Sen. Joseph (Joe) McCarthy Part 46

Document text

FEDERAL BUREAU 0? WWESUGATION
JOSEPH MCCARTHY

__92. _ __   __u: iv] __u__ _ '  __ __ _ _ _ _ _
__ _ I _ __ _ _, ___  V "__  A 1: _*__,_  _ W k _ _ _|___"____ F _____H__ F  I _ _ ____ _ _ _ __  _,_ ______ _ _ _ _ ____'___ _ __ _ __ _V_ ___r__ __' _ ___I__'_ 0 1  __,_i§E__£5»m_$#__ 
t F_T_%:£w_nHi____ F" ?___,___H L __ _ I __  _ S _: __ _ '__ U_'____ uh_ I _92  1 X _ _ IA 7: 92_ 92  92 A _  M __ H __m Uh _, V ,' _ r _ _ __ _  ___ M ¢___  ',_ _, _ '__-_"_:,_ _ __92 A in: ff _ _.__-V_'__Hl  _____ _
f_ _ _  _ __ _ _ __  _ __ __V _ f.___2___ _ _ V___ F  _r ___,__ _i__ _ :_ ___ __ ___ __H __  ___ A __5_"___1 _I __ _
___ _92:_,  _ H  Jr  __ __ __ __.92:k_ V  _  _ _h H _!_____ P _ ___ _ _ _
__r,_ _92 _U _____n _ __J! ___ _ _ _ _ J_ !_ __L __,_ '1 _w T ___ _, _ ,_ _
J "______f__ __ _ k "_ "_ 4 _H ___ __ __  _ _ __J___ ' '_w  _ _ i_ _____ _y r "  _ ad t _' _ 92 _I _ f 4. _ _ Q _
_% _i _ __ _
92_/£__|_______L__':l__
m©_£UHNKWUOEPAD

l
P--_.~-4*
_ q=w *  <1!
ll  J-_-&#39; &#39; " -.
SUBJECT_ j w_ f  _ i. __
FILE N"uMBER-_/j/-    _
s *Z &#39;§ It/64449
d&#39;/ F"$"°

,_   __  LA __§, Q; i_.___  Tr ____L__ _ A V *  _ T]  &#39;_&#39;___ _ t _ _ _  _ _  92__
&W%§_&#39;% Mw__" ____ &#39;1 H  __Hh__L__~_N_h_%_  ___r,___ &#39;__ _ _ _
_ %:___f  Mm L_    H _ W _ ____n____+  _  :1  __4__j_ __*_  é&_ _M______I___H 3   I H_ __ _ _ _ _v_i1H    M_d__  &#39; y   ___ _;_ _H " ____ ~ M_*" 5  4_____A___wr"_#$§k_"_
___Wn_w_M¢________; _h___w__%_92__r__:  "I H   HM   _n%_vvHWMJ_M_ _ __ _ _ __# _ _  __&#39;   ___  _&#39;_____ G; __ __ "Jr_92__i____ I: V n__ _ rm, __ &#39;1 _ T _ __ _3% _ __  kn I $1 £____~ 4 __ J? é
f  __ __ ___; ____H "____b£%_§______2_~_ __:___é_r_  ___§____ in _  w ;__é__ _-__3___é V N: 92LE yswp __   _  ,n__w_H___v_____&#39;____UJ__ |_u__> _fI__  _ ___M__H__ ___ _ ___ A   __ f ___r tr __ __ _____  _&#39;_ _ * __ z _ L _ P _ __ _ _ __ ____ __, _ , __ _,_ ,  8  ___._- /l_ __/I _am
Em Tm
mu
NH
_____
mm
3
RR
mm_m
T
ma _
92
X
m___mE
_92
X
n___
mu ___929292Hg
___92
mm
92__92
__
_92
R
__
92____
WW
mmw
W
W
92M
mm
K
w
92m
W
w

92
92
wM1__I &#39; /II 
zzM I R; 3 _  ___:_ _&#39; ___  ___92__   __ __ > _y I _ I 1* _ I   _
__   _ _r 5: _#92&#39;___£ ___ "__ _ WT __!_ _ L __ ___ __A__hV _  _____iN  _ Vd _.GJ _ _  _ _ __ __%_M_w ____ _!; _ _. vn_ _ ._ _ __J ___ _   _ _ ______ ____ &#39;_ 
_m;_ __ ___ _ H _V92V ___ ___: V.S"  ,__,:_.___h__
__§_W__f_ 1 _ _ _____________ t *____
____ H_____bh__wé __ _____  __
t   M_F__§i_FE 
E 92


 rd T  r__ _T  _W92t
n
C
m
t
_|_ __
3 M
p K
C U____D 1I &#39;
M _  %
1
A_  _ m km WMt B W C
u Us _N_ 0 S 6 _*m[_E92 _ &#39;0 Sm  HJ 92 "H
N O  W&
W
W
NX
 ByO  Rwy6 92_U__C t SI n W 
D _m 
Y a _ _A___
T wb _ TX _92
W __ S ENC _ _92 X  _ HwulnI 92mFQ _ ____
% WT FD
_ _
_
__k _! A P l _ _ __ _  N _, y_H__!_ ___r__ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __, _  ____ _  __ __ __ _  __ 1 _ _ __ _ _ P k ?___92_p__||&#39;__"____ I __f 1  _ ___ _ __ $_"__ vw ____ :__u___
_h A___:___ _
  _ _m N ff _ H 3 |_n_hV   _ _ W __{_" ___ _.  _ __ _:_W"___ é _H__7_&#39;____ ___  _
 1_ __V  £2 __V n______J_H_h_h__J_ &#39;__  _   by vi _____,:;_ F _I LR _ _"1 _ _ _ "Z. ___ w ___  _ _L___&#39;Y___H_". __§__ 92 H 3m_&;___i_%§___ 1&3"; ____ : __éh___"___Pu_____ u !_ VD921L;_H__J___ _ _%__ _92_;_ 92_  é  _ __V
___ _  ___   _ _m _ _i ___w__ _H___HW___x_    __W.____92_H___h&#39;___m"_m_v~__ _:__"____e_ _ __ __ __ ___ _ ,_ _  _  _a _____ _     E;  _ _ ______r _" ___?! _  I _ :_  ___ _£_ _ ___A_"__ J_ _ __ ___ H V ___ ___$_ _  __ J TM3 _~_ _  ___ _ J W2? _____ __ 4&#39;n____ __ ___ P i ____ ___o__;__ ._ _m__ r T_____n_ __ _____&#39;."_&#39;__&#39;n_ ~ 1 _ I _ J  _ ;;_ _ __ _ __  _ _h____1__ __ ___ _ __ L _H _HAr_"J_!_&#39;_____ :_ _ Z _ ,____,__ .__,V__% ___ , . _____  ZT ____ ___ U _ __ _ _ :_  __ _,_____ it: _ _ Q}  _ __4_ __ J? aw ___# _ : , ____ __ _ ___ H ___________&#39;_  _ __ __ _, __ _ _ ___ ___ , , _ _§g___ WP; K 7: _ __ E I U__,_,_ __ __h_ 1? £9 _  ___ r it w E __M_!____ I _ _ L____| D 5 *__,_

1&#39; 3.
A J_ -_  -._._.__.._._ 4&#39;:-1- ._&#39;..¢|-..¢
When y6uhe;1r the charge of "Whitewashing" or
covering up" of disloyal employees in the
State Department by the investigating
&#39; < 1 .
J I i
-I-&#39;-g.-1:-U
92-I A :1
is,~&#39;....¢"  .If-PI -&#39; i Iat--lg -=,__ L; :1Ft 
0&#39; "
r|_-92P
, -» _t 5.1- Z. .h .
&#39;.;§.?_&#39;I
-
3
- Jt _ . _.. 1_ ix-*
.9 .. ii;  &#39;
-=
1?  "&#39;5.~§ _  &#39;n __  v ."
--.+;*.t,_ "
=r¢"&#39;
-;  4.--&#39;1, .
|~
-.&#39; _
.- &#39; _,_
;_ ._ ..|
-  5."-
i  "5""
; J,
.y_I __ ...- ». ~=- -5;-aw _-._ _-R - &#39;
-.1; _ &#39;5___&#39; $er"--, g ?
. L11-QM &#39;,_
ii,-"._
aw
53%&#39; 4committee, tell them:
1. Don&#39;t _mn l;n09292&#39; the ollitial retrml shows that these same persons were
tntestigaletl not by om, but by [our separate ctnnntittees of Congress
tinting the years I9-IT anti HHR, at a time when  l mgre.ss was 092"er192&#39;he]m-
ingly tonlrolletl in the House and Senate by the Hrjmblirnn Party?
How tome these ll Relmhlitan umnnittees did not turn up any Com-
llllltlials lnnn the same tllarges? 9292&#39;e1&#39;e the Republiurns "9292&#39;l1ite9292&#39;ashing"
a l!e:nott&#39;atir. athninistration?
2. Tell them-that in a speeth made on the oor of Congress by Repre-
sentathe _]onkman, Iir&#39;j;ttMir"rtir of Mithigan,  oi a sub-committee of the
 lonnnittee on Foreign Alluirs in92"estiga&#39;ing these same charges! page
{U93 of the  lnngressimtal Recortl of .-tngnst 2, 1948, said:
"But before the 80th Coin.-,rt-~.> atljot ms, 1 want the embers to
ktiuw that there is one I!t:}:a|&#39;t11|t nt in tvhith tlle known Or
1ea~onab]y suspected sttbversiyes, tlommunists, fellow travelers,
sylllputlii.-ers and persons whose -eryites are not for the best
interest» of the United States, have been swept out. That is the
iiepartnient of State."
3. Tell tl1e|nu&#39;hat Senator Lodge, Republimn member of the itt92-estigating
~.ub-tunnnittee, haul to ta}, as quoted from the Congressional Record of
jul_92 2|, l9:&#39;1 !:
. . I tlitl not 
ntl any Cnnnnnnists in the State Iflepartment but
I wt-in to all It-ngtlis tn whith I think any man could go, in that
I !!Li|92UII2lll} intertietvt-tl the State Department agents and special
a;_;ent92 triyerittg a large part of the Unitetl States, Europe, Africa
and the Mitldle East, and I asked every one of them whether
they knt-xv of any  lumnntnists in the State Depztrttnent. All of
them ~.ait| they did not."
l92&#39; !&#39;]E.: The nri;_»_in:tl |n&#39;inletl hearings oi the 4 tunmriflm-.r anal the Con-
gfessiunal Rt-mrtl~. tmnaining the _]tml»;man speech antl Senator l.odges
___&#39; "v &#39;5-w -1-_?77--7"T7~FF-&#39;I]*&#39; 
lm  -  t- -Y 9292o - .
&#39; ja. &#39; _,
-., "&#39;13!"-r-
1: y---_ M-y_
- 92
4 ";  .Iu&#39;-- .- t1- ..~.__IQ
&#39; *1-4;.»
_- -  _-f, . I-_ 1:" t, . - ._92 5 -F-.I-_.H , F &#39;-&#39;1.  _£t
. -a
:1. &#39;
-.--_l-,§t_a-u___.-=*&#39; "1;-, f_. .._., J2. &#39;
_ .&#39;.=st= _.,.zv&#39;-" at-4" "  1 ...,-_..,  4,5; sQ .  . c " t:"I &#39;. 5 &#39;§-»- _-,;*_~Jl-~- _&#39; 1 ,;"__1~:&#39;£92a.3§
%§
;.  -1  I it 4
;%~
Jm
&#39; ~ ._ ..Y.>.r- -_ -.
__I"_ {t .n r 1-v» . ."»":  - 1 . +-  . -* ~ 92 {.-4;__,._ ..,., .,,_,¢, , _ ». -- _p»,.._ _* 1 I. in_ ,1-=&#39;-:r  I - *-
 _ . . ,4$Q%at
*%a%%r
Lia. Hi!-&#39;r t 1-."...--tr -" s»
 .1 " &#39; "21-3- &#39;:- .- &#39;:.92,&#39;i*_i-
 . _av ,.~»_~=>&#39; I &#39; .,3 5" -&#39; 3
92-o 92 _3* J . "  4., . , _,, . Y -*=- 3.7:".»*;->i.- 5 ,  3;-___._ , K-_&#39;¢:.1*&#39;I:, _ -y it _&#39;.Jrizt   ~ J" Pt 1&#39;* , &#39;1-_-"I5 -i t"&#39; .-"Ms &#39;  .,u-
--&#39;1-».
2-".1 EH5-r
i;.§&#39;-- "&#39;1 l  l _
-;gf&#39;_%L- e-9"" &#39; a" ___  1*"""&#39;  ~ -,»"&#39;-»
"{92i-E
iigfp
...__ _
%%&@e.
£%?T@

I
&#39;2 &#39;.t-|-
ii? 7 -1- I
...,   - -_-j-1
-&#39; -1+ .~=.-5 =;,i.,.=
$3115..-=<_-2.1. _- --  7 ,q|923. .Z92 v-Z &#39; - . ...=,-,_.:_.  .
-.__;,92:_r.-"  "_" __&#39;;92rr...&#39;.&#39; - - -- =__-.&#39;e.92t!."__ P - , 5. *.*=¢: ~":;f." - _{&#39;.1._ "-&#39;W  y 35 ; -.n~.2 T? llir-"§T"h.i§&#39;_§n  .»~  :. » -._. f
3" 1 >&#39;: §._ .-_;&#39;+-I
-":2"; .1" -..n.,92-n-; . .71. . .7 -
.~ ,. &#39;.;;..-_ &#39; . Q.-4--.-5--e  .- I ._1-an 
n -~ -., |  c »- .=1 , -
55 ed.-en,. ____5.-._. I -qr» .
W1».-;&#39;.. i *=,.¬ll§.&#39;§-1:1, in"at-. e »~;-.- n.-. ,,-*
gvh J.  .  ;
1&#39;1 -1; 15.1" - r,_ -_ e.-,;. _ _.
1 <- ?-- :7-.==" 92-7;"-<r.+*¢,92"~_,".   &#39;.-,,&#39;T. f 1-, »; ,92!&#39;_92.~}.-.P-lath T-* .1-&#39;-T -&#39; 1* .&#39;."> 41:?.&#39;~. -_-.> -<1 &#39;--;92 -.-~&#39;-r.-"-.-~;_: ~.»_--.92- 1,.-~,_, »_,.._  _..1 I5 "1 92 Ill-if .24.." ".92"-3"-&#39;- v .- ~. =-_ =-.1I  ;.:1&#39;.T;_-:_ J ;.,;_-I :_.~,.J_ . ,4}; V.- --; &#39;  _ .._.. if """f_;?*&#39;= na-u "" I"-" 1-.":;;&#39;,**"=-*-. .:!~ -.. .,,..,,.,,_ h,;____. _.
5; -  -. 1
"  ~ L 7. -_ .. -~ ;  H5 &#39;7-1__.---- ..~ -_ &#39; , r . 1
.=-.&#39;»- .2--. :-1,; -:-~:Z~&#39;~~ -,. =-4__.__* . " --. "&#39;-- . .- Q1+  J s _-K -_ - T .~ -.
I _ -2.. 3* . - Sincerely yours,
.33:5|. . .. V 1 -3
1  ~l*¥..-&#39;_-&#39;i .- ;-  "=..t:..._.. it, . _~92.&#39; - &#39; 
". T. &#39;._&#39; .   :  I.--=8 _- _ , _~ &#39;-.3 "lr.=.~.!,"._ ,1 Ir. &#39;!=r.-_.._ _ _A~-_ -.._-we» _ ~- 1 4.-_.&#39;¢-te L, ; ~ r »~:;,_".&#39;;_1&#39; 1 7;" --7||||s-1&#39;-4&#39;-s.:..n-.0-lu_--1;-L -&#39;-l.92--- .Fu-Q-&#39;n."-ob -ii --  4-- 
1&#39;24-||a4l;> arc available fur mu" im Ittlinn at the T "din s H1-ad: uarlors in l l S 1
thc Elm.-nun Hutu], Buhimnrc, Maryland.
The 1-&#39;.B.1. will be glad to gut any information r;0ncc1&#39;ning Communists in
gnu-1&#39;||:|n-111. I13 their job I0 ferret lhcm 0u1and they do just that.
I I Q
If YOU l1£lI&#39; lhal the 
lm and rcumls cxaminul by lhc investigating ¢u|nmilu?e
9292&#39;u1- rnpn-cl, riliul or imu|IlplL&#39;1L", loll lhcm the F.B.l. says No.
OFFKE or mt amt: IO!
_.-- , ._ -I-72-"&#39;§;-,._. &#39; &#39;92|
_§92 I I- /..&#39; -iebrral Bureau ai Inunligatian

nite?! Staten Bepartmeni uf inict
Rlnslpiugtnu 25, 3.0!.
September 8, 1950
Honorable Iillard I. Tydinge
United States Senate
Iashington, D. C.
Hy dear Senator:
In response to your inquiry as to whether
the FBI reviewed the State Department personnelfiles that were under consideration by your Committeefor the purpose of ascertaining whether reports sub-
mitted by the FBI to the State Department wereincorporated therein, this is to advise you that atthe request of the Attorney General, we did note such
a check on July 13, 1950 and found that the StateDepartment files were intact, as indicated in theletter from the Attorney General to you dated
July 1?, 1950.
Iith best wishes and kind regarde,
"" &#39;Y~92&#39;7"I.- .-r-r-:-92P&#39;-&#39;-1I=&#39;r~.a- -n-&#39;_v&#39;I-"
e" re;rv--I-.-1>"~92rf-192*~@P.!1f.1"
§f&#39;,&#39;f92":>yI-+r-&#39;-_-&#39;z- w_--,~&#39;<=-1&#39;I&#39;.92p&#39;;&#39;*r*"r92-er.»  " &#39; -- &#39;--.1./-. -&#39; .__ . r . »&#39;<-____
l.
K
-92:-.
 ._.4.--1
L; .
1&#39;22" 55:3-"&#39;.¥
-£1111% : _ }_5$ &#39; ._".1, -£3-&#39;."§5». &#39;
"~u &#39; &#39;5-1..  Zr. 1-  . V 4vi: 
-.
* :&#39;_...-:4  -af_92L_..-*-M, $7 ».
;¬~&#39;_,_ . _&#39;#._ !=,:.1.. - 0&#39;1.".&#39;i=~ .. _.».i--31?é. . _
-2". -5_  -:_§~
.1 ;..,&#39;V -,
* .7;---=&#39;=i-&#39;3;Q .*  51*"--&#39; "_&#39; . - "-05..,_ I jr. - Vrt -&#39;.";a.. &#39; n.
.. &#39;;_a_¢.i"&#39; -- . .»
ya"/ I-55 "
&#39;i&#39;*.&#39;..==.-_"&#39; -. 92"
1 &#39;$&#39;:f&#39; ".":I.;-&#39;l~"..-Li-1;§&#39;f -.1":-&#39;-;_ ;._ "&#39; >:[1.-!~_I "&#39;2;,-.v.eI.92_$-."..: &#39;-&#39;
,,.=-5...: ; =..___-.- =-
:--..P 1;~=_:. ., .5&#39; -L-1 -vi um - &#39;  -- .. :0-H&#39;?."":.-= &#39; .-- .-
~>]:&#39; &#39; &#39;
3.... .. *_ -
*1-2-7. V
-1
 _ -.1
i fl e. 4, H",-I &#39;   &#39;--.~&#39;Z ..&#39;:~&#39;. if l " &#39;&#39; ;_;.;,  .
m~1"&#39;-  Y"l";m-. _
,-ti, :::_".r&#39;1 &#39;.; .606-at  -".2ii r |
He-&#39;-Ii-, 
&#39; -.7
121- ;I&#39;,_ _.-92-: Q- - --- .-._._.--._&#39; .. ___ . ,_
. ,_..-et

#1 _-
.».__4 i
,&#39;,._V =_ "Eat; "F;-.&#39;_
 .- -._ 92 _"  _ -1- -" &#39; &#39; an . &#39;
-t.-¢ -._  1
t .  &#39;* ~ .. ,_Ha_,:_92 ..t.. t.
5, ~  _>. -1
- 1 at *-3: :.. J. . A.1; _-Fat-§> ._.-1. i
12-  x,:&#39;e-.*..&#39;:jr1
-I -n_t.1...t .-X t .__ &#39;-  . -4|!-4
_.. .__. 1
P7-&#39;"&#39;"&#39;1, .. .. &#39; - -&#39; "st.l .-1 -- Q .M 39- . .r :_  _  r  7- en --&#39;:-&#39;»_.-&#39;. --92 .
l-17". 92&#39;92a-Q1!-1 J .&#39;&#39;s- -.-&#39; 92&#39;F1: , . n92 .
H-. -&#39; 92t"&#39;
m-ml .
4&#39; J;-;» "   
, -. .- 1"_
--
ii_ . ;i"&#39;li3 it-._V;-¢_
mi" " t
 I &#39;1. gj * .~>~  &#39;-=..&#39;|7 3»; &#39; 1 .
_,-,-"r£_E._:&#39;.;;J-t;&#39; 1;, _ r
-w 1; =- "...,_ ll  - 1
. E. :- ,3 "--  _
-2 -*-9?""-F " t
F; &#39;1
=2}. t -QT.
. . _¢_.».. . traid .*-_ v-.. _-M-it"-17&#39;;-5» " - 7&#39;5 "-
-1 -
:
.|
E; .1..._-4:5;- "  "5-~ft
-.-.-4»-.,»,-¢n~|umq-.---|-u?-.i- . t__< -1-5 If---.771" 
,-&#39;;-w-__-L. .-._ ,..at_.._l_ M ; ; | J. , - &#39;5 -j-,. 3 H33;  1-I-_ "~-  - . - - -
MII.I&#39;IAR92 RECORD __ -
_  	: Sl&#39;ll92&#39;A&#39;l !R &#39;1YI!ll92lGS
Enlisted with  Iompan! l!, t92l:tr}lantl National Guard, June l9l
, and saw
st-riire on the Mexican Border. Upon returning from this duty, while
tlistharge from servite was still in lltc mail, war with German!" broke out
antl again was ealletl out April ti, lllli, antl thus scrvetl tontinuottsly until
. .I._._ ......._...... . ..»..._.- . ....._l/. .l.-... .... 1.... i&#39;I&#39;92P92i92 l92n l!K&#39;lHg I!|l]|I|ll|-L1} IEIIIIKIF, ld]lI92§ lllllll L&#39;ll}l
{L&#39;92l lllllll ill
Lieutenant  Iolonel.
[&#39;pt1|| tonlpletiolt of sltltlltis at l-"t. Sill,  !kla., graduated 
rst in  lass and
was awartletl l!i92&#39;isio|1 lnsttt|tlor&#39;.~.  lerlilitale in .92lttsltetry. Upon comple-
tion ul studies in Setoml Corps .92Iathine Gun Sthool at  Jhatillon-sur-Seine,
l"1&#39;a||tt:. gratltttttetl 
rst in  lass and was awarded  lorps I92lat"hine Gun
lllt-tltt t0l"s  Iertilitate from said hl&#39;l] ! !l.
with the 29th llitisitm itt Alsatc, t-otttntatttletl the ntathine gun units
 o92e|&#39;in;_{ raitls on German ttetirlles and also hail tharg
 of the harassing
tnathine gun 
re program whith ealletl fn: shooting up enemy targets with
machine guns six times each 2-1 hours.
la:"|itipal<-tl in l92l¢&#39;t|~at-.-92r;_gonm&#39; f!llL&#39;ll§i92t? and while in this engagement.
9292&#39;<n&#39;Letl out a llanking tmtthine gun atta-la on German positions which was
sttuessful aml which is set forth in one chapter of an .-92rm_92" pttlilieation
talletl lnlantrs in Battle", one of the ext hooks used at the West Point
Military Aradetny.
Cited Ii!"  éenerals Pershing, Morton, and Upton; awarticd Distinguished
Servite Medal and Dislingttished Servitic Cross.
man of international stature
Keep a patriot with a line retort! in ol
ce, whcrc he has helped and is con-
tinuing to help keep Ame:-ita strong. Millard T}-clings is known and
respected from Maine to California. He has put Maryland On tht:
politital map.
RE-ELECT T YDINGS
---u-tr-1--"I!_IIP1~ "=T- r=g 1*-"up-v~1g|-q.*_]-1&#39;-w*~*-.___.
I __92
.1.
92I
-:»:"192-- .
- ..-.4-
-ti 4-_ 12$ . . tt. . ~ n--./5 {-t . _ .4 ~: -- &#39; -
.w
.:.- &#39; 27-"p - .
I-"%¥ &#39;   #:-
.-- <B_.»$&#39;..,_*_ P.. Iii;-%:_n_ _ U .. _...-:»<- ,"i- _92~g._ &#39;4,_._ in-z. ..__ _ L. .. : _ ._, t,Q .t l-¢.":"&#39;= w ..~.,;.~i-_, -¢._¢a->.:_- in
1&#39;5 -__ {L *3
!:_ . . .=.
1 _ ~
ii. ;" -lw Z- ii&#39;¬}t§% I - "
&#39;.-la"¢~a"*&#39;a-"i -at -~ nr
-" ___,92.:-~ l 3&#39;.»
_, __ .t.;-1 
g;F-,..-_,, _ 4 _ .__. jt, _ . ru. &#39; .1 .r.a-  »-a &#39;ya _ , -7-4..-Y --- sf» - .._.».?.-92.&#39;+  l*1 i F -"&#39;- . -~- - "M .--;_ -<- .,  u .=~._"§_4$&#39;--»&#39;= ..-LI It e..,7.,,_,_3 if _. ..__-9,5 ;r -- -,-..-,5» G. _-rt"-".2
,;--4. 1- 4 ..>1--:??;=f.»t&#39;»W1! _ ..
ti"» .+-.-..- as -
 ".-*"-.&#39;-- fl 1&#39;1
 --1-~.cI~"-tiF--*:,-~*
< - .. . i &#39;
A .  _
-&#39; .=~:=1-;;
. I ,~_,a- 92n
i
r45 .. .. .,92 -. I-4 .- -

1Q
Q/ _ i G
 10
_/U __ __ &#39;___w:n
gn
wV _l__l|;J__£___L¬Lba?l&#39;, < _ _  &#39;_$&#39;_a_~_ ___F_|& r___ __ tr _ &#39;1___&#39;_ "I __-_&#39;_| __ 1 I II ,_ j % _____m mkwwrw %__=_wE j
mmmw  % Lash jGg
 < M55 EI5  _Uu__m
t£__%m__
UZQNE___ /IF
W%

A few documents submitted by Senator McCarthy to
the Tydings Whitewash Conmzitteeo
It should be remembered by those who complain that
LEGAL CRIMINAL CASES were not proved against aJl the individual:
named that:
The following material. was developed without the right
to subpoena any witnesses or cross examine those few called by
the Committee. The ranking Republican member of the Cmnmittei
asked that some thirty witnesses be sulyaen-and - witnesses who bad.
been previously interviewed and whose backg-omds had been thoroughly
checked by either the Republican counsel or l&oCarth;y&#39;s investigators
and who had valuable information on Gonmrurlisti i
 lee? poei
o-ma in
the State Department. This request was flatly refused by the Demo-
cratic members of the Committee--vH
J!
92
4...
>
92P 92
!
92
1
1
i
?41

i T
The attached files on Chew Hong and
Dr. Chi are of some significance in the
Lattinore case in view of a letter from
re, then he
Division of the Office of&#39;War Information
dated June 15, 19b3, Ordering that E11
Chinese except the two Chinese mentioned
in these files, Bong and Chi, be discharged
from the Office of War Information and that

--~--n~-_,_- 4&#39; ... .... _____ _ .__ ______ _____,: &#39;_,_ H _a_ H K_._- I H-E. 1 r.I y
as
/
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EILHINER
October 12, 1942
THE COHHISSION:
 Via the Executive Director and Chief Examiner!
Memorandum Opinion
In the matter of Chew Sih Hung
Assistant Field Representative, Office of Her Information
Hong received a temporary appointment in December of 1941 as Assistant
Field Representative, $2600 per annum, Office of War Information, at New
York City. The appointment was made under Executive Order 8564, subject
to investigation. &#39;
He was born in 1910 at Yinping, China, of Chinese American parents,
his father having been born in San Francisco. His citizenship is appropri-
ately established. He arrived in the United States in November of 1920 at
San Francisco. He was educated in the California Public Schools, completing
part of his high school and some of his university work in China, the I»
university work being taken at Tsing Hua University. In Hay of 1937 he bf
graduated from the University of California with an A. 3. degree in po-
litical science and history. Apparently he was unemployed in San Francisco
from_!ay through August of 1937 when he went to New lbrk City, receiving
his first employment there in October of 1937. For a period of about two
years until September, 1939, he served as Executive Secretary of the Chinese
Hand Laundry Alliance at a salary of $900 per annm. From September of
1999 to July of 1940 he engaged in establishing a Chinese newspaper known
as the China Daily News with address at 105 Mott 
treet, New Ybrk City.
From July, 1940, to the date of his employment with the Fedpral government
he operated as President and Editor of the China Daily News at 8 salary of
$960 per year. u . = .
I
J
r
>
I
F
1

- t . . |W . t - _, __, L_.__,.&#39;_,&#39; -H i- _-[I - **s~-e_-;~::_~92..=- --a.92 - _ _ _ -..k,.____;4a---&#39;-j.a~iu.h-hr -- :u-an ---~ -&#39; - _i.-..,_.._..-- ---- -~~------ -~92A , ., ._...A_._._i ii A 1 *- -"&#39; ""&#39;. .... , ,,
L @©L@Y
a rs that the organization was originally started as representative oft
getrade indicated by the title. The evidence in the record shoes that
several years ago a division occurred among the membership. I5-tneelel
report that it was the Communist element that caused the split and there-
after the conservative group in the membership. as distinct from the_
radicals or Comunists, withdrew and established their can organisation
under the name of the Chinese Hand Laundry Association. The incident,
as reported, conforms closely WM&_
penetration. kit the special hearing, Bong was 
red how he night account
:3?-&#39;t1Tfsct that tn. Alliance has the reputation of being Communistic.
He stated that it may have originated during the split several years ago
and due to the fact that it does not exclude Conmnmists or any other po-
litical groups from membership. it the time of the division the conserve-
tive elements brought a lawsuit challenging the election vrhich reected
the split. The conservative group after extended litigation lost this
suit. The incident is reported on by attorneys who participated and also
by others. From such reports and from inferences, which it is believed
may be dravrn from Hong&#39;s own statement, it is believed that the organi-
sational division represented a victory for the Communist group in the
Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance and that the cumulative evidence shows
the alliance to be a Comlmmist Party affiliate._____________
1--* I &#39;
M" In-addition to the foregoing, significance is attached to items
extracted from past copies of the Collunist newspaper, "Daily Iorksr".
in item in an issue of the Daily Iorker on Ilay 5 of 1933 consists of s
letter from James Lee, Secretary of the Chinese Hand Laundry Alli
xce
and Supervisor of Bong. Lee&#39;s letter refers to the record of the i1i.&#39;
c&#39;e
and pleadsfor your confidence and good I111".
In another item in the Daily Iorker, issue of January 31, 1938, a
report is made on activities resulting in the obtaining of ambulances for
shipment to the South Chinese front. According to the news item the
announcement of the completion of the aizulancs undertaking was mde by
one Chu Tang of the Chinese Hand Laundry issociation. The item reported
that procuring of two more ambulances las to be undertaken by the Alliance
in cooperation with the American League for Peace and Democracy and the
American Friends of the Chinese People.
In a record found in the New York City Police Department it is
stated that the [oily Iorker, July 21., 1940, announced a meeting protest-
in glggigo gf this Fhv-um R:-92: l_ &#39;1"!-an Tint nf nnnmlrn-rm fnr 1-.&#39;l-1n Ismael-Inn -I-Q Q n v v Irna-I ovn saw an-ww wo wrvte-wow Qwc wamw twwyy
included names of persons generally considered as Commnists and included
one Lo Ton as representing the Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance./92
! China Dail News _t_l3g_tg1.i.mog_j,s_t9jl92L£Wl°l£1 Ql&#39;_Lect tn. K/the China @.y @ti,on  for Chinese Comnup;,s1,g,is described by some individuals as the %
Iorker. It is clearly shown from evidence t China Daily News
the organ of the Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance. Bong moved from his
second post eith the alliance to cork first as p.-carter and second ii
editor and president.

&#39; T .&#39;-Y-*&#39;&#39;-&#39;92o--F -at I- J-M-92-~-Ba-in--d4.nn|.1J-._...&#39;;l.i_,_1|_..&#39; "_ ,5, _ . H----I "I; ,-,3-5 . _ _l "&#39;--&#39;- -~ s ,_-=1--_._._.,
@©lF@Y
The paper has been publishing since July of 1940 and probably 
would supply an accurate application of the Communist party line test.
It is understood that the paper is printed in Chinese and probably a
considerable aaount of translating would be required to ascertain whether
or not the paper adhered to the Communist party line. There is the addit-
ional problem of whether the ordinary cnnception of the party line test
would apply to a Chinese Communist. Since China was at war with Japan
during the period from August of 1939 to June of 1941, there is little
likelihood that the test usually applied during this period would have
any significance. The Chinese, including the Chinese Counists, were
probably not anti-British and certainly favored as much intervention for
the Chinese in the Chinese-Japanese conflict as could be provided. -92
ipa
 iron the foregoing it is believed that the evidence shows the V
newspaper to be Communietic.
There is a report filed with the Dies Committee, undated, which states
that two Chinese Counamist leaders, Leiu Chei llann of 191 Canal Street and
Tong llanchu of 172% Canal Street were to publish a Coanmist party paper in
the summer of 1940. 191 Canal Street is the address of the Chinese Hand
Laundry Alliance. The hone residence given by Bong in New York City is
298 lest llth Street. However, it should be noted that at the time of the
special hea
ng Hong stated that one ftiii ihich he had used it tines iii
Chn Tong. &#39;
! Refezrencesz and associates - One of the references sup$ed by
Hong was lg;-_L!_5a
Thag[f
, apparent
 an associate from the tine Hong was
in ca11r6}n1a. F4nl_BaAin_1s_a_naaaJ5usatJamiJausL92i_ia_s2nn22ii2&_!EFh
11 kn many loyaltg invgstiatinns. He is a brother of llax Radin, a we own- _ aw teachin rofession on the staff of M a.B&#39;F"&#39;pi&#39;=&#39;Eta er member of the 1 5 P 9
the University of California. It is the opinion of the undersigned that
pau1 F331;, ---1&#39;-**&#39;-""-""l In the coarse of one rather detailedinterview, Max  described his brother Paul as very far to the left,
ewpling Paul&#39;s name with that of Dr. Robert Brady. lax, it is recalled,
stated that his brother Paul and Dr. Brady 81&#39; =1&#39; *° &#39;1&#39; =&#39; Y&#39;d1°1&#39;-&#39;
gong 1-erg;-1-ed to h nan by the name of Q1 ius L, Bezoso, as one of
his associates both in the alliance and in the newspaper organisation.
Besozo is an attogaey wh9_j,e_j.denti;ied as _gne_nf_,ths_9!n§1&#39;§ QIJJ39 C919!hill e-5} It is established that he does legal work for the Chinese Hand ,/,/
h  hi nailv News It is also 8110111 T-118$ hi
re re, _ or Communist  al  j d1?fsion. Bezozo was interviewedwhich occurred at the time ofthe kE.-itated that he had known Bong since he first came to New Tor . He
stated that Hung was one of his very good friends and attested to his__- _ Q - II92____1__ __. __it-ed Be as a Haw D6&L6I"&#39;o 92l"l-111-I " 1"::{E];tyi:Ion:°:§8§:8:el&#39;§$ by zothzgtgitness, favorable to him, as aD" Jeffersonian Democrat! -
-2-l
I
r1
i
1
!
1

Vf VI
92/1/___ E J V____ ___A_________V _ . - . . L,  ,-_ ,L_ ;..l.¢..-y...--.92_;...a_.,J».--.-._.,J.|n-6.4-.----._.-. _-~=~__
@©PY
In the special hearing Hang referred to his acquaintenceahip with
llr. Bezozo and also with a Hr. Tauber senior member of the law I111
which includes llr. Bezozo. 332020 Is said by witnesses in the investi-
getion  and to re arl &#39; " &#39; &#39; in legal
matters. TFO Tina, Including Teuber, Is described as attorn I t eye or he
_I2t;er:1ai-10191 Tebor 1bI_en=-92?- Th&#39;ir_9£.%-i£t_1°&lEi!I38tZional I-alas:
 om a3 a Comunifst. org-an1g._ati_9n auB@s§d to Iy__§h§_L§;&#39;.l-
52111 5@<3&#39;¢i9ne<>f, *-he "@550!  .
o legal Za;;g_t.o Conmmisj.am r=1_1<=- trevqleae are  =-*Ac¢owg to H1-
Civil Service Comission security files, inn . Bezozo was report-ed
as a member of the legal staff of the International Labor Defense in an
issue of the Daily iorker dated 
bruary ii, 1933 we lei giTven*§s_a _§e£greqg_g_ b1 Bong, as is IJ:._Baul Eadin. I
It. 1,5 conc_lude_<;l tggggg tpg act.ivitiee,_ a§_f_iliat_i_onsL_aJ1q asaoc§._a_t1oq§
¢Jf*HOE.g!N§S_ 3h0ITl by the_QQEj,ssion&#39;§_ f &#39; on are C C0
Ffndlng of ;lnel1E.1:&#39;biliy*i,s considered necessary in _thi§ case, _ -E.-J*_~  7
.___,__________ ,_:|-n|I-
J. F. Cannon
Legal Adviser
/ ___ W __. __c_______
-4»-

/"I- - --- -A - A 4 J -W  .... _.__ - ___.;h__+=_n:z -Li, ____.__Jr..n_._4_ ..._.  4.:j,F:.____».i:_3-1: 5,5-9.; __i _,,,_d i_
- - CFFICE OF THE CHIEF L11! OFFICER
Novenber 11., 1943
THE OCH-IISSION
through Mr. Smith
and
The Executive Director
and Chief Examiner
I an submitting herewith as s unit the cases of Chew Sih Bong
and Dr. Hung Chusn Chi, employees of the Office of Her Information.
These cases are being submitted together because both individuals
ere serving in the same section, and it sppeers that-Mr. Hong was
employed at the recomendetion of Dr.  hi who in turn was employed by
Mr. Owen Lattimore, Director of Pacific Operations of the Office of
1hr Information.
The ca.se___9{__§_1r. Bong was previously before the Ckxission and
anslys of the fac in his case were furnished by the undersigned . Cannon. both took the position um H0ng&#39;_s_ onnectionswi thnihilgy Laundry ljlliance, reputed,-to"be&#39; an o:$g§,zation
urniaied h the Cmmunist Party, and pné Chins Daily News, end
to be a publication by and for Chinese Caisunists, en:I-ih:t1r erencee
and associations, were such es to warrant a finding of ineli ibility.1 £I&#39;_5*";3""Z The Camission is-atrisnitt-ted to the Office of War nnior_ms-ion e propos__/1 memorerdum pinion in the e of Sir. Bong and under date of November" "7 _, 191.2 HQ. §lmer_ Davis s letter to Ca:-niissioner Flaming stated
that in view ormstion which we 
xrnished him, Bong was
terminated at the close of business November 15, 191.2. The Crnnission
thereupon advised the Office of War Information under date of December
8, 191,2 that the Ccnlission has concluded that e finding of ineligibilityis neceesig and that the Commission&#39;s records have been noted to show
the Ir. ong&#39;s services were terminated at the close of business on
November 15, 191.2 as reported in the letter frcn Mr. Elmer Davis of
November 30, 191.2. Previously the Ccunission had approved the finding
of ineligibility end this action was recorded in Minute 5 of December
4, 191.2. g cg
In s letter anus July 27, 191.3  &#39;%_
5 referred to previous correspondence regarding Mr. Bong s
the letter of November 30, 1942 frun the Office of Her Information to
the effect that Hong had been terminated st the close of business
November 15, 191.2 was somewhat in error because  Hong had been
separated from the New Iork office of the Office of Usr Infomation
on November 15, 191,2 for duty with the A:-nu and that when he returned
-4-1-uI-Q92
I
___ I

.._.=-_ A --
»_| .. _ . _ _1. _ ___, __ __- .. .. -__;.- ..- _ _.-if er - ---~1-7--~-L -IF-""&#39;-&#39;f"-"3  ._._. . . __,J L»g . .
P@ L7-&#39;5°3V_ - -1" §-/ u uhad boon declared n1e1_§1
e by the cm; Service Commission. Admire].
McCullough accordingly requested that the Gcmussion
case of Hr. Bong. Mr. Meyer than sent the file the Investigatio
Division so that an interview might he had wi Mr. Oven Lettimore ed
of the San Francisco office of the Office of H  --Hr;
I-attimore was accordingly interviewed in San Francisco and on s later
date Mr. Steely interviewed Admiral McCullough and Mr. Marsh of the
Office of Jar Information regarding Mr. Bong, Mr. Owen Lattimors being
also present during this interview. Fir. Steely reported among other
things that Mr. Lattimore stated that he wished to keep Mr. Hong on
the job, that Hr. Lattimore had an efficient setup in the Chinese
section in the Bow York office of the Office of War Information and
vented to keep it that way, that he had explicit confidence in DreE
1
e
1
-a
=i
- 1
..  _
I
_i
Chi, that Mr Hong is under careful supervision and oven if he were&#39;/_9292e ceenemin he is not in a position where he can do any damage, that
the selection of suitable Chinese was s delicate matter, and it is
extremely difficult to obtain a ccmpetent employee who does not have
connections which might constitute leaks in the organization, that
under the present setup with Dr. Chi and Mr. Bong there have been no
incidents of con
dential information getting into unauthorized channels
and that there had been no attempts on I-tr. Hong&#39;s part to use his
present position four the spreading of Columnist propaganda. Mr.
Lattinore also pointed out that Mr. Hong was recently used by the
Lrnw to teach Chinese to 22.4 officers in Iniia. Mr. Lattimors stated
that he did not know Hr. Hong but he did lmow Dr. Chi and is relyirg
upon Ih-. Ch.is reoonnendation and knowledge of Mr. Kong.
During the interview in San Francisco Mr. Lettimcrs nsdo an az-
.tended statement regarding Mr. Hong and Dr. Chi and also furnish
¥_.__.
the investigator with s copy of a letter which he had written to Mr.
Joseph Barnes under dste of June 15, 1943. The ltatgzgnt of 111-,
Lattimore during the interview and the copy of his latter to 111-, gum;
are appropriately identi
ed in the file. It would be a difficult
thing to attempt to limnsrize Mr. Lattimc:-e&#39;s lengthy statement or his
letter Mr. garnes. Howeyer, the gist of his cclmaents is that he
does not know Bong personally but based on his knowledge of the situa-
tion, neithor the Chinese I-land Laundry Alliance nor the Chim DailyV I
E
I?
I
r
__.----.. .__- 1B&#39;
i
Few unis ic. He then proceeded to give rather involved 1/"
reasons or s conclusion. He said that he had known Dr. Chi, who
1&#39; about 7° rem of ass. in China, that he was s respected and cultlmbd
1&#39;"!-Be 9-Yd 1&#39;-ht hi! knowledge of Dr. Chi is such that he has i.u:p]_lcitgith and confidence in his integrity and ability. He tale-1 1!;-, chi
=°1°=t *-he Parson he Vented to assist en. and m-. cm selected
Hr. Borg. This was the first time that Hr, Letting-gym] my knoqlggz.
of Hr. Hang at all, &#39; "i
Anong other things Mr. I-attinore said:
"Of course I have no concrete proof that Hong is not a
Communist but in the absence of concrete proof I think

_ . . _. ...._ .__, _,____ _ _ __f_.._. ., _A lite- ....: ._ _ _.___.:_--- ifs--.1 *5...-:5_ ___ ,
/.2
l
-..p
CQPY
there is a prime-facie case to show that he is not a Can-
munisti I know there is a law preventing the hiring of
Comunists. Pe1;_s_onellyga_:;;d_1&#39;__rankl I woulp_ n be tooj91;r_L§_i£o E511 Indifi
jinl Conmu
istzwerefn 
bgnéls position. 1This is because he wod&#39;nbTb&#39;¬IbIe&#39;tETU!
&#39;"Trc5lI*"
i"
92 could not get away with anything. He could not com it
verbal sabotage, and all of the work coming out of the
New York office has to clear through me".
On a later occasion Dir. Lattimore stated to our investigator
in part:
"Now I know that the various factions smear a non-Conformist
by charging him with being a Communist. However, the Chinese
Government dare not come out in the open and intervene in
such domestic problems. I merely say this: If your people
have gone to the Chinese Ambassador or any other Chinese
Government representative and such Chinese representative has
told you that this man Hang is suspected oi being a Connunist,
then I say you should discount such evidence and certainly
should not declare the man ineligible merely on that kin!
of evidence. It is true that I don&#39;t know anything about
Hong personally except what I have learned frcm Dr. Chi. It
is also true that he could be a Communist without my knowledge.
It is also true that he could have hoodwinked Dr. Chi. However,
until concrete evidence is presented that he is a Ccmnmist
then I believe that based on Dr. Chi&#39;s standing and reputation
and ability, P-is judgment that Hang is not s Cammnist is e
prime-facie case in favor cf Hong and should not be reversed
on the testimony that you may have received frm anyone repre-
senting the Chinese government or for that matter on the testi-
mony of any Chinese."
11. will be noted that the ammo-sesitii
ger re-. Lattimore&#39;e"&#39;
testimony is that he does  Mr. Hong, that he does know Dr. .
Chi, tlmtghe has hill faith in Dr. Chi and was willing to employee/Z9g»on&#39;Dr. Chi&#39;s reccnnerxiation, that he does not know whether Bong
a Cclnmunist, but does not think be is and that even if Hong werea Communist, he would still like to retai Ijong in as 8_eI"!f_i§9.-.bB@ll¢Hong could do no harm in his position. F I I
0 &#39; &#39; I
In his letter to Mr. Barnes, Hr. Lattimore outlined the entire
situation as he understood it, described the relationship between
Horg ani Dr. Chi s.nd then said!
"Ls long as Dr. Chi stands in the relationship of loyal
friendship to me and the loyalty of an honest employee oi an
American government agency, there will be no difficulty with
either man, no irresponsible p18.Yi8 V11-h chine P°3-13°;
-2-7

,5»-
92/
I
-__,»
@© FY
and no leakage to any  Thinsse faction. The retention of both
men is therefore a guarantee to the secrecy and security oi
the work of 01-II as well as a guarantee of the confident ful-
fillment oi directives. I H1g§_j[_q§,92_np_&#39;§_tO be high-pressured __
I into ettingrid oi&#39;_e_i_ther man. I know bTit&#39;hme!&#39;r-@BU"""""""
s
hjeci
d to att&#39;é&#39;c1{s. Civen the time to work on , c
 ram&#39;
E attacks to their origin and give you
the full details. I doubt whether the Personnel Security
Consnittee of UNI would be able to trace such attacks, rooted
in the intricacies of Chinese factionsl politics, to their
source; but I should not like to see us placed in a position
where, after getting rid of people now attacked, we would be
forced to hire people who would actually be the nominee of
factions not under our control.
The foregoing letter £1-an Mr.&#39;Lattimore to Hr. Barnes was written V
1
92in strict confidence and is not to be quoted to any outside source.
The evidence before the Cmnnission at the time unfavorable action
was originally taken in the case of Mr. Hong tended to indicate rather
strongly that Hong is a Communist and engaged in activities having for
their purpose support of Communist party interests. ihe recent in-
vestigation and interviews have not changed the evidence and have on
the contrary elicited some information tending to strengthen the posi-
tion that Hong is pro-Comuniet. Thus it was brought out in addition
to all of the other information that Hong was active in the America
Student Union during his school years. _
The evidence indicated that Hong is pro-Ocnnnmist. The question
now for determination is whether his employment should be approved be-
cause oi the strong representations of Mr. Lattimore that Hung is
probably not a Cmmunist, but even ii he is e Communist Mr. Lattimore
still wishes to retain him because Hong will work under close super-
vision and  not be able to do awhnws ~ -- - --  _, _ __1 Ii l-
9
u
in
1.1
I
»
ii
92
L
192
?
.. &#39; ,1 Z
/ On the one hand it can he argued that since we are reasonably -
convinced that Bong is pro-Ccnmmist, it is our responsibility to re-
quire his removal notwithstaniing Mr. Lattimore&#39;s representations.
On the other hand the Ccnniesion could, if it wished, take the posi-
tion that since Mr. Littmore has assumed responsibility, the Ocsilissioun
can afford to permit Hong&#39;s retention in the service. If the Cun-
mission takes the Latter position it will be tantamount to saying that
although we believe the individual is a Communist, we will be willing .
to rate him eligible provided the employing agency is willing to assume
the reepozueibihty. l doubt  the Commission can afford to avoid
the issue in this manner. Ir we believe Hong is a Oonsunist then we .. - I
should rate him ineligible. e &#39;
_,,,,-&#39;1»-nwve------. .,,.,._.-...,-,. -- _,..._.-we
-- &#39;~ Do ue&#39;*5aI1E¬¬&#39;nosg is a Ccsmninistl the Cami!
ing was based on Hong&#39;s connections with the Chinese.1-~"""-

hij--.
_-I CQPY
and with the China Daily News. Much of the information regarding the
Coumunistic nature of the Alliance and the newspaper cane Iran Chinese,
some of whom were oommected with competing nevspqaers. We 0111&#39;-N1"!
have not read the China Daily Iiews. Mr. Lettimore states he has read
some of the issues and has found nothing Connunistic in them, al-
though he admits there might have been something Coumunistic in theissues which he has not read. Hr. Latjina:-e has- spent  -and from his statement and letter t o1&#39;-r. Barnes  that
he is thoroughly familiar with the various political factions. his
conclusion is that Hong&#39;s connections, in the light of his knowledge
of the situation, do not necessarily point to pro-Coununism. In
matters of the Chinese, Lattimore is scnewhat oi an expert and his
opinion is entitled to considerable weight,
Since we have no direct evidence that Hong is a Ccmmnist,
and since the original decision was based on the circumstances of
Hong&#39;s connections and in view of I-jr. La.ttim0re&#39;s representations,
l an ready to reach the conclusion that possibly we made an error
in the case of Mr. Hong; I en, therefore, ready to recommend that Wk. y
Bong be rated eligible for retention in his position in the Office
of War Information. 
In the case of Dr. Chi, I recommended in my memorandum of Fay &#39;7,191.3 that he be rated eligible. Mr. Smith did not agree with me. The Q
Gcnnission has not yet acted on the case of Dr. Chi. For the reasons
stated in my memorandum of May 7, 1943, I again recommerd that Dr. Chi
be rated eligible.
Llred Klein
Acting Chief Law Officer
CX:FS:OIB
September 17, 1943
MTI. i&#39;iUl&#39;T5I_i8
I do not believe I clearly understand Mr. Lattimore&#39;s point of
view regarding the cases of Chi and Hang. It seems that he is, in
effect, suggesting that whatever evidence we may have, short oi being
positive and direct, tending to show the applicants to be cccmunisticelly
inclined is entitled to very little weight and that his judgment, based
on his personal knowledge of Chi and on Chi&#39;s appraisal of Bong, should
prevail. However, as pointed out by Hr. Klein, there is no absolute
proof that the applicants are Ccusmnists and in view of Zattimoreis
knowledge of the complicated Chinese political situation, gained
through years of residence in China, I am also willing to change nu
previous reccmmendation for both applicants from ineligibility to
eligibility.
Farrar ems
-5-

