04 Hills chikungunya 508

CDC ACIP — Vaccine Advisory Committee

Acip

Slides

127

Document text

Surveillance for adverse events following use of 
live attenuated chikungunya vaccine and its use 
among travelersNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases
Dr. Susan Hills
CDC Lead, Chikungunya Vaccines Work Group
Arboviral Diseases Branch
Division of Vector -Borne Diseases
Fort Collins, Colorado
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting
April 16 , 2025
Background on live attenuated 
chikungunya vaccine
Live attenuated chikungunya vaccine (CHIK -LA) 
•Manufactured by Valneva and called IXCHIQ
•Licensed in United States in November 2023 for individuals aged ≥18 years
•Single dose primary schedule
•Licensed based on immunogenicity and safety data in ~3,500 adults

Local and systemic adverse events in pivotal Phase 3 trial
•Safety data from 3,082 subjects
•Solicited local reactions  within 10 days after vaccination
-15% in vaccinees vs 11% in placebo recipients
•Solicited systemic adverse events  (AE) within 10 days after vaccination
-50% in vaccinees vs 27% in placebo recipients
-Most common were headache, fatigue and myalgia in ~25% –30% of vaccinees
Schneider M et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a single -shot live -attenuated chikungunya vaccine: a double -blind, multicentre , randomised , placebo- controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 401: 2138 –2147. 
Comparison of adverse events in 18 –64 years and ≥65 years*
18–64 years ≥65 years
Vaccine  
(n=2,736)(95% CI) Placebo 
(n=916)(95% CI) Vaccine 
(n=346)(95% CI) Placebo 
(n=117)(95% CI)
Any related AE 52% (50%– 54%) 32% (29% –35%) 46% (41%– 52%) 26% (18% –35%) 
Any related 
severe AE2% (2%– 3%) 0.1% (0%–0.6%) 1% (0.3%– 3%) 0 (0%–3%) 
*Data from pivotal Phase 3 trial
Comparison of adverse events in 18 –64 years and ≥65 years*
18–64 years ≥65 years
Vaccine  
(n=2,736)(95% CI) Placebo 
(n=916)(95% CI) Vaccine 
(n=346)(95% CI) Placebo 
(n=117)(95% CI)
Any related AE 52% (50%– 54%) 32% (29% –35%) 46% (41%– 52%) 26% (18% –35%) 
Any related 
severe AE2% (2%– 3%) 0.1% (0%–0.6%) 1% (0.3%– 3%) 0 (0%–3%) 
*Data from pivotal Phase 3 trial
•Fever ≥100.4° F (38° C) and ≥1 of:
•Symptom onset within 30 days of vaccination Chikungunya- like adverse reactions (1)
- Arthralgia or arthritis
- Myalgia
- Headache
- Back pain
- Rash
- Lymphadenopathy
- Certain neurologic, cardiac, or ocular symptoms
Package insert – IXCHIQ (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines -blood -biologics/ixchiq)
•Chikungunya -like adverse reactions 
-11.7%  of vaccine recipients and 0.6% of placebo recipients 
•Severe reactions  preventing daily activity or requiring medical 
intervention
-1.6%  vaccine recipients vs 0% of placebo recipients
•Prolonged reactions  with  duration ≥30 days
-0.5%  vaccine recipients vs 0% of placebo recipients
Chikungunya- like adverse reactions (2)
Two serious adverse events considered related to vaccination
•58-year -old female, history of 
fibromyalgia and hypertension
•Severe myalgia
•Hospitalized for 6 days for pain 
management and diagnostic procedures•66-year -old male, history of 
hypertension
•Myalgia, high fever, atrial fibrillation, 
and hypovolemic hyponatremia 
•Hospitalized  for 4 days
FDA Clinical Review Memo (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines -blood -biologics/ixchiq)
ACIP Work Group summary of CHIK -LA safety in Evidence 
to Recommendations, February 2024
•Reactogenic vaccine but similar adverse event rates to some other 
vaccines 
•Important to monitor for rare adverse events post- licensure as sample 
size of ~3,500 vaccinated subjects too small to detect rare events
Post -marketing studies
•FDA-required post -marketing studies
-Vaccine effectiveness study in persons aged ≥12 years with safety component (Brazil)
-Pragmatic randomized controlled trial in ≥10,000 individuals to assess effectiveness 
and safety
Post -marketing studies
•FDA-required post -marketing studies
-Vaccine effectiveness study in persons aged ≥12 years with safety component (Brazil)
-Pragmatic randomized controlled trial in ≥10,000 individuals to assess effectiveness 
and safety
•Additional safety data collection
-Valneva conducting safety study of 5,000 U.S. travelers for medically attended 
adverse events of special interest
-Observational registry study of pregnant women in Brazil
Post -licensure surveillance for adverse 
events following use of CHIK- LA
•National reporting system for adverse events (AE) following vaccination co- managed by CDC 
and FDA
•Designed to detect rare or previously unreported AE or changes in reporting patterns that 
might signal a potential safety concern that warrants further investigation
•Anyone (e.g., healthcare providers, patients, vaccine manufacturers) can submit reports
•Effective in intended role as early warning system but limitations includeVaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
-Under -and over -reporting, variable report quality and 
accuracy, lack of data on vaccine doses administered, 
and lack of unvaccinated comparator group
•Generally cannot determine if AEs caused by 
vaccine
Timeline
Licensure 
November 2023ACIP 
recommendations 
February 2024Exact timing of 
distribution 
unknown*
*First report (non -serious event ) to VAERS received May 6, 2024 
28 AEs reported to VAERS after CHIK -LA vaccine 
administered in May -Dec 2024*
*Excludes 1 foreign report (non- serious)28 AEs reported 
22 non- serious 6 serious
22 n on-serious AEs
22 non- serious AE
10 chikungunya -like 
adverse reactions4 arthralgia or 
arthritis without 
fever8 other*
*Syncope (n=1), flushing (n=1), rash/headache (n=1), musculoskeletal pain (n=1), low grade 
fever/headache (n=2), respiratory tract symptoms (n=2)
Serious adverse events (SAEs)
Any adverse event associated with use of biological 
product, whether or not considered product -related, 
that results in:
•Death
•Life-threatening adverse experience
•Inpatient hospitalization  or prolongation of existing 
hospitalization
•Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
•Congenital anomaly/birth defect
•Other medically important event  that may jeopardize 
patient and may require intervention to prevent one of the 
outcomes listedFDA definition of SAE per federal law
Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title -21/chapter -I/subchapter -F/part -600/subpart -D/section -600.80)6 SAEs
5 hospitalizations1 other medically 
important event
Any adverse event associated with use of biological 
product, whether or not considered product -related, 
that results in:
•Death
•Life-threatening adverse experience
•Inpatient hospitalization  or prolongation of existing 
hospitalization
•Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
•Congenital anomaly/birth defect
•Other medically important event  that may jeopardize 
patient and may require intervention to prevent one of the 
outcomes listedFDA definition of SAE per federal law
Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title -21/chapter -I/subchapter -F/part -600/subpart -D/section -600.80)6 SAEs
5 hospitalizations1 other medically 
important event
When SAEs reported to VAERS, 
attempts made to collect additional 
information (e.g., medical records)
Case 1: 83 -year -old male
Case 1: 83 -year -old male
Coronary artery disease Hypertension
Hyperlipidemia
Chronic  
thrombocytopeniaChronic heart failure
Chronic kidney disease
Multiple medications to treat comorbidities
Active at baseline
•Received CHIK -LA vaccine 
for travel to South America 
and AfricaCase 1: 83 -year -old male
Coronary artery disease Hypertension
Hyperlipidemia
Chronic  
thrombocytopeniaChronic heart failure
Chronic kidney disease
Multiple medications to treat comorbidities
Active at baseline
Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)

Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptoms

Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptoms
Myalgia, arthralgia, 
mild fever, chills, headache, generalized weakness, brain fog, 
anorexia, severe 
fatigue, unsteady gait
Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weakness

Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weakness
Determined to have 
acute kidney injury likely from dehydration; brain MRI and head CT - no acute changes; 
discharged home
Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weaknessDay 11: Returned to 
hospital with persistent 
weakness; admitted
Left lower extremity (hip flexor) weakness, myalgia, 
fatigue

Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weaknessDay 11: Returned to 
hospital with persistent 
weakness; admitted
Left lower extremity (hip flexor) weakness, myalgia, 
fatigue
Leukopenia, acute on chronic thrombocytopenia, 
elevated liver function tests; declined lumbar puncture

Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weaknessDay 11: Returned to 
hospital with persistent 
weakness; admitted
Left lower extremity (hip flexor) weakness, myalgia, 
fatigue
Leukopenia, acute on chronic thrombocytopenia, 
elevated liver function tests; declined lumbar puncture
COVID, influenza A/B, RSV PCR: negative
Blood cultures: no growth

Case  1. 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weaknessDay 11: Returned to 
hospital with persistent 
weakness; admitted

Case  1. Encephalopathy in 83-year -old male
•Discharge diagnosis: Encephalopathy and generalized weakness - 
suspected association with chikungunya vaccination
•Completely resolved after 3.5 weeks
Case  1. Encephalopathy in 83 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
 (only)Day 3: 
Initial 
symptoms
Myalgia, arthralgia, 
mild fever, chills, headache, generalized weakness, brain fog, 
anorexia, severe 
fatigue, unsteady gaitDay 7: Presents to ED 
with ongoing 
generalized weakness
Determined to have acute kidney injury likely from dehydration
Brain MRI and head CT 
- no acute changes
Discharged homeDay 11: Returned to 
hospital with persistent 
weakness; admitted
Left lower extremity (hip flexor) weakness, myalgia, fatigue
Leukopenia, acute on chronic thrombocytopenia, 
elevated liver function tests; declined lumbar puncture
COVID –19, influenza A/B, RSV PCR: negative 
Blood cultures: no growth

Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Coronary artery disease
Hypothyroidism
Selective IgA deficiencyHypertension
Benign prostatic 
hyperplasia
Several medications to treat comorbidities
Active at baselineHyperlipidemia
Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Coronary artery disease
Hypothyroidism
Selective IgA deficiencyHypertension
Benign prostatic 
hyperplasia
Several medications to treat comorbidities
Active at baseline•Received CHIK -LA vaccine 
for travel to Southeast AsiaHyperlipidemia
Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VC*
*JE-VC: Inactivated Vero cell culture -derived JE vaccine
Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptoms

Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptoms
Severe fatigue, 
fever, diarrhea, myalgia, urinary urgency

Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent Care
Diagnosed 
with viral illness

Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent CareDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Profound weakness with inability 
to stand and intermittent confusion; no dysuria or macroscopic hematuria
Admission diagnosis of fever of 
unknown origin, diarrhea, dehydration, hyponatremia, 
hypochloremia, and suspected 
urinary tract infection

Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent CareDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Urinalysis: Negative
Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent CareDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Urinalysis: Negative
COVID PCR, influenza A/B 
antigen: negative
Blood cultures: no growth
Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent CareDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Urinalysis: Negative
COVID PCR, influenza A/B 
antigen: negative
Blood cultures: no growth
Brain MRI: no acute intracranial 
abnormalities
Case  2. 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VC*Day 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent CareDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Urinalysis: Negative
COVID PCR, influenza A/B 
antigen: negative
Blood cultures: no growth
Brain MRI: no acute intracranial 
abnormalities
•Discharge diagnosis: Acute metabolic encephalopathy – possible 
association with vaccination –  and fever of unknown origin (resolved)Case  2. Encephalopathy in 77 -year -old male
Case  2. Encephalopathy in 77 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VCDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent CareDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Day 19: 
Readmitted with 
urinary retention 
for ~24 hours 
•At ~4 months after onset: Still recovering with ongoing weaknessCase  2. Encephalopathy in 77 -year -old male: outcome
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA &  
JE-VC*Day 4: 
Initial 
symptoms
Severe fatigue, 
fever, diarrhea, myalgia, urinary urgencyDay 6: 
Presented to 
Urgent Care
Diagnosed with viral illnessDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with 
worsening 
symptoms; admitted
Profound weakness with inability to stand and intermittent confusion; no dysuria or macroscopic hematuria
Admission diagnosis of fever of 
unknown origin, diarrhea, dehydration, hyponatremia, 
hypochloremia, and suspected 
urinary tract infection
*JE-VC: Inactivated Vero cell culture -derived JE vaccine
Urinalysis: Negative
COVID PCR, influenza A/B 
antigen: negative
Blood cultures: no growth
Brain MRI: no acute intracranial 
abnormalitiesDay 19: 
Readmitted for 
~24 hours with 
urinary retentionCase  2. Encephalopathy in 77 -year -old male
Case  3. 86-year -old male
Diabetes mellitus
Medications to manage comorbiditiesHypertension
Heart failure
Hyperlipidemia AnemiaHypothyroidism
Case  3. 86-year -old male
Diabetes mellitus
Medications to manage comorbiditiesHypertension
Heart failure
Hyperlipidemia AnemiaHypothyroidism•Received CHIK -LA vaccine 
for travel to South Asia
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA

Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptoms
Lethargy, 
drowsiness, 
fever
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptoms
Lethargy, 
drowsiness, 
feverDeterioration 
in mental 
status, 
shortness of 
breath
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Hospitalized, 
admitted to ICU
Altered mental 
status, acute 
encephalopathy 
secondary to 
hyponatremia 
(118 mmol/L), 
shortness of 
breath
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Hospitalized, 
admitted to ICU
Hypokalemia, hypochloremia, 
hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemiaElevated liver function tests
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Hospitalized, 
admitted to ICU
Hypokalemia, hypochloremia, 
hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemiaElevated liver function tests
CT head: No acute abnormalities
Chest X -ray: bilateral infiltrates
Echocardiogram: Small pericardial effusion
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Hospitalized, 
admitted to ICU
Hypokalemia, hypochloremia, 
hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemiaElevated liver function tests
CT head: No acute abnormalities
Chest X -ray: bilateral infiltrates
Echocardiogram: Small pericardial effusion
Day 13 post -vaccination serum 
sample: chikungunya virus RNA 
Case  3. 86 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LADay 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Hospitalized, 
admitted to ICU
Day 31: 
Discharged 
after 23 -day 
hospitalization
Case  3. Metabolic encephalopathy  in 83-year -old male
•Discharge diagnosis: 
-Toxic metabolic encephalopathy
-Fever possibly related to a post- vaccination inflammatory response 
with possible superadded bacterial pneumonia
•Mostly recovered at 1 month after discharge from hospital
Case  4. 68-year -old male
Prostate cancer*
Medications to manage comorbiditiesHypertension
Hypothyroidism Dyslipidemia
*Radiation therapy pending
Case  4. 68-year -old male
Prostate cancer*
Medications to manage comorbiditiesHypertension
Hypothyroidism Dyslipidemia
*Radiation therapy pending•Received CHIK -LA vaccine 
for trip to Southeast Asia
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA*
*At intervals 8– 15 days earlier, received six inactivated vaccines: Tdap, influenza, polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis A
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptoms
Fever, 
headache, 
fatigue, body 
achesPhotophobia and neck 
stiffness
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptomsDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptomsDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
CSF pleocytosis (109 WBC/µL with 
mononuclear predominance; 157 RBC/µL)
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptomsDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
CSF pleocytosis (109 WBC/µL with 
mononuclear predominance; 157 RBC/µL)
Meningoencephalitis and respiratory PCR 
panels negative, CSF culture no growth 
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptomsDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
CSF pleocytosis (109 WBC/µL with 
mononuclear predominance; 157 RBC/µL)
Meningoencephalitis and respiratory PCR 
panels negative, CSF culture no growth 
Brain MRI, CT: no acute abnormalities
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptomsDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
CSF pleocytosis (109 WBC/µL with 
mononuclear predominance; 157 RBC/µL)
Meningoencephalitis and respiratory PCR 
panels negative, CSF culture no growth 
Brain MRI, CT: no acute abnormalities
CSF chikungunya testing: IgM and 
neutralizing antibodies detected
Case  4. 68 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA
Day 5: 
Initial symptomsDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
•Discharge diagnoses: Meningismus /aseptic meningitis likely 
secondary to recent vaccination 
•Status : Headache and fatigue initially persisted but fully recovered by 
~1 monthCase  4. Meningitis in 68- year -old male
Case  4. Meningitis in 68- year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA*
*At intervals 8– 15 days earlier, received six inactivated vaccines: Tdap, influenza, polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis ADay 5: 
Initial symptoms
Fever, 
headache, 
fatigue, body 
achesPhotophobia and neck 
stiffnessDay 12: Hospitalized 
with meningitis
CSF pleocytosis (109 WBC/µL with 
mononuclear predominance; 157 RBC/µL)
Meningoencephalitis and respiratory PCR 
panels negative, CSF culture no growth 
Brain MRI, CT: no acute abnormalities
CSF chikungunya testing: IgM and 
neutralizing antibodies detected
Case  5. 67-year -old male
Hyperlipidemia
Medication to manage condition
Case  5. 67-year -old male
Hyperlipidemia
Medication to manage condition•Received CHIK -LA vaccine 
for trip to central America
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccine*
*19 days prior: COVID -19 and inactivated influenza vaccines
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptoms
Myalgia, fever
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 6: 
Palpitations
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with atrial 
flutter with rapid 
ventricular responseDay 6: 
