Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 34
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 34
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant. 20-CV-00833 (PAE)
DECLARATION OF KARA CHRISTENSON
I, Kara Christenson, declare as follows:
I. I am employed by the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
("BOP"), as a Government Information Specialist ("GIS") for Central Office, stationed at the
Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota ("FMC Rochester"). I have been assigned to
Central Office since August 2016. Prior to that time, I served as a Paralegal for the North Central
Regional Office ("NCRO") from September 2008 to August 2016. From June of 1994 through
September of 2008, I served in various legal support positions for the Legal Department at the
Federal Medical Center (FMC) in Rochester, MN. I have been employed by the BOP since March
1992.
2. As a Government Information Specialist, my duties include serving as a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) Specialist responsible for all facets of processing FOIA and Privacy Act
(PA) requests, with primary responsibility for analysis of, responses to, and monitoring of requests
for BOP records pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552. I also provide litigation support for the FOIA
EFTA00015361
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 34
requests assigned to me. In addition to these responsibilities, I am authorized to review for final
BOP disposition the FOIA determination responses prepared by other GIS staff in my office.
3. I submit this declaration in support of the BOP's motion for summary judgment, to
describe BOP's search for records responsive to the FOIA requests submitted by Plaintiff, review
of responsive records, and application of exemptions to responsive records.
4. The statements made in this declaration are based upon my personal knowledge
and information available to me in my official capacity and about which I have become
knowledgeable.
I. PLAINTIFF'S FOIA REOUESTS
A. FOIA Request 2019-05665
5. In an email dated August 13, 2019, the BOP received a FOIA request from Plaintiff.
The FOIA request sought documents "about Jeffrey Epstein who died at the Metropolitan
Correctional Center (MCC) on Aug. 10, 2019." See Attachment 1, Plaintiff's FOIA request dated
August 13, 2019. Specifically, Plaintiff sought the following records:
(1) The signed log in the Special Housing Unit at MCC that shows
when prison staff did rounds on July 22 and 23, and Aug. 9 and 10;
(2) All quarter entries (showing which cells he was housed in) for
Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(3) The CIM Clearance and Separatee data sheet for Jeffrey Epstein at
MCC;
(4) The chronological disciplinary records for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(5) The intake screening form for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(6) The security designation records for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(7) The inmate profile for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
EFTA00015362
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 3 of 34
(8) All incident reports related to Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(9) All medical reports related to Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(10) The signed visitor log for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC;
(11) Documents showing when MCC staff held meetings regarding
Jeffrey Epstein, and who attended;
(12) All records generated from the meeting at MCC during which it
was decided that Jeffrey Epstein would be taken off suicide watch;
(13) The Post-Watch report compiled in order to take Jeffrey Epstein
off suicide watch;
(14) The overtime sign-up sheets for the Special Housing Unit (9
South) at MCC for Aug. 9 and 10, and on July 22 and 23; and
(15) Documents showing which staff were augmented at MCC and
what positions they worked in on Aug. 9 and 10, and on July 22
and 23.
See id.
6. In a separate email, also dated August 13, 2019, the BOP received a second
FOIA request from Plaintiff for documents "about Jeffrey Epstein who died at the
Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on Aug. 10, 2019." See Attachment 2,
Plaintiff's FOIA request dated August 13, 2019, Email 2. Specifically, Plaintiff sought
the following records:
(1) All video camera footage at MCC pertinent to the Jeffrey Epstein
suicide and the first suicide attempt;
(2) All BOP documents pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and first
suicide attempt;
(3) All BOP documents, including email correspondence and meeting
minutes, pertaining to the decision to remove Jeffrey Epstein from
suicide watch;
EFTA00015363
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 4 of 34
(4) All BOP special investigation reports mentioning Jeffrey Epstein;
and
(5) All BOP correspondence with the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding
Jeffrey Epstein.
See id.
7. Because these two email requests from the Plaintiff were dated the same date and
received by the BOP on the same date, the BOP consolidated the requests as one request and
assigned this consolidated request FOIA Request Number 2019-05665. On September 23, 2019,
the BOP issued its final determination response regarding FOIA Request 2019-05665. See
Attachment 3, Determination Response for FOIA Request 2019-05665. In its final determination
response, the BOP categorically denied the request because "any records responsive to your
request are categorically exempt from disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5
U.S.C. §§ 552 (b)(5); (b)(6); (b)(7)(A); (b)(7)(C); (b)(7)(E); and (b)(7)(F). Id. The BOP also
advised Plaintiff, as to exemption (b)(7)(A), the application of the exemption was temporarily
utilized "to protect active and on-going law enforcement proceedings." Id.
8. Plaintiff appealed the BOP's determination response to the Office of Information
Policy ("OIP"), and in response, OIP affirmed the BOP's determination response on partially
modified grounds. See Attachment 4, OIP Determination Response on Plaintiff's Appeal.
