From: FBI News Briefing
From: FBI News Briefing
To: "FBINewsBriefing"
Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Daily News Briefing - April 14, 2025
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:15:12 +0000
Importance: Normal ce.
View in Browser
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Seal April 14, 2025
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Daily News Briefing
(In coordination with the Office of Public Affairs)
Email Public Affairs to subscribe to the Daily News Briefing. Mobile version and archive available here.
Table of Contents
EFTA00163378
EFTA00163379
• Ghislaine Maxwell, Jailed Epstein Accomplice, Appeals Case to U.S. Supreme Court
EFTA00163380
EFTA00163381
EFTA00163382
EFTA00163383
EFTA00163384
EFTA00163385
EFTA00163386
EFTA00163387
EFTA00163388
EFTA00163389
EFTA00163390
EFTA00163391
EFTA00163392
EFTA00163393
Ghislaine Maxwell, Jailed Epstein Accomplice, Appeals Case to U.S. Supreme Court
ABC News (04/11, Hill, Katersky) reported that Ghislaine Maxwell asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday
to overturn her sex-trafficking conviction, arguing she was covered by a non-prosecution agreement the
government made with her former paramour, Jeffrey Epstein. The article noted that Maxwell is currently serving a
20-year prison sentence. She was convicted on five counts of aiding Epstein in his abuse of underage girls in
December 2021. A federal appeals court rejected her argument that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement,
arranged in 2007, barred her prosecution in New York. She urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider her
case. "Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agreement promising in plain language that the United States
would not prosecute any co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell
as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein," her attorneys wrote in their petition. The article added that Maxwell said the
US Supreme Court should resolve differences of opinion among federal appeals court as to whether a non-
prosecution arranged in one district can be enforced in another. "A defendant should be able to rely on a promise
that the United States will not prosecute again, without being subject to a gotcha in some other jurisdiction that
chooses to interpret that plain language promise in some other way," defense attorney David Markus wrote.
EFTA00163394
EFTA00163395
EFTA00163396
EFTA00163397
📷 Images in this document (20 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image appears to be a screenshot of a text document with a redacted or blacked-out text. The document seems to be a news article or a report, as indicated by the headline and the paragraphs. The text is too small and blurry to read the specific content, but it includes visible elements such as a date, a name, and a location. The date mentioned is "April 2012," and the name is "Mrs. M. M. M. M.
[Image 2] The image shows a screenshot of a webpage with a document partially visible. The document appears to be a letter or a report, but the content is redacted, with black lines covering the text. The visible elements include the header of the document, which includes the name of the sender and recipient, and the date of the document. The sender's name is redacted, and the recipient's name is visible bu
[Image 3] The image shows a document with text that is redacted, meaning certain parts have been blacked out to obscure sensitive information. The visible text includes the names "Matthew Vassar" and "Amy Coney Barrett," along with a mention of "Supreme Court USA." The document appears to be a legal or official type, possibly a court filing or a government document, but the specific details are not visible
[Image 4] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or a digitally altered image with horizontal stripes of varying shades of gray. There are no visible texts, logos, or distinct objects that can be confidently described. The image does not provide enough information to determine the type of document or the content of the photograph.
[Image 5] The image appears to be a grayscale photograph or a digitally altered image with horizontal stripes of varying shades of gray. There are no visible texts, logos, or distinct objects that can be confidently described. The image does not provide any clear indication of a document type, people, or location.
[Image 6] The image appears to be a digital representation of a document or a photograph with a series of horizontal stripes in varying shades of gray. The stripes are uniform in width and create a pattern across the image. There are no visible texts, logos, or other identifiable features that would allow for a specific description of the content. The image does not provide enough information to determine i