TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To File ZORRO RANCH/waisiELD June 6, 2014
C From Casey W. Cook, P.E.
Subject ZORRO RANCH WELL 6 TESTING
Introduction
In early 2014, Zorro Ranch reactivated Well 6, which had been mostly unused since the early
2000s. Figure 1 shows the location of the well. We understand the well was reactivated to make up for
lost capacity from the Dakota well, which is out of service with a dropped pump. In reviewing whether
Well 6 is suitable to make up for lost Dakota capacity, Balleau Groundwater Inc., (BGW) recommended'
that the Ranch rehabilitate and test Well 6 to determine the capacity and sustainable yield. In May
2014, Rodgers and Co. pulled the pump 6 and rehabilitated the well, then installed a temporary pump
for testing. The Ranch authorized BGW to coordinate the testing and to report on well capacity and
long-term yield. This technical memorandum provides a documentation of Well 6 rehabilitation and
testing, projects the well capacity and yield, and recommends a pump capacity. We find the well to be
capable of 15 gpm pumping for 10 hours a day, for diversions of up to 10 acre feet per year for several
years. Ongoing regional water level declines and self-induced drawdown eventually will reduce well
yield to less than 10 AFY with fewer hours of pumping or a lesser pumping rate.
Background
Well 6 was drilled in 1994 under OSE File No. E-5902, and later renumbered E-6478-S. The well
is 215 feet deep and is completed with 6-inch PVC casing with perforations from 100 to 120 and 175 to
215 feet. The drillers log (attached) suggests the well is completed in basin fill alluvium with the primary
water-bearing zone identified as a gravel between 172 and 196 ft deep. The basin fill is the primary
aquifer of the Estancia Basin. Static water level in 1995 was 87 feet, and is 117 ft today. The 30-foot
Electronic Communication from Casey W. Cook, of Balleau Groundwater, Inc. to Mr. Brice M. Gordon of Zorro Ranch,
March 6, 2014 Well 6 Pumping Test.
BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594361
2
decline, averaging 1.5 ft/yr, is less than regional declines seen at other Ranch wells in deeper
formations, but is similar to trends at other basin fill wells in the area. The ongoing regional decline is
expected eventually to reduce the capacity of the well.
The proof of completion of well (PCW; attached) indicates Well 6 in 1995 could produce 30 gpm
with 100 ft of drawdown. The well is equipped today with a 7.5-hp pump, Grundfos model 40575-25
(pump curve attached) capable of producing 30 gpm against 580 ft of total dynamic head. The installed
pump apparently is different than the 1.5-hp pump reported in the PCW. Discharge at the wellhead is
piped three miles and 200 feet uphill to the Ranch's main storage reservoir. We understand the Ranch
plans to reroute the piping to the Dakota booster pumps (Figure 1).
Well 6 is permitted under OSE File No. E-6478, along with Ranch Wells 4 and B (File Nos. E-6478
and E-8976), for diversions of up to 15.5 AFY for domestic, ranch and irrigation purposes.
Rehabilitation and Testing
Rodgers and Co. mobilized to Well 6 on May 20, 2014. The crew field tested the installed 7.5-hp
pump and motor assembly and found that it performed satisfactorily. The pump as installed can
produce 75 gpm for several minutes discharging to the ground with no back pressure, but the pumping
water level falls rapidly to the pump inlet because the aquifer and well cannot sustain that rate of
pumping. Rodgers removed the pump and swabbed acid into the well to rehabilitate the screen, then
left the acid overnight. The following day, the driller brushed the well screen and set a temporary pump
to 195 ft deep for removing the acid and for testing. Static water level is about 75 feet above the pump
setting.
Rodgers step tested the well on May 21, 2014. BGW coordinated the test and set a logging
transducer in the well to record water levels. For the first step, the well was pumped at 21 gpm for 30
minutes with 40 ft drawdown (Figure 2). Water levels were stable for the last 10 minutes. At the
second step of 28 gpm, the pumping water level dropped into the lower screen and rapidly toward the
pump inlet. The rate was throttled back to around 20 gpm and the crew continued to pump the well for
several hours to remove the remaining acid. After shutdown the well was allowed to recover overnight.
BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594362
3
On May 22, Well 6 was tested at rates of 24 to 18 gpm for 9 hours (Figure 3). The pump
temporarily lost power about an hour into the test. The initial 24 gpm rate caused the pumping water
level (PWL) to draw down into the lower screen, so the rate was valved back to 21 then to 18 gpm. Rate
control was poor, resulting in an unsteady drawdown trend. The test was shut down after nine hours.
Recovery water levels were monitored for about 39 hours before the test equipment was
removed. Recovery data (Figure 4) matched to a Theis (1935)2 recovery line indicates aquifer
transmissivity (T) of 90 ft2/d and no apparent hydrologic boundaries.
Projection of Well Yield
Test data suggest the well can sustain 15 gpm pumping for up to 10 hours, but rates over 20
gpm can dewater the productive zone and cause PWL to drop to the pump inlet. Well specific capacity
at 9 hours is 18 gpm / 60 ft = 0.3 gpm/ft, which is in line with the T from recovery and the capacity
reported on the PCW form (30 gpm with 100 ft drawdown = 0.3 gpm/ft). However, due to regional
declines, well yield is now limited by a shorter water column and less available drawdown above the
172-foot deep productive interval (55 ft today vs. 85 ft in 1995).
Pumping at 15 gpm for 10 hours a day year round, the well can produce 10 AFY. That level of
usage is projected cause 14 ft of drawdown over the next 5 years (T = 90 ft2/d, S = 0.1, r = 0.5 ft). With
another 7.5 feet of regional decline (1.5 ft/yr) over that period, non-pumping water level is projected to
decline 20 ft in 5 years. Thereafter, pumping the well at 15 gpm will cause the productive zone to
dewater, and the pumping rate will have to be reduced. We project the well can provide 10 AFY for a
few years, but that yields will decline after that. The well eventually may need to be replaced by a
deeper well or by production increased from an existing well if the Ranch wants to maintain the present
capacity.
We recommend operating the well to maintain pumping water level above 175 ft to prevent
significant dewatering of the production zone. Pumping at 15 gpm for up to a half day day should
maintain an acceptable PWL, though the Ranch must monitor water levels and set pump controls to
2 Theis, C.V., 1935, The Relation Between Lowering of the Piezometric Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well
Using Ground Water Storage: Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, Volume 16, pp. 519-524.
BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594363
4
prevent drawdown to the pump inlet. A new pump will be needed, as the existing pump capacity is too
high for the well.
A 15-gpm pump is recommended to better suit the well capacity. The pump should be set
between 190 and 200 feet deep and should provide 200 ft of lift to the wellhead, plus sufficient pressure
to convey water to storage or to the Dakota booster pumps as specified by the Ranch engineer. We
recommend setting up the well controls with a variable frequency drive and an interconnected water-
level sensor that reduces pumping if the PWL approaches the pump inlet. The pump should be set with a
one-inch PVC sounding tube and equipped with a logging transducer to track water levels and monitor
well performance.
Water Quality
The Ranch submitted a water sample from Well 6 for laboratory analysis (report attached).
Water quality is good with conductivity at 421 µmhos/cm, and total dissolved solids estimated at 350
ppm. Well 6 water is of better quality than other Ranch wells (Dakota well has conductivity 3500 µmhos
and Wells 4, B and K have 1000 µmhos). The major constituents are calcium and bicarbonate; water is
considered hard at 181.8 mg/L CaCO3. Nitrates are high, but would be removed for indoor use, along
with hardness, by the Ranch household RO systems. Water is suitable for irrigation with no treatment
and for drinking with RO treatment.
Conclusions
1. Well 6 is capable of yielding 15 gpm. Higher rates above 20 gpm can dewater the primary
productive zone and cause water level to fall to the pump inlet.
2. Pumping 15 gpm for 10 hours per day, the well is projected to produce 10 acre feet per year for
several years. Yields are expected to decline below 15 gpm and 10 AFY as regional and self-
induced drawdowns reduce the available water column.
3. Water from Well 6 is good with 421 µmhos conductivity and is suitable for irrigation use without
treatment. The water is hard with high nitrates. Existing household RO treatment will remove
those constituents for indoor and drinking use.
