Search tips — use boolean operators for precise results
  • "exact phrase" — match exact words in order
  • maxwell AND clinton — both terms required
  • epstein OR maxwell — either term
  • epstein -trump — exclude a term
  • (maxwell OR clinton) AND "flight logs" — group terms
🌐 Profoundd doesn't have specific coverage of this topic Showing external search results first. Profoundd's index results follow below.

Found 37+ results for "Gabbard drop" in Markets

Profoundd NewsRoom Media-Accountability 8/10 ?

11 of 11 major outlets silent on Gabbard's Fauci-Exposed COVID release — Profoundd accountability audit

11 of 11 major outlets had not covered the DNI Gabbard Fauci-Exposed COVID release 27 hours after it dropped. Full audit, list, methodology, and downgrade log.

Show full text (4822 chars)
<div class="audit-rendered"><h2>What this audit measured</h2> <p>On <strong>2026-06-18</strong>, the Director of National Intelligence released a tranche of declassified records on COVID-19 origins, NIAID grant flows to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, EcoHealth Alliance contracts, the Lawrence Livermore Z-Program assessment, and internal Intelligence Community communications around Anthony Fauci's role in shaping the official COVID-origin assessment process.</p> <p>Profoundd mirrored all five PDFs (<a href="/archive-docs/fauci-files">Index + Parts 1-4, 391 pages</a>) into our permanent archive within hours so the record cannot be erased by upstream takedown.</p> <p><strong>27 hours</strong> after the drop, we audited every mainstream outlet on our tracked-source list to see who covered it and who stayed silent.</p> <h2>Methodology</h2> <ul> <li><strong>Query</strong> (matches articles satisfying ANY of these): phrase <code>"fauci files"</code>; phrase <code>"fauci exposed"</code>; phrase <code>"fauci-exposed"</code>; phrase <code>"gabbard drop"</code>; phrase <code>"dni gabbard"</code>; both <code>gabbard</code> and <code>fauci</code>; both <code>gabbard</code> and <code>declassified</code>; both <code>gabbard</code> and <code>ecohealth</code>; both <code>gabbard</code> and <code>wuhan</code>; both <code>gabbard</code> and <code>niaid</code>.</li> <li><strong>Window</strong>: <code>published_at &gt;= 2026-06-18T12:00:00Z</code> (the moment the release went public).</li> <li><strong>Source set</strong>: 11 mainstream outlets, the same list we use for our Pulse Tier 4 narrative-coverage aggregation — wire services (AP, Reuters), the legacy broadsheets (NYT, WaPo, WSJ, USA Today), the broadcast majors (ABC/CBS/NBC News, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC), the policy-press (Politico, The Hill, Bloomberg, CNBC), NPR/PBS, the British broadsheets (BBC, Guardian, FT, Economist), and the news magazines (Time, Newsweek, The Atlantic).</li> <li><strong>No editorial judgment on tone</strong> — only whether the outlet published anything matching the topic within the window. A two-paragraph wire pickup counts as "covered."</li> </ul> <h2>Outlets that did NOT cover the drop within 27 hours (11 of 11)</h2> <ul> <li><strong>ABC News</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Bloomberg</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>CNBC</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Financial Times</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Fox News</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Politico</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Reuters Legal</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>The Economist</strong> (credibility was 7/10)</li> <li><strong>The Hill</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Wall Street Journal</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> <li><strong>Washington Post</strong> (credibility was 5/10)</li> </ul> <h2>Outlets that DID cover the drop within 27 hours (0 of 11)</h2> <ul> <li><em>(none of the tracked mainstream outlets covered it)</em></li> </ul> <h2>What we're doing about it</h2> <p>Each silent outlet listed above has had its Profoundd <code>credibility</code> score decremented by one point, logged to a permanent, <strong>operator-reversible</strong> audit table at <code>/admin/coverage-audits/gabbard-fauci-exposed-covid-release-20260619151227-4dbd51</code>. If an outlet runs the story later — even hours from now — the operator can revert the downgrade with one click and we'll publish a follow-up noting the recovery.</p> <p>The point is not to "punish" newsrooms. It's to keep a transparent, auditable record so that next time someone says <em>"the media covered this"</em>, the record shows precisely <strong>which outlets, on what timeline, and which ones chose not to</strong>.</p> <h2>Read the source documents yourself</h2> <p>Profoundd hosts the entire 391-page release locally so it remains accessible if the upstream pulls the files. Browse, search, and download at <strong><a href="/archive-docs/fauci-files">/archive-docs/fauci-files</a></strong>.</p> <p>Searchable directly under: <em>Gabbard drop</em>, <em>Fauci files</em>, <em>gain of function</em>, <em>lab leak</em>, <em>EcoHealth</em>, <em>NIAID grants</em>, <em>Wuhan biolab</em>, <em>covid coverup</em>.</p> <hr> <p><em>Audit run: <code>gabbard-fauci-exposed-covid-release-20260619151227-4dbd51</code> · methodology + revert path at <a href="/admin/coverage-audits/gabbard-fauci-exposed-covid-release-20260619151227-4dbd51">/admin/coverage-audits/gabbard-fauci-exposed-covid-release-20260619151227-4dbd51</a>. Profoundd applies the same accountability discipline to itself: every Tier 5 forecast we publish is scored against eventual mainstream coverage at <a href="/pulse/forecasts/scoreboard">/pulse/forecasts/scoreboard</a>.</em></p></div>
articles.mercola.com News Web Result

Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts on Last Day

In her final days as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard released a collection of newly declassified documents that reignite one of the COVID-19 pandemic's most consequential unresolved questions: where did COVID-19 come from, what did government officials know — and when?1

cybernews.com News Web Result

Apple beats UK backdoor demand| Cybernews

Aug 19, 2025 · Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Monday the UK had agreed to drop its mandate for iPhone maker Apple to provide a "backdoor" that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens. Gabbard issued the statement on X, saying she had worked for months ...

cnbctv18.com News Web Result

UK scraps Apple 'backdoor' for American users, US spy chief says

Aug 19, 2025 · Gabbard said the UK had agreed to drop the mandate for that backdoor, “to ensure Americans’ private data remains private.” She did not specify if the change would extend to users of other nationalities as well, though she added that US President Donald Trump was involved in the discussions.

Grokipedia News 7/10 ? Grokipedia

Glendon Gabbard

Glendon Gabbard is an American theatre professor, director, and character actor known for his extensive career as a professor and former chair of the theatre department at Eastern Illinois University, where he mentored future Academy Award-nominated…

Grokipedia News 7/10 ? Grokipedia

Steve Gabbard

Stephen Edward Gabbard (born July 19, 1966, in Lexington, Kentucky) is a former American football player who primarily played as a defensive tackle during his college career at Florida State University and briefly in professional leagues.

Grokipedia News 7/10 ? Grokipedia

Mike Gabbard

Gerald Michael "Mike" Gabbard (born January 15, 1948) is an American politician serving as a Democratic state senator from Hawaii's 21st district since...

mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Bloomberg Running for President to Rebuild America

…Qualified for the December Debate ​ I hope Gabbard can stay in until the end. Hillary Clinton trashed Gabard which is reason enough to support Gabbard.…

…Qualified for the December Debate ​ I hope Gabbard can stay in until the end. Hillary Clinton trashed Gabard which is reason enough to support Gabbard.…

Show full text (22904 chars)
• • • The Democrat field officially expanded by one today as Bloomberg Says He Will Launch Democratic Presidential Bid . Billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s late entry into the presidential race Sunday puts pressure on an already crowded Democratic field, with an essentially limitless budget at the former New York City mayor’s disposal that could further prolong the nominating contest. Mr. Bloomberg, co-founder and the majority owner of financial data and media company Bloomberg LP, faces a tough path to the nomination given his late entry. But he has already invested tens of millions into his campaign, starting with a roughly $30 million ad buy for next week alone to introduce himself to voters. He has said he would self-fund his campaign and not accept any donations . His advisers have also been building out his campaign staff, intending to focus on the delegate-rich Super Tuesday states, which vote on March 3. Many of the Democratic candidates have invested fewer resources in those states than in the first few nominating contests, in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. “I’m running for president to defeat Donald Trump and rebuild America,” Mr. Bloomberg said in a statement Sunday. “We cannot afford four more years of President Trump’s reckless and unethical actions. He represents an existential threat to our country and our values. If he wins another term in office, we may never recover from the damage.” Asked for a reaction to Mr. Bloomberg’s announcement, Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh said simply, “Underwhelming.” Video Campaign Kickoff Unlimited Funding It’s nice to not have to raise money. That’s what being worth over $50 billion means. But please consider Democrat Debate Rules . Debate Qualifications Polling Threshold: To meet the Polling Threshold for the December Debate, candidates must meet either the “Four-Poll Threshold” (at least 4% in four party-approved polls) or the “Early State Polling Threshold” (6% in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, or Nevada). Grassroots Fundraising Threshold: To meet the Grassroots Fundraising Threshold, candidates must submit a certification, executed by the candidate’s campaign Treasurer, by 11 A.M. on December 13, 2019, demonstrating that the campaign has received donations from at least (1) 200,00 unique donors; and (2) a minimum of 800 unique donors per state in at least 20 U.S. states, U.S. territories, or the District of Columbia. If Bloomberg will self-fund his campaign he will not qualify for any debates. Qualified for the December Debate ​ I hope Gabbard can stay in until the end. Hillary Clinton trashed Gabard which is reason enough to support Gabbard. In case you missed the details, please consider Tulsi Gabbard is more well-known after Hillary Clinton took a jab at her, but also less popular . In an October interview, Clinton described Gabbard as a “ favorite of the Russians .” She added: “They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.” Gabbard offered a scathing response to Clinton’s remarks, stating the former secretary of state is “the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long.” If that’s not enough reason to support Gabbard, what would it take? Attacks on Gabbard are ridiculous led by Hillary Clinton’s absurd Russia portrayals and also by the New York Times. Tulsi Gabbard’s White Pantsuit Isn’t Winning The New York Times commented Tulsi Gabbard’s White Pantsuit Isn’t Winning . Yes folk, the NY Times devoted an entire article on Tulsi’s white pant suit. The lead in comment was “ It leaves a chill. “ Indeed, it does leave a chill, but on New York Times reporting and how far into the gutter it has sunken. The DNC does not want Gabbard in the debates, and that is yet another reason to support her. Warren is Slipping Meanwhile, support for Elizabeth Warren is falling like a rock. I suspect voters are looking at her monstrous tax-and spend proposal that are so looney even the Left cannot stand them. The same thing is happening in the UK with Jeremy Corbyn’s radical left agenda as the Tories Jump to Double Digit Lead in Every Poll . Back to Bloomberg It’s unclear how Bloomberg will impact the Democratic race. He has enough money to drum up support but that will not buy him an entry into the debates. And if he takes votes from someone, will it be Biden? We need to see more polls now that he is officially running. Correction Forbes has Bloomberg as the 9th wealthiest man in the world, worth over $50 billion. I originally posted a much lower number and left off a zero. Mike “Mish” Shedlock Billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s late entry into the presidential race Sunday puts pressure on an already crowded Democratic field, with an essentially limitless budget at the former New York City mayor’s disposal that could further prolong the nominating contest. Mr. Bloomberg, co-founder and the majority owner of financial data and media company Bloomberg LP, faces a tough path to the nomination given his late entry. But he has already invested tens of millions into his campaign, starting with a roughly $30 million ad buy for next week alone to introduce himself to voters. He has said he would self-fund his campaign and not accept any donations . His advisers have also been building out his campaign staff, intending to focus on the delegate-rich Super Tuesday states, which vote on March 3. Many of the Democratic candidates have invested fewer resources in those states than in the first few nominating contests, in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. “I’m running for president to defeat Donald Trump and rebuild America,” Mr. Bloomberg said in a statement Sunday. “We cannot afford four more years of President Trump’s reckless and unethical actions. He represents an existential threat to our country and our values. If he wins another term in office, we may never recover from the damage.” Asked for a reaction to Mr. Bloomberg’s announcement, Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh said simply, “Underwhelming.” Video Campaign Kickoff Unlimited Funding It’s nice to not have to raise money. That’s what being worth over $50 billion means. But please consider Democrat Debate Rules . Debate Qualifications If Bloomberg will self-fund his campaign he will not qualify for any debates. Qualified for the December Debate ​ I hope Gabbard can stay in until the end. Hillary Clinton trashed Gabard which is reason enough to support Gabbard. In case you missed the details, please consider Tulsi Gabbard is more well-known after Hillary Clinton took a jab at her, but also less popular . In an October interview, Clinton described Gabbard as a “ favorite of the Russians .” She added: “They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.” Gabbard offered a scathing response to Clinton’s remarks, stating the former secretary of state is “the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long.” If that’s not enough reason to support Gabbard, what would it take? Attacks on Gabbard are ridiculous led by Hillary Clinton’s absurd Russia portrayals and also by the New York Times. Tulsi Gabbard’s White Pantsuit Isn’t Winning The New York Times commented Tulsi Gabbard’s White Pantsuit Isn’t Winning . Yes folk, the NY Times devoted an entire article on Tulsi’s white pant suit. The lead in comment was “ It leaves a chill. “ Indeed, it does leave a chill, but on New York Times reporting and how far into the gutter it has sunken. The DNC does not want Gabbard in the debates, and that is yet another reason to support her. Warren is Slipping Meanwhile, support for Elizabeth Warren is falling like a rock. I suspect voters are looking at her monstrous tax-and spend proposal that are so looney even the Left cannot stand them. The same thing is happening in the UK with Jeremy Corbyn’s radical left agenda as the Tories Jump to Double Digit Lead in Every Poll . Back to Bloomberg It’s unclear how Bloomberg will impact the Democratic race. He has enough money to drum up support but that will not buy him an entry into the debates. And if he takes votes from someone, will it be Biden? We need to see more polls now that he is officially running. Correction Forbes has Bloomberg as the 9th wealthiest man in the world, worth over $50 billion. I originally posted a much lower number and left off a zero. Mike “Mish” Shedlock Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Here is the problem Adam Schiff created: https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/mrz112319-color-1-2-mb_orig.jpg Don’t know much about Tulsi, but Biden is the only one that I do know about that isn’t part of the looney left, as opposed to Biden, who is part of the Fascist/Corporate Crony left. At that, Biden wants to spend Trillions more. But, he wants to feed his rich buddies, so is less likely to tear everything to pieces. Warren and the rest are more like Corbyn in the UK. The left seems to believe as the central bankers do. If it hasn’t worked so far, we need more of it. They drive themselves to be more and more radical. I think Biden’s candidacy is mainly there to thwart investigations into what happened with Ukraine & DNC & other pay-to-play shenanigans which is son (and no doubt Clintons et alia) got sucked into, expecting a Clinton win in 2016. Because, of course, anyone investigating a political opponent is clearly corrupt. Problem? If it comes to a Senate trial, that premise is going to boomerang big-time given the amount of domestic surveillance and other dirty tricks used to investigate their political opponent, Trump. When you are a democrat candidate the last thing you should do is a debate. Gavin Newsom refused all debates with the republican for Cal. governor. It made him appear way more moderate than he really is and he won. If I were the Dem candidate, I would not debate Trump either. Why give him more oxygen? He won’t follow rules, he won’t be civil and he won’t be focused. Pres. Trump has several faults, one of those being that he goes on the attack quite a bit, perhaps too often. However, when GOP Presidents are civil, they get crucified by the media: remember Pres. George W. Bush & Hurricane Katrina? Any GOP President would do well to note that attacking too much is a better fault to have than attacking too little. At the very least, it keeps the opposition — and, yes, I include the media within that phrase — off-balance. Bloomberg must really care about the American people as he has given so much of his money to good help ordinary people. Oh wait. If only Trump was as generous. But then Trump doesn’t really have much to give as all his assets are borrowed. I think this is one of the reasons that Trump is holding on to his tax returns so tightly. They will make it clear that he has given comparatively little to charitable causes. Bloomberg says that Trump is the existential threat, but that’s not what he thinks. Trump is a very vulnerable R candidate for 2020, but the current D field is so weak that the DNC is struggling to put up a winning candidate. Biden will implode over the coming months leaving moderate Ds with limited choices. So maybe Bloomberg can pick up some delegates. There seems to be a good shot of the Ds going to their convention without a first ballot nominee. Maybe Bloomberg could be a compromise choice in a brokered convention? He has a better chance to beat Trump than Warren, Bernie or Pete. Even after being told outright that the comments section is dominated by DNC paid actors, Mish only bans conservative commenters. He got really mad when Country Bob pointed out the comments were DNC operatives — and he banned Country Bob for daring to speak the truth, but Mish did not ban the left wing paid commenters…. so did Mish already know that his comments section is DNC propaganda? He was just angry that someone dared to point this out? Yeah, yeah, now I will be banned like all the other conservative commenters, but Mish will keep the left wingers. Nothing changes Which of the comments here do you consider left-wing and why? Don’t feed the trolls. Cuntry Boob got banned for being a cunt. CB got banned because he pointed out the number of commenters that are paid to go on blogs and Facebook and spew propoganda. Mish doesn’t want to admit that his blog is being used (actually most of the “Top economic blogs” are being used, not just Mish’s). George Soros funds massive disinformation campaigns in many countries The trolls (Sechel, JoJo, Realist, Causual Observer, etc) are being fed (paid) by special interest PACs to write comments that would be called propaganda if they happened in some other banana republic If the DNC does not waive the campaign requirement for Bloomberg, then he could run as an independent and pull votes away from the Democrat’s nomination. And if the campaign requirement is waived; then it must be waived for ALL remaining candidates who meet the polling requirements. The DNC completely rigged their last nomination, blocking Comrade Bernie. They had the CIA and FBI try to rig the election. Why wouldn’t they rig the democrat convention a 2nd time? They were never held accountable for their earlier election rigging (either case). Bloomberg News promising not to write anything bad about any democrat, because that would be unfair use of his media empire. But they will continue to write nasty things about Trump, including repeating the discredited Russia and Ukraine frauds — well not the part about Biden soliciting and accepting bribes. Bloomberg news claims they haven’t thought about what would happen IF Bloomberg wins the democrat nomination… like they haven’t thought about their own jobs ending in a year? Bloomberg can’t easily sell his media group. So Bloomberg news is implicitly repeating what they said last summer: Bloomberg News doesn’t think Mike Bloomberg can win Bloomberg News is already an anti-Trump propaganda machine. They sit around and craft headlines to put Trump in a bad light (e.g., trying to blame negative market moves on Trump statements). No need to make big changes to give D’s a free pass. I have been a terminal user for nearly 30 years. It is sad to see them lose perspective and become MSM sheep. They keep customers because of their tremendous market data franchise, but their news has become a big negative. It’s easy for intelligent people to be be anti-Trump! True dat, about Trump! Also quite easy for intelligent people to be anti-MSM. Bloomberg News used to be an apolitical market source. Since 2016, they have changed their stripes. Intelligent people don’t believe that someone else (either party) is going to fix things for us Agreed. That has been the genius of our Constitution. We have the right and responsibility to take care of ourselves. I hope our electorate does not allow what rights we have to be infringed upon. He will take so many votes from the Democrats that Trump will win again. I hope Hillary jumps in to. A bloodbath for the Democrats. Mish, Tulsi only needs a few thousand new donors and one more qualifying poll to make the December debate. Send her a dollar if you want her on the stage. Did Bloomberg accept Jesus Christ as his lord and savior? Oh, no? Then there’s no point in discussing this. Yes, that might actually make America more of a terrorist target. Another rich old white man – Democratic Party complains but still holding on to status quo. I’d be really interested to hear why Bloomberg wants to defeat Trump so badly. I hope he pretends we’re all children and explains it to us slowly, because I’m having enormous difficulty understanding what big issues separate these two. It’s especially difficult to understand what “existential threat” Trump represents. Is Bloomberg saying that rather than the Trump doctrine of fomenting unrest to foster regime change, he would do it the old fashioned way with US troops? Stuki is right. They’re both shady New York billionaires who want the Fed to ease forever and both of them slobber all over Israel and Saudi Arabia. Where is the difference, and what’s galvanizing Bloomy here? Other than the rhetoric they offer to the great unwashed I’m not seeing it. “It’s especially difficult to understand what “existential threat” Trump represents” Seriously? Perhaps this will jog your brain a bit: NOVEMBER 23, 2019 China attacks U.S. at G20 as the world’s biggest source of instability BEIJING (Reuters) – The United States is the world’s biggest source of instability and its politicians are going around the world baselessly smearing China, the Chinese government’s top diplomat said on Saturday in a stinging attack at a G20 meeting in Japan. The point is that we’re going to be hostile to China and most of the world whether we have Trump or Bloomberg. Again, what’s the big difference? I don’t think that is true and I don’t think that is necessary. And anyway, China is on a path to supplant the USA as the worlds #1 economic and superpower. Look at all the investments they are making in the middle east, Africa and even parts of Europe. meanwhile, the USA doesn’t have enough money to repair its own infrastructure, let alone do big science, go to the Moon/Mars, etc. The town I live in is probably 70% Chinese now. 20 years ago that number was probably closer to 20%. China plays the long game and they are slowly moving their nationals into towns and cities all over the world, buying up housing stock and starting/taking over businesses. It’s not Central American immigrants we should be worried about in the USA, it is the Asians! Rebuild America with trillions borrowed ( freshly printed )with cheap ass crap made in China lol, leave it the way it is ie the nicest bankrupt 3rd world banana republic ever. Wearing white after labor day violates fashion rules! Unless you where it well! Who cares?! With all that money Bloomberg has, he should have no problem buying all the super-delegates. Couldn’t make up a more fitting General, in this by now fully financialized dystopia, than one between two self promoting New York Fed Welfare Queens. Both handed billions of dollars worth, by a central bank who stole it all by debasement, from the very Americans they now pretend they are going to “rebuild and make America great again” for. “Any polling now will be useless. Bloomberg just got in. Bloomberg’s ads haven’t hit. He’s clearly betting it all on Super Tuesday since he’s skipping the early caucus states.” For sure he preempted the caucus states. But that does not make the polls useless. Rather, it will take a bit to see the impact. In general, I side a Sechel here. And if he starts polling 15%, will they let him in the debates? Billionaires self-funding their own campaigns will be given an exception from the debate qualification requirements. That’s what I think JoJo Then the need to concoct a way to get Tulsi out of there I think Bloomberg is not running for Pres per se, however he is going to be putting out a huge amount of attack ads against Trump which he can easily do as a candidate whereas campaign finance laws would restrict his contributions to the DNC to a paltry amount. So by running he can put a few hundred million dollars into negative advertising and he doesn’t have to show up at a single debate (though I suspect he will use savvy email marketing campaigns and social media to meet those thresholds somehow) in order to be able to keep pumping out those ads until the final nominee is chosen. That said, Bannon has been predicting for a while he would step in (or HRC if needed) given the weak field thus far. It’s all moot: with Trump polling over 30 with the back vote, according to many models he’s a shoo-in. I don’t know about that, but he hasn’t delivered his counterpunch yet, but when he does, I suspect it will be enough to swing most independents in which case the Dems are going to be lucky to get more than 200 electoral votes. His only successful gun control program was stop and frisk. No other gun control program has succeeded in bringing down crime and the murder rate. Now he is apologizing for it. Nothing will ever please the radical left which consists of the majority of the democrats. Advocating strict gun control will alienate anyone normal. He even admitted that banning so called assault weapons is pointless as the total number of people murdered per year by all rifles is less than 400. Nonetheless he is still for banning them. Hard to reconcile that idiotic idea. Calling Trump an existential threat is also going to piss off a lot of people. That is a pointless statement if he wants to attract independents or Republicans. He would be better at focusing on any of his policy shortfalls like the trillion dollar deficits. He seems otherwise to be more of a conservative democrat. He spoke at my sons college graduation and scolded the snowflakes for being such big pussies. He basically told them to grow one instead of crawling into a safe spot and sucking on mommies teat. The real world is nothing like that and they need to get over it. He is just another lying politician. Since he knows Stop and Frisk is unpopular with Democrats, he now says it was a bad idea. Of course stop and frisk was effective, which is why it is a favorite technique of totalitarian governments. The Nazis used it very effectively. My point was simply that Bloomberg is dishonest and deceitful at his core. He used it and defended it for years as mayor but now suddenly apologizes for it and says it was a bad thing. Was he lying then or is he lying now? Mike turned out to be a big-government mayor of NYC, taxes up, gov’t and labor union employees up (they vote blue!), MTA in ruins, further underfunded pensions, schools worse, roads worse, hey but we NY got new bike lanes (on bad roads), stricter smoking restrictions, Citibikes taking away parking, foolish and slippery-slope restaurant-menu labeling, a moratorium on “large-size sodas” and if we’d kept him any longer, he’d have told everyone what else to do with their lives while making them pay higher taxes to fund his Big Brother style. Treating police and fireman almost as badly as De Blasio, the current even more horrible mayor. Mike can’t even give a speech without reading notecards verbatim. Imagine him getting steamrolled by experienced debaters. No way and no thank you, as president. We need smaller government by and for the people not by and for Mike. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
Investing.com Markets 7/10 ?

Trump, aides chase vote-rigging claims even after latest probe finds nothing

…Olsen’s investigation has used staff and resources from Gabbard’s ODNI, the Justice Department and the FBI, four of the sources said.…

…With Trump’s popularity dropping over rising prices and the Iran war, Republicans are expected to sustain losses in the November congressional midterms.…

Show full text (5003 chars)
By Jonathan Landay, Erin Banco and Phil Stewart WASHINGTON, April 23 (Reuters) - Late last summer, Kurt Olsen’s patience had run out. U.S. President Donald Trump had enlisted Olsen months earlier to seek evidence of foreign interference in U.S. elections and re-investigate Trump’s 2020 loss. A prominent election-denier, attorney and former Navy SEAL, Olsen aimed to prove the discredited conspiracy theory that Dominion Voting Systems machines had been infected with malicious code controlled by Venezuela, according to three sources familiar with the matter. But a secret federal investigation of Puerto Rico’s Dominion machines had found no trace of hacking after the administration seized the machines in May and directed a cybersecurity contractor to scour them for months. Confronted with the results, Olsen turned on the contractor, Virginia-based Mojave Research Inc. in a September message to Trump, the three sources said. Infuriated, Olsen accused the firm of blocking his work, serving the “deep state” and secretly taking money from billionaire George Soros, a Democratic donor and frequent right-wing target, they said. Mojave had been brought on by Trump’s director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, to search for vulnerabilities in the machines Puerto Rico used during its 2024 gubernatorial elections. Olsen’s campaign to discredit Mojave has not previously been reported. Five sources familiar with Olsen’s probe told Reuters that the failure to find evidence in the Puerto Rico machines led the administration to expand the investigation to Georgia, where the FBI seized 2020 election ballots, and Arizona, where the FBI has subpoenaed voter records. The reporting also sheds new light on the broad leeway Trump has granted Olsen to use federal money and staff to chase discredited election-rigging theories – despite dozens of court rulings dismissing similar allegations by Trump allies after the 2020 vote. Olsen’s investigation has used staff and resources from Gabbard’s ODNI, the Justice Department and the FBI, four of the sources said. At Trump’s request, the CIA gave Olsen access to “intelligence related to the 2020 election,” a CIA official told Reuters. The official declined to detail the intelligence. The probe comes as the Trump administration seeks to access state voter lists and to mandate rules for voter registration and voting systems – authorities the U.S. Constitution broadly grants to states to limit the concentration of federal power. With Trump’s popularity dropping over rising prices and the Iran war, Republicans are expected to sustain losses in the November congressional midterms. That raises concerns among Democrats and election-integrity experts that the administration is laying groundwork to challenge the vote’s legitimacy. The doubt Trump has cast on election integrity has ​gained broad traction with the American public, an April 20 Reuters/Ipsos poll showed. White House spokesman Davis Ingle called the Reuters reporting “misinformation” from a “few disgruntled leakers,” adding it did not fully reflect the government’s effort to ensure “critical infrastructure across all risk sectors remains secure.” He did not answer questions about what else the administration was doing to secure upcoming U.S. elections. Olsen did not respond to requests for an interview. Trump took Olsen’s deep-state allegations about Mojave seriously, two of the sources said. In response, the company opened its books to show it took no money from Soros, according to a September 8 company statement to Gabbard that was seen by Reuters. The statement called Olsen’s Soros theory "patently absurd and ridiculous.” Olsen advocated that the company’s work be terminated, which happened in October. Around that time, Trump appointed Olsen as Director of Election Security and Integrity. He works from the White House and reports to the president, the two sources said. DNI officials said Mojave’s contract ended only because it had completed its voting machine analysis and that Gabbard would continue working on election security. “We believe, strongly, that this work has been shelved for reasons that have nothing to do with the mission of ensuring every American can trust our election outcomes,” Mojave said in response to questions, without elaborating. Soros’ Open Society Foundations said in a statement to Reuters that neither he nor the organization had ever worked with or contracted Mojave Research and had never heard of the firm. MILLER PUSHED FOR FBI INVOLVEMENT Trump’s Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller shared Olsen’s frustration at Mojave’s failure to prove vote manipulation in Puerto Rico, according to two of the sources, describing previously unreported details. They described an October 3 White House meeting where the Mojave team and Gabbard briefed Miller, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt on their forensic analysis of the machines in Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory. Miller, th...
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Can DOGE Cut $2 Trillion Out of $1 Trillion? What About Revenue?

…Finally, the above examples assume no recession in the next 10 years (alternatively net revenue does not drop and deficit spending does not rise).…

…I litked your tax scale but would raise the corp tax a couple percent and drop the low income tax the same.…

Show full text (50000 chars)
• • • The answer to the first question is obvious. So let’s discuss what’s reasonable. I created the lead chart from Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2025 from the Office of Management and Budget. Without giving any details, DOGE says it can cut $2 trillion in spending. Assume Miracles Team Doge wants to eliminate the Department of Education. Let’s assume that happens. Heck, let’s temporarily assume DOGE is so successful that it cuts the entire $1.001 trillion of discretionary non-defense spending by eliminating 100% of every department, not just the Department of Education. Wow. Well done DOGE! But where does DOGE find another $1 trillion to achieve its goal of $2 trillion? Defense Spending Defense spending is $884 billion, and Trump wants to raise that. Please note the Republican Platform says Keeping the American People safe requires a strong America. The Republican Plan is to return Peace through Strength, rebuilding our Military and Alliances, countering China, defeating terrorism, building an Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield , promoting American Values, securing our Homeland and Borders, and reviving our Defense Industrial Base. We will build a Military bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. We will invest in cutting-edge research and advanced technologies, including an Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield, support our Troops with higher pay , and get woke Leftwing Democrats fired as soon as possible. How much would that cost? For now, let’s believe in more miracles. Assume cost of of the iron dome and higher pay for troops is precisely $0. Belief in Miracles As long as we are believing in miracles, let’s believe DOGE cuts another $1 trillion from mandatory spending. Wow. That’s another well done, DOGE! TCJA and Other Promises However, we do need to address Trump’s promises and priorities. His highest priority is renewing his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that extending the TCJA would increase deficits by $4.6 trillion over 10 years , $0.6 trillion of which would result from additional interest payments. That is roughly $460 billion per year. Trump also proposes to reinstate State and Local Tax deductions. He needs to do that to buy vote from New York Democrats as an enticement for them to approve the renewal of the TCJA. The Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that to eliminate the SALT cap entirely beginning in 2025, would cost an additional $1,169 billion on top of the TCJA extension. That is an extra $170 billion annually. What about three other campaign promises including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security. The Tax Foundation estimates No Tax on Social Security would cost $1.6 trillion over 10 years, an extra $160 billion annually. The Tax Foundation estimates No Tax on Overtime would cost $680.4 billion over 10 years, $68 billion annually. No Tax on Tips The no tax on tips idea is interesting because bastions of alleged fiscal conservatives have latched onto the idea . The Senate bill, introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and titled the “No Tax on Tips Act,” would create a 100 percent above-the-line deduction for cash tip income, with cash in this context referring to payments in physical currency, debit or credit card payment, or checks. Non-cash tips (like a ticket, a coupon, or some other item of value) would presumably remain taxable. Additionally, both cash and non-cash tips would remain taxable under the payroll tax . Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) has introduced a companion bill in the House. However, a different House bill , introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and titled the “Tax-Free Tips Act of 2024,” would exempt tips from both income and payroll taxes. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates the cost of exempting tips from federal income tax would be $100 to $200 billion over a decade. If tips are also exempted from payroll taxes, the total could run to $250 billion. That’s only $25 billion a year. But the results are hugely distortionary. The biggest beneficiaries would be those who work in casinos and high-end restaurants, not the short-order cooks and servers, and not the hotel maids who don’t report tips anyway. The bill would also create huge fraud incentives to label some income as “voluntary tips”. The idea is fiscally irresponsible, and it would create moral hazards while encouraging fraud. Nonetheless, alleged fiscal conservatives are for it. Reflections on Discretionary Spending Cuts The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) budget for fiscal year (FY) 2025 is $9.7 billion, the budget for Homeland Security is $64.8 billion, the budget for the FBI is $11.3 billion, the budget for the justice department is $37.8 billion and the budget for national intelligence is $73.4 billion. Those items total $197 billion. Trump also wants more for the wall and mass deportations. Trump may need another 10,000 ICE agents even if his goal is a modest one to two million deportations. Q: Wait a second Mish, didn’t you cut those expenses totally? A: Yes. I cut 100% of discretionary spending. But those are areas where Trump wants to increase discretionary spending. Wonderland Thinking “One can’t believe impossible things,” said Alice to the Red Queen. “I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” Trump nominated Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence. She would be gone too (or gone and not gone simultaneously in Wonderland thinking). I eliminated the National Intelligence, the FBI, drug enforcement, NASA, justice department expenses, and agricultural department expenses. Q:How realistic is that? A: It’s not. Nor is it realistic to assume DOGE can come up with $1 trillion cuts to mandatory spending. But we need so come up with $2 trillion in savings, so I did. Voila! I’m a believer. TCJA and Other Promises Annual Subtotals TCJA: $460 Billion SALT: $170 Billion No Tax on SS: $160 Billion No Tax on Overtime: $68 Billion No Tax on Tips: $25 billion That’s $883 billion per year. So, even if we assume DOGE can cut $500 billion from somewhere (that Congress approves), Trump would increase the deficit by $383 billion per year if his key proposals pass. How Realistic is $500 Billion in DOGE Savings? Yesterday, I asked Elon Musk a question. The deal to avert the government shutdown added $110 billion in disaster and farm aid. I was OK with that as long as the deal cut $110 billion elsewhere, but that didn’t happen. Although DOGE prevented a bigger disaster it also approved the above compromise. Thus DOGE officially starts fiscal year 2025 $110 billion in the hole. Q: What do we call this? A: Winning, obviously. Fortunately, that’s only a one-time win (until it happens again) which is guaranteed to happen when Trump carries through with his threat of 200 Percent Tariffs on John Deere , driving up the cost of most farm equipment. Also, please factor something in for the iron dome and whatever else Trump concocts for defense spending. That’s more winning. Fiscal Year 2025 Revenue Total revenue is $5.485 trillion. Total spending is $6,942 trillion. That would be an annual deficit of $1.457 trillion. But revenue won’t be as stated because of TCJA and SALT. We already addressed those shortfalls to which Trump added $383 billion annually. That would make the annual deficit $1.840 trillion. And this assumes the cost of the iron dome defense system is zero (or doesn’t pass). Trump Proposes Eliminating Individual Income Taxes In October, Trump Proposed Abolishing Individual Income Taxes . “When we were a smart country, in the 1890s … this is when the country was relatively the richest it ever was. It had all tariffs. It didn’t have an income tax,” Trump said after a barber asked whether it would be possible to jettison the federal income tax. “Now we have income taxes, and we have people that are dying. They’re paying tax, and they don’t have the money to pay the tax.” A few days later, podcaster Joe Rogan asked Trump whether he was serious about replacing federal income taxes with tariffs. “Yeah, sure, why not?” Trump said during his interview Friday on “The Joe Rogan Experience.” Eliminating income taxes would cost $2.679 trillion annually. Outlays would remain the same as shown in the lead chart (plus another $383 billion net difference between DOGE gains and Trump proposals), but revenue would shrink to $2.806 trillion. The new net would then be: $2.806 trillion in Other Revenue – ($6.942 trillion FY 2025 Total Outlays + 0.383 trillion in Net Additions) = -4.519 trillion per year. To balance the budget with tariffs as Trump proposes, he would need to increase tariffs ( a tax on consumers ) by $4.519 trillion annually. Impossible? Not if you are the Red Queen. And please note Trump promises to bring manufacturing back to the US. This implies another miracle. So once again, I am a believer. We will simultaneously collect $4.519 trillion annually in tariffs and bring the jobs back home while increasing exports too. Wow! Sobering Balance of Trade Math Total US goods imports from the entire world in 2023 was $3.226 trillion. So, even if we magically assume Trump can collect 100% tariffs on 100% of imports, Trump would still be $1.293 trillion short. Returning from Wonderland with 60 percent tariffs on China, trade with China would stop completely. Trump would not collect a cent from China. With more modest tariffs Trump might be able to collect $300 billion (from US Consumers) assuming no mass retaliation and no global economic meltdown. That would mean annual deficits of $4.219 trillion ($42 trillion over 10 years not counting interest on the national debt). My non-Wonderland conclusion is that eliminating income taxes is so ridiculous that it won’t be seriously discussed other than to explain the math to Trump who perhaps may not understand. More Realistic But Still High Assumptions Expecting $500 billion from DOGE cuts is on the high side, but let’s assume that happens anyway. If we further assume that Trump’s plan to have no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, and no tax on overtime all fail, the cost of the iron dome is zero, the border improvements cost nothing, ICE costs nothing, and Trump does not have to increase handouts for Democrat priorities to get TCJA across the finish line, then Trump’s proposals would only increase the deficit by $150 billion per year to $1.607 trillion. Instead, if you further assume $650 billion in DOGE cuts (or other revenue increases), then annual deficit is unchanged at $1.457 trillion. Hooray? Finally, the above examples assume no recession in the next 10 years (alternatively net revenue does not drop and deficit spending does not rise). Hopefully, you are beginning to see why Trump demanded the debt ceiling be eliminated. What Would You Do to Balance the Budget? Unlike DOGE and Trump, I did balance the budget in my proposals. For discussion, please see An Interactive Exercise: What Would You Do to Balance the Budget? In my pro-growth proposal, I cut corporate taxes to zero on domestic income while keeping the tax at 15% elsewhere. I also slashed income taxes for all but the very top-end. To pay for the above, I let TCJA expire, eliminated all deductions, and decreased military spending. I assumed $630 billion in DOGE cuts (or other revenue increases wherever DOGE failed). I ended up with a surplus. Click on the link for more discussion and the economic gains of my proposals. What can you come up with? I created the lead chart from Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2025 from the Office of Management and Budget. Without giving any details, DOGE says it can cut $2 trillion in spending. Assume Miracles Team Doge wants to eliminate the Department of Education. Let’s assume that happens. Heck, let’s temporarily assume DOGE is so successful that it cuts the entire $1.001 trillion of discretionary non-defense spending by eliminating 100% of every department, not just the Department of Education. Wow. Well done DOGE! But where does DOGE find another $1 trillion to achieve its goal of $2 trillion? Defense Spending Defense spending is $884 billion, and Trump wants to raise that. Please note the Republican Platform says Keeping the American People safe requires a strong America. The Republican Plan is to return Peace through Strength, rebuilding our Military and Alliances, countering China, defeating terrorism, building an Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield , promoting American Values, securing our Homeland and Borders, and reviving our Defense Industrial Base. We will build a Military bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. We will invest in cutting-edge research and advanced technologies, including an Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield, support our Troops with higher pay , and get woke Leftwing Democrats fired as soon as possible. How much would that cost? For now, let’s believe in more miracles. Assume cost of of the iron dome and higher pay for troops is precisely $0. Belief in Miracles As long as we are believing in miracles, let’s believe DOGE cuts another $1 trillion from mandatory spending. Wow. That’s another well done, DOGE! TCJA and Other Promises However, we do need to address Trump’s promises and priorities. His highest priority is renewing his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that extending the TCJA would increase deficits by $4.6 trillion over 10 years , $0.6 trillion of which would result from additional interest payments. That is roughly $460 billion per year. Trump also proposes to reinstate State and Local Tax deductions. He needs to do that to buy vote from New York Democrats as an enticement for them to approve the renewal of the TCJA. The Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that to eliminate the SALT cap entirely beginning in 2025, would cost an additional $1,169 billion on top of the TCJA extension. That is an extra $170 billion annually. What about three other campaign promises including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security. The Tax Foundation estimates No Tax on Social Security would cost $1.6 trillion over 10 years, an extra $160 billion annually. The Tax Foundation estimates No Tax on Overtime would cost $680.4 billion over 10 years, $68 billion annually. No Tax on Tips The no tax on tips idea is interesting because bastions of alleged fiscal conservatives have latched onto the idea . The Senate bill, introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and titled the “No Tax on Tips Act,” would create a 100 percent above-the-line deduction for cash tip income, with cash in this context referring to payments in physical currency, debit or credit card payment, or checks. Non-cash tips (like a ticket, a coupon, or some other item of value) would presumably remain taxable. Additionally, both cash and non-cash tips would remain taxable under the payroll tax . Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) has introduced a companion bill in the House. However, a different House bill , introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and titled the “Tax-Free Tips Act of 2024,” would exempt tips from both income and payroll taxes. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates the cost of exempting tips from federal income tax would be $100 to $200 billion over a decade. If tips are also exempted from payroll taxes, the total could run to $250 billion. That’s only $25 billion a year. But the results are hugely distortionary. The biggest beneficiaries would be those who work in casinos and high-end restaurants, not the short-order cooks and servers, and not the hotel maids who don’t report tips anyway. The bill would also create huge fraud incentives to label some income as “voluntary tips”. The idea is fiscally irresponsible, and it would create moral hazards while encouraging fraud. Nonetheless, alleged fiscal conservatives are for it. Reflections on Discretionary Spending Cuts The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) budget for fiscal year (FY) 2025 is $9.7 billion, the budget for Homeland Security is $64.8 billion, the budget for the FBI is $11.3 billion, the budget for the justice department is $37.8 billion and the budget for national intelligence is $73.4 billion. Those items total $197 billion. Trump also wants more for the wall and mass deportations. Trump may need another 10,000 ICE agents even if his goal is a modest one to two million deportations. Q: Wait a second Mish, didn’t you cut those expenses totally? A: Yes. I cut 100% of discretionary spending. But those are areas where Trump wants to increase discretionary spending. Wonderland Thinking “One can’t believe impossible things,” said Alice to the Red Queen. “I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” Trump nominated Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence. She would be gone too (or gone and not gone simultaneously in Wonderland thinking). I eliminated the National Intelligence, the FBI, drug enforcement, NASA, justice department expenses, and agricultural department expenses. Q:How realistic is that? A: It’s not. Nor is it realistic to assume DOGE can come up with $1 trillion cuts to mandatory spending. But we need so come up with $2 trillion in savings, so I did. Voila! I’m a believer. TCJA and Other Promises Annual Subtotals That’s $883 billion per year. So, even if we assume DOGE can cut $500 billion from somewhere (that Congress approves), Trump would increase the deficit by $383 billion per year if his key proposals pass. How Realistic is $500 Billion in DOGE Savings? Yesterday, I asked Elon Musk a question. The deal to avert the government shutdown added $110 billion in disaster and farm aid. I was OK with that as long as the deal cut $110 billion elsewhere, but that didn’t happen. Although DOGE prevented a bigger disaster it also approved the above compromise. Thus DOGE officially starts fiscal year 2025 $110 billion in the hole. Q: What do we call this? A: Winning, obviously. Fortunately, that’s only a one-time win (until it happens again) which is guaranteed to happen when Trump carries through with his threat of 200 Percent Tariffs on John Deere , driving up the cost of most farm equipment. Also, please factor something in for the iron dome and whatever else Trump concocts for defense spending. That’s more winning. Fiscal Year 2025 Revenue Total revenue is $5.485 trillion. Total spending is $6,942 trillion. That would be an annual deficit of $1.457 trillion. But revenue won’t be as stated because of TCJA and SALT. We already addressed those shortfalls to which Trump added $383 billion annually. That would make the annual deficit $1.840 trillion. And this assumes the cost of the iron dome defense system is zero (or doesn’t pass). Trump Proposes Eliminating Individual Income Taxes In October, Trump Proposed Abolishing Individual Income Taxes . “When we were a smart country, in the 1890s … this is when the country was relatively the richest it ever was. It had all tariffs. It didn’t have an income tax,” Trump said after a barber asked whether it would be possible to jettison the federal income tax. “Now we have income taxes, and we have people that are dying. They’re paying tax, and they don’t have the money to pay the tax.” A few days later, podcaster Joe Rogan asked Trump whether he was serious about replacing federal income taxes with tariffs. “Yeah, sure, why not?” Trump said during his interview Friday on “The Joe Rogan Experience.” Eliminating income taxes would cost $2.679 trillion annually. Outlays would remain the same as shown in the lead chart (plus another $383 billion net difference between DOGE gains and Trump proposals), but revenue would shrink to $2.806 trillion. The new net would then be: $2.806 trillion in Other Revenue – ($6.942 trillion FY 2025 Total Outlays + 0.383 trillion in Net Additions) = -4.519 trillion per year. To balance the budget with tariffs as Trump proposes, he would need to increase tariffs ( a tax on consumers ) by $4.519 trillion annually. Impossible? Not if you are the Red Queen. And please note Trump promises to bring manufacturing back to the US. This implies another miracle. So once again, I am a believer. We will simultaneously collect $4.519 trillion annually in tariffs and bring the jobs back home while increasing exports too. Wow! Sobering Balance of Trade Math Total US goods imports from the entire world in 2023 was $3.226 trillion. So, even if we magically assume Trump can collect 100% tariffs on 100% of imports, Trump would still be $1.293 trillion short. Returning from Wonderland with 60 percent tariffs on China, trade with China would stop completely. Trump would not collect a cent from China. With more modest tariffs Trump might be able to collect $300 billion (from US Consumers) assuming no mass retaliation and no global economic meltdown. That would mean annual deficits of $4.219 trillion ($42 trillion over 10 years not counting interest on the national debt). My non-Wonderland conclusion is that eliminating income taxes is so ridiculous that it won’t be seriously discussed other than to explain the math to Trump who perhaps may not understand. More Realistic But Still High Assumptions Expecting $500 billion from DOGE cuts is on the high side, but let’s assume that happens anyway. If we further assume that Trump’s plan to have no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, and no tax on overtime all fail, the cost of the iron dome is zero, the border improvements cost nothing, ICE costs nothing, and Trump does not have to increase handouts for Democrat priorities to get TCJA across the finish line, then Trump’s proposals would only increase the deficit by $150 billion per year to $1.607 trillion. Instead, if you further assume $650 billion in DOGE cuts (or other revenue increases), then annual deficit is unchanged at $1.457 trillion. Hooray? Finally, the above examples assume no recession in the next 10 years (alternatively net revenue does not drop and deficit spending does not rise). Hopefully, you are beginning to see why Trump demanded the debt ceiling be eliminated. What Would You Do to Balance the Budget? Unlike DOGE and Trump, I did balance the budget in my proposals. For discussion, please see An Interactive Exercise: What Would You Do to Balance the Budget? In my pro-growth proposal, I cut corporate taxes to zero on domestic income while keeping the tax at 15% elsewhere. I also slashed income taxes for all but the very top-end. To pay for the above, I let TCJA expire, eliminated all deductions, and decreased military spending. I assumed $630 billion in DOGE cuts (or other revenue increases wherever DOGE failed). I ended up with a surplus. Click on the link for more discussion and the economic gains of my proposals. What can you come up with? Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. This ignores tariffs, which would increase revenues, with a short-term (1-5 years) increase in price inflation. Trump will vigorously work to bring manufactures back to the US, which will provide jobs and raise income taxes. Trump can eliminate income taxes later. The biggest place to cut gov expenses is Medicare and Medicaid. We can easily shed the second trillion there by making clear to the American people that Big pHarma promotes expensive “patent” medicine to make money–but the most effective and curative remedies are the ones God, the gods, or Evolution made. You cannot patent those. Evolution’s keynote is “survive.” Creatures which need rare or unavailable remedies do not survive. A loving God would have made people and other living things suited to what exists in abundance. There is a theory that lots of gods participated in Creation. One made deer, another made wolves to eat the deer, and a third made mosquitoes to torment them both. Okay, these creations still need to survive, and that means their needs are present in abundance. What is abundant is cheap. I assumed $300 billion in tariffs which is about all Trump can realistically get without crashing the global economy and the US too If Trump does 60% tariffs on China – Trade would halt and tariffs are zero Usonians always vote for Lucy van Pelt as their president. The FY2025 estimated interest payment seems low. Isn’t interest on the debt anlready > $1T/year? And it will increase in 2026 and beyond as more national debt (Treasuries) roll over at higher interest rates. When reality finally intervenes, both spending cuts and tax increases will be required. For spending cuts, “mandatory” has to be renegotiated. Medicaid and SS Disability are not constitutional Federal responsibilities and perhaps should be devolved to the states. Medicare and the entire US “HealthCare” (SIC) system need a complete overhaul which should cut Federal costs 50%. Realigning incentive structures and forcing transparent prior-to-service bids on standard procedures (as done in most other service industries) will help everyone. Social Security with its dedicated tax can be taken entirely off the Federal books: drain the trust fund gracefully leading to no trust fund, no deficit or surplus, retirement age indexed to life expectancy data, tax rates vary each year as needed to maintain solvency. Defense needs a Peace Dividend akin to Clinton 1 approach. First we need peace though. In DC land, a cut is a non-increase in funding, i.e., flat or status quo. I’d end all current taxes and fund the federal government with a 20% corporate revenue, not income, tax. The government is primarily designed to maintain a sound environment for corporations to do business. Let them pay for it. One solution is to let Congress continue in its profligate ways until the nation is bankrupt and the people revolt. At that point, we can line up past and present politicians and shoot them if they ever voted for a bill that created/contributed to a deficit/National debt. It won’t fix the deficit/debt problem. but we’ll feel better, and the next politicians might learn by example. The other solution would require a benign dictator to make the difficult decisions needed because Congress is incapable. However, for the exercise, let’s assume government employees are rational decision makers. Create an environment that rewards effectiveness that requires fewer resources, and punishes ineffectiveness. Begin with a %-across the board cut. Those units that take the cut and increase effectiveness get a bonus. Those who maintain effectiveness get a smaller budget cut the next year. Those who decline in effectiveness get a higher budget cut the next year. Let the units hack out lazy ineffective employees/overpriced contracts/etc. Don’t micro-manage. Judge the results. Apply it to every government depart/military, etc.If competent leaders emerge, great. If not, bye bye. We’re the ones who keep voting for this, though. We want our social security and nice roads and medicare and we’ll vote for people who tell us they can fund those things and cut taxes, because we’re stupid. Social Security, Medicare, and Highway Funding are supposed to be Trust Funds, neither taking from nor contributing to the General Revenue. They have their own problems and should be dealt with outside of the regular budget. Social Security and Medicare will be forcibly cut in a few years just by staying within the Trust Funds. Social Security was folded into ‘the budget’ long ago so the surplus in social security revenue would make the overall budget deficit look to be less, even creating the chimera of balance and surplus. If Social Security outlay is cut sooner then it would be tough to have the social security payroll tax revenue the same. See solutions, one and two. Trump is a big spender there is no evidence he is any sort of conservative. Yellen: Treasury currently expects to reach the new [debt] limit between January 14 and January 23, at which time it will be necessary for Treasury to start taking extraordinary measures There should be no limit to my spending! This Mish piece shows once again that Trump’s words mean nothing and cement Trump’s reputation as the “Grifter-in-Chief”…..Mostly Trump is addicted to attention and the bigger the lie, the more attention he gets. But the problem of debt is a real one and there is no solution without tax increases, and tax increases will cause a recession or worse. We’re in a very deep hole, and Congress and Trump are still digging. We will go deeper into debt, regardless of what Musk’s plans are. Musk has no authority to impose any of his ideas on the country….that’s mostly Congress’s job, and they haven’t done it in decades. Nixon took us off the gold standard around 1971 and back then we had maybe $300 billion in federal debt; Now it’s over 100 times that and growing fast. There is no solution except default on the debt, and ZIRP along with QE is de-facto money printing and default, but that’s where we’re headed. America is a debt Ponzi and we’ll borrow until nobody will lend us another dime. At that point we become Japan and we’ll go to zero rates and print trillions more to keep the Ponzi going until it ultimately collapses, along with the value of the dollar. The higher prices we’ve experienced over the last 4 years are directly related to massive money creation, and when that happens, we get higher prices and the dollar buys a lot less. I’m so old, I remember when I could buy a new small car for $1800. Things have changed a lot since then. I’m the one you should be listening to. My little immigrant friend and I think Americans are morons, and need to be replaced by foreign labor. That’s the agenda. Mish, is that you wanting to entertain us? If so, we’ll done. The Dept of Defense should have to pass an audit, balance sheet and make the necessary cuts in useless projects like f-35. The military doesn’t have to lose ability we just need to stop letting billions disappear in shady contracts and graft. Remember Don Rumsfeld admitted we lost 2 trillion in the Pentagon. He was forced to admit it and then 9-11 saved his bacon Spoken like an accountant. Audit and thee shall find. How about instilling an attitude change in the public sector–one of responsibility to the People. Reward contract managers for savings on contracts, more competitive bidding, control of projects/overruns etc. Do the same throughout the military. If we can do it better and cheaper, there’s a bonus. Apply the same approach to Medicare, Medicaid, social security etc. In other words, activate people to be come cost cutters. Those who resist are the first people fired. “Unlike DOGE and Trump, I did balance the budget in my proposals.” I vote for your “return to Capitalism” solution you mention in the link that jettisons Crony Capitalism. Now that Biden is stepping down soon and apparently Musk will be the new president, I changed my avatar from pinch-faced Biden to spheroid Musk. A lovely likeness! So if you don’t pay taxes on tips, does that include Social Security tax also? Because if so, that is going to impact people seriously when their SS benefits are calculated when they retire. Do they also not pay Medicare tax on tips? How about state income taxes? There is an old saying about unintended consequences that these fools should ponder. You have to factor in Canada, Greenland, and Panama. All should be cash flow positive in six months. Liberation of Canada (freeing it from liberals) will take some effort, but doable within a couple months. It will take some effort to close entire agencies but it is doable. So, On top of that assumed $1 Trillion, I would initiate the contents of Rand Pauls’ annual report “Festivus” and get rid of spending within the remaining agencies. He came up with another Trillion. Then there’s the already released examples from the preliminary DOGE list: $1.7 billion to maintain 77,000 empty federal buildings The above is just the low hanging fruit, I’m certain there’s a fortune in hidden or obscured handouts and waste to be discovered. The toughest part will be overriding the objections of the Congress & vested interests who will set up a howl when one of their vote purchase arrangements is kicked out. Please re-read my post. 100% of non-discretionary, non-military is only $1 trillion. You bring up piss ant stuff of a million here or there and in some cases meaningless thousands. Cutting everything including the wall, ICE, intelligence, energy, education, everything is only $1 trillion. What about my math do you fail to understand? And the majority of empty Federally-owned buildings are in locations that no one wants to operate in — in empty places where no one lives or works. A bunch of them were built for the military during WW2 — they cant be sold for any money. Nice to see Mish understands the reality of cutting “a trillion here and a trillion there.” The spending isnt going down no matter what Vijay and Ebert say. Its the revenue that has withered on the vine. A line item veto would fix most of this, or expose the President to ridicule. However, the real problem is an ingrained culture of spend, spend, spend. BTW, this will get worse with more DEI. THen, you get the morons who say we can ‘grow our way out.’ You can inflate your way out, for sure, but the People suffer. You can tax your way our, with the same result. What is needed is real sustained economic growth and a ban of deficit spending, no matter the cause. Impossible with the fools we elect to Congress. My advice, buy gold in at least two other countries, and get a non-US passport. So what if we reach for $2T and only get $1T. $1T would be huge victory for the American taxpayer. That is 1 trillion that isn’t coming out of the taxpayers pocket today. But is being borrowed and put into the taxpayers pocket. Not a win for everyone. There is so much waste and fraud in government spending that $2T might be a low bar. A 9th telecoms firm has been hit by a massive Chinese espionage campaign, the White House saysand Trump with regard to this(and to numerous other breaches) will do?? https://apnews.com/article/united-states-china-hacking-espionage-c5351ef7c2207785b76c8c62cde6c513 Biden’s China appeasement in action. I feel a lot more threatened by many of the residents of our inner cities than by Russia or China so I try to avoid such neighborhoods. The US made a big mistake meddling in the politics of Eastern Europe and launching a costly war against Iraq in 2003. And now they want to fight China over their own island province – which the UN and U.S. have long agreed is part of China. Anyone joining the U.S. military now is making a big mistake. I really wanted a government shutdown for all those non essential employees Giving DOGE something to focus on. The U.S. saw an 18.1% increase in homelessness this year, with nearly a million American citizens counted as homeless, per HUD Just a terrible time for America. Will take a herculean effort to turn it around. We’re not going to turn it around. What prosperity we have now is based on a mountain of debt which will get much worse. Politically it’s impossible to make the massive cuts and/or impose new taxes to control deficits, debt and interest costs. The America we knew 50 years ago is dying and there’s no way out. Positive thinking–YES!!! I agree it will take real leadership to stop the tide, and likely a disaster. That said, the outcome will likely be Idiocracy States need to push the legal envelope on forcing drug-addicted and mentally ill street people into confined treatment. Letting them continue to take over parts of cities with their encampments is destroying neighborhoods, causing crime to rise and endangering other people. A big cause of of that is the terrible govt policy of interest rate suppression, supported by both parties, including Trump and Musk, which fueled a speculative frenzy in real estate with people hoarding housing, driving up prices and rents to unaffordable for people. Representative Ro Khanna has called on banning stock trading by members of Congress Great idea It’s so obvious so it will never get done Another moron who bans and does not understand how markets work. The simple solution, a member of Congress must post buy and sell orders on a public website 3 business days before going into effect. And cannot retract the order after posting. Regarding ‘no tax on tips,’ let’s start by looking at all perks. For starters, there MUST be a companion bill that eliminates the deduction of tips and meals as a business expense. This might extend to include all travel expenses above the minimum fare charged for that mode of travel. Frequent flyer miles could also be taxed.etc Only 50% of meals and entertainment are deductible now. You take a client out and spend $100 on a meal, write off $50 and save maybe $18 on your taxes. Why is there a ‘freebie’ from the government for the lucky diners? Or the lucky flyers. or….waiters etc.Should an employees lunch be tax free? The tax code is screwed by exceptions. The IRS code says ‘income from all sources derived.’ Better no federal income tax on personal incomes let corporation’s fund the waste and mismanagement. The U.S. provided more than $60 billion in military aid to Ukraine under the Biden administration, per the Kyiv Independent. Total aid is over $100 billion so far, and that’s just what they are officially saying. Not counting additional aid from the usual black budget sources. Flushed down the toilet. Epic failure As always, follow the money – Announcing the U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine’s Economic Recovery – United States Department of State President Biden today announced the appointment of Penny Pritzker as the U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine’s Economic Recovery. In this role, she will work with the Ukrainian government, the G7, the EU, international financial institutions, international partners, and one of our great assets – the American private sector – to help forge Ukraine’s future as a prosperous, secure, European democracy. Special Representative Pritzker will drive efforts to shape donor priorities through the Multi-Agency Donor Coordination Platform to align them with Ukraine’s needs and to galvanize international partners to increase their support for Ukraine. She will also work closely with the government of Ukraine as it intensifies reforms needed to win the future, open export markets, mobilize foreign direct investment, and catalyze economic recovery. My sock puppet promised to end the war day one, and he shall! If one goes back to the Maidan Revolution in 2014, US aid to Ukraine may be as high as $200 billion. I litked your tax scale but would raise the corp tax a couple percent and drop the low income tax the same. Also think maybe we might need a sliding scale to adjust for cost of living in some states but only at the lower taxing levels. Enough with the g’damned subsidies. We need a simple tax code. NOT thousands of pages. Unleash AI combined with 5-10 RN/NPs judgement overseen by an MD for a multifold productivity increase. AMA doesn’t like of course….only MD’s can have AI. DOGE will need to massively change sick-care to have an impact. Ozempic at $25K/year won’t be handed out like candy. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/scope-practice/ama-successfully-fights-scope-practice-expansions-threaten End all wealth transfers to the States. Dump Medicare Medicaid on the States. Means test Social Security. Substitute drones for tanks, warships, and fighter aircraft. Leave NATO and all foreign occupations. Dissolve NASA, and Health Education Welfare. That is going to *crush* red state budgets, though. Probably hard to get the votes. They’ll still vote for me though. Cults are nice that way. The red states are not obliged to pay for personal medical expenses, unemployment, welfare, and student loans. Low tax states will attract wealthy people, businesses, and hard working achievers. Welfare states will attract the dross. Erm, you may want to go look up where Federal transfer payments mostly end up. Republicans have a 2-3 seat majority in the House and about 30 limp dick republicans (of 53) in the senate. There’s no way in hell any of this Doge stuff gets done. I like Mish’s general approach. Trump isn’t serious about anything he says. The next 4 years will see National debt rise by $12 Trillion minimum. He will get his tax cuts and maybe 2 rounds of them. I don’t take his comments seriously but if I had a choice I’d rather see him eliminating property taxes instead of income taxes. I don’t really care about the debt. We should have an efficiency task force for all government and at some point eliminate the tax cuts from Trump, Bush, et al and debt will come way down quickly. The deficit grew over 50+ years because of tax avoidance by the rich and super rich. Aint no budget cuts gonna do anything, and especially not in 1,2,3,4,5 years. This is a multi-decade revenue loss. It will take 50+ years to fix, and there is no signs of the rich putting in their fair share … ever. It’s always a revenue problem for you, never a spending one. Think on that Midnight cannot find one thing that you want to cut that isnt WILDLY popular by the population that is a meaningful amount. Yes, cut foreign aid. Cut the National Endowment for the Arts. Thats .3% of the whole budget. Now what? Social Security? Medicare? Never happen. Cut, baby, cut! Exactly. This is why we need that debt ceiling gone. I think Mish’s math demonstrates that fiscal sanity will require Democrats (and Republicans) to reduce spending and Republicans (and democrats) to raise taxes. The politics of getting elected don’t currently support fiscal restraint so until the voting Americans get our heads rapped around that concept we will continue to elect people from both parties who want to spend. Growing out of the deficit can occur in modest amounts, but historically, politicians dreams of growing out of deficit have not reduced the deficit enough to matter if at all. We’re not going to reduce spending because they can’t get serious spending reductions through Congress. Nor will we impose new taxes to shutter deficits and debt. We spend and borrow, which gives us the illusion of growth, and at some point, America will collapse. That’s the future. If you think homelessness is bad now, give it another 10 years. As Mises said, the reality of a debt fueled boom is that the debt collapses or the currency does. That’s the way the math works. It’s ground hog day over and over again. In Biblical times they had something called a year of jubilee, every 50 years. Nothing has really changed since then. Cutting 2 trillion out of 1 trillion sounds like getting 10 pounds out of a 5 pound bag. If you read what Elon and Vivek tweet, it is mostly focused on efficiencies. Identify the core function of each department and program, staff and budget to do that job and nothing else, delete functions that aren’t necessary. Add new functions that are necessary. Similar to how Twitter was remade. It turns out, they had a huge amount of highly paid dead weight. Whether anything like this is possible or desirable in a government is a different question. Twitter was special case … it’s old mission was curated (censored) social media; it is now a simple bulletin-board of postings. The censors, their rules, judgement and govt connections were eliminated. Try criticizing Musk on Twitter… and get back to us on that suspension of censorship theory… if you can: “Laura Loomer accused Elon Musk of ‘totalitarian’ behavior after she and other critics of the X owner were stripped of their verification badges after criticizing Musk’s comments on American workers and foreign H-1B visa holders. Quote from Laura Loomer Lashes Out At ‘Totalitarian’ Elon Musk I just kicked Laura Loomer off personally. She hurt my feelings. Yeah, but even if you eliminate basically everyone, the problem is transfer payments, not gov’t employee salaries. Our problem is a demographic one. I cant believe Mish is spending even five minutes trying to figure out how Trump and his henchmen are gonna cut the budget, yet at the same time borrow trillions for Donald’s spending priorities. Even Hitler couldnt do it unless he robbed the Jews of their wealth. Is Mike actually gonna try to shove the round peg in this square hole? Budget cuts of this magnitude will anger not only the democrats but repubs as well. Please dont waste any more time on this. Elon and Vijay will be gone in six months. Omg a Hitler reference. That worked so well in the election. Without the “collection” of Jewish wealth there was no way Adolph would have afforded all the weapons and public works projects that were paid for in the 1930s. Germany has nothing to sell except engineering. My God, it’s brilliant. Mach es noch einmal. The Nazi government also defaulted on various bond issues issued by successive Weimar governments prior to 1933. Until the defaulted bonds were finally paid off in 2010, there was a secondary market for defaulted German government bonds. If there’s no tax on tips, I’m going to get my contract modified so it is 90% tips. Sorry, Tips are voluntary, not contractually enforced … maybe a risk worth taking and splitting the savings with long-time clients. Patience. The season of cuts will be upon us soon. And my season of handouts will continue. Maybe one way to fix this total fiscal mess would be to take the social insurance programs (health, social security (SS) out of the Federal budget and run them as insurance programs that need to be balanced ex ante year-on-year (forget about prefunding SS; it doesn’t work). That would take roughly 3 trillion out of the Federal budget, which is also the fastest growing part of the budget. Many countries do exactly that to prevent politicians from using those popular programs as cover for their natural inclination to run unsustainable fiscal deficits. That leaves about 3-4 trillion non-interest spending, and let Congress have its annual dogfight over something where trade-offs are much clearer than in the present fiscal setup. Keeping on that theme, Veterans Admin expenses should all be accounted for under Defense so we can see the true cost of playing Globo-Cop. DOGE? These guys are already infighting and it is only 23 days before Trump takes office when Trump/GOP will control all branches of government and we are already seeing MAGA on MAGA hate. Evidently, President Musk wants to double H1B visas and bring FOREIGN workers in to replace Americans….lol. What’s the point of border controls if everyone gets a visa and green card. How is that going to impact the federal budget? https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/maga-civil-war-why-elon-musk-is-clashing-with-laura-loomer/articleshow/116713456.cms Lol! You get what you voted for? We didn’t vote for anyone. We voted against someone. … and got me! The horns of our society’s dilemma are getting sharpened. On one side I see continuing to drift in this massively credit-bubbling, feather-bedding welfare state economy. On the other, I see one of the biggest rug-pulls every done, the too-rapid receding of that debt-welfare economy, with a tremendous asset grab by the elites, a tremendous eviction of (what remains of) the former middle class. I am hoping for some sort of third way, around or between these two paths. Happy day. If Trump makes Canada a state, we can move up there. Only if the Trudeau voters get deported back to France, England-schmengland and Arabia. One state? Multiple states! This is much akin to the US Congress saving 3% by cutting the annual GROWTH in spending from 9% to 6%. For one year only. Cutting $2 trillion from $1 trillion is easy when you schedule it for the future when these folks are no longer responsible. I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger Today. If I get you fries with that, can I get paid Monday? I think there is lots of opportunity to save on “defense” if we just close all the overseas bases, bring all the troops back home, and cut the MICC down to whatever is needed for defense of our borders. Of course, that won’t happen until we have our Soviet Union moment. You arent much of a Repub, Lisa. Cutting $2 trill is easy when you arent interested in facts. You simply go to the bottom of the budget and cross out the number that is real and just write in whatever number you want. Simple. If it were that easy, it would have been done already. They can’t even let tax cuts expire as scheduled. Would somehow forcing the dollar to decline against other currencies also be an advantage that could be utilized? Cant think of a faster way to $10 a gallon gasoline. …making my cars a bargain The other countries would out-whore us and drop faster than us. The dog will be feeding on your income the rest is just wishful thinking get over it.! You laid it out very well, Mish. The question then becomes; How long on the current road before it all comes tumbling down? According to a few forecasts, such as Howe’s “Fourth Turning” and Ray Dalio, it’s coming at the end of the decade. I’m a Trump voter because I just can’t stomach the crazies runnning the Democrat party, but he’s never managed anything successfully other than borrowing money and campaigning. Elon and Vivek are going to hit the wall soon. All they’re going to get from Congress is hand clapping and lip service, and the Dems will be back in control of the
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

The Warmongering WSJ Editorial Board Now Sounds Just Like Trump

…Says Iran Did Not Rebuild Nuclear Program After 2025 Strikes, Contradicting Trump – Time Magazine, March 2026 https://time.com/article/2026/03/18/tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-trump/ Trump, Gabbard Comments…

Gabbard is full of crap, which is why Trump keeps her locked up and silent. Trump is President.…

