Case S09-CY806ESPDAI ' Dominant 59 ',teed on FLSD Docked 077102009 Page 1 0110

Case S09-CY806ESPDAI ' Dominant 59 ',teed on FLSD Docked 077102009 Page 1 0110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO 2 PlainSP vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delendanl JANE DOE NO 3 Plawtstt vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. DNendanl CASE NO: 08.CV.80119-MARRALIOHNSON CASE NO: 08.CY-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4. CASE NO 08.CV.803.80.MARRAJJOHNSON Planta vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Oefendani SDNY_GM_00328555 EFTA 00201307 EFTA01308033 Cato 9 Oc.,cs AAA. Don:sent 39 Emoted on FLSD Docket 07/7012009 Page 2 of 10 CASE MO: ISCV4011P4IARRAMOMOISON JANE DOE NO 5. Flambe vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delonlant JANE DOE NO 6 Planter Y9. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant JANE DOE NO 7. Piamdf vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Deiendanl CASE NO: ISCV-1031141ARRAIJONNSON CASE NO: 00CV40014-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO: 00-CV-5099,341ARRAFJOHNSON 2 SDNY_GM_00328556 EFTA_00201308 EFTA01308034 Case 9 C IAA.I YAM flocometni 39 Enleled an FIST/Docket 07/10/2009 Page 3 of 10 PLatnefl CASt NO 0.8-CV 80119.MARRAVONNSON CASE NO: 0S.CV-80811-MARRAfJOHNSON vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant JANE DOE, CASE NO 08.CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Remelt Vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et el Defendant DOE II CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHNSON Plamtfl vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. et al Detendadts SDNY_GM_00328557 EFTA 00201309 EFTA01308035 Case P r :A KAIA Document 39 Entered on ELS() Docket 07/1012009 Page 4 of 10 CASE NO: 08-CV.4014-41ARRNJOHNSON JANE DOE NO 101. CASE NO 09LVA0591-MARRAQOHNSON Plaintiff vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant JANE DOE NO 102. CASE NO 09-CV 4306S6MARRAMOHNSON Plarnhff H. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delecsdant PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADIMSSIONS TO DEFENDANT theme,' Jane Doe. hereby moves this Coon fcc an cyder competing defendant, Jeffrey Epstein to answer ner first reouOSIS for admrssiOns or. on mo alternative. to prove Mat Ms invocation of his Fifth Amendment pnwtegre is Proper Jane (Afro haS propowstal 23 requests for admission to Epstein includeng SuCh straightforward etvpuera as • YO. It net worth is greater than SI Maim 4 SDNY_GM_00328558 EFTA_0020 I 3 I () EFTA01308036 Case n KiM Document 39 Entered on ELSE) Docket 02/102009 Page 5 of 10 CASE NO 00.Cv400944ARRAo0HNSON • You Own or control. &reedy or indirectly. real estate properly in foreign counties • You are moving significant financial assets overseas outside of the direct lerrilOrial reach Of me U S and Florida Co•rt9 • You currently have the ability to post a bond of St!, mtrupo to satisfy a judgment in this Case without financial or Other difficulty In response to each and every one of these questons Epstein has given the following reSpunie in response Defendant asserts his U S cOnStity/Oenal pnvieges as &heated herein I intend to respond to al relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit however my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot trendy answers to any discovery relevant to this tavvsuti and 1 must accept this aCtuee or nak brig my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation Accordingly. I assert my federal constitutional rights under he Firm Sixth. and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United Stales Constitution Drawing an adverse inference tinier these amunistances would unconstitutionally burden my overate of my consblutional rights would be unreasonable and wOuld therefore violate the Constitution This Court should Order Epstein to answer arl of the requests for adrinSiOn Or, in to alternates, prose Mat his F6th Amendment invocations are valet It is for the <Oen not the datmoni to determine %harbor the hazard of incrimination is iusbbed United States v Argennarur, 925 F 2d 1349. 1355 (11th Cr 1991) 'A gout must make a particularized inquiry deOding in Connection with each specific area that the clueshmffnel dart. wishes to explore, whether or nor the IffmffIleaswet-founded' ld Iffsbeliv this is done in an in Camera proceeding wherein the person asserting the Foveae° is oven the cfpOrlunty sLaostanhate his claims of the privilege and the 5 SDNY_GM_00328559 EFTA_0020 13 I I EFTA01308037 Case 9 0ri r v chl Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 07,10120119 Page 6 of 10 CASE NO. 01-Cve011eefARRArJOHNSON district coca re able to censyler the queshons asked and be documents requested by the summons - al lete Epstein has made boilerplate invocation of the Fifth Amendment to each and every question propounded by Jane Doe. et:ruched for exams* a request that he admit that her net worth is more than $500 mace It is not apparent how admitting hp net worth is incrumnating in the circumstances of this case In any event the Fifth Antendmeet dote not operate n the fashion it is Epszein's obegehon to expain his claims ce weer embr question basis • la Ihe only issue before the Court is Eastern's Filth Amendment privilege Epstein has only asserted a Fifth Amendment oblecbon to production As a result any other objections to ~Mellon are deemed waned Soo Local Rule 26 1G 3l3) ('Ay ground IfOr an °hereon' not slated in an objection within the time provided by the Federal Rules 04 O71Prnredure aly estensiens thereof shall he waived') SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION For thn converwerce or he ChM - and in compliance with Local Rue 26 1 H (Party Slinc iv lea to compel shall list seeofic requests in SuccesSiOn) - Jane Don requests for admission are 45 follows I Yinml worth is greater than 5 It) million 2 Your net worth re greater than 550 ribbon 3 Your net worth is greater than 5100 mace 4 Your net worm is (realm than $500 Nihon 5 Your net worth is greater Man 51 blew G SDNY_GM_00328560 EFTA_0020 13 12 EFTA01308038 Case 9 0! -cf.& Vara tscinthent 39 Entered on Fist) DOckel 07/1072009 Page 7 of 10 CASE NO: 0eCV401i9-ALARRAQOHNSON 6 Since being ncarccratod you have dreary or indirectly (through the seances or asstslauce of other perSOns). conveyed money or assets man attempt to insulate Or protect your money or assets from being captured in any civil lawsuits fled against yOu 7 You own or control *redly or indirectly. real estate property in the Cahhbeen You osn or control directly or indirectly. real estate property in forego Mattes 9 In the last 2 years yeti have transferred assets dad/or money and/or financoal instruments In cnunthes outside the United States 10. You have provided financial support to the modeling agency MC2 11 You have Committed sexual assault against Plaintiff, a minor /2 You committed battery against Plaint!! 13 Y119 neffallY ponesalnd Plaintiff when she was a minor la You offered Plaintiff more money Contingent upon her having sex stet your or giving you Oral sex '5 You intended to harm /garneff when you et:fin-need these sexual acts against hat '6 You knew Plaintiff was tinder the age of 16 when you sexually touczed and fondled her 17 You intend to hire investigators to intimidate and haraSS Plaintiff diming this libgatiOn IS You were engaged in the act of trafficking rune's across state or country bmderr for the purposes ol sex or prOsbtution between 2000 and the present 7 SDNY_GM_00328561 EFTA_0020 13 13 EFTA01308039 Case, P' (r :AI Comment 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/1042009 Psge 8 of 10 CASE NO. ORCV-80,194IARRArlOMNSON '9 You coerced Plaintiff into being a prostitulo and remaining in prostitution 20 Yeti are guilty of the lohovong offenses aeons( Jane Doe A Procuring a mMor for the purpose of prostitution as defined n F S 796 03. B Uattory as defined by Florida Statutes C Sermal Battery 7I You are moving Hgnificant financial assets Overseas. outside of the direct fernforre rearri of Me It S and Florida Courts 22 You are maxim asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgment that mot be entre° against yOu in this or smiler cases 73 You currently have the atelsly to post a bond of $15 m. Lon to Satisfy a eldgenent in thus cane weevil financial or other difficulty CONCLUSION Fre ail 'hese reasons the Court should compel Epstein 10 answer the requests ler adenine,' nr provide a patheulanZed justifical on fOt h5 Fifth Amendment invocation with regard ro each request Counsel for Jane Doe have conferred with opposing counsel On the issues raised n Mrs motion and no resolution was possere DATED July 10 2009 Ftespeclftfiy Sul:mitred. Bradley J Edwards Bradley J Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Ores Blvd Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsanle (954) 5274663 Fonda Bar No 542075 Ennai L. 'yr,* .ri.t±a- CUM 8 SDNY_GM_0032856 2 EFTA_0020 13 14 EFTA01308040 Case 9 0hsutt:r.:, C: la Marksman N Entered cri FLSD nek - 07/10/2009 Page 9 of 10 CASE NO 0aCV-801.9.14ARRA.JOHNSON and Paul G Cassell Pro Nac Vice 332 $ 1400 E Salt lake City. UT 84112 Tereplione 801.58`5-5202 Facsimile 801.585-6833 &Alan CERTIFICATE OF $ERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 10. 2009. I electronically Ned the foregoing document win Me Clerk Of the Coat usng ClArECF I also catty that the foregoing doarmenl is being sensed Ns day on all parties on Me attached Service List in the 'earner specified. either via bansmission of Notices of Electronic Fend generated by CM/ECF or in some other aumortzrm manner to Mose parties who are not authorized to receive Mediu-le" Med Notices 01 E rectronse Fling Bradley .1 Ed...raid% 9 SDNY_GM_0032856 3 EFTA_0020 13 15 EFTA01308041 Case 9 ix, nor” RAM Drturnent 30 Flawed on FLSD Docket 07n0i2000 Page 10 of 10 CASE NO 0ACV40119ASARRAVJOMVSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v, Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan exadberger Eaa Robert I) moon Esp 'sore Vanua? Garcia Jack Patrick Ha Katherine Winhen Eros What- J n ca lake Paul C.; Casson Richer., Konica Waits Rouen C JotOlsotry AiWno liocOnilz Stuart S W07)0510111 J 10 SDW_GM_00328564 EFTA_0020 13 1 6 EFTA01308042 Case o •. KAI.I Oornmeol 38 Enleo ed on ELSD Docket 07/10/2009 Par 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO 2 Purnell vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defend:se JANE DOE NO 3. Plantill VS JEFFREY EPSTEIN. th7(6141.1/11 CASE NO: 08.CV-80119-MARRALIOHNSON CASE NO 08.CV.80232.MARRAOOHNSON JANE DOE. NO 4. CASE NO: 08.CE-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Pennon vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant SDNY_GM_00328565 EFTA_0020 13 17 EFTA01308043 Casa 9 09r.. Moe: •K Docuoton4 38 Enured on FLSD Docket 07/10/2009 Page 2 of 16 CASE NO: OACV4011941ARRAIJOHNSON JANE DOE NO 5 Plana n JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delenclanl JANE DOE. NO 6 Plainbff JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant JANE DOF NO 7. Plaintiff VS JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Delendam / / CASE NO: OSCV403814AARRAMOHNSON CASE NO: OSCV409914AARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO: 08.CV,90993.MARRA/JOHNSON 2 SDNY_GM_00328566 EFTA_00201318 EFTA01308044 Casa 9 IKAcv 1 4' KAM Downie« 38 Emoted on ELSE/ Docket 07/100009 Page 3 of 16 CASE NO: OACLASO2I SAMARA/JOHNSON CASE NO. 08-C1.1.80811-MARRAMONNSON C MA Planet! vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (Mandan( JANE DOE CASE NO. OfICV-80893-CIVMARRAUONNSON Plerteff Vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ot el l/elmemni DOE II CASE NO: 09.CV-80469.MARRAMOHNSON Piaints/I vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN ot andants SDNY_GM_00328 567 EFTA_00201319 EFTA01308045 Case rr :010. 8PA1 Dner.mert 38 F.nrered on Ftso Docket 07/10 Ewa Pane 4 of 16 CASE NO. ON-CV.80119.MARRSJOHNSON JANE DOE NO 101. CASE NO 09-CV-80591-MARRAJJOHNSON Painsfl VS JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defer4anl - - - ----- JANE DOE NO 102 Planer vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant CASE NO 09.CV-13065661ARRANOHNSON PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTEE'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION Plwaer Jane Doe hereby moves this Court for an order compelling defendant Jeffrey EpsI in pi answer her Psi request In. productce or in me allernatme. to Pove Mal his eiwocatron of his Frith AMOIldneflt priulego Is proper Jane Doe also requests production of a putege log Jane Coe has propounded 16 requests for production mciuding such straighlonvarl requests as requests for production of SDNY_GM_00328568 EFTA_00201320 EFTA01308046 Case 909< r 1 Document 38 Entered on FLSO Docket 07/102019 Page 5 0116 CASE NO: 00-Cv.80IINNARRA ,JOHniSON Request No 1 Comes of al belegliOne records. Remarlt No 2 Photos of Me mude of your home located at 358 El Brillo WaY. Palm &mach Moeda that desert the roornts) where massages took place Onclodel9 massage table) Request No 10 Correspondence between Epstein and federal mosecutors tteounv No 12 Personal tax returns. Fr roues, No 13 Photocopies of Epsten s passport. :rers9 No 14 A statement of no' worth, and Iternertf No IC Medical records In recn,nse to each and every one of Mese reouests Epstein has given the followirm response (with only minor variations hero and there) Defendant is asserting hi U.S constitutional privileges I intend to :espord to aN relevant questions regarding this lawsuit however, my Women have CounSeted me That al the present time I cannot select authenscaie and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must eccapt ins advice or nsk loses; my Sixth Amendment right to effective 'permute:mon nocOrdingty. I assert my federal consetutional rights under me NM Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by :he United Sults Gonsmitution Dressing an advent inference unser these orninttlances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my 'arm mania, rights, would be umeasonade and would therefore violate ihn Court/axon Ths Court shoukl order Epstein to provide all of the requested information or. in the artemnive Prove that his Firth Amendnaent mvocatrons aro valid It is for the court. not Me Clamnnl to determine %Memel the hazard d inCrirnelatiOn IS juStrfied owed Slaw: v Atormarnt 925 F 20 1349. 1355 (11th Cu 1991) 'A court must make a parballareed weary deciding m connection with each speatc area Mal the 5 SDNY_GM_00328 569 EFTA_00201321 EFTA01308047 Casa 1' 00 cv ^ x'•:.. KARI Document 31 Entered on PLSID Docket 07/102073 Page 6 of 16 CASE NO 08-O1410IIAMARRNJOHNSON Questioning unity wishes l0 explore wMthei or not me pewter is nollifounded ' Id TYPcaily tnis is done in an in carnet a proceeding wherein the person asserting the privilege in caves the opportunity 'to substantiate his claims of the Mintage and the district court is able to consider (he questions asked and the documents requested by tie summons' Here foetern has made botlemlate mvocabon of the Filth Amendment to each and es=ry rioireal propounded by Jane Due including for example the request lot comes/Palermo with federal prosecutors and for production of federal lax returns This obviously is rota request with Fifth Amendment implications as the information has efrOady ham, suer disclosed to the Government Fa a/ 'nage reasons. the Coon Should Compel Epstein to answer the requests Or rant* a orieculanred sustifir.ation for his Fiflh Amendment invocation with regard to each rectasi Pastein's foul and paste' response to the request /or production also blatantly Orsregaris the: mcpuiremonts lot arecarng privilege under the Courts local mats Local rule 26 1 G me-y 'needle:thy requires the preparation of a privilege log with rescect to all dryairnnMs one, er COmnionieationS (among other thvgsl that are ',simnel(' on the bass Or I.-wedge Epstein Ms failed 10 prepare such a log making it impossible for Jane Doe In effectively chalenge his generic assertions Indeed, with respect to a few request‘ Epstein has slated Turther the request may include information subject to work paste er an attorney-tient envitege O1 course. the whole purpose of forcing a Clefenclms 10 nrepare a (inviteee log is tO face me delendam to decide whether Or not 6 SDNY_GM_00 328570 EFTA_00201322 EFTA01308048 Care • fr • o KNµ Da-rinal 38 Entered on FLSO Docket 07/10/2009 Page 7416 CASE NO. OhCifit0119 MARRALJCWNSON ISO:matron is aronleged M asses/bon that something 'may be privileged is cbueusly weedier deRoent The local Rules do not parrot Ma tactic. and Epstein ShOuld be (at a oranady regaled to produce a Prinkce log For all mese reasons the Court should weal Cation to prondo a faimItege 100 and to answer the inarroga'ones a provide a parteuLanied askatation fa his Fiflh AmoMnw•µ •avroallon with regard to oath rogues-I it shoOsf 1p Mad that huth minor exceptions) the Only grounds on which Epstein can Herne m anowet the request 404 producton is proof 01 avoid Fifth Amendment printer lh(4 the orgy Nam-bon Pastan has asserted (with mmor exceptions) As a result any ethee OblePtions to production are deemed waived Soo Local Rule 26 IG 3 (al r Any croon fee an obsectOn) not sated in an objection wenn the lime provided nv mg Federal Rules 04 CNA Procedure or any extensions thereof. Wall be waived SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION Du me convenience all the coon - and in ocereltance with Local Rule 26 I H (patty 4 UN nJNµs to compel shall list smoke requests in successoon) - Jane Does requests log n•.durten and Eastern s obsetionS are as follows Request No 1 Coen el all telephone f ecoads n your a your attomey's posseSaon horn 24432 lisingh 2005 char any way relate to you (including a phone lines owned by you a that were used to ['COLIC( girls feat the purposes of schedultig massages for you) DdFUN.I 0 asserting ha U S ocnstitutronal Privileges I mend to unhand to all relevant queskons legating this lawsed however my xnengys nave ces Haled me that al the present time I Cannot select ostrx and produce documents relevant to thus Lawson and I must .Mcii dawn) Or alga losing my Seth Amendment ignt to effective 7 SDNY_GM_00328571 EFTA_0020 I 323 EFTA01308049 Case I 05, • hi.ki i a,amiem 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2039 Page 8 of 16 CASE NO: 01-0/.801111.MARRA/JOHNSON rn(we,entaben Aomrdingty. I assert my federal constitutional rights under Filth Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by toe United Staler. Constitution Drawn° an adverse inference under these :mai sauces weird unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my ocoStilutional rights. would be unreascnable. and would therefore violate Cnnshlution Realest No 2 MI massage appointment hocks. Manes. computer calendars or ScheMeng &Mies. scheduling books Or any other writing or Correspondence that con is Inc names of any el Ito gals that wore called contacted scheduled Or vino wool to you' home located al 358 El Emile Way Palm Beach Florida. for the Pundelin eleking you a massage /Vs., nt is asserting his U S constitutional privileges I intend to reuse-O re all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit hcmover my itinowif Owe counseled me that al the present lime I cannot select authenticate. and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I mess ACreni this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective refaesentabon Accordingly I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United Euives ConStilubun Di iw.ng an adverse inference under these cmcinorlenceS would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my tammaiutional nghis would be umeasonaNe. and would therefore violate c.s.si :talon Negfaint No 3 Any and all doCumentabon in your possession that contains Plaintiffs name ii fees to Plaintiff directly or ndcectty. (includes CeMdels, letters message pads. &ones anpontment hooks COmptAer pent outs) Deatinnant is asserting has U S constitutional privileges I intend to respect! to all relevant questions regarding this landd however, my alto '!)s have counseled me that at the present time I cannot seed .iciaa and ntoduce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must drips Mt: advice c• risk bang my Sixth Amendment right to effective .opieuk tt font Aeconsingty. I assort my federal Constitutional rights under de Filth. Sixth, awl Fotirinereh Amendments as guaranteed by the United Bram, eferskruhno laraverig an adverse inference under these doCunislanoss would unconsbtuttaually burden my exercise of my :mu lutional rights would be unreasonabka. and would therefore violate to Os's, when Balitleo I.. A AM' and as Photos vdeos downloaded digital prints or any other v.Sual depiction onidi or of any other known or suspected minor females introduced to you. dretilv,x motet-ay. by Plaintiff 8 SDNY_GM_003285 72 EFTA 00201324 EFTA01308050 Oise 9 Mon/:' KAM Edsnumend 38 Entered on FIST) Docket 07/1012C09 Page 9 of 16 CASE NO: aSCV4O1IS-MAREUVJOHNSON 0oter4 ins i‘ assetting his US constitutional privileges I intend to reszont to all relevant questons regarding this lawsuit heWever my ancertrtY5 have °weaseled me that al the present erne I cannot select atkienecate. and produce documents relevant