Specifically, OIP determined the "BOP properly withheld this information in full because it is
protected from disclosure under the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A) and it is reasonably
foreseeable that disclosure of this information would harm the interests protected by this
provision." Id. OIP did not adjudicate the applicability of the other exemptions asserted by the
BOP. Id.
B. FOIA Request 2020-01336
EFTA00015364
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 5 of 34
9. In an email dated December 12, 2019, the BOP received a third FOIA request from
Plaintiff for documents "about Jeffrey Epstein who died at the Metropolitan Correctional Center
(MCC) on Aug. 10, 2019." See Attachment 5, Plaintiff's FOIA request dated December 12, 2019.
Specifically, Plaintiff sought the following records:
(1) The full log of Mr. Epstein's phone calls to and from the MCC;
(2) All email correspondence to and from Mr. Epstein while he was at the MCC
(including any correspondence through the Corrlinks system or any other
email system he had access to);
(3) The full log of people who visited Epstein while he was at the MCC when
they visited;
(4) The full list of people that Mr. Epstein had requested to be on his
approved visitor list;
(5) The full list of people that Mr. Epstein had requested to be on his
approved email correspondence list; and
(6) The full list of people that Mr. Epstein had requested to be on his
approved call list.
See id.
10. In an email dated January 2, 2020, the BOP received a fourth FOIA request from
Plaintiff for documents "about Jeffrey Epstein who died at the Metropolitan Correctional Center
(MCC) on Aug. 10, 2019." See Attachment 6, Plaintiff's FOIA request dated January 2, 2020.
Specifically, Plaintiff sought the following records:
See id. (1) The full recordings of the last three phone conversations that Mr. Epstein
had.
11. In a response to the Plaintiff dated January 9, 2020, the BOP advised Plaintiff that
the January 2, 2020, request and the December 19, 2020, request were aggregated under FOIA
EFTA00015365
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 6 of 34
Request Number 2020-01336. See Attachment 7, January 9, 2020, Aggregation of Requests
Response Letter. The BOP did not issue a final determination response concerning FOIA Request
2020-01336 prior to the filing of this action. On January 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed its Complaint in
this case.
II. SEARCH FOR RECORDS
12. The BOP initiated a search of its records systems to identify records and other
information potentially responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA requests. This search process entailed my
consulting with staff across BOP divisions, offices, and facilities regarding the various items
requested in Plaintiff's FOIA requests, and determining which BOP divisions, offices or facilities
likely maintained potentially responsive records; staff undertaking searches for records; and staff
subsequently forwarding any potentially responsive records to me for review to determine whether
the records were responsive to the request, whether any records were duplicates of any other
records received in response to the search; whether any records were exempt in whole or in part
pursuant to any FOIA exemption; and whether any non-exempt information could be reasonably
segregated from otherwise exempt records pursuant to FOIA to provide maximum release of the
records.
A. BOP's Search for Records and Records Retrieved
13. SHU LOGS — Based the experience and training of myself and other staff involved
in searching for records, it was determined that the SHU at MCC New York is the most likely
place to locate records responsive to the request for "[t]he signed log in the Special Housing
Unit at MCC that shows when prison staff did rounds on July 22 and 23, and Aug. 9 and I."
EFTA00015366
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 7 of 34
However, the SHU log books in question were handed over to the Office of the Inspector
General ("OIG") on or about August 22, 2019. Therefore, the BOP is no longer in possession
of the log books that are the subject of the FOIA request, and no responsive records were
located. Scanned copies of certain log book pages, count slips, or other records showing when
staff conducted rounds in the SHU were retained in the electronic files of certain individual
staff members at MCC and were located through their searches for these documents.
14. SENTRY QUARTER'S HISTORY - Based on the experience and training of
myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the SENTRY
database was the most likely place where records responsive to the request for "[a]ll quarter entries
(showing which cells he was housed in) for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC" would be located. The BOP
SENTRY database is a real-time information system consisting of various applications for
processing sensitive but unclassified (SBU) inmate information and for property management.
Data collected and stored in the system include information relating to the care, classification,
subsistence, protection, discipline, and programs of federal inmates. To search SENTRY for
responsive information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054
and the transaction code of PP37 for Quarters history. The search returned the Inmate History
Quarters for inmate Epstein, which was produced to Plaintiff on June 22, 2019, with redactions.
15. CIM CLEARANCE SHEET/SEPARATEE DATA - Based on the experience
and training of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the
SENTRY database was the most likely place where the "CIM Clearance and Separatee data sheet
for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC" would be located. To search SENTRY for responsive information,
staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 and the transaction code
7
EFTA00015367
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 8 of 34
of PPIO for am and Separatee information. This SENTRY search returned the CIM Clearance
and Separatee data sheet for inmate Epstein, which was produced to Plaintiff in full on June 22,
2019.
16. DISCIPLINARY RECORDS - Based on the experience and training of myself
and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the SENTRY database
was the most likely place where the "chronological disciplinary records for Jeffrey Epstein at
MCC" would be located. To search SENTRY for responsive information, staff used Jeffrey
Epstein's unique inmate Register Number of 76318-054 and the transaction code of PD15 for
disciplinary history. This SENTRY search returned the disciplinary history for inmate Epstein
which was produced to Plaintiff in full on June 22, 2019, and one incident report for Epstein, which
was withheld in full as noted in the attached index at Entry 1.
