R R1[11[11 ATT0R NEYS AT LAW
R R1[11[11 ATT0R NEYS AT LAW
L MARTIN REEDER. JR
DENISE G. REEDER
C. BRYCE ALBU
DOLLY VOORHEES DAVIS
GERRY S. GIBSON
Of COM&
July 12, 2009
By email ([email protected])
Jeffrey Epstein L MARTIN REEDER, JR.
Direct Tel. 561-575.97
Re: State and Federal Civil Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein Currently Pending in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida and in the Circuit Court for
the Fifteenth Judicial District of Florida
Dear Jeffrey:
Enclosed is our Invoice 1219 ($30,365.00), representing legal services rendered and costs
and expenses incurred on your behalf for the period through and including July 10, 2009. 1 do
not have a mailing address for you, so if you would like me to mail you the original of this letter
and invoice, please let me know the address.
I appreciate the privilege of representing you.
Very truly yours,
/frSt
RUDER & R8wnU
250 S. CENTRAL BLVD., SUITE 200
JUPITER. FLORIDA 33458
561475-9750 PAX: 561.57S-9765 ingw.feedenzarteder.com
EFTA00722880
RFFUF
Jeffrey Epstein
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss,
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL
33401
Attention:
Re:
DATE
Apr-28-09
Apr-29-09
May-27-09
May-29-09
Jun-09-09 FUR C' FORNEY'S 1.,.W
Jane Doe, et al. v. Jeffrey Epstein
DESCRIPTION
Read First Amended Complaint In CMA case and
Complaint in BB case per request of R. Critton.
Meet with J. Epstein, R. Critton, M. Burman and J.
Goldberger.
Review E.W.'s Motion to Unseal; teleconferences with
R. Critton and J. Goldberger re same; analyze EW's
arguments, review Fla. R. Jud. Admin. rule and local
administrative rule in effect in 2008 regarding the
sealing of court records; send analysis of rules to J.
Goldberger and suggested arguments ofr defeating EW's
motion; review Motion to Disqualify Judge Hafele; read
hearing transcript; read cases cited in motion and send
analysis to M. Pike ofr use in response to motion;
suggest other revisions to M. Pike; review and respond
to question from R. Critton regarding whether to file a
notice of supp. authority beofre Judge Marra, notifying
court of J. Hafele's ruling; email to Critton
recommending filing such notice under authority of
Local Rule 5AD.
Analyze case law on procedure for sealing court records
in a criminal case.
Phone conference with J. Goldberger.
Phone conference with R. Critton regarding stay hearing
set fro 6/12, appealability if stay is denied, assertion of
rights under 3rd party beneficiary theory by victims and
Josephsberg; review copy of NPA, stay motion,
opposition, government's response memo and J. Marra's
order.
Analyze law on obtaining interlocutory appellate review
of order de eta when 5th amendment privilege
against self v is implicated.
Analyze non-prosecution agreement; analyze motion to
stay and responses thereto; analyze case law regaling
REEDER & REEDER M.
250 S. CENTRAL BLVD.. St011 200
FLORIDA
561-575-9750 FAX: 561.575-9765 July 12, 2009
File #: 165-01
Inv #: 1219
HOURS AMOUNT ATTY/PL
1.00 400.00
1.00 400.00
8.50 3,400.00 LMR
LMR
LMR
1.00 250.00 CBA
0.10 40.00 LMR
3.80 1,520.00 LMR
6.00 1,500.00 CBA
3.00 750.00 DVD
EFTA00722881
Invoice #: 1219 Page 2
non prosecution agreements and third party
beneficiaries.
Jun-10-09 Analyze NPA; exchange emails with R. Critton seeking
answers re critical facts; analyze stay motion and
potential appellate remedy for denial of stay; analyze
third party beneficiary issues
Analyze law on interlocutory review of orders denying
stay; prepare memorandum to M. Reeder.
Analyze case law regarding construing non prosecution
agreements and third party beneficiaries' rights; analyze
cause of action under 2255.
Jun- I 1-09 Exchange emails with J. Epstein re motion to unseal;
teleconference with J. Goldberger; review cases
regarding indictment of defendants when they are
alleged to have breach an NPA, and remedies available
to defendant; analyze issues related to hearing.
Analyze local rule governing closure of court records;
strategy conference with M. Reeder, prepare notice of
hearing on motion to vacate sealing order; review
motion to seal; teleconference with J. Goldberger.
Analyze Florida contract law and third party beneficiary
standing thereunder; conference and email with M.
Reeder regarding results of analysis.
Jun-12-09 Attend hearing on Epstein% stay motion; post hearing
conference with Critton, Burman and Goldberger.
Strategy conference with M. Reeder regarding positions
taken at the hearing.
Analyze non-prosecution/third party beneficiary cases to
determine how the court should construe.
Jun-14-09 Exchange entails with J. Epstein.
Jun-17-09 Research and analyze Florida case law regarding court's
analysis of third party beneficiary's rights under a
contract, if contract ambiguous.
Jun-18.09 Prepare memorandum regarding construction of non
prosecution agreement.
