From: Richard Kahn
From: Richard Kahn
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 8:00 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Steel building
not =hat i am aware of..
problem is that if i do not push =veryone daily nothing gets done..
unfortunately =ately i have been busy with banks, brokerages and hedge =unds..
last =mails to glidden below..
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 =exington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022
tel
fax
cel
On Mar 12, 2019, at 3:57 PM,1 <[email protected]> wrote:
Did we order the building steel
=nbsp;
Begin =orwarded message:
From: Richard Kahn c=
Subject: Fwd: 40x60 bldg.
Date: March 7, 2019 at 4:15:25 PM EST
To: michael glidden <
EFTA_R1_01851381
EFTA02631147
Cc: Daphne Wallace , Stephanie Remington
i =m not sure if you responded and i apologize if you did and i missed =t..
could you please update on status and next steps as =ee would like ordered asap
thank you
Richard Kahn
HBRK =ssociates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th =loor
New York NY 10022
tel
fax
cell
Begin =orwarded message:
From: Richard Kahn <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: 40x60 bldg.
Date: February 22, 2019 at 3:25:25 PM EST
To: michael glidden
Cc: Daphne Wallace Stephanie Remington
can you please review and reply ASAP
thanks
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, =Y 10022
tel
fax
cell
2
EFTA_R1_01851382
EFTA02631148
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brian Buck
Subject: RE: 40x60 bldg.
Date: February 21, 2019 at 1:30:57 PM EST
To: michael glidden
Cc: Daphne Wallace , Richard Kahn
Stephanie Remington
Michael,
I =ant to put together a drawing for you but I need to clarify a couple of =hings first.
• So the =uilding was not erected according to plans, it was modified somewhat in =he
field? The building was a fully sheeted building. So the =rector opened up the left end wall to 8'2" and the back =ide
wall to 10'6" but was sheeted 5'6" =ast the roof of the 14" slab. How deep is the retaining =all?
• Are the (2) 12' x 14' =oors on the marked up dwg you sent back (front side wall and right
end =all) to be included in these locations? Are we adding a third =ollup door in bay #3 of the front side wall where you
currently have a =5' rough opening?
Assuming the above is correct this is =hat I would propose.
We previously had the left end wall as = flush girt condition. I would change it to a bypass girt so
that =he girt would extend 10"(depth of girt) past the face of the =olumn. This way a) the panel would lap over the
retaining wall(if it is =0" or less deep) for a good seal and b) would allow us to shift =he columns in 10". This will clear
the existing anchor =olts which will be cut off and providing the pier is sufficient in =idth, would save a whole lot of time
and labor on those (4) left end =all columns.
I'd leave the back side wall =pen to 10'6", sheet above the roof and provide a wall =o roof
flashing. I'm assuming the slab is all even =levation?
I think if we change the bay spacings =lightly(less than a foot in most cases) we can avoid having
to do a lot =f the demolition.
What do you think?
Regards,
Brian Buck
President
Direct
Toll Free
3
EFTA_R1_01851383
EFTA02631149
Web www.bucksteel.com <http://www.bucksteel.com/> Follow us on social media!
6855 Lyons Technology Circle I =uite 18 I Coconut Creek FL 33073
1107 Battlewood Street I Suite 221 Franklin TN 37069
Legal Disclaimer: =his communication and any attachments contain information which is =onfidential and may also be
privileged. It is for the exclusive use of =he intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) =lease note that
any form of disclosure, distribution, copying or use of =his communication or the information in it or in any attachments
is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Where the content of this email =s personal or otherwise unconnected with
the firm's or its clients' =usiness, Buck Steel accepts no responsibility or liability for such =ontent. E-mail communications
cannot be guaranteed to be secure or =rror free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, =ost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. We do =ot accept liability for any such matters or their
=onsequences.
From: michael =lidden
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 4:56 PM
To: Brian Buck
Cc: Daphne Wallace ; Richard Kahn
Stephanie Remington <
Su ject: Fw : 40x60 g.
Good =fternoon Brian.
I thought that this might help =nderstanding how the building was installed. The only openings
are as =arked up.
I will gather the information =omorrow that we discussed .
Begin forwarded message:
From: michael glidden
Subject: 40x60 bldg.
Date: February 20, 2019 at =:47:48 PM AST
To: [email protected]
Sent from my =Phone
=/div>
4
EFTA_R1_01851384
EFTA02631150
5
EFTA_R1_01851385
EFTA02631151
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or an email. The text is partially obscured, but it seems to be a professional communication, possibly related to work or business matters. The document includes a date and time stamp at the top, indicating when it was sent or received. There are visible names, but they are redacted, and the content of the text is not fully legible due to the
[Image 2] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a formal communication. It contains text that is too small to read clearly, but it is structured in a way typical of a letter, with a header, body, and footer. The document is printed on standard letter-sized paper. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image. The content of the document is not
[Image 3] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or an email. The document is partially obscured by a red rectangle, which seems to be a watermark or a censorship mark. The visible text includes the sender's name, the recipient's name, and a subject line. The sender's name is redacted, and the recipient's name is also redacted, with the exception of the last name "Wallace." The s
[Image 4] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a memo. It contains text and a date at the top, which is October 17, 2001. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a formal communication, possibly related to a business or organizational matter. The document is addressed to someone named Jeffrey, and there is a reference to a "problem statement" and a "solution." The se
[Image 5] The image appears to be a document scan, possibly a letter or a report, with a header and a footer. The header includes a date and a reference number, but the text is too small to read clearly. The footer contains a page number, which is also not legible. The document has a watermark or a pattern of lines across it, making it difficult to read the text. There are no visible names, logos, or other