17. INTAKE SCREENING FORM - Based on the experience and training of myself
and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the DROP File was where
records responsive to the request for "the intake screening form for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC" would
be located. A DROP File is a temporary, condensed version of a typical inmate Central File.
(Program Statement 5800.17, Inmate Central Files, Privacy Folder and Parole Mini-Files) Only
inmates in pre-trial status have their records maintained in a DROP File. Upon an inmate's
sentencing, the DROP File records are incorporated into a regular Central File that follows the
inmate for the remainder of incarceration. The DROP File contains records such as remand
orders, some displinary information, personal property records and routine custody related records.
Based on my experience, I requested staff at MCC New York conduct a search of inmate Epstein's
DROP file for a copy of his Intake Screening Form as that is the location most reasonably expected
8
EFTA00015368
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 9 of 34
to locate the form. A review of inmate Epstein's DROP file did not produce records responsive to
Plaintiff's request for the Intake Screening Form. Based on my own experience and conversations
with MCC staff, there are no other locations reasonably expected to produce results.
18. SECURITY DESIGNATION - Based on the experience and training of myself
and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the SENTRY database
was the most likely place where "the security designation records for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC"
would be located. To search SENTRY for responsive information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's
unique inmate register number of 76318-054 and the transaction codes of PPGO for Security
Designation and PPG6 for Classification. The search returned the security designation for inmate
Epstein, and produced to Plaintiff in full on June 22, 2019.
19. INMATE PROFILE - Based on the experience and training of myself and other
staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the SENTRY database was the most
likely place where "the inmate profile for Jeffrey Epstein at MCC" would be located. To search
SENTRY for responsive information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number
of 76318-054 and the transaction code of PP44 for Inmate Profile. The search returned the inmate
profile security designation for inmate Epstein, and produced to Plaintiff in full on June 22, 2019.
20. INCIDENT REPORTS - Based on the experience and training of myself and
other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the SENTRY database was the
most likely place where "[a]ll incident reports related to Jeffrey Epstein at MCC" would be located.
To search SENTRY for responsive information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register
number of 76318-054 and the transaction code of PD15 for disciplinary history. This SENTRY
search returned the disciplinary history for inmate Epstein which was produced to Plaintiff in full
9
EFTA00015369
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 34
on June 22, 2019, and one incident report for Epstein, which was withheld in full as noted in the
attached index at Entry I.
21. MEDICAL REPORTS - Based on the experience and training of myself and other
staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the Bureau Electronic Medical
Record (BEMR) was the most likely place where "all medical reports related to Jeffrey Epstein at
MCC." BEMR is the electronic medical records repository for the BOP that contains all medical
records for inmates in BOP custody. To search BEMR for inmate related information, staff used
Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve all of his medical records.
The search returned any medical, dental, optical and/or psychological records for inmate Epstein.
The psychological records were withheld in full, as noted on the attached index at Entry 19. BOP
is currently revewing the remaining BEMR records to segregate non-exempt information and
intends to release the records in part.
22. VISITOR LOG - Based on the experience and training of myself and other staff
involved in searching for records, it was determined that the TRUVIEW database was the most
likely place where visitor log information for inmate Epstein would be located. TRUVIEW is a
BOP database that combines several inmate information databases (i.e., inmate finances, call lists,
messaging, visiting, and volunteer management) into one program. Regarding inmate visitors,
the TRUVIEW contains a log of all inmate visits. To search TRUVIEW for inmate related
information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve
all of his visitor information. The search returned the Federal Bureau of
Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center Report for inmate Epstein, produced to Plaintiff with redactions
on June 22, 2019. Scanned copies of certain log book pages showing visitors to Epstein were
10
EFTA00015370
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 11 of 34
retained in the electronic files of certain individual staff members at MCC and were located
through their searches for these documents. The search returned two pages of scanned visitor
logs, which BOP is reviewing for segregable non-exempt information and intends to release in
part.
23. MEETING DOCUMENTS - Based on the experience and training of myself and
other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of staff emails would
be the most likely way to locate records responsive to the request for "[d]ocuments showing when
MCC staff held meetings regarding Jeffrey Epstein, and who attended." The email search is
described in Paragraphs 44-46, infra. Additional searches for meetings documents are described
in the Declaraton of Nicole McFarland (the "McFarland Declaration").
24. SUICIDE WATCH REMOVAL MEETING DOCUMENTS - Based on the
experience and training of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was
determined that a search of staff emails would be the most likely way to locate records responsive
to the request for "[a]ll records generated from the meeting at MCC during which it was decided
that Jeffrey Epstein would be taken off suicide watch." The email search is described in
Paragraphs 44-46, infra. Additional searches for meetings documents are described in the
McFarland Declaration.