Jun-19-09 Analyze case law and prepare memorandum regarding
third party beneficiaries and contract interpretation
applicable to non prosecution agreement.
Jun-20-09 Prepare memorandum to regarding case law
on contract interpretation, third party beneficiary rights,
and interpretation of non prosecution agreements.
Jun-22-09 Review draft memo of law on third party beneficiary
issues prepared by D. Davis; assign follow-up on several
issues.
Research and analyze possibility that federal common
law could be applied to interpretation of non
prosecution agreement; research contemplation of non July 12, 2009
3.00 1,200.00 LMR
2.50 625.00 CBA
7.50 1,875.00 DVD
1.50 600.00 1..MR
1.50 375.00 CBA
5.50 1,375.00 DVD
2.00 800.00 LMR
020 50.00 DVD
3.10 775.00 DVD
0.10 40.00 I .M R
5.00 1,250.00 DVD
6.50 1,625.00 DVD
7.00 1,750.00 DVD
2.00 500.00 DVD
1.00 400.00 LMR
2.00 500.00 DVD
REEDER & REEDER •
EFTA00722882
Invoice #: 1219 Page 3
prosecution agreement in speedy trial act; research
history of usage of non prosecution agreements.
Jun-23-09 Review additional authorities found by D. Davis on 3rd
party beneficiary issues; read Petition for Writ of
Certiorari filed by EW challenging order requiring her
to reveal her sexual history; teleconference with Critton
regarding no automatic stay and procedure likely to be
followed by 4th District Court of Appeal.
Research framework under wig. decides if
contract is ambiguous; email regarding same
Research and analyze impact of E.W.'s appeal of
discovery order; procedure for stay; impact on case in
elraourt and appellate court's procedure; email
regarding analysis.
Jun-24-09 Teleconference with J. Goldberger.
Jun-25-09 Review 4th DCA's acknowledgement of new case.
Jun-26-09 Review 4th DCA docketing statement
Jul-02-09 Review Injunction Motion, Motion to Appt. Receiver
and Motion to Require Epstein to Post S15 Million
Bond; teleconference with R. Critton re motion;
conference with D. Yarema.
Jul-07-09
Jul-08-09 Review draft of response to injunction motion; email
comments to D. Yarema; analyze adverse inference for
asserting 5th amd. in a civil case; locate cases holding
that adverse inference is allowed only if there is
independent evidence to support the inference.
Exchange emails with R. Critton regarding status of
EW's cat. petition; send Yarema more cases on 5th
Amd. adverse inference issue for response to Injunction
Motion.
Jul-09-09 Work on 3rd Party Beneficiary Memo.
Jul-10-09 Complete 3rd Party Beneficiary Memo; review revised
draft of Injunction Response Memo; send comments to
D. Yarema; exchange emails with R. Critton; review
comments of Weinstein, Critton and Epstein (with
follow up questions.) July 12, 2009
3.00 1,200.00 LMR
0.80 200.00 DVD
1.80 450.00 DVD
0.10 40.00 LMR
0.10 40.00 LMR
0.10 40.00 LMR
1.00 400.00 I,M R
1.50 600.00 LMR
2.00 800.00 1M R
4.00 1,600.00 LMR
5.00 2,000.00 LMR
Totals 94.20 $29,370.00
DISBURSEMENTS
Westlaw 422.00
Photocopies - June 68.00
Westlaw Legal Research - June 505.00
REEDER & RPEDRR
EFTA00722883
Invoice 4: 1219 Page 4 July 12, 2009
'totals $995.00
Total Fee & Disbursements $30,365.00
TAX ID Number: EN 01-0668548
REEDER & REEDER P.A.
EFTA00722884
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly a financial or legal document, with a list of items or services and corresponding monetary amounts. The document is dated July 15, 2009, and includes a header with the title "Analysis of Law and Order." The items listed include various charges and credits, such as "Analysis of Law and Order," "Analysis of Law and Order," and "Analysis of Law and
[Image 2] The image is a scanned document, specifically a check or a receipt. It contains a list of items or services with corresponding dates, descriptions, and amounts. The document is from Pepper & Becker, and it appears to be a record of payments or expenses. The visible text includes names, dates, and monetary figures, but the specific details are not clear due to the resolution and angle of the scan.
[Image 3] The image shows a document, which appears to be a financial report or invoice. It contains a list of expenses with corresponding dates, descriptions, and monetary amounts. The document is structured with columns for date, description, and amount. There are also sections for totals at the bottom. The visible text includes names, dates, and numerical figures, but no specific details about the conten
[Image 4] The image shows a document, which appears to be a letter or a memo, with visible text and signatures. The document is addressed to "Attorney General" and includes a reference to "the current budget cycle." The visible text includes the sender's name, the recipient's name, and a date. The document is signed by the sender at the bottom. The text is formal and seems to be related to a legal or govern
[Image 5] The image appears to be a scanned document, specifically a financial statement or report. It includes sections such as "Description," "Page," "Date," "Amount," and "Total." There are visible numbers and text fields, but the content is not fully legible due to the resolution and angle of the scan. The document includes a header with a date and a footer with a page number. The visible text includes