_.r_-._---__ V *__ _,,_,,_h _...-.e,. - ~--- ---_-__ 
@ C,@@ gay cm
As requested by you, Hr. Frank Marsh and Admiral hcCullough of
the Office of Iar Information were interviewed on august 31, 1943 re-
lative to the case oi Chew Sih Hung, Assistant Field Representative
in the New York Office of OH. Hr. Owen Lattinore, Director of Paci-
fic Operations, OII, who is sponsoring Ir. Bong and upon whose recon-
Iendation OWI requested that this case be reopened, was also present
Rnwil no +1-M I &#39;1 n§.n&#39;rI92r|
1I_II. ll. I.&#39;ZllIL.LEN:"
Hr. Hong was originally investigated in New York for this posi-
tion and was rated ineligible by the Commission  see Minute 4 of Dec-
ember 4, 1942!. The file also shows that on November 30, 1942 the Com-
mission was informed that Mr. Hong&#39;s services were terminated at the
close of business November 15, 1942 as a result of information furnished
the  II by the Commission in a letter dated October 26, 1942.
The Comission was subsequently inicrned umier date of Jug 27, 1943
by Admiral McCullough that the information furnished it by Hr. Elmer Davis
under date of November 30, 194.2 regarding the termination of Er. !&#39;l0ng&#39;8
services, was somewhat i.n error as Hr. Hang was separated from the New
York Office of  II for duty with the Army and that upon his return in
the Spring of 1943 he was again employed in the new York Office as the
New York Office was not advised of the fact that Hr. Hong had been de-
clared ineligible by the Civil Service Commission.
on the basis oi Bear id_L1rLl lAcC92Qlongh&#39;a letter of Jay 2?, l9é3=
this case was reopened for the purpose of interviewing Ear. Owen Latti-
more of San Francisco and some additional investigation was also made.__,_.-__.._-7.-.__.-_
Daring my interview with Ir. Harsh, Hr. Lattinore and Admiral Lic-
Cullougi, the evidence secured during investigation of Ir. Hong was dis-
cussed and the w re advised fully regarding the substance of the derog-
atory informs on.
&#39; &#39;
is reported by Investigator He Re llenering, who interviewed Hr, Lat-
timore in San Francisco, llr. Lattimore does not know ilr. Hong personally
and in reconmending his for retention in the Service, he is relying upon
Dr. Kung Chuan Chi, Assistant Language Editor  Chinese! in the New York
office of  II. Hr. Lsttimore has known Dr. Chi since about 1935 when he
net hin in Shansi Province in China. Hr. Lettimore is also personally
acquainted with Dr. Chi&#39;s son, Dr. Chi Chao-Ting. Mr. Lettimore added
little to the testimony given llr. llemering in San Francisco.
QT: Hung Chun Chi has been investigated by the Consnission for his
position as Assistant Language Editor  Chinese!, GI, and his case is new
pending before the Commission. In view of the fact that llr. Lattimore is
relying upon Dr. Chi: recommendation regarding llr. I-long, the  II repre-
sentatives were a1so_il_1__£grmed of the unfavorable informtion _e_ecur§d re-
&#39;|?rR:@1J¥TUEF*aF-Triii son,iE{EH&#39;f
6Iaa"ertastra6n;y"t&#39;e"&#39;£B3"er?EéT£¥m"
_ ~ -=_ or __uel &#39; _ : IT _;,_;__--.-.,- _ &#39;- r~:_-....; W:-:_A_&#39;_..-....,__._ A_ _" f -in _* Lj
V.¢_.v &#39;4 I   I,___;a.n:¢g_c-Av»--12.4-e-4:-5-rim-M-use-=* ta» &1i  _
i
I
1
.1
J
x
I
é

 L &#39; ii;  - S -tn: __-_-_ i.__._:__,_,,q___&#39;__  _V_:_ ,_ _ ____ ____,i :1. I _; _____ .[;_ _____ - - - i Ii. jig. .i| &#39; &#39; i -  i !
I 92
@© FY
92 , .4-the young Dr. Chi-,i_s_;|.L1g3, mt ntly, a Comm? and that beat one time was a delegate to the ______Inte:-natio in lloscos and
to the effect that the elder Dr. C was 1&#39;-enoveo Tron his position asCommissioner of Education in the Shansi Province because of Conmnist I
activities. .---"="---6 iii  
Hr. Lattimore devoted considerable time to a discussion of fac-
tional striie anong the Chinese and possible interests on the part of
witnesses giving derogatory testimony regarding Hr. Hong. He appeared
/*"&#39;"92incli.ned to explain away all accusations of Conmmism made against Ir.
Hong on this basis. He also advanced as a neason for believing the
Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance not to be e Communist organization the
fact that this organization was composed oi snall businessmen whose in-
terests iould be affected adversely under Cowunism. Er. Lattimore said
he could not understand why the story that the elder Dr. Chi was removed
from his position as kinister of Education in the Shansi Province because
of Cousunist activities would be circulated. Ir. Lattinore also stated
that Dr. Chi was known to Congressman Walter B. Judd of Minnesota uni
that Congressman Judd, a former missionary, spent some time in Shansi
Province during the time Dr. Chi was an official there. It was pointed
out to Hr. Lattimore that testimony regarding Dr. Chi&#39;s removal Ias se- _cured by the Commission both in New York and San Francisco. The in.l&#39;or-
* mation received in San Francisco came from a source found to Q |;&#39;E:abl§ _&#39;
in the past by the Commission. The informant did not lcnol Dr. Chi per-
sonally but had to inquire about his to secure this information. Tint
this latter source should be biased against Dr. Chi in making this state-
ment appears to be unlikely.
After a lengthy discussionhoi t m case suchas the intricacies oi Chinese politics, possible motives Iitnesee; testi-
fying sign have, etc., as sell as the derogatory testimony itself, Ir.
Lattirnore, Hr. Harsh and Adii
 iieCullough iere asked ihether, in v:|.eI_
oi the information in the case, they felt that Hr. I-long should be retained.
Their statements Iere substantially as follows:
llr. Lsttimore stated that he wished to keep Ir. Bong on the Job, that
he had an efficient setup in the Chinese Section in New Iork and wanted to
keep it that say, that he has explicit confidence in Dr. Chi, that llr. I-long
is under careful supervision and even ii he were a Communist that he is notin e position there he caild do any damge, that the selection bf suitable %
Chinese was a delicate matter and it is ea-rtrc-renal"; &i&#39;iazlt to obtain a %
patent employee who does not have connections which nigat constitute leaks
in the organization, that under the present setup Iith Dr. Chi and Ir. Bong
there had been no instances of confidential information getting into unau-
thorized channels and that there had been no attempts on Ir. Hoops part to
use his present position tor the spreading of Cocuniet propaganda, etc.
Hr. Lattinore also pointed out that I-lr. Bong Ias recently used by the Lrq
to teach Chinese to 221. officers in India. Ir. I-long was hialy praised for
this work in a letter from Col. Gilchrist of the United States Lrq.l
5
1

92{ In  -I   I _ _._i __é_;___ Q _, "--- .&#39;-.-_- :4J- --A -._...,t _ ___..;__ ._ - -Na"-41 5-I" __  .. ., ,_ A __ . ._.-<. -..._...,... Z 92i .- &#39; --4---1"" * _ _,i_._&#39;._L&#39;_.i_&#39;_.___:_&#39;L ._  ...,f.,. _:
1
The substance of Ir. Lettinore&#39;s statements was to the effect that
he u-"ante to retain k. -long and is still relying um.-1 Dr. Chi: reo% - _nendation and knowledge or Hr. Hong, all evidence to the contrary not-
withstanding» _______.------&#39;-"""""&#39;
WHr. harsh stated that he recognizes the intricacies of Chinese pc1i- Z
tics and he feels that if Hr. Lsttinore still rants to employ Hr. Bong,
lcnoring the nature of the testimony against him, the risk involved, etc, 5he would recoanend that Hr. Lattimore be permitted to retain Hr. Hong K
as an employee of OII in his present position.
Admiral McCullough said that it 1&#39;-r. I-long was to be removed on the
basis of the evidence that he had heard in the case that he felt that
others higher up in the organization should also go, that others had
 retained against whom the evidence was more danagng than it was
against Ir. Bong, that he would go along with In-. Lsttilore and Hr. Harsh
in favor of Ir. I-Kong&#39;s retention in the Service. *
In vies of the rm. that llr, Lattinore is placing so much reliance rj Kupon Dr. Chi, shone case is aiso pending before the Commission at the pre-2!?-&#39;- i
sent tine, it is suggested that Dr. Chi&#39;s investigation be considered in
con»-=*-1°» 11_th1h_q_H0ae===§¢ae-;.~. aA.-_seaeo.._e>~e1s=---------__.....__,..,___
F Lire I.-sttimre see asked ehether there nae .a_n.;1th.ing n_n.io,ne about !r= 1
Kong&#39;s services which could not be performed by other Chinese Translators
and he said "_!§2" but that he wished to keep his present organisation in
- vise of the fact that it was rxmctioning efficiently.
92""v"w.-unIu.|I92_|-nelesn-q...
~&#39;-&#39;*""&#39;
 vies of the teatimnrv obtained durhig-time s~.:bsw,uc_&#39;~.t inraetiga-"&#39; " """""""&#39;
tion of Hr. Hcng,t1f&#39;San Francisco ahgthe evidence secured in the inves-tigation o?  Chi regarding Comn.mi;&#39;§.ectivities on the pert of hie 1
and his son can see no reason shy Commission should disturb its
p:-aims . of inelig.-,ihi1it5&#39; in Hr fie:-.3-ls case.

§_III_-qvw--._ 71 J &#39;
The attached is of some interest in the Jessup case in view
of the State Department&#39;s press releases to the effect that Ambassador
Jessup was only one of 50 trustees of the Institute of Pacific Relations.
The Research Advisory Council, of which Jeesup was Chaimsn,
had complete editorial control over the publication FAR EASTERN SURVEY,
which concentrated. upon selling the Cemnuniat Party line on Asia.
During l?!l3, E. C. Carter teciznically was in control o
magazine. However, the actual physical control was exercised by Jessup
at the time of the Bisson article, which initiated the Conrznmist Party
line smear attack upon the e.nti-Cozmnunist forces in China. and the lavish
praise of the Chinese Communist leaders. The anti~-Communist Chinese
were referred to him when they objected to the fact that the FAR EASTERN
SURVEY was following the Ccnmunist Party line on Chine.
The attached checks represent Communist money paid to suppor&#39;t
the Jessup publication. It will be noted they are signed by Frederick
V. Field, the self-proclaimed Communist who has been named in sworn
testimony before the Senate Committee as a Soviet espionage agent-
lt this time I am unable to supply the photostats of clieckspeid aub-
eequent to December 1, 1943. The committee has been urged, but has
to e~ .,1.&#39;i&#39;s cmlete fi_92.i=.ncie1 recorlee/
.1-u ---- --,4

2" - __ _ &#39;4 _, . ,__  , -- ,._,...-3--;-» _-_ _-r_-..-.:-..___  ---¢~..-+7 W-:, 1?-
-.4-bu 1&#39;92 -nn =i
[/mgene E. Barnett_ ___,__ _. _,_, _,_ _ . __,___ H. _-,_._T, _.___... .5;--r_t F! _._
z.
memcm COUNCIL
INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC RELATIDNS
- Jlwbsrn ,v_11B!=i¢11l1v=~§<>=1n1H9n -141354 no
M Q I&#39;InI:I9292Jlli3i.l u.n.3|l|n
I
92_/G. Ellsworth Hugginl ~/
QVPM lipC. JeaeujvV
[/Yemen L. hcConnug!w Y
Lawrence horrin V
Irc._ Ml fcoagtcck !{oteatei_n_ V
Lawrence D. Seymour _/
X/"F1-ederi ck V. Field-_-_ Mi..-
In

S __ m __ I
H m__U__&#39; H
J TI I. 
r Q"
P E 
._"_
H ____I .- "H
Y
MUMF_
_. I_=_:&#39;_°___2?. __ ___ _____ __&#39;_  . _  ______w_r___
__ _ g ______L_
M__V_W; _ _ ___?_ ___u_._ :______g§__§__M §__m§*H*M_w_*_umgu :. ._#___h_~___w___"P__¥___&#39;_ A_4__J________
_m_r___._"_"___"t_£r¬_
r
M  h_I5t_HU_p_§h_§_Q
___ __ W _w_u£__$_H_r_WH_1_*_HH_w_J
mu m: ___l __ __ ___ 3&#39;02 I _ _H __ __ t khm . __ Po H 
__J_ _ __ ____ fu  _ &#39;L _Wm_%:_&#39; ..O*&#39; P _&#39;l .I I I 6 ..&#39;lmIM _"_ ___m_O _m"_ *4 _
W   F: hm ~
M IO  H? W ihllNll-1___ I El _ &#39; HIE-92u _  _>__3_£__szQ .. £8:::£§
_ 92 "_ " __5;_z __° >__~__E°o _n_______ _9_E__wus is 838. 
g  ..W _=Z____° .==:;< :c.:_i: .___ n_______,_
_Wm_r&#39;]_| 1| £1 __ _ % %2 OI I ! 1  g
 N  
g §_92__Q__________AN&#39;_  "I: ou II: . . 
n z H _ _. . . . . . _ _ _ vs is 3__ _ ______________ 
r __8E___<_ _ I _| I _§_l|._t:_  _ I  _ M _7_ _ ! 11 _ _ I _ Z ":1I_A"h"- "A J1 I _ &#39;  __ 1 : __
g ___
_
__
_
T,4_XY w

&#39;
w
M_
_
_
W_; 
_
_v
i_
__
_ _ N __ Wv
_
Wi3Q/&#39;
___ 
I

§__k__ F1: _3|  __&#39;_____i_ * i_
_ ym_
_ k A
_A
:
m__
1
______
H?
lw 1 _
_
____
_
_
A _
0 __
J
MW
_
_L
% M
L __
W
__L3 I
$L _r_
~_.
r "II
rt
_ .
__M
WLP _
_ _ _h
W:_____ .__ ______i____, _ __ _ _ _"_ _MWM?_%_H%_$_WMw£_w_ _§mm_wW_§rQ* Mam _Ng__Ww_
n W 3     _____;___W ;__1_{_Hm___
h. _ _ _ _ __~ _ kw:   ________Y_: v as ___ . .. . _ £5. f_ _
.. .k..   __ &#39;2 _  I ._
m ... _. J . F ______ _:__:_. 5! °.__ . J. .  .... ... U .*  ____ &#39; &#39; F.. " . . § Q
. . . . 0.   ks Q  QT
h. .... . .. . :_____: ___&#39; Q; §. . I __ ______ i U . .__ 0. . H . 0&#39; Bf. . . . F A U  92 __ ii  w___°Ez____h"M§l!_9y__ A MM£35? _ ggi-ix __ __ §. 92 VHg _&#39;_ ._. . . . _ I . I _ T _ 6 _~ N mm 5 ":_ u n _ u _f___ __q M _*_M__,m§_F r__ __" _ __ _. . __ ____________________  __ d___________ _________ !!_h _¢§__  / 92_ __
_ _________°F_H__|_&#39;_wJ_ A NA E;  N 1  L _ J2 _: If 92_ __ éamN _92lH_T Pill? . Ill _  __ ___y m_3_A__h H  %_& ____,m_ _MW%w!_ G1 v}, _92 IC

$133
_ __ if
_ __¬_ g _ _.. DGIV }DI_.  mf-L _ __u___92_ __J__ __ V J _____ __ _ _-_&#39;-____#_ ___ ___  _ . &J,{§.__¥d_ _ V _vV~&r__%» ______
%._ _%*___g_} I 
. _ cg . i   _._  ___ __J__*__kn_a____ W H ~__ _   ___w__ _: ... 2. M __ _: Oil OI O ii  _r __&#39;_O? H II u I  3
 C O O O. O Ol
gC O.I 92.O  *3 %_3__ 8 I ____q 2&5 mi .0. . ..   5  G  __ ___  _$_?____B_xM7 ..ImOCI 2_  ...  _ _ __ __ .__ . D &#39;__ __ M________1_"I_ 2 _ . _ _§_A_92 A  h___Jr_M A     W _____ _  __1jd .9. ._3% 
v Ir %A Pg   __&9292_ __  ______i____ { 
Mk:  tiny. j A W _ __ I_._ _.  H. _ _ _ V_ ___J_ 3  JH____ __ _ .  E __  &#39;h__ £_q_____£r__5____I I: % __ 92 i_|______W v_ O>3® k
 _ Q _ _ ___ j j
% M 2__O£__u%&#39;__%%u _£______b____H___8_6J   _   _:_j_______: U 1  __[ _ __"_ F,  |_ é __ _  _ l|_é;_1_:___ &#39; I  J_ 1; _  I I &#39;3 I J.-_Ii>___ H .1l_* __ ilH&#39;l|T_ _ __ __;_| I V_ _I1__a____1" I I IQ 	lG PM


1__&#39;____ ___ __ av  
év .W - _s_: vi ___v__ _ _ q _  _ .
L &#39; Do; 9% £_§__¥_y_____ . . . . .H 9 37 _ _    ."Q OQC _ _
_n by  __J&#39;_.%  .O_ . Cl O __ _ __w______m_I_____
__0_ ______,§__"I__W___&#39;__h__ _}__&#39;____}__u_ _ _ :__-_________ -: . .
Q §________uJG__
__h"_h_mf
__%M? _I__§?¢__.£_____""___J3 __ an __%£___%_ .__¬_ %w|______;u_ I_&#39;gM:_m__:_$:rH|1Ut__ . ._ An ___$£_ A" 9% __£_£_ §_:___§$£
 N_1
___w_3._I_q_§_é1__u_§z . 5; Y ___;__ may u____p__ ,__»_,__ __;___ {y __:____u H .;._:.J . .; I_t 3* {_____ _____l___.hh__¢égHI_l_.Q"l#_wp_J_:_I_ . . .  _  __ _ _ h _ __" _ _. _ __I
é_ at __ .... W

___-
vi_§i.?. _  __ ._ , _ __ . I.  l l_ m___F_______f ___th_____h__?___  by  _ _________ _ _ W _ ____ ___&#39; _ _ _ _ _ I .8 Ha £-3 N ___  _ __ gag _ _M     égwpgbwhmgou
.
m
_L
_
__ L
s_ Wm&#39;___"J___ __"  II  LH _H  
_u_M_b_"___x_ ___Vu_A&#39;____Lk%_ i___ ___ J I_ _ 9. _
__&#39;_ ___"__ __  I ___ &#39;__ _ . _ ___ __wH __J___&#39;U_H_"_____ ____?_,_ A  _ I wt _&#39; ___ N MW é 92 N  A% L3: _ _M__ __  ___&#39;{_____ ___ __ H nu _r _ _ ___ _ T _. _ _ Q,  I A _%. I _&#39;   __ 2 _._I ~L___&#39;__ ____&#39;____ ____92_ _&#39;_ ___  92_|v____~____h_: ____ ___   ___*_.__ %wh92  _ . &#39;.  § am N -
I. .
_]_
_ 
LL
 __
1:-
.__
I&#39; &#39;__ .D.
_ E
W ____v__   I?    .__ V: __  _f_! _ !_ __ __   _ __ _ __ ___ _ "I  _  . I
_ _"_ 3 I _._ __ hi, ___ __  _ ___ __T L; ____ __ ____&#39;_:__ 0 __  W1 _ __rw___  .   __   _ 2 Lh if
. _I
_92__ 92
CJ
___IN
O
J
J
___
{U0
d
1
H
1W
P
m_ _A
M
9
M [____g__ &#39;| {F I; Q _"|1_iII|![|92[ J gi L; &#39;__  |__ | _ _&#39;___92I xi 1____:_._CW? _
____
___~W /_"_ h__E
A M

QQ
>zd____|j>/_m____Zm____"u________°_____?9_______H_HH;a____m___J__M__h__1W__:r_h _ ___H _1_____¢g_r__"&#39;____;_ _m_V_z¥.__A____M_1n>$m
>____n_n__g_ __£__N__
:>_wmq"W_m___mwg
_:__:I___ Mm____v_%92

 PHILIP JE3SUP!
DATA on can lass naozrr ORGANIZATIONS WITH
muss AliBA.SSADCR JESSUP ms AFFILIATED.
Source: "Citations by Official Government Agencies of Organizations and
Publications found to be communist or communist fronts," Pre
pared and released by.Comnittee on Un-American Activities, U.SI
I
n
House of Zeprosentatives, December 18, l9hB. b,,/ i
,n,_.&#39;f&#39;a_Ig,@n courcrtf irrsricg-1f::_o1"1 P.*,CE_IC ;j:;f_ -T1o;.s-air
1. "Cited as a Cmmnxnst front which received funds from the
American People&#39;s Fund, another front organized and.directed
by Frederick V. Field as a repository for funds to be dis-
tributed to Communist enterprises."
 California State Legislature Committee on
Un-American Activities, Report 19b8, p. 168!
Iote: &#39;Q;nrican ?e22le&#39;s Funi - organized and directed Hy
Frodexick Vanderbilt Fie1d&#39;a§ a repository for funds to be
distributed to Communist enterprises. This Communist
financial organization has paid out large sums of money to
* * * Conunist and Communist-front organizations such_as
Iational Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Allied Labor
Bess, American Russian Institute, American Committee for
Protection of Foreign Born, Joint AntiFascist Refugee Com-
nittee."
 California State Legislature Committee on Un-_
American Activities, Report 19L3, p. 163!
CC_C&#39;L&#39;-I?InT1lIC coz.uII&#39;r""_n.s T0 1.n~f_r__gu_1; ,Si§&#39;I§!£ "eg.1s.-taco
1. "Cited as one of a number of front organizations, set up
during the Spanish Civil War by the Communist Party in the
United States and through which the Party carried on a groat_ I
deal of agitation."
 Special Congressional Committee on UnAnerican
Activities, House of Representatives, Report,
March 29, 191m, pp. 137-133!
2. "Cited as a Communist front."
 California State Legislature Committee on Un-
Anerican Activities, Report, 1937, p. 210!
=-Q19:
1, "Cited as a Communist front."
 Special Congressional Comittee on Un-American
Activities, House of Representatives, Report,
   Po
2. "It will be remembered that during the days of the infamous
Soviet-Iazi Pact, the Communists built protective organizations
known as the National Emergency Conference, the Kational
Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights, which culminated in
the National Federation for Constitutional Liberties."
 Congressional Committee on Unrhmerican Activities,
House of Representatives, Report no. .115,
September 2, 19b7, p. 12!
3. "Cited as a Communist front.
 California State Legislature Comittee on Un-American
Activities, Report 19b8, p. 115!v
¥I

/ 1
-2.... &#39;9
I92§TI §IA.L__I£g.lI£§lJj§CY C_0I-!&#39;.TJ*.I3_l.&#39;C3_ P0,. 1!;! £0_C_P..1T_IC i _P.IG1i&#39;IS1. "Cited as a Communist front." C &#39;
 Special Congressional Committee on UnAnerican Activities,gages of Representatives, Report, March 29, l
hh, pp. h3 and
2. "It will be remembered that during the days of the infamous Soviet-
Ilazi Pact, the Connunists built protective organizations known as
the Rational Imcrgency Conference, the National Emergency Conference
for Democratic Rights, which culninater.-. in the lfational Federation
for Constitutional Liberties."
 Congressional Committee on Un-American Activities,
House of Representatives, Report Ho. 115, September 2,
19m, P- 12!
3. "Cited as a Coramuriist-front organization defending Communists.
Democracy in February, 19b0, the Communist Party frantically
organized a new series of front or;anizations. The National
Eiergenoy Conference for Democratic Rights was one of the new
fronts and it was filled from top to bottom with veteran Com-
munist Party liners."
 California State Legislature Committee on Un,-American
Activities, Report, 19b8, pp. 112 and 32?.! "nifter the dissolution of the American League for Peace and /
h. "Cited as &#39;subversive and Un-American. &#39;"
 Special Subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations,
Report, April 21, 19143. &#39;9. 3!
AI;§P.lC.§1Y__P.iiSF=lA192 I3-IST
T
i T-C111 CT.:..T1jf.L ;".l;L.TI-SETS   S" __ ,_U150 icnovm as t1~.e;.a§£iesn&#39;:=.uss1.§31 Institute i
w " " C * *
1. "A direct agent of the Soviet Union, engaged in traitorous
activities under the orders of Stalin&#39;s consular service
in the United States. Founded in 1226 ~11-ii-iithe semiofficia1
status of the American Russian Institute is established."
 California State Legislature Committee on Un-American
Activities, Report 19b8, pp. 169 and 327!
C 2= "Cited as a Communist organization supported by "intellectuals""&#39;
 Massachusetts House Committee on Un- American Activities,
Report, 1938, p. 279!
mmrcnz Inn srxm-more ASSOCIATION
&#39;{l.etter1iesds, &#39;~.vhieh &#39;s&#39;-.=s.rE;-Ts-.1,-are none as r-ember of Faculty .-f~.dv&#39;isc:&#39;y
Board, were printed in Conmmists print shop and bear label number
209, which is Corilnunist print shop label!.
1. The American Law Students Association -sras affiliated with the
_§me:lica;_1_ I_cut11_C orgresg.