25. POST- WATCH REPORT - Based on the experience and training of myself and
other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of staff emails and
BEMR were the most likely ways to locate "the Post-Watch report compiled in order to take Jeffrey
Epstein off suicide watch." The email search is described in Paragraphs 44-46, infra and the
BEMR search is described in Paragraph 21 supra. The BOP located the psychological records
11
EFTA00015371
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 12 of 34
for Epstein from BEMR, including a post-suicide watch report for Epstein prepared as part of his
removal from suicide watch, which was withheld in full, as noted in the attached index at Entry
19.
26. OVERTIME SIGN-UP SHEETS - Based on the experience and training of
myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the
Roster/Overtime Program was the most likely place where "[t]he overtime sign-up sheets for the
Special Housing Unit (9 South) at MCC for Aug. 9 and 10, and on July 22 and 23" would be
located. The Roster/Overtime Program is a web based program that allows staff to submit
overtime requests, submit Quarterly Preferences, view Daily Assignments, and view the
Mandatory Overtime List. The search returned the MCC daily assignment rosters for August 9
and 10, 2019, and July 22 and 23, 2019, which were withheld in full, except for one page released
in part from each roster on June 22, 2020, as noted in the attached index at Entries 7-9.
27. STAFF AUGMENTING RECORDS - Based on the experience and training of
myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the
Roster/Overtime Program was the most likely place where "Documents showing which staff were
augmented at MCC and what positions they worked in on Aug. 9 and 10, and on July 22 and 23"
would be located. The search returned the MCC daily assignment rosters for August 9 and 10,
2019, and July 22 and 23, 2019, which were withheld in full, except for one page released in part
from each roster on June 22, 2020, as noted in the attached index at Entries 7-9.
28. VIDEO CAMERA FOOTAGE - Based on the experience and training of myself
and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the Special Investigativer
Agent's (SIA) office was the most likely place where video camera footage responsive to the
12
EFTA00015372
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 13 of 34
request for lap video camera footage at MCC pertinent to the Jeffrey Epstein suicide and the
first suicide attempt" would be located. After consulting with the custodian for such records, it
was determined that the BOP does not have possession of responsive records because all
video/NICE vision equipment was handed over to the FBI on or about August 10, 2019.
29. The BOP sought to preserve video footage from July 23, 2019, the night of
Epstein's apparent suicide attempt, pursuant to a preservation request in a criminal case.
However, the BOP inadvertently preserved footage showing a different area within MCC, and the
video footage from the SHU at MCC no longer exists on the backup system because of a technical
error. See Letter from the Government dated January 9, 2020, Dkt. No. 182, United States v.
Tartaglione, No. 16-cr-832 (KMK).
30. SUICIDE ATTEMPT AND SUICIDE RECORDS - Based on the experience
and training of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a
search of the Bureau Electronic Medical Record (BEMR) and a search for Forms 583 and related
documents were the best methods to locate records responsive to the request for "[Ill BOP
documents pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and first suicide attempt." To locate medical
and psychological records responsive to this request, BOP searched BEMR. GOP's BEMR
search is detailed supra at Paragraph 21. The psychological records were withheld in full, as noted
on the attached index at Entry 19. BOP is currently revewing the remaining BEMR records to
segregate non-exempt information and intends to release the records in part.
31. With regard to the Form 583 and related documents, MCC Staff located the Form
583 and related documents concerning Epstein's apparent suicide attempt on July 23, 2019 as
described in the McFarland Declaration. Because staff at MCC New York did not have access to
13
EFTA00015373
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 14 of 34
the Form 583 and related documents concerning Epstein's suicide on August 10, 2019, I requested
these records from the Correctional Programs Division in the Central Office of the Bureau of
Prisons (BOP). Based on my knowledge and experience, I am aware that the Correctional
Programs Division (CPD) has access to all Form 583s and related documents regardless of the
institution that created the Form 583 as they are the Division that has overall responsibility for all
Correctional Services Departments in the BOP. Accordingly, once I became aware staff at MCC
New York no longer had access to the Form 583 and related documents from August 10, 2019,
knowing that the CPD was the location most reasonably expected to maintain the Form 583 and
related documents concerning Epstein's suicide on August 10, 2019, I requested, and received, the
records from them. The 583 Forms were withheld in full, as noted in the attached Index at Entries
15 and 18.
32. BOP staff also located additional reports prepared following Epstein's apparent
suicide attempt and Epstein's suicide, including a psychological reconstruction of inmate death
and responses thereto, including a memorandum; a document titled MCC New York Updates; draft
letters to Epstein's brother, Chief Judge McMahon and Judge Berman; a letter to the MCC warden
dated August 14, 2019; photo sheets from Epstein's July 23, 2019 apparent suicide attempt and
Epstein's August 10, 2019 suicide, a chain of custody form from Epstein's July 23 apparent suicide
attempt, reports of the July 23, 2019 apparent suicide attempt, memoranda and reports of Epstein's
August 10, 2019 suicide. MCC staff located these documents by manually searching their files for
records pertaining to Epstein's July 23, 2019 apparent suicide attempt and Epstein's August 10,
2019 suicide. These records were withheld in full or withheld in part as noted in the attached Index
at Entries 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 35, and 36.
