agreement. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be discussing the conditions of a service or product agreement. There are no visibl [Image 2] The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly a letter or a report, with text and a table. The visible text includes a heading, a date, a recipient's name, and a signature. The document contains a table with columns and rows, but the content of the table is not clearly visible. The visible text includes phrases such as "This is to inform you that," "Please note that," and "Thank you for you [Image 3] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document is titled "REPORT" and includes a header with a date and a recipient's name. The body of the document contains numbered points, which seem to be related to a discussion or a report on a specific topic. The text is too small to read in detail, but it includes phrases such as "attached document," "attached r [Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a memo. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, indicating that some information is being withheld. The visible text includes a salutation, a body with several paragraphs, and a closing. The document is addressed to someone named "Lawrence," and it mentions a "release" and a "change." There are also references to "Sus [Image 5] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or an email. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, which suggests that the document contains sensitive information. The visible text includes a salutation, a body of text, and a closing. The document is addressed to a person named "Larry," and it mentions a "Mike" and a "Jerry." The visible text also includes a date and a referenc