Document text
0-IO Flow. l-ll-591 ' ' Q Tolaon V
' Balm
' DOLv "CG
llohr
' Pinion:
Boson
in Tumm
__ --. N___ .._. 9*Tr ter
"" - WI- "M - ' -$%%';E-I'1j¢"5-'.._ -:1--B"-f"- '_~' -'9' '!f, - I 00111 -19"" "_i';*-;ag-- 1- ~ ~ ! - . . .. .., , _ 1__ - -1- _ - 1 V > .._r$,;.* ; - I-__:$a' K ' * - 3' -- - - '4' I 1-... . _ I __92,- g. -, .q ii, 2*. _ -__ ' _- I, l ,_-__".":v __ I I 7. -5 . _ . n --_ :_92_ - d'__M, L _ .. _ ~ ~ 9»; ' -»- 1...» -"E »-I--.-ii »iI"§;-»,-it;-r,.Af__/$5 V *. .4," ,
" I 1-. » ¢ - _ 5 A - 1 _ . -¢ ... _- - l , »_ __ ._ _ I .., ._ ' '_@- Ag-1. '1'?» '- 1." 4' I/v ' ;-'-'1-EL ' ' f,' "0 ; ' '1 '_ .
3 ' J'1
dance
that
PUWQI an
againgt
_ For
*"'-'* ' ' - _, " ren
I18; u1mmn_.T.ee'| Tlms, the 1 '
to Protu Cqm 'r'§1m'd hm'"iMm §li;wh'éu anal mm -. _.
nal¢°"-rt hi! shown gqmg
We think Cimzresa hmib¢t£g;-gtéhg-mmnmmmu, |,'~ M... W1. a" *a,:z-=~w kw»g its wijrainud wgll "mm ' Mk w"n'°.' Jbook-to mt °n°° tr c°F°*°{mp " its M 7r°'R°d' m'C°11£1'B8s and
, 2 7! 5 '
--- --.-""'' "' s-O1 1 -2-- 1_ -7,1 _ _ "A. 1-10? '-=i"%-019133 |'_"92.-J! .- l92, 9| I
N 92_'. '1 WW 1?:
___-_*_______Z,-,-i
--1-I---.-_'--. .~-,8P.
0
5%
L//:"
l_ - ._ _ _ ..._..__.. .'_. _.__._._ --- -- ___._......___.--_ _...__.--.v'
Y Q!' ; - v .
"0
WW
/! /
92'
920
J
92 . I},/53 !9 r _!_z '1owm 19 1959 6' MT $7 @The Icuhinqton Pol! und____
Time! Hncdld
Tho Innhlnqton ciiy iviiiii .
Tho Bvoalnq liar
Now York Harald Tli|.b92lIlI .__
N01 York Journal-American _
New York M1rror__Z__i.241! jar! Dally Nun
Now Ya:-In Post ______..._
Tho Nov: York Tina: i
'r;¢~ubr¥'¢|- ______._.___.-
The Now Locdii _.____i_
The I011. Street Journal __
Duh
Jun 151959
_ . !
4.1-11 saw I " "" I
I-ll n: I-it-50! ' /¥ - __ 0 .._ 0 , Tolaon
-I-W-II - .¢
.r kl".
: »
»~
r _ .<.
I '1
,1-;_
"4
92
forQ %_%92£'":,u.,
1*:
W1 $-
192.92:._ -3llll-J ill!-
muniam. -- hr; . '4' -it '
~ An92'1.ill<1°i!!-8§192L!92r»'iP ,
its many defenders I ehnncrqn
against its orice 81'
would limit its jqristlicon; ,
' _' In one decision, Jtliél Harlanliold
"for 11>. majoritj em 4, amine -Um-.
American Acvltieq lubcommithe did
not act _
-"Vassar -Coeie ini»F921c% qua»-at-s"
_ about "the"-Communist Party; K In the
_text 0i»ihd_ decision,JudioeHu-In:improperly in aswe»; we _ _
said
92
= took c<!:l'8"l0poini:tmt umuh relieve
yeerl ago in the Watkins
green nu unufy its giowerlb fun,investigate-ihad no bearmrin H31: _ '
earlier declium -int-ypz-steel
lava-era as a.-um.---=-g out state"
laws, did not Chip flu state
' right tmgrotact thernse1v_e:,"
had no bearing on the cuebefoi-e it. lathe omr
. ' philosophical rpllt become: 01$
/ .
1 92"'d n ' . D :~||*"~ "."e* U ' L_ '_. "92_ _ * . . ilonrf. . - 1 . . -I - 4- »~'92 - 3- ~ - - 4 "$'-'- ' -* eaten
I
vimg when are _count_ad an _ ' But_whai|éqoi_" '
two deciuiuni! In both cage; the same needed ' judge: upheld -the investigat:-S Supremewww ==* C»-=1»-P <1-= yup , I n _=-2-emI in!-ll G10 pote_ntin1'9owver ' _'
-[n"ppr6prhfe nder. "e Coiiiu .Buck 1.. in-1a,, ' 9°'.T-°_".. » -. . - .. .1 - !n1>=?t:@!=i 1»
ma D.-I 0! QDIWBOIDD if
clmm freedom fromwhex-eve; it 1; mhuggz w -§i'.;If|'p*_-_:nig
M .
mt?
_;_ L__n..*--"-+.:~;.-»-nBelmo
DOL
hr
9292 1 . "ag--92'. r._ _ .- -l ~5~~;:--='~_*--11-;-,i'a»-?r*"- '- 1}:#+;;1¥;uy§'QgW*".;v*.:'-F*&i"fF§3?*?'1'1" .2 .;'' '. . O
L I 1',3??? I. cm ..;
¢-"'l'I1¥. Boom ..._
'i'|O11OlIl@lI __._..Gdnd ' é
I- .' '»<__- .- ~i_
. ' V..92 '
ew
F Fw13'. . , " . '. u w '
,. , __ _- -A -. __ _ _ My ~; ,___» __ 7 . .- -5. ....
92 '§__ - "T r I. . - "'0 M'-"!:#V_J,__-_'-.J... _ I _ 0 _ V H. H .-F:-I . _ 0 '= MI: A92' ' ' ' ' A 7' I II. DOIQQ-
- - - - D , .-~~ - , - * ..>:-. " -. ,- 5*;-'- 1' .- ' "-- -' f}- W; D.- L"?-"-4i¥&5&*;1#-ai~.-+" '.*,".'?~'{§'1l§Ni."?'#""": =-D ii »-"??;~»..¢:11¢.'§x?~.§.1'-::=1=.==@<*1-.. I
- ~. .---.~._-,..-..-, 1---~. -- .---~,=w-D2--*"'5:, _-.-'J.':- .__ -_:_ , _.,:._,._' __,,__'. ,v'_fu __ ,4-w§'§,._:;-B: --_r».3- J11. J-;.-. ' "1- ~' ' K-12'.» . " w- D .~_ _ D D ;_'-" : *' >1 92 _ '¥?l ' ' »-* _ ' - ,§j,'/1.;S$~'~ " DV '_ ' , -. 92 ._ .~o
K
_ _ - ' r ,. <_,'-'-I'I __0. 5, -
2: FE
.. :92 l __¢__ Q: ,_ J: II _~_I ATab.
Ir. HaIu|nI__
..-,1};-A . _ ,,_, _' _ _ ,.__ Q,_ - » 9 - =-I 1- _ - _I r" .' _ _' - -0 -:r'-.:--- - W-1 " _ " ._;-<5! -:',_'_-fwsy L. *
ll
'92} .
I92-H ,.- A
m old principlb. ' 5 W,-,
mm:
entire ahtl-Zl_~IAACP 7'
D. <!=*@=°¬w..*!Y=1#w@..,H°?*1l_i-'1lFDP1f.t!'§f?!"'i*'_?:",D?.'
M aJidrecoanm'ende'dt1n§:1§:§=*7=r=*=<Lby Mtin! D9" -sluger _1.'°°.l*Wl."°°°?m"9!15*e-rhr-D.» ;m-mun: ii-N§A¢1!;9s1a¢n hnlql
; =- lglinqmmesofcon »»+-
- nancial tu1'Dm_1ation.-.=lhi,- - '.=
mtqgg-add th_¢_i0w , '92! J 92
""'-+9»-s-41*
/W
'1-as vmexmnn PILU1 /'
uoarom LEDGER D1sPA'mT-1"____
JOURNAL AND GUIDE """"'_"_"
VIRGTNTA BEACI-I SUN NEWS
PRINCESS mm hams PRESS
sum=~om< mzws HERALD
NEWPORT usws DAILY P
NEHIPQR1 NEWS TEES HERALD
NOMO
DATE 6 - 0-
EDITI
AUT _H H Z "WT rvnnrngnn "1""-7 ~ ~= . *7 ' " "
m.u.1u:-L 5 H5 Q, agate;
TITLE _ W i_______ _¥-iu|-|-I-mini
;~.
-
,9
.2.
F"
E. , »_ - _ _ _ , ._. _.__1 , ~,92_ . .. r. - 92 ~ ' .~92
,_ . ,.* .,:,.~$1- I _ .'-929~dr_$rm . _xi .._.A1:_.'1.-»v$;9§ff, .?_lr;»J".ar:_.T_f'f_ u,=; .~ .
. -" -- "-- K . -, -- »-w- 7-Y1: -- rv ..y-w- - 4 . . . ,, 3 _ Q _R -.0 . I - .-. ~ -.
_ _ _ Q _ . , A-W, . Al .- ,
- -J-' J1 ,1".-2» I-' A- '1 < -1' ' -- 7* ~e' - '- -' , .1' I -- - --5_:£""P" :-s. - ' --;_,:§_"_ - Q1113. ; ' " " him ' ' _ - " . _ .-1 =_ ' . ' - - _,_f*--_,¢' >~r_--5 ' ~, , . V-.
~ > . ' - . -. '4" 4 . - .~'-. . , 92:._ 5' " "9"
V H _ _ - V .- J _ _ _ J , I _ _.,, -. / -- . - . . 92'~....._1:»¢._..._-;;..-.;»-.'.. .'...¢..,,_=»'¢[email protected]~. I _ ADM. . »-_..-L . ~11-_-»-_-wzJ'Ana1.lruihrs.;$_-u&£IGil.";'-il¥Y!, . _,.92 . .._.,... ,, . , ,, -,__, ,,, , _u_ ,.,. , ,. _1
§ , , , _ .-92-;~» 4-- '.,- ,' '- - --- ;_.."- -0-, - 1-+ -'- ' _.-_~ " ' ~' - 1' ~ -*- -' ~ " . r -" -,1<...:: -1 -1 - =3; ." R 7 f"_" V I I II _ _ -"__ . Q ,_._ n 1'. _1 .4 _92I"'92 j-41' w.~ - .- 77 - -- - -. -_ - ~ ./- = . .=--"-.: = -Mar. , , . .. .-__,,_ ,. _ I Y > . _::»,}L.j,._;__: _._ ._-lP;_.i4_,T __»--1:2. I . -_.:, ,, _ _ .__. ,_,-92_.|~ -- - , .2 A -.-- P; --. , - I;-'--I ~ - -, - _~ = . - '1_ _92 I g 2 F. -
- .. "' '92-92 '92J4l -.- V - ' "3 -- - ' "H1 -J--.. _ _ , -, . .. re-3. -= _» .,';:f,- 1-. .1
_*_ -¢.,-<--as 4.
1 ,.| _. . I . 5' -_' 3 _ » _.-r
4-92 -
1 r
H >s_
I
I
I .
f I
-.,-
92 -
15? 7
1-." .
,7
up g|,|. nm,"n..-msnm up
- E5 gj,-J |nIIl._||u_'|n|u.g1||nuun-_;;,- -_ "-r:_' <-;""'.ml£I1|f1.uIa.|u||n|||ln.;,'§_,§_- __ E . V" _:1_i'.» -_ _. __ _ _ . M- --Eta; f" 5 Iiauyzuie m,sn__:u.|m|'nu m I, an mu .'§"£§>'-- HE =*' _-"_,s|:-noun rum um Incl :1 nun urns!1--. s-3 - ~- _- I -- .--2A -, , 1:1. -- '92
I _ 92~:mJm v___ __ r':__. W: .3: _ _ . ,3"--I ... 192_ ~ 92' - 1
Y» 21,, ' ," ' -- -.--' . _. ~ ~~ '-_ .. V _ I I ' ' i VIII . . H I _ '_!a- .-'4 92|lu'lA|b_'ib-_ 1-
9211v - ~ n. _.92-@'-i:"1-¢- -
92 » " .":;.~--.-" ¢~"" ' _ -. . .-. . ¥'.th-;.4_.:5;;}_,gj§~:.:."._.*4:-kg .-..
{F 1;;
,h____.92?_:r._,'<7__ 92. H .,., -in ..-,,;9292'-.J;q5__J ,. ,gY_~;,;{-.<3-.'
.:_92-s-_é'~. ;_',3fE{, » _I 5*, 1.. 9;! ,5, z, I Ax.-. ___.,:.1:15
,1." ' "-__;-Y - L g . _1_.¢ Ff? 1_ - -I '. "' _"' ' If -.-_""j"' '.| .'_. ' ,-+ 92-1'-¢,,;92_*.-' -I I -. - - g; '3.-, ilk . ;,92__. -~_-.,_92.-
*'=i'~.;2-' 1" Tr .1 *5 "=1 1- aw +1. .~~- .' ' -.... *5?-f' __ ~=' "11-! ~' , 1 '- .,. . _1. -- :r _ . 92' '- - - - --> '
'~§~ ' -.'-' *'z-r!: ' '* _ '. _92 N-_ __5 1». - .- . - . . '}-,-. ;--. -.- .;-, .~ I ;_ -mp -v .- Q 1_I* ».-- - " §'~ "- ":.."' ""'-- . ;.,.-1. - - ' --1- --.. ' ._ -. . - '_ _ ' " " H "' .» . __--; _.-31. . . ,- L E H, t I Ir» I. 5 . *3 ____ .. _-_ I -5 .' 1- n *' -92 92.; ,,. I it > I .- i _, d Jig
., ;,..-~.- " . ' ' .
..'_;-;92£92,92_-""_f">-, ._ ~ - .. _ _ ~ - -92 -- - » 3» " I IEIGPIII llunul alun 1..-Q 1,-,1. -_-.~,-_
' 92.H ,.w~ ' _'
4.1:
_ .. . . '5!» .. K ,.';_ . :;_n_-,_'_ _ - -*' I ' "'" -_ :":.92'1,_- 'V.¢t'92;;
Ihllllth, lfnl yhyl. lg-|g92_ _|..n92u ._ , . . ,_
.',__92'< I . -v V - ' ___;;'A< ; 1 _;; __~*i;_ ~_ ; i _. I 0-A..4."1 ., _ . ;v'-A-,. 92
T_ - 1' J7.--",
1.
. O
- ' » K ""1?--'7". K1 ' " '1
5: __,_-*,:.;~.,;-."::.1-.*:':'.,":.r"'.;.:t.":¢..'".:%*'¢ HIE IIIJAIL NEWS~ yr,
Mi?-A
, I
1%
Edition
D6161 f" /0 if? 7 7* , r 5"_ ,. _ 0-H __,,_ A ii F _é fWI?NE§DA_Y, {uni _. 1; q ;_A_5h. A.
cmrrnmc Asrmcr CANCELED ~ %.i-51%-= ,,,7' f Q? 1-¢';"" *-§;3*n r = Ax." i =:.":r;~;=".{~_; " ii}, n,{w ' ¢%{=" §§=g<:# ;_:,;;;"
H . . . - - ..§?r*- .§ '1 &- -zfcl __1 ',, _ 3 ._' - g --_l .' - 1, _ fi » '. ' ' " y"- M ; "-_ '_"'-";'% 1-; -_,_,4> ~ .r_ ,. , ' n 43- -A , 9. ; _ - *,_, ,-...,_s= , - 1 .>JL ._'.'I;.éni-=' -7""'.. r -= - . .
_ ' " - " F 1 -2 b ' - r-- .' #3 r-L rdI R".>A Pége /4 cm.
J,
4.. 7 _ 4.~ '7'. ' 4,
-. F '_ ." ;.,..,' I us.
___ A . ., . ..- . . . - .. .. - . - . _. . . .. - w , .- , D M . 1 _ ..; , _ ,, 1,. ..é _V 7 M: .v92F:_,{ ¢, $2.. ..~_ x a __ ,;.- .
>=
~
-1?
.- .; P-Kai?
l~*'_" _
T? In 5:
» '-I; 1-, if-?1'{_:_ _..~
K _.
.'~ 1-
.4,. _..g/*;. v
-Ina-i
1; ' .--- 3 Q1110 cl
-.; .. .'-*5; ._-w,
- [- ,,.,,~_..,...4, - ' 4:. j ' _ ' ..,_,: =1-4 - -. -.~ K .92.92 ._ . *- i.-5%; N _
eulnmlqqn__ Y_ ..12"
4:
I?
1 Ti1-.» I@-5
"r » _-_ ___
. - 1- _:A__,1n;'T_ 1;- R? _.,.4l9292~ "- £1 -575$- .T81?
.. Jr? _. i "..~ -*_""'_l.kr '_ ' If.§-_;§=_ went: 1008 '_
J .-' , . ' IONDATS 5-to-4 decilig*;§:»_'j1>*?- *-» _" "for-a.@w=u<:n¢:.=_;. . ..
.. _ - " a¢1q1=1.:e,a=_Ia=f_1_1-la_u1 " _ "
1 Q1. ' i.- :. » . ..' .92- -- J -u.4 . A _ .
activity in dis country Julia nun
- __._--. .,,_-.--,, _- _ 2!; ¢¢I.-=1.=_- l . .:"> 1" F"? >1» M._ J - Wpoui-txunbanadta-iiiupf*".t
~ _ hlptt cue tlaepuhjoct mttara 1»" .;ihe,limn!iqn ha um -;-jnatngiauuwr,_ __ p -' """' '7 - - '1; *'~-T-%g="lm-nnrlnlnlhJ-F .¢' 9»<.=.-. .¢ mag. ~
f is- ~"~92
-" . §..s-
-1 .-- F Q?,_
.-__ , -L.-._ .1-.__-.
73¢
| ¥ " .
1V. -. 92 *"2..,-.,-»_ . -.."'5 ~. . ff? '1'."~¢§'-..'..".5=?._7;.'~:11.<1.' : ' " -'.. L; "'1 -i.-'.=L.**"~,-:;.,..=-;.;_. ~- ' 1 ' - - - - _~.- V '. "".- .
..,_;'-..- ~._,~.¢ A . ,8 F, IQ. w,g.. .. 5' J17 .. _ .. P. -. '- ._--'» _,,_ '
~'r'* - ' ~ " - ' . U a..:- . ,. . , -.~ T ~ -1:: _ ~>.§.-. _,_=L¢; -1,.* ' -. -. _ -- _ . 5,7... - Ia >1 ~-* - .=--.~. -- ~ rr~-~.~¥-~='=#-3'*'-~.»:..-' ..~=.='= . -*" ' K J4"? 31 *-- - '92* - ~ .* ' -*~', 3'.-_ V *' ._,r »r?*"<-/5 . 1.-.,".'-"v.-'"-Fl-*;.-.1._.r; :..'.-*"~-" :-.i~.*'i'~,»f4.r.**!§';j-'==---*
1. . Z3 __ g I, _,_ __L:.,___ ,,,._4r; _._ D_. ..._
. . - "¢-rm:.. ff .' :_¢;' __ ; J .. ll: ;__~__'. 92:{;;. - I. _.~ F_- . __ [TI - ._ -L: 1! J -_~ .": - - "'~92-.- ,, . l _ .31 7 _ ' "'Af ' " -- ' ' .' 3' -_.'s=" ='-;.:- _f_-- '!r.*,j.;§§Z.w$- _ ' . .. . ._.- -'1 a . H-- -k 4_'__ ' .__~ F _. .1 .:- -_ -.'_-...' _1 .- ' . ,92.' .. _ .. .--. - -' ._ .".1... ,. .. _.~1.._. ...2.~ _¢.u~;a:..*$u;.ua.h*;..a=.»-~.. . -. Lam ifu-.'.13£§;92 ..m..IMI:i'*£&?§..- » 1:12:
__;_ '_ -'- ...;-92-1..,-,;-.191-.5-é*#+*§{ ¥*~=-§;?'.":"~?92 f vi ""1 ,1ma 4.1"-.'4
4~ 5I
' L I 1 p
i___. .3-ll» E.
92.,... .- __ I q. J
"2.
'1' -1Q . ." "_." " 4
| E} "'6' '3'75-" I 4 ',.. i r _' ._ -
1 _ -.l:_ 1- 7. .- ,in ra l».___,"':. x-- ~_r_. j
-ilv
.1
-J.
~ v --H 16
*-' *.-i-,ri
£791
-1":
ii.
2. V,
Jr 4.-
I-.
>
; !|
IT-Iii-3."-.
":§". :
_o
-1%:
.____-._
-
is
if
2
g .
mig-Z.D-ii :1 V- Q-28°59] /Z_ / TO]. '4 -i . B '
, V , ..,,-,.,,-..,,.--we--Q---re
;,TH-E-N'ATIONAL scryr - . .
Fundamental Rights
Tackled by Court 6,5
Ihséundnmentahl oi freedom written into the !1_rstm nt ve for 163 years provaea 1ustice's*of the'&1i'1¬n':'eAmend-
Court tohilts-of judicial passion, often recorded in pungent legalistic
" prose. - »
_ The solemn language at the first article oi the Bill of Rights
pledging freedom of speech and press, of religion and assembly
'_ is regarded by most Americans, lawyers and laymen alike, as the
_most important paragraph of the Constitution. _
L Ii there is any principle of the Constitution that more im r -;tively calls tor attachment than any other it is the pr
tree thoughtnot free thought
ior those who agree with us but
Ireedom for the thought that we
hate," wrote the late Justice
Oliver Wendell Holmes, jr.
The extent to which the rights
oi the individual as delineated by
the First Amendment can be
abridged and subordinated to the
national interest has oeen debated
exhaustively in the controversy
over the tactics oi coI181'B$-sional
committees in the much-tilled
eld oi Communist investigation.
The issue, intertwined with in-
vestlgatory rights oi the legisla-
tive branch. has sured to some
deg-rec in almost every subversion
case before the Supreme Court.
But while the high tribunal has
narrowed and dened the con-
stitutional prerogatives in _a series
of controversial decisions .that
have invoked the wrath oi many
members oi Congress, it has never
met. the basic questions head-on.
Drawing the Line ~ '
Last week the Supreme Court
moved a substantial step closer to
drawing an unequivocal line be.
tween the investigatory rights oi
Congress and the constitutional
privileges or witnesses summoned
before its committees.
It did so in two 5-to-4 decisions
that dramatized and deepened
the sharp division oi the court
on the crucial issue of individual
rights and the mantle oi pro-
-tection offered by the FirstArnenment.
The majority opinions claried
and. in some eyes, adulterated the
court's celebrated rulings in the
Watkins and Nelson cases. But
more than this they stated in
clearer language-than the emu-t,
has ever used before the con-
stitutional rights oi both con.
lrress and State govemments in
.th'!'1!mIsubvers;qn.»qg1¢*-~17! 92st case involve t. a former in
Vassar College who refused to
answer questions of the House
Un-American Activities Commit-
tee in 1954 about Communist asso-ci%'ions. ~ r '.
upholding Barenblatt/s con-
tempt conviction, the high court
ruled:
I The committees right to con-
duct, the investigation was "un-
assailable." -
0 The Government's interests
outweighed Barenblatts protec-
tion 'under the First Amendment.
O The Watkins precedent did not
apply because Barenblatt did not
raise the issue oi pertinency before
the committee.
Justice Harlan wrote the ma-
jority opinion and was joined
{by Justices Frankfurter, Clark,W 'ttaker and Stewart.. he tour dissenters were J -
ti s Black. Douglas and Bren an
an Chief Justice Warren. Epcot-iny for the minority, Justice Black
declared; 92
"Ultimately all the questions in
this case really boil down to one
-whether we as a people will
try feariully and futilely to pre-
serve democracy by adopting to-
talitarian methods. or whether
in accordance with our traditions
and our Constitution we will have
the condence and com-ale to befree "t 0. .. F _~ L mill... é ..
their oonsirlss-.i1Ie last point alone
aumcient reason-zioria witness
to refuse to answf. Q11! commit-tee: questions. .:--~'" 1 -
Thus they would extend to itsgibroadest Possible I009! the rulinl
._ oi the .c0urt in the Watkins case
that questions need not be an-C
swered unless they are "perti-
'_nent_ to the invcltllation. - "
Here, as at almost every other
. point, the majority and minority
. views were in irreconcilable op-
position. I.n one of the most sli-
nicant statements oi the major-
. lty opinion, Justice Harlan as-serted: '
So long as Congress acts in
pursuance oi its constitutional
power. the judiciary lacks author-
ity to intervene on the basis or
the motives which spurred the
exercise of that power."
_ In blunt language the majority
opinion said that Congress had
complete authority to investigate
subversive activities. that it had
conferred this authority on the
Uh-American Activities Commit-
tee in vague but still valid in-
structions tto investigate "un-
American propaganda"! and that
it was not for the courts to ques-
tion the committees true motives.
The Witness. Right
Where does this leave s Witness
-who balks at answering questions
because he does not consider them
pertinent to the subject of the in-
vestigation? It leaves him with
t right to demand oi the com-
ttee an explanation at what it
d ving at.
As the Supreme Court said Watkins case: "
-- "The explanation must descrll§eL
McGuire
Mohr __i_..._
ons r
Gill
Trott
W.C ' n -1
Tele. Room ..._
Holloman _.___
W
'1
1
/V "92. 92 ,1| ' ' .,' j_V|V -.
__:___;__._..__._.__Tsa_wasmns92vn Pest ="i--
Times Harald
The
TheWuahlnqton Dill NEW! -Eveninq Slur ;p.
_ .-._.=;- Q
_r.-. .¢,..'.;1""i_- _'
_.. ..
..._. ._.:_': _
-
-. _-_-1,, ;
-,---
Y
Z
9
1".
.7.t..,.
_.._i--.-liq-ii...
I
l
iQI s'5h..; E, "ope t...i.. twig 1% ;em=1=mr You--qe connective reaso n
whereby the precise questions
asked relate to it.""
' In its other 5-to-4 decision last
week the court upheld the con-.
tempt conviction oi Dr. Willard
Uphaus. executive director of the
New Hampshire World Fellowship
Center He refused to give New
Hampshire's Attorney General in-
formation about the New Hamp-
shire World Fellowship Center,
which identies itself as e pacitlstorganization. '
The Supreme Court had ruled in
the Nelson case that the Smith
Act under which United States
Communist leaders have been con-_
victed for advocating violent over-
throw oi the Government pre-
empted this ileld from State law.
It threw out the conviction oi
Steve Nelson, e. Pennsylvania
Communist Party leader, under
the Pennsylvania Sedition Act.
The decision was widely inter-'
preted as striking down the
sedition laws oi 41 other States.
In upholding the right at New
Hampshire to question Dr. Up-
haus. the Supreme Court made it
clear that the Nelson decision had
been much less far-reaching.
"All the Nelson! opinion pro-
scribed was a race between Fed-
eral and State prosecutors to the
courthouse door," said Justice
Clark. delivering the majority
opinion. It did hot. he said, "strip
the States oi the right to protect
themselves."
Sabotage Protection
Had the Supreme Court re-
treated from its highly contro-
versial position in the Nelson
case? There was no evidence that
it had. In a widely overlooked
sen nce in its Nelson ruling, thecoi. had emphasized they itsdc ision did not "limit the .' ight,0 a State to protect itseltbit any
time against sabotage r' at-
tempted violence oi all kinds.
The immediate consequence oi
the Barenblatt and Uphaus de-
cisions was to diminish the pros-
pect that Congress will enact
legislation at this session to re-
verse the Supreme Court on the
Nelson case and other contro-
versial security rulings. While
there remains strong support for
such hills, particularly in the
House, the two rulings unques-
tionably eased congressional con-
cern over the direction the high
court has taken in the e.nti-sub-
versive eld.
Last week: decisions also eased
tears that the court had fallen
under the domination 01 "liberals"
on the security issue and its vital
hconetitutional ramifications-; Chiei
Justice Warren and Justices Black
and Douglas make up the hard
core of the liberals. _They are
joined on aimost all cases involv-
ing individual rights by Justice
19l'¬ll!!El!.'.Lu.. .-»i.4-,...."."'f"'jj"',__,w over at est one o er mem
.ber of the court. The rnost-fre-
quent "swing man" is Justice Har-
lan, who Joined the hberals the
previous week to make a 5-to-4
majority in the Vitarelli case. But
Justice I-:'.arlan's firmly stated
, conclusions in the Barenblatt case
would seem to put him past the
point of no return on the broader
issue of congressional investiga-
tions.
Indeed it is hard to see how
any oi the {cur justices who sided
with him could reconcile their
view: with those oi the minority
in cases involving the same basic
,issues or the same fundamental
concept of the First Amendment.
Liberals Lose '
The liberals have lest two other
lm ortant constitutional cases in
~ th current session. the 5-to-4 -cl n that health inspectors 1%!
lter 8 private home withoi aarrant. involving the Fa th
Amendment, and the 5-to-3 deci-
sion that a man may he prose-
cuted by lfederal and State courts
for the same oense, despite the
double Jeopardy provisions 0! the
Fifth Amendment.
In all these cases hinging on in-
terpretation oi' constitutional sate-
guards oi individual-rights Justice
Stewart. who joined the court at
the start of the present session,
has voted with the majority and
' I I-
-1 FR,
'_'"92/"'
l
92¥.v"
.lUSTlCE HARLAN
Spoke for majority.
E against the "liberal" bloc. Bo has
Justice Whittaker. who lled the
last previous vacancy on the
q bench in 1957. .
= Thus President Eisenhower has
succeeded by iudicious screeningtot his -last" two appointees in
"maintaining the delicate balance{on the court that was threatened-1 I-l_ --_92l--. -ei_ti___ VI'92I_- Q--axiii £1-I5 CHI!-I-ff iwgwlllll J-U5I
_ ap es cover"' " " ' "---¢'I-m--41_~.n..4§- If'- ,...-.-.-..-3» -1»-92-6;;-v---92'.'-"""' e oi e co0 - '
-0-»-
oon rov sy, Irom Earl arren. on
the lett, to Potter BWIII1. Wh it
appearl will take hi! P05111011
somewhat to the 1'18! 0! Justice
Whittaker. _ .
