Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009104
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009104
Exhibit 5
EFTA00192978
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Timeline -Summary
2/20/2007 --Meeting (US: nd Junior
Ortiz, DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt) .
6/26/2007 --Meeting (US:
itimilirrernr, Junior Ortiz, , DEF: Alan
Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez) .
• Defense argument --Travel has to be for "the" sole
purpose of engaging in sexual activity not "a"
purpose.
• Defense became aware of the Government's strategy to
charge Epstein with Enticement in addition to the
Traveling charges.
7/26/2007 --Meeting (US:
Metelmieekommiemmigeememinkconference call) , Valerie Parlave, Junior
Ortiz,
• US Attorney's Office presented a State two-year
incarceration plea agreement.
7/31/2007 --Meeting (US:• • .• • • -
DEF: Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez) .
• Defense stance was jail time was not an option.
8/31/2007 --Meeting (US:
I .1
• Case briefing to DOJ representative.
9/7/2007 --Meeting (US: Alexander Acosta,
WIPMMIWENOPAPEPOOMPONOW John McMillan, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay
Lefkowitz, Lilly Sanchez) .
9/12/2007 Meeting (US: impimmmak
raistiter DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack
Goldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Barry Krisher and Lanna
Belohlavek) .
9/18/2007 --Rescheduled date for computer hearing. (Hearing
initially set for 9/13/2007) .
9/24/2007--Non-Prosecution Agreement signed.
9/25/2007 --Scheduled date for Federal Indictment.
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009105
EFTA00192979
10/29/2007 --Deadline date for Epstein's plea
according to Non-Prosecution Agreement.
11/2007--USAO extends deadline for Epstein's
per request of Epstein's counsel. and sentencing
plea and sentencing
2.1/23/2007 --Unscheduled meeting between Jay Lefkowitz, Alan
Dershowitz and Jeff Sloman. (Drop in by Lefkowitz and
Dershowitz) .
01/04/2008 --Scheduled date for Epstein's self surrender according
to the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
01/08/2008 --Trial date set for State of Florida vs. Epstein.
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009106
EFTA00192980
FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES CALCULATION
(Using November 1, 2004 Guidelines Manual)
Each count of §§ 1591, 2422(6) and 2423(b):
Base Offense Level under 2G1.3:
Offense involved sexual contact: 24
+2
26
Counts do not group, so add 5 levels for more than 5 units, pursuant to 3D1.4
Offense Level 31
Apply Repeat and Dangerous Sex Offender against Minors enhancement at 4B1.5
Total Offense Level 36
Assuming Criminal History Category I, advisory guideline range is 188 - 235 months with
lifetime supervised release.
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009107
EFTA00192981
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Timeline -Summary
2/20/2007 --Meeting (US: a and Junior
Ortiz, DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt) .
6/26/2007 --Meeting (US: -
MIIIIIIIIMMIJunior Ortiz, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, DEF: Alan
Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez) .
• Defense argument --Travel has to be for "the" sole
purpose of engaging in sexual activity not "a"
purpose.
• Defense became aware of the Government's strategy to
charge Epstein with Enticement in addition to the
Traveling charges.
7/26/2007 --Meeting (US: Lc_s1. 0
Terence call) , Valerie Parlave, Junior
Ortiz,
• US Attorney's Office presented a State two-year
incarceration plea agreement.
7/31/2007--Meetin (US: ueff bsoman, matt menc e , Marie
DEF: Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez) .
• Defense stance was jail time was not an option.
8/31/2007 --Meeting (US- . ..... ,i411 -.F
• Case briefing to DOJ representative.
9/7/2007 --Meeting (US: Alexander Acosta,
,,;1,-F--,+ John McMillan, DEF: Kennet Starr, Jay
Lefkowitz, Lilly Sanchez) .
9/12/2007 --Meeting (US:
._ DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack
Goldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Barry Krisher and Lanna
Belohlavek) .
9/18/2007 --Rescheduled date for computer hearing. (Hearing
initially set for 9/13/2007) .
9/24/2007--Non-Prosecution Agreement signed.
9/25/2007 --Scheduled date for Federal Indictment.
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-009108
EFTA00192982
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image is a document scan, specifically a page from a court transcript. The document contains text that appears to be a list of court cases, with visible names, dates, and case numbers. The text is organized in a structured format, typical of court records, with headings and subheadings indicating the nature of the cases. The document is dated and includes case numbers, names of parties, and de
[Image 2] The image is a document scan, specifically a page from a court transcript or a legal document. It contains text with various entries, including names, dates, and descriptions of events or actions. The text is organized in a structured format, typical of legal documents, with headings and bullet points. The document is dated, and there are references to individuals, locations, and actions such as "
[Image 3] The image appears to be a document scan, specifically a page from a legal or official document. The visible text includes a case number, a date, and a reference to an exhibit. The document is titled "EXHIBIT 5" and includes a page number "5". The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be related to a legal case or a formal proceeding. The document is marked with a stamp or seal at th
[Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a memo. The document is dated and includes a header with the sender's name and address, followed by the recipient's name and address. The body of the text discusses various topics, including a deadline, a request, and a scheduled date. There are also references to a specific individual and a location. The text is organized in a
[Image 5] The image shows a document titled "FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES CALCULATION." It appears to be a form or worksheet used for calculating sentencing guidelines for a federal case. The document includes sections for the defendant's age, offense level, criminal history, and other relevant information. There are numerical values and checkboxes indicating the defendant's status in relation to the guide