Tyler Robinson Evidence Falling Apart. Baron Coleman Breaks Down Charlie Kirk Case

Charlie Kirk / Tyler Robinson Case — Court Transcripts & Filings

2026-07-20

Document text

Tyler Robinson Evidence Falling Apart. Baron Coleman Breaks Down Charlie Kirk Case
YouTube video by Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHw8Vq57UwI). OPINION COMMENTARY by Baron Coleman (Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips)) — one commentator's contested analysis of the Charlie Kirk assassination and the State v. Tyler Robinson prosecution. These are his own assertions and theories, NOT the court record, NOT established fact, and NOT endorsed by profoundd; some make unverified allegations about named individuals. Archived here, attributed and lane-separated as commentary, so the claims can be weighed against the primary record — the tyler-robinson-trial hearings and filings in this same collection. Inclusion in this archive is not evidence of truth.

But innocent people don't hire people to go call other people evil. They don't do that. [music] We're told the parents were going to were going to rat on their son, that they confessed to them, that's why they turned him in. Push comes to shove, we don't get shown that. We're told there's uh insurmountable evidence that Tyler Robinson was on the roof with a gun. were shown grainy Bigfoot footage that people in the courtroom compared to a blob were shown a gun that the detective who is like his whole job is to look at guns and he's like it looks like a pole. I mean it could be a gun. It's kind of gun-like straight. It doesn't look like it's not a gun. Thank you, Detective Baggley. Sharp work there, partner. We're told there's just solid DNA. THE IS GUN DNA IS ALL OVER THE GUN. AND THE lady gets in there like it's pretty degraded. Actually, some of the oldest DNA on the gun. Oh, and by the way, the gun had dust all in the barrel. Oh, and by the way, there's four other people's DNA on there. And theirs are not as degraded. Huh? Wait, what? This is totally inconsistent what we were told. Oh, you're going to see HD footage of him all over campus. We literally have blurred faces. And the only pictures we have that you can even kind of see a face, Cash Patel told us they were enhanced. The enhanced photos and the video. Well, the photos that they released that he said were enhanced. Even in their enhanced state, Lance Twigs gets up there and says, "I can't 100% identify him. He's wearing the same jeans. I guess I know he owns shoes. He likes hats. That guy's wearing a hat. I've never seen that hat. But I love He loves hats. He's a big hat guy. Big into hats. And he has an affinity for sunglasses. My sensitive eyes. I guess that guy had sunglasses. We're told he returned to the scene shortly before 1:00. So we're shown a Dodge Challenger returning to the scene shortly before 1:00. Pretty compelling until you hear from the homeowner that it was driven by a bold man with three passengers. Oh, okay. Nothing we're told is true. Nothing we're told happened. We just continually go through this over and over and over. It's nonsensical at this point. And there's really no way to square this circle. If every single thing we're told about this case falls apart under the slightest bit of scrutiny. If every single emotional pull looks manufactured, that young man, I forgive him. As she's reading the confession, the the forgiveness, and then she says, "Well, I didn't even know I was going to say that. I just spontaneously came to me." No, you gave like uh Daily Fredo Cassia did a great job on this. She read like five lines. It was like five sentences long that she was looking down and reading word for word. That was not spontaneous. It's all manufactured. It's It all falls apart the second you begin to look at it. I go back to what I've been saying. He was not supposed to live. He was not supposed to live. Cuz if he didn't live, none of this happens. There's no case. There's no trial. We're not sitting here investigating it 10 plus months later. We're not examining his social media post, Lance Twigs. We're not looking at the timeline of when Charlie Kirk made it to Draper for the funeral home. And what time could Erica possibly have gotten there in order to get back to the the Air Force 2 at the time she allegedly rolled in? How long could she have possibly been in that room? And you know, you got to load up the casket and you got to unload the casket.And whose suit was he wearing? Why is there lint all over it? Why is it dirty? Why is he wearing a dirty suit? Whose suit was that? And why hadn't it been to the cleaners? No offense to those of you who wear dirty suits, but I mean it's it's obvious it's not a brand new suit. It's not a brand new tie. That tie has not been manufactured in the last 20 years. That's a tie you see on people in pictures in the '9s, maybe the early 2000s. There's nothing wrong with this. Is probably a nice silk tie. Probably ties a nice knot, but it's not new. It's not something that Charlie would wear. He he never wore a tie like that. And so what the hell's going on? What the hell's going on? Like you you could get to this point in the case and you could look left and you can look right and say why why does everything fall apart? Why did they pave over the crime scene? Why is the FBI telling people to pave over the crime scene? Why is the governor of Utah pay telling people to pave over the crime scene? I'm not going to play it because it's