Show full text (36254 chars)
• • • Apparently, losing less than the rest of the world is winning. Trump’s Resolve on Iran at 60 Days “ The President hasn’t folded under pressure, but more military strikes may be necessary, ” says the board. It’s as if Iran won’t strike back, and more bombing will fix things. Please consider Trump’s Resolve on Iran at 60 Days President Trump on Friday repeated his determination to blockade Iran until it agrees to nuclear concessions and reopens the Strait of Hormuz. He added a threat to resume military strikes, and he may have to follow through on that threat to get an outcome that is a strategic victory. Iran’s regime is “choking like a stuffed pig,” Mr. Trump told Axios on Wednesday regarding the blockade’s effect, “and it is going to be worse for them.” Operation Economic Fury is squeezing Iran’s financing, and to avoid shutting-in oil wells, the regime is scrambling for any junk storage it can find. The President is under pressure to give up on his war aims, and give him credit for standing firm. He’s also right to reject Iran’s demand that he end the U.S. blockade. This would be the third time Iran has teased Hormuz to win U.S. concessions; it reneged both previous times, as the closed Strait is its only real leverage. When Iran runs out of oil storage, it will have to stop production, causing permanent damage. Reliant on imports, Iran also faces a gasoline crisis—which is politically combustible. While Trump critics say Iran can hold out forever because it withstood sanctions in the past, the situations aren’t comparable. The other concern is that Iran will respond by resuming attacks on its neighbors’ oil and gas, sending prices even higher. But Americans would suffer less than the rest of the world, including China . This would give Mr. Trump a card to play when he visits Beijing this month. Treasury’s warning to Chinese banks linked to Iran’s oil trade also increases Beijing’s incentive to help reopen the Strait. Mr. Trump deserves credit for staying the course when so many around him are losing their nerve. Germany’s Chancellor boasted about America’s “humiliation” in the Gulf, a remark he may come to regret. Democrats in Congress are hoping for Mr. Trump’s failure in Iran, as if that wouldn’t also be America’s. Many Republicans are also heading for the tall grass, as they worry about gas prices and the coming elections. Worse is the whisper campaign sowing doubts from inside Mr. Trump’s own administration. Damaging leaks about U.S. munition stocks surfaced in this paper and the New York Times on the same day last week. This week the Atlantic reported that Vice President JD Vance is asking serious questions about the war, as if he’s the only strategic thinker around. Mr. Vance has positioned himself as a skeptic from the war’s beginning, perhaps to stay on the good side of MAGA’s antiwar faction. This is a bad look for a supposedly loyal Vice President, and it doesn’t help with public support . The war isn’t a failure , but it could be if Mr. Trump settles for a bad deal. Iran’s nuclear program was devastated in June and hit again in March, but some important targets remain. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens of senior officials have been killed, leaving Iran with less-experienced replacements, a Supreme Leader in hiding and a divided junta. These columns have supported the war on the assumption that the President wouldn’t start a conflict he doesn’t intend to win. If the war ends with real Iranian concessions, or the U.S. forcibly opens Hormuz or seizes Iran’s enriched uranium, Mr. Trump and the GOP can enter the midterms with a better story to tell. “The War Isn’t a Failure” That one line by the WSJ editorial board tells you all you need to know. Recall the board was once against this war but now embraces the expansion of it. The war is a total failure on every front (inflation, splintering of allies, loss of global respect, budget deficits, squeeze on farmers). But we now rationalize these losses by defining winning as “ suffering less than the rest of the world .” By the same logic, bombing Libya was a success, and the US should have stayed in Afghanistan and Vietnam. The Journal notes damage to Iran’s well. “ Iran Is Squealing Like a Pig “. Lovely. That damage will be permanent. The damage in the region will be permanent as well. It’s not just Iran who will be capping wells. The longer this goes on, the more damage will occur, and the higher price for oil, gas, fertilizer, aluminum and everything else that passes through the strait. The war is a total failure. The sooner we admit the truth, the sooner we avoid another Vietnam, Libya, Afghanistan, or Iraq setup. Hegseth Testimony In Congress this week, Pet Hegseth, the appropriately named “Secretary of War”, admitted we totally destroyed Iran’s capability to build a nuclear weapon. Hegseth rationalized the war was necessary because Iran wanted to build a weapon. It was quite an amazing pretzel Hegseth became. Mattis and Dunford Contradict Trump Please recall that Trump’s own top general and Secretary of Defense in Trump’s first term admitted in Congress, under oath, that Iran was honoring the terms of Obama’s deal. Testimony (October 2017): Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mattis said, “I believe that [Iran] fundamentally [are] in compliance with its nuclear deal”. Contradicting Trump: Mattis, a career hawk, advised that staying in the deal was in the U.S. national security interest, putting him at odds with President Trump’s public criticism of the agreement as an “embarrassment”. Iran only began stepping back from JCPOA limits (e.g., higher uranium enrichment levels, reduced IAEA access) after Trump unilaterally withdrew in 2018 and reimposed sanctions—not before. This sequence is well-documented in IAEA reports and international statements that include Trump’s top general and Secretary of Defense. New York Times October 3, 2017: Mattis Contradicts Trump on Iran Deal Ahead of Crucial Deadline General Dunford testified at the same hearing alongside Mr. Mattis, and while he did not take a position on the Iran deal, his description about whether Tehran is violating the accord was at odds with the administration’s talking points. He said Iran “is not in material breach” of the agreement and that it had “delayed the development of a nuclear capability by Iran.” Trump’s First Term Flashback Trump’s US State Department: Iran honoring the terms. Trump’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: Iran honoring the terms. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): Iran honoring the terms. Arms Control Association: Iran honoring the terms. All US European allies: Iran honoring the terms. Every other signee of the accord: Iran honoring the terms. Trump’s top general Gen. Joseph Dunford: Iran honoring the terms. Trump’s Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis: Iran was complying with the terms of the 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal Iran did not resort to building a nuclear weapon until after Trump tore up the deal. And now here we are. Let the Bombing Resume?! The board seems to have forgotten a big lesson. Iran retaliates. Recall this war was supposed to be over in 3-5 days. It’s now day 60. Damn the consequences, let the bombing begin. If Trump does, Iran may very well bomb every desalination plant in the region. One successful strike will cause the biggest water shortage in history. As a side note, Trump needs approval from Congress after 60 days to do what the editorial board wants. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (also known as the War Powers Act) is a federal law designed to limit the U.S. President’s ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad without Congressional approval. It requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing troops to hostilities, authorizing a maximum 60-day engagement unless Congress declares war, authorizes an extension, or is unable to meet. But who cares about the law? Not Trump or the board. Trump makes ridiculous excuses that the peace talks interrupted the 60 day limit, while the board simply looks the other way. Chiding Vance Vance agued against the war. So did Rubio and top military leaders. Unfortunately, Trump listened to his feelings, his son-in-law, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and a pack of lies from Netanyahu. I would advise the board to please admit who was right. Instead, the board mocks Vance noting “ Vice President JD Vance is asking serious questions about the war, as if he’s the only strategic thinker around. “ At least someone is thinking. The board is incapable. It can’t even think 6 months ahead to the midterm elections. Trump’s Resolve on Iran at 60 Days “ The President hasn’t folded under pressure, but more military strikes may be necessary, ” says the board. It’s as if Iran won’t strike back, and more bombing will fix things. Please consider Trump’s Resolve on Iran at 60 Days President Trump on Friday repeated his determination to blockade Iran until it agrees to nuclear concessions and reopens the Strait of Hormuz. He added a threat to resume military strikes, and he may have to follow through on that threat to get an outcome that is a strategic victory. Iran’s regime is “choking like a stuffed pig,” Mr. Trump told Axios on Wednesday regarding the blockade’s effect, “and it is going to be worse for them.” Operation Economic Fury is squeezing Iran’s financing, and to avoid shutting-in oil wells, the regime is scrambling for any junk storage it can find. The President is under pressure to give up on his war aims, and give him credit for standing firm. He’s also right to reject Iran’s demand that he end the U.S. blockade. This would be the third time Iran has teased Hormuz to win U.S. concessions; it reneged both previous times, as the closed Strait is its only real leverage. When Iran runs out of oil storage, it will have to stop production, causing permanent damage. Reliant on imports, Iran also faces a gasoline crisis—which is politically combustible. While Trump critics say Iran can hold out forever because it withstood sanctions in the past, the situations aren’t comparable. The other concern is that Iran will respond by resuming attacks on its neighbors’ oil and gas, sending prices even higher. But Americans would suffer less than the rest of the world, including China . This would give Mr. Trump a card to play when he visits Beijing this month. Treasury’s warning to Chinese banks linked to Iran’s oil trade also increases Beijing’s incentive to help reopen the Strait. Mr. Trump deserves credit for staying the course when so many around him are losing their nerve. Germany’s Chancellor boasted about America’s “humiliation” in the Gulf, a remark he may come to regret. Democrats in Congress are hoping for Mr. Trump’s failure in Iran, as if that wouldn’t also be America’s. Many Republicans are also heading for the tall grass, as they worry about gas prices and the coming elections. Worse is the whisper campaign sowing doubts from inside Mr. Trump’s own administration. Damaging leaks about U.S. munition stocks surfaced in this paper and the New York Times on the same day last week. This week the Atlantic reported that Vice President JD Vance is asking serious questions about the war, as if he’s the only strategic thinker around. Mr. Vance has positioned himself as a skeptic from the war’s beginning, perhaps to stay on the good side of MAGA’s antiwar faction. This is a bad look for a supposedly loyal Vice President, and it doesn’t help with public support . The war isn’t a failure , but it could be if Mr. Trump settles for a bad deal. Iran’s nuclear program was devastated in June and hit again in March, but some important targets remain. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens of senior officials have been killed, leaving Iran with less-experienced replacements, a Supreme Leader in hiding and a divided junta. These columns have supported the war on the assumption that the President wouldn’t start a conflict he doesn’t intend to win. If the war ends with real Iranian concessions, or the U.S. forcibly opens Hormuz or seizes Iran’s enriched uranium, Mr. Trump and the GOP can enter the midterms with a better story to tell. “The War Isn’t a Failure” That one line by the WSJ editorial board tells you all you need to know. Recall the board was once against this war but now embraces the expansion of it. The war is a total failure on every front (inflation, splintering of allies, loss of global respect, budget deficits, squeeze on farmers). But we now rationalize these losses by defining winning as “ suffering less than the rest of the world .” By the same logic, bombing Libya was a success, and the US should have stayed in Afghanistan and Vietnam. The Journal notes damage to Iran’s well. “ Iran Is Squealing Like a Pig “. Lovely. That damage will be permanent. The damage in the region will be permanent as well. It’s not just Iran who will be capping wells. The longer this goes on, the more damage will occur, and the higher price for oil, gas, fertilizer, aluminum and everything else that passes through the strait. The war is a total failure. The sooner we admit the truth, the sooner we avoid another Vietnam, Libya, Afghanistan, or Iraq setup. Hegseth Testimony In Congress this week, Pet Hegseth, the appropriately named “Secretary of War”, admitted we totally destroyed Iran’s capability to build a nuclear weapon. Hegseth rationalized the war was necessary because Iran wanted to build a weapon. It was quite an amazing pretzel Hegseth became. Mattis and Dunford Contradict Trump Please recall that Trump’s own top general and Secretary of Defense in Trump’s first term admitted in Congress, under oath, that Iran was honoring the terms of Obama’s deal. Iran only began stepping back from JCPOA limits (e.g., higher uranium enrichment levels, reduced IAEA access) after Trump unilaterally withdrew in 2018 and reimposed sanctions—not before. This sequence is well-documented in IAEA reports and international statements that include Trump’s top general and Secretary of Defense. New York Times October 3, 2017: Mattis Contradicts Trump on Iran Deal Ahead of Crucial Deadline General Dunford testified at the same hearing alongside Mr. Mattis, and while he did not take a position on the Iran deal, his description about whether Tehran is violating the accord was at odds with the administration’s talking points. He said Iran “is not in material breach” of the agreement and that it had “delayed the development of a nuclear capability by Iran.” Trump’s First Term Flashback Iran did not resort to building a nuclear weapon until after Trump tore up the deal. And now here we are. Let the Bombing Resume?! The board seems to have forgotten a big lesson. Iran retaliates. Recall this war was supposed to be over in 3-5 days. It’s now day 60. Damn the consequences, let the bombing begin. If Trump does, Iran may very well bomb every desalination plant in the region. One successful strike will cause the biggest water shortage in history. As a side note, Trump needs approval from Congress after 60 days to do what the editorial board wants. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (also known as the War Powers Act) is a federal law designed to limit the U.S. President’s ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad without Congressional approval. It requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing troops to hostilities, authorizing a maximum 60-day engagement unless Congress declares war, authorizes an extension, or is unable to meet. But who cares about the law? Not Trump or the board. Trump makes ridiculous excuses that the peace talks interrupted the 60 day limit, while the board simply looks the other way. Chiding Vance Vance agued against the war. So did Rubio and top military leaders. Unfortunately, Trump listened to his feelings, his son-in-law, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham, and a pack of lies from Netanyahu. I would advise the board to please admit who was right. Instead, the board mocks Vance noting “ Vice President JD Vance is asking serious questions about the war, as if he’s the only strategic thinker around. “ At least someone is thinking. The board is incapable. It can’t even think 6 months ahead to the midterm elections. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock The war is a total failure on every front This is not true. MICC always win. Another winner is US shale industry. Netanyahu always win. Anyone that says an oil well will be permanently damaged from being shut in doesn’t know a bit from a water barrel. Superannuated neocons. Taking the country into a war of choice on behalf of a foreign nation without consulting congress is treason. I am not a constitutional lawyer. Just my opinion. For the other side – let take the Five points one at a time. Inflation – Inflation is not bad once you consider deflation(Depression). The real issue is stagflation and demand destruction. No one wants to talk about this because Stagflation is not sexy. Two truths to think about. Inflation is a monetary phenome. The cure for high prices is high prices. Allies – Is Nato really an ally or a leech when they continue to make themselves more vulnerable with an insane energy policy by destroying their nuclear plants and buying their energy from a dictator. Trump warned them. This conflict has demonstrated that Nato is impotent and can not help open the strait and the US is the only power in NATO. NATO should have been disbanded when USSR fell apart. The reason for its existence went away but it exists just like any good government program. When you buy a friend – they are not a friend. Global Respect – Real politic is transactional. China learned again that they are very venerable and they lost cheap oil. USSR and Chinese weapons are shit and can not stand up to the US weapons. The Arabs are learning that Iran is their enemy. OPEC is falling apart.  The Saudi need the US to protect them. Europe is impotent to secure the strait. Iran’s latest missile can reach Europe. European socialist imported Syrian and Africans and are now beholden to their small political block. Does anyone want to talk about all the Iranian princelings in Starmer’s UK? Budget Deficits – The return on investment is greater in missiles than in social programs. The real question is do you want to support defense contractors or fraud in democratic states where they get a cut. Farmers – Most US farmer bought the inputs to this year’s crop in December and January. Anyone that did not is switching from corn to soybeans. Hint: Soybeans do not require nitrogen fertilizer. US corn is not used for food but to feed animals and make ethanol. Leaders are lonely because they think ahead of the crowd. Who could have thought that in 4 years – Panama Canal, Iran, Cuba, Venezula, China will all be more freindly to the US because we stood up and used our power. So you’re arguing for extortion and robbery. BINGO! Trump says US navy like ‘pirates’ while seizing a ship in Iranian blockadeUS president says ‘we took over the cargo, took over the oil. It’s a very profitable business’ The countries you mention are more friendly by virtue of extortion. Ie. They have to be. None of those countries have the back of the US. The US has no friends today except Israel and with Israel as a friend you don’t need enemies. Nobody has Trumps back. who helped when Trump asked for help with the Iran war? It was crickets. Why? Because Trump has treated the rest of the world like shit. The US may be powerful but not so powerful that it does not need allies and Trump has alienated everyone. Now other countries have to think is this going to be over in 3 years or are the US idiots going to elect yet another moron? Is congress going to get its act together? Is the rule of law still alive in the US? Is there going to be a revolution? Will their be an orderly transfer of power? Will the US finally choke on its debt? In a lot of ways the Iran war has revealed that the emperor has no clothes. A backwards country like Iran has stopped the US in its tracks. A lot has to go right before the US will ever regain its position as the leader of the free world. I am thinking not. Trump maybe didn’t cause this situation entirely but he sure hurried it along. R E S P E C T Find out what it means to me! They know what Israel and Murdoch want. Israeli media bias is legion https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/telegraph-and-politico-owner-says-journalists-must-support-israel-or-resign Current US Intelligence Opinion regarding Iran nuclear efforts: Gabbard Says Iran Did Not Rebuild Nuclear Program After 2025 Strikes, Contradicting Trump – Time Magazine, March 2026 https://time.com/article/2026/03/18/tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-trump/ Trump, Gabbard Comments on Iran Nuclear Capability – June 2025 “The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” https://www.factcheck.org/2025/06/trump-gabbard-comments-on-iran-nuclear-capability/ Thanks Also promised no long range missles.They surely can be trusted. It wasn’t as imminent as the poliburo says but it was a matter of time before they had a nuke and surely would have used it. Yeah, after Trump ended the JCPOA. Like breaking a contract to buy your truck and then crying that you don’t deliver the truck. Anyone trusting a radical Islamic extremist regime is delusional. Sure you all go with that. They certainly don’t TACO as much. In other words, you have no evidence. Iran wasn’t building long range missiles until Trump ended the JCPOA. Trump’s own CIA could find no evidence that Iran was enriching uranium beyond what was permitted by the KCPOA. BUT Trump is an Israeli puppet, a pathetic little cuck. They don’t even need missiles. They don’t even need full nuclear capability. They could just detonate a dirty bomb that they smuggled into Israel and spread radioactive dust (although some would drift into Iran also, since the world winds blow west to east). Or put a dirty bomb on a boat off the coast of Manhattan and destroy Wall Street. They could. Funny, we are daily assured that they are crazy and seek Armageddon, but Iran has not done so, in spite of Iranian missiles regularly getting through the “Iron Dome”. Why, it’s almost like the lies you spew are lies…. Gabbard is full of crap, which is why Trump keeps her locked up and silent. Trump is President. He presumably knows far more than you and any articles in support of your beliefs that you can dredge up. The US Intelligence agencies have been wrong more often than right. Better to deal with a threat preemptively, says I. So the 16 different US Intelligence and Defense Agencies that developed this analysis are incompetent and you know better. I stand corrected. By that logic, the world should deal with the US. The idea thaf Trump now is an intelligence analyst as well as a Persia expert is a laugh. No other war was authorized by Congress.How did afghanistan , iraq and vietnam become relatively infinite? WPA allows Congress to appropriate money for military action without formally declaring war. It reduces political fallout to include military action spending in a bill with lots of things voters want. False. Congress authorized the use of force in all three of those cases. Always the whining! Trump made the right choice, listening to the people he believes in. The WSJ is correct. Trump must stay the course. You think the small amount of economic pain Americans suffer due to this war is meaningful? Consider yourself lucky that you are not living in Iran! Iranians Feel the Pain as Their Economy Descends Into a Death Spiral Businesses are closing, unemployment is soaring and food is increasingly unaffordable Businesses are closing, unemployment is soaring and food is increasingly unaffordable Margherita Stancati Margherita Stancati April 28, 2026 10:00 pm ET April 28, 2026 10:00 pm ET Quick Summary Quick Summary • War and a U.S. naval blockade have caused severe economic hardship in Iran, leading to more than one million jobless. • War and a U.S. naval blockade have caused severe economic hardship in Iran, leading to more than one million jobless. War has imposed a heavy cost on Iran’s economy: more than a million people out of work, soaring food prices and a prolonged internet shutdown that has slammed online businesses. War has imposed a heavy cost on Iran’s economy: more than a million people out of work, soaring food prices and a prolonged internet shutdown that has slammed online businesses. The question is how much more pain Iran’s leaders are willing to tolerate as they try to negotiate a favorable end to the war. The question is how much more pain Iran’s leaders are willing to tolerate as they try to negotiate a favorable end to the war. Talks between the U.S. and Iran have stalled. American officials are betting that Iran will soon crack because of the deepening economic crisis. Iran is betting the U.S. will crack first and end its blockade of Iranian ports to calm global markets and bring down American gasoline prices. Talks between the U.S. and Iran have stalled. American officials are betting that Iran will soon crack because of the deepening economic crisis. Iran is betting the U.S. will crack first and end its blockade of Iranian ports to calm global markets and bring down American gasoline prices. To contain the economic fallout, the Iranian government has raised wages, subsidized basic goods and handed out cash to the poor. But authorities are confronting a level of hardship not seen in decades, according to residents. To contain the economic fallout, the Iranian government has raised wages, subsidized basic goods and handed out cash to the poor. But authorities are confronting a level of hardship not seen in decades, according to residents. “It is an authoritarian regime, and it can claim that resisting economic pressure is a question of national pride,” said Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow and Iran expert at the Middle East Institute. At the same time, “As the money dries up because of the blockade, we may find that more and more folks have no choice but to mobilize politically,” he said. “It is an authoritarian regime, and it can claim that resisting economic pressure is a question of national pride,” said Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow and Iran expert at the Middle East Institute. At the same time, “As the money dries up because of the blockade, we may find that more and more folks have no choice but to mobilize politically,” he said. … … https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iranians-feel-the-pain-as-their-economy-descends-into-a-death-spiral-47dba669 https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iranians-feel-the-pain-as-their-economy-descends-into-a-death-spiral-47dba669 Good piece. And likely the only kind of “peace” we’ll get! I believe “ Iran did not resort to building a nuclear weapon until after Trump tore up the deal.” IS correct – and documented too. ON losing less than Europe supposedly being winning I used to have a realted similar credo: “Less bad is not a defense.” Please document your belief that Iran is building a nuclear weapon. There is no evidence for this, only Trump’s constant, ignorant, bloviation turning propaganda into conventional wisdom. Well, Trump’s the president and you’re not. So all you can do is spew BS on internet blogs, loser. 🤣 By that logic, Iraq must have been chock a block with WMDs. The president said so. Amen, Mish! Warmongering is the word for the abject WSJ. “But we now rationalize these losses by defining winning as “ suffering less than the rest of the world .” By the same logic, bombing Libya was a success…” The US has already lost this war of choice–or rather of whim. And worldwide recession (and indeed starvation in the poorest countries) will be one major result of the Netanyahu/Trump war. Present GDP cannot be generated with 20% less energy and fertilizer. As far as the neocons are concerned, Libya was a success. Iran did not resort to building a nuclear weapon until after Trump tore up the deal. This statement is incorrect . Iran has not, and is not building a nuclear weapon. At least they were not until Trump recently attacked them. This is not my sole opinion, it is the consensus Intelligence Estimate of all US Defense and Intelligence Agencies. After Trump foolishly reneged on the agreement that Obama painstakingly negotiated, Iran gradually increased uranium enrichment to about 60%, far below the 90+% needed for a weapon. Nor did they take any steps to weaponize uranium. This nuclear excuse is a complete canard being used by Trump to justify his aggression, just as Natanyahoo has been using it for the past 30 years. This war is about Zionist delusions of grandeur / entitlement that God chose them to rule the Middle East, nothing more. “ This war is about Zionist delusions of grandeur / entitlement that God chose them to rule the Middle East, nothing more‘ Israel has found a way to solve this ‘problem’: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-pour-730m-propaganda-gaza-genocide-iran-war-turns-it-pariah They must be experiencing diminishing ROI on their purchase of US Presidents and Congresspersons and need to diversify. “These columns have supported the war on the assumption that the President wouldn’t start a conflict he doesn’t intend to win.” It sounds as if the WSJ supports any conflict that we can win. That is a very illogical method of determining support. There are lots of countries that we could attack with that criterion. I would support a war that we couldn’t win if it was just. The war on Iran is a disaster for everyone. The tariff war on the rest of the world is a second disaster. The alienation of our allies is a third. Trump’s confrontational style is a disaster. You can’t bully your way to prosperity. I am a WSJ subscriber (print + online). I read the B-section first, then the A-section. I usually do NOT read the editorials. No need or any real Iranian concessions… the Trump administration and their propaganda channels are fully capable… of making up the stories they want to tell. The one constant in the WSJ Editorial Board is that they are Israel First in all things. Israel’s #1 desire in Iran is to keep the US engaged there, so that is what the WSJ EB will say is the best policy. And the problem with this is? I would have no problem with that bias if they would simply disclose to readers that the Editorial Board is bought and paid for by Israel. But then they would be less effective at persuading readers, so they hide that fact and pretend they are being objective. This is not unique to the WSJ. CBS is now owned by Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, the largest single contributor to the IDF. He is also in the process of closing the deal to buy CNN. Even though he is American, when he uses the term “we” to describe a nation, he is talking about Israel, not the US. The foreign TV news networks are much better than American ones in providing objective international news. France 24, Deutsche Welle, BBC, and Al Jazeera all have excellent 24/7 English-language news networks and news websites. Rupert Murdoch is a virulent Zionist and his wife is jewish…how is this a surprise? Certainly not the same WSJ once run by the Bancroft’s. I couldn’t find a WSJ story reporting on this brutal attack on a nun by an Israeli man, motivated solely by the fact that she is catholic https://www.timesofisrael.com/police-arrest-man-suspected-of-attacking-french-nun-at-jerusalem-biblical-site/ I’ll see your Israeli man attacking nun story and raise you this https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/allegations-abuse-israeli-detention-facility-sde-teiman-1792763 Evil Don’t get arrested and you won’t have any problems. [shrug] So if a Biden Administration were to arrest trumpers, you’d be cool with that. Indeed, it was a very fine and credible publication under the Bancroft’s. Murdoch pisses in everything he touches. It’s worth pointing out that polling shows a 60% majority of American Jews are opposed to the war in Iran, so pointing out his wife as being Jewish doesn’t support your argument. Link? 68% of American Jews back the US-Israel war against Iran , survey finds …straight from the Home Office https://www.timesofisrael.com/68-of-connected-american-jews-back-the-us-israel-war-against-iran-survey-finds/ Israel quadruples propaganda budget to $730 M as it loses global ‘war for hearts and minds’ https://x.com/TheCradleMedia/status/2050489776982163788 And Iran is filled with virulent Muslims. If the WSJ does not offer a what customers want then the WSJ will not survive. By offering the article MISH reports, the WSJ either knows that’s what subscribers want or is testing the waters by measuring feedback from subscribers. chatGPT query below. WSJ clearly knows what its PAYING customers want. I assume that Mish also knows what his audience wants, although none pay here, which is why he continues the foot stomping, turn red, hair-pulling TDS approach that so many of his posts exhibit.. As of the most recent data (2025–2026 timeframe), The Wall Street Journal has roughly 4.6–4.7 million paying subscribers . Around 4.7 million total subscriptions (digital + print combined) were reported in recent 2026 updates Around 4.7 million total subscriptions (digital + print combined) were reported in recent 2026 updates Of those, just over 4.2 million are digital-only subscribers Of those, just over 4.2 million are digital-only subscribers Key takeaway Key takeaway The WSJ is heavily digital now: ~90% of subscribers are digital The WSJ is heavily digital now: ~90% of subscribers are digital Growth has been steady, up from about 4.2 million in 2025 to ~4.7 million in 2026 Growth has been steady, up from about 4.2 million in 2025 to ~4.7 million in 2026 I’ve been a long time reader and admirer of the editorial page of the WSJ and, especially, Barrons. I haven’t always agreed but thought they were well worth reading. Except on defense policy. They’ve never seen a dollar that couldn’t be better spent on bombs. Never have they seen a war, or a supposed threat, that wouldn’t benefit from more dollars. It seems that even now, they’re advocating for a radical expansion of the navy,. including a new carrier group. Something that’s enormously expensive, especially for a government that is essentially bankrupt. What’s worse is that they’re still fighting World War II. Carriers aren’t the thing any longer. Drones are. But hey! Drones are cheap and we can’t have that. It would not surprise me a bit to wake up one morning and read about our carriers being sunk by some new drone they weren’t at all prepared for. I feel bad for the guys that are stuck on those big targets. Human sacrifices collateral damage if not part of the plan or contractual tribute to be paid. Loosh generation for the satanists’ masters. Well, they would spin it as some kind of kitchen fire that went out of control. LOL That sounds like “friendly fire”! “advocating for a radical expansion of the navy,. including a new carrier group” Trump Says U.S. Navy ‘Like Pirates’ in Enforcing Sea Blockade of Iran. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-says-u-navy-pirates-140341163.html US/NATO (Bankrupt) – Pirate World As Trump Declares – “It’s a Very Profitable Business – We’re Like Pirates” ! No ‘Audit’ Of Ft Knox Gold Reserves Yet.! Lock Her Up (2016) – NO ONE At The Top Gone To Jail/Prison Yet! Turns out the Ft Knox stuff isn’t up to snuff Ft. Knox Full Of Impure Gold Unfit For International Transactions https://www.zerohedge.com/precious-metals/ft-knox-full-impure-gold-unfit-international-transactions Trump simply says the quiet part out loud. Pretty funny that I’ve been confronting JoJo with the fact that Trump is basically a robber and extortionist. Now Trump himself admits it. You know WHY? They are part of MICC. MICC is unbelievably large. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Shocking End to US Dominance in the Mideast

…If any politician opposes this, they will find the Deep State trying to remove them, whether Trump or Tulsi Gabbard or anyone else. Even Schumer warned Trump about this !…

…incompetence) and hope that a dollar decline forces Progressives to finally vote against this ceaseless aggression – and CONCENTRATE on fixing the US. care to support any of these comments with documentation

Show full text (41247 chars)
• • • US Humiliated in 13-2 UN Vote on Iran US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo pressed US allied in the UN to extend an arms embargo against Iran. The US failed 13-2 or more accurately 2-2-11 (Russia and China voting against) with 11 abstentions. Humiliating Abstentions Germany, France, the United Kingdom and eight others abstained. Only the Dominican Republic, supported the US resolution in a in a Humiliating UN Vote . Let us underline this. The most powerful countries in the world and the current representatives of the main global blocs just sided with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei against Donald J. Trump. Under the terms of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the weapons ban on Iran will expire in mid-October. The Trump administration wants to extend the embargo despite having exited the deal. Pompeo even watered down the US demands to no avail. Cannot Have Your Cake and Eat it Too Trump threatens to unilaterally impose an embargo arguing that the US has the legal authority to re-impose sanctions on Iran under UN Security Council Resolution 2231. Trump unilaterally withdrew from that treaty. Now it wants to enforce part of it. OOPS. The rest of the UN Security Council thinks Pompeo’s idea is crazy, that he can trigger the snap back provision even though the US pulled out of the treaty, telling CNN , “ You can’t have your cake and eat it too .” Even Iran Surprised Note that even Iran was Surprised by the Humiliation . President Hassan Rouhani said, according to US News and World Report, “I don’t remember the United States preparing a resolution for months to strike a blow at the Islamic Republic of Iran, and it garners only one vote. But the great success was that the United States was defeated in this conspiracy with humiliation.” Poking Trump in the Eye The spokesman for the Iranian foreign ministry, Sayyid Abbas Mousavi , said on Twitter Saturday that the US regime must take a lesson from its absolute defeats at the UN security council. Otherwise it will, he said, continue to be isolated, even more than it is today. Mousavi, by using the term “regime” to describe the US government, was tweaking the Trump administration, which routinely refers to the Iranian government as a “regime,” which has connotations of authoritarianism and illegitimacy. China is the Big Winner The EU is weak and European corporations are unlikely to risk the wrath of Trump by making deals with Iran. China is another matter. China in particular appears determined to risk US sanctions in order to make a huge investment in the Iranian economy. The US Treasury Department can only sanction firms that trade in dollars with Iran or that also trade with the US. China intends its projects in Iran to be funded with soft-money currencies it has accumulated through its vast global trade. In accepting those African and other currencies, Iran will suffer a 30% loss, but it will escape the American net. What About the New UAE Deal Trump is bragging about a new Israel-UAE Peace Deal even though it leaves Palestinians in the cold according to a Bloomberg Op-Ed. The Palestinians were disbelieving. They understood the agreement not as a friendly diplomatic move to ward off an Israeli land grab, but as, in the words of Palestinian authority president Mahmoud Abbas, “a stab in the back.” Abbas is right. The UAE has secretly been doing business with Israel for years. Such clandestine dealings are considered par for the course in the region . But by going public with a peace treaty, the UAE did something revolutionary — it proclaimed its independence from the Palestinian cause. The country is willing, even happy, to be of help to the Palestinians, but it is no longer committed to Ramallah’s side or its demands from Israel. As par for the course, Trump takes credit for something in which he played little if any part. Trump’s Six-Point Legacy Bully Allies Belittle Friends Break Good Deals Invoke Disastrous Trade and Sanction Policies Amplify Racial Hatred Drive Countries Into Deals With China In regard to points 4 and 6, Trump’s trade and sanction policies have been a disaster on every front. All of our allies thought the nuclear accord deal with Iran was working, every one of them. Another Trumpian Scheme Bites the Dust By unilaterally breaking the nuclear treaty with Iran, Trump undid the single best accomplishment in 8 years of an Obama presidency. It could have been and should have been US corporations making infrastructure deals in Iran. Instead it will be China. As with NAFTA, Trump said he cold get a better deal.  He didn’t. Another Trumpian scheme backfired miserably. Winning Comes to An End The US cannot take much more of Trump’s self-proclaimed “ winning “. Fortunately, such “ winning ” comes to an abrupt end in November. One of Biden’s first moves ought to be to revive the nuclear deal with Iran hoping to rebuild a good setup that Trump destroyed. Even so, the Mideast picture will never be the same. The Bright Side US unilateral dominance in the Mideast and the US go-it-alone sanction policy have both hit the end of the line. That’s a good thing even though the rise of Chinese influence (thanks to Trump) isn’t. Mish US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo pressed US allied in the UN to extend an arms embargo against Iran. The US failed 13-2 or more accurately 2-2-11 (Russia and China voting against) with 11 abstentions. Humiliating Abstentions Germany, France, the United Kingdom and eight others abstained. Only the Dominican Republic, supported the US resolution in a in a Humiliating UN Vote . Let us underline this. The most powerful countries in the world and the current representatives of the main global blocs just sided with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei against Donald J. Trump. Under the terms of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the weapons ban on Iran will expire in mid-October. The Trump administration wants to extend the embargo despite having exited the deal. Pompeo even watered down the US demands to no avail. Cannot Have Your Cake and Eat it Too Trump threatens to unilaterally impose an embargo arguing that the US has the legal authority to re-impose sanctions on Iran under UN Security Council Resolution 2231. Trump unilaterally withdrew from that treaty. Now it wants to enforce part of it. OOPS. The rest of the UN Security Council thinks Pompeo’s idea is crazy, that he can trigger the snap back provision even though the US pulled out of the treaty, telling CNN , “ You can’t have your cake and eat it too .” Even Iran Surprised Note that even Iran was Surprised by the Humiliation . President Hassan Rouhani said, according to US News and World Report, “I don’t remember the United States preparing a resolution for months to strike a blow at the Islamic Republic of Iran, and it garners only one vote. But the great success was that the United States was defeated in this conspiracy with humiliation.” Poking Trump in the Eye The spokesman for the Iranian foreign ministry, Sayyid Abbas Mousavi , said on Twitter Saturday that the US regime must take a lesson from its absolute defeats at the UN security council. Otherwise it will, he said, continue to be isolated, even more than it is today. Mousavi, by using the term “regime” to describe the US government, was tweaking the Trump administration, which routinely refers to the Iranian government as a “regime,” which has connotations of authoritarianism and illegitimacy. China is the Big Winner The EU is weak and European corporations are unlikely to risk the wrath of Trump by making deals with Iran. China is another matter. China in particular appears determined to risk US sanctions in order to make a huge investment in the Iranian economy. The US Treasury Department can only sanction firms that trade in dollars with Iran or that also trade with the US. China intends its projects in Iran to be funded with soft-money currencies it has accumulated through its vast global trade. In accepting those African and other currencies, Iran will suffer a 30% loss, but it will escape the American net. What About the New UAE Deal Trump is bragging about a new Israel-UAE Peace Deal even though it leaves Palestinians in the cold according to a Bloomberg Op-Ed. The Palestinians were disbelieving. They understood the agreement not as a friendly diplomatic move to ward off an Israeli land grab, but as, in the words of Palestinian authority president Mahmoud Abbas, “a stab in the back.” Abbas is right. The UAE has secretly been doing business with Israel for years. Such clandestine dealings are considered par for the course in the region . But by going public with a peace treaty, the UAE did something revolutionary — it proclaimed its independence from the Palestinian cause. The country is willing, even happy, to be of help to the Palestinians, but it is no longer committed to Ramallah’s side or its demands from Israel. As par for the course, Trump takes credit for something in which he played little if any part. Trump’s Six-Point Legacy In regard to points 4 and 6, Trump’s trade and sanction policies have been a disaster on every front. All of our allies thought the nuclear accord deal with Iran was working, every one of them. Another Trumpian Scheme Bites the Dust By unilaterally breaking the nuclear treaty with Iran, Trump undid the single best accomplishment in 8 years of an Obama presidency. It could have been and should have been US corporations making infrastructure deals in Iran. Instead it will be China. As with NAFTA, Trump said he cold get a better deal.  He didn’t. Another Trumpian scheme backfired miserably. Winning Comes to An End The US cannot take much more of Trump’s self-proclaimed “ winning “. Fortunately, such “ winning ” comes to an abrupt end in November. One of Biden’s first moves ought to be to revive the nuclear deal with Iran hoping to rebuild a good setup that Trump destroyed. Even so, the Mideast picture will never be the same. The Bright Side US unilateral dominance in the Mideast and the US go-it-alone sanction policy have both hit the end of the line. That’s a good thing even though the rise of Chinese influence (thanks to Trump) isn’t. Mish Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Good luck dealing with Putin and other crooks. What’s the point of being a libertarian but not espousing those values for the world ? Do you think a blog will change the world ? You think China will come out ahead? We did exactly what we wanted while there and even that did not work out. We will be laughing like Russia is now with Afghanistan…. I can hear the water starting to drain! C’mon Trump! @Webej Dude, where are you getting your information from(you’re a scumbag, by the way)? Ah. Had we met before then? Don’t recall. Or was there a single-comment litmus test? You, sir, seem to be an intemperate buffoon with the manners of a cur. Do you talk tonyone that lives more than 10km from your house, or trailer park? @nlightn Oh, really? Is that why Putin(“best relations between US & Russia in decades”-Putin), Kim Jong Il(friendly with US; more cooperation with S. Korea), Saudi Arabia(Wow; Ardha dance), China(“please, make a deal!”), Iran(on their knees now) are in trouble or begging to be friends with Pres. Trump? ROTFLMAO,..you bought ALL of Trumalinas narrative. None of what you mention was stated by those world leaders. It’s more of the Orange Ones BS. Trumpalinas’ morning wake up statement,..”Ah, I love the smell of my own BS in the morning. “ @[Louis Winthorpe III] No, I’m not. I go where I see is right and I see that Pres. Trump has done much good for the US and the world in 3.5 years. If you think the US is a laughingstock, I dare you to hand out a dollar in any other country and see how fast they take it and how much respect it gives you. Give me a euro or a pound and it’s a souvenir. Don’t let yourself be fooled by the anti-Trump narrative; look at the facts. @xil Nowhere? Who does the US terrorize except the bad guys(Russia, Iran, China, Venezuela, North Korea, etc.)? what.. has Iran or Venezuela ever threatened to invade you, in your head a bad guy is anyone who does kneel before you in gratitude for your rule. p.s. not quite what the founding fathers had in mind @Sechel Well, that’s interesting; why would Iran develop nukes now if they only wanted nuclear material for energy purposes? Hidden intent no? No negotiating with terrorists. Besides, Iran is not a threat to the US. Israel can finish it “chik-chak” if US gives the green light. The US government has become a pariah internationally which cannot be good for American’s long term interests. This has been apparent for a long time now. Mish – What really gets me though, is that you recognize that the 11 abstentions are essentially a vote for Iran and against the US, but you are abstaining from endorsing a presidential candidate. Failure to endorse Biden/Harris is essentially sending a message that you are ok with continuing down the path the country has taken under 4 more years of Trump . Do you really think Biden/Harris would be as bad?? Still 77 days to change your mind…. “US dominance in the Mideast is over. Thank president Trump.” US dominance of anything has been waning for 50 years. At an accelerating pace. Trump just happens to be Dear Leader at a time when circumstances are making it more obvious. (Not saying he hasn’t helped speed it up, but only t the margin.) No country where increasingly all resources are being handed willy-nilly to mediocrities in exchange for nothing, will dominate much of anything for long. The US started with a lot of capital post WW2. It had a long way to fall. But the mediocrities The Fed has handed it all to, has by now largely burned it all, with their near universal incompetence at anything whatsoever aside from collecting welfare checks stolen from their more competent superiors. Covid, the BLM riots etc., just put some pressure on the hollowed out cardhouse which is all that America now is. And, of course and inevitably: The mediocrities who “made money from their house” and “their portfolio,” and from mindlessly being handed cuts of money others “made” of their house and “portfolio”, failed. As fail is all they have the aptitude to do, once the task they are faced with, gets any more complimecated than collecting stolen handouts from The Fed. Per current fantasy-derived-from-nothing-but-inertia, Americans are still plenty wealthier than Chinese. Which is exactly as relevant as Argentinians being wealthier than Chinese pre Corralito. In both cases, nothing but a Chimera built on a cardhouse. Just like in Argentina, once people start looking under the covers, and see how rotten it all really is, reassessment can be very, very quick and painful. Thank God for the 2nd Amendment. When crap hits the fan, which is surely will, at least the “leaders” here will have to have second thoughts about taking on a well armed populace. Sad it comes to this, but it seems like the republic needs a cleaning to get back to constitutional principals, including hard money! “Sad it comes to this, but it seems like the republic needs a cleaning to get back to constitutional principals, including hard money!” It’s either that, or increasing criminalization until people are fed up enough to realize the only ones competent to do anything useful about it, are the militant Muzzies setting up Mosques down the street. Either outcome is a vast improvement on what we have today but, not being a militant militant Muslim myself, I would much prefer your solution. By voting in favor of Iran, China may earn a “terrorist nation” label. Any labeling by the U.S. is worth less and less. The result itself of the UN Security Council shows that the world does not give much shit about how the U.S. labels another country. They start to have their own thinking. Sadly this will not be the end of this story. Remember the coalition of the willing. It proved the UN security council is an empty propaganda shell. Further gutted by the Libya adventure. In more noble times the UN security council would dissolve itself, but too many high paying jobs are at stake. As you said, the financial embargo will go on, and will strengthen China’s hand. They (China) can’t believe winning would be so easy. GOOD! and with any luck, Trump will get the military out of the 70 odd countries around the world and the 800 or so military bases there. Why didn’t he start on that the day after he was inaugurated? Like I think he promised during his campaign? When Trump assumed the USA throne, I stated on a few forums that Trump would prove to be a Manchurian Candidate. I think I can claim 100% success in this prediction. The only question is who is controlling Trump, because no one on their own could be as stupid as Trump has shown himself to be over the last 4 years. “because no one on their own could be as stupid as Trump has shown himself to be over the last 4 years” It is all 13-dimensional chess. Fat Donnie™ is sucking the Deep State in and then Q will rescue us. Right after Dumpy Boi finishes his lunch made from babies. Stupidest Comment In Months “So if you encourage supplying weaponry to terrorists, you are no different than them.” The US supplies weapons to Saudi Arabia – a Terrorist nation. The Corrupt CIA has been involved in more deals that have blown up (including Iran) that I can count. Where’s “My” Patriotism? @Spex , you would no know patriotism if it jumped up and spit grapefruit juice in your eye. You are a “false patriot” neocon foolishly waving a military might-makes-right flag in defiance of all common sense. You bought US military propaganda hook line and sinker. Dude, I guess it was smart enough for you to respond. How is SA a terrorist nation? Separate Arab nationals from active state-sponsored policies & initiatives. See here and read through to end: https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2019/saudi-arabia/ If you fully understood my comment; neoconservative is nowhere near. Military propaganda? Please, stop joking. And I strongly suggest you open your eyes and see the anti-Trump narrative(propaganda?) pushed almost everywhere(and not because of his policies, but because he’s “racist”) and make the best choice between your options. If you still want to put nuclear capabilities/weaponry in the hands of the Iranian government that still chants “Death to America!”, then think about your “patriotism”. Idiot. I’m tired of your junk. From one economist to another. SA is an obviously terrorist nation in its aggressive spread of Wahhabism. They panicked after Iran’s 1979 revolution and fostered this movement of extremism around the Sunni world. I suppose you think it’s a coincidence most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi? More recently they have committed many war crimes in Yemen, something even the royal family has tacitly admitted (but not MBS, of course). The US spent 50 years fing around the Iranian people to get their oil and oddly enough they don’t like you much. You opened the door for Islamism you opened the door for the Chinese. FFS go fing home and fight among yourselves. Your style of “patriotism” begets terrorism. Patriotism is overrated and terrorism is over-used. Overrated. Shows what you think about it. Go back to school. You mean the government-run schools we were all brainwashed in? Think for yourself man. Trump is clueless when it come to international diplomacy. There is no way the Europeans, or any other country for that matter, will support a Trump initiative given Trumps belligerence and America first attitude. Trump needs to realize he can dictate terms to the rest of the world but it does not mean he will get a buy in from anyone. He might have gotten away with that behavior in the business world when dealing with suppliers but it just won’t work in the big boys world. Two words come to mind: mental midget. “Trump is clueless” were enough words. You don’t need more. As I see it, there is no alternative. Biden is already pushing regime change in Turkey and hinting at more attempts at war with China. Congress and liberals oppose Trump and vote for more endless war – with Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and whoever it is this month. It never stops and it’s sick. If any politician opposes this, they will find the Deep State trying to remove them, whether Trump or Tulsi Gabbard or anyone else. Even Schumer warned Trump about this ! The US is a man with a leaky roof, trash in his yard, debts he skips and a family often in rebellion. His solution? Start a fight with somebody in the next county that is reputed to beat his wife. The only way to stop this insanity is to wreck the system (Trump, deliberately or through his incompetence) and hope that a dollar decline forces Progressives to finally vote against this ceaseless aggression – and CONCENTRATE on fixing the US. care to support any of these comments with documentation. i see nothing biden is saying ro doing to suggest regime change in turkey or war with china Yahoo published a similar piece – as to the drive towards China war may not not change under Biden. As for regime change in Turkey, this hit the headlines in the past couple days and Erdogan blew up over it – although the Biden interview took place earlier. The military industrial complex/Deep State (or swamp or Neo Cons) dictate ever more war and God Help the politician who says otherwise. Libya was destroyed under Obama and they tried to wreck Syria, too. And then there’s Ukraine (quote “F**k the EU”). “reputed to beat his wife” ?? with whom his wife sleeps And, a member of the “burn it all down and squat in the ashes” contingent speaks up. Power doesn’t guarantee perfection, but power can accelerate the move toward the better. When both parties push for more war, what positive change do you think will arise? I have some hope that universal health care will trim US warmongering ( and some Neo Cons apparently know that) because the resources for Eternal War will dry up, as with Britain, Germany and Canada’s constraints. I see you don’t do subtlety–either it is “China good” or “China must be militarily crushed”. There is a whole area between, called diplomacy and negotiation. Diplomacy? You mean like when Bill Clinton had a deal with North Korea and they actually blew up a nuclear facility compliantly….. and then Congress wrecked it? I’m fully aware of subtlety but it can’t function as long as members of Congress need cheap political support ( like “Russia, Russia”, now, “China, China”, ). Note how blazingly stupid US foreign policy is in regard to pushing nations towards China – the very opposite of Nixon/Kissinger balance. Both parties push for war? What secret messages are you hearing? The parties need to die, but the system keeps us alive. Lets not cut our own throats here. Good! We need to be out of these cesspool no win areas anyhow. Mish, if I remember your positions 4 years ago, you were tired of the endless wars and wanted to see Trump get in as he promised to end the wars and bring our troops home. Now he does it, and you say its a humiliation? I mean seriously, Trump is a bull in a china shop (no pun intended) and stumbles through the “delicacies” of foreign policy and domestic as well. BUT….he IS heading in the right direction, although there are probably many better ways to do it. But Trump isn’t bringing troops home and there’s no indication that he will. Late in 2019 it was shown that there were more US soldiers in the ME than when Trump took office, and then at the start of the year (remember the Baghdad US embassy attack?) we sent even more troops. It’s like when he bragged about pulling troops out of Syria a while ago, but then it was revealed that they hadn’t left Syria at all, they were just redeployed to guard oil-rich areas in the eastern part of the country. We should all realize by now that the MIC doesn’t leave ANYWHERE voluntarily, especially in the ME. Either Trump was lying about yet another campaign promise, or he’s powerless against MIC lobbying. To the extent Trump is speeding up the collapse (as completely and 100% as possible, leaving absolutely nothing of it left, one would hope) of “The System”, he is inevitably heading in the right direction. Much in the same way that nuking Hiroshima moved Japan in the right direction, but still………… I guess you need to tear down a system so you can rebuild it. And Tengen…..agreed. Some of the troop withdrawals (well, most) have been sleight of hand moving them to other areas or reclassifying them. As you note, the MIC is indeed a very powerful force within the swamp. Heck, I was worried when Esper and the generals almost started a mutiny against Trump after the riots in Washington. Trump, like him or hate him, is the commander in chief….and the job of the Secy of Defense and the generals is to execute orders, not second guess them. THAT was some scary shit. Im sure Trump know this….and is acting accordingly. These generals need to be retired post haste. There used to be a “tradition” of subsequent Presidents mostly adhering to previously reached agreements and treaties. The random, personal and vindictive over-turning of agreements and treaties that Trump has done has injected great uncertainty in world politics. Who can count on what from a future administration? There is whole domino fall around the world with respect to other agreements. When rise or fall international agreements are allowed to be tied so tightly with the personal whims of a president, we have moved well into the effective neutering of effective US power in the world. I’m regularly in contact informally with people who are overseas in governmental positions in lesser developed countries. When I first became involved with this program during Obama’s term, there was huge respect for the US, though this already had been tarnished by the Iraq/Afghanistan debacles. In the past few years, the opinion of the US has diminished significantly and it is odd to be the recipient of sympathy of others in other countries who have been also at the random fiats and catastrophes of neo-dictators. But it’s great we can still count on the Dominican Republic… …The United States, which left the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, argued that the arms embargo should not be allowed to expire because Iran continues to support terrorist organizations. But Russia and China said the U.S. has no place presenting resolutions on a deal that it is no longer a part of, and European allies expressed concern that extending the embargo would cause Iran to withdraw from the deal and begin developing nuclear weapons. Of the 15-nation Security Council, 11 nations abstained, with two voting yes and two voting no. The United States would have needed nine votes to prevail — but Russia and China, the two nations that voted no, each had veto power and would have been able to defeat the resolution even if it received the nine votes. The Dominican Republic is the only nation that voted with the U.S…. Just wait. For the US to support a permanent seat for the DR on the Security Council with a view to their vast global sway and responsibility. Yep, I live in a long time US ally. But you are down the track of being just like any other fascist power we can choose to pay homage to, except with better media programming Any thought that we could install a democracy in Iraq was grossly naive. Anyone with a modicum of understanding of history in the Mid East should have been able to fathom that fact. It never was about democracy any more than invading Iraq or any other country was about democracy. USA Empire seeks so-called “free markets” for its multinational MIC corporations, which is code for we liberate your resources and you buy our weapons. QUESTION: What could convince Iran that any new deal could endure the vagaries of US domestic politics and rhetoric? I’m not sure Trump has been the one driving this. I think he’s surrounded himself with neocons who want a war with Iran. His mistake has been appointing the wrong people around him. No I think Trump’s iran policy is in conflict with itself. He wants to box Iran in but doesn’t want war. Iran knows this so every few months they harass the U.S. and its allies as part of a pressure tactic to stop the sanctions As more of these countries realize how irrelevant we have become, I would imagine Americans are about to find out the hard way about the huge trading advantage we have had all along–the world’s reserve currency. When they dump the dollar as the main trading tool… It certainly sets the stage for it, even if it would be very hard for the world to do(for now). It’s the proverbial shot across the bow. Does this mean the US can get back the $1.7 Billion that the previous administration sent to Iran? As David Stockman noted, that was always Iranian money. Frozen assets from the late sevenites. He knows that. It’s misdirection aimed at defending his would be Emperor. tRump is bringing Chaos to America and to the whole world. But in the long run, he is inadvertently bringing down the American Empire, which will be his greatest achievement, and remembered by History. Five countries that could be next to make peace with Israel https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/five-countries-that-could-be-next-to-make-peace-with-israel-638821 Mish, shame on you. I used to have respect for you, but now I don’t. Where is your patriotism? The Iran deal was a fraud and even enabled Iran to pursue nuclear weaponry(remember they didn’t allow inspectors?). Not only that, but it is public that Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism(hezbollah, hamas, Syria, Yemen, etc) and they say so themselves. By selling Iran munitions, they enable murder, rape, abduction, and just plain destruction for the sake of it. So Pres. Trump is right; and you’re an idiot, along with everyone else that abstained. And just so you know, they probably abstained in order to keep selling them weapons and making money. So if you encourage supplying weaponry to terrorists, you are no different than them. i was against the Iran deal too. But it was passed, it was being followed and Trump offered no better alternative. If anything the situation today is worse. The U.N. and Europe were correct to smack Trump down. Trump killed an imperfect deal with no deal and a more dangerous situation. So now instead of Iran having to wait to develop nukes a decade they can do so now. And in the meantime we’ve had more , not less confrontations with Iran. War with Iran is not remotely in our interest and it can’t be won if we used similar resources that we use in Iraq. No way the U.S. wants to occupy Iran. A disaster a mile away and you can’t blow up the nuclear infrastructure either. Iran isn’t Syria or Iraq where Israel could send in a plane and do the job and get out. @Anda Iran was against the west since 1979. Why the participating countries abstained is a question in and of itself. Either they’re corrupt and got paid off or they want to sell them weapons on the side. Maybe both. Btw, Syria is partnered with Iran. where is the us in your list of states who sponsor terror? Where is your patriotism? Where is yours? You are putting dear leader and party over country. If you can’t see what a disaster Trump is for the U.S. after reading Mish’s articles then you are, at best, willfully misinformed. At worst, malevolent. In only 3.5 years Trump has made the U.S. a laughing stock amongst the international community of nations. All that occurred on the world stage is Trump was given the Huge Middle Finger for his Apprentice bullying tactics. It does not work on the world stage. Trumpalina and Pompeoness were totally set up. They took the bait and swallowed deeply their arrogance and false authority. Countries are putting Trump and his goons in their rightful place,… The Middle Finger where they deserve to be. Trump thinks he can screech “KNEEL BEFORE ZOD” and the world will comply. It’s simply not in US interests to engage in another unwinnable overseas undeclared war that we print money to fund. In fact, it could be suggested that someone who endorses such a policy is not patriotic themselves….but I’m not much of a jingoist. Where are you getting your information? – Everybody but Trump (including US intelligence) agree that Iran was complying with inspections and the conditions of the deal. – The US is the biggest sponsor of terrorism, ever since they weaponized jihadist dissent in Afghanistan and started tracking their assets in a CIA database (hence al-Qaeda, Arab. for a database). – Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorists b/c Israel brands its enemies as such, just as the Ukraine calls the people in Lugansk terrorists, or Erdogan calls anybody who displeases him a terrorist. Hamas and Hezbollah are not splinter groups but command respect among huge swathes of the population, offering medical care and social services where nobody else does. Compare that to the cowardly use of drones by youngsters in Nevada bunkers playing Doom and blowing up kids collecting cow dung who never heard of America. – The wars in Yemen and Syria are kept going by foreign intervention, mostly vassals and terrorists controlled by the US and its proxies. – Iran is not wealthy enough to get any weapons producing countries to kow tow. The problem is that ever since the CIA installed Shah was removed, they have asserted their own sovereignty and pursued anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist policies. Attempting friendship is much less likely to instigate all the evils the war-mongers pretend to be combatting. The only lesson that Iran could reasonably have learned that the only way to keep US agression at bay is to be nuclear armed, even though their religious leaders have state that atomic weapons are haram (forbidden by Allah), a pronouncement they cannot easily walk back without losing all credulity with the population. On the bright side he just shifted responsibility of what Iran gets up to in future into what there is of an international community. That is quite a smart move. Iran was not going to turn to the west without its own revolution, and its ties with China and Russia are long-standing, so it is not like the US is losing a partner, simply making the lines clearer. Obviously the west wants Syria and Lebanon , Turkey and occupied territories, aligned with it, and down through the gulf. So there you have leverage over other western countries who didn’t embargo the moment Iran can be shown to use its arms purchases aggressively. I expect they would rally around expelling Iranian influence in the nearer east now they can’t get arms they sold or allowed, back. Etc. etc. etc. and certain countries in the region will profit from that also, and as an obligatory alliance of recognition, against Iran. Etc. etc. etc. Etc. Where is your Patriotism? That sort of question was asked back in the day when I was in the Army of any people who didn’t back the war in Vietnam. They happened to be right, not unpatriotic. A different point of view means you are unpatriotic? Really? BTW if you call someone an idiot who is quite clearly the polar opposite of an idiot you make yourself look rather stupid. US has killed a lot of people in VietNam and elsewhere that were just seeking self determination. The modern day US would be allied to the British to defeat the dissident colonials Good Riddance signed – US taxpayer Enough with the Empire garbage that only benefits the owners of capital (aka – “the rich”) I’ve said for decades now that the US needs shut down the CIA and close ALL its foreign military bases and bring the troops, planes, ships, and drones home. The CIA has toppled democratically elected governments all over the globe and as a result created hatred for the US. The CIA is the exact opposite of what we believe the US should stand for and support. We need to stop being an empire and start taking care of business right here at home. If we actually do that, maybe in a few decades the rest of the world might forgive us… might… maybe… The CIA will not allow itself to be shutdown. Exactly. How this became Trump’s fight is odd to me. Everyone knows that Iran has been on the CIA’s list since the revolution and removal of the Shaw. …So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!” https://genius.com/General-wesley-clark-seven-countries-in-five-years-annotated Sort of hard to do when Obama administration overturned sovereign government in Libya and almost did the same in Syria. Exactly. Secret agencies are the oppositie of democracy which can only thrive on the basis of public debates that appeal to reason. U.S. position on Iran as pushed by Trump is a mistake. UAE making peace with Israel is an indication nobody trusts the U.S. to be the stop-gap so UAE is making peace with Israel for military cooperation and most likely the nod from Washington that they can purchase more advanced weaponry. If anything the peace deal with Israel represents an escalation and not a calming of tensions. I may be wrong but I bet if we watch we’ll see news in the coming weeks and months that support the view that military thinking drove the UAE decision. The UAE and Israel had defacto relations already , just done in secret. I’ll award trump a point for not starting another war. I figured that would be the reelection plan. Destroying the postal service so people can’t vote is a novel approach…. but it might end up getting more people killed when it’s all said and done. Trump’s been lucky. There’s no wisdom or strategy behind Trump’s middle east choices. He’s been driven by the base and polling more than any doctrine. Trump is not destroying the postal system. He wants to address their issues instead of blindly bailing them out. Something that will effect them well after the election. He flat out said he doesn’t know what his postal appointee is doing. It’s not too late. U.S. is losing dominance everywhere. I don’t agree with you that it’s a positive although I do agree or involvement in Iraq was counter-productive as was our involvement in Iran during the Shah days. We don’t always have the wisdom to match our military capability. My eye right now is on Belarus. Any other President would be standing firm with NATO and warning Russia not to become involved. Weak and indecisive Presidents often invite conflict because they lack strengthand determination. Don’t see Trump standing up to Putin. We could see what many would argue an attack if they get “invited in” and the U.S doesn’t properly discourage. Standing to Putin? What are you talking about? Put down the crack pipe and live in reality. Is the FSB causing unrest in Mexico to get an American base next to us? No. Is the CIA causing another color revolution in Belarus to get NATO closer to Russia? Yes. You are falling victim to the hackneyed “victims of oppression heroically rising up for democratic rights” narrative promulgated with every regime change operation. Just like Syria when the people demonstrated in Dara’a to have separate boys/girls schools, and for the right to wear veils in schools, translated by the MSM as “democratic agitation”. 80% of the population just voted for him. 20% of the votes were distributed among a very splintered opposition. This is just another color war psyOp. Even if there was massive election fraud, it would not have swung the election. Sechel… Find Belarus on the map. Exactly how far do you want NATO power to reach? All the way to Moscow? You know, they got their back against the wall, and got nukes. Good thing you’re not ruling the nation. The US is a bully boy, it has had a good run and the Chinese have learnt well. Better for the rest of the world to be able to play them against each other, with side shows from wanna be powers in Europe India and Russia. Losing dominance? America’s problem is it’s attempt at world dominance. Goes against our founding principles of individual freedom and liberty. President Eisenhower kept the US from interfering in Hungary in 1956 (the Hungarian Revolution) and the US survived just fine. The US is now rotting from within, from Portland to New York. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

The Election is Already Over and You Lost

…The DUTY I have is to squelch your brand of patriotism directly into the circular file where it belongs.…

…A citizen lottery for special power to oversee government power with the power to declassify information.…

Show full text (43989 chars)
• • • We don’t know that yet. And with mail-in-voting it’s possible we will not know for days after the election is over. But we do know who lost: all of us. This post comes from one of my readers, “Anna” who replied to my post Biden is a Huge Favorite to Win the Election . Here are Anna’s comments. The election is over. You lost. We will spend more on war. More on zombie corporations. More to lobbyists. More to the rich. We will continue illegally occupying countries and invading new ones. More on treating Americans like they, too, are a conquered people to be watched over and lied to. Either trump or biden has already won. How did they win? For the past year, all media aligned with the state told you who was electable. You accepted it. Now, go complete your performance in the farce — by voting on election day. One of my followers picked up that comment in a Tweet. Reader Wisdom https://twitter.com/BungalowBills1/status/1293634388752773121 About half of the US will be wildly cheering on election day, thinking they won. Their candidate may have, but they didn’t. Mish But we do know who lost: all of us. This post comes from one of my readers, “Anna” who replied to my post Biden is a Huge Favorite to Win the Election . Here are Anna’s comments. The election is over. You lost. We will spend more on war. More on zombie corporations. More to lobbyists. More to the rich. We will continue illegally occupying countries and invading new ones. More on treating Americans like they, too, are a conquered people to be watched over and lied to. Either trump or biden has already won. How did they win? For the past year, all media aligned with the state told you who was electable. You accepted it. Now, go complete your performance in the farce — by voting on election day. One of my followers picked up that comment in a Tweet. Reader Wisdom https://twitter.com/BungalowBills1/status/1293634388752773121 About half of the US will be wildly cheering on election day, thinking they won. Their candidate may have, but they didn’t. Mish Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. You can’t eradicate cannibalism by eating the cannibals; there is no better analog for what voting is. The voting booth should reconfigure the ballot lever to a dildo and require the Helots to use their mouths to make the selection of their next master, it also provides a keen preview of things to come for the voter. “A ballot is just a substitute for a bullet. If your vote isn’t backed by a bullet, it is meaningless. Without the bullet, people could ignore the election outcome. Voting would be pointless. Democracy has violence at its very core!” ~Muir Matteson, “The Nonviolent Zone” “Free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves.” Herbert Marcuse “Working within the system means to become a part of the system. When you go into the voting booth, the only meaningful significance that your action will have is to show that one more person supports the state”. ~Mark Davis “Politics is the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich, by promising to protect each from the other.” ~ Oscar Ameringer “An election is a moral horror, as bad as a battle except for blood; a mud bath for every soul concerned in it.” ~ George Bernard Shaw “If the right to vote were expanded to seven year olds … its policies would most definitely reflect the ‘legitimate concerns’ of children to have ‘adequate’ and ‘equal’ access to ‘free’ french fries, lemonade and videos.” ~ Hans-Hermann Hoppe I respectfully reject the “we” presumption. And I respectfully ask you to consider a Hildabeast Killary Rotten Felon “alternative”. I respectfully reject the author’s presumption of “we” this, “we” that. I do not have a rock/turd in my pocket and I have no interest in frog-French. This VFW, whose “white privilege” and deaf ear didn’t exempt him from the draft in ’67, humbly entreats other GROUPed/GUNned/GARDENed and . . . System-D SIMPLIFIED on a portion of arable, UN-addressed/UN-encumbered inland, rural “allodial” GROUND . . . “carry on”! “Thrive-in-place”! Lock[ed] and load[ed]. NO Fear/Hate when,”… where two or three GATHER together …”, What/Who “abides”? “JC always before me/us” cuz … there are no atheists in foxholes! Daily increasingly grateful/thankful to still be active/un-medicated and daily engaged in COLLABORATIVE PRODUCTIVE enterprise while “… the whole shit-house goes up in flames” – Jim Morrison. ‘Nuf said and … “a little closer to Home”. Hoo-rah. If Biden wins, I won’t be happy, but I’ll be relieved to see the American experiment’s continued existence. We’ll have more time on the clock to course correct. Everyone here that’s equating a Trump win to a Biden win is outright ignoring the pace in which Trump’s pushing the country into outright authoritarianism. We currently have a President that can flagrantly break laws and abuse power in a way that no other President in recent history could have ever gotten away with. U R kidding?! I respectfully reject the “we” presumption. And I respectfully ask you to consider a Hildabeast Killary Rotten Felon “alternative”. The real issue, the one that is going to impact all citizens going forward, is going to be government debt on all levels. The Federal Government, Your State Government, and you local government all have massive budget shortfalls. These are the biggest shortfalls in history on all levels of government. That means they are coming for you. They need money, and you are the only one they can get it from. Of course they are not going to tell you that until after the election, but let me ensure you they are coming for your wallet. The next 5 years will be a period of tax inflation so huge it will forever change the standard of living in America. Go ahead and vote, and think you have some say in your future if that makes you fell better, but you don’t, and deep inside, I think we all know that…… The general trend over the past 20 years since 9/11 has been the transition of Americans into tax slaves. With each new president, we are guaranteed war, debt, and less freedom. Even Trump, who ran as an America first candidate has vetoed efforts to bring American troops hope from foreign entanglements like Yemen while continuing to pour fuel on the fire in places like Syria. This trend isn’t going to change whether it’s Biden or whether it’s Trump. Consider, in 3.5 years, with Trump’s signature on every spending bill, America has added over 70% to the national debt what Obama’s signature added in eight years. Zardoz already beat me to the Carlin reference. Worth posting again. I guess we will find out if a Biden win will be better than a Trump win as people start voting in just less than a month. Read this and weep: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/ Polls in isolation can be wrong as we know, but when 9 out of 10 polls give one candidate a lead this far outside the margin of error this close to the vote the ONLY way for the underdog to win is to cheat. Mish I am surprised at the sudden rush of russian Troll Farmers your page has gotten lately. I don’t remember this happening on your pages last time like this. He’s drawn the ire of Q! We remember Hillary was ahead by 20 points. Your polls don’t mean anything. There were 49 shootings in New York City in 72 hours last weekend. Democrats are encouraging that with their de-fund the police. It is unsafe in NYC. It is unsafe in Chicago. It is unsafe in Portland. It is unsafe in Seattle. People are running to get out of San Francisco. Democrat run cities. A recent poll showed that 1/3rd of black voters are turned off by Kamala Harris. Democrat Leo Terrell said he would vote for Trump if Biden picked Kamala. Terrell is now speaking out against the Democratic Party and telling people to leave the Democratic Party. No Democrat policy maker appeared on the weekend talk shows, just before the Democratic National Convention. Unprecedented. The Harris-Biden strategy is to hide from the press. There is no there, there. Just attempt to run out a clock. Democrats don’t even want Biden to debate, that is how poor a candidate he is. Keep him hidden from the American people. That is not leadership. Remember, Kamala was at one time the odds on favorite to win the Democrat nomination. Tulsi Gabbard took her down with one comment. The Democratic Party is more vulnerable than they think they are. American voters will have to choose between Donald Trump and Joe Biden to be our next President. It could be said many voters are not jumping with joy. Both of these men are old. Biden sports signs of dementia and has been accused of corruption. Trump is considered divisive and not as truthful as many people would like. The article below argues are flawed presidential election process is responsible for giving America such poor choices. just as many people accuse Trump of dementia and corruption. Evidence is actually far better I disagree. This is just another misguided tactic to attempt to answer what are complete bs rationalizations. The problem with the system is we the people. We the people have become garbage. We the people have nothing to offer. We the people are corrupt in their personal lives so that is what they bring to elections. We the people have no self actualization and practice the art of finger pointing instead of introspection. We the people, Trump and Biden are exact mirror reflections of the garbage this society has become. No one with any cajones ( a place of power that can implement change ) will surmount this,..that is where the problem lies. Totally agree with Anna’s assessment. I will not vote for garbage,. Both Trump and Biden are the same ole same ole garbage. Voting for the lesser of two evils approach is an immature and adolescent fairytale so one can feel grand about themselves that they are “doing something” to improve the system. Really?,.. How does a voter improve the system by voting for what does not deserve a vote. How does a voter not become part of the same garbage that they are voting for ? Is the act of voting just so you the voter can get off the hook of not being called “Un American “ Voters, who vote for the lesser of two evils, are really saying ‘I don’t like being robbed but if I have to I prefer him, he’s more handsome’,…or some other unconscious rational masquerading for an adult. Hey voter of the lesser of two evils,…how about doing what Gandhi did ? He marched to the ocean, picked up some ocean water salt and gave the loving middle finger to the British. He displayed through the use of intelligence how to change the system. Hey voter of the lesser of two evils,…would now be a good time to begin to practice a conscious act and say ‘I don’t vote for garbage,..i throw it out !’ See,..after election day and voting , which I abstain of until a candidate I deem as worthy of my vote enters the race,…I can feel rather dandy about myself that I did not contribute to the destruction of this country. YOU, voter of the lesser of two evils, are the enabler of this failed system. I hope you are gleeful with your contribution. Voting for the lesser of two evils is the ONLY adult thing you can do when faced with a choice of one or the other. To do anything else is childish and selfish. By voting for a third party candidate with zero chance to win or just not voting at all you abdicate adult responsibility to do YOUR part to make sure that the lesser not the greater of the two is chosen. You can rationalize it all you want, you can get pissed off and throw all your toys, but it is your DUTY as an adult to do anything you can to stop the more evil from gaining office. Really, the Sanders voters are saying the same thing you do, “why don’t we just vote to make things SO bad in America people will finally chose a radical FAR _____ or _____ being left or right or fascist or socialist, and keep in mind your OPINION is nothing more than that, you are not stating fact when you say one is better than the other, you are stating YOUR FEELINGS. And to make such a potentially life ending democracy killing decision based on your childish feelings is about as immature as a person gets. Like Sanders voters you are just saying I would rather just set it all on fire so we can rebuild, problem is after you destroyed everything the same partisan split will remain and nothing will get rebuilt, at least not without a totalitarian dictator. Something only those on the right really want. A total bunch of manucia and BS. It’s “adult thing” to do to recognize that you are part of the problem and you the voter will not contribute to it any longer by voting for garbage candidates. The DUTY I have is to squelch your brand of patriotism directly into the circular file where it belongs. You’re under the kool-aid spell of voting for the lesser of two evils and that somehow is responsible and mature. It’s a wasted vote,…how difficult is that to comprehend. I know,…its better to have the evil you know than one you don’t. How selfish and unaware you are. You are out of touch and have your head is in the sand. Blinded by the Light. Would now be a good time to wake up ???? Whatever comrade. “Grown men do not need leaders.” – Edward Abbey Nations do There’s a line you can fill out with a name other than Trump or Biden… It’s called a write in candidate. I am going to write on that line this year “Ron Paul”. If millions of voters did the same, what would those f**kers do then? As a Biden voter I really appreciate your write in for anyone but Trump. Why not vote for a candidate who’s actually running? LOL, You don’t mind if I post this to the Trump Twitter feed do you, it will give the GOP and the fat orange spy nightmares right up to the election. This is how Mish and others try to explain away their responsibility for the Trump mess – that the other side is bad too, its a big liberal conspiracy, etc etc….. no political party or candidate is going to be perfect or suit everyone, but really people, there is no comparison. It’s up to you to deal with the pandemic, not the government to “save” you. If you’re concerned, isolate yourself until it’s over. Grab some vitamin D & C, zinc, & Quecertin. Line up a doctor, and have a therapy planned out. Take personal responsibility for your own bones. As with many issues, it take both A) people individually exercising personal responsibility, not just for themselves, but for those around them, and B) a competent, caring government, to together to effectively address the issue. If you don’t have both, you won’t succeed, and if you have neither, you have a big Trump Cluster-F. Just a bit hard to do when Trump is doing everything he can to make sure the coronavirus kills as many people as possible. Like opneing the schools just as a second wave hits. Clearly if people COULD do anything about the virus they would, so no it is not up to the individual. You do your best but that is just not enough. Every single case of Covid, every death, every closure of business, it is ALL on Trump’s head. By election day he will not get enough votes to be county dog catcher. Truth. The one thing government should have been doing is providing testing and (opt-in) tracing. Complete failure in the US. I suspect there are many layers of dysfunction involved (typical government), but certainly much blame goes to this administration. The people haven’t won an election in over a century. Hopefully this won’t change in my lifetime. The pain required to change the system is not worth it. I completely disagree. Americans are by far better off today than they were 100 years ago, and much of the improvement is a credit to the actions that have been taken by our democratically elected government and hardworking civil servants. There is also lots of room for improvement, and American should all take a vested interest in the process and stay engaged. Your “hope” is failure and defeat….. @nzyank I didn’t say we are not better off. I said the people haven’t won an election in over 100 years. Besides Donald Trump and Kennedy, every president has been an establishment figure picked by the establishment. Tulsi was our chance. Oh, but she’s a Russian asset. Well she is actually a crackpot fascist. Actually Mish you have a poor way of looking at things as does Anna. Life isnt perfect. We aren’t entitled to everything. But we should expect a competent government and leadership. While Biden isnt perfect, I think it is a mistake to let perfect be the enemy of competent in this election. I voted for Trump in 2016 and it been a disaster. Do we really think 4 more years of Trump will somehow get better ? While I realize you are a libertarian, I dont see you doing anything meaningful to further that cause. This platform could be a bigger stepping stone in a place like Utah for you. “While Biden isn`t perfect” The understatement of the year. Hilary….”While Hilary wasn`t perfect” and on and on. There are none so blind than those that will not see. “While I realize you are a libertarian, I dont see you doing anything meaningful to further that cause.” Mish writes a well-read blog analyzing events from his perspective. What is your definition of “doing anything meaningful”? I think you are wrong Mish. This is about mere competence not policy. Fox news is not broadcasting the Democratic National Convention. This tells you all you need to know. We know other networks will broadcast the Republican National Convention. Fox news cannot call itself a news network anymore. They simply want an alternative reality. Oh the irony but i bet you can`t see it. Bless you. You still think “the other networks” are giving you the real news. “Fox news is not broadcasting the Democratic National Convention.” It is on the Fox News channel on my TV @Casual_Observer YOU ARE FAKE NEWS. I am guessing you got that fact from the same place you get all your other propaganda. Fine some other news. Get off social media. Wasnt on during the hour of Hannity. Period. Fox couldn’t be bothered to preempt most of their political programming. @CautiousObserver That’s just capitalism. Fox is the most watch prime time channel. Noticed I said channel and not cable news channel. Get off social media though. They are manipulating your brain. I actually don’t. Unless you count Mish’s blog as social media. I spend most of my time working as an engineer, taking care of two kids and and well ..working. Question is if elections matter. In 2020 are there policy and governance differences between Trump and Biden and during the primaries were there policy and governance differences between Biden and Sanders. Seems you’re arguing all three are the same while I can’t imagine a more stark comparison. Feels like a voter suppression argument but I don’t see you intentionally engaging in that. The Russians already control this country so any election in November is just a sham, comrade. Putin is our real leader. Lowest voter turnout in history is my prediction I see team Biden correcting mistakes made by Hillary and ensuring the party is united going into the convention. I suspect that Biden gets a superior turnout vs Hillary Clinton and even adds more Republicans to the mix vs 2016. Think Biden also gets more Blacks, Women and Independents. Where Trump gains is Hispanic males but this is a trend that transcends Trump’s four years Meanwhile back in lalaland. My estimate of turnout, Trump 54 million; Biden 71 million. And I think it could be lower for Trump than even that. Part of his problem is that at least half of registered voters tell pollsters they think voting will be dangerous and difficult, the hardcore fascists will turn out to the last one, but that only makes about 35 million anymore than that will come from independents. But, a lot of them will wake up on election day and just say to themselves, “you know what? It just is not worth the risk to vote to reelect that guy.” They will stay home. On the other hand democrats are fired up to the point they do not care what the danger is or difficulty. In May 25% of the voting age population identified as republican, 31% as democrat, and 40% as independent. I say half the independents will not vote, and more than half the rest will go to Biden. That leave only stealing the election as Trump’s last hope. But the margin by which he and Vladimir will have to cheat is just too wide to be plausible. That’s always the case. The State wins because it controls the government regardless of who is elected. Yes … and “The State is a tool in the hands of the ruling class.” — Josef Stalin One difference is that 1 of the candidates is out to destroy all aspects of government other than himself. Congress, courts, state and local are all irrelevant if 1 of the 2 candidates win. Boy, the propaganda begins with the convention. “Give up, Trump is no different than Biden, Biden has history, it’s all in control of the deep-state, world conspiracies, don’t try–it doesn’t matter what you do, etc.” Lots of easily led people or people with agendas starting to come out of the facebook woods with the dire news of our political impotence. Yes – and just like Trump feeds this machine, Mish also keeps feeding it….. We are each individually responsible. Anna….THE ELECTION IS OVER. YOU LOST…. Another of the “burn it to the ground because it isn’t perfect” people. Le’s sit in the ashes and weep. She’s pushing the “I’m so smart because I know the real story” conspiracy world-view–deep state and all that. Sorry, Anna, but people have been in worse places than this in the history of the world and while you may denounce the sheeple, the world has always been full of these wobbles. I don’t think that was her approach, she said exactly what made her consider it to lose. That is a moral perspective or choice. On the other hand, you are saying that to not endorse a government, or government, is to try to burn a country down. I don’t see how you jump to that conclusion. “Perfect” is nothing but a strawman. You burn it to the ground for the same reason you burned Germany to the ground in ’44&’45: Because yes, it/we really is that imperfect by now. At least. And the longer “we” kick the can down the road instead of taking out what is by now nothing but trash, the sooner someone marginally less imperfect will take it (that’d be us) out for us. The Founders advocated a revolution a generation. Again, nothing to do with perfect. They simply realized than any power structure/System left in power for too long, would degenerated into what we are suffering under today. Hence, you burn it to the ground not because it is somehow “imperfect”, but simply because it is there. And having sufficiently big and many matches, is what differentiates free people from straight up slaves. I’m going to call your post ‘Requiem For Doom’. How melancholy! I don’t believe any of this. Sounds like the complaints of an outsider who wants in. My mom grew up in a communist country with no say in the government my father even worse. I will argue that if you want more say you need to get involved more. There’s a ton of differences between Trump and Biden. A post like this can only have one goal to disenfranchise and suppress the vote. If we were all powerless movements like BLM would have zero impact not would the suffragette movement have worked Sorry comes off as a whine You note the difference in effectiveness between direct action and voting. The two are related in my opinion They are complementary I suppose. One could say that neither would be effective without the other. Exactly what sort if “impact,” on anything which matters, has BLM had? Did they stop the Fed from robbing productive black guys to feed their favored gaggle of slumlords who are making it harder and harder for black guys to afford a roof over their head? Or from robbing potentially productive enterprise from being competitive enough to be able to hire more black guys? Or from handing the funds obtained by debasement robbing productive black guys to the useless leeches driving them out of their neighborhoods under the banner of “gentrification?” As for the Suffragette movement, that only “worked” in the sense that it contributed to splitting families apart, hence creating an army of newly vulnerable and unprotected voters clamoring for Dear Leader to rob others as long as he cuts them in for a few breadcrumbs. @Sechel Great post Trump has done a very good job at getting more people involved in politics. This is a win for everyone. Most of the news during Obama was positive and many terrible things happened with almost no coverage. More people involved is always the best possible outcome. I hope Trump wins again just to see even more people involved. I’m afraid Biden will get a pass just like Obama (and bush,Clinton etc) did. A divided country is the best outcome. Any country that has come together on most issues turns into a dictatorship quickly. I like it better in America where only property owners who had a stake in the game were allowed to vote. This idea everyone needs to vote when they invest such little time in developing their vote besides red team vs. blue team and a few sound bites is concerning. That combined with other changes could make our society work pretty well. Other ideas I would love to see. A citizen lottery for special power to oversee government power with the power to declassify information. Rules limiting politician wealth and take away their ability to get provide jobs after government. I could go on and on but those things will never happen. If we truly had a say in government, why are we reduced to the limits of two parties? Any party trying to inject itself to provide us more choice are quickly shut down by the partnership of these two parties. Isolation of America would be a good thing. America does not need to meddle in the affairs of other countries. Friends of America? You must mean Fiends of America, countries sucking the life out of us. I don’t know him, he is far from the devil. Biden is far more corrupt (he’s had 50 years in Washington DC) than Trump. You must mean harris will do just fine, joe won’t last 4 years! People are told what to think in this day and age. Social media has become very very good at manipulating people. Most don’t understand what is going on but Facebook proved long ago it could manipulate people’s emotions. Thought control is wide scale at this point and most don’t even understand it’s possible while being fully manipulated. The easiest way to prove this is to talk to someone about deleting their favorite social media system. Instantly it goes to how little they use it and how they don’t have a problem just like any addict. “Biden is more corrupt (he’s had 50 years)” Yet you cannot cite anything actual and proven and credible of that corruption. “democrats and BLM starting riots” — lol you just lap up those talking points. why? why do you drink them up like so much free booze? Because they fit your beliefs: darkie bad. democrats and BLM started protests. it was proven with evidence that other factions came in and did the violence, the destruction. Mish – and the comments in your comment section here are exactly why this will continue into the unforeseen future. People on both sides choosing the lesser of two evils instead of saying they both are just as bad and I will support neither party. I will only cast my vote for someone I support and will wait for that candidate. If we all wait for candidates we actually support, they will show up. As long as votes are cast for the lesser of two evils, nothing will change. The wealthy will continue to steal the wealth from the country until there is nothing left. Then they will move on. They won’t hesitate to give you promise you want. Happy? If you’re looking for a candidate that 100% matches your priorities, you’re living a fantasy There is a world of difference between a candidate that 100% matches my priorities and complete garbage. Totally agree with that assessment. I will not vote for garbage,. Both Trump and Biden are the same ole same ole garbage. Voting for the lesser of two evils approach is an immature and adolescent fairytale so one can feel grand about themselves that they are “doing something” to improve the system. Really?,.. How does a voter improve the system by voting for what does not deserve a vote. How does a voter not become part of the same garbage that they are voting for ? Is the act of voting just so you the voter can get off the hook of not being called “Un American “ Voters, who vote for the lesser of two evils, are really saying ‘I don’t like being robbed but if I have to I prefer him, he’s more handsome’,…or some other unconscious rational masquerading for an adult. Hey voter of the lesser of two evils,…how about doing what Gandhi did ? He marched to the ocean, picked up some ocean water salt and gave the loving middle finger to the British. He displayed through the use of intelligence how to change the system. Hey voter of the lesser of two evils,…would now be a good time to begin to practice a conscious act and say ‘I don’t vote for garbage,..i throw it out !’ See,..after election day and voting , which I abstain of until a candidate I deem as worthy of my vote enters the race,…I can feel rather dandy about myself that I did not contribute to the destruction of this country. YOU, voter of the lesser of two evils, are the enabler of this failed system. I hope you are gleeful with your contribution. Don’t vote for the lesser of two evils. Do vote for Jo Jorgensen. The lessor of 2 evils is still evil. People should just sit this election out. Trump will win, its obvious to me. Most people are sick and tired of these politicians who promise everything and deliver nothing. Trump is far from perfect, but he would be hands down better biden and harris. Vote for joe if you want harris in charge. Trump is now a politician, but it was just 4 short years ago he was elected as a non politician and look how things have changed since….through all his faults, he will win again. The worse part about this election is that whoever wins, half the people will be pissed. I hope and pray they don’t start voting from the rooftops… “Most people are sick and tired of these politicians who promise everything and deliver nothing.” Politicians like trump? He doesn’t act like a politician, that’s for sure. Politicians, er I’m sorry, I meant liars such as Trump, Biden, Obama (if you like your plan, you can keep your plan), Clinton, Bush I and II, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon (Aug 15th just passed – know your history?) Johnson??? Shall I continue? And then all the 535 members of the bought-and-paid-for group sitting in the capitol of this country, the greatest corporate fascist state ever seen. Promise everything–don’t deliver? Sounds like a hardcore political BSer. “The worse part about this election is that whoever wins, half the people will be pissed.” It’s the other half who are the problem, and the worst part. @Stuki I am really just glad people are waking up to politics. Trump was a win for this country because of the scrutiny politicians are under. Obama skated and did some very underhanded and terrible things just like every politician before him. The difference was he got a pass. I hope Trump wins just to watch people get more involved in this counties issues. The other side being mad is a feature not a flaw. People who are happy , out of all things, with any possible Dear Leader (bona fide deities perhaps excepted) leading a government as overgrown as our current one, are exactly the reason America has fallen as far as it has already. The whole “politics as a football match” nonsense; cheering for “my team” to beat “your team” at any cost, serves noone but the totalitarians sitting on top of it all pitching people against eachother. The task The Founders left Americans, was to keep Government, period, in check. Not to grossly abrogate that one, in favor of degenerating into fighting over who gets to nominally run the completely unchecked disaster resulting from failing to do so, for the next four years. @Stuki I am a believer in what I call wave theory. It’s very similar to the Fourth Coming but over a longer and short time scale. People go though cycles weekly, monthly, yearly, and over their lifetime. Societies go though cycles in the same fashion. Humanity also goes through cycles. Things go up and come back down. Nothing can stop these cycles they can only be delayed or accelerated. I don’t know where America is on the overall timescale but I would guess we are more towards the end of things than the beginning. On a shorter term timescale about every 80 years something breaks and things go sideways. We are reaching that point. 1770s, 1850s, 1930s, 2010s. This situation we find ourselves in is predictable from a timescale perspective. The only real question is how it shakes out. Somebody took a famous George Carlin rant and made a pretty compelling video to that effect (WARNING : MANY BAD WORDS) What Anna said soundS true but we still need to rid the country of the grossly incompetent Trump or we’ll never survive COVID19 and the raping of the natural world so once again it’s the lesser of two evils but this time one is exceptionally evil while the other just your everyday, self interested politician. I’ve gotten so nihilistic that it’s not even that. I’m just annoyed that donald trump has been thrust into my daily awareness and has become an active threat to my survival. I liked it a lot better when I never thought of donald trump, and I would like to return to those halcyon days. Im done with the lesser of 2 evils. I didn’t vote last election. I’m not voting this one. As far as i’m concerned stick a fork in it. Vote Jorgensen. Nothing to lose, ad although she won’t win, the more votes she gets, the more her positions will be catered to in the future. It’s a sad state of affairs when the best two parties representing over 300 million people can do is offer two incoherent, elderly candidates that most likely will died of old age before the Presidential term is over. McCain wouldn’t have lived out his term. If he’d saddled up with Sarah again, imagine the idiotic hijinks we’d be in the middle of right now! “when the best two parties representing over 300 million people” IMO its about 400 people or less. And what does it say about the people who do as they are told and vote for one of these pathetic candidates? How about someone files a $40 Trillion class action suit against the Federal Reserve for Grand Larceny. Just for fun? Here’s a bold prediction: the next administration will feature lots of Goldmanites in prominent positions. Funny how warmly even the “outsider” Trump embraced them after they kept paying Hillary $10K per minute to give rambling speeches about how wealthy she was! Why would it be a surprise Trump embraced the bankers? For it was the Rothchild Bank that ensured Trump would maintain his status as a wealthy man as the Taj Mahal was failing. Wilbur Ross of the Rothchild Bank saved Trump from financial ruin. I said it once and I’ll say it again — this country is run by the people, and the people are responsible for making the country run. 200 years ago, our people came here from mostly Europe, and they saw what kings and queens and their henchmen did to a populace. Im pretty sure no one wanted to start over and come here with very little. They had come here because politics in Europe wasnt some political game like on cable TV. People were hurt and killed for no good reason. It really doesnt matter who is president. He/she is weak by design. They knew what would happen if they made the president a king. Kings, autocrats, dictators get a lot done, assuming you are on the right side. Id much rather live in a sideways, unsatisfying, milquetoast, maddeningly gray country like ours than in some duke’s dungeon. Voting at least reminds them all that we are still here. Kings and queens are like owners of a country… Like home owners, they’ll try to take good care of it in order to keep the population happy and have their descendants inherit the throne. You got 50% chance that your ruler will be competent. Presidents are like renters, they are only interested in those 4 or 8 years of power, they run deficits because why not it’s the problem of the next president. Your chances of getting a really competent one is far below 50%. @Democritus Dictatorships though out history have had some of the best runs. Our two party system will eventually become a one party system that will transition to a system like a dictatorship but much worse. The one party system will begin to in fight instead of giving up power an a two party system leading to civil war. Most forms of government don’t last very long. I just hope we get at least 50 more years. I would like to believe that, but the truth is the country is run by corporations. They are larger and more powerful than ever before! How do you measure that “corporations … run the country”? I’d go with civil servants being more in charge than corporations. And, yeah, revolving door, etc. The fact is, the US is designed such that no one entity is “in charge”. Royalists, as they were called in the late 1700’s on the east coast of North American, argued against such a design. They lost that particular argument at the time. But it’s an argument that will go on forever, and you could say they are back again, now. RE: “How do you measure that “corporations … run the country. I’d go with civil servants being more in charge than corporations”? Nearly all of the most powerful and influential “civil servants” in the country are bought and paid for by corporations via their ubiquitous lobbyists and deal makers. RE: “The fact is, the US is designed such that no one entity is “in charge”. “ The $ is in charge … everywhere … The people in this country will trample and fight each other for a 200 dollar TV on black Friday. Christian values are at an all time low, particularly among Christians. There is no team spirit. Bourgeois culture, any culture, can only stand if it is rewarded. In prior times bourgeois culture was fundamentally supported by the upper classes, who invested in America, creating vast wealth. They modeled sobriety, hard-work, risk and reward. The working classes modeled the behavior through church and labor unions, standing together for each other and nation. The wealthy have abandoned America, and the working classes have abandoned religion, unions, and each other. Into that void steps cultural anarchy. Bourgeois culture requires hard-work, and discipline. It requires accountability, primarily of the wealthy. I tire of articles that lament the loss of culture without holding those accountable who have abandoned their responsibilities. I see both at the same time. Boomers were handed the expansion of obtention wealth in a new global setting, along with the culture shift of the seventies away from “nuclear family” , and the introduction of fiat, debt and false values. It all happened at once. Manipulation of social values and identity has been going on a long time though in the west. Centralisation of registry and power from at least the early nineteenth century. Classical liberalism was replaced by socialism and government audit towards the twentieth century, and from there a gradual evolution of nationalism, statism and social grant that melded into the neo liberal socialist concoction we have today, via finance and corporate interest. In the US it was the seventies that that really took off, in other countries in different ways, at different times, to different degrees. If you look at europe, some countries only went that way in the ninetees for example, some are still clinging to their previous ethos while still moving in most other ways to new hierarchy. Who abandoned responsibility though is very hard to pin down, because the whole cold war reality was foreign expansion via whatever means was less than open conflict. That is to say that it was in many ways a duty to westernise the world, to profit from that also in some kind of mutual way with foreign powers . That included with China, and the US beat the british to first place with the country in the diplomatic hustling that went on. So you had an immense wealth effect at home and abroad, compared with the previous generation, and that brought freedom, technology and industry allowed new freedom also. What happened after was the transfer of much western manufacturing abroad. The framework was rigged to take advantage of cheap foreign labour and support cooperative governance, while introducing modernisation to those countries, to the profit of western consumers who became more a service economy – serving each other. Do you want to work on a factory floor or in an office for more ? It’s simple. Later, do you want your investments to rise in value ? It’s simple also. So finance and asset pumping is the result, along with a loss of productive framework, new social realities that become disconnected. Who abandoned responsibility ? Everyone and no-one. People look out for their own interests, and when there is competition that places their existence, or position, in question, they secure that first. So you have the boomers with their assets being supported, and social grants offerred to those who were not part of that expansion, in a new domestic financial experiment that includes low rate mortgages, loans for education, food stamps, $600 a week etc. That was all a series of cultural shifts as much as economic redirection and financial manipulation. Clearly the end result is very confused, and that reflects on what choice of government is proffered and people’s expectations with regards. Maybe the question is “Who is going to take responsibility ?” Maybe the answer is “It suits us to have a government we can blame.” We have the worlds largest prison population hence your dungeon. One little screw up bye bye. You are absolutely right. The “American system” is actually not broken yet. Voters COULD still fix everything. The problem is most voters are very, very bad a political philosophy — thus we end up with the horrible leaders and policies that “we” are foolish enough to choose over and over. “But we do know who lost: all of us.” … Not Quite. For years it has been the Haves vs the Have Nots … not R vs D. “The Rich” have done fabulously … and will continue to do so. “For years it has been the Haves vs the Have Nots … not R vs D.” That, in a nutshell, is our biggest political problem. No matter who wins this election “all of us” will not lose because some of us are the rich beneficiaries of the current system. For thousands of years the rich have done well. We actually read history about the times the rich didn’t, but for the most part a small group has controlled the wealth and power throughout history. Don’t expect this to change…ever. It doesn’t have to be this distorted though. It’s fine if the rich do well, but not when it’s at the expense of everyone else in what appears to be a rigged system. In the last 50 years income growth has been concentrated in the top .1% to a degree not seen since the robber baron era. I would rather see a broader distribution of society’s wealth and not end up at some point with the chaos of a French or Russian revolution. When the rich don’t do well, there is often blood in the streets. That doesn’t serve anyone’s interests. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
Gov. Document

