To: Robert Glassman

EFTA00016896 Dataset 8 5 pages Download original PDF Download as text
From: To: Robert Glassman Cc: , Nathan Werksman <N Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:13:49 +0000 Hi Robert— I just saw your email about scheduling. I'm checking with the team, but my cell is if you need to reach us. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 16, 2019, at 6:52 AM, Robert Glassman <II IIIMM> wrote: • — what's your cell again? > Robert S. Glassman > Panish Shea & Boyle > psblaw.com >> On Dec 13, 2019, at 2:06 PM, C wrote: >> Totally understand, just wanted to ask. We'll see you Monday at 11:00. And thanks for that additional info as well. ».= >> Original Message >> From: Robert Glassman •t > >> Sent: Friday,December 13, 2019 16:14 » To: » Cc: ; Nathan Werksman >> Subject: Re: SDNY investigation >> , unfortunately, we can't do earlier than 11. She just needs time to get to my office after taking care of kid stu etc. >> Re the mom, my understanding is that she is overseas somewhere. Pretty sure she's not in the US. I will find out and we can chat about it on Monday. >> Robert S. Glassman » Panish Shea & Boyle » psblaw.com >>> On Dec 12, 2019, at 1:30 PM, wrote: >» EFTA00016896 >>> Robert, >>> >>> We wanted to ask if it might be possible to start at 10:00 on Monday rather than 11:00? If not, we totally understand (I think you may have wanted time to meet with her before starting with us) but wanted to check. >>> .1 >>> Separately, I know eft you a message earlier, but since we're emailing about this we can just ask -- we were wondering if it mig e possible to tell us where mother currently lives? Not her literal address, but just city and/or state -- we don't have any intention of contacting her before we speak to you and your client in person, but just for our longer-term logistical planning, we're wondering where we would be headed if and when an interview of her were to be appropriate. >>> >>> thanks, >» >>> >>> -----Ori inal Messa e >>> From: >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 13:15 >» To: Robert Glassman < >>> Cc: ; Nathan Werksman < >>> Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >>> >>> Confirmed, thanks -- we'll see you then. And just on substance, I think we mentioned these topics when we spoke on the phone earlier, but just to refresh, I expect we'll want to talk through some additional specifics on travel, we'll talk more about other steps we'll be looking to take in our investigation for corroboration and what the appropriate timing and format of that would be, and to start to talk about specific conduct by Epstein and/or Maxwell to whatever extent is comfortable with that at this stage. And we'll also likely refresh on some other topics as well, but just to flag some of the more immediate areas we'll expect to cover. Let us know if it's useful to chat again before Monday, otherwise we'll see you then. >>> >>> thanks again, >».= >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message >>> From: Robert Glassman < >>> Sent: Wednesday,December , : >>> To: >>> Cc: ; Nathan Werksman >>> Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >>> >>> Let's do 11 a.m. on Monday. >>> >>> Robert Glassman, Esq. >» Panish Shea & Bo le LLP >>> >>> e : >>> Fax: >>> Ema >>> Web: www.psblaw.com >>> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >>> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). CA 90025 EFTA00016897 Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone, and delete all copies of this message. >» >>> If you are a potential client, the information you disclose to us by email will be kept in strict confidence and will be protected to the full extent of the law. Please be advised, however, that Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and its lawyers do not represent you until you have signed a retainer agreement with the firm. Until that time, you are responsible for any statutes of limitations or other deadlines for your case or potential case. >» >» >» Ori inal Messa e >» From: ) [mailto >>> Sent: Wednesday, Decem. 