14
EFTA00015374
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 34
33. SUICIDE WATCH REMOVAL DOCUMENTS - Based on the experience and
training of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that, in
addition to any records that may exist in the BEMR for inmate Epstein, a search of staff emails
was the other place where records responsive to the request for 101 BOP documents, including
email correspondence and meeting minutes, pertaining to the decision to remove Jeffrey Epstein
from suicide watch" would be. The email search is described in Paragraphs 44-46, infra and the
scope and results of the BEMR search are described in Paragraph 28 supra. These records were
withheld in full as noted in the attached Index at Entries 19 and 52. Additional searches for
documents pertaining to the decision to remove Epstein from suicide watch are described in the
McFarland Declaration.
34. SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS - Based on the experience and training
of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the
BOP Special Investigative Section ("SIS") database known as TRUINTEL was the best way to
locate records responsive to the request for "[a]ll BOP special investigation reports mentioning
Jeffrey Epstein." The SIS database contains information related to investigation of both inmates
and staff. To search the SIS database for special investigation reports about inmate Epstein, staff
used inmate Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve any and all special
investigative reports maintained by the BOP about inmate Epstein. The search returned one
Inmate Investigative Report for inmate Epstein, which was withheld in full, as noted on the
attached index at Entry 9.
35. CORRESPONDENCE - Based on the experience and training of myself and other
staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of staff emails was the most
15
EFTA00015375
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 16 of 34
effective way to locate records responsive to the request for "[a]It BOP correspondence with the
U.S. Attorney's Office regarding Jeffrey Epstein." The email search is described in Paragraphs
44-46, infra.
36. PHONE LOGS - Based on the experience and training of myself and other staff
involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the TRUVIEW database was
the most likely place where a "full log of Mr. Epstein's phone calls to and from the MCC" would
be located. Regarding inmate telephone calls, TRUVIEW contains a list of all people who were
approved to be on inmate Epstein's telephone list, and it also has a log of all inmate telephone calls
not made on a legal line. To search TRUVIEW for inmate related information, staff used Jeffrey
Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve all of his telephone call
information. The search returned the Federal Bureau of Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center
Report for inmate Epstein, produced to Plaintiff with redactions on June 22, 2019.
37. EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS - Based on the experience and training of myself
and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the TRULINCS database
was the most likely place where "[a]ll email correspondence to and from Mr. Epstein while he was
at the MCC (including any correspondence through the Corrlinks system or any other email system
he had access to[]" would be located. TRULINCS is a BOP database that is comprised of two
main components. One component is the inmate application used solely by the inmates and
provides inmates the capability to manage their contact list for emails, communicate with members
of the public on an inmate's contact list via email, and communicate with staff. To search
TRULINCS for inmate related information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register
number of 76318-054 to check for email communications to and from inmate Epstein. The search
16
EFTA00015376
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 17 of 34
did not return any results for emails to/from Epstein's TRULINCS account - either to/from any
member of the public or to/from staff.
38. VISITOR LOGS - Based on the experience and training of myself and other staff
involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the TRUVIEW database was
the most likely place where "[t]he full log of people who visited Mr. Epstein while he was at the
MCC and when they visited" would be located. Regarding inmate visitors, the TRUVIEW
contains a log of all inmate visits. To search TRUVIEW for inmate related information, staff
used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve all of his visitor
information. The search returned the Federal Bureau of Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center Report
for inmate Epstein, produced to Plaintiff with redactions on June 22, 2019.
39. In addition, staff at MCC searched for physical visitor logs and located one log
book showing a visitor for Jeffrey Epstein on July 30, 2019. A copy of the page from the log
book showing this visit was produced to the Plaintif with redactions on June 22, 2019. All other
physical visitor logs were handed over to the OIG on or about August 22, 2019, and the BOP is no
longer in possession of these logs.
40. VISITOR LISTS - Based on the experience and training of myself and other staff
involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the TRUVIEW database was
the most likely place where "[t]he full list of people that Mr. Epstein had requested to be on his
approved visitor list." would be located. To search TRUVIEW for inmate related information,
staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve all of his visitor
information. The search returned the Federal Bureau of Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center
Report for inmate Epstein, produced to Plaintiff with redactions on June 22, 2019.
17
EFTA00015377
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 18 of 34
41. EMAIL LIST - Based on the experience and training of myself and other staff
involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the TRUVIEW database was
the most likely place where "[t]he full list of people that Mr. Epstein had requested to be on his
approved email correspondence list" would be located. To search TRUVIEW for inmate related
information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve
all of his visitor information. The search returned the Federal Bureau of
Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center Report for inmate Epstein, produced to Plaintiff with redactions
on June 22, 2019.
