Document text
COMMENTARY by Candace Owens — "Candace’s New Rooftop Footage DESTROYS Case Against Tyler Robinson! w/ Misty Winston" (published 2026-07-30).
This is third-party opinion/analysis ABOUT State of Utah v. Tyler James Robinson — NOT the court record. It is indexed for comparison against the primary transcripts/filings. Transcript is the YouTube auto-caption track (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tQAsJTi7VY) — verbatim ASR.
I'm not sure what that what flash is. Um, actually looks like I'm not going to read into it. Garland Nixon here and I am back standing in for Jimmy Dore. As you probably know, Jimmy and Stef are on vacation having fun doing exciting things that they'll be able to come back and tell us about. You're talking with Misty Winston. She's an activist and commentator whose work focuses on press freedom, free speech, liberty, and foreign policy. And I'm sure she's going to talk about Tyler Robinson's cuz now we're going to talk about something very interesting. Some new footage Here's Candace Owens. She's up to no good again, Misty. Candace Candace Owens has just released unprecedented, never-before-seen footage from the LoC Center. That's the best kind. The footage Candace released is unedited and uninterrupted, unlike the stuff that got thrown out of court in the Tyler Robinson They're like, "Hey, we got some footage here." And the judge is like, "Dude, you stuck that together and you manipulated the footage. That's not acceptable in court." >> No. >> But apparently they didn't know that. The footage Candace released is unedited and uninterrupted. This is the same footage that is allegedly meant to show Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. It does not appear to be Tyler Robinson. Very good reason for that. It also doesn't match any official narrative we have been told by the authorities. The man in the footage has no limp. He has He never takes the gun out of his pants. He cannot be seen assembling the gun with a screwdriver. No recoil from a .30-ought-six is remotely visible. He also performs a technical crawl that is known in the military as a lateral crawl. Yeah, that's what all the furries do. You know, they practice their lateral crawls. They're really into the what they talk. Anyway, let us continue. This will make your hair stand stand up, Misty. And you've got pretty hair, so >> And the footage is completely removed. >> Jumping. Let him go. Now what happens next is exactly as my source stipulated. Our our rooftop guy begins a tactical crawl. It's actually known in the military as a >> Wow, that Tyler Robinson's highly trained. >> show you a side by side so you can actually see a real military man do that >> Um um alongside >> this person on the rooftop. Let's bring in that side by side clip. Here we go. That general action >> Yeah, that's it. >> as a lateral crawl. >> That's it. >> Now you may have noted if you're looking at your eyes some sort of a flash that just took place, right? We're going to show you that slowed down. And just to clarify this, we've gone back and forth here. What is that? Is he pulling something out? Is it like a signal mirror? Is it a flash? >> like. Mirror. He's doing something new. That's reflection of something new. >> Is that something weird? Is it a car? >> I don't think it's a car based on where they're >> flash. We're just going to show you that flash in the background. A back and forth flash there while he's military crawling. Here we go. There and we're winding that back and forth there. >> It's something he has. It's something shiny. >> a hundred times. >> It's something really shiny. >> Next up, what you're going to see is that it's going to look as though as he gets into position and completes this lateral crawl that he thrusts something forward in a way that my brain told me it looked like he was unfolding a gun. I'm not sure what that flash is. >> Mhm. >> Um actually looks like I'm not going to read into it. >> like a professional. >> See, like a bag. You notice how it flops. Yeah. I see it flop. Boom. It flops. It's a bag. >> But more importantly >> the gun out of the bag and he throws the bag aside. >> not going to see here. So remember this is supposed to be a German 98 Mauser family heirloom gun uh used during World War I. >> Let me just stop this. I And as I said, you know, this is kind of the stuff that I did. I actually had a special ops team under me at one point, right? I was in charge of special ops. He had It looks like he had the gun in the back and one of these black bag, you know, like nylon bags or whatever, right? And he goes down. What does he do? He takes the gun out of the bag and he throws the bag this way, right? You know what I mean? You take the gun out of the bag and when you look at it flop, you can see that it's like some kind of material. It's not hard. You take that So, he gets down. He doesn't have the gun out. He gets down, takes the gun out of the bag, throws the bag there, shoots, and when he runs away, you'll see him pick the bag up and you can see that it kind of flops. But anyway, let's continue. >> In World War II that'll effectively take your shoulder out. You could hide one of those in your pants easily. >> I've shot one of the like something similar. >> And if you're looking through a scope as he allegedly was, you might even