DNI Gabbard COVID-19 ReleaseDocument Index

...Document Index 18 June 2026 Release of COVID-19 DocumentsUNCLASSIFIED 1 2020-05-27 LLNL International Assessments Report: COVID-19 Lab Modification Conditions Present at WIV 2 2020-02-03 Agenda - Expert...

...Meeting: Rapid Response for Assessment of Data Needs for 2019-nCoV 3 Research Article: Assembly of long DNA sequences using a new synthetic Escherichia coli-yeast shuttle vector 4 2020-10-21 CHD press release...

Gov. Document

Fauci Exposed Files — Part 2

...Regards, DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026 2 -- Tamara Tamara A....

...Best, DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026...

Gov. Document

Fauci Exposed Files — Part 1

...DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026 Expert Meeting Rapid Response for Assessment of Data Needs for 2019-nCoV Agenda February 3, 2020 2:00 p.m.–3:00 p.m....

...On: ====================================================== DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026 2 FYI....

Gov. Document

Fauci Exposed Files — Part 3

...http://2013.igem.org/Team:WHU -China/noteProtocal DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026 http://2013.igem.org/Team:WHU -China/introduction DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026...

...A more in-depth examination of the issues will be established as a follow up as needed. 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026 DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD...

mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

China Halts US Liquid Natural Gas Imports, Turns to Russia Instead

…In the state I reside if input costs are lower, the state regulator files tariffs reducing rates for customers.…

…Maybe install Tulsi Gabbard as DNI? More supply chain disruptions caused by Trump’s trade war.…

Show full text (44188 chars)
• • • The US is building expensive terminals to export LNG. Now what? LNG Exports, Another Trade War Victim OilPrice reports China Halts U.S. LNG Imports Amid Tariff War China hasn’t imported liquefied natural gas from the United States since early February, as the tariff war hit energy trade and could have long-term consequences for U.S. LNG export contracts. The last LNG cargo to arrive in China from America was a tanker from Corpus Christi, which docked in the southern Chinese province of Fujian on February 6, according to shipping data cited by the Financial Times. The Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods, including energy products, and the broader trade war between the world’s two biggest economies could have long-term consequences on the ability of new U.S. LNG export projects to attract anchor offtake commitments, analysts warn. “I do not think Chinese LNG importers will ever contract any new US LNG,” Anne-Sophie Corbeau, a gas specialist at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, told FT . Following the tariffs, Chinese LNG buyers with long-term supply contracts with U.S. producers have started reselling the cargoes to Europe, Bloomberg reported , citing trading sources. What’s more, Chinese traders have grown cold towards new long-term commitments for future supply from the United States, instead seeking long-term deals with gas producers in the Middle East and the Asia Pacific. Goodbye US LNG Hello Russia Russia has emerged as the third-largest supplier of LNG to China behind Australia and Quatar. Russia and China have been negotiating over a new natural gas pipeline, the Power of Siberia 2 according to the video above. EU Trades One Problem for Another Reuters reports EU plan to end Russian oil and gas imports due out in May The European Commission will announce a more detailed strategy to phase out Russian oil and gas imports next month, it said on Monday, after twice delaying the plan. The EU has pledged to quit Russian fossil fuels by 2027 in response to Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but the Commission has delayed publishing its “roadmap” for how to do so. The plan was initially due last month. The Commission will now publish the roadmap on May 6, an agenda published on Monday showed. While Russian pipeline gas deliveries have plunged since 2022, the EU increased its imports of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) last year, and the bloc still got 19% of its total gas and LNG supply from Russia in 2024. Unlike oil, the EU has not imposed sanctions on imports of Russian gas. Hungary has vowed to block Russian energy sanctions, which require unanimous approval from EU countries, while some other governments have also signalled unwillingness to approve sanctions on Russian LNG before the EU secures alternative supplies. The EU has said it would consider buying more LNG from the United States, and Trump has said selling more energy to Europe would be a key focus of his administration’s efforts to eliminate its trade deficit with the EU . U.S. LNG helped to plug the Russian supply gap in Europe during the 2022 energy crisis. Last year, the U.S. was Europe’s third-biggest gas supplier, after Russia and top supplier Norway. Will the US Be a More Reliable Provider to the EU Please consider Back to Russian gas? Trump-wary EU has energy security dilemma U.S. liquefied natural gas helped to plug the Russian supply gap in Europe during the 2022-2023 energy crisis. But now that President Donald Trump has rocked relationships with Europe established after World War Two, and turned to energy as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations, businesses are wary that reliance on the United States has become another vulnerability. Against this backdrop, executives at major EU firms have begun to say what would have been unthinkable a year ago: that importing some Russian gas, including from Russian state giant Gazprom could be a good idea. The head of French oil major TotalEnergies , Patrick Pouyanne, has warned Europe against over-relying on U.S. gas. “We need to diversify, many routes, not over-rely on one or two,” Pouyanne told Reuters. Total is a large exporter of U.S. LNG and also sells Russian LNG from private firm Novatek .”Europe will never go back to importing 150 billion cubic meters from Russia like before the war … but I would bet maybe 70 bcm,” Pouyanne added. France, which produces large amounts of nuclear power, already has one of the most diversified energy supplies in Europe. Germany relied heavily on cheap Russian gas to help drive its manufacturing sector until the Ukraine war and has fewer options. In Leuna Chemical Park, one of Germany’s biggest chemical clusters hosting plants of Dow Chemical and Shell, some makers say Russian gas should return quickly. Russia used to cover 60% of local needs, mainly through the Nord Stream pipeline, which was blown up in 2022. “We are in a severe crisis and can’t wait,” said Christof Guenther, managing director of InfraLeuna, the operator of the park. He said the German chemical industry has cut jobs for five quarters in a row, something not seen for decades. “Reopening pipelines would reduce prices more than any current subsidy programmes,” he said. “It’s a taboo topic,” Guenther added, saying many colleagues agreed on the need to go back to Russian gas. Almost a third of Germans voted for Russia-friendly parties in the February federal election. In the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the east German region where the Nord Stream pipeline comes ashore after running from Russia under the Baltic Sea, 49% of Germans want a return to Russian gas supplies, a poll carried out by the Forsa institute found. “We need Russian gas, we need cheap energy – no matter where it comes from,” said Klaus Paur, managing director of Leuna-Harze, a mid-sized petrochemical maker at the Leuna Park. “We need Nord Stream 2 because we have to keep energy costs in check.” U.S. LNG Expansion Plans Unravel as Trade War Escalates CleanTechnica reports U.S. LNG Expansion Plans Unravel as Trade War Escalates China has just suspended all LNG imports from the United States. No warning, no phasedown, just an apparent state directive that Chinese buyers, including the national oil companies, were no longer to sign, lift, or receive U.S. liquefied natural gas. But the trade war launched in 2018 by the first Trump administration slammed on the brakes. China imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. LNG — first 10%, then 25% — and imports plummeted to near zero by 2019. Only the Phase One trade agreement in early 2020 restarted flows. That year, U.S. LNG volumes to China rebounded to over 4 million tonnes, rising to a record 9.3 MTPA in 2021. In that banner year, China represented over 12% of total U.S. LNG exports, and the deals were worth over $3.4 billion in nominal dollars. Dozens of long-term contracts were signed, and U.S. project developers counted on China to underwrite future expansion. That faith proved misplaced. By 2022, U.S. LNG flows to China dropped sharply as Europe, reeling from Russia’s war in Ukraine, bid aggressively on spot cargoes. Chinese imports hovered around 2 MTPA in 2022 and rose modestly in 2023, but never recovered to their 2021 peak. Now, with Beijing’s abrupt suspension of U.S. LNG, the relationship has collapsed entirely. Contracts are frozen. Cargoes already loaded are being diverted. And any terminal with offtake exposure to Chinese buyers is facing the real prospect of default or renegotiation. In just a few weeks, a decade of growth has been reversed. The loss of China as a customer comes as the U.S. LNG industry is still navigating Europe’s shifting role. Europe became the largest destination for U.S. LNG almost overnight after 2022, when Russian pipeline gas was cut off and European countries scrambled for replacements. U.S. export volumes to Europe surged to over 60% of total shipments in early 2023, with countries like France, the Netherlands, and the UK relying on American LNG to keep industries running and homes heated. As early as 2024, forward-looking European utilities began declining 20-year LNG deals, instead favoring short-term contracts or portfolio purchases. The message was clear: European gas demand was peaking and would soon be in structural decline. That left the U.S. LNG sector reliant on a delicate two-legged stool: China and Europe. And now one leg has been kicked out from under it. Over 20 proposed U.S. LNG terminals are in various stages of development. Some, like Venture Global’s CP2, Sempra’s Port Arthur, and NextDecade’s Rio Grande, have already secured partial financing or begun early construction. Others remain in the permitting and contracting phase, awaiting final investment decision (FID). Across the Gulf Coast, the vision has been consistent: build more capacity, serve growing Asian demand, and use flexible destination clauses to capitalize on European price spikes. In a series of publications over the past three years, I’ve argued that this expansion was speculative at best. The assumptions behind the next 100 MTPA of capacity were shaky: that global demand would continue rising, that geopolitics would remain stable, that carbon pricing wouldn’t bite, and that markets like China and India would buy whatever the U.S. was selling. I’ve pointed out that most of these new terminals were being justified on the back of long-term contracts that wouldn’t hold up to scrutiny, and that a significant share of planned capacity risked becoming stranded as demand plateaued or declined. Now, those warnings are materializing. The implications for these terminals are severe. Without Chinese offtake, nearly a third of the volume committed to future U.S. projects has evaporated. Some developers will attempt to resell this capacity, but few buyers have China’s appetite, credit profile, or willingness to sign 20-year deals. With Europe capping long-term gas infrastructure growth and preparing for a long-term decline in fossil imports, the second fallback market is shrinking fast. Projects that have yet to reach FID may be shelved entirely. Banks and institutional investors will demand more conservative projections. Risk premiums will rise. Insurance may become harder to obtain. Terminal utilization rates will fall short of modeled expectations, and the entire economics of Gulf Coast LNG will have to be revisited. The final irony is political. U.S. oil and gas executives spent heavily during the 2024 election cycle, once again backing Trump in the hopes of favorable policies, looser regulations, and accelerated fossil fuel exports. Billions were spent on lobbying, campaign donations, and friendly media to amplify the message that fossil fuels meant freedom and prosperity. And what did they get in return? A trade war that shuttered their second-largest LNG market, destabilized long-term supply relationships, and sent shockwaves through global energy finance. It makes no economic sense for the EU to buy expensive US LNG when it can get cheap Russian gas by pipeline. And closer to home, the EU should look to Iran and the Mideast. Trump wanted bilateral relationships. He succeeded in moving China and Russia closer, China and India closer, China and Iran closer, India and Iran closer, and now it seems the EU and Russia closer. Related Posts April 16, 2025: Fed Chair Powell Warns of Higher Inflation and Slower Growth Due to Tariffs At the Economic Club of Chicago, Jerome Powell makes a cautionary speech. Tariffs are highly likely to generate at least a temporary rise in inflation. The inflationary effects could also be more persistent. April 17, 2025: Need Car Repairs? Get Them Done While Parts Are Still Available Tariffs are about to hit car parts, insurance, and repairs. April 18, 2025: Ford Halts Shipments of F-150s and Other Models to China, Winning? The shipment halt is a logical conclusion to something no one would buy. But remember, “Trade wars are good and easy to win.” LNG Exports, Another Trade War Victim OilPrice reports China Halts U.S. LNG Imports Amid Tariff War China hasn’t imported liquefied natural gas from the United States since early February, as the tariff war hit energy trade and could have long-term consequences for U.S. LNG export contracts. The last LNG cargo to arrive in China from America was a tanker from Corpus Christi, which docked in the southern Chinese province of Fujian on February 6, according to shipping data cited by the Financial Times. The Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods, including energy products, and the broader trade war between the world’s two biggest economies could have long-term consequences on the ability of new U.S. LNG export projects to attract anchor offtake commitments, analysts warn. “I do not think Chinese LNG importers will ever contract any new US LNG,” Anne-Sophie Corbeau, a gas specialist at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, told FT . Following the tariffs, Chinese LNG buyers with long-term supply contracts with U.S. producers have started reselling the cargoes to Europe, Bloomberg reported , citing trading sources. What’s more, Chinese traders have grown cold towards new long-term commitments for future supply from the United States, instead seeking long-term deals with gas producers in the Middle East and the Asia Pacific. Goodbye US LNG Hello Russia Russia has emerged as the third-largest supplier of LNG to China behind Australia and Quatar. Russia and China have been negotiating over a new natural gas pipeline, the Power of Siberia 2 according to the video above. EU Trades One Problem for Another Reuters reports EU plan to end Russian oil and gas imports due out in May The European Commission will announce a more detailed strategy to phase out Russian oil and gas imports next month, it said on Monday, after twice delaying the plan. The EU has pledged to quit Russian fossil fuels by 2027 in response to Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but the Commission has delayed publishing its “roadmap” for how to do so. The plan was initially due last month. The Commission will now publish the roadmap on May 6, an agenda published on Monday showed. While Russian pipeline gas deliveries have plunged since 2022, the EU increased its imports of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) last year, and the bloc still got 19% of its total gas and LNG supply from Russia in 2024. Unlike oil, the EU has not imposed sanctions on imports of Russian gas. Hungary has vowed to block Russian energy sanctions, which require unanimous approval from EU countries, while some other governments have also signalled unwillingness to approve sanctions on Russian LNG before the EU secures alternative supplies. The EU has said it would consider buying more LNG from the United States, and Trump has said selling more energy to Europe would be a key focus of his administration’s efforts to eliminate its trade deficit with the EU . U.S. LNG helped to plug the Russian supply gap in Europe during the 2022 energy crisis. Last year, the U.S. was Europe’s third-biggest gas supplier, after Russia and top supplier Norway. Will the US Be a More Reliable Provider to the EU Please consider Back to Russian gas? Trump-wary EU has energy security dilemma U.S. liquefied natural gas helped to plug the Russian supply gap in Europe during the 2022-2023 energy crisis. But now that President Donald Trump has rocked relationships with Europe established after World War Two, and turned to energy as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations, businesses are wary that reliance on the United States has become another vulnerability. Against this backdrop, executives at major EU firms have begun to say what would have been unthinkable a year ago: that importing some Russian gas, including from Russian state giant Gazprom could be a good idea. The head of French oil major TotalEnergies , Patrick Pouyanne, has warned Europe against over-relying on U.S. gas. “We need to diversify, many routes, not over-rely on one or two,” Pouyanne told Reuters. Total is a large exporter of U.S. LNG and also sells Russian LNG from private firm Novatek .”Europe will never go back to importing 150 billion cubic meters from Russia like before the war … but I would bet maybe 70 bcm,” Pouyanne added. France, which produces large amounts of nuclear power, already has one of the most diversified energy supplies in Europe. Germany relied heavily on cheap Russian gas to help drive its manufacturing sector until the Ukraine war and has fewer options. In Leuna Chemical Park, one of Germany’s biggest chemical clusters hosting plants of Dow Chemical and Shell, some makers say Russian gas should return quickly. Russia used to cover 60% of local needs, mainly through the Nord Stream pipeline, which was blown up in 2022. “We are in a severe crisis and can’t wait,” said Christof Guenther, managing director of InfraLeuna, the operator of the park. He said the German chemical industry has cut jobs for five quarters in a row, something not seen for decades. “Reopening pipelines would reduce prices more than any current subsidy programmes,” he said. “It’s a taboo topic,” Guenther added, saying many colleagues agreed on the need to go back to Russian gas. Almost a third of Germans voted for Russia-friendly parties in the February federal election. In the state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the east German region where the Nord Stream pipeline comes ashore after running from Russia under the Baltic Sea, 49% of Germans want a return to Russian gas supplies, a poll carried out by the Forsa institute found. “We need Russian gas, we need cheap energy – no matter where it comes from,” said Klaus Paur, managing director of Leuna-Harze, a mid-sized petrochemical maker at the Leuna Park. “We need Nord Stream 2 because we have to keep energy costs in check.” U.S. LNG Expansion Plans Unravel as Trade War Escalates CleanTechnica reports U.S. LNG Expansion Plans Unravel as Trade War Escalates China has just suspended all LNG imports from the United States. No warning, no phasedown, just an apparent state directive that Chinese buyers, including the national oil companies, were no longer to sign, lift, or receive U.S. liquefied natural gas. But the trade war launched in 2018 by the first Trump administration slammed on the brakes. China imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. LNG — first 10%, then 25% — and imports plummeted to near zero by 2019. Only the Phase One trade agreement in early 2020 restarted flows. That year, U.S. LNG volumes to China rebounded to over 4 million tonnes, rising to a record 9.3 MTPA in 2021. In that banner year, China represented over 12% of total U.S. LNG exports, and the deals were worth over $3.4 billion in nominal dollars. Dozens of long-term contracts were signed, and U.S. project developers counted on China to underwrite future expansion. That faith proved misplaced. By 2022, U.S. LNG flows to China dropped sharply as Europe, reeling from Russia’s war in Ukraine, bid aggressively on spot cargoes. Chinese imports hovered around 2 MTPA in 2022 and rose modestly in 2023, but never recovered to their 2021 peak. Now, with Beijing’s abrupt suspension of U.S. LNG, the relationship has collapsed entirely. Contracts are frozen. Cargoes already loaded are being diverted. And any terminal with offtake exposure to Chinese buyers is facing the real prospect of default or renegotiation. In just a few weeks, a decade of growth has been reversed. The loss of China as a customer comes as the U.S. LNG industry is still navigating Europe’s shifting role. Europe became the largest destination for U.S. LNG almost overnight after 2022, when Russian pipeline gas was cut off and European countries scrambled for replacements. U.S. export volumes to Europe surged to over 60% of total shipments in early 2023, with countries like France, the Netherlands, and the UK relying on American LNG to keep industries running and homes heated. As early as 2024, forward-looking European utilities began declining 20-year LNG deals, instead favoring short-term contracts or portfolio purchases. The message was clear: European gas demand was peaking and would soon be in structural decline. That left the U.S. LNG sector reliant on a delicate two-legged stool: China and Europe. And now one leg has been kicked out from under it. Over 20 proposed U.S. LNG terminals are in various stages of development. Some, like Venture Global’s CP2, Sempra’s Port Arthur, and NextDecade’s Rio Grande, have already secured partial financing or begun early construction. Others remain in the permitting and contracting phase, awaiting final investment decision (FID). Across the Gulf Coast, the vision has been consistent: build more capacity, serve growing Asian demand, and use flexible destination clauses to capitalize on European price spikes. In a series of publications over the past three years, I’ve argued that this expansion was speculative at best. The assumptions behind the next 100 MTPA of capacity were shaky: that global demand would continue rising, that geopolitics would remain stable, that carbon pricing wouldn’t bite, and that markets like China and India would buy whatever the U.S. was selling. I’ve pointed out that most of these new terminals were being justified on the back of long-term contracts that wouldn’t hold up to scrutiny, and that a significant share of planned capacity risked becoming stranded as demand plateaued or declined. Now, those warnings are materializing. The implications for these terminals are severe. Without Chinese offtake, nearly a third of the volume committed to future U.S. projects has evaporated. Some developers will attempt to resell this capacity, but few buyers have China’s appetite, credit profile, or willingness to sign 20-year deals. With Europe capping long-term gas infrastructure growth and preparing for a long-term decline in fossil imports, the second fallback market is shrinking fast. Projects that have yet to reach FID may be shelved entirely. Banks and institutional investors will demand more conservative projections. Risk premiums will rise. Insurance may become harder to obtain. Terminal utilization rates will fall short of modeled expectations, and the entire economics of Gulf Coast LNG will have to be revisited. The final irony is political. U.S. oil and gas executives spent heavily during the 2024 election cycle, once again backing Trump in the hopes of favorable policies, looser regulations, and accelerated fossil fuel exports. Billions were spent on lobbying, campaign donations, and friendly media to amplify the message that fossil fuels meant freedom and prosperity. And what did they get in return? A trade war that shuttered their second-largest LNG market, destabilized long-term supply relationships, and sent shockwaves through global energy finance. It makes no economic sense for the EU to buy expensive US LNG when it can get cheap Russian gas by pipeline. And closer to home, the EU should look to Iran and the Mideast. Trump wanted bilateral relationships. He succeeded in moving China and Russia closer, China and India closer, China and Iran closer, India and Iran closer, and now it seems the EU and Russia closer. Related Posts April 16, 2025: Fed Chair Powell Warns of Higher Inflation and Slower Growth Due to Tariffs At the Economic Club of Chicago, Jerome Powell makes a cautionary speech. Tariffs are highly likely to generate at least a temporary rise in inflation. The inflationary effects could also be more persistent. April 17, 2025: Need Car Repairs? Get Them Done While Parts Are Still Available Tariffs are about to hit car parts, insurance, and repairs. April 18, 2025: Ford Halts Shipments of F-150s and Other Models to China, Winning? The shipment halt is a logical conclusion to something no one would buy. But remember, “Trade wars are good and easy to win.” Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. I think that Trump truly is determined to make both China and Russia Superpowers, while turning the USA into a 3rd rate country. Halting imports of NatGas from the US was a symbolic string for China to pull. It was never allowed to be imported in such large amounts as to expose China to become dependent on US NatGas. As long as Ukraine and Russia are at war, Ukraine’s NatGas is staying underground. Russia needs to sell its energy to finance war, and citizens to fight it. China could supply rigs and refineries with labor instead of military. Oops, Western missiles hit a refinery and anger China. Europe is energy deficient, so it will gladly, privately take the futures contracts Chinese energy dealers are liquidating. Europe cannot simultaneously support Ukraine military efforts and import energy from Russia. Germany’s, and soon to be the Continent’s, recession will put pressures on leaders to back off of tariffs for energy. Global NatGas demand has not changed, only the paths it takes. That is fine if you ignore Nordstream 2 being re-opened to Europe and the pipeline to China from Russia completed and opened. LNG exports directly from Russia to Germany? You bet! Global demand is down and alternate sources are the clear winners over trumps stench of economic abuse. Trump is destroying America day after day… As long as Ukraine and Russia are at war, Ukraine’s NatGas is staying underground. Russia needs to sell its energy to finance war, and citizens to fight it. C === so much BU11LLSH111IT, I really doubt you are real human or some kind of bbc/cnn/abc bot! ======= =1 what ukraine natgas??? there is NO natgas production in Ukraine!! Ukraine always, I repeat always imported gas during USSR times, and from Russia after 1991. !! outside some local production points it is 100% depend on import. same for oil. ======= =Russia needs to sell its energy to finance war what finance? Russia is ruble based economy, same as USA $based, and China us yean based. Russia is 4th biggest economy in world, bigger than Germany! it has gdp nominal over 2 trln$, by PPP it is about 5 trln$ or more. ======= Russia during hey days exported 200 bln cm of gas ! mostly into Europe,. before 2022, if avg prices was $200 per 1000 cm, it is $ 40 bln, GROSS. from those $40 bln you have to pay salaries, taxes, etc do you even have basic knowledge of macro, finance, etc? or you are just mor1on who repeats usual mass media idiocy how Russia sells energy to finance itself? ps you can do same calc for about 4*5 mln barrel of oil per day Russia used to export. As a natural gas consumer through my utility I’ll look forward to lower heating bills next winter and possibly this summer thx to Trump’s tariffs. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/natural-gas Who would’ve thought that raising tariffs on foreign goods would benefit US energy consumers? Right there with you. Gas bills are 2.5 times more than 5 years ago. Good luck if you think your utility will lower your monthly bills just because their gas supply cost decreased. Other costs are more relevant. They have pensions just like states and municipalities and ever-rising healthcare costs. In the state I reside if input costs are lower, the state regulator files tariffs reducing rates for customers. The utility has futures contracts stretching out to 5 years but also one year and the spot market. Costs for anything NEVER go down in CA! This one is an unintentional blessing in disguise. Keep the natural gas in the ground for coming energy shortages. Of course, the US has no long-term energy policy, it only has a long-term gun boat policy. Substituting one for the other explains the permanent military waste. It should also continue the acceleration of coal fired power plants to gas fired. Here’s one example that’s finishing up: https://stories.xcelenergy.com/stories/Fueling-the-future-at-Harrington-Station–Transitioning-from-coal-to-natural-gas#:~:text=The%20end%20of%202024%20marked,fully%20complete%20in%20May%202025 . Trumps love of Tarrifs is a dissater for US workers and the US econ Complaining about Trump tariffs is a sign of a short time horizon. The game has only begun. The trade deals are yet to be made. For example, China’s economy is such a disaster that China won’t need oil and gas imports until Xi begs for a deal or is assassinated by a horde of starving Chinese. US tariffs interrupted a third of Chinese exports and the rest of Chinese exports will soon dry up as Europe and Asia feel the pinch of their own tariffs. Europe and China are export driven economies. US is immune to counter tafiffs and US can build whatever is not imported. Get busy and start building. There must have been a sale on Tester’s airplane glue in your vicinity. Your opinion does not count when Trump and I agree. And the games are just beginning………… 2024 : China accounted for approximately 5-6% of U.S. LNG exports, totaling about 4.16 million metric tons ($2.4 billion). This was a small fraction of the U.S.’s total LNG exports, which reached 11.9 billion cubic feet per day, making the U.S. the world’s largest LNG exporter. Not for long! Russia is building the China 2 pipeline to China and Qatar has huge projects coming on-line to add pain to the U.S.exporters. Plus with the U.S. abandoning Ukraine to Russia the NOrdstream 2 pipeline will re-open. Who does Trump work for? Dollar down and Ruble up, any questions? Really do not need Gas purchasing when your economy has run out of customers for what it produces with that Gas. Other then that another Yawn article. There was much bashing of Biden admin for calling for a slowdown in the future expansion of LNG terminals after it was clear that Europe was not going to be able to take in the lofty export goals of the industry and right wing talking heads. Most of us here are fiscal conservatives. It is natural that most here would have chosen Trump over Harris. When will conservatives come to the conclusion that Trump is a disaster? I am eternally grateful that Mish provides an economic forum, that is not paywalled, to debate these issues. How many here can bring themselves to admit that the US would have been better off with the Biden style guidance? Not ready? I’ll give you another 90 days and re-poll then… Trump’s not even a conservative. He’s more of a corrupt autocrat sort of guy. What exactly is conservative about Trump? He cut long-term revenues without reducing corresponding expenditures. He hates free trade. He has no plans to take on out of control medical costs or the social security deficit. He hasn’t gotten us out of any wars. He sent hundreds of billions of dollars of free money to the general population. He has little respect for the Constitution or historic institutional norms. Anybody? Anything? He didn’t start any wars for his first administration and he reduced troop levels in Afghanistan from 13,000 to 2,500. But yeah, that’s all I can give him credit for. He sold a lot of red hats which was good for Chinese hat manufacturing. Trump is not a conservative in the traditional sense. He’s why conservatives are vilified. He just happened to run under that banner. He’s an outlier, and not in a good way. define fiscal conservative in the context of long term economic goals. define the attributes of biden style guidance. biden guidance was mostly a fraudulent sleep walk of non-action. he said so himself in that room of donors muttering how things will not fundamentally change. I was going to give you a thumbs up for Trump being a disaster until I saw the part about how we would have been better off with Biden-style guidance. Maybe, but only if Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and stopped anything from passing. Would you not prefer turning the calendar back to Nov1st 2024? You liking this shit show? So JD Vance was one of the last to have met with the pope. What was said? Elon will be the next pope, no black or white smoke carbon emissions going up the Sistine Chapel chimney? That’s the new Democrat meme since this morning. They are flooding all the blogs with the same meme trying as always to build a narrative. That companies planned to build many export terminals has nothing to do with Trump but was a stupid herd mentality action. As for gas markets globally if China switches to another supplier then that supplier has less output to supply other customers. Might not those customers then turn to US gas? Those doing that would also benefit from reducing their trade surplus with the US and thus getting lower tariffs on their exports to the US. China is also facing a recession so it will likely need less US gas even without the tariff war tit for tat. And at some point the US has to stop running huge trade deficits so however disruptive the tariffs are now they will have a benefit in making the US self sufficient in most things that will become unobtainium when China becomes more belligerent The only problem is – no one wants to trade with the US anymore. If you talked to heads of companies they would relieve you of that delusion quickly. How do you know this? Can you point us to some specific earnings information from US exporting companies pre- and post- (and future) Trump’s election? You talk to the heads of companies obviously. No, I don’t talk to heads of companies. But I don’t think you do either. Yet only one of us is ‘sure’ of collectively how these heads of companies think about foreign trade relations with the US. Hubris ever? What moved China and Russia together was the misguided response of the US to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which was Russia’s response to the misguided US policy of repeatedly goading the Russians with the threat of bringing Ukraine into NATO. To say that Trump caused this shows your true colors and is no surprise. What will be interesting will be the US response. We should probably hold firm against China and move quickly toward tax cuts, deregulation, and a new Fed chairman. No need to fire him. Just set up his successor and the “Shadow Fed Chairman” and the markets will follow him instead. But he would have no power to do anything. The scary thing is that, even if Trump gets rid of Powell, the voting board members could outvote Trump replacement. The Treasury needs to step in with its own open market operations. No power except everyone would know the present head is a lame duck and act accordingly. The world doesn’t revolve around US policy the way it did 20 years ago. Russia’s invasion had its own set of priorities and motivations, some of which had to do with our actions and many had nothing to do with us. The people yapping about this don’t speak russian or ukr, have never studied Russian or Ukr history or understand the history of this part of the world. You read headlines and think you’re an expert. We all need to cut the crap. Oh really? Well tell me what you know, mr. expert. Why did Russia invade Ukraine. If it was to annex the Russian part of Ukraine, they’ve paid a high price for something of questionable benefit. It is a commodity. Commodities will flow from place to place over time. This site should quit panicking so easily. I agree with this statement, however LNG is temperamental unlike other fuels such as oil. It must be stored at -160C to avoid evaporation and rapid pressure increase. Pumping LNG requires specialized equipment to maintain the low temperature and pressure. Constant boiling off LNG steam via a “tea kettle” maintains the low temperature. Wikipedia has a nice LNG article. I am not an expert… just recognizing the difficulty of preparing, transporting and maitaining LNG is not as simple as other fungible goods. – Russia has emerged as the third-largest supplier of LNG to China behind Australia and Quatar. Russia and China have been negotiating over a new natural gas pipeline. > So Russia LNG to China and no longer to the EU, who won’t take it anyway. Got It! – The European Commission will announce a more detailed strategy to phase out Russian oil and gas imports next month. The EU has pledged to quit Russian fossil fuels by 2027. > The EU already had decided to No Longer accept Gas & Oil from Russia. Got It! – The EU has said it would consider buying more LNG from the United States, and Trump has said selling more energy to Europe would be a key focus of his > So EU Gas & Oil will come from The U.S. moving forward, as thy had already agreed to in Principle. Got It! – Last year, the U.S. was Europe’s third-biggest gas supplier, after Russia. > This Year the U.S. will be the Largest Gas Supplier to the EU. Got It! What I don’t get, is where is the story? All of this has been in play for quite sometime, as we could see. Nothing new, nothing different, just the same, but said again? Just Curious… If I had gone through what Mish just went through I would not have been able to do much of anything let alone keep writing a blog. My hat goes off to him for his devotion but I would prefer that he takes it easy for a while. I’m sorry, I missed any news about Mish. What happened? He had a grievous cardiac accident that put him into the hospital Had to have four stents put in. His aorta was 90% blocked up. Thank you for letting long-time readers know. I 100% Agree! Good job. Increase domestic inflation, check. Strengthen your adversaries, check. Alienate your allies, check. Bull in a china shop, check. What else would Russia have a Manchurian Candidate do in addition to all of these things? Maybe install Tulsi Gabbard as DNI? More supply chain disruptions caused by Trump’s trade war. In addition to being the largest oil importer in the world (11 mbpd), China is also the largest LNG importer. They are using more natural gas every year to replace coal and oil, for industrial use and for transportation use (half of China’s large trucks have converted to natgas from diesel). Six percent of Chinese LNG comes from the US as a result of long term contracts signed in the last few years. China placed a 15% tariff on these US imports in February, in response to Trump’s new tariffs on China. And now placed a ban on US LNG. Chinese importers with long term contacts have no choice but to resell the LNG elsewhere. As I mentioned, most LNG is sold with long term contracts. These contracts are necessary in order to secure the financing to build new LNG facilities, such as the many new facilities planned in the US over the next decade. Some of these new facilities may be i jeopardy now as the world’s largest LNG importer looks elsewhere for that gas. Too bad Trump doesn’t want to get rich quick selling US LNG to China. Will they though? Worldwide demand for LNG is still the same. If China doesn’t import from the USA it must import from elsewhere. That means ‘elsewhere’ now has less to sell to country Y. So country Y can simply pick up the slack from the USA. The only way it’s a problem is if ‘elsewhere’ can increase production to the point that it satisfies all the demand that China is moving the the US. I’m not sure that can happen in the short run (ie Trumps term) because as the articles mention, China isn’t importing that gas to China, but they are still taking it and simply offloading it elsewhere. Not a good argument. If China imports from countries other than the US, they will just produce more. Oil/gas production isn’t fixed in place and the US is about to learn the hard way what it feels like when nobody wants to buy our stuff. There is demand for LNG only to the extent piped NG is not available. And Europe does not want long-term contracts. China did. A definite loss to the US. Correct. The US is not the only player in the booming LNG market. Qatar, Iran, Oman, UAE, Saudi, Egypt, and Canada are all rapidly expanding their LNG export capacity to meet the growing global demand. These countries can easily displace the US. If China (and others) turn to them, rather than the US, because of Trump’s tariffs and rhetoric, then US facilities won’t get built. Because they need long term contracts in order to get financing. China’s overall demand for LNG is by my guess collapsing. Lots of their factories are idle and consequently don’t need energy. No idea how long it will last but it is rippling through their economy. Your guess! Lol! No hard data. You’re as bad as Michael. Why should I bother with people who simply make sh*t up because they want it to be true? Here’s a guess with numbers for you. Shell expects global LNG demand to grow by 60% in the next decade. Maybe that guess is wrong, but it’s an informed guess. Not something pulled out of their ass like yours. Whether it turns out to be 60% growth or even 30% growth, that LNG has to come from somewhere. And as things stand now, it probably won’t come from the US if we keep pissing off our potential customers. No exports equals no business equals no revenue making it hard to pay workers and suppliers ect. You know that. You just don’t want to admit it. NO exports! Another fantasy pulled from your ass. China exports more to both AESEAN and Europe than it does to the US. The US is just 12.5% of China’s exports. How do you expect me to take you seriously when you keep posting this garbage? You still take him seriously ??? I am just about done with him. And a few others here. Their tongues are so far up Trump’s ass that they will never be able to see what’s going on. More and more LNG is going to be supplied by Russia. LNG is fungible. What might happen is that China could finally agree to pay for the pipeline across Russia to China. Till now they have not wanted to pay for it and they wanted to pay the same price as Russian domestic users pay which is very low. Anyway to get it up and working would take a few years and who knows what the world will be then. Not a easy problem for China to solve. Is the car wiring with soy ingredients a good thing for GDP after the squirrels chew it up? Did Krugman come up with that? Thank you – very informative article. Back in 2003, Warren Buffett had a good idea on how to deal with trade imbalances and it required no tariffs or government bureaucracy. Import Certificates that could be bought/sold on the open & free market. For everyone asking for “solutions” well here you go. https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/growing.pdf Not sure why Trump didn’t pick up on this, digitize them and call them “Trump Trade Tokens” Now China isn’t buying US LNG or soybeans and farmers are getting scared. They shouldn’t be, they should just reap what they sowed – idiots. Article on China dumping US soybeans in favor of Brazil’s. “Farmers deal with bad weather. We deal with pests. We deal with tractors breaking,” said Heather Feuerstein, who owns a farm near Grand Rapids, Mich. “That’s our lives.” But tariffs? “This is a threat to our continued way of life,” she said. But tariffs? “This is a threat to our continued way of life,” she said. Lol. Shut up and take your medicine! https://archive.is/gNkAB You get what you vote for. Unless your IQ is really low, then you vote against your interests every four years and eventually get speared like a hog. And you deserve to get it good and hard. Collassal-scale monoculture is not a good way of life. They can ditch the GMO, improve soil health, and thank tariffs for compelling them to leave that life behind. It takes a LONG time to switch crops. Its not just a simple as planting something else. You need the right equipment (tractors, watering etc), right fertilizers, right shipping / storage etc. All on top of hoping this new crop produces the same revenue per acre. That’s a lot of things that need to go right. You forgot to mention. In America you need the right Government subsidies. There’s no market for little boutique farmers, in the middle of Nebraska. Growing boutiques is no longer profitable. They need to plant hope-ium. Trump never figured it out because he is too absorbed in his own ego to learn much from anyone Every post points to Gold. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

U.S. to Send 200 Troops to Israel to Support the Gaza Cease-Fire

…Hamas wants Israel to withdraw from around 70% of Gaza in return for the release of hostages, Arab mediators said.…

…I don’t understand how seemingly authentic non-interventionists like Gabbard can remain in this administration.…

Show full text (23111 chars)
• • • Israel approves a deal with Hamas. Trump’s plan moves forward. Cease-Fire in Gaza The Wall Street Journal reports Israeli Government Approves Hostage Deal Setting a Cease-Fire in Gaza Israel’s government approved an agreement brokered by the Trump administration to free the remaining hostages held by Hamas and establish a cease-fire in Gaza, sealing a diplomatic breakthrough after months of failed talks. The hostage deal, which President Trump announced from the White House on Wednesday, promises to close a major wound opened by the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel and give momentum to the effort to end a two-year war that has left tens of thousands of Gazans dead and the enclave in ruins. The deal will bring the first significant pause in fighting since March, and the administration hopes it will be the first step toward a longer-term settlement that will involve talks over the disarmament of Hamas and the formation of an interim government to oversee Gaza. U.S. troops began to arrive in Israel Thursday, the first of about 200 being sent to support the cease-fire in Gaza as part of an international team, according to U.S. officials. The troops will help monitor the implementation of the cease-fire and eventual transition to a civilian government, according to a U.S. official. They will also help facilitate the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has faced resistance to ending the war from far-right members of his coalition government, welcomed the deal to bring home Israeli hostages. “This is a diplomatic success and a national and moral victory for the state of Israel,” he said early Thursday. Israeli polling for months has shown strong majorities in support of ending the fighting to free the hostages, including among voters on the right. Tel Aviv was buzzing with hopes for a deal. On Thursday, thousands of people—whole families with their dogs and children, soldiers in uniform, individuals and groups of friends—gathered at a courtyard in Tel Aviv known as Hostage Square to celebrate the deal. Unlike most days at Hostage Square, where gatherings are typically somber, people sang, beat drums and waved Israeli and American flags. Hamas wants Israel to withdraw from around 70% of Gaza in return for the release of hostages, Arab mediators said. Israel wants to withdraw from less territory, and the two sides are still negotiating this detail, according to people briefed on the negotiations. “We ended the war in Gaza, and really on a much bigger basis created peace,” he said during a cabinet meeting. “All Americans should be proud of the role that our country has played in bringing this terrible conflict to an end.” Praise to Trump for Brokering a Gaza Hostage Deal to End the War Earlier this evening, I commented Praise to Trump for Brokering a Gaza Hostage Deal to End the War I am skeptical of deals until they happen, but this one looks real. Congrats to Trump. There was no mention of a Palestinian state which I believe is a prerequisite to lasting peace. Where is Israel withdrawing troops to? Where is rebuilding aid coming from? War contamination of land and water supplies? Lots of Issues remain and success is not assured. Click above for Trump’s 20-Point Plan and additional comments. We Have a Start Despite all of the missing pieces, we have a start. But there was no way to negotiate all of the missing pieces I mentioned. So, congrats to Trump for the start, even if it is less than ideal, because ideal was impossible. Addendum The Gaza Cease-Fire Is Great, US Troop Involvement Isn’t Details are still missing, but I failed to comment on one key aspect. For discussion please see The Gaza Cease-Fire Is Great, US Troop Involvement Isn’t Cease-Fire in Gaza The Wall Street Journal reports Israeli Government Approves Hostage Deal Setting a Cease-Fire in Gaza Israel’s government approved an agreement brokered by the Trump administration to free the remaining hostages held by Hamas and establish a cease-fire in Gaza, sealing a diplomatic breakthrough after months of failed talks. The hostage deal, which President Trump announced from the White House on Wednesday, promises to close a major wound opened by the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel and give momentum to the effort to end a two-year war that has left tens of thousands of Gazans dead and the enclave in ruins. The deal will bring the first significant pause in fighting since March, and the administration hopes it will be the first step toward a longer-term settlement that will involve talks over the disarmament of Hamas and the formation of an interim government to oversee Gaza. U.S. troops began to arrive in Israel Thursday, the first of about 200 being sent to support the cease-fire in Gaza as part of an international team, according to U.S. officials. The troops will help monitor the implementation of the cease-fire and eventual transition to a civilian government, according to a U.S. official. They will also help facilitate the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has faced resistance to ending the war from far-right members of his coalition government, welcomed the deal to bring home Israeli hostages. “This is a diplomatic success and a national and moral victory for the state of Israel,” he said early Thursday. Israeli polling for months has shown strong majorities in support of ending the fighting to free the hostages, including among voters on the right. Tel Aviv was buzzing with hopes for a deal. On Thursday, thousands of people—whole families with their dogs and children, soldiers in uniform, individuals and groups of friends—gathered at a courtyard in Tel Aviv known as Hostage Square to celebrate the deal. Unlike most days at Hostage Square, where gatherings are typically somber, people sang, beat drums and waved Israeli and American flags. Hamas wants Israel to withdraw from around 70% of Gaza in return for the release of hostages, Arab mediators said. Israel wants to withdraw from less territory, and the two sides are still negotiating this detail, according to people briefed on the negotiations. “We ended the war in Gaza, and really on a much bigger basis created peace,” he said during a cabinet meeting. “All Americans should be proud of the role that our country has played in bringing this terrible conflict to an end.” Praise to Trump for Brokering a Gaza Hostage Deal to End the War Earlier this evening, I commented Praise to Trump for Brokering a Gaza Hostage Deal to End the War I am skeptical of deals until they happen, but this one looks real. Congrats to Trump. There was no mention of a Palestinian state which I believe is a prerequisite to lasting peace. Where is Israel withdrawing troops to? Where is rebuilding aid coming from? War contamination of land and water supplies? Lots of Issues remain and success is not assured. Click above for Trump’s 20-Point Plan and additional comments. We Have a Start Despite all of the missing pieces, we have a start. But there was no way to negotiate all of the missing pieces I mentioned. So, congrats to Trump for the start, even if it is less than ideal, because ideal was impossible. Addendum The Gaza Cease-Fire Is Great, US Troop Involvement Isn’t Details are still missing, but I failed to comment on one key aspect. For discussion please see The Gaza Cease-Fire Is Great, US Troop Involvement Isn’t Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. They better make sure their life insurance is up-to-date. Boots on the Ground! Something tells me they’ll be staying for a while and sooner than anyone guesses there will be another American Base in a foreign land. The violence will resume before they even arrive. My guess is that Trump squeezed the anti-Christ (Netanyahu). Hopefully, this will work but Israel is still a brutal, thug state, so success is questionable. I don’t have a horse in this race, but it’ll be a timeout. Israel wants more land and they won’t be stopped. “Keep the Champagne corked.” https://thefloutist.substack.com/p/keep-the-champagne-corked Despite the announcement of a ceasefire agreement, this morning the IDF (Israel “Defense” Forces) continued “its bombardment across various areas of the Gaza Strip”, as reported by Al Mayadeen , which in another article reported on the skepticism of Palestinians in the US, such as Mosab Abu Toha, https://geopolitiq.substack.com/p/is-trumpanyahus-peace-plan-being – Israel approves a deal with Hamas. Trump’s plan moves forward. > You have to hand it to the “Peace Maker” Last Term No Wars, and this term more Peace Plans and more to follow!! – On Thursday, thousands of people—whole families with their dogs and children, soldiers in uniform, individuals and groups of friends—gathered at a courtyard in Tel Aviv known as Hostage Square to celebrate the deal. Unlike most days at Hostage Square, where gatherings are typically somber, people sang, beat drums and waved Israeli and American flags. > What a Beautiful Day for the World, Israel, and America! I just love to see, hear, listen to, or be part of stories such as this! Peace, Love & Friendship is/should be the Ultimate Goal of the World, so whenever it’s on full display, it’s a spectacular achievement!!! Thank you to ALL who participated in such a truly wonderful occurrence for ALL!! Macron and the UN declared a Palestinian state, but first Hamas has to go. Bibi kept the comatose Hamas alive. Hamas demands Sinwar bros mummies. Bibi said: no. Hamas demands 3 west bank leaders. Bibi said: no. There is hope that within 72h Israel will get a few mummies. Thereafter Israel will stay put in new defensive lines inside Jasa. The IDF will not run Jasa madhouse. They will leave it to Qatar, MBS, Erdogan Tony Blair and Trump. Hamas will kidnap a few for ransom to show its power. Erdogan sent a Turkish flotilla to provoke Bibi. Israel might let them in to avoid conflict with ego maniac Erdogan. But if not: stay tune… wont last long.. nothing was settled. war /iran is coming. War with Israel, is War with America and Peace. Not going to happen by any major Country IMO, and if any small fraction acts up, they will be instantly annihilated. Any Major Country, will be sealing there Countries Fate and the People will not stand for that, as they see what will happen to them. This is more than just a Peace Plan with Israel, but more of a Plan for The Middle-East as a whole. This will bring stability now, and that always leaves a chance for change to occur. I see that potentially happening now. = This will bring stability now, thanks buddy!  it is Friday WE ALL NEED GOOD LAUGH AFTER WORKING WEEK! “Potentially” because of egg heads like You! Sure you get a good laugh, but in Israel, they got Death & Destruction not long ago. America is trying, so put your TDS Aside for a moment, and you lust for hate for those who disagree with you, and realize the importance of such an event!! Not just for America & The Middle East, but for The whole World to also bear witness to as well. Peace Anywhere is Good for The World to see!! Some, like yourself obviously, plead for a Nuclear War, and think that will make your self destructive behavior brighter. So while you sit happily by awaiting for Peace to Fall, I will stand here with Hope for Peace, Thank You! = so put your TDS Aside for a moment, mor11on. my sister married into jew, and live /w kids in Israel!! I am not moronic american from middle of Omaha who never opened a hist book.!! I KNOW history of region ,and what happened 2 3 and 5 000 years ago in that region. I bet you dont!!! ps you are posting like you are not human , some kind of AI robot! get lost. dont have time for uneducated peasants like you! get back to school! – my sister married into jew, and live /w kids in Israel!! > I have relatives married to Jewish Others, so yes my eyes are open… – I KNOW history of region ,and what happened 2 3 and 5 000 years ago. > So what you actually know, is simple History, and even from 5,000 years ago. What do you know about tomorrow? Is it the same as what happened 500 years ago? I know what happened this morning, it not this evening, but what about You? By now you hopefully get my point. I have bought many homes over the last 30+ Years, but have bought none in the last 20+ and will never buy another one, ever. >> Tomorrow has nothing to do with last year or yesterday. You might be gone this evening, and so may I. What will go on is Life as in Nature and Evolution, and with that comes change, some Good and some Bad. Nobody know which and how much of each… – get lost. dont have time for uneducated peasants like you! > Too bad, but You should make some time, and maybe learn something… or maybe not. >>> Pray for Peace, as We Do Know it’s better than War. Why wait for another War to start praying, when perhaps this time, with prayers and Life, time, and the Unknown ahead of us, we may actually accomplish some!!! The risk of war with Sultan Erdogan, backed by Trump, is higher than with Iran. w./ israel? please ==== turkey is not 3th world country,. it is 2d biggest army in NATO only army that has combat experience. it is 80 mil against 10 mil. == and IF THIS HAPPENS somehow TURKEY CLOSE OUT Dardanelles and Bosphorus FOR NATO AND open up for Russians!! Russia will eat alive all black sea countries! open up a map!!! alx = TRUMP DID NOT GET NOBEL PRIZE. jesus. what a childish m1oron . expect fireworks. This is a Kennedy moment for Trump. Members of the ‘all lands must serve Zionism’ party will be looking at how JFK, Rabin etc were stopped when they started moving forward with radical ideas. Something is amiss here We support Mish’s optimism, people inside the USA (even Democrat craphole cities) don’t appreciate the hellhole existence of most people in.. Mumbai, Damascus, and Manchester (haha). On the other hand, squashing a few Hamas cockroaches is second order for Jerusalem compared to War on Iran… the sequel to the 12 Day War: Longer, explosive, uncut! Netanyahu needs to conserve his resources; those bungholes in Syria might need squashing while Iranian missiles create havoc inside physically tiny Israel. Likely to happen before Dec, 31. Keep up the great analysis! Peace over there can work temporarily (under the supervision of a third powerful country). When supervision is gone, they’ll start again, everybody against everybody. Same for Europe. The period 1945 – 2025 is the longest period of peace between European countries, under the supervision of the USA. When the USA withdraws, they’ll split and start fighting again. As Pete Hegseth recently acknowledged, the military isn’t good at policing, its purpose is to kill people and break things (part of his justification for renaming the DoD the DoW). Peacekeeping by the US military didn’t work in Afghanistan, it didn’t work in Iraq, and it didn’t work in Mogadishu. By the way, you claim Europe has been at peace for 80 years? Don’t forget Bosnia, a country very much in Europe. 30 years ago it was about as peaceful as Gaza. Ukraine isn’t exactly peaceful these days either… You’re right, I forgot Bosnia (I was in Europe at the time, and it got much less coverage in the Media than Iraq II had gotten). It was not seen as a European war by European Media, it was seen as a US/EU intervention to stop a genocide . While Iraq II was almost 24/7 coverage, Bosnia was mostly kicked on page 4. The Central European Apparatus doesn’t like any country having a big army in the area, whether it’s Croatia or Ukraine. And in Europe we don’t really see Eastern Ukraine as “Europe” – more like Asia. At any rate, the Middle East is setup to always fight, with or without Western intervention. It’s of course part of the Middle-Eastern culture to present themselves as victims and poor beggars, even in their daily lives, and the West should stop falling for this attitude. Those governments down there have no problem sacrificing millions of their own for millions in dollars. Remember Yasser Arafat? He died a billionaire. Speaking of geography and ‘Europe vs Asia, isn’t ‘Europe’ geographically designated as ‘west of the Ural Mountains’ ? I believe that Moscow is the largest city in Europe. Totally agree with this. It has been impossible for Israelis or Palestines to be rationale over the last few years so I really hope that the world community can step in (physically) to support both sides reach peace without favouring one side or the other. Not sure that the US is an honest impartial actor in all this but lets see. Absolutely agree about Europe as well. However, I’m not sure that it is the US withdrawing that will trigger fighting again. The rise of populism and its drive towards breaking up the EU is really going to create war at some point. If only the non-populist governments were a bit more competent. Mish, are you drinking tonight? “As a libertarian, I always praise peace.” Most libertarians praise liberty, which is sometimes–perhaps often–incompatible with political declarations of “peace.” “[W]e have a start.” No, we have a charade that is incompatible with the reality of the Arab-Israeli conflict, on a par with the cretinous Sharon government’s 2005 decision to forcefully remove Jews from Gaza and cede the place to the PA. The fantasy even relies on the same images: hate-filled Arabs giving up the decades-old hope of destroying Zionism in return for prosperity. The b.s. was ankle-deep on the ground in 2005, and the fantasy lasted how long? Less than two years. Unfortunately, the only peace Israel can hope for is through the destruction of anti-Zionist dreams, and that is wishful thinking: for how many generations would you have to occupy every square meter of Gaza, controlling the education of every Arab child, to sell civilization to a population that has been nursed from the cradle for generations on dreams of mass-murder? And the U.S.is going to have troops in the middle of this show? I don’t understand how seemingly authentic non-interventionists like Gabbard can remain in this administration. As for the more conventional Republican lickspittles, I get it: “This time will be different because we’re running things.” As jobholders, they’ve got a stake in lying to themselves. What’s your excuse, Mish? 200 American soldiers… plus 10s of billions of US taxpayer $s (to fund the Gazan genocide) in addition to the $4 billion annual tribute we pay Israel (as well as $3 billion each to Egypt and Jordan, an annual bribe from the US to be nice to Israel). Why is it our business that the Israelis have been fighting their neighbors ever since the 1948 invasion? Because that little apartheid state in the hemisphere opposite the one we live in…rules the DC Swamp & the Mockingbird media. Would you rather the area be a mess? Another long period of the Suez Canal being blocked like from 1967 to into the 70s? As for the 1948 invasion the Jews managed to stop that invasion by the Arab nations and ended up with more land than originally mandated. As for 3 billion each to Egypt and Jordan it’s more like half that. And the Israelis really suck at committing genocide as after 2 years they only managed to exterminate at a rate lower than the annual population growth rate. I’m glad that Trump seems to be pulling this off as my home is between Cairo and the Canal and who needs a war on your doorstep Stinks to high heaven. Trump already stated that he wants Gaza to become like the “The Riviera” (presumably to the benefit of Israel and him) and this seems like another step towards that goal. Watch Israel kill some Americans and blame the Palestinians. I hope not, but they would if they thought they could get away with it. Watch some Palestinian terrorist kill an American and blame it on Israel. Trump is a fool to agree to this! The Senate should put a stop to this idea. One dead American soldier and low-information Americans will be totally onboard with bombing the heck out of Iran…which of course is one of Netanyahu’s dream objectives. This stinks! The USS Liberty bombing is a very definite and tragic example of this gambit by the Israelis. (And Mossad definitely had something on LBJ, who treated the victims of the Liberty like garbage.) Are those 200 US troops to secure the mile of prime waterfront real estate for the new Trump Tower and Golf Club/Resort? Almost certainly part of the greater plan. On the new Gaza Rivera! 50% off! Come one, come all! Tom Waits – Step Right Up (1977) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRHgE2Yi3To https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRHgE2Yi3To step right up step right up step right up step right up step right up step right up everyone’s a winner bargains galore everyone’s a winner bargains galore that’s right you too can be the proud owner that’s right you too can be the proud owner of the quality goes in before the name goes on of the quality goes in before the name goes on one-tenth of a dollar one-tenth of a dollar, we got service after sales one-tenth of a dollar one-tenth of a dollar, we got service after sales you need perfume? we got perfume, how ’bout an engagement ring? you need perfume? we got perfume, how ’bout an engagement ring? something for the little lady something for the little lady something for the little lady something for the little lady something for the little lady hmm something for the little lady hmm three for a dollar three for a dollar we got a year-end clearance we got a white sale we got a year-end clearance we got a white sale and a smoke-damaged furniture you can drive it away today and a smoke-damaged furniture you can drive it away today act now act now and receive as our gift our gift to you act now act now and receive as our gift our gift to you they come in all colors one size fits all they come in all colors one size fits all no muss no fuss no spills you’re tired of kitchen drudgery no muss no fuss no spills you’re tired of kitchen drudgery everything must go going out of business going out of business everything must go going out of business going out of business going out of business sale going out of business sale fifty percent off original retail price skip the middle man fifty percent off original retail price skip the middle man don’t settle for less don’t settle for less … … http://www.tomwaits.com/songs/song/322/Step_Right_Up/ http://www.tomwaits.com/songs/song/322/Step_Right_Up/ Congrats seem a bit premature. We still have phase 2 and phase 3. I don’t believe Netanyahu has retracted his statement from last week that there will never be a Palestinian State. Nevertheless, anything that will even temporarily stop the carnage and relieve the terrible suffering of the women and children in Gaza is a very positive development. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Due to Extreme FIMD, Trump is Now Behind, He May Need a Hard Recession to Win

…EVEN BIDEN WHEN HE STATED, HE CURED THE ECONOMY AS RECORD BANKRUPTICIES ARE BEING FILED! BK’S BEING FILED THIS TIME BECAUSE THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE SO FAST!…

…KAMALA IS NO TULSI GABBARD! THANK GOD SHE DOESN;T HAVE TO DEBATE HER! I think you’ve missed it on this one. It’s not about the economy, Trump, or who said what.…