.One statistical hot ltill dis-
turbs court critics the appoint-
ment. or conversion, oi one more
"liberal" would create a newpower bloc that could bringdil
drastic ghanle in tho DIM-tilt -
rection oi the court. S-=--=-==
u7% U
i F_ _ _ % & __A 3 _ I _m_ ,_ 1, -_u__ In _I CC _ ;_ _ R N n 1 AT in _ t Y I I W",_' n% _ mm? _ __m M M
Y ._ dd u l '1 d_ IL __ u aka _u dmwhn n_ ___ ___ ld C" N, T __ _v __~ HM Mn; __H___d _
_ am W Wm H Y N NWQ AO w Q II C h hh N T TTD fpq Y
__ 92_.g _ K92_p_
W L_ ___ ____W _1 n 5
_ 7 F 4 L n , .
_ m M __I__ _w
In M _Q > _ P _ _ km _ WM ___
MWMUEMHM _M__mh%M mamQ * ;M_k%%_ _§_ Q
* ink MW?_MbMVmMW H mm w!é%mwO_ PH ___ w _ A _ 3D
M N ___ M M L M MI _' _ i __ _" __ H __ _ _ O __, _ _*___ j_mn__ nu I W T H W Y Y W _. W ' 'W
8
U
m
n
.
'
E _
.
_h
T_ _
_ I __ _ _u * _ r_ _iM3_,_m %_ _ J ' _ _ _
i%§_xLIVL_O_b_ _ __ ____ _____ M_M_______*_ __ é _ ' _ T n H N N T WA d_ _. _I___ $31 __mM_ M WM _ g_ W ?_M'&HJ1'_ _ _!__ p P D. _ _MM_ m___Mmmm @M__Tm mu: MN
MWM_m_§_Wmmmmmmmwwmmmmmmmmw lg km _Mw_ H Jaw I l q V _ gimwmmT % Mm M? n, Mmgdm/Mm%$hmmmmwwwmwmwmwwmwmEmmmmmwmmm
up MtWmmMMMm%Mgm%MmWMHMEWMM mW%_$i
A L_& __mk_WmMMmMMmW,h % MM vi?
L__ 92 _ M WML»_M9H;K __ & 'kit _ L __2_ _' ____N L 1 é é
@-
_
i ;
--.2
u
iK -. . I 3- .-,
, kqi§QT%miQx
f_i!;&l'_L»
.- _*
92
-_ _.-In1 -
. .. _,-.4 »< == ~ - " 92"- vr ' ' T-"' - 4- -'- ,#. - M-=,.~'1-a
Gllgnilod wIJrunt'uI.thn Inndor1;-:1»; Be.-==~;=-w 1» -159-_ i;_;_..> .D _J."~¢s ._,"'.: V f ,9
_éI!_aotq_n wot!_n§_ l'hl§U_Q_ l.LI_|__aI 92
u'en|:_|, WlIllI.Il.ll'lim.e&n!_n11aI.4:QIpe&x1I,-=mung; molt-nib-a:a0d_ ew an
lbs court of l lulu In |nv0rnMEu§ 3
court cunlcrvlvll qld tad tn!
Onupnil 1 with leglllaitve burl}; III:-_
.~.°_*".°'§mar," i,--Ff 1.» ." - ,.,."a';
. UIIWIHIJE.
an
by lonml ohlorvuri
Illmndv ,..... ..-._=!. Q.-si=I..-@.=»===§¢=.§_Y_?
;"._;g-nhloml Ill-lid by llll-G -nlllnf '
3MȢmw:?"%'b*w#*u"*
T of'J'ug.en Wuhan l_nd_ Jultlzk collll '92092d I 10" ._-;_l_l1'h.hI vi»;-1:.nnw| sum the
pr A_dvmcc1__nentQrmpie chlml u_'0__ded¢nel etlorb. But tin
majority, :11
a. amnEm
E
*.§: " ;v;a@a§§g%§@w$%mu@m!@%§w@$$»F§%&"&umw§%&Q@%H5%wu¢m@m.
w%%
*,-._.§U§h¢:;1 ._ é'.~ . -<- .--.,~< 3., .v._u,. >._,- .1 _ _ -0
- Zia-, ,,
-. _ ___ 4+ - _- '
._ 4 é
_ an, .¢
~_"t"' v ~.
11
% ~ i
fh _H __1_ um I 1* Q1,_____ _ -_
_ _ _ _ A
at
W MML
_ G* !_ .
_ H
_ -
U _
I__ 1
_ __ 'T
Q mH
_ __ __ __ i __ __ __q_ n Mk _ m H n
in u 3 Maw TM MML _m___ __ _m___mmm__"e M .. _ H_ ______m*9!? WT "mhm P
L1 m___________ * mt O
Er Y Y
I w w
h. . .
TN N N D
O0 H?
_ A
rm ___1 V _ _ _ _ XMM E WW_ '1 M LW 0 Wu /9 Q r_ __ _ , 5+Jhn%& _ O W _J __1__ _~__'
_ _ UmA _ _______ "L
w _6 Gm ,
L_ My J __ _ '
bx _
I A _
___ __:_ "Tit
aw
"J H3 _, Vm'__ _ff ____, a
T _ _ V my_ I __E _ ~_-_ _H_m _ _ A_ H ______J __r__W% mmMu w. § % WWW W_ _ a . ' r
!_ u _ F _ G TH _ _ H H U w '
I I_92_ _ I pi _ J ___Q
r92| __ M __ _ r;_____ Wi _A _ H _ am? M M ___ _ W __%_'_¢W'u_W _ __mMM%m N N W WMMWWMNWWHMMWWM._
_"
W
.
h
T at VI; QMm "M _
I J
LP P:.
m_m
T
___ °_ Y
W
.
N
M
T r
h.
mm
Ls
Nd
F
HM
_"______MmPr_mM§MW__WwM_mm_u___%émmmmwmmm mum EM _ _4_ _ Mu _ _ h v ____ ___
Wwlmm$m%wm MMMEWWMMMWWMWW
_ Q A d * WU 3
2
N
U
J _
Q
D __ %MN E HMi_%_MWMwWm M mum mm M MM:&@au%?MM@%m§Ai§%1 %w@%WMW§@@%%%%&@JlqEM Maw? mm
F%_ _ _92:____A__ n ,_ 7 mu _|__R K _ W L ______P_ __ 4 Qwk _ __ , _ , _ __.__-3 __ _ W_U_____ _'_"_ ,____
"_ k __ _ J _ _' _ _ W _ _ __ Zr _ __92 s_ _
w rii__ fh_ 7 ; r %§ ,_' ;%? T F5 __ n
M/mm
_j_E2
_m9
_ RW
_;mJ
Mg 1E
G m_F5 Wm5 pw
mg/y
Am
if
#.
?$':-
an
I
92
| -gr .0-1'0 nu. |-:0-an
xx i ,
-_i' -/
,0-Ts 5"- _.a92' W -,. . i , In
0
1
1
3
$3
t.
. 3
-- pd
- no
92-_ I.
5.;
Q
| .{[11 "
I.___92 .. _ _ _ @-
° 0 ToilonV " elm
' r
r __ __ _-;, ' H I . Jaw . ___ _ _ -I uh G ._92 .-.2 ;_ ..',_' __ _.-;-1-:_-Hi.-92_92I "' - - ""_ 1 ---=E921<'i=1$.-:,-_ . _, _. .1-_ - ~ - - @111- ..PwI<l1. llcG
-"T?" Ho
against _
which ' -
prone:-ibing
.-1-
0-l I Rev. 1-2!-
F"
-i.=-
4.-r-n. z "'4,-5i!
_.v92ap...92 s '1'-.: » F ' P . I Y
_ _. _ . -Is?' -"" '- <:*~' 1- ' .. .' .. 1 A .~-- I -- ,. ,-V -. '-I __:5?_ K ~g_ _v - i; 1"! _': i I __ ____§-_"_;V_V __M1
--1: - '*"" i ____ _ _.
7'? IRREN ootrrrr onsrs ltd
""1f'rnews nowadays when the Earl Warren Supreme,4 Ema upholds an Act of Congress, instead of overruling it
5
>__ liing that it doesnt mean that Congress thought
It meant. .
On Monday of this week, the
Warren eoun-tthough by divided
votes, to be sureupheld I. 1957
Act of Congress aimed at undoing
some of the damage wrought by
the Warren _courts decision in the
Clmter. E. Jens!-as case. =
In that affair, the court ruled
that Jencks, a union leader eon-
victed of falsely swearing that he
wasn't a Red, should have bee
a couple of FBI plants inside th
Communist Party. AClinton B. Jeleh
u This decision obviousl threatened the FBI's effective- Y
ness in ghting the criminal Communist conspiracy. Con-
gress made haste to limit strictly the types oi pre-trial
statements of witnesses which accused persons may inspect.
Day before yesterday, the Warren court politely obeyed
this Act of Congress,_by upholding convictions of seven
assorted characters whose attorneys claimed that they had
been unjustly. prevented from forcing the prosecutors to
tip their hands before triai. . '
It looks as if the Warren court is at last properly im-
pressed by the storm of bench, bar, press and everyday-
citizen criticism of its long string of pro-Red decisions.
That's a gain; but we hope-
. - t119292Tn I1 1.10:1
. 92./U1 ustnbb. u-will not assume thata few pull-backs by this court mean
i
Ithat the tribunal has mended its ways completely.
- The House voted Monday to consider a bill to clip the
claws wahich the Elarren court s92tuc1k out in the §tev§ NelsonDQHQ ifs n Ilrif IIGIIIII nn I1 Q :l- Q an-nu n 'l- nI- l.92l92::t92I92
the court denied the right ofystates to prhsecute subversives
' plotting against the Government.¢?¢I'8¢ C158 th }':Illle bill t]l_lld6i' conrgderagin kfno-cits 33° e esonrumgintot emi eo next" ° week. Maybe it is too broad, I5 the
appropriately by skilled Congressional lawmakers--after
rhich, we think it should by all means be enacted.
It's time to atop this trend toward government by theg|£IA@,%!£Lt and restore the court to its roper f n 1 nIJustice Department fears. But if so, it can be narrowedl
!
I
r'allowed to see, before his trial, lreports on him sent to the W51 ha i» l
| . p .ls Wnfqill sncvllnaaan innrnnll nf rnnlirinrr {ham ii|= I 74 laauivalrli-ulna. saws: aaanvi.-Ins U4 aaalnaaalss 92-saunas. mg
E _ l. 1 n /
_ . 4: 4 ¢
McGuire ......i.
ll_L-
ill!
Parsons.74- un_74_.omm ZZpkra '-r' .|
,1_§_....J¢.._-- I :4- -n i pug:4- = V Gl1 ....
ele. Room ......_
b HollomdnGondy
V70
- 92.-"_? __v.pa-5
rs" _ I-V5 _
F ~"
rs!"-'4' C an
3. '7._,__ ,._- Zinnl
EOORDED
5 i359
1'-4---_ -=- *5-~==*-=!P3-L -» 1 C I L1
The Idahlnfls Post nnd____i
Tlmoqllttlld
The Washington Dally News _
'1"h%§nn1l6!¢r _.__.__..._...-'
New York l"Il'.G-1d Tribune _._._.J.
Nev York Ioumal-American _.
New York l{l.l'I'0IN... ".1. M,Q
New _Yor§ Post ._i....._.i
The Iioasfork litmus _...__._._Bgc Tia worn:
' The New Loader _..___i._-.--
_ , The iiuii iirlai Journal i_-, - , ., ..I
. mm
_. ,-3» r _- I _ JuN24I959
-
62 JUL 3 1959
9 19 Rot I 3| SI!..':Q__:.- --l ---Am.
. . ..a_-_- ":.:z.s-92.
-
I
.1!
. I-
_:~.
4;}
,__,$¢
1
r9!".
theirnetworksTolson
,_,., ___ += Jim I ' [III
3" foro_ian'-t cricket.
It seems to us that such an ipthorization is
s hurry: ~Exposure of witnesses or informerslpmy
sags W92nover been gross or the President,
cripple coastal-espionage 6'I'&tlGLS- '. , .1 .-: J1," t - ¢" 92 ""'*-~ ' - .~5*".. F-:-.1 ;:1---.>§:»92;*r*:r:*.-,"""'"? 1-is----»» ~ " *'*b -= W ¥f<---
d ~ '11- - - 1--K?--:;1"-*i~' P - ~¢=2=~>< W-' V
cont:-out the
against them
I11!!!
Warren court isn't always wrong, thouéh.othero£1ts-. l " -- ,i -- - I '~ r - V 1- -..-...-. _.. ~*1v-No» > -. - , v _--_ ,_ 4 V NMONDAY DECISIONS _ -1.
to-thetruling that TV Ind radio stations ,..---r "* I
be sued for libelous statements msde o_veo;_ .
by political candidates. Such immunityf
logically follows from Congress decx-be that stations must
equal time to opposing candidates and mustn't censor
sneenhea. i _. 1--* - - - -. "-.~ . i.~.s.|s 1i=2'.iI1£ie; Depsrtm J ent says theiimmunity =m'naatb ;_giewspspers prmting such speeches without slanting them; - g ;~
s A ' QIJNI|f.'.1;' . "' .
- if p_Bos:n.
I '5 Tdmm
'1 . ' Trotter
G11 .-
Téie. oom ._-_A V Hoilomcn ____' ' Gdncly
Iy; J. _2 22,. 15 '
126 UUL 7 1959
£3ll;
*-1-"
T:_ 92
Q_ ~lJ-5
"_ dcasters set "as more conveyor belts for other peof:leiT *" =;._ All this seems sensible to us. When newspapers qad
EQW ey should be immune to libel suits on those views. - s thiiierprise, they wouid iiqve to refrain from cayii iii:-ihé 5Qnaterial--thereby omitting an important -rs. Washington Post ms____
I:, P
»-,-L ' t"of? "-
QI ! 'r 5
92.¢ J. 1 1 if-_' : J r___ * 4" Timon Harald
The Washington Daily Now! _
The Evening itcr_...._.__i
New York H01-aii Tribune .___..
Now York Journd-Anoriccln i
Now York. Mirror York Dcy
Now York Poll _..__..i...
Tho Now York. Timon _
Thu Work or i,_._..._._i...
The New Loads: _i..__.__
Tho Wall. Strict Journal _._..___
_ Date Z:-
_ JUL 1 I959
-c _ {
. Q52.
f ' V M .92£>' UM
I
1.1 d i
F,- I.-, -T.» ' . _ _
Q *»'-P
."~'§'hI
Bhl
result,nip -,4
f "' Tuesday pro-._
-6 mammme h
11181! 3 m arrested 4
ipem rm suspect: that-
~~P"7 e "W *1! V-73
""3!-'9 , 1.
T" 92 'ey.'- ' P611" ',! an muted person ",thit inn a 158111 110.
1, mun.-.e! :26, ue it ope-All-! F-9 ¢_l8PI1"I that rightit precisely the umrwmn 1; mum be
i moot lmportent to him-'--before he bu, mlé
~ ngin -moan», mm-a -91, dtp; ,$e==9nd.-,1! would effectively nuify -the Pl'iVl1E§B B11011 391!
| lncrimination by allowing $110, P0110! 10suspects in the lonely and lntimidln lfloiilillo| of a police station where cooperation or"oon£oo-
5 |ion!_may well ooem the part of prudence, The
police warning to the suspect aordl dubious proe
Phection. -A pol_ice1nIn._miy nu {prisoner at nu 7
"right: in much" I bone of vl-lite ,!!"Ta_DWpvt1'n 1'81"}, U, $119111-7 -t-~1"-'*'~-' -- 1 1": ' . :>_=és-=92&:=1:"£1
' Senator Kepting hen indica}tedp1§ui1_92e_1riI1 I8
amendth'qBI11boi§ore1too1niI92o"92i'oh§- Q; e Senate, but toe change he hu proposed would
1 _ot, in q|':_r' opinion. pnupake 192;__|ound_1e:_lollt_lo;_1._ atever problem romaine of ICNQDJ-PI lnlpel ti»: -=- mo.» M-Wow
_;,;l___r___*~,f;£-=:====:=--1;!--1* *~"*< _ 1 ;i"-:7/. "*5 O °»-A /"*2-;@%
- -I; -_I_.»'l'.-,,-A-92 ~ _' -1 I .A-A. ,_ §= 1- H_._,;:<.§_,._1 you' " ' ' " Parsons
- o_'~liIl_Il" .
~.- ':-ii-5*:'a;'+;I1"eI*'!!"¥ »-._ ,,-t $_ '_ 35- -- __ ;92-V_ -_ !! -1 <
_ 7 ." 3' '7 I , __ .a_r- if . -' 1,, ..
V Y
92-v
a2 1' & 4 5'iv:
inTomm
-- -
W __ _ U pw.c.snEKZ
- Tole. Room ..__
-e * . Hollomcm .___._ pp V M Bondy In
w U
._ N, K
-/Xer "
u
- »~ ,1ir ._--.-"* R ' ..':. -;=_;-
a ., =.
1Tho Iuhlnqtou Past nnd
Tuna Harald
The Inuhlnqton Dally Noon .
The Evonlnq BtcIr__.._.___._.
New York Herald Tribunn _..._
New York Journl-Am»-loan __
noco
6 1959
n ' I?_.- New York £1229: 1%-ii;
Now York Ddlf Now: _....._._
Nov: York Poll _..__-__-
lfho New YoII_ "Fine: _....____
fI: 'Ln. '*
{Jpn
1,.
. 1
-e.J--
-u
'1.
sh-E
SI>0-19 Rev. I-2!-59}1 C 0 R
I.-' _ W. .-in 92. aw Ln :11 , _:L . . , ' . _.. . .. 92 _ . _ .- .- -;-=w.- u -.-a".".- --92. lk 492__ 1 -»- -1; 1-v 611111 -4 I-8% . ,. ._. t;_- = ..-...Jf_1:r|w? _J _, .. . F . .,92..-._>.<,::___'; -__'_ fl _ 8
E . D Q 1: -#3; _ 92.
qpr 0, l
~-t rtqrgvkii -neg_ r . -.» _.t-!.r" n - -- , ="'$,' A ~ ~ -_, -- , . _ _ ,, e?!» 1; *1.
" vl92'h"|! 0 92 A -_-.. P. a ._' . -_~ V 92v~ ' . -
'_ - ' 0 , - J! CI: ' .
I ..:,' '< ,|92v"-' "' M; - w"5- I - .' I ' I . - J . _ .1 1 _ . .I ' -'F'";"% -'%k"["" ".~_F-,-.'r_1. '- ' -1'9-F R W
*~ 1 » 1» 3 OI '* V >
~11 . |.. =-§:»-.,,--f-- ,=@--. . J » -Ia" = ~ - = . -' - =- . _~ ' .- =. - _ '~""='.7.»1.-:-__w - -"'1 >1? *5, F E ,. -- lm WI !u"'h"'-1'-1* *'t- ' at §;">1h-5515*»;-*'-v-1-ea-&aej."r k...J . ¢ cenleaaloaa lrom' e olel onthl'FU'UIU'I~31: ' in _xu-ta!-Inment. -it
- ~:rl3~ "t:: :::t."°°'.-soAnd N01; Clarify t: Inuikpzcsummmm.- 4;-i" -J-w . _ * a . _ g - _, .. -.
. Sari Congress
"Would Confuse - »
B¥JohnJ.Lind_say_- "
|_I 1 I-4 .92
o'I'homla C. Hen- - - v
nings J12, D-Mo.! urged Con-
gress yéste not to tam-per with tpreme Court
Mallory decion. A
-- Hennings plea let the stage
for the expected showdown
_£igl-it in the Senate on a'bi1l
~ assed last week by the House
to clarify the Mallory rule.
r _Con[reasiona1 maneuvering
over the pest twp yeiri to
"clarify" the Mallory rule, said
Hennings, lead! to the ines-
capable conclusion that we
would be better off if we left
the matter in the hands of theQ .- . -
Congress in its ebrts to
improve the rule-on admis-
sibility of confessions as evi-
dence in court tr1a1shas only
increased confusion, Hennings
said. .
.The Mallory decision holds
criminal confessions inadmis-
sible as evidence if obtained
_£rom a suspect during an un-
-necessary delay between ar-1
grest and arraiznment. e ;
Ilttllctlons Recalled Q
hie decision was handedgown in the ease of Andrew B.
or], whose confession an
kn rat-e oi a Dist:-ict-re-'=%gee held inliuihle becauseIt was obta ed during a HS-Bur delay in arra.ignmenL_.,.
it passed by the
Home lat ms
QUJULIQ I- Hennlngl, aald the din P11"
dictionipi timid souls" that
the Mallory rule would relelle
upon the District a -veritable
ha:-e 6: aitnililn id ghlb
ter" effective 18W eDI01'¢¢-
ment throughout the count??-hlve not mater-ialized._ -
Kenting Plan Criticized _
Law enforcement niclals.said Hennings, have succeeded
in working within the mandate
ot'_the _Supreme Court. Themhave been diligent, he bald. 111
observing the constitutional
gin!-it; of erimlhll Juspeeta.
House bill by Sen. Kenneth B.
Keating R-N. Y.! that would
-in eect-leave to criminal
juries discretion to determine
hether a delay in arraign-
ment ia sueient to invalidate"n," he said, "is eneuy
what the Supraie Court
wanted. . e .
Hennings criticized a pro-
posed amendment to the
a confession.
'_Hennin§s laid this would
only muddy legal waters un-
the ruling, he said. shows it
eeds no "clarication." ~ _ P?-necessarily. Practice under?§
I
z
i
i
i
I!,1 ..92
920
.-K
--at
, <
¢ '.:":'3'T'.L - V
LTclson
DeL _.__
I-ic:Guii-e i
MohrPurs
Rose.
Tumm
Trotter ._i
_ EC. Sullivan __
'-' Tole. Room _.__
Hollomun _.i_.
Gondy .___________Beim
l
|0
~-a|q&-Mm? IA»_k_92._::_";W"7lh_pi ___._V 7 __ 4____L_A: __ _ . _t_:_:_- -V .. _m - -_-._,,,--~ -1:; --an-..|-__-_
I 4/ § o-|§, nu. 1-as-so! . 92., Q T - i to O i -' -1 .-fro V 'I - - A '-
2 "~ ' ¢~
.1 .
i
92
...i_.
i, __'~_,_
.4.-J"
n-
n. _
...,_ "-
,
-3
, _' I'.;
.3-_".' '1
as
'1 ;
C.--I, -.2P L.- pl., _ 2'1}
e 92//I
il3' -, t - --__
FH ' .+
. "-
1
. A
i0
41- .1_ r'lit. w Y -
I i A K - __ "Q1-1
- 1'!. 1' L4Hosen -t - ~ ' I Tclmm ,1
Trotte __K W. n
T e. "C-*5
Bollomcm .._._
f
__ ,__ _ ,__._, e,,___ __ V __,--W ~ -- - . 43' - - ~-'w-
R A
O Bowing
The Su rerne Court was ae-eused y?§;$E";UT1eferring
loo often to Congress.
Justice Felix Frankfurter
was singled out for particular
criticism in an analysis oi the
__urt sud Co ess presented* =I!_..L1!=' nix-'erslty__of nesota at an
_ erican Politicsl,Science As-
" iation meeting here.
Chase, an expert on the Su-greme Court, discussed the_ourt's interpretation ofE;-zssional acts and actions
_ ce Earl Warren was name
thief Justice six years ago.
"Although a minority of the
arren Court as an institution
has been exceptionally defer-
tial to Congress. 'dges would prefer to have itLube:-wlse,'.' Chase said, the
: "So much so," Chase added,
Qthat for one with libertarian
talues it has been too permis-gve, permitting the Congressmake grave invasions oi
Qundamentai libertlm."
1 Many commentators on the
s performance underEnd the Conference of Stain!hie! Justices for their attach
n the Court. , .1
;sonn1ly disinterested leaders.!§,-, 7 V 1;; I-Lligh ' Court AccusedF:
F
i
1
it0C0ng'Féssi
Court as a "bulwark against
congressional escessos.
But Chase said that the real
ndlctment of the Court should
st on the grounds that it has
ailecl to hold the power escr-
ised by Congreq within con-
titutional bounds. _
lo recent rests. Dials
aid, Justice Frpkiurter has.
een I0 intrigued with the;
iculty of statutory interpre-,
ticn that he has-vied with_
' eli to find prose adequate
lo describe it. Y
At th session, ilIl0 er0! th mver i
y_o Iowa sharply critiied
e American Bar Association
Schmidhauser said their at-i
tacks reflect deep-seated dif-ti
ierences in social and political
values" with tha Supreme,
Court rather than "a dispos-
sionate appraisal of the
Court's work by allegedly per-
The Chief Jusl-gs criticised 1the Court a year o. Last vr1n-
fer a Bar Association commit-
tee attacked of thegr arren have looked upon the
"t:C|D.|-----» - _,_ re. .._i__L+_W_ __"s-."""92_ r- H PU.
ICourt! decisiolgxce 1958.
-' 5.
L" Q 2:,
. Q 2 - ~ ._B-U; V357 4 , L D54/; '
.*
r__ Bondy ¥ "'
/, _.,
F
/ "_ 1
92-_-f
_i-
_l_Q__a/L-
/&
- -l- .. - ,!u"sw York Post __..__.._._.-_-*1
IThe Icrshinqton Post untal
Timon Hmuld
The Wqahinqton Daily Howl i
The Evening Blur _._._i_...._
New York Hllllld Trlbunl .._._..._
New York Journal-American _..__
New York Mirror iii.
New York Daily Now! ii
The Now York Tlml ii
= - if":
k
!
/M
92
-=-1-
Jilin...
=
_.2J'
21;"-92 ,- ,
. Red Ruli11.__ 1,!.-1-L}/"
Bar Meet
By Vi"'lLLIAM IHACKEY
The .c-ritics obrecent
United States sine
Court decisions on civil
iiherties yesterday w ere;
labeled more of a threat?
to national security than:
the subversive Communistf
Party card-carrying ele-5
ments they disclaim. i
Attorney Joseph A. Ball ofi
Long Beach, a past presidentiof the State Bar. made it plag
fthat hc included the AmericBar Associations _com_initt<Q'_ on Communist taettgs as
prime offender. -""1 '
Defending the decisions of
the high tribunal in I debate;
which concluded the State Bar
convention at the Fairmont
Hotel, Ball praised the lead-_
ership of Chief Justice Earl
Warren, target of most ol the
critics. lush of Views y
"1 say thank God for Earli
92.'arren," Ball declared to the-E
overflow crowd of lawyer's and
judges. - '
On the other side of the
debate, former ABA presi-
dent Loyd Wright ot"Los An-
geles said:
"Too often of late the deci-
sions of the court have given
vidence that it has aban-
oned its appointed role n
he constitutional system d
as embarked on a campa n0 . ._./.1
. ,-
~.n=~Le.:I-itll FRAIJCISCO E!liiMIl92IER
Son Francisco, California
Date: 9/26/59
Edition: Final
Managing Editor: LI?TON von
B E .5.-i LD I NGE ll
Publisher: CH,1hLES 1'-LAYER
Case:
Classification: /1 -1- is-,-/,§7.--
i 3'. RECORDED
;? 031 16 ;959
W
SEAgCltED...I..........lNDEXED----------»
g|5mp.|_|zi-:0.............r|i.Ei:t.................
nu-In 5'1 .r. -on-i
bbi dt IUD:
FBi - SAN FRANC_l§C0_ i
3.
/
K
-iii
--4
92q1 o effecuate the personal pre-
' erence an dphilosophies of
ts members."_ .
Ball said that the decisions
which the ABA committee in
February claimed "have en-
couraged Communist activity"
simply determined whether
individual rights had been
elected.
PRECl0US LIBERTIES "
In a time of threat to ou
ational security, we shoul---...i_ -
ot part with such precioulberties," Bail said.
l man RIl92II92:I92QI92" ulna-IAII I-ID!-I ill Ullllllcllllj DI.-IIHWI-U.lhonest people get up and say
we should curtail these liber-
ties in the interest of national
security they are heard . . -
and they are believed.
l "Therein lies the danger."
l Bail said the whole ap-
praisal of the courts leader-
ship was not properly re-
searched by the committee
when it was presented to the
ABA house of delegates,
which approved the report.
He said the report imposes
on me a policy which I abhor,
3 policy fused to party line
thinking."
Wright, emphasizing law-
yers had a fundamental right
to criticize the court, said
there are four major weapons
in the hands of Congress for
protecting the Nation's inter-
nai security: criminal lawfpersonnel security. limitationiIon international travel, illdi
exposure. U
In all four fields. Wright
aid the Supreme Court in
ecent decisions "has dis-
.upted if not emasculated
ongressional efforts . . ."
Wright declared that it is
Congress which is charged
with the responsibility of
making laws to protect na-
tional security and that law-
yers in Congress have done
the work effectively.
Wright said that in many
of the decisions the Supreme
Court has gone "outside its
job of deciding cases to warn
the Congress about how its
affairs must be managed."
The former ABA head saidr.ports that Warren quit theiBA because of the organiiiz ttions critical committee rel,
rt were untrue, Warren:
letter of resignation was re-
-ceived nine months beforethed report was written, hesai .
Wright said that the War-
ren Court's decision in the
Jencks Case opening 261
files for examination! too
broad, confusing and prod-
uced chaos in lower Federal
Icourts. He said the rule of
the case held that the de-
_ ndant, in some unspecific
gree, is entitled to examin
e reports received by trs ..IR- a--.....§,»- -.-
92
ii r17 |0 n
i
1
i
q
|
l
.-ii
E1
|
I
1
I
f
l
l
l
I|
I
r' Q92 I. -' i . ti .
Q IN» I lam» kg?! L_. .: _ _ _ 1 Y
;~..i"_:"§4'l'.l]- .-.._.__ B. I. Amrcst IllegalAgents Had No Warrant Whcu92 '
They Seized Stolz-u Goods in jar
I» u lmuuu rm: mm d . . ff, Iwmsamsros. um. :1 .._l,mm:,:m::tM, M "° " ""5 / _" 7" ~ /4 -/- T21-I Super-m C0u.'1¢oc1u'c¢lb- ,-92 *7 L-ll women an: ll Hilcaguu egugxlt K1 2: :3: 'll1::l£lf.1'-l PK} Q I 1:9! bgfggg y huh cg:-1 -Q my I I f p arer to In hand; on I casual, |-' 1 L "nu MA, u: 0 ' /l
I J ya l¢" t, " 1': '0'" "h"P|C'92O92LlIl:e1.{.nl'!lOu:':+ L111 gr.
I¢'1mr£r'..rr~'= of Jain Pat.-tcfumg Q! rm tank Hm? 1c
I-Ir*fy at tru.c.q: on cl-n.~|r.s';g,-M ¢~h;_-"5 Um. U4 _u."q;
.7 um:-r';..I pun:-Ln 0! ltzeelcmm-W,-,_ F,-_ ,_ 1. CC _ Y 3
ca" ".:.- 0. role: r-aim:
Tf- t1..92 2.1: :g'.'.:.i,_ w:'H'.er
tn Jx. ;.- Tr J...
.!r"n'.-.pL..
'__."_-, |-__-:~~~,p¢- ~--.-..
r
' C-,!-In l.I92TIfL',;
0 ..;.. hr '; u-. 1 141»-.»~
r d ,1-*7-e'F'¢'..',r 11¢: hp-
'..'-.' L:.92- in. * dln op»-
zs 92.r~.;r.}~¢~|,' .
-'~'r.c 1f.:fne:.'.
1' I L; "'2 haf r
T. .;' Q. M; 't,.""-' 1'1
c 1- ..i'n~ d-~r rrf ..r_
5:" J _ 1 "P ..:-2.4 r 1 |..:-V: -
' . Hr mt;-d
I' '1 LI I~ P"! Pr-:':*
Arr" t " ' 'J"~:92I.»!.l1.Q !92
.'.'~ II
- 1:» F
u:,-."- ".~....- - 4
'5' ' 15-"tn ." .* --» a - , ,
'.i"..?".. '.n:!_ _ ~n 92' " -_
I . I c" .",..¢---:- .=. " --
f f. . f*';::... ;" u:,.t,
' ' -~ ' Er '1-.4: -' .~ . '
' . .. 1' C13.-k m:_ '
fa < l.;'_.. -! i-C'..'.':3-~ I!C; " I s..'r-v-PA. ;.92n._~:.; .- _
r ' ~ l92.'
.»-wy -. _ . "l Ll " t~;:_:1-3 a§='.'.- 2;; '-
'- ".f':.,ztl1< C1'..'. - .1... ~.-,1
H=-t.:y ua 1:.:-d 1:. 'L'".!:r~.. ._,_.
5_.='.e-s D'.=.."::C.:.."t1..C!.;u;:
-1.". 33.. 4, I51-E5. c;v:.92':cu-d Q1
'.:.x.':.'~ !?":;. ar. inter:-:a'=~ ah:p-92i-,~_-'+i_..-._-. . _ ._.. __._The 1| s. 1- - F/?7_ _
"QT RECQRDE-6__ HQ} Z-1] :9:
47 DEC.;L|959
l..'.J.'- r| -1..
Pg A rm-
'l'0r .0-av - 1|
' n , v , _
i
r43';|
1
a
iI
l
1-
___ |I
1".
92
-i
.1.1
>
P
>¢
921|___ - 7 *
I I nee. he ls obh||.1.rd to Pro-lllffll eed to make starch'%..Itl.1:urcsC5 ud arrests as 1:.» c:r':um--
rr.@m.m.Ȣr1 from page nn-H tnnce: require.
hOL§lS IHLIT |Cll'l92'.'."d 1.11? Hldil-IE 15 only by 55-h |1|_92|'1_ne55
Lad bo92ns1.olcr.fromas!.;u:nent.;mM chm, 15 qmcm-N-9¢_ in-
U: H11" Z.-:i'lu LLLl. 'bL USPS. Lye]-1-upggdl pl-Qyenhgd Ind mm-
JMUCP 1~'1'l~3** 1°? '-he m9ilshed," he wrote. We should3°51! laid 7 B 1aF"u ¢a'inoI. place Bdd.i1]0!'111l b.1rdens
I-01 mi-kt 191011! 9'11?-" mm on luv-'-enlorcemrr-.:. t.lrnr:es."nut. a warrant unless offenses In other .ctm,___ m,q'1}- the
are commnuc-d in than pres-acou;
err? or ur.1e:92:92 1.h¢-92- Mme 1-ea-i
Ionable 5:-ouncus to W "Pu that
the p:I':;01'l I"..=.~ rur:.n=.'.'.rd or
is comm:u.:m 4 c: 71:
111 H92r.1"3 .= cm Justicr
Duuz1a> .=sa..1_ 1?;r E. H 1 agent
did t'.r1. km»: ;z.92:~*v'1.:92blr czmzr U
urh>'.'92 a -.'.=.n;: ind b" I1 cum-
m|;:rd b'- !1u.:y. L. vi Iurlhe"
"'.;.- :-- ::..r. a!92.¢:-1-.:.rds cm.-
1:au;=:= in: ci;=v.v'-rre"d xa nh
en=9292:;'.
J...~'"w Dr.H.:1as :92~c£.Lj.£d ax.
ca.L'~ r~ .;=n:.92c :.*..!"L d92_l"!SlO{.
T,l..< .r 2::-.'. ms hr."-1 1u;'L:f:ed
L"; 92'~ :..r. .1."-1:; sesrcz. turns up
A11-xtnr-~s l'rais4-d
.?.1.=%.=- '1.92,-J: d;~.=»_>:':. nah:
£3141 92.92r"¢":-. an 1n9292=s1..a::| :2
p.'nr_-4*d- to LP.» pm-r.: uhr-rr 31,
age.-".1 has :'v.nscm92.1£| 92"ow.'I1r1a
Lu L+.7..?92" ULIUI an if:'|l_*" 1;
b".n:' "qr 1r:1.md in p.'=- -
1@E
92
s
1;e~_
'-.1
,¢
1
I
- 1".-'9-.,- Iii..2 ,1
5e .
:,.<5;:. e -
1*-'
T
re 1"-~.. J _.rI_
it ,.- .' -1.-.3iz.";?"_-
- . _ '-aieri
., .3_ _ we
-- ='5
'_ _ie~__
,._."'I~
t
t»- -3 _
pa
lion we rivets defense plank
spin brings up the question of what
the nation ia going to do to PW!!!
ltseit against Cominuni infiiiretiei,
'.lPi-°11I8l- Proponents md deceit .
The industrial security program
was used by the pvernment to acreea
out privately employed security
risks" and withhold from them classi-
ediniormatiom - "- -'5"-Q»; . 1-i
Often the worker had tobe mes
because without the classied infor-
mation he could not do his job.
The court in its decision warned
that any new program must provide
{airplay procedures - expressly theright to confront an accuser--or In
good reasons for denying these "tn-
llional eaieguards." =
In the past several years the Su-
preme Court has struck down more-
than two score procedures used by
the government to combat commu-
llany people think thst the nation
h in an extremely vulnerable posi-
on as a resuit of the Supreme Court
decisions.
The Supreme Court justices have
lien aceueed of being unaware of
the determination at the Communist
conspiracy to destroy the United
States.
The decisions, which have had the
effect of giving the Communists great
58 DEC1%Q59
. 1 ,92 =5.., P ' _ . _ . -we It. _~ ee.n.h- A ecu.-.l~loi._. " -I , -1'»'1'»**i-t:;'**+e?;eif
J5,-'.; .--54:1I..i.
heed" o1a_toeart1osiIltlttlielrl9erI-Mtiona.IIlreiseenIrHeg.a'l.tI:iaed.
Aneesntrepoetd Homecom-
mtlaQOUn-AmerielilhettfltislCommunist activities in Southan Celi-toe-aia illustrates he pd-1 5 ~- Q
'-er: L-H-=1. -l',;,ti.~l;;",e92=r~.-..,1g.I! P5
are who aet Q command from ol-
eow, In committee said. t "To incense the, wee hisltepped-tip process, Comm areundenordera to wear a new l::"agl the se comrnlttee rt. oil to I degree
in party history, Communists are now
promoting themselves ea loyal to the
United States, peace-loving and hu-
manitarian in purpose. and anxious
to work in harmony with socialists,
liberals and even capitalists for the
good at the nation." '
Concerning the Supreme Court de-
elsions. the Senate Internal Security
Subcommittee had this to say: -
"The not of all these decisions has
been oomlort for the Communists and
criminals, frustration tor iaw-ento1'ce-
u-use nlaviaia -an-I.m-in tnisarfie-arson
with Congress sell-informing func-
tion, and destruction of all efforts
of the American people to protect
themselves against the subversion It
home through their state govern-|
meats. _
"It would seem that the efforts ol
the Supreme Court to protect the in-
dividual have gone so tar that the
eatety oi the nation has been en-
dangered.- -.. --..._.,-....___,_------_----Jr?" or - 1,..-1 ' T. -P:
-~'."r~".'1~:~:.»;-,
.. 1 I . -. . . t __.- .. __--i , A . -.~ a~ ~14- , A . 9% i_-; t<=,.-_»92 _ ~-=~ J,- '--,-~ I _-r .+' " iv Y 1- " -_- wt '-. t-I _' "2 92 M -x
. ,- .l_: " ' '. 1,. "'
_,v§.< -
."~ar
. .5
. 1" ». -.5 ' __.. ' e re
/
I
Wgo Qt it
Butte Daily Poet-*
Butte, lontinl.
December 3, 1959 "
Editorial Director:
George W. iclley ~
Butte Office
ft, .
., 4' ,_. »-.
5?;%:%?%»i??"4
-
_o
Pii
-26% J I-4--0_
.. _ -- J .>~.-rr- 92.'I"'T' < " 53%-,»H ___ _|_ _ 1.-_5, .-,192__ l -. _ 1 r_,,. - L_ .¢_._, .u _ _ _ 3
4. "3 § - ., ..r. :~ J', '1;, J < 5 . 1,- ,1i___l
4a
a _ I..
. ._ _ E -.;1- 4, . -.. - "_,. .
HP3|FeTo92ver
' I I IINI
i-I-LEI. 0111'
ltheeeeeunder lllll
nan-n:i_Jghn Peu-iek Henry 0*-Chin:hed been convicted oi thet. The
wasn't much doubt thet he had e0mmIt-
ted theito
But the Supreme Court held that theevidence n u lnI»q§_.I£:b16mr use against him at. hie trill been
the I-BI agents hid not hid iufficienf.
telsun to eel:-ch hln cu. They Ind
stopped hlrn only because t.hey'- were eur-
plclnul. They had no search Iurrani:
!he}' did not have reason to believe that
he had committed e felony. m the
fnlled Staten, nupiclon 1| not enough.
The Supreme Court: decision In thll
cueuegoodone.Itw1l1be:oodi'ortiuAmericen people and it should be good
int the FBI.
mv...,..-.. 92Il me 1'91 ire tiuihi tint they
are repreeentetivee of the beet netinnll
police orgenlzatlon in the world. This in
probably true, It will not harm the spirit
of the bureau to lave the Supreme Court. ..¢
! fir ,."
Ibi!I-..._
.--.;s~.
- line Glad!;__. 1
|____ --
V pl
./J
W]c/
-J01
.
1--r
¢_t-.
_ .
asQ r 5;: _2_a_.f /.7For
- double blIf H F ..........__,.»
0- - '
. 4 - »
_'_,_-an.i%E;92 ii
_-;
"es;=~ . "
I 4'l
1+4
F;
S-'=3l.-
9:.,r_ .. .-vn
f, .. '_'
'+
14>
.~ 1' -5 we0
9/ 0 0
" " =~-1"-"" 1 £1.e =1 5,, .. .___'-st. -r-tn J ._ 92'~ -ugreme Cou|'tCu|jbingi c Q_olice,ipSoy$ Tompkipnsl1 {I Imhnalooak Police
US. Supreme Court
protection oi so-called rilh
dividuals at the elpenae d weak-
ening law enforcement agencies
attempts to protect the public from
Tompkins made ee charge Ulle
addreaaing the weekly lundaeon ol
lb Kiwanis Club at Hotel Staf-
bId- 1'-~'*ummuu- --~ _
aald, the Suprenn Court has denied
police oicers the right of na-, -i knnmeumuneumihqha
92ll
..
.,;-'".
' f '_-1..
- _. we'-4.._.q
- F
i Eaonable interrogation oi a suspect-
ed criminal.
And in more than use iutance,
he added, the Supreme Court has
reversed the decisions of lesser
courts on insignicant technicalities
and aet_ guilty criminals tnee.
Every police oicer, Tompkins
said, is taught certain rules oi
arrest-namely, the authority to
arrest and conduct a reasonable
aearch when they have reason to
believe a ielony has been commit-
ed. But now that privilege has been
violated by the Supreme Court, be
said, citing an example iIl92mlV-
in; the arrest of a Washington,
D.C_, woman, Judith Coplan, for
espionage. _ _d tb
o cere osubstantiating their claim of ea-1l
13?-"é=i"'-*3-+.."""_"* l? "5 5
Iaanother ,'Ilo Hnapdm-'ea out ling tlingemruled um e S P ° Cow92 liq $1 mu openeetrret les of orrna on on crim-
inals to the detendant or tum him
loose. __ _ I -' ._
This act seriously endangers the
law enforcement agency: eiiort in
securing miormation from in£ot'm-
ants in the pndet-world, Tompkins
lime »-'1 t --='**~=;ie - "t *1. 5! v" *1.-.-_-Y - 92
_Someth}ng moat he done, Tomp-
kins audbut nothing will be
done until the public is aroused
enough to urge Legisieive-action.. _~;1f" __,_7T|-er: I.t.
-7 -V I
e0._ _+__ _,_m _ A7» - _-¢ -----73.-.-._
3 , . .. " ~, _ -I» -1q I0 rL-
! .'- 1" " F 1"" t f '~,-- 4 I I H--1. 1% ' L Q _
I. "Mr '!oIaea...--
. IeGnlra.._-
Mr.
Mr. Roaen
Ir. Taps!
Mr. " e.--
Hr. W -alllfll
Tele. Room ._._
Hr. H011oi:.an_.._
Hill Glndyt-__..
-_,,_,__.,.,_--'i
THE TUSCALOOSA NEWS
12/15/59
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Final Edition"
BUFORD BOONE -
Publisher.
In this caae, Tompkins an e}Supreme Cotut ruled that the po- _ £_1=---1-1lice officers had no right to search 1 ]
the woman: handbag in which theHi 1 und additional evidence ¥
piol'g'!.'!'l!'!!!0ugh the FBI had eye- _ _witness evidence ag-elnes--hen _p ; -. _ - e""""-"' '-_ ""'$
c "J
V i" 42¢-g_7zm=»4cm we-.;+:<oL.'|>' ' -
~41 ggc 28 +955
+3, ;;ntc'2a19ss M7 ;_____=____
r
ft?
0- I9 Raw. 1- I 1-SUI
WJ 0 ./
Tolson
Mohr_ ' Pms"" "Ii-"".i'_?,f'_-?7".~" ;.i.' 1 '_ _..._§'¢*°"?*' hie .-,¢-
.._... _ __,; - _,-_ ,._ _ -Q __,, --_ Z I wphcl as aU,,jS. Priifegg
-I 3 - . "7_ -' J i J .h8,D*92?l]!_ uiwellihqt __ i _~ ~.
5 w492513;uwqT0H, Mu. 2.-Commentink on I decidm thisdeck by our highest court. the lollowing manor nu been
Inlde m criticism:
'-'- "4 performmce of this kind deprives the Supreme Court
G the intellectual respect it need; now more . xZ : .
-5.- ' ~1. .1. ... '92*:-1 -t .1: ;F'it , ..., -.5 _.4-in these demundlnz times." Whoeenthlnoeeitoometrolnuie
or the crlticl who has been 1-lmentinl the
decisions 0! the Supreme Court on states
rights, comunism, the lth Amendment and
io on? Is it i pronouncement by i ouT'mTu%
0! the Americln Bar Aleociltiti or of the
conference of Btete Supreme Court Justices?
Or is it an exclamation by some 02 the many
lowrere and iuozoe who have come to the
conclusion that the Supreme Court has
ulpured lelieletive functions? - Ie. -._ .
- i Lewrenee
._ I92 _
v-1"
I
..
. F
- "1-_ .
air.
1
0
lWi
l
I.uprezne Court rulinls.Not at all. The criticism quoted ebo
as made this week in an editorial in ;
ew York Times" which tor e Ion: time
een one of the foremost defenders_ It so happens that the court is right in k
.h!s =.=.-air: decision and owesrt sesame
lame bein: heaped on it by thoee who don't like the ruling.
11! the importance oi the criticism is that it clears the air.
eeerts. in effect, thut adverse comment on the Supreme Court
not sinful. For, despite the impression that so many mistaken
so defenders of the court's legislative rulings have ug/ht to con- ,vcr in_th_e_D8.st. criticism of oi} 7*
court GQGISIOII is not an "under-
mininz or the .inst.1tutlon"the
phrase I0 often applied to the
court! critics in recent years
evm by high oiciuls here.
The Bilzht to Crltielke
Nobody who is at all nimiiiui
with our Judicial system really
wuntfto abolish the Bupremei
Court of the United States es
the institution which must de-'
clde cases in the Jurisdiction
epecicelly Prescribed bi the
laws of Conlroee and by thd
provision! 01 the Constitution.
But every critic feels he has n.mm to point out rouiiri
ioosoninz oi the justices.
The ceee which aroused the
criticism of The New York
Times" concerned two emDloy~
eee of the Btnte of California
"ho were dismissed under en;
ordinence which sen they must
be tired I1 they decline to testi-
_Iy before e Conzreeeional com-
mittee concerninz subversion»
They had invoked the Fitthr
Amendment end thereby re-t--5..LO-Jill about ellgcd sub-
vereibe nmiietions
-51MAR 141960
--.
92
No.1 Q§rI0Dlu
in MAR 1i41%°r
O. '-
92
J . - ,. 76/
F-
ij 'r
K _ .. tr 1.11/1:3;-i,§..;;"~"@»"'",
I'°° _
._ ; W; .__
_ in .Room._....,L_. 92"
'1 _ ' Gently
92
I
I
4|
I
'92
The Iuuhlnqlon Pod Ill
Tlmll !'IlId'.1d
The Wulhinqton Daily NONI -_-
Thn Evontnq Btu! i
Ngvr York Herald Tribunl L
New York Journal-American ._
New York Mirror
Novr York D6111 News _.i_-.-
Now Yolk POI! i_.i-.-.-i
The New York T130! -i-
Tho Worker
The Now L.oud0r_..._._._---
The W011 B_trIot Journal i--
D in§.,' -e?7§/5f__.5:.' I? MAR3 1950
1.-
..-
_92.~;:
4-'-
<.-1
.-.5
1_-it
"92
tit
._________i_______ _ '
r
51-letter. n e etete or city is veil..: --. 92-._ t.
-is-uieeisi-.is|ana-Quasi
ewfrork Bteteiews, known eel
the illoehower due, _th_e In-1
IIIEIII UUIIIT "U! DUI UIIIUEG
Btetee fled ruled in 1056 thet
state employees could not bedismissed under e lew thet said
that eueh employees who in-
voked the Fifth itmeodment;
§voulQ lose their lobe. ' The
'i_Iiniee" mid in its editoriei: '
HIi'iitel.d OI epecii'YiIll int
Employees who refuse to testify
et hearings because oi possible
self.-incriminstion must be dis- it421111531-_,i92i1e Caiiior.o1e..iaw re-*
Tfuires dismissal of il
WhP'C0i11'iOA to testify" for myreeeon. ~ 1
"This distinction without e
diirerence was seized upon by
the meiority to distinguish
Monday: decision from theSlochowu case. But tor 1111'
"practical pm-poees. the letter
must nowberegardednsedea
enouzh to ovoid putting th
term self-incriminatioiv ex
plicitiv in_the'1ew. itisfreell Di;-; Jr 1!
. ._e.- _
;-';a=..";.:.~'-
g g ill
citizens by the United ,
lcenstitution. line work
-eat is rettiiiii. . . ,1
If" -=_-lien ll
' But shouldn't
employer be verini
any employee w
rietibie with other
jineificient withou
reason? The Iup
the United States in themyers cese in 1926. for instance.
92 held the right oi the Presi-{gent to tire s postmaster or my}the: eovernment emnhree et
e time when Conzreee hed not
specified or limited the ground:tor removel. ' -
The question in the current
one is wl:iethe.92r e etete may
dismiss en employee who re-
fuses to testify et Congressional
hearince. Pieiniy the, eznployeee
had e right to test the constitu-
tionelity or the Celiiornie iew.
They were in e eense "ruining"
.it, e.s they had the nrivilele
doing, though Southerners whcourt orders ere usuegid ribed es "deiyini the in
as engaging in maesiv
tance." -
There con be no doubt thet;
the Buoreme Court in this cue;
changed its mind because it felt
the iectl were dierent-»the
two low: Jere not worded the
same wey. But whet shall be
id oi e Supreme Court that
ereiy reverses itseii when the
acts end constitutional parin-
lpies ere identical and eipieins
t eiiewer by e. statement;
eeiaring that whatever wee!
e psycho1o|y" prevalent It
the time of the previous deoi-ion Jmust now be llIltIV"
his was the [round for tiitn1954 deeegregetion decision. i
Perhaps those who here been
unwilling to see the risks in-
volved in reve:-eels by the court
when the some D!'il1¢iDlB hll
already been built into eeteb-I
iished law new will I-debt I
ore cheriteble attitude toward;
the critics who have token the
lush court to tut: tor ite~
regularities. - "1
mo,1v.r.r:eraia nc._ iliaiiaiiiii-:.i____I-I .i - 17* ~,~-4 t
-3-
~
J
8/
92
92
xi
_ 92
>.-v1.-.~>-
- I
. E
_-L"
H.-T-"'$='
._
Iii»-
1_:_,.u.;li.;
., A.
. ¢ . _ ___g go R 1 ll-00!
3'1 $1: um
av,-_,__
I
-- .fV921.;:.
/ /
,1-
Q
177- _ _ _ _:__ ______*__ ___ __i__ ,_ _.. . ..__._.__ J__,.___;-_ l-=1:j AIL-,5 ;~Ai¢i"_<I|w-1-"--l~ ii *,-In - II - I -
.134-é» lmnumnu bu
@7_¢--._~,:,-.-Uwwi :"I"l'V"" """""'7_'4" '4'__ __,, .7--_ _f_~ '--"" rx S
é>2- A]~,___ _____]_,>Z5NOT RROORDED115 JUL s 1§e0
My ___._.,,__.--
J ,lo "0 I oI . ..'1 hf
. " I -é - 7. * arson
. v Y l L M Ii lmo
I I McGu
1 ' BI! '
mum
M Ttbtter ¬.__
PRC. Sullivan _..._| ~_ é. Tole. Room iIh In ___._...____.._qru
Grundy
mu
.--,
§:'n:'tPrg¢:t:?§t¥i§:_'::t':§'s;;"¬:i§?=%2$|-¥':i§-i'¬$-Sci!!! ¥?»£'i-'"¥"=¬"I!', ., - .1_- : 1 .. _-. ' "*5 ' 'xi _ r, W. _ _. ,q,_»
_. Q I. - _ -.j.
F"=>
3!
..6""A"
* >
- ¥ -3-u . '9. .
" if: a _,_."? . _,. -
---as
t '; ""_'_4__ I "'-._.- -..
12.
.sk_-at
.'"
nd T
j -92
if
V,
Ji
i
l
i i
1
iG-I9 Rev. i-ll-bf?!
?___
3- B'2FEvidence
In U. S. Cases
Fourth Amendment
Cited by High Cour-ti
WAS GTON, June 2'1 AP!.The lggpreme Court today
barrea ET¢rminai
trials of evidence illegally ob-92
tained by state and local police
officers.
By a vote of 5-4, the court
swept aside the old silver plat-
lter" doctrine. Under it, Federal
prosecutors could use evidence
unlawfully obtained by state
and local officers. Under the
new rule, state-obtained evi-,
dence must meet the test of the
Fourth Amendment's guaranty
against unreasonable search
and seizure. -
Majority Decision
peaking for the majority.
qu rice Potter Stewart sumrjed
it pr 'Evidence obtained by state
police officers during a search
which. if conducted by Federal
officers, would have violated
the defendants immunity from
unreasonable searches and seiz-
ures, under the Fourth Amend-
ment is inadmissible over the
defendant's timely objection in
a Federal criminal trial."
Justice Felix Frankfurter, in
a dissenting opinion concurred
in by Justices Tom C. Clark,
John M. Darlan and Charles E.
Whittaker, sharply criticized
the new doctrine. Justice Frank-
furter said it overturned a rule
of evidence always the law and
formally announced in 1914 by.
a unanimous court. . . . " I
In its final decision of the
1959-60 term, the court over-
turned the conviction of James
Butler Biz Jim! Elkins and
Raymond Frederick Clark, of
Portland, Ore. The decision
sends the case back to the Fed-l
eral court for further proceed-.t Unless egal ,Accused Teamsters--_._....,Hi5h§'-time kingpin gambling
operator, he charged LHQ,
Teamsters Union officials were
conspiring to take over Port-
land rackets. He also accused
Ivarious public officials of cor-
ruption and said he had tape
recordings to back up his words.
At the time of his testimony
to the Senate committee, Elkiris
was in difficulty with statg au-|
thorities. On May 1'2, 1956, state',
officers with a warrant had;
searched Clark's home and
seized five tape recordings of
telephone conversations. Two
state courts later ruled the
warrant was fault? and the '
tape s were barred from use in
a state trial.
The tapes were deposited for
safekeeping in a bank, where
Federal offmers got possession
of them by serving a search,
warrant. The tapes were aci-
'mitted in evidence in trial of
Elkins and Clark in Federal-
court in Portland.l
Jailed and Fined 1
Elkin was sentenced to twen-
ty months in prison and fined
$2.000. Clark got six months
and fined $2.000. Clark got six
months and $500 fine. Their at-
torney argued before the Su-
preme Court the evidence
against Elkins and Clark vio-
lated their Constitutional rights
because it was obtained through
starch and seizure." _
r Llgree To Review 7/I 4
| In another action, the court -
iagreed to review a decision that;
wiretap evidence may be usedj
in criminal trials in state courtsl
The decision was given by thei
United States Court of Appeals
iin New York in the case of,
Burton N. Pugach. a Bronx
lawyer now under indictment
on a number of charges.
Negroes Appeal
In Dismissed
The court dismissed the ap-a
peals of five Negroes convicted
of trespassing on a city-owned,
privately operated golf course
in Greensboro, N. C. The tribu-nal held that no Federal ques-,.|
tion was involved because of
the failure of Negroes to raise
such a question in their appeal
before the North Carolina Su-ings.
Elkins is the man who hurled
sensational charges in 1957'hearings by the SegatejadretsE.prerne Court. Chief Justice
Earl Warren, in a minority-3
opinion, said the Negroes i
should be allowed to press their
claim of unconstitutional racial 1
discrimination in ,_I.he._-StateSupreme-tourt.
ii
r -Toison _i.._e..s
Mohr '
I 9C'iISOTl/B__________
,:e!~mont.- ,- $§FR~:._, -. 10 Ck ,
Moio'rio/ ' "
' McGuire
Fiosen L
Tomm _...._____
Trotter ________
!='.C. Sullivan _
Tele. Room _
Inqrom i
J v 1
The Washington Post cmdi
Time: Herold
The Washington Daily News ah
The Evening :r
New York Herald Tribune __£_
New York Journal-American _
New York Mirror___i_._.._.
New fork Daily Nev-YB A-_._i
New York Pout n,__,,,___..___._i
The New York Times _....__
The Worker-______ii_,_
The New Lauder ii
The Wall. Street Journal _._._.___._
Dole ._..._....i_.-.t._....___
f_'.-"_--
, .. 9. :-- N160
.._____.. 1- _'_iI.E '.':c';@f_'_'1e D
JUL to you
w
m
!~ - - - __ _ -- :~ _ :__:_~A,
0-19 Heir I ll-BO!
I wit
Y._, i._ -..92 "" r
92
"re
is: ._ t-»'-2'? t |'_ .17 Jllhl
l Ilia hrpremetourt grater-
iday heard aait-in csse~tbat
jloeked deceptively can im-
Etll the Justices began prob-
'4n| the arguments. '_ihen it
became apparent that the
F lack oi one tact Ln the record
Fat the trial may force the
Collrt to decide I constitu-
tionnl question it misht other-
iise have avoided -.
l The case involves a trip to"his home in Selma, Fa, that
I How Law Scho-0 student.
Brno oynton, started justbe£o%%h.ristmas in 1958.
f.
ffR.g &% ways bus and went into the
5
é
l
lat: evidence to show whoWhen he got to Richmond.
.&nv'nt cli bed n the Ti1l_l-- I'll! 'l'l'l -,,-..-."- --1-_-_ __ _ .
terminal to eat. , '
When the bus left. he was
hot aboard because he had in-
sisted that he had a legal
right to eat in the restau-
rant inside the terminal,
which was reserved for whites.
H refused to go to a similar&M@t for Negroes a"nd|W convicted of trepassing
ned S10._ I
Alum trlal,itwasestab-M_lial_1ed that the restaurant op-
erated under a lease fmrn the
Trailways Bus Terminal, Inch
mt nothing was introduced. A -
' >
._ W _:_ _ .
"'_"~l"f'l -. _- -,
...~ .- .,.... _ -g . 4'»" -III
I-
8 reme
General intervgn --
tonhsideasatrlendotthe
Court. He l>l0<!¢¢<1 409"!"menu to show that the bus
line did own the_termLnf3 lid
could be eonnél waua I-Iii Irestaurant. . .
In the argument Yesterdl!-'.
Waiter E. Rogers of Richmond,apecisl counsel tor Vi1IiQl,'
admitted that it the bus omn-
pany operated the fttlllflllf
it could not refuse to aim
Ngp95,_ I-lo argued that thebu] eomrpny had no control
over the restaurant and t
ti} restaurant. Ii I PT! ll 4b iness, can discriminate D1i chooses. _
Even it the bus company
did own the terminal, a tact;
Rogers argued the Court can-1
not contsder since it was not
bef0l'I the lower courts, the
restaurant still has I right to
discriminate unless It 1| mm-
is controlled by the tel-~.......m-1,1he contended. " ' *O
J1JV
n1;l9-9it. ,4? ___ a _ :____ - --1'* ¢~ ~
Tolson
Mo
s n
Bel out
C iahan
i ' Malone .777;
as__f"..|.._ .-1Wl-92J urn: 'Fiosen K:
Tcimm ___..._.__.
Trotter
W.C. Sullivan __
Tele. Room _.__
V LngrcrrnGrind
/Ii/l.f.92 1
- s ' /..J
r . I
1/1
an-lIt"9 01:21 C
'- E,92;_
a_ -
Q:
."' ":1
a'_Q.
ht:
I-*;< --- r_ _ :|n-slants: - e .
, ,_ ..., __,._ 5 _ I __ "'""""'f' s. I-~ » lie » w '1...7'=<--"M"'s?'-*4".- ,,"',l» " 92_ , 92
l W My _.--V ._:- ».I .
Justiee rempomlt-out that 11- the 5'49-t
ruled that any restaurant can-not discriminate agatuatc:aenzera in interstate
merte, it would aect the tiny
lunehrooma attached to gas
stations at which buses some-
times stop as well as the large
city bua terminall.
Marshall indicated that not
many of those tiny places re-
main, but Jtilce Stewart re-
plied, Wlell', I atqpped at one
last weekend." _
With the fact in the record
that the bus oompany eon-
trolled the restaurant, the
Court could rule that Boyh-
ton: arrest violated the Inter-
state Commerce Act. Without
it, the Court may have trouble
decliing the case except on a
constitutional issue, something the Justices prefer to
avoi .
It was clear from the argu-
ment that they had no desire
to tackle the underlying con-
stitutional lssue, which is the
backbone of the legal attack
now going on over arrest: tor
sit-ins. ~-That is the Issue whether a
statefs acti n in making an
arrest to support a private busi-
nessman: desire to discrimi-
inate is a violation of the 14th
Amendment. '
this issue in his hour-long argu-
ment, although it -is discussed
in his brief. The Solicitor Gen-
I cl -92 Marshall barely mentioned
n.||l'ill e a lillll-ll| n ll] Boyntons favor on this 1
_-.- A
92_ _ ,_._ _; _92 a . . .,n,- -- Q». .,.._;~.§,-_- :,'~"t,_ .
1- ' .1 ' _- '.. -1- ._-
, _ _ . .
l
1
ii """_77j___92 . I -4- e
lame In la liriel.ergo yesteq. 1 t "T
the other eonatmnMl__
laaue. that the reatauranfl to-'
uaa1toaerveBoyntonunneeaa-arlly hurdenelunteratata cone 2erce, the Co has trouble;
cause it normally prefer! ll 'e on the buts of an act of i
onp-es; if it e:ieta._ In thia
ue, the Act eriata, but the
iasioz fact tram th cue
application;;-.92- r-- .21;
_, .1 ~,,~$;"._ . --~, V.
d F. - 1__ ».:~ 3 .¢"¢» -1- U _ / l
4 »
I;_..q..._.
» ies to. dlscrilninlil
ui&','
E
-:
?
'2
>
{
'3
n
r
l
T.Erased e. decision 01- the Filth
II I_..-. ,_ --;,IQ__ ._ .-.,,_.
-st
_,.
with their b_oidi
Alsbome legislature
right to recast '_I921sir¢¢e_e
28-sided shape ii its p
II¬8TOIl- "~._. K. T
There is no question that
this was the ieniaietures pur-
pose for it was openly conceded
when Tuskekee'e' once-square}
youndnrles were ' redrawn in
1957. The Negroes who carried
their appeal to the aupremei
Court must now on through the
local Idrmslity oi proving their
ease 1,n Federal District court.howevu: ' -- --
.I_ _..._ ,_ I92_A.__l_ _-__ ' i : '92 A ' 92 ' __ ' ;_ ' . ,1 -->-v_ ,. . .. v 1p M > .' eh ox . ;-5.; - 7- -..3e1;_; .--~u-- - . .' .5, W---v ~-- . ' .-
l.
eurnumw-,
_-_ T" _'_;_Ai-_-.1.--_--___~_A:~_
" l_1l*l'_l'Ell'it;E"llVE!£I'Ol'l' ;' i_
tdlnu1dtbeiirieIorthe|n'§@1t_
againstludioio-lmterterenoeln
aspure1ypoiitloni.Itwil1lIev1
ytheopportuniiatodoeomort-;
which white voters in Tenne '
see ere pro!-estino Ierrylnlii
Idering which Permits rm-
districts ID dominate the TWB
Tuskegee had a population
or 5.391 Negroes and 1,810
whites belore its boundaries
were re-drawn. OI some 400
Negro voters formerly within
V -,1» the city limits. only tour or
Dllleftllce Ill rruiclyle
eeterdn.y's opinion by Jus-1
_ Frankfurter emphasized!
the dierenoe in principle be-
tween ¢er1Yrl1lI92dei'in-E for P0-
litical purposes and eerrrmnn-during which has the intent oi
1-gcinl discrimination. To some
judicial observers'th3e_ line Al:-tween lite two iybtrely -
oernibie. howevor..p.nd it seemsctljt the -court at iome
_. dew 92'1,1.=I= theis! decision as -w deonlne-
stone for a further advance in-
to the em-rymsnderin: thicket.
The Frankfurter opinion re-
Circuitourt of Appeals. which
had relied on previous Supreme;
Court dedsions for its iiridine
that Federal courts lacked lu-
risdiction in :eI'i'y1Ilonering
eases. Appellate Jllle JohnB:-e are left and 'l"::.=:.e:ee In-
stitute. turned neat of Nezro
learning founded by Booker T.
Washington. is now outside the
cit! boundaries. -
. mvide in z Decisions _
The edort's unanimity in the
Tuskegee decision was notably
-lacking in two other rulings
ion the busiest day of its 1960-
di term yesterday. Decisions in
two cases involving the riebts
of witnesses u=w""re laiisiative
committees investigating nib-
version brought bitter protests
from the liberal bloc.
By o 6-3 vote, the court
denied o second hearlnz to Dr.
Willard Uohaus. who has si-
moot completed his one-year
loll -sentence tor roiuslnl to
in New I-Iaml>Bi'il.re. It divided
5-4 in uphoidinc the contemptMinor Wisdom mid it that
time: _ -'
;; = .t,
/ 5-,I . 1*
|;_. ,. , . _
:_ M
vol: .r.~.,. -
n -____ -__.-..:_.u_... AIBUB I U55 UUJI YJULIULI 92!tl|gerrymandering that it reaardi w _ i ,5 - " -. ' , , r U
1 -ft K D Q 1? x, 1 :4 E Q .92 1 r
- ' I ' . e ~+ - ' ~
1 _ - a 1 ., . .
I I
i .
i
rJ
ll! in !D03-1391' Pending oonjn.
nessee Legislature. '_ - -¢
reveal the names ol guests at}
his World Fellowship Centerlper in remain; to reve I
th . .
the McPhoul cue. Y
three-mo-n liberal bloc, joined
by Justice Brennan. objeeted{
chieyto the feet tftsi there;
had been no proof that lI.l.'l_."
McPhaui, who was sentenced to
nine months in prison and
fined $500. _ha.d been an oleill
or the Civil Rights Concrete}Justice Whittaker, who
for the melority. noted thatthe subcommittee he-d_
to believe _Mr. 1loPhluL-Hggeeutire meretar! '0! " '
group, which has been Iista;
by the Attorney General as al
subversive organization But
the court's liberals _telt the de-
fendant should have been pro-
tected by the legal presumption
oi innocence until proyenyuilty. *- " 1 - '
Today we take o step buck-
wsrd," Justice Douglas 8-lid tor
the dissenters. We allow IN V, " ...Q,
-* ntc:ctepr%.!-as-doingmore. so tar as thisToleon
Mob: Y
Parsons ._____
Belmont
Collhon '
DeL.ooch
" Malone _,__....__
McGuire
Rosen ________.
TornrnTrotter Y
W.C. Sullivan __
Tele. Room ___..
Ingram
Gondy
. ? I
=0a"=
Tho Washington Pool und_Z...
Times Harald
Washington Dull New! _.Evening Star
York Herald Tribune __,_iTho
The
NOW
Now York Journal-American ..__
_ _____,,,,_____ ~-1 u|1' r -n-nun-u-I - ~1I~~1-I-Inn--I--r~1r~'~ v- -- - _-
Q-19 Flov. I-20-51} .- -I u
92
_ D92t_x> KJ Q?! zeezééiQ? e d ":?F"ZW " ' ' B out
.23 W ' __
-Fen-III _.THEQ:rp1-eme nu-m_wlr In-lit
. 2J
.-Ve_-:-
2. F-1*.-!
t_A,_
1-decision on mom censorship striku
directly at 1 fundamental right g11I_1lll-
nmel hv th onntntio r:"".'--'-r'--5""-.""-"'1! ' I
'1: mien the suarsnties at
the First Amendment, the key PI°Vfi83°l1
of the sm of Rights; ._~ . -
:1 lll'*-L-gene; glue Inn¥AI92n-h'92&'. 92,¢u|..|1cao ounce um-n-n_ nu linwv .-..-|--.4"
Tine an estabiishment of rdikion or pro-
dhibiting thefree exercise thered; Or!;br;|1gmg we freedom of speech or or
the press; or the right of the peoole
peaceably to aseembie andto petitlon
the Government for aj redress 0! £riev-
l-nces."- - - ; .5» "' ._ - _
The decision, iroted five to four, af-
firms the power of ste-tee and cities to
-require movies to be submitted to a_
board of censors before they can be
s.11<>Wm 5 . . .. .
. In question was at Glcago ordinance
e.imed- at immorality, obscenity end
scenes deemed-to incite breaches of the
, -,._.~r..-'...e. '
3 This has been the alinounced purpose
-of censorship from time immemonal.
It we:-. the alibi '-vita Hit.1e:s Z*!@s
Lhlirned the books, placed the schools,
news rs radi theater and all otherM one
McGuire
Rosen
Trotter
w.c. Sullivan ;_
Tele. Room _..__
Ingram __.___
Gundy __...___: _ _ _._-.- ; _iforms of public exjinsaan
T-1~f-,
mete who abuse Le ri_,;l,'hte ._
speech, whether in poblic tn
print oron stageorscreen. Th
voive qonscation of the offendingteri.aI,r;I;,q criminal prosecution d _utho _A_d/1111.1 1' er '1 -"'|":f.§.f'T%§?
Pre-eenso up ethinz
-different. _ It sofa up leet board
powered to jlldté, in vain, Q
good for the public jsoe "
Almost inevitably this
far beyond such obvious tnmgs as
scenity. It lters out unorthodox idem.
It is, in fact, inclined to combat any
ideas at all; and it-sets the precedent for
systematic thought control whenever
dernegogs in power-frog _Ku
Kluxem to religious and political tand-ice-mayso decree. -
Al Obie! Justice Warren said injildissenting glpinion, this decision F9219-sent-s the r-_ de.n,ger of evatuel e.!_.1H.!_'-
ship for every n-m of eommnnieation;
And, in the w'ords of '-Justice9292{haither;-1-a.s h_6I]1E--CitY officials 0f- l 'Mr. E _
§f.ifI'.T..;~ ai A10...-15 5"""""" """""""""""""1'3:§11E'i'¬I:1"i3""" W
...no such regime ispe ythe
First Am ndm . pape or e ent 1.7 :~ Q;
no-1-I-I-It _ Ip-If-I-DV__V_7 iwjhiqu-ugl
_ _ Tho Washington Pout and
Timon Harold
. 1 1.-H4, _ The Vlolhlnqton Dally Nlwl 26
Y
The Evonlnq Star ._i
New York Harold Tribuno L
NOW York iournoi-American i
New York Mlrror___o
New York D1111! News _.._...._.__._
Nov York Pol! ____i__i_
The Now York Times _.._...._._._._...
The Worker _____...i__.._..___.{/,¢/The New Loader __:._i_
Tho Wall Street Journu1_.___--
'* . i
i
92
1
_...~ WI W ..,_> . . .. . , .m._ W - '- - <-- -- - ' " ""
:1-
5.}
1....-avI
- <
Y"7. 2.
0-l9 Hev.6-1-61!
_, o _§_______:_ ____
i i I IJQQ-V'~II'h; '92.'-!-5-'~.-% -H
3; isci
R: " W
open its hlxtion-Mon-I
.i*!1 i=."="='¢,=*.@¢nte1"-1on is involv,
the legality of sit-in?-i
Q e m 6 n strltions a.¢a.inst
legregation the _Soutl1.;
. The court, ui has been-
; I - 18 -1, Iggntesgwzvia mw ca%-
' dlr of civil rights cases{gm at them brouzht byQ38?
111:
ationsl Association tor th
fAdv1ncement.o! Colored Peo-1if re to speed riciai inieirtr. . _ ,_ ' s _-92|§. . ** - r e
=,-gt" But It also may ham! down|
' me far-reaching decisions in.
_ ther elds. Major tests-in-|gglve the Government's antl-..-|- Jo-lu,. on u-.~4-Ba I.-iéill Bl Ill IV: BU LITDLI ILL UUl§J_ I
guess mergers. union seniority!
rights and the power 0! the
-Federal courts to force state
_ REDS APPEAL .- 1The rst major ruling_ e session may come Oct.
pg 1 Communist Party pelion. - 4 -
This asks I. re-hearing of
the case in which the court
., = _ earlier this year ordered the
fI
nWrty to rqister under the
. ternal Security Act of 1950.
If the petition ll denied. the
Communist Party will have
about 90 days to register or
iisbsn. My t .' . , I i
The court ls scheduled to
liear lrguments In the sit-
ln" 112st case starting about
Oct. 16. . t
' The NAACP has challenged
-the constitutionality of state
ws under whldi lnti-segre-
ation demonstrators have
arrested in the South.
£1; The case involves three
"groups of college students in
Qatari Rouge, LIL, who eon-
jlucted Bit~ins" in lunch
lilting in 1 bus station, de-{tuortrnent ltore and drug. re.,acté$.; M
_-.. 0._ -e.-...,§.,-;
__g1siatures to redistrict. 15"! f
_>.!!!92=. _- _. - -"r . ~i
astute iI'.§'hra'm"3-gupreme Com-t UR! 101111_ ;eonsti%iconAI1lxn.ita:i0ns" oneJJ I rosecut | 101'Egiignging-h-iF':lt-!ns."9n .. -
. by its gene:-ll counsel.
urzood Mariuil. But he.1111] noble to i
i I'92Dl'I'liHlh @ lib _92_.i_;'t plinner-been were pee-?
_,___________ __ ____ Co '
L.'a' -' _: Ii i- 5"lheeourtiruHngmeyi l
;'ytnhunct:'edsototl92erg_-§ cues-as welluto the
3 i'92°:m'92-re:-eii Qtes. 1
' LPPOBTIONIIQT Hi .
. The court: rst hearing-
-starting Oct. 9wi1l be on I
. re-argument of the so-called
Tennessee apportionment
I--"r This Involves eorts to
' Iorce the Tennessee legisla-i
1
ture to re-district Ior the nmi
time in 60 years and thus end
oz r-_1rs! areas. A 5L'ni!!.!'4¥r0blem exists in many _ totes. ' _ .
A Tennessee p carried
Courtwlth Justice Depart»
backinga1ter Jt hm![the case to igmSupreme
' ment
|_bee-1; rebued b state courtstend by_ 1 Fegeral _distrlctcourt. ='_
i This com held um the
federal courts were barred
- entering such 1 politi-
_cl1 thicket." .
. ANTI-TRUST A
i The Supreme Court llso
laces the rst test oi enti-trust laws enacted in 1950 to
vise the C-evernment power£0 block business mergers
which limit competition.
»' This case iigrows out o! I.
1956 mergers of the Brown
Shoe l.;o.. e or manufac-11.iltl'. with B..-Klwrmgv' Tier. 1' retsilshoe chlun. '- the top-heavy representntion]
lO ' 0
->1
.1
I/JV 1
W
M I;, _. A, ,_,_ . --- ..@_.i . , __.¢ '1g~|-- _ -__ H *" - - ,7 ""* '
ullohun __...._
gPI'dA.'7é'
l'I
/arrival _._...;
Trotter __.___._._
ele Room ___._
~§i:'gndy
ti
'1
-
.' 4'1.' ' UK --.
1|6_2.__»2?$.7$-BiNOT uncon-
mm Q5 F991
.~ W
j
- 7'1I -' _.
4Times Harald rThe Wulhlnqton Dolly NewIH
The Evenlnq StatThe Wulhlnqton Poll and
New York Herald Tribune i-
Heu Yen Journal-American i
New York Mirror iii
New York Daily News i_
New York Poll l$?_
The New York Tllnel ii
The Worker
The New Louder
;;;,"=*s1;vws¢r-r
;__A
am-
'-E
, .:2
',_ .
.- 1
.-:
*""
Ade~d
¥. ,---
-r
k J
0I
42* 1
3£5_ _ - _¢' *1-11*
. _1 - I
1 'o
M, ..-..-.__.,, '._
=~%1@h'.°=592".
i. V-.| _. The seoondh C» ut Opui 'rt
¬§.?%.""mnw" »£="2J $3} e e asl niov we _ ,ll businen ' ,'- n"§m.q.mb@'L°$F'i or Ohio. , Pennaylnn
nd Californk, have
nppeal.__: If
. The couri also_mtjr rule
; ppeal; in a half-dOZen coni;
I tempt or Congress cases. ln~'"
.cIuding that of Maurice A,Hubcheson, gresldent oi ue Carpenters nion_
I Also pending is an appealby Dave Beck, former frei--L dent of the Teamsters niun.
who claims the grand jury
which indicted him tor e
ezzl-ement was "biased."
The Government contend-
law requires that I. gr
jury be unbiased. _ _ i 1
I9292 _ _ ..~i-,-_- ,..-n-15;»;l|~.£| ._.. ..
- _ , 4- a '10.,"
pr " '
. |. "O * _..
14 ; --92. U 'L
r
I
r _ I _iiW i it W _ W _,__ . - - --~._.%L -- -
o-lo Raw. o-i-oil 92fl Ou 0 »
-;.;A__;_ } $2-osecution of Negroes who re-*=',i /92 4 tr
/J I-1;-92-ale-su%r¥1TTD?5'3*»*l.T¢#E@PIrlf'i=r1»*=-weI~' "~":§&'§92
1 92
l
'1.
e
i
1-.-arm the publicunreasonsbl
_ '. Asks Early Reversal
a
' term, the Justice DEpa.!'.l1.Eiilil Inns asked for earl? reversal of
Baton Rouse eomictiona,
A department brie! all thej
F
ire! such problems was given the._.. . If luadalll Frill an wasnmcrron. p.
.'5'11te supreme coma open a
new mar-wmorrovwo two its,
jinest array of appeals by. in cases N-118111! Iron
-rrests in sit=in de.'::onei.r:tior92.e Y
*6 theft of chicken mu. _
""_en.u'nin: alter a vacation
.liat began June II, the nine
Jlstices will hear three hours%B!I1.lIn¢1'it soon in the court's
st-time consideration of state
__ $0 Ifhite Ill]!-Chgem-item in the South. .
'Counse1 for sixteen Negroesgreeted in sit-in demonstra-ns in Bltdn 'ROUl8. II... W111"rlir. ammo anauuum-.
;wiiiiamrtueonou.uueataie~
thrgueh its police, ma not actin such alt-in case. {touch a
attired, "then a storekcepar whodoes not Md: meg:-we certain
patrons will lei io,hla own
devices." i - :~
Inc court has been eskel to
grant hearines in other it-in
=ea'ses from Durham and
R-Qeilh. N. C-. and from Rich-
inohd and Ariinzton, Va. "
Arg'un92ien.t.e will be h rd llHall on an a by ezlie a-'tionai Asaocia on ior the -II{|th% is nd. HI. 1:.,-utn-.
gu tht lunch count, sei_='V3IlC¬Ia"".|.¬t 0! C9-19%! ..... ....gaéon. when enioroed -br%W°'3 K Lie! I *
Rate authority, violates the"
U. _S. Constitution: guarantee
of due process of law.
The sixteen were sentenced
to tour months in Jail under a
-Louisiana law that prohibits,
the commission oi any act
nich a manner as to distu.rb o
ear the law-
equally andLouisiana
plies to everyone 92
was not designed, or s_.pplied,;
lo enforce racial discrimination;
Ib uphold the deznonirtratou-s,.
the state contends. would beto tramp! the rights or aui
other citiziens. " i.
with numerous other sit-in
and Freedom Rider oases likely
lo be appealed to the Supreme
Court during its nine-month
convictions were utterly unsup-
ported by evidence that the
sixteen Negroes did anything to
unreasonably disturb or alarm
the public.An indication of the diicultyx
"ourt'in s brie! tield by Attor-i
'i--d General T. W. Bruton oi
-rth Carolina. His brief asked
"'0 court to denya hearing to
Hnbert. Williams, a Nelro sen-
enced to thirty days in jail for
9. sit-in demonstration at a,lnia Bupre Court decldliri.
;The Virginia court held the as-f
pociation engages in unlawful
solicitation of legal business for
rite attorneys.
; Also scheduled lor tall armi-
92l1'i.l!llt is an apped hr-Theodore
R. Glbson.' who -retused to pro-
duce s list oi members oi theMiami branch of N. A. A. C. P.
3I:le was convicted 01 contempt,
nnnfu an m Ii! mnniha In jail m.u....iC92.u -.' -- ...---_-_ _._ __=
and ned $1.200.
Cases Under Bind!
Arrests made in two privately
operated amusement Pl:-ta in
Maryland when grouiii of Neg
noes and some white persona
refused to leave; a suit by a
Memphis Negro to compel le-
segreeation or a restaurant in
the Memphis Municipal Airport
'building; iour appeals by
lbouisiana in its eortrio-put oil
Integration in schools in various
quarts of the state. » -
An appeal irom a Tennessee
state court order to close High-
lander Folk School. a racial!!!
integrated adult education cen-
ter; an appeal tzom an Alabama
state court which N. A.-A. C. P.Mara; 1.. - --
4
The chick
was
lit.
Eennard. aigro. was
oi paying a Negro rout
e lacks of feed. He
. to seven YER!
to Denltentiarl - "5... @111 .
Co
. .. p ., _ . '3U §;§S_.' upreme. Court Openni ,;§' A ..,. _ p _ L on-9 ~ - I grow s El!%aN6g_l0 "3S"- l. . . __':;_a¢~:-r;E=; r;11r92;en___ _ _ - -- Henrik!" _ V ve __...._..__
, .
Trotter _._i
' } Teie Room __..__
Ingram
Grmdy
A
-_._
inaicr racial cane exp .
to be taken to the B i
gout soon Lnvolves lower
Innings rst di-si:ric_t' I:p92gn¢92,-
rla 0! the Lincoln elementary
school in New Rocheligr N."I.,-had been zcrymanéered bi
BR the school: /enrollment}
almost entirely Nqro. The llswi
hcelle School Ipard opnndsthere has been rig;-jg.oi district um and no incrim-aw
.{/
i inationf agailllg; og-rue,
A U1o Jr flaw
no er racial case Hkm in -llama-Pie-auonr
down of public 'FT . . 1_;$£§"°=~._...--'
Md?-. 2l_5_Z5*!?
NOT RF F ORDED
13;; OCT 9 F561The Washington Poll urn-.l¬_____
Timon Harald
The Washington Dally News _
Tho Evqnlnq Star '
New York Herald Tribune Q
,..
.3
D5§
atQ92
kl@ A; - 4'" - _ - ---~ 7 F:*' W p
' 4
bln ' _
92-.-
!M
'.92_', _:.:_,-.5...-_~__ r
i I ;-»qr, i_ - t- ., l -. Q . -1.1-t-~"
. , 1 -. ~-5."V,l5l":",.-t§§'<"-"'--'"'? -"
,. - .l_.__,,-.-,-i. -.._.V
92' .. v "'1J _.,.ji~-J -_- _ __....,, _. _ . - .. '
Refused Review
BY 5 urt
WAsnn~ioToN.=ll1e U. S. Supreme Courtha- I'JIIl_§t M. -....:-.-, st... A...-:..:.... .-.4 ¢l..,.; uaa lClU-DlS92-l 1.u lcnwvv tun ucualuu U]. umi Pennsylvania Supreme Court which voided
1 and federal constitutions by the Court of
Common Pleas, a decision upheld by the
State Supreme Court. The state asked the
U.S. high court to review the decision, argu-
ing that other courts in other districts would
be inuenced by the -reasoning of the state
high court.
But, motion picture people argued that
the Pennsylvania courts had declared the
ct invalid under the laws of Pennsylvani
d that it was not necessary, therefore, t
nsider federal questions. The Suprem
ourt, in refusing to review the decisio
i vs no reasons, as is usual in such cas
The eeot is to permit decisions to standlwithout providing legal precedents such as
actual Supreme Court decisions do.
l The voided act sought to set up a three-
man board which would have had the power
to ban lms outright or to prescribe them
for showing only -to patrons 17 or older.
Films being shown in Pennsylvania for the
rst time would have had to have been
submitted 48 hours -before showing. Exhibi-
tors would have been required to register
with a fee.
The Dauphin County court found the act
tlnconstitu-tional in that it restricted freedom
of expression and communication and es-
tablished prior restraint. It said standards
were vague and indenite, procedural and
judicial safeguards were iackinc and ims
were singled out from among other media.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Cou-rt agreed
with all this and found the registration fee
to be a tax upon free speech.
The coui-ts refusal to review the law was
looked u n by the Catholic Stan;1g,n;I.,.& ringing an end to t e public
103 1961
"- . R "f"-'-'3-hi-1-__ .r '----...._.,,__,,_,~ P37'C6HSt;ITCliigE_:<[
l
the state er censorship-classication law.
; Th e_nnsylvania _192/Iotitgficture Control r - *
Ac as held to be void both under stated-demand that there be controls of ' _ ' " itm"'rnUVYes in Pennsylvaniai." T l "
organ of the Cadroiic diocese in Philadel- .
phia, -in an editoral, called the decision a:
"hollow" victory and called the pevpl _0fPennsylvania. the losers." The editorial,
stated that the law was knocked down _~n0t Lbefore the strong demands of constitutional .
law, but rather before the SIIOQB and 1111'
rgasmiag demands that censorship of =92"-7"!
..ind is inheremly evil." ---- ... 1
4» Q1
Independenj F
New York, cw
Nov. 18, 1961
Page 5
- - 4'
e M Q22?<§$ la-5'.;*n§;§"|ipzo
149 NOV 30 1961Mr. Tr>lson_.__,_...,
Mr. Be1m0nL__,_
Mr. Mohr._.____
Mr. CalllhlI|._._
-.-_-Q,
SnmvIn..__
Mr. Tavel
Mr. Trotter___
Pele. Room__,_,,
MIX Ing'rl!'n_._._.
Miss Gnndy.__,__M
m
/i./5?
I
1|
ill Journal
York
5'1/9.
1,E
A or_.a.;y u- av. la-I've; - --
Illuhun _.___.__
OIHCI
eI.. 11
UV ---......_.i
'1
>
_ -m
n
.- I
~-1-eit
V i-.r
Q»
a
o" ' Trotter
- _ Inqrom i...-< " " Te1eRoom__.
a V
_. v- . - - - ----~- A --i--_.._4-->.. --- -- r LI
w W 4
i
i I
i . g .
Ir snnuim on-enmzno _
._ . lta:lta£IIritI -i
Ibo tortuous trail of the Hts-
trioifs criminal insanity decisions
has nnallly led to the Bupreme
Cotrt.
For more than seven years. the
hizh court left undisturbed both
the Durham rule broadening the
criminal insanity defense and the
law o'"o-1-rmlliriz hospital wmm:t-
ment tor those acquitted via the
Durham rule. - r " .
Ironically, although most of the
controversy has swirled around th
Durham rule, it's the eornmitmen
w that comes under attack
orthoomin: arguments before th
up:-eme Court. -
The Durham decision oi 19
rovided that an accused cannot
be held c inally responsible I01-
his act it t was the product oi
e. mental """-re or defect. " -
1 The law, passed if months
Hater, provided that an accusedE round not Quilt? by reason of in-
sanityhadwzotolmentalhok
pital and stay there until the
1 hospital superintendent certified
lthat he had recovered his sanity
' and would no longer be a dangerto himself and other-a. Under the
_ 1955 law, the recommended release
had to be approved by the court.
Z83 Sent to Hospital _ we
Prom the passase oi the law
to lune 30 or last. year, 258 persons
had been acquitted on insanity
grounds and sent to the hospital.
In the same period. 92 were re-
i sed either O0ndlti0nai,L¥__L].|];y- . r -
Q
lXwistric M sonlt A
: ~ 7" *'* *"|_1_. -_ _ ~__ _rMM? *
7, 1f/
. /"5/._92
/Qr
I
ax_ ___ ___? _ ._ _ ___ ?i- ---i-d-'- - "' " n
-
1-»
IH-92-v-1-49292
.. e '?"F.._§oG 3 '
t
_;_-.6! Tfqgrl -1 v t
92 ._I ,.1 Rs ~
' b
-r
I
I
ns---._
1 A IH
lrlnthe ts
amfl
sporadically
hospital WI-I
than the time the
have hadto spend
not been acquitted on insanity
grounds. For instance, Mrs. Kath-
a n mes. who wu e
from Bt. Eiizaheths Hospital 48
days after she was iound not
guilty on grounds or insanity. Bhe
was the rst committed under
thethennew1aw.' m" .-
Meanwhile. the Court of AD-
pesls was busy interpreting. ex-
plaining. expanding and deiendinl
the Durham rule. A comnlicating
factor was added in 1057 when
Bt. Elizabeths decided that a
sociopathic personality" was a
mental disorder. Thus, those pre-
viousbi classed as sane but anti-
social were brought under the
ental disease classication
eDurham rule. .tore Acquii-tuls Result
[This seemed to open the dud!-
wider to acquittals via the insan-
ity route and the parade or "so-
ciopathie persona1ities"' g r e w.
There was rebellion witiin the
Court of Anllesls itself. pointed
comments that no other court
was iollowing the Durham rule
and abortive efforts on Capitol
Hill to replace the Durham rule
with legislation. *
Progressively, however. insanity
acquittals began to ]oo_k less at-
tractive to the accused. District
Court Judges, suDDOrted by the
Court oi Appeals, were increas-
ingly disinclined to make a re-
volving door oi St. Elizabeths.
The very defendant who was
acquitted as .a sociopathic per-
sonality," John D. Leach, was in-
volved in a landmark appellate
decision on the question oi get-
ting released from the hospital
after his acquittal. In a unani-
mous opinion. the court of ap-
als e a distinctio ' 'mdbdM n -_ '_ _|_1 'Il
I
C!_ Lnormai mental conditione for relnae,"
tothesoecialciulotwhiehlaclr
2: e mam.-..-..r,"!:ot1.-Jri @2815
_ T. Washington, "means sometlhinl
dierent from having
more psychiatrists III
that the individual is san
must he freedom iron:
make the individual dangero
himself or the community in 1
reasonably foreseeable future." -. . 4
Ccllrt Declines Review ..-If Y»?
The Supreme Oourt refused to
review Jae r1.I.11he' in the lhvaeh
case in 1959, thereby declining a
bidtolookatthelawwhiehit
has now agreed to examine.