expect a black eye. You you will recall that the guy who recorded the footage specifically said told us that he saw no recoil. That's pretty crucial. He just saw the guy get up and run. >> It would be nice. >> I argue >> not necessarily going to see it. >> That would be impossible for this specific making one making a problem. >> let's watch and see her V with our eyes. >> Lock it in real tight. >> Yeah, I did not I shot like this is not like Benny Johnson 4K footage, but it's at least clear enough here on your screen that you would be able to dis- discern a strong kickback on a gun from somebody who's just laying down taking a shot. So, I'm going to let this run. It's about 50 seconds. Um and you just let me know if at any point you see that before he gets up and breaks into a sprint. Take a look. >> You see that flop? Yeah, that's a bag. >> Now, watch him pick it up. This is audio This is one of those episodes that you actually do have to go watch. So, you'll have to go over to YouTube, to Spotify, um somewhere that provides the video because this is not something that we could just produce on an audio podcast here, unfortunately. Um but this is going to run. >> Watch what happens when he jumps up and runs. You'll see the bag flop. You can see that it's >> timestamps, but See here. I've 10 more seconds here. Okay, he is up. >> See? >> see the bag flopping. >> Mhm. Anybody see a recoil? >> No. >> I didn't see one, but let's let's actually put that footage all together uninterrupted. Here we go. For you guys He comes running onto the rooftop. >> Limping, he's limping. >> What we see is he gets down into what is known as a lateral military crawl. He begins that crawl over to the right first and then to the left. We see a quick flash. We're not sure what that flash is. >> Mhm. >> Um actually looks like I'm not going to read into it. >> It looks like a professional. >> throw forward I say fold forward you can say throw forward, but that's definitely something being flung forward getting into position and here we wait for what we expect to be some sort of a kickback. >> Now, where does he put the gun back together or take it apart? I'm missing that part. >> must have been when our source began recording. >> Where did he drop the screwdriver? >> Right. >> He's taking it apart, putting it back together. Watch the bag see the bag watch the bag >> What do you guys think? The limp that he has in the footage is completely removed. >> Again, if someone's published the enhanced video of the alleged shooter on the Lucy Center roof, remember the enhancements were threefold, red circles, blurs, and zoom. Vinny Johnson claimed it 4K HD. Jack Sobie said he was watching the timestamp and said it was like watching Charlie die all over again. See for yourself. They lied to you. What they did is the same thing the mainstream media has done to the everyday American people. It's why most people don't trust the mainstream media. This is why you should not trust all of those influencers who came out and exaggerated what they saw in the courtroom to fast track the death penalty of another human being. They said it explicitly. This video clearly shows Tyler Robinson take the shot. >> Clearly? There's a fuzzy dude who could have been >> Yes. You know what I mean? I mean the idea that that's clearly shows Tyler Robinson. >> Listen Garland, I covered this when Jack Posobiec came out and was talking. I covered it on Jimmy show and he came out and he was all just so emotional and we watched this video and it's so clear you can see Tyler Robinson and he was just so emotional and then there's a video of the prosecutor being asked directly by the judge, is there a video of Tyler Robinson taking the shot and the prosecutor says that video does not exist. You cannot see who that person is. It does not show clearly that it is Tyler Robinson. You could there's no way you could possibly identify that person, period, end of story. It's crazy to even think that that is reality. So and then the idea that people are I mean what is so and this is we've seen this happen time and time again. We saw it happen with COVID. We saw it happen with Russia gate. We saw it happen with weapons of mass destruction in the Gulf of Tonkin, the Syrian gas attacks over and over and over again. There are people who otherwise distrust the government who will suddenly believe that well this time they're telling the truth. What is that? What is that? They're never telling the truth, guys. Never, ever, ever, ever. They're never telling the truth. You Your starting point should be they're lying and then go from there. And the idea that people just throw out their critical thinking skills and just swallow the fed slop is embarrassing. >> Oh, absolutely. Let us continue. >> [clears throat] [snorts] >> Again, this is just released footage that the judge ordered not to be shown to the public. She's already docked the witness for the prosecution. When is she GOING TO BE CHARGED WITH OBSTRUCTION? This is completely out of hand. She is doing everything she can to destroy this trial. Destroy this trial? She is absolutely evil. Now, I have a question that seems uh to make sense to me. Somebody needs to be charged with obstruction. As you know, I did this Uh don't you think the people who tore the crime scene to pieces and stole the flash memory out