Show full text (50000 chars)
• • • Trump is suffering from extreme Foot-In-Mouth-Disease. He Just cannot keep on message. Dear Donald, it’s still the economy stupid. I mentioned to a friend this morning that I thought Trump was behind. Trump got into very hot water twice, likely offending any person with the least bit of common sense. The above image from Nate Silver’s Silver Bulletin came out about two hours ago and it confirms what I thought. Last update: 1:00 p.m, Sunday, August 4 : After another day of strong polling , Kamala Harris has pulled ahead of Donald Trump for the first time since the forecast launched. Although the race is still a toss-up , Harris leads Trump by 1.4 points in our national polling average, and has a 51 percent chance of winning the electoral college. Trump Questions Kamala’s Race Trump on Harris: “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and now she wants to be known as Black.” By the end, the audience begins laughing at Trump. The moderator notes that Harris went to an HBCU. pic.twitter.com/M20uHjw4uJ — Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) July 31, 2024 Listen to the gasp from the audience when Trump says “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and wants to be known as Black. I respect either one. Obviously, she doesn’t.” Wow! That is going to cost Trump tens of thousands and perhaps over a hundred thousand Black votes. Ironically, this was at a conference when Trump that aimed to build Black support. Not Just Trump Also consider Republicans Step Up Attacks on Kamala Harris Sebastian Gorka, a former aide to Donald Trump, recently referred to the vice president as “colored” and a “DEI hire.” The former president’s campaign referred to Harris as “Low IQ Kamala” on social media. Some of the former president’s supporters have for years donned shirts, carried signs or sported “Joe And The Hoe Gotta Go” bumper stickers. What Happened to the Polls? instead of sticking to an economic message, Trump cannot stop from telling the world how great he is and how bad everyone else is. He cannot control himself. To put it bluntly, Trump would rather throw red meat to howling hyenas than win. Then, to top it off, Trump twice played race cards and was burnt badly both times. Even Republicans can’t stand it. Brian Kemp, Georgia Governor Blasts Trump My focus is on winning this November and saving our country from Kamala Harris and the Democrats – not engaging in petty personal insults, attacking fellow Republicans, or dwelling on the past. You should do the same, Mr. President, and leave my family out of it. pic.twitter.com/m8y6CSuZKY — Brian Kemp (@BrianKempGA) August 3, 2024 Geoff Duncan, the former Republican Lt. Governor of Georgia NEW Former Georgia Republican Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, just released this statement following Donald Trump’s deranged speech in Atlanta, GA: “If you were able to see through Donald Trump’s incoherence and vindictiveness tonight, you saw a Donald Trump who does not care about… pic.twitter.com/GglJovOUN3 — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) August 4, 2024 Going After Kamala All Wrong Please consider Abigail Shrier: Republicans, You’re Going After Kamala All Wrong Here’s what Republican wallowing looks like: Pushing the idea that Harris is a “DEI hire.” Conservatives insist that calling her a DEI hire is fair and just. After all, DEI is a terrible, unethical system. If the Democrats love DEI so much, why not own it? Biden all but branded Harris a DEI hire when he announced he would only consider female minority candidates . All true. And all equally beside the point. Republicans foolish enough to attack Harris as a DEI hire are likely to be startled by the stampede to defend her. For one thing, calling Harris a DEI hire mistakes attacking the system with attacking its beneficiaries. The system of DEI is unethical and must be dismantled. But the beneficiaries did nothing wrong. Were they not supposed to apply for these jobs? Why shame them now? Consider that we all regard it as immoral for Major League Baseball to have once excluded Black players. The system was rotten, but the players in it—Ruth, Williams, DiMaggio—don’t deserve our contempt. Attack the system, not the players. The other counterproductive strategy—which some Republicans seem keen to pursue —is “slut shaming” Harris for her affair, early in her career, with the powerful older politician Willie Brown, the married mayor of San Francisco. The charge seems ridiculous when leveled against a happily married woman turning sixty, who looks like a kindly auntie and whose stepchildren call her “Momala.” In four years as the first female veep, she presented a personal side that was warm and conventional, and that’s what voters remember. Shaming her for earlier romantic affairs will only inspire her base to vote early. The question Republicans ought to confront before leveling any attack is: “Will this energize my supporters more or hers ?” For nearly every ad hominem salvo currently flung at Harris, the answer is: hers. Slut-Slamming Hypocrisy Slut-slamming is all the more amusing in the light of Trump’s affair with Stormy Daniels, an American pornographic film actress. Defending Trump Trump isn’t saying that Harris isn’t black, he’s saying she is inauthentic, that she will be anyone that any supportive group wants her to be. And it’s something voters notice and don’t like. https://t.co/MPodZRUR5x — David Marcus (@BlueBoxDave) August 4, 2024 Stop defending Trump. There is no excuse for what he said. Governor Kemp has it correct. Peak Trump On July 21, I commented Good News for Democrats: Throw the Polls Out, Start All Over At the time I made that comment, Nate Silver had Trump’s odds of winning at 72.8 percent to 26.9 percent for Biden with a 0.4 percent chance of no majority (recount of a rogue elector voting for Kennedy). Trump Steps Down to the Occasion On July 22, I commented In the Wake Biden’s Campaign Exit, Trump Steps Down to the Occasion Question of the Day The following question is how many independents will see things: “ Would I rather have a jackass president who will get some things right, or would I rather take a chance on Harris? “ Let’s be honest about how Trump’s belittling sounds. If you don’t like the word “jackass” then feel free to substitute a word or phrase that suits you. I do not know the answer to my question, and if you have an ounce of common sense, you will admit you don’t either. Regardless, such statements will cost Trump votes. Peak Trump? Trump’s polling odds have peaked or soon will. My statement implies nothing other than widespread belief that Harris-Anyone has a better shot than Biden-Harris. I nailed the top. Is Nate Silver Wrong? Please spare me the sap about Nate Silver being wrong in 2016 or whenever, especially if you liked his odds on July 21. Silver was wrong, but in a totally different sense than most think. He had the odds wrong, not the election wrong. The election was much closer than the thought. That was the real mistake not the outcome itself. Had it not been for a last minute Comey bombshell and/or a stupid FIMD by Hillary regarding “deplorables” she would have won. Predicting Hillary to win was reasonable. Calling the odds 70-30 was the mistake. People act like 30% chances never happen when they happen 30% of the time. I thought the election was more like 55-45 not 70-30. I still think that is about right. Comment on Bias (Added after posting) Modest oversampling is irrelevant. Results are weighted. And here is a real hoot: Erza Klein moans about Republican Bias. The worst offender is Rasmussen with a strong Republican bias. Pollsters generally correct for oversampling one side or another. If they don’t Silver adjusts. Two weeks ago Republicans loved Silver, now they don’t. The problem isn’t Silver. The media doesn’t even do their own polls for the most part. Siena does NYT and is very highly rated. That said, I meant to make a comment that Harris is in a honeymoon period and the polls are likely a bit high. Things will settle down about a week after the Democrat convention. Can Trump Win? Of course! Peak Trump does not imply Trump will lose. However, after foolishly losing huge numbers of Black and independent votes due to blatantly stupid statements, winning will be much harder. Winning back back any votes he just lost won’t be easy and may not even be possible. But there still are undecided votes to win or lose. Best Thing Going for Trump The best thing going for Trump right now is a weakening economy. I believe a recession has started and it will pick up steam. July 31: Small Business Employment Growth Is Now Negative (and What It Means) ADP data shows year-over-year payroll growth is negative 88,000 for small corporations sized 20-49. Trends are negative in all but very large corporations . August 1: The Manufacturing ISM Index Is Lower Than Every Economist’s Estimate The ISM manufacturing report was a disaster from every angle, especially employment , production, and backlogs. Employment reading worst since June 2020. August 1: Commercial Construction Spending Is Down 9 Consecutive Months Here’s the kicker: It’s not office related. And the Census Department has heavy negative revisions to spending. Let’s investigate. August 1: Intel Announces 15,000 Job Cuts, 15 Percent of its Workforce Intel received $8.5 billion in Biden administration grants (Inflation Reduction Act) but announces massive layoffs and halts dividends due to a decline in revenue . August 2: Unemployment Rate Jumps, Jobs Rise Only 114,000 with More Negative Revisions The headline jobs number was much weaker than the consensus estimate of 180,000 and the unemployment rate rose 0.2 percentage points. Recession Has Started On July 8, I wrote Weak Data Says a Recession Has Already Started, Let’s Now Discuss When I’ve seen enough. A recession has started. Let’s discuss starting with a very good indicator that has few false positives and no false negatives . My follow-up post was on August 2. August 2: The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered A recession indicator based off rising unemployment triggered in July. Claudia Sahm, a former Fed economist, takes credit for an indicator she did not invent. Let’s discuss. A Recession Helps Trump If Trump can avoid additional cases of severe FIMD and manages to stick to the economy, he can win. Alternatively, if the recession is deep enough and Trump’s FIMD is of a lesser nature, he can also win. Otherwise Trump may have blown it. Damage in the last week was enormous. A recession is still my base case. Meanwhile, if you defend or make excuses for Trump’s antics, you are part of the problem. Addendum Nate Silver The Silver Bulletin polling averages are a little fancy. They adjust for whether polls are conducted among registered or likely voters, the presence or absence of RFK Jr., and house effects . They weight more reliable polls more heavily. And they use national polls to make inferences about state polls and vice versa. It requires a few extra CPU cycles — but the reward is a more stable average that doesn’t get psyched out by outliers . Addendum – The Big Point It is not whether Trump or Harris is in the lead that matters. It is the direction. How can a fight with Brian Kemp not cost votes? How can stupid statements about race not cost votes? The BS over sampling and pollster bias is just that. Silver corrects for it. Pollsters also correct for their own weighting errors. It is (should be) perfectly clear that Trump is acting stupid, and it is costing him votes. I mentioned to a friend this morning that I thought Trump was behind. Trump got into very hot water twice, likely offending any person with the least bit of common sense. The above image from Nate Silver’s Silver Bulletin came out about two hours ago and it confirms what I thought. Last update: 1:00 p.m, Sunday, August 4 : After another day of strong polling , Kamala Harris has pulled ahead of Donald Trump for the first time since the forecast launched. Although the race is still a toss-up , Harris leads Trump by 1.4 points in our national polling average, and has a 51 percent chance of winning the electoral college. Trump Questions Kamala’s Race Trump on Harris: “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and now she wants to be known as Black.” By the end, the audience begins laughing at Trump. The moderator notes that Harris went to an HBCU. pic.twitter.com/M20uHjw4uJ Listen to the gasp from the audience when Trump says “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black and wants to be known as Black. I respect either one. Obviously, she doesn’t.” Wow! That is going to cost Trump tens of thousands and perhaps over a hundred thousand Black votes. Ironically, this was at a conference when Trump that aimed to build Black support. Not Just Trump Also consider Republicans Step Up Attacks on Kamala Harris Sebastian Gorka, a former aide to Donald Trump, recently referred to the vice president as “colored” and a “DEI hire.” The former president’s campaign referred to Harris as “Low IQ Kamala” on social media. Some of the former president’s supporters have for years donned shirts, carried signs or sported “Joe And The Hoe Gotta Go” bumper stickers. What Happened to the Polls? instead of sticking to an economic message, Trump cannot stop from telling the world how great he is and how bad everyone else is. He cannot control himself. To put it bluntly, Trump would rather throw red meat to howling hyenas than win. Then, to top it off, Trump twice played race cards and was burnt badly both times. Even Republicans can’t stand it. Brian Kemp, Georgia Governor Blasts Trump My focus is on winning this November and saving our country from Kamala Harris and the Democrats – not engaging in petty personal insults, attacking fellow Republicans, or dwelling on the past. You should do the same, Mr. President, and leave my family out of it. pic.twitter.com/m8y6CSuZKY Geoff Duncan, the former Republican Lt. Governor of Georgia NEW Former Georgia Republican Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, just released this statement following Donald Trump’s deranged speech in Atlanta, GA: “If you were able to see through Donald Trump’s incoherence and vindictiveness tonight, you saw a Donald Trump who does not care about… pic.twitter.com/GglJovOUN3 Going After Kamala All Wrong Please consider Abigail Shrier: Republicans, You’re Going After Kamala All Wrong Here’s what Republican wallowing looks like: Pushing the idea that Harris is a “DEI hire.” Conservatives insist that calling her a DEI hire is fair and just. After all, DEI is a terrible, unethical system. If the Democrats love DEI so much, why not own it? Biden all but branded Harris a DEI hire when he announced he would only consider female minority candidates . All true. And all equally beside the point. Republicans foolish enough to attack Harris as a DEI hire are likely to be startled by the stampede to defend her. For one thing, calling Harris a DEI hire mistakes attacking the system with attacking its beneficiaries. The system of DEI is unethical and must be dismantled. But the beneficiaries did nothing wrong. Were they not supposed to apply for these jobs? Why shame them now? Consider that we all regard it as immoral for Major League Baseball to have once excluded Black players. The system was rotten, but the players in it—Ruth, Williams, DiMaggio—don’t deserve our contempt. Attack the system, not the players. The other counterproductive strategy—which some Republicans seem keen to pursue —is “slut shaming” Harris for her affair, early in her career, with the powerful older politician Willie Brown, the married mayor of San Francisco. The charge seems ridiculous when leveled against a happily married woman turning sixty, who looks like a kindly auntie and whose stepchildren call her “Momala.” In four years as the first female veep, she presented a personal side that was warm and conventional, and that’s what voters remember. Shaming her for earlier romantic affairs will only inspire her base to vote early. The question Republicans ought to confront before leveling any attack is: “Will this energize my supporters more or hers ?” For nearly every ad hominem salvo currently flung at Harris, the answer is: hers. Slut-Slamming Hypocrisy Slut-slamming is all the more amusing in the light of Trump’s affair with Stormy Daniels, an American pornographic film actress. Defending Trump Trump isn’t saying that Harris isn’t black, he’s saying she is inauthentic, that she will be anyone that any supportive group wants her to be. And it’s something voters notice and don’t like. https://t.co/MPodZRUR5x Stop defending Trump. There is no excuse for what he said. Governor Kemp has it correct. Peak Trump On July 21, I commented Good News for Democrats: Throw the Polls Out, Start All Over At the time I made that comment, Nate Silver had Trump’s odds of winning at 72.8 percent to 26.9 percent for Biden with a 0.4 percent chance of no majority (recount of a rogue elector voting for Kennedy). Trump Steps Down to the Occasion On July 22, I commented In the Wake Biden’s Campaign Exit, Trump Steps Down to the Occasion Question of the Day The following question is how many independents will see things: “ Would I rather have a jackass president who will get some things right, or would I rather take a chance on Harris? “ Let’s be honest about how Trump’s belittling sounds. If you don’t like the word “jackass” then feel free to substitute a word or phrase that suits you. I do not know the answer to my question, and if you have an ounce of common sense, you will admit you don’t either. Regardless, such statements will cost Trump votes. Peak Trump? Trump’s polling odds have peaked or soon will. My statement implies nothing other than widespread belief that Harris-Anyone has a better shot than Biden-Harris. I nailed the top. Is Nate Silver Wrong? Please spare me the sap about Nate Silver being wrong in 2016 or whenever, especially if you liked his odds on July 21. Silver was wrong, but in a totally different sense than most think. He had the odds wrong, not the election wrong. The election was much closer than the thought. That was the real mistake not the outcome itself. Had it not been for a last minute Comey bombshell and/or a stupid FIMD by Hillary regarding “deplorables” she would have won. Predicting Hillary to win was reasonable. Calling the odds 70-30 was the mistake. People act like 30% chances never happen when they happen 30% of the time. I thought the election was more like 55-45 not 70-30. I still think that is about right. Comment on Bias (Added after posting) Modest oversampling is irrelevant. Results are weighted. And here is a real hoot: Erza Klein moans about Republican Bias. The worst offender is Rasmussen with a strong Republican bias. Pollsters generally correct for oversampling one side or another. If they don’t Silver adjusts. Two weeks ago Republicans loved Silver, now they don’t. The problem isn’t Silver. The media doesn’t even do their own polls for the most part. Siena does NYT and is very highly rated. That said, I meant to make a comment that Harris is in a honeymoon period and the polls are likely a bit high. Things will settle down about a week after the Democrat convention. Can Trump Win? Of course! Peak Trump does not imply Trump will lose. However, after foolishly losing huge numbers of Black and independent votes due to blatantly stupid statements, winning will be much harder. Winning back back any votes he just lost won’t be easy and may not even be possible. But there still are undecided votes to win or lose. Best Thing Going for Trump The best thing going for Trump right now is a weakening economy. I believe a recession has started and it will pick up steam. July 31: Small Business Employment Growth Is Now Negative (and What It Means) ADP data shows year-over-year payroll growth is negative 88,000 for small corporations sized 20-49. Trends are negative in all but very large corporations . August 1: The Manufacturing ISM Index Is Lower Than Every Economist’s Estimate The ISM manufacturing report was a disaster from every angle, especially employment , production, and backlogs. Employment reading worst since June 2020. August 1: Commercial Construction Spending Is Down 9 Consecutive Months Here’s the kicker: It’s not office related. And the Census Department has heavy negative revisions to spending. Let’s investigate. August 1: Intel Announces 15,000 Job Cuts, 15 Percent of its Workforce Intel received $8.5 billion in Biden administration grants (Inflation Reduction Act) but announces massive layoffs and halts dividends due to a decline in revenue . August 2: Unemployment Rate Jumps, Jobs Rise Only 114,000 with More Negative Revisions The headline jobs number was much weaker than the consensus estimate of 180,000 and the unemployment rate rose 0.2 percentage points. Recession Has Started On July 8, I wrote Weak Data Says a Recession Has Already Started, Let’s Now Discuss When I’ve seen enough. A recession has started. Let’s discuss starting with a very good indicator that has few false positives and no false negatives . My follow-up post was on August 2. August 2: The McKelvey (Sahm) Unemployment Rate Recession Rule Just Triggered A recession indicator based off rising unemployment triggered in July. Claudia Sahm, a former Fed economist, takes credit for an indicator she did not invent. Let’s discuss. A Recession Helps Trump If Trump can avoid additional cases of severe FIMD and manages to stick to the economy, he can win. Alternatively, if the recession is deep enough and Trump’s FIMD is of a lesser nature, he can also win. Otherwise Trump may have blown it. Damage in the last week was enormous. A recession is still my base case. Meanwhile, if you defend or make excuses for Trump’s antics, you are part of the problem. Addendum Nate Silver The Silver Bulletin polling averages are a little fancy. They adjust for whether polls are conducted among registered or likely voters, the presence or absence of RFK Jr., and house effects . They weight more reliable polls more heavily. And they use national polls to make inferences about state polls and vice versa. It requires a few extra CPU cycles — but the reward is a more stable average that doesn’t get psyched out by outliers . Addendum – The Big Point It is not whether Trump or Harris is in the lead that matters. It is the direction. How can a fight with Brian Kemp not cost votes? How can stupid statements about race not cost votes? The BS over sampling and pollster bias is just that. Silver corrects for it. Pollsters also correct for their own weighting errors. It is (should be) perfectly clear that Trump is acting stupid, and it is costing him votes. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Modest oversampling is irrelevant. Results are weighted. And here is a real hoot: Erza Klein moans about Republican Bias. https://www.reddit.com/r/ezraklein/comments/1b7gmvc/salon_calls_out_times_for_inaccurate_polling_and/ The worst offender is Rasmussen with a strong Republican bias. Pollsters generally correct for oversampling one side or another. If they don’t Silver adjusts. Two weeks ago Republicans loved Silver, now they don’t. The problem isn’t Silver. The media doesn’t even do their own polls for the most part. Siena does NYT and is very highly rated. That said, I meant to make a comment that Harris is in a honeymoon period and the polls are likely a bit high.  Things will settle down about a week after the Democrat convention. I had Trump winning in 2016 and Biden winning in 2020 based on my poll of polls. People called me crazy on social media and private chats when I told them that Trump would win in 2016.The night before election day I posted on multiple private facebook groups that Trump would win and people should not be shocked. I got made fun of repeatedly by friends and family. No one was laughing the next night. This year is less predictable b/c of the economy and the churn and because Trump appears to be more erratic every day. Just as no one wanted Biden because of his age, I think more people may not want Trump as the days go by b/c he is simply becoming more erratic by the day. Some voters are waiting for a debate that may not happen. But truly as Trump keeps up the wrong-headed attacks on Harris, his polling numbers keep going down. @“casual observer” As every second post on this thread is from you, you hardly deserve the moniker “casual.” As each one is a vindictive missive denigrating the candidate you despise, your pretense of being a dispassionate “casual observer” is laughable. Please find a more truthful handle. May I suggest “Rabid Demagogue?” How about something more subtle… “grumpy troll?” Nah, The degenerate Candidate is doing it ALL to himself. He’s been doing it the entire election. He was just fortunate to be running against someone that wasn’t up to speed. Now the Dems have a candidate that just needs to avoid saying something completely stupid and hope that the economy floats for about 3+ months before any significant downturn. Trump could easily be 20 points ahead if he could just shut his mouth for HALF the amount of time. But he can’t and he won’t. Not a surprise. No need to piss off your OWN party. He’s a buffoon. Yelling at Brian Kemp to “Get Off My Lawn” makes him look like the older and dumber and more foolish egomaniac that he is. Last time I checked, Georgia could be a swing State. Wanna piss of the Governor of a Swing State? Insult his family…that WILL do it. Exactly. People say that Harris clearing the Biden bar wasn’t that hard but Trump was not that far in front of Biden and this is what Harris has shown in 10 days. The Republicans could have easily been ahead at this point by double digits if they had anyone other than Trump but Trump coopted the party and turned into a Trump business. I am certain a solid chunk of Republicans will silently vote for Harris in swing states to make sure Trump doesn’t win. Georgia is exhibit A. Yeah, if enough Nikkey Haley voters go Harris, or simply sit out the election, it’s over for Trump. Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensperger failed to stop the cheating bc they are the D puppets. There was no cheating. And yet you keep reading them. I’ve been on Mish’s blog circa 1999. Don’t let the name fool you and keep the comments coming. It is all very interesting. The comments section is what keeps this place lively. Economics is a dismal science. Human behavior is what drives it. Some time ago, the past was the future, which is now passed. The future we passed is past. One day, our future will be our past when we pass it. Until then, the past and future are exactly, precisely, that. Our now will be then, but then can’t be now. Most “black people” don’t regard Kamala as “black”, so Trump’s comments are unlikely to cost “black” votes. did everyone see the Braindead McCain RINO’S in AZ gave support to dumber than rocks-laughin-K Fix is in and it’s full speed ahead I find it hard to believe this minor gaff could be this major of an issue to where he looses the election. I mean he is not wrong, and yeah its rude – but hardly worth loosing. It was not a minor gaffe It was two major gaffes back-to-back Offending blacks and trashing Brian Kemp are huge errors. He could easily lose Georgia over this It was not even a gaffe, never mind a minor one, stop hyperventilating and get out of your CNN/MSNBC bubble. Calling out Kamala’s race swapping is not “offending blacks”, it’s pointing out facts published regularly, and drawing attention to the cynical nature of trying to use identity politics. Suggesting that black people only vote for people based on how they look rather than what they say is what is “offensive to blacks”, as if the racist left is suggesting that black voters don’t have minds of their own or sophisticated ways of thinking. It’s those attacking these observations who are insulting “blacks”. Abigail and Mish must think they understand the black community but they are underestimating the intelligence of the black community “keeping it real.” They understand full well Kammy is a fake-blacking phony, and the net effect for Trump is on the upside as he reminds them of what they already know. Any black people clutching their pearls over his statement already wouldn’t consider voting for him anyway. No one has any loyalty to Brian Kemp, at all. No voters care if he gets offended. Trump’s idiotic ways are already well baked into the cake at this point. I have commented that huge numbers of Blacks have switched to Trump. Even more so those under the age of 35 So you must have missed some posted because I have talked about tis at lest 5 times Most voters have never seen her live or heard her speak except for reading a teleprompter. If the Dems keep it that way, she’ll lose. If she speaks, sounds normal and sensible, and not a militant member of the party’s far left, she’ll win. Most of the public senses that 80 year olds really shouldn’t be president. But the instinct of the control freaks who orchestrated Biden’s removal will be to keep her in the basement protecting a narrow lead in the electoral college. That would be a mistake that would open the door for Trump. Polls are biased and useless for the most part. We learned that in 2016. And what can Nate Silver, the guy who at one point predicted Hillary had close to a 100% chance of winning in 2016, have to say that anyone cares about? bogus one/two point difference polls to make a steal believable. Kamala Harris Surprises Everyone Aug. 5, 2024 By Gail Collins and Bret Stephens https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/05/opinion/kamala-harris-trump-birthrate.html Mish is right! TOO MANY VARIABLES IN THIS RACE WTH TWO UNPOPULAR CANDIDATES! I GIVE A SLIGHT EDGE TO TRUMP! WE ALREADY KNOW HIS DUMB SHORTCOMINGS! ARE YOU BETTER OFF OFF, COULD KILL HER CHANCES! A BLACK SWAN EVENT LIKE A TERROIST ATTACK, RIOTS AFTER SCHOOL START GETTING OUT OF CONTROL, HER CACKLING, BEING EVASIVE, PAST VIDEOS AND COMMENTS, WARS ESCALATING OUT OFCONTROL,A LOT CAN GO WRONG FOR HER! MAYBE HER DISGRUNTELD STAFF CAN TURN ON HER TOO! EVEN BIDEN WHEN HE STATED, HE CURED THE ECONOMY AS RECORD BANKRUPTICIES ARE BEING FILED! BK’S BEING FILED THIS TIME BECAUSE THINGS ARE GETTING WORSE SO FAST! USUALLY THEY ARE FILED WHEN PEOPLE SEE THINGS GETTING BETTER TO GET BACK ON THIER FEET! PULLING THEIR HEADS OUT OF THE SAND! EEK IT IS GOING TO BE WILD, LETS SEE WHAT ELSE POPS UP! KAMALA IS NO TULSI GABBARD! THANK GOD SHE DOESN;T HAVE TO DEBATE HER! I think you’ve missed it on this one. It’s not about the economy, Trump, or who said what. Kamala is experiencing- benefitting from – the same social engineering that they used to promote Covid-19, Taylor Swift – everyone HAD to go to the eras tour, or the Gabby Petito story they ran to take the heat off of the Afghanistan withdrawl, the list goes on. Ultimately you are correct. Kamala is in the lead, they literally announced her as the new candidate on iHeart Radio music only radio stations in my area that have NEVER run any news stories. There are behind the scenes players working on this one Im voting Trump, but I wish he’d pivot and say something like ‘frankly I’m not interested in identity politics…thats what the democrats have been doing to divide this country now for years. My focus is on making sure middle and lower income families don’t have to worry about whether they can put food on the table, buy a home and have enough left over to go on a vacation every once in a while.’ I suspect he could get closer to a Reaganesque style reelection result that way (within reason accounting for the polarization and social engineering changes over the last 40 years) And you all think Kennedy has no chance… The election will be decided in the middle east. After Biden told Netanyahu to restrain his retaliation against Iran, the Trump debate was proposed and Harris replaced Biden. So she owes her ass to Bibi. When push comes to shove, she will side with her jewish donors over her non-White base. And it looks like push is coming to shove very quickly. Trump, his base and his donors are all on the same page. I’m guessing she’ll pick the Jewish PA governor as her running mate. That’s the dead giveaway. Oh yeah, and she’s married to a Jewish fellow. Polls are as reliable as a 1986 Hyundai Excel and should be read as though Babylon Bee wiped something on the wall to come up with the results. The propaganda is coming hard from the media. The independent (UK) is reporting Kamala’s massive crowds outnumber Trump at rallies, citing her recent 15 minute speech in Atlanta. The Independent reported a crowd of 10,000 for Kamala. if you examine the footage, her stage was on the main floor, it was large and took up where many seats would be. Across from her stage the risers were empty. Yet according to many media sources, not just the Independent she had a crowd of 10,000 people. The venue can only hold maximum 8,000 people and the fire marshal is very stern in this regard. There is no way she pulled 10,000 people. It was less than 1/2 that number at most from video footage available. Trump spoke for 90 minutes at the same venue and people were lining up the day before to get in. There is no such grass roots support for Harris. Her numbers are manipulated by a compliant DNC owned media. “The independent” is not and never has been a “newspaper”, it’s a low grade trolling rag for sociology students. A deteriorating economy is far more likely to hurt Trump voters than Harris voters. So it’s influence may be less detrimental to Harris than it initially appears. Mish called peak Trump a couple of weeks ago and he is probably right. In that spirit, I’m calling peak Harris this week. The economic weakness spreading across the world and her own unlikeable personality will start to weigh as she is on camera daily. Biden remaining in office will hurt her too as events deteriorate and his incapacitation hurts America. The election will be close and decided by a few key districts in a few key States. I have no idea who will win, but it won’t be a landslide either way and neither party will be able to claim a mandate. I almost feel sorry for whoever wins, but both parties sicken me so no sympathy. I’m calling peak Mish, every week. Trump masterfully called out the scam of Identity Politics. Any black person that was voting for Trump has not changed their mind now that Harris is the installed nominee. Ditto any Hispanic voter. Two groups that Trump has made gains with and he has not lost any of that support. This is a class issue, and blue collar workers, working class voters, have figured out that career DC politicians dont give a crap about them. If you never spend any time in minority areas or among working class ppl then you will likely not hear their voices in the MSM. Dont make the mistake of believing that they are still as devoted to Team Blue as they were 4 yrs ago. “Meanwhile, if you defend or make excuses for Trump’s antics, you are part of the problem.” How about we see it differently from you? Trump is the immediate problem, Mish. He had an opportunity to sell a fairly radical, America-first, non-interventionist, liberal-capitalist agenda. Instead he decided to play footsie again with traditional conservative Republicans, adding scattered non-sequiturs that must have popped into his head on the golf course: no taxes on tips, massive tariffs, green cards for college grads, and god knows what’s next. The larger, obvious problem is that our political system gives us a choice between this buffoonery and a radical socialist/fascist management class, with maybe big wars in Europe and Asia to cement its control. If Trump were offering a worthwhile agenda, we wouldn’t give a hoot how often he mocks Kamala. It doesn’t matter how ignorant and racist Trump is, over 40% of Americans don’t care how ugly his behavior is and they’ll vote for him in November. Some voters have zero standards. I could say the same about democrats mindlessly voting for Harris Did this help make you feel unburdened from what has been? Russia is a big country. It’s next to another country called Ukraine. I’m voting for someone who pulls us back to the center . I don’t give a rats ass about their stupid comments. I want someone who hates the racist DEI more than I . The democrats must be stopped now or they will continue their complete destruction of the social fabric of this once great country or you will see a civil war breakout .Common sense has been jettisoned for emotional ,pearl clutching feelers that believe everything the biased media says. Defunding the police is a great example of the knee jerk feelers . Eliminating ICE is another example . Letting the country be overrun by economic asylum seekers being paid up to $ 20,000 ( I have proof of this ) ea. when rents are sky high and rentals are few and far between will breed massive civil unrest once they are forced out of their free rooms or dormitories. I’m glad I don’t live in the city as hell is sure to visit these places soon . oh yeah ,please tell me about the standards Biden ( the big guy ) voters have . Trump simply pointed out the obvious about Kamala. She is an Indian, and not a Negro. She was hailed as the first Indian in American History to get elected to the Senate. She has literally denied her true identity and is referring to herself as an African American, which she is clearly not. She obviously doesn’t respect her own Heritage and also the Negro Heritage, as she lies about that race for her own personal gain, as a fake, phony, and fraud. I have a harder time trying to understand how this will not cost Kamala votes for being a liar about her own identity. All the black people I know, are far too intelligent to fall for her BS, and even though some were voting for Biden, for there own reasons, I don’t know any, that will vote for the fraud Kamala, and I wouldn’t either if I were black! The Following: “Consider that we all regard it as immoral for Major League Baseball to have once excluded Black players.“ is an extremely horrible example, and you should apologize for it. Baseball is a Sport! (P.S. They don’t allow Woman to Play still today, unlike Blacks, So are ALL Woman Not supposed to vote for Trump as well? Your losing it Mish.. It should be clear, that rules in Politics are created by the Politicians, so don’t blame Trump OR Kamala, as they are simply Politicians, and “We All Know They Lie” so leave it alone as it is what it is. I am not going to say he was smart or political astute, but he is playing by the rules, and he is 100% Honest, so let him have at it, and the chips will fall where they may. I personally don’t think this hurts Trump at all, because what He will gain from some black voters, most white voters, and should be ALL Indian voters. I think it has more potential to help than hurt, as it gets noticed at a fact, once the MSM BS goes away, and they move back onto the Jewish. Man those Dems truly hate just about everybody, and that includes themselves in many cases… “Would I rather take a chance on Harris?“ Nobody should want to, nobody has to, and most won’t, and this will not change any of that IMO. Let’s be honest about the Economy shall we. It’s in shambles, and that helps Trump Tremendously, and way beyond a play on words, not a “Word Salad” mind you, but just honest spoken words… i only dispute one point you make in your excellent summation. Trump is NOT a politician. If he were he’d “act & speak” more like Mish Wish he would!! Unpolished comes to mind for me, but he truly was in no way a Politician, but He is in that Role now, at times unfortunately for him, as they wouldn’t count for nearly as much. As such He must try His best to be one, play one, etc. to fit the Narrative expectations that have been set up long ago… Irony: Trump Famous Words: “Your Fired” Politicians Least Heard Words: “Your Fired” “The Apprentice” boardroom jerks ruled the US between Jan 2017 and Jan 2021 and messed it up. Trump should bow out, like Biden did and put Haley in. The Pubs would have a good chance of beating Harris then. Keep Trump in, we need to stick the stake through his heart “a kinder, gentler, politics” from the extreme far left, the ideology that saw the extermination of millions. BWAHAHAHAHA!!! So you want two Indian retard puppet girls in the race? What a weirdo you are. The Dunn-Kruger effect is finally catching up with Trump. Calling Kamala Harris low IQ, when she obviously has a higher IQ than Trump, is just a sign of a low IQ but being unable to realize it. That he has chickened out of the debate just adds to the impression of a morose campaign. I think he’s scared of debating someone who is much younger than him. He avoided debates during the primaries b/c of the look of being old against younger Republicans who are certainly more coherent and would have made much better general election candidates. Literally the only person Trump could look better against is Biden and that ship sailed. Hardly. It’s that the Democrats want to have a debate hosted by a Democrat-biased media network, rather than go on Fox where they can’t control the environment for their weak candidates. Um… Kamala is running, and scared as hell, from the debate, and Not Trump! I’m from California and have observed Harris for years. She is not a high IQ person Kamala is clearly a bubble head – she has the depth of thought of the average LAUSD employee. At least learn to spell it, lest you become a victim of it. Oh the irony! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect B.R.O.K.E. Can Harris or Trump fix that? We are a bankrupt nation. One of them is trying to get wages up by getting manufacturing back to the US and securing the border. The other is going to ride the outsourcing, open borders, cheap labor policies to the collapse. “He May Need a Hard Recession to Win” Looking at the markets tonight, he way get it. You are a prophet. Trump comments about Harris “not being Black” intended to highlight she is a rank political opportunist. Harris family history is readily available online. Primary heritage is Indian. Indian on maternal side, paternal side Finnegan a surname. Our society is enlightened enough to permit if not applauded one being allowed to identify as male/female and now to identify as any ethnicity? Open minded African American voters will not appreciate, similar to native Americans not appreciating Elizabeth Warren’s false claims of ethnicity. What does Harris’ 23andMe account state with respect to ethnicity. My bet, based on online genealogy records, 3/4 Indian heritage. Related to Elizabeth Warren. So what? Trump lost votes It’s a stupid and losing issue. See weekend CNN interview of authentic working class Black males in barbershop shop – “Kamala is Asian not Black,” with white commentator, after they express their views, noting his view and not theirs represent the Black community. Yes her ethnicity is and should be a non issue, but use of “Black heritage” when not warranted, reeks of political opportunism. We are so tribal we alway view everything through our set of societal prescription glasses. Those offended were not voting for Trump anyway. Those supporting such statements are the key – Black working class community in swing states. Harris should embrace her true, predominant, Indian heritage and represent a community that has accomplish so much in such a short period of time. Ah yes, are you a white man, splainin’ to Kamala how she should behave? That seems pretty sus, if so. Learn english, people will understand you better… Trump has not lost one single vote, yet. He may, but he equally may pick up a lot of votes. We simply don’t know yet, because as usual the truth is being masked. Nobody knows just yet… It’s a stupid and losing issue. Only if your primary objective is garnering votes (the usual motive of a politician in the run-up to an election). Although that is _a_ motive for Trump, it is _not_ the primary one. Trump’s primary motive is garnering adulation for Trump. He simply felt (probably quite correctly) that the issue would produce yet more adulation from his established base. Quite often his primary motive, which he finds quite impossible to control, actually works against his chances of election. Watson Can you prove he lost votes over that? No, I thought not. Stop it. There are other reasons for votes to be lost. It’s a minor issue anyway, just pointing out that she is FoS and cynical identity politics manipulator. In 2016 Graham said if Trump wins it will be the end of the Republican Party and we will deserve it. They had more than enough chances to get rid of him and be rid of him. But their fears were/are greater than their convictions. When people fear standing up to power, bad things can happen to democracy. Look at RealClearPolitics polls back in 2016 and 2020 showing on 4 August for those years how far ahead was Clinton and Biden. I think Biden was 6% ahead of Trump in Pennsylvania, yet he won it by around 1.2%. Trump has to avoid the trap of petty banter such as woke identity politics and focus on Harris-Biden regime policies like Medicaid is +$120 billion over the Pentagon budget (how much is that from the open border). Focus on Harris being the candidate of Soros Prosecutor (from liberal dystopia California) and the Open Border Czar. Focus on her being the most liberal Senator as far as voting record. Bottomline, now she is undergoing a “remaking” into Chameleon Harris to try to fool enough voters that the economy is great and that she is a “moderate”. She’s worse than “weird”, she is “RECKLESS” and “DANGEROUS” to our country. This is not 2016 or 2020 it seems more like 1984, the book, not the year.. ” She’s worse than “weird”, she is “RECKLESS” and “DANGEROUS” to our country. ” Yup. And effectively no different in any meaningful way; at all; from Trump. Nor Bush. Nor Obama. Nor Reagan…. Ron Paul was a bit different. The rest of the post ’71 illiterate rabble…: All far below the noisefloor of the noisefloor, as far as meaningful differences go. No, she is different, she talks and laughs like a moron, she can’t be taken seriously as a president, nor Biden. “..she can’t be taken seriously as a president,..” I know. No different from Trump. Nor Bush. Nor Obama. Nor Reagan…. All the vitriol and name calling between Trump and Kamala is such a turnoff. I prefer to listen to the candidate who is talking about the real issues effecting real people; chronic illness, economy (Trump added $8 million and Biden $7 trillion thus far to the deficit), endless wars, corporate capture of our federal agencies, the abuse of power by the government weaponizing agencies, and censorship. Stop the insanity. Enough with the duopoly. Nothing has changed with them in control because corporate oligarchs control them $$$. All these manipulated polls. And they changed the rules for any independent to run after they learned their lesson with Ross Perot. Kennedy will be on the ballot in all 50 states. The DNC is trying to block them but so far they are on 42 states and will be on all 50 plus DC. Can’t wait for him to win! “I prefer to listen to the candidate who is talking about the real issues effecting real people; chronic illness, economy..” Emphasis “talking.” Yet will do NOTHING meaningfully different from the two similarly illiterate frontrunning loudmouths. Truly, none of the politicians have a clue about what is really happening in the economy and why. And not just none of the politicians. But indeed noone in the entire class of people from which politicians are drawn. As in, literally, not one. As bad as some may feel this sounds: “We”, as in Americans, WOULD be better off as a province of China by now. By a lot. Life would simply be better, per nearly all measures, for far and away most. And that’s not at all due to communism being even remotely good in any way at all. If you don’t want WW3 vote for Trump. If you want WW3 vote for kamala If anybody truly wants WW3, then why vote at all? CHANGE!!! It is just a word promised by Obama, Biden, and Trump. They will not deliver that thing, CHANGE. FACTS. Because they are on the oligarch payroll. They are owned. I don’t think it’s an act. There’s no way a hard recession happens by early November unless a war or some other major exogenous factor pops up. Although unemployment claims have gone up a bit, they are still well below anything approaching recessionary levels and new jobs creation while down, is still enough to capture all the new entrants to the workforce. Home prices holding up despite massive inventory increases. TSA checkpoints breaking passenger records at airports every day. At Costco today there was not a single empty parking spot, even all the way at the very end of the parking lot. People are still spending money hand over fist. Don’t get me wrong, a recession will happen and and we’re due for one. I just don’t see it in three months’ time. Anything can happen…although you’re probably correct. BIG Stock Market crash or a Bank going under or some REALLY bad issue with Tech, etc. could always happen. But it’s getting pretty close to voting time for many people. you sound like the Bernanke’s succesor, the Goldman Sachs fellow begging nancy peolosi on his knees after the housing bubble crash of 2007/2008. Nobody saw it coming, he said….. I’m in the Trump camp, but his vitriol directed at Harris verges on delusional. I have a
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Harris Goes With Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for VP, Why?

…If he went with Gabbard the whole MAGA movement would have ended with his second term.…

…Just my opinion, but Trump needed to soften the ticket with a moderate with a brain…Tulsi Gabbard.…

Show full text (50000 chars)
• • • Walz is more progressive than Harris and she needs to move to the middle. What Happened? Image from WSJ video. Harris Taps Tim Walz The Wall Street Journal reports Harris Picks Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as Running Mate Vice President Kamala Harris picked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her vice-presidential running mate, selecting an avuncular Midwesterner and former high-school teacher who in recent years has signed into law policies popular with the Democratic base. Walz wasn’t widely known outside of Minnesota before his name appeared on Harris shortlists. But he gained some Democratic fans outside his state in recent weeks for television interviews that hit at former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, without being overly nasty. He called the pair “weird,” a word that went viral among Democrats. But Shapiro’s selection might have also angered some progressives because he has supported private-school vouchers and is a vocal supporter of Israel at a time when some activists on the left have condemned the Biden administration’s handling of the war in Gaza. Harris’s choice of Walz was earlier reported by CNN. Trump’s campaign in a statement suggested the selection represented a doubling down on progressivism. “It’s no surprise that San Francisco Liberal Kamala Harris wants West Coast wannabe Tim Walz as her running-mate,” the statement said. “Walz has spent his governorship trying to reshape Minnesota in the image of the Golden State.” Minnesota Republicans have suggested Walz was slow to call out the National Guard to address rioting that started after the Minneapolis police murder of George Floyd in 2020. A Nice Choice? Nate Silver says Tim Walz is a Minnesota Nice Choice . Wikipedia defines “ Minnesota Nice ” — the property stereotypically associated with the home state of Kamala Harris’s new running mate , Gov. Tim Walz — as follows: Minnesota nice is a cultural stereotype applied to the behavior of people from Minnesota , implying residents are unusually courteous , reserved, and mild-mannered compared to people from other states and more akin to their Canadian neighbors in Northern Ontario . The phrase also implies polite friendliness, an aversion to open confrontation, a tendency toward understatement , a disinclination to make a direct fuss or stand out, apparent emotional restraint, and self-deprecation . It is sometimes associated with passive-aggression . Playwright and corporate communications consultant Syl Jones suggested that Minnesota nice is not so much about being “nice” but is more about keeping up appearances, maintaining the social order , and keeping people (including non-natives of the state) in their place. This was a choice designed to maintain the social fabric of the Democratic Party, and avoid news cycles about a disappointed left and Democrats’ internal squabbling over the War in Gaza. Or at least, that’s what I think it was: we’ll need to learn more about Harris’s deliberation process. I’m not inclined to be too deferential to any political candidate, but it’s plausible that there were vetting issues with the runner-up, Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania. Harris certainly has more information about the internal feeling within the Democratic caucus than I do, or she may just have thought the chemistry of a Harris-Shapiro ticket wouldn’t work. It’s a nice pick: Walz, a two-term governor and six-term U.S. Representative, is from the family of Tim Kaine-style VP choices: inoffensive, unlikely to cause any harm, “safe”. Although maybe that’s unfair: Walz is likely to be better on the stump than Kaine [Senator Tim Kaine from Virginia]. If you surveyed Democratic members of Congress, he’d probably be who they’d choose. But I believe he’s probably the wrong choice, a step back toward the Democratic Party’s instincts to triangulate instead of the boldness the Harris campaign has displayed so far. Harris Swings Left or Does She? Silver thinks Walz is a nice choice but “ Shapiro was the higher-upside option that was probably worth the risk. “ I don’t know enough other than to say Shapiro has some issues with the Progressive Left. Was there anything else in the closet? Perhaps the choice was to avoid riots in Chicago over Palestinian issues. But Walz will have some issues with with the middle. For example, The Journal noted Walz supported universal free school meals for students, voting rights for the formerly incarcerated, driver’s licenses for migrants who crossed the border illegally, recreational marijuana and signed a law that made abortion a “fundamental right.” Harris has tried to move to the middle (or at least claims to). She now supports fracking of all things. This is why: Pennsylvania is the second biggest producer of natural gas after Texas. I pointed out the natural gas issue with Pennsylvania many months ago, and said that the issue could easily cost Biden the state. So now? Harris says she supports fracking. Does anyone believe her, especially with her tapping Walz? Suboptimal Choices Trump and Harris likely made suboptimal choices. Trump did for sure. Vance was an outright bad pick that only MAGA supporters could love. Both Trump and Harris needed to pick up swing voters. Harris went with the Progressive core (possibly for reasons we don’t know) and Trump went with Vance for reasons we do know. Trump looked in a mirror and saw Vance. Thank You! A sentiment shared by many. https://t.co/kvn3ZLQ37D — IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) August 6, 2024 A Word About Polls I suspect Harris is currently ahead, but we will not really know until a week to ten days after the Democratic National Convention. Too much overexcitement is baked in current polls. Harris is the official nominee, so there’s plenty of time to prepare for a big party. And might I suggest it will be a bigger, better party than the Republican threw? Trump droned on forever and ever amen. By the time he finished his acceptance speech, most people were in bed. On August 4, I commented Due to Extreme FIMD, Trump is Now Behind, He May Need a Hard Recession to Win I have a follow-up to that idea later this week. A recession is my base case. So let’s see. Meanwhile, don’t be surprised if Trump slips further behind. We are in a momentum phase and need to discount some of that momentum. It’s likely to influence polls but may not stick once a discussion of issues comes into play. Trump can easily go after the Progressive record of Kamala, especially with her pick of Walz. This race will change if Trump can keep his foot out of his mouth and just stick to the issues. That’s the both the opportunity, and the problem. Harris Taps Tim Walz The Wall Street Journal reports Harris Picks Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as Running Mate Vice President Kamala Harris picked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her vice-presidential running mate, selecting an avuncular Midwesterner and former high-school teacher who in recent years has signed into law policies popular with the Democratic base. Walz wasn’t widely known outside of Minnesota before his name appeared on Harris shortlists. But he gained some Democratic fans outside his state in recent weeks for television interviews that hit at former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, without being overly nasty. He called the pair “weird,” a word that went viral among Democrats. But Shapiro’s selection might have also angered some progressives because he has supported private-school vouchers and is a vocal supporter of Israel at a time when some activists on the left have condemned the Biden administration’s handling of the war in Gaza. Harris’s choice of Walz was earlier reported by CNN. Trump’s campaign in a statement suggested the selection represented a doubling down on progressivism. “It’s no surprise that San Francisco Liberal Kamala Harris wants West Coast wannabe Tim Walz as her running-mate,” the statement said. “Walz has spent his governorship trying to reshape Minnesota in the image of the Golden State.” Minnesota Republicans have suggested Walz was slow to call out the National Guard to address rioting that started after the Minneapolis police murder of George Floyd in 2020. A Nice Choice? Nate Silver says Tim Walz is a Minnesota Nice Choice . Wikipedia defines “ Minnesota Nice ” — the property stereotypically associated with the home state of Kamala Harris’s new running mate , Gov. Tim Walz — as follows: Minnesota nice is a cultural stereotype applied to the behavior of people from Minnesota , implying residents are unusually courteous , reserved, and mild-mannered compared to people from other states and more akin to their Canadian neighbors in Northern Ontario . The phrase also implies polite friendliness, an aversion to open confrontation, a tendency toward understatement , a disinclination to make a direct fuss or stand out, apparent emotional restraint, and self-deprecation . It is sometimes associated with passive-aggression . Playwright and corporate communications consultant Syl Jones suggested that Minnesota nice is not so much about being “nice” but is more about keeping up appearances, maintaining the social order , and keeping people (including non-natives of the state) in their place. This was a choice designed to maintain the social fabric of the Democratic Party, and avoid news cycles about a disappointed left and Democrats’ internal squabbling over the War in Gaza. Or at least, that’s what I think it was: we’ll need to learn more about Harris’s deliberation process. I’m not inclined to be too deferential to any political candidate, but it’s plausible that there were vetting issues with the runner-up, Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania. Harris certainly has more information about the internal feeling within the Democratic caucus than I do, or she may just have thought the chemistry of a Harris-Shapiro ticket wouldn’t work. It’s a nice pick: Walz, a two-term governor and six-term U.S. Representative, is from the family of Tim Kaine-style VP choices: inoffensive, unlikely to cause any harm, “safe”. Although maybe that’s unfair: Walz is likely to be better on the stump than Kaine [Senator Tim Kaine from Virginia]. If you surveyed Democratic members of Congress, he’d probably be who they’d choose. But I believe he’s probably the wrong choice, a step back toward the Democratic Party’s instincts to triangulate instead of the boldness the Harris campaign has displayed so far. Harris Swings Left or Does She? Silver thinks Walz is a nice choice but “ Shapiro was the higher-upside option that was probably worth the risk. “ I don’t know enough other than to say Shapiro has some issues with the Progressive Left. Was there anything else in the closet? Perhaps the choice was to avoid riots in Chicago over Palestinian issues. But Walz will have some issues with with the middle. For example, The Journal noted Walz supported universal free school meals for students, voting rights for the formerly incarcerated, driver’s licenses for migrants who crossed the border illegally, recreational marijuana and signed a law that made abortion a “fundamental right.” Harris has tried to move to the middle (or at least claims to). She now supports fracking of all things. This is why: Pennsylvania is the second biggest producer of natural gas after Texas. I pointed out the natural gas issue with Pennsylvania many months ago, and said that the issue could easily cost Biden the state. So now? Harris says she supports fracking. Does anyone believe her, especially with her tapping Walz? Suboptimal Choices Trump and Harris likely made suboptimal choices. Trump did for sure. Vance was an outright bad pick that only MAGA supporters could love. Both Trump and Harris needed to pick up swing voters. Harris went with the Progressive core (possibly for reasons we don’t know) and Trump went with Vance for reasons we do know. Trump looked in a mirror and saw Vance. Thank You! A sentiment shared by many. https://t.co/kvn3ZLQ37D A Word About Polls I suspect Harris is currently ahead, but we will not really know until a week to ten days after the Democratic National Convention. Too much overexcitement is baked in current polls. Harris is the official nominee, so there’s plenty of time to prepare for a big party. And might I suggest it will be a bigger, better party than the Republican threw? Trump droned on forever and ever amen. By the time he finished his acceptance speech, most people were in bed. On August 4, I commented Due to Extreme FIMD, Trump is Now Behind, He May Need a Hard Recession to Win I have a follow-up to that idea later this week. A recession is my base case. So let’s see. Meanwhile, don’t be surprised if Trump slips further behind. We are in a momentum phase and need to discount some of that momentum. It’s likely to influence polls but may not stick once a discussion of issues comes into play. Trump can easily go after the Progressive record of Kamala, especially with her pick of Walz. This race will change if Trump can keep his foot out of his mouth and just stick to the issues. That’s the both the opportunity, and the problem. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Kamala has no international political or world affairs experience. Does Walz? Waltz seems like a decent guy. I like his real-world experience, serving in the military and working in manufacturing. Much like Vance, you can’t say he was a coddled elitist rising on his advantages. All that said, I won’t vote his way because I don’t like progressive politics. I’ll hold my nose given the stench of voting for Trump. I think if Trump had picked Tulsi Gabbard, that curveball would have really messed up the Democrats. Trump went with Vance to show he was serious about changing the Track US is set upon. If he went with Gabbard the whole MAGA movement would have ended with his second term. If people have had enough of Washington DC Garbage and really want to return the US to its founding principles then they have the option to do that with Trump. People can now make the stark choice of Paths laid out in front of them. If electorate want a Constitutional Republic with a “Fiercely independent Judiciary” then choose Trump. If electorate want Progressive Socialism and the Judiciary as just another part of the UniParty,then put the marker on Harris and the Gym teacher. Unless a person happen to be not able to decide your own Future and want to be told how to live then vote for status Quo remaining in Congress. Add: Consider this if people lose the “Fiercely independent Judiciary” because it gets watered down as is being proposed, what is to keep your Bill of Rights enshrined in the US Constitution from being reinterpreted by a political party? VPs are picked to satisfy a swath of platform needs. Simplifying the decision to one reason can’t possibly be the calculus here. Does he appeal to the party base? Does he appeal to swing voters and Undecideds? Does he appeal to the donor class and party elites? Does he appeal to demographics the POTUS nominee doesn’t? Can he lock up the swing states? Is he “Deep State” “Washington Consensus” approved? Can he campaign across all demographics and hustle for campaign cash? Did he have a lot of power behind the scenes? Is he a shapeshifter that can change positions quickly as circumstances dictate? Is he articulate and versed on the issues? Can he exhibit folksiness, policy wonk, statesman, be hip, proven consensus builder, reach-across-the-aisle chops? Can the elites call in favors because he’s in their pocket? Does he have an executive pedigree with a solid record of decision making? The left must have thought this person checked enough of these boxes and probably many more…. It’s a terrible choice for VP, but they haven’t got any good choices.. Look at the list of democrat VPs.. When was the last good one?! Maybe someone after WW2? Look who they chose for the big “P” Did you think that would garner a good pick for a “VP” They went from a puppet at P and a do nothing, word salad, border disaster VP , to a do nothing, word salad, disaster at the border P and a Biden 2.0 puppet at VP. Talk about Disaster as a game plan… this was possibly the worst two choices they could have made. They got worse at the position of President, and that was quite the accomplishment, let me just say. They got even worse at the position of VP, as they picked a Biden Clone, I guess they wanted the Voters to replace what they had at VP, and what they are equally looking to install as the President… Things that make you go hmm… It’s simple. The reason is no one else was willing to play second fiddle to Harris on a losing ticket. Only someone more brainless and more woke could fit the bill without upstaging her, hence the bottom of the barrel has been thoroughly scraped. Which is exactly why Harris will be out of Politics before the election, and certainly will not be the Nominee. They might as well hand the prize to the Republicans, if she is, and with that VP pick whew… Talk about throwing in the towel!!! Loving the delusional comments by those here who kneel to Trump. They reek of desperation. Trump will soon be in court again as multiple cases resume in August and September. Get your popcorn ready Trump-bitchez. I agree, the delusional comments by those here who kneel to ANY Party Leader is simply astonishing to me! They reek of total desperation. I am not sure now if Trump or Biden goes to Court First. Hell, Hunters already there, so that’s complicating things for Biden, Trump and Kamala… Politics is a race to the bottom. Then why are the Politicians Always On Top? They are at the top of the bottom! Recognising that Harris and Walz are extremist morons does not mean that you support Trump. Are you so delusional that you can seriously endorse such atrocious Democrat candidates?! Even an imbecile like you must crave more credible candidates than Harris and Walz. Out of 330m people, is this the best you’ve got?! Really?! The Dems could still get religion (or common sense) and make a change at the convention. But they won’t do that. They are already too invested in the anointed choices. There is a lot of media talk today about “joy” and “energy” from the Harris team. Unfortunately, that doesn’t lead to competency. First off, I seriously doubt that Kamala had much say whatsoever with Walz as the VP Selection. Second off, I actually think this was more of a pick for the (eventual) Presidential Nominee within their Own Party. Let’s look at what he supposedly could bring. The Mid-West Vote? Perhaps, and more so than what they had maybe? The Teachers Unions Vote? Not sure on that, as times have changed a lot. The Biden Vote? Damn it if he’s not a clone. A Puppet that looks like an old frail Man? Slightly more together, balance is much better, and listening and hearing are far superior, so they would have that going for them. It’s a “Trial Balloon” with plenty of time to do so!! They know two things for sure. One is that Kamala cannot possibly beat Trump. The other is that nobody else they have can either. Hunter, Joe’s Handlers, and The DR. Screwed it all up… We don’t have A Clue, because They Don’t Yet Either… Some by design, as they await the Trial Results, but mostly because they really don’t have much of a choice IMHO… Spent time in China and still speaks Mandarin. That should be bonus bucks in some corners. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/08/06/tim-walz-55-things-harris-vp-00172790 Fei hua, shazi. Growing up in the Midwest we always had a fat teacher or coach who was a total bastard. Sure, but how many people were fooled into thinking he was a good guy? That’s how they get away with it Denny Hastert, Jerry Sandusky… Only later do people realize they’re ass-rapers. Another nail in Trump’s coffin. His lawyer flipped on him on him in the fake electors case which is not good for his fate. Election fraud is a federal crime. https://apnews.com/article/arizona-fake-electors-attorney-2020-presidential-election-2b45b3ff90725fd07dd6c4dc9bfe6f22 My prediction also is that the states where Trump has taken over the election boards like Georgia, will not certify the election unless he wins. This is merely another attempt at what he tried in 2020 with the fake electors. Good thing that multiple lawsuits have overturned what fake electors in Arizona tried to do in local and state elections and the state supreme court has prosecuted those involved. If you are an elector and showing up at Trump rallies, I think your fate is going to be similar. TDS much? Lol. Are you a TDS GPT bot? Why ? Because in 2018, Walz got +43% deltas in counties that Hillary Clinton lost to Trump in 2016. Walz also does very well amongst high-school educated white voters. Trump looks more erratic by the day. He is mispronouncing a lot more words which makes me think there is some cognitive decline since he was hit in the ear by the shooter. Time will tell but I don’t think Trump is 100% anymore from a cognitive standpoint since the shooting. Of course he or his doctors will never reveal anything from the tests they did as Trump makes every doctor sign an NDA. Lol, yeah you were real vocal when dementia joe was still in there. I disagree with “Trump looks more erratic” but agree that Walz won 6 congressional elections in a row in an R+7 district (Cook PVI) that was Republican before him and Republican since he left that district to run for governor. Think Jon Tester. Tampon Tim not a good choice but I think VP picks are largely irrelevant Usually irrelevant, but sometimes not. I agree with you, but I am a bit baffled that she didn’t pick Shapiro given that she cannot win without PA Regardless of who is elected, we have a debt of $104K per person, $268K per worker. I don’t have that kind of money to just give to the government. WHAT IS THE PLAN? This is Trump’s race to lose. If I was running his campaign, I’d duct tape his mouth shut until November 6th. If he had picked Candace Owens he could have just let her do the talking. “Trump looked in a mirror and saw Vance.” Maybe a stark choice is what’s needed. Democrats represent the WHO, WEF, Summit of the Future, Pact of the Future, Pandemic Treaty, and bugs for breakfast, lunch and dinner: “sustainable farming.” And i read yesterday that Tulsi Gabbard is on the Quiet Skies list and has 3 sky marshals tagging along behind her, any time she flies, as if she was a national security threat. Tulsi would have been a smarter pick than Vance. Trying to build a coalition of people who identify as something something or another isn’t easy. At some point somebody will have to be jettisoned. The numbers were telling her it was Israel supporters or at least turn the support dial way down by not getting a Jewish VP. If she went the other way the ornery free Palestine faction would show up at her events and crash them. Can’t have that. Smart move? Probably not. Neither is not putting your agenda on the campaign website. The media is running cover for her in overtime so she does have that going for her. Senator Casey has a target on his back. Here: https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/ I said her personal site. Not the DNC site. Take out a student loan and take junior college reading comprehension 101. I will pay for it. I actually have to pay for it. He called the pair “weird,” a word that went viral among Democrats. Republicans should just flip the script and call the Democrats ticket, weird. The term will burn out in short order. You argue like a toddler. Like a Democrat. Ftfy. What’s really weird is believing that we need tampons in boys’ bathrooms for “menstruating non-females” — which is the bill Walz signed into law. Ugh. He is a tampon. Especially now. It’s not about who’s more moderate – Walz or Shapiro or Kelly or whoever. It’s about who LOOKS more moderate/normal. Harris & Obama pulled the “Fat Old White Guy in a Jean Jacket” trick. It’s been working for Jon Tester for years. Note that Tester is the only democrat to win state-wide in Montana. Walz looks like half the men in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Plus, he was born and raised in Nebraska, so he’ll win Omaha’s one electoral vote (which Trump could have needed to get a 269-269 tie). This pick is – unfortunately – a stroke of genius. It’s not about winning a particular state. It’s about winning Midwest white people’s votes. Vance the celebrated author, Yale-educated lawyer and Silicon Valley venture capitalist can’t top Walz, the high school teacher and wrestling coach. Which wife will resonate more with middle aged white women – Gwen Walz or Usha Chilukuri Vance? Walz and Kamala are in the same age, but he looks like her father. Kamala with her Jamaican father, Indian mother, her Jewish husband and two step-children is a weird family. Add ex SF mayor, a nanny and a cat to the salad. don’t forget the ex. Weird family, raised in another country. America would never elect anyone like that. Oh wait … Si se puede. As a Midwesterner the fat teacher meme is not attractive at all. It’s condescending and fake as hell. He doesn’t have to bring a majority of white people. He just has to reduce Trump’s winning margin among white people. Meanwhile, Trump is trying to win black votes. Besides, since when is “fake as hell” a problem in American politics? ..and which “white people” is Tampon Tim going to appeal to? Gwen Walz said she loved the smell of tires burning during the 2020 BLM riots in Minneapolis. That doesn’t resonate too well with me. 1.) He’s a non-threatening old white dude… like Biden was for Obama 2.) He’s not a howling rage monkey spitting vitriol at everyone 3.) He genuinely tries to govern in a way that benefits everyone People are sick of angry weirdos preaching doom and hate. Oh you mean like Biden’s Red and Black presentation with the Armed Marines in Backround calling 80 million Americans dangerous. Come to think of it that must have just been for funzies and not weird at all. Joe Biden is Mr. Normalcy and Harris is Ms. Normalcy Harris getting whitewashed so clean, she is a Regular Dorothy saying there is no place like home and then clicking her Ruby slippers together and away she goes. Weirdos tend to be dangerous. The army can handle you. Most weirdos are too fat and gay to be dangerous. It remains Assholes like yourself that will put Trump in for a second term. Thank You for participating in demonstrating where the Democrat Party is at. Weird – Surrender (Live at Nippon Budokan, Tokyo, JPN – April 1978) (youtube.com) Ya voting to enshrine mutilation of child’s genitalia into law. Great pick Kamala…. And we’re the weirdos. At least we ain’t sickos You weirdos have an odd fixation with children’s genitals. There you go again… Ranting Tulsi/Kelly bs cont. Local church food bank was very busy today. Lot of young Mothers with kids in tow. Must be all that successful Progressive economy working so well. Vote progressive is a vote for poverty. Kinda catchy campaign slogan. We have a winner. If only interest rates were lower, life would be easier and they would be so much better off! Lower interest rates will be coming as the economy collapses into recession. That will only make earning a living wage harder. To change the economy which is what is supposed to create prosperity there needs be a change in the way it is governed. I’m glad to see the very-democratic democrats have saved democracy yet again and officially appointed their spectacularly erudite presidential candidate after Biden’s untimely departure. I feel comfortable knowing that brain-washing proceeds at a furious pace in the race to the finish line. Democracy? I call bullshit! Has Biden departed? Surely he is still leading the country into economic oblivion? Or is he just oblivious? Yeeeesh, I think Mark Kelly would have been a far better choice but perhaps unlike Hillary they are taking into account they might get smoked by Trump and this guy getting pulled outta Wisconsin is not gonna leave a political void to be exploited Harris needs the Upper Midwest. Kelly does nothing there. Trump might have won AZ even if Kelly had been the VP pick. Minnesota not Wisconsin They both sound like made-up names for US states. They are Native American names. If in the next two/three months Bibi signs a ceasefire with Hamas, Kamala Harris will surf on a 50K Dow, benefitting from Biden’s legacy. SPX [1M] might drop to Oct 2021 close, or Aug 2022 high, in an A-B-C down, before taking off. Oct 2022 low +13K to July 2024 high. 13K + 36K ==> 50K. I do the charts before bs : Kelly can take the Dow to 70K. No good. Kamala Harris and Warren Buffett Jr taking the Dow to 50K is good enough. I don’t care if it’s Trump or Harris News flash: they can print the Dow up to any number they desire. They can cut debt with higher wages and a few 1998 type corrections that will fill gov coffer. On the way up it can be as volatile as gold on the way to $1,940 There will be no cease fire until Israel has ripped Hamas out of Gaza. Sinwar, the little Hitler hiding in his bunker, replaced Haniyeh. Getting him will wipe out Hamas military and political leadership, even by sacrificing a few hostages. how many olympics events u and your family attended. Two. Fencing in Paris and the men’s bicycle race which went through our village twice. Sat in the cafe drinking beer and watched them cycle by. Would have seen more but my wife has a hard time Getting around. Amen.. Send them back to Jordan. Waltz is Bernie in MN. Bernie is a storefront for globalization. He is supported by NY and CA $. The question to ask is, who is really behind globalization, and why? The Journal noted Walz supported universal free school meals for students, voting rights for the formerly incarcerated, driver’s licenses for migrants who crossed the border illegally, recreational marijuana and signed a law that made abortion a “fundamental right.” Terrible Policies for the MAGA faithful! I want kids to go hungry at school! I want to deny the vote to (certain) citizens (who I don’t like)! I want people to drive without licenses! So that they’re uninsured on the road! I smoke marijuana but don’t want it to be legal! That’s radical liberalism! I don’t want people to have abortions! Unless I need to get one! Sounds to me like policies that are actually popular with a large portion of the populace. I was just going to say, none of these positions seem terribly controversial. I think I read elsewhere that he also provided healthcare to migrants (medicaid?) but that seems reasonable too, as preventive care can end up saving the State money over overburdened ERs. Great except citizens do not get the same free healthcare and have to pay for migrant’s healthcare out of their taxes. “free” is never free… The same people who clamour for free healthcare, simultaneously clamour for higher wages for nurses and orderlies… Yet fail to make the link. They want to exploit medical workers and fund everything through debt and default on the debt through inflation that everyone pays, including the nurses and orderlies, and the illegals – oh but wait, the illegals are the ones that never have to pay. So they are stealing from the working class… How very unsocialist. Walk me through the process of getting auto insurance for illegal aliens. It’s called Uninsured Motorist coverage / premium on your own policy. First, you give them a free car. Then you issue them a drivers license. Then you throw in an all perils insurance policy. They do not care about the insurance the goal is the ID. With the DL you can gain other forms of ID and get benefits. Or you could fund healthcare in the countries they come from at even lower cost, and secure the border, preventing the exploitation of illegal aliens by criminal gangs. Please give us a list of the latest Democrat bullet points that come in identical format and with a lag time I could set my watch to. Things such as not telling parents that their first-grade teacher has decided that their kids should change gender? That is very decent, don’t you think? Indecent proposal. Essentially they want the government to steal your children. You’re joking, right? I no longer have access to the data, but a study a few years back showed that with few exceptions, the cost of benefits given to first-generation immigrants exceeds what they pay in taxes. The exceptions are mostly foreign graduate students who legally enter the country. Also, the impact of ‘low-end’ immigrants is mostly felt by poor communities, and those least able to provide for themselves. Is it decent to steal from the working class to fund criminals? I await the day when ‘visitors with driving licenses’ slaughter a few schools of preschoolers while they are eating their free lunches. Sounds to me like policies could go awfully awry “I want to deny the vote to (certain) citizens (who I don’t like)!” Illegal aliens shouldn’t be voting. Any American adult can afford an ID card, so Democrats are Gaslighting that Republicans are trying to prevent eligible people from voting. People in the country illegally should not be driving in the first place, as they are breaking the law by being here. Democrats say no one is above the law, but they exempt illegal aliens from that, along with certain other politically protected people. In most other countries taking id to vote is normal. Maybe not in Somalia or Afghanistan. When they say “great” they mean like Russia… the original shithole country. Every chapter of Russia’s history begins with “and then it got worse”. They’ll happily suffer if they think it makes someone else suffer more. Russophobia is the fashionable xenophobia these days, don’t you know. Straw man “Free school meals” are not free, someone is paying working class people to provide each stage of the food supply chain. You want to deny working class people a living wage to subsidise the indolent?! Convicts have never had the vote. You want election integrity with minimum corruption in voting? Or do you want to turn elections into who can buy the most votes, and which criminals can be hired to intimidate voters and dispose of ballots? What if those missing votes are Democrat votes? Driving licences are not motor insurance. Why should foreign citizens enjoy all the same rights and privileges of citizens? The implication is that you want to abolish citizenship, and the implication of that is you want to abolish countries, and the implication of that is you want to return humanity to “might is right” and the law of the jungle where gangs rule and violence is everywhere, with no protection available for the people you want to protect, because there’s no government any more. Marijuana is a minor issue. As long as people don’t buy it from organised mafias or operate vehicles and machinery and just lay on their couch all day masturbating and eating pizza – and I ‘m not accusing you of anything, it’s fine. Abortion is a states rights issue. America was created so that people could have different states with different cultures and rights in them, that’s how a republic works. Abortion can’t be on demand, it needs cautious medical and legal protections and filters in place to avoid undue harm to big humans and little humans. Mr Walz isn’t for any of that stuff, and he also wants the government to intervene between parents and their children to ensure that children are brainwashed, mutilated and sterilised in the name of an anti-scientific, aggressive misogynistic radical political fad/cult that turns children into lifelong patients. But to hell with medical ethics, just go ahead Dr Mengele, experiment on those vulnerable children. Harris-Trump race is first since 1976 without a Bush, Clinton or Biden April Rubin 6 Aug 2024 https://www.axios.com/2024/08/06/kamala-first-election-without-biden-bush-clinton And with an economy to match the 70s. Movin’ on to the next generation. “I suspect Harris is currently ahead.” You have to ignore the “Harris is up in the polls” BS. This election is not a national race, it is a race to win three states Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. How does the Harris ticket pick up the working class white voters who abandoned Hillary in 2016 for Trump, and switched from Trump to Biden in 2020. Harris/Walz going to pick up these voters without Covid to assist. Unlikely. Shapiro would of made Pennsylvania more competitive, if Harris threw under the bus at the last moment – politicians have egos – state may no longer be in play. Shapiro would have thrown Michigan. Fetterman has critiqued Shapiro, not clear that he would have really taken PA. As in 2020, the election will be decided by the effectiveness of brain washing (on both sides) The Brain-Wash ratio: mphT-neg % of total mass media coverage (minutes/hour) of Trump in a negative light mphtT-pos % of total mass media coverage of Trump in a positive light mphK-neg % of total mass media coverage of Kamala in a negative light mphK-pos % of total mass media coverage of Kamala in a positive light mphT-pos/ mphT-neg relative to mphK-pos / mphK-neg Some (definitely not all) of the liberal voters are anti-genocide. Both Biden (and Harris) are pro-genocide. Picking Shapiro would have meant adding yet another pro-genocide candidate. This would have pissed off the anti-genocide liberal voters. There are not many of them (because most liberals are PEPs – Progressive Except for Palestine) but they still are a large enough voting bloc. The only genocide happening in Gaza is in the minds of the deluded and those who do not understand the definition of the word genocide. Jojo, Same thing happened during Covid. People accepted the re-definition of the words immunity and vaccine. People will believe what they want to believe, even if it’s coming from psychopaths doing what they accuse others of doing. Genocide in Germany and genocide in Gaza have a lot in common. When the goal is clearly the elimination of every man, woman, and child within bombing range, genocide is entirely descriptive, regardless of your definition. At the end of the day, I fear we will realize terrorism was the excuse, It was always about land acquisition. Why did Israel return the Sinai to Egypt when they negotiated their peace agreement? Just like the whole “genocide” (against a Gaza population that has doubled in the last 25 years) the “land acquisition” myth (read: expansionist/imperialist) doesn’t fit the reality, but it does fit the drive to Jew-hatred camoflagued as “anti-Zionism”. First, Israel handed over the Sinai (except the Taba) as part of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty of 1979. Without it, there would be no treaty. Taba was later handed over after arbitration. Jojo doesn’t like the word ‘genocide,’ so, let’s use the right terminology. Vernichtungs-Schlacht , is a “battle of annihilation.” The IDF was initially charged with depriving Hamas and its supporters of the ability to fight. The Biden administration went along with it. However, in the process, the IDF shifted to Vernichtungs-Krieg. It is now a “war of annihilation” with the goal being to permanently evict, or exterminate members of the population, regardless of capacity to resist, or whether they support Hamas. By the way, this would be a war crime.. There are two reasons for the resulting genocide: one is to increase the territory of Israel. The other is to eliminate all future resistance caused by the battle of annihilation. Israel has now gone beyond the bounds of proportionality. They are rapidly losing support from most of the world. Eventually, their only support will come from the US, which does not have the leadership needed to stop the war.. Ah, “without it they wouldn’t have handed the land BACK”, but they did, and the Egyptian who agreed to the treaty, Anwar Sadat, was murdered by the group, Muslim Brotherhood, who spawned Hamas. Sadat was guilty of making peace with the Jews. For them, and for you evidently, Jews and Israelis can be charged with “grabbing land”, agree to return the land with a treaty of peace, and still be guilty. Guilty of what, really? That’s the thing you really can’t contemplate, and so you make up noble sounding rationalizations. Proportionality makes zero sense, you need to defeat your enemies. If they can’t put up a serious fight it doesn’t mean you don’t get to really fight them. Too funny! Who drew up the rules of war such that responses must be “proportional”? Is that an internet or UN rule? How about instead “Trample the weak and hurdle the dead”? How about, teach Hamas and other terrorists a lesson they will take a long time to forget? However, as I keep repeating, the killing of Palestinian civilians could have ended 9 months ago if only Hamas had chosen to release the hostages, laid down their weapons and surrendered. They did not and so Israel and Hamas will fight to the last Palestinian in Gaza or as you write “ Vernichtungs-Schlacht”. Many in Europe dream of a new genocide. Right, because Gaza is the new Auschwitz. Can you define holocaust? Didn’t think so. How about crusades? Got a definition? This sums up the VP pick: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal – Vice (smbc-comics.com) I agree. This is a nice summation statement. The Dems chose to stick with the current constituency of the party and not anger the far left, which is what Shapiro or Kelly pick would have done, especially Shapiro. Walz will bring no new votes to the Dems that they didn’t already have locked up. This could be a serious strategy mistake for the Dems. Make Somalia Great Again https://x.com/i/status/1820826803084161045 I am glad the Democrats chose him because it is hard to find someone who is less remarkable by nature and accomplishments than Kamala, but the Democrat party has managed to find a VP that will not outshine Kamala Harris. I was worried that they would have picked Mark Kelly who does have considerable qualifications and competences but as VP he would have blown Kamala out of the water by comparison but now that risk is no longer present. We now have a president and a VP that are both weak figures in every way. Nevertheless they could win because the Democrat Party Machine is very well oiled. And they are running against a cult leader who will after he loses the election have his followers drink the poisoned cool-aide for which he will charge them $12.00 for a cup. He will of course fake drinking it himself. I bet you own a cat. Am I right? You can’t even spell kool-aid, I guess that’s what drinking it does to you A race to the bottom. My god. Walz is the worst. I do not believe he was reelected without cheating. We have the idiotic 100% Renewable energy by 2040 law here. What I call the Impoverish and Kill Minnesotans Act He jailed people who tried to keep their businesses open during COVID Walz is pure evil And if they need to keep Minnesota Blue, a state that has not voted GOP for POTUS since I was a child, well they have serious problems Walz is not going to fix The Reps have been taken over by MAGA and the Dems have been taken over by Progressives. Dems are run by corporate donors desiring someone they can control. It was easy to control an elderly plank of wood and its easy to control someone who, like the Scarecrow from Wizard of Oz, lacks a brain. Regressives Aggressives There’s nothing progressive about them Mish; This is all about keeping Minnesota blue, for there are a high concentration of Muslims 3% of the state population with more Illegals now. Walz is just another version of the extreme democrats. “Minnesota nice” is a dog whistle phrase. 66% of murders are committed by blacks in Minnesota. Blacks make up 10% of the population in the state. Nice… I feel a meme coming on This is all about picking off gettable votes in PA/MI/WI and Shapiro being a Zionist would induce Tlaib to tell her Muslim fellows to sit out in November, minus 15 EVs right there. Also, Shapiro has some mild sexual harrassment stuff jumpbling around his admin. Walz has no controversy. He also has a good track record of working with both sides, and he flipped legislature to get the trifecta. Not to mention, Trump’s FIMD is making GA possibly an option for Dems again. Keep it up, Donnie Dingbat! Rando – he flipped the legislature that was barely split (House was already D, Senate was barely R). This was the “Red Wave that Never Was” election. Other than drivers licenses for illegal entrants I don’t see what’s so Progressive about MNs policies. I read about some allegations regarding Shapiro. Don’t know if they’re true but Walz seems a decent human being which in today’s political environment is unusual. I guess we’ll see if either VP matters to voters but I suspect not. He decently let Minneapolis burn during the riots and decently signed into law illegals getting drivers licenses so they can vote in this election. He is a very decent person. Personally, I see him as the typical Democrat career politician. If you toe the line the Party will take care of you. Have a look at some pictures of Minneapolis in 2019 and then compare it to pictures today. That’s the opposite of decency. Kamala would never pick a decent human being Other than Portland, Seattle, Chicago, and maybe Bay Area/LA/core big cities, can’t get lefter than Minnesota, specifically MSP. Worked there for 30 years, they are batcrap crazy on the all things left. This was about shoring up the base progressives, gung ho on killing babies, and every other pet project the left drones on on an on about. I’m confident I just won a 50:1 bet that Minnesota stayed blue–only voted for a Republican once in 68 years. True to form this will be a coin toss election nationally as will 2028, 2032, 2036…….. Harris has done nothing, said nothing, answered nothing and no one since her presumptive nomination. The internet has been scrubbed of her most liberal label and her word salad comments do continue when she says anything at all. No mind, she’s not Trump in the eyes of the not-truly-independent never-gonna-vote-for-Trump pretenders. Indict a ham sandwich? They’re gonna try to elect one!! And what goes with a ham sandwich?? Apparently a progressive state liberal governor like Walz. Goodness I hope Pennsylvania pays attention and votes accordingly–they tried to kill Trump there and she couldn’t make the easy pick of the Pennsylvania governor. If Trump can win Pennsylvania and GA then MI, WI, NH and even AZ and NV can remain blue and still crawl over the finish line. I’ve posted many times, most folks who say they are independent are simply looking for a reason to pull the blue left lever they’ve pulled their entire life. Usually that reason is because it’s Tuesday or November. If you’ve seen what’s become of everything liberals and big government central-planning progressives touch you shouldn’t be hanging on every word someone says or doesn’t say, just watch the flawed policies of the left and how they impact you, not the words. I prefer to wait until babies are born, then diddle and eat them. Stay triggered! Then Kamala’s your huckleberry! Many a true word spoken in jest. Excellent analysis. I live in Rochester, MN and won’t go near Minneapolis. I’ve voted for both Dems and Repubs in the past according to their stated policies. No longer, after the mega cult takeover I’d vote for a dead dog if it was listed in the dems side of my ballot. Until the mega cult is gone I’ll not even consider ANY republican so clean up your house or die in it. Kamala Harris chose a Jewish Husband. Picking Josh Shapiro is a concentrated portfolio. She picked a mainsteet gov bc he called Trump a weird. Since then the “weirdo exchange” dominate the two camps. That’s why Kelly should have been her first choice. But his kids recent “drug” problems surely must have impacted this decision. Trump screwed the pooch by picking Vance. Mish is correct in that Trump saw Vance in his image. Just my opinion, but Trump needed to soften the ticket with a moderate with a brain…Tulsi Gabbard. Oh, with Tulsi, what could have been … The only thing Tulsi had going for her is that she was a woman and if picked would have sent the message that DEI is alive in the Republican party. That would have been the message to voters. I am not sure if she would have brought in more voters than choosing her would have lost. She would have brought a lot more than that as a person, but you’re right it’s about how many voters they bring. Is that your personal email as your commenting user ID? @ Woodsie Thanks for responding with that. Today I had new notice from Mishtalk to re-subscribe and my email was inserted into the username box and I did not notice that. I need to take down my personal email. The Dems/DeepState put Tulsi on the TSA Terrorist Watch LiSSSSt two weeks ago. That will teach her not to shred Hellery and Kumala! I’m glad he screwed this up! He belongs in jail which may come next month. Tim Wolz – The Sarah Palin of Minnesota. Surprised she didn’t pick someone zombie squad member. You know….. for diversity. Diversity to her is an old white male. Her party seems to think they need to throw a bone to them so they might vote for her and not notice the agenda. ‘Minnesota Nice’ is almost extinct. When that term became popular and was parodied in the movie Fargo the demographics were a lot different than what they are today 30 years later. Most of the guys I play hockey with who grew up in Minnesota in the 80s-00s say the Minnesota they remember is gone. When Dru Sjodin was raped and murdered by Alfonso Rodriguez, that was the inflection when it should’ve been obvious to everyone that the Boomers had flushed North Dakota/Minnesota down the toilet. W
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

How Progressive is Tim Walz, Kama Harris’ VP Running Mate?