42. APPROVED CALL LIST- Based on the experience and training of myself and
other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a search of the TRUVIEW
database was the most likely place where "[t]he full list of people that Mr. Epstein had requested
to be on his approved call list" would be located. Regarding inmate approved call lists, the
TRUVIEW database contains a log of all people who are approved to be on an inmate's call list.
To search TRUVIEW for inmate related information, staff used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate
register number of 76318-054 to retrieve all of his visitor information. The search returned the
Federal Bureau of Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center Report for inmate Epstein, produced to
Plaintiff with redactions on June 22, 2019.
43. RECORDINGS OF TELEPHONE CALLS - Based on the experience and
training of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that the
TRUVIEW database was the most likely place where the approved call list information for inmate
Epstein would be located to determine if there were any "recordings of the last three phone
conversations that Mr. Epstein had." To search TRUVIEW for inmate related information. staff
18
EFTA00015378
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 19 of 34
used Jeffrey Epstein's unique inmate register number of 76318-054 to retrieve all of his call
information. The search returned the Federal Bureau of Prisons/TRUVIEW/Inmate Center
Report for inmate Epstein, produced to Plaintiff with redactions on June 22, 2019. Epstein did
not have any calls listed there, and so no recordings of Epstein's calls were located. As noted
above, Epstein did make telephone calls on the legal line at the MCC, but these calls were
unmonitored, unrecorded and not logged in TRUVIEW, such that there is no system to search for
records of them.
III. BOP'S EMAIL SEARCH
44. Below is a description of the email search for records as it relates to requests for
which a search of email records was conducted, as noted above. Based on the experience and
training of myself and other staff involved in searching for records, it was determined that a
search of the BOP's GROUPWISE email system was appropriate as GROUPWISE is the BOP's
email client platform for staff. Based on the scope of the requests, the GROUPWISE email
accounts for the below identified BOP staff was the most likely place where communications
about inmate Epstein would likely be located, as these BOP staff were key decision makers at
the institution, regional, and central office levels of the BOP and were likely involved and likely
made recommendations about Mr. Epstein's classification while he was confined at MCC New
York. The email search was conducted using both the staff member's name and his or her
unique BOP identifier and other particularized search terms based on the Plaintiff's FOIA
Requests. The staff whose emails were searched were as follows:
(1) Acting Director Hurwitz;
(2) Former Regional Director Johnathan Ray Ormond;
(3) Regional Counsel Darrin Howard;
19
EFTA00015379
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 34
(4) Deputy Regional Counsel Adam Johnson;
(5) Correctional Programs Administrator Sukenna Stokes;
(6) Warden Laraine N'Diaye;
(7) Associate Warden Shirley Skipper Scott;
(8) Associate Warden Charisma Edge;
(9) Associate Warden Brian Best;
(10) Executive Assistant Lee Plourde;
(11) Supervisory Attorney Nicole McFarland;
12) Captain Jermaine Darden; and
(13) Chief of Psychology Elissa Miller.
45. Based on the scope of the FOIA request, the search terms used for the search and
the date range for the search were as follows:
(1) Jeffrey Epstein, 76318-054, MCC, New York, meetings, suicide watch,
suicide, AUSA, USAO and
(2) 7/6/2019 (Date Epstein went into custody at MCC) through 1/9/2020 (the
date of Complainant's last FOIA Request).
46. The email search produced 1911 records, which totaled 18,062 pages. After
review of the records, it was determined that 3176 pages of these records were responsive and
non-duplicative.
III. APPLICATION OF EXEMPTIONS
Segregability
47. I and other FOIA staff reviewed and continue to review the records located in
response to Plaintiff's FOIA requests to determine whether or not there is any non-exempt
information in the records that could be reasonably segregated and released. We have already
determind that 584 pages contain such information, and those pages were released, with
appropriate redactions, to Plaintiff on June 22, July 7, and July 10. Other than these 584 pages
20
EFTA00015380
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 21 of 34
and the records listed as withheld in full on the attached index, I and other FOIA staff continue to
review the remaining records because we currently believe that they contain segregable
information, such that the additional records could be released in part. Each of the records
withheld in full includes exempt information that is inextricably intertwined with any non-
exempt information in the document, such that segregating any non-exempt information would
be of little to no informational value.
48. All of the responsive records withheld in full by BOP are withheld under FOIA
Exemption 7(A), except for the 2 pages of draft letters at Entry 11 of the attached index and the
57 pages of email records at Entry 54 of the attached index, withheld under Exemption 5 and
discussed below. The basis for withholdings under Exemption 7(A) is explained in the
accompanying declaration of Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney Russell Capone. In
addition to the withholdings in full under Exemptions 7(A) and 5, BOP has also withheld certain
records or portions of records under Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and 7(F).
A. Withholdings under Exemption 5
49. Title 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5) ("Exemption 5") excludes from disclosure "inter-
agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party .
.. in litigation with the agency." 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5). Exemption 5 incorporates all the normal
civil discovery privileges, including the deliberative process privilege andand the attorney-client
privilege. BOP has withheld records in full and in part under the deliberative process privilege.