of the cameras? >> Yes. >> Perhaps some of those people could be charged with obstruction of justice. In fact, perhaps whoever is in charge of that investigation should be asked, "Did you look into that?" You know, think about it. Somebody was in charge of that investigation. I know I used to be in charge of investigations. Right? You give Garland that investigation, and what is Garland going to say? "I'm going to come in there and I'm going to say, why the hell isn't there yellow crime scene tape around that damn crime scene and 20 officers standing around and saying, nobody gets there Nobody steps in there but the people from our forensic lab who have on the space suits. Why are they contaminating my crime scene? And those guys that are grabbing stuff, grab them and lock them up and take them down and we'll talk to them soon later." Or if you didn't get to it later, why is someone not saying to those people, "You know, guys, uh who told you to do this?" >> Right. >> "And the things that you took from the crime scene, where is it?" >> it? We're going to need that. We're going to need that. We're going to need that. >> Take me to it right now. I want it." No, what These are questions that I mean, you don't have to be Perry Mason. >> No. >> I've given away my age. I don't even I don't remember Perry Mason, but I know the words. But I know the I know the I know the word. But you don't have to be a great lawyer lawyer, how's that, in order to figure these things out or an investigator. You know, it's just You look at it and you >> sense. >> Yeah. >> It's genuinely just common sense. A man was just shot in a public assassination at an event at a in a public location at a college at a speaking engagement, and within I mean, really hours, days, you have people like paving over stuff and cleaning everything up and you've got a guy taking the camera. What is happening? That is beyond my ability to comprehend and the idea that people just gloss over that so frequently and they they act as if you're crazy to even bring it up. They act as if that somehow you're some crazy conspiracy theorist because you feel like common-sensically somebody should be doing a genuine investigation and they should be you know, retracing steps and they should be measuring trajectories and all of the things that happen in typical crime scenes. I'm a true crime nerd. I watch a lot of true crime shows. I know how investigations work and that's not how they work. That's that's not how they don't do that. I mean if you look at the Idaho 4 murder case, it was a long time before they tore that house down. A long time. Like they they they generally try to keep crime scenes, evidence, witnesses, all of that stuff on hand, certainly at least through the trial of whomever the suspect is because they may need that stuff. They may need to take a jury to the crime scene so that the jury can see it for themselves. They do that regularly. They take little field trips so that jurors can see what the crime scene looks like and they can envision it for themselves. It's just nuts to me, Garland, that all of this is happening. >> Well, here's the issue with the crime scene. One of the first things you learn in the police academy, which I ran a police academy, the first thing you learn the first things you learn in your investigations class, right? Even in your basic law enforcement class is crime scene preservation. >> Yes. >> That's the term. That's a that's anyway, that like what are we going to what what you're a you know, just a regular cop out of the academy and there's a murder, right? And you're the first on the scene, right? What is what is critical? You have to an officer gets out of the academy first day out of the academy and there's a murder, he responds and there's a body. He knows this. Crime scene preservation. Nobody Nobody comes anywhere near this, including me. We're going to put tape You know, we're going to see if the person's alive, if they can be revived, things of that nature. Certainly, you're going to act on behalf of that, but nobody gets in there. Why? Because if you get a bunch of people run getting all over the crime scene, the a good defense lawyer is going to tear that to pieces. None of that stuff is going to be admissible. You're going to say, "We found this at the crime scene." He's going to say, "So, tell me, Mr. uh Officer Nixon, Detective Nixon, how many people walked across that crime scene?" "About 50." >> JonBenét Ramsey is a great example. The JonBenét Ramsey case, those people they had the whole neighborhood over, and they couldn't that that investigation was blown from minute one because they had 50 people in the house within hours of them discovering that she was missing, and they're never going to be able to solve that case now because all of the evidence was contaminated, all of it. >> Yeah, exactly. That's what you have. Crime pre-scene preservation means that you do not contaminate the crime scene. >> Mhm. >> And that's the big one because to me, that's the big thing that stinks here. >> Mhm. >> And that is, you know, number one, the story about this guy running around on a roof putting guns together and taking them apart now no longer exists, first of all. Not that it ever made sense, but now it doesn't exist at all. But additionally, the idea that I've never in my life seen