! "Cited as suo&#39;.rer:-live and Conrnunist."
 Attorney General Tom Clark, letters to Loyalty
Reviezr Board, released December 1;, 1914? and
September 21, 19h5!
! "It originated in 1931: and *-R-1&#39;=has been controlled by
Communists and manipulated by then to influence the
t-hou;;ht of Jlnerican youth."

7 -3- _, .
 1
American Peace Hdbilization." &#39; ; Special Committee on Un-American Activities, ?
Report, June 25, 19b2, p. 16; also cited in
Reports of January 3, 1939: P. 82; January 3,
19b1, p. 21; June 25, 19h?» P. 16 and liar-ch
29, l9hh, p. 102! .
 h! "Launched during August of 193k and for about 7 years sin
one of the most influential front organizations ever
established by the American Communist Party."
 California Committee on Un-American Activities,
Report 19b3, p. 179!
and building this American Youth Congress is the same
as in its other youth groups, namely, to build up a
united front, to push the objective of and produce i"The purpose of the Young Communist League in controlling £////
cadres for the Communist Party among persons to whm A ,
they would be unable to make a direct approach." 5 ,
 Massachusetts House Committee on UnAmerican
Activities, Report, 1938, pg. 525.!  1i
! Cited as "subversive and unAmerican."
 Special Subcommittee of the House Committee
on Appropriations, Report, April 21, 1953. P. 3.!
! Cited as a Communist front.
 Pennsylvania Commonwealth Counsel before
the reviewing board of the Philadelphia
County Board of Assistance, January l9h2.!I
I
The American Law Student Association was affiliated with
the United Students Peace Committee of 3h? lhdison Avenue,
eu&#39;York City. *1 4* 7

! "The American Student Union *** announced that it &#39;
set up the &#39;front&#39; movement, the United Student
Peace Committee, in 1933, which has brought into
its front 1? national youth organizations."
 Special Congressional Committee on
Un-American Activities, Report, January 3,
1939.! P. B0!
The American Lam Students Association was affiliated with the
American Qeague Against Ear and Fascism

! Cited as subversive and Communist.
 Attorney General Ton Clark, letters to Loyalty
Review Board, released December L, 1957. and.-.._._~ _r92&#39;I 92hlD92
DBPBCHDCP CL, L7Uc!
! A "Communist-front organization."
 Attorney General Francis Biddle, in re Harry
Bridges, 12;; 28, 19b2, p. 10!
! "Established in the United States in an effort to create
public sentiment on behalf oi a foreign policy adapted
to the interests of the Soviet Union."
 Attorney General Francis Biddle, Congressional
Record, September 2h, 19b2, p. T683!
 L! "The American League A;ainst&#39;Ihr an Fascism was organized
at the First United States Congress Against War which
was held in Hen York City, September 29 to Cctober 1,
1933. Four years later at Pittsburgh, November 26~2G,
-J 1°17 the nameanf the QE£Q§i§?P§°n was_Ehan;ed to the

__ .. i _. ... .--.~ 9191- ., ... .,......-....___,i,.....
£ it W1
Iv
-1,-
American League for Peace and Iemccrac?-***It T%HBin%¢
- as completely under the control of Ccmmu.nists when the
name was changed as it had been before."
 Sjecial Committee on Un-American Activities,
Report  29]  P0  also cited in
fieports, Januriry 3, 1939, 
n. 59 and 1215
January 3, 191,0, p. 10; June 25, 19h2, p- lb.!
 S! Hollywood unit cited as a Communist front.
 California Elommittee on Un-American Activities,
Report, 19b3, p. 91.!
! "The Communist Party has, since the inception of theLeague, been a component and controlling part of it." J//f
William Z. Foster, chairman of the Communist Party,
admitted his party was "a vital factor" in the League.
 ihssachusetts House Committee on Un-American
Activities, Report, 1938, pp. 293 and 1160.!
 Y! Cooperated with the Communist Party in defense or Merrie
U. Schappes, Party member convicted of perjury.
 Rap;-Coudert Comittec, Report, 19b2, p. 293.!
 B! "The American League against War and Fascism, predecessor
of the American League for Peace and Democracy, both
described by Earl Browder as Communist transmission
belts . "
 New York_City Council Committee investigating
the Lmnicipal Civil Service Commission.!
_h. The American Law Student&#39;s Association utilized the Communist
____ _e Party Brint shoo known as the Prongt Press, using union 1abe1 209.
CHIUA AID_§Q§HCIL  Ike. Jessup member of Executive Comittee!
1. "Cited as a Communist front and a subsidiary&#39;orgcnization of
the American League for Peace and Democracy."
 California Comittee on Un-American Activities,.
Report, 1928, pp. 151, 319, and 336.!
2. "Cited as a &#39;subsidiary&#39; of the American League for Peace
and Democracy."
 Special Congressional Cmmittee on Uh-American
Activities, House of Representatives, Report,
June 25, 19b2, P. 16!
# .. 92I  ,,nnni. if

JESSUP URGES STOP T0 ALL ATOMIC HJHB PRODUCTION
THE NEW YORK TIMES, SATURDAY. FEBRUARY I6. 1946._ i _ _ if 7 7* .. i _ . éjigi _ iii? if 7 V __i_ i _
§ Letters to The Times
cw @~n11=;1~w@ Yew» 3
 Celunbia Pi-efeeeere Aek Declaratiee;
to Mi U376 Cenieeiel
re rue liar:-or or rm New You Three: 92
In View of the eetebllehment of the
tmo Commiallen on the Au.-me
Bomb, we would like to ruggeet e doe-
leretion oil poiiey or the following na-
lure by the President of the United
;ta1.ee. in order that the diecurelone of
it-he UNO eomrnineien may proceed in
inn eunoephere of full good leltn endi
of eandenee in their eueoeldui eut-
eome for international peeee: ii
1. Lite Unitor Itatal will e_t _q-page -Q :1» pL5h?==f°n!_&#39;;ml*!.£r°m -=- i
ma! a.ir1-iii This In-F  &#39;7 er 7
gieiudee E prepeneu of sub-eeeenv
bile! em ell other procedure! invelvedy
in the fabrication of bomb. 92
l. for one year, which would eeen
to be e reeaonabie time tor the eon-r92
mierien temetnre itl ylene endteee-92 r
Lcilre action m them by the Govern-92
mate  we #111 Ra =e=;
vi-Illmllilnl purified plutonium l
y
urenl92nn~235.whieh ere the ellentlll ln- H
gndiente or etnmlc bernbe. The plante J
which produce these material! Will be
kept merely in e Item!-by eoadmau.
I&#39;M thin purpoee they will run at the
minimum rah eompetibie with main-92
tuning them ll lood order. but they»
gum not wrmmneu the re-mam; pun-§~
tied end fl-eeinneble pr-odueu. M ,
:!=¢¢i_I~hg¢ W21;-e eiinlln-;¢§_er_er: 92.E:_5L""? ?11==r.-ii "92*=;T L. "P11ki eml&#39;F3TFe oéean or returning them 
92 {Z their orifinll mixture. i
i 3. We ere prepared to have the dis-
lpoeition of our present etockplle 0!
}_bombe considered es one of the heme 92
 ll an Bgreement to be entered Into by 
til and the other Gavernmentl. }92
L. C. Dram. hwin IZH-Il.92&#39;, A. PH
1292u92.~:n, seuc I-men-r. P. C. §IE3.~iUP,
R. ll. l.l.92cl92&#39;1-I. Eilwcni urun.;
I. C. HIL-Ll, GEORGE B. Puclesl,
1. I. B.n|.Ji92:¢ scniur, C. B.8noI:r. 
JlL¥.?.*.b..?l_°&#39;?- 13; 329- _ . . _K-i
L
.
E?
*2
I .
I
Q .
5
!i
._ _ -
J4|»
i
92

-+_..-____ _._. -___ :_ %_____,_____L_;; __ _:i_i; _ éT_ __ U.  ., ., &#39;_ ,_ &#39; &#39; &#39; c-i-. v -.j.__ . _ V
-.-.W-~ - &#39; wt; 92{ :_~.c..¢
 t  <19
Part of e 106 page secret report prepared by a State Department
eecurity officer for the head of the Security Divisime
-29-
1| euzeldefahli doubt whether the 1-pm wee mu; $5,
ilerogetezj en I eeeurity hell. I
Uhile thle does net apply to Departmental pereonnel,
the fact ehould he noted ee deeonetratlai a fhrther rel!-
anoe upon FBI by the Department. Preemahly, thie eheek
1e Iede by HI ee e latter e! eceenedatleu, not of duty.
Io control ue ezereieed by the Deperteent over the levee-
ugaueu. .
 e! It 1| Important to note that the Department la en-
tirely and practically exe1ue1ve1,7_dependent en III tea-
the type et Lela;-eatioe uhieh eeeea tree em-velllanee,
wide coverage, and the nee of unusual eetbode of interre-
gatlon and laveetigetlen. 61 appear! T-0 have III!-the! III
elpertence nor the facltlee to do that type of mart en!
it 1e apparent]; net need by any one in that type of work.
FBI 1e the eole repoeiter-1 of eueh infonetlee, therefore,
ae the icieetity of 
elnuniet Ferty ieifeefi, ef 
apetfr
laere and fellow trevelere, of eepionage eaeee, ani of
nndlecloeed foreign egentee

!! I&#39;ll hae prepared e ehart, pee Ln the peeeeeelen et
a which pm-port: to ehuu e ember at &#39;agente",
"Cua||un1ete", "e1epethieere&#39;, and "e92llp0=tl"&#39; In 1-bl 5?-I
Department ea of Ila! 15, 19". The 1-8111118?-10! lbw!
lgente----------3Guneuniete----_----13
Sylapathleere-------1!.
Suepeete---------77 -  -  &#39; I  &#39; :5-&#39;   .&#39;&#39;f""
. 1
92/I
&#39;?¬:&#39;- 5% I

Q _. -  Q
&#39; . - _ 4-,". _ - .4," -. -.___ __ _ - _ &#39;_ ;&#39;- e_ _-__"-A L-w__",__&#39; -- 4- "-&#39;-1&#39;~a--  ~*_:*~-~~ -u..!~&#39;~- 2~1 "
p
conrznzltxii 
M hill 10, 19$?
IBCHI E1111  OB 0¬l92&#39;HI.l&#39;.l&#39;B _
DI £35-Ill! O! STATE, Gilli}! O. IIIRBEIIL
Itbeocnn neeenuy due
attention to e eoniition that in-e
pa-bent under the lhininh-etion
It 1|-Iti
iltl that there in e Qgiggte ted progrln being on-ridwtmtmhwp tprmm1
I!!! intelligence Jarotegtiou  Q 1111111?-I;
to

f&#39;__ _A_ _____i _-  1- -;-;___»_~- _ -.;-..-.--...~_.__J.-;_-_,.._£- - -_____-,_.__._i__7___ A _-é -_
 -- .4.¢"}|&#39;_ _ t , - . 3-»....&#39;
; . _ . i .
. U "*  H
Attached are photostats of two documents which demonstrate
the typical tfeliliez-ate mi
Liciiahon Committee and the
of this investigation.
It ".1-ill be note-.1sreprosentationa engaged in by the i;,rdi.ngs-
State Department during the entire course
that the letter of J. Edgar Hoover, Director
of the Federal Bureau of Lwestigatioz, clearly brands the Tydings
statement as a lie.
"HIT vm-1F117=w=11&#39;m &#39;T1-vi hm-n ...,.. _--.. .--.._._ -.........e
Thursday, June 22, 1950
Tydings Assertsr
E B. I. Cleared
State Dept. Files
Says Cheek-Up Showed No
Loyalty Dale Tampering
as Charged by McCarthy
By Raymond J. Blair
W55!-IIINGTON, June 2!..--A
check by the I. 8. I. has filled toi
substantiate Senator Joserm B.
McCarthy&#39;s charge that eighty-
one State Department loyalty lea.
have been "raped" to eliminate
damattnz evidence, Senator Bil-
ar 8. &#39;Iydi.n;-K, Dr-mocflt, Oh
tiand. slid lnd.
Senator Tydinxs ia chairman of
the Senate Foreiln Relationa nab-;
committee investigating eha.r|ea
by Senator McCarthy, mputuem.
&#39;0! Wisconsin, oi communism in
the State Department. The loyalty
records were made available to the
Twdinge subcommittee Ml! G DI
President &#39;.lIrl.uru.n. Benatnr an-92Ca:-Lbs recently enai-gee my moi
been Taped, akeleianiaed G GIII-,
pered with" no that they did hot}
contain all or the relevant ma-me:-tat 92
1 Eeoetor Iyiimze Q1! zegerme!
that upon hearing senate:-a|ecu--1
thy: charge, he naked the Jtilthe
Department f-0 imsglk. Tod
he reeeived the department: re-1
Dori-.hesallLlnaletteri&#39;:u|n
Peri-on Ford. assistant to Attomu
General I. Hbwlrd M001-nth, f
The report said, senator I&#39;ll!-,
Inga atabed. that a stud: by P. I. 1-
I-tents had shown the iiiea were
"Intact" and that all P. B. I.
material on the eight!-one In-
dividuals involved, whom Senator
IMcCar92.I hll seemed or Comma-niat leanlnia. we; ineludea.
 Senator Tydinza aim said that;
stud! of the mu would be eon-
pieted BI the auheommltke lun-
&#39;da1 night. It was not clear, hoc-
ever, whether I-his program ya;
aeeeotahla w all subcommittee
memharl. t
.&#39;>., _ ,emu -rrmt II"l.1II§IUZII Ii-lamb 5-uni
munsoav. JUNE 21- 1
WGARTHY IS HELD 92
1 REFUTED on mas |______,,._---w
ydmga Says F B I RaP°&#39;
Doaaiara Not Tempered With
__
mup to End Examination
 5; muuu s. warn:
 aegial 1- tn III narnna
WASHINGTON. June 21--Senate I
inveatigatorl Will =10" °l "14-*7
 gm, their two-month enmlmi-WIor eighty-one eondentlal Stale 92
mparunent loyalty {u and will
return them al. onto to 92-N l¢II9215&#39;92&#39;1 illruolt
92 Thin was diacloled today W 5"
ator Millard I:.&#39;l&#39;ird1nu. 1>===°="l¢*
Qt Maryluvd. chairman of the lil-
J: Foreign F-eiationa I1-92b¢9II92lI.lf&#39;[13 L&#39;ha|, has Seen iiaii
aiiie
-3&#39;.rum ghg Janie:-a in the WWII
House in nu invutlnwl =1 "ll"
92g_ 1- Jaeph R. Hl:CI.l&#39;Ulf&#39;-I4;; eommunlam in U10 3&#39;-I"
hit &#39;. ..:.i&#39; F? =ml» mm E55 gnw
" W°"&#39; "l&#39;iaum avg; [Q u lIl§¢°m!|92l.Q-92 A letter jut received from PI!-92um pm-4, I11-at Auiltant M-lornl!
92Gen¢rll- "-&#39;41 5.&#39;!E"°&#39;.m§§92, a ii: i.
iiu-&#39; m=--Y 34$.  oi fl9292Olu&#39;nigh produced 
ll !¢n092"1I 5&#39;
aultlr"That the I
e no b 92 the _ &#39; "ton ° 9 y92 m ; ; ma etial Mimi!
ioverrmatlr  D¢P"""""Y;,&#39;7Pf-1-ii.» 3 92 DO&#39;:icS:in:; t§2i1.&#39;ft""§- v=1"¢4
, _ _.. .92  -.1.-6_.=~ 1.~.-.1.-*7. -~92-3 " " ---  -
&#39;-"fr-I|j -r: .   _ -&#39; "--- ._ __ .1-w--.-_ _ _. I ,. ..s.- - .§,, .-~ »- -4 ,.__v_*_,_,_,_.&#39;!__"m____,F H |_|n__ U~-&#39;=4nI-;~~v:~-,_uih-;i*3r- - es»---4;-i --5
runthtpag the aameatme. ll?  &#39; mam-t . =- 1- &#39;
ream: =r=:ES!I!l~
?1*&#39;*
L HIS Kill§S}§.°1.§&#39;§&#39;.wguld lilciole the Mm" °92ii the #7-9&#39;-¥  nu wing;
minder dud!-

1%
FHC-E U I&#39;ll Ollf-C73
_ Ieheral Iureau at Iunelgatinn
i;_:h_ t _;" niteh listen Begariment of Justice
 nanhmgtnn 25, B. 0.
July 10, 1950
Honorable Joseph R. McCarthy
United States Senate
Iashington, D. C.
Ey dear Senator:
I have received your letter dated June 27, 1950
inquiring whether this Bureau has examined the 81 loyalty
files which the members of the Tydings Committee have
been scrutinizing and whether such an examination by
the FBI has disclosed that the files are complete and
that nothing has been removed therefrom.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has made no
such examination and therefore is not in a position to
make any statement concerning the completeness or in-
completeness of the State Department files.
For your information, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation furnished Mr. Ford, at his request, o
record of all loyalty material furnished the Etate
Department in the 81 cases referred to. For your
further information, I am enclosing a copy of Hr. Ford&#39;s
letter to Senator Tydings which I have secured from the
Attorney General.
 Sincerely yours,
Enclosure Q U
BY SPECIAL MESSENGER92
92

3
K
r
vi.
1.:F , s .
__ A _&#39; _ _ _______ _"__ n__ ___3; ___b_ N J __ ___h__;____ ¥____;:______,____ _:;.:.__,,_;,,:_ -_,.__..._i_,...~.. ._
I
This ease was presented to the Senate
as e typical file covering those individuals
whose oases were given to the Senate by
Senator McCarthy. The name of the individ-
usl involved was deleted because of the
_ position that Mo
erthy has always taken
that no individual should be publicly named
util he has had the opportuity to present
his defense. The names of informants have
also been deleted es well as all other in~
formation which might in any way hemper
H further investigation by the F.B.I.
I
" -Ir--.
** 1mW

1,._ I
i -K 7:, &#39;: _ "v-5~:&#39;:-"7&#39; T_&#39;.__1.:&#39;ar-1? ~ --e~&#39;--I P -e
I
- __&#39;...._~-.
  wt §EF_92"rr m,.,,e  Re:£rv¢-,3
n q : rs" sm -s. 4, EMUHL I-£>im:§*r GATIOIIS POSITION
92 TJI w92 ""Y-W I>".e:e»5er or IBM.-STIG:1TIO!92I92_______ _ .
- 
Economist, Department of StateCIVIL SERVICE COHHISSIQN
Investigation Conducted By: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Distribution: Department of State ,_§__copies
~-- Q | | 92_ 1;. Q q I l92n92II&#39;92
HGPOPE 01&#39; I"B.L SPECIG.-L AQGZTD &#39;;&#39;ncma.s An UOHTOY, -l8.S!&#39;1lIl§OI1, L!. Um, |J921.l.}" D, .L!&#39;L|.O
i emigrated to United States August
at -&#39;¢&#39;ashi.n-gton, D. c., i. Place oi birth,
m indicated he attended Herder Real
received LLB degree in 1933 from University of
from Sorbonne, Paris, and 1I3co1e des Sciences,3, 1935; naturalized
Iiosccw, rlussia.
Gymnasium in Berlin and
Berlin, MA degree in 1935
Paris.
In 1936 he acted as interpreter at World Power Conference at
Jashington, D. C. From January to September - employed as market
analyst fora 00., Stanford, Connecticut; October -
to June £% employed by De artment of Justice as legal research assistant;1; :1 t  &#39; do -- h sta lO1&#39;1e a
work on the
time he wrote several chapters for111,, researc
during which
n Q... 3.1118
+ "J-. 92-92&#39; 1- &#39;n "&#39;1 |" &#39; _T n nvnrc FD =1-n ¢: f. F. +.
It #1!UV IIQSIIEEUQJ, yi Mil, All v-3Ju-; -D I-lad   5--1
On Oc tobe L irom appointed as
Assistant Stu.tistiCi3.!1, Statistical and Reference Division, Feieral Public
Housing, .&#39;:&#39;ashinL;ton, D. C. On made
Research Analyst; February  . Transferred to
, remaining until enteredwe:-1»-_;L
 -- to September 16. 1916- -inlllrll
 detailed
to 063.  While previously at D was
Division.! Upon discharge, appointedi 8-
Foreign and Lconomic Development, Department ofEconomic Analyst, OBS -- USSR
s 5¢0n0mist, Division of
fiJ._ _.Dliatfjtransferred to nosition of International Economist, division of Investment
and Economic Development, Central and Eastern European Branch, where Currently
employed. In this capacity he works with the Assistant Chief and other ranking
officers in the drafting of final policy determinations reg-i1din£ W-lI&#39;i011B
forms of economic assistance, in»-estment and development programs. He
also makes policy recommendations in connection with questions of public
and private invsstment and effect on industrial
stability and development oi the central and ea
relationship to the broad objective of the Unitorganizations, economic
stern European areas and their
ed States foreign policy.
For the past several months he has been working on the question of exports
to Russia and the satellite nations. Currently residing a
Wa5hing1I.On, Do C 0I
I

 a _ __  k _. __ . __.,._.= ;..A:>i.n.¢-i-as-i-I~_~  .1.
-2...
"eoev
BASIS FOR IINFSTIGATION -1 &#39;
An FBI informant of known reliability was contacted by the FBI during
course of a previous security investigation conducted in June l9l:1.2. _At
this time he hlrnished a list containing names of persons on active indices
or mailing list of United American Spanish Aid Committee. List contained
name  -  Group cited by Attorney General.!
Previous FBI investigations indicate that United American Spanish
Aid Committee was organized by Communist Party and completely controlled
by it.
An FBI agent who joined the Communist Party at the request of the
Bureau in 1937 and was expelled iron the Communist Party in 19148 and whose
record as an informant was one of complete reliability, stated that h
was a member of the Communist Party and personally known to him as such.
The same informant advised that L wife, L, had
been a member of the Comnnmist Party both before and after her marriage to
i. She formerly lived with .  and the wife of
Bernard Addes. They have maintained close association with m an
admitted Communist Party member.
According to this informant i. 01-lined 1&#39;-0 have 1968!! in 1-110
Communist Party in Europe and said his father had been a Trotsiqits.
i came to a lot of "open unit" meetings and to all recruiting
meetings of the Communist Party from 1938 to sometime in 19h2- This
informant said he had had no contact with i since 19142, stating
further that hwu horrified at the Russo-German alliance in 1939.
Another reliable FBI informant recalled i as a member of the
Communist Party in the late 1930s.
His wife, W was formerly secretary to in OI
Workers Alliance. His wife, h, was member of and active in
Young Communist League before and a while after she became a Communist
Party %Hb8I&#39;c
A reliable informant said Bernard Addes and his wife were associates
on in the late 1930&#39;s and these people were both members of the Communist
Party and have been over a long period. lire. Addes and "M:-s. n were long
time friends. Er. Addes ran for Governor of Maryland about 1931; on Counmun:Lst
Party ticket. Recently named in paper and by radio commentators as well-
lmown Communists who contributed $51000 to the Presidential Campaign
Fund of Wallace  Verified thr campaigi records in office of Clerkof Senate -- contributed 2/B/113%? The same informant said that when Hrs.
-h was secretary to i she was a Communist Party menber and it
was strongly believed that lit was also a member but his membership
was never definitely established by informant. i however was a Coummist
sympathizer and propagated Cozmmmist principles and became quite friendlyW
i
F
u