4. The existing installed pump is rated for 24 to 55 gpm. A new variable speed pump is required.
BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594364
5
Recommendations
1. Replace the existing pump with one that can produce 15 gpm with a lift of 200 ft plus sufficient
pressure at the wellhead to convey water to storage or booster pumps. Control the pump with
a variable speed drive and sensors to reduce rate if pumping water level approaches the pump
inlet.
2. Set the pump with a PVC sounding tube accessible at the wellhead. Equip the well with a
logging pressure transducer to track water levels and well performance.
3. As capacity declines, plan to replace Well 6 in several years with a deeper well or with additional
pumping from existing wells.
Attachments: Figures (4)
Well Record
Proof of Completion
Pump Curve
Well 6 Lab Analysis
BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594365
Booste Map Area
Dakota VVPII
0 1.000 2.000 3.000 Feel
lillllllllllllll
Protection. NA083 New Aleuco Central Zane Wain Storage e GOO gal)
DATE:
G.5.02014
PROWLED .
ciitCKL0
CWC
i-e-E tint_
Wc+16L4c.nixo ZORRO RANCH /
WELLFIELD
WELL 6 LOCATION
FIGURE 1
EFTA00594366
ZORRO RANCH
WELLFIEW
FIGURE 2
WELL 6 STEP TEST
0
10
20 •
•
30 •
•
•
•
E z
40 ..Q= 21 gpm •4. • • . .
**** **** 1144.600.0
3
i
50 • Q= •
•
• 26 gpm
60 Top • •
• •
•
•
70 of screen 175 ft B
•
•
• • 4
80 Pump inlet 195 ft • •
1 10
TIME (MIN) 100
w.B timp.obb
BY
61.1,2014 BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594367
ZORRO RANCH
WELLFIELD
0 FIGURE 3
WELL 6 TEST HYDROGRAPH
20
40
60
ii. 80
'4100
O i—Pump on
24 gpm Temporary
loss of power
120
ill
O
140
160
- Top of screen - 180
\ Reduce rate
to 18 Pump off
200 gpm
22-May 23-May
DATE 24-May 2S-May
...46bet211.4•40144.0
BY
6/6/1014 BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594368
ZORRO RANCH
WELLFIELD
FIGURE 4
WELL 6 RECOVERY
E 0
10
20
40
so
60 Theis Recovery
aw = 18 gpm
As = 7 ft•
•
1 10
TIME (MIN) 100 1000
valthne221.4sv20144th
BY
06#014 BALLEAU GROUNDWATER, INC.
EFTA00594369
WELL RECORD
Settles R.GENERAL INFORMATION
wino nil 'JEFFREY EMTE c/o ZCRRC RANCH °(A) Oneia Well No Sin« or Post Offra.Addnen 1.•01, SOX 567
Cary as State ::Tarr NV._ B4O56
Well am tiled ender Parent Nar E4302 and k legated ra the:
_åfa. ---24_.S.Lxof hake 20 Township 1254 Rust. 9E N.N I'M.
h. Tract No 0111110 stake
4. Lot Na of Wor.ft No.
wear M tibeCconstysoshdhiriow recopied ill
G R. fat, Ya fret Dll Ozedbate System Uwe Y the Gnat.
000•13304 Milt.1.1•10 (B) Drabs Cawiramtet
Amms r. 0. 8ox 84 treaty, (>7056
Drabrer Ratan °Yin/94 Completed 09/29/94
Elevation o( land author or
Completed wen la 3 ciao. Outman. bpi bob Lazar No '1;47
Rower Sae aka 12' In.
al well k 1L Total depth of well 215ft.
Depth to nms woe caepkt PC on of Wan tL
&Like 2. PRINCIPAL WATER-SEARING STRATA Depth fa Fed llamas
Ye Feet Deacripthoe of Water-beetne Forsakes Unmated livid
Woos per m lank) From Te
96 113 17 Ya.t.on 1: swe
172 198 26 0114103, 40 CW
_._
Sect« 3. RECORD OF CASING
Dada
Dean) TM*
pet loos Threads
Pas al- DelitA In Feet Leas*
Dort/ Type of Shoe PetforatIone Toray Roam From To
6^ PVC 0 -4 215 215 motet 100 120
0 215 215 'tot, 175 215
(awns "Su)
Section 4. RECORD OF ~DING AND CE0D4TDIG Depth I Fat Mete
Meseta. facks
of Mad Cubic Feet
of Cement )4cthod of Plumed En To
kaki% 5. ?LUGGING RECORD
/trains Coatuctor
Addres.