As noted in the attached index, BOP has withheld in full under the deliberative process privilege
the incident report for Epstein's July 23, 2019 apparent suicide attempt, the psychological
21
EFTA00015381
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 22 of 34
reconstruction of Epstein's suicide and responses thereto, and draft letters to Epstein's brother
and Chief Judge McMahon and Judge Berman.
a. The incident report for Epstein's July 23, 2019, apparent suicide attempt is
predecisional because it preceded the decisions to remove Epstein from
suicide watch and to house him in a particular cell in the SHU with a cellmate.
Decisions concerning cell designation for inmates and whether to cell an
inmate with another inmate or with a particular inmate are policy decisions
involving open and frank conversations by senior BOP staff to include
security staff, medical staff, unit staff, and executive staff. These discussions
are particularly amplified when dealing with high profile inmates and for
which the inmate's incarceration with the BOP is the subject of great media
and public attention. Thus, the incident report was prepared to assist BOP in
making those decisions because it documents details of Epstein's apparent
suicide attempt that were relevant to the determination of whether he would be
removed from suicide watch and how and where he would be housed
thereafter. It was deliberative because it bears on the exercise of a policy-
oriented judgment by assisting in the application of GOP's policies of
releasing certin inmates from suicide watch and housing them in specific
circumstances based on details of their psychological profile and any suicide
attempt. Release of the incident report would hamper BOP employees'
abilities to frankly discuss the circumstances of suicide attempts and assess
GOP's suicide prevention policies.
b. The psychological reconstruction of Epstein's suicide and responses thereto
are predecisional because they preceded GOP's decisions regarding how to
respond to Epstein's suicide and was prepared to assist in deciding which
actions to take. Specifically, the psychological reconstruction report was part
of a review by BOP following Epstein's suicide of MCC's suicide prevention
policies, including a determination of whether MCC's suicide prevention
policies needed to be changed. It was also part of a review to determine
whether or not wider changes, such as changes in personnel or leadership at
MCC, were necessary. Further, the purpose of the report is to provide Senior
BOP staff information for which to consider future policy considerations
throughout the BOP concerning the care and custody of inmates. Thus, these
reports are ultimately recommendations in that they not only point out factual
information, but with this factual information Senior BOP staff are able to
consider strategic initiatives. The report is deliberative because it contains
multiple recommendations —and responses to certain recommendations -for
how MCC should change its suicide preventation policies and measures,
including, for example, recommendations about double-ceiling and direct
observation of inmates, duration of suicide watches, how to structure such
22
EFTA00015382
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 23 of 34
watches. These recommendations are used by Senior BOP officials in terms
of policy considerations that impact BOP operations across facilities.
Further, any such recommendations are discussed by Senior BOP officials and
as such requires the frank and open assessment by these officials in reaching a
decision to adopt a policy recommendation. Release of the report would
hamper frank and open discussions and assessments by these officials in
reaching policy decisions.
c. The draft letters are predecisional because they were prepared in advance of
final letters sent to individuals and to assist in determining the content of the
final letters, Agency formal letters are purposed as final Agency policy
directives and members of the public and press view Agency letters no
differently than officially adopted policy statements. As such, draft letters
are not the Agency's final response and like other policy related documents,
Agency letters are not an official statement of the Agency until a final letter is
prepared and dispatched They are deliberative because they bear on the
exercise of a policy-oriented judgment in that they are part of BOP's
determination of how best to inform family members and other relevant
parties of the death of an inmate. Their release would harm BOP's ability to
determine how best to inform family members and other relevant parties of
the death of an inmate.
Certain email records have also been withheld in part under the
deliberative process privilege.
d. One category of emails pertains to Epstein's July 23, 2019, apparent suicide
attempt and incarceration. These emails are predecisional because they were
prepared to assist BOP in making decisions about Epstien's incarceration,
including whether he would remain -on suicide watch and whether he would
be housed with a cellmate. They are deliberative because they bear on the
exercise of a policy-oriented judgment, namely the application of BOP's
policies of releasing certin inmates from suicide watch and housing them
under particularized housing measures, including based on details of their
psychological profile and any suicide attempt. The decision to place an
inmate on suicide watch or to remove an inmate from suicide watch involves
involves policy deliberations from several BOP senior level stakteholders
from medical staff, psychology staff, Correctional Program Division Staff,
security staff, and executive staff. Release of the information in these emails
would hamper BOP's employees' ability to frankly discuss decisions
regarding placing inmates on and removing inmates from suicide watch and to
discuss suicide prevention policies.