-...a ___W I  &#39;___ &#39;f". " _ &#39;-T_&#39;%:-,-.~_~:-:492nr.re-s-- - ---~_-~e~Jgg>_~~q,,|sn»+~~~_~---A-_-&#39; e-h
-3-
cigiKAand associated with &#39;1 through um. 1» / A!
4A confidential and reliable informant said was closely
associated with L L. who are
admitted Communist Party members.
Hrs. L was found to have roamed with
rho was considered by the Bureau, as the result oi previous investigations, _
as a member of the Communist Party, and who also openly admits Ccumnunist
Party membership.
f Interstate Commerce Committee
said he hired is to work with him on Brookings report in summer oi
1938 because of his ability toread and speak French; specifically questioned
j as to Communist connections he might have had in Russia orIurope, and % said he had none, and expressed hinnelf against

z hi ,
-1,-
C ©  8¬5.»?5~ 1,,
and the group made up of those on the political desk who were inclined
to be more cautious until a definite policy had been forsnilated by the
-iitate Department. 
nes on the former group and was often overoealous,
endeavorin; to dominate the committee in his capacity as executive secretary.
j was made to realize the State Department&#39;s position and has ollsod
no trouble since. concluded by stating that he had no
serious doubts as tot loyalty.
Office or United Nations Affairs, said as had been
i of the above committee on Czechoslovakia as sell as other
committees. I advised that ntver before had . seen a menber of the
committee adopt an attitude such as that exemplified by L She
said that i evidenced a strong pro-Czechoslovakian attitude and
approached every question with the query: "Hon will this affect Czechoslovakia
and not "H0-rr will it affect the overall policy of the United States."
. saidi inmzdiate reaction was that he must be a
Czechian National or at least oi Czechoslovakian ancestry. 1 had no
contact other than the three months period from ipril to July 19145 and
said I could not comment other than to state from his actions K
would hesitate to place too much trust in him from a loyalty standpoint.
The following is a signed statement dated September 7, 19148, Iran
s follows:
I served as g of the Czcchoslovaidam Cc::mittee in Hay Nil
June of 19146. lly acquaintance with the person in whom you are interested is
limited to this period. At the first meeting and at all meetings thereafter,
I noted that he approached each problem from the standpoint "Hour will this
help Czechoslovakia?" As I recall, such questions as German transit rates,
the settlement of the Army&#39;s debts, and further loam to Czechoslovakia Iere
under consideration. I know nothing about the person in question, but U16
bias displayed was so marked that I queried the fr and found
she had reacted in similar fashion. I assumed he was of Czech origin and
checked the register as a matter of curiosity, only to discover that his
origin was Russian. Since he had worked in other agencies and his origin
would naturally have caused him to be thoroughly investigated, I did nothing
further at the time.
I recall two other episodes. He requested me to have reproduced, as I
Committee documnt, an article by Maurice Hindus which had appeared in the
Congressional Record.  I believe at the request of congressman Sabbath,
but an not certain.! The article was a eulogy of Bones policy of friendship
and cooperation with the 5oviet Union. Apart from the contents of the
article  about which I had grave questions!, the request to publish it as
a Committee document was peculiarly out of order. I spoke with Br. Gangs
and Mr. Reber of the Secretariat about it, but they took the position that
the Secretariat couldn&#39;t question a Committee member: request. I than
spoke with Hr. Iillianson, the Connittee chairnuan, stressing theL_1 . _ . l . _ ... _ 7 .» _._ _i. is .- --V.-¢.=a-u..#l_~-was-___&#39;-_1-:|r.ia~-;1i-;.;..-Inn; -db.-_.l|c.;: - - .i» _-..o...
é
s
5
|_w
i
5

|
- &#39;-T-1" - 4  TI &#39;*--
%J@-  ..  ,
-5...
&#39; @ ©  8¬09,_o!
inappropriateness and the expense  the article was lengthy!. He directed
me not to issue it as a document, but to obtain a. few copies of the Record &#39;
and circulate them for information. That was done.
At that stage I was beginning to have doubts of the nature of the
pro--Czech bias --- as it pro-Czech or proSoviet, particularly since the
reports from our massy were to the effect that Czechoslovakia was over
the hump and that he night be building up Czech industry ibr Russia. All
the information ccmixg into the Department during that period was certainly
opposed to the position taken by the person under consideration, and policy in
line with the reports was established by the Secretary shortly thereafter.
Toward the end of June I attended a mating of the Russian Committee under
lir. last, secretary of the Committee, at which the individual
under consideration was present. After the mating, which was on 0. highly
secret matter, in ccssmented that he considered the individual
dangerously pro-Soviet and that he intended to discuss the quetion oi his
further attendance with the Chairman oi the Russian Goulnittee. I do not
know what subsequently transpired, since I went on detail to UIVA early in
To summarize: I was so strongly convinced initially oi pro-Czech bias
that I assumed the individual was oi Czech origin, but the matters involved
were such that Soviet interests were also served. The weight of opinion and
information from the Embassy during the period did notaffect his Jud@nt
or approach, although it directly preceded and must have entered into the
sharp policy decision by the Secretary. I believe I was totally unaffected
by the Russian origin of the individual since that fact plus his previous
employment led me to assume that he would have undergone o. searching invest-
igatim and must have been cleared. It was considerably later, when all
connection with the Committee and the individual had. been terminated, that
I recommended an investigatilm.
The determinigg factor was therealisation, hrom facts emrging in
other cases, that the assumption of thorough investigation in view or background
was not necessarily valid. I still hesitated since I am totally opposed to
"red-smearing" and other form of harrassment. I was questioned about
another individual both by the Department security officers and by FBI agents
and was impressed by their ability and by their sincerity in trying to search
out the truth. With that assurame oi s thorough investigation and fair
hearing for the individual, Ifelt that I dared not refrain any longer iron
recommending an investigation. This is the only instnce in over six years
in the Department when I have felt that I had to take such acticn.
1%, /./ 111%

92
I
92 - . . _ a_ _ ___ _____ _ W _ _ .  _..... -.__...-in-_a.....a.a.,._-_ -;-_. 2 _--1-l»<92L¢""II--Iii"-1+ km &#39;17::
Q 6 Q
Y @©F>Y ~*r0/;$92tta
h, Eastern European Division, Department of State,
said he had been working very closehr with i recently on the question
of trade relations with Russia and the satellite nations as to the policy
this country should take regardirr; export to those countries. It has J
been hie observation thath has constantly advocated a "be soft policy"
toward Russia and her satellite nations. i said this would be consistent
with the Communist Party lines, however, there had been nothing to indicate
the latter to be so. i volunteered that he could not see how anyone
in touch with the situation could adopt such an attitude as the employee
and because of his Russian ancestry he would be inclined to be very alert as
to the question of L loyalty.
# of the Department of State said he baa
for some time, but only from contact in committee meetini.
contact in recent months. i stated that from what
he might question g Judpent but never his loyalty.
? a former resident manager of Q
Avenue, N. "H, advised that i had lived there about ten years ago;
and that he recalled that at this time the.-re was some literature distributed
in the building advocating sane kind of "peace group-" i stated
that he recalled clearly that some one of the other tenants hhd advised him
that this literature had been distributed he is
Washington confidential informant of known reliability, readily
recalled hothtx and his wife, in as having lived er.
ill. VL, priocr to moving to   Prior to
this the some ihrernaht recalled that hand  92
lived at llmulilo when the a had been reeehuy
married they moved to  , and the above informant
definitely recalled I-In as having received Comnmist literamm
at h N. W., and that herecallod that both of the-
received siniliar Communist literature at Q, relating
to some "youth group."
Washington confi lential informant of known reliability advised that
the name 01"? appeared on thsnactive indices or the American
Peace Mobilization.
; of the Federal Housing Office, Greenbelt,92-&#39;92
1

H
- 77 7 We-____ J ___ .. i_ &#39;- .. &#39;;&#39; l&#39;._&#39;Im|:.;.." -at 1&#39; 1 - ..--&#39;e-1..-u-..._.|..nL.4.Lh4...a.si.=»___ , ___
_7..
&#39; @ ©  94°0,;¬!
1
A reliable confidential informant advised that i had changed
hisnametohandvrasafomermembcroftheloungccsammist l
League and is presently believed to be a member oi the Ctlmnmist Party.
L father has been a Connm@t party member over a period of
,92 time.
Washington confidential informant advised that Hr. and Hrs. h.
-h, Washington, D. 0., appeared on a membership lmt of the Rational
Federation for ~*onstitntione.l Liberties; th
 organization has merged With
several others and is new known as the Civil Rights Congress. Both oi
these organizations have been cited as subversive by the Attorney General
of the United States. ifashinggton Con
dential infomant iho gave the above
informticn is of established reliability and 
nrnishcd the indo:r:na.ti¢.n to
the Federal Bureau of Investigation during a previous investigation in
H8.I&#39;Ch 1.91310
was a fellow employee oi? when they were
employed by the Jr " tee Housing Authority in Hastdngtm. it another
government agency. L listed 1 as a reference describing
92 i as being well-acquainted with him and could furnish information as
to i loyalty and character. L was a member of the
Washington Bookshop Association, Louisville, Kentucky, 5-lmptor or the
American Youth Congress; and listed on the active indices of the American
League for Peace and Democracy. ill organisatims are listed on the
subversive list of the Attorney General oi the United States. It has also
been reliably reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation that h
use scharged Irm. a ,mitim a a.".neur.eer for e !_eui.sviJ.le, Kentucky, r-...._.""o
station in 1937 for making strong pro-Coummist statements over the air in
violation of that station&#39;s censorship regulations.
The State Department Passport Division files show that h
was issued a passport  | for travel to France, England» IndSwritzerland for a vacation; the 
le contsim K-he mmNoffIl, aState Department employee,   V91": - 3&#39; i
signed an affidavit for the passport application that she had lmmm_
ier three years. Washington confidential informsnt,considez-ed reliable,reported that é was a member or the Washington Bookshop Association
and the United American panish Aid Committee during a previous FBI invest-
igation in llarch 19142. Washington Confidential Informant also advised that
wm a member of the Gomzlunist Party and that she andl
 &#39; both held Ccurnmiet Party meetings in their respective
apartments at New Hazwshire Avenue, R. W. &#39;1&#39;hs:rwere both very friendly
with the he &#39;

_ _ __ 7» ~ur92- _..._. - -£1-.~_:77 1- -e_+_~ _ __,-.:-»--- ; --:~_:*~ ~
4 p
-B.-
- CQPY e%
r
£BI_E3pqr&#39;tp_6/_2§|_i_Richm0nd3L gg;5g;&#39;_13;_ _Spe_c_ A ent Claude E. Willie Jr.: ial
-I con
dential informant tho is believed reliable, zhirnished
signed statement June 2h, 19146, and advised um she 1» uilli.ng totoeti

before Loyalty Board provided her identity in not revealed to the emplqbe.
"As I rehrxiber Ir.  when he lived in the L Apartment,
I New  AVBITLIB, H. we; Washington, no 0., in B13011?
and 19140, I would consider his actions to indicate that he rel
dieloyal to the 
nite-d States government. Thong: about B year!
have elapsed since my contact with I-tr. I, and W conception:
of the tern &#39;Coram1niet&#39; and fellow traveler may have been colored
by present waning: of those terms, I feel that Hr. i perhaps
vrae and new be e Camznmiet or fellon traveler. By &#39;Cmmmiet&#39; I
man A group or groups to overthrow our government or cause dieeention
or dissatisfaction with our may or Government or anyone who is loyal
to the Russian Government. By fellow traveler" I mean &#39;1 oorerup
group for the Ccmmmiote who do their dirty work. W dirty work
I mean Te peso out their literature or make contacts for then.
"During the time I BGII Hr. I I observed hm passing out literature
in the lobby of the apartment for the I Group, which at that
time I considered to be a poup which were dieloyal to the United Staten.
I received one copy of these pamphlets. I cannot recall that it
said azwthm or a dieloyal nature however. I also recall that
ltr. put  literature under the door: of the gpartaente
the upper floors. I believe Hr. I no a member or the
ll Organization, because he tried to sell the principals
of the organization to two or the elevator operators which he
intimated to be operators as being better than our lnerican way.
He frequently talked about their low pay and long working hours. Ha
seemed tome tobe afanatic onanythingpertaining tolnbor, to
unions, to conditions under which Americana work, and the pq scales.
This to me was an indication that Kr. imiizt be 1. Caununiat.
Another reason which makes m think that he might be a Cmmnist il
that he gave out literature which I hea-d supported the Spanish
Loyaliote, which group I rec-all was supported by the Comnnmiste of
Russia at that time. I know that Kr. I was receiving mil
n-on spain because 1
u  - Witness: Claude E. 111111;.

I
-9... &#39;
I-_ CQPY
§,5_I;j53OD::TLé/gh/hlgl s°_h1<-was  $P@21al_5s<=s¢aD@I14s1a-I-s 1!~&#39;z°a=:§sz= "
I-Ir. L Professor of Economics, L University,
Evanston, Imois,-in State Depart.-.nent&#39;s Division of
Investment and Economic Development, and was h. He
recalled that a wrhispering campaign" about i» loyalty had been rife
for a while in his division. He believed that the only basis for it was
that i was foreign horn. Hr. i expressed the opinion that
j was loyal.
FBI mscxvr, 6[28QB-, spgeial Agent Joseph 2.1. Keg;
it Professor of Economics, Russian Institute, h
University advised that from i to Jenn-&#39;=1ryi&#39; he nah Economics
Subdivision, {ESE Division, $5, 8111 that  W38 01&#39;! hi Staff f0! I
year. I-Er. h stated he becade fairly ell acquainted with _ and
that he had heard or seen nothing to indicate disloyalty. Hr. L
concluded on the basis of & knowledge of I that he is loyal.
, Executive Mi. Compaxw, advised
that in E, ho was a Deputy on the Financial Hatters to William Clwton
mxnnunnn Division of Financial and Development P011;-,». l
advised um out was employed 5,, _i under one iii Cue:
or a section under iv I-Er.  stated that his contacts with
Q-_ were very limited. In 19146 a SIZIIQ Joined the State
Department and worked under h and that h. was probably one of
-up ms: officers at 1Jret=ent. angular always spoke favorably
of and becawe oi this Lt. L
ltated he was of the opinionh was loyal.
_ &#39; _§an_Ff11an<L1g=OL Cutcomhi a%e¢1a1_*a=n*_R1¢h@=ds_T-_P_1e@aa~1
.i.-1_.Universit h said hens h of the committee on RussianEconomic 
rm. in the State Department mi and that-III!!! represented
the Czechoslovakian section oi the state Department in the Comdttee matings.
It became apparent to some of the eccmnittee after a meeting or tuo that Ii
seemed to be more patriotic to his om country of birth than to the United
States. Dr. de
ned, further 
at? approach to the problem
under consideraticn appeared "colored" and that i did not have the
traditional iunsrican patriotism it Iii felt iii needed fer persons ser-sing
ca: um Committee. He laid he could not say that-
ves disloyal to the
United States but he did not feel he was ll! percent American. Dr. i.
was reluctant to go into further detail. He advised that the Committee
decided to m_a_l-;e it a slosed membership, which action was courteous um] of
dispensing with the a ervicos of the employee.

I JI .E IU CQPY °Q<°¢:¢<<
_E .1 ~11?-ef-L; if Qeceeefeis-1%; U-A21 Air-Q §%@ P=¬1-4"-%~l-"*i%=
o 3,1,-inufagtm-ing Cqmpmg, stanford, Connecticut. The personnel
folder ahm-red that 
r-&#39;38 employed by that irn from h
to h as clerk. Previous employment ehom as engaged in lax work
with  . for one year. subsequently he worked in advert-
ising with the 1 Corporation, 
om which he resigned when he left for
U
5&#39;31 ;-e;,=<-4-gi Magi F_1.oride., deted June 12, 19b3, stated unable to locate
any record or knowledge of i at Etetson University 1937-33 as stated
by employee.
T. _ ___ . -... II-.- III! AI . _ - | O Loo r
I__
F131 Rigging, _1q@w_ _I_g;:1c__LIit.y o/1.5/*uo,_ 32ec_1a.; Agetj gfosepn m. peg;
chum. Vice President of the h Cmnpany, said he

rst not on; in 1937 or 1938 when in inmigprated to the United
Stetee iron Eurepe= Lire L Zathe:-in-J.ew was 11-iendly with i.
grandfather when both resided in Moscow.
i family had been very".-wealthy but loot all property to the
Soviets after the 191? revolution and were forced to leave Russia ea
re
igees. To the beet of his Imorrlcdgeh received most of hie
educaticn in France and mono cane to the United States he visited
the h home in New York City for a while. llr. 1 has not seen
i for four or five years. He recalled that leave:-al time
Ieeotioned his edniretion for the United States. On the basis 01&#39; hill
limited acquaintance with i, Hr. l considers o to be
loyal. to the United States.

-11..
Ki ©  U
, coworker in the Division of Investment and Economic
T&#39;|aIIa1r92&#39;r92!-|@r92§ :&#39;9292~|Il!92192492-92v92 1&#39;92cr"n&#39;;ru-92 T924-92-r92a92I+!I92Qv92+ Al q+I92+I92 an-11&#39;-1&#39; an.-I an 9292a-A urn-92u921!92§ -lai-alJ92;Vl§ul-92I1Jh-lLvlJU L-H-ll UFUGJJ J,J&#39;.l.VL-3-Ll-I&#39;ll, ..J&#39;G1-lnlUloll54-IU 92J&#39;J. I-IUGUG, .lJ.V.LClG92¢l 11¢ ,||,,92,l &#39;92-all -I-CHI» 51-92l§
by side 1-for the past two years and stated in his opinion there is not a
more loyal person in the Department oi State. However,  -
advised that he also knows in socially as a friend and knows him to be an
acquaintance of L5
During FBI investigation l9hl,&#39;i was a member of the National
Lawyers Guild; closely associated with ii
mda was
thoroughly aware on Cornmunist activities. W
is knoxm as an-up-n-n Member under the name gal; and has
been engaged in Russian espionage over a long period of time and at one time
was active in recruiting espionage agents from the ranks of the Communist
Party. 92
K
I
w
r
.-»_
Zff
I51?
I
Ii ¢-
4-.92
:-i 5
I

_,___..  ii Q .; >4!
_ __ ___&#39; ______&#39;  :,_;. Tr.-.-;~~--V-V-~----_»- -;-- ;&#39;T. -- - 4:; ;- ~=~--  1 A L- - h_|----&#39;7 ..i_-__
Attached is one of tour statements received from State
Department employees who worked on the project 01&#39; removing all
cvidence of comuniatic act$.viti&#39;a ate" from the files of
State Dcpa-hunt employees.
__ PLPJ
!¢J7d,/F~1"0
~P74--& The ~Z--D-2 ,4¢.<>@.....<;1:-,<;,,&#39;cz;..r~.TAzz,4-01. 4140.4 42: »»n.L,¢@_-,_ ,-J.:1.--_i__.&#39;: ;..__"_1 ,1:1r_,_fol! i.,q@,,¢;,,..;_¢.2{m..._ Wnj 7
 I
-u~P¢=».._. Z»;-7 41 m» 77rRK.<§&#39;=-¢&#39;fEI12.JZ3-13
5.1; If/;-.a,...,...,&#39;.02 Q4/Z /r-/4 ~91»-,=<» /|.4......4.fw-d~/~~-?",;r
tj;   &#39;:;: ,,,,*?;:,a&#39;~,:;,T&#39;,i ,,i;f"F q;< §_.°.l,fIi.-51$s-.1» m &#39;!,4...&#39; ..v,4-&1,u;w7,~£v& .@£:t::r jJ./e2.=_-,>.C., aM.w.»?.Pw.eL,z*¢~/-11w"um  ac mm q/5-@=-*~in
Walla» &#39;.&#39;~ Au -  W4,M%,T/W~¢¢/-v~.» 1»; ¢=?-
i
ifgdfixqg
l. it _
_ M _,____,
I_  --=___._,-1* __ 92v
4

_ k !___ _ _ &#39;I Ii __ _ _ ,_:_ __ L _ _ __ _ |92|!_~ ___l _ _ _ WW T JT W
W 
g 1% i
gw  w

w
 W QMMIWWJMWW J WMWWWMW WW WWWW _ 4%   Aw I
MW% MIWMW WWMMW 
www

ii do/WWW 1% 
n? WW W JIM j/ppm QM
  M%%M%$WW%%ww 
gj WWW? 
r

W . I.-.._. 1  7» P
_P 3.

zolwa H Avm
-H   .I-Lc,~3&#39; /7 _Q 7 M ,.;.¢;,aJ.1->»»I¢ 4/MW?Wmygjbéghwm
,%,:;W;§ ";r*3;Zé" "-;m
/OM &#39;
if£;fZ*i"#%W 4.»;/4 5 ,,,g,J.- u~J- 4&#39;1?%Wz JG ,3} 7,..,p -
/QWCL 1,<,Z%l¢--
61,19 4J /?$-J
- /743 I/-/4744.51/1
J&#39;A¢..,,~-&#39;-1 ~14?3/3 0/ /mm

SUB-IE¢1IQ_S:.eJ:x  ¢QQ!§J:|.u_-
FILE NUMBER l!~1_W-3 §,_Z~L=51_§ _
SECTION mmER  hehnvd, sin Q,
7 "/¢?$",:-92~g.¢p
__ _ AA __ W   I

f
I
7&#39; 1&#39; _;
ii»1_M*?_¬&#39;-5
»-..,,a&#39;:..-.~ ,..&#39;3 &#39; i -&#39;!-91--*?&#39;-_"&#39;"
.| - V92_.
&#39; 5i§&#39;
1
"
59-
§if"".&#39;¥
_I- 5; C
&#39;___ »_.&#39;;_92._*-
. q"v- &#39;92-A5 V -
*&#39;e..:&#39;§&#39;-
- .-X.» A941! ",-,_
"&#39;~ :1-*"-&#39;2
.5 .7.-~> -+
.;_ ___ _...-Q. V
.=.. g.-"AK
--¢-. &#39;1?-92&#39;JI&#39;§&#39;.2.
I . .&#39; |
. _.-"-"4"
L-;.&#39;_~&#39;_T_:!,; 2;, _
L &#39;  1!
---.. u_--M.»-..u§._:~ 9.?!.-, .--.1
.,..-.-
;- . ...&#39;.l_."1&#39;
A.->-~.=»=A~:CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE-
N0. 1
NO. 2
NO. 3
N0. 4
N0. 5
N0. 6
NO. 7
H0.B
N0. 9
140.10
N0. 11
NO. 12
N0. 13
NO. 14
NO. 1.6
NO. 17
N0. 1B
NO.20
HO. 23
N0. 29
NO
NO
N00&#39;30
. 31
. 32TABLE OF COINS
M
1
_3 ..
7
1.1.
13
92
16
184
20
23
26
. 2&#39;7
29
31
33
36
40
41
42
u.
1.7
49
51
52
-, ,.. _. _ .r ,1-.92-,. ,_,_. ..,- ;_.,_ ___ . .._... _-.-_. -- -
* "&#39; -= r_&#39;--.-.~»;:1,r:¢;j<g_.;;v&#39;-g-2 - Iv;-1, §»»z»~.--;-92_&#39;{*-v§"=~_-,&#39;,;-=u~&#39;:*,- ~.<_.&#39;:._- J. &#39;=&#39; 5* -1- wru "&#39;-&#39;._ "&#39; - -&#39;

. -v~ 92
4-"r -i
I -.
~¢
it
&#39;7-1_ - ..-&#39;_92_1u.*-
Iv!"
41
_&#39;
&#39;1&#39;:~r..;-
,:-a- -*
gr
,T_,,_ .
1:5.-
2.1"»:
an -"
1::-"&#39;54- -J
-"-1:31;;
IF?
, 1
-.. g
:a.. _.-nw-
-1»-.  7 .._ ;:,._..,A.____-_.- -- -= 2-L--L-&#39;-*.----*-S; ~-~= * _ ~ 4,. 7 "&#39; &#39; &#39;
CL-SE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CAKSE
0 "
CASE
CASE
C-ASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASEHQ,
N0.
NO.
NO.
NO.
N0.
NO-
HO.
NO.
N0.
ID.
NO.
NC.
HO.
HO.
H!.
N0-
NO.
NO-
NO.
NO-33
34
37
38
39
40
4-1
42
43
44
45
46
4&#39;7
43
50
51
$2
53
&#39;:1
Jil-
55
56
57&#39;1&#39;!-
and 49iwv
6 Q
 m. rsram oomsn: Bnmmum!£081...sl-
ss
s6

92 --
~ 1.  :5: L.
92 1.  C.
.." -1»1 - ?
. J?
7%
- 1--c--
, ;
.&#39;.*."*" "&#39;
*2;L? 1
&#39;3&#39;
92---
.., ..
3-..£
i.-1.
i
Ie-I&#39;- 1:1
7;-_;|>f_&#39;.f_ ______ ,- _,_,___ ,1. _ll_&#39;l ,5-.1-. §I&#39;nI192!£-  &#39; "&#39;
60
61
62
63
6!»
65
66
67
68
69
&#39;70
71
&#39;72
&#39;73
&#39;74
&#39;75
&#39;76
&#39;78
CASE ID. &#39;79
BO
B11  -.-.
i __. _k_ _._~4.__5__92:f;.» ~ _. -11  - =
. Q
£3;
96
98
100
102
1os
10-1
109
111
us
ns
1.16
11-2
119
121
122
124
us
125
129

F
92
1
J
i
4-
921
Y
J- 92-
y-were
I-1 g_=&#39; .2-.
mun;
1, .
.-
&#39;_¢ _.b&#39;-: 
32;? .
snu-
_,.
r
J
_?
.-.. .-.-1 | _-".,&#39;,&#39;*:, |r-=1 .-
11 &#39;I.&#39;V4&#39;1
.,-
1
JQ...
"u
._;.
1 -~4-I.-:&#39;*53.-.,, ..|-B-"_&#39; T?3 G57 2,_ ._,. .., _ ..a._....-..~.. --q. .--..._..-.;_...,  . _._as-____._. ;_.-._.:....._...-_ -4.-7- ...__._. ....
&#39;  :¢  &#39;!
FEB 24 1950
lllegation  §g_n_a;tor*}§cC_er_ilg
"Case No. 1. The man involved in case Ho. 1 is employed in the office of
an Assistant Secretary of State. The intelligence unit shadowed him and found hill
contacting members of an espionage group. 1 memorandum of December 13, l9l;6,
indicates that he succeeded in having a well-lmmm general intervene with an
Assistant Secretary in behalf of one man who is an active Cormmmist with a long
record of Cozmmmist Party connections. There is another individual who is very
closely tied up with a Soviet espionage agency. There is nothing in the file to
indicate that the general referred to knew those two individuals were Communists.
"That is a part of the usual modus operandi. If there is one Gommmist
in the Department, he will get some other individual to recommend mother Communist
so that the breed can be increased.
"This individual was successful in obtaining important positions for
other Communists. They were finally ordered removed from the Department not
later than November 15 oi the following year. Subsequent to that time, however,
both of them still had access to secret material.
"A memorandum of November 2, 19146, pointed out that this individual and
the previously mentioned Communists whom he succeeded in having placed were con-
nected with an alleged Russian espionage agency. Hevertheless, this individual &#39;
still occupies an important position in the State Department. I should like to
point out at this time, however, that the security group, which was than operating
in the State IbP8.I"l2m6nt, was apparently doing a good job. It presented the entire
picture to the Secretary of State. This individual who, the investigating agency
of the State Department says, is a Communist, got a general innocently to bring
two other Commurmists into the State Department, and he is today in the Stats
Department md has access to the secret material. ls I_ say, his name is certainly
available to any Senate committee that wants it.
Passiblsslésniiiiaiiiaa
This individual is Rlreau
reflect that a loyaltwho as of October, E9,
t19
of S ate,
>" 1 >"-"&#39;5&#39;

4 H "LH.n_-_ I _
&#39; Q. O
i
9:
1.
. * &#39;-V-., 5* _ ,

1-..I-aw  V
__!:,&#39;?1:-&#39;-.&#39;.. _=;_a:e~- --.--.. c ¢.~ _ :- L2,.-r .
.&#39;-". &#39;_. ,3 -
~ 1 -
1-;=-.= -
-Zlml-E 7b_,_ ,g: 1&#39; &#39; V
.&#39;--&#39; -3-&#39;  me
i. -I
""-P7"-_.=-if;--&#39;_ .-- ._-1"? f The Hgghinctgn Rgnknhnn Imam--1 n+5 an _ "ne92*&#39;v92r9¥.492u92 r92~.......-: 4+-.. 0...-..., -n.-.._...___..;; --- in - - -------r ..---.-92...-.--Q-.&#39;..; e;-»--.5 vu uvm|.u.|.vvuw J-UL JJUIHUDL 1501.5;
:_:;_1,;;§__&#39;-? _~,_- Lotion and the American Peace Mobilization appear on the list of organizations
 113111861 by the Attorney General as coming within the purview of Executive 01-59;- -e.--.-.7--&#39;92¬1.! &#39;-"&#39;92 9335. The International Juridical Association and the National Lawyers Guild
-.  _ -were cited as Commu-list fronts by the Special Committee on unAmer.1.can Activities,
.1.&#39;~_e;.-; March 29, 191,14._-_
 _ _
The lcglty reports were sent to the Civil Service Commission on e September 15, 19 ,
-A  yalty Review Board by letter dated October 7, 19b9, adviaed thatQ; _;-_ had been declared "eligible on 1oya1ty,I
2*:  1&#39; &#39; 
_ ____
..-.:r< -
13- &#39;
1-1_»~;. _
t
....ki:_n .
bu, b1 r-.4
&#39;74.

92-&#39;1"sa-Q
{"1"}
J
-".
. is .v._
.__&#39;._._,_;_v _-
ttf
I It.
4
r
I 92-
..,.. __.
A I
. ,2
- i F1-
"-
_ q_, ..--L .e
:.é*1§,=§?-if?.;_.&#39;.-V;-_,".E
;.. ., .
&#39;_- _ _l
. fa
_.j,{»"T"~f;.i.-,:_ V.
.%_._1,_-_. -
L
_-»_ -
92~.- _21.1  -,,_.,»u_
92 _A, , q - m-iimiLeiiiiiiiii -
,1
. < <r
Allssaianoe than 5s_n.a@°r I-*_@-Ilslzthz
Case No. 2
"This is a case to which I particularly invite the Senate&#39;s
attention. The files show two very interesting facts. 1 major portion
of the file was removed. Papers refer to information in the file which
is nonexistent. Upon contact with the keeper of the records, he stated
that, to the best of his knowledge, the major portion of the file had been
removed. He did not mention any name, but he said, Be was put in some high-
brass job about 2 years ago.
"I am inclined to think that this individual&#39;s name may be known from
the information which I shall give here.
"The file shows two things. It shows, first, that this individual
had some of his clothing picked up, with unusual material in it, an, second-
and this is important-it shows that the State Department and the President
had prepared material which was to be sent to a foreign government. The file
shows that before the material left the State Department it was in the hands of
the Kremlin in Moscow. Do Senators follow me? The State Department&#39;s own
investigative file shows that some secret material, which was being transmitted
to another nation, before it even left this country for the other country,
showed up in Moscow. So far, that is not too significant. However, the file
shows that this particular individual, who has held one of the most important
positions at one of the listening posts in Europe, was shadowed, that he was
found to have contacted a Soviet agent, and that the Soviet agent was then
followed to the 5oviet Embassy, where the agent turned the material over to
the Soviet Embassy. Do Senators follow me? This is what the secret State
Department file skews: First, the papers get to Moscow in some mysterious
manner, and, second, this individual, who is now one of our foreign ministers,
contacts a Russian espionage agent, and that agent is followed to the Russian
Embassy, where the material is handed over. This is no secret to the State
Department.
"Incidentally, I might say that I promised the press I would have
copies of this material for their use. However, in view of the fact that I
have nothing completely ready at thh time, and must refer to the documents
before me, which I cannot turn over to the press, I do not have anything to
give them. I am sorry. I shall try, however, to give them now the material
I have, and shall try to make the dates and places as clear as I can.

 £
W
&#39; ~.-33&#39;."
_<. __&#39;lr.- 92&#39;~&#39;
*;?
1, .<_§i§9ssib1e_Identificati9n
This individual apparently 1s The Bm=92=files reflect that we have not conducted any investigation of-Bureau files owever, contain the following pertinent information re-
lating to
.»..,"-&#39;11 -. :.92i
.1._-1 1-u .4 E 92, -_; yr.-
 ._4_}.,_&#39;,f;. .
.&#39; -;  . -1
I
-
.-
 -.>.K
A _
4:
ew
L: An article appeared in the Fastington Daily News on February 27, 19457" Thi a ticle re orted theQJZ. under te heading of "Top U S Dlplomat a Ped Spy s r ythe House Appropriations Committee had developed inforwetion during a hearingon State Dep rtment apyroprietions which indicated that a confidential Thite F:
bc.

92...
.~
$7 A~.~: _I}-. ;
. 1 _ -_
--LI; .:.r :-
1&#39;"
4.
§
%;§
#@¢$a
,~ ,y_. _ . .v.
1?#
5;
.r-l
r 1
.2
if .
.~" ,
{L
&#39;_.-1&#39; A &#39;-_ 4 -
_ s.."*,.&#39;-._ ..1, 
/3.:
1  r_. _ri _.. _ - _ _...-.|_..__.....,r-__.,_..._._._ , .__ ---.-_:..~_+.¢...--=-~-1- - -- _ [email protected].&#39;.
-  a <7"
telegram to Chungking, China, reached Moscow before ever leaving Washington.It was alleged that Hoscow obtained the telegram through a top United Statesdiplomatic official identified only as "No. 52." It was further indicatedthat investigations had disclosed that the diplomatic official referred to as
No. 52 was seen conta a man in Fashington and was trailed to the SovietTmbassy. that the individual referred to as
N0. 52 was
1
I

i
l
¢
1
92
92
ev , |
--- A
1-. I
in-I
. ,,-
_r..-air
:1",:.-_P&#39; <3;;-,
V; _;.
. l :"_- 
-.,-&#39;-"_u- ~2;-»<r~--n;
-. r. &#39;  -1
eg
ig
I _92&#39;,.-¢_ .
;=-In-11&#39; .&#39;
1
V.
92-
I.|§&#39;__&#39;
-¢
,  .
.- . I
&#39; 1; -
13_1..
- -.. &#39;    
The Attorney General was advised by memorandum dated July 13, 1948,that no Loyalty investigation of mvould be conducted and the State
Department was advised by the Lia so 1 ction on July 16, 1948, that no
be conducted. Loyalty investigation would
notation on the reverse side that information
available concerning him in the files of this Bureau had been furnished to
the State Department, and that in the absence of a special request, no
L0 alt investi ation would be instituted.QLoya1t_-, Form was returned to the Civil Service Commission
on April , 4 , with the
L70_ E _ 4 _. - i.»-..-__-.__.-._p -.._.i H"~92.__A__..-.-,1» ¢_ __.  - --¢_-L-. -- .-..._ - -._ _

i
i
i
F
9292 &#39; I
er--teen
r-- i
- ".. Q:-*&#39;?"--2» 1 1*
"-&#39;1-3; ..-»- s.
._ -4-_ &#39;0..
&#39;_ if .&#39;
,er~"&#39;1
tn :_"|."&#39;; &#39;"I."_. M, _.-0&#39; &#39; &#39;1":-:_;__s. .r.§ -1 Q
. __
&#39;-y:._L.P _
_i.&#39;; _ -
5,,&#39;a_&#39; U....-.,. .
L _ .
_1:;&#39;.--&#39;;"92{&#39;*" ". &#39;. &#39;. -1.- -3. -Easter;.~w
wa:
:~ 2;a&#39;a;~--
211*; -,_&#39;-1 _,a__:.§
,.. ..w g , &#39;
. -&#39;-1&#39;é-
,3"
_
i  .s ---- &#39;-.
-&#39; I -Y
-&#39; Y? .:_, .1 . :&#39;
!,{.*-"--
. é_
s;*%¢-
- r- &#39; 1
H1.{  vs.
__. __.  . .. .. __.... __._._ ____ 4-. 92IIbIiT1ll
allegation hyu§enatcr Mcarthys
"Case No. 3. This individual was born in Flushing, H. I»,
in l903. He was employed with OSS in 1942, In 1945 he was transferred
to the State Department and assigned to Research and Intelligence. The
State Department&#39;s file shows that he is a member of a nuber of
Communist-front organizations, and that his pals are known Communists,
The file further shows that this fact is admitted by hhn, The original
report in which this information is contained is dated July 5, 1942.
The security report of April lB, 1946, indicates that numerous witnesses,
including college professors and police officers in California, testified
he was a radical and a fellow traveler, He was very friendly and sym-
pathetic toward Harry Bridges, and strongly opposed any move to deport
Bridges. The report also shows that he was also a close friend of Ralph
Friedman, secretary of the Communist Party in California, Another
security report, dated November 13, 1946, quotes his associates as saying
that he favored the Chinese Communists in China and favored Russia in
most respects.
"The State Department officials themselves, according to this
report, describe him as being overly sympathetic to Russia and the
Communist experiment. This is all a part of the report. Another
-Government official said the individual frequently blamed the capitalists
for all the trouble in Russia, and constantly praised Russia as the ideal.
So far as I know, everything in this individual&#39;s file indicates that he
is actively working with and for the Communists."
1 t The Bureau!
OThis individual apparently s
files reflect that he was investigated by th Hay and Jnne
of 1942 as an applicant for the position of
tor of InformatiPossible Identification:
the Office

4-750 -7-79!   XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU BF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PMIE IIIFIIRMIITIOII SHEET
..  Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the 
le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.

leted under exemption s! J E @_i_ with no segregable
Cl
E]
E]
.___._ Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agencyliesl;material available for release w
Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Documentlsl Originating with the following govemment agency
es! __ _ _r ,_ ,_o
_ __ _, E _ E , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
_ __ __ _ r__ o___ _ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
__i Page s! withheld for the following reasonlslz
El For your information: _ _ r_ _ _ ,_y __ _7__
/&#39;who following nu ber &#39; to be used for reference regarding these pages
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX/,.=?z-JJ§zl-   __ __
XXXXXXXXXXXXXKXXXXX
2,1 DELETED PAGE S! X
it NO DUPLICATION FEE
X FOR THIS PAGE

1
J
. 92-.
%
L
|
1&#39;. -92
s
*-ail
b&#39;1l*
v
*- _I
L"-F
.
_:
-....
L - ¥
;§ "
§..".
:rf_,_.
-3? .-
.;92 J"
~_:ZL;;,
as:wsse
2*  .-
geek?
:1-&#39;1;-?"¢&#39;r&#39;3
&#39;.&#39;=--_= =»-11¢
-a -
&#39;-. _,
-;._.&#39;
.1:
=-=- t:
s11 - r
§. q
_"§
L.-_ ;1- |.    &#39; jitQ &#39; -
1 a. --- ._.- ,.-- .. a_._..92 .. _ ._ -__._._.4..-_, I--.. -..
1 &#39;92
. Copies of reports on the loyalty investigation oi?
were furnished to the Civil Service Commission by letter date pril
19, 19h8 and by letter dated February 23 , 19h9 to Assistant Attorney
General Alexander M. Campbell. .
On April 15, 19149 the °vi1 Service Con-mission, with respectto the disposition made of 
xnyalty case, advised that Phad
been retained as an e ee of the De artment oi the Army in e capacityof   at the request oi Assistant
Attorney ner amp 11 copies of the charge and answer thereto, 111-
terrogatories and answers thereto and a transcript of the record of
proceedings before the loyalty Board were furnished to him on June 13,
that the Bureau reports in the case failed to disclose aw available
evidence of aviolation of title , section 1001, or of any other
federal statute.  Ibid. Ser. 38!19119.  Ibid. 121 ser. hl!
On June 17, 19h9, Ass
; Attorney General Campbell advised

~ 4 A4 ul--|-.  i
s--HIIIIIQ1
.. I _
r
.;&#39;;§&#39;92-A."f_..i§r-Ts-ea?
-1 -.~- ,1:
-&#39;-._ .-3.»:$14141
r_
#
.
.TI_=.li _ - _. --.- -. .-.|_ _-s-_-._ n..--...__._4-,.._...._44-ii-_ .---._.__ .._ _
éilegation by 5enator McCarth[
Case number h The individual came to the united btates xrom nungary
in l9hh He was employed as a translator and script writer for CW1, and
later by the Oifice of International Information and Cultural Affairs. The
report of January 3, l9h7, indicates that he is an active member of a
Communist front organization, and that he lost his former Job because of his
constant arguments in favor of communism. A former employer, according to
the file, stated that this individual boasted of being a member of the
Communist Party A third informant also stated that this individual boasted
of his Communist connections and argued that communism was superior to democ-
racy The fourth informant said that he constantly argued politics, and that
communism was the ideal system for this country Two of the references on
his application for citizenship were members of at least one Communist-front
organization and contributors to Communist periodicals Another reference
refused to recommend him, questioning his loyalty, and saying that he was a
Communist Another reference, of April 2h, 19h7, showed that this employee!
supervisor in the Stats Department felt he was a fellosbtravelsr This indi-
vidual has been contributing to the Hungarian Communist magazine, N O K
"Various memoranda and reports by the 
tate 
epartment Security
Agency in the files indicate that no one was found to question this employee&#39;s
communistic connection and beliefs "
Epssible Identification
92 &#39;=<-M

F
i
T
4
1 I
Q-&#39;iI*
 i
3.: "
,_, &#39;
&#39;=I&#39;!>1» u, _._92-:1.-aR .¢ ._
.4!-
,_ ,."&#39; .
":-2:- ,
-E
, ,er
*&#39; 1
.3 _
__I¢:- _.- - 4
Eai
ijii
1;
1.
U.
.-Ila-
I.
.-J-
-yp
a;i-,.
I
so _ -FE i
. - F,
-ti _ . .. ,._ ,_..i__,.da_._....... 71-.-4.._._-____-..m_ v.--._»_,.a__...-.__._..&.__-._n-...u.--......_._,_.n
 &#39;  
p resigned her position with the Department of State on
Harsh 5, 17...». iccorng to the tiles of the Bureau ehe has not been re-
lo ed b the De artment of State since that time °PY P &#39;-
-was investigated by the Civil Service Commission in 191.1. 
and 191.5, for a _ position with the Office of"?far Information.
She was declued  on March 3, 191.6, by the ¬ivi1.Service 
ommissionLoyalty Rating Board.
In April 191.6, the Department 01&#39; State was adieed that the
files oi the Bureau contaieiecl no intormation concerning This was a
routine record check made at the time all UNI emoloyees we ferred tothe Department of State  I
The investigation of _was completed in lav of 191.8. it
was during this investigation that the above information eoncerning .iwas obtained. -has not been the subject of e. Bureau investigation.
Investigative reports containing the above  oncerning-were furnished to the Department or State on June 1,, 1358, and to en.
Civil Service Commission on September 20, 19108. 
Inc
at

i1
1
1>
5
92
92-
1
fi
1
J, a
, &#39; I
}--slurs-
P".-* 1
.__- ,
:1&#39;§&#39;_~92-&#39;_:~"-:1.
3, ,
$*::»,;:
!&#39;.3A-"Ev
_-If w
L _
1*:
55- _
__,A~
V I v. &#39;1t, ._., 1
.-: v},"_ _ 3".§:l:lP:oi:-
Fa .%:&#39;:;&#39;;--_. ,_..§<.-.@&#39;:~i3-
-"535
&#39;1. - h,
5- .-
§
~
..l....-
,, ___ .
:___f.  o
_ A -e1~- --1¢»---p_-" -_-s..-. L1, .......=~_- .- &#39; "&#39;;- " . .;-.-11 -Wei--..._..i ___,_
  P
-i-ii----i¬-
.t.1}asa§i@1923thzt§s_w<2=1l4=°=:*h:
C-see Ho= &#39;4,
"He was born in North Carolina in 1900. He was employed by the Foreign
Economic Administration from August 191:2, to August 1916, and was then trans-
ferred to the State Department and placed on Research and Intelligence.--.
"The report dated Hay 1;, l9l+6, in this man&#39;s tile shows that eight per-
sons, including six college professors at Harvard University and the University
of California, agreed that this individual has strong communistic leanings, and
that in their opinion he was either a card-carryzing member oi the Gomhunist
Party or a 1elJ.ow-traveler. that is the opinion of sis: professors at Harvard
University and the University or California. Some oi the opinions expressed
by his associates might well be read. e
"A professor at the 
niversity of California stated that he was acquainted
with this individual since September 1937: that he did not trust him; he con-
sidered him in the class of Harry Bridges; that under no circumstances would he
hire him, and also that there was something about him that amused his intui-
tion, and caused .@ to be st;-aid oi his outside connections, and under no
circumstances would he recommend him to the Govermentw
"A. fellow student stated that he had known him since l939 and that he
knew him definitely as a Communist; that he felt that this individual was
getting money from the Communist Forty, and the other students did also, oe-
cause they would say that this individual was not preaching communism for
hie health, but that it was a business with him; that he would not reccomend
this individual to the Governnent because he feels that he is a Gonsnunist.
"This individual was discharged from a Navy school during the war for bad
grades and for Communist activities. A memorandum, dated May 15, 19b6, Iran
GSA to the Office of Controls, states that an investigation discloses evi-
dence ot a material nature tending to affect adversely the loyalty to the
United States and its institutions This report reveals that this individual
is unmietakeably identified with comnunistic activities. While the records
of the Bureau of Naval Personnel show that he was given a special order dis-
charge in March 27, l9h2, under honorable conditions, evidence in his file,
all oi QF-ich is, of course, available to the Secretary oi State, reveals thathe was discharged begase it was found that he was an ardent student oi and
advocate of communism.
is-&#39;ic-i>o

11
I
92
.
L
I
i
l
La
K-2
F*r~ ?
-.  aweft .92&#39;-.- ¢-.-».=
J T1".- ~. &#39;r:-
: ~ >-:8
Is ~
2:
.s&#39;~
1&#39; .
=;F¢&#39;i"l&#39;.a92
.-r-..
~13;1.-Q; :
e..__&#39;k.-
@-_ 31,..-
. :-_- , .4.
§i3;T~@;&#39;i;§-
11;." J1; ,-&#39;.- .1§.-1-L-IF "45".1<.-.",&#39;:,:§4.¥- 3
Y
.%¢e;*
&#39;Ii;f&#39;.~- :-
93-vi-1-l.T»&#39; ".&#39;n&#39;. |_&#39; -. PA .
. L .".~,,, V
._;.._-&#39;-1- . I-, rd fl92 I
.. __ -. _. 4-_-.-el_~|92 --..-_- _-1.... .-.-......._.4-4.i_._.___&#39;.. -.-.-__._,.J..|e--...-..»_--._. _ _
"A report, dated March 25, 191.7, indicates that this individual had been
receiving mail from the Soviet Embassy, as well as comunistic publications.
An official of a Washington, D. G. university stated that he had hired this
individual to conduct a class in Chinese, but later learned that he was closely
connected with communietic groups on the west coast. Four members of the _
faculty at the University of California confirmed this individual&#39;s communistic
leanings. All of the above information was brought to the attention of the
top officials in the State Department in a memoranduxn sunmarizing the case in
191+7, with the recommendation that he be immediately discharged. The State
Department refused to discharge him because it was not proven that he had
committed any overt act. Subsequent to this time, this individual argued
often and heatedly in favor of a Communist regime in China. He admitted
having been a subscriber to the Daily Horker....
"ihe State Department&#39;s own Security Board then submitted four subsequent
reports, the first one dated September 12, 191:-7, in an attempt to convince the
Department that this man was dangerous and should be discharged. Subsequently
this man&#39;s position was abolished. However, he was not dischax-ged....He was
transferred to the Division of Reeeax-ch...."
Possible Identification
1mndm1.§w~
me Bureau files reflect we conducted the following investigations
of this individual: _
Loyalty of Government Employee; Hay 28, 191.8 to June 11, 191.8