?tsp.* Method
Date Wed Matti
rainibt enrand
SON Engager Repreelatatlyt No. Depth 1. Feel Cates Fort
or Cmacat Tow Bottom
1
2
4
FOR USE OF STATE ENGINEER ONLY Data RooN•red
Fie No Child aR ESL
Loads No
EFTA00594370
3 3 TOP SOIL
3 cy 93 BOULOTIIII
96 113 17 Irmo
113 172 riv non etAr
172 198 26 C.Ptisvtl. r•ro-dvc, S' 7. 198 215 17 7
GOAT CLAY
tattoo 7. REAM ItX.1 AND ADDITIONAL IN)1OILIIATION
The lidotteset• busby °Miran that. to the tan of his koomtiodge and belief, th feNeelas a • tan ••• coma mord of the alson Ottaltted bolt
Dales
DESTRUCTIONS: This Iona sbcsaM G ••••••tel is trIpDtatt, pratersitty typrorto to, sod luhemItIc4 Co as mpplopristo dab** office of she Stith Easunory. AG a:Awes, cAcept Section S. sun in allintiO a• COmptettly aad wan* as parable flee In *WIN mated, tt thol. or csrpose• Tata this loon is tine ks eloss••• otos AN. st.s ....4••••••••• • p.02
EFTA00594371
Permit No. E-6478-$
I. Name of Tater Right Onset
Nailing 'address
City and State Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, Zorro Ranch
PO Box 567
Stanley. lid 87056
2. Permit is for suoolemental w 11 from shallow (supplemental well, change location of well) (artesian or shallow) ground want.
3. Description of well.
Located ie the NE 5i SW i4 ofSee.4_2rep.12__N age. 9E ex Tract t4o. of Map No. of the Disuicr total dept, is well cased,S__-• outside diameter of top casing (or hole, if uneased),,Sinebes; if slush.., is well equipped with gate wain n/a time drilled 9-23 to 9-29 19 94 • Name of driller Dennisson Orill /MO
4. Record of Pumping Test, if made (to be supplied by penon or rum ashlers test); Name and address of person malting test Zorro Ranch ang Dennisson Drilling personnel
dare of test 1-26 to 1-30 95 • depth to water before test, _E feet below land surface,
(above, below) and pumping level during test. 198 ken length of test, 48 bons; average distinct' 3° er-P•M.; specific capacity of well. 0.446th-fain. per foot of drawdono.
Pimping test data submitted with application to appropriate E-6478 5. Pennant Pump Equipment:
(a) Description of pump: Make Jacuzzi ; Type .15E642510 —S2
size of disebargir,S5_ inches; if turban type, gin aiu of cobs , inches; diameter of bowls inches; number of talk • length of suction pipe feet; total length of column, bowls and suction pipe ,fees if centrifugal type, give size of pump inches: if other type, describe
rated capacity of pump (if knows), 30 G.P.M., al rev. pet min., lama • depth of 213 feet.
(b) Demi/xis. powerplans, mike New 1ex Elect . Type Single phase, 120V
rated horsepower (if available); type of drive connection to pump
(direct. geadiead, or belt)
(c) Actual tEscharge of SO G.P.M., st__ fin. per min., from • depth of 188 fete Nit of „es, 1-26 CO 1-3D 19 93
6. If reservoir is land, give ripproximate size: length nia fter width • depth
7. U above well replaced an old well to be plugged of abandoned, fill ow the following: the well abandoned is located in the n/a %of Sec. Top. Rge.
Describe plugging method
Name of plugging contractor
8. Tell Record filed with State Engineer's Office, Yes (as cn5902)
(Yea or No)
of Glorieta Geoscience, Inc., agent for the spelt
I. Sue Rutte, Consultant, alum that the foregoing statements are erne to the best of matow and belief and that I MP the agent for owner sod holder of said water right. 33 (sole, partial, agent for, etc.,) -- P JeffrerEpsrp, Zo/ro Ranch Detainee S -0
OW i -
a r -61 0
STATEMENT OF STATE ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE
I hereby certify that I have inspected the above well and find it continued in accordance with the conditions
of the permit. Note any exceptions
Accepted for filing without benefit of field check by State Engineer Office personnel.
