Document text
What Baron Coleman Just Admitted Is SHOCKING!
YouTube video by Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IRz3xR2Ihs). OPINION COMMENTARY by Baron Coleman (Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips)) — one commentator's contested analysis of the Charlie Kirk assassination and the State v. Tyler Robinson prosecution. These are his own assertions and theories, NOT the court record, NOT established fact, and NOT endorsed by profoundd; some make unverified allegations about named individuals. Archived here, attributed and lane-separated as commentary, so the claims can be weighed against the primary record — the tyler-robinson-trial hearings and filings in this same collection. Inclusion in this archive is not evidence of truth.
then I think we should be able to see that, because all of that information we discussed should be available. It should all be something >> [music] >> Now, to team Erica. This is the part that's fun. This is the part that's fun. I'm going to go to a filing of hers. I'm going to go to a filing of hers. This is a filing Erica made. Now, again, Utah allows this weird situation where um the actual wife or or whoever it is, here, let me close it. The the victim representative they have in Utah can actually file stuff. And this is an example of what she filed, a supplemental notice concerning access to evidence presented in open court. In other words, Erica has an opinion on what we the people should be able to see. And I happen to agree with her in this case. Uh she's the widow and duly recognized victim representative. By and through the undersigned counsel, uh notice supplements the notice yada yada as before, Ms. Kirk asserts her right upon request to be present and heard on the matter affecting her interests, and so does so on behalf of the victim's family. The victim's family position is simple. Good. At a minimum, at a minimum, every exhibit entered into evidence during the preliminary hearing must be visible to every person lawfully present in the courtroom. To receive evidence in a manner shielded from those seated in the courtroom as happened today is not transparency. And in the absence of transparency, speculation and conspiracy theories will continue to proliferate in the public domain relative to the tragic assassination of Mr. Kirk. Breeding doubt and trust into the judicial system. We don't want doubt and trust in the judicial system. This is not what anyone should want. We agree with you, Ms. Kirk. Uh Dr. Kirk. We agree with you. We think every single exhibit entered into evidence must be visible. It certainly would have prevented what happened on the final day. Where everybody walks out and says, "Oh my gosh. They've been showing you this blurry Bigfoot footage, but you should have been there on the final day. It was HD, Can we have it? I would like to see it. I'd like to double-check Agent Posso. Is it really that good? There were other people in the courtroom like Brandon Bili who said maybe it wasn't. I'd like to be my own determiner of a fact. Absolutely every single piece of evidence needs to be made public. Absolutely every piece of evidence needs to be made public. So, what is the relief Ms. Kirk is asking for? Well, let's find out. For the foregoing reasons, Erica Kirk, on behalf of the victim's family, respectfully requests that the court, at a minimum, order all exhibits admitted into evidence during the last 3 days that were not published to the courtroom be so published during the proceeding scheduled for July 9 so that all persons lawfully present in the courtroom may view them. Well, Do know what one of those pieces of Do you know what one of those pieces of It was the medical examination. It was the autopsy report. All we got in the autopsy report was an officer stating that he heard from somebody that the manner of death was homicide and that the cause of death was a We weren't able to see it. But we know it was exhibit 11. We know it was offered by the state. And we now know what's in it.That autopsy report is going to have a number of things in there, including the manner and cause of death that that they told us the conclusion, but it's also going to have a whole lot of other stuff like the time the body arrived where? What time did the body arrive in Taylorsville? At the medical examiner's office. Well, we don't know. We're guessing around 8:30 or 8:45. Well, what time did the autopsy start? Where did the body move about in the facility in the meantime? Did they take it to the uh morgue to cool it down? How long did that take? How long was it there? How long was it on ice? After it moved from being on ice, where did you go then? Did you go exactly right to the autopsy table? What time did that take place? When did the autopsy begin? The actual, you know, opening of the body, the examination of the body. When did that take place? How did you determine the body was the proper temperature? Who was in the room? That's going to be in the autopsy report. We know only one name. It's an officer, or excuse me, Sergeant Barrett of the State Bureau of Investigation. As we discussed last night, we can't find one. We can find one Sergeant Barrett in all of Utah. And that Sergeant Barrett is a highway patrolman. She does traffic stops. She You would think there would be an autopsy assistant, maybe? That's typical. Who was that? What was that person's name? Uh you would think there would be maybe an x-ray tech of some sort. You want to do an x-ray, particularly if you think there's I mean, I think it's pretty standard to do an x-ray anyway on an autopsy, I think. But if you if you um don't do an x-ray, how do you know if there are bullet fragments in the neck, for example? You should be able to know the answer to that question. Did you do one? That should be in the autopsy report. Erica Kirkus said that she has seen the So, it's not like when her lawyer [snorts] goes and files and says, "We want everybody to see all the evidence that was submitted into evidence." That she doesn't know what's in that autopsy report and she's and she would go, "Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa." I know we said all. I know we said every. But I forgot about the autopsy report. That's not how it works. There wasn't a lot of evidence. I think there were only like 16 or 17 pieces of evidence that they that they entered. A lot of those Well, if if you know what the evidence is and you've seen the evidence and you direct your lawyer, I'm assuming you directed your lawyer, you direct your lawyer to go intervene in the midst of a preliminary hearing, which is I And that lawyer says, "We want it all Then I think we should be able to see that because all of that information we discussed should be available. It should And I agree with her lawyer. The absence of the evidence is causing >> [music]