4-T50 /7-79!I 1 IE l xxxxxx
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FOIPII DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the 
le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
Euéleted nder exem ti0n s! _ b Q  7  V with I10 Segfegble
Cl
El
II]
l&#39;lL.._.IU D
material available for release to you.
Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Documentls! originating with the following government agencyliesl _ E _ E &#39; _ _
T __ _ , __ ____ E , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Pagelsl referred for consultation to the following government agency iesl; ;_________
_ ___ E a_,i as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
Pagels! withheld for the following I&#39;¬B.S0n S!:
n___ ..___.. :_.r.._..4:.._..I UI J/ULIJ llllUlI1li5l.L1Ull- _ _ 7 ___i __ i ii _7 7 _i* V *_ _
[A following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX073°?
P-ls
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X DELETED masts! X
o DUPLECATION FE- -
FOR THIS PAGE
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

-"&#39;- -_ _&#39;3
r."-I I
&#39;7: ...
:7 * -rs-*" IAN- I._92.
hr
__,
v;l -;&#39; + &#39;
5" -s &#39;2&#39;1 V F14"!
LL; . 1 .
Q  , , e
_&#39;  -1 10,. ~?f.  ..5: &#39; &#39; - I!
fr. 1&#39;5,-53%,; jg
_it¢:§=:;»_g._ - .1_~&#39;, _l&#39;~i&#39;, ,&#39;..-- :.-.&#39;;.- -*--.1:  _g92 .iv 1-;_~,;~,-?;4.*.
.~;1,_Z, .-_-15.: -,s-/.
I-&#39;I;=--Til
Z, , , _" II ,92;D _->_.  _
.- . 1... 3
W --; .
f ;/-* _4 »;,_:_..=- ..~;_- .
. &#39;143--
ii 1
- I qullx
> -cf .. _ --92_ -.--__. ....._ _. _-1. -....-. _i¢...._ _&#39;-».._..._. .._.-..._.......-H--._...~_ 92 e.-i ___ l _ .
no  L
Allssation EI_§9B?i2?,¥§5a{FhI. ~
Case No. 6. "This individual is with the Division of Central services.
A security report dated Decanber 3]., 1945, describee her as being &#39;pink&#39; and as
advocating that we substitute conditions in Russia for those in the United States,
She takes a very active part in the conferences of the UPFIA, which has been picked
up by the CIO, actively opposed the President s loyalty order, but has been given
top secret clearance. This individual has e right to see all the top secret
documents.
who as of February
U. S. Department of State,
Bureau records reflect that a loyalty investigation was conducted con-earning 1  under the provisions oi Executive Order 9835 and
the res s o s es get on, which was conducted during I-ebu-nary and Ila:-ch,
191,8, were transmitted to the Civil Service Commission by letter dated larch 13,
1943.1i=>_=_=o1_1=o1-=o Ei21!1=i£i_=aF1°§
The individual is
4, 1949, was employed as
Washington, D. C.
The loyalty investigation reects the following pertinent inrormationz
mo so  -

 i T: V
&
"- .;
E irlr ..v92
". 5*-*7;-
1 7-;
K - .>..__., ... _-* A  _.l92-u I :
.A
L: - E.1_ ;
~». ,. F-1
f --- ?&#39;
; -K ..-~,
-1|, ;__ -.-"&#39; IA ¢&#39;. -. i
1 "&#39;_:~;.,_ 92< &#39;1.-_. L,  ~=.*2§!
..- L
. ,_ -- .
_*"J .
. .-_&#39;._&#39;_.-=5-_, .,I5 5:]. r.92~_r_§&#39;..&#39;- ;. &#39;~-*,&#39; -.4 -L&#39;.f~&#39;-r;&#39;..T§".-H :T1&#39;1 5;-  -.-. 5.-I &#39;- .-_-23*;
.1
;-2?? "
T;F . :&#39;* x ,__..,-.
1u!*_ ; -
L:._ _
&#39;- .<~. 
, p, .3
_ ,_, __.
_ ..__,,l
I0-1.-_._q&#39; 2:"  ---...;_-
¢- ;:;~:
. _ ii-V &#39; _. ».
,., r§";"&#39; 
Q .-1-.-7; -of ,_
__&#39;; l.,. 0
The Loyalty R8ViGll&#39; BOQIXI advised 1 it dtd F b o ee had been retained: by e er e mm? 4&#39; 19491 thatthe enply 
7c;
be 1-k &#39;~92. i_.,,_. -_,_-..-..~_._&#39;_-..-_92-_k
 ,1
D

J t. &#39;.&#39;_ _
z=e»»t§&#39;r53nss
we Jwp.-.47-». it ab, ..&#39;92_
.-_-
1 1»--.-In -.-v_- ._.; .4-
eapl V
&#39;;"53§:it ..&#39;;&#39;- "
 .7"§.-- -"
ii 4;2&#39;-5 ..: "
-35?
.@ 1_ .E4  v
_»a.-/I-"
 ;., ..
. .,,._ _.
,,_ -.71 .J Y. 7  92 ,_f_ .,."P&#39; --v".."
._ _ .,
&#39;..?&#39;.i.;" .1._&#39;-&#39; _&#39;,.-..
-.._ i.x.
¢ .
. .-- pr.-1 &#39;1,
,--,>?.1.»
&#39;7?<*.&#39;. &#39;-&#39;-= -1&#39;1.
3,}:-v- I-.1=_&#39;;.. - -.,:- .4..
._,_ __ _
&#39;f&#39; -1.-§;_;&#39;. 8-2»  -
;f_".3  ,_,__ .5
,.5l_$-7":&#39;-.&#39;. _,_ _ .
;,__ .,3 .,§,._- _|
.1. P. -1, .-1 #1 1: i
&#39;:w- _- .
-=___,;_.2f:
._" 3:1. F13.--.:_  5
|I .
i _
_ _ ____  __ __n___._ _,,._ ._..,_-._; -n.._....- -.-...i....__~_.....-_ ~
. A 
.  _.&#39;I
_ -
-21:1.-._".s*T»T§*Ei."s.:12?"[s -5_*._&#39;5__"1§ll&#39;§°_§_a..l"°_*.T
"Case number seven. This individual was an associate business
economist to August 1944; with FEA from August 1944 to August 1945, and then
transferred to the State Department as an economist. This individual is a
member of the Young Communist League. He was affiliated with four other
organizations which are named by the Attorney General as having been Comunist
fronts. This individual admits membership in the Young Communists, and in
the other Communist-front organizations, but claims to have changed his view
since that time, and therefore was given top secret clearance by the State
Departent. I may say incidentally I am using the pronoun "he" in all these
cases, although some of the individuals are not of the male sex."
T-P35 Bibi? .I_12nlii:§.°i§i_°B=
The individual apparently i Bu1-eau records
reflect that a loyalty investigation was con ucted by this Bureau under the
provisions of Executive Order 9835 resar H who as
Department of State, Washing on, . - ,
P
-i-i- iii
lo! c...1>¢.8D

.?-._J-»-Q
&#39;.92
r e 4
P
@-
-;._. ,I
I. .
:1-
,2
p,_..
&#39;31-at-7
- »,I.*~t_-"&#39;3&#39;E»;-.¢.**>i_-».§
&#39;.,~...|w.-H".-:..-* t -|>}.&#39;.
1&#39; -,. -.,
r
i
IQ...
.&#39;=&#39;
I . ..v1
1Ft _
:.1_&#39;Y ._ ._ __._._. _..-. .... .._-.2  _ _.~»..- - --,--5*-J -< --ii.-if-_ --41.---w» __ _>
: .  _ C!
-"frhe Commmist Party, the Young Communist League, the Washington
Bookshop isseeiaticn, the Washingten Committee for Deeoeratie Aetien, the
American Peace T-iobiiization, and the United American Spanish Aid Committee
have been cited by the Attorney General as organizations coming nit-hin the
purview oi Executive Order 9835.
- The American Student Union was cited as a Comnnmist front by
the Special Committee on Un-American Activities, U. S. House of Representatives,
mu 3
an-... -a,..._.-.-I-.. -,...4&#39;1....,4--t...... 4%.. ..,,..-...1.a-.-. ...:92 .. -|......&#39;u... -:......._-s-.:....4.:..... _...._inc iuyui on 1c.|..|.::92,92.-4.115 mu: 1cuu.|.ua U1. u. J.UJd--LU] .uur::au_|_ga,o4.uu nu;-3
transmitted to the Civil Service Cqnmission on April 20, 1948 and by memorandum
dated June 7, 1949 the Loyalt Review Board advised that the employee was"eligible on loyalty," h
D

s
¢
&#39; I
..-"i-IF
&#39;:1 1
_-I-. -1 A.
,_i.,..,..1.¢_ - .
»-»:-&#39;=.*.--2&#39;-::=¢,_
.=."*§""?&#39;r »;-&#39;¢ &#39; 92-n¢1»ay:
.-,_1:1.._ E? Y
- &#39;
-L1,. &#39;
"-?_&#39;__f &#39;5.
e »1--4:11 - _
.-~
&#39;.92;.._..
- &#39;4:.&#39;- .&#39;< ..- ,, - _
.__,"_
1*-r...T"&#39;
-___.-.
~ .! __&#39;
 &#39;_&#39;_..;n_&#39; ,3-.. ..,;,
.=&#39;.-&#39;¢.=92:-  ¢_.:-r,-, &#39;1 31-. ._,.~,.v..:?:-*rn&#39;.&#39;r 14.:-3. _-3 -&#39;_o&#39;|&#39;.".».&#39;_,1 &#39;  ..;.&#39;__.,?&#39;_.-._:
_ I . .
. .1-;=-.-:12,
&#39; -.t.&#39;~, __ ,1
~:._*&#39;_92 2
i ii;
_*?
, .
. 4&#39; =-.|u--.11-we
.5
- 1-4;
.7 ,
j&#39; 92-.. _- Q. _,, 0
- s.»-¢3_-.< .__-i .&#39;+ =__A,:}-I
&#39;-K
I Q I-  ._  -- x. fA.un_,4 i;._-.._ _.- -- ____i_ _+,_____
 i  oi
lé~!~,1§e5F>1 O9 by seer;-torso i-csrtsr
"Case X0. 8."
"This individual was born in New York City in 1918. He was
employed as an economist and analyst with the OSS in the State Department
from June 1945- Previous to that time he worked for the For Production
Board. He was assigned again to Research and Intel1i;ence in 1e State
TJe;ert:w1ent. This nan, acccrding to the Stcte Department files, was an
active neiber of a number of Communist-front organizations, was a very
close friend of several men who are under suspicion by the FBI of Eeing
connected with Russian espionage cases and has two brothers who have been
openly working for the Communist Party."
fossihlepidentification
This individual apparently is who
w"s the Oct of e inve sfon
The following information is contained in the loyalty file:
The rcsults of the Lovs1t&#39; investigation are as follows: . 3
D20

4-750 -T-79!l .i l xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
FEDERAL BUREAU DF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PAGE IIIFDIDMTIDII SHEET
Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the 
le. One or more of the following statements. where
indicated, explain this deletion.
I[Deleted under exemptionisl §  . B   with no segregable
material available for release to you.
[II
l:l
Cl
ClInformation pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Docurnent s! originating with the following government agency ies! _ .__. . , _ _
._ i _ __ _. i . __ , wasf were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agency ieSI; ;_____tai__
. i _. .. . i . as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon retum of the material to the FBI.
Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
For your information: _ ___ ._ _ _
2/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXI3-92."- 92-_§_§J"ll-- L$_l§:£4:na§&aa.-a-A-1/;nt =11 ,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X DELETED PAGE S!
§no oupucarron FEE
X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
FBI/DOJ

1
i
Md 44 A441-
92I1
5
|-an-Q
F1» &#39;
1
.2-my
t--.-_
" 92
" Q,
-. jf Z.-is,,,~
£77
~=
4.
5 &#39;- i
|_, Z
aw 92. -
:&#39;? .
4:"F1.
£ii;=;»<§< 1.;
"*-if
,:-».-I /.192-
&#39;!.
-z.
4"-s. i
-5-&#39;.,
V
4"
&#39;4-.~QL-v Ia
II &#39;___ _=~-1.. -95|.
1 . -_.._.-.7 ..._ . . ._._.-...r~ ¢.._¢~-.~_A -._.e.-n-92_l E __4._a.@_..._A-...._@-¢.,_4._-..-_.. -._-....__._._
.  r
Reis.-0: ts of the Lo},-silty; investigation were furnished to the -
Civil Service CO]T1I.1iSSi.0I1 on I&#39;z1rcn 3, 1948 and to the Attorney General
On T2-:;r 29, 19»/-,9. The Bureau received from the Loyalty Review Board
2. disposition sheet dated llarch 25, 1949, reflecting the disposition of
this ease as: "&#39;P.osi:1ed or otherwise separated £ror1Fe:leral Service."Serial two of 1"eflects that Civil Service Commission records
she.-; the subject resigued from the State Department on April 30, 1948,
to ezter private business and this same file reflects that he is privately
8tT.plOy8d .
Q

I1
J
|""
L
B
~_,.,____9i,
_ ,_-.4:.- V4;; .- -&#39;~=a
__,. 5, -1. 3
-
=1: -_
T.-, 5&#39;.»<>,-... _ &#39;_
ii" &#39; Ea, .-__v
.&#39;=-&#39;.  
 4- .
Y1.
g,_92~_;-|__ I . _§-5
;$;.i-J-.-5 a-21*,-;.oi», - - I.-&#39;..-" ,.&#39;_&#39;_.&#39;,&#39;~ &#39;- ~.
l;%:&#39;_:>:,_._..f¬_}"
&#39;1.
if
tee&#39;* ; .-Q- 1
,, , r
-- .14
4.;
,_ .5;_..., _-.n~&#39; -
-I .a-
&#39;r";&#39;:A" - li-;&#39;vJz&#39;¥. &#39;
:..-._-! I.
J P
 Q-
&}}§E§F§9E5 PYi3§at9P 59§§PthE
"Case No. 9. This individual, after investigation, was not given
security clearance by the State Department. After failing to obtain clearance
by the State Iepartment he secured a job in the Office of the Secretary of
Defense. And where do Senators think that man is today? He is now a speech
writer in the White House. That is case No. 9- I will secure a little more
information on that case if I may.
"So that there may be no question about this, we will refer directly
to the investigative file. I think I an doing Mr. Truman a favor by telling
him this. I do not think he knows it. I do not think he would have this
individual there writing speeches for him if he knew it.
"Both the individual referred to and his Iife-this ii in the fill
of the investigative agency--are members of Communist-front organizations.
He has a relative who has a financial interest in the Daily brker. Bt in
any event the State Ibpartment used good judgment not to clear this individual."
"Case No. 77. This young man applied for a position in the State
Iepartment. The file indicates he is a very close friend of reported Comunists
and that he is closely associated with members of Communist-front organizations-
The file indicates that his wife belongs to an organization listed as subversive
by the House Un-American Activities Committee, and that a relative of his has a
financial interest in the Daily Worker.
"hr. President, 1 believe I have covered this case before, and what
I have just said seems to be a repetition. This is the case of a young man who
ended up as a speech writer in a well-known house in Washington."
possible Identification
Gases No. 9 and 7&#39;7 apparently relate t
The Bureau has conducted the following investigations of-
&#39;§: Iepartmontal Applicant, 193?-193%  reports sent to the Iepartment!;
Internal Security, 1941,  report to Department!;
mation furnished orally to Secret Service,White House Detail,
January 3, 1949,. Hatch Act, 1942,  report to GEM, May 1942, which advised-retained
in employment at OPA; report sent to State Lepartment, Ibcember 1946;
to Mr. Dawson, white House, November 10, 1948; and summary of infor-
&#39;!II" 9:3

iP
4&#39;9
I
I- -
P 1- "1
..
_,_
. __ I
-¢&#39; :..&#39;
._ >1:
53:23;
-*5
--=.
_.
&#39;r _--~53.=-v-T_-.4,
_;-,__;5_.
--1»-.
"--,-5*,-7-&#39;~;~,_&#39;
., 1 ..; _
:-.&#39;-:»¬ r. 5. &#39;;-4- 
&#39;9-; .
>7: .95 Y§
, <
-1"
e@§
_.~.-1
&#39;3
§
E7c.-.;co +-
Special Inquiry - &#39;|.hite House, 191,8,  blind memorandum of information
furnished Mr. Dawson, White House, November 19, 1948, and oral
sum-nary to Secret Service, White House Detail, January 3, 1949!;
Loyalty of Government Employees, 1949,  reports to CSC and Department, ~
Hay 9, 1949. Department advised no criminal prosecution, Hay 26, 1949.
No disposition received in file from C-SC to date!
The loyalty investigation which was initiated at the specific request
of the Civil Service Commission disclosed the following i.nform.ation;
B6 E.

,*92
e.- s ._.._...,._..»... ....   ;i.._..._.. ,..._..__.s__._._.. ......_,__,_.. ,__
..
. Q {r
- v,
;e"-5-
&#39;a_-I -Q
-=_».T .-I . .
. . . _..-_
U
._- _...-~
3.,-_ _..-,5 _ -,._ I 4;-....I w -:  .w&#39;-
-
. t >
5
< - 1 _ _ ;_ .
21" f_i..&#39;r.92;-
. . .41!11!.." ,- 92_-M3 2-,; , ;.-r.--,-. .
Z &#39; 7.. :4 ,
E"-/~+
.1. _
35" - I!
;-=1? 4,
. ,&#39;§.~e..&#39; ,-v,"~».__,&#39;_ . :&#39;jTg&#39;.- j
..,<5-4;
4
>..-,- _- _ .- P.  _
---w-~..___,
A" ,_-The national Iawyers Guild, the League of Ibmen Shoppers and the
International Juridical Association, above-mentioned, were named as Communist
fronts by the House Comittee on Un-American Activities in March 1944-
The Descendants of the American Revolution was similarly described by the
same Committee in June 1942- The "Daily worker" is an East Coast daily _
communist newspaper, while "New Masses" has been characterized by the House
committee as a "nationally circulated weekly journal of the Communist Party."
The Weshington Bookshop was cited by the Attorney General as being within
the purview of Executive Order 9835.
use
was , drafts of on, speeches, etc
indicated that a very valuahle man and that nothing of a
his wrk.
L70
Isa,
P5

=rr
92
|
l
L
92
92_I
H._ I
- ;
. 92~
F*#!
I-&#39;v_.=&#39; "1
.* 1- I
1,;
 "Q
92
a
1.,..
5&#39;. l-
.r¢.
|&#39;
- , if 4:
xii
ESE]
§"_f-_
_I_"§,A.
"rm:-<
._ V?
"E .
=1:
J-"&#39;
§i;¬f§ f
so
-7 .» AMI:£&#39;;*
! .-_- &#39;n&#39;[ _ ._ L:"f.I.. i_ _. _.._. ._~-._..- _»_._A-.. .___~.-.._,..-_..._._-...-_--.----92_ J <---92......__....-._--92----.._.r--n- --I -_ I
 la   i
Allegetions_of_$enator_EcQarthg
"Case Number 10: This individual is in the Biographical
Information Division of the State Department. Her husband signed a
Communist Party election petition, stating he was a member thereof.
She is active in the UPW1. The mere fact that her husband was a Communist
may not make her a Communist, but she also has been given top secret
clearance."
Rossible,Identification
i This individual is apparently  i rev en of
Bureau fiies disoios U _ __o i ,o_ H __ th h
r
|the es no information 1 ent_ iab e _
the d to the Bureau on a confidential
Ibn January 29, 1948 which refers
and sets forth substantially the same
by Senator McCarthy. In this connection it is noted that the
Bureau obtained photostatic copies of the testimony before the House
Appropriations Committee concerning the Departmnt of State appropriation
bill for 1949. Under the testimony of Hamilton Robinson, Director, Office
of Control, Division of Security and Investigation, on January 28, 19LB,
there appears information to the effect that the individual_inroived in"Case No 7"  identified in Lee! material as _vras not
employed in the Department of State, having resigned on January 9, 1948.
2-39749-1109!
!s?<-;
I9

i.-
_""&#39;I?>&#39;1_F£.=&#39;- &#39;<1 . : &#39;5 { 92 g_t .
5:7- { - _- - _ ___...i._i...-__  4 .__i-.e_.1li,, .,___-__e ..
.    
.. ,u
4-~--1-!-g
1 "-- T
r.2 .
_ -&#39;=&#39;1-~ -g..-L t
o 6-1-.=-I
T.
_§ -
53- _
.- v .-
l?_-._-,,§ -_
=_.IT _" _  _
-;i: &#39;~.. "57I &#39;- K &#39; &#39;
*ee;--Q: J _ . 1 . __.¢-
- :1" -.1"
. _¥;__""" P .-".-1__--»- .
, - &#39; --_-_ .0=-$7.:- 1-1-"§F&#39;L.- &#39;-, 4,; -»-.I
-_-.; , ;-"
.u;::. .__*
-is _.&#39;_ {I - .
; Ti
._! -1.r . 1;-T-&#39;_&#39;if
 ..;___i
r.-.;.-" f
.92_,
.-.:;;;::
;.,__1-= ,.b$
-&#39;13} . =&#39;-w.-r
&#39;1-.-r 1Y I 1-_" L 92
."."7l:k""I
, avg
F W ..
&#39;  .-- F4? - "- ..
1-if-&#39;¢&#39;i~ FF" &#39;.&#39; &#39;1 .&#39;* ~ .&#39;-9*| r. _e -9-92<&#39;1 .-- .
.--In-92" ..__-&#39;-fl ¢-
.-IAllegation by 75enfaito::_1§cCe.rthZ
Case N0. ll: "This individual was an analyst in OSS from July,
19143, to August, 19145, and was employed in the Division of Rap
Intelligence in the State Department after August, 191.5. He is a
close pal of e. known Golnmunist and has stated it would be a good
idea if the Gonmunists would take over in this country. He is e.
regular reader oi the Daily Worker. This individual is not in the
State Department at this time, but has a job in the C11 as of today.
Here is what 1-re find. Such individuals use the State Departnent
as a stepping stone to some other agency. Thi man, who pal around
.w-ith Communists, who is satisfied, according to the f:L&#39;l.es of the
State Department, that Communists should take over this country, is
new in the Central Intelligence Agency."
_1Zo_s§ihle_ildentifijoation &#39;
This individual apparently is  -Iomaaa It is
noted that Senator McCarthy refers n vidual as a man.
{ I

T
+492
1 92
>92-
.--ii
Pv E
&#39;i&#39;/:+ .F51. &#39; 
_ ,
&#39;2.
5:
I-
I
 .~i >1
¥?¬¬
§
J;-lj.;, _ - I;
,;L __,
Ir A
In
..J
_ C
J
wi
63.56 were
on September 2, 19148. The Civil Service Commission advised by letter
dated Jaiw-51"? 23, 19149, that1ad been retained in her
position.
lo? c -ydto the C2.v:_1 5erv:|.ce CO!T£1iSSILOn
- .-92_.....

a
. V - v
921>1...---i
,"-1 "1 -I
¢;w&;m
4;
: _,.""-1-
r
_ -.1"¢
., _
§i&#39;.
ZL&#39;».&#39;;-,--;"92&#39;:&#39; -92
**tW%§_&#39;,&#39;-..| -:1-.;.!. _ 51 *&#39;-&#39;1.-C, .¥&#39;_~&#39;=;&,_-8-92~_: .&#39;-L! .2, .:e+@~ee
é_¬%"
Fm!s-
":,_>,&#39; &#39;,&#39;.;- ...V; .:
-I l- ._r."_ -.
10$r
w
..Vd,__ .
§
15v1=-&#39; --1
¥ 7 -..
_ -II-
Ff
is
61I_ _ .. _ ..._ r____92_ _-A-__1~_¢~__--4. ---71:-; A4. --.. ._... ,, t_ ___i.,.._.92 _ _}___i_: __"__ W b__~__
U. F I  &#39;
  o.
e1l_@ee§i9aee_a2_S2n§*=_=211Jia
mhz -
"Case No, l2, This individual started as a corresponding secretary
at the White House. From there he moved over to the Soviet Embassy and
obtained a job as assistant editor. From there he transferred to the State
Department and,so far as I can discover, transferred from there to a section
of the Commerce Inpartment, with which the State Department works, where he
remained until several months ago. Where he is as of today I frankly do not
know. I think this is a rather interesting shift, however, from White House
to the Soviet Embassy, to the State Department, to the Commerce Ibpartment.&#39;
.Iiqeeible Identliiestioo
7 __
I
&#39;0 &#39;2  .44
" - $1 . .- ----n¢-- - _,__-"&#39;- I " .- 1-ow - -- _.- _ ,
&#39; &#39;|II"  |