Well was producing spa against a had of
(measured) (estimated)
Old well has been
(plugged) (copped) (retained for other sights) feet at
By. Robert D. thompsca
Title: Water Resource Specialist
Date March 14. 1997
EFTA00594372
PERFORMANCE CURVES 40 GPM MODEL 40S
FLOW RANGE: 24 - 55 GPM
1900 HEAD (FEET OUTLET SIZE: 2 " NPT
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
CAPACITY (GPM)
SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
4' MOTOR STANDARD, 1.10 HP/3450 RPM.
6' MOTOR STANDARD.15Q0 HP/3450 RPM.
' Also available with 6' motor. 40 45 NOMINAL DIA. 4"
50 55
Performance conforms to ISO 9906. 1999 (E) Annex A
Minimum submergence is 5 feet.
CRILINICtrCbS 4-21
EFTA00594373
MODEL 40S 40 GPM TECHNICAL DATA
DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS
MODEL NO. FIG. HP MOTOR
SIZE DISCH.
SIZE DIMENSIONS IN INCHES APPROX.
SHIP WT. A B C D E
40510-3 A 1 4" 2" NPT 24.6 11.8 12.8 3.8 3.9 32
40515-5 A 1 1/2 4" 2" NPT 29.7 13.6 16.1 3.8 3.9 37
40520-7 A 2 4" 2" NPT 34.5 15.1 19.4 3.8 3.9 41
40530-9 A 3 4" 2" NPT 43.3 20.6 22.7 3.8 3.9 65
40550-12 A 5 4" 2" NPT 51.3 23.6 27.7 3.8 3.9 78
40550-15 A 5 4" 2" NPT 56.2 23.6 32.6 3.8 3.9 84
40575-21' A 7 1/2 4" 2" NPT 74.6 29.6 45.0 3.8 3.9 120
40575-25' A 7 1/2 4" 2" NPT 81.2 29.6 51.6 3.8 3.9 124
405100-30' A 10 4" 2" NPT 103.7 43.9 59.8 3.8 3.9 181
405150-37DS A 15 6" 2" NPT 99.5 28.0 71.5 5.4 5.4 244
405150-44DS A 15 6" 2" NPT 111.0 28.0 83.0 5.4 5.4 340
405200-SODS" B 20 6" Z' MPT 136.0 30.6 105.4 5.4 5.5 319
405200-58DS" B 20 6" 2" MPT 149.2 30.6 118.6 5.4 5.5 334
405200-66DS" B 20 6" 2" MPT 162.4 30.6 131.8 5.4 5.5 394
NOTES: All models suitable for use in 4" wells, unless otherwise noted.
Weights include pump end with motor in lbs.
• Also available with 6" motor.
• Built into sleeve 2" MPT discharge, 6" min. well dia.
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
COMPONENT CYLINDRICAL SHAFT (3-44 Stgs.) DEEP SET (50-66 Stgs.)
Check Valve Housing 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Check Valve 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Diffuser Chamber 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Impeller 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Suction Interconnector 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Inlet Screen 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Pump Shaft 431 Stainless Steel 431 Stainless Steel
Straps 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Cable Guard 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Priming Inducer 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Coupling 316/431 Stainless Steel " 329/416 Stainless Steel
Check Valve Seat NBRI316 Stainless Steel NBR/316 Stainless Steel
Top Bearing NBRI316 Stainless Steel NBR/316 Stainless Steel
Impeller Seal Ring NBRI316 Stainless Steel NBR/316 Stainless Steel
Intermediate Bearings NBR/316 Stainless Steel NBR/316 Stainless Steel
Shaft Washer LCP (Vectra®) LCP (Vectra®)
Split Cone 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Split Cone Nut 304 Stainless Steel 304 Stainless Steel
Sleeve Not Required 316 Stainless Steel
Sleeve Flange Not Required 304 Stainless Steel
NOTES: Specifications are subject to change without notice.
Vectra® is a registered trademark of Hoechast Celanese Corporation.