an incident where a crime scene was taken to pieces, was disassembled, and the the they literally took the semen up >> Yes. >> and the stage, and the chairs, and took it all and moved it away. And here are my thoughts, you know, one of the things that you have there's this spray, there's different things, but there's a a spray that you spray around, and it'll show if there's gunpowder, if there's been an explosion. And it's possible that there could have been some kind of explosion or something on that at that crime scene >> Mhm. >> that they didn't want people to see. You know, there's a number of reasons things going on at that crime scene that they did not want people to see clearly. Somebody didn't want them to see, obviously, because they took it apart, but the issue is not what they did at the crime scene, it's what the investigators did afterwards because you got to have those people. You got to bring them in. Within Now, and and when that happened, if you come upon it and they're contaminating the crime scene, you got to say, "Okay, let's get everybody out of here." Then you have to say, "Wait a minute, some stuff was taken away. Grab everybody and bring them here and where'd you take that stuff?" And take me to it. I want it right now. That's evidence. Now, it probably won't be admissible now because it's been moved and they're going to challenge the provenance of it. >> Chain of command. >> And all of the uh yes, exactly. Uh chain of custody, actually. All of that chain of custody custody and all of that. But, the point being, you want it anyway so you can look at it. Nope. I'm sorry. It's all gone and these officers and then FBI people don't seem to be very inquisitive about any of this stuff, do they? >> No. And which is weird cuz this is a high-profile murder case and you would think that they would be very interested in gathering all of the information and evidence that they need to secure a uh a suspect and a conviction. And they might get their suspect and their conviction, but I am not convinced at all >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think that that um one of the things that we get from that particular video also is, this is important, is there was a narrative and that there apparently the Jack Posobiec's of the world and the other people that are Binnie Johnson's, the people who are saying that they didn't see a that they saw a video in 4K that doesn't exist. Why were they doing that in my opinion? There was a narrative and they had their job is to say, "This is the narrative. Tyler Robinson did that. Blah blah blah blah blah." And they just say whatever you need to do to What they the stuff apparently they just made it up. Looking at that video, I mean, it could have been me or you, for God's sake. Who [clears throat] knows who it could have been. You know what I mean? When you look at that guy. >> Yeah. >> But or guy, it could have been a girl. We don't even know that it was a human being. It could have been an alien, Bigfoot, who knows? But these people out here online, these uh what do we call them? Influencers. Apparently their job is to come up with anything they can to make the story work. >> Yeah. They're not I mean they're influencers. I guess that's the correct term, but they're really narrative managers, especially that crew. Uh I mean these are the same people who came outside with the binder of Epstein files and they were so proud of themselves. You know what I'm saying? Like these people are not legitimate actors. They are assets. These are people who are used to push a narrative, to push an agenda. And that's why they all repeat the exact same things. And you'll notice that the those same people online will often tweet the exact same stuff almost verbatim, using the same language. They may change it up just slightly, but that that whole crew of people, they're constantly And it's because the more you say something, the more likely people are to believe it. If you just repeat it over and over and over again, it becomes the truth. And that's what they're doing. >> Yeah, I think you're right. And and and I think um you have to ask yourself, you know, um are these people paid actors? You know, are these people um you know, are they simply, you know, part of an organ- Do they have something to hide? I don't know. You know, but but I ask myself why does someone go on Twitter constantly and just do everything they can to push the neo-con tropes, you know? >> Mhm. I think they probably do it for various reasons. They might have some dirt on some of them. Some of them just may want the opportunities. Um it's it's advantageous to them career-wise to play that role and they want the wealth and the fame and the riches and the followers and all of that stuff. Um I think there's probably various reasons for it, but the result is the same. I don't really care why you do it. Um, your intention really means nothing to me cuz the result is the same. >> Yeah, but what's the old There's an old saying that it's like the outcome is the intention, right? >> Exactly. >> That's all that matters. >> Hey, come see me on tour. We'll be in Burbank, California August 30th with the live celebrity panel show, and then September 18th through the 20th in Chicago, Illinois and Rosemont, Illinois. Go to jimmydore.com for a link for tickets. >> [music]