Q; &#39;92_.
. E,
|,-9;-r
F-"=1" 1
2.-= JP
15%
..z,=.&#39;
4..-_&#39;
P:
"x .
":15"?-.
a--in...
~-
f:,_ ..1., " ,*
kt! &#39; u-&#39;U I
.;a&#39; 3:: ."_ :§225%:
5-"5:--&#39;1-=,~i.
rs-.  1&#39;r =-5- =1?
Qt.,
PT
&#39;¢_&#39;E_.
~F3E
..-.
:1;
".1; .
 ~:>.-_.. Qi ___ e....._ - _ 4- ..l-__-_-._,-..- ,.;__...______ ..._.___-&#39; _.._
A loyalty investigation concerning was initiated by the Bureau
in may 1948 while she was employed as a clerk-s enographer by the Department
of Commerce, Washington, D C The loyalty investigation was predicated largely
on the foregoing facts. esigned from the Commerce Department in
march 195.8, ad the lo-ya_.._, investigation was therefore d1=r*oo+im1ed-
No reports had been submitted by the field By letter dated June ll
CSC was advised of the resignation o£ and
was being conducted under the loyalty program
57¢,

l
l4~Ln&;l~4l~4-T1{
|--1.?
I.-1 31
i

est
-:~;=-1 rt-
.;#
1?-
3./5
..._ 1
-4.?
va&#39;f__H.-
..-_._4-
4_ -72
I53..&#39; .
La,
§35§~;f§3>I
it ski
ii&#39;=.1"&#39;: 2"-
:e»ue
$.13 7
J; _._-_ .1 .
92_.,,. ;.1, __ lad _
:_-.--v~
...
1_~  -  Ea m__.e..._-._.n -.1-.4.» -__ .-. ..--- -------- _ 1. A ._ _ ._ . - ;_..,._......_...., ..-_.-1-:, A
1 I11-
éllegationmby;S§nator Mbcarthz
"Case Number 13: This individual is a foreign reserve officer under the
information and cultural program. He was appointed to this position in
September 1947, and assigned to Milan, Italy, where he took part in the
educational program. This individual spent time in Soviet Russia in 1927
as a member of the tradeunions delegation to Soviet Russia, which delega-
tion was repudiated by William Green, president of the A. F. of L. He
was the sponsor, organizer, and member, respectively, of various COmmunist-
front organizations. He has been cited by the Daily Wbrker a number of
times for his work. The records of the industrial detail of the Chicago
pclice department list him as a Communist as early as 1930. This man&#39;s
file shows that members of the churches in Italy and high officials of the
National Catholic Welfare Council objected to his being assigned to
educational duties in Italy, basing this objection upon his commmnistic
activities. Lt. Col. Gayre, of the British Arum; who was this individualls
supervisor in Italy, indicated that he was a wild leftist theoriet,I who
wculd veer entirely to the left if given the opportunity. This individual
is described as a pedantic, tedious, conceited, impractical, pompous man,
and this applies to so many of them, a man who would enjoy the pleasures
of the right, but popularity with the left."
Pessible Identification
This individual is I The
Bureau Files
from March k,
t0 Hay 18, 191080
tisecs as B6

!- §
4--{Q
.__,_1_V,
---
" ._ 92 .&#39;-.&#39; -U. _&#39;_ -.-> -u, i ._ . .
&#39;!&#39;P~,
i~-e-ii &#39;r
_ W. r,
-,_
- &#39;.
##-
1:13.
:;*1
l,.6_3&#39;.lF
"YgA§?E
.,_Ur¢m
§§
-&#39;5-if 9.1- *4-.-,&#39;»._ ._ __.¢-1.r-- 1.-Q.1.} --_.,,_",¢,:.-_.,_ __.§:.5
fnii=4_, .-bi
"a0 *1
-."v Y,
Q
92 F;
_1-&#39;~a---
"  .-. .&#39;°l&» I
v-7 U.
__.i.IF - " 3-
~11"-
1 "J" I3.; 1..
3  _;_
&#39;14: &#39;
_..:&#39;-:1 
92" 1&#39;.--92 &#39;.}:&#39;_,_..? -_ _1- >1--. -
".-2; . &#39;&#39;1};-14 s
..*-_ I
L_ . ._.._s .1 ...._._ ..___i.__-_..i_.....4._.____.i.-__, _~_A__ ._4,,.__,,_____ .._. -___. 4__r__i l _.. _ _ _ ___ . ____ J Rr or
. -   !
Ii-1
Reports were disseminated to the Intelligence Division of the Army
on Larch 28, 1949. Fbu carbon copies of the loyalty investigation were
distributed to the Civil Service Commission on June 7, 1948, and one carbon
copy of the reports was sent to the Attorney General on June 7, 1948,
On October 1, 1948, the Civil Service Commission reported the
following disposition of his case, "retained."
7Q, 32 92.>

1
I
i
w
92
1
1p-.-an-w-
Pr F
.-p
-&#39;.= .
Ii:
-. ~ .:-;-,
¤i@&#39;1;
~.;?~"# -&#39;..1-D .,!__.
gw
rg_._._:_  .
§%!&#39;3
.-
 __.
~a- 1
a*.-;
.ln
1"as
¥-¢
EC!
s. :1 :;_T.L, . &#39; -  Ju&#39;_
Alleration byngenatorgcsrthz
"Case Ho. lie This is a case of pressure from a high State
Department official to obtain security clearance for an individual with
a bad background from the standpoint of security. He was appointed in
December 1945 as a translator in the State Department.
"This is an interesting case showing the extent to which some of
their superior officers will got when they find that some of these very
unusual individuals are going to lose their jobs. He was appointed in
December 1945 as a translator in the State Department. A report from__ !92 "ll92JL AJJ,another Government investigating agency under date of January v, ivno, &VLSUG
that the subject should be dismissed as a bad security risk because he was
flagrantly homosexual. He had extremely close connections with other
individuals with the same tendencies, and wto were active members of Communist-
front organizations, including the Young Conmunist League.
"I think this is interesting, Hr. President. I asked one of our
top intelligence men in Tashington, one day, thy do you find men who are so
fanatioally Communist? Is there something about the Communist philosophy
that attracts them?
"He said, Senator McCarthy, if you had been in this work as long as
we have been, you would realize ti
4h--- ::. .-uuuar: iii-..J.v&#39;1dhu.lSu YOU
twisted mentally or physically in
"The State Department&#39;s:at there is something wrong with each one of
that practically every active Communist is
some way.
own security agency recommended the discharge
of this employee on January 22, 1946. On February 19, 1946, this individua1&#39;s
services were term nated with the
l9L6, the action discharging thisState Department. Subsequently on April 1,
individual was rescinded and he was rein-
stated in his job in the State Department. In this case a GSA report of
September 2, 1947, is replete with information covering the attempt of a high
State Department official to induce several individuals who had signed affidavits
reflecting adversely upon t*e employee to repudiate their affidavits. The file
shows that that high State Department employee even went out and personally
contacted the individuals who signed the affidavits and asked them, Won&#39;t you
repudiate then?
"This individual, according to t7e security files of the Stats
"epartment, was a very close associate of active Soviet agents. As to whether

1&#39; H
-Y? _-L1*1.-__§
1..
&#39;_&#39;~&#39;i
vii: 1
. , _,-J M
"";=:
&#39; 1?:
v&#39; "
k1;
.1; . 1?
:__ ..;.., .Possiblp Identgfiqg
ion
The Fureaut1 i This indlvldual aipizzglti s December 14
files reflect we conducted
1°48, to "arch 3, 1949 8
.}:;:£- .&#39;£_;
~»- .-1.!~_:%m
!
§;;
" r .
4~ -
.;1 &#39;1
&#39;1&#39; &#39; -nu-&#39; 3-4
1 54-
[F
<.>n "
&#39;.
.-
r,
-qw
q__.
| _ __.F;-_ ,_.
15¢ be

&#39; C C2
7 r
bid
,_, -_., , 1
:22.
.......,._._;., _-s~ - -9&#39; 92l&#39; -1.. h.&#39;~ -&#39; 
Li
__*__ _
~* -:1if -
v____._ . --r W5". .
:.=s:..4e-"
. ..¢s._.....
"1u&#39; .
&#39;-*
ESQ,-l_&#39;92 ._ _ -
.=-&#39;- I 1,-?! -  &#39;
-r _."&#39;; &#39;1&#39;; _-__ -6 &#39;|i-,_1-. ,v
§.&#39;="&#39;§_=;.--l.927."F &#39;5
- .<-." 5-. rj-&#39; I
r.-31&#39; 2?.-L"-£1!-=&#39;?~¢ea?as
!-&#39; .
F} -1- TE: . _.
F i
nL _ - s "1
, -1
" r-T-as-I92. -.
.s,_:j_-e ,
2;;-. ,
L -. 41-.
,h_. RI.ia~=¢ -E"; A-.- 4:i  1&#39;r92
1-. if .
.e:5aI¢_., ..;.ia», _ .~.. {F &#39;
_ _ _ -W--. __..i_...>._ _-_ -- __- .-1-_-i¢---.._n s A_...1-A--s_...-.,4... -... -.nn_..-_¢L..._4-..__~. _
Reports reflecting the results of the loyalty investigation were
furnis!-.ed the Civil Service Commission under date of March 3, 1949. The
Civil Service Comrrission under date of November 7, 1949, advised regardingdisposition of the case that- was "eligible on loyalty.
In addition to the Civil Service Commission, information relating
to as been disseminated to the following: The Attorney General,Ofgce for Emergency T.-anagerzent, Department of State, Senator Elmer Thomas
of Oklahoma, Department of the Army,and the Office of Naval Intelligence.
l&#39;>7 -H»

_44&#39;h|lr I-1&#39;.
|--ta-r
I"-1.1 -I
ii
,-V
E
ss-
iis
&#39;
1:". _ -92b§!.~
;: .u 
-i;. -if.
: &#39;_".".? £5 "&#39;  -,_,.=a,;h
."
"Q.
i*si
.&#39; _._
--45",
uZ .
at &#39;__ . .-
EEé&#39;
 __._I.~ u
Ai_92
I :.   .
Allegation_by §enator McCarthy
Case No. lb. ..."Among other things, the files reflects that this
individual furnished material to icnown Soviet espionage agents and that
he had constant contacts with a long list of Communists and suspected
Soviet agents. On July 24, 1946, a recommendation of dismissal was made.
Nothing was done. In September, l9h6 there was a request for further
information, even though at that time the records showed that he was
r.......-:._:..x a , . . .A...-2+ .~..~+.....-R-.1 4-.-. I ,,,, M-. ro92rv92ry9292I|92I92:t+ Q.-, +hJ.l.J..I.l1.|..DH.L11§ EGULUU 1-I-l-eiuci .111-L our l92.lLUIIll 92!92JHll-ILA-ll-LIJU ab U0
"On July 2A, the State Department&#39;s own security unit furnished
detailed evidence showing that this man was furnishing secret material to
known espionage agents. He had top~secret clearance.
"In September further information
l9h7. nearly a year and a quarter later,
indicate whether the individual was with
action was in his case. I later learned
recommendation of dismissal was made, he finally resigned. He was not di
charged. He resigned on December 13, 1947. For what Federal agency he is
working at this time, I frankly do not know. I have attempted to get that
information from the Civil Service Commission. It has been very helpful,
but there a;e so many individuals of the same name that the Commission has
had difficulty in furnishing the infonnation."was requested. As of October 15,
there was nothing in the file to
the Department or what the final
-I-hn+ L mr92n+he Q?-i-as-vu 1-Inn n1~¥n&#39;1nn"lIi? K II-LIJJJUJJ-9 I-ii U92Ij U11? Y} J-
Possihle Identification
This individual is apparently
Bureau&#39;s files reflect we conducted an
15-»

4-750 -7-T9!
H2Y XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF IIIVESTIFMTIUN
FUIPA DELETED PAGE INFORIMTION SHEET
Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
l/Deleted under exemptioms! iJ  with no segregable
material available for release to you.
Cl
E]
U
IIIInformation pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Document sl originating with the following government agencyfies! _i ___ _ __
_ _ __ _ ,was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agencyiieslg ________.e__e_I
_ _ e__ &#39; _ __ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
Page{s! withheld for the following reasords!:
Foryour information: _ , _ ___ ____ ___H __ ______ ___ _
tn
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXThe following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:/.4/-2!.? J 3. 3§J9i_ 7 I, _
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX onnereo PAGE S! §§No DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

¢< .c " 1
&#39;3, ., .
-:1-A 
._ .5.92 .... ,_&#39;-92-
......i . .92iv "5-&#39;41.? &#39;
3;
I, ...r- &#39; &#39;
.;._.-.
.7-.=~ ":&#39;92
*1
_ F.
.. . ":7
-.1 .
-we&.
<¢aa:

n. 3 &#39;.-Q ,"-J
£11?
.1 &#39;1&#39;.
.- -
. -114&#39; .
w,_
éQ: ow ._
., ~L .1
41&#39;:-&#39;-E"-.1-I
east,1»-.
. . , .
:11 &#39;-EI_5;"G
.7-&#39;,Z&#39;-.1¥.§,".s:-;-; l -5,1,,
"-
~=i-er .
i,&#39;i¬<..,. ~-&#39;1&#39;92---&#39;-.
&#39;.-"&#39;--L.".__,- r-_
-__ .. 1;
h-~.
1-
-. &#39;
... -J
92_ .,
,.,
» ea"
.., -"*4-r 
,&#39;¥;f;__-.3 -_ _ __ ..2-1&#39;:-j:&#39;.:&#39;¢.Y-. _, ._.. .._J_,.,_.,r1f,;-f1+",i,,3v.",,&#39;1 - A 7- -_- -..-_.._.__..-- -. --__ -...r_ - .  ...___-_._.l.__._..._ -._...._.__ __ _ .-_ __
 a, {ts
A113§?°l?l1¬ J3>c§a*1=*>°= 1§<29*=s&#39;*=hi
Case No. 1?  "This individual signed an affidavit saying that he
was a member of the Communist Party. He did this on several occasions. This
was not a non-Communist affidavit; it was a Comunist affidavit. This filo
is rather significant, in that the reviewing officer in this case indicated
that if this employee had testified to a change of heag he would have
received top-secret clearance. In other words, if this man had said, I have
now reformed, the security officer felt he was bound to give him top-secret
clearance. This, of course, seems unusual to us, but a Communist, who has,
of course, no respect for the oath, which consists of swearing before the
Creator that he will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth, is educated to the idea that there is no Supreme Being, so, obviously!
an oath means nothing to him. I think the reviewing authority in the State
Department should bear that fact in mind."
ii=1s=*i922L=_i@2~#1£i=:&@1°s
This individual, possibly identical, is mentioned in the confidential
investigative files of
reflected that
_resigned from the State Department in April, 1911? and
was classified in the State Department as an
in-Ii-
no investigation was conducted by the Bureau on this individual.

1&#39;-92
rv-are{E-5. I
- -_92 -isi -1;-__
&#39;,
-!
It»-4»
.._-
. _..,.~...f
.__;-.. _
3&#39;
iégfg
. "; J A
i";-,
Qt-""?
-ft.
In:
I.--
£1"
1
§:&#39;92.
,..&#39;
. &#39;1 PL!
>_..-
I L.-_&#39; ,_ ___. ,_A. _._ ._____,+__i___._n__ ::.. .____ ________.. _____.. __:__* _._ ....i_ i_. _;_,_ _. i ___:. __,4____l _____r
1  l
< <>
Allegetiog;Q1_$enatpr Mc
arthz
metion ro ded to the Bureau on January 29,
on e confidential basis wherein
-.5Case No. 18: "This individual was thoroughly investigated before being _
hired on December 26, l9h6. While the file indicates that this women
was a Communist, I em not too sure that she was not a peychopetic case.
She was hired when the file showed e great deal of Commnnistic activity
on her pert." . _
Qossible ldentificetipn
This individual is ossib13 No investigation
eeu files fail toP
has been conducted concerning her by the Bureau. Bur
reflect any information which can be identified with
1
o as a e No. 16" and is described as a 1 case, although no
information concerning Communist activity ea alleged by Senator lc
erthy
is sot forth. In this connection it is noted the Bureau obtained photoe
static copies of testimony taken before the House Appropriations Committee
in connection with the State Department Appropriation Bill for l9b9. Under
the testimony of Hamilton Robinson, Director, Office of Control, Division
of Security and Investigation, on January 2e, 19b8, there is net forth
information to the effect that the in ved in "Case No. 16" identified in Lee&#39;s material as ae not employed in the
State Department, having resigns ovem , 1957- $2-397%?-1109! &#39;.
191,2.
- w .-.--~»e.-¢ -w 1 .--- ,- , -. -.. 1- _. ,

.. v
Pt?
I
r-
.1
....-I-
1&#39;"-r
..-
-._;:;~_::., 4
;;;
i?
In.1

.-
&#39; V I4-.-..
. I. .
If"-"-i
1 "-._:3&#39;-&#39;.. -&#39;P Bureau main files fail to reflect that we haveri
_ ..a-. - --a i..._1 ...-__._._aa_.__.._ -.-.. &#39;921 ;---~---....._-.-- ..-..__-_._ ,__-...- _._ .-
<i K I
* I
éllggation by Qenator McCarthz_ , -
Case No. 20: "This individual&#39;s file shows close connections with a number
of Communist-front organizations. The individual, his sister, and hii
father spent some time in mental institutions. The report, which is dated
July 7, 1947, shows that his mental health is unstable. This man is still in
the Department as of today.
Mr. DONNELL. Mr. President, will the Senator yield!
"1-:I&#39;a  I Yi
lda
Hr. DGNKELL. Does the Senator hate any information as to the type of
responsibility the last-named individual has in the State Department!
In other words does he do janitorial work, or supervisory work, or just
what kind of work does he do?
Hr. MCCARTHY. I do not knoww The information was not in the file. I Ill
curious about that particular question myself. I was told that he had top-
seoret clearance. That would indicate that he was handling rather important
documents. Frankly, what he was doing, I do not know. Let me check on the
actual eaee, if I nay, eo that we may have any information on it that may be
available. He is in the Office of Information and Educational Exchange.
What he is doing there, I do not know.
Possible Identification
This individual is apparently identical with
nvestigation of this person. Bureau files fail to reflect any disloyal
information on hie oomplete name other than the information "resided to theHBureau on January 29, 1948 on a confidentia.
basis. In Lee&#39;s material, erre 0 as ass Ho. O and the informa-
tion is set forth that he s an for a ition with the Office of Infor-
and Educational
lo&#39;!¢ __
----we.-. fl H! -_ " &#39; -i -Q-~  .9292

J. 1&#39;- M
ft
I-&#39;1&#39; 3
&#39;¬.$:._»&#39;i92,"-&#39;.
1- T ~"27?v;t&#39;|>-~ --;_r
.1"-Y27$!-z
&#39;i.§&#39;1"_
 -é -
51 -3 3
3- of
L; Jr " .
-Al HI
351 ,.
J ~:
> 1
i  .I&#39;.&#39;l&#39;§
J. ~40
.,~ = --&#39;1 "
Q
. !w4
1"
I . .2&#39;1}. I- A; _ _- _ _ ___-_.....__k_____h._  _ i _, 4717144» V
   W
for continuing this investigation.
In connection with the above, it is noted that the Bureau also
obtained photostatic copies of testimony taken before the House Appropriation!
 t A ro riation B111 for 1949¢ Committee in connection with the State Departmen pp p
Under the testimony of Hamilton Robinson, Director, Office of Control, Division.
ti to of Security and Investigation on January 28, 1948, there appears infoma on
 F 20"  identified in Lee: the effect that the in
aiimived in Case 0.
Irotefial as as not employed by the Staia Department,being an "appuoang under consideration." G2-39749-1109!
.3-
ulc
I
1
V
43

1.-. -_- -. - &#39;¢_ ___.-:"-&#39; :5-5 .&#39; &#39;2
_-9292i --.;~,__. ,a
.4-~-L
a:-e
-|i-- "
.82,--.i
>.-__- -
f&#39;li~"&#39;
I- ._.~ _
. .&#39;.92&#39; Ti».-.:35-&#39;: -
1&#39;:
i»-- 
k_._ -~ 2
is-¬-&#39;-e
.3 _..
I-:~
,,;- .
gf-:-lf

i.§
4-- .
">
&#39; -it-§_
._; -
-3}: G.
"».&#39; &#39;-.1-,1_-.-T37,"
.?1=L¥-:J:
-"+-§
~*¥w:M§
. i I
&#39;-&#39; :
. , _.,,_,.,
. Z 4
5,92= "5!-
._.;_:_:~Q.
-..~
1-92
_-
" __w I
. h-» -ii.1. _ .. . J.
.__
-1
._ ;__~,___iA_____ L" 7+ .~; _s_ _-92__ ,, ___ 7? _ _ _ _,.__,,__.- _..._- .- --. -----_92._ .-#  7
 v  !
I
Z
Allegation,of_§enator,IcCarth;
Case No. 28: "This individual has been with the State Department as I
Foreign Service career officer since 1936. He is still holding a high
salaried job with the Government, and to the best of my knowledge he is now
stationed at Frankfurt, Germany. A report ct June 23, 19b7, indicates that
he is a member of the Communist ?arty, that he attended the Youth international
in Russia in 1935. While working in the State Department, the tile indicates,
he showed an intense interest in getting information on amything pertaining
to Russia, including any figures and records, whether or not the information
had any connection eith his particular job. He had been discharged previously
from the AFL Federation of Government Employees, on the charge of commmnistic
activity. Both he and his wife have been mebers of a number of Commnist-
front organizations, and he has been very closely associated with known com-
munist-front workers. The file discloses the interesting information that he
is a member of the central group, whose task it is to spearhead an attack on
J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI. These fellows do not like J. Edgar Hoover at all.
The man is a member of the central group which is the spearhead of such an
attack. This is all in his tile. He is still working for the Government."
Possible IdentificationThis individual apparently 1; The Bureau files
reflect that we have conducted several investigations o this individual as
follows:
1.  Special Inquiry -
2. Internal Securitv L Hatchzlct which was opened October 21, l9h1
and closed in January, l9h2.
3. Special mam? - Stats Department  Greece&#39;!u.rkey Aid Bill!
which was instituted August l9, 19h? and completed September 10, l9h7.
h. A Loyalty of Government Employees Investigation was instituted
April 19, 19hB which was completed in Hay l9hB, and reports transmitted to the
Civil Service Commission Hay 27, 1?h8. A form letter dated August 1%, l9i9,
received from he Civil Service Commission in connection with the LGE investi-gation ofontained the notation "employee cleared on security."
-_

5
Q-&#39;=|-II
F:-&#39; I
?¬". 1*:
*
-ii; ii
u
,,..
L
-n
_. , -.1,, ....
. 92:¬__a
gj-a  I i=_-:1: v;~:_i
- P &#39;A
. I
. " 92
I
2;-
;._. 4-- ~
-.-.-,_.L-I-I:
§::"iL&#39;, ~  <&#39;1&#39; I
_ ~ 4. ..-p--c.. Q4 -92.. -_.... _._.i__. _ _ -_ .... .._._-_-.-_-_.____,. _
A 5. On December 30, 191.9, The Economic oration Adminiatratioyrequested that we conduct an investigation of ame was then employed
by the Economic Cooperation Administration in a civilian capacity i
The investigation was completed and results transmitted
o on e ruary 6, 1950. This investigation has since been reopened at
or ECA for further inquiry and is currently pendi . the request ng
i
V ___i_ ,,
Summaries of information in Bureau files or investigative report!concerning -have been furnished to the following individuals and
:0 7c -1!

T
92  -2:I- r __- _ ___ _,- __. . H. -_-_. _ ...._.... .._._......_._..__._.....r_-__.__ ._ :.~__..___ ._..__.._u_._.g_ L
&#39; .  L <9
&#39;92
"--
1--
&#39;2
&#39; 1* j; :&#39;-Kg&#39;-r--ii». Me;_ __.
".-5-;~t_»;;
5&#39;71 . "
;z-
&#39;3? .
-e.- _
,_.- ."~. .&#39;eniz tions: Sidney Sherwood, Assistant Secretary to the Council oi org aNational Defense; Wayne Coy, Office of Emerge uagemmti 553-t"-1&#39;1°" 1"
- Ge e a.1&#39; The Department of McGuire, Department of Justice, The Attorney n r ,State; Douglas H. I-!oGregor, The Assistant to the nttorney General, The
Intelligence Division of the Army, The Civil Sernce Commission, CongressmanTaber of New York  oral!; and the E
ormation e licab e was located N0 identifiable inf pp e
relating to "the central group, whose task it is to spearhead an attack
on J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI," mentioned by Senator McCarthy-
be
46