'Stainless Steel option available. Fig. A
E
2"
•
A C
BOB
De'
Fig. B
4-22 TN,CR LIN °PCPS
EFTA00594374
) WATI,R ITC-NOLOGItS eVO UA
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Analysis NO : 101909
Job ID : J[2014MAY15]32319
Zorro Ranch
49 Zorro Ranch Rd.
Stanley, NM 87056
ATTN: Eric Carriaga-EWT ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
4669 SHEPHERD TRAIL
ROCKFORD, IL 61103.1294
Branch Org. Code : 020
Sampled
Received
Completed
Purpose
Supply/Source
Sample Point
Description TELEPHONE 815.877-3041
FACSIMILE 816.921.8166
Page 1 of 1
05/02/2014
05/15/2014
06/03/2014
Presale Activity
PrivateNVell(Deep)
Well #6
Raw Water
CATIONS RESULT UNITS ANIONS RESULT UNITS
Calcium (Ca) 130 mg/1 CaCO3 Barb (HCO3) 157.0 mg/I CaCO3
Magnesium (Mg) 51.8 mg/lCaCO3 Fluoride (F) 1.04 mg/I CaCO3
Sodium (Na) 28.7 mg/I CaCO3 Chloride (CI) 24.0 mg/I CaCO3
Potassium (K) 2.5 mg/lCaCO3 Bromide (Br) 0.104 mg4 CaCO3
Iron (Fe) <0.002 mgA Nitrate (NO3) 18.0 mg/I CaCO3
Manganese (Mn) <0.001 mg/I Phosphate (PO4) <0.080 mg/I CaCO3
Aluminum (A0 <0.005 mg/I Sulfate (SO4) 16.4 mg/1 CaCO3
Barium (Ba) 0.159 mg/I Silica (SO2) 18.4 mglICaCO3
Strontium (Sr) 0.742 mg/1
Copper (Cu) <0.002 mgA
Zinc (Zn) <0.002 mg/i
OTHER PARAMETERS RESULT UNITS RESULT UNITS
pH 7.94 Total Hardness 181.80 mg/I CaCO3
Turbidity 0.05 NTU TOC (C) 0.25 mg/I
Conductivity 421 uS Free (CO2) (1) 4.1 mg/I CaCO3
The reported results are representative of the sample as received.
OUR REPRESENTATIVE IN YOUR AREA IS:
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC/Albuquerque
3800 Rutledge Rd NE, Ste A
Albuquerque, NM 87109
505-344-8250 Fax 505-345-5937 [I] Derived from Alkalinity and pH
ANALYZED BY: Jackie Benzel
EFTA00594375
📷 Images in this document (15 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image appears to be a map or a satellite image with annotations. It shows a section of a desert landscape with various markings and labels. There are red and green boxes with text inside them, indicating specific locations or areas of interest. The text includes names such as "ZOOKE RANCH" and "WELLFIELD WELL & LOCATION." The map also includes a scale and a compass rose, suggesting it is a nav
[Image 2] The image shows a graph titled "Performance Curves." The graph is a plot of performance data, with the horizontal axis labeled "Flow Rate (GPM)" and the vertical axis labeled "Head (PSI)." There are multiple lines on the graph, each representing a different model of a pump or engine, as indicated by the model numbers 405 and 406. The lines show the performance of the pumps or engines at different
[Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a financial statement or report. It includes various sections with headings such as "Statement of Income," "Statement of Expenses," and "Statement of Changes in Net Assets." There are tables with numerical figures, which likely represent financial data such as income, expenses, and changes in assets. The document is a scan, and there are handwritten no
[Image 4] The image is a document scan, specifically a technical drawing or blueprint. It contains various tables and diagrams with technical specifications for a model, dimensions, weights, and material information. The document is titled "MODEL 405" and includes a table with dimensions in millimeters and a table with weights in grams. There are also diagrams showing the construction of the model, includin
[Image 5] The image shows a technical memorandum document. It contains text and a table with numerical data. The document is addressed to "Ford" and is dated June 5, 2000. The visible text includes an introduction and a conclusion, with the main body of the text discussing technical details related to a specific project or study. The table at the bottom of the document lists numerical data, possibly related
[Image 6] The image shows a document that appears to be a form or application. It contains various sections with fields to be filled out, including personal information, employment details, and possibly educational or professional background. There are checkboxes and lines for writing, and the form is structured with headings and subheadings. The visible text includes phrases such as "DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR