Document text
Principal Investigator: STEVEN M. ASCH
Organization: MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER
Fiscal Year: 2024
Funding agency: Veterans Affairs
Background: Advanced liver disease (AdvLD) is a serious illness that disproportionately affects Veterans. As
many as half of AdvLD patients die within 2 years of developing liver complications, and nearly all suffer
increasing symptoms and hospitalizations. Although many patients hope for curative liver transplantation, few
receive it while experiencing an increasingly severe illness. We found Veterans with AdvLD report many unmet
curative and supportive care needs. They also prefer to align care with their outcome goals earlier in the
AdvLD course than is now common. A Whole Health program in AdvLD focused on what matters most to
Veterans, shared goals, and goal-aligned treatments could improve both curative and supportive care.
Objectives: Our overall goal is to develop and test a sustainable Whole Health, Integrated-Veteran-centered
Care in Advanced Liver Disease (I-VCALD). We propose a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study
utilizing formative implementation assessment prior to an effectiveness trial and assessment of implementation
outcomes following the trial. Our specific aims are: 1) conduct a formative assessment of I-VCALD
implementation for Veterans with AdvLD; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of I-VCALD in a randomized controlled
study at 4 VA centers; and 3) conduct a summative assessment of implementation outcomes of I-VCALD.
Methods: For Aim 1, we will conduct a formative evaluation of implementation using stakeholder interviews
with patients, leadership, clinicians, and staff partners at the four study sites structured by i-PARiHS
framework. The assessment will identify barriers and promoters of I-VCALD implementation within VA,
strategies to overcome barriers and build on strengths, and modify existing tools to embed them into clinical
structures and workflows. Expected outcomes include recruitment of clinical champions and refinements to
study procedures to facilitate implementation in routine care; care counselor training program; informational
materials; EHR note templates; and menu of communication processes. For Aim 2, we will conduct a
randomized clinical trial to determine if I-VCALD improves timely decisions about transplantation and goals of
care planning. Secondary outcomes include goal concordant care, health related quality of life, shared
decision making, satisfaction with treatment experience, and quality of supportive AdvLD care. Participants will
be identified by population screening at participating sites for AdvLD and new onset complications and
confirmed by manual chart review. Consented patients will be randomized to usual care or referral to I-VCALD
nurse care manager who will conduct 4-5 visits over six months. The care counselor will facilitate serious
illness conversations to assess and cultivate patients’ understanding of their illness, identify patient priorities,
and work with patients’ clinicians to help tailor curative and supportive care such that it aligns with patients’
understanding of their prognosis and priorities. For Aim 3, we will conduct a summative evaluation of
implementation using the Proctor framework domains of acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility,
fidelity, penetration, and cost to guide interpretation of study findings. Assessments include chart review,
qualitative interviews with patients, clinicians, and interventional staff, and structured implementation surveys.
Findings will inform adaptations and further efforts to implement and disseminate the I-VCALD approach.
Significance: Our proposed project has the potential to significantly improve care for AdvLD and could be a
model for redesigning care for other seriously ill Veteran populations. Together, these aims will provide
evidence for the clinical effectiveness of the I-VCALD approach and barriers and promotors of its
implementation across other VA sites. We have assembled an advisory panel including leadership from the
national VA whole health, gastroenterology and hepatology, and palliative care programs who will inform
adaptations and subsequent dissemination of integrated, whole health for AdvLD care.
Terms: <Adoption><Affect><Assess implementation><Care Manager><Care given by nurses><Caring><Case Manager><Chronic Disease><Chronic Illness><Clinic><Clinical><Clinical effectiveness><Collaborations><Communication><Complex><Consent><Counselor><Decision Making><Disease><Disorder><Effectiveness><Electronic Health Record><Evaluation><Gastroenterology><Goals><Hepatic Disorder><Hepatic Transplantation><Hepatology><Hospital Admission><Hospitalization><Hybrids><Implementation assessment><Infrastructure><Intervention><Intervention Strategies><Interview><Knowledge><Leadership><Life Expectancy><Link><Liver><Liver Grafting><Liver Transplant><Liver diseases><Los Angeles><Manuals><Measures><Mental Depression><Methods><Modeling><Nursing Care><Outcome><Outcome Study><PARiHS framework><Palliative Care><Palliative Therapy><Palliative Treatment><Participant><Patient Preferences><Patient outcome><Patient-Centered Outcomes><Patient-Focused Outcomes><Patients><Penetration><Perception><Persons><Pilot Projects><Policies><Population><Procedures><Process><Proctor evaluation model><Proctor framework><Proctor multi-level outcomes framework><Proctor multilevel outcomes framework><Proctor process outcomes><Proctor taxonomy><Professional counselor><Prognosis><Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework><Provider><Randomized><Randomized, Controlled Trials><Reporting><Severity of illness><Site><Specialty><Structure><Supportive Therapy><Supportive care><Survey Instrument><Surveys><Symptom Burden><Symptoms><System><Testing><Time><Training Programs><Transplantation><United States Department of Veterans Affairs><United States Veterans Administration><Veterans><Veterans Administration><Veterans Affairs><Visit><Work><assess effectiveness><care as usual><care coordination><care preference><care seeking><chronic disorder><comfort care><coordinating care><cost><depression><design><designing><determine effectiveness><disease prognosis><disease prognostication><disease severity><effectiveness assessment><effectiveness evaluation><effectiveness trial><effectiveness/implementation design><effectiveness/implementation hybrid design><effectiveness/implementation hybrid study><effectiveness/implementation study><electronic health care record><electronic health medical record><electronic health plan record><electronic health registry><electronic medical health record><evaluate effectiveness><evaluate implementation><evaluation of implementation><evidence base><examine effectiveness><experience><falls><formative assessment><formative evaluation><framework by proctor><health care management><health management><health related quality of life><healthcare management><hepatic body system><hepatic disease><hepatic organ system><hepatopathy><implementation efforts><implementation evaluation><implementation facilitation><implementation framework><implementation outcomes><implementation research framework><implementation science framework><improved><informant><innovate><innovation><innovative><interventional strategy><liver disorder><liver transplantation><medical specialties><military veteran><mortality><multidisciplinary><outreach><patient oriented outcomes><pilot study><population based><population health><preference><proctor conceptual model><proctor implementation><proctor model><prognosis model><prognostic model><prognostication><programs><promoter><promotor><randomisation><randomization><randomized control study><randomized control trial><randomized, clinical trials><randomized, controlled study><randomly assigned><recruit><routine care><satisfaction><screening><screenings><secondary outcome><shared decision making><staff intervention><tool><transplant><transplant centers><treatment as usual><uptake><usual care><veteran population><virtual><whole health><whole person health>