five minutes long and I don't want to sit here and watch a fiveminute clip of another podcast. But the PBD podcast, I went back and watched it five days. Five days after Charlie Kirk went down. I think They're all sitting around the whole cast. And you know that if you watch it, there's three or four people on there. I don't watch it, but I see a lot of clips. Some reason my timeline gets infested with them and sometimes they're compelling and I watch them. But there's like three, four guys sitting around and they all had different complaints. They all they all agreed that's not a 306. If that's not an exit wound, that's not a 306. And even if it's an exit wound, it's probably not a 306 because we know what a 306 does. Everyone knows what a 306 does. Even our friend uh from uh one of I can't I can't think of the name of the channel right now. McGary, what's his channel? I can't think of the channel. the our friend uh oh gosh I'm blanking. Oh, Paramount like he made his whole channel for the first month after the thing. I mean he was getting hundreds of thousands of views, million I think got a million plus views on some of his videos basically telling everybody there's no way this was a 30 out six. We got to figure out what's going on here. And he might have thought body armor. He might have thought deflection like he said this is not a direct shot to the neck because that's totally inconsistent. Well now he's changed his mind and oh Martin Luther King. Yeah, cuz stop it. Stop it. 30 out sixes don't stop in 4 in of neck. They just don't just don't. And at the beginning, we all universally agreed with this. Everyone universally agreed with. But it wasn't just that they were asking questions about. They were asking questions about all, you know, it had to be after the 15th that they had this. Maybe it was the 15th or the 16th that this podcast interview this podcast was because then they sat around saying, "Why did they crave over the crime scene?" And the guy was getting really angry and he's like, "You don't pave over the crime scene." And he mentioned other high-profile high-profile crime scenes. And he said, "These crime scenes were preserved for weeks. You couldn't walk anywhere near them because they didn't know if they were going to go back and need more evidence as the investigation developed." So, they just preserved it. They just preserved it.They put caution tape around it and posted an officer there and said, "No one walks there." Yes, sir. I got it. and they paid someone to stand there and make sure nobody walked on the crime scene. And my point when I was going to play it, but I don't want to sit here and play it. It's late and I don't want to play a five-minute clip of someone else's podcast. But my point was going to be and my point is that we all universally accepted very early on that everything about this case sucked as we knew it. Well, I'm here to tell you folks it still sucks. Nobody called me and offered me anything. Maybe other people got a call and they were offered something or threatened. I was not. So, I'm continuing to investigate. I'm continuing to look into it because as I look into it, I say this doesn't make sense. This would have been a totally different case if he took his own if he if he took his own life. If he died before being before turning himself in, totally different case. Then you can put Erica in there and if she's a total weirdo, no one really notices cuz we're not investigating a murder. I mean, it's pretty obvious the murder's open and shut. We might look and go, "Gh, she's kind of weird, but that's it. No one would think she had anything to do with it. May not have anything to do with it, but I mean, people are asking the question because why the hell are you acting so weird? We wouldn't have Blake Snashing out on X We wouldn't have uh Andrew Kovette crashing out on X like nine times a day attacking people and somebody makes nine points and he'll just write this is false all nine points. Which point is false? Is the name of the person true? Like if you say this is false to somebody, is my name true? What is which part's false? We would get answers. I had a conversation today with someone actually um who you know I was telling them I said I feel like if TPSA paid me a bundle of money I could get them back on track but they'd have to commit to the truth but I would answer every question. I'd say you know what it's gone on long enough. We're going to put this to bed. What do you want to know? I would start hosting people for two-hour interviews and I would say send me your questions ahead of time so I can dig up the materials you need. You want to know where I was on September 8th 9th and 10th? Here's my calendar. This is my story. I stick to it. Here's where I was. Here's every move I made. What else do you want to know? Oh, where was I on this date? Here's the flight I took. Here's the manifest. Here's the itinerary. Here's the email where they sent me the confirmation. What else can I answer for you? We're not getting that. Instead, we're getting obuscation. We're getting confusion. We're getting anger. We're getting lashing out. They're now hiring people to go around and offer six figure paydays for somebody to show up and debate for two hours. What a silly, preposterous notion. You know what a sellout you would look like if you took money to go debate someone? You know why they're recommending that? Cuz it worked for them. That's my guess. That's my guess. I