…Dems had the chance after the breakdown of Biden, loss of Manchin, Gabbard, Kennedy to sit and reflect upon the situation.…

…#TamponTim Four years ago the Trump administration filed a lawsuit against Googl.…

Show full text (40677 chars)
• • • Yesterday, a friend told me that Walz was not as much a Liberal Progressive as I thought. Let’s investigate. Image from WSJ video. What the Choice of Tim Walz Says About Kamala Harris The Wall Street Journal comments on What the Choice of Tim Walz Says About Kamala Harris Donald Trump did Democrats a favor by choosing a running mate who reinforced his base rather than reaching out to swing voters. Kamala Harris has now returned the favor in selecting Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the progressive favorite, as her pick for Vice President. The choice that scared Republicans was popular Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, a swing state crucial to an Electoral College victory. But Mr. Shapiro, who is Jewish, was the target of an extraordinary and nasty campaign against him by the Democratic left. He was too pro-Israel and had upset unions by showing rhetorical support for school vouchers. Ms. Harris appears to have wilted under this pressure, perhaps fearing protests at the Democratic convention in Chicago this month . She went with Mr. Walz instead, and there goes Mr. Trump’s hope of flipping the decisive swing state of Minnesota. That’s a joke, since the Land of 10,000 Liberals has voted Democratic in every presidential election since 1976. Mr. Walz’s progressive bona fides will please Sen. Bernie Sanders and the teachers unions. But his governing record will be fodder for Mr. Trump. And picking him is a bad omen about the ability, or even willingness, of Ms. Harris to defy her party’s left. Walz Scorecard Increasing taxes, though Minnesota already has the fifth-highest top income-tax rate among the states, 9.85% at $193,000 of earnings for a single filer. Mr. Walz added a 1% surtax on net investment income above $1 million, while reducing deductions, and the Governor wanted more. Minnesota is a rare state that still levies a death tax, up to 16%, on top of the federal 40% rate, which is one reason the state is losing taxpayers to better climes. Making an estimated 81,000 illegal immigrants in the state eligible for driver’s licenses, along with health insurance through the MinnesotaCare public marketplace. Funding “the North Star Promise Program, which provides free college for students with a family income under $80,000,” including illegal immigrants. Creating a state system for paid family and medical leave, capped at a combined 20 weeks a year and funded by a 0.88% payroll tax. Mandating that public utilities generate 80% carbon-free electricity by 2030, ramping up to 100% by 2040. He’s a fervent believer in “climate action.” Subsidizing electric vehicles by “requiring EV charging infrastructure within or adjacent to new commercial and multi-family buildings,” as the Governor’s office bragged. Passing one of the nation’s most permissive abortion statutes that has essentially no limits and no age consideration for minors. Declaring Minnesota to be a “trans refuge,” with a law saying that the state will ignore a “court order for the removal of a child issued in another state because the child’s parent or guardian assisted the child in receiving gender-affirming care in this state.” Establishing automatic voter registration and letting Minnesotans sign up for a permanent absentee ballot option. I believe I can rest the case but I will throw in one last kicker. FLASHBACK: Governor Tim Walz signed a bill requiring schools to provide tampons in the boy’s bathrooms. Beyond parody pic.twitter.com/fRQGKTXAUJ — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 6, 2024 If this is not kowtowing to the radical progressive wing of the Democratic party, then what the hell is radical Left? Harris Goes With Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for VP, Why? Earlier today I asked Harris Goes With Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for VP, Why? Silver thinks Walz is a nice choice but “Shapiro was the higher-upside option that was probably worth the risk.“ I don’t know enough other than to say Shapiro has some issues with the Progressive Left. Was there anything else in the closet? Perhaps the choice was to avoid riots in Chicago over Palestinian issues. But Walz will have some issues with with the middle. Chicago Riots This morning I pondered on Chicago riots. This afternoon, so did the WSJ. I have no idea, but if that played any part of it, all I can say (and I am not the only one to say this) …. Thank You Chicago A sentiment shared by many. https://t.co/kvn3ZLQ37D — IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) August 6, 2024 What the Choice of Tim Walz Says About Kamala Harris The Wall Street Journal comments on What the Choice of Tim Walz Says About Kamala Harris Donald Trump did Democrats a favor by choosing a running mate who reinforced his base rather than reaching out to swing voters. Kamala Harris has now returned the favor in selecting Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the progressive favorite, as her pick for Vice President. The choice that scared Republicans was popular Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, a swing state crucial to an Electoral College victory. But Mr. Shapiro, who is Jewish, was the target of an extraordinary and nasty campaign against him by the Democratic left. He was too pro-Israel and had upset unions by showing rhetorical support for school vouchers. Ms. Harris appears to have wilted under this pressure, perhaps fearing protests at the Democratic convention in Chicago this month . She went with Mr. Walz instead, and there goes Mr. Trump’s hope of flipping the decisive swing state of Minnesota. That’s a joke, since the Land of 10,000 Liberals has voted Democratic in every presidential election since 1976. Mr. Walz’s progressive bona fides will please Sen. Bernie Sanders and the teachers unions. But his governing record will be fodder for Mr. Trump. And picking him is a bad omen about the ability, or even willingness, of Ms. Harris to defy her party’s left. Walz Scorecard I believe I can rest the case but I will throw in one last kicker. FLASHBACK: Governor Tim Walz signed a bill requiring schools to provide tampons in the boy’s bathrooms. Beyond parody pic.twitter.com/fRQGKTXAUJ If this is not kowtowing to the radical progressive wing of the Democratic party, then what the hell is radical Left? Harris Goes With Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for VP, Why? Earlier today I asked Harris Goes With Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for VP, Why? Silver thinks Walz is a nice choice but “Shapiro was the higher-upside option that was probably worth the risk.“ I don’t know enough other than to say Shapiro has some issues with the Progressive Left. Was there anything else in the closet? Perhaps the choice was to avoid riots in Chicago over Palestinian issues. But Walz will have some issues with with the middle. Chicago Riots This morning I pondered on Chicago riots. This afternoon, so did the WSJ. I have no idea, but if that played any part of it, all I can say (and I am not the only one to say this) …. Thank You Chicago A sentiment shared by many. https://t.co/kvn3ZLQ37D Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Tim Walz has no ideology whatsoever except that of his own personal advancement. He was a five term “moderate” Democrat from a rural, often (and currently) Republican district in southern Minnesota. He took on that good ol boy demeanor and visited with constituents in a red and black checked flannel shirt. Then he ran for governor as a moderate, but once in office became a radical progressive to appease the massive numbers of hard left Democrats in the Twin Cities who dominate the Democrat Party in the state. He was basically a rubber stamp for every idea they came up with including completely unregulated abortion and merging the right to abortion with the right of minors to transgender health care. In the last legislative session they (and he) blew through an $18 billion budget surplus that consisted mostly of unspent Federal relief money (and, by the way, Minnesota is one of a handful of states that tax Social Security income – in fact the state has the highest marginal tax rate on Social Security of any state in the country). For campaign purposes with Harris he’s going back to being folksy ol Tim for his campaign duties in the non-urban areas of the electoral swing states in the Midwest. Just remember none of his act is genuine. If, and when he gets into office he will transform himself again into a Progressive crusader that will blend in perfectly with the Harris wing of the Democratic Party. Funding FMLA is regressive. Those on the margin of poverty are now more likely to fall into poverty. Those trying to climb out of poverty are now facing a tougher time. Grew up in Stassen, McCarthy DFL land. It was ok then. NOW it is a total FUBAR, can I say that. The Mpls sports the largest somali and egyptian pop in the country. Well, it went south very fast. The whole city and subs whent off the left cliff into the abyss. Walz and Dayton were total commies, hence Moscow on the Mississippi. There is a reason that Minneapolis nick name has changed from the ‘Twin cities’ to ‘Little Mogadishu’. Tim Walz: “There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially around our democracy”.  How very Faucian of him. I mentioned the other day I had noticed Trump’s cognitive decline since the shooting. Looks like other people a lot more qualified have noticed as well: https://www.statnews.com/2024/08/07/trump-mental-health-linguistic-analysis-suggests-potential-cognitive-decline-experts-say/ I don’t know that he’s the same person he was even 6 months ago. Cognitive decline starts even in those who haven’t been shot at the age of 79 or 80. This is from many brain studies over large samples of people around the world. The shooting may have accelerated Trump’s cognitive decline in the last few weeks. The Republicans should have run Haley. She could have been a winner nationally. Harris/Walz You betcha! This is interesting because I don’t see a lot of those policies as “far left.” When your list includes an item like paid FMLA, it feels like a big reach. If you’d said he’d supported defining & dismantling the police force or pushed for a ban on all weapons in the state, then okay. But since nothing like that made your list, I’m inclined to think there’s nothing like that. Ah Tampon Tim joins Kumelot Harris, the last of the baby boomers following in the footsteps of Da Nang Dick and Hotlips Hillary, Bimbo Bill’s first bimbo eruption. . . All that matters is how he performed as governor. If you just look at his record, he is a Dollar Store version of Gavin Newsom – woke, foolish, confused and overall a rube willing to follow whatever direction the political winds blow. He’s a perfect party candidate and an excellent match for Headboard Harris. He will never outshine her. That’s not a compliment. The election will be decided in the middle east. Mish – “this morning I pondered on Chicago…….” Bridgeview Orland Park Orland Hills Chicago Ridge Worth Hickory Hills Palos Hills Justice Oak Lawn Oak Brook Burbank Tinley Park etc. etc. etc. Midway area Whoocoodanoode? And? What if Kamala wins? Nobody is going to be thanking Trump for thanking Kamala for her VP pic. “If this is not kowtowing to the radical progressive wing of the Democratic party, then what the hell is radical Left?” Does the left wing MSM ever use the term left wing? Just what is radical left, to the left wing and left wing MSM? It doesn’t really exist to them. Obama said, “we won the culture war,” then Democrats started a new one. This week, two men will be the Gold And Silver medal winners in women’s boxing, at the Olympics. Exactly. Right, alt-right, far-right…it’s always made.a point to use these but it does not happen with the left. “Funding “the North Star Promise Program, which provides free college for students with a family income under $80,000,” including illegal immigrants.” So much for the Democrats claims that no one is above the law. When Trump made Kamala’s race an issue, he played right into her hands. Kamala wants the fight about identity because that is all she has. She does not want to talk about policies or beliefs. In the musical Hamilton, Hamilton attacked Aaron Burr’s lack of beliefs. Burr’s advice to Hamilton was to talk less and smile more. Burr had no values outside of his own political and financial ambition. That is who Kamala is. She is Aaron Burr. She has no sense of right and wrong only what makes her look good. She did not want to look badly with the progressives so that is why she made the VP pick she did. What policies does trump talk about? Every speech is 2 hours of whining. Really? Closed borders, deport criminals and maybe more expansive. Persistence of the tax cuts, which contrary to the left’s assertion benefit nearly everyone including me and everyone I know in the lowest tax brackets. No foreign aid to Ukraine and a push to end that war that never should have started. Funding strong police, ending the “defund the police movement”; crack down on crime. End the fentanyl importation and all its fallout. Resume extensive energy independence/production. Scrap the mandates against ICE cars, gas stoves, gas furnaces. End the wasteful agencies such as the redundant federal Department of Education. I mean the whining is present, sure, becuase he has eyes like many of his supporters–we see what’s transpired in 4 years. I mean if you can’t vote to ban illegals voting in federal elections where is the nation going, especially as Kamala says we need to reform immigration and give pathway to citizenship–exactly what we said was the plan all along, let them in and grant them citizen status for which we were called conspiracy theorists. To say he hasn’t discussed policy is silly. And to ignore that we have 4 years of a previous presidency which should also serve as a predictor of policy. And if we follow that logic then we can look to California and Minneaopolis to see what policies Kamala Harris and Tim Walz would embrace. If only the MSM would actually ask those questions of her. Also of note–notice MSM doesn’t even mention any bad domestic news now, it’s as if it’s just one lovefest of Kamala. Question: Where is BIden? Why is he still president. She should be president now; they ran him off the ticket but left him in charge. For that they are criminally negligent, willing to do anything to win political favor and power but not actually govern. Trump has policy proposals? Like what? I think he’s promised tax cuts to basically everyone on the planet now, so there’s that. I know this man! It’s Wallace Shawn … great and very funny actor from Princess Bride, and Young Sheldon (Dr. John Sturgis). Also a writer, having co-penned My Dinner with Andre . Edit to add link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallace_Shawn Never get involved in a land war in Asia – Never start a land war in Asia – Princess Bride (youtube.com) Governor Desantis and Governor Abbott Have you seen this? Your migrant problem is over. Minnesota wants them bad. Clear out your migrant camps and send the busses to Minnesota. Also, send your U-hauls because a lot of rich people are going to leave Minnesota for your state. I am reading comments here that indicates that some of you ACTUALLY THINK that there are Material Differences, on Insurance, wars, Justice and the BIGGER issues we are facing, between the two parties??? WTF? Do you think there is no difference between candidates positions on Judicial approach? One party has been actively attempting to subvert the Judicial branch to its political ideology while the other party is resisting loading the dice at the Bench. Appointing strict constructionalist jurists is adhering to the Founding principles of this nation by maintaining separation of powers. If a person finds themselves in a minority position how would you expect to get fair hearing if instead of a Judge your are facing a political appointee based upon ideology of a majority? That the press refuses to discuss real issues and outcomes does not mean those same issues do not exist. “Appointing strict constructionalist jurists is adhering to the Founding principles of this nation by maintaining separation of powers.” Well: That went out the door with the “fire in crowded theatre” nonsense. And has been going nowhere but straight down from there. Complete arbitrary discretion, has been the sole and only “principle” of this dystopia for 150 years now. America was founded with proper money, no standing armies, no income taxes, NO restrictions on own and carry, no entangling alliances…. no, no,no, no to every single idiocy that both current idiot-parties and their captive indoctrinati uncritically embrace. “Judicial approach” means nothing, when the realistic difference between the two idiot camps are effectively nothing. The whole thing amounts to not one lick more than simply being pulled around by the nosering by Massa. While pliantly acting happy about it, to boot. It makes NO difference, to almost anyone, exactly who ends up “winning” this latest silly contest. Taxes will remain, ditto shortages of everything: From housing to health care to, by now, even food. American competitiveness will continue to fall even further behind ever more other countries (we’re down there with The Congo already…) . Ambulance chasing rabble and useless Fed theft beneficiaries will continue to rob more all more sentient and useful Americans, with the aid of the ever more totalitarian state.”The debt” will be yet higher. Deficits as well. Even more will be wasted on idiotic adventurism abroad. As well as childish grandstanding aimed at affording rank idiots the opportunity to pretend they are “statesmen” and has anything at all of value to contribute to anything and anywhere…..etc.,etc. NONE of this will differ, in any meaningful way, regardless of which party of idiots nominally “wins” the next childish autumn ritual. Instead, the only purpose the whole thing serves, is to force even more attention to be paid to the utter riffraff making up both the idiot camps. Our Society is much more complex then when this Nation was founded. Its resources are also much more complex. These things have occurred long before I was born and will continue long after I am gone. My only concern is what kind of a Shepard I am of what has been a situation not of my making but one I am living in now and will be leaving to the generations of my bloodline that follow. It is doubtful that a return to the simplicity of the past is possible. Being a pragmatist therefor leaves me with making the best of what has been placed at my feet to work with. Do I endorse this situation as the greatest ever? No I do not. Do I embrace the two party/slash uniparty as the next Living God to be followed? That is ridiculous. Do I think Thought can get introduced to challenge where things are headed? Yes I do. Thoughts can be dangerous to established notions and are always fought tooth and nail as we experience the censorship efforts to stop Free Thought and Free speech. This is why I know that Thoughts can alter the future as they can change or affect peoples minds. Am not into using Force as it is the resort of the Feeble minded, who always trot it out when they are caught drowning in their own stupidity. So if we are to change the future which is revealed in our minds first via our perceptions, we must introduce new thoughts to alter this current Paradigm. “Our Society is much more complex then when this Nation was founded.” As is technology and industry. All done without altering the fundamental laws of nature… There is no; or at least precious few; reasons why similarly fundamental economic laws must be altered. Arbitrary complexity can be built on top of very simple fundamental constructs. But only as as long as those constructs are truly universal. Which, in economics, requires derivation from first principles. No amount of Krugman digging up some random period of time where one of his gross oversimplifications appear to hold, will ever pass that standard. In the natural sciences, sufficiently overwhelming empirical evidence can; tentatively; be substituted for logical truth. But that’s only due to the lucky happenstance that the entities under study; such as atoms and planets; can be assumed to not have a rational mind of their own; hence try to game each study; and the response to it; for their own ends. Economics affords no such luxury. Ergo: It’s either direct deduction from first principles (themselves deducible from; effectively; competitive evolution). OR it’s just nonsense; bandied about by charlatans, and uncritically fallen for by lightweights. As is the case with various blind faith fads like Marxism, Keynesianism, Monetarism and all the rest. And it is these exercises in applied silliness which have served to excuse one act of government overreach or another. All in some futile effort to supposedly “manage” “the economy.” Non of which will ever even a theoretical chance of serving any other purpose than granting ever more arbitrary power to whichever Dear Leader brings up the sillyism. The parties are the same, but Trump is (aside from Israel) off the Deep State reservation when it comes to instigating strife and turmoil around the globe. That’s why they did Russiagate, hid Hunter’s laptop and then lied about it and probably were involved in trying to kill Trump after lawfare failed to take him out but before he could name Vance (another problematic candidate) as his VP choice. … and fully on the Derp State. You can make the case that Biden and Trump are the same economically, borrow and spend. Neither had any interest in fiscal responsibility or balancing the budget. However, if you look at foreign policy, Biden catered to the military industrial complex, and Trump hated it. Trump thinks the USA has a horrible deal with NATO and wants out of it. I think the Ukraine war ends in no time if Trump wins. With Israel, I think Trump can talk to Netanyahu and at least turn down the heat some. Netanyahu has walked all over Biden. So yeah, I think there is a huge difference between Biden/Harris and Trump with foreign policy. Huge, as in +-1% of military spending…Now ain’t that huge. America was founded without a standing army. That is a huge difference. Dorking around forever perpetuating yet another failed system of this failed state, +- no more than a percent or two; is an insult to the very word “huge.” Materially there is little difference. Debt is incurred at effectively the same rate. It is a question if that debt goes to the rich to reduce their taxes or the middle and lower classes. To the billionaires, I say go ahead and leave the US and give up your citizenship. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. There is really going to be little anyone in power can do about climate change, wars or debt. And there is no turning back the clock and erecting trade barriers to somehow make things better. We’ve been down this path since the 2000s and both parties are to blame. Some positives: he’s actually run a state unlike Cackleberry or Vance and done so competently within a liberal context. Not like Illinois or California. He has more China experience than anybody but his human rights obsession may mean more impractical nonsense, with the US isolating itself by its arrogance in dictating to others. The US won’t back away from Stupidity as with a bill to “counter China” with guess what? More Sanctions ! The trans thing is ugly but since the US is going full Idiocracy, keeping fools away from reproduction may be for the best. Let Mormons, Amish and Born Again Christians fill the cribs. His military stuff has no traction. Bush Jr. was a joke and got elected anyway. I blame Republicans because they hung abortion around their necks like an albatross and never stopped – and never move on legal immigration. Vance wants more babies but Walz gives them free meals at school, instead of just slamming cat ladies. How guns vs butter is this guy? That’s looming as a big choice in the near future. Walz will be irrelevant. Harris will leave the entire security state as it is, with the three letter agencies (and NED) roving the world like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. You may be right. I just hope when Trump loses, the Republicans pick up enough in the Senate or House to slow down craziness He does have experience on running a state into the ground. In that he and Newsom are alike. These valuable lessons will be put to use in running the country into the ground if they get into office. He’s certainly against you having a gun. Given butter comes from cows and cows have been declared to contribute to global warming he’s probably against all dairy products as well. He’s not against you having a gun – he’s simply for gun control. He is a hunter and gun owner. In the past, he has been “A” rated by the NRA. Tim Walz is “Holding a pig at a country fair radical” https://i.redd.it/fysebgovg2hd1.jpeg And it seems as though his daughter actually likes him! The horror. Didn’t realize that spawns liking their parents was an asset. How has Cocaine Biden’s love for papa made papa better? Or Cocaine Biden? Walz won’t be in charge of anything even if he becomes the VP. The main job of the VP (with exceptions like Cheney) is to attend state funerals of presidents, prime ministers and royalty around the world. On the topic of Israel, Walz is just as much of a Zionist as Shapiro, except that the doesn’t wear it on the sleeve as much as Shapiro does. A Harris win means continuation of fighting to the last Ukrainian, supporting Israel 100% (same as Trump), continuing to try to regime change Hungary and Kazakhstan, roping Georgia and Armenia into NATO (for the next proxy war against Russia), regime changing Myanmar and Thailand and setting up the Philippines for a proxy war against China, etc. Unfortunately Americans don’t understand or care about the rest of the world – only about issues like abortion which is 98% the same (or even more lenient) as before Dobbs. Dems had the chance after the breakdown of Biden, loss of Manchin, Gabbard, Kennedy to sit and reflect upon the situation. Someone in Politics who was rational may have had a thought gee wizz this is not where we want to be going. But noooooooooo they must double down. Something appropriate about that famous Einstein quote doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome as the definition of being insane comes to mind. This is what Dems consider moving to the middle. After all everyone else is weird cepting them. Politicians rarely ever “Self-Reflect” which is the downfall for many a hopeful Nominee. Sometimes it goes unnoticed, others it has crushed, and some get rewarded for it. Look at Trump and his use of words, Kamala and her Cackle, Biden and his inability to speak coherently, Newsom and his destructive policies, and annihilation of CA. Cheney and her J6 debacle, and the list is simply endless… Trump does say things that raise hackles across the board. His game does inflict psychological stress on his opponents. Why would someone like Trump who is a very skilled negotiator do that on purpose? Perhaps a reflection on how deeply the real problems of this Nation are getting glossed over in ongoing efforts at making everything personal. He does not move on bedrock issues such as energy independence, illegal immigration, crime, weaponization of judicial system, America first. Since there has been an all out effort to smear everything about the man to make it personal, his actual policy stances are quite solid and unwavering. He just throws some shit back at the perpetrators. Seems fair play to me. I agree 100% ES [1M] is down 600 point from the top. The wave from Oct 2023 low to the top is 1,600 points. ES landed on a support line coming from Oct 2011 low to Feb 2016 low. 600/1,600 = 37.5%. The wave from Oct 2022 low to the top is 2,219 points. 600/2,219 = 27%. If Iran attacks ES might tumble downhill on its back, until the Nov election. The Last Walz … Anyone who wants to put tampons in 4th grade boy’s bathrooms should not be calling anyone else “weird”. Total lack of self-awareness. Maybe he is getting bribed by Proctor & Gamble? Maybe someone is getting the story all wrong a la Fox News How is it wrong? Tampon Tim signed the bill that required them in all bathrooms. Isn’t it pretty much liberal orthodoxy by now that it’s discrimination to restrict any of the 49 “genders” from using any bathroom they want to? Here’s Tim’s defender. Good luck, Scott. There’s always gotta be one guy who will defend tampon dispensers in boy’s bathrooms. What about sixth seventh eighth ninth tenth eleventh and twelfth grades? #TamponTim Four years ago the Trump administration filed a lawsuit against Googl. A verdict was issue on Mon : Googl has been paying $18B entities like AAPL, Samsung and the SF mafia to monopolize their search engine, suppressing freedom and other search engines, making $300B from advertisement, after raising ads prices. If Trump wins, after the supreme court verdict, his administration can dismantle Googl, AMZN and Meta and Kamala Harris can go to jail. Just a tad ahead of your skis, are you not? You’re assuming Trump Wins, and currently that’s 50%/50%. You’re also assuming a SCOTUS ruling and that’s never smart, as you never know what could occur there. I highly doubt a dismantling ruling will apply, and this is in its infancy stages, as trials and sentencing etc. are finally handed down. Heck, this may never even go to Court, and certainly could be tied up in the Courts for a decade easily…slow down. If Trump wins and If Scotus confirm the federal judge verdict, his administration can dismantle Googl as former administrations dismantled AT&T and the railroads, or prevent them from bribing other entities, herd together creating a bubble, attacking political opponents, muzzling enemies, or just fine them. At this point Googl controls 90% of the search engine, after dismantling Bill Gates 25 years ago, doing what they want, serving their masters. “If”… “If”… “If”… like I said slow down. “If” everybody on Earth learned how to fish, Hunger would disappear from the World tomorrow… “If” I play the Lottery tonight, I could be a Millionaire tomorrow… I have a long position on Googl. I wonder how many of Kamala’s VP options turned her down? At least one. Gavin told her back in January – “What? No way! You’re a loser Kam.” All the smart ones, which is why we got a Biden 2.0 Clone… He is a fertile field of Progressive Issue turnips all ready to be picked by Republican harvesters. Which candidate will be most capable of asking these hard questions? The World That Awaits the Next President Aug. 6, 2024 Aug. 6, 2024 By Bret Stephens By Bret Stephens Some questions for the next American president: Some questions for the next American president: If necessary, are you willing to use force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons or China from subjugating Taiwan — two events that may well take place on your watch? Will you use the threat of an arms embargo to compel Israel or Ukraine to agree to cease-fire deals they do not want? Are you prepared to increase military spending to Cold War levels to contend with great-power competitors and new asymmetric threats, such as from the Houthis? If necessary, are you willing to use force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons or China from subjugating Taiwan — two events that may well take place on your watch? Will you use the threat of an arms embargo to compel Israel or Ukraine to agree to cease-fire deals they do not want? Are you prepared to increase military spending to Cold War levels to contend with great-power competitors and new asymmetric threats, such as from the Houthis? Above all, do you believe that maintaining our global primacy is worth the price in effort, treasure and sometimes blood? Above all, do you believe that maintaining our global primacy is worth the price in effort, treasure and sometimes blood? If the answer to that last question is “no” — an answer that has the virtues of honesty, modesty and frugality — then you can mostly ignore the previous questions. You can also comfort yourself with the fantasy that the world will leave us alone in exchange for us leaving it alone. If the answer to that last question is “no” — an answer that has the virtues of honesty, modesty and frugality — then you can mostly ignore the previous questions. You can also comfort yourself with the fantasy that the world will leave us alone in exchange for us leaving it alone. The world doesn’t work that way. Unlike, say, New Zealand, we are not a pleasant and remote country under the implicit protection of a benign ally: Nobody will protect us if we do not protect ourselves. We have globe-spanning territorial, maritime and commercial interests that require us to police the global commons against bad actors, from China in the South China Sea to Iran in the Strait of Hormuz to Russia in the cyber domain. We stand for a set of ideas, centered on human rights and personal liberties, that invariably attract the violent attention of despots and fanatics. The world doesn’t work that way. Unlike, say, New Zealand, we are not a pleasant and remote country under the implicit protection of a benign ally: Nobody will protect us if we do not protect ourselves. We have globe-spanning territorial, maritime and commercial interests that require us to police the global commons against bad actors, from China in the South China Sea to Iran in the Strait of Hormuz to Russia in the cyber domain. We stand for a set of ideas, centered on human rights and personal liberties, that invariably attract the violent attention of despots and fanatics. We’ve also tried isolationism before, in the 1920s and 1930s. It ended badly. We’ve also tried isolationism before, in the 1920s and 1930s. It ended badly. … … https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/06/opinion/harris-trump-ukraine.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/06/opinion/harris-trump-ukraine.html As concise a summary of lock limit, naive idiocy as any I’ve seen. Par for the course for the Fed Theft City Times, of course. Is the pick of Walz as simple as this? Why Pelosi and other House Dems were privately pushing Walz It went beyond ideology — many House lawmakers wanted one of their own. It went beyond ideology — many House lawmakers wanted one of their own. Nancy Pelosi arrives for a vote at the U.S. Capitol. Nancy Pelosi arrives for a vote at the U.S. Capitol. By Sarah Ferris, Nicholas Wu, Meredith Lee Hill and Daniella Diaz By Sarah Ferris, Nicholas Wu, Meredith Lee Hill and Daniella Diaz 08/06/2024 05:55 PM EDT 08/06/2024 05:55 PM EDT House Democrats have often chafed at President Joe Biden’s favoritism for the Senate. So, when they pushed Tim Walz for vice president, they had more than ideology on their minds — they wanted one of their own. House Democrats have often chafed at President Joe Biden’s favoritism for the Senate. So, when they pushed Tim Walz for vice president, they had more than ideology on their minds — they wanted one of their own. House Democrats have grumbled for years that Biden doesn’t really understand their chamber, a complaint compounded by the fact that Vice President Kamala Harris was also a former Senate fixture. Even while Democratic lawmakers were happy to pass major legislative priorities like the infrastructure law and the Inflation Reduction Act during Biden’s tenure, the process often left them feeling run over. House Democrats have grumbled for years that Biden doesn’t really understand their chamber, a complaint compounded by the fact that Vice President Kamala Harris was also a former Senate fixture. Even while Democratic lawmakers were happy to pass major legislative priorities like the infrastructure law and the Inflation Reduction Act during Biden’s tenure, the process often left them feeling run over. So some House Democrats privately lobbied Harris’ camp to pick Walz, wanting to see someone on the ticket who truly understood the so-called lower chamber. While other candidates like Gov. Josh Shapiro and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) also had some House Democratic backers, many of them saw Walz, who served 12 years in the House and counts strong allies among both centrists and progressives, as a potentially perfect fit. So some House Democrats privately lobbied Harris’ camp to pick Walz, wanting to see someone on the ticket who truly understood the so-called lower chamber. While other candidates like Gov. Josh Shapiro and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) also had some House Democratic backers, many of them saw Walz, who served 12 years in the House and counts strong allies among both centrists and progressives, as a potentially perfect fit. “I used to tease [Biden] a lot. I said: ‘Man, you know you’re too senatorial in your speech making. You gotta learn to do like we do in the House,” Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), a top Biden ally, said in a brief interview. “We do one-minute speeches in the House. So we know how to get to the point right away.’” “I used to tease [Biden] a lot. I said: ‘Man, you know you’re too senatorial in your speech making. You gotta learn to do like we do in the House,” Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), a top Biden ally, said in a brief interview. “We do one-minute speeches in the House. So we know how to get to the point right away.’” “If you noticed, Walz is very good at getting to the point right away,” Clyburn quipped. “If you noticed, Walz is very good at getting to the point right away,” Clyburn quipped. … … https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/06/pelosi-house-dems-pushing-walz-00172939 https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/06/pelosi-house-dems-pushing-walz-00172939 Certainly sounds plausible. We are, after all, dealing with children. Wanting to be mommy’s favorite, is about as advanced a like of “reasoning” as can be expected from any of them. Walz signed an executive order stating MN supports gender-affirming healthcare. In other words, we’ll let you castrate your kid before your ex-husband even finds out. He also signed the most extreme abortion law in the country, You can now terminate the pregnancy at any time until the kid graduates from high school. This is why the democrats will successfully steal this election from Cornel West and the Trumpster will rest in the tampon-bin of history. You sound weird. Cornel who??!! Cornel Sanders. Good for him to get picked even after publicly carrying water for the current president last month. It shows he’s a team player (or at least a good toady). At least she wasn’t badmouthing him a year ago. True toady is better than turncoat toady. Command Sergeant Major, the highest non-commissioned rank in military and the most respected commissioned or non-commissioned. Coached high school state title winning football team. Knows how to work a crowd and room. This will soon be seen as a shrewd pic. He quit the reserves when he found out they were going to Iraq. Abandoned his men and deprived them of a leadership position as they went overseas to risk their lives. Choosing a coward isn’t shrewd. “He quit the reserves when he found out they were going to Iraq.” If only all of them were that sentient. He was never credentialed as Command Sergeant Major, he retired as Master Sergeant. Takes two minutes to look up. He was forced to quit coaching that high school team after his DUI. That should’ve also ended his reservist military career but somehow didn’t. Instead he quit when he found out his unit was being sent to Iraq and has been lying about combat ever since. Good choice. He’s not an ice cream cone. You don’t have to keep licking. Progressive…as far from progress as conservative is from conservation. Politics is just advertising with a larger budget. should I call him trans-timmy, lgbt-IT walz or just say laughin-K and grandma timmy Trannyapolis. It’s “Tampon Tim.” Here in Australia there is a brand of biscuits named TimTams. 2 biscuits stuck together with a creamy centre and covered in chocolate. They are frequently eaten by dipping one end in a hot drink and sucking up the drink through the centre of the biscuit. If the moniker Tampon Tim takes off it will be a field day for memes involving TimTams. Where would he put the tampon? In his mangina. Ouch. Lol. Fantastic summary. What a gift! You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Trump Would Rather Win Adoration From the Base Than Win the Election

…I’d pull the lever or fill the box for RFK Jr on one condition – he picks Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate. Otherwise, I’ll just stay home. Heck, I may stay home anyway.…

…Just saw on news tonight that biden is now air dropping aid to Gaza.…

Show full text (50000 chars)
• • • This post is not just about Trump. Rather, I make the case Trump and Biden are each their own worst enemy. Biden promised to be a healer and a moderate. It was the biggest lie in campaign history. He turned out to be as polarizing as Hillary and as Trump. The difference is Biden is politely polarizing, Trump isn’t. New Scum Yesterday, Trump gave Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom the name “New Scum.” Trump: “You look at what this Governor New Scum from California — isn’t that his name? New Scum?” pic.twitter.com/MPp4MUG8Vg — Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) February 29, 2024 Hillary’s Deplorables One of the reasons Hillary lost the election to Trump was her labeling Trump supported “deplorables”. The second big reason Hillary lost was a bombshell announcement by James Comey: The Comey Letter Probably Cost Clinton The Election I think it took both of those things for Trump to win. Who Can Win the Moderates, Independents, Suburban Women? I don’t know, and here’s a hint: You don’t either because no one does. But I can tell you that both Trump and Biden are recklessly appealing to the base so much that the independents and moderates are sick of both of them. The Base Loves Trump (and Biden) Already A friend emailed a link to an article about “New Scum” agreeing with it. I replied: Trump ought to be reaching out to independents, moderates, and supporters of Haley. He needs some of them to win. The base is going nowhere. He needs to appeal beyond the base. Biden has the same issue. Unfortunately, one of them will win (assuming they both make it to the election) A second friend replied to my email response: I agree. I think Trump has changed for the worse since 2016. Then, he did go for the middle. His behavior in the courtrooms this year has been nothing short of insane. He was not like that in 2020. But no! Trump openly taunts judges which my friend noted. And he keeps calling Haley birdbrain. If all the Haley supporters sat the election out, can Trump win? Maybe, but if so, only because every rational person on the planet knows Biden is a senile Progressive, not the promised moderate. As for Trump, how silly is this Trump Says Haley Donors Will Be ‘Barred From the MAGA Camp’ “When I ran for Office and won, I noticed that the losing Candidate’s ‘Donors’ would immediately come to me, and want to ‘help out,’” he wrote on his social media platform . “This is standard in Politics, but no longer with me.” He then added, using his insulting nickname for Ms. Haley: “Anybody that makes a ‘Contribution’ to Birdbrain, from this moment forth, will be permanently barred from the MAGA camp. We don’t want them, and will not accept them, because we Put America First, and ALWAYS WILL!” It’s like cheering red meat tossed to a pack of howling hyenas. The first friend mentioned above commented … I like it. And, it means he is not a robot, or being handled. If you vote for Trump, you know what you are voting for. Yeah, I get that. Trump thrives on tossing red meat to hyenas. But many independents don’t like it. And it is not the hyenas Trump needs to convince, it’s the independents and moderates. As for knowing where Trump stands, you don’t really. Look at all the glowing things Trump said about Nikki Haley. For example Trump praises Nikki Haley as ‘very special to me’ after her resignation Did Haley change? Of course not. She is the same neocon warmonger she always was. Instead of calling her “birdbrain”, Trump would be do himself better by calling her a neocon. Both Trump and Biden need to win moderates, independents, and/or do much better with suburban housewives. Both would rather appeal to their own bases. One of them will succeed at alienating more voters. It may be closer to a tossup than anyone thinks. Ironically, MAGA are now believers in polls for the first time in history. Even if the polls are finally right, it’s just March. The election is seven months away. I don’t know if Biden can last that long. And if not, Trump will not be running against a senile old man. So, he cannot afford to alienate Haley voters and independents. He need them to win. But Trump can’t help himself, and his biggest MAGA supporters love his name calling. Biden cant help himself either. Biden flouts the Supreme court on student loans and brags about it. He is still trying to force people into EVs they don’t want. And all of his regulations and decrees are highly inflationary. Most important, a big majority of the nation knows Biden is too senile to run again. As a free market Libertarian, neither Trump nor Biden is appealing. But I would much rather have Trump win than Biden. I think Biden would economically destroy the nation. But I do not get to make the call. It’s a titanic battle. Which one of them ultimately does himself the most harm and sinks his own ship remains to be seen. Biden promised to be a healer and a moderate. It was the biggest lie in campaign history. He turned out to be as polarizing as Hillary and as Trump. The difference is Biden is politely polarizing, Trump isn’t. New Scum Yesterday, Trump gave Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom the name “New Scum.” Trump: “You look at what this Governor New Scum from California — isn’t that his name? New Scum?” pic.twitter.com/MPp4MUG8Vg Hillary’s Deplorables One of the reasons Hillary lost the election to Trump was her labeling Trump supported “deplorables”. The second big reason Hillary lost was a bombshell announcement by James Comey: The Comey Letter Probably Cost Clinton The Election I think it took both of those things for Trump to win. Who Can Win the Moderates, Independents, Suburban Women? I don’t know, and here’s a hint: You don’t either because no one does. But I can tell you that both Trump and Biden are recklessly appealing to the base so much that the independents and moderates are sick of both of them. The Base Loves Trump (and Biden) Already A friend emailed a link to an article about “New Scum” agreeing with it. I replied: Trump ought to be reaching out to independents, moderates, and supporters of Haley. He needs some of them to win. The base is going nowhere. He needs to appeal beyond the base. Biden has the same issue. Unfortunately, one of them will win (assuming they both make it to the election) A second friend replied to my email response: I agree. I think Trump has changed for the worse since 2016. Then, he did go for the middle. His behavior in the courtrooms this year has been nothing short of insane. He was not like that in 2020. But no! Trump openly taunts judges which my friend noted. And he keeps calling Haley birdbrain. If all the Haley supporters sat the election out, can Trump win? Maybe, but if so, only because every rational person on the planet knows Biden is a senile Progressive, not the promised moderate. As for Trump, how silly is this Trump Says Haley Donors Will Be ‘Barred From the MAGA Camp’ “When I ran for Office and won, I noticed that the losing Candidate’s ‘Donors’ would immediately come to me, and want to ‘help out,’” he wrote on his social media platform . “This is standard in Politics, but no longer with me.” He then added, using his insulting nickname for Ms. Haley: “Anybody that makes a ‘Contribution’ to Birdbrain, from this moment forth, will be permanently barred from the MAGA camp. We don’t want them, and will not accept them, because we Put America First, and ALWAYS WILL!” It’s like cheering red meat tossed to a pack of howling hyenas. The first friend mentioned above commented … I like it. And, it means he is not a robot, or being handled. If you vote for Trump, you know what you are voting for. Yeah, I get that. Trump thrives on tossing red meat to hyenas. But many independents don’t like it. And it is not the hyenas Trump needs to convince, it’s the independents and moderates. As for knowing where Trump stands, you don’t really. Look at all the glowing things Trump said about Nikki Haley. For example Trump praises Nikki Haley as ‘very special to me’ after her resignation Did Haley change? Of course not. She is the same neocon warmonger she always was. Instead of calling her “birdbrain”, Trump would be do himself better by calling her a neocon. Both Trump and Biden need to win moderates, independents, and/or do much better with suburban housewives. Both would rather appeal to their own bases. One of them will succeed at alienating more voters. It may be closer to a tossup than anyone thinks. Ironically, MAGA are now believers in polls for the first time in history. Even if the polls are finally right, it’s just March. The election is seven months away. I don’t know if Biden can last that long. And if not, Trump will not be running against a senile old man. So, he cannot afford to alienate Haley voters and independents. He need them to win. But Trump can’t help himself, and his biggest MAGA supporters love his name calling. Biden cant help himself either. Biden flouts the Supreme court on student loans and brags about it. He is still trying to force people into EVs they don’t want. And all of his regulations and decrees are highly inflationary. Most important, a big majority of the nation knows Biden is too senile to run again. As a free market Libertarian, neither Trump nor Biden is appealing. But I would much rather have Trump win than Biden. I think Biden would economically destroy the nation. But I do not get to make the call. It’s a titanic battle. Which one of them ultimately does himself the most harm and sinks his own ship remains to be seen. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Couple of notes 1) Accuse me of TDS – you get banned. No one who prefers Trump over Biden has TDS. Rather, any nutcase making that claim has TDS type II, Trump can do no wrong. 2) On the road. headed back from Death Valley. What an amazing trip. Lake Manly is 6 miles long, three miles wide and about 1.5 feet deep on average. Most water in 10,000 years. I will be slow to approve posts. Id call that not type II, but more like advanced TDS….LOL Cant wait to see your pics of the trip! Agree with most of what you said. Trump is a narcissistic idiot (just look at some of the counterproductive things he says) but I would vote for him 100 times out of 100 over any of the Democrats that would potentially be their nominee. On the other hand, I respectfully disagree that he should call Nikki a neocon. Most voters have no idea what that is, and it would just make him look like any other politician to them. I’m not a big fan of his name calling, but it seems to work with a lot of people (and not with others, of course). Thank God that he was there to nominate some Supreme Court justices, though. Who Can Win the Moderates, Independents, Suburban Women? I don’t know, and here’s a hint: You don’t either because no one does. But you do know Mish and I’ll refer you to this post you made back in November. https://mishtalk.com/politics/i-said-abortion-is-a-losing-issue-for-republicans-elections-prove-me-right/ That was the correct call. Republicans got hammered on abortion. But making a call is not the same as “knowing”. I did not know, but I did make a very good call. I presume you got a chance to do some kayaking. The pics I saw online of the lake on some other websites were pretty cool. Have you posted yours yet? Went kayaking 4 times. I have some amazing images. It will take me a while to go through them. Over 5,000! THE election is about disbanding the Democrat controlled multigenerational Administrative State in DC (the real rulers of America)—2.7 million in 300+Federal Agencies paid $575 million per day protected by civil service rules. They hate Trump as he refused to staff up their agencies fully and his Schedule F to place the Senior Executive Service under the Executive Branch for firing if needed. I don’t agree with this take. Trump is a populist. His political career has been made on saying outlandish things and debating like a 10-year old. He treats the Romney/Bush Republicans like enemies and that has worked for him. He says “I don’t need those a-holes” and that actually makes him more appealing. I think the 24/7 media hysteria about Trump was what caused the divide. People who consumed copious amounts of MSM invariably ended up with TDS. “The difference is Biden is politely polarizing, Trump isn’t.” This statement is false. The person making it is misinformed, an idiot, or a leftist (I repeat myself). Just the other day Biden called those who do not believe in a coming climate crisis “Neanderthals”. I am one of them. I have a blog on the subject, that has had over 720,000 lifetime page views. HonestClimateScience(DOT)Blogspot(DOT)com Biden has made equally rude comments about Trump, Trump voters, MAGA and the so called white supremacists who exist in his imagination The first 2020 presidential debate was an orgy of insults, with Biden calling Trump a “clown” and telling him to “shut up.” Biden decries Republican loyalty to Trump as fascism and semi-fascism’ in 2022 Trump won the election in 2026 ad probably would have won in 2020 if only legal votes had been counted. He does not need advice from any RINO Republican like the author on how to win an election. ———————————————-· “Trump thrives on tossing red meat to hyenas.” This statement implies that Trump supporters are like hyenas and is an insult. Only a horse’s a s s would make such a statement, or a RINO Republican (I repeat myself). I voted for Trump in 2020 and would vote for him again in 2024. I do not censor myself online, so this comment may get deleted, or never show up here in the first place This is exactly what I think I do not use a moniker My home is in Bingham Farms, Michigan Anyone who calls Trump supporters hyenas is a Rino Republican who should stick to economics and not deliberately anger what few readers he will have left. I deleted the post I am replying to but instead decide to respond to it. First, I am not a leftist as anyone who could read would know given that I said “But I would much rather have Trump win than Biden. I think Biden would economically destroy the nation.” Second, it should be clear that I am not a RINO given that I am not a republican at all. “As a free market Libertarian, neither Trump nor Biden is appealing.” As for calling those with TDS Type II, hyenas, if the name fits wear it proudly. A MAGA friend of mine is a proud believer and took no offense. I was purposely trying to make a point, which my friend understood. As for readers, yep I could get more if I was a MAGA supporters whose goal was to get more readers. Instead, given that I do not like any of the politicians, I criticize both major parties. There are not many of us, willing to do so. I have on 4 occasions been accused of being “extreme Right” and “extreme Left” in the same day. That’s not easy to do. I am anti-war, small government, free-trader, Libertarian. Trump doers not come close. But he is much better than Biden, which I clearly stated. Trump is not small government. He whined for a bigger fiscal stimulus than he got. Biden did get and the result was massive inflation. The amusing thing is Trump (and most of the Congressional republicans) are RINOs. Wow after reading the comments i thought i was on zero hedge. My observation is candidates motivate their base during the primaries then try to get the middle voters at the last min. Primaries get you on the ballot but you need the middle to win the election. “The difference is Biden is politely polarizing, Trump isn’t.” Well let’s see………..Trump is nasty to Democrat/RINO politicians and the media. Biden is nasty to every American that objects to his America destroying (actually Obama’s) agenda. Trump honors the military; Biden looks at his watch when forced to stand at the arrival of soldiers whose deaths he is directly responsible for. Trump’s economy was great. Biden’s is a disaster – trillion $ deficits every 95 days. Trump made peace treaties. Biden set the world on fire. Trump stopped illegal immigration; Biden put it on super steroids, and is responsible for the death of thousands along the way, the rape of thousands of women, child trafficking of 60,000 children. I could go on and on……….. but won’t. Did Trump do everything right? No. and i hope to hell he learns from his mistakes. But the Democratic contenders, including Michele (a grifter in her own right) are all suicide for America. They all lead to communism; the destruction of our military, our freedoms, our national security and along with it, the wealth of the middle class. Trump’s America was a better place than Biden’s and I’m voting for a return to it. Will be supporting Trump in 2024. There is wisdom in the old saying watch what a person does not what they say. Rough humor is what Trump delivers to his base. Not any different then rough humor delivered on a construction job-site. He talks the common language of working people not for the thin skins of bureaucrat class. If anyone watched for what Trump does look no further then this just past Friday occurred in courtroom in Georgia where Prosecutor Fani Willis and associates got massacred by Trumps Lawyers who understand how Justice operates. Trump chose those lawyers to represent him. They are not agents of chaos but agents of the finest Legal minds that there are. Us freedom loving deplorables do not believe the only road to Freedom is via anarchy. If men where all angels there would be no need for laws, That statement implied that there was need for an organized set of rules to guide conduct or there would be chaos. This is what the election process attempts to create consent of the governed to chosen representatives of the peoples values and written Laws to guide outcome of a productive society. So watch whom Trump surrounds himself with and you will understand how Trump intends to govern in a second term. That is what you will be voting for. Don t worry, Michelle, Michel some say, is ready to run for the presidency….The Clington Clang on the road again…..yiiiihaaa … I had to look up TDS. We’re doomed Even with all his faults, Trump has my vote. Biden truly needs to go home and take meds to help his dementia and try and spend all that money he got from, China, Russia, Ukraine and that’s just a few. He doesn’t have time in his side That is a rational view. Who cares? If Trump needs to be a different person to win (I don’t think he is capable of it) why bother?  Trump is the right person our country needs for the dirty job of cleaning up the deep state. It is a choice: do the majority want the corruption slowed, or do we want to descend further into the sewer of perversion? What you are saying is you prefer Trump to be an ass and lose to Biden than Trump to trey to win. OK. Many are with you. He may win anyway. Trump won in 2016 being Trump Trump probably won in 2020 if only legal votes had been counted. So your advice is to tell Trump to act like someone else? Thet is not logical How much experience do you have running campaigns and winning elections? One had TDS Tyle II to believe Trump won in 2020 My advice to Trump and Biden is the same. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that it was not the base that won in 2016 or in 2020. And anyone with half a brain should understand the base for Biden and for Trump is not going anywhere. They will vote for Biden and Trump respectively. And that will hold true in 2024. As a result, anyone with half a brain should be able to figure out that alienating the independents and swing voters is just plain stupid. It’s a battle of stupids here. By the way, in 2016 Trump did reach out to independents and Hillary alienated them with “deplorables” label along with obvious BS about Russia. So, do you have half a brain or not? You tell me. The University of Florida is firing all DEI positions and administrators today. Too bad DeSantis is no longer in the primary. He gets things done. Not that charismatic but charism is overrated in my book. I prefer someone who knows which buttons to push and levers to pull to get things done and that is DeSantis. As my governor I love the guy for getting things done. But he wasn’t ready to be president and in truth it wasn’t a great idea to run in this election given virtually everyone knew Trump was going to get the nomination again. Lets face it Hillary lost because she’s a bitch. Madonna could have attracted more attention from guys in Wisconsin and Michigan by running around with antlers on her head near the tree stands. Nah, Trump wants the W and the adoration. An election win will do that. Let’s go Trump!!! “alienate Haley voters” why worry about that, they equal nearly ZERO Trump’s problem is that he is turning the 2024 election into an IQ test. The Big Lie is the legal equivalent of claiming that 2 + 2 = 3. No surprise that among college-educated GOP voters, Nikki Haley beats Trump soundly. Most conservatives voters think she is to much of a neocon almost as bad a Mccain. I would rather have Trump than her she will perpetuate the war maching for her evil money masters the MIC. The point I am trying to make is that it’s hard to win a presidential election by relying pretty much on the left half of America’s IQ distribution. Nikki will do the real-life reprise of this scene – Bing Videos fool …..should be 5 ! id argue the media ( propaganda wing of the establishment) is the great divider, NOT some dude…. This is Mish playing Mercutio and saying “A plague o’ both your houses”. Did Mercutio have Libertarian tendencies? I wonder. For the first time I did not vote in the primary. Not sure if I can vote for Trump , I know he is the lesser of two evils but I never liked him but did vote for him in 2016. Biden is not going to run, the dems are going to pull a switcheroo and put in who they think can beat Trump. The only thing that really irritates me is how the low information voters on the liberal side can sit by and watch them abuse our justice system against their political rival. Our country is facing so many catastrophic issues, ie debt, inflation and an invasion with a evil corrupt governing body setting the rules. I feel we are circling the drain. What source do you have to read to be high information? I guess not NPR. Is it Infowars? yeah info wars, brilliant Fair question. For me it’s Glenn Greenwald, Mike Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger, Assange, Snowden, Cheryl Attkisson, Catherine Herridge, Bari Weiss and now Mish. Matt Taibbi is one hell of an investigative journalist. The CNN crowd blasting him makes him more reliable in my mind REEEEEEEEEE-O-Meter: 2014 Alex Jones 2015 Trump then Stew Peters Nick Fuentes Salty Cracker Styxhexenhammer666 James Howard Kunstler Gonzalo Lira Dave Collum Mel K Redacted Tom Luongo Scott Adams Jimmy Dore Glen Greenwald Matt Taibbi Denis Kucinich Brett Weinstein Are all over the target. And don’t forget Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan i enjoy all these nonsensical “Democratic switcheroo” comments. They amount to wishful thinking by the “chattering classes” starved for drama. Here’s a news flash, Einstein; Biden’s not going anywhere unless his health goes south. Deal with it. We’re totally screwed. A good chunk of Haley voters are democrats crossing over to muck up Trump. They will NEVER vote for anything but a Dem. Trump, and Biden, are riling up the base as they need massive turnout to overwhelm the polls. For every position you moderate….you may gain a moderate voter (by their nature are indifferent on voting) but lose one of your base. Its a complicated dynamic to be sure, but the old run to your base in the primary and the middle for the general no longer works because the campaigns never end. Used to be mods started paying attention late (ie after labor day). 24/7 news means this is no longer the case. Spencer: “inflation isn’t measured correctly” : yes ! He, from SF, cont to mislead, distort and insult his followers. Biden might not win the election if the Dow will plunge. I can say a couple of things about this post (by the way, hope you’re enjoying your trip – I turn 62 in a few weeks and the first thing I’m going to do is buy the lifetime National Park pass). “The difference is Biden is politely polarizing, Trump isn’t.” No, he’s not. On the campaign trail in 2020, Biden insulted a man at a town hall in Iowa (“Hey, fat, let’s see how many pushups you can do!”). When he mandated the jab, he got up on national TV and said angrily how he was losing his patience with us (and when did you become my doctor, senile Joe?). Then he does his best impersonation of a fascist dictator in Philadelphia, complete with a red background that CNN tried to hide, calling Trump supporters dangerous to national security or whatever (I didn’t watch it so I don’t recall his exact words). That is not being polite, that’s being an a-hole. “But I can tell you that both Trump and Biden are recklessly appealing to the base so much that the independents and moderates are sick of both of them.” Yep, that’s for sure, this independent is sick of both of them. I’m ready for a reprise of that 2016 campaign bumper sticker – Giant Meteor 2024 – just end it already. I’d pull the lever or fill the box for RFK Jr on one condition – he picks Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate. Otherwise, I’ll just stay home. Heck, I may stay home anyway. We don’t have one presidential election this fall, we have 51 of them (including DC). And I already know how the one where I live is going to turn out – whoever has an R behind their name is going to win my state, so why should I bother? No doubt. And no matter how I vote, the D will win in this state. Mish used to live in the Republik of Illinois back in the day…he knows. I guess it goes both ways. At least we avoid the endless commercials and stuff if we lived in a true swing state. Given the poll numbers, even considering potential Biden alternatives, this is a pretty dopey hot take. More so if you exclude the outlier polls. A cult leader cannot be all things to all people. Trump created a cult, or perhaps the cult created Trump — these things tend to be symbiotic. Therefore, Trump cannot win general elections, but that doesn’t really matter to have political power. With his cult, Trump is the rudder of the Republican party, firmly in control of a third of the electorate. When your party’s goal is obstructionism and (ostensibly) shrinking government, a strong minority is more powerful than a weak majority. As long as it still takes 60 Senate votes and only 5 of 6 conservative justices, Trump can render the USG impotent. Trump won the general election in 2016, genius “Trump Would Rather Win Adoration From the Base Than Win the Election”I so hope you are correct. In the end, I think people will vote for Trump, myself included. Why? I’m independent, find his behavior often abhorrent, but we need border security in this country and our cities are lawless!!! Only idiots or women vote on emotion. I’m willing to put my emotion aside and look at REALITY. Haley is a warmonger and all the other Republicans are RINO’s and part of the Uniparty. The people in Congress should all have term limits. They all suck. I had high hopes for RFK, but he’s a Israel boot licker (like Biden and Trump) and has shown silly liberal tendencies that destroyed his credibility. It’s really too bad, because he could have been a force for change. His destiny is to be abused by his liberal wife. Good luck Charlie. So, Trump wins. The order of this country is being undermined, as is order in the world quite obviously and deliberately being pushed to world war. If you want more of the growing chaos – open borders migrations, climate lunacy, normalizing race and gender extremism – LGBTQBIPOC, drag queen story hours, DEI, ESG, urban crime, etc etc…by all means…vote for more… support Biden (or replacement….Harris, Newsome, or Clinton(?))…… …we are circling the drain in America. Debating Politics is akin to Debating about LIARS. BOTH lie. BOTH corrupted. BOTH blowhards (However, Biden is running out of steam). Jared kushner and his zionist friend will try annihilate the Palestinians n the Middle East. American century is over. You talking about Biden right? How many times has the USA been the sole party to vote against peace in the UN??? I used like dump till I just believe he’s a racist , con man who inherited money and over valued and gamed the system. He admits to nothing . He’s never wrong and that’s his psychosis. C’mon man. Trump didn’t shower with his teenage daughter (that we know of). Trump hasn’t spent 50 years sucking at the public teat, cheating and lying to get to the next level. Trump didn’t throw open the border and allow the country to be invaded. I’m no fan of Trump. But Mish, when you’re sitting in prison, either a real one or a digital one, because you refused to comply with your new Communist masters, you’ll have a lot of time to think. You can ponder which administration was most responsible for your fate. Interesting difference between public speech and private speech; we expect the former to be restrained. Trump’s crude pronouncements are tame compared to what bounces off the walls in my house, mostly the obvious 8- and 11-letter words. But yes, he could tone it down to politer company without losing my vote. No Election Day: “there are decades when nothing happens; and there are weeks when decades happen”. -Lenin As an independent voter, I go by the sayin’ “ if it ain’t broke don’t fix it ” So what has Biden done: 1. Built a juggernaut economy with 3.8% unemployment and holding 2. The stock market is breaking all records – even HIGHER today at ALL time highs 3. Inflation is coming down from trump highs 4. Millennials and women hate republicans and trump 5. Biden fixin the border issue – this will mute trump 6. trump voter base primarily consisting of boomers are dying faster and faster, why cater to these people? So what’s on offer from Trump other than past failures? He’s not Biden isn’t enough. Trump’s failures: 1. Build a wall – did not deliver 2. Trade wars easy wins – did not deliver 3. Drain the swamp – did not deliver 4. Trump crashed stock market 5. War on IVF and abortion has galvanized millennials and women against trump but don’t hold your breath, republicans will come up with more crazy schemes between now and election to piss off women, millennials and independents even more. What states from the 2020 election map is trump going to win over and why? https://www.270towin.com/2020_Election/interactive_map The math don’t add up for trump. Biden wins easily. See you Nov 5 to gloat. Goodness – inflation coming down from Trump highs shows from where your “independence” emanates: Trump’s years 2017-2020 were, from the known-to-be-understated CPI official numbers 2.1%, 2.4%, 1.8%, 1.2% Biden in office 2021-2024: 4.7%, 8.0%, 4.1% and tracking to be nowhere near any of the Trump Presidency years. That was a 10 second search of the Fed web site. At least if you want to say things, make them true and back them with some evidence, even if one has to quote the weak and feeble Fed’s terrible inflation calculations. And Biden fixing the border–really? He let it burn, intentionally, by opening it up on Day 1 (see Mish’s previous articles about executive orders enacted upon Biden taking office) and then went to the border for the first time that I can recall just now because it’s a losing issue for him in his re-election bid, which he’ll again run from the lid-called White House instead of the previous campaign’s basement abode. So what you’re really saying is that you fit into the group mentioned in #4, which is okay but no need to gaslight us on “trump’s” inflation or biden fixing the border. (lower case to fit in with your misuse of handling proper nouns and names) And on draining the swamp–good luck to anyone doing that, they are a perpetually and secretly funded org that worked to fabricate numerous now-proven-to-be-false allegations against a sitting President and successfully dug in and doubled down on their hold on power. On the stock market–it’s almost as if you want to say Trump created the Plandemic himself because that’s about the only brieft time in his Presidency that the market fell, only to rapidly recover long before it continued its ascension in his 4 year term. Not arguing it hasn’t continued higher on record spending now unchecked by the suspension of the debt ceiling/deficit limit on hold until 2025 but to presume he crashed it is outright silliness and again, counterfactual. Independent you are not becaues true independents at least will be factual where facts exist. The other things you mention are opinion and you are entitled to those uniquely. Inflation doesn’t happen overnight. It was trump’s free money give away, PPP loans and other goodies that started the inflation mess. biden did make it worse but he is also making it better now. there was a bill that would have helped the border issue, who killed it? republicans at trump’s request so he could score political points. so much for loving america. I should give credit for trump for two big wins: But I noticed you avoided the issue entirely. Why vote for trump over biden now? Beyond that why would any states biden won in 2020 change for trump? And lastly, what is trump offering? Saying biden is too old is the pot calling the kettle black. trump is too old himself so what else is trump bringing to the table? he had a long list of failures and if the “swamp” wouldn’t let him fix anything then he is an impotent president. what’s the point of getting him back in? WHY should I vote for trump? It’s crickets here. Surely someone here can speak intelligently on the issue beyond the adolescent name calling or is that asking too much of trump supporters? Even if you think nothing is going to change whether we have a Republican or Democratic president, the most most obvious reason is wanting someone who isn’t mentally incoherent in the highest office in the land. Beyond that the next most obvious reason is that Trump will actually do something about the border crisis. Biden will do absolutely nothing if re-elected. He’ll definitely promise to do something and may even start a few half hearted efforts this year to generate votes but if re-elected he’ll stop on day 1 because he no longer has to do anything. The high inflation in 2021 and 2022 was from huge federal budget deficits financed by the Federal reserve Bank Who approved those budgets? (1) President Trump (2) Republicans controlling the Senate (3) Democrats controlling the House Biden had no responsibility for the high 2020 and 221 inflation rates The Fed started fighting inflation” in April 2022 and it is now down to 3.1% year over year, down from a peak of about 9% year over year. If it weren’t for shelter costs, which now comprise 25% of the CPI, the year over year change in the CPI would have been only 1.6%, well below the Fed’s target and very good news for everyone. But the way the BLS calculates shelter costs has boosted the reported year over year change in the CPI to 3.1%. Biden’s idea of fixing the border is to only allow 1.5 million illegal invader criminals and leeches to cross annually instead of the current 3 million each year. Oh yeah, and we have to give $100 billion to Ukraine and Israel as part of the deal. So why didn’t trump permanently fix the issue? he had four years. You should know by now that no president can do anything permanent. Everything can be undone by the next administration via executive order (exactly what Biden did on day 1 regarding the border). Then what’s the point of voting for trump if he’s going to do “something” about the border then have it undone by the next president? And if Biden really is too old, he’ll be removed by the cabinet and replaced with the VP. By your own words, this is a non-issue because it’s not going to be a permanent fix so what’s the point? I said it can be, not that it would be. Things that the population approves of (like say tax cuts) don’t get undone. Similarly, if the population approves of tighter boarder control it won’t get undone. lol, yeah, you’re an “independent” question: do you actually believe what you just typed? yes, i’m an independent. what’s so hard to believe. how do you think independents think? Is the stock market not at all time highs? it broke another record today. Is unemployment not at all time lows? do you think millennials and women love republicans? Look at what happen in deep red Kansas on abortion and other state elections. Who is delusional here? Any more employment and the economy will turn red hot, maybe too hot and inflation goes higher. But somehow trump is gonna win? Just saw on news tonight that biden is now air dropping aid to Gaza. That will bring back those disgruntled Michigan voters and they hate trump too. so which blue states will trump take back in 2024? now is the time to make calls. See you on Nov 5. Out of curiosity when was the last time you voted Republican? If you only vote Democrat or have only voted Democrat for say the last 20 years you are no longer an independent, you have chosen a party. November 2023. I don’t vote straight party ticket, I pick and choose the people I think will do the best job. And I vote libertarian. we are on a libertarian site, not a republican or democrat one. there are plenty of websites for those groups, not many for libertarians. I will primarily vote libertarian in 2024 but not for president because trump was a big failure and the libertarian has no chance of winning. And biden is doing an ok job and no one can offer anything from trump just “biden is too old” and “he’ll temporarily fix the border for a few years” which is code for gimmicks. Is this independent enough for you or is there more interrogations I need to go through? Want to quiz me on all the libertarian candidates for the last 20 years? For a guy who has been pumping Bidens tires for months you don’t sound remotely independent which is why I asked. I suppose I should have been more specific as in when was the last time you voted Republican for president rather than caring about your local or state level voting record. Not sure exactly what Biden is doing an OK job at other than not being Trump. Most of the mess economically (run away inflation, high unemployment, massive money giveaways etc) is 100% the result of Covid which straddled Trumps last year and Bidens first 2 years. When history looks back on this administration it’s going to remember the raging inflation, the failed green policies and immigration mess at the border in the same way Jimmy Carters administration is remembered for raging inflation, gas lines and the Iranian hostages. Yeah, I agree. I am not voting for “retribution”. I want to vote for the public good. At this point I am leaning towards Biden because of the economy and greater freedoms for women. But I wish this election wasn’t just a rerun. You had me at juggernaut economy. Sincerely, Those who are priced out of the housing and car markets. how will trump fix housing and car markets? with more tariffs and trade wars? IDK but we would all rather pay Trump prices for homes and cars than Biden prices. Bideninflation is killing the working class and shutting them out of the home and car markets. Gloat away. You’ll be inheriting the same Marxoid future as I will. And better yet, so will your kids. Newsom is probably the worst governor CA has had in my lifetime – and there have been some doozies. If you drew a Venn diagram of Newsom supporters and Trump supporters, they would never intersect at all. He alienates nobody by attacking Newsom. The Marquis of Queensbury days of publicly praising your political enemies and knifing them in the back are deservedly over. People tolerated those niceties back then – in the Twitter age, they are gone forever. Authenticity matters more, and Trump owns that lane. No other politician even bothers to challenge him on it, and that’s a shame. If you take a look at Haley’s donors, you get Charles Koch (libertarian), Reid Hoffman (!! – partisan Democrat), and avowed establishment types. These establishmentarians were the ones that were the handmaidens in scuppering Trump’s border wall, and complaining about the China Tariffs. They succeeded in derailing DeSantis’ candidacy when they donated to him (for the express purpose of derailing Trump) and they are doing the same to Haley (for the express purpose of derailing Trump). What do people think they will try to do if they actually donated to Trump – support MAGA 2.0 (or is it 1.0) all the way? Absolutely not. They’ll just try to derail it from inside the tent – just like the last time. Besides, nobody but political junkies are looking at the primaries right now. People pay attention after Labor Day. Let Trump be Trump today. Lots of time to ‘moderate’ 60 days before the election. Why take money from Haley supporters? Wouldn’t that mean he was bought if he did? That would simply make him a Politician. Now to take and stand your ground on all beliefs and stances to date, then OK. Now to take and bow to the RINO’s, is an entirely different story. Do you really, and truly, see that occurring? We have reached an age where egocentric unconscious behavior is not only encouraged, but applauded. Social Media is the fuel for this behavior in my view. Prudence, emotional control, and deliberate conscious thought are dead for most. It’s all about likes, views, and the intoxicating cheers of one’s sycophant cult like followers. Those in the middle, like myself, are left scratching thier heads and wondering what the hell happened to the generally balanced society they grew up in? We are in uncharted waters. Where this ship ends up is anyone’s guess. “ Those in the middle, like myself, are left scratching thier heads and wondering what the hell happened to the generally balanced society they grew up in?” Make America Great Again is Trumps mantra for goodness sakes. Trump is fighting for the very soul of our nation. When the neocon establishment throws everything they have at him don’t expect him to play nice. Tell me…..what is “the very soul of our nation” in your view? refer to the constitution and declaration of independence MAGA is a marketing slogan, not Trump’s way of life. Humility, selflessness, sacrifice and the values of many Americans from 3-6 generations ago are lost on him and most of the USA. He’s a brilliant merchandiser, but MAGA doesn’t go beyond that. The Cloward Piven / Saul Alinsky / Obama / Soros strategy to destroy the country. Full on NOW. A primer. Obama has Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, and Victoria Nuland installed as Biden’s staff for his third term! https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/the-collapse-of-the-usa-the-rule-of-law/ https://news.grabien.com/story-obama-id-be-fine-third-term-if-there-was-someone-who-wouldve Alinsky lays out to take the country down. https://www.openculture.com/2017/02/13-rules-for-radicals.html – Trump and Biden are each their own worst enemy. > True, but Trump can verbally fight back. – Biden promised to be a healer and a moderate. It was the biggest lie in campaign history. > True – The difference is Biden is politely polarizing, Trump isn’t. > I don’t agree with that at all, over the last year anyway. – Yesterday, Trump gave Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom the name “New Scum.” > The Base Loves Trump – Trump and Biden are recklessly appealing to the base so much that… > The Base Loves Trump – I would much rather have Trump win than Biden. > I Agree P.S. The Base doesn’t Love Biden I live in California, and Newsom is New Scum. This man is out of control and him and his cohorts in the California legislature are destroying this state. There is a reason people are moving out! Wake up people. “– Yesterday, Trump gave Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom the name “New Scum.” > The Base Loves Trump” Exactly why I will never vote for Donald Trump. He appeals to people’s basest nature instead of pushing them act on their best nature. But once in control of that base nature, he shines a light on fellow Americans and calls them the enemy. Democrats are no longer the loyal opposition, they’re “far left socialists” who are trying to “destroy our beloved country”. All Democrats, not just some. He is the first President in American history to desire the end of the peaceful transfer of power through elections. The man is a menace and a traitor. And I am a lifelong Republican. But today’s Republicans aren’t the Republicans of my youth. I don’t belong in the same political party as those who cheer at national leaders being called “bird brain” and “new scum”. While I do indeed get what you are saying, I just have a more simplistic view, when it comes down to Politics. I dare say, that on a Federal level, I can make no difference casting my one ballot, for what I personally wish/hope to occur. I vote, and have never missed an election however, because it gives me a right to speak out for change. On a State, and more specifically, a city or town level, I can, I do, and I have, made a difference. Based upon that, and in this particular upcoming election, and widely based on the destruction and chaos this current Administration has caused, and I must lean Republican and to Trump. It suits my current requirements at this moment in my life, and protects my kids short term in hopes their generation figures it out, before things just get done for them, and it’s over… Putin is the present day Hitler. And here we have a Putin boot licking Trump ready to give all the sloppy kisses he can to Putin. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/02/29/putin-russia-state-union-speech-military/?wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F3ce97c2%2F65e0b7cb8a7f6027d0908f6e%2F596a6a15ae7e8a0ef33e3ad0%2F9%2F54%2F65e0b7cb8a7f6027d0908f6e Putin threatens nuclear response to NATO troops if they go to Ukraine MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin used his annual State of the Nation address on Thursday to take aim at the West, threatening to use nuclear weapons against NATO countries if they send forces to help defend Ukraine from a Russian victory. In a speech to Russia’s Federal Assembly that was predominantly dedicated to Russia’s domestic affairs, Putin delivered a tough warning, threatening retaliatory strikes against the West in the event of attacks on Russian territory. “They must understand that we also have weapons that can hit targets on their territory,” he said, warning of “tragic consequences” if NATO forces were ever deployed to Ukraine. “All this really threatens a conflict with the use of nuclear weapons and the destruction of civilization. Don’t they get that?” Putin has endorsed Biden. You look very foolish quoting the CIA owned Jeff Bezos rag Washington Compost as a source of truth Putin is similar to Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s. Placate Putin and he just takes things by force and kills or jails his resistance. Mish is GONG WRONG ! Donald Trump really shouldn’t be the Republican Party, but he is . That is an issue that Republicans will continue to suffer from. https://www.mediaite.com/tv/this-is-not-normal-whoopi-goldberg-stunned-by-members-of-congress-being-more-open-to-russias-policies-than-to-our-own/ ‘This Is Not Normal!’ Whoopi Goldberg Stunned By Members of Congress Being More ‘Open to Russia’s Policies Than to Our Own’ And that’s the problem that we’re encountering with some of my Republican colleagues that, there’s a growing pro-Putin faction in the Republican Party, and it’s led by Donald Trump , some other outside figures like Tucker Carlson and on the inside, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Jim Jordan . And what we’re saying is that standing by Ukraine is standing by America’s national security interests. Yeah, and that’s why it should be done in a bipartisan way. And we’re calling upon the Republican leadership in our House to just put the bill on the floor for an up or down vote. Glad to have you aboard Mish. It’s amazing how much I disagreed with you during the first Trump administration when you bashed him and now you’re preferring him over Biden. I’m adding you to my very short list of bloggers to trust to be non-partisan. You’ve have convinced me that you do in fact play it down the middle. In this particular post I happen to agree that Trump is shooting himself in the foot with the ‘Bird brain’ strategy. Maybe what he meant to say is that he’s not going to allow his new administration to get backstabbed again by RINO’s like what happened the first time. I can’t stand the Governor of Cali but the ‘New Scum’ name is beyond the pale and is down right childish. What’s next ‘Poopy face’. Good lord people Thinking elections change anything of substance? You’re all getting played. It’s all fake! That explains the prevalence of actors in the leading roles. Trump is literally an actor. Biden’s played the role of politician for 50 years. Has anyone asked themselves? Why almost all notable elections are almost perfectly split 50%/50%. Do you really think this unprecedented, persistent phenomenon is a natural evolution of our social zeitgeist? All elections henceforth will be decided by a fraction of a percent? Occupy, conspicuous in that it’s never EVER mentioned, manifested national unification across ALL lines. This scared the piss out of the overlords and they went into overdrive to divide us. All of your “Hate Biden/Hate Trump” rhetoric is planted in your heads. A sane person will hate them both since they are a two headed coin, that when flipped, magica
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

For the Good of the Nation, Biden Needs to Stay in the Race

…Drove out Manchin and Gabbard. Years ago drove out Joe Lieberman. Have been having rank and file moderates abandon them as they could not take the crap any longer.…

