View in Browser

EFTA00160297 Dataset 9 20 pages Download original PDF Download as text
View in Browser PlIFederal Bureau of Investigation - Seal March 13, 2024 Federal Bureau of Investigation Daily News Briefing (In coordination with the Office of Public Affairs) Email Public Affairs to subscribe to the Daily News Briefing. Mobile version and archive available here. Table of Contents CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS • Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Tells Appeals Judges That Jeffrey Epstein's Florida Plea Deal Protects Her EFTA00160297 EFTA00160298 EFTA00160299 EFTA00160300 EFTA00160301 EFTA00160302 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Tells Appeals Judges That Jeffrey Epstein's Florida Plea Deal Protects Her The Associated Press (03/12, Neumeister) reported that imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyer asked a federal appeals court Tuesday to toss out her sex trafficking conviction and 20-year prison sentence, saying Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution deal with a U.S. attorney in Florida should have prevented her prosecution. The article added that attorney Diana Fabi Samson's argument was repeatedly challenged by one judge on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before the three-judge panel reserved decision. Lawyers for Maxwell are challenging her December 2021 conviction on multiple grounds, but the only topic at oral arguments was whether the deal Epstein struck in Florida to prevent a federal case against him there also protected Maxwell in New York. Samson said it did. A prosecutor said it didn't. Maxwell, 62, is serving her sentence at a low-security federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, where yoga, Pilates, and movies are available. According to the article, Epstein's lawyers made a similar argument about the force of his non-prosecution deal in Florida after his July 2019, sex trafficking arrest in Manhattan. But the legal question became moot in his case after he took his own life a month later in a federal lockup as he awaited trial. ABC News (03/12, Katersky, Hill), BBC (03/12, Wendling), Business Insider (03/12, Shamsian), Independent (03/12, Bedigan), Fox News (03/12, Ruiz), Washington Examiner (03/12, Deese), Reuters EFTA00160303 (03/12, Stempel), New York Post (03/12, Kochman), and the Daily Beast (03/12, Briquelet) also reported on the story. EFTA00160304 EFTA00160305 EFTA00160306 EFTA00160307 EFTA00160308 EFTA00160309 EFTA00160310 EFTA00160311 EFTA00160312 EFTA00160313 EFTA00160314 EFTA00160315 EFTA00160316

📷 Images in this document (20 detected; 6 largest described)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image appears to be a screenshot of a webpage or a digital document with a black background and white text. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a news article or a report related to criminal investigations. The visible text includes phrases such as "Criminal investigations," "New York," and "Jersey City." There are also mentions of a "New York Times" article and a "Jersey [Image 2] The image appears to be a screenshot of a webpage, specifically a section titled "Criminal Investigations" from the FBI's website. The content is partially obscured by a black rectangle, which suggests that the image is meant to be a representation of a webpage with a section that is intentionally obscured or redacted. The visible text includes the title "Criminal Investigations" and a subtitle "F [Image 3] The image appears to be a screenshot of a webpage or document with a blacked-out section. The visible text includes the word "Brad," followed by a series of numbers and letters that are not fully visible due to the blacked-out area. The style of the image suggests it might be a photograph or a document with a blacked-out section, possibly for privacy or security reasons. The rest of the text is no [Image 4] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or a digital rendering with horizontal stripes of varying shades of gray. There are no visible texts, logos, or distinct objects that can be confidently described. The image does not provide enough information to determine the type of document or the content of the photograph. [Image 5] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or scan of a document with a series of horizontal lines. The lines vary in thickness and are arranged in a pattern that could suggest a structured layout, possibly indicating a table or a series of columns. There are no visible texts, logos, or other identifiable features that would allow for a specific description of the content or the nature of the [Image 6] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or a digitally altered image with a series of horizontal stripes in varying shades of gray. There are no visible texts, logos, or distinguishable objects that can be described with certainty. The image does not provide enough information to determine the type of document or the content of the photograph.