Palpitations
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with atrial 
flutter with rapid 
ventricular responseDay 6: 
Palpitations
Elevated troponin, proBNP
Nuclear stress test: suspicious for small infarct
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with atrial 
flutter with rapid 
ventricular responseDay 6: 
Palpitations
Elevated troponin, proBNP
Nuclear stress test: suspicious for small infarct
No evidence of pulmonary embolism, normal 
thyroid -stimulating hormone 
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with atrial 
flutter with rapid 
ventricular responseDay 6: 
Palpitations
Elevated troponin, proBNP
Nuclear stress test: suspicious for small infarct
No evidence of pulmonary embolism, normal 
thyroid -stimulating hormone 
COVID, influenza, RSV PCR: negative
Case  5. 67 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccineDay 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with atrial 
flutter with rapid 
ventricular responseDay 6: 
Palpitations
•Discharge diagnoses: atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response, 
suspected small non- ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
•Status : Fully recovered on discharge, medication ongoing 3 months laterCase  5. Atrial flutter and non -ST segment elevation 
myocardial infarction in 67- year -old male 
Case  5. Atrial flutter and non -ST segment elevation 
myocardial infarction in 67- year -old male with 
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA & oral 
typhoid vaccine*Day 4: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: Presented to 
hospital with atrial 
flutter with rapid 
ventricular response
*19 days prior: COVID -19 and inactivated influenza vaccinesMyalgia, fever 
1 day laterDay 6: 
Palpitations
Elevated troponin, proBNP
Nuclear stress test: suspicious for small infarct
No evidence of pulmonary embolism, normal 
thyroid -stimulating hormone 
COVID, influenza, RSV PCR: negative
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Ischemic 
cardiomyopathy
Medications to manage comorbiditiesCoronary artery diseaseHypotensionChronic leukopenia
Chronic thrombocytopenia
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Ischemic 
cardiomyopathy
Medications to manage comorbiditiesCoronary artery diseaseHypotensionChronic leukopenia•Received CHIK -LA vaccine 
for planned travel to 
Southeast Asia
Chronic 
thrombocytopenia
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Day 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VC*
*JE-VC: Inactivated Vero cell culture -derived JE vaccine
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VC
Fatigue, weakness, 
lightheadedness, 
mild shortness of 
breath, noted 
hypotension 
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Presented 
to internistDay 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VC
Severe 
hypotension 
No evidence 
of heart 
failure 
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Presented 
to internistDay 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VCDay 10: 
Blood 
collection
Leukopenia, 
thrombocytopenia
Case  6. 74 -year -old male
Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Presented 
to internistDay 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VCDay 15: 
Follow -up visit 
to internist
Some 
improvement in 
blood pressureDay 10: 
Blood 
collection
Case  6. 74 -year -old male#
Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Presented 
to internistDay 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VCDay 15: 
Follow -up visit 
to internist
#SAE as “Other medically important event”Day 10: 
Blood 
collection
Case  6. Worsened and prolonged hypotension in 74 -
year -old male
•Final diagnosis: Episode of worsened and prolonged hypotension on the 
background of pre -existing cardiomyopathy and hypotension - likely 
related to CHIK -LA vaccination 
•Resolved within ~2 weeks
Case  6. 74 -year -old male#
Day 3: 
Initial 
symptomsDay 8: 
Presented 
to internistDay 0: 
Received
CHIK -LA 
&  JE -VC*
*JE-VC: Inactivated Vero cell culture -derived JE vaccineFatigue, weakness, 
lightheadedness, 
mild shortness of 
breath, noted 
hypotension Day 15: 
Follow -up visit 
to internist
Severe 
hypotension 
No evidence 
of heart 
failure Some 
improvement in 
blood pressure
#SAE as “Other medically important event”Day 10: 
Blood 
collection
Leukopenia, 
thrombocytopenia
Summary of case characteristics (N=6)
Age 
(yrs) Sex Key comorbiditiesCo-administered 
vaccinesSymptom 
onset (days) Discharge diagnosis(es) Chikungunya testing
83 MaleCoronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic thrombocytopenia_ 3
Encephalopathy
Generalized weaknessN/A
77 MaleCoronary artery disease, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, 
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, IgA 
deficiencyJapanese encephalitis (inactivated)4
Acute metabolic encephalopathy
Fever of unknown originN/A
86 MaleDiabetes mellitus, heart failure, anemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia_3Metabolic encephalopathy
Fever possibly related to post -
vaccination inflammatory responseRT-PCR on serum on 
day 13: positive
68 MaleProstate cancer, hypothyroidism, 
hypertension, dyslipidemia_†
5 Aseptic meningitisIgM & neutralizing 
antibodies in CSF
67 Male HyperlipidemiaTyphoid
(oral, live)*4Atrial flutter
Non -ST segment elevation myocardial 
infarction (NSTEMI)N/A
74 MaleIschemic cardiomyopathy, hypotension, coronary artery disease, chronic leukopenia, chronic thrombocytopeniaJapanese 
encephalitis 
(inactivated)3
Worsened and prolonged hypotension 
on background of pre -existing 
cardiomyopathy and hypotensionN/A
*19 days prior: COVID- 19 & influenza (inactivated); †8–15 days prior: Tdap, influenza, polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis A; N/A: Not available
Age 
(yrs) Sex Key comorbiditiesCo-administered 
vaccinesSymptom 
onset (days) Discharge diagnosis(es) Chikungunya testing
83 MaleCoronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic thrombocytopenia_ 3
Encephalopathy
Generalized weaknessN/A
77 MaleCoronary artery disease, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, 
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, IgA 
deficiencyJapanese encephalitis (inactivated)4
Acute metabolic encephalopathy
Fever of unknown originN/A
86 MaleDiabetes mellitus, heart failure, anemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia_3Metabolic encephalopathy
Fever possibly related to post -
vaccination inflammatory responseRT-PCR on serum on 
day 13: positive
68 MaleProstate cancer, hypothyroidism, 
hypertension, dyslipidemia_†
5 Aseptic meningitisIgM & neutralizing 
antibodies in CSF
67 Male HyperlipidemiaTyphoid
(oral, live)*4Atrial flutter
Non -ST segment elevation myocardial 
infarction (NSTEMI)N/A
74 MaleIschemic cardiomyopathy, hypotension, coronary artery disease, chronic leukopenia, chronic thrombocytopeniaJapanese 
encephalitis 
(inactivated)3
Worsened and prolonged hypotension 
on background of pre -existing 
cardiomyopathy and hypotensionN/A
*19 days prior: COVID- 19 & influenza (inactivated); †8–15 days prior: Tdap, influenza, polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis A; N/A: Not availableSummary of case characteristics (N=6)
Age 
(yrs) Sex Key comorbiditiesCo-administered 
vaccinesSymptom 
onset (days) Discharge diagnosis(es) Chikungunya testing
83 MaleCoronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic thrombocytopenia_ 3
Encephalopathy
Generalized weaknessN/A
77 MaleCoronary artery disease, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, 
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, IgA 
deficiencyJapanese encephalitis (inactivated)4
Acute metabolic encephalopathy
Fever of unknown originN/A
86 MaleDiabetes mellitus, heart failure, anemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia_3Metabolic encephalopathy
Fever possibly related to post -
vaccination inflammatory responseRT-PCR on serum on 
day 13: positive
68 MaleProstate cancer, hypothyroidism, 
hypertension, dyslipidemia_†
5 Aseptic meningitisIgM & neutralizing 
antibodies in CSF
67 Male HyperlipidemiaTyphoid
(oral, live)*4Atrial flutter
Non -ST segment elevation myocardial 
infarction (NSTEMI)N/A
74 MaleIschemic cardiomyopathy, hypotension, coronary artery disease, chronic leukopenia, chronic thrombocytopeniaJapanese encephalitis (inactivated)3
Worsened and prolonged hypotension 
on background of pre -existing 
cardiomyopathy and hypotensionN/A
*19 days prior: COVID- 19 & influenza (inactivated); †8–15 days prior: Tdap, influenza, polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis A; N/A: Not availableSummary of case characteristics (N=6)
Age 
(yrs) Sex Key comorbiditiesCo-administered 
vaccinesSymptom 
onset (days) Discharge diagnosis(es) Chikungunya testing
83 MaleCoronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic thrombocytopenia_ 3
Encephalopathy
Generalized weaknessN/A
77 MaleCoronary artery disease, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, 
hyperlipidemia, hypertension, IgA 
deficiencyJapanese encephalitis (inactivated)4
Acute metabolic encephalopathy
Fever of unknown originN/A
86 MaleDiabetes mellitus, heart failure, anemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia_3Metabolic encephalopathy
Fever possibly related to post -
vaccination inflammatory responseRT-PCR on serum on 
day 13: positive
68 MaleProstate cancer, hypothyroidism, 
hypertension, dyslipidemia_†
5 Aseptic meningitisIgM & neutralizing 
antibodies in CSF
67 Male HyperlipidemiaTyphoid
(oral, live)*4Atrial flutter
Non -ST segment elevation myocardial 
infarction (NSTEMI)N/A
74 MaleIschemic cardiomyopathy, hypotension, coronary artery disease, chronic leukopenia, chronic thrombocytopeniaJapanese 
encephalitis 
(inactivated)3
Worsened and prolonged hypotension 
on background of pre -existing 
cardiomyopathy and hypotensionN/A
*19 days prior: COVID- 19 & influenza (inactivated); †8–15 days prior: Tdap, influenza, polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis A; N/A: Not availableSummary of case characteristics (N=6)
clinical consult services†
support enhanced surveillance
clinical research
†More information about clinical consults available at :
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine -safety -systems/hcp/cisa/index.html8 participating medical 
research centers with 
vaccine safety expertsClinical
Immunization
Safety
Assessment 
(CISA) Project C IS A 

•Available medical records for each of neurologic (n=4) and cardiac (n=2) 
reports reviewed with experts in vaccine safety, infectious diseases, cardiology and neurology
•For each report, at least one CISA expert considered association of CHIK -LA 
with SAE plausible
•However, experts noted difficulty differentiating between general reactogenicity in older patients with comorbidities leading to SAE versus chikungunya vaccine causing SAESummary of CISA review of SAEs following CHIK -LA 
reported to VAERS
•Temporal association ≠ causal association
•Sometimes concomitant or recent administration of other vaccines
•Comprehensive investigations of possible etiologies not always 
conducted or available
•Unlike in controlled clinical trials, no unvaccinated comparator groupGenerally cannot determine causality from VAERS data
Shimabukuro TT, et al. Safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine 2015;33:4398 -4405.
All events began within 3 –5 days of vaccination
For 3 patients with co -administration of other vaccines (i.e., JE, 
typhoid), association with other vaccines less likely1-3 
Investigations did not indicate clear alternate etiologies for any 
patient and most (n=5) discharge summaries noted potential 
association with vaccination
For 2 cases with chikungunya laboratory testing, results 
suggested an association with CHIK -LA Factors supporting possible causality of CHIK -LA for SAEs
1. Rabe IB et al, Vaccine 2015;   2. Walker WL et al, Vaccine 2018;   3. Begier  EM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004.  
All events began within 3 –5 days of vaccination
For 3 patients with co -administration of other vaccines (i.e., JE, 
typhoid), association with other vaccines less likely1-3 
Investigations did not indicate clear alternate etiologies for any 
patient and most (n=5) discharge summaries noted potential 
association with vaccination
For 2 cases with chikungunya laboratory testing, results 
suggested an association with CHIK -LA Factors supporting possible causality of CHIK -LA for SAEs
1. Rabe IB et al, Vaccine 2015;   2. Walker WL et al, Vaccine 2018;   3. Begier  EM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004.  
All events began within 3 –5 days of vaccination
For 3 patients with co -administration of other vaccines (i.e., JE, 
typhoid), association with other vaccines less likely1-3 
Investigations did not indicate clear alternate etiologies for any 
patient and most (n=5) discharge summaries noted potential 
association with vaccination
For 2 cases with chikungunya laboratory testing, results 
suggested an association with CHIK -LA Factors supporting possible causality of CHIK -LA for SAEs
1. Rabe IB et al, Vaccine 2015;   2. Walker WL et al, Vaccine 2018;   3. Begier  EM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004.  
All events began within 3 –5 days of vaccination
For 3 patients with co -administration of other vaccines (i.e., JE, 
typhoid), association with other vaccines less likely1-3 
Investigations did not indicate clear alternate etiologies for any 
patient and most (n=5) discharge summaries noted potential 
association with vaccination
For 2 cases with chikungunya laboratory testing, results 
suggested an association with CHIK -LA Factors supporting possible causality of CHIK -LA for SAEs
1. Rabe IB et al, Vaccine 2015;   2. Walker WL et al, Vaccine 2018;   3. Begier  EM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004.  
CHIK -LA and SAEs in persons ≥65 years
•Immunosenescence  affects older person’s ability to adequately control 
replication of live attenuated vaccine virus
-Example: With live attenuated yellow fever vaccine, SAEs more frequent in older 
persons, and age ≥ 60 years is precaution for use
•Wild -type chikungunya virus infections more likely to result in severe 
disease in older adults
Estimating incidence of SAEs after CHIK -LA
•Difficult as limited  data on vaccine doses distributed  and very limited  data 
on doses administered
•Obtained data from commercial source (IQVIA; private -sector company that 
provides healthcare data)
-Sales data : Weekly Sales Perspectives (WSP) data are unprojected (i.e., actual) 
sales for prescription products (vaccinations) sold to retail, non -retail, and mail 
channels and capture about ~90% of total sales*
-Administration data : National Prescription Audit (NPA) data represent projected 
estimates  of vaccinations administered in retail and long -term care pharmacies
*Information from IQVIA
Confidential and pre -decisional – for official use onlyCHIK -LA (IXCHIQ) weekly and cumulative sales  as of week ending December 27, 2024 
IQVIA SMART Weekly Sales Perspective (WSP)
13,891 total 
doses 
distributed 
Pharmacy total = 1,275 (9%) Medical office total = 12,616 (91%)
Confidential and pre -decisional – for official use onlyCHIK -LA (IXCHIQ) weekly and cumulative vaccinations administered in pharmacies , 
as of week ending December 27, 2024. IQVIA SMART NPA Weekly Extended Insights
Estimated
928 doses 
administered 
in pharmacies
Confidential and pre -decisional – for official use onlyCHIK -LA (IXCHIQ) pharmacy administrations by age, March 3– December 27, 2024
IQVIA SMART NPA Weekly Extended Insights
53% doses 
administered 
to individuals 
aged ≥65 years
N=928
No. 
eventsEstimated rate of events 
per 100,000 doses administered
(95% CI)Estimated rate of doses administered 
resulting in 1 event
(95% CI)
SAEs 682 per 100,000
(30–180) 1 SAE per 1,220 doses
(1 per 3,333 doses to 1 per 556 doses)
*Based on VAERS reports, IQVIA data on doses distributed (N=13,891 doses), and IQVIA data that 52.7% (n=7,320) administered to p ersons aged ≥65 yrsRisk estimates for SAEs and hospitalizations among persons aged 
≥65 years*
No. 
eventsEstimated rate of events 
per 100,000 doses administered
(95% CI)Estimated rate of doses administered 
resulting in 1 event
(95% CI)
SAEs 682 per 100,000
(30–180) 1 SAE per 1,220 doses
(1 per 3,333 doses to 1 per 556 doses)
Hospitalizations 568 per 100,000
(20–160) 1 hospitalization per 1,471 doses
(1 per 5,000 doses to 1 per 625 doses)
*Based on VAERS reports, IQVIA data on doses distributed (N=13,891 doses), and IQVIA data that 52.7% (n=7,320) administered to p ersons aged ≥65 yrsRisk estimates for SAEs and hospitalizations among persons aged 
≥65 years*
Limitations of risk estimates
•Calculations limited by potential imprecision in numerator and 
denominator data
-Unknown completeness of reporting of events to VAERS 
-Potential inaccuracies in vaccine administration data overall and by age group
•All VAERS SAE reports included in calculations but cannot confirm causal link between vaccination and all reported events
•Overall low certainty in estimates
•Updated data as of March 21, 2025
-0 SAEs  and 9 non- serious AEs reported to VAERS in United States*
-Additional ~4,250 CHIK -LA doses sold# 
•Risk estimates not updated for this presentation 
-Delays in CHIK -LA reports to VAERS (median 13 days) 
-~2,375 doses sold in last ~2 weeks of 2024 and likely not 
administered in 2024
-Unknown impact of CDC alert in February 2025 about 
hospitalizations after CHIK -LA in ages ≥65 years
-With updated data, risk estimates lower but within 95% confidence limits of previous estimates
 Update: 2025  VAERS data
*Excludes 6 (non -serious) reports from other countries; #IQVIA data 
https://www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/prevention/chikungunya -vaccine.html
Work Group considerations regarding SAEs 
following CHIK -LA
All SAEs in persons aged ≥65 years
Findings considered preliminary because in clinical trials and post -licensure use, CHIK -LA only administered to 
~7,700 persons aged ≥65 years
VAERS intended to be early warning system to flag potential safety issues; signal identified for persons aged ≥65 
years, but further investigation warranted to better define true risk 
For individual travelers aged ≥65 years, risk -benefit assessment needed to weigh risks of disease vs risks of 
vaccination because vaccine use might be supported in certain higher -risk settings (e.g., outbreak) given known 
risks for severe disease and hospitalization in this age groupFactors considered by Work Group 
All SAEs in persons aged ≥65 years
Association of CHIK -LA with SAEs is plausible, but causal association for each event not determined
Findings considered preliminary because in clinical trials and post -licensure use, CHIK -LA only administered to 
~7,700 persons aged ≥65 years
VAERS intended to be early warning system to flag potential safety issues; signal identified for persons aged ≥65 
years, but further investigation warranted to better define true risk 
For individual travelers aged ≥65 years, risk -benefit assessment needed to weigh risks of disease vs risks of 
vaccination because vaccine use might be supported in certain higher -risk settings (e.g., outbreak) given known 
risks for severe disease and hospitalization in this age groupFactors considered by Work Group 
All SAEs in persons aged ≥65 years
Association of CHIK -LA with SAEs is plausible, but causal association for each event not determined
Findings considered preliminary because in clinical trials and post -licensure use, CHIK -LA only administered to 
~7,700 persons aged ≥65 years
VAERS intended to be early warning system to flag potential safety issues; signal identified for persons aged ≥65 
years, but further investigation warranted to better define true risk 
For individual travelers aged ≥65 years, risk -benefit assessment needed to weigh risks of disease vs risks of 
vaccination because vaccine use might be supported in certain higher -risk settings (e.g., outbreak) given known 
risks for severe disease and hospitalization in this age groupFactors considered by Work Group 
All SAEs in persons aged ≥65 years
Association of CHIK -LA with SAEs is plausible, but causal association for each event not determined
Findings considered preliminary because in clinical trials and post -licensure use, CHIK -LA only administered to 
~7,700 persons aged ≥65 years
VAERS intended to be early warning system to flag potential safety issues; signal identified for persons aged ≥65 
years, but further investigation warranted to better define true risk 
For individual travelers aged ≥65 years, risk -benefit assessment needed to weigh risks of disease vs risks of 
vaccination because vaccine use might be supported in certain higher -risk settings (e.g., outbreak) given known 
risks for severe disease and hospitalization in this age groupFactors considered by Work Group 
All SAEs in persons aged ≥65 years
Association of CHIK -LA with SAEs is plausible, but causal association for each event not determined
Findings considered preliminary because in clinical trials and post -licensure use, CHIK -LA only administered to 
~7,700 persons aged ≥65 years
VAERS intended to be early warning system to flag potential safety issues; signal identified for persons aged ≥65 
years, but further investigation warranted to better define true risk 
For individual travelers aged ≥65 years, risk -benefit assessment needed to weigh risks of disease vs risks of 
vaccination because vaccine use might be supported in certain higher -risk settings (e.g., outbreak) given known 
risks for severe disease and hospitalization in this age groupFactors considered by Work Group 
Age ≥65 years should be a precaution * for use of CHIK -LA
•In general, vaccination should be deferred
•Vaccination might be indicated if benefit from protection from vaccination 
outweighs risk for adverse reaction
*https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz -best -practices/contraindications -precautions.html
Work Group proposes revising recommendations for 
use of CHIK -LA among travelers
•In accordance with updated Evidence to Recommendations for travelers 
presented in earlier presentation for CHIK -VLP
•In consideration of safety signal following use of vaccine in persons aged ≥65 years 
Existing CHIK -LA recommendations for travelers*
Chikungunya vaccine is recommended  for persons aged ≥18 years traveling 
to a country or territory where there is a chikungunya outbreak.
In addition, chikungunya vaccine may be considered for the following 
persons traveling to a country or territory without an outbreak but with 
evidence of chikungunya virus transmission among humans within the last 5 years
-Persons aged >65 years, particularly those with underlying medical conditions, 
who are likely to have at least moderate exposure to mosquitoes, OR
-Persons staying for a cumulative period of 6 months or more 
*Approved in February 2024
Existing CHIK -LA recommendations for travelers*
Chikungunya vaccine is recommended  for persons aged ≥18 years traveling 
to a country or territory where there is a chikungunya outbreak.
In addition, chikungunya vaccine may be considered for the following 
persons traveling to a country or territory without an outbreak but with 
evidence of chikungunya virus transmission among humans within the last 5 years
-Persons aged >65 years, particularly those with underlying medical conditions, 
who are likely to have at least moderate exposure to mosquitoes, OR
-Persons staying for a cumulative period of 6 months or more 
*Approved in February 2024
ACIP recommends live attenuated chikungunya vaccine or persons aged ≥18 
years traveling to a country or territory where there is a chikungunya 
outbreak.
In addition, live attenuated chikungunya vaccine may be considered  for 
persons aged ≥18 years# traveling or taking up residence in a country or 
territory without an outbreak but with elevated risk for US travelers if 
planning travel for an extended period of time e.g., 6 months or more.Revised draft recommendations for CHIK -LA among 
travelers#
#Age ≥65 years is a precaution for use of CHIK -LA
Arboviral Diseases Branch, CDC
•Rebekah Sutter
•Erin Staples
Immunization Safety Office, CDC
•Sarah Meyer
•Michael McNeil
•Elaine MillerAcknowledgements
Immunization Services Division, CDC
•Seth Meador
•Suchita Patel 
Clinical Immunization Safety 
Assessment (CISA) vaccine safety 
experts
For more information, contact CDC
1-800- CDC- INFO (232 -4636)
TTY:  1 -888- 232- 6348    www.cdc.gov
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.