Intergenerational Foresight 2026
Page 7 of 57 · WEF_Intergenerational_Foresight_2026.pdf
The Future50 Initiative is a purposeful effort to
reshape the practice of foresight and its inclusive
participation. Created through a joint effort between
the Global Foresight Network and the Global
Shapers Community, it gathers fifty emerging leaders
from various regions to collaborate with experienced
foresight practitioners over several months.Its goal is not to develop a single model or
set of recommendations. Instead, it aims to
examine how intergenerational design can
enhance foresight’s ability to address long-term
challenges by rebalancing perspective, power,
and responsibility across different generations
and timeframes.
This handbook contributes to the ongoing
development of foresight as a leadership and
governance skill. It does not aim to establish a new
orthodoxy or replace existing methods. Instead, it
promotes intergenerational foresight as a means of
redirecting and strengthening established practice
amid increased uncertainty, risk, and accountability.
By combining conceptual framing, guiding
principles, and practical insights, the following
methodology shows how wider participation
across time, geography, and experience can
enhance decision quality and legitimacy. Key to
this contribution are the provocations developed
through regional collaboration. Each provocation
demonstrates the application of intergenerational foresight within a specific context while addressing
broader governance dynamics that go beyond any
single region. These are not definitive solutions or
prescriptions, but strategic prompts designed to
identify blind spots, challenge inherited assumptions,
and broaden leaders’ strategic perspectives.
The handbook acts as a reference point rather
than a fixed guide. It positions intergenerational
foresight as an ongoing practice that must
continually evolve as the futures we aim to
govern become more complex, contested, and
consequential. It encourages reflection on how
organizations currently embed foresight and how
they might develop it to better serve both current
and future generations. The Future50 initiative
Purpose and scope of this handbookForesight has often been positioned as a specialist
function, concentrated in dedicated units, expert
communities, or advisory roles. While this helped
establish analytical credibility and protect long-
term thinking within systems otherwise driven by
short-term incentives, it also narrowed the locus of
authority over the future. Over time, assumptions
about expertise and legitimacy shaped participation
in foresight, determining whose perspectives held
significance. Decision-makers often frame knowledge
rooted in lived experience, local context, or long-
term stewardship as contextual input rather than recognizing it as a form of strategic authority. As
demographic change, climate risk and technological
transformation accelerate, the limits of this
arrangement are increasingly evident. Long-term
challenges affect generations, regions and social
positions unevenly and no single vantage point can
fully grasp them. Under these conditions, the greatest
gains emerge when foresight is treated not as
specialist expertise but as an institutional capability:
embedded in leadership expectations, decision
routines and organizational culture and shared across
roles and levels as part of everyday governance. From specialist practice to institutional capability
Intergenerational Foresight: An Approach for Long-Term Responsibility in Governance
7
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: