Oregon wolf plan critics bite back - February 6, 2005

Mail Tribune (Medford, OR — Wayback)

2005-03-21

Document text

50 °F Forecast | Road Cams Sunday, March 20, 2005   Today's News | Classifieds | Autos | Homes | Jobs | Tempo | Health | Community | Home Delivery      SECTIONS Home Page Local News Sports Business Obituaries   Life   Opinion   Tempo   AP News   Weather   Classified   Archives   Site Map   SPECIAL SECTIONS   Since We Asked   Outdoor Journal   Menu Guide   How To Guide   Health   Readers' Choice   Real Estate Showcase   Real Estate Guide   Joy Magazine   Homelife Magazine   Wedding Guide   Passport to the Rogue Valley   SHOP OUR VALLEY AutoFinder HomeFinder JobFinder Classified Place an ad  TOP JOBS   EXTRA   Ashland News   NIE   Personals   Movie Times   TV Times   E The People   Volunteer   Moving here?  eSouthernOregon   CUSTOMER SERVICE FAQ's Advertise with us Home Delivery Employment Contact Us Media Kit Oregon Road Conditions & Cams Email Story to a Friend February 6, 2005 Oregon wolf plan critics bite back By MARK FREEMAN Mail Tribune Opponents of a draft plan for managing wolves that wander into Oregon are posting an 11th-hour attempt to scuttle it, claiming a recent federal court decision re-listing wolves as "endangered" renders the plan toothless and useless. Under Tuesday’s ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Robert Jones, wolves lost their 21-month stay on the threatened species rolls and were returned to the more stringent status as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The ruling means only federal agents can kill wolves that attack livestock. Oregon’s plan includes protocols for allowing ranchers to shoot offending wolves, which can be legal under threatened status. The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission is scheduled to finish an almost two-year-long discussion on wolf management Friday by adopting its wolf-management plan. However, Sharon Beck, who represents ranchers on a committee that drafted Oregon’s wolf plan, said she believes Tuesday’s decision renders Oregon’s planning process moot because it negates any need for a plan. Advertisement "Legally, we have to stand and watch it kill our livestock, leaving us impotent to do anything," Beck said. "Why pass a plan?" Beck instead would prefer the commission wait until wolves are taken off the threatened or endangered species rolls and their management shifted from federal agencies to the states. "I don’t think it will in our lifetime," Beck said. "We can’t even get it down-listed, let alone de-listed." Commission Chairwoman Marla Rae said Saturday that the court decision does not change a need to craft a strategy to manage wolves, which biologists expect to cross into Oregon naturally from Idaho within the next five years. "The court didn’t order the wolf to stay in Idaho," said Rae, of Salem. "They’re still going to come to Oregon and we need a plan in place to deal with them." Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife officials also are resisting efforts by Beck and others who created a spurt of last-minute public comments to the agency Thursday and Friday. Anne Pressentin Young, the ODFW’s spokeswoman on wolf issues, said Tuesday’s ruling does alter the draft plans for laying out under what circumstances problem wolves could be killed by residents. But she stressed that other aspects of the plan — educational efforts, creation of criteria for how many breeding pairs would make viable populations here and identification of areas where new research is crucial — make it relevant. "Just because we don’t have everything in place doesn’t mean we should stop what we’re doing now," Pressentin Young said Friday. "Why not pass it now and be ready?" The commission, which sets Oregon fish and wildlife policies, is set to hear its last round of public comments during a hearing Thursday in Troutdale. The seven-member commission is scheduled to discuss and vote on a final version Friday in Troutdale. Amaroq Weiss, the western director of species conservation for the Defenders of Wildlife and a member of the wolf advisory committee, said delaying the plan’s adoption could keep the Oregon Legislature from passing new legislation to enact the plan during the current session. Weiss, whose organization filed the suit that led to Tuesday’s decision, said halting the plan’s passage would create unneeded "public angst" in an already emotional debate. "We need an action to take place and we need to move forward from there," said Weiss, of Jacksonville. The draft plan promotes social tolerance for wolves that were hunted to extinction in Oregon in the early 1900s to protect livestock. Although there are no known wolves in Oregon, they are classified as a threatened species on state lists. Three have been found in Eastern Oregon since 1999, having migrated from Idaho. Two were found dead and the third returned to Idaho. The multifaceted plan would establish population and breeding objectives, create a program to compensate for livestock losses and permit wolves to inhabit unused but suitable habitat within the state. The plan must first be adopted by the agency, then requires state legislation to fully implement it. Reach reporter Mark Freeman at 776-4470, or e-mail [email protected] Mail Tribune Home  | Local News  | Sports  | Business  | Obituaries  | Life | Opinion AP News | Archives  |  Site Map  | Community  | Classified   Copyright © 1997-2005 Mail Tribune, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Website Feedback Student Loan Consolidation Conference Calls - $50/Month Home Security Systems Trunks, Footlocker, Trunk, Footlockers home equity loans helzberg Slippers Student Loans afsa teleconferencing Memory Foam Mattress w2 forms Tatoo Advertisement s