Show full text (41336 chars)
• • • This headline will have some people wondering what I am smoking. But hear me out. Biden Has a Unique Quality Assuming you are still reading, Biden’s unique quality is ability to lose to Trump. And that’s a good thing. The US cannot afford another disastrous four years of this president. Everything Biden has done has been inflationary. Energy policy. Check Regulations. Check Student Debt Cancellation. Check Push for More Unions. Check Push for More Child Tax Credits. Check Tariff Policy. Check Inflation Reduction Act: Check Trump is on board with tariffs, but not the rest. What’s Fixable and What’s Not? If you are a Republican, you should want Biden to hang on, willing to take your chances on Trump beating him. Trump would not be my choice for many reasons. At the top of the list, I am a free market, mind my own business Libertarian. But there is no chance of changing the Republican end of the ticket. The saving grace for Biden is he may the one person Trump is most likely to beat. Saving Democracy 🇺🇸WASN’T THIS ALL ABOUT SAVING DEMOCRACY? This clip gave me goosebumps. How can the Democratic Party be about democracy when their entire vetting, nomination, and delegate system feels so autocratic? “What about me? I feel abandoned…” is the new battle cry of diehard… pic.twitter.com/JS68953yXn — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) June 29, 2024 Bill Maher: “ The whole rationale for Biden running has always been I’m the only guy who can beat Trump. Now I think it’s inverted. He’s the only guy who can lose to him . I keep hearing all day from these Democrats we can’t abandon Joe Biden. What about me? I feel abandoned. I have nobody to vote for.” Nate Silver – The Big Picture That image is from Nate Silver’s post The Presidential Election Isn’t a Toss-Up . It was on June 26, ahead of the debate. Please do not confuse Nate Silver with his old 538 site which ridiculously had Biden with a slight lead ahead of the debate. Panic at the New York Times NYT Editorial Board June 30: 48 Hours to Fix a 90-Minute Mess: Inside the Biden Camp’s Post-Debate Frenzy The all-hands efforts, from Wilmington to Washington, showed the depths of the damage Mr. Biden did to his re-election campaign in a mere 90 minutes. His campaign has been criticized as insular and insistent, so the burst of activity signaled that the debate fallout had turned into a real crisis that spun those in his orbit into a frantic battle mode. NYT Maureen Dowd June 29: The Ghastly vs. the Ghostly He’s being selfish. He’s putting himself ahead of the country. He’s surrounded by opportunistic enablers. He has created a reality distortion field where we’re told not to believe what we’ve plainly seen. His hubris is infuriating. He says he’s doing this for us, but he’s really doing it for himself. I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about the other president. In Washington, people often become what they start out scorning. This has happened to Joe Biden. In his misguided quest for a second term that would end when he’s 86, he has succumbed to behavior redolent of Trump. For years I have stated that Biden’s arrogance and Hubris is every bit as awful as Trump’s but the only real difference is Biden was more polite about it. It’s great to see a NYT columnist make the same point. Biden Challenges Trump to Golf in the Debate One Person Worse than Biden First video above is by @lwoodhouse Check out his excellent reporting on the ongoing political corruption scandal in Oakland, which is even too much for the SF Chronicle. pic.twitter.com/LyJcSam99J — Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) June 28, 2024 NYT: To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race The New York Times editorial board says To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race I strongly disagree. To serve the nation, Biden needs to hang on to the bitter end, losing to Trump. The country may not like Trump for many reasons. But economically speaking, Biden has been an absolute disaster. Even worse, and despite the denials, Governor Gavin Newsom is likely on deck. Newsom is one person guaranteed to be worse than Biden. Here’s the key question: What are the odds Trump could beat Newsom? I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to find out. Ironically, to serve the nation, Biden needs to hang on. It may be the only thing in four years he will have done right. Biden Has a Unique Quality Assuming you are still reading, Biden’s unique quality is ability to lose to Trump. And that’s a good thing. The US cannot afford another disastrous four years of this president. Everything Biden has done has been inflationary. Energy policy. Check Regulations. Check Student Debt Cancellation. Check Push for More Unions. Check Push for More Child Tax Credits. Check Tariff Policy. Check Inflation Reduction Act: Check Trump is on board with tariffs, but not the rest. What’s Fixable and What’s Not? If you are a Republican, you should want Biden to hang on, willing to take your chances on Trump beating him. Trump would not be my choice for many reasons. At the top of the list, I am a free market, mind my own business Libertarian. But there is no chance of changing the Republican end of the ticket. The saving grace for Biden is he may the one person Trump is most likely to beat. Saving Democracy 🇺🇸WASN’T THIS ALL ABOUT SAVING DEMOCRACY? This clip gave me goosebumps. How can the Democratic Party be about democracy when their entire vetting, nomination, and delegate system feels so autocratic? “What about me? I feel abandoned…” is the new battle cry of diehard… pic.twitter.com/JS68953yXn Bill Maher: “ The whole rationale for Biden running has always been I’m the only guy who can beat Trump. Now I think it’s inverted. He’s the only guy who can lose to him . I keep hearing all day from these Democrats we can’t abandon Joe Biden. What about me? I feel abandoned. I have nobody to vote for.” Nate Silver – The Big Picture That image is from Nate Silver’s post The Presidential Election Isn’t a Toss-Up . It was on June 26, ahead of the debate. Please do not confuse Nate Silver with his old 538 site which ridiculously had Biden with a slight lead ahead of the debate. Panic at the New York Times NYT Editorial Board June 30: 48 Hours to Fix a 90-Minute Mess: Inside the Biden Camp’s Post-Debate Frenzy The all-hands efforts, from Wilmington to Washington, showed the depths of the damage Mr. Biden did to his re-election campaign in a mere 90 minutes. His campaign has been criticized as insular and insistent, so the burst of activity signaled that the debate fallout had turned into a real crisis that spun those in his orbit into a frantic battle mode. NYT Maureen Dowd June 29: The Ghastly vs. the Ghostly He’s being selfish. He’s putting himself ahead of the country. He’s surrounded by opportunistic enablers. He has created a reality distortion field where we’re told not to believe what we’ve plainly seen. His hubris is infuriating. He says he’s doing this for us, but he’s really doing it for himself. I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about the other president. In Washington, people often become what they start out scorning. This has happened to Joe Biden. In his misguided quest for a second term that would end when he’s 86, he has succumbed to behavior redolent of Trump. For years I have stated that Biden’s arrogance and Hubris is every bit as awful as Trump’s but the only real difference is Biden was more polite about it. It’s great to see a NYT columnist make the same point. Biden Challenges Trump to Golf in the Debate One Person Worse than Biden First video above is by @lwoodhouse Check out his excellent reporting on the ongoing political corruption scandal in Oakland, which is even too much for the SF Chronicle. pic.twitter.com/LyJcSam99J NYT: To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race The New York Times editorial board says To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race I strongly disagree. To serve the nation, Biden needs to hang on to the bitter end, losing to Trump. The country may not like Trump for many reasons. But economically speaking, Biden has been an absolute disaster. Even worse, and despite the denials, Governor Gavin Newsom is likely on deck. Newsom is one person guaranteed to be worse than Biden. Here’s the key question: What are the odds Trump could beat Newsom? I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to find out. Ironically, to serve the nation, Biden needs to hang on. It may be the only thing in four years he will have done right. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Mish, Your article conflates with what is good for the country with what is good for the GOP. The last time I checked Trump had high unfavorable ratings with most voters. Neither candidate is good for the country. Trump is a megalomaniac with daddy issues, a misogynist, serial lier, three times at least failed businessperson, a wannabe dictator that will get us more involved in the Middle East siding the genocidal Israel. His proposed tax cuts will only worsen the deficit and his likely increasing the military spending will only further exacerbate the lack of R&D and capital spending in the private and public sectors as well as domestic spending for education, etc. This country is headed to its own demise. As Pogo said, “We have met the enemy and he is us”. Not at all. It is a lesser of evils type of post. Where did I say I like Trump? I don’t. Mish, Thx for responding. Three more comments : I read today that Biden has said he is going to “try harder”! [lol] “No. Try not. Do… or do not. There is no try.” –Yoda like a big guy with constipation, sometimes you gotta keep pushing. Mish, very good points and agreed. Nawfal: “How can the Democratic Party be about democracy when their entire vetting, nomination, and delegate system feels so autocratic?” Democrats aren’t about democracy. Newsom got the direct democracy Tax Payer Protection Act removed from the California November ballot. The impeachment of Trump was an attack on democracy. A legal phone call is not an impeachable offense. It was election interference. If Newsome actually winds up being the Democratic nominee, what are the odds that he fails to carry his home state in the general election? It is very difficult to get to 270 electoral votes if you do not get California’s 54. And the powers-that-be may be assuming that Newsome is a shoe-in to win California’s 54 electoral votes. But is he really? ZERO. Not a bet you should make. Newsom isn’t much loved here but he wouldn’t lose the state against Trump. That is what I was thinking – his popularity in CA is not what most people assume. I had exactly the same thought as the title of this post as soon as I saw Biden’s performance in the debate. I’m really hoping that Jill Biden’s hubris and the Biden family’s general self interest wins out. This is the same damaged person who was ordering people to get an experimental transfection reagent. Think about that. It just came out that the Biden administration pressured the FDA to rush approval of Comirnaty, so that with licensing, it could be mandated. It also came out recently from a South Korean Study, that the shot doubles the risk of dementia. That’s why it takes 7-10 years to get approval of actual vaccines. The mRNA RSV was approved after 1 study and the advisory committee was bypassed. One of the best “Biden must go” columns I have read! This Isn’t All Joe Biden’s Fault June 30, 2024 June 30, 2024 By Ezra Klein By Ezra Klein On Thursday night, after the first presidential debate, MSNBC’s Alex Wagner interviewed Gov. Gavin Newsom of California. “You were out there getting a chorus of questions about whether Biden should step down,” she said. “There is a panic that has set in.” On Thursday night, after the first presidential debate, MSNBC’s Alex Wagner interviewed Gov. Gavin Newsom of California. “You were out there getting a chorus of questions about whether Biden should step down,” she said. “There is a panic that has set in.” Newsom’s reply was dismissive. “We gotta have the back of this president,” he said. “You don’t turn your back because of one performance. What kind of party does that?” Newsom’s reply was dismissive. “We gotta have the back of this president,” he said. “You don’t turn your back because of one performance. What kind of party does that?” Perhaps a party that wants to win? Or a party that wants to nominate a candidate that the American people believe is up to the job? Maybe the better question is: What kind of party would do nothing right now? Perhaps a party that wants to win? Or a party that wants to nominate a candidate that the American people believe is up to the job? Maybe the better question is: What kind of party would do nothing right now? In February, I argued that President Biden should step aside in the 2024 election and Democrats should do what political parties did in presidential elections until the 1970s: choose a ticket at their convention. In public, the backlash I got from top Democrats was fierce. I was a bed-wetter living in an Aaron Sorkin fantasyland. In February, I argued that President Biden should step aside in the 2024 election and Democrats should do what political parties did in presidential elections until the 1970s: choose a ticket at their convention. In public, the backlash I got from top Democrats was fierce. I was a bed-wetter living in an Aaron Sorkin fantasyland. In private, the feedback was more thoughtful and frightened. No one tried to convince me that Biden was a strong candidate. They argued instead that he couldn’t be persuaded to step aside, that even if he could, Vice President Kamala Harris would lose the election and that if a convention didn’t choose Harris, passing her over would fracture the party. They argued not that Biden was strong but that the Democratic Party was weak. In private, the feedback was more thoughtful and frightened. No one tried to convince me that Biden was a strong candidate. They argued instead that he couldn’t be persuaded to step aside, that even if he could, Vice President Kamala Harris would lose the election and that if a convention didn’t choose Harris, passing her over would fracture the party. They argued not that Biden was strong but that the Democratic Party was weak. … … https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/30/opinion/biden-debate-convention.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/30/opinion/biden-debate-convention.html Dems put themselves into a Box Canyon of Radical Progressiveness. Drove out Manchin and Gabbard. Years ago drove out Joe Lieberman. Have been having rank and file moderates abandon them as they could not take the crap any longer. One of the few Real people they still have are like Andrew Cuomo who is a sleeze on the side. They fully backed a walking Cadaver which now blew up in their face, and they are as consequence in a panic. This situation has been building for decades. If you abandon your core principles and opt to go off the Cliff with Hollywood then you lose America. Not being able to tell Fantasy from real life is now smacking them hard in the Face. There still remains a possible quicky reversal and bring back Kennedy. Since they waited for the inevitable self destruct explosion which just occurred to make amends, is there enough electorate left that believes Dems are capable to Govern? There is no Democrat Party on a national level without that coalition of the crazies you want to jettison. The Democratic leadership wanted Biden because the donor base wanted a safe choice to contest against Trump. Biden had been on the plutocrats payroll for years.Sanders had Big Mo going into South Carolina when James Clyburn almost single handily turned the primary into victory for Biden. The candidates got the memo next day and almost to a person conceded the nomination to Biden leaving Sanders the only remaining candidate. The donors all rallied to Biden and Sanders IMHO also got the memo, stating to contest but lose and you will get a chairmanship of a committee so Bernie sold out too. Manchin is a shill for the neoliberal order. Joe Lieberman was another bribe taker that would jump ship from the Democratic Party without getting a quid pro quo from McCain. Another mental midget in the senate. Biden’s debate performance was unacceptable, but Trump’s debate performance was despicable. He lied whenever he opened his mouth. Compared with Trump, Hugo Chavez was a paragon of truth. Only a Banana republic would find a serial liar like Trump acceptable for high office. But this is where we are now: Headed for full Banana republic status. The whole world is laughing (and soon crying) about us. I hope people like you keep posting. Proves without any doubt just how out of touch with American populace the Dem machine has become. You believe your own delusions so deeply it is impossible for you to understand what just occurred. Still thinking Dems can create a new reality just cause you say so. Not even a shred of self reflection over asking how can we as Dems go to the American people and say Trust us to govern as we know what we are doing and would never lie to you. As long as facts, truth, and logic count for something, I will keep posting. Unfortunately nothing you say is fact or true and most definitely not logical. You live in a world of make-believe and have no answer for when reality kicks you in the nuts. September surprise??? come now dirt nap joey can still do it I’ve already been guessing for a long time ago that Gavin would end up running. They are already grooming this jackass. What’s the old saying? So goes CA so goes the rest of the US? So, if you want more immigrants, outlaw all your gas powered stuff, etc etc etc he’s your guy. 100% onboard with the WEF, WHO etc. Gavin is 100% absolute deep state material. I don’t think I need to tell anyone here how much trouble we’re in. My tinfoil instinct tells me “they’re not going to let Trump be president”. Biden’s disastrous debate performance means something big has to happen to keep Trump from being elected. And it will happen. California has a net outflow of people and companies. It would be interesting to see how Gavin polls among Californians and then among the rest of the country. I’m trying o figure out if Newsom is living in a bubble and how big it is. Meanwhile… The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease Story at a Glance: •There is a widespread belief that elevated cholesterol is the “cause” of cardiovascular disease. However, a large body of evidence shows that there is no association between the two and that lower cholesterol significantly increases one’s risk of death. •An alternative model (which the medical industry buried) proposes that the blood clots the body uses to heal arterial damage, once healed, create the characteristic atherosclerotic lesions associated with heart disease. The evidence for this model, in turn, is much stronger than the cholesterol hypothesis and provides many important insights for treating heart disease. •The primary approach to treating heart disease is to prescribe cholesterol lowering statin drugs (to the point, over a trillion dollars have now been spent on them). Unfortunately, the benefits of these highly toxic drugs are minuscule (e.g., at best taking them for years extends your life by a few days) and the harms are vast (statins are one of the most common pharmaceuticals that severely injure patients). •In this article we will explore the specific injuries caused by statin drugs, the forgotten causes of cardiovascular disease, and our preferred treatments for heart and vascular diseases. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the kick ass eggs and bacon for breakfast it is High Cholesterol is but a possible symptom of a health issue, not the cause. Same as a high antibody count is a symptom of an infection and not the cause. Statins make as much sense to lower cholesterol as taking drugs to reduce your antibody levels. Best bet is to avoid grain carbs and seed oils and eat plenty of oily fish like sardines, cook in butter and tallow and eat grass fed meat. Avoid like hell ultra processed foods. Nailed it. The Solution? There is no sense in trying to stop people from taking vaccines and consuming processed foods. Hire a bus and offer to drive them to the clinic to be injected with more Fat Juice Boosters. Applaud as the dumb beasts stuff KFC and Big Gulps down their insatiable maws – because it is for the greater good. You benefit from this. Celebrate their obesity! Join cnnbbc and Sports Illustrated in promoting obesity! What you can do, if you care to, so as to be one of the 90+ year old ‘useless eaters’ is adopt a healthy lifestyle. Eat whole foods, ideally organic. Avoid processed foods, seed oils and sugar. Take vitamin supplements. Minimize alcohol consumption and do not smoke. Exercise. Reject all vaccines. https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control Hoorah!!! More job openings!!! 50 % excess mortality in age group 1-39 in Norway https://patientmaktpatientcv.substack.com/p/50-excess-mortality-in-age-group It is inflammation from seed oils and sugar…lack of exercise, smoking etc… has nothing to do with cholesterol Trump would literally destroy the country to save himself. Biden is incompetent and his son is facing 25 years in jail. My vote is Arnold Swarzenegger with Hulk Hogan as VP. Arnold: “I’ll be BACK” Hulk: “Kids eat ya vitamins” Hey! The Hulkster is a REAL American, he should be the Prez!! Arnold was born in Austria, so that’s a no!! Given it’s all nothing more than World Wrestling Federation Theatre… https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/what-if/ I’d like to see Paris for POTUS with Kim as VP Newsom, The Hair, far too left, not enough time. Why run and lose? Let Joe take that on himself. Pritzker, shirley you’re joking, Whitmer (gagging sound) … Killery? No one likes her, she’s damaged goods but at this point she is a throw away. Would not be surprised to see her run. Taylor Swift, she might have a shot … No, they waited too long. Maybe the next crew of Nat Sec Harmony are thinking the move too far left was great entertainment and distraction, but has become dangerous. Yep, all it would take is somebody like Gavin Newsom who probably has a better or more nuanced take on Israel to bring back a lot of the younger Democratic voters into the fold to win it and beat Trump You like him because he looks like a fellow vampire. His mouth is smiling while his eyes are looking at your throat. Where did you get the idea I’d vote for Newsom? He’s a snake Could be cast as Damien in Omen III How many vote on the Israel issue? I agree with you, Mish. “As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” HL Mencken, 1920 HL Mencken, 1920 Really does not matter who the Dems run, Trump is running against what they represent. It would not matter one little bit if it was Biden, Newsom, Kamala, Michelle. Whitman, Hochul, Pritzker. They could reincarnate Andrew Cuomo, they are all the same cardboard cutout. The only thing Trump is waiting for, and he is delaying his announced VP pick, as he does not know yet who the paper face on the other side will be. There are many people who don’t like Trump and would vote for a Democrat who is not cognitively impaired. Are you voting for policy or a Cult figure? Image portrayed is radical Progressive for Democrat party. That image will fall short as needing to buy food, having a roof over ones head, having a job or retirement supplemental income that keeps up with inflation, safe communities, affording health insurance, national defense/secure borders. These are the issues that directly affect peoples lives. Not arguing over Michelle Obama not being able to stand Jill Biden. But who is actually running the country? Clearly, it isn’t Biden. So agreed. Biden is actually a decent man, but he’s a puppet for the NGO and crazy progressive crap going on in the past 4 years. If he was a conservative democrat without the Cultural War his controllers brought, Trump would lose in a landslide. Biden is not decent man he is a corrupt evil pos In a landslide? Not a chance. Both parties have a strong base of support, so candidates have to win over the (relatively few) independent-minded voters. Biden was NEVER a strong enough candidate to win decisively Only a 5% opinion Swing is needed to generate electoral college landslide. Every American has a right to know the answer to this question. Jake “the Mortician” Sullivan and Anthony “Gilligan” Blinken. Smallest of small hatz. “To know who is your overlord, merely ponder whom you may not discuss” (Voltaire paraphrase). There are some decent Dems. Newsom isn’t one of them. Polis has done reasonably well for Colorado. Polis is a disaster in CO. He is a Utopian, central planner. CO has an energy disaster in the making. Polis has many other crazy ideas, both socially and fiscally. Polis and his comrades have initiated many new entitlement programs including university tuition, expanded Medicaid, housing subsidies, leave stipends, and others. If Biden stays on the ticket … and wins, then we are stuck with Great Leap Forward government policy for another four years. If Biden loses then the first question is “What lesson do Democrats draw?” My guess is that they will blame the candidate, not their own platform, and we will get someone like Gavin Newsom in 2028. To take one policy point, climate change, we will be past Greta Thunberg’s tipping point, but they will still push the same policies, because here in America the real issue is fossil and industrial pollution, not really climate change. The second question, in due time, will be “What will be the issues and who will be the candidates in 2028?” The Democrats ought to be at a disadvantage, because they simultaneously advocate for a better life for ordinary lunchbox workers, and for a degrowth lower standard of living to save the planet. Some of them try to finesse that by attacking “inequality”. Biden can’t win this time. They know with such a candidate they can’t cheat votes anymore. It’s too obvious!! Agree. If Biden pulls out a victory it’ll stink to high heaven (like 2020, but so much worse). The political establishment in Washington detest the average american . They knew how bad Biden was is and chose to display him to the american people . He is the same maybe a little worst than what he has been the last 4-5 years. I think they run with him and show the people they can get a brain dead zombie elected using the alphabet agencies and the state controled MSM. You need to realize that these are the people who champion a biological male winning the womens miss Maryland beauty pageant or womens sporting events and champion that you can chose your gender after conception . The sad truth is you have sizeable portion of the voters that will vote and believe this garbage bought to you by the same people who said follow the science . Two comments for Mish and audience: The Party picks the candidates (the politicians, the staff pollsters, PR spokesmen, speechwriters, consultants, and the big donors), and look what they picked: it shows their corruption that they’d pick him as a figurehead puppet while they secretly make the decisions and JB gets the blame. Trump and Biden both had the fed create trillions of new money to suppress interest rates and send stimulus checks. That’s not free market at all. You know you have a horrible ideology when your arguments consist of: “We need a bad opponent so we can win.” This is exactly why the Democrats promoted Trump; they are ideologically and morally bankrupt, just like Trump is. Both candidates are cancer, and the fact that these are the choices shows how rotten the Republic is. Trump’s weakness is his personality. The Democrats’ weakness is their ideology and policies. Trump only care about his big ego and bravado. However, he loves this country! Quote: “At the top of the list, I am a free market, mind my own business Libertarian”. Libertarians have shown to have their economic logic upside down. Libertarians always fail to recognise the difference between inflation and deflation. I was saying exactly the same thing to my best Pal after the “Debate.” TRUMP WANTS HIM IN, or otherwise Trump would have simply said, point to his left: “THIS is the best that they can present.” I use PRESENT as the second meaning: it is a GIFT TO TRUMP that Biden is such a disgraceful F-UP! [rotflol] Reverse psychology, eh? No, reality. Did you see the Real Debate? RFK Jr. actually answered the questions – https://rumble.com/v545lnn-the-real-debate.html Doesn’t matter how informed and persuasive he was. He will win exactly ZERO electoral votes. It’s a REAL pity the current system doesn’t allow a third party to run in any elections. Both parties have an interest in not allowing this to happen because both parties know it would be a electoral disaster for both parties. How many corruption scandals involving Republican mayors / city councils aren’t being reported ? None. There are probably a few. But they are far fewer than the Dems have and unlike the morons on the Dem side they are not so stupid to flaunt their dodgy acts so their is no remotely obvious corruption for the left wing media to point to. As for the Dem corruption we see so many cases of it and the frightful part is that what we see is but the tip of the iceberg that the leftist media hasn’t been able to bury. Trump is a disaster! His orange visage would take a hike to oblivion, were it not propped up by certain groups. Careful, Icarus! That’s your next president you’re talking about!! You’re mad because he didn’t grab your pussy. funny Lol. You mean handing out subsidies to corporations in red states and calling it “Inflation Reduction” doesn’t work? OMG! The inflation figures don’t lie. How I wish Trump would have answered the question about deporting all of the illegal aliens: Trump: I would not go looking for them door to door. I would start with the criminals or suspected criminals that are known to law enforcement and start there. That would be my first priority. My second priority would be those that have no safety net of friends or relatives already in the country that are draining our resources that could better be spent on our own citizens who need help. No need to critique Biden’s performance because it spoke for itself. Look closely at the tape, and you will see Trump blink three times while Biden was looking at him. I can”t believe the CIA and their puppets WAPO and NYT didn’t see this and blame the public Biden Foolishness on Putin and Trump as they turned Biden into the Manchurian Candidate. As good an explanation as i’ve read so far. Biden was looking at him? Biden was staring “miles away” with his mouth all agaped. If you follow the tape you’ll notice Biden flipped notes in front of him on the next page when asked about current Gaza war. If Biden has shown us anything its that he doesn’t care about the good of the nation. All he cares about is the good of the Biden Family. Why else would he let his drugged up son be the bag man for an international influence peddling ring? Joe might not be aware but Jill knows that the Biden’s are going to get paid when Joe to steps aside. And she is holding out for for the biggest Biden pay check ever. Ironically, the value of the Biden name is rocketing at the same time his presidency is crumbling. Once Joe is discarded, his family name will have the same value as Hunter’s best work of art – NOTHING. She will name her price and Joe will remain president until she gets it. The longer he hangs on the bigger the pay day. Sadly, I agree with you. The country can’t survive another 4 years and I worry about another 4 months The dems have NO viable candidates to replace Biden anyway. Any who ever were, have abandoned the party long ago. Michelle? I feel like it’s 1980 with a good helping of 1968. Let him stay. They can cancel the second debate if they want. They being the Democrats. I’m also not fond of Trump any more. The debate was a joke with both of them sidestepping questions and all they had to say was “Muh America, muh military and muh exceptionalism.” Only the American fool, which is most, swallow this juice. At least Trump spoke common sense wise about the border. The libtards still can’t figure that one out. Also, I’m hoping, that he would stop the war in Ukraine and not lead us to nuclear war. Obviously Biden has no idea what’s going on over there. Lastly, both shill for Israel. Not sure who’s a bigger recipient of AIPAC, but they both are Israel first, America second. Disappointing. Can Trump withdraw US support from Ukraine on his own, by edict? What if the Congress disagrees? If Trump DOES manage to sever US support to Ukraine, then I believe that Europe will be forced to step up and make Ukraine an immediate NATO member followed by sending in NATO troops and weapons to battle Russia. If this then turns into another full Europe war, then the US will have no choice but to join the fray, just as we did in WWII. Trump will support Ukraine because he wants to be on the winning side. It’s as simple as that. Trump will likely scale back money and equipment to Ukraine unless Europe increases theirs (similar to his NATO argument). The question is will the rest of Europe increase their money and equipment to make up for US scaling back. What makes you think Ukraine will defeat Russia? That’s one hell of an assumption! Russia is the winning side. The longer it takes the Ukraine to unconditionally surrender the more territory and men they’ll lose. What the U.S. is doing now is cruel – like encouraging some drunk that he can take Mike Tyson. Ukraine can’t win even with unlimited deliveries of arms and dollars. Russia is winning and is doing so without mobilising the bulk of its troops. Ukraine meanwhile started with a far smaller population of which a sizeable number have fled to both Russia and the West and now Ukraine is grabbing anybody who can fog a mirror off the streets to go to the front lines to be slaughtered. This year alone the death rate of Uke troops is double what the US lost in Vietnam and the year still has 6 months to run. So why would Trump try to back a loser when those same limited arms stocks the US has would get a better customer in Israel? Um, Europe can’t make Ukraine a NATO member without US approval… Trump has spoken about withdrawing from NATO. Impossible to disagree with this rational argument. With the deterioration over the last four years, Trump must fight the easy battle. Virtually any other candidate the Dems could pick (aside from the current VP) will be quicker, more coherent and credible than Biden. As commander in chief of the Army at the moment (unlike Trump on Jan 6th), Biden and his boys will put down any uprising in any city by old, fat, ignored white guys with guns and lots of arrogance, who will quickly kow to a professional army who is dying to beat someone into submission. You think the Army is on your side? LOL! Biden will stay in the race and possibly win because he is only a one-term prez so far. History considers one term prez’s (Carter, GB 1st) as failures. Every elected official in Washington has dreams of being president, and Biden is no exception. But without a second term, history will consider him a failure. And he cant win a second term if he doesnt run. Even if Biden stays in and wins reelection as the “Weekend at Bernie’s” candidate, he won’t remain President for long artier inauguration. I’ve long believed that the plan for his legacy is to step aside, blaming health reasons, and elevate Harris to the presidency. He will then be remembered as the President that made possible the first woman President and a half-black one to boot. For anyone who actually thinks that Harris is competent, I suggest watching the following Daily Show sendup on Harris: Meet the “Holistic Thought Advisor” Behind Kamala Harris’s Speeches | The Daily Show The Daily Show The Daily Show May 22, 2024 May 22, 2024 Meet Kamala Harris’s holistic thought advisor Dahlia Rose Hibiscus (Desi Lydic), who is deeply committed to helping the Vice President translate words into idea voyages. Hibiscus preaches the practice of speaking without thinking and encourages Harris to describe her journeys, molding our Vice President into a meditative guru. Meet Kamala Harris’s holistic thought advisor Dahlia Rose Hibiscus (Desi Lydic), who is deeply committed to helping the Vice President translate words into idea voyages. Hibiscus preaches the practice of speaking without thinking and encourages Harris to describe her journeys, molding our Vice President into a meditative guru. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1RmWKA5Vaw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1RmWKA5Vaw This is another one of her speechwriters: Meet Kamala Harris’s 6-Year-Old Speechwriter (youtube.com) Shes won every election she’s been in. How many have you won? It’s not that she’s a loser. It’s that she’s retarded. That gives her a leg up. There are many ways for a woman to get to the top of the political pyramid when she doesn’t have a brain, especially if she is a goer… “Nudge nudge. Nudge nudge. Know what I mean? Say no more…know what I mean?” History spoke at the debate. Biden is a failed president. The whole reason for this discussion is because Biden has failed. Most of us have seen this for years. Only the most loyal dems and the media couldn’t see it. Now they can’t unsee it. What we saw was an old man who had just what they said .. “a bad night.” A lot of you old guys have bad days and we still let you drive. We didnt want Biden in 2020 but we got him, and he isnt dying as fast as everyone thought he would … not to mention again the 5000 political appointees who REALLY run the US Govt .. Kind of a large difference between driving a car to Walmart and back, versus working as the President of the United States… The only problem with it all is that every economic crisis happens under a Republican president for various reasons related to deregulation or mere incompetence. The last 3 recessions all started under a Republican president and were disastrous. Two were effectively economic crashes induced by bad Republican deregulation on multiple fronts (financial deregulation and throwing out the pandemic playbook that had been created by a Democratic predecessor). The third was a terrorist attack that was predicted and ignored by the President in his daily briefing one month before it happen. Go ahead and keep hoping for a Republican president. You will get an economic disaster. This economic disaster you can blame on Biden and the Fed no matter when it starts. The best comment in the NYT article was by James Carville. I don’t really care for Carbville, but he is very astute in his assessment of presidential candidates. On Saturday afternoon, the Biden team sent out a fund-raising solicitation from James Carville, the Democratic strategist who has repeatedly argued that Mr. Biden shouldn’t be the party’s nominee. “What really just set me into orbit was the day after his excuse for not doing well is that he’s old. Well, that’s the whole point,” Mr. Carville said in an interview, adding an expletive. “It is safe to say there is a pushback, rally-around-the-flag moment here. But we’ll see.” Agreed. My only fear is something terribly goes wrong internationally and he becomes a wartime president. This would be a difficult hurdle for DJT to overcome despite the Democrats and the Biden team being incapable, ineffective, and …feckless. no wartime president has ever lost a real election. I don’t really think some massive international war is going to help him here. Americans feel everything spinning out of control and another war is just more chaos that would be laid at Bidens feet. In this particular case I think this time really is different. “My only fear is something terribly goes wrong internationally and he becomes a wartime president.” You are spot on. Zelinsky already said -quote (we don’t have much time). I believe Zelinsky will create s small nuclear tactic bomb false flag just to draw NATO in full war against Russia. As Trump said-Let’s hope we’ll not have a nuclear war before election! ‘Z’ = MI6 There’s no chance that any member of the MAGA crowd would vote for Biden because he’s a wartime president. If Americans think Trump is the stronger leader, they would want him in charge during a war! Four more years months!! This is the most idiotic train of thought I have heard out of an adult in years. Careful! Your ignorance is showing!! You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Assange is a Political Prisoner, Free Him Now

Declassify Documents Similarly, Trump has threatened on many occasions to declassify documents.…

Declassify Documents Similarly, Trump has threatened on many occasions to declassify documents. Is Trump anti-deep-state or not?…

Show full text (22977 chars)
• • • Political Prisoner Julian Assange took refuge in the Embassy of Ecuador in London in June 2012. On 11 April 2019, Ecuador removed Assange’s asylum following a series of disputes. Assange was then arrested and held by the UK. Wikipedia has these Notes on Julian Assange . Julian Paul Assange born 3 July 1971, is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. WikiLeaks came to international attention in 2010 when it published a series of leaks provided by U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning. These leaks included the Baghdad airstrike Collateral Murder video (April 2010), the Afghanistan war logs (July 2010), the Iraq war logs (October 2010), and Cablegate (November 2010). After the 2010 leaks, the United States government launched a criminal investigation into WikiLeaks. The United States government unsealed an indictment against Assange, related to the leaks provided by Chelsea Manning. On 23 May 2019, the United States government further charged Assange with violating the Espionage Act of 1917. Editors from newspapers including The Washington Post and The New York Times, as well as press freedom organisations, criticised the government’s decision to charge Assange under the Espionage Act, characterising it as an attack on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees freedom of the press. Assange is incarcerated in HM Prison Belmarsh, reportedly in ill health. On 2 May 2019, hearings began into the US government’s request to extradite him. On 4 January 2021, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled against the United States’ request to extradite him and stated that doing so would be “oppressive” by reason of his mental health; the United States has 14 days to appeal. A U.K. Judge Denies Extradition to U.S The Wall Street Journal reports U.K. Judge Denies WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange’s Extradition to U.S., Citing Suicide Risk Under British extradition law, as well as European human-rights law that the U.K. is party to, a judge can block extradition on health grounds if it would result in unjust or oppressive treatment. “I find that the mental condition of Mr. Assange is such that it would be oppressive to extradite him” to the U.S., Judge Baraitser said in a 132-page ruling. “The overall impression is of a depressed and sometimes despairing man who is genuinely fearful about his future,” she said, rejecting the U.S. extradition request. On Monday, Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said he would ask the U.K. government about the possibility of freeing Mr. Assange, and that Mexico would offer him asylum. “Therefore, a pardon for Mr. Assange, pardon and asylum,” he said. Mr. López Obrador said Mexico was happy that the British court had denied the U.S. extradition request, which he called a “triumph for justice.” He said Mr. Assange is a journalist. Trump Should Pardon Assange Trump could have and should have pardoned Assange instead of pardoning a massive parade of political hacks. He still could, but he won’t. There’s an interesting article on ZeroHedge on this subject: Trump’s Last Chance To Snub The Deep State I am not the only one hoping that Donald Trump will do the right thing with Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden too. The last president, one Trump hates, first put Assange’s key whistleblower in prison, in isolation, under torture. Chelsea Manning was sentenced to 35 years. Obama leaving office with a gesture of “goodwill”, commuted Chelsea’s sentence once she served seven years. She was later jailed for another year for not snitching on Julian. Tulsi Gabbard, the only Democratic presidential candidate in 2020 who wasn’t a war hawk, is asking Trump for goodwill. She tweeted tagging Trump, “Since you’re giving pardons to people, please consider pardoning those who, at great personal sacrifice, exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state,” and named Assange and Snowden for him to drop charges. If Trump did the honorable thing of halting the persecution of Julian Assange, it would be a blow for freedom and a middle finger to the Deep State including Obama and Clinton. Wasn’t Trump supposed to be the anti-Deep State candidate? Now’s his chance to prove it . Declassify Documents Similarly, Trump has threatened on many occasions to declassify documents. November 28: Trump threatens to declassify ‘devastating’ documents if Democrats ‘want to play tough’ November 11: Trump allies clash with top intelligence officials in quest to declassify more Russia documents Is Trump anti-deep-state or not? We knew the answer to that long ago, and it won’t change now even if he did pardon Assange. “I will declassify soon” – @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @FoxNews @FoxBusiness — Maria Bartiromo (@MariaBartiromo) May 3, 2019 Assange a Hero No only is Assange a political prisoner, he is a hero in my book for disclosing what he did about US illegal activities. Hats off to Mexico for offering asylum. But what’s needed is a full and complete pardon coupled with an apology. Mish Julian Assange took refuge in the Embassy of Ecuador in London in June 2012. On 11 April 2019, Ecuador removed Assange’s asylum following a series of disputes. Assange was then arrested and held by the UK. Wikipedia has these Notes on Julian Assange . Julian Paul Assange born 3 July 1971, is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. WikiLeaks came to international attention in 2010 when it published a series of leaks provided by U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning. These leaks included the Baghdad airstrike Collateral Murder video (April 2010), the Afghanistan war logs (July 2010), the Iraq war logs (October 2010), and Cablegate (November 2010). After the 2010 leaks, the United States government launched a criminal investigation into WikiLeaks. The United States government unsealed an indictment against Assange, related to the leaks provided by Chelsea Manning. On 23 May 2019, the United States government further charged Assange with violating the Espionage Act of 1917. Editors from newspapers including The Washington Post and The New York Times, as well as press freedom organisations, criticised the government’s decision to charge Assange under the Espionage Act, characterising it as an attack on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees freedom of the press. Assange is incarcerated in HM Prison Belmarsh, reportedly in ill health. On 2 May 2019, hearings began into the US government’s request to extradite him. On 4 January 2021, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled against the United States’ request to extradite him and stated that doing so would be “oppressive” by reason of his mental health; the United States has 14 days to appeal. A U.K. Judge Denies Extradition to U.S The Wall Street Journal reports U.K. Judge Denies WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange’s Extradition to U.S., Citing Suicide Risk Under British extradition law, as well as European human-rights law that the U.K. is party to, a judge can block extradition on health grounds if it would result in unjust or oppressive treatment. “I find that the mental condition of Mr. Assange is such that it would be oppressive to extradite him” to the U.S., Judge Baraitser said in a 132-page ruling. “The overall impression is of a depressed and sometimes despairing man who is genuinely fearful about his future,” she said, rejecting the U.S. extradition request. On Monday, Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said he would ask the U.K. government about the possibility of freeing Mr. Assange, and that Mexico would offer him asylum. “Therefore, a pardon for Mr. Assange, pardon and asylum,” he said. Mr. López Obrador said Mexico was happy that the British court had denied the U.S. extradition request, which he called a “triumph for justice.” He said Mr. Assange is a journalist. Trump Should Pardon Assange Trump could have and should have pardoned Assange instead of pardoning a massive parade of political hacks. He still could, but he won’t. There’s an interesting article on ZeroHedge on this subject: Trump’s Last Chance To Snub The Deep State I am not the only one hoping that Donald Trump will do the right thing with Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden too. The last president, one Trump hates, first put Assange’s key whistleblower in prison, in isolation, under torture. Chelsea Manning was sentenced to 35 years. Obama leaving office with a gesture of “goodwill”, commuted Chelsea’s sentence once she served seven years. She was later jailed for another year for not snitching on Julian. Tulsi Gabbard, the only Democratic presidential candidate in 2020 who wasn’t a war hawk, is asking Trump for goodwill. She tweeted tagging Trump, “Since you’re giving pardons to people, please consider pardoning those who, at great personal sacrifice, exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state,” and named Assange and Snowden for him to drop charges. If Trump did the honorable thing of halting the persecution of Julian Assange, it would be a blow for freedom and a middle finger to the Deep State including Obama and Clinton. Wasn’t Trump supposed to be the anti-Deep State candidate? Now’s his chance to prove it . Declassify Documents Similarly, Trump has threatened on many occasions to declassify documents. Is Trump anti-deep-state or not? We knew the answer to that long ago, and it won’t change now even if he did pardon Assange. “I will declassify soon” – @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @FoxNews @FoxBusiness — Maria Bartiromo (@MariaBartiromo) May 3, 2019 Assange a Hero No only is Assange a political prisoner, he is a hero in my book for disclosing what he did about US illegal activities. Hats off to Mexico for offering asylum. But what’s needed is a full and complete pardon coupled with an apology. Mish Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Well, let’s meet back here on Jan 21 and see if Trump pardoned Assange. Free Assange. Dammit!!!! Assange and Snowden are both symbols for me that Trump was never committed to draining the swamp. Yes, Virginia, there is a Deep State……and guys like Assange and Snowden are the proof. Our Enemies of the State are journalists and whistleblowers. Assange, in particular is guilty of a most grievous crime…..pissing off the Clintons and their political machine. Forget the bogus Sweden charges….if screwing Swedish teenagers is such a crime why aren’t there more rock stars in jail? He was targeted because of who he is. Useful idiot for Russia? Maybe…..useful whistleblower for the US…absolutely. We (the people) had a need to know a lot of things Wikileaks reported. It made Assange some powerful enemies….but it was casting aspersions on Clinton that got him in the most trouble. Even though it was the real idiot, Comey, who threw the election for Clinton. And Trump doesn’t give a flying fuck about Assange. Everything Trump ever said about the Deep State was a calculated lie to make him appeal to the people we now refer to as the Trump base. If he were to pardon Assange, that will be why he does it. I agree that Trump’s pardons so far are all just loyalty rewards for the sleaziest members of the Trump army, fwiw. I’d expect more of the same. Not teen-agers The whole thing stinks to high heaven…one of the accusers initial complaint was that Assange didn’t use a condom, and that’s what constituted rape. Pretty fine line, and subject to a “he said, she said” argument. Not exactly Harvey Weinstein stuff. The judge in the case appeared to me to be some kind of man-hating activist looking to make her #metoo bones off of Assange…never mind the political implications. And they let the case drop for nine years and then brought it back when Assange was in custody. Very convenient. Yes the women accusers appeared to be “of age” ..although I’m not so sure about the groupies led Zeppelin used to hang out with….. Don’t expect anything from Trump. Instead of a pardon for Assange, he decided to pardon a number of Nisour Square war criminals who were indicted on the strength of facts that came to light because of Assange. (For random assassination of civilians, including RPGs into a schoolroom of little girls.) Trump is underscoring the exceptional position of the USA as the only party in the world indemnified in advance of war crimes. In fact, by delaying extradition on humanitarian grounds (Trump can hardly pardon somebody who has not been indicted or condemned, or can he?), this may be a devious way to circumnavigate any possibility for Trump to actually intervene. u.s. goverment has been making the case that assange is not a journalist but a hacker. senate report makes the case that assange worked with russia. to me assange is not in the same category as snowden or ellsberg Can you produce a single shred of evidence that Assange has a relationship with Russia? He has published quite a lot of information that was not welcomed by the Russian state either. No evidence that Assange hacked anything, in fact, the hacking allegations all revolve around a bunch of tips he gave to Manning to cover your tracks and involved no hacking on his part. start reading the senate report it should go to trial at the very least, assange is Russia’s useful idiot. Its not credible to believe what Assange publihed didn’t come from Russia No facts contained, just innuendo and suppositions. Absolutely no documentary evidence, including any evidence of any hack. The DOJ dropped the case brought by the Russians like a hot potato. No indictments or court cases will ever be based on any of this material. Correct. Assange is too dumb. It isn’t Assange who is on trial and this isn’t about Assange, who poses no threat to anybody. The imperial state’s only interest is to set an example. Everything Assange revealed was published in carefully curated form by the Guardian, WaPo, the NYTimes, etc. The example that is being set is that anybody who reveals the (war) crimes of the imperial state will be squashed. Anybody means any person anywhere on the globe, since Assange has no relationship with the American state. » What is on trial is the right to reveal the truth and the rights of journalism « The outcome is very depressing, since the order to discharge is not germane to the case which is being accepted as valid. And all but a few maverick journalists have retreated from any attempt to defend the principle, including the revered outlets who were only too happy to published it all but abandoned Assange like rats. ‘Everyone lies and cheats’… Speaking for yourself ? Disgusting attitude of yours btw, wishing for someone ‘to rot in jail’, especially taking into account that the guy merely exposed REAL crimes…. That being said, you seem to be suffering an identity crisis; sometimes you are left, than right, to be left again next day, a peaceful warmonger etc….quite inconsequent.. What really amazes me, or even offends me, is that a intelligent person would be in favour of the Clinton bitch,…but then again, I shouldn t be surprised; she wanted to drone Assange in the very embassy, and she laughed and giggled when Khadaffi was sodomised and murdered by her terrorist friends ! I am sure you voted for her… …this comment was meant for @ Jojo, dunno why it ends up here Sorry to disappoint you. The fact that I can have all the variation you rail against in my beliefs shows that I react to an issue or person and am not captive to any specific ideology. i have voted Republican, Democrat and 3rd party over the years. I know that is disappointing to the echo chamber, “my party above all else” folks but so be it. Mish, I am afraid you are going to get a lot of heartless criticism today… I, for one, do agree with you; Assange’s plight is utterly gruesome and inhumane ! How can a modern democratic system justify similar cruelty ? Even in Russia, the country so many of you on this blog despise, this guy would ve received better and fairer treatment ! Yes Mish I am in total agreement. “I find that the mental condition of Mr. Assange is such that it would be oppressive to extradite him” to the U.S., Judge Baraitser said in a 132-page ruling. “The overall impression is of a depressed and sometimes despairing man who is genuinely fearful about his future,” she said, rejecting the U.S. extradition request. Assange’s dump of Clinton’s stolen emails from that technical idiot Poesta, who got hacked/phished by a Russian operative is what helped Trump get elected. Assange should rot in prison forever. Clinton may not have been the greatest president ever but she certainly would have been a damn sight better than Trump. Poor baby Assange is depressed. So sad. When you play with the big boys, you should be prepared to get stepped on. Assange may kill himself. Who cares? Please go right ahead you piece of crap. Broadcast it on social media so we can all watch. So then kiss journalism goodbye? Not me. ” When you play with the big boys, you should be prepared to get stepped on.” Should Woodward/Bernstein have been subjected to this type of treatment or are your emotions stated here a lingering effect of Nov 2016? There were criminal activities exposed and, had the activities been done by persons working under the Russian or Chinese flag, I suspect many who excoriate Assange would be praising him. Ideally, speaking truth to power would be universally celebrated. In our world, too often it depends on how the truth being spoken aligns with one’s world view. And? As I said ” When you play with the big boys, you should be prepared to get stepped on.” If you want to go against the TPTB you should be prepared to spend life in prison or even die. I doubt anyone on this board or in this world is 100% honest. Everyone lies and cheats. lying and cheating make the human world go around. If you want to take people on and reveal their secrets, they might come looking for you. There are potential consequences for all actions. The point I wanted to make was that ideally one shouldn’t have to be prepared to do those things, because society won’t stand for those repercussions. If those lies and secrets implicated Russia and Putin, many who ignore or support Assange’s current status (especially in the media) would be praising his actions. Whistleblowers have been celebrated the past 4 years, but were generally smeared or ignored by the media when they were persecuted by the previous administration. That should be a problem for you and everyone else. This isn’t a ‘TPTB’ issue if societal norms are constant instead of malleable based on how closely the subject aligns with one’s personal values and views. Clinton would likely have started a few more wars, continuing on the same trajectory. She may even have started nuclear confrontation with Russia. No idea why you think this epitome of vanity and self-serving corruption would be better than anything. As for the Russian operative … no evidence whatsoever. Please produce a shred of evidence that Podesta mails went through Russian hands anywhere. Assange will die if he is freed. As he should. He is simply an arm of the GRU and Russian state as 2016 showed. Next to nothing new was revealed by Wikileaks regarding Iraq and Afghanistan. Assange was never prosecuted for two child molestation charges because of statute of limitations. That isnt exactly a ringing endorsement of justice if you think he should be freed. This comment doesn’t make any sense at all. Actions that the U.S. gvmt would consider war crimes, especially if committed by a nation on its ‘enemies’ list, were revealed, including torture, shooting civilians, and fomenting war. If you’re going to whine about 2016 and exposure of DNC malfeasance, is there information that was published that is false and/or fabricated? Despite the previous administration taking it to whistleblowers, they sure have been celebrated the past 4 years! Here’s a generic selection of highlights from a bland, national source: Lastly, you have an extra word in your penultimate sentence. The charges did not involve minors- …each time I see your avatar, I know I am gonna read something MORONIC… You are delusional and not doing a whole lot of observing. Please produce some evidence for any child molestation or any actual charges of any type of molestation. Assange has never been charged with anything remotely resembling what you imply. As for the GRU and Russia, there is absolutely no evidence. In fact, sworn testimony before Congress reveals that there is not even evidence of any intrusion or exfiltration of information by any party at all. The Q crowd claimed for years that Trump would free Assange to “stick it to the deep state” but obviously that didn’t happen. It’s one of a thousand things that should have tipped them off that Trump was a fraud, but hope springs eternal online. Right there with you on this one. Assange is a journalist and in no way belongs in jail. This sets a terrible precedent against freedom of the press. “Freedom of the press”??? Please. If the press were truly free, then they wouldn’t be in complete lockstep with government on Covid lockdowns. At least some in the US would be strongly questioning the rationalization for abridging the US Constitution due to a so-called public health emergency and the arbitrary economic destruction of so many businesses and financial assets. Some would be publishing a running total of flu hospitalizations and deaths on their TV screens and in their printed newspapers but again, none are. There is no counterpoint to any aspect of Covid-19. No major MSM outlets are consistently questioning any aspect of Covid-19! That should tell thinking people all they need to know. I would agree with you on the lockdowns if we could get all of the morons in this country to wear masks and not do stupid indoor gatherings without masks. I agree with you on a lot of the BS reporting on Covid in the press. Covid was not a problem in SoCal until after Thanksgiving but you’d never know it from the reporting hype. And for god’s sake don’t tell people to take vitamin D and stock some zinc, hcq, and ivermectin. The reporting has been so politicized its been criminal. Looking past the MSM tho yes we do have freedom of the press but it requires a bit of work to sift thru all the BS. I do not want these valued sources I have muzzled by this precedent. I don’t have a good feeling about Mexico’s offer, but his home country is officially open. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-wikileaks-assange-australia-idUSKBN29A07N Whole heartedly agree. Free Assange. Free Assange. Free Assange. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

47 Percent of All Voters Think Harris Is Too Progressive

…If that was the case then why did Biden have to drop out? Because he didn’t know what he was doing much of the time. Why are you asking this dumb question?…

…blew her up in the debate such that Harris dropped out Can she be trained well enough to avoid it?…

Show full text (35062 chars)
• • • The latest New York Times / Siena College poll is a doozie. It has Trump in the lead. Let’s discuss why. Image created by X’s Grok based on image description provided by Mish. Trump Slightly Ahead The New York Times reports Trump and Harris Neck and Neck After Summer Upheaval, Times/Siena Poll Finds . The survey finds that Donald J. Trump is retaining his support and that, on the eve of the debate, voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands. Support for Harris Stalls Nate Cohen comments on the poll in his take New Poll Suggests Harris’s Support Has Stalled After a Euphoric August . That’s a free link. Is Kamala Harris’s surge beginning to ebb? That’s the question raised by this morning’s New York Times/Siena College poll, which finds Donald J. Trump narrowly ahead of her among likely voters nationwide, 48 percent to 47 percent. To me, the result is a bit surprising. It’s the first lead for Mr. Trump in a major nonpartisan national survey in about a month. As a result, it’s worth being at least a little cautious about these findings, as there isn’t much confirmation from other polls. There’s no way to know whether the Times/Siena poll is too favorable for Mr. Trump. We never know whether the polls are “right” until the votes are counted. But the poll nonetheless finds that he has significant advantages in this election — and they might just be enough to put him over the top. He’s more popular than before . Overall, 46 percent of likely voters say they have a favorable view of the former president. That’s down a tick from our last national poll, when 47 percent had a favorable view, but it still makes him more popular than he was in 2016 or 2020. He has an advantage on the issues. We asked voters a two-part question. First, what’s the most important issue to your vote? Second, do you think Ms. Harris or Mr. Trump is better on that issue? By that measure, Mr. Trump has a five-point lead on the issue that matters most to voters, whatever that may be for them. He occupies the center. A near majority of voters say Mr. Trump is “not too far” to the left or right on the issues, while only around one-third say he’s “too far to the right.” Nearly half of voters, in contrast, say Ms. Harris is too far to the left; only 41 percent say she’s “not too far either way.” He’s seen as the change candidate in a nation that wants change. While President Biden’s departure from the race lifted the spirits of many Democrats, the national mood still isn’t great. An overwhelming majority of voters still say that the economy is poor and that the nation is heading in the wrong direction. And a clear majority — 61 percent — of voters say they want the next president to bring a “major change” from Mr. Biden, compared with 34 percent who want “minor change” and 3 percent who don’t want change. Only 40 percent of likely voters said Ms. Harris represented “change,” while 55 percent said she represented “more of the same.” Mr. Trump, in contrast, was seen as representing “change” by 61 percent of voters, while only 34 percent said he was “more of the same.” The Mistakes of 2019 Could Cost Harris the Election Nate Silver comments The Mistakes of 2019 Could Cost Harris the Election Ordinarily, I wouldn’t think it’s worth it to write a story based on a single poll. But this one merits an exception. The exceptions were: NYT/Siena is our second-highest-rated pollster. The poll has a large sample size: 1,695 likely voters. The poll is very recent, fully post-Labor Day and having completed its field work on Friday. The poll provides trendlines for comparison: the numbers are just a bit worse for Harris than the previous NYT/Siena national survey in July and considerably worse for her than a series of battleground state polls the Times conducted in early August. The NYT/Siena poll tends to singularly drive the media conversation about the race, given the poll’s well-deserved reputation for accuracy and the Times’s outsized influence in the media. This morning’s NYT/Siena poll contained a pair of questions on whether voters think Harris is too liberal/progressive and whether Trump is too conservative. The numbers were lopsided in Trump’s favor. Only 32 percent of voters said Trump was too conservative, while 47 said Harris was too liberal. The demographics on this question are about what you might expect. Harris is faring poorly among white voters without college degrees, rural voters, and older voters: the types of voters who are plentiful in Blue Wall states like Pennsylvania. Democratic messaging often suffers from the sheer abundance of potential attack lines on Trump, causing voters to tune out. The aforementioned whiny progressive media critics don’t seem to understand that elevating every minor controversy surrounding Trump only reduces the signal-to-noise ratio and makes them look like the boy who constantly cried wolf. The last paragraph is interesting. Trump makes the same mistake. Trump needs to stick to the inflation, housing, immigration, and education indoctrination. He just can’t do it. Harris Will Be More Like California Harris is attempting to run a generic campaign, pretending to be middle, yet promising everything to everyone. She want to restrict immigration while supporting it. She promises to allow more fracking while attempting to placate the Greens. California is a disaster, but everything she espouses translates to “more California” solutions. Trump’s idea to bring in revenue via tariffs, is economic madness. But Harris can’t easily attack that because she wants more tariffs and a crackdown on China as well. Anybody but Biden The big surge for Harris was nothing more than a grateful mirage of “Anybody but Biden”. The huge initial lead of Trump was the same thing. So we had unsustainable surges first in one direction, then the other. Trump vs Harris Biden is out to pasture. Had Democrats had an open convention It would have neither been Biden nor Harris. From here on out, Harris more than Trump needs to prove she has moved toward the center. It will be difficult at best for her to pull that off. August 24: Vote for Harris if You Want Radical Racial Indoctrination of Your Kids August 16: Kamala Harris and Her Free Money, More Inflation Now Proposals (MIN) More Inflation and More Indoctrination That’s the winning message for Trump, if he can just stick with it. Trump Slightly Ahead The New York Times reports Trump and Harris Neck and Neck After Summer Upheaval, Times/Siena Poll Finds . The survey finds that Donald J. Trump is retaining his support and that, on the eve of the debate, voters are unsure they know enough about where Kamala Harris stands. Support for Harris Stalls Nate Cohen comments on the poll in his take New Poll Suggests Harris’s Support Has Stalled After a Euphoric August . That’s a free link. Is Kamala Harris’s surge beginning to ebb? That’s the question raised by this morning’s New York Times/Siena College poll, which finds Donald J. Trump narrowly ahead of her among likely voters nationwide, 48 percent to 47 percent. To me, the result is a bit surprising. It’s the first lead for Mr. Trump in a major nonpartisan national survey in about a month. As a result, it’s worth being at least a little cautious about these findings, as there isn’t much confirmation from other polls. There’s no way to know whether the Times/Siena poll is too favorable for Mr. Trump. We never know whether the polls are “right” until the votes are counted. But the poll nonetheless finds that he has significant advantages in this election — and they might just be enough to put him over the top. He’s more popular than before . Overall, 46 percent of likely voters say they have a favorable view of the former president. That’s down a tick from our last national poll, when 47 percent had a favorable view, but it still makes him more popular than he was in 2016 or 2020. He has an advantage on the issues. We asked voters a two-part question. First, what’s the most important issue to your vote? Second, do you think Ms. Harris or Mr. Trump is better on that issue? By that measure, Mr. Trump has a five-point lead on the issue that matters most to voters, whatever that may be for them. He occupies the center. A near majority of voters say Mr. Trump is “not too far” to the left or right on the issues, while only around one-third say he’s “too far to the right.” Nearly half of voters, in contrast, say Ms. Harris is too far to the left; only 41 percent say she’s “not too far either way.” He’s seen as the change candidate in a nation that wants change. While President Biden’s departure from the race lifted the spirits of many Democrats, the national mood still isn’t great. An overwhelming majority of voters still say that the economy is poor and that the nation is heading in the wrong direction. And a clear majority — 61 percent — of voters say they want the next president to bring a “major change” from Mr. Biden, compared with 34 percent who want “minor change” and 3 percent who don’t want change. Only 40 percent of likely voters said Ms. Harris represented “change,” while 55 percent said she represented “more of the same.” Mr. Trump, in contrast, was seen as representing “change” by 61 percent of voters, while only 34 percent said he was “more of the same.” The Mistakes of 2019 Could Cost Harris the Election Nate Silver comments The Mistakes of 2019 Could Cost Harris the Election Ordinarily, I wouldn’t think it’s worth it to write a story based on a single poll. But this one merits an exception. The exceptions were: This morning’s NYT/Siena poll contained a pair of questions on whether voters think Harris is too liberal/progressive and whether Trump is too conservative. The numbers were lopsided in Trump’s favor. Only 32 percent of voters said Trump was too conservative, while 47 said Harris was too liberal. The demographics on this question are about what you might expect. Harris is faring poorly among white voters without college degrees, rural voters, and older voters: the types of voters who are plentiful in Blue Wall states like Pennsylvania. Democratic messaging often suffers from the sheer abundance of potential attack lines on Trump, causing voters to tune out. The aforementioned whiny progressive media critics don’t seem to understand that elevating every minor controversy surrounding Trump only reduces the signal-to-noise ratio and makes them look like the boy who constantly cried wolf. The last paragraph is interesting. Trump makes the same mistake. Trump needs to stick to the inflation, housing, immigration, and education indoctrination. He just can’t do it. Harris Will Be More Like California Harris is attempting to run a generic campaign, pretending to be middle, yet promising everything to everyone. She want to restrict immigration while supporting it. She promises to allow more fracking while attempting to placate the Greens. California is a disaster, but everything she espouses translates to “more California” solutions. Trump’s idea to bring in revenue via tariffs, is economic madness. But Harris can’t easily attack that because she wants more tariffs and a crackdown on China as well. Anybody but Biden The big surge for Harris was nothing more than a grateful mirage of “Anybody but Biden”. The huge initial lead of Trump was the same thing. So we had unsustainable surges first in one direction, then the other. Trump vs Harris Biden is out to pasture. Had Democrats had an open convention It would have neither been Biden nor Harris. From here on out, Harris more than Trump needs to prove she has moved toward the center. It will be difficult at best for her to pull that off. August 24: Vote for Harris if You Want Radical Racial Indoctrination of Your Kids August 16: Kamala Harris and Her Free Money, More Inflation Now Proposals (MIN) More Inflation and More Indoctrination That’s the winning message for Trump, if he can just stick with it. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. As I was saying … it is all fake… look at this clip of Harris https://www.zerohedge.com/political/excuse-me-are-you-his-daughter-1995-clip-willie-brown-side-piece-kamala-resurfaces She is EXACTLY what the men who run the world want in the fake democracy… Someone who will do what they are told … cuz they want fame and fortune… functional idiots are the best!!! Trump is no different… Bush… Obama was slightly different… he had a bit of ‘gravitas’…cuz that was what was called for after the Bush fake presidency…. but that was also just acting.. he is an ACTOR… a yes-man… they all are… You are being played… this is a Ministry of Truth production Why is Harris being called “too progressives’ instead of “Too far left wing”? Republicans are always identified as “right wing” or “far right wing”. I wouldn’t call anything the New York Times is associated with “non partisan” including the weather forecast. Especially the weather forecast come to think of it. harris bj’s for everyone! Kamala is a bit dim. 10 watt bulb dim. It is better for one to remain silent and appear a fool, than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt. Kamala is finally forced to open her mouth in the debate tonight. Well, that is not surprising at all. That accounts for pretty much every Trump voter. They think that Harris is a communist even though she is just as much of a right-winger as Obama and BJ Clinton were. “ Calling Harris A Communist Is An Insult To Communism “https://freepress.org/article/calling-harris-communist-insult-communism Communism should be insulted and Harris too. Harris is a Communist because Communism is just another form of Feudalism in practice. You have the elite completely controlling what can and cannot be done by the individual to a degree that far eclipses what happens in other systems. Suppression is necessary because the system defies human nature instead of working with it – without that it will implode. Obama said he was 5 days from fundamentally changing America. There was nothing right wing in that statement. Everyone can see Kamala is a 10 watt bulb. Why the ‘one-two punch’ of Liz and Dick Cheney backing Harris matters Campaigns are chasing any movement at the margins. By Adam Wren and Megan Messerly 09/09/2024 08:20 PM EDT Liz Cheney is hitting the campaign trail with millions of dollars at her disposal to defeat Donald Trump and down-ballot Republicans, aggressively taking on the MAGA movement that dominates a party where she, and her father, are no longer welcome. Cheney has pledged to do anything she can to help Kamala Harris, and has resources to back that up — including a PAC that raised more than $3 million in the first six months of the year, according to FEC records. It’s part of an unprecedented effort by one of the party’s former highest-ranking leaders to not only take down Trump but purge any trace of him from the Republican Party . GOP strategists and elected officials who share her opposition to the former president say Cheney’s campaign — including her and her father’s endorsement of Harris — could pave the way for members of their party to join their cause. A critical mass could be enough to move the needle in a tight election. “It’s a true reflection of how bad Donald Trump is — to think about a Dick Cheney, who is as time-tested of a conservative Republican as anybody in the roster, to come out and take a stance to support, like myself, Kamala Harris,” said former Georgia Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, a Republican Harris supporter. “Look, the Republican Party loses no matter what. If Donald Trump gets beat by Kamala Harris — like I think is going to happen — the Republican Party loses. But if Donald Trump wins, the Republican Party loses even more: We’ll lose any and all credibility that we’ve got.” … https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/09/liz-cheney-trump-kamala-harris-00178093 Dick Cheney coming out of his cave to support Harris should be a clarion call to real conservatives and progressives to rally around Trump. Tulsi Gabbard said it best. A vote for Harris is a vote for Cheney. Why would democrats want to vote for Cheney? Duncan: “We’ll lose any and all credibility that we’ve got.” Duncan doesn’t have any credibility, supporting a radical leftist, over his own party. WIll TS be the next cult figure to replace Trump when he is ushered out to pasture? Seems likely. If ever there was definitive proof that Harris is firmly entrenched in the neocon camp, support from the Cheney family is it. It’s important to maintain the status quo. FYI, Dick and Liz have no future in the Republican party. If Trump loses to Harris, and the economy crashes in 2005, as seems likely, House and Senate Democrats will have two years to find new jobs. Kamala will be impeached. Balz will be told what to do, to finish the term. “47 Percent of All Voters Think Harris Is Too Progressive” What’s the margin of error with this poll? 10, 20, 30%? Half of the country is conservative. Half of 50% is 25% How does this not add up to about 75%? My gawd, who can believe in ANY polling nowadays? It’s all made up to fit The System’s narrative. For all we know Gemini is running The System with Obama acting the Puppet Master. Wait, what happened to Mish admiration for Nate Silver? He has Kamala ahead nationally in the polling aggregate 48.9 to 46.6. That’s today. Where’s the love? Mish is trying to get a hold of Jimmy The Greek for the odds. He was always in-tune on the race nuances. Barack Obama’s half brother is voting for Trump. A simple headline of “Obama votes for Trump” is a powerful campaign message. Some will assume the ex-president is voting for Trump. Others in disbelief will read the article, and still be shocked the headline is actually true, but “Obama” refers to Barack’s half brother. Malik Obama entered the country legally and earned his US citizenship, which other immigrants will identify with. This is the most bizarre election I’ve seen in terms of a house divided. RFK Jr’s family was not happy with his decision to run for POTUS. Tim Walz had 8 relatives publicly endorse Trump. Barack Obama’s half brother publicly supports Trump. Party swaps are just as surprising. Former VP Dick Cheney (Republican) publicly announced he will voter for Harris. His daughter Liz (Republican) endorsed Harris. Alan Dershowitz announced he left the Democrats. And I’m sure I missed others. Cheney going with swamp puppet Harris is hardly a surprise considering his daughter’s overt rejection of Trump – she’s likely Dick’s mouthpiece anyway on many topics. Much more than that think she’s an idiot. Kamala Harris plans to provoke Trump. It wouldn’t work. Tomorrow vp Harris will face an ex president, a businessman who will do business with 100 million voters in front of her. On the campaign trail he is a showman who entertains his followers. I think he’ll turn the tables: “Not being endorsed by Dick Cheney is one of the proudest moments of my life. When the main person who pushed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan picks my opponent, that’s a badge of honor. Anyone planning on voting for same person as Dick Cheney really ought to rethink it.” All Trump has to do is ask Kamala whether she approves of Cheney’s death and destruction agenda, and why wouldn’t she distance herself, unless her plan is to take the US into WW3. inflation, housing, immigration, and education indoctrination Not pointed enough: Avert nuclear war; Close open border; Rule of Law & Justice instead of lawfare; Uncensored freedom of speech. Housing & inflation are not easily solved or characterized. Indoctrination is too nebulous. All of the above are of interest to Boomers, having lived through some 70-odd years and been more or less patriotic. Millennials are great at texting and sexing. Dwayne The Rock just was in the news saying that we needed Trump’s courage after the asassination attempt. Rock is a lefty. They are starting to run from IF Forest Gump were a semi black woman … Kamala as Gump? Gump was funny. Everyone she’s worked with says she a grump. No he’s got it wrong. 47% of voters think she’s too stupid. Trump will respect vp Harris. He will talk to her like an adult carefully talking to a crazy teenager who lost her bearings. If elected, he will be the chairman of the board. Vance will be the CEO. Trump biggest enemy is frog cooking, things that change very slowly and nobody recognize them. Trump has to sell his vision of this country in the next 5 years and 20 years, in a 4/5 punchlines, and how to get get there. Tomorrow he has convince a 100 million voters to believe in him and his plan. Trump didn’t laugh at Biden when he mumbled. Biden repeated “Trump is lying”, but lost ! I seriously don’t know who these supposedly educated white voters are who support Harris. You’d think that if they were as “educated” as is purported they’d recognize the parlous economic situation created by the Biden-Harris administration (and none too little aided by Trump and profligate Republicans) and that her policies would simply be doubling down on that negative outcome. It’s almost as if virtue signaling optics matters more to these people than actual sound economic, financial, and foreign policy. I guess I live in one of those areas where educated or uneducated white people are almost all decidedly not Harris supporters because I don’t know many people who view her as anything more than a glorified DEI hire with all the downside implications that brings to the table. we traded educations for degrees years ago … greshams law affects everything. Being educated does not mean smart, or wise, or clear thinking. Remember 80 million voted for a demented old man, who is still president. What does that say about the US? They directly or indirectly make a living off of taxpayers or grift off of taxpayers. Hollywood, legacy media, NGO’s, homeless organizations, restaurants that feed them, corporations like Amazon that make the bulk of their money off of government contracts like the cloud and military contracts. The list is extensive. Trump is slightly better but he is also a printing machine. It all makes sense if you use the equation educated = indoctrinated Mr. Shedlock consistently advocates politicians sticking to the issues and avoiding childish and inappropriate personal attacks. They keep making the personal attacks. Is this because they’re inadequate as politicians, or because people are so base and ignorant that campaigning on prejudice, bias, anger and hate is the only effective way to get elected in America? If only Mr. Shedlock were running for President… “give the people what they want, but never give them what they ask for” … and that’s why Vince McMahon is rich. I consistently underestimate the intelligence of voters. This time, I hope I’m wrong. Well, he’s not, so we’re still left with the same two choices for people to choose between. Kamala, AOC, and Bernie. I don’t believe grouping these 3 together is wrong in anyway shape or form. They are the three-headed socialist monster. And sometimes communistic. The lady initially proposed price controls as a solution for god sakes. God help us. And let’s not forget the stellar lights and common sense of Elizabeth Warren who brings a nice fascistic set of economic policy prerogatives to the mix. Heading into the 2008 financial collapse, Warren was flipping houses like pancakes. Remember this vividly. Pocohantas Capital LLC. Why yes, the MAGA propaganda machine is very effective: 47% of all voters are Republicans; so only 1% didn’t get the memo. What percentage of those still believe the 2020 election was stolen from Trump? What percentage realize he actually tried to steal it for himself ? What percentage do know but do not give a shit ? And a more pertinent final question: I’ve heard of Republicans for Harris… but have you heard of any Democrats for Trump? the man who engineered Sept 11 2001. Yes, I have heard of Democrats for Trump. They’re at least as common, if not more so, than Republicans for Harris. Other questions: What percentage of Democrat voters believe Trump engaged in collusion with Russia? What percentage of Democrats believe that the entire Hunter Biden influence racket was Russian disinformation? How many know the FBI lied under oath to a federal court and how many know that the administration’s letter from leaders in the intelligence community regarding Hunter Biden was entirely fabricated? Further questions for the supposedly “thinking” Democrats out there to ponder: how many think that Harris was either a) completely uninvolved in hiding Biden’s declining mental state, or b) was involved in hiding Biden’s declining mental state? If a) why was she so cut out of the power loop in the White House? If b) why do Democrats not care that she was intimately involved in deliberately deceiving the American people? Why should she be excused for being such a liar and deceiver? These are good reminders, thank you. Still not enough for me to change my vote to the gentleman who, while getting his stinger wet, tells the fetching porn-star that she reminds him of his daughter. Then, later, leads his doltish followers into an unpopular, unsuccessful and pathetic ‘insurrection’ at the nation’s Capitol. I am supporting the only candidate that intelligent investors with integrity can vote for: Cornel West. All true, however, the reason why people do not know, is… yup, you guessed it. The meddling media. the laptop was real. we gave up dick cheney and got rfk and tulsi gabbard. we won that one BIG TIME, as my soon to be president would say. Let’s imagine, for the sake of it, that the mass media fairly treated both candidates, and that Biden was evaluated as critically as Trump. The election was stolen, not by votes, but by a complicit media. That Biden still occupies the White House, in charge of the most powerful country in the world, reflects on the US in ways you can’t imagine. Boy that’s a big thumbs down for me, possibly the biggest of the year. “ I’ve heard of Republicans for Harris…but have you heard of any Democrats for Trump?” Correction, sir, you’ve heard of RINOs breaking for Kamala. These people are not real conservatives. Piers Morgan wrote a scathing editorial about Dick & Liz Cheney breaking for Harris. Given all of the horrendous things Dems have said about Dick since GW2, it’s beyond rich and horribly hypocritical of the Dems to get excited about Dick’s endorsement of Harris. As for real Dems breaking for Trump, well yes I can: RJK Jr and his VP Tulsi Gabbard Bill Ackman A lot of black men Some black women And the biggest one of all may be Dershowitz who says he will reveal his pick just before the election. I’ve got a Benjamin on Trump, especially if he has a good debate tonight devoid of ad hominems I think she’s too dumb and cringey Very cringe, Everything she says is cringe. And that weirdo Walz, he’s a psycho. Kamala Harris has to repeat : “Trump is lying, Trump is lying, Trump is a convicted felon”. The D will salivate. Don’t forget the BS that he’s Putin’s b!tch Any non-progressive (D) would destroy Trump Any non-MAGA (R) would destroy Kamala Yet here we are watching the two America-hating extremes argue – the demigod (R) party taken over by Trump and his loyalists on one side, and the WEF Globalists taking over the (D) When Putin endorsed Kamala last week one of the reasons he gave was all her laughs. He has something there – Americans love a show and laughs. In 1965, 20 years after WWII, every character in Hogan’s Heroes was a comic, including the Gestapo with the little black mustache. The Soviets were much too dour such a show. Dude. When Putin endorsed Kamala he was joking. You Yanks never get sarcasm or tongue-in-cheek 😂 There is no way Putin is truly for Harris Putin is just trolling. He mentioned them pulling Biden out. And just falling in line with Biden’s endorsement of the new appointment. He’s dissing America as a democracy. As for the cackles, obviously a jab at the inanity. Putin is showing contempt masked by humor. Putin’s sense of humor misses most people. His actual statement bears repeating: “I said that our ‘favorite,’ if I may say so, was the incumbent President Mr. Biden. He was removed from the race, but he recommended that all his supporters support Ms. Harris. So we will do the same, we will support her… She laughs so expressively and infectiously that it means that everything is fine with her. And if everything is fine with her — then Trump has introduced so many restrictions and sanctions against Russia that no president has ever introduced before — and if everything is fine with Ms. Harris, then maybe she will refrain from such actions of this kind.” Bottom line, he called her a weak half-wit, the same as BIden. When listening to Her over the last couple Months, one could arguably state that She would become the most Progressive President in U.S. History. While at the same time also being the 2nd coming of Gerald Ford (a bumbler). She’d also wind up as the 2nd least likely president after Ford (she wasn’t the party nomination either and backed into it like he did under similar circumstances when the president more or less abdicated their position). I would suggest that the similarities end, in the fact that they both abandoned office in the month of August. I believe the main thing is who can pull over the independents. Trump is quite rambling in his thinking which will contrast with Kamala who is very well spoken looking more presidential Well spoken? The lady can barely give an articulate thought. Where do you get the idea that she is well spoken? By following Lincoln’s famous maxim? Sir, please put down the hash pipe. Does that mean 53% think she’s just the right amount of progressive or not enough? Last time I checked 53 > 47. I will re-iterate my demographic thesis, 5000 trump leaning boomers hit the graveyard each day, that’s a large number to have to make up over the last 4 years. Millennials now outnumber Boomers so it will be an interesting election. It is an inevitability that the highly diverse millennial group will eventually take over, and they are mostly incompatible with the MAGA movement. “47 Percent of All Voters Think Harris Is Too Progressive” But she is NOT TRUMP, which overrides. If that was the case then why did Biden have to drop out? Because he didn’t know what he was doing much of the time. Why are you asking this dumb question? Harris was likely part of the team behind Biden that was and IS STILL making Presidential decisions because Biden isn’t any more capable than he was months ago.. You basically said the election choice is ‘Trump’ or ‘not Trump’. If that’s true then why did Biden have to drop out? Technically he didn’t need to since he’s not Trump and would suffice just as well as Kamala. Harris is not a “progressive.” She is simply working towards the same things Uncle Joe started working towards in the Spring of 1922. Everybody unite, you have nothing to lose but your chains. Trump’s first term was nothing but a disaster. How can people forget. Where does scrapping the constitution and democracy fall on the Left to Right spectrum? She’s central Left. She should not scare conservatives. He should… …which is why so many former Republicans and his admin are against Trump. Harris is radical left. Conservatives are not fooled by her current routine. The debate tomorrow will be interesting, though I still probably will not watch it The question is does the Dingbat Biden herslf or not By which I mean come off as such an incompetent that the polls swing wider after the debate She did it in the 2020 race where Tulsi Gabbard blew her up in the debate such that Harris dropped out Can she be trained well enough to avoid it? Tune in and find out. I doubt it. Supposedly she does not review anything prepared for her in real life. And maybe she will be overprepared. In any event, whether the “CIA” is forced to resort to more violent means to keep Trump out of office may depend on tomorrow nights results. I am buying beer and popcorn for Tuesday and avoiding chips. I may not watch much of the debate, but I will watch the pre-game show and the post-game pundit analysts. I think she’ll go for the low blows. The only thing she has going for her, is getting Trump upset enough to fall for her bait. It’s key he stays on point and level headed. As a Californian, and one who has read Peter Schweizer’s books – she *is* incompetent, every bit as corrupted as Biden, every bit the liar that Biden (and Newsom) are. Newsom is also a foreign agent. With more and more truths coming out in conservative-leaning media, such as Issues & Insights, RedState, and Revolver, the Lie Machine (TV, “news”) can’t cover for Democrats anymore. Their lies have been exposed. BTW, when Kamala dropped out in ’20, left of Lenin Los Angeles Times published an article showing she had a 96% disapproval rating in California. In. California. We hate her here. If it weren’t for mail-in ballots only (Covid, into today), ballot harvesting, ranked choice voting in some counties, Dominion statewide, except for Smartmatic which is in Los Angeles County alone, and unions – Democrats wouldn’t have a chance. Our last Primary, we did actually start to flip back red. Blah, blah, blah. I don’t care for Harris either and I also live in CA. But this choice is simple- Trump or NOT Trump. PERIOD. If the Republican had run almost anyone other than Trump, this race would have been significantly in their favor, instead of neck and neck, as it is right now. We can’t know that because they could easily have gotten someone like Hillary that no one was excited about. There are plenty of other solid candidates but no guarantee any of them would have been the nomination if Trump wasn’t. For that matter, if any of the rest of them were that electable then the primaries that Trump obliterated his competition in would have been a lot closer. But no one came close to winning a single state much less defeating him. Closed mind. Block of Wood. Lives in CA. Now, it makes sense. Bigger question: can Trump simply state facts and avoid getting lost on some personal attack tirade. Can he show some discipline in a debate or just throw out insults? I’m hoping he’s looking at the polls and what he needs to do and that people around him are telling him to stick to the facts because the facts do argue against her. Discipline, Focus, and a Conservative — not right wing—Vision will win in November Well, that rules out Trump on all three counts. Trump has focus, just not the focus we all wish he had but he definitely has it. Unfortunately Donald’s primary focus, and his secondary focus, is on Donald. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Department of Defense Shares Classified War Plan Details With Journalist