to this lawstat and I must accept Pas advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective ..epreier I.rtion Montan,* I 33340 my federal conslitubonal rights under he silly Stadh and Eoureenth Arnendmeres as guaranteed by the United Slates :gest:Mann pawing an adverse nference under These breurdiakces would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my nonshtylional rights. would be unreasonable. and would therefore violate Cnneritoon Requtt 'In • Photos ni the inside or your home located at 358 El Brdlo Way. Palm Beads Floats that detact the room(s) where the massages too place (reducing manly* tartlet ler,ndalt is stnnining his US constitutional privileges I intend to 'OWN-soci In ad raiment gueStiOnS regaraing this lawsuit honever my anent*" have rxxinselea rte that al the present tine I cannot select elheicockle and predate Ck)Curnents relevant to this lawsut and I must except ilia °donee or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective reuresonlaiion Aces:atingly. I assert my federal constitutional nghls under •NE l ilt frt. and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed try me United Crwislaubon Drawing an adverse inference under these kir erstarCeS would unconsliTutionalry burden my exercise of my consstutkidal opts. woub be unreasonable. and wertild therefore 'notate Cerl.tutoOn Request No tr Any and 111. documentation cv cancelled Checks or evidence of payment to PISMO 01 tray kind and lot any reason whatsoever alS.rtlivi his. U S constitutional privileges I intend to • to rtit releweel fltwn born regarding this lawsuit hemover my nave .savinEeled me that al the present time I cannot sekt-t c.o....W.00e and croduce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must ,tcreil 'Pas advice or tislt losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective reerawmfebon Acnardongiy. I assert my federal constitutional rghtk under the Fifth. SOUK at., Pennettnth Amendments as guaranteed by the United .;rtees tcestitot,ort °wenn an adverse inference under these emcee w 1st/ tincOnstituarnally burden my exercise of my ...art slit dl lights would be unreasonable, and would therefore owlet* a ....940.011 9 SDNY_GM_00328573 EFTA_00201325 EFTA01308051 Case 9 lin v 5. I , Untried on FISD Docket 07/10'2009 Page 10 of 18 CASE NO' Olt CV4011941ARRNJOHNSON Reque' U. ()recovery information obtained by you or your attorneys as a result Ot the oi discovery in the State criminal case against you or he Federal invest., • , Wrier yen - dnin 15 assening Ius U S manslittibanal ponlOges I 'mend 10 le,,,onci to all relevant questions regarding this Lawsut however, my attorneys have counseled me that at re present brie I cannot select authenbcale. and produce documents relevant to thd lawsuit and I must accent bus advice or nsk losing my Srth Amendment right to effective reprearta1iCel AOCOrdingly. I assert my federal constituter -tat rights under tin tilt. Sod- and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United "kw Conriblion Drawing an adverse inference under these • winkle-ries would unconsttubonaly burden my exercise of my rignts. wctel be unreasonable. and would therefore morale IX' .1.:111}910,1 In ACIrtibon to and wchoi4 waving hs cornices:nal • --v.,.7•S line Worm:ton sougnl is rivileged and Confidential, and insfortelle to Ow terms of the deferred prosecution agreement. Federal le or Evidence 410 and 408. and § 90410. Ha Slat 'Further, the nylkeel may including information serer:tie work product or an attorney-mon' ernes, Roque_ .4in:snarl documents evidenong asset transfers from 2005 to present for you O-..p...1;riynt ary company or corporation owned by you florenetbef IS assertion his US consblithonal privileges I intend to lo M tee-var. Questions regarding Chit lawbuit hoover. my'referee., bane nnUnertled me that at he present erne I cannot select sidnehrobt and produce documents relevant to this lawsuil and I must scram ins advice or risk losmg my Sixth Amendment right to elleCtrfe rano Peg ern Acoaroingly I assert my federal constitutional rights under Jar 1: inn ark and Forwent Amendments as guaranteed by the United eisegieige f rawmq an adverse inference under these cgs... sconces would unconstitutionally burden my °Keeps° of my .41.4401.1I iigMs. would be unreasonable. and ward therefore 'notate Tin Cr-.starers Jane I . nine to use irwtje nalenas to ores a lertieleten inference et ye fro, te mere Ian that ,. • nice prowftd 1.)...V enforcer...rearviewnewt el pea orcksirons Art triCe OTt v in ei HXe also rtS. 0004/ nitY10 ledb ale ananr1 Or'Cr aelmnialkk *manna •1 mire leer 'erne so.ifrect maw as OW lame Toe* exits. that Fµten Ines on IM riot. •••••.. el -linen', MI" hi • ihnegerner Oars rktoovery of inlommon relnyney ,o Luna, 10 SDNY_GM_0032857 4 EFTA 00201326 EFTA01308052 Case Co 09 ..y if t JO Entered co DSO DOcilug 07/102009 Payoff 0116 CASE NO O8-Cv410119.maRRAfJOHNSON Ragged N. 0 My darurnents or Other evidentiary materials provided to local state. or !ow Nth:cert.:rut investigators Or local, stale or loderal prosecutors Theeket'lre tali' sexual acbvities with minors t'c'ff r'.-A is Erahairy M US cOnSftubcoal privileges I intend to ;expand to ell relevant Questions regarding this lawsuit however. my allOrnes.S have Counseled me that at the present time I cannot select oxtrientrate. and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk 'mite my Sixth Amendment right to Olean* insurxmlatron Accordingly. I assert my *de's' constitutional rights under on ' an teeth 301 f inirioerth Amersintents as guaranteed by the United Cratitutinn Drawing an aCiVerSe inference under those othier.flahres w: ed unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my room-.Donal rights• would be unreasonable and would therefore vicrato : c..'Aston In addition lo and without waiving his constitutional Me ireonnabOn sought is proitegod and confrientol and ^ vdfddeble ensure tO file tears of the deferred prosecution agreement 'el R..9 Of Fadden** 410 and 408 and § 90410. Fla Stat ' Further. Mn redoes{ may indude information sub1ect to work product or an x1omeptIrent prmlege Rogues . fie Ig All rOrreSpocdence between you and your attorneys and state or federal Ow orfOreeMent or prOsecutors (includes but not limited to. letters to and from the SY ••• "A:•treys ors-Ace arty agents thereof) rerers.,ini 7 arssxnang his VS ccnstitubonal privileges I ntend 10 rro. '0 ad relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however. my t..cennts nave cotriotled me that at the present into I cannot select Mt-tea* and produce documents relevant 10 the lawsuit and I must >ma ins servIro Or risk litdiog my Sixth Amendment right to effective i. ris-,sor few Accordingly. I assert my federal constitutional rightS under oin Six I rind FOOlulergh Arneridimenth as guaranteed by the United Ciiiniiroklin Ordering an adverse inference under these 101 en tocnnst ivtionally burden my exercise of my metro Agin. weird oe unreasonable and would therete re violate ni.Wl in .xpoitron to and WIthOul waiving his constitutional • a Inn inneMieliOn Sought •s privileged and confidential and ......, -•srie Jursioleil 10 the terms of enn deferred prosecution agreement - — 1 jab ph es o iv/ nand 10104 nese Maims% to cads if lorbidOen inlifferee of Quit hem tic Irene Watt!: "Ntisern. be mew e. ono, rweibm These melemile die duo urry JO Mfg mote docare• .}.sill, irnio, s. to en 02nd t Olen rents on the nOn-IXOSebecn Wren' • •• • •'is DiY.-mare sniiiaseniny 01 race matOn relevfrt Xi Ms linbul II SDNY_GM_00328575 EFTA 00201327 EFTA01308053 Cale 9109 :a ••.. or nes' .; Elfrensd on FLSD Docket 071I0f2009 Page 120116 CASE NO. 0J-CV.80119 MARRAcIONNSON Fed n M al Ekidence 410 and 408 and § 90410 ill Slat Further. r JUCSI may include informatron subject to work product or an .,ft.:1 'fAy AIWA Crorego Request In it Arty and as documents reflecting your current not north Defendant is OSAtertInd his US constitutional prntleges I intend to etc.t.n. ea cern& questions regarding trio lawsuit, however my aberners have courtne.4 me that al the present Owe I cannot select at Tient cafe. and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must ••rxer des *tare iv risk losing my Sixth Amendment nght to effective everneltripon Actrirdinitly, asset my federal constitutional rights under F4. enrh. and Frunetenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United Stites Consblubon Dravnng an adverse ofilerenCe under these .:::ate*, •r.011 trv,oshltit."12 9, burden my exercise of my cons' turcnal nphts