9-11 2019 8.2 ) AM >» To: Robert Glassman >» Cc: ; Nathan Werksman Ca- >>> Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >» >» Robert, >» >>> That's great, thanks very much. Do you have a preference on timing? Anytime that morning starting at 10:00 a.m. or later would be fine for us, or we could also start early afternoon if that's easier--whatever you and prefer. And our hope is that we'd be able to cover everything on Monday, but we'll also be available on Tuesday if that ends up being useful as well. >» >» thanks, >» Alex. >» >» >>> -----Original Message >» From: Robert Glassman < > >>> Sent: Tuesday. December 10.2019 20:59 >» To: >» Cc: ; Nathan Werksman >>> Subject: Re: SDNY investigation >» >>> Monday morning works at my office. Tuesday may also work too if you need more time. But confirm for Monday. >» >» >» Robert S. Glassman >» Panish Shea & Boyle >» psblaw.com >» >» >>>>> On Dec 10, 2019, at 9:35 AM, wrote: >>» >>» Robert, >>» >>>> Following up on our call, in terms of logistics, we can come to California to meet with anytime this coming Sunday, Monday, or Tuesday, if any of those work? Also, if it's at all possible to either set aside a significant amount of time on one day or--possibly preferably --a few hours on two consecutive days (and EFTA00016898 if so, we could do the second meeting on Wednesday if that's helpful), that will allow us to review relevant case notes, do quick research, or anything else that would provide for helpful follow-up where we'd just need a little time between discussion sessions. And as always, happy to discuss via phone if that's helpful. >>» »» thanks, >>» »» -----Ori inal Messa e »» From: »» Sent: Monday, Decemb »» To: Robert Glassman »» Cc: >>» Subject: RE: SDNY investigation ; Nathan Werksman < >>» >>>> Thanks Robert -- we'll call you in 5-10 minutes, just gathering everybody up in the same place. Thanks very much. >>» »» Original Message----- »» From: Robert Glassman »» Sent: Monda December 09 2019 17:34 »» To: »» Cc: >>» Subject: Re: SDNY investigation >>» »» Yes. Call me on my cell today. >>» >>» »» Robert S. Glassman »» Panish Shea & Boyle »» psblaw.com >>» >>» >>>>>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:21 AM, aa > wrote: >>>» >»» Robert, >>>» >>>>> Checking in on the below -- is there a good time to chat this week? >>>» >»» thanks, »»>- »»> >>>>> Ori inal Messa e >»» From: >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04 2019 13:06 >»» To: Robert Glassman >>>» Cc: •; Nathan Werksman >>>>> Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >>>» >»» Hi Robert, >>>» Nathan Werksman EFTA00016899 >»» Following up on our discussion a couple weeks ago, would it make sense to have a quick call later this week or early next to check in on current status? We also have one additional data point we'd like to convey as well, at your convenience. >>>» >»» thanks, »»1.1 >>>» >>>» >>>>> Original Message >>>» From: Robert Glassman <la >>>>> Sent: Friday. November 22.2019 13:31 >>>>> To: >>>» Cc: ; Nathan Werksman >>>>> Subject: Re: SDNY investigation >>>» >»» Thanks. Cell is best >>>» >>>» >>>» Robert S. Glassman >»» Panish Shea & Boyle >»» psblaw.com >>>» >>>» >>>>>>> On Nov 22 2019 at 10:14 AM, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> EFTA00016900

📷 Images in this document (5 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a document with text that appears to be a letter or an email. The text is partially obscured by black lines, suggesting that it may be a confidential or sensitive document. The visible text includes a salutation, a body with several paragraphs, and a closing. The document is addressed to someone named "Dr. [Name]." The visible text does not provide enough context to determine the e [Image 2] The image shows a document with text that appears to be a message or a letter. The text is partially obscured by a black rectangle, which suggests that the document may contain sensitive information. The visible text includes names, dates, and a reference to a "budget." The document is not fully visible, and the context of the message is not clear due to the obscured text. [Image 3] The image shows a printed document with text, which appears to be a list of messages or notes. The text is partially obscured by a red rectangle, indicating that some information has been redacted or is meant to be kept confidential. The visible text includes names, dates, and a few phrases that suggest the content of the messages, but the specific details are not fully visible due to the redacted [Image 4] The image shows a document that appears to be a transcript of an email conversation. The conversation includes several messages with timestamps and names of the senders and recipients. The content of the messages is not visible due to the blurring of the text. The document is a digital scan, and the visible elements include the email subject line, the sender's name, and the recipient's name. The e [Image 5] The image appears to be a photograph of a document with text. The document seems to be a letter or a report, as indicated by the visible text which includes phrases such as "Dear [Name]," "Subject: [Title]," and "Thank you for your recent inquiry." There are also visible names, dates, and a logo at the top right corner of the document. The text is too small to read in detail, but it includes a sal