…Almost as if there is a US National Security Breech that has occurred and Ratcliffe, Gabbard and Patel have a serious Spy web to uncover.…

…Recruitment is up because Pentagon’s racist DEI policy was dropped. I disagree with you, Phil.…

Show full text (31744 chars)
• • • The most striking aspect is the MAGA denial and hypocrisy. Texts to Reporters on Yemen Military Strike Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg reports The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling. I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming. The reason I knew this is that Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, had texted me the war plan at 11:44 a.m. The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing. This is going to require some explaining. The Wall Street Journal reports Top Trump Officials Debated War Plans on Unclassified Chat Shared With Journalist Senior Trump administration national-security officials held detailed discussions of highly classified U.S. plans to launch airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi militants using a commercial messaging service and mistakenly included a journalist in the conversation, U.S. officials said Monday. The chats over the Signal encrypted messaging service spanned days and included specific information about weapons, targets and timing used in the attack, according to the Atlantic magazine, whose editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, was inadvertently included in the discussion and who disclosed the texts. Vice President JD Vance was skeptical of the need to strike the Houthis. Little U.S. trade passed through the Suez Canal, the maritime thorough way connecting the Red Sea to the Mediterranean, whereas “40 percent of European trade does.” Attacking the militants, Vance argued, would benefit Europe far more than the U.S. and might lead to a spike in oil prices. “I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,” he said. While he would support the consensus of the top officials in the chat, Vance said, “I just hate bailing Europe out again.” [Inconsistent messaging, hmm no one could possibly have thought that] Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and an account with the initial S.M., apparently the initials of senior White House aide Stephen Miller, agreed with Vance’s criticism of Europe. “It’s PATHETIC,” Hegseth said, though he recommended moving forward with the strikes instead of delaying the attack another month, as Vance suggested. The debate about the attack could leak, making the administration appear “indecisive,” or that Israel would decide to strike first, Hegseth said. National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes confirmed the authenticity of the chat in a statement to The Wall Street Journal. He didn’t respond to questions about whether the chat ran afoul of legal procedures for handling classified information. “I never sent any classified information on anything other than a secure U.S. government system. There is no justification whatsoever—none—to use any nongovernmental system,” said John Bolton, Trump’s third national-security adviser during the president’s first term. “This is appalling.” [Expect Trump supporters to attack Bolton instead of focusing on the message] Hegseth, speaking to reporters in Hawaii Monday, criticized Goldberg as “discredited” and said that “nobody was texting war plans and that’s all I have to say about that.” [Ah yes, attack the person you sent the texts to as “discredited] According to the Atlantic article, Hegseth pushed back on delaying the operation by a month, in part out of fear a potential leak would make the administration look “indecisive.” Two hours before the strikes began, Hegseth sent the group sensitive information about the strike plan, including “weapons packages, targets, and timing,” the magazine said. Goldberg wrote that he was initially dubious that the Signal chat group he was mistakenly invited to join was authentic. “I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.” The article didn’t include the operational details on the strike and withheld the name of a CIA official, Goldberg said. Hegseth is Discredited Please play this Amusing Video of Hegseth arracking Goldberg. Hegseth made a jackass out of himself. Here are some Texts Regarding Yemen . Had the administration acknowledged the serious error, Hegseth would not look so stupid, and I would not be doing this post. In this X video , Trump said he didn’t know anything about it. How many find that credible? Image the howls had this happened under the Biden administration. Texts to Reporters on Yemen Military Strike Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg reports The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling. I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming. The reason I knew this is that Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, had texted me the war plan at 11:44 a.m. The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing. This is going to require some explaining. The Wall Street Journal reports Top Trump Officials Debated War Plans on Unclassified Chat Shared With Journalist Senior Trump administration national-security officials held detailed discussions of highly classified U.S. plans to launch airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi militants using a commercial messaging service and mistakenly included a journalist in the conversation, U.S. officials said Monday. The chats over the Signal encrypted messaging service spanned days and included specific information about weapons, targets and timing used in the attack, according to the Atlantic magazine, whose editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, was inadvertently included in the discussion and who disclosed the texts. Vice President JD Vance was skeptical of the need to strike the Houthis. Little U.S. trade passed through the Suez Canal, the maritime thorough way connecting the Red Sea to the Mediterranean, whereas “40 percent of European trade does.” Attacking the militants, Vance argued, would benefit Europe far more than the U.S. and might lead to a spike in oil prices. “I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,” he said. While he would support the consensus of the top officials in the chat, Vance said, “I just hate bailing Europe out again.” [Inconsistent messaging, hmm no one could possibly have thought that] Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and an account with the initial S.M., apparently the initials of senior White House aide Stephen Miller, agreed with Vance’s criticism of Europe. “It’s PATHETIC,” Hegseth said, though he recommended moving forward with the strikes instead of delaying the attack another month, as Vance suggested. The debate about the attack could leak, making the administration appear “indecisive,” or that Israel would decide to strike first, Hegseth said. National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes confirmed the authenticity of the chat in a statement to The Wall Street Journal. He didn’t respond to questions about whether the chat ran afoul of legal procedures for handling classified information. “I never sent any classified information on anything other than a secure U.S. government system. There is no justification whatsoever—none—to use any nongovernmental system,” said John Bolton, Trump’s third national-security adviser during the president’s first term. “This is appalling.” [Expect Trump supporters to attack Bolton instead of focusing on the message] Hegseth, speaking to reporters in Hawaii Monday, criticized Goldberg as “discredited” and said that “nobody was texting war plans and that’s all I have to say about that.” [Ah yes, attack the person you sent the texts to as “discredited] According to the Atlantic article, Hegseth pushed back on delaying the operation by a month, in part out of fear a potential leak would make the administration look “indecisive.” Two hours before the strikes began, Hegseth sent the group sensitive information about the strike plan, including “weapons packages, targets, and timing,” the magazine said. Goldberg wrote that he was initially dubious that the Signal chat group he was mistakenly invited to join was authentic. “I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.” The article didn’t include the operational details on the strike and withheld the name of a CIA official, Goldberg said. Hegseth is Discredited Please play this Amusing Video of Hegseth arracking Goldberg. Hegseth made a jackass out of himself. Here are some Texts Regarding Yemen . Had the administration acknowledged the serious error, Hegseth would not look so stupid, and I would not be doing this post. In this X video , Trump said he didn’t know anything about it. How many find that credible? Image the howls had this happened under the Biden administration. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Can someone tell me why when something good happens Trump takes credit, but when something bad happens, it’s never his fault? I heard that Trump invented the phrase, “The buck never ever stops here.” An interesting way to communicate with Europe? Believable? This is just Nero and his minions doing the best they can don’t be to harsh.Just read finance and see what’s Boeing is asking Nero. Trump‘s people should use Hillary Clinton‘s line after the death of the US ambassador to Libya, a death that she probably could have prevented — “What difference, at this point, does it make?” While Trump is dealing with Iran and Putin western investors are pouring in. China is in a drought. investing in China is drying out. For decades China was entitled to western funds. Li Qiang, China PM, #2 after Xi, threatened western investors. Yesterday he sign an EO to fight the Anti China sanctions. Back in the olden economic analysis days ~ 18 years ago, Mish was big on ‘definitions’. How about this one – ‘Shared’ ? Your headline is ridiculously false. Whatever it takes for the clicks though I guess. It’s actually true Their marching orders came in; the new strategy is just lie and say it didn’t happen The mental gymnastics of thinking this admin is competent yet knowing they shared battle plans by mistake is proving too much for MAGAs. So now? Dissociate from reality and pretend it didn’t happen. In a day or two they’ll actually believe it. We’ve seen this before. “Battle plans”???????? If you had any time in the armed forces, you’d know that’s not what was discussed on these messages. If Goldberg actually claims he has classified information, then he should share it. The X post that Mish posted in this article is NOT classified. This is the Dems/Left looking for a scandal. Here’s another great Trump idea: White House Says Gold Reserves May Be Used to Purchase Bitcoin https://finance.yahoo.com/news/white-house-says-gold-reserves-213421472.html One of my observations from all of this, is that JD Vance seems to be the voice of reason – basically hesitating to think things out. I actually think he is the brains of the entire outfit. Of course I am orignally from Ohio, so I might be a bit biased. He could be the 9th president from my former state. After lecturing the European leader he is lecturing Trump’s cabinet members, while his wife is in Greenland. She shouldn’t have had that argument with him the other day. Now she finds herself suddenly in Greenland. Sometimes I wish I could have that power. In my experience people from Ohio have superior IQs and reasoning abilities as well as being level-headed, inventive and innovative. Those from the southwestern part are especially gifted. Although I myself come from there my judgment is disinterestedly correct. Downvotes come from non-Ohioans. Iran wants to make a deal with the US if Trump remove the sanction. In Riyad Russia and the US have agreed to a free merchant ships navigation in the Black Sea. Russia agreed to stop attacking energy facilities. The US will cut the cost of shipping insurance, Russia will sell fertilizers and agri products to the US and the global market. Guarnateed if Biden did this GOP would immediately begin impeachment proceedings. Everyone here knows that’s a fact. Um, did they impeach Biden for incapacity? Make Israel Great(er) Again! We’ve been bombing them for decades. Boneheaded chatting about this stuff but beyond that they are still kicking warning or no warning. They can’t be defeated with bombing. This never happened when everyone in the Government used Blackberries and their proprietary network + encryption. Maybe the US should have bought Blackberry just for the proprietary network + encryption so that only government employees would be on the chats. I don’t know how someone could “inadvertently” listen on the conversation on any platform, especially one that is promoted for security. Very fishy story. You democrats are really clinging onto small stuff and false hopes lately. I guess it is all you have left. Let’s talk about your decimated party instead. The end of globalism worldwide. The continuing nullification of your media lap dogs like the WSJ. All the corruption and theft by your hands that is being exposed. Your dwindling membership. The inevitable extinction of your party. What would you have said had this happened under Biden? Would it still have been “small stuff” then? I doubt it. Conservatives don’t care about any of that so long as they are in power. Correct, I wish both conservatives and liberals would just cut the BS and admit they want a dictator simply to punish the other side. https://babylonbee.com/news/4d-chess-genius-trump-leaks-war-plans-to-the-atlantic-where-no-one-will-ever-see-them Hilarious! W. VA banned emulsifiers and 7 artificial dyes in public schools. This situation is not about the leak, the Houthis, or what Donald Trump knew when asked. It is extremely alarming because the people in the administration whom the American people entrust conduct themselves in a serious and responsible manner as they perform their duties, which require strictly following all security protocols. These people lead government agencies that use safeguarded information as a matter of national security and life and death for the soldiers, operators, and sources they are responsible for preserving. Furthermore, how can these Cabinet members and senior advisors to the President ask those who report to them to strictly follow all security laws and protocols when they are having sensitive discussions on a private messaging App? Unfortunately, this is what you get when you staff your leadership positions with people who have zero or minimal experience handling classified material and working in the government in a world where strict adherence to security protocols is non-negotiable. How could the Director of the CIA, the Senior Security Advisor to the President, and the Director of National Intelligence not know better than to participate in such a discussion on a non-government unsecure messaging App? I would have even known to have everyone disconnect when the conversation turned to operational details. You have offended multiple GOP toadies After today’s Senate hearing, I have to wonder whether many of the principals who were on this Signal Chat actually understand what would be considered classified information and what would not. “[Expect Trump supporters to attack Bolton instead of focusing on the message]” Really? One can definitely expect Bolton to attack Trump, anytime his name is mentioned. Bolton would attack a turkey skeleton. The much bigger news is the incendiary devices found at the Tesla dealership in Austin. Why is Mike Waltz even talking with this Goldberg guy from The Atlantic. The Atlantic is a left-wing rag. Waltz needs to be yelled at and course-corrected. It would be helpful if the administration moved out of DC, away from the seductions of power. A small town in Texas or Oklahoma perhaps. Oh gee something is going on. Public acknowledgement that Biden was mentally impaired for most of his administration. Not so long ago Chinese Spy Balloons flying over military installations left unchallenged and nobody knows nothing. Opps meant weather balloons. Blinken and Sullivan security clearances revoked. Hillary Clintons security gets revoked. Some EU meps caught taking money from CCP operatives. US pulling back on NATO. Almost as if there is a US National Security Breech that has occurred and Ratcliffe, Gabbard and Patel have a serious Spy web to uncover. Nah could never have happened President Sharp as a Tack leaving Classified documents in his Garage, was on top of everything But then again am sure there was just one too many wedding invitations sent out by error. Trump man Baaaaaaaa….d If Waltz gets phased out then there is substance to leak story. If he remains a key administration personnel then there is more going on then public knows about. Biden was old but this gang are just plain morons. A “moderate” Trumper I know just jumped off the Trump train because of the attack on Yemen… He believed Trump’s claims about being a candidate for peace. biden was soiling himself and didn’t know what planet he was on. “He was old” was sold to arrogant leftists to keep the myth alive while the rest of life on earth could see reality. ‘sharp as a tack’. Bro, do better. The perfect winning administration screwed up! Have your heyday over it. Guess who is still in power. Everybody gets so excited when Trump’s administration screws up! I’m ok with the shear excitement over the screw up too. Whoopi, Trump’s admin screwed up, woopi woopi! Everyone is just waiting to pounce anyway. There is a lot of hatred going around mixed in a lot of TDS, still. It’s still a screw up that should not have happened. Whoopi and Michael Waltz do the tango. Michael Waltz sent it to the wrong Goldberg. Oh yeah, here’s that hypocrisy The US attacks the Hooties, ex Israel. The Israeli air defense intercepts Hooties ballistic missiles daily. Israel is on the bench. The US doesn’t need Israel. The US isn’t protecting Israel. Egypt, the UAE, the Saudis and other Arab navies might join together along with the US, the British and the French to protect the freedom of navigation in the Red Sea. It’s their interest – not Israel’s interest. JD Vance doesn’t get it. He is a trouble maker, a prsona non grata. That was the massage to the Atlantic. The Houthis only resumed their missile attacks because Israel refused to allow food, water and electricity to Gaza. Israel is trying to starve the Gazans. Trump could have told Netanyahu to let the food and water through or he’s cut off from all aid. Instead he’s bombing Yemen. I don’t believe he’s decapitated Ansar Allah’s leadership. They survived years of US-funded attacks by Saudi Arabia. Amygdala: Hamas is a criminal gang, They imposed $15K protection fee on every food truck. They collect 20%/25% protection fees from retailer. They have the guns. The Palestinian are moving to a safe zone. Three divisions will eradicate Hamas in the war zones. The IDF eliminated Hamas leaders and those who replaced them fast. Very fast. Those in the safe zone will get food, water and other supply. Those in war zones will starve. The US and the Arab nations and the Palestinians themselves want Israel to finish off Hamas. Ethnic cleansing. bs wipe off the cookie crumbs, pull your pants up and get a job. Hamas cleansing. You have said many ignorant things, but this might be the cherry on the sundae. Once again you have no idea what you’re talking about. Stop repeating what others say to you from men in white pointy hats. One if by land, Two if by Sea. How about this – no justification whatsoever for U.S. military in the sphere of Our Greatest Alley? Europe is pretty thick about American values and intentions. Goldberg was merely the useful idiot chosen to relay this message: “I just hate bailing Europe out again,” VP Vance “I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC,” SecDef Hegseth Worse of all – Israel. maybe the prudent action would have been to notify the source to indicate you received this information. This is far better than feeling compelled to notify the world. What was the need to celebrate your find? It’s Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic – a sworn enemy of Trump. Trump admin promised transparency. You don’t believe the American people deserve to know that we have a gang of incompetents at the top? The Hooties are stronger and more sophisticated than Hezbollah. The risk of sinking a US navy ship is high. There were a few close calls. In an era of nuke proliferation one regional power can use their proxies to destroy an enemy, or blackmail the US. It requires a preemptive strike. Attacking the Hooties is a massage to Iran. Why did the Atlantic, a failing liberal magazine, get an inside info about JD Vance. JD Vance used to write for the Atlantic under a pseudonym. Why Usha Vance is in Greenland. Yemen’s GDP is about 1/3 that of Vermont, the smallest US State. Its population is 50x greater. So why are we talking about Houthis doing this or that? They can’t afford to throw rocks by themselves. Put a TV “personality” in charge of the department of defense and you wreck national security. Put a TV “personality” in charge of the white house and you wreck the global economy and U.S. reputation. What did people expect? Curious silence from the regular Trumpers here. Don’t worry guys, it will just get harder and harder to defend the clowns and circus but I’m sure you’ll try… in that case, let me make some noise .. military recruitment is up. your family is in debt up to their teeth due to the policies of the first quarter century in this country. if you try to unscrew 25 years of bad policy in 2 months, you’re bound to have some screw-ups. if you didn’t vote for trump, maybe you voted for biden. if that’s the case, maybe you like pretending you don’t know where covid came from or whether or not we should have penises in girls locker rooms. I’m sure this is all very difficult for you. Military recruitment is up because 18 year olds feel hopeless about an economy where they will never be able to afford a house or even a car. how about a source citation on that point. Plus free college. Don’t underestimate the value of that. Recruitment is up because Pentagon’s racist DEI policy was dropped. I disagree with you, Phil. I know numerous military families in the area whose kids QUIT the military and wouldn’t re-up the last few years due to insane woke and coddling of the Island of Misfit Human types. Some are now returning. remember that time when Pete Hegseth accidentally included a journalist in a group text and then the next thing we knew russia was invading ukraine and China was blatantly flying spy balloons over the United states. oh wait … Seems like there’s a lot more downvoting commies on the site lately.. all those girls at Columbia have more free time on their hands now. The alternative was the blow job queen of San Francisco and the Hillary-Biden team of Blinken and Sullivan who’d set the world on fire. bj queens ? why is that a problem? It’s just not reason enough to elect someone presidentress. There’s a lot of BJs happening, but it’s between MAGA cultists and Trump/Musk. Worse is fellating the Prime Minister of Israel. HaHaHa!!! BJ Queen… Hear hear good sir!!!! Well said!!! What an embarrassment. Had this happened under Biden, MAGA would be calling for an immediate impeachment. MAGA = cult just as mush as progressive lib = cult. MAGA = AINO (American In Name Only) Put a disappearing (for weeks?!?) DEI hire (Austin) in charge of Defense Dept. Put Trannies in charge of.. multiple depts.. Put a communist Cuban immigrant (Mayorkas) in charge of the border & immigration….. Put a senile, treasonous felon (Biden) in the white house… And whaddaya get….. A million dead Ukrainians, $300 billion GONE/stolen/grifted, 12 million illegal aliens, DISASTROUS Afghan Pull-out, $375 billion to John Podesta controlled bank accounts, $1.8 trillion Green New Deal, $4.1 trillion disappeared, etc, etc, etc… There, I fixed it for ya. You’re welcome : ) Vs a DUI hire at defense and war plans being treated like an Uber eats order, lol Mish is right, your a bunch of hypocrites That would be ‘you are or you’re’.. You’re welcome, lol E pluribus unum … The world and the world’s investment money, in both holdings of US debt and US equities, are now voting on the reliability of America’s leadership, the American constitutional democracy, its rule of law, its institutions, and its past promises. The recent (since mid Jan)diversion in relative declines of the STOXX vice SPX is not random. Pete has just accidentally posted on Facebook the D Day battle plans for the invasion of Greenland. hat tip to ZH Must be the latest administration policy, code-named MATTA – Make America Totally Transparent Always./sarc Seriousy, it’s one big yikes! Simply a mistake. No big deal. The Houthi’s got bombed. Not surprised at all that Mish, Bolton, and Mr. Clinton are clutching their pearls. Bolton should be the first to go into Yemen. I would contribute to a go-fund-me to cover the expenses of his equipment, training, and travel expenses. I’d help, but he thinks he’s so smart that he wouldn’t need training. Here’s that hypocrisy Mish was on about KEGseth is a drunk. in over his head. this crowd ain’t america first. it’s imperial war mongering. more of the biden trump obama bush clinton stuff. These are the merit based hires? I bet they wished they’d kept a DEI hire around to blame this on. Maybe they can cancel the Inquisition now: https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/22/politics/defense-department-polygraph-tests-leaks/index.html This was because of a DUI hire. Very disappointing that these boobs aren’t pushing all discussions like this to the classified “SIPR” net, that supports conversations up to SECRET. Hegseth needs to re-accomplish required annual COMSEC training! This is Jack’s complete lack of surprise. Seems a real simple bright line might be to ask, ‘Would I put my social security number into this chat?’ “Lock him up, lock him up…” That’s all I need to hear for the next 3.75 years. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Unless Hegseth was on another bender. Then he needs help, and we should excuse his errors as they aren’t his fault LOL Who is it you want to lock up? It can’t be Trump because he wasn’t on this chat. Why Does This NOT come as a Surprise? Amateur hour! So how did Goldberg get “included.” Someone at DoD or elsewhere along the chain definitely “included” him … How would a TDS journo get ahold of this? Remember he foisted the “suckers and losers” hoax. He was fed that info by someone. Its not like your email autofilling. Why would he be on anyone’s email? Or Signal app? Using the app is the bigger issue. There are channels over which they could have discussed this securely. They didn’t. Some suggest the DoD does not trust regular channels. Others say to ensure it’s not recorded at all. Those are the 2 theories I have heard. I have no idea Does not trust regular channels or…convenience. The secure means of communication may require everyone getting in a SIPRNet room(s) to have conversations live. Who has time for that? Or a combination of trust, convenience, and ability to delete the record at will. Signal lets you delete a message you sent for yourself or for everyone. You can also delete the entire chat. Of course, everyone else will still have your text message unless you delete it for everyone, which again doesn’t work if someone has taken a screenshot. How about because they are just f-ing stupid! Exactly. How did he get included. I’m having Vindman flashbacks. It could be a stupid, but honest, error. Hillary did stuff like this on purpose and people got killed. But you have to wonder, how does the Editor in Chief of the Democrats Bible, and the rag that hates Trump even more than the NYT, get included? Mish is so quick to jump to conclusions before all the facts are known. I think he might be getting TDS. Ah, classic example of the “ MAGA denial and hypocrisy” Mish referred to. “Stupid, but honest, error”? So Hegseth didn’t know he was in charge of and discussing a major military strike ON a third party unsecured app? We’ve got ourselves a winner of the day, folks LOL Hopefully you are saving all this for therapy sessions. If you accept things like this as a fractured media and propaganda organs present them, that’s about your only option. look Im conservative, but we have to hold our leaders accountable no matter what ‘team’ we are on. This was bad. This whole ‘TDS’ stuff is is a scapegoat. Call out BS even when your side does it. We elected someone unqualified and unprofessional and we are surprised that we get this degree of screwups? I miss when politicians take responsibility. Simply having the discussion on the app broke federal law. It is very easy when you dont know what you are doing to push a button you didnt want to push and not even know you pushed it. Hillary’s big red button with Sergei? Hopefully that doesn’t include the nuclear launch buttons! Oh, this whole thing is deep in Mad Magazine, “Spy Vs. Spy” territory. Do Signal chat groups have separate “admin” users, one of whom (absent Signal app bugs) must have added Goldberg to the group? Do Signal groups have a log of who changed what, when? Was this a test of Goldberg, and/or using him to feed disinformation to unfriendlies? Was this a test of an admin? Did Goldberg raise a warning and who would he have notified of the issue? One might wonder how Goldberg would have been treated if it were WWII and he did not raise any red flags. We can count on never knowing any of this. Yes. He was in with JD Vance. Vance wrote for the Atlantic with a pseudonym. Slowly but surely Vice President Vance’s Maga/Trump loyalist image is being built up. Color me a conspiracy nut, it looks to me that Vance is being setup to be the next president. The betting will have to be Trump running for a 3rd term no matter what vs. Trump brushing the courts to the side and going full dictator vs Trumps family creating a monarchy and we just get one Trump after another vs JD using his billionaire connections to muscle into the top dictator spot when Donald gets sick … bets anyone? Nothing says strength like attacking one of the poorest countries in the world. After the beating taken by the US’ best proxy that money could buy, the untrained, the US has to come out swinging at some poor sob. Only carrier groups are such sitting ducks for hypersonic missiles… I’m no fan of President Trump and his inexperienced officials. But with this article, Mr. Goldberg has exposed holes in our national security. Better he should have reported it to the Senate privately, imo. Apparently you’re unfamiliar with Mr. Goldberg. I’ll take his side on this one, though. He’s under no obligation to cover for Trump administration ineptitude. It was good that he let the news out. There’s always the possibility that including Goldberg was not an accident. Yes, it’s very curious. This is the last journalist anyone would have on their contact list. The idiots on Idiot Mountain have reached their first plateau. Can it get any worse? Are you kidding? You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Biden’s New Carbon Capture Mandates Will Cause Blackouts, Increases Prices

…Biden dropped some carbon in his diaper yesterday or the day before right?…

…It’s our release of greenhouse gasses that is trapping that heat. That’s what matters. Not the heat that we release. That is a rounding error. 0.028% to 0.0425%.…

Show full text (42896 chars)
• • • The lie of the day is from the EPA: Carbon capture will pay for itself (thanks to IRA subsidies). No, it won’t even with subsidies. Expect blackouts and a higher price for electricity. Suite of Standards to Raise Costs, Reduce Output Let’s take a dive into the EPA news release Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes Suite of Standards to Reduce Pollution from Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants “Today, EPA is proud to make good on the Biden-Harris Administration’s vision to tackle climate change and to protect all communities from pollution in our air, water, and in our neighborhoods,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. “By developing these standards in a clear, transparent, inclusive manner, EPA is cutting pollution while ensuring that power companies can make smart investments and continue to deliver reliable electricity for all Americans.” A final rule for existing coal-fired and new natural gas-fired power plants that would ensure that all coal-fired plants that plan to run in the long-term and all new baseload gas-fired plants control 90 percent of their carbon pollution . The final emission standards and guidelines will achieve substantial reductions in carbon pollution at reasonable cost. The best system of emission reduction for the longest-running existing coal units and most heavily utilized new gas turbines is based on carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS) – an available and cost-reasonable emission control technology that can be applied directly to power plants and can reduce 90 percent of carbon dioxide emissions from the plants. Lower costs and continued improvements in CCS technology, alongside tax incentives from President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act that allow companies to largely offset the cost of CCS , represent recent developments in emissions controls that informed EPA’s determination of what is technically feasible and cost-reasonable. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law also includes billions of dollars to advance and deploy CCS technology and infrastructure. EPA projects that the sector can comply with the standards with negligible impact on electricity prices, thanks to cost declines in CCS and other emissions-reducing technologies. E PA analysis also finds that power companies can comply with the standards while meeting grid reliability, even when considering increased load growth . Final EPA Rule The EPA’s Final Rule is only 1,020 pages long. There were 953 references to carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS). I went through some of those 953 references and found these tidbits. CCS is an adequately demonstrated technology that achieves significant emissions reduction and is cost-reasonable, taking into account the declining costs of the technology and a substantial tax credit available to sources. The first component of the BSER [Best System of Emission Reduction] for base load combustion turbines is highly efficient generation (based on the emission rates that the best performing units are achieving) and the second component for base load combustion turbines is utilization of CCS with 90 percent capture. One of the key GHG [Greenhouse Gasses] reduction technologies upon which the BSER determinations are founded in these final rules is CCS—a technology that can capture and permanently store CO2 from fossil fuel-fired EGUs. I confess. I did not read all 1020 pages and don’t intend to. I have seen enough by reading through a dozen or so of the 953 references to CCS. Returning to the Biden-Harris document I note references to “reasonable cost” and “ largely offset the cost of CCS .” Thus CCS is admittedly not cost effective even with subsidies. IISD Sustainable Development For a rebuttal to the above Biden claims, please consider the International Institution for Sustainable Development article Why Carbon Capture and Storage Is Not a Net-Zero Solution for Canada’s Oil and Gas Sector The poor track record of CCS in Canada is part of a broader trend. According to the Global CCS Institute (2022), the global growth of carbon captured by commercially operating CCS facilities has been much slower than anticipated. As of September 2022, only 30 commercial CCS projects are operating across all sectors around the world, capturing 42.5 Mtpa. This falls far short of the IEA’s (2009) previous target of 300 Mtpa by 2020. Most proposed projects have been withdrawn: of the 149 CCS projects anticipated to be storing carbon by 2020, over 100 were cancelled or placed on indefinite hold (Abdulla et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). I n the United States, despite significant industry and government investment in the technology, more than 80% of proposed CCS projects have failed to become operational due to high costs, low technological readiness, the lack of a credible financial return, and dependence on government incentives that are withdrawn . Of those projects that are operating globally, 73% of the carbon captured is used for EOR. Put simply, proponents of CCS have repeatedly over-promised on the technology’s ability to reduce emissions, and CCS projects have under-delivered. CCS is both energy and capital intensive. The greatest amount of energy is required for the capture and compression of carbon, with additional amounts needed for transportation and storage. Capture and compression alone require 330–420 kWh per tonne of CO2 captured. CCS projects increase the energy demand of the facility they capture carbon from by 15%–25% on average, which stands to increase emissions given that the energy used to capture CO2 is often natural gas-powered electricity. In general, the technology is highly energy inefficient and generates its own emissions . The above doc largely pertains to carbon capture in Canada’s Oil and Gas Sector, not electricity production, bit it is instructive on the difficulty of and inefficacy of carbon capture. The lead CCS image is from that post. Biden EPA’s Plan to Ration Electricity The Wall Street Journal calls the CCS mandate Biden EPA’s Plan to Ration Electricity Section 111 of the Clean Air Act says the EPA can regulate pollutants from stationary sources through the “best system of emission reduction” that is “adequately demonstrated.” Carbon capture is neither the best nor adequately demonstrated. As of last year, only one commercial-scale coal plant in the world used carbon capture, and no gas-fired plants did. EPA says Inflation Reduction Act tax credits and funding in the 2021 infrastructure bill will “incentivize and facilitate the deployment” of carbon capture. But subsidies would have to be two to three times larger to make the technology cost-effective at a coal plant. Carbon capture reduces a plant’s efficiency, which also raises costs. Because carbon capture uses 20% to 25% of the electricity generated by a power plant, less will be available to the grid. That means more generators will be needed to provide the same amount of power. But new gas-fired plants won’t be built because the technology will make them uneconomic. Talk about a catch-22. Another problem: CO2 must be stored underground in certain geologic formations, largely in the upper Midwest and Gulf Coast. Permitting new wells for CO2 injections can take six years. Pipelines to transport CO2 can take even longer. Green groups oppose pipelines for CO2 as they do for oil and natural gas. All of this will hit while demand for power is surging amid new manufacturing needs and an artificial intelligence boom. Texas’s grid operator this week raised its forecast for demand growth for 2030 by 40,000 megawatts compared to last year’s forecast. That’s about seven times the power that New York City uses at any given time. Texas power demand will nearly double over the next six years owing to data centers, manufacturing plants, crypto mining and the electrification of oil and gas equipment. When temperatures in Texas recently climbed into the 80s, the grid operator told power plants not to shut down for maintenance. Americans around the country are increasingly being told to raise their thermostats during the summer and avoid running appliances to prevent blackouts. Even some Democrats are noticing the pinch on their voters’ pocketbooks. Reps. Marcy Kaptur, Henry Cuellar, Mary Sattler Peltola, Vicente Gonzalez and Jared Golden last weekend urged President Biden to defer finalizing EPA’s power-plant rules because they could “inadvertently exacerbate existing problems related to the unaffordability of electricity” and cause “increased risks to electric reliability.” Mr. Biden’s new rules will surely draw a legal challenge. But as litigation plays out, the tremendous uncertainty will delay investment in much-needed new gas plants. Americans didn’t face energy rationing in Mr. Biden’s first term, but they might in a second. The Inflation Reduction Act Keeps Biting in Predictable Ways Biden plans to reduce inflation by raising costs, producing less electricity when more is needed, force people into EVs without a capable grid, pipeline captured carbon when the pipelines don’t exist and allegedly increase reliabilty. It’s so stupid even some Democrats are concerned. Well not to worry, this can all be done at a “reasonable cost” with costs “largely offset” thanks to the IRA. Expect backouts and a much higher price for electricity as a key component of “reasonable cost”. Meanwhile, In Europe On May 2, I commented Europe Scraps Net Zero, Biden Should But Won’t, Why? Europe is rapidly backing off net zero as too costly, too inefficient, and too politically damaging. In the US, Biden is owned 100% by the Progressives. They control climate policy, regulations, student loans, abortion, everything. And they don’t give a damn about costs or inefficiencies. Finally, please note Biden Promotes Climate Change at the Expense of More Global Poverty The mad rush to deal with climate change, even if it works (it won’t), has a nasty tradeoff (more global poverty). But I do have some good news: Ford Loses $132,000 on Each EV Produced, Good News, EV Sales Down 20 Percent The fewer EVs we produce the fewer will be sold. EV sales are down 20 percent. That’s the good news but it hardly offsets Biden’s EPA madness. Suite of Standards to Raise Costs, Reduce Output Let’s take a dive into the EPA news release Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes Suite of Standards to Reduce Pollution from Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants “Today, EPA is proud to make good on the Biden-Harris Administration’s vision to tackle climate change and to protect all communities from pollution in our air, water, and in our neighborhoods,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. “By developing these standards in a clear, transparent, inclusive manner, EPA is cutting pollution while ensuring that power companies can make smart investments and continue to deliver reliable electricity for all Americans.” A final rule for existing coal-fired and new natural gas-fired power plants that would ensure that all coal-fired plants that plan to run in the long-term and all new baseload gas-fired plants control 90 percent of their carbon pollution . The final emission standards and guidelines will achieve substantial reductions in carbon pollution at reasonable cost. The best system of emission reduction for the longest-running existing coal units and most heavily utilized new gas turbines is based on carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS) – an available and cost-reasonable emission control technology that can be applied directly to power plants and can reduce 90 percent of carbon dioxide emissions from the plants. Lower costs and continued improvements in CCS technology, alongside tax incentives from President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act that allow companies to largely offset the cost of CCS , represent recent developments in emissions controls that informed EPA’s determination of what is technically feasible and cost-reasonable. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law also includes billions of dollars to advance and deploy CCS technology and infrastructure. EPA projects that the sector can comply with the standards with negligible impact on electricity prices, thanks to cost declines in CCS and other emissions-reducing technologies. E PA analysis also finds that power companies can comply with the standards while meeting grid reliability, even when considering increased load growth . Final EPA Rule The EPA’s Final Rule is only 1,020 pages long. There were 953 references to carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS). I went through some of those 953 references and found these tidbits. CCS is an adequately demonstrated technology that achieves significant emissions reduction and is cost-reasonable, taking into account the declining costs of the technology and a substantial tax credit available to sources. The first component of the BSER [Best System of Emission Reduction] for base load combustion turbines is highly efficient generation (based on the emission rates that the best performing units are achieving) and the second component for base load combustion turbines is utilization of CCS with 90 percent capture. One of the key GHG [Greenhouse Gasses] reduction technologies upon which the BSER determinations are founded in these final rules is CCS—a technology that can capture and permanently store CO2 from fossil fuel-fired EGUs. I confess. I did not read all 1020 pages and don’t intend to. I have seen enough by reading through a dozen or so of the 953 references to CCS. Returning to the Biden-Harris document I note references to “reasonable cost” and “ largely offset the cost of CCS .” Thus CCS is admittedly not cost effective even with subsidies. IISD Sustainable Development For a rebuttal to the above Biden claims, please consider the International Institution for Sustainable Development article Why Carbon Capture and Storage Is Not a Net-Zero Solution for Canada’s Oil and Gas Sector The poor track record of CCS in Canada is part of a broader trend. According to the Global CCS Institute (2022), the global growth of carbon captured by commercially operating CCS facilities has been much slower than anticipated. As of September 2022, only 30 commercial CCS projects are operating across all sectors around the world, capturing 42.5 Mtpa. This falls far short of the IEA’s (2009) previous target of 300 Mtpa by 2020. Most proposed projects have been withdrawn: of the 149 CCS projects anticipated to be storing carbon by 2020, over 100 were cancelled or placed on indefinite hold (Abdulla et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). I n the United States, despite significant industry and government investment in the technology, more than 80% of proposed CCS projects have failed to become operational due to high costs, low technological readiness, the lack of a credible financial return, and dependence on government incentives that are withdrawn . Of those projects that are operating globally, 73% of the carbon captured is used for EOR. Put simply, proponents of CCS have repeatedly over-promised on the technology’s ability to reduce emissions, and CCS projects have under-delivered. CCS is both energy and capital intensive. The greatest amount of energy is required for the capture and compression of carbon, with additional amounts needed for transportation and storage. Capture and compression alone require 330–420 kWh per tonne of CO2 captured. CCS projects increase the energy demand of the facility they capture carbon from by 15%–25% on average, which stands to increase emissions given that the energy used to capture CO2 is often natural gas-powered electricity. In general, the technology is highly energy inefficient and generates its own emissions . The above doc largely pertains to carbon capture in Canada’s Oil and Gas Sector, not electricity production, bit it is instructive on the difficulty of and inefficacy of carbon capture. The lead CCS image is from that post. Biden EPA’s Plan to Ration Electricity The Wall Street Journal calls the CCS mandate Biden EPA’s Plan to Ration Electricity Section 111 of the Clean Air Act says the EPA can regulate pollutants from stationary sources through the “best system of emission reduction” that is “adequately demonstrated.” Carbon capture is neither the best nor adequately demonstrated. As of last year, only one commercial-scale coal plant in the world used carbon capture, and no gas-fired plants did. EPA says Inflation Reduction Act tax credits and funding in the 2021 infrastructure bill will “incentivize and facilitate the deployment” of carbon capture. But subsidies would have to be two to three times larger to make the technology cost-effective at a coal plant. Carbon capture reduces a plant’s efficiency, which also raises costs. Because carbon capture uses 20% to 25% of the electricity generated by a power plant, less will be available to the grid. That means more generators will be needed to provide the same amount of power. But new gas-fired plants won’t be built because the technology will make them uneconomic. Talk about a catch-22. Another problem: CO2 must be stored underground in certain geologic formations, largely in the upper Midwest and Gulf Coast. Permitting new wells for CO2 injections can take six years. Pipelines to transport CO2 can take even longer. Green groups oppose pipelines for CO2 as they do for oil and natural gas. All of this will hit while demand for power is surging amid new manufacturing needs and an artificial intelligence boom. Texas’s grid operator this week raised its forecast for demand growth for 2030 by 40,000 megawatts compared to last year’s forecast. That’s about seven times the power that New York City uses at any given time. Texas power demand will nearly double over the next six years owing to data centers, manufacturing plants, crypto mining and the electrification of oil and gas equipment. When temperatures in Texas recently climbed into the 80s, the grid operator told power plants not to shut down for maintenance. Americans around the country are increasingly being told to raise their thermostats during the summer and avoid running appliances to prevent blackouts. Even some Democrats are noticing the pinch on their voters’ pocketbooks. Reps. Marcy Kaptur, Henry Cuellar, Mary Sattler Peltola, Vicente Gonzalez and Jared Golden last weekend urged President Biden to defer finalizing EPA’s power-plant rules because they could “inadvertently exacerbate existing problems related to the unaffordability of electricity” and cause “increased risks to electric reliability.” Mr. Biden’s new rules will surely draw a legal challenge. But as litigation plays out, the tremendous uncertainty will delay investment in much-needed new gas plants. Americans didn’t face energy rationing in Mr. Biden’s first term, but they might in a second. The Inflation Reduction Act Keeps Biting in Predictable Ways Biden plans to reduce inflation by raising costs, producing less electricity when more is needed, force people into EVs without a capable grid, pipeline captured carbon when the pipelines don’t exist and allegedly increase reliabilty. It’s so stupid even some Democrats are concerned. Well not to worry, this can all be done at a “reasonable cost” with costs “largely offset” thanks to the IRA. Expect backouts and a much higher price for electricity as a key component of “reasonable cost”. Meanwhile, In Europe On May 2, I commented Europe Scraps Net Zero, Biden Should But Won’t, Why? Europe is rapidly backing off net zero as too costly, too inefficient, and too politically damaging. In the US, Biden is owned 100% by the Progressives. They control climate policy, regulations, student loans, abortion, everything. And they don’t give a damn about costs or inefficiencies. Finally, please note Biden Promotes Climate Change at the Expense of More Global Poverty The mad rush to deal with climate change, even if it works (it won’t), has a nasty tradeoff (more global poverty). But I do have some good news: Ford Loses $132,000 on Each EV Produced, Good News, EV Sales Down 20 Percent The fewer EVs we produce the fewer will be sold. EV sales are down 20 percent. That’s the good news but it hardly offsets Biden’s EPA madness. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Meanwhile the UK government has been taken to court and lost twice over trying to wriggle out of it’s silly Carbon Capture Act – because they don’t have the balls to just abolish the Act… same with “leaving the ECHR”, the “Equality Act”, and the “Race Relations Act”. “a technology that can capture and permanently store CO2” I guess these idiots won’t realize we need the O2 part of the molecule to breath until everyone starts dropping dead. Plants keep the carbon part of the molecule and give us the oxygen. Just plant more plants. Most of it is done by “plants” in the sea… Maybe so, but adding plants on land would help. It’s better than burying our oxygen. More is needed. Yes. But that is only a part of a solution. There is no single answer. It will take thousands of different initiatives to solve this problem. Don’t worry. Ripping out Joshua trees, yucca, Palo Verde and a bunch of other vegetation/eco systems and destroying the deserts in the southwest to put up a shit ton of un-recyclable solar panel farms is the magnificent irony for you climate activists and “renewable” energy retards. You are FRAUDS and have been propagandized that in order to save the planet, “we” have to destroy it. That takes a severe mental disease to buy that kind of bullshit They are cybertrees silly, making infinity cryptomoney! More importantly, the Biden energy policy will cause mass impoverishment and death as people must choose between heat and food NetZero == Genocide NetZeroGDP “The Science” posits that adding CO2 to an atmosphere traps heat and will increase the temperature of the atmosphere. That fact has been known since the 19th century. If the United States had some sort of atmospheric bubble over it that didn’t allow CO2 emissions from China and the developing world, the Biden policy might make some sense. Obviously that is an impossibility and the real goal of the Biden administration and the Davos crowd is to reduce the standard of living of the U.S. middle class to that of the developing world. They believe Americans have it too good and the majority must sacrifice so important people can continue to live large. I will add that if the American political class and the world elites loathe Trump, it gives me pause because I’ve always seen the enemy of my enemy as someone I should examine further. Trump will likely get my vote because of his enemies because I was far less impressed with those he hired and how he governed. Fifty years from now, people will be amazed at the religious belief in anthropogenic climate change occurring in the 21st Century. Meanwhile, we have to suffer through another fatwa from our good leaders. Do carbon credits make sense to help lower carbon emissions? .. why not use the 4 Principles of Market Environmentalism (cedarowl.substack.com) – to lower or minimize carbon effluents – in an absolute sense, like through decentralized solutions and technology and innovation? .. “Phantom carbon credits are worse for the environment than no carbon credits” – ft.com/content/93938a1b-dc36-4ea6-9308-… They don’t. It just financializes environmental activism for banks to get their cut of the action. If WEF participants believed what they are selling, Davos would remain a quiet town year-round and not have annual parking crunches for commuter jets. It’s fascinating how they manage to be both short-termist and long-termist simultaneously. “The mad rush to deal with climate change, even if it works (it won’t), has a nasty tradeoff (more global poverty).” That supposes that the aid that the USA gives to poor countries provides significant relief (it doesn’t). If the USA government was actually concerned about poor countries (it isn’t), it would try to work out a global trade system that makes sense for everyone, as opposed to one dominated by the dollar. Apart from that, yeah, CSS is greenwashing of the worst kind that mostly conveniently ignores that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is a pretty real thing, so there was never more than a snowflake’s chance in hell that it could be made to work. Stop NJ Governor and President, Union leaders, from placing Windmills in our Ocean , short term profits, but killing our wildlife, higher electricity bills, No windmills off the Jersey shore! Think about it! You are not voting this November, about the Individual, but the actions of the Federal Government party they represent! Maybe have a look at the Net Power technology. They’re building a new type of gas turbine that makes ccs affordable. https://netpower.com/technology/ And if CO2 regulations go away, the CO2 is valuable for enhanced oil recovery. “Americans didn’t face energy rationing in Mr. Biden’s first term, but they might in a second.” Coming full circle to the rationing era of WW2. “Today, EPA is proud to make good on the Biden-Harris Administration’s vision to tackle climate change…” Obviously, a political propaganda speech by the verbiage. Hey, that’s what political appointees do! Sleepy joe continues to dig his own hole. Drill baby drill! In my opinion, this is the statement that needs to be scrutinized… “ Lower costs and continued improvements in CCS technology, alongside tax incentives from President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act that allow companies to largely offset the cost of CCS , represent recent developments in emissions controls that informed EPA’s determination of what is technically feasible and cost-reasonable.” ‘Technically feasible and cost-reasonable’ means that the technology has not yet been developed, and that the costs certainly will never be REASONABLE. Biden dropped some carbon in his diaper yesterday or the day before right? Great video of the mini squat and squeeze It is elder abuse at this point and they do it to all of their stooges Re elect Biden. Pay the man. Biden sure is bursting with new ideas according to the articles here. Did he received some secret elixir of youth? Asking for an older friend. Honda generators are the way to go. I can’t imagine another Trump Whitehouse, but we don’t have a choice Yes, you do have another choice. https://rumble.com/v4soyjf-rfk-jr.-biden-is-the-real-spoiler.html Well, if the CIA manage to off him, you might get President Tulsi Gabbard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHB2F2pOm_0 Mass fish death in Vietnam as heatwave roasts Southeast Asia | AFP You believe the media output from a corrupt developing world communist dictatorship? BSER – Bull Shit Excuse for Ripoff. Say bye bye to the gulf coast and Atlantic coast. Sea level rise since 2010 is swallowing more land. https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/alarming-map-shows-american-south-sea-levels-rapidly-rising/ss-BB1lRlU3?ocid=weather-verthp-feeds Obama’s beach house in Martha’s Vineyard is the only proof one needs to expose the rising sea level scam. Have they raised Plymouth Rock yet? A hundred years, or a thousand years is nothing in earth years for the planet Earth, no matter what the Human Race do , the earth will not be recognizable in a million years, One benefit is that it will reduce the population of wealthy Democrats who hog the shoreside real estate. Again it’s an economic system underneath it all that doesn’t work anymore for the vast majority of people globally. Relax, enjoy the ride until it is over. You may well wake up with a bit more maturity under your belt and then you will suddenly be over that insanity with clarity. It’s debt, which is liberally and enthusiastically used by socialist governments to steal and destroy economies, impoverishing everyone – see history for details. CO2 storage will only be done when it is economically beneficial to do so. The good news is that it is, especially in otherwise poor soil areas like rainforests. Charcoal stores carbon in soil for centuries, enriching it and making it fertile for agriculture. Another possible counterintuitive answer lies in redirecting plastics recycling flows to compaction and burying in played out strip pits in arid climes for possible later retrieval. Plastic is a stable, solid form of (hydro) carbon. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta Biochar is a reasonable way to store carbon and improve soil at the same time. It has limited use though and has downsides. Over application actually makes the soil worse. And many inexpensive sources of biochar are often contaminated and worse for the soil. Isn’t charcoal acidic? It’s like with oil, there are different types, with different effects. Idiots will idiot. Thank goodness those in-all-way-superior Afghans are still massively outbreeding “us”, over in that vastly superiorly governed, comparative utopia of heirs. That does leave hope that there will still be something resembling a civilization left, even a few decades from now. I have not read this proposal. Nor do I intend to. Thanks to Mish for looking at some of it. There are many types of ccs. But for simplicity I will break into two: at the source, before it is released into the atmosphere; or at the end, pulling it out of the atmosphere. At the source is best. Coal plant emissions are 12-15% CO2. Gas plants are 5-7%. Far easier to capture these emissions at those concentrations than when it’s already in the atmosphere and just 0.04%. It is far more cost effective to capture at the source. Having said that, no business will do this voluntarily, because there is no profit in it. So it has to be legislated. And there is no way to determine if the cost is reasonable or if the long term benefits outweigh the up front costs. The more logical way to reduce emissions dramatically would be to replace all coal plants with natural gas. Particularly since NG is so plentiful and cheap right now. “ The more logical way to reduce emissions dramatically would be to replace all coal plants with natural gas. Particularly since NG is so plentiful and cheap right now.” PapaDave – I have been saying that for years. I don’t like coal, more so for SOx and NOx than CO2 On ships, they only switch fuels when they enter EU waters. On typical LNG carriers coming from somewhere like Qatar to Rotterdam, they pass through the Red Sea and Suez with sour HFO from the gulf, then switch to NOx/SOx free near the Spanish EEZ, to pass through the Straits of Gibraltar. Yep. We agree on this. Regarding the last paragraph, “The more logical way…”, The yet more logical way is to use less energy, to replace the coal plants with nothing. Mish alludes to that with his statements about blackouts and rationing. We have been warned, and the political zealots are giving us no choice but to adapt our lives to using less, much less, electricity. I am old enough to remember warnings not to plug too much into our home’s electrical sockets or we will blow a fuse. We need to understand that such a life is returning to us. Good luck with that. Our use of energy has only moved in one direction since we moved from hunter/gatherer to agrarian. We won’t do it voluntarily. And you are correct. The only way to reduce energy use is with higher prices. Got oil? Good thing electric car sales are down. Who needs clean air? Smog gives you lovely sunsets…and keeps the grave diggers busy. The eco-arsonists in southern Quebec gave those in Great Lakes flyover states lovely sunsets last summer. Those fossil-fuel powered electric cars? How about hydrogen fuel cells instead? Or Elephants? I’m not an expert in physics, but I remember some basic laws. If we produce energy burning coal or gas, liberating CO2, to trap it through chemical or physical means will consume a similar amount of energy. The trees can make it with sun’s energy, but with man made means is impossible to be efficient. It’s like a perpetual movement machine. Trees capture 30% of man’s CO2 emissions. Oceans capture 25%. The rest keeps accumulating in the atmosphere. Which is why CO2 levels have increased from 280 ppm (in 1800) to 425 ppm today. We are currently increasing CO2 levels by 2.8 ppm each year vs 2 ppm in the 1950s. Presuming your numbers are accurate, that is quite the improvement per capita considering global population has more than tripled during that time. Revert cropland devoted to corn-based ethanol back to grassland/prairie and you’ll sequester yourself back to a tolerable emission level. Toss in restored tropical and subtropical forests and you’ll be ahead of the game. Land use change is ignored, but much easier and cost-effective than trying to isolate and sequester a gas that composes 0.0425% of the troposphere. First: I would like to see your numbers (cost and benefit) on reverting cropland and forests please. And an estimate of how long it would take to complete this reversion. Otherwise, it’s just empty words and wishful thinking. Second: The climate will react to the level of CO2 accumulating in the atmosphere. It doesn’t care about per capita levels. We are currently at 425 ppm and still rising. Plus there is a lag of approximately 20 years before we see the full effects of increased CO2 levels (studies range from a lag of 10-50 years). So the climate today is the result of CO2 levels that were 55 ppm lower (370 ppm) from 20 years ago. This tells us we have 20 years of increasing issues still baked in. Even if we could magically stop all emissions today (an impossibility). First- In the US in 2022 ~15.4 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol were produced from 5.5 billion bushels of corn (about 36% of national production). Presuming 200 bushels/acre (rough approximation…perhaps it would be best to only consider lower-yielding land?) that is 27.5 million acres or 43,000 sq miles which is roughly the size of Virginia. Shifting that amount of land back to prairie/grassland would take time, but there are both short-term and long-term benefits from raising of albedo (especially in the cold months since snow cover would persist longer) to cooling near-surface temperatures that would be in addition to carbon storage and general environmental improvement. The numbers here work out to roughly 0.5 metric tons per hectare, which would be roughly 5.6 million metric tons C/yr during years 13 to 22, being mindful that their numbers don’t extend more than 60 cm below the surface and there would be additional root growth beyond that. This would be an ongoing process once established and be a much more natural and sustainable approach than trying to capture gas and stuff it in subterranian cavities with the hope it doesn’t leak out. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-08636-w Globally those folks estimated that human agricultural activities have moved ~133 Gt C from the soil to the atmosphere so there is plenty that could be done in this particular arena. I don’t have a cost for you, but considering the things that have been conceived and funded over the years this would hardly be the worst of the lot and the fringe benefits wouldn’t be for just a connected few. No cost? No time frame? Then how do you know if it’s worth it? 1 Solyndra should cover it. Seriously though, it could be started by funding it with the unused/unneeded corn subsidies from the unfarmed land- beneficial program with no increase to the budget! The linked article provides a timeline for ROI , but I did pull out the sequestration during the second decade in my comment. If you’re asking how long would it take to plant, that would be a function of time/money put into it but really it is plowed land to begin with so it could happen immediately, unlike sequestration schemes which require years and environmental reviews to get going. If you’re advocating reducing atmospheric CO2 levels to pre-industrial amounts how could you seriously question the value of reverting land used to make corn-based ethanol to its pre-agrarian state? One other benefit I should mention is no more water needing to be used to grow corn and ferment it, which will be increasingly important as aquifers run dry. Very good. Sounds promising. What are the chances of it happening? Much smaller than I’d like them to be, but optimistically i’d say chances are non-zero. Unfortunately K.I.S.S. approaches don’t tend to be politically favored, maybe it needs more overhead to grease the wheels. Second- The fixation on atmospheric CO2 is missing the forest for the trees, as the planet’s climate is a complex system of complex systems. Human life is exothermic and the more “advanced” a society is, the more waste heat its population produces to remain comfortable and entertained. Urbanization, broader land-use change, transportation impacts beyond burning fuel (e.g. road building and maintenance) — devoting so much of our collective resources to addressing one particular facet of humanity’s impact on it’s environment (atmospheric CO2 concentration) is not a good allocation of time or money in my opinion. I pointed out the per capita increase as evidence that there has been a change in the rate. Most population projections expect a plateauing of the planet’s population by 2100 and perhaps the delta will shift to negative for the next century based on birth rate alone (other variables aside). It seems to be the way most ”developed” nations are headed there sooner. This is not to say that any man-made problems will resolve on their own, of course. I bet he wasn’t expecting that – he likes to pontificate with sketchy numbers and then demand that anyone else produces chapter and verse from academic papers, as if that’s what he did. Nope. You are the one missing the forest for the trees. It’s not our release of heat that is warming the planet. The heat energy that reaches earth’s surface from the sun each day is 3000 times greater than what man emits. It’s our release of greenhouse gasses that is trapping that heat. That’s what matters. Not the heat that we release. That is a rounding error. 0.028% to 0.0425%. In addition, the globe warms and then carbon dioxide goes up. Not the other way around. C02 is plant food and it comes out of your mouth. Correct. Warming comes first (normally). That is how Milankovitch cycles work. Orbital changes cause a tiny bit more of the sun’s energy to reach earth’s surface which starts the warming. Subsequently, the additional warmth causes more CO2 to be released into the atmosphere. Which begins a feedback loop for thousands of years. More CO2 then captures more heat, which causes the release of more CO2, which causes the capture of more heat, etc. Over a 10k or 20k year Milankovitch warming cycle this feedback loop causes CO2 to increase from 170 ppm to 300 ppm, and temperatures to rise. Without the CO2, the temperature would barely budge. But because of the CO2 feedback loop, the earth warms a lot, the mile of ice over New York melts, and the ice sheets retreat to the Arctic. Then a cooling Milankovitch cycle begins and the process reverses for 80,000 years (yes , cooling cycles are much longer than warming cycles). Over the complete cycle of 100,000 years, CO2 ranges from a low of 170 ppm to a high of 300 ppm and then back down to 170 ppm. And yes, the warming and cooling begin first, and then the CO2 feedback loop begins. Currently, we are 8000 years into the current cooling cycle. For the last 8000 years, the planet has been slowly cooling and CO2 has been slowly decreasing as it always does. But in the last 200 years, mankind has thrown a big wrench into the works. Instead of a continued drop in CO2 and temperature, our emissions from fossil fuels has increased CO2 from 280 ppm in 1880 to 425 ppm today (levels not seen in the last several million years). This is no longer temperature first, then CO2 feedback loop. This is mankind pumping massive amounts of CO2 first. And temperature will follow. The problem now is that we are accelerating a natural process that normally take 10k years and cramming it into 200 years. And we are moving into territory not seen for millions of years. Not 300 ppm upper limit. We are heading towards 500 ppm before 2050. It is estimated that temperatures and other climate changes will lag the forced increase in CO2 by 10-50 years. Which means that until we stop our emissions, CO2 will lead and temperature will follow. Trapping the CO2 will take MORE energy. Then it must be compressed and pumped underground taking even more energy. Unless this process is entirely free of fossil fuels (it won’t), it will not reduce CO2 Correct. It isn’t cheap and it isn’t very effective. Particularly if we keep pumping out emissions. It’s like trying to empty a bathtub full of water with a thimble, while the tap is turned on and running full. I happen to know a scientist who worked on CCS, and I have also worked on one phase of the construction of a CCS project. I can confirm that a lot of HFO was used to run the ships, and plenty of kerosene for flying workers in and out… but I think they had an electric car, to run to the local shops in, so that’s alright. The funding for the R&D is all public/taxpayer money, and then contracts handed over to large TNCs to develop it to a commercial level. “Reasonable cost” is the new “Common sense” euphemism for insane, unconstitutional marxist policies. It means they have no idea, and they know that whatever number they put, it’ll be higher. Yet another stupid idea from a senile marxist on his way out. When the democrats in Chicago and Baltimore and Philli and NYC start freezing, we will see how much they actually support this crap and how much is just posturing The most vile policies have to have the most misleading and dishonest euphemisms. “Gender affirming care” = genital mutilation. “vaccine mandates” are forced experimental injections, aka SEVERE violations of inalienable rights, “Green New Deal” = unaffordable, authoritarian, anti-free market corporatism, “Common Sense Gun Reform” = taking your private property and right to self-defense. These are all great evils being illegally forced onto a free people. Inflation Reduction Act, Patriot Act, etc. This is just another “full employment bill: and generator of thousands of jobs for overpaid counterproductive federal bureaucrats and regulators, 95% of whom, will vote Democrat for the rest of their lives. DEI employment program. High paying government jobs where you can never be fired and there is no reason to be efficient became profit doesn’t matter and taxpayers are never “paying their fair share.” You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Did Trump Adopt Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s Bazooka Theory?

…Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan.…

…Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan.…

Show full text (37184 chars)
• • • The answer is yes, but the context is much different. What Is the Bazooka Theory? “If you’ve got a bazooka in your pocket, and people know you’ve got it, you may not have to take it out.” Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson made that statement on July 15, 2008 in during his testimony before the Senate Banking Committee regarding government support for mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Paulson Fires Bazooka In October, Paulson fired his bazooka in what was the start of the biggest bank bailout in history. Please recall Compelling Banks To Lend At Bazooka Point written October 15, 2008. The chief executives of the nine largest banks in the United States trooped into a gilded conference room at the Treasury Department at 3 p.m. Monday. To their astonishment, they were each handed a one-page document that said they agreed to sell shares to the government, then Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said they must sign it before they left. By 6:30, all nine chief executives had signed — setting in motion the largest government intervention in the American banking system since the Depression and retreating from the rescue plan Mr. Paulson had fought so hard to get through Congress only two weeks earlier. All told, the potential cost to the government of the latest bailout package comes to $2.25 trillion, triple the size of the original $700 billion rescue package, which centered on buying distressed assets from banks. The latest show of government firepower is an abrupt about-face for Mr. Paulson, who just days earlier was discouraging the idea of capital injections for banks. Fed Fires Bazookas Also note the Fed slashed interest rates to zero, started an alphabet soup of lending facilities, suspended mark-to-market accounting (still suspended), started paying interest on all reserves, and launched QE to heights no one would have believed if I predicted them at the time. Trump’s Bazookas Reciprocal tariffs of up to 140 percent Breaking USMCA Mass deportation threats on and off Repeat “Two Week Warnings” None of the above threats had the intended effect. Trump announced 200 deals “guaranteed” and delivered one. Threatening nations with tariffs to the negotiating table failed miserably, even after the bazookas were fired. Trump did not get deals he liked even after upping tariffs. Then Trump was forced to dramatically cut back tariffs when China withheld rare earth elements. On April 17, Trump said he would know if Putin is tapping us along? Well, Mr. president, what have you found out in the last two months? Honestly, the best thing about Trump is the fact he always chickens out. When facing public backlash for the worst elements of his agenda, he always folds like a lawnchair. https://t.co/JsyDlUFdhJ — Joshua Reed Eakle 🗽 (@JoshEakle) June 19, 2025 Trump Will Decide Whether to Bomb Iran Within Two Weeks Yesterday, I commented Trump Will Decide Whether to Bomb Iran Within Two Weeks In saying he’ll make a decision on Iran within two weeks, President Trump has reached for an old standby. Two weeks and he’ll know whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine. Two weeks until the next move on trade. Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan. “When the next decision isn’t obvious, sometimes he just buys himself more time,” said GOP strategist Alex Conant, who worked in the George W. Bush White House. “Two weeks is forever in politics. The truth is, a lot of problems just work themselves out if you give them time.” That appears to be Trump’s current calculation. He is trying to buy more time in hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran – or a total surrender. Putting off a decision also keeps the onus on Israel to continue the fight, and spares Trump the difficult choice of whether to commit the U.S. militarily. Trump campaigned on getting the U.S. out of wars, not joining them, and his political base is in a fierce debate over Iran. The bazooka this time is a bunker-buster bomb. CNN reports Israel has pushed the US to use its ‘bunker buster’ bomb on Iran. Here’s what the weapon can do As President Donald Trump is warming to the idea of using US military assets to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, officials and experts have suggested the US’ 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bomb is the only weapon capable of destroying the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, a facility thought to be key to Tehran’s nuclear program, which is carved into a mountain and extends deep underground. The GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), which has yet to be used operationally, is designed for “reaching and destroying our adversaries’ weapons of mass destruction located in well-protected facilities,” according to a fact sheet from the US Air Force. The weapon is a 30,000-pound bomb with 6,000 pounds of “high explosives,” said Masao Dahlgren, a fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies Missile Defense Project. What to Know About the Fighting Between Israel and Iran The New York Times comments What to Know About the Fighting Between Israel and Iran A day of talks involving representatives of Iran and Europe in Geneva on Friday broke up with no signs of a breakthrough, a week into the latest escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. Civilians have borne the brunt of the attacks, as Israeli missiles hit some apartment buildings and residential complexes. Residents who spoke to The New York Times said they had not experienced attacks like this in a generation, with some recalling the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s. Some Iranians are steeling themselves for a long conflict and weighing how to find relative safety. Long lines of cars have packed highways heading out of Tehran, though many residents say they have no place to go. U.S. intelligence agencies continue to believe that Iran has yet to decide whether to make a nuclear bomb even though it has developed a large stockpile of the enriched uranium necessary for it to do so, according to intelligence and other American officials. The U.S. military has concluded that one bomb would not destroy the Fordo facility on its own; an attack would have to come in waves, with B-2s releasing one bomb after another down the same hole. Trump is hoping the threat of using a bunker buster bomb will mean he won’t have to use it. So far, no luck. Recall Trump’s claim Russia would not have invaded Ukraine on his watch. Then Trump pulled out bazookas threatening sanctions on Russia. What happened to those threats? Trump made similar claims regarding Iran and Israel. Supposedly it would never happen on his watch. That bazooka threat vanished too. Since it will take more than one bomb to hit the site, perhaps Iran wants to make Trump use a bomb before it negotiates. But who knows where the latest high-level games of chicken take us. Related Posts April 13, 2025: China Halts Rare Earth Exports Desperately Needed by the US I have been warning about this for years. It’s now happening. June 5, 2025: Two-TACO Trump Day on His Call to Xi Over Rare Earth Elements Trump is hyping up his call with China’s Xi. But chalk up 2 more TACOs. June 5, 2025: Trump Gives Negotiators the Green Light to Lift US Export Controls There is no precedent for negotiation over security-imposed export controls. June 12, 2025: China Keeps Leverage on the US with a 6-Month Limit on Rare Earth Exports Trump’s crowing over a new deal is more hype than reality in 3 ways. When other nations pull out their own bazookas, Trump backs down. Iran wants the bomb for the same reason North Korea wanted the bomb. Some might argue justifiably so. Does A) Israel need to take out Iran’s nuclear facilities, or does B) Israel’s action show why Iran needs a bomb to defend itself? C) Neither D) Both https://t.co/SxT8z725o5 — Mike “Mish” Shedlock (@MishGEA) June 13, 2025 Regardless, the problem for Iran is that in the absence of a bomb, it has no bazooka to pull out. What Is the Bazooka Theory? “If you’ve got a bazooka in your pocket, and people know you’ve got it, you may not have to take it out.” Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson made that statement on July 15, 2008 in during his testimony before the Senate Banking Committee regarding government support for mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Paulson Fires Bazooka In October, Paulson fired his bazooka in what was the start of the biggest bank bailout in history. Please recall Compelling Banks To Lend At Bazooka Point written October 15, 2008. The chief executives of the nine largest banks in the United States trooped into a gilded conference room at the Treasury Department at 3 p.m. Monday. To their astonishment, they were each handed a one-page document that said they agreed to sell shares to the government, then Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said they must sign it before they left. By 6:30, all nine chief executives had signed — setting in motion the largest government intervention in the American banking system since the Depression and retreating from the rescue plan Mr. Paulson had fought so hard to get through Congress only two weeks earlier. All told, the potential cost to the government of the latest bailout package comes to $2.25 trillion, triple the size of the original $700 billion rescue package, which centered on buying distressed assets from banks. The latest show of government firepower is an abrupt about-face for Mr. Paulson, who just days earlier was discouraging the idea of capital injections for banks. Fed Fires Bazookas Also note the Fed slashed interest rates to zero, started an alphabet soup of lending facilities, suspended mark-to-market accounting (still suspended), started paying interest on all reserves, and launched QE to heights no one would have believed if I predicted them at the time. Trump’s Bazookas None of the above threats had the intended effect. Trump announced 200 deals “guaranteed” and delivered one. Threatening nations with tariffs to the negotiating table failed miserably, even after the bazookas were fired. Trump did not get deals he liked even after upping tariffs. Then Trump was forced to dramatically cut back tariffs when China withheld rare earth elements. On April 17, Trump said he would know if Putin is tapping us along? Well, Mr. president, what have you found out in the last two months? Honestly, the best thing about Trump is the fact he always chickens out. When facing public backlash for the worst elements of his agenda, he always folds like a lawnchair. https://t.co/JsyDlUFdhJ Trump Will Decide Whether to Bomb Iran Within Two Weeks Yesterday, I commented Trump Will Decide Whether to Bomb Iran Within Two Weeks In saying he’ll make a decision on Iran within two weeks, President Trump has reached for an old standby. Two weeks and he’ll know whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine. Two weeks until the next move on trade. Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan. “When the next decision isn’t obvious, sometimes he just buys himself more time,” said GOP strategist Alex Conant, who worked in the George W. Bush White House. “Two weeks is forever in politics. The truth is, a lot of problems just work themselves out if you give them time.” That appears to be Trump’s current calculation. He is trying to buy more time in hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran – or a total surrender. Putting off a decision also keeps the onus on Israel to continue the fight, and spares Trump the difficult choice of whether to commit the U.S. militarily. Trump campaigned on getting the U.S. out of wars, not joining them, and his political base is in a fierce debate over Iran. The bazooka this time is a bunker-buster bomb. CNN reports Israel has pushed the US to use its ‘bunker buster’ bomb on Iran. Here’s what the weapon can do As President Donald Trump is warming to the idea of using US military assets to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, officials and experts have suggested the US’ 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bomb is the only weapon capable of destroying the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, a facility thought to be key to Tehran’s nuclear program, which is carved into a mountain and extends deep underground. The GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), which has yet to be used operationally, is designed for “reaching and destroying our adversaries’ weapons of mass destruction located in well-protected facilities,” according to a fact sheet from the US Air Force. The weapon is a 30,000-pound bomb with 6,000 pounds of “high explosives,” said Masao Dahlgren, a fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies Missile Defense Project. What to Know About the Fighting Between Israel and Iran The New York Times comments What to Know About the Fighting Between Israel and Iran A day of talks involving representatives of Iran and Europe in Geneva on Friday broke up with no signs of a breakthrough, a week into the latest escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. Civilians have borne the brunt of the attacks, as Israeli missiles hit some apartment buildings and residential complexes. Residents who spoke to The New York Times said they had not experienced attacks like this in a generation, with some recalling the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s. Some Iranians are steeling themselves for a long conflict and weighing how to find relative safety. Long lines of cars have packed highways heading out of Tehran, though many residents say they have no place to go. U.S. intelligence agencies continue to believe that Iran has yet to decide whether to make a nuclear bomb even though it has developed a large stockpile of the enriched uranium necessary for it to do so, according to intelligence and other American officials. The U.S. military has concluded that one bomb would not destroy the Fordo facility on its own; an attack would have to come in waves, with B-2s releasing one bomb after another down the same hole. Trump is hoping the threat of using a bunker buster bomb will mean he won’t have to use it. So far, no luck. Recall Trump’s claim Russia would not have invaded Ukraine on his watch. Then Trump pulled out bazookas threatening sanctions on Russia. What happened to those threats? Trump made similar claims regarding Iran and Israel. Supposedly it would never happen on his watch. That bazooka threat vanished too. Since it will take more than one bomb to hit the site, perhaps Iran wants to make Trump use a bomb before it negotiates. But who knows where the latest high-level games of chicken take us. Related Posts April 13, 2025: China Halts Rare Earth Exports Desperately Needed by the US I have been warning about this for years. It’s now happening. June 5, 2025: Two-TACO Trump Day on His Call to Xi Over Rare Earth Elements Trump is hyping up his call with China’s Xi. But chalk up 2 more TACOs. June 5, 2025: Trump Gives Negotiators the Green Light to Lift US Export Controls There is no precedent for negotiation over security-imposed export controls. June 12, 2025: China Keeps Leverage on the US with a 6-Month Limit on Rare Earth Exports Trump’s crowing over a new deal is more hype than reality in 3 ways. When other nations pull out their own bazookas, Trump backs down. Iran wants the bomb for the same reason North Korea wanted the bomb. Some might argue justifiably so. Does A) Israel need to take out Iran’s nuclear facilities, or does B) Israel’s action show why Iran needs a bomb to defend itself? C) Neither D) Both https://t.co/SxT8z725o5 Regardless, the problem for Iran is that in the absence of a bomb, it has no bazooka to pull out. Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. I went on a road trip to Mexico late seventies, and got so fed up with people warning us about banditos that I told everyone I had a roof-mounting bazooka. It worked. I didn’t have a single encounter with banditos the entire four months. Trump says Iran will not be allowed to have a nuke. But North Korea gets a pass. What’s the difference? Israel. North Korea will soon have an ICBM capable of reaching the U.S. Russia and China have its proxy (NK), which is very useful to them. We have Israel, a huge liability to us. We can no longer afford to get involved in every fight. We are getting weaker and weaker, along with Israel. The trend is not our friend. WSJ has a hilarious (to me) article/video: Trump’s “two weeks” prop. It has been pulled out and used, and come to no solutions, on trade/tariffs, Putin and Ukraine, …. His schtick is remarkably limited, if tracked systematically. In this case though, we are pivoting on world history, and it is improv night. Forgot 90 more days for tik tok. He wants to put things not successful off so people will forget. Keeps current s$$t going so know one has time to look back. I worked for a guy like him one time. Never good to be around those kind of people. You will be the fall guy or worse. Think about it. How many people have moved on from trump to better things. It’s been over 70 years since “Operation Ajax”. What a web we have woven in the Middle East. The British split the land along non cultural( on purpose or ignorance) lines the left leaving a power vacuum. Our foreign office and intelligensia f*ck up every thing the touch, Israel, Kuwait, India, Africa, the list is endless. It pays right now to consider all scenarios. Here are some worst-case visions: ” … If Iran falls, the region doesn’t get freer—it gets bloodier. The Islamic Republic is brutal, yes—but it’s also a geopolitical keystone. Remove it, and the arch collapses. The aftermath wouldn’t be democratic reform or some Instagram-filtered “Persian Spring.” It would be tribal fragmentation, religious warfare, and the violent settling of decades-old scores. … Israel would face attacks on multiple fronts. ISIS remnants would resurface in the chaos, feeding off the vacuum like parasites in open wounds. Iraq would fracture again. … Russia and China, already circling, would seize the chance to claim strategic energy corridors and military influence. Western embassies would go dark. Diplomacy would give way to drone strikes. And Europe? It would face a second refugee crisis, exponentially worse than 2015. Millions of displaced Iranians, Afghans, Iraqis, and Syrians, fleeing instability, starvation, or sectarian cleansing, would flood the Mediterranean and Balkans. …” https://asiatimes.com/2025/06/tucker-carlsons-a-trump-coddling-coward/&nbsp ; asia times is the best source for world wide analysis of geopolitics, imho. besides the old testament and the koran. funny that the Palestinians are semites, isn’t it? hmm, GBU developed after 2002, in wide conversation since then, mostly talking about Iran as a target So, what makes anyone, anyone at all, think that if Iran has a nuke program, Iran has not taken the steps to mitigate the capabilities of the bomb. Penetrate “up to” 200 feet? YMMV Look up the SURF facility, with labs and gigantic labs in caverns built more than 5000 feet under the ground The Cheyenne Mountain Complex has 2000 feet of granite over it. You might note that IT IS possible to dig out facilities more than 200 feet down. But, shhhh, don’t tell Iran Is the Trump assessment of certain “hands-off” (no troops on the ground) one easy trick bombing campaign success based on the “hope” that Iran never reads and cannot dig below 200 feet? Dumb, dumb, dumb. Gee, no hints here Iran nuclear sites may be beyond reach of “bunker busters”By Reuters January 12, 2012 7:32 AM CST Updated January 12, 2012 There are too many ifs. Iran can rebuild quickly, the bomb may not do the job etc. Ground troops are essential if a deal isn’t made. My guess is the plan is for the US to drop the bomb and then US troops will be used to secure the sites. Politicians who say no to Isarel don’t last. If Trump doesn’t follow Israeli orders he will probably suffer greatly and maybe removed from office. 200 Russian scientists in Iran nuke programs. Tramp better turn TACO within the next 2 weeks. Can you say Jihad? Europe is full of Muslims. There are a lot of unintended consequences in this loaded gun. bingo. lived in most muslim hood in brooklyn 30 years ago. exponentially bigger now. 99.99% are fine. but the unintended consequences of pax dumbfuckistan bombing the world, did end up in the blowback, on 9.11.01. the twin towers played jenga. No so much Israel but the money flowing into us politics. He and benny both have reasons to stay in power. A good old world war would do it for trump. . I’m finding lots of insight on Trump’s thinking and bargaining (balanced, showing angles I hadn’t deeply considered on all sides) in Jim Sciutto’s 2020 book, The Madman Theory: Trump Takes on the World . Would recommend it to anyone. Jury still out, but the “bazooka” might seem to have blunted or been indefinitely sheathed to some extent (another metaphor: goal posts moved) in Ukraine/Russia, North Korea, trade/tariffs, tiktok deal, possibly immigration control, …. But playing close to the edge might someday actually encounter a big, bad one where reversal and waffling are not available. My model of Iran however is a slow crumbling mess with all sorts of currently unforeseen consequences (hello Iraq, Afghanistan, George W. Bush’s world which became ours, very expensively). better than the (claimed) alternative? Not sure. Could Iran have friends with a bazooka? Who, what and how would they use it? It appears not. [lol] Israel 70 years old artificial construct. USA 250 years old artificial construct. Iran, 3,000 years old non artificial. Who’ll persevere?? The answer is obvious. Surely you don’t think the people in Iran today are the same that were there 3000 years ago. The Muslim religion itself has only been around since the 700s AD. If Iran manages to turn this into a prolonged war, the US is going to lose. Note that since WW2, the US hasn’t won a single armed conflict that lasted more than a year (see Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan). And Iran seems to be well equipped to turn this into a prolonged war. No need to invade. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan were not existential like Hitler and Germany was so no need to go all out. Iran is not existential for us either however it is for Israel. By helping Israel nullify their immediate existential threat we eliminate a potential future existential threat to us. Ukraine is similar. what a bunch of hyperbole and bullshit. existential threat to usa? even the nazis and italy and japan were NOT that. persia was our puppet for 25 years, just like israel is now. my lord where the hell did you learn about history and life, fox news or some acid trip you took? thanks for the entertainment. never change. Did you get the beeper I sent you? Terrorism in response to hurt feelings? Just trumphumper things… You are just unhappy that your preferred friends and allies are getting creamed and I find it very amusing that you of all people are trying to use the morality play when you and them are devoid of any at all. I am happy to see this happening and most people are. Interesting strategy… get called out for being a garbage person, declare all other persons to be garbage, then sit in garbage solidarity with your new imaginary garbage friends. I guess if it works for you, it don’t matter what everyone else thinks of you. so brave, why not go whack off some more to Benny Net. btw he went to HS and college in the good ole USA. how many per day do you spank your monkey into the israeli flag? Come on bmcc. You are just a paid troll. Can’t get more loser than that. You’re just envious you aren’t getting paid. you don’t want to threaten me. i’m sicilian. we have long memories and long tentacles. i’ll wait 10 or 20 years and get more than even. now take it back, like a nice little pussy would. Agree. I’d prefer if Mish stuck to economic-related posts. That said, this blog post has a lot of good historical geopolitical information and perspective for people to consider. https://rogerboyd.substack.com/p/why-iran-the-context-and-the-consequences Banks were gonna lose money loaned to the Britain if i recall If the US would mind it’s own business, stay at home and be a good neighbor we might eliminate potential future treats to us. Much easier and cheaper than having 800 military bases all over the world causing discontent and hatred. Would be nice if everyone else did the same but they don’t, do they? What other countries have bases on American soil? Do we even allow their navies to refuel at our ports? We may allow some allies in our ports for R&R. Let’s get you outfitted with an infantry load out so you can head over to Iran and fight since you’re so committed. You and your progeny. I’m sure there are people on here that’s be willing to crowdfund the expenditures via GoFundMe since we all know you’re as totally committed to putting yourself and your kids’ lives on the line for this cause as you are for putting other people’s lives on the line. Armchair warrior. Time to eviscerate the jewish lobby in the US before America gets dragged into another war, the one Tramp promised he would not get involved in. Just tell Bibi no! Trump is controlled by the Israeli lobby. I predict US ground troops fighting for Israel. How much will this war cost. The goal is regime change and seeing how Mossad has been able to penetrate thoroughly Iran’s defenses I would expect that its political class has equally been penetrated to the same extent if not more so regime change can occur when the moment is ripe. Wars between nation-states always end at the negotiating table. As to whether big bombs can take out the bunkers where the nuclear material is located, no one here can answer that question because we are not privy to what the bomb can actually do and not to the methods used to obtain that objective. The 3 stated goals of Bibi and Trump(of many and changing daily): 1: No nuclear enrichment 2. Regime change 3. Unconditional surrender Perhaps #1 can occur with negotiation. Very unlikely conventional bombing. The bunker buster bombs bazooka only work if the underground structures are well understood. My understanding is the nuclear material and quite possibly centrifuges are dispersed across a large area of Iran in bunkers, an area close to the size of mainland Europe. 2. Regime change isn’t happening via air with conventional weapons. I seriously doubt the reports of the Iranian airspace being controlled by Israel are accurate. Especially in light over how badly Israel has been damaged by the Iranian missile strikes while claiming to the contrary. All the latest reports from Iran discussing Israeli strike damage mention rockets or drones. Trump will have a revolution on his hands in the U.S. if he tries to do a massive ground invasion, the only way this is happening . 3. Unconditional surrender is a joke. The Iranians will fight to the last man before they unconditionally surrender. Especially Bibi and somewhat Trump have really set themselves up. They might be able to salvage a win by using the tactical nukes bazooka but we would become a pariah nation that is if we avoided WW3 nuclear annihilation. I’ve noticed Trump seems more interested in negotiating of late but Trump is very hard to read. With the Houthis, he just declared a loss a win and moved on. Maybe he’ll do the same here. “We have successfully forced Iran to limit enrichment to 60% and promise not to build a bomb” (status quo ante). The whole strategy of Israel is to pull in the United States. No bunker buster bomb is needed to close these sites. Just like the Marines in the Pacific in WW II with Japanese in caves, fire a few smart missiles (that can strike individual apartments) at the entrance tunnel and seal it shut. If excavators and bulldozers arrive, hit X Marks the Spot again. No more food trucks, maybe even no access to water and air. Israel can do it themselves, but want America into the war for them. Trump has a knack to break his good promises and to keep his bad ones. TACO boy only wants the limelight. he cares not a bit about what the topic is. mug shots to bunker busters or name calling………….ala low energy jeb That’s his mental illness at work. If trump stays alive and congress remains his puppet the US will probably deteriorate into revolution and civil war or become a totalitarian state. The average American has a better life than the average citizen of almost every other country worldwide, 70M of these stupid fucks are willing to throw that away for bullshit propaganda on fox news and other right wind media. Hank Paulson bazooka has turned into a boomerang, destabilizing not only the financial system, but causing social havoc from which we are still recovering. Just saying. In his first term, Trump dropped a MOAB on the Taliban. They didn’t care and continued fighting. The Taliban couldn’t eve produce a machine gun or bullet. The Ayatollah is NOT going to back down. His legacy is at stake, and he knows that so long as he doesn’t make a move on the SoH, then it’s not likely that Israel will take him out. He’s just trying to hang on and make it through the destruction of his nuclear weapons program. Trump will bomb Fordow. Likewise, he has a legacy to consider as well. He believes that he knows when to walk away. He also wants to prove to the world that the US has the ability to use its military might without getting involved in a full-blown war. I would expect the US will bomb as much of the IRGC naval capacity that could be used to move on the SoH as soon as the bombs start dropping on Fordow. I doubt that Iran will do much in the SoH for multiple reasons: – the SoH is a very large area; the shallow parts are near Iran; the deeper parts where ships travel are near Oman; so Iran would have to travel far into their neighbour’s territory to impact shipping – any interruption of shipping in the SoH would impact Iran’s crucial food imports -Iran exports most of its crude to Asia and China; important customers who provide crucial funding for Iran’s govt.; they don’t want to risk upsetting their best customers – Iran does not want to trigger the US to join the fight by attacking US forces Our attacking & eliminating Fordow is a very big deal. The only thing that would be worse would be killing the Ayatollah. I didn’t say Iran would. Again, I’m saying the US will attempt to obliterate the Iranian capacity to move one the SoH as the bombs are falling on Fordow. In a perfect world, Fordow & Iran’s ability to disrupt shipping through the SoH are eliminated at the same time. Granted, taking out the naval assets will take more time than dropping a modest number of MOPs on Fordow. I think what Trump fears is that if our big bombs don’t do the job, then our military will lose a lot of cred. We could join the military paper tiger brigade of Russia and Iran. Haven’t we already done that in Korea, Afghanistan and Iraq? These ground wars come down to one simple equation, more of them are willing to die than we are willing to kill. They are preserving their homeland we are doing WTF, we don’t know why. Look, warfare is what humans do. We have been fighting each other since the beginning of history. Do you understand how much employment and Congressional bribes the MIC is responsible for? This will continue until an AI takes over. AI won’t need a human friendly, livable environment, destroy the environment eliminate humans, problem solved. Wow, just absolutely profound. How did you get inside of Trump’s head like that? In 2004 Hans Blix stated that “there were about 700 inspections, and in no case did we find weapons of mass destruction.” But Bush said that Iraq had WMD and they were imminently about to use them. This is a replay of that same game. A member of Trump’s cabinet, Tulsi Gabbard, seems to contradict the allegations. She may be out a job soon. Israel has added to their demands, including that Iran must be disarmed of all ballistic missiles and delivery systems (!) Isn’t it strange that the only time Iran has used ballistic missiles in recent history has been against Israel, and only after Israel attacked Iran first? The real goal is to turn Iran into another Libya, where it will no longer be a threat to the US dollar and US control of oil. I still stand by my prediction the US will bomb Iran before the weekend is out. The Senate address on Tuesday is likely to come after the fact. I hope you’re right. Too much delay is not good. Maybe you’re correct taking time to consider weather you want to become involved in another nearly endless war for no good reason should be rushed into. No sense in considering what the outcome might be. israel is an amerikan pawn. a strategic pawn, near all “our” oil interests. my dad worked for the shah as a wall street man in the 50s until his overthrow. many of my pal’s fathers’ worked for either the saudi kingdom or persia. owners of big construction companies and oil C suite or wall street big boys. you couldn’t do both. those lunatics the shia the sunni and the jews, basically tribal rivalries, are like the hatfield and mccoys. kooky cousins who have hated each other for centuries….. Who is whose pawn? …the problem for Iran is that in the absence of a bomb, it has no bazooka to pull out. Iran may not have a bazooka but it does have lots of missiles capable of penetrating what’s left of Israel’s air defense. The “Iron Dome” will last only so long until Israel is completely vulnerable to further missile attacks. I see this as the worst-case scenario for Israel: the U.S. opts to stay out of the war, the conflict becomes a drawn-out war of attrition, and Israel’s air defense is exhausted . Israel seeks regime change in Iran, but the regime that might topple first is the Netanyahu government. Pray for Iran. I don’t know about a bazooka but the big beautiful bill is looking really ugly right now. ICE is running out of money, they have spent $8 billion for 200,000 round ups. They’ll need $500 billion to finish the job at that rate.  And don’t forget a trillion or two for the Iran war. I read oil could hit $200 if those bombs drop. https://stitchsnitches.com/trumps-one-big-beautiful-bill-just-collapsed-as-parliamentarian-blocks-it-and-gop-civil-war-erupts/ President Donald Trump’s sweeping legislative proposal popularly referred to as “One Big Beautiful Bill” has encountered a major obstacle in the U.S. Senate, where a combination of procedural rulings and internal party dissent now threatens to derail the administration’s ambitious policy agenda. President Donald Trump’s sweeping legislative proposal popularly referred to as “One Big Beautiful Bill” has encountered a major obstacle in the U.S. Senate, where a combination of procedural rulings and internal party dissent now threatens to derail the administration’s ambitious policy agenda. On Thursday, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough delivered a significant blow to Republican efforts to advance the legislation through budget reconciliation—a process that allows certain fiscal measures to bypass a Senate filibuster and pass with a simple majority. On Thursday, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough delivered a significant blow to Republican efforts to advance the legislation through budget reconciliation—a process that allows certain fiscal measures to bypass a Senate filibuster and pass with a simple majority. It’s dejavu all over again. Got exit strategy? If the 2017 tax cuts expire, will alimony become tax deductible again? Asking for a friend. Trump plans to let Israel do all the dirty work making things safe for him to come in and take the credit. lol If Trump doesn’t do the deed then he will be viewed as having been out-crazed by Iran’s Ayatollah! Trump has said that Iran will not be allowed to get a nuke. Israel has softened Iran up, so now it is time finish the work with a swift bomb in the cojones. 👆🏻 Langley troll. Now THAT is an accurate bomb!! They can never “finish the work”. They can only delay Iran’s obtaining nukes while strengthening their resolve. While Israel continues to attack Iran, which in turn retaliated again by launching a “fresh barrage of missiles” toward Israel today, the unfit president announced he needs another two weeks to ponder how to handle the urgent middle-east crisis. He then whipped out his dusty distraction card and yet again griped about his baseless election fraud woes on Truth Social. Like he’s already forgotten about Iran. I thought that was a Mae West / W.C. Fields line. Is that gun in your pocket or are you happy to see me? pickle in your pocket. i walk by mae west’s HS and the NY FED on weekly basis in my flaneuring about gotham. i always chuckle at both. You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Trump Will Decide Whether to Bomb Iran Within Two Weeks

…Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan.…

…Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan.…

Show full text (50000 chars)
• • • Trump deploys his usual negotiation standby, threats then decide later. Plans Already Approved The Wall Street Journal reports Trump’s Iran Decision to Come Within Two Weeks Trump told senior aides late Tuesday that he approved of attack plans for Iran , but was holding off to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear program, people familiar with the deliberations said. The U.S. has beefing up its forces in the region. A third U.S. Navy destroyer entered the eastern Mediterranean Sea and a second U.S. carrier strike group is heading toward the Arabian Sea. The Pentagon says the moves are defensive. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says his country wouldn’t surrender and warns any U.S. military intervention would bring irreparable consequences. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calls an Iranian strike on a hospital the work of “terrorist tyrants,” adding Israel is advancing “step by step” toward eliminating Iran’s nuclear program and ballistic missiles. The death toll in Iran rose above 639 people, according to a human-rights group. In Israel, 24 people have died as a result of Iranian strikes. The Two-Week Ploy In saying he’ll make a decision on Iran within two weeks, President Trump has reached for an old standby. Two weeks and he’ll know whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine. Two weeks until the next move on trade. Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan. “When the next decision isn’t obvious, sometimes he just buys himself more time,” said GOP strategist Alex Conant, who worked in the George W. Bush White House. “Two weeks is forever in politics. The truth is, a lot of problems just work themselves out if you give them time.” That appears to be Trump’s current calculation. He is trying to buy more time in hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran – or a total surrender. Putting off a decision also keeps the onus on Israel to continue the fight, and spares Trump the difficult choice of whether to commit the U.S. militarily. Trump campaigned on getting the U.S. out of wars, not joining them, and his political base is in a fierce debate over Iran . Honestly, the best thing about Trump is the fact he always chickens out. When facing public backlash for the worst elements of his agenda, he always folds like a lawnchair. https://t.co/JsyDlUFdhJ — Joshua Reed Eakle 🗽 (@JoshEakle) June 19, 2025 MAGA Brawls Over Prospect of Trump Joining Strikes on Iran Also consider MAGA Brawls Over Prospect of Trump Joining Strikes on Iran The fierce debate—unfolding online, across conservative media and on Capitol Hill—has pitted the more isolationist wing of Trump’s coalition against hawkish Republicans who have called on the president to step in to ensure Iran doesn’t develop a nuclear weapon . It marks the strongest challenge to Trump’s iron grip on the Republican Party since he regained power in January. And it comes as Trump’s base is also divided over immigration, with the administration wavering over whether to exempt farm and service workers from deportations to insulate the economy . Some of the sharpest objections over Iran have come from avid Trump allies such as Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. “Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,” she wrote on X . Appearing on former Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz’s television show, Greene said, “A Middle Eastern war will pull America back 20 years.” As Israel prepared to attack Iran last week, Kirk polled supporters about whether the U.S. should get involved. Nearly 90% said no . In recent days, as Trump has moved closer to military action, Kirk urged his five million followers to have faith in the president’s ability to handle the crisis. “His whole life has led to this moment,” Kirk wrote Monday on X . Levin has been publicly fighting with Tucker Carlson, the former Fox personality who, after Israel began its strikes, accused Trump of being “complicit in the act of war.” Trump hit back on social media, saying “Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!” Trump conceded Wednesday that opinions on U.S. involvement in Iran were mixed, but insisted, “My supporters are more in love with me today than they were even at the election.” The administration’s short-lived guidance to exempt workers in key industries from deportation also triggered frustration among allies of the president who have advocated for stringent immigration restrictions. After facing backlash from supporters, including inside the White House, the administration said there was no longer blanket guidance pausing immigration raids at farms, hotels and restaurants. Asked if some exemptions would stay in place, Trump said Tuesday, “Everyone is being looked at.” He also called for an expansion of ICE operations in Democratic-controlled cities such as Los Angeles, New York and Chicago. But some of the president’s backers said the damage to his immigration agenda had already been done because the possibility of exemptions muddied the administration’s message. “It’s guaranteed to sabotage any efforts at self-deportation,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, a group favoring immigration restrictions. “It also increases the incentives to come illegally because you’ve heard they aren’t going after restaurant employees anymore.” Trump has been flip-flopping on deportations and tariffs since the start of his second term. For now, deportations are back on, one day after they weren’t. Trump also announced the return of reciprocal tariffs for July 9th. Then one day later Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Trump was likely to extend the pause. Q: What do we call these massive flip-flops? A: 5D chess, of course. Businesses love the uncertainty of not knowing whether tariffs are 10% or 88%. They also love knowing whether their workforce will show up for work or be on their way to El Salvador. It takes a master like Trump to figure this out. And best of all “My supporters are more in love with me today than they were even at the election,” said Trump. Also note that we are into our second 90-day extension on Tik-Tok. Gabbard on a time out in the Trump inner circle for warning against thermonuclear war. So be it. Many of us thank you, @TulsiGabbard . https://t.co/70SIee3kNs — Dave Collum (@DavidBCollum) June 19, 2025 Final results of poll: pic.twitter.com/CpnrSLfIul — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) June 14, 2025 One thing we know for sure is two weeks means two weeks, unless it means two hours or two years. Meanwhile, “Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!” Plans Already Approved The Wall Street Journal reports Trump’s Iran Decision to Come Within Two Weeks The Two-Week Ploy In saying he’ll make a decision on Iran within two weeks, President Trump has reached for an old standby. Two weeks and he’ll know whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine. Two weeks until the next move on trade. Two weeks until a health care overhaul is released. And two weeks for an infrastructure plan. “When the next decision isn’t obvious, sometimes he just buys himself more time,” said GOP strategist Alex Conant, who worked in the George W. Bush White House. “Two weeks is forever in politics. The truth is, a lot of problems just work themselves out if you give them time.” That appears to be Trump’s current calculation. He is trying to buy more time in hopes of a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran – or a total surrender. Putting off a decision also keeps the onus on Israel to continue the fight, and spares Trump the difficult choice of whether to commit the U.S. militarily. Trump campaigned on getting the U.S. out of wars, not joining them, and his political base is in a fierce debate over Iran . Honestly, the best thing about Trump is the fact he always chickens out. When facing public backlash for the worst elements of his agenda, he always folds like a lawnchair. https://t.co/JsyDlUFdhJ MAGA Brawls Over Prospect of Trump Joining Strikes on Iran Also consider MAGA Brawls Over Prospect of Trump Joining Strikes on Iran The fierce debate—unfolding online, across conservative media and on Capitol Hill—has pitted the more isolationist wing of Trump’s coalition against hawkish Republicans who have called on the president to step in to ensure Iran doesn’t develop a nuclear weapon . It marks the strongest challenge to Trump’s iron grip on the Republican Party since he regained power in January. And it comes as Trump’s base is also divided over immigration, with the administration wavering over whether to exempt farm and service workers from deportations to insulate the economy . Some of the sharpest objections over Iran have come from avid Trump allies such as Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. “Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,” she wrote on X . Appearing on former Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz’s television show, Greene said, “A Middle Eastern war will pull America back 20 years.” As Israel prepared to attack Iran last week, Kirk polled supporters about whether the U.S. should get involved. Nearly 90% said no . In recent days, as Trump has moved closer to military action, Kirk urged his five million followers to have faith in the president’s ability to handle the crisis. “His whole life has led to this moment,” Kirk wrote Monday on X . Levin has been publicly fighting with Tucker Carlson, the former Fox personality who, after Israel began its strikes, accused Trump of being “complicit in the act of war.” Trump hit back on social media, saying “Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!” Trump conceded Wednesday that opinions on U.S. involvement in Iran were mixed, but insisted, “My supporters are more in love with me today than they were even at the election.” The administration’s short-lived guidance to exempt workers in key industries from deportation also triggered frustration among allies of the president who have advocated for stringent immigration restrictions. After facing backlash from supporters, including inside the White House, the administration said there was no longer blanket guidance pausing immigration raids at farms, hotels and restaurants. Asked if some exemptions would stay in place, Trump said Tuesday, “Everyone is being looked at.” He also called for an expansion of ICE operations in Democratic-controlled cities such as Los Angeles, New York and Chicago. But some of the president’s backers said the damage to his immigration agenda had already been done because the possibility of exemptions muddied the administration’s message. “It’s guaranteed to sabotage any efforts at self-deportation,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, a group favoring immigration restrictions. “It also increases the incentives to come illegally because you’ve heard they aren’t going after restaurant employees anymore.” Trump has been flip-flopping on deportations and tariffs since the start of his second term. For now, deportations are back on, one day after they weren’t. Trump also announced the return of reciprocal tariffs for July 9th. Then one day later Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Trump was likely to extend the pause. Q: What do we call these massive flip-flops? A: 5D chess, of course. Businesses love the uncertainty of not knowing whether tariffs are 10% or 88%. They also love knowing whether their workforce will show up for work or be on their way to El Salvador. It takes a master like Trump to figure this out. And best of all “My supporters are more in love with me today than they were even at the election,” said Trump. Also note that we are into our second 90-day extension on Tik-Tok. Gabbard on a time out in the Trump inner circle for warning against thermonuclear war. So be it. Many of us thank you, @TulsiGabbard . https://t.co/70SIee3kNs Final results of poll: pic.twitter.com/CpnrSLfIul One thing we know for sure is two weeks means two weeks, unless it means two hours or two years. Meanwhile, “Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!” Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Well, he’s right about not allowing Iran a nuclear weapon. This Iranian woman explains what’s really driving the Shia’s focus on destroying Israel…. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmdTB3W7BlU Israel is frightening and shaking in his boot. US is waiting for 2 weeks For what? Why? What is the reason? US is abandoning Israel like NATO and its allies who are also shaking in their boots, frightening and very furious. Abandoning for at least 2 weeks. After that? Who knows. John Mearsheimer said Israel gets whatever they need. No. Not this time. Israel will collapse without Us support political, military, financial. That’s hilarious. One thing’s for sure; Israel will continue – and prosper…. His supporters are in love with him, LOL. You guys got a boyyyyyyyfriend! “collapse a mountain” “destroy the vents” “collapse the bunker” – so many delusional warmongers in this chat. The same morons who thought Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Ukraine and many more would be easy victories. History suggests you are very likely 100% wrong about everything.. Of course these “experts” (PhDd’s in Stupid), getting all their intel from CNN, know better than say Ted Postol, MIT specialist who is describe as the “west’s top expert on missiles and anti-missile defence” for over 30 years now……he actually knows what he is talking about, you don’t, and he says the bunker busters will likely do very llittle to bunkers 200′ down, and against 2,500 feet deep bunkers, nothing at all. besides, the US and Israel have been telegraphing this attack for so long, it is highly probably the Iranians have moved everything of value to other sites by now, unless they are as stupid as you are: Joe Tzu – “Always warn the enemy years in advance where you ae going to attack, and success will be yours! Judging by the videos of the Iranian hypersonic ballistic missiles, I’d say they are 10 years ahead of the US at least in missiles, and considering they also have hypersonic anti-ship missiles, and hundreds of thousands of drones, the USA will likely lose this war and see carrier fleets at the ocean bottom, leadintg the US to use nukes, which will likely beget a nuclear response from any number of nations. This could be America’s last war, and Trump the last President. He will be lucky to get away with just mpeachment.. Israel is being destroyed as we speak here, missiles are landing all over it, and the Iron Colander is managing about a 10% overall interception rate, and running out of missiles doing it. So the Israelis are desperately trying to get the USA to save them from the results of their own stupidity, and Trump is probably dumb enough to try it, at the behest of the Israeli donor class, the real rulers of America. No doubt why Trump wants the Golden Dome – the gold is in the profits of the contractors who will build that ineffective boondoggle. It’s easy to be brave, when you’re shipping other people’s children off to die. From 90% interception rate yesterday to 65% today – let’s average it out and call it 10%…. https://www.eurasiantimes.com/from-90-to-65-israels-interception/ the early take… “Ryan Girdusky , a Republican political consultant with ties to VP JD Vance , put it to Playbook succinctly: “No one gives a fuck about a few bombs so long as we don’t send in ground troops.”” Absolutely no conciousness of the day after and the wide exposure of the US in the region and world Looks like Iran has 2 weeks to buy a nuke or 5 off the North Koreans or Chinese. More likely from their neighbor Pakistan. Who says they haven’t already bought nukes? My bet is they have boúght Russian Nukes. Then why aren’t they using those nukes as a threat for Israel to lay off? That is what a nuke is supposed to be for, yes? You are so stoopid… This situation is similar to Iraq and “weapons of mass destruction”. The important point is that bombing will not do the job, ground troops are needed. That means the US will need to supply the troops. My guess is Trump will not commit ground troops and Iran will eventually have a nuke. No reasonable American wants any of this mess. Let’s say goodbye to Israel and their wars. Ground troops around a lot of nuclear stuff? Naw, don’t think so. Agree, Melvin. Even if the U.S. can destroy Fordow, so what? Iran’s government will remain and its people will support them. Israel wants regime change, but it ain’t gonna get it. Regime change may be worse than the current leadership. 80% of Iranians do not support their government… https://www.iranintl.com/en/202302036145 Nonsense! The righteous fury of Jesus will complete this mission for us. Here is my prediction… Donald Trump will change his mind at least three times in the next three days https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/world-war-iii-update i’ll take the over 3 All this discussion about more war and decapitation can only lead to more chaos for normal people. About time the US reconsidered the case for the ICC as a way of holding leaders to account. Both Khameini and Netanyahu are not doing good things for their populations and ought to be facing some kind of justice. The US states that it is concern about the ICC being used politically against US interests. The reality is that the US wants to continue acting with impunity around the world. About time that this was stopped. it seems that all ideologies/nations want to act with impunity. One set of rules for them, another for us. Rule of law for Mexicans that cross the border illegally. No rule of law for Trump supporters that attack our capital under the direction of their fanatical insurrectionist. Our nation in in serious trouble! . Insurrection, was a Democrat Party disinformation campaign. Why did the Capitol Police apparently fire on the protestors just standing on the lawn below the Capitol steps, without warning, precipitating a riot? Am I alone in noting that the Geneva Convention prohibits bombing nuclear facilities? Clearly the bombing raids in Iran are releasing nuclear materials and “Dirty Bombing” Iran’s highly populated cities. Where is the outrage for contaminating Iran and our world with radiation? Who does Trump work for? ;-( Wow, I just watched the Israeli “Economic Minister” (war monger) who basically states that Israel wants to and will kill anyone that it perceives as a threat. It does not matter if they are a threat in actuality. If Israel competes with economically or can make a case against any nation, people or state, they will be attacked as a function of Israel’s unbridled aggression. Joe Kernan of course supports his bellicose position and promotes investment in Israel. This is madness? israel is amerika’s pawn. the 100 mile land bridge of sinai is the connection of 3 continents. that part of globe has been ruled by empires for most of recorded time in human primate history. today it is amerika. yesterday it was UK, before that ottoman, and egypt etc……….this really is quite apparent. geography and anthropology has most of the answers. Most people don’t know much about the subject – that’s why you’re not seeing outrage. Interestingly, Russia & China seem to understand the problem. Trump doesn’t care about the Geneva Convention. He doesn’t even care about the US Constitution so why are you thinking he might care? Geneva what? [lol] Following Israel’s lead on the wars in GAZA and Iran has consequences. Sure it is easy to bomb GAZA to dust. That has been accomplished and now the U.S. is being lead into a total war and regime change in Iran. Israel and the U.S. are now bombing the hell out of Iran. Given the U.S.’s provision of weaponry to Israel and technical and tactical support it is impossible to separate the U.S. and Israel’s aggression in both attacks. The U.S. constitution provides that the U.S. is not to provide for the establishment of any religion. Yet clearly, this is being ignored in supporting Israel (Jews) over Gaza and Iran (Islam). Common sense indicates that a free nation should not take sides in religious conflicts. While it is certainly tempting for our Neo-Cons to force our nation into these wars for the profits they will generate. It is unwise to continue because of the risk of expansion. Trump is not a wise man and unfortunately only thinks of grabbing quick profits for himself and his sycophants. Bombing nuclear sites is prohibited by the Geneva Convention so Israel is in clear violation of this provision. Particularly since there is no objective evidence that Iran was building a bomb. Even if Iran was building a bomb, they have the right to do so. Why is Israel above sanctions for bombing what it defines as nuclear sites and why does the world not stop Israel from essentially “Dirty Bombing” Iran? The worst thing to do is think, “oh yeah, just a bunker buster and out.” Whatever arguments one make pro or versus, it’s soon quagmire time. And human catastrophe time. The USA needs to nation-build at home, and does not have a lot of spare resources (in a world of limited mega-borrowing) for doing this AGAIN abroad. Wasn’t that MAGA’s core point? But I don’t expect a certain mind to stay on ANY track. I’m just saying, there will be costs, and not small ones. Maybe historically pivotal costs. The price of getting on a track of kicking more and more and more booty has not classically been a successful one. And letting someone else, however beloved, dictate one’s timing is a big gamble too. Dolf tried that for Benito and others. Problem is Iran already has many tons of spent fuel rods which are in many ways much worse than conventional nukes. Load up a number of missiles with rods and explosives and once they get near Israel then they will get blown out of the sky which will spread contamination over the land below or if they get through then they will blow up either at altitude or on ground strike. Such dirty bombs will salt the earth with radioactive stuff that will make the area uninhabitable for many thousands of years. By not committing for 2 weeks at least Trump is buying time for some sort of deal to be made. If dirty bombs do rain down then it will be WW3. And the US isn’t safe by having a few thousand miles gap. Not hard to load spent fuel rods in a cargo ship or 3 with enough shielding so they won’t be spotted and then explode them in major US port cities. That won’t happen because Iran’s rulers aren’t that evil. They could have done that for decades. There are many Muslims in and around Israel and the Dome of the Rock is there. Only Israel or the U.S. would do something like that. I had never heard these concerns so asked the AI to elaborate. As I suspected, this is nothing but FUD. Let’s try to keep the discussions honest and realistic. ## Can Spent Nuclear Fuel Rods Explode or Be Used in a Dirty Bomb? **Explosion Potential:** **Explosion Potential:** – Spent nuclear fuel rods cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. They do not contain the necessary concentration of fissile material (such as highly enriched uranium or weapons-grade plutonium) required for a nuclear explosion[4][5][8]. – Spent nuclear fuel rods cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. They do not contain the necessary concentration of fissile material (such as highly enriched uranium or weapons-grade plutonium) required for a nuclear explosion[4][5][8]. – The uranium in commercial reactor fuel is not enriched enough to be weapons-grade. Extracting the small amount of enriched uranium-235 or plutonium from spent fuel would require a large, sophisticated chemical reprocessing facility, which is beyond the reach of most non-state actors[5][8]. – The uranium in commercial reactor fuel is not enriched enough to be weapons-grade. Extracting the small amount of enriched uranium-235 or plutonium from spent fuel would require a large, sophisticated chemical reprocessing facility, which is beyond the reach of most non-state actors[5][8]. – The rods themselves are ceramic solids encased in metal, and after use in a reactor, they are highly radioactive and thermally hot, making them extremely dangerous to handle without heavy shielding and specialized equipment[5][7]. – The rods themselves are ceramic solids encased in metal, and after use in a reactor, they are highly radioactive and thermally hot, making them extremely dangerous to handle without heavy shielding and specialized equipment[5][7]. **Dirty Bomb Potential:** **Dirty Bomb Potential:** – A “dirty bomb” or radiological dispersal device (RDD) combines conventional explosives with radioactive material to spread contamination, not to create a nuclear explosion[4][6]. – A “dirty bomb” or radiological dispersal device (RDD) combines conventional explosives with radioactive material to spread contamination, not to create a nuclear explosion[4][6]. – In theory, spent nuclear fuel could be used in a dirty bomb. However, this is highly impractical for several reasons: – In theory, spent nuclear fuel could be used in a dirty bomb. However, this is highly impractical for several reasons: – **Extreme Radioactivity:** Spent fuel is so radioactive that anyone attempting to handle or steal it without proper shielding would receive a lethal dose of radiation within minutes or hours[5][7]. – **Extreme Radioactivity:** Spent fuel is so radioactive that anyone attempting to handle or steal it without proper shielding would receive a lethal dose of radiation within minutes or hours[5][7]. – **Physical Security:** Spent fuel is stored in highly secure facilities, either in robust pools with thick concrete and steel walls or in massive dry casks designed to withstand extreme impacts and tampering[1][5]. – **Physical Security:** Spent fuel is stored in highly secure facilities, either in robust pools with thick concrete and steel walls or in massive dry casks designed to withstand extreme impacts and tampering[1][5]. – **Material Form:** The ceramic or vitrified form of most high-level waste makes it very difficult to disperse effectively with a conventional explosion[1]. – **Material Form:** The ceramic or vitrified form of most high-level waste makes it very difficult to disperse effectively with a conventional explosion[1]. – **Risk vs. Reward:** While such a device could cause contamination and public panic, the actual health effects would likely be limited, and the conventional explosive would cause more immediate harm than the radioactive material itself[4][5][6]. – **Risk vs. Reward:** While such a device could cause contamination and public panic, the actual health effects would likely be limited, and the conventional explosive would cause more immediate harm than the radioactive material itself[4][5][6]. ## Conclusion ## Conclusion Spent nuclear fuel rods cannot be used to create a nuclear explosion. While they could, in theory, be used in a dirty bomb, the extreme radioactivity, secure storage, and physical form of the material make this scenario highly impractical and dangerous for would-be perpetrators. The primary impact of a dirty bomb would be psychological and economic disruption, not mass casualties [1][4][5]. Spent nuclear fuel rods cannot be used to create a nuclear explosion. While they could, in theory, be used in a dirty bomb, the extreme radioactivity, secure storage, and physical form of the material make this scenario highly impractical and dangerous for would-be perpetrators. The primary impact of a dirty bomb would be psychological and economic disruption, not mass casualties [1][4][5]. … … https://www.perplexity.ai/search/can-spent-nuclear-plant-fuel-r-ZynZuu7jTDaP6_EtuOxBDw#0 https://www.perplexity.ai/search/can-spent-nuclear-plant-fuel-r-ZynZuu7jTDaP6_EtuOxBDw#0 Good Substack post here: Iran’s predicament is largely a result of its own folly Follow up on Revolution is not a dinner party Follow up on Revolution is not a dinner party Hua Bin Hua Bin Jun 17, 2025 Jun 17, 2025 https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/irans-predicament-is-largely-a-result https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/irans-predicament-is-largely-a-result Israel, embroiled in two wars now (Gaza and Iran), finds itself desperately needing America’s tender care and aid. Is it so surprising that the country cannot find its own footing in these precarious times? In military terms, the goal of Israel is not only to destroy current nuclear production facilities in Iran but to make sure that future ones don’t get built. They do this through intimidation, by killing scientists. To be sure, murder is an effective tool if you can wield it with impunity. The Gestapo found out this in its own short political-paramilitary career. But it is unfashionable to be the one telling the Emperor he has no clothes: and Netanyahu is butt naked at this point, believing himself strong when he is acting out of a kind of weakness. Trump, who vacillates on so many issues, is only certain about China (and the Bible: the Bible is good). China rips off America gigantically, in the Teflon Don’s book. And maybe it does, maybe it does. But what’s going to happen to your esteemed tariffs when the next president rolls on into office, Donald? =-=-= Dark . Sport. Blog is my website — come read more of my writings there! You’re not really suggesting that Trump has any idea about the bible are you? Last I saw he just sees it as a product selling opportunity. What a coincidence, every Cyborg post here is a product selling opportunity for his blog. Interesting that Iran has gotten a few missiles through? Hitting the Israeli hospital might not have been so fortunate as it makes for great sympathy press. Of course I have been lied to before so who knows it this is even real. Either way, Tehran is toast! Unless China steps up to save part of its oil supply… This arrival of Chinese equipment and possible support is making me nervous! .I thought that Iran was defenseless… Russia bombs Ukrainian hospitals every single day, but no one cares enough to get involved in that war. I don’t see why it should be any different when an Israeli hospital blows up. Herp derp. American media parrots Ukrainian media which parrots CIA bullshit. Do you notice that all Mockingbird media reports of bombs or missiles fired by Russia or Iran always fall on schools or hospitals. Never hit any military targets. Ever. You’d think Russia must be losing that war…with such bad aim. Iran / Israel war review from Col. Macgregor. Rare reality check, forget about the MSM. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pO0-49_oCk What’s a grifter to do? On one side, the “flying palace” from Qatar and the multiple development deals from the rest of the ME countries… but there is the counter-offer of TrumpGaza from Israel Maybe China will smooth over the kefluffle with free gold Tphones for him to resell So many opportunities It would appear that Israel isn’t winning bigly, and wasn’t the stable genius demanding Iran’s unconditional surrender within a day? Something doesn’t add up. Seriously, does anybody think China would let one of her most reliable oil supplier fall to the opposition without a fight? A cunning grifter knows you gotta give a couple weeks for the auction fever to build the Chinese navy has arrived in the Persian Gulf, in the form of two electronic surveillance ships, nos 855 & 815A (from OSINT Updates on X today). Read in conjunction with the recent arrival in Tehran of a couple of Chinese heavy air transports, with secret cargoes, it looks like China has come to assist Russia in providing advanced air defenses. Uh Oh! Electing a dictator has consequences? Tell me NO! , A couple of cargo planes is not enough for even one anti-air system so it is something else. I got $100 that says this is all just a ruse like the last time. Act like you’re going to get serious about negotiating and then, BAAM, Israel goes all commando & unleashes hell. EVERYONE knows this is just a stalling tactic by Iran anyway. After Iran hit the hospital & Bibi came out & basically said the Ayatollah was dead, my money is that Israel bites the bullet & greenlights plan B. And Trump might even be in on it. Acting like Iran has got two weeks, gives Israel more time to put plan B into motion. I think they are making sure when all the fissionable material is before bombing. We don’t know what is going on behind the scenes and can only speculate. This has been planned for a long time. We can see it by the cadence of the strikes and the seamless delivery of the logistics from the US. I wonder if the removal of carriers from the Indian Ocean before the attack was to lure the Iranians into believing nothing was imminent. We are working together. Good cop bad cop now. So Sunday or Monday, I believe, Israel came out & said they had destroyed 1/3 of Iran’s missile launchers. I’d like the updated stat on that one. Yes, I agree. Israel & the US are doing a lot of fine tuning of the final act, especially if Israel is forced to go it alone. I would imagine 20 GBU-28 (5,000 lb) bunker busting bombs would do an enormous amount of damage to Fordow. The Israeli F-15I could likely carry two of them. Israel may try them out on the underground facility at Natanz that has lots of centrifuges. It’s said to be ~140 feet below ground & sits below 26 feet of reinforced concrete. A laser guided, pinpoint strike of TWO GBU-28’s would most likely breach that level of fortification. I would imagine that Israel would have to spread the 20 bombs over a fairly wide area to ensure they’ve taken the facility out fully. It’s parameters are said to be 140 ft of earth + 16 ft of concrete. The GBU-28 was developed & deployed in three weeks back in Desert Storm. The outer casing was fully redesigned, making it even more capable. It’s been reported that Israel has been attacking Natanz, but I haven’t read anything that suggests they’ve deployed the GBU-28. I did read that the tunnel structures at Natanz are much larger than expected. If Israel goes it alone, I would imagine there’s going to be hundreds of commandos deployed to Natanz & Fordow to assess damage & mop up. And that’s really the whole point of US involvement around Fordow especially. The GBU-57 would either eliminate the need for boots on the ground or turn it into a much shorter & risky mission. Probably the most important point is that the intelligence community seems to believe that Israel has infiltrated the regime much more deeply than anyone knew. If so, I’d bet Israel’s intelligence on what / when the structures lie underground at Natanz & Fordow is very reliable. Do you think that Israel will ever behave as a moral actor in the region? And/or adhere to international laws and norms? TACO is a schizo like sybil. he’s making Genocide Joe who rode shotgun for Israel in the genocide of GAZA, look like sun tzu. TACO was always destined to destroy himself at the end of his long waste of a life. he spent past 80 years destroying everyone and anything in his stupid path. he even pissed away the few hundred million in r/e his daddy gifted him, when he was in his mid 20s. took him about 15 years but by god he accomplished that stupid and nihilist accomplishment. Trump is amerika. his voters are idiots, just like him. biden and mamala voters slightly better. it’s a crumbling nasty empire of endless warfare. nonstop since 1898. all voted on, too. So far the Iranians don’t believe the TACO moniker. They haven’t attacked any US bases, ships, etc. since Trump said that if the Iranians do we will obliterate them. Like all the mUslim terrorist states, Iran talks tough but gets knocked over with a feather. That’s why no one respects them. Bad time for a dumb as bricks president with a dumb as bricks cabinet The U.S. is already involved and has been from the get go. The debate about whether or not the U.S. will enter the war is a farce. The general public will only believe it when the MSM officially declares it. I predict the U.S. will “enter the war” in the next 1-3 days by bombing Iran with its own aircraft and missiles. The bombing of nuclear sites will make the headlines in keeping with the “WMD narrative”, but since the real goal is to turn Iran into another Libya, there will actually be widespread targets that the MSM will barely mention to keep the operation on script. Trump posted a couple days ago on Truth Social that 95% of Republicans support his foreign policy and by the timing of his post, he seems to believe this level of support exists for the war with Iran. He’s either deluded or dishonest. The question is: what is the level of support for war with Iran among Republicans in the real world? How many in his base will abandon him because of this? Well what could possibly go wrong with this plan? Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Beirut/Lebanon, etc have all been stellar successes so far, we have a pattern of amazing success in republican war mongering! /s And I’m 100% sure there will be absolutely no blow back from this! /s Totally agree. Hillary instigated Libya, but that’s picking nits. It was Regan that started with Libya. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_United_States_bombing_of_Libya It was Ghaddafi who started Libya on it’s path. pro tip, the D and R pro wrestling is bullshit. the war mongering indistinguishable from both parties past 65 years. Why either/or deluded or dishonest? Why not both? democracy works. always has, since the republic of plato was penned and explained this simple truth. trump’s base are assholes. like TACO. same goes for mamala / genocide joe. Have you ever thought about becoming a fiction book writer? Iran is almost 2.5x bigger than Canada with respect to population. Bigger than Germany at the beginning of WW2. They are close to a peer adversary to the US with respect to modern missile tech, and a lot of the WW2 military tech we have is only suitable for beating up on third world countries. Meanwhile China, Russia, and Pakistan are airlifting military supplies into Iran and China has moved two high tech arial surveillance ships into the Persian gulf to provide early warnings to Iran and provided the latest sophisticated targeting tech upgrades to Iran for the Chinese supplied anti-aircraft systems. Additionally Iran has subs capable of firing missiles. This is not gonna be pretty..Trump better listen to cooler heads. We didn’t attack N. Korea right before they got nukes..this is not what we voted for.. You voted for a liar. You don’t get anything you wanted. we told you. You wouldn’t listen. So how do you think Kamala Word Salad would be handling this right now? Many people (the middle) voted for Trump precisely because of who was the other choice. I have no idea… but at least she’d be acting like an adult. There wouldn’t be this flip flopping and endless stream of broken “two weeks” promises. There wouldn’t have been millions spent on a pathetic military parade for the birthday of a draft dodger. We also wouldn’t have a convicted rapist, felon and best bud of an industrial scale pedophile as president. Dignity as a nation counts for something. Because of trump, no country trusts us, and they all think we’re a joke. I voted for Kamala because I saw this was the other choice… not because I think she would be a good president. I think she would have been a better president though, and trump just keeps dropping that bar. great points except for the last. you voted for a grifter and con man and schizo who only likes headlines and klieg lights. don’t be childish. TACO is a shizo cult leader Are any of the subs off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard? Doesn’t seem to be working for them though. China is there because of the oil need, not because they like Iran. Implicitly they understand this attack is an effort by the US to restrict oil to China as retaliation for them restricting rare earths to the US. Remember if there is a regime change the next one will be friendly to the US and less friendly to China/Russia which means the US will gain control of Irans oil via a puppet leader. MIT Prof Ted Postol speaking with Lt. Col. Daniel Davis deflates the GBU-57 bunker buster myth. Postal: “bunker busters are likely to have very low rates of success”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=TriASB-F5UY The deep bunker of Iran’s Fordow facility is reportedly 800 meters below the surface– or 2600 feet. With maximum of 200 feet penetration by GBU-57, that leaves 2400 feet of rock and subsoil to absorb the blast, plus the structure of the bunker ceiling is likely designed to resist a massive blast. So why would the USAF risk the shoot down of a precious B-2, and consequent PR disaster? You answered your own question at the end. No snark. We don’t have to hit the actual caverns where the installation exists. It would be good enough to collapse all the mountain around it and bury it. Then if Iran tries to dig it out in the future, we bomb it again, once they have opened it up. An underground bunker is no different than a deep underground mine. It needs access shafts for men/materials and ventilation shafts. Plenty of miners have survived cave ins only to die when they run out of air. Destroy the bunkers access shafts with major cave ins and the bunker is entombed. Then just monitor for any attempt to bore new shafts. Nearly as good as destruction of the bunker and technically easier. Really a matter of semantics. We are in this already. Where is Israel getting the wepons and also who is advising them. This is already our war whether we like or not. Can we please stop the flow of weapons to Israel. Their leader has been waiting for this moment for 15+ years and he will not stop now. israel is amerikan empire’s dumb little bitch outpost close to our petro dollar hegemony heartland. mossad and idf does nothing without blessing of CIA You guys provide regular chuckles! You understand nothing about global politics. Why not trade in your citizenship for some other country more to your liking. How about Russia? What is baffling to me is why we are willing to violate our own laws and norms in defense of this aggressive little country that constantly attacks its neighbors and violates our values. Saudi Arabia? https://archive.is/OwCY5 No matter who you vote for, you get John McCain, piss be upon him. EXACLTY We will use 4-6 of the deep penetrating 30,000 pound bombs in the initial attack. They are dropped within seconds of each other on the same precise point of the mountain that the Fordow nuclear plant is under. There is approximately 300 ft of earth, concrete and steel the bombs will have to penetrate. Each bomb creates a hole for the following bomb to dig deeper until they reach the centrifuges with delayed fuses. This attack on Fordow has been worked on for years by the targeting experts and practiced many times by the B-2 crews, and in fact a replica of the target has been built and bombed. We have 6 B-2’s at Diego Garcia waiting for the order to execute the plan. We can strike Fordow with the bombs as many times as it takes to do the job. There wouldn’t be an attack if the odds were against it being highly successful. Where is/was the replica of Fordow? Didn’t you watch Top Gun: Maverick? total BS. the only goal of MICC is to spend money and line pockets of C suites at raytheon…….and the pentagon revolving door of whores…………..there has NOT been any goals of actually “winning” a war since 1945. fog of war, fog of war you seem to think that Iran never heard of these bomib types and did not do their own planning The B2’s were foolishly recalled from Diego Garcia. Just another example of Trump’s wishy-washy decision process. It will not be Trump making that decision! Trump can’t decide what hand to wipe his ass with. . Neither, by the looks of things. Neither can reach. All Trump really wants is to end that underground nuke factory for good. With a perfect hit it could take less than an hour. It’s ready to go. It is a very tempting target indeed. Basically he is right. I.S. should never have nukes. Meanwhile, he is happy to wait in readiness while the motivated IDF hacks apart Iran’s air and missile power. Regime change is not actually on the menu, but you never know if that might come too. It will take the Iranis to make that happen, . “I.S.” “Iranis”. ??? MIT Professor Ted Postol says don’t be so sure about the bunker busters. This is a 12 minute clip of a 40 minute interview from a day or two ago. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TriASB-F5UY Don’t confuse the Iranians for Afghani’s in caves…the Iranians have been planning this for 50 years.. It is funny that you think that the Iranians just shrugged and did nothing when the caught wind of the “bunker-buster” bombs a decade ago, saying “oh well, I guess they got us…” CNN watcher^ In the real world, Israel is lsong badly and getting desperate The USA needs a regime change Wrong. This is the same perpetual regime change plan. Same as in Ukraine/Russia, and barring a US slut regime, a failed state. There is low probability of destroying Fordow, and it is contrary to the Geneva convention, although we have already seen NATO target the nuclear reactors in Kursk & Zaporizhzhia. But the real question is: “The Pentagon says the moves are defensive.” I call bullsh*t. 8,000 miles or whatever distance it is from our borders with hundreds of military bases outside our borders playing globocop and trying to control the entire world. We can mind our own fracking business, engaging in commerce and friendship with other nations, without being (gasp!) “isolationist.” If our troops get attacked it will be hard to have sympathy. Swat a hornet’s nest, expect to get stung. Life’s tough; it’s tougher if you’re stupid. Love your bullshit comment! Iran couldn’t attack us on our home soil with their weaponry. So this rules out “Defense” quip from the Pentagon. My thoughts have focused on the Neo-Cons pumping money into our defense contractors pockets. Since when can we get through a couple of years without attacking someone under false pretenses? With GDP crashing under Trumps war on Americans and exploitation of his office for personal profit it is logical to stuff hundreds of billions into the pockets of defense contractors to cover up part of the decline in GDP. Plus, taking over Irans oil reserves would be handy for Trump and his handlers to exploit… . we don’t wage wars for anything but profits in C suites. all the rest of the analysis is garbage if you don’t get this. including 9.11.01 and the lame response to that. How do you konw Iran can’t attack the US? Becasue they have not done so yet? Likely they are wiating for the US to enter the war, then we will find out what is what. “Operation Spider Web” in Russia and the Israeli operation in Iran have give the Iranians the blueprints, all they have to do is follow them You think the US has any defense agianst those kinds of attacks? Congressional testimony last week said there is none, and likley to be none in the forseeable future. In 1000 years, the Romans only undertook defensive actions to maintain order & justice. Yes, really, that was their take. I’m guessing he has been served and consumed a bullshit sandwich by Israel that the US can play Superman and rescue Israel. Yes, rescue, since Israel would not ask the US to intervene unless they were in dire straits, whether projected in advance or surprised by recent failures of the Iron Dome (aka, Canvas Awning?). Bunker buster bombs have no chance of reaching Iranian hardened sites deep underground (reach is 50-60 meters), and there have likely been few if ANY incursions into Iranian airspace by “stealth” or otherwise visible aircraft thus far. If the US were to be able to detonate a nuclear warhead, we can kiss our entire presence in the ME and Europe goodbye, and maybe a large city or two in the US when, not if, Russia and China join in. This is not a fantasy, but a synthesis of non-propaganda facts gathered from low agenda but highly informed sources. Meanwhile, Markets are pricing in a total and quick victory. When is the last quick victory our government has experienced? Good luck, everybody. “ This is not a fantasy, but a synthesis of non-propaganda facts”. what facts? you’re speculating about us detonating nukes for some reason which has zero chance of happening unlikely to spiral into something big because there aren’t troops on the ground and aren’t going to be. A: Grenada. my pal was med student there. his photos lounging on beach having beers during the invasiion of grenada were keepers. that was a reaction by raygun to the barracks being blow sky high in lebanon. it was a morale booster to the humiliation of all those marines blown up. poor dumb bastards,rip. Bombing Gaza, which can barely shoot back, was easy, but Iran can and does shoot back, so Israel now cries Uncle Sam. Puh-leeze. Tiny Israel, it’s IDF still battling Hamas in Gaza, has now decimated the self-promoted huge and powerful Iranian military machine! Israel hs complete air control over the whole of the Iran country and are selectively picking off targets, WHILE not targeting civilians, unlike Iran, with their errant missiles. They claim to target Israel military but hit civilian infrastructure and a hospital. Iran is like Russia. A lot of military parades, a lot of chest beating about how tough they are, a lot of bluster
mishtalk.com Markets 8/10 ?

Hoot of the Day: Trump Admits Beef Prices Are High Because of His Tariffs

…desperate-special-forces-bid-to-save A funny set of headlines on RT today remind anyone of the simple lesson to ignore what they say: https://swentr.site/news/627252-meeting-with-xi-will-lead https://swentr.site/news/627225-gabbard-us-regime-change…

…Blackhawk, op by a national guard soldier, trained for 1h, to pickup stuff, fly 70 miles and drop it. Wow..…

Show full text (22696 chars)
• • • Trump argues with cattlemen over the price of beef. CPI and PPI Beef Components index levels Trump to Quadruple Argentine Beef Imports While US Ranchers Fume Reuters reports Trump to Quadruple Argentine Beef Imports While US Ranchers Fume U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is quadrupling the country’s low-tariff imports of Argentine beef in his attempt to lower grocery store beef prices, a White House official said on Thursday, evoking fury from the nation’s cattle ranchers. Raising the tariff rate quota on Argentine beef to 80,000 metric tons will let the country ship more of its beef to the U.S. at a lower rate of duty. U.S. beef prices have set records due to tight cattle supplies and strong consumer demand. “A deal of this magnitude with Argentina would undercut the very foundation of our cattle industry,” said Justin Tupper, a South Dakota cattle producer and president of the United States Cattlemen’s Association. Farmers were also angered by Trump’s $20 billion currency swap with Argentina while they lost out to the South American nation on soybean sales to China. Trump on the Price of Beef Truth Social Link : The Cattle Ranchers, who I love, don’t understand that the only reason they are doing so well, for the first time in decades, is because I put Tariffs on cattle coming into the United States, including a 50% Tariff on Brazil. If it weren’t for me, they would be doing just as they’ve done for the past 20 years — Terrible! It would be nice if they would understand that, but they also have to get their prices down, because the consumer is a very big factor in my thinking, also! Also note : “The price setters are the packers. If there is any gouging of the consumer it comes from them.” Farm-State Republicans Reach Breaking Point Politico reports Farm-State Republicans Finally Reach Their Breaking Point For President Donald Trump, it was a brief musing to reporters on Air Force One about his plans to import beef from Argentina. GOP lawmakers in cattle-producing states unleashed a flurry of calls over the following days to the White House and the Agriculture Department. A small group of Republican senators, including retiring Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, cornered USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins in a private meeting less than 48 hours after the Oct. 19 comment. So far, the burst of objections has not generated a U-turn from the administration, which is going ahead with a beef import plan that Trump officials argue will both lower steak and hamburger prices for American consumers and bolster relations with a key Trump ally, Argentinian President Javier Milei. But it has exposed the limits of GOP lawmakers’ tolerance for policies that have especially tested states heavy on agriculture. Some of the president’s staunchest Hill allies watched for months as Trump’s tariffs devastated farmers. More recently, they begged his deputies to reopen key farm offices during the shutdown. Then came the beef beef, with one GOP senator granted anonymity to speak candidly calling it a “a betrayal of America First principles.” Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.) and Reps. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.), and Greg Steube (R-Fla.), along with 11 other House Republicans, warned against Trump’s beef move, according to a letter sent Tuesday to Rollins and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer that was obtained exclusively by POLITICO. The frustrations are also playing out on the Senate floor this week on a series of votes to undo some of Trump’s global tariffs. On Tuesday, five GOP senators joined Democrats to reverse 50 percent tariffs on Brazil; four Republicans voted Wednesday to cancel tariffs on Canada. While the votes are largely symbolic — House Republicans have preempted any challenges to Trump tariffs until February — the message was sent. “Brazil had a trade surplus, and the impetus behind it appears to be a disagreement with a judicial proceeding,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said, referring to Trump’s displeasure with the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. “I just don’t think that’s a strong basis for using the trade lever.” CPI Ground Beef Price per Pound Ground Beef price per pound from the BLS CPI and PPI Beef Components Percent Change From Year Ago CPI and PPI Beef Components percent change from a year ago Beef Chart Notes The price of ground beef is up by $2.45 per pound since pre-Covid (63.3 percent) The price of ground beef is up by $0.65 per pound from a year ago (11.5 percent) The slaughter cattle index is up 118 percent since pre-Covid The slaughter cattle index is up 26.5 percent from a year ago Trump’s Observations on Prices There is virtually no inflation Cattlemen are doing well because tariffs have raised prices The price setters are the packers. This is despite the fact that the PPI is up 26.5 percent from a year ago. Cattlemen don’t understand tariffs. Unlike you, I see absolutely no contradictions in any of this. This is Trumperland where contradictions do not exist by nature. Obviously, there is price gouging by the meat packers although prices are not going up because there is virtually no inflation. Related Posts August 12, 2025: Where Do You Spend Money on Food? How Screwed Up Are the BLS Weights? Does the BLS match your budget? August 11, 2025: Is Homeowners Insurance Understated in the CPI? Shop Around! Our Insurance went up by $2,000. Then another $2,000. Here’s our story. October 24, 2025: Market Giddy Over Tame CPI for September, But Was It Really Tame? Tame September CPI? How Tame? Trump to Quadruple Argentine Beef Imports While US Ranchers Fume Reuters reports Trump to Quadruple Argentine Beef Imports While US Ranchers Fume U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is quadrupling the country’s low-tariff imports of Argentine beef in his attempt to lower grocery store beef prices, a White House official said on Thursday, evoking fury from the nation’s cattle ranchers. Raising the tariff rate quota on Argentine beef to 80,000 metric tons will let the country ship more of its beef to the U.S. at a lower rate of duty. U.S. beef prices have set records due to tight cattle supplies and strong consumer demand. “A deal of this magnitude with Argentina would undercut the very foundation of our cattle industry,” said Justin Tupper, a South Dakota cattle producer and president of the United States Cattlemen’s Association. Farmers were also angered by Trump’s $20 billion currency swap with Argentina while they lost out to the South American nation on soybean sales to China. Trump on the Price of Beef Truth Social Link : The Cattle Ranchers, who I love, don’t understand that the only reason they are doing so well, for the first time in decades, is because I put Tariffs on cattle coming into the United States, including a 50% Tariff on Brazil. If it weren’t for me, they would be doing just as they’ve done for the past 20 years — Terrible! It would be nice if they would understand that, but they also have to get their prices down, because the consumer is a very big factor in my thinking, also! Also note : “The price setters are the packers. If there is any gouging of the consumer it comes from them.” Farm-State Republicans Reach Breaking Point Politico reports Farm-State Republicans Finally Reach Their Breaking Point For President Donald Trump, it was a brief musing to reporters on Air Force One about his plans to import beef from Argentina. GOP lawmakers in cattle-producing states unleashed a flurry of calls over the following days to the White House and the Agriculture Department. A small group of Republican senators, including retiring Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, cornered USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins in a private meeting less than 48 hours after the Oct. 19 comment. So far, the burst of objections has not generated a U-turn from the administration, which is going ahead with a beef import plan that Trump officials argue will both lower steak and hamburger prices for American consumers and bolster relations with a key Trump ally, Argentinian President Javier Milei. But it has exposed the limits of GOP lawmakers’ tolerance for policies that have especially tested states heavy on agriculture. Some of the president’s staunchest Hill allies watched for months as Trump’s tariffs devastated farmers. More recently, they begged his deputies to reopen key farm offices during the shutdown. Then came the beef beef, with one GOP senator granted anonymity to speak candidly calling it a “a betrayal of America First principles.” Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.) and Reps. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.), and Greg Steube (R-Fla.), along with 11 other House Republicans, warned against Trump’s beef move, according to a letter sent Tuesday to Rollins and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer that was obtained exclusively by POLITICO. The frustrations are also playing out on the Senate floor this week on a series of votes to undo some of Trump’s global tariffs. On Tuesday, five GOP senators joined Democrats to reverse 50 percent tariffs on Brazil; four Republicans voted Wednesday to cancel tariffs on Canada. While the votes are largely symbolic — House Republicans have preempted any challenges to Trump tariffs until February — the message was sent. “Brazil had a trade surplus, and the impetus behind it appears to be a disagreement with a judicial proceeding,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said, referring to Trump’s displeasure with the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. “I just don’t think that’s a strong basis for using the trade lever.” CPI Ground Beef Price per Pound CPI and PPI Beef Components Percent Change From Year Ago Beef Chart Notes Trump’s Observations on Prices Unlike you, I see absolutely no contradictions in any of this. This is Trumperland where contradictions do not exist by nature. Obviously, there is price gouging by the meat packers although prices are not going up because there is virtually no inflation. Related Posts August 12, 2025: Where Do You Spend Money on Food? How Screwed Up Are the BLS Weights? Does the BLS match your budget? August 11, 2025: Is Homeowners Insurance Understated in the CPI? Shop Around! Our Insurance went up by $2,000. Then another $2,000. Here’s our story. October 24, 2025: Market Giddy Over Tame CPI for September, But Was It Really Tame? Tame September CPI? How Tame? Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts. Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time. This post originated on MishTalk.Com Thanks for Tuning In! Mish Mike Shedlock Comments to this post are now closed. Trump tries to get beef farmers to adopt his way of thinking by insulting their work over the last two decades. Trump statesmanship on display. There is “no inflation” because the BLS says the consumer has substituted sawdust for ground beef. Brings to mind the old joke – “Just when I finally got my horse used to eating sawdust, he upped and died on me.” The MAGA movement typifies a number of Eric Hofer principles. Present sacrifices are necessary to achieve the glory of the future. beef? whats that? It’s what a lot of people here in Mishtalk do in the comments section. Unlike you, I see absolutely no contradictions in any of this. This is Trumperland where contradictions do not exist by nature. When you think in 5D you are blessed (or cursed) with two extra dimensions of dumb. That’s how MAGA thinks, it’s no different from the confederates to the nazis and they always lose because what they think is just dumb. But despite ranchers, farmers, SNAP, ACA users and most of MAGA being thrown under the bus, they’ll keep doubling down on idiocy. If you need proof just look at the current congress. Stockholm syndrome – a psychological response where victims develop positive feelings toward their captors or abusers over time. This can occur in various abusive situations, including hostage scenarios and domestic violence. “Your purpose, then, plainly stated, is that you will destroy the Government, unless you be allowed to construe and enforce the Constitution as you please, on all points in dispute between you and us. You will rule or ruin in all events.” -Abraham Lincoln on MAGA. Got exit strategy? OT: Latest from Simplicius. https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/desperate-special-forces-bid-to-save A funny set of headlines on RT today remind anyone of the simple lesson to ignore what they say: https://swentr.site/news/627252-meeting-with-xi-will-lead https://swentr.site/news/627225-gabbard-us-regime-change and instead watch what they do: https://swentr.site/news/627254-trump-nigeria-christians-military-action https://swentr.site/news/627242-us-amass-troops-venezuelan-coast Amid tariffs disputes, the US and India signed a ten years defense pact in Kuala Lumpur. They will beef up production of jets engines. The will beef up production of ships, missiles and drones. They will produce self driving helicopters AI, without pilots. India will reduce its corp with Putin. You believe everything Humpty Dumpty says, don’t you? Firstpost: Palki Sharma, confirmed by BBC. Blackhawk, op by a national guard soldier, trained for 1h, to pickup stuff, fly 70 miles and drop it. Wow.. I didn’t know it was a function of government to lower food prices,, can’t find that in my copy of the Constitution. And not sure anything they did to “lower” food prices would be Constitutional. Also,, if I want to buy a cow from Argentina, or any other country where does the government get the authority to stop me. Can’t find that in the Constitution either. And finally, I thought “free trade” was what made this Country great and our system of commerce far better than any other Country. It’s not, but it’s also not their job to keep the prices of things artificially high via unnecessary regulation and by picking winners and losers, yet they do both things very well. You’re probably the best person to ask, with your knowledge. What is the difference between: ??? zip. except the make believe country like usa can keep delusional and do so much damage make believing…….. U.S. Constitution Article 1, section 8: “The Congress shall have Power … To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations ….” “Commerce” traditionally and generally means trade, business. “Regulate” generally means set limits on. There are other clauses with grants of government power which less explicitly touch on this too. Questions are pending before the courts on how much Trump can tap into this. history does not repeat itself it rhymes The first tariff in the USA was the Tariff of 1789 , signed into law by President George Washington on July 4, 1789. This law, also known as the Hamilton Tarriff If something is not written into The Constitution, it does not mean you can’t do it. What kind of logic are you using, anyway? The amount of beef he is buying from ArgenUSdoleatina is unlikely to improve the situation, which is ultimately being driven by the “hoax”. When drought is prevalent in ranch country, ranchers have no choice other than to sell productive cows and heifers because they do not have enough forage. They have to cash out before they start losing weight and getting sick, or worse. The second the drought lessens, herd size rebounds, but drought conditions have dominated for a long time. When I was in school I read in one of my Dad’s journals the cattle population of the US was ~125 million. There were around 210 million Americans. Now it’s 86 million head of cattle and there are ~340 million of us. Food security requires surpluses. Weather requires farm and ranch socialism. They’re about to announce a heifer retention program (socialism). Maybe it will rain. Next spring the screw worm will probably gain a foothold in the Southwest and make its fast migration north. I used to spray them when I was in grade school. Usually around the eyes. They eat live flesh. The screw worm facilities got axed by doge right I don’t think so. The sterile fly approach was containing them, for the most part, in Panama. They have been moving north since 2020. They’re restarting the facility in Texas. SB online for summer 2027. The wildcard is climate change. Will the NWS have a leg up over sterile flies? Good thing they don’t get heartworm. At least when socialism is done by Trump, it is defined as Making America Great Again and not some evil commie ploy by the baby diddlers. – U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is making an attempt to lower grocery store beef prices. It would seem some of Our Nation’s cattle ranchers are upset. > Hmm… Are these some of the same Cattle Ranchers Families that had The Farm Security Administration (FSA) that was established in 1935 during the Great Depression to assist struggling farmers, including cattle ranchers. In recent years, U.S. government policies have included tariffs on imported beef to protect domestic ranchers from foreign competition. Programs have also been implemented to stabilize prices and support ranchers during periods of low cattle prices or adverse conditions like drought. >> Appears on the surface, a bit Hypocritical No? It also appears as though Prices must come down. I don’t care how, but they better, to stay profitable and competitive. Invest much more into infrastructure and Processes. Streamline even more, and combine resources with other Farmers for Innovative Solutions Etc. As I am sure all are being looked into, or have been, or maybe simply time to revisit things. If a REAL INVESTIGATION were done into beef inflation, I feel very confident that the MAIN CULPRET are cattle ranchers who have intentionally lowered their herd sizes while complaining about climate change. Hell, even Bill Gates is now on record saying is not as bad as they’ve made it out to be. In 1983, the US had ~ 115M head of cattle with a population of 233M. Nowadays, that herd size is headed towards 90M with an extra 100M+ mouths to feed. If you restrict supply, prices go up. We can sit here at laugh at TACO pointing to tariffs are raising beef prices, which we all really know isn’t the full story. Beef prices like everything else have been on the rise since COVID. Every producer known to mankind is taking advantage of consumer inflation expectations. Once it’s ingrained, the only way to get rid of it is a recession. And that little 4-week recession in spring of 2020 didn’t count. The cattle ranchers love tariffs jacking up the price of their product, but heaven forbid Trump consider doing something like a carve out that will bring the price of imported beef down. Whoa, wait a minute. Both you and Doug78 have been very vocal babbling that tariffs don’t cause inflation yet here were are dealing with beef inflation. Not only that but Trump admits that his tariffs are causing inflation. And that’s the whole point of all the tariffs isn’t it, to drive up prices? This is true for cars, steels, beef and whatever else Trump has tariffs on now. And the solution to inflation now seems to be to open up the trade and import goods from another country. You’ve got a lot of egg on your face. Since you own half of all Argentinean Cattle ranches you should be happy about what Trump is doing for you. Yes, of course, tariffs are raising prices. I’ve never said they haven’t. What I’ve said consistently is that broadly speaking, they haven’t raised prices all that much to-date or nearly to the level that all the Trump haters were crowing about back on Liberation Day. Now, there will always be exceptions, and I’m sure beef “might” be one of them. But the main points of my post still stand: The number one driver over the long-term for rising beef prices is less supply. Cattle ranchers love tariffs on foreign beef imports, and they whine endlessly if Trump plans to do something to try to right size prices. There are zero inconsistencies in my post. You didn’t ever expect him to admit anything other than being 100% correct, or were you born yesterday? I would have to assume that cattle ranchers would not intentionally lower their Main “Profit Item” I would not be surprised if they whined to get the Federal Assistance that “They Received“ however. As they say: “Desperate Times call for”… Unfortunately, like Car Insurance for Drivers, Ranchers get no (affordable) Insurance to speak of. They do require assistance now and again due to weather, and situations changing. They are a National Staple as well, so attention will always be paid to them. I don’t need to hear them yell about others receiving help, that we can, will, may, have to rely on as well. Keep all your options always on the table (ask GM about that). My main point is that cattle ranchers are fine with smaller herds, since this restricts supply & pushes up prices. The bottom line is that there’s no shortage of cattle / beef. Everyone can go to their favorite beef market & buy all the beef they’d care to eat. No, ranchers are not using the “hoax” as an excuse to sell productive cows and heifers. I guarantee you that every single Republican Senator and House member who is complaining, will continue to toe the MAGA party line like good little sheep. Maybe their constituents should elect people who still have a spine. The problem is they don t embrass the pro abortion and pro gun regulation of such peoples Dude, the only thing that’s going to solve inflation is a nasty recession. Joe Biden did way more than Trump’s tariffs to-date to push up inflation. Remember that 9%+ happened on your boy’s watch, not Trump’s. the voters of the maga cult reps are spineless and stupid and love being in the cult. democracy works. always has. always will. people vote themselves. If my being in a cult keeps me from thinking like you, then I’m all in. I’ll pass on the kool-aid though. Not going that far, broski. gulp gulp. slurp down the kool aide and the penis of your cult leader. don’t forget to swallow. Um, you’re too stupid to realize that I’m talking about the Jonestown cult that “drank kool-aid” given to them by Jim Jones that poisoned them to death. Instead, you seem to think a vulgar comment is going to cause me to lose sleep over being put in my place. Nice try, broksi. The result of high beef prices? You will eat bugs, and you will love them. Where have I heard that prediction before? From the same people who said you will own nothing, and you will be happy. They got what they voted for. Anyone who trusts what taco might say at any moment in time can only be sure of one thing. He is likely to change his mind as every day is a new day for him. Could you date the “recommended articles”? You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
thehill.com News Web Result

Gabbard drops out of 2020 race | The Hill

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) dropped out of the 2020 presidential contest Thursday, endorsing former Vice President Joe Biden in what is now officially a two-man primary with Sen.