can't say that for sure. I've not seen the checkbooks. But anybody who thinks that Candice or Baron or anybody else can be bought to go debate probably believes that because they know they were bought. That's just my guess. That's my guess. Throw money at them. They won't be able to resist it. How do you know? Well, I couldn't resist it. I Uh well, I can resist it.I can resist it. because I can't be bought. I can't be bought. I wouldn't I wouldn't take a a flight from these people to go debate and there's nothing to debate. I had a different conversation today with someone else. Said, "Hey, will you want to do a podcast with so and so and just an honest sit down conversation?" I said, "Well, I'll tell you what. I might do that. Why don't you set up a call and we'll have an off thereord discussion and see if there's anything even to talk about?" Because if all they're going to do is say, "Well, the prosecution showed X, Y, and Z, and all I'm going to say is everything I've already said on my podcast to what the prosecution showed, what is there to talk about?" But if they have something interesting and engaging, I highly respect this person. I think this person's a good faith, honest actor, very well respected, been on TV for 10, 15 years, uh, high-profile cases, I'll be happy to sit down and talk with someone like that. This guy's rational, level-headed, but I want to make sure there's something to talk about. If there's nothing to talk about, I'm not doing it. So, we'll have a phone call and we'll figure it out. I I I'm more than happy to engage that way. But innocent people don't hire people to go call other people evil. They don't do that. If you're innocent, you don't engage in that behavior. That's not right. That's not normal. I've never hired anybody to go call my enemies evil. And I bet you I could pay someone. I'll give you $200 a day to just sit around and tweet all day about these three people. Okay? I know people who do it. Well, why? I've not done anything. I have no reason to. If these people want to pay to or take a paycheck to sit around, if they want to sell their integrity to sit around all day and write about Candace and Baron and Trigger and Zach and Colin and have fun, that's great. You know how much it bothers me? Not at all. Don't care. I'm I'm I'm a I'm an old school. All press is good press. The more you talk, the better the more my audience grows. [laughter] It's just a fact. It's just a fact. You know how many emails I have sitting in my email inbox right now? Like I would have never heard of you, but I saw this argument on Twitter and I thought, I got to go see what this gu has to say. And now I watch every night. Great. Keep going. I hope you get lots of money to do it because you're helping me tremendously. Someone is paying you to advertise my show. It's fantastic. But if the case was what you said it was, if you if it was what you believed it was, you wouldn't care what I say. Just like I don't care what you say because I'm am what I say I am. independently investigating this, looking into it, opining where I have an opinion, pulling up facts where I can support them, and I pretty much anything I've ever stated as a fact, I put on the screen. Almost everything I've ever stated as a fact in this case, I have put on the screen. Everything else is opinion. Fair enough. I have opinions. I can't help it. I used to get bullied for it when I was young. You guys want to investigate me? Go talk to the people who used to push me into lockers. [laughter] They'll be happy to tell you what a scumbag I was. That's fine. Don't care. Don't care. I really don't. I really don't.And so Because if Lance Twigs is not who we were told he was and if the photo op at the at the uh uh mortuary was a rushed staged job and all of the zone flooding with all these different fake stories and all you people that are sending me tips and I look them down and they look them up and then I realize you're just lying. If you're doing all this, I know I'm on the right path. I know I'm on the right path. If you sold me a bill of goods for the last 10 months, telling me just wait till the court gets the prosecution gets to present some evidence. Just wait. You'll see. You're going to look so stupid. I don't look stupid at all. That case was a dud and you know it and I know it. That case sucked. You can hire all the social media influencers you want to tell me how strong the evidence was and how this is one of the strongest cases you've ever seen. Then you don't watch cases you've never been involved in a case. I've been involved in strong cases against my client where the only thing you're hoping for is maybe the prosecution will have a little mercy and work with you to get some kind of a deal. That's it. Like that's your only defense. Maybe we can get a little mercy. Maybe we can appeal to the judge in sentencing. Maybe we can get a stack of references. I had one guy that was so guilty our stack of references was this high. There was no way to getting out of it. So, you might as well try to work on mitigation for for sentencing. That's it. That was it. That was the whole case. You almost didn't even have to cross-examine anybody. You almost didn't even have to put on a defense. Just Can we go on and do sentencing now, judge? We'll preserve a few things for appeal, but my goodness, this is not overwhelming. Not at all overwhelming. And they know it or they would not be on the attack. They would not be flooding the