Alter the Leach ease. the
o!ADD6al.s took on a series o
ehaileneins the commi-
m t law as a growing number 0
acquitted on insanity noun
d it was easier to get into
S Eiizabeths than to let out.
Where the hospital superintend-
ent refused to certify them tor
releaae,thqwererreetoseekre-
lease via habeas corpu.s proceed-
ings. That's where most oi the' ~ ' Cl
.-.44 a92
s
test-scame. -* | < '-
The Court oi Anneals standard
emerging from these tests Dm-
vides that the one seeking release
must show that he has recovered
his sanity and that the recover!
has reached the point where he
has no abnormal mental condi-
tion which in the reasonably fore-1
A
seeable future would endanse Ihim or the public it he were ref
l d. ue series or decisions.
J
,-
.- i -
ii _i
l I-
I'-
.C
o
4
oi
1. Q1-;-'1.._, .. '
. - l -3,.
ft ,-
I
In another case. the lgielllts
court selected throon tion--_
advanced by the American Civil
Liberties Union-that automatic l
commitment to a mental hospital. L
after acquittal on rounds oi in-
Ianity violates ConstitutionalIh.:w " -. 1' _; i
~ The case now betore the Bu-preme Gourt involves a cad check
writer and again the American
Civil Liberties Union, um time as 1
triend of the court," is claiming
that the mandatory commitment p
lawisuncohstitutional. - '-
The man in the csse is !"red- F
erlck c. Lynch. 42-year-old !or-
mer Air Force lieutenant colonel
who zot into trouble Xor writing
badchecks.Onthedayhebieaded'
not auilty in November, 1959, he
was sent to District General Kos- ,
pital Ior a mental examination. i
A month later. the hospital
ported that he was mentally
mpetent to stand trial but
mber 28, 1959, the hospi
d he had shown some imllrov
ent and now appeared able tonderstand the charges against i
him. At the same time, however,
the haspital reported that Lynch
was suffering from a manic de-
pressive psychosis at the time oi
the e_I'i_me end that nich an ill-
ness would particularly aect his
judgment in resard to financialmatters, so that the c,%ime
charged would be a produ oi
this mental disease."
The report thus spelled out -
nsanity defense under the -
am rule, but when Lynch
trial his court-appointed co -
l chose not to use this defense.
Instead, he advised his client to
plead guilty. Chiei! Judge John_
Lewis smith, 3:2, or Mmiicipei ~Court refused to accept the guilty plea. After trying the case, he
lound Lynch not guilty by reason
oi insanity and ordered him com-
mitted to St. Elizabeths.
Hobeos'Corpus Proceeding o
after six months in the hos-
pital. Lynch tiled a. habeas corpus
petition attacking the legality ofi
r
92
i
I
i
1
!. O .
' .-4-»-.- -"
..... |
was or
in A9111-
told the ..
turbanee in
restaurant by -
in front of the
diners and making
marks aboutthoir
was also advind
week period, Lynch _ :
bad checks. i _ _ . '
Shortly after Lynch was re- i
turned to the hospital, his at-'
torneys petitioned the Supreme
Co to review his case and the
rican Civil Liberties U
ca in as friend of the court.
ions Are Attacked "
e contentions oi Lynch and
the American Civil Liberties
Union in effect attack all the later
decisions of the Court of Appeal!
dealing with commitment to the.
hospital and release from it. The?contend that 01118 the delendsnt Q
can raise the insanity issue, not
the Judge or prosecutor; that
those accused of nonviolent crimes
like check-writina should not hecovered by the mandatory oom- 5
mitment law and that those round
not guilty by reason o! insaniw
ment hearing to determine men-Lshould be siren a pre-comm.it- '- s-1' _ , ._
- .21-..g;;___. _i A s~"v0ioMgt."-. J 9I_"'
L A ' » -- r 92 3 1
I
lé.
*1
QR
-' ---.'*-III
r___""Y
_,-".7
,-
n" -
4'-
92- -
7
1:-an.5-¢'%. .¥___§92
?9'
I
0
92
92
I
-v
7 - éQ I%
J
I
1
I
92
z I..
"'_',Y92 : -u- Ir .;,~. 0%" I"-?P9292I'Q1
IIIGIIU C1lI92-.mu inenni - . need_ nu-E
prompt confinement pending bi-_
aeration of the ambient: mentel
oondition. the Government er-
guea. is in mom oomoeliine in e
caae where the individual hoe
eommitted anti-lociol note nod
may very well continue to -do no
unlese treated. . - iv -
Contenoin: that e t>re-oom_1nit-
ment heenn: atter = eerdtct oi
acquittal on insanity lfounde is
not required on Constitutional
grounds, the Government brie!
points out since 1800. ludll have
been ordem those acquitted on
zrounds oi insanity to be held in
custody u dangerous. Implicit in
the detorinination of not ruiltyl
by reason of inpnity, the Gov-
ernment arm-lee. is the tindini
_ that the defendant actu-11! oclm
Emma the acts with erhioh n -n - -L.--_¢-JIn mimic.ap-ert Testiniol --
- To underline the difference be-
tween the mental patient who
goes through civil procedure end
the one who goes through crim-
inal courts to Bt. Elizebethe. the
Government cites one of the many
experts who tutied in COIJKIBSS
for the mandatory commitment
law. '
A man who is in n hospitei
becauae he has committed e crime
tor which he has been Qllllllltf
ed." slid Dr. Manfred 8. Gutt-
meoher. one oi the Nation; lead-
inl nuthorities on criminll in-"
sanity. it e different individual
from the individual who has been
sent there as A inentel cue."
Tint; one oi the meior points"
the Government will nrmse when
&o~_-8-H31-eme Court hqn-1
Oh! IIU92l92I92l'huunn unveilin-' -_ O _ u l
i
1
4;-_
:5-"_l
Lt!
.- -. _'_.§
F9? ¢ -
|.rpr-.--k.
. .---=~=-rJ _
v
r.
¢92-1"
1 - |_____ _ _ _ 7;» -in-I t:__ _:~ '1'" - - _. I _.._.._.__.-._-___- .______.--_.._ _ _U
' o
¢ v _I' ' 'l'O---vi v.- P, O :"1
A .. __..-...... . |."- :4
... _--. ..,1:.u1_,- V .v ,.
I
3
-1
1
u
I ~ 7* ___.
wThl John Howard .paviIlior| at St. Eiimbeths for treatment or the crmlnuury lniunu. V- .;,, .4 1-1 ~ .. W-~-_,
f.;_F_f_
2'-_, ..,.
_'_'.-;-if
s ._*_V_W_ i i_ _ i*7A7_T_ H __ __ __7 _ L _§ ___ ¢ ;_e " __~}>-*:A mi 7» ' -.._
0-1! Riv. O-1-6 ll
a
.;/. 0.,OL! ' ,1
fa
C!
on DécgwyyylieDr.f9 $¢3lhi11§ lDi$s!?11l l
;_i L WABHINGTD . * rrllrmeee
claim to hardened In - Aéllllli ECU? Piall ill
a hie. sen drewiii unust EEK! de-
mmeiation from the minority
NIT-Brdli; 7 " 'Justice Tom ii C'is.rI;,speakin: for the issenll.
said. "Once the opinion goes
the round oi our prisons, we
will likely be plagued with a
rash oi such spurious appll-.
cations."
. The decision. he said. is an
invitation to prisoners al-
ways seeking a sojourn from.
their keepers to swear to
Munchs.usen' tales when sell-
interest readily leads to self-
deception." Munchausen"
referred to the eighteenth
Century German spinner oi!
wild tales. Baron Karl vcm
Munchausen.
l- Claims Excessive Sentence
. ' The decision will permit
John Machibroda to return to
Toledo, Ohio, to present his
argument that his forty-year
sentenoe for robbing two Pled-
erally insured banks in Ohio
as excessive. Maehibrom. in
appealing to the Bupreme
Court. said his guilty plea was
not voluntary but was induced
;. by a promise oi leniency by an
r assistant U. 8. Attorney.
l He complained also that he
* was coerced into concealinl
|the situation from the sen-
tencing .court _becs.use theI prosecutor threatened his: il
, connection with other oi-
i Machibrods was sentenced
lli§}_§_§,_1§6._and he did not-_< 7 _ 92? " . 5 s_ --1"! - 92,? 1." If 1"" 4"°""'""" J _appea1tor-re-senteneiagisptil
sellitaneirmoourt denidrequest on srounru tint ht~._$tcl'ywas!a1.se. fr
-Justice Potter Btewart. lit".
Qiemaiorityooiniosnsaidz.
7 "!heresriilalwa!'sbemar-__eiusicases.and thissssels '
not far from the line. But
,-thepecicanddetaiiediam
tuai assertions oi the pe-
tfoner. while improbable.
st this llincture be
said to be incredible. -theslletetions are true. ,
titioner is clearly satin to.
17eliei."_' , i ;;1-- * i.
Justine stew»: sud "he l
could not ssree with the 301- 4
ernment that a hearing
would be futile because oi
the apparent lack or any eye- 92
witnesses to the occurrences H
allesed escelit tor Machi-
brods and the U. 8. Attomel.
Other Dissent-on -F
Justice Clark's dissent.
iloined in by Justices Fell!
Franhfmter and John M.
Harlan. said an examination l
oithelessndreoordsinthe 7
case reveal that Machihroda ;
clearly outspoke iumseii.
"II s deal had been ml-Q.
Justice Clark said, "it borders i
on the incredible that peti~ i
tioner would sit quietly in plPrison over two and one-halt Hyears alter the prosecutor
had reneled on his promise. '
"Alcatraz is a ma:imum- '
security institution housing
dangerous ineorrizlhiss
petitioner wants a ehanieof
5¢9!16I'F. til 001-I11 has leftthe door aiar for atrlp from- » -' 1
California to Ohio along with
the accomnanyinz lg" I-
- .5M.'lP1 5" "" " * The Vlcrli Slruoi Journal
.: Q
REC. 31
Ml '9 7 >'<?s'
u-unil--.---__.-sis-p
nor neconoso
46 FEB 27 1952
. i'iiwe92P]g £?l'loOI:ll C
Mohr
Callahan ___.
Co ad
Ev s
lldlone
e Rosen
'Sull1v<m
Tuvel
Trotter i._...._
Tole Room .___
Inqrcrm
Gondy
} ./
92 ,7 I4
v
The Icrshinqton Poll. andi_,,___
Times i-ins-aid
The Washington Daily News _
The Eveninq Bio:New York Herald Tribune E
New York Journal-Amlritn _-
New York Mirror
NQW York Daily News _i--
Ncvs York P08!
The New York Times in
The iv-.»i_n'r _:___.;_
The New Lauder
B .92 _D ' FEBZO 1962
4f_..
I
I
E1» l
ii.
é
at
ur .
. _<2-_='
-we;-=_.
_ V,
5 44;D-l Raw. I-2-52] !
-,; .=_V . .-. ,,,,~ .xi, _ ,r._, .,,____ _'-_,§_; 1; r-* _I 9 ~ ' . _ -I 1 d,___:- ¢ ' .
-. . _ I .l ' tr--§9292a=w= ~ » .
I I
.Ill
I
<
It In possible, of toourse, tI_1at'-l,n- e
[would mean little or nothing. The
,"l921.¢5l they believe time Ictl.-10 be_ _ intenntiondeetserereiltneompe '-- wt
I
...= U. ' .0
Idea of diiili
"151-eezlnubljrout nah anon rell-''6 r»-';;»~-aw-_1'r§in t§e1isoitm1:c1xievoul"_
urt qnensmuu edunod'
became no one known precisely?"Hp mu ma?-tqu w_gm;-gee;
I .
exclusion of
gressly gtatetl llltlrlll _E .
not mm together. -<
I practice of reconciling Federal ind
The overpowering oaé againstthie e
prohibition that Representative Smith rrould lay;'1 down for the cour.t_s' la that it would be
Jgintheeez-k.'.1'heu{gumontIorlt'|eeme
nboutthesamaetthe_erg1nnen_t£ortoedn,|§~,Fmonkey wrench into {delicate Piece of machtuclfan order to see whit would hippo; ..
:-' Of course, the Supreme Court ll not infallible;
It may hm mieconstrued the tlntenteot C'on¢roal_:
when it interpreted the Smith 8.61. B no bar Ill]?
state legislation similarly designed to penllize sub-vversion. But l Congress can always modify the'1anguage'of a statute that they have been mtscon-'-'7-ptrued without pulling em 1£nnn"1.he em-tin g legal etruce ' Fortunately,11» mum oeleoant mm Senate meta»?
President to prevent HR-3 front jaeooming mg.even it the Home should pull once more. But,
the tact that e subcommittee lfei reverted to:~.,l'
nuisaneebillddlskinditotiinewhmtlnooi-inM to loaded nd: imported: legle-~tion is appointing. ' J "'- Tr,-,.....,...;_r. ___...-,.;,_,;92__.~,»,-.';;,'%_:--.|'-~;,';.1:;,;£"..r:#"»-'; --' "
1; 1"; MAR 1ms29292'92u
~ .7
in ,, 92mi. I"4 Tolso /
A/5%-W°~ Mohr_______._.__._
Callahan
C r
Mo one
. ave-I ._._.i.
Trotter ii
Tole Room ___._.
Holmes
Gcmdy __...._._r
,___._--
'-J.... =5©§,,l..Qc/v92¬. C.rwF<f'° I_'____ <- -15
__ §The Washington Post and AF
Tlmen Harald
The Wcuhlnqton Dotly News ____
The Eventnq Sm: ___.n__....i_
NOW York Herald Tribune _i_
New York Journal-American __..
Now York Mlrror
New York DQLIY News ii...
New York Pus1_______._n.i_._
._ _ _ Tho NII York Times _,__,____._
1 The Work||'_____i_________-
The New Louder ____._._---
-'IlI!INcnlonc1 Observer ,_.____REG, 29 ,1; ¢ 5! ',A1'he Ilull Street Journal ____.._
~e";-
' i u 0 I
-- lb$175 a
R01" nsconoenom46:m 9 1962 MR5 Q52
vv
_9292Ul§ 92HO92l'. J-5-Bl-J
{ 5! ,5! : Tolsozt
4-- ' it 1; .-. - g-' __].--,_1- I
. ..._' . ,. -- -. .~=t' A.
-- - 7'". " .J J-: -. *:--._ ',--'<f_'_-;_._d _. -1 - ;92.,_ _-it?-i Y '_i92"S.":.'»-_§£;=.s:"?. M -:3:-d_ - Qxieqn 5 fCourt . -~"* -~ - - -
it -_-;_{:};§-_92',j=.'&,?92.§ Fist-:2; M
_ _A.-..._..." Qurl!
1": __ __ ..a
~*rw;
-=1the -- .;:;~he :1 _=,. V I V_.- :_
I16 -
Solioishy
. n the heals 0! lai
or whether the Constitution
has been violated. they
should he able ll92"Y¢1'!. know
the law or where to find it,
and be thoroughl! fllfiililr
with the Constitution. They
/should not he imlliiciana.
"Frequently eases are de-
cided on a_ basis. Onesine mu claim some law or
the Constitution has been
violated. How can that he
possible? H they all know
what the Constitution IIYS.
how can a decision be other
than unanimous; one way or
the other? ~ '- i -
The questions raised here
In only difficult in answer
iecause the writer apparent-
ly cannot envisage the Su-
preme Gout, whiclfconsists
§ia|e men appointed foraim oi whom are lawyers
_=ki1ow the Constitution.
Inflhe Constitution. like the
». nndments, 'is I a
- ¢M="."!!£P*e,i
I30inr
lmmqimson no
FOR INS
N litionshin E " " =
n|ent_.asad
because in"
forced to -
the kind Ill
Goyemnaenf
miislllli rockets,
etc. These clnnot he made
by small enterprises or by
s single company. Some I100
American industries played
a role ll the Manhattan
Project which produced the
atom bomb. The application
or the antitrust laws to pa~o~Jllljlon will have to ha re~
in rpreted to meet tigse
conditions. ~
Or " to give -another ex-1
ample: villages and even
small towns _sre being 08811-'
ed and more and more peo-
ple are moving into hrze
cities. The urbanization or
__our population has raised
inany ui1estions'?n' interracial
relations in a country where
_there are about 19 million
Negroes, many of whom have
in recent years moved to
large" cities. Some have
fought in two wars abroad.
Others have been ts éoiiele;
They have raised questions
ls.t0 their riihts under the
Constitution which the Su-
preme Court had to hear. ;
A 5-to4 decision ls in no
manner a violation of pm-
priety; lt simply means tint
nine trained lawyers of dis-
tinction have reached dier-
ent conclusions in their inter
-preiatioactthanneclause
H=r»'_:a' . -1 EH .55
,_i"i_r92_-,.J " ' .a'.
J!- xigiii 21 V557-_:__, __._._..--nh.2-
:_' Z-be 5."
Constitnaq - ' = -
aiuutimhviaithan. Rt -n;*=¢jir.»;,a ~=_ --ewe .1 -
A 1'
i-lust tho attau used aaif
is. Ienerally
Justice Earl Va:-run, -who if
being held responsible lot llll
desegregation deeil, - -drthoufh nine Justices were re-ll
sponsible lor I. .,,,_,_,_-;
a fin attaekh on 'poiltiesl',|asu§l:o an uuueaas; iii iii; %
Chief Justice Warren, el-
though Chief Justice Tit and-
Chief Justice Hllllsel were
politicians before they Iound
their places on the bench.
Hugo Black was I oaters
an_|:nas,1nniapanpi-315$been a member ti ll
Kiux Klan; yet today he la.
regarded as the most liberal
judge on the bench. Jnstinl
lessor and was legrbd as a
radical; todsytbe probablyI
Felix Fra.nkfurtu' was a [Riki
the most correctly oriented
and conservatl-U! member of
In a word, my
--out ought to take a trip -ll
Washington to see the Su-
preme Courtaiai wort and
then be would understand
what a magnificent lnstitih
ticn it -has been throughout
stators. And he-op-'"""' '-
rend a [ood' biog-splay if
Chief Justice John Marshall
to learn how the Court earns
to be what it ls.
B cw It-P-I
'* II. "°.*P!""'Mohr in.
Cnlluhun _Z_-
Cenrcid %_ e_Loach ____.
eEvans
Melon
new
n LiTroug
Tole Room _..____.
Holijnes ..__---
Gcmdy ..___._._..._.-
or»?
r/"/
U_.g/
Q.92/
The Vlciahinqton Post undi
Times Herald
The Wczshinqion Daily New! _
The Evcnlnq Slur __i___--
New York Harald Tribune __
New York Journal-Americh .-
Naw York Mirror i.....__
Ncw York Daily News ....____
New York Pant
The New York Time! _--
The Worker
.-.-n"l"'
C.
7.
in.;
R
7 ' _
1,. *3 .
-. .1:
g~:_-.-.
8
I"Y ...._
. P _. ' 0°
422 - , I __a.. . .__--- - . ;_-___ "" =,_._ .-T. - .Riv 3 I B2!
--Q
4 ,,,,@:' _. Tale H-* - *'§'_';. 1; , >1-'_~ e-;.;»*- ' . 1,. » '2 92 p_ _.- - i - _ if-_ .- " =~ 1- w - _: ~ V . _r ,._,,'I;r'
92 .~ -- =1: __ -_'- .»~- -" . _ ~. . _ . . _ _ Kb -.
.
_' ._, ,. -. .-,.; ,u_~., 4;_.__ _ . ,_ . - -"3-lp*,<.p .., . ~ I - 1, .e > _ _ , -,_5.11I_ a _.,.92._>-rain.»-=~4l-*- >2»-;
- ; "aw .-Y.-hi. .1 ' -- ' ' Y , . _ . nit . r ' _ ~ ' on . . , r. .-.-,- - I ~ ' -1- _ ., -e--|I-y-F i _--~. _. v , .< - ~ . ,l i _92 _ _- - , ii _ r -
D
.1
i; F '._"
THE 6-2 DECISION L
_, f Don Irwin . - . "-
_ __ f _ 92 ASta'C:orre:p-ovident _ __ 1;, " _- " wiislmra-ra1i.'m in e poigrywi Ilveepinl 6-to-2 |§e_cioior_1 thaj._ijo% imi to for;-Z!-e-..',":="
group of urbin vat-era in Tennessee ioiue for rcvision_
_t,he mu": iegisintive distra-:t iinel. Thane "toundoriee "
the district trap which st:-be Senator: 111.6 FWDne.sunin.- "vie are chosen have been imchntitedlince 1901. despite 3provision oi the at-no 0ODB$llUlJ0l_l;l'BQl_§lfil1l mmrwa _ »every'deeuh.92 .-=" ' --' Althouzh the court; ninjorii! recommended noihtnt l
cepttmn.hecueberemnndedmati1rr..iudzeoom'th _'
ashviiie, in tindini upset precedent and procziee undqf
hich Federal 000114 11170 l'01.md redistrictinl d181;Ii1!-OI W -
he "po],ii.ical dispute!" outside - ""
The majority was accused in 1 vigorous disseni bimuoo roiurnouurw or 1-"mono; ' _.i pr e 15;!-_" I
opinlm an _psnert-inn at deltructiyil
he Ill it dilllrill "lI'I1'll;'l11ihB hi the Ultlfl " '
"rt my wail woo |_5lI'0lII.Itl:iI§Qi1Ufl'll the diam}!
- ornn cl tho supreme low 0! the"!-sud In um. wait mice or
-"ii probiwii. =2-in in-oar; ezitanil-ad i.:_p.-.p92:i=r 4-..._.....""*'.
which um oouri t. pronounoef Juitice Preqkiurint. , ' .-4. _,.';*'.-,. "We that kn court: authcritr rule an "p|1hlic~U Q V.
. A,--:._, , JR é' Tqvel
*;_.,_.@ '4: '.":92.¥] a
.» -,3 ,-»
..
J".7. FA
J é e ,~»_¢_"_ gr > L»
";1i1éPBi;smNi'1ir10i¢r'-~-_~_:,||,_._ -__ __...'_1F---->4-' --q-.»-4..=_;- - -A---:_ _----4;"'f" '"-* -'-' " "
Mo r _.._._._.....
W j Callahan _.___
: L7I Evcma
°°"'E
Hasen '
*-" Sullivan ._......._...'
III
= O
C/*
- ~ I V .7 ' , - .'J -=81 e" T '- ~ " _j'. 7-. '4":"£ v .'_- ,-92_--- . ' -o -J-V -5-I "J':_92-Fr-_
ooiqdiianit law, .f=_-*-3'»'._§:'¢'s=np£_=,»:':§¢:¢a6i1n1ip|=m+q1aomsm¢oai¢ ' _'
gcjreggtiva fI_'0II F1450! _ Ciibmty 1-epimm 02,7247 r" " '
re1'n'eaen£cit£ve_f1-om tiny §J'cho_l; Coun
_"' eeeiits 938 of
;1!l-i811 93 to om; -.; -1 ,..
917
K -QTT1, _ .*-. ' '_.,:':._,__, 1,55 ' a._ d
7 ""_'.-'.__' 9;-. -F-';; .Q
-e _r on to =»1urI=Eis11w 'I;l92ifvrwI1iI':i:.'. O -§§§1n Ziooi-.F@a92." - 9- ~ - Q M 1-» The ooo;.Eion"iu"5£iiBod the miidiir oi an mempi by W8 E/l92 Q» 92_.b*4 7*»
Timon Herold
The Vlanhinqion Dali? News _._./,92WI92 or .ri_
r w92
6&5
eoourifl!udich.lnaIe1'?'_-j_~:i.=',.~~,1 u.» 'The Evoninq StarNew York Herald Tribunc AL.
New York Journal-Amcrican __..'
New York Mirror __¬_.___..__
New York
New York
The New York Time: _i..iDally Nawl ___i__
Poll _,,i._i._i-
The Worker
The Nuw Leader _____¬_-_-
The won gmooi Journal ___._-
i
-_
-kI4i
s
' at--.-1 .4".-
i-.'-P_ _-w
-xi1 ,4?
_'._.r.
M
.. .._,L
;
-an
__»
I'-"LIE
ow
prevailing opinion, which held
that the oourtl ought not to
ter this political thicket, but
ouid leave redistricting prob-
-- to state ieirialaturee or to
r breaking from this posi-
yeeterdar. Justice Bren, - - held basically that courq
have constitutional authoriw
e field and that the isu
- ed by the Tennessee cs-se
are "Justicisble"; that is,
iect to settlement by court de-
cision.
As a prelude to this nding.
Justice Brennan recited the
substance at the cosnpinint
brought to the hhh court two__7 wf
/K ii
-7.". " 1
92
MONKFromm
ooniti
it.illIIlil'°II'
.¢_
|_
q92
3- r-if . ,
-1!-
. r K:._-_.t_ E;
- -
t .-__ if;
.1: -
P1". ,
Q1_ -1-, ,.'-- ,,.,_ __ W ,__ _ __ ¢__._. ~- _ I W':'_. ""1; F J F 7% Q IQ -"' . '-:;_. . __--. _ ' _ _ 1, 92._iV ;_ A|I"I"'l> ;_;_. -._>',_,:|,__- h ~; - . .. +*~-- --45:"-.'"~§.;}--r.,'" . .1. -~ - '" , .' .. -. -:_ K"
..__ W? -.- Y -. ---. .». - . .. - 4.»...--~ .
I.*1 "X
_,. _:=* _'.,.:__._¬.__.-__._:-_ _ _.'_ - L?-,5.-_-_' , t ._ s ,5!»;.. "* --+»»~. '.-'- ~ . ;~'-"-*m~=~-
to "=o"f we-to-t-s A 192- J _,._e
eiverttlneai
watuathepowneotruralareu
~tico1l1alHntlat92ue|!ro|n
amonzqrerthmgntbe
oomentr-ldloqatpnottLuna ». . , -,5;
.j;P..}. If-I L _-A zl :91-
aho
eq-rypeadlug Qlie:-5
lI|lll'l'U- ' - =- l-.Z"* ':.;.*-='.=-. "_ _ ,
ntthoulh1» mum In the 6¢¢1li0n.H¥°!'lB48§lN¢. etwnrnerl I14: -
seritetion fewlnl from Ierrrmonderin: ll.
I mum out or we !"*°'lI'
'l92enneuee -_{- é ,- .1 1. _ _-'__";. 1
ail. the hizb court: pro_no|.;ncement yedlr;
to have 0. greater Impact onllaenoan
prlordee1sionlntbieoentIl'l'!. - - -sf
- Citydvellereee weI1aao1ei'a1|otnrbo1i92|.x'e|ohaDeI .
» _the'dec-iaion, deoeribina it on an opnorhmitj -to pin oqultp -
§..r..*= renre...-.=-.*.=.m t.':".e:|-5-letdve 11-5_uun1=1pe1 Asgoetatlon described the rulinz an pmblbly.
tne nznmcantthm anythlnl !mmtln_eom-th|.eea--
new-.1-.m¢:mem-.tne dedetoniéerdaibal
apecmoally with the question at fair representation in
ewe Lekmlemu-em -* _ V . "
_But the brood sweep of its meeeaae maywelleddupto
this: 1 - -
Federal courh now are given the authority to rule on
whether state: are fairly and equitably apportioned Io that
me p o! lawmaklng bodies ietmlr representative.92- ~ rurmei-more, 1! the court: decide there
92*.r:a.-.1-ea:""*ecorrec .
. Al has been true with the
tupmme Court; 1954 decision
kmaehoo1mte¢nuon.u:1enr0=-
es: of imnlementlnz the MI
.1aw of the land" hid dill!
yesterday could be tedious and
may take time. . - ~
r In other wordl. Whil 13¢
lhlgh court has launched the
7tunen.1 procession tor rural
Yeomml of mm. the oort-oil.
.1153 pm; c1'|,$y-quilt IZIOG?-I hi
nezouate en route to the:- todbbe-ahndmartmPr
-i..¢.n-.'~.J& - - " ."_;..
~a!::E5&.w»7- Q-" ' '". ""Y*-"-'4
W .
"1-=1nuiijf*"*f
; ' " Jit-
lmabnr, n _-
l|e_.
-8en.!etauvu-.ahoah1|-ye:V tbedeoietonlillun
lmplementan oi he
memlneotm:rceut|mtion-"-
Mr. Rhine. former dweteident
tho.Amer1canBr.Alool.a-L;
andcurrent1yehatrnu.n'
the I.3l0c1atl0Ill Intern»-
tiona! Committee on World"
Peace Through Liv. sold the
elect of the decision will be
to revitalise states. Thereby it
eetuallr ahould reverse the
o-em whereby local govern-
ment! have been rluhinl to
Waahlnitun lot aolutlnna to
problem: that rural-dominated
Legislatures refused to reoo:-;
nil-e and cope with, bl added.
The Tennessee oaie val
started by a group o1 citleem.
who complained their Consti-
nol rightl Ill! belnl
pled became u Legisla-
ture refused to reooportton ltei
membership to keep poo: wltl_1_
-the ewlteh in populatlon '
Tarme to cities. ' '
q!!l'UB.. one relnnt-01.n"'i.ra Hoora "woo-"*6 T-ww '
1...." .:::."m"%%:..'?;eentauvee ae :00 reeidlnb 1__;-.-vii. -_- , '-I. " 9 _ r -
¢_ I lee - - . 1. . .. . . .
.,_..!,v,,_,,.4,.,-,,,-92-_,..'. V - ',.--_.-' .-. ., Z g ._"-::a|1Wi*1M' ._ '-'.
t ' anqr -. ' A ..,.,_- '
e ,
,0 U Y rr*;-.~, '|.- -.. ~- ._r-.-'
.1 -- ....
:1
#3
"1
But
ittereuy. Its
the farm
eomnl.51;
nINll~ ~-__ I ~___ _____ 4~-Q V 7 A 7 _,_V_ ___ _
O-20 Rev. 3-2-62!-.. ;, N e» ,/*
.., l
I1 I-
92 . _ xi
* IBOUT CQSES UNTIL NEXT NIL SUHIBLY ICIBSII V§ILY I
I MP392_, r ____/ ols on
4lV%w;
_1 ,1,-_ |-_I92v-. n A =,»,. '1!"11-1:-1 °i°;-. '&-=e _ .1. 1 el .l '
u-" -.hmm,;___
"Pele. Room __.. ' - -_. W u Holmes. Lur_, Gndyq,:. - Ir A - _,v1 4'" M
I:-._ '
an-as "N
uasinqgnn m: summ :11-mu: mu Ill tim-fsuczs rm rut err ac
0
mu. =he most surutn to IIIIT s non vzvuanm =
an FLORIDA nwouznc an s mum: count us luzaucnn ansnxr 111 usxcrunonI Jusrlcn cnmzs runs u n uzcnust nu A ussucctssol--nvaou unrrt-4: mu: us st m*mu:a
I! H: mun.III #0811 AIKEN FORIIALLY INFORM! 0; :%TTAKIIR'SIITIIEIIII IT SSIOI. III EXPRESSED O IIJUSTICES AID PI THAT UHITTQKIII UOU PLETE RECOVERY.IS I'll! J5 II PD TU . gUSTICIPQTTIII TIIUA QTCH ll SUIIIIGS TIOI IT III
D WT!!-
armu. noucrrr av 11: use
c m: PRACTICE or Lav sun:an no: IAACP 1s rlmirn IN , Q
1. pusmiss. . I ._ -. __, _ Q,
" %<J-4,2H!
r .
s g
éii
- -zw
y?
#-
,;--
_ »-1 -1*
1-, --
K"1--§?é
- iii
'<.J'_7
-r
.-- .e_ _
1;.-"'~. ' '-- A4 -'::_ _ -~-
YORK Ill QCHOOLYSZ
W
1|
H
U
H
ll
llor oas
llN IRIIG ISSDCIICOHHITTIE Ilnglg..! C3 %
1
'4
8111'! IIS TIYIII Tl IHSTIIIC IIACP
°::s§s'1-meson I ansou or mun urusns ufu mu to mi |.r:1s:.mv|: nwrs-mum:9;: I: us camcrtn or coumm.u § nsun tnscom. cmcn, asM issii I ' 7
ll TIIII FLO! I
GIBSON, Q 2IIISIIEIT O T
HT!-HONOPUL
POI Till PUIIPO
WI T? FATAL-- IE ISSUE 0
CIVIL TRIALS OF
CRAVEL
MEI I
3A
<-r ' ; _JQ Z'
0'-no Ru. a-2-on
:¢;f:_. ;ig If o
uni "
I i P _
-
an ,
u-5O ' 1 lson
' _ I ont
. RI
9292
Q 5?.- 1- ';'>92""
UP 8tarts RIG!:A§i¥IGTUN'-THE AT UOULI RE
mt run mu01%, sronsoam. s conmm:
mt nous}: sauna
nut 11' ms ntvn n Bi-Z6-2 ' L _
AR! OHHITTEE TUIAY APPROVED A,_ ,__A- K K - W; »__,,1. . _
. I F
' 92. ¢!~92§ LR 1&1 ' r
HAHN IHIL1--
* _kA_-i-1nI
Holmes ____....._
Gdndy. Room __...
8 FROH IIPIIG OUT %TATI LI! II -I COMPLETE CO::%lC gan nnunni I. Tn 0-vn , or tnrnovzn IY 11!: Julxcxni com-um:
1 transn son: iousts urromzns nscluu:THE RICK TATESQOI THE HITTEE -
92
A IRA
LEGAL
IT BECAME L
OTHERS FEEL
HANACEHERT.
ATLEGISEBEI PROIISI
E CEHAIUEL
GI THE IIL
O-I9 Rev. 3-1-62!
O - O-~-1|--q:_;-- - --1-' 1: - -__.,______-___
Tolson _i
Belmont _i
Mohr L
Callahan hi
; Conrad_ K '""" ~ DeL.
I}
L 1-
I-92-. -'1...
'-unt:
., 1 g_
-4 k
e%.%
. -gig
"1; ~e'_
- e-Y.
0-iI, i.
3,-5 we ,_ ill-'8'!" T '"'_ ";"~'-1-:,r: -Q I .L _ ' 'f_.-V! -ii, ,_ _r_ ._ _ ~ *1 , 1-..,,_,__' -
Be:i.ne16'C. mm. I4. retired
icpty eier-i of the ' E-um-e-me
Court, died yesterday at Car-
roll County f3-enerll B08!-ll-1.
Westminister. Md" 0! injuries
reeelved in en automobile ee-
-icident e week em. i -q Ir. $111. who begun workina"10: th upreme Codrt II n 14-Far-o1 lervedunder six Obie! Justices. t
P He was in charge oif the dock-txbetml hie retirement in
8Y 92
I Mr. Dilli. 1 long time WashQgcton resident. moved » to4; ernesboro, Pa., when he re-
itired. _ K71 _ He attended every oi-Iming ofthe courts term since hie em-
1,1 Dloyment as a pale, se-id eoun.
Maiden. Following his retirement,
he made special trips tram
;W5yne&bGl'0 to'be preeent at
each initial session. _
i. Serving as cierkmior five .----.... L... m- an-A A 1-er '1I 1:1.?a7;;a ;;:-..;.;;§deputy clerk from 1&2! un
his retirement.
Hr. Dilli was e mber at:71: Columbln. Huoréc Lodge in
l .nZ£1T2;§l2;I§mn° n.."£f;2"E-£2end Rotary Club and the
waynesbur Presbyter anChurch. '
ll his wife, Mrs. HelenIS erman D1111, and info deu3h-
/W-f'Reginald Dillifies, 95 §.RetiredHighCourtAi§Ie { ,
necmuu.e- c. mi} -he -
945 Phil-0!
ters: Mrs; Keith Kelly of En-
eiiio. Ci_iif., and Mrs. Harry
Hughes of Port-Lasutey, French
Morocco, end the ¢rendc.h-dien. ' -' l
Fume;-al services will he held
at; pm. at the Grove Funeral
Home, Waynesboro. Burial will
be in the Burns H111 Cemetery
there; '- -
-Mn. nun was renamed in
serious condition with heed in-
juries at University Hospital.
Bpltimore. _. ._ ,' ."""."-"'-
'1'"-i---1-- ! EVMal one ____
' ' Y Hoeen ___i_
Sullivan
Tuvel
. Trotter .____
Tele Room
Holmes ___...__-
Gundy _____i-. I '
/./
-er' 755514
The Wcxehinqlon Poet and _,_
Tllnel Herald
Woehlnqtun Dell ltwe .iEveninq Slur iii
York Herald Tribune _i.. L.
92 The
The
New
New York Journal-American _..
York
OrkMirror __,...._.__...i_ New
New Dally Nev-re____.
Post _..,i__ii New York
92
f a ,1»-_ , ..an
*5
¢-.
I %'i
4.a' 0
w
o-1: tn». 3-2-on
i
i.
i
I
i
i
K
I
l
i
3
I
1Al,
an g -P9-1
.,92,. - s O
_ ;_a.:-;__' Tir-
i=Y5*eW<"* .~*¢.~=~1t
!l_Cl§l.f_i_ J;
_ Y ccessar! _in theoouroeofupholdinzsconriction. _ , I
The case involved Harry lanna. who was convicted of
nfusin: to answer questions before I New York State isallve
oolnmittee investigating possiblecorruption in the state parole? _ "_°"_'f"°,,5.*f".;....{,i_""
Iltcm. ' . -
Lanna claimed that he oould
not be constitutionally punished
tor-refusing to answer the cun-
mittee'a questions because a
conversation he had with his
anther in iail had %n ela=
tronically intercepted and rec-
orded by Btate officials and a
transcript of the conversatlo
had furnished the basis of th
committee's questions.
Justice Stewart, writing the
unanimous opinion. said that
the record showed that at least
two of the questions which the
committee asked were not rc-
lated to the intercepted con-
versation '1he.refore, hs- said.
..=.e mp:-me ¢_.!ou_=-t did not
have to go into the constitu-
tional question of whether the
use of electronic eavesdropping
in this can violated Lanzrs
riahts. - s
P-Qsita &i-mefnte, l.!o92.!eeee'
Justice Stewart commented.
however. that it was "at best
a novel argument" to our that
a public jail was the equivalent
of a man's house or that it is
a place where he n claim
constitutional immunity from
unreasonable search or seizure,
as electronic eavesdroppinl
under certain circumstances
could be.
It-isobvious,hasaid.thata
.*:".. she:-u com er the attri-
butes of privacy of a home. an
automobile, an office or a hotel
room. In prison. he aaid. oi-
fioial surveillance has tradi-
tisnalisl-heen the order of the -.m= - fni vvur -mu-.-.. tr-dis .11-:*.~.=-.-.,r cwI Eleven. iw "wholh oi-in oounnmntr"
I ITO!!! JlI.l4I-iii, Eiiwlnolqguss. J
China! Justice Warren uid
that in his opinion oomments_
like Justice Stewart: can lead '1
only to mislmderstandlng andconfusion in future oases. l
Expressing regret that Justioei -Stewart. in mun: the uwu-ll
mous opinion. departed froin
the usual practice of refusingi
to reach for constitutional]
questions not necessary for de-
cision. the Ghief Justice Wrote:
"What makes this court's
action singularly unfortunate is
that the State courts. State
ofiicisis and the people oi New
York State have uniformly
condemned the eavesdroppin:in this case as deplorable."
bites Freed PrisonerI
*7
|
1 The Chief Justice quoted re-
rts that a New York trial
t Judge released a prisoner
...thcl:t hell £ could con-
uit his attorney. the Judas not
dwt after the
__ |_ l g'.._---no-.- lsalllluvg 4__n 4ljllalia in Uni u@s@>va 1...
*4
al --u
vite'ofi'ioia1law _
intheionzrurucanbe
harmful to our soeiew
Justice Brennan protested
éw'hat- he called the courts
92"a':-aruitous exposition of grave
q constitutional issues not be-
. Tore the tribunal. -J fie tenor of the ooul'ts|
i wholly ur92.n-..ce%.ry commt-s."
Julicc Brennan trots. "is sut-
1 ficiently o|:ninouIto Justify the
.st1-onsest emphasis that or the
. abbreviated court of seven who
J participated in this decision.
feqer than five will even inti-
1 mate views that constitu-
itional protections azslnst in-Vii? of privacy do not oper-
iate or the benefit or persons
i --w'hetlier inmates or-viii4n1-
insb a isii. . . .'. ;*.'_i=~.
* Justice Brennan. whom the
Obie! Justice and Justice Doua-
Ias Joined. referred to the hot
that neither Justice Frankfur-ter. who is n1. not Justice
White, who came on the bench
i after the case was srsued. took
The
Th8individual contuina.cy.' J -1-.. 0 Tolson ___._.___JV , _ B-elmont i
'i Monr _._._.._____
Callahan
Conrad ___.._
J . DoLodch
Evans i.__.__.
Malone
Rosen _.__._.._
Sullivan _.._.
Tove-1 .._.__.i
Trotter i._
Tele Room __._
» olmes
" . ndy _____.._
3 .
f=9292. M /
e Q5 -
s -11'
=
I
TC? Cl.iF?il'i 0 ZliATEii_¢_iL___-5+new f_ue__~_uu_¬___ -
useless .FiI_£ mo mlwiiiii
.=
. ?~ju_;
h
* it
P1
3;-'Q1 I
; 920-ll Roe. a-2-ea! A--"'
Q-to--sq
'920
4» .§§:'l*;"-I. awauurlnar R -i 1' - '
3 The supreme com today-re-veraed= the convictions oi
nix Hegroea convietedot a breech of the peace after tour of
them entered a hue station waittng room reserved for white
people in Shreveport, Lt:-, -'.!r=. -2- Y.-
Neither the unsigned opinion not the brie: seeking high
eouit review specics-y reterred to those convicted an
T om the brie!
ted them as aayinl the! were
tin: tor a bus to Jackson.
him. Item or the Freedom
Rider demonstrations last year.
The court acted without
hearing arguments in the case.
-eterring to a previous deci-
'alon in ita first and only sit-ini___ ______ _______i__ __ ______ ____Y__
3 Justice: Critieiae Camnenh by
Stewart. Page A-97*-_:v_~_'__-,-, _ _,L~__~v~__4
ease. the court said the only
evidence to support the charge
at a breach ox the peace wasliat those conetiotaitrera vio-
*=at11i' i custom "hie. at-e.'=ted
people in waiting rooms accord-
ll to race. "a practice not
lllcwed in interstate trans-
1
H
-1.;Q1_Pedem11ew." 0 __' iportation iacilitiel by reason ot
Y" Vote 1| 1-1 0 e
" In the -alt-in decision. the
111811 court based its reersel on
the narrow sroqpd that there
was no evidence to support the
conviction.011.5%-ii noun
court should have heard argu-
ment on the case before actinlt.
Justice Frankturter, who is ill,
heck no part. The courts vote
.-was thus I-1. .
, nae court! two~paee doc!-w
aion noted mat four of the nix
persons went into the white
iwailig room and refused to I0
to the Hesro waitini room
when approached by Bhreve-
port police. The other two
%"i i1"i'w :i*-ti:-I
nearby in the car which--had
Hon. '"
.i oi onnote ' reh_T£..£}.L w-ms -
was no evidence 0! violence and i
that the six were quiet, orderly
M W11"-;. '1'!" °P."!%°" . Hiected the finding ct the trim
Judge that the mere presences
of Negroes in the white waiting
room was sufficient evidence of i
abreachcithe peace. I i
~ .' Twootihlontha t
fIhe would-be travelers all
received substantial sentenceaj
Two women who entered the
hite waitin: room were each
ntenoed to serve 16 den 111
Jaii andto,DI7aiineotl_1t092
or serve another 80 days. One
of the men was given e 30-dam
iail term plus use tine or an?
additional 30 life. i
r-The other man in the wait-
ing rooin was sentenced to three
months in lali and fined $200
or an additional £5 darn. - ~
As for the two men who did
ct enter the station but were
onvicted as principals. one was92 5 t __l mont, - i - . 92
Q. "
fair labor in-a|:'t1eil'I'ia'iI'pi'|I_~iongedwdieautl Ili IQINKAuto or era.- ii -J2..Orde1-ed lBI§'l'i@llI$ I l_'
suit over distribution or waters
ct the Cola-ado-II-tin in kn!-h-..
Btatva, The leeiliun to
hear the caae It a Joond time
was announce! in a mu order
which elva no reason. The
can-had been armed betoze
the high, tribunal for more
than ll hours, bennninc iaet
Janulri l and concluding onJanuary 11. - - 0
8, Refused to review the eon-
viction of the former preaident
of the Newspaper-and Mall De-
iiverers Union on chalriee o!
obetructiris commerce W ex-
tortion. The case was bronchi;
to the high court by the for-
mer union president, Sam Fold-
man. who was found guilty with
others of extort!-mt $45,000 from
a magazine and newspaper
wholesale distributor.
Irvine Bite an underworid
*7 "15 DY livew ermine-J
teati:ieeum:r'e1¢mm' "
vliute ameethtl92 tonand threatmeqQ92¢m"y[ ri gnfilbe it they failed tof|:i_i-1
whatever yqg;with reupeenlau
ix Reverse _ __0 4Revmeo,b1a4,.|y,m
ntenced to three months in
oh gig lined $200 or an addi-
ionei 45 day: and the other
as sentenced to 30 deys in
ail and fined $200 or an addi-
icnal £5 days. _
In sentencing them. the
Louisiana 11-Idle said the Bent-
enoes were motivated by "18
court: desire to do what it
can to maintain the relative-1?
hannonioua relationships in this
ommunity that have existedin the peat betweigcthe meetgm to prevent ident: in
Shreveport that can have herdiy
any other conciusiori-400090-411 prought the sixjo the but |t,aTLim_m_mn at we mime
2* youth h bad -ham tum.92 m°wlII;1rieonmant.:.:_er 1-I
-admitted I robbe qlg|,|ig3
if
I
ti8u,w_.w.ho..|rent into
nape: diatrititltion pie
rirnt-dear
re man who am-lite;
_* Justice Dmigig 54?°"w of the berm:
detention. the failure to o' '1"-' W wean. In eaaioe
mediate}! to brim him hefun
I I1-Wenile emu-t J92ilda~e';and ml
failure to see to it that he me
r the advice of 1 mm: or friend
ciueton that the fqg-migqy
tension on which hie-germ.-ti
1-emu violated m. °.m,""ftlvnel rlshu. 1* 9' .Justice cm-ii, gag
Justices Kuhn"M W wurt no.3: 3: :1:-'
vietion without support fromDrveiglte eaeea ma cg; oMohr
A l--mousse!!! °°°"'
eel iii1j*voi§=1,e1wimiuiHé¢'ri@=§*iir§u@éni;" "
'$,_1"o Sentenced oi Sh_rev'ep_ori-___'- -ayumuuorrmmmo -2; Ix-T-GT1?
Evans
: Melon
Fiosen
Sullivan
Tele Room _.___
_ . aunlrnn i ll92.lJ-HIEIJ .-_1-i
R IO ,Gundy
if/
LU
<'> I it
.<_'upi¬<<:m"f;
nu/Hi
The
Time! Hlruid
The
The
NewW0",-iinqion Daily quaEnminq Star _L___. ..L_.|.,_"l
York Herold Tribune __;
New York Journal-American i
York Mirror __...i..__
York D1111! Now: i_.._New
Nlw
NOW
The
The
The
Thy"
Th;YQ_|'k Poll ¬_._._i.._
New York. Timon ii.
Worker _ii__i,,_i__i_
New Leader __.__._....__.._..__
m1_n Q--___a e__.__|ICILI I'll-IIUI JUUFIIUI
No:iono1Obae-rver ,_._-_
Date
52 T-J75 $- /-J to ' ifav
---itM Tove} ___________
Trotter _.__...___
Wuahinqton Polt und_____
r
C
V
A 4
: .'I
an.4»
1.
11
4it
t
L
{,..
-
I1
.¢e1vtn-v. a-2-ea! ' ~7**-I '
TV I . _ - i If ltillljw l {T492W 0 =5 " Q e
i I . O To
Callahan
Col r
1' -:?"":-ark... -_92 I -Z " - ._"f'.---".1':"cio:n~l It D _ I Fa-% _. _; '43.; EvansT. -Q 8&¬¥§§:§e*§t;§-i-";la l ..._--'>.*»».=~*.-1' " . -kit. Mlene
w ,3; - WI _ - __ tad Rosen ___Z_.. 92.»~e ."5.Ji'5' -»b ---r~<- 1 - '- ' Sullivan i_
I I
-. Eu»
F I.
1 bwqevr
tqanseer questioneonthe ground- _ v_ ated_li!_ byan
i were based Information obtained
through the mane ii mum. memento:Tprivicy guaranteed to him Fourth
; Amendment Supreme Court concluded thatI "at least two oi the questions were not related to
L _" the intercepted conversation and sustained Lama's -ction for _9n'th.is'groun' d alone. I
5 But: Justice Stewart: hfter acknowledging
that the Four_1_Amondme'nt'a Qmtection may ea-it
tend not alone to a home but also to a business A_
1'1 0!ce, 1 etore,.a '_hote1 roqn'1,a*n apartment, an _automoblie_.era_ta_xtcab, l vein f_ a-la! ibani
=_e vacy" to be found in such places. yearns to$1: worm we-.=v=.1.t.._o....-. "To be sure, ax" Hr. Jugtice Stewart put it,E.-gay that 1 pebuejeu 1» the equivalent of 1 man:
*'*'house or that""it ll-a92'p1ace where"he cant claim?
,;eo'nstiu_1tlona1 immunity from or ipjPa novel n-gumbnvi But um is not the .l1Qt1mentTuvel __..._._.iv /0 _/ Trotter __._.._.__._
@ t
¢éw~l/L@/
54%
Tele Room ._._...
W Holmes _._-
MW on
92The Vlnshinqlon Pant und__Ql
Time: Harald
* Inna-n--- - --L1, - - A:;_,_, 1-.-1
"1 o-no Rev. 0-20-an T015011 /
Belmont 0 3 M $5
92l
' 1I I1
A
~ee
1» _
-1! I, I
.0
. :1 1 _--
-1- -.._ . 1;.1..--.
-.5 .":,-..92
I-_,§7-1
I,. to
." 1-" v..-
.._ /I
-TIT'I7"' - :*!»'* W"Irry-G0-Ilolui Haleii _, __
r...
I
e me,
1!! !l_.LI!.~
nu: It-Ill cl
":51
Insure
,1
.-'-AL10 o'e1oQ,
t their aelb.
III Wm-en re e
*"-.:.;:=-.,,...*'~.. , -1*{ll Ml NI-Bl. ":-.- F-1'
t _"I have mud; »edmjnli- =e......,.--=- -~=~ 1* aa-md. amt in en: will
now administer it ludldn
L M
In
without pmI
Jultleo Go
ill Q The en I """"""-.¢......n|c_-4 . 1. .1. d
autonlfliuu
-IV"aw-butting
_ -.- ----w-y I-w---_
mbud,
whhlillilMo _._.i______,_
Casper _____i
Callahan
omJd,I
Ma e
5223:
2» n pi
Trotter ___
Tele Room i
Holmes _...._.i.__ GandY
* *4-' ~ . _ ,
92I' _ ,' _X0H0WW W r up m_InNHW$ __-
Wmm
ugh _ _ ____ __ _ __ _ k ?_ N R on h
_ F £8 m%M kw MN %MummmWM£__MWm92" I .¬i__92I_§ n ____ _ _ _! fr V ___ _ _ K?
J'
1..-.
92i-
4
.s-.-
If-I
' F/1
I
in]Il§!f§_lI£Qnrve_lV¢f_
ev. IO-15-62!
§kE$ff4?.§ 711-»
. _
ti7"
--i-¢iii_Tolson /
Beimont
Mohr :_
Casper _i__
Callahan
Sullivan
Tuvel _..___________
Trotter o
Tele Room ___
Holmes o
Gcmdy .._____
R ._ W... i--*'_ .r T-m"l"" -4:»-.--_r-=~" Wu , ....-_. _-r--.c. ."-E-5:,
Q
31,1} -92--we rm -_' the question o£'Stete power
local treasure! IIH which
give etore owner: police beet-
emes it any men "we will
have broken boner end my
be deaths
Theodore A. Snyder Jr of
Greenville aid e property
owner should be permitted to
cell on lew otcen to elect
anjr person he does not like.
Otherwise, he said, the ql-lee
tion arises whether the owner
can ts.k.e the low into his own
bends end use tome.
The blah tribunal heard the
South Caroline cale, one oi
seven from six states, in the
ot its consideration
n
1 3 " l Date
l ...
GONWI3South §lWYel' enforce leiregetion in pri-
T-Olil 31¢ 3119l9iI!¢ C01-""1 385- ate buaineae plecea open to
1l;lll7l:hetI:Ii.tknocksdown- pub1ic.'1'hearg1unentssr_e
amected to he completed to-
eybut the answer mu not
until newt urine , '
r_ -Attorney General hate. r.
Gremilllonot Louisiana asked
Court whet State olciele
can do when racial picketing
raises a thrust of dierrderl or
even riots.
"11 we 1
police to
rst thing
lhlls will
million sei e next thin:go. troop! will be mu-chin:
The Louisiana otciel In
eiendine the eonvictlon atour own
lee, the
the mar-
in, Gre-
bree Negroes and a white.1 ._lunch counter in I Hetlrory
dime store in New Orleansdm-hag 1960 eitin dgmonstre-I
tionn in the South.
92 Constance linker Motley,
cquneel for the Legal Dienle ""ma oi the Naonel Amen-Q
tlon for the Advancement 01
Colored People, argued on be-jg
he]! of 10 Negro lit-in demon-92
etra-mrs who irere convicted; _of trespass liter tting atlwhite-only dining eves: in Bir-
mingham, Ail, etoree. N
She said the 1-rests were it 7
dared by Police Headquarters
without any requeet from util-
cills of the etorea add that the
Negroes were pnoeecuted by
Mthe city even though no one
ll connected with the ltores
leitned eomnlsinis. "
;< ,?911$}
if oTerelé}iass Lawé Are;..V0idQd{man for refusinj I-to er
92
The Waehinqton Poo! and _Ai
Time: Herald
The Washinqton Dally News i__.
The Evenlnq Star i
New York Herald Tribune _.......-i
New York Journal-American ___,.______
New York Mirror _.i_________._
New York Daily News __,___,____,,_,_
New York Post in
The New York Times on
The Worker
The New Lbcldor i____,__,__________;
The Wcri1Street Journal __.__i
The Nililoncll Observer ____i__...
u . /,_, .--'2'_ .uQ§27#??;ww'Yw% -=/ 4nornrconoso -Evans
Gale
Rosen
*i_ 7 7 i "D i iii #'
'_,,. __'_..-.-~
....
-a
4
. ijhg-I
- ;- .*4_'-.1-re.-'.1, ..'
v <_.. ~14i It
$
53- -'
-in V. .ii;-
-.1.' 1
-'5 II .' g/..-92 4
on n aw Ordinance mm
red-ll llln U eet~
tlcllitiee, bultresed by 1
inudve State poiiey qt reel-Ll
Ie§t'e[atien." A .é ;
BirmlnIhem'|eonn|e1,IIe92tp
1. Davin, oonternl by lilt-
ing that the 14¢: Axnendrnen-t
Fduee not reach-.to demandin-
tlum conducted on private
property IVE! the objection of
*1-he owner." He Jlld the reel
ionic in this cue in int of
-trespassing after Wlfllf.$;_192e Court $9 heard
arguments on an nrppeai by
we Birmingham Negro
minletere convicted oi inciting
eoilele gtudeut: to vioiate
trespass law by joining in si
in demonstntienl. The
F. L. Shuttleswortb h und
lentence of 1D day: in 1ind the 1'l.ev.JC.hu-lee Btiiu
Tl! ICIII-E U III!- Tbe Song Carolin: sit-in
ue which the Court was
Itlll considering when it quit
hr the ll? involve: 10
Negro student: errelied It V
lunch counter in Gznenvle.
Matthew -T. Perry, e Colum-
bia, S. C., attorney, argued
flit State ncon ill -
valved in the arrests which
were made by Greenviile
At the very="!enI'i-," be
said, "the State may not en-
force racial discrimination
which expreseee deep-rooted;nubile policy. " ~ 92
In his reply, Snyder skid I
Greenviiie ordtmnee requir-
ing p:-Gprietoru to provide
separate facilities for Negroes
.end white persons probably is
unconstitutional. But be con-
tended the ordinance was not
_ voived in he cue oi the QL-J"°
_ . I _ I 1
-_-
r_ _rt~
-¢ ll
T:..,-.1 "ii": » - I
92-
/1-o-sse -:-ezi
' Mount Clipping in ipoeo Below!I!
! I/F 7 7 __V 7A __ _ if: 7 _ 77!: ___ ___ _ ._ _92___ r_______.--- --;_.¢.;--uun--- _.
l - ih
Ir. Tole-MI----
He. Beimoll
Mr.
_. E6
. l r
1
s-_I|loniyehowinttherehI*
s,.-
' v
E bihi-ihgbnism ense"'¬bn-
92 I i-_
I-1 r itWijci __ ,_ 1-. ;~ W c r r W '
I-_ ___-~__ .3-;_nt.. j . -.~ 1'-. Q -' - ' - - J: ~" < . : ' - 2 .-- ,~ --tr 4" - Fyl-ii-»-.. ._."_ -<, - J . -- '1'». Q5" "'7'?-..§_{"". 1". "i,¢ 1;
. sf 2; . I .1, D -_ g, ._ ' _ {J : ....I.,'sv_ ;_.... . _ . - , .. _ . ._ I . I, ___
-6615 I-0-
- ,", nvmnuunnoouizvm. '-I
Police Supt. O. W." Wilson charged Friday that Americancourts greatly restrict policemen in their authority to enforceiia
laws and protect lives md property. »' f ~i =~._ '-"
Decisions of our courts tend __ -f ' _ ' " ' * '"
to reect hostilities against the Bldfibl dl5¢1'¢P"¢i<'/5 b¢fW'-'-W
police in; cnntiniiing an-eeen. what thepubiieexpecisthepo-
n ticinesmasi-awssin¢yu=.e§1°.§.'.'l..l.§.t.:..1f."ii".,,m -"§i"°_ '1 f -ll? we it =1» we we e he e ' ' ' ' 3
LET_the police have the nu-
thotity to do what the public
expect: to do in suppressing
crime. if we followed some of
our court decision: literally.
the public wou_ld be deifnimding
my removal .with iustioe-'
Wilson spoke at a confer-
ence, sponsored by the NU Law
School, on police protection and
individual civil liberties; Attend-
ing were 150 law enforcement-
experts from across the country. l
_ The unlfortn crime reports
heen n steed and consistent_ "Pt-i WilS011 i iI i I I derc-tilt Qbilitv 1
92 _ J
1 To Be Effective, He Contends
Y
4h Ji¢llC!l!lllQG¢lly&l',"leluid,ll1ttheynlsolhowl
downward trend in the per-
centage of persons convicted
h moot categories of crime.
This may be taken as a warn-
ing" that the scales of justice are
getting out of bpience." -
U I I -
WILSON said two sources ofGood citizens stopped by
the police for traffic violi-
oiu often blame the police
rlther than themselves. No
one likes to admit he B itt'n'0ng._,_he niq. 1 .~ .
:'ih-ere also is a tendency to 1,
blame the police for a high inci- -w
I
I
dence 01' crime instead of recog-
nizing there are many other
crime causes such as sltirn con-
ditions, narcotics addiction, lackof parental responsibility, uncm-Yployment, 'cultura1 iriequalitice. '
end other eocini factors aver
which the police have no influ-
ence control." h-.._....¢Mr. Gill1......-
Mr. Roeen---
_ Sulliven_._-
Hr. TQYQI ---1-
_ ']rn92Z!Ef._..._-»
Tele. R0°m-----
M153 HlmQl..__
Hill Gendy_...-.
____________--I-Q
indicate
newepcpln
92/l- ii
h1cago,I 1.
i Data: Q ,
Ejjiiq: Rd Str99-tk
Author:
Editor: John Stanton/._Zghi cage Dilly News
is
4-
1
I-'7.
5A
IV,
_' _ W v r r ,__ i _ , _ __+..-. ._»%» - .
r
5:
Nib
A
3
1'
A . jbl
-. I
K
l
5
¬
et-
.
vs.
1%-
L.0- 9 [H0 5-62!
»4 l . Q... / :5
4
r;/elf?" e .¢*3:.@¢5l0/
_?___,z=___n_ ,_ 2.?
just acted on a.notha' freedom -use
-Lbtlone lb-ot_h. the %
' t . - -» - .- l"T'---
The head cl'__a. chapter ofN m for the Advance-Ill.9_!I__t _o é ' fore an 1nvestTga'£in§&mann'ttee_of ue
Florida Legislature. The committee
. oetensiblyjvml checking on Whethe! 14fuzzier thin moat. l --.~.- ' .,- _»e -Y
ne; , ._ =_
u Ineeoncun-mg opmmn,Jushe_e_ ht to Associate ;z,l@fe*- "e:>'§f" .e.,._,,***"""'S= owner M-_ _ f Tole Room _..__.__IN1_tsanpomtedetaako'fprptechngour tn. ltalleomes _ er end,l|eee.td,_:; Holmes ______- hbertles. the $921'l>re1.ne C-oul-P has _d the constitutional ptfvileje to__be'92 1_", Gqndy
II mega in a.saoc|atnms.m_ leg1t.1mateor-
Ias went beyond the Goldher-"g opinion,
saying 1 man; associatg no eon- tif g0ve1fntnenl'.."_; Jliliei Black
m another opuuon, said" a man hll I.
rig-ht to asmciate with eennuunisteoralleged communists or sympathizers had ._lHY°11¢_ 915*: - P - - ~ . - _. _.__:;t--1". -- .1 - '" 63. Fff =*-, die-Bpten _ _Ius@ §id&t _ em1edy's
**'**"""""""""""""'*.-.-.,. W-.. .,..e.ce, send the ¬'£a'$_<-,f like I92I.A_.A..C-P %tie-.2! underoath that none ogthe 14 was a memberf_.
u[_hiedmpta.". ~ title 'IIi;ulda't bring
1'61 _1nen1bershIq: list the hearing
roor_n to refer to in sight ofthe coqnzgjbto ; He was, wvlo *1; :-1;;
_ With this type of hair-slicing on both
mdes, Itisnot s_ui-prising the Supreme
in; the cane. The sharpest split, inter-
§1ngly'en0ugh, _wa_92s between Presi-
eieni; lienned-ys two aprpoinhnents to the
_dy'§ newest court who-ointee, vérote the
majority 0p_in=i_0n, whilrh erased the 000-
tempt eonvzetlon of the Rev. Theodore
R. Gibson of the Miami NAACP. Them
was_no adequate foundation" for theFlonda oomnnttee nosing into the
NAACP membership, he said -on sus- . . _ I _PM-">" "M1 a tew ..-en~.nnes had air,--e.-'_.
I I: 5'. tr» .
92" l .Court eptic in several direttiblls in decid- -
JusuEéCoidbéi:g,' Pienaentdecision could be to prevent official
xnvestagntors from_di5I:We1'Ing commu-
mst pe.netr'a.tion of legitimate organiza-I - ._,__n
ons ungtjli Wee too .lateuatil _"-;; n aw: 1:35-
B31888 by the eornmunistg. W I __
--. ' ~ _- »;_I-».~.;-e3;:,_
- irolrld hive th0ugi|t;"' dulrlic'
Wh_1te wrote. that the freedom of
socaationwhich is and should be
to constitutional
be promoted. not hindered,
-lm whioh permits members -
sociatiun to know'_with whom
and affords them the 01190!"tumty to make an intelligent choice as
to whether certain ocf their a53;]3i3t5$
who are communists should be l-owed
to continue their membership.
-Freedom to essociate, like o1er'fme-
gpmsgreleo cimrrles a Jug-92-i nité I153 5 flqihi. . __ '__ _ _=_
J
M
_921Callahan
M1
WV
The Wushxnqion Post anti i
Times HeraldThe Wnshlnqlon Dally Nwlié
The Evemnu Slur id?--Z
Ngw Q1-|; Herald Tribune __i..
New York Joumul-American -
New York M-l1'Jf _._.___-1------
New York D011? NI"! -i--
New York __----------
The New Yuri. Times _....__._._.___
The Work er
The New Léflf
The Wall SI-[_9Ql Jeurfml --i-
Tbe Ncltlongl bbaeri --"'
F
1 41*
A.-:-=
4 -&i|-I ,-:',~ -----_;*-r~~-~ --,_ _|n|-u-i ~-@ __ .
I 2
I
0|
n}l:!1;F*v. s-21-as! P _ T01305' / 0 ' Belmont
_ . Casper
,/"Mohr
Callahan
d
- 92- . .1 ., - . . ' - = Ev I -
. -V #4 -Y-"V. --V ' - . e-'1" _--x ..:». I - ?' - ... 3- .. h ' 1 - h'192;-2 '1 '& 3 Fig.1 92 5".-' ..3i}.i¬rg@"".{:. w ;""§92-x;_; '3 'f' ° . e ' ' . -' _ " H -= -I! . "1 Q "- 94- an ' . *~-ge 11,- A *- _ ' s '-
f*7-»9"f_"a"_________i____ __ _ _ é_ _ ave1___.._i____' » - ' "" -4 " W Trotter-" ..._____
--
1-
.>__ »-».,;_..a e.=-1%-a .»;=_,,e , -;."i.=u.»F.¢..§,, a__-_" ._; ' n ~ ~'.- -" n v: _ .1-1» <~~
II3l1l_ ~L|S¬aSe I - I .
.. 3 -»~,',1 ;92_,_' U; I" _, L7;-I, ¢ - ,_ _~ :-~}_:» u? ~_ .t__ . 1 _., .14 I 92 J If 1-kw~ . I ..1 - '$
-"'1 ;, t92.<»#:1i:,..7&"
1r'_1n-== . ._N.;-"ii-*-V:-,-,-;,..'_" ":TF;'fi"2;'_-;.--;-7,1:-...r ,1. w- . .. |_! 1 '* 1 92 - 1 - ' ; 5,8-;92 ?"§»;-'*~ Byalmeszi-¢:;y5na,<# _ -2-'1 - nmu;!¢h;
II xjaxely, éveu 58¢; eek when st;-f
preme Court was confronted with,ora1 argumentg Q1
J issues as l1l!:p0l"-'3.Ill~,l0 the Na_tion and uto observer: as those it face; hm gm| _:.»ni._v _ M
Wto lnryerl, the mn-
hear arstlmentl on
oqgdesegregation in Yin-92% "
:§A§.|:H_Géi5tg1l, 1EE£!lzi!h!e r:i?reiT Calafiig,
l ' m_.|__;nd a group at citizen-
wggywww-nwwe
- the Court H lling asked;
bold part; of acts of Congftis
unconstitutional. Imtwo more
nummgunawnmamu
WI unconatitucionaL In lt!mi: three id this: mallelléli
1
|
noth?r,- the validity of | sum
4."J!'.!*.l*'.!"".'l!-1 ;92..:'e!1e'!e1._aIemuenii. e_.,-,, -; it _;»--@=@+iFée§
;" Ill 1|! Pfblll-I1the Nation le bro meg.
jnvolvingé deuegiegatisn loom|1$uIr1l|i4:thi~.=._..__ ,,j
Ill~.%ez% .Vn-.being asked in rule rim it
unconstituuanal for a state
Q99; gublie school: ii: 0
county to avoid
awhile, keepina $1-we nchpols a 69¢-' - -_ EWll'll'I1 cloalpgenpablld school: his
watched by other areas la
Deep $uuth ll I WI! U0 W
pane even turlhezgthe
when public 8611001! Will-
delegregated. ._i _ - -~
. in the oier due, the Court
h_ bel_n.g asked]? _l~lY Juli
It meqt nine Nu-I al°
wh_en.!t aid schools lhoald be
'de¢e|1~=aavee_w11:1_ -an
ate speef
' I-.~.,=3T-& 9- 7.3
V A-tlmta, Ga.,'*'!:' deae
Jug-la uchooll, an In PH
yen} troln the highest irade
- The NM4.CP'Lega1 DI-_
" use Fund has asked the. 15. ,~.@2:° _= _//~34 » aw»43?! bmigq TD g.92' a ';f::'2/»4.4.!- at V I§Zi;Il°°'._."f"?
.*_--_$:_- . _ Candy ._..___...._i
I_
%
7 ,6dew
W7/ Th; Wuihlnqton Poll and _
Tuna: Harald1gar F. u.
The Washinqlon Dally Nov! _.........
The Evenlnq Slur ______..._..i
New York Herald Tribune __,__,i
New York Journal-American i
NOW York Hlrror ___i,,__,,____i_
N--. Ynrb 1""m1|.. um.- -.__ .--- --..-y .--.._ -Z-_-ii
_NIw York Post _,___i____,,_,__,_
The New York Times _.__._i._..
The New Leader .__._:___Z..
The Wcill Sine] JoI;ncll _i_.._
The Nazionql. Observer _..__.._..._-_-
Poop1e's' Work! Z.______---
"'ii
MAR 30 1964 Worker _._.____i____.__.._,_ii___9
é=1:-~
I
i
. i/ 92n
1"!.3 .1-tr w.;:.».t..;t
A or zl-11» Ii-, - 1 ".-.. ' *1,-.; -1..r'-- o . -- J-'
in;
, -m _
_- = -"'shoui|l méealn 1964.
},- The Oolondo
- _meniel.s,~perhlIl.the_'
-i--~-~ofitlk1ndI1I!l
,~ Jultioes. They
_ o undee eilvipement use
"' emf logilhtivi
'nt1nNew!ork,
. Ind-Wrllnin
$1. _-
kn
rpest lineal
tlw adopted I
_ane1lm-entdl
etninonehouneot
-onpopulation- . I"on ~"
vl
t leaving those In
I non-population _in anvil!-I |92nnr92l.-,.,.... 3...." ...... _. _. .-_....,-.
1e '1ltt1 redenl" A-w oi vixen any 1:
e! mom than 91 cit?
llers. 3 ~=..4- -H
fps cluuupaj '
t_.l ~The two ease: involving ob-
-iI|:en1t!- will Rive ue I
mother chance to clarify who
ii becoming one of the most
ublesome areal oi the law.$101181, the quelon involvesn picture Tm iqi-|;er!." In Kansas, in quelon ll
1; law that allow: the lelzurpj
and destruction Q oheomi
book: without trial by Jury.
3 The tw0_eit!2.enoh1p cam In-
wolve people in quite dierent
circumstances. In One, wegun §s betng asked whethernot of Congress taking eit-;t_zenship_ away from those wigheme in the aimed tomes
ejorelgn state is .~:mt1tut!on- . iUl"°l92?=I ;!
wutbec efje er QT
ban political prison. f _ fl
The other is {challenge to
_ other Provision of the Inn
Itrlod citizE'n£h1'p_ trom
unlined Americans who re~time 'e§n.ploy0l -the
urtcanndtreclllnhmllldl92 :
u
92_ ¥_a'92'-:n
W, :_,. .,
._,,,_. L fix N
,. . ., - _ow - ~e .-M,||u_.-._ - I |=-92 ".-Q
. - ._ _ .11.- m.
, 92-a.__
_' array 6! dilcult qaeetnieand 1nt,eresn_g2ee:~hns faced
a o_..,,--.';'l 1,l'_92!.'.-'.'_-I'!l-:..~11.=- .5.-'.- tR to .J C1-Fr . ,. , . m~ R1-h ,, -1} , !
,4
<»@»<
F
->
.. ..-
f¬*@%&~nn _ j 7 H 7 777 :i:t '77: l AI_i .-4 a .__- _ 4-
i QQ weT015011 /
Belmon
Mohr
C Casper _________
Callahan
tow;.
H Evans
$523
11*
1}: .
.5-"r.
E
y
»,,- -o.
a.-
.-'
,, _i
l*"?'v_ .
.? Q
,.-.44av
?._;_§f. ,_
.== '
-IIN A %A.NIHOUS and important decisionthe me Court has ruled that indi-
vlual states which have anti-discrimination
hiring laws hare the right to ezgtend them to
interstate airlines." Presumably the ruling
eoulda 1 nlsotoallinterstate carrlemon V PPY-- I the ground and water as well as in the air.
It was in our opinions. just decision. ,
The particular case was that of Marlon pg.
ptiih. He had sought in C loradg a pilotsjob with Continental Airlines. %e was declared
qualified but was not hired. The Coloradoanti-discrimination Commission found the
his race was the reason for not getting the jo
But the Colorado Supreme Court rul
that State fair employment laws ma; not in-
clude interstate carriers. The Supreme Court
and we emphasize, unanimously-reversedthe ruling. It is significant that 16 of the 25
States that have anti-discrimination hiring
statutes filed a brief as friends oi the court
supporting.the subsequently unanimous view.Among them were the two biggest States, Cali-
fornia and New York. on -- .
Justice Black, who wrote the decision, dis-
posed logically of the argument against it. Wethlieve that it is a notable step forward towarde goal of racial and religious equality in our
country_.. _ it : V,r92"{g1'een, 32, a Negro and a former Air Corps i s [ j*_"~-.'- '- r -7" . .-.,
a
t 920table&Ru1ing'. ,3
iGale
Hose
Sulliv ____i
' Tove! iii
Trotter
I Tele Room ___'92 V Holmes _
l J I1 /W '
s.4m==.3I
v-
»
l
92
.
1
I .
The woahinqren P53; and
- Timon Herald
The Wuahinqlon Daily New;
The Evenlnq §tur
New fork Herald Tribung _____i
New York Journal-American
' New York Mirror _
A The New LgqdgfNew York Daily Now;
New York Post
The New York Times __
The Worker __
,8? é Q U2 The Wall Slreei JQu1-nq]
. 1- The NC!i1OI1CI1Qb3Qfye['' aEciJ;h, i Dqie
MAra'?. I563
i
.1
l" i-.1-AEs.r,-' "' - *""" "'1" . 7 _ i_ _ _A_A__ _V
I
I
I
, .
4"" 192. _ ;
.1
.14
i'!7b-356 Rev. 1-1e-eel
92- ' . |,92--we 92_!
' wehavplineh c11m_e'ln the
United States? mere are various seasons
llul one of them, an over-zealous concernfosfthe rights of c:hn'ina1s.'tsEIntinglei-enforcement officials hum their
duty effectively. A few exlmples:" it policeman walking his best in-a New
Yq-I: _ adjoining" a frequesitlyglinrgied :esidentia_i__I}'el. soled a men d:_sg-' gin; a suitcase. "Where did you get irnai
suitcase?" llkd o patrolman. When heto snswesmtzae man was telnet; to_poce hésdquarilh for hveltiseee-*1 --nets mm toi*'n',§192om*o before formallyIt turned out that the suitcase was crsm- '
i med with the proceeds of s burglary. But
-tll pen-oiman-..not the lisrsler. was srlti-,clad when the case came to court. Becsruse
Iedidnoti:nowabur:1u'yhadbeenoom-
mited when,he approached, questioned and
fdeiainedthedeiemil-mt. thecourtmiedtln
' arrest was uniswiul and its evidence of the
tlurglary was illegally _seized,}he_c1ue was dilnissed Ind the burglar west tree.
- * Washington, D.C., man strangled hiswig. bundled he? body into e car end dis-
posedotltinscitydumpl-ls msdeavsguerepo later, thst his wife had been missing! vb days,92and he was picked up by the po-
lice on suspicion of murder. He confessed
f and-cosh-the police be thedump whenethei I "'- ' _,..--_ »
- -935/. _
63 0c": 2. 92954t_ kil ilsount Clipping in 530:0{
me {rm Reasons Lnme l$|Y:'F$rF|'P1
sFail, without counsel ' ore I~
;E-mellow, who no a criminal record going
l-dietuxbil trends" Ihlve witnessed it Inf uyears of law enforcement; an over-sesloul-J
i
iJ /L.-.
eoqise was uncovered. F
was reversed by the
cause, his confession had _In 1957 the madef
s. decision which shoo meat;
ofiicisls thmugl-tout; the nation,
beck to 1951. had been arjresbed for e brutal
rape. He confessed under no duress and-
wesfound guilty. oleft Supreme Court
reversed the conviction because the police
charging him with the crime. He was re-
leased, only to be an-ested for a simsrl
crhnei few years later iii Philadelphils éThese ereoniyefewofthescores, peg
he s hundreds of miscarriages oi justice in P . _recentyean. ' 1;; ;:. 4 or! es! Director 1. sow
We ere faced today with one of the most_
Tolson
Belmont
Mohr
Casper
Cllihg|1______
Tsvg
T" iter _ 1
a°°
HOIHIQ
Gand...
Y-_..
pity for the criminal and an equivslent dis-
1_-egerd for his victims-Y, 35- :1-.__ 0
_ Ihis is one oi__the reasons crimes stein-i
cressing. We are throttling oua_'-law so-_
fol-cement officers with judge-mad_e_ni1in3s
that, stagger common sense. i
;' ;@ l">F.
I' ' g now n'scHiz"o¬E'
46ocT 1 1964
§r " i ,: _
indicate page, nome_6'|-'_'i
newspaper, city and lune.! "
Page 8
Council Bluffs
llonpareil '
Qgyncil Bluffs, Iowa. :.. ,_
on k
his ' "$.13 an ; K
-' ..§92' - .-' -T7. '92'_.
-
I-Ie r
-1. V .'l . .,_- 92 --
Dole: 9/3/54 '""
Edition: ,
Author:
Edlww Alvin I. Piper
Title:
Character:
i
iI l or
Clullllicsltionl -
Submitting Office: O-h.
Q Beinq Investigated
./»a~ 97o?oj>-
rmIf
F' e t . '4 .
w.-2;
-- -I
U; _, 1"es t Q Z
i
'1 l ~e-
¢
5
'1
n.1-Z-a.,-..34: ~
s?
92 ..~__
-1.-
!
. -
noFI"-QQ
0-lg Rev. 12-14-64!_**_.--sr~- nun-r _.. -92r3i _ . -_ --Iii-um--.
' how John-
aeleoted Abe Portas-
pierscnlil iriend oi ion!
standing who has never had
a day: experience on the
bench?-to be one oi the nine
justices of the Supreme Court
oi the United States. This is
In line with the unfortunate
is-end oi the past several
years, _ -- e
Other Presidents besides Mr.
Johnson, Republican as well
as Democratic. have appoint-ed
to the Supreme Court pulltioll
associates or partisan sup-
porters with I controversialbackground. ' '
Just what critctio do Presi-
dents use in making appoint-
ments to the Supreme Court?
They sometimes look for out-
standing lawyers rather than
experienced ludges. but often
there are political inctors in-
eolt'e-*... Jccesi.cr~.-.11.. e mem-
ber of the Senate with a leal
- bocksround is appointed. I-Dd
several men have gone to the
Supreme Court from Congress
.or from the Cabinet.
neral in the Department o!
Justice has won promotion
the Supreme Court. Borne
of these appointees have5 Every now and then 11?. B. Emrney General or Bo cltor
ngade s. ne record. and it is
' ibie that Mr. Fortes may$5 out to be a well-balanced
and fair-minded justice who is
able to forget his early es-
pousal oi "Left-wins" causes
that made him a controversial
gure in the "New Deal." He
tsonly 55toda¥lndho.ss
lonsperlod or time ahead in
which to adjust his thinking
to iudicial doctrines. - -
_ Men in the political iworld.
however, are not inclined to
ihandon their views when
they ascend to the bench. As
justioa. they do nu. usually
in their" decisions forsake
passions or preconceived?e0lo¢ies. Justice Douglas isI
1
4
Tl
1i
1'
vi1i
1 Po
"oouidservectewnu
aoooirimentsl
miembu
has
Q11! previous
Jndicel or
Sdpreme Oourt o
is on appeals courtFederal iudiciary before
in; ion appointment;44>; the Bu-preme Court of titUnited States. - ,
"This corresporiderrhdiscuss-
I the prevalent indifference
the need for men of judi-
' l eTwerience for serri on
highest court of the land.
'58 in I 1l§tC11 D11 OCR In
53:
President Eisenhower nssi
he chose Gov. Warren to'
be Chis! Justice! because or
his middle-of-the-road phil- 1
osophy. What has that to do
with the irlterptetation of the
statutes or the settlement o!
co|!l!'UV¬i'!lEs be_tweel'rc1i::2ens,_1'0
Tove!92 Trotter;fl, /$»&.1§@.l -Viwwu "*"*"
;.Z
RFT"" '!_'QDED
184 AUG II T965
in-up---i______
yiiihiéi s1si1%Ii¬.::l"i_Q;
l'!5'tti.'is"of constitutionality
are involved?
' There is no middle of the
road between right and wrong
in determining s judicial
question. Congress may pass
good or had laws, yet whether
they are Constitutional has to
be decided not on the basis
of any particular philosophy
of governmmt but on their
actual conformity to the
powers set Iorth in the Goo;
stitution.
In the some week of 1953,
but before it was known whomore ti-.=:: cl...»-Tr t_5.e§~ $1:
actually been bad'lY"&Hli!r-
emphasi.sed- There are neat.
and distilliilhed judges b-
on on both state and Federal
courts eminently qualied tor
the judicial and administra-
tive responsibilities of the
chief justioeship. .-_-.__ __ _,__
It may be that the articu-
lation of then and similar
views had an effect suba-
quently on President Eisen-
hower, tor in his liter
appointments to the high
court he nominabd such ob-
jective-mlnded and experi-53%-/1---..._
|__.
.-
,-
"'§'E.92' * l:.EC.i
The! Wm~-- 1
C sper ._._.' _..__-'_
111.1. rvui u Z--_._-_-
Cont " .
_Fn1 *
, Cole
' P IBI1
C .
["
.->
I"
-w1?>4s
Washington Poll and _..._.__..._
Timon Herold
The
TheWcrshinqlon Dally News _7,_
Evening Star ___________________
0-I9 Rev. 5-4-551 - '92
l
t 91$
.13
-
J;
.-
-I1i
é
r
1-;. 1
-.-
-92
,.
"uweivnu
tno | F
F' m "" ';#§I 1- _ A_ _ __ V,__ -- _~_ ' ~4~1-;~:' '/ v
92,...J _b~¢-
s _totewCl1|ef ]¢n§t|ces !§§soI Q 4
~e~w-o» ~+@_s~»+nl~@~»-»st ~»--~» haw-..~ o --owl»M0 m blunt
criticism ti the Su reme Court's
ing cl crime susects is coming
from the annu conference of
chief justices of the highest date
courts. "
I don't feel there is a sound
constitutional basis for it, said
Chic! Justice '!'l.Q_92d¢_92_Pe C;
Garfield of Iowa, the conierence
- lining workshop
llS¢11S8l0l!Il on criminal In
esterdny. A ~ - T
Jurist after jurist echoe
similar sentiments. However,
the conference was expectedto
reject I formal resolution
calling on the Supreme Court to
reconsider last June: controver-
The 5-4 ruling was that
crime suspect mustbe effective-
ly informed of his rights,
ing the rlglt tohave eretained
or appointed lawyer advise him
before police can question him.
A leading fedora], judge who
uldressed the state jurists
conference called. for greateruwsieée of evldgzlce obtained byta in: otlgr eloj cdevlcegp to bslmp the new
restrictions placed on-police.
Ti we take away tne_means oilpossibly soloing crimes by,confession is it octthenlogicul,
that these other means he made 11available?" mu ChlefJudge .1. ll
Edward Lumberd of the U.S.
II! Ciraiit Court oiltppealsint
New York. - ~- = A.
"Asked about the eif
1934 federal law that
interception andIhldahjiirtsts,
ns, dwelled on
they our raised
prema Court: ruling
115- whlltlnawyerlswhen
wwegsu
buCI|;;é:£ Justice Jcsegiieintra-i
rlIwy!1"1lll1 EEEE
ethical hsstsfw
suspect: Ii you want my advi
as a man, tell the truth."
That's ne if it: robbery," 1
former New York rosecutorlg-Qmldons who aattnonthe
said. But ll hesatbird offen-
der lacing Eh . - ,. youwould
to .' ;".»'-.1
N E;-non
Rte 49 'intheirl
.. £1;I."~ _ gnmumom l " ',=p¢.¢'I'llmum the jutlcoaRM u | ViT ?i"ai A
the promo toundoJuneruling. ' " it
A restgtutlons committee
l!12m!1_!t_'1m! to !1.Ilrcon.%n-ee,
but Beilldulotlto ' npmit.Pve been e 2133- all my
life," he laid. Tuireadytodo
mm-eghng."
The chiei jlmtloesnrebolding
their sessions inadvancelthe
Nth annual meeting ul the
American Bar Assoeintimnext
week. 'IheABAn1aolsexpectad
to discuss the recent Supreme
Culrtaen. .»..r; , 4 _'-.1-" . _'Tolson i_.._._
De.-Louch
Mohr ._............._.Z_.
Hick i_:._.__-
Casper i_.__
Callahan _._......_....
Conrad éi Felt ' l
-.1 Gill! -.-i-a-i-
'Rosen .._....._._..._._.'
" ~ ' Sullivan __..... U
Tuvel __...._...._.....__.
Trotter mm
Tele. Room ..___
Holmes ...ii
Gandy
61-'1 "
92 -1,5
r
- l
1
The Washington Post and ._._._
Times Herald- /The Washington Daily News E
The Washington Evening Star
New York Daily News ____i_.
New York Herald Tribune i.,__._-_-....~i-
1'
I
Q
ii
4
Q1-Its-
__-__7Re§f|F1'Z:ti0ns, on¢P.lge judicial j Crinsi
,R.e,port1'ng Are-Predicftcii. | L . . 7 _._._..-_.......,---i
' --?''IIIu-|92 '| _5""B;Pnnn P. GRAHAM T lib? "mid in -wort. Pi-oressorl
Special lo The New York Time: I
MONTREAL, Aug. 6-T'he
freedom of the press of the
United States to printing preju--
diciai artifllls about criminal;
defendants may soon come to
an end, a constitutio I law,expert said two?!
__Er_QL_At'_tl_1_lg1'_ .*§uth§!rland of
I-1a.:-varHI;Ew Ecliool made his
prediction in a talk to trial
judges from the United States,
who are here for the 59th con-
vention of the American Bar
Association next week. He said
that the- Supreme Court's
recent decision reversing the
murder conviction of Dr. Samuel
H. Sheppard might be "a crack
in the armor" of the press's
freedom to ' t what it wishesabout a maacing trial.
Since the Supreme Court has
never mle 1his
point, he urged the trial judges
to "step into the fray" and as-
sert power to punish news-
papers for contempt it they
print prejudiciai articles.
In the Sheppard decision, the
High Court blamed the trial
judge for failing to insulate the
jury from the prejudicial pub-,
Licity, but Professor Sutherland.
said the decision implied that
judges had the power to con-
trol "outside influences" that
might prejudice the trial.
' Notes Clark Opinion
He called attention to the!
following passage trom Justice,
Tom C. Clark's opinion in the
Sheppard case: 1
"If publicity during the pre-
ceedings threatens the fairness
of the trial, 3. new trial should
be ordered. But we must re-l
member that reversals are but
1pailiative-s; the cure lies in
those remedial measures that
will prevent the prejudice at its
inception. The courts must take
such steps by rule and regula-
tion that will protect -
e prejudicial outside
interference."
Professor Sutherland men-
tiqgg;},,_p3,;cularly ilbldlt-y'0f
confessions and previous convic-
tions, when neither may be ad-
mitted as evidence.
I In aspousing the adoption of
in system s'un.iia.r to the one
used in England, in which casesi
,1mp ii1:nu" f
>,{»'i"i 'Wld cha.mpioll'£'§""E1'lbFSIYIOH of another Harvard
Bwnprofessor, Supreme cqurgJustice Felix Frankfurter.
T During the 19-i0s the High
Court ruled three Limes that
,the First Amendment's free-
ldoin or press guarantee P,-O_
ihiblted llldge from punishing
i
ii
i
"9w5P3-P9! that criticized the
conduct of pending ca5e5_
Frankfurter Dissent
ll Justice Frankfurter was the
|il°_e member or the court who
insisted that 3, judge mum
imvsflhslsss Pl-m'Eh journalists
if? Printing Pfejudicial articlesabout cri ' defendants.H Frelfl ginson Jr_. Assistant_ er-a'l of El-le United
p States in charge of the criminal
i division, told a meeting of state
bar officials that the public in-
, terest may require publicationi of certain information ut
F. Speck, who was identified by
the police as the man who mur-hdered eight nurses in Chicagolast month, presumably in an
effort to apprehend him.
enforcement officials would not
initiate prejudicial news stories,
but would release a suspect's
. record of convictions upon re.
quest.
At the final session of the
Conference of Chief Justices,
the delegates, representing 47
states and Puei-to Rico. voted
down a resolution sharply criti-
cal of the Supreme Court's re-
cent decisions limiting police in-
terro ation."6h%-Eight votes w"Ere" ca?i'
in favor of the resolution. whichwas p§.ed by Chief Justice_ I . 11.11;. of the Eggif 'l92B.Bi-Supreme Court. l
IAlU"°Ugl'l mall! Of U12 justicesLhad been critical of certain as-pects Of the high court's con-I
fessions doctrine during thel
group's diScgiiSiOT15' they said~We I1 Prepared to at-,as the court in strong-am;
until the clec.ision's effects lawl
_ '- .
enforcement became ltlHI'l'lf"""
The chief justices indicated
their concern at recent distur-
bances in city slum areas by
condemning all forms of dis-
ifpect for law by both individ-
't_1als and groups, calling the
rule of law the only alternative
to a lawless society."
f1'!92 _ _e suggestion "!l'f"'1.¬It!¬_ _£' My. Vinson said Federal lawA. /tjirj -3Dc-Looch ______
Mohr ___________.____
Wick __..___.__._
Casper ..______.___
Collohon _____
Conrad _.i___..
Felt __._______
Cole _.._.?.__._
Fiosen ____..__
Sullivan ..i.___
Tove] ___i__
Trotter ____.____s
Tele. Room
Holmes _i_i
Gcindy __.i._..._
Justice Joseph Weliilrl-lb Vi
New Jersey, who said ma--15'groups and individuals just don'tget attention until they <1 ii?wrong thing, the justices added;tqitheir resolution the state-iL mellt that government had 8-
*-w deal rrqmrtiy W1.' with the clauned grlev-1
i_-.' V, lan s of the citizens. _
criminal suspects, R _. He cited the case of R K f/, / 3' / 5' 1 ,. ,_ - , r,
NOT Tire 92__
-: ~.
!
-ii...-is-..The WE-lshin-éTFf'Fost and
Times Herald
The Washington Daily News ____
The Washington Evening Star *_
New York Daily News __¬_.__
New York Herald Tribune
New York Post __________._____
/ The New York Times L-
New York World. Journal __..___
New York World __:..__s.:
Journal Tribune _______
The Baltimore Sun *
The Worker
The New Leader
The Wall Street Journal ______
The National Observer
People-'5 World .___-j
Date __.__¬__-?-ii
1/ -
s}A.L_ilk V
Tr}? 1965:-.
-'
,.
'5.~s
4 3-r
L
.'J1:
Fl5" L n
C0-39 He-wt. 12-9-65l
¬
.
1
1
1
1
1111
1
I
111
i
I
1i 92./u
t " 92-' Lit. J
cw *w....,=e
ghly discriminatory; the state!
tor the Court; 2'3 leer has -:-evince "ti.--.n conviction unnot stand; ti it llrbaeetl on
jndifrtment at 1. grind theverdlct er'»i_-~-
_petit iury from which liegroes were exeludeztby
reason of their n_noe." But some Georgia authort-'
Lies simply refuse to recognize this feet. The Cellrt A
of Appeals had thrown out previous convictions
in these easel on the ground" that although 45
per cent of the population of the county use
Negro, no Negro had eves-"server! on a jury withtp *the memory of the witnesses, ' -1 92i e ' "~
Despite this reversal the state used the old dis-
credited jury 1113 once morefin the new trial. It
left jury commissioners inee to select prospective
jurors from segregated tax rolls on the basis ofpersonal acquaintance. Btu is inevitably built tntoin
such s system, and the continued use or rt sug
gests studied lle.anee_nl.the hw. .=-' ' "nae Supreme Court resisted a plea front eouns
that the defendants be freed because of these
circumstances instead of being sent back tor e___:
new trtet. Retrial, of course, ts the customary5» JV
0 "s..::'"*'0. 91 seleetlni2=*=.-,1-*=»~s~*-z1=r>*=-w==ev-~'i 100;°f°""7 °1"3-.'-él-.A. 1' ' '1" 1
For over four econ years. -er iustlceols /
_ / e ouch
O
Casper
Collahu
Conrad -.-.--i
J
Sullivan
'I_'e92_1vol!!._é._=._..:..__.....;Trotter _.__"i
Tole. Room _....__._
Holmes __.__.._...__'
Candy __..._.__..._.__Z'
Q-I"
!- ..D ,
.a
04 92_
J1
r4- ..
92 lVI .
~|¢l
92
v
r
$!F92*_ .
F
"i='§'I
.»_-;,i;#.,3
L0-20 tn". 1-zo-an %son /0 -U DeLoach
:3 sper ___.__
E; - Callahan _i
____ Conrad
Hu*;z::: _ V N L, - I M Q iii. M l . J I ' ' 1 _ OSGI1 ' '
. R 51
.' 9292.I
3/17-'r$<r-:.mo2P£sl 1 -- --..l_l---,-- I-;_,_-unnnn-nuns---nan:------- -+%l&»---4. -.
I ' Sullivan .__,____......
- Tavel i
' ' A Trotter_i_
- I Tole. Roam _-_-
H ..........._......... . _ olmes
1-3.
1* 5%.
" -1 -Q E
-.2--V 4'" _ .._. w - - _n£1'...-~¢.--- -4-:-,-~_..=::.¢_-»..»-.-~~- 1u~+ -¢1~1i--main-d1--~*92I-Ii-I -~ K
' um-1 no I,i_ ,-,- csuvnzm: count:~ wasnmcron--mo cnamrr nzmazns AND mo rmns gr concnsss .
WERE MENTIONED TODAY AS POSSIBLE SUCCESSORS T UPR.-_ME COURT
JUSTICE nc.c1.Am<. mama A u. 1.1:: .. - L. ¢n!°g_f§J_. 1* --- ' 'WITH ARK 0 HE BRI ETIREMENT NA s 0 /MARSHALL,mzasunv st RE owuzn LABOR szcnzm 1. z srn.nan A , - N . AND REP.92_i,I.l. -§n.§.§»/r:A?rrrttmw m N Y lg A - ATION ABOU PR1-I 1: 1' ormso ' --~
LIKELY cnoxcz yon A T. Acumx $1, A vrnrnm o as on -ms HI um sunn I um:
PR1-IYtsrznnnl HE wouu: RESIGN v s cunnsm 11-: s N .1
TO morn ANY POSSIBLE com-"1. 1 son nmsrv
cunx won JOHNSON nor-mm:ms RETIREIENT cou1.n cnsnmt
opznxucs wuxcn cou1.n PERMIT tn: sxnzur to APPO
COURT.
A SECON WHITE HOUSE TERM FOR JOHNSON COULD GIVE HIM ALMOSTSIX YEARS T%l-ILL VACANCIES AND THE COUR'l"S PRESENT MEMBERSHIPINDICATES T RE HILL BE SEVERAL RETIREMENTS DURING THAT PERIOD-
S IGENERAL .
OF
A JOHNSONNTEREST U
AY TO BE ATTO
FIRST OT A SE
'1l r 1 In _
II . 4 .
LI
9.
I
I
I
F
1
w
ii.
Ia.
I92'4
Im "$4: s . ,/' -2-Q I' was 1Nc%on-- HAL RP or was-f I mourn § r was SSIBLE w, av10IN¥§I3§§ as u 5. up92 I . AROLINA g_ O-20 Flaw. I-2!-88]
K
. -... . ., I 0
. J W I .45, ,.;;!3§'g{a¬,1n§.'T_§=,:I_.'.§[ 1:» Q?
' -- .u. "-5 I :3 9 J I F. I ~»
I r-I' v-.. 0 -3- '»-;;-T ' _'< '_. =;Q°'J ..'-'. "-. . I O
Q
I, 4 I :1 A 1. _ . __ uY r,. . ., _' I . __ s ' ' .1 _
r-3--~ ~§Jt~£.;§7:J: w»!-v*!f§g':Ii_92:¢§
. Ai. J
r u- "4 7
I ' ' ~-I ' ' ' . I-,1 I I H 92¢"".. - . u I ..
92' J 1
De h
Mo .
Cl p
Callahan i._._
Co rad
F
oaenq..................._
SuI11vu1__1'_'%__._.Z7..__
Iiotzpi" _Tole, Riiom ....._.......'-
H0lmn_.__.....-.--" ' 7
Gunduyl-.,._-__._.-1-I V 1
._ .- . r. _.'1 1" ,,.:-. _.:- U
__.__._, - I ~.. -.::., _;- - -._. ,-||»-~,,..-.._ ------ __¢Qi"" ---11 tr~~|gr~1.g| _A,, ;, -y- ___ I41 V
. sans sm znvm . JORDAN mm-ra c nznocnafs nxzvzmzn rub: mun suammzn JUDGE iaanr-"smm: to Phrsxnznr JOHNSON IN A Lzmza., F
3/3--TSZISPES J,
ru -t
;- *F§
a ¢'§La-: .,_-. _. _ V
!
I-» - » I;-_ r Y '.-F ';"|||: .,_. "
Jr IE
I!_.
. u=t-
~~ sxeelI
a1.uzce¬i<§?';, I Q I
_ ah-"1 ,--_,I-}'lI.- REC-60 I.
_ NOT R|:coR'B- -
'5 i°ms1ssr-
WASHINGTON CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE
92
m:3
E. G5 Q t N
3
al-
4
!
92_ . ...n J"
0 0 I DeL.oc:c -O-20 Hon I-20-NI
0-
.. . ' .
Can
Cull CI
_ Conad ''
l }_____} _ _ '_ _ -f , Felt
1': A
.. T .-_ _ _p[- _,~'-I-l J "if{" __. ....'y .9' I-1: ' - "' . ;.,_ 1 "1. 7 ' ,;T_ N; | _ -.- Sulll ...._'.._.... G _ --M ~>~** --2 -1* "-'* "r¢v¢1__i_ w , 1,4 :1 J. , -'» "A ' - I -- -J. -I.- ~ ' "f" < - " '1» - _ Trotter'...__=;....... '
I Tole. Room _.@ Z G
. Holme _____.......
. _' Gqndy*4
Q-..-Q _ ....
£¢Z§>jvif
-c
- T---92,...-
- .--pa ,1 ¢'van 1 "~ - 1
311,. _.
92.H ____ ____ H ______ *_______ _______ __________ ___ fjm H ___ _____________|___ ,,:..ZL...;,-'J
a .> 0. . . ' ulcfou--nu: mm nzvznszn m: nunnzn couvzcuon _ s ggicgh m Plmmgm IN THE 1942 samrxac or n I
om:-sninzucz ongn nu: coin cxrin rrs unuamr nzczsxouo nunnzn couvxbnons manna F GEORGIA LAY W THE GROUND THAT 4GT1!!! IKSTIH DISGRIHIIIAIID AGAINST TIE DEFENDANTS, VHO
6 III row! 3 chst was JASPER comm SIIIZRIFF c w
nmrm on JO O
an 1 9 my noun gunsil: s5u§'r6§h|:1.n l081'lCK'8 convxc-non l » as 1 - G
~
,, £756-7G ¢*"{'f£!! é22<;ég :§2@5367- é ":71; l '_ "==» /A ' __'no'v1mnom>nnFig.0 9 Wig H cg 115 am 3 1951 _
5 -' 5. '»'n',f_1 ___________ H18 is on _. n .-- G
-~ MB *2! 4"**"?§*»r*-*"" Tolson
mu 12-0-onDel. c
o
tlmelndicated
Amendmeotloetlunle
apwnroteltbynnma
nndrepresentativesh
onlysuch thmgsul
to acquire and a
oitheunendmentisthe Yew! auv
£ornwidera$ol 1,?guarantees
hhmuun: I,quonl from I
predileiu ldh
can-y_¢'|§||
oanciudqi
eommitun
one would
Ill
wed.Omstim
weren't lnexistence
omwu-ed:-sited!WM
provui
Legal Defense
whether Marshall
ngamd wluta
Ill, Hmhnll
Idonthiow
Qltlwuaphit
Iolow-mquestim
Mnrshallenex
ilthowouldlbri
s-ma hlr treatlm y
nablngoneelae. * "'
the SupremeH13 Lfcape/ Calla* Conro_
F
4:, »
Hosea F!'$}- _ =-1 . __ w3_.r!'__ff-g,-,r;, 7'.--TqvilTrotter '" ' -
Tole. l=_lo-ou1".__._I- ' V -
Holmes p .-1
I
i.r'Times PseidThe Waahingnon Daily Nevis "
The Evening Star Washington
The Sunday StaI_ Washi.ngton!
Daily News NeU'92_'otk! .........'___,_
Sunday News N15-.vur! _____'_'New Ycrk Poll I " '
The New York Times ._._.i_..._.._
World Iouliul Trilnme I-
New Yclk! §
le Sun Baltimore! ____i_.
The Worker '
The New Leader _______i____
"rm inn Street journal ..______
The National Observer ._i__._
People: World _____._i..._....
D3; ,- 1 9
, _ 9'7 ?s- I! ._
ornzconozg _ P;111 JUL 26 war ' 7.4
5'ZJuL use?
__:. 2'
£4
e
--H .,
-
,.
:92 -.
'_»e~e
It. 1"1i .,-;r-;...;..,-.,..,, ' _ O . do
e~ _ --_a-
' 1..
..~;.. .
K
/ riuprerne Court Building jweuee-any with
aadlndlgnalion_lHtA1u-oh_ehI3l1altehole1I1pIe_dl'|
14*:
a ,
1
1'
'1'.
if"!
i!
- .
. 1" -~*
J!
.-:92
1L.
--49*- ;os~§.<
0
.-
w.i.::~ 1|lal-u~~uaInaaan-ae-~-|n|- -1I--3T;_|i-qll_-:.1~~.-~...,.|------ '-- ~- *'92..a_..-H _ .. _.__ .
1
Tolson
DeL.oach
Mohr
Bishop
Casper ____:-_-
Callahan __---
Conrad ___._..Felt Gale
Helen
" " ,1-_.".. ..,__ '.*, .. . M Ft! ' " ' ~| -l' ' _*.-- _-"_ V W _;,.i1L__.¢_~'~< * "
' 2 _ .. '. 92--' ',:-- ,e -- /"11 .:...-... _-- I - --- 1'. r,e- 'I ' - II I 92._ .:i-_. ....'._ ___ ~_H_|- :1, IA ._-. __,__'~_<__y:i. .:_-r_92, w92_,-hr a l 1 » » re *~=~ - r ti 'f"r.1.; on--r-¢-; t
3""'¥;92""'="a."-""=@*-*""f¥7~'< Helmet " "_.. . - 0.». ,. .. :-S
_,_ h . . -- ea, . r,»-'2.-4,. ~~
f»O1'dimr:'£mvri<'5Ii dalglvml ru-it tefnqlrdiagraeatul behavior dthoee who besieged the
Iwtth the old _f01§-W_i_.B;§_lIl:, poor people have poor.WI?!-":¢ -
er unume and 1 polite education cannot be at-.1. l
Those who have been deprived lithe advaatageli...'$ _1__ H _-;_:_ __92 ' ' ' '--' ' I .. a '._-.~
. - ' |l-_-r _ ..4 1'.fi i r- 1 -3
= . - - ? . .r» .- - F .: . ; c .".~._"-- c - '4" < ~ - ' I _ ...,,.
» .'¢~N .
i P
4 f
* g-nailinghave the manner; oi nishing achoo!
o1*-t_he voo.nhu_1a_r# er en-ate-Lei.
I-Dd ltyle oi the dignied lawyers Who. ~.appear before the Court insidethe building wan
hudlytobe otthaenruly¢athe:ingaI-pemhled outside Building. _
l Thin apology being utter , and this statementE mitigation having been aoieed, however,_1oth-f g can be aaid in defense at the acts of violence
by the Poor People: CamPl18I1- The but trlendl
otthe Campaign muatreeetupnthiaeplaode
1 with lorrow and elweiy the sober peraom_who are
l1>Irtatthe=jamn1iaI1 I192_Ill19Qlbl_¢kWP°192t92ldemonstration with theme. -"I'h'ere was aomething
iiironic in this assault upon the Supreme Court
92 Building by a predominantly Negro mob on the very
day that Governor _ Lester Maddox was ordering.
G-eox~giafiagetoflyathal:l'atai!becaueeott-l92eU,8.
mhool integration. .""~*" " * 1*" 4?-*"' 5?-
- the black militant: in the oountry+i|might like eee racist appellation: hurled at the
,Supreme Court, alnce it in the living proof that jun-
;tice in America is not dominated by ra'clsm.'1o per-
de racial minorities that the Supreme CourtJ-xm would he us convince them um the Negro
cannot hope tor justice in the existing order.
the rank and tile of the Poor People: Campaign
cannot wish to eee such an unjult reproafastened on the Suprerne Court tor such :3llnlrfpm-pole. ",¢-;_.@#f;.::-44.1.R
[bylndividualelnthegroupbroughtto theptemlael
Supreme Court decision against freedom of choice!V. 1
b -1'1- --,- 'r_
L_f ' 4!:1 if
q '.;2-;1756Z- C."4. .19D. r .¢ _ '..-.r ' f'<.4 _' , -P-92" ." .r' J A : -a
.j~j j,-I ' _ 5!:--= - |='_'_i;I.'.-A-2-'¢ 92iv.;_ 'r ' -J
t - _ .i_ .
,1, 7. _
{d
The Washington Poet __
Times Herald
The Washington Daily News___..._.._
The Evening Star Waehingtohj Z:
The Sunday Star Washington! _._._.,
Daily News New York! __.i._.___
Sunday News New York] __.__:_..."'
New York Post iii?
The New Yer: Timoi ___._i-_-_
The Sun Baltimore! _......h__
ue Worker _____i_.__i.
The New Leader 7
The Wall St:eet_]ou|-nal i....___
The National Ohierver i__.._.
People: World ._.___i.___....._
qlhf-C __, ;
>
.92.92-92.
E, ' 1,, : ' '7; -1"'§_;?..;_.-" ' 4- ,*....__P . 92- Z. { -A -Y v :4-ay-1: 'If§!!¢Q§"¬" , "---Wig-$3 _ . .__ ~-» . '- - ~ ""1 ' " - > , . .. . --1 .._ .
I
-Q 0
4 _
92-r
E I?
r 1 _
qr; attempt :o*pouti>h"-iihfsupréxne
_ wu 1 gum impropriety the bmustughon the shoulder! of Dr. Abernathy and
[ag laden. The Supreme Gout math
f9pcti0nqq"__1p mmnqt, IQ the _ pllngl.-'1tc1nnof _:eq'>ond to 1
Qnstntlng delegation. Were it to do I0
L iiiiii it woiid bi it i 2'-fmcgupx-emn'Court tin be petition .
oounsel, in appropriate form and through pm
lcribed channeu. The demonstration lilinlvthl .Indian shing cue decision oat the Com-twu ll;
inadmissable as would have been 1 legregatinnist
___hmonatn=tion mrthe Supreme Court
le school 11l'tGg1'lUUi of 1951."??? ?"' -" -_
The Poor People| Campaign, by this foolish epi-
Qode, has done its cause morelhu-m than any 01
no e:92.e.'!92.!e5 mull! do ze A: _-_- P:-.e.i11e=£e.-14 weml Tens nddrec:1|:_"Thon whq glorify:qirngoi litl u1io;1u~engaHg§he_ e_»ho _@ j.'1.,,._h - -.8. ¥;,Iv-II
. D5A..* u ,3
rs
__ 1
as or 1are '
_>.--:
1 eFI 1
~- E
1.. :,_,
. -t
_: '_' 1,4-- -1-
N-"'ra
T _
-11
E52}
as _ _.13¢!-
__._e.| L-10- -Ices! 1-11-ea» 15°/ Locich
{..
The Washington Merry-Go Round,,._.;-n_ .** ."
_ By Drew Pecan" inisters in Brussels to attend
NATO 20th anniversary cele-it
Q Relations between the P1_'esi- ration in Washington next
_-4 dent and President-elect. hith-
1 tween any other incoming and'92outgoing Presidents, were dis-
rupted when Nixon moved in
on_the question of continuing
-Chief Justice Earl Warren
without any consultation with
. President Johnson whatsoever.
l
arks of a quick double play
1 o block the interim appoint-
-ment of former Justice Arthur
lkioldberg as Chic! Justice.
P President Johnson has on
;his desk right now the resigna-
ltion of Chief Justice Warren
subject to action at any time.
I-ie can and still may act on it
-right up until noon of Jan. 20.
And he had been debating
such action when out oi the
jclear blue. the President-elect
phoned Chief Justice Warren
asking him to remain as head
,0! the Court until June.
Obviously it was not Nixon's
preogative to do this and, tur-
thermore, both protocol and
courtesy -required him to call
=tbe President in advance of
his request to Warren. John-
son has leaned over backward
to clear with Nixon all ques-
tions of policy which affect
, the country during this in-
"[i-crim period. _ - _
f,_ He cleared. with Nixon be-
Tforehand the relatively minor
I matter of the invitation which
Secretary of State Rusk con-
_t1;e_ ;~IA'l_O _§or_eign
" '.-B-¢'];92Nixon's move had the ear-"erto more jcordial than be-eptember.
He -also has taken up with
Nixon every detail of the Paris
talks, and instructed Ambassa-
ci A ll rri or vere I-Ia man to call
on the President-elect to fill
him in further. No step has
been taken in the Vietnam ne-
gotiations without informing
Nixon.
l The President also informed
the President-elect in some de-
tail regarding his talks with
Soviet Premier Kosygin and
his hopes to have one nal
;sunnnlt conference. He even
invited Nixon to accompany
him to Europe, it the talks
were held.
1 No President in half a cen-
itury has been more coopera-
tive toward the new Adminis-
tration, even ordering 17
State Department rooms
placed at-Nixons disposal 48
hours after the election-
roonis which are still largely
led unoccup .
Because of this there is
some belief that Nixon called
the Chief Justice deliberately
in order to head off the Presi-
dent's plan to appoint Gold-
berg as Chief Justice. Mr.
ohnson had been considering
this idea ever since his nomi-
nation of Justice Abe Fortes
for Chiei Justice was turned
down by the Senate. I-Ie was
-ot unmindful of the fact that
early as last "July Chlei
ustice Warren, when asked by
P ld t d1
l, b76/
propose a successor, then dis-
creetly pointed out that the
Middle West had no represen-
tation on the Court and that
Goldberg, who comes from
Chicago, would make a great
Chief Justice.
While the President put his
old friend Forbas first on his
list, he did not forget Gold-
;berg. Goldberg served as Sec-
retary of Labor in the Ken-
nedy Cabinet, then on the Su-
preme Court, then -agreed to
resign to tackle the tough
problems of Vietnam peace at
the U.N. .
In the course of considering
Goldbe:-gs nomination as
mentioned it to Nixon during
their November luncheon.
Nixon was non-committed. The
appointment _was delayed
chiefly because the President
was seriously considering call-
ing the Sen-ate into special ses-
sion to act upon the nuclear
non-proliferation tre at y, at
which time he planned to ask
for Goldberg's confirmation as
Chief Justice. _ _
Meanwhile several high-
ranking Republicans had
urged Nixon to go along with
Goldberg's appointment, in-
cluding former Attorney Gen-
eral Herbert Brownell and
Max Fisher of Detroit, one of
the biggest money raisers for
the Nixon campaign,
It was against this back-
ground that the President-
elect put in his private call to
Warren. -
_e oe res en to reoomrnen 3 mhief Just§%' E !h|§,l'll8uccessor, at first declined t -the oppos e st e on
ixon had sabotaged Warren!
id for the Presidency in 1832
t the G01? convention. The
have not been cordial
nee. " I-sa-osnriae. am-Ht-sun§the..Baauhl-ism ,,f¢?g§__¥ 5111_ V / - lxomwaa caught "su;rprii¬-92d' f JChief Justice, the President,*Nix[tl,Call, to Warren ndercut ,5
I
IMohrBishop I.
Casper _.__._.__.
Collcxhdn
Conrad
Fell
ii o hi-iT in . -
:<§uer____i
ele. Room _.___
Holmes._._.___
Gcmdy _._____.i.._,.,...,__.._.i-1/
I.
¢ "'
I
The Washington Post [jwTimes Herald _____?__i...
The Washington Daily News _._...._..-
The Evening Star Washington! ____
The Sunday Star Washington! i.
Daily News New York! ?.._i_
Sunday News New York! .._____._
New York Post __,____,___,_._.
The New York Times ___i.__i_
The Sun Baltimore! ____l__..
The Daily World_.i__i.-_
The New Leader ___i...i_
The Wall Street Journal ii
The National Observer ..i_._._....._
People's World ______i_____
Examiner wuahingtoni &
Utii 7*
Date ,_-- n -
le.-, _ It ' ,.|{_ ' .§
Nan r-r~"-92'"~ "9211,
I70 Mi-' 10 1969I .
A
' ' - .. _._ L
'92.
1;?"-I 3aih -I
,<.
1
I
_ _ I
r4 1.
1|-
#2I |QCBot hhe call £ro e-|den:t£!!!!"lR1n: m o to
admiaism the oathoi offifg
Ind also continue until June,
he acquiesced without real}:-
lnz that it was President John-son, not Nixon. who still
the powertoaocepthig re -
nation at any time up to Jam.
20. Nor did the Chlet Justin;
realize that Arthur Goldbelj,
the man he very much wanted
to be'hLs'a'uocessor, was on -the
verge oi gettinf-an intérim Ip-
polntment as Chis! Justice. <
O 1m. m1-worm nnamu. mi.
Drew Pearson and Jack Avi-
derson will rweal n secret Sizi-goc pgatt :1 stall the Par-is pm?ta s u ero1:erq§,|g'!5[JO ,
Iodlji-1:010:40 mm. and 6:40 p.1ri..
92
. O S
;,_ ' _. .
._ - ._= .', ,-,-
. .
Y ' A v'_ olso
I 1
an
1...-n-
THE
' IIALEIQ
PO-20 Riv. 7-27-67!
92 §92
. . . - . ,l .I . 7; _+_;_;§, = 2' ~ l L?-f1. =. J1-K - . A
l _"' " ' ' I 1I " v ' q 92 1 A_ ' Sullivan _
Tove!
Trotter _.___i..- x =
»;¢
*¢.~:#.-'- _ ,_;_ . ___._._;__*.1 -- -..___._., __;,_. _7 7'71
-4 "" ' I
Q - f F
§ 2. E °'=
1 _ T - Mo
- - Bi -
Csp
, . __ ~ Con:
¥?~i*+:~_"£--3*
> 92 ..OBQII
O Qii I Cullah n_.__.......-
--uni-1-p
in-mi-------1-
Tale. Room ._.....__
H lm s -
| , , |
» RIFEATIICUPI-21] . I ' E K PI-SI "
" "LOT!
. CLEVELIIID--TIIE T81 EBAY EFUIED '¬0HlIIN'l' MREPORT I FEDER GRAND JURY HAS INVE§'l'RSSINATE THE IINE 5%M°~@ Mm
us IN 'n:s11;nnn§'s rnrrxon or m: cuzvnmn PLAINzwsmmn we-rm: souncss c1.os1: to ma cnmn JURY,HJBLI SHED
__a__, sun. 111: not was to hm: emu cmmzn our nov. as nut ins
rosrpenzn ma mmaoum uznsews ~
mu n.u:c:m.v omszn men count-s 1. mm. uzmmcs.JG12I|2H.'.S12/26 m£7_5'u_ PR {ME dean?
P
1*
I
_ zf
I ;_;.'JAN 31???..;3_: _.__- --
1101 RECORDED
E 116 M 24 W
. . '"7,
Y92»,
-I
f
:1 7525-6 -'THE SOURCES SAID THE FIVE II HJNRED YO KILL TIE JUSTICES BEACUSE K
1
_ ,.
'-.
1"
I92'j~.__II V
-:r 92
:5»
' "1,
:.l;3
~..-_1*
1' -i'~m. .;,,:,, 1- .
, . _ H--it -' a; ' =-' -r8-19 Rev. 12-so-111 _ in Tolson ___i <2 F"
""92 in/I.,.t *1 Q
i-.'4- 92"r"'.¥:'§'--" r... » - .. -.
E4
4.
'11 »92.ca .» ~~ ='
"*-""""~¢1e" ._-;...m-."'0_;j:-id .11.--33,
"""' . .
1 _-' I '~- g._ » '--_.-Z
tivitlea oixnumeroul . federal
subgoiiimitiee to con-
ittee stat! dis-
dosed um Ervin hlriyse WM
mentioned at lust once in the
veet ies tamed owe: h _h
Pentlgon in the eoune oi the
»emwr'__- mmoaaon #1-legql invuloi__;9$'gt1 Mthe military. " r_ -"""
' Am mentioned. the -chi!
"said, were numeroul lemtors
and repreieutatlvql, tome of
"°°"..';i,"°' L?.L;;£ ' 00 '_ he probe, .&'ul1lI!¢'"QenI: 1ward M. Kennedy 41>-Manx§ mmumi;_ and Guru.-'lc¢:-l.1'I- .0.! - ~ -_ ;~92°"*.:»""..:,=*§~E ',=§=**wane identletibeetiili ane |gQpmJn,| ,ed computer' milituy n: bill-h T150lag-my |Qy| :|_g KIabeen destroyed and one print-
jpui preserved," solely for III'-a iv
currently lcve iu_'ltice,'
*1 Ervin'a bid dkLi1ot identifythe jugggfnd the "staff oi ins-
Senite Comtltutlonll Rights
y the
§I! iipn T 19"/2'.t I.w5¢IrV46;"m1=u'=¢i- a-wqn lawful; we-,
°i I/ir»-'~--" °' M5";Roaen
.1'.- " Mob:
t " . Bishop
i t ' Miller,
_ cum _____..
' Casper ___'i
Conrad
Ponder V ' -< - "=
""1:-av '§."'-41 5 Hr ' ~ "1 Bate. .' __v" Jt_ _ ' Waikart ___.__W
' i*" ,7 Walters __..__" '
Soyara _+.'..._
- Tele. Room __..'._
Holmes _..i_.4» ~ _ W J.-_..._1,{: Ggndy H
Q . .
.1 tilt b / A
The Waahington Post
Times Herald
The Washington Daily New!
The Evening Star Washington!
The Sundw Star Washington!
Daily New New York?
Sundq News New York
New York Post :___i_¬
The New Yolk TimesThe Daily World _
The New Leads _________i_
The Wall Street J01-trnal
The National Observer
Pimple! World ___________i_._;r»
_<¢d 1 ,. I ...___ *M It 1972
a» . ' .up_,.'--- -.- »-. 4 _ "t. 9292A _
, 92
t $9 4.1.-a'7J7-57-/?
. _Zb__ " EAR 29 Q72
'.~-.
n
.3",'
J;
J
W
__ ;
-1»-:_5i
2- 92
1
unsu-
Coun. hugs;
compnlnuIn tho nIiA'Il'l :'~.f~:»=- -A» '
Ch!!!-WI
mup
in
iI U r ' /'2.::h:r@%:*92 " if ":7 d .mg o W r ~ '
1
I, ~l ., . 92 _
insubstan-
. *=~*i""1*??é-' 5:?
"w""E.'-'.°
,~Y"lllo|:92tI'|or-1|a'O1!1ber1"li'I92 '
uh ¢.,. A _ dgf
.:._§.-LI? - I10 °*~ I 5|
J-1 1- lhuiell Nile!
* ewYork Unlvarsiry,andthree
92 , _ delphllkobert Stam-92 _ cago nnd Petor D. E3;-enhaf_t
of Wnshington, D.C.o Working under the auspice!
~. the Federal Judlchi
viurpd all aha upremo 92 I
Justices. It: recommendations.Which in scheduled to be;
transmitted to the Chief J11-Itillllbout three weeks, were dis- Q
¢1oaear»y-ru=mm>u10b--ill!-lIl:UIQl'|ilIl¬p,.§=.rqi
i-I bowled
a-medthereportlnd
fmgrn 1 roster containmg g1! of_ '.., _ Berni-I115.-5.¢l!1_L$
I
|..mad
Dalb -
Gob
Jenlzuus .__....__.
Marsha}! _.i_
Miller, E.S. .__
Purvis ._.._.._...._..._.._
Soyars .i__._
Waltcrs;_.______I- rug:
Telc. Room ___.
Mr. Kinlcy _.____
, Mr. Armstrong __._..
Ms. Harv.-ig .i_
Mrs. Neenan ..iQ
._ H
The fushin gzon P05:
Tamas Herald
Thc Evening Star l92-hshington! ._
The Sunday Star {92'-'a.shir~.gLon! ___
Daily New! New York! _i__
S1-mday News New York! __,___'_____
New York _PostThe M
The Daily World
I ' The New Lender ___
i The Wall Street Journal _.___
The National Obse.-92-er _____i
People: Worldo'i- I
I
a
0
1 u_ Hf _ i_D - fl | __ N _- _iwm Mm
%JMM%%m¬_Mw_ mg Mmm &LmiMMu_mWMéw~ MU i |l _ Z V_ _ W v H JM $__W__ gm Mmmwmwgh W_@#mMHmMmmmmM% mg hi %W__%_mmwmmwMm QW WM WWW Mmmmm a Wm
__%mwMWMm$iM%MmwW_h _WmM&MJ MW__: w&Mwem& _ Md
J mhg_ _ _ _L __ V ____ P _ _ , i._ _ _ _V_!_ ______ _________I"_ _ _"__ _
_ _ _ A_ P ___r_b_ __ __ :__ _ _