23
EFTA00015383
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 24 of 34
e. One category of emails pertains to press inquiries concerning Epstein and his
death and how BOP will respond to them. They are predecisional because
they were prepared in advance of GOP's decisions regarding whether and how
to change policies at MCC, including suicide prevent policies, following
Epstein's death and in advance of GOP's decisions regarding whether and
how to respond to press inquiries about Epstein. They were prepared to assist
in how deciding how BOP would respond to inquiries because they are
communications, including deliberations, between BOP employees about how
to respond. They are deliberative because they consist of GOP's
considerations of how to respond and include drafts of responses to press
inquiries and discusions of what responses should be provided. They are also
deliberative because they bear on GOP's decisions regarding whether and how
polcies at MCC, including suicide prevention policies, should change, in that
they include details of Epstein's death, the response or reaction of BOP
employees to details of Epstein's death, and discussion of steps taken at MCC
following Epstein's death, including responding to press inquiries. Release of
the information in these emails would hamper GOP's decisionmaking
processes in determining how to communicate with the press and its
assessment of policies at facilities where suicides occur.
f. One category of emails pertains to Epstein's suicide and GOP's response to
Epstein's suicide. They are predecisional because they preceded GOP's
decisions regarding how to respond to Epstein's suicide and were prepared to
assist in deciding -areas of policy consideration for the GOP's suicide
preventation strategies. Specifically, they relate to deliberations within BOP
and MCC following Epstein's suicide about MCC's policies, including its
suicide prevention policies. They are deliberative because they include
communications that were part of a review to determine whether or not policy
changes, such as changes in suicide perevention policies, personnel or
leadership at MCC, were necessary. Release of the emails would hamper BOP
employees' frank discussion of suicide prevention policies (and leadership
and personnel decisions) at its facilities and whether it is necessary to change
these policies (or leadership or personnel).
50. As indicated at Entry 54 in the attached index, one 56-page set of emails was
withheld in full under the attorney-client privilege. This group of withheld emails consists of
communications between BOP employees and GOP's attorneys, Assistant United States
Attorneys in the Civil Division of the USAO-SDNY, concerning requests for documents related
24
EFTA00015384
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 24 Filed 08/05/20 Page 25 of 34
to Epstein, preservation of documents related to Epstein, and how to respond to requests pursuant
to Department of Justice regulations (known as Touhy regulations). As communications
between attorneys and a client, these emails were properly withheld under Exemption 5. Release
of these emails would negatively affect BOP's ability to seek out and receive frank legal counsel.
Threshold Justification For Application of Exemption 7
51. As a threshold to applying Exemption 7, an agency has to demonstrate that the
"records or information [were] compiled for law enforcement purposes." 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(7).
52. The BOP is a law enforcement agency. The term "law enforcement officer" is defined
as "an employee of the Bureau of Prisons or Federal Prison Industries, Inc." See, e.g, 5 U.S.C.
§ 8401(17)(D)(i). Furthermore, BOP employees perform law enforcement functions. They
possess the authority to make arrests, 18 U.S.C. § 3050; seize evidence, 18 U.S.C. § 4012; and
execute searches on inmates and visitors to the institution, 28 C.F.R. §§ 511.10-511.12, 552.10-
552.14. Additionally, the BOP is tasked with the law enforcement mission of protecting inmates,
staff, and the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 4042(a)(1)-(3) ("The Bureau of Prisons, under the
direction of the Attorney General, shall (1) have charge of the management and regulation of all
Federal penal and correctional institutions; (2) provide suitable quarters and provide for the
safekeeping, care, and subsistence of all persons charged with or convicted of offenses against the
United States, or held as witnesses or otherwise; (3) provide for the protection, instruction, and
discipline of all persons charged with or convicted of offenses against the United States . . ..").
53. All of the records withheld in full or in part were compiled for law en
📷 Images in this document (67 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image is a document scan, specifically a page from a legal case document. The document is titled "Case No. 1:09-cv-00005-PAC-PAC" and is labeled as "Document 43." It appears to be a page from a court proceeding, with text that includes a list of numbered points, which are likely arguments or points of law related to the case. The text is dense and formal, typical of legal documents. There are
[Image 2] The image displays a document, which appears to be a court filing or legal document. The text is too small to read in detail, but it includes numbered paragraphs and sub-points, which are typical of legal documents. The document is structured with headings and subheadings, and there are references to case numbers and filing dates. The text is dense and formal, suggesting that it is a legal or offi
[Image 3] The image shows a page from a legal document or a report. The text is written in English and appears to be a list of recommendations or guidelines. The document is numbered "Page 2" and is part of a larger document, as indicated by the page number at the bottom. The text is organized into numbered points, suggesting a structured discussion or analysis. The content of the document is not detailed i
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official letter. The text is in English and includes references to legal procedures and information requests. The document is structured with headings and paragraphs, and there are visible sections titled "Information Request," "Information Request," and "Information Request." The text mentions the Freedom of Information Act and
[Image 5] The image is a document scan, specifically a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice. The letter is addressed to "Alexander Hamilton," and it appears to be a formal communication regarding a legal matter. The visible text includes the sender's address, the recipient's address, the date, and the page number. The letterhead features the U.S. Department of Justice logo. The content of the letter i
[Image 6] The image appears to be a scanned document, specifically a page from a legal case file. The document is a "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" filed by the plaintiff. It includes a heading, a case number, a date, and a page number. The text within the document discusses legal matters and references specific sections of the law. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be described wit