would be unreasonable and would therefore maldte • tn -tt Whey Request kin '' Ramona, tar returns for all years MAT 2002 through the present %dental. Is cis ding he US constitutional privileges I mend to i ?II 60roont niesoons regarding m5 lawsuit however my ..v.st.v; fiche ',nmad me that al the present lane I cannot select aminmt ntnitgn fl0C0MoMS feteVant to Ms lawsuit and I most At tft.'n MAI ROOM co tit', e...swe one Sixth Amendment fight to effeCtue • rcmantiticn Ao:Ordingly I assert my federal constitution,' rights under thu Frit, Slink aryl Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United Sian C0ASIdulfon UraWing an adverse inference under those tiviratitaini von.AI tfec0nstdotf0rally burden my exerose of my rat, m' unal rights would be unreasonaUe and wou'd therein vglate • • fin .t• • —iv Dread Roque c 1 . NY/ of your passport including any suppcemental pages Tureen, • inovirms ov the 50 Unted States between 2002 and 2008 air, cm. • rlocrtincrs ce records rogardrng Oar* bcacs hotel receipts. or tranlp • ."nifidernegiGn Jane I act of matoof rein Or F. vt I: ...a 614Fe motonao In chive a loctsdahla NerenCe of got Won We mere rte. WOLF-CM won plea filonal•CVIS FYI ISM6 tO, arm Papaata Taft. I 66 ID a- ad N Is. USCOaLay d FOng ademsobleeocienco To Frt eaftrt mat [putin r -en O Wnymnre't And ex; in Mat Agra...NM ton ,Annflry or trorwason reitara 12 SDNY_GM_00328576 EFTA 00201328 EFTA01308054 Case 9 Oa r -rev' 90 Emceed on FLSO Docket 07/93:2009 Page 13 Of 16 CASE NO. OFCV40.0-MARRAUOMNSON flefeeSent is angling Pis U.S constituticnal privileges I intend to yr' 7 t as teferanl quebbCos regarding this lawsuit however my ; • s , viva cc, 'cited me that al Inc present time I cannot select ror r•so an end otodute documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must ers advice C. risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to °Hectare remirientaben Ai:con:Jingly. I assert my *decal constitutional regnts under :- 113 Sulh. arc Fotifleen6sAinendrnems as guaranteed by the united States Constitution Drawls° an adverse inference under these carrumstances would unconshtiaionally burden my exercise OI my nyeblimenal rights. would be unreasonable and would therefore violate me (drew...woof, ro withriod to and w.:hout waiving his constitutional acct., viewers lire scope Of wletrnatsen is SO overt:wad that rt - •-•, •+laimn n. 4 it relMer relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead uceueit,,:e evidence compiling such eirorniatwn over a • :an ve-util be unduly nordenS4ese and time consuming' Rogue . 4n " c sworn statement of your net worth (including a detailed financial staters • ..,.red all rerronl assets and hal:Mies) Defends. , o asserting hes US centimes:oat privileges I otend to respond to all retevar• err rid.'s regarding Ibis lawsuit however, my attorneys have countered me that at • r •I tans select authentecate and produce doCUMentS relevant to MS la. -I . Must accept MI advice ex MA losing my Sixth Amen:Went right to effeCtr, Aretrdingiy. I assert my federal constit,itionat rights under the • ii Fatilgene Amendrnents as guaranteed by the United SlAlcs eccmtir ItaWailru lea adverse inference under these circumstances should unCon. ,•••• durden my exercise of my COnStitutxxial rights. would be irweas • rot woulo vOlate *he Constitubon Roque... iie, rmanriel s;alernentS Or affidavits produced by you for any reason. to ady..erson onropuny entity er corporation since 2005 • asseterg his I) S consblusonal privileges I intend to 'emend aueseens regarding th4 lawsuit. however. ran 4.4, n. !red red Mat PI the presen, Wile I cannot select perdue. wannest, relevant to this lawsuit and I must . cr.-."0; advert or ins losing my Sttth Amendment right to effective c•r swim. Aresdingly. I assen try federal constitutional rights under re) hr., Suult and 90ufleenth Amondmen:s as guaranteed by tne United • ant., 'Lwow IWO ealillets Ease owe-sew luwel asamein of °Gown, ...Mona sots ice steel Ounce. rev. v. µway 61411,140 aufweicueon for wch admits Also pwedng a co") or a passport pas . .'Ass eawn am fact tot Fessen is retry re ham used To swonw. of a Irwst art ar • e Hwy 4 REW r..1beWaco, it. seri le weer* cvdtear ere overseas v.v.', Inn, SDNY_GM